ILM is kinda sucking these days (boring and meta ignore not safe for work)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (848 of them)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDl3bdE3YQA

mbvgz (how's life), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:26 (thirteen years ago)

Really? I just meant that its as innocuous as goons talking about record sales or mixtape downliads (which I can now guess is probably not what is being referred to when they bitch about 'insider basebakl' in the goon thread)

Xp to lex

Drugs A. Money, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:28 (thirteen years ago)

'downliads'? Gah!

Drugs A. Money, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:29 (thirteen years ago)

Even Patroclus downloaded, a far, far better man than you.

mbvgz (how's life), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:30 (thirteen years ago)

well, you're wrong! you do not seem like the kind of person who would admit that though. maybe spend less time trying to divine what other people think based on tossed-off msgboard annoyance and more time working on yourself? god it's like those people who think they know the ~real me~ because they follow me on twitter

lol this is like the nth time you've attempted this failed zing. please continue with the "no-one actually knows what I think from the pieces I write about music unless they've read absolutely every word twice" routine, it's a riot - it's like you're saying "my writing is unclear enough that no-one could actually divine my thoughts from it," which is a weird thing to brag about

available for sporting events (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

there are good reasons for someone critical of the site to "think about pitchfork" ie, about its outsize role in discourse... that said, look at the ilm eoy poll results, lex not exactly in the minority, you are basically a "tastemaker" on this site. that aero post is characteristically embarrassing but i think ppl are fed because it seems like ur being zero tolerance about it so they make self-regarding patronizing posts in expasperation(??)

flopson, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:35 (thirteen years ago)

flopson on his scorched earth shit.

Tim F, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:20 (thirteen years ago)

pitchfork review is up now

lol a+ bump

❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:22 (thirteen years ago)

pitchfork thread is a joke

lex hates humor

❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:23 (thirteen years ago)

not much more to it

❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:23 (thirteen years ago)

OPPA GANGNAM STYLE

乒乓, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:24 (thirteen years ago)

fwiw i made a 100% bullshit post to this thread yesterday and no one said anything about it

Artists who waited ten years or more to make a follow-up

❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:26 (thirteen years ago)

lol

mbvgz (how's life), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:29 (thirteen years ago)

I can sorta see whiney's point about threads like that one as they seem to have little actual discussion. Like "s/d: albums that fit x criteria" at least encourages qualitative judgements whereas "let's list every exampe of albums that fit x criteria" results in just that, a list. And then it sorta does become tv tropes for music. However as a registered poster with fingers he is in a position to generate music discussion himself so shrug

☯ t (wins), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:33 (thirteen years ago)

example

☯ t (wins), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:33 (thirteen years ago)

this was the thread that i think got whiney on his whole tv tropes thing, a thread i started, admittedly without deeply pondering its greater implications on the discource of ilm as a whole....that said i think there is some good discussion on it

Every huge artist has their "New Jersey" - a huge event album that ultimately feels a bit hollow & signals a career decline

downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 21:55 (thirteen years ago)

there've always been threads like that on ilm

don't call it a cloud rap i've been high for years (zvookster), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:03 (thirteen years ago)

for example the classic creatively bankrupt newish chillwave/post-AnCo bands whose names are just '80s ephemera

don't call it a cloud rap i've been high for years (zvookster), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:04 (thirteen years ago)

http://d2ywbsv4foxae1.cloudfront.net/p/hasbro-3195-96653-1-product.jpg

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:10 (thirteen years ago)

*sniffs* i grow weary of superficial discussion

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:15 (thirteen years ago)

the great thing is that lex didn't actually read the thread, he merely found its presence in new answers insupportable

mookieproof, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:22 (thirteen years ago)

I think it's kind of funny that Whiney basically said "I was going to complain about ppl guessing a Pitchfork score" but apparently decided to create all the 1980s movies where a punk band recorded the theme song instead

like, how are you going to bag on ppl for having obsessive fun and then start an obsessive fun thread

Ima R.A.E.D. (DJP), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:25 (thirteen years ago)

whiney, god bless him, is the king of going after people for doing stuff that is basically 99.99999999% similar to the stuff he does

zero dark (s1ocki), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:27 (thirteen years ago)

he's a goer

mookieproof, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.angryyoungandpoor.com/store/pc/catalog/products/ts/likeyout.jpg

christmas candy bar (al leong), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:39 (thirteen years ago)

hahahah

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:41 (thirteen years ago)

Whiney & The Lex one of my fave Cartoon Network shows in the 90's.

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:42 (thirteen years ago)

the narcissism of whiner differences

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:43 (thirteen years ago)

I had to See Image Info on that one, I kinda want that shirt

xposts

there were chinchillas, these weird little rat animals, in cages (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:44 (thirteen years ago)

otm

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:04 (thirteen years ago)

horace: eram quod es; eris quod sum

the late great, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:11 (thirteen years ago)

delenda est ilm

Ballboy to Afghanistan (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:29 (thirteen years ago)

I Love Mewling

scott seward, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 23:58 (thirteen years ago)

.. a nu-golden era beckons perhaps ..

some cracking good threads at the moment ..

or is this cos 2013 has become interesting after a dreary couple of years ..

mark e, Thursday, 7 February 2013 22:22 (thirteen years ago)

yeah threads that are just a catalog of things have always been a part of ilm, like alex in nyc's "album covers that have someone wearing a hat" threads or Favorite Long Songs ?

the discourse on poll threads doesn't really seem much different than what was on the Pick Only One or In Praise Of threads. they're just a harmless catalyst for discussion imo.

scott otm about the decreased britisher presence, that's the main difference between old and new ILM to me. which really just means that i'm when i check out an artist that gets rapturously praised on here and i'm like http://www.city-data.com/forum/members/jill61-603505-albums-emoticons-pic62805-shrug.gif it's for gucci mane and not girls aloud now.

slam dunk, Friday, 8 February 2013 19:38 (thirteen years ago)

^^^ this sort of internet hardman vibe - which isn't really that widespread on ilm, but is more in evidence than it used to be - is exactly what people mean when they say ilm sucks more than it used to

it really isn't, but maybe the level of earnestness that used to be there has dropped more-than-proportionately

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:26 (thirteen years ago)

back then rap fans had a notable new album to discuss every 6 weeks or so, now there's a notable new mixtape every 6 hours.

i do not think that we agree on what notable means btw some dude

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

noted ilm poster darraghmac

every soulless meta poster is a ✰ (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

btw this thread premise is p much equivalent to 'hell is dry and hot these days' imo but i heard there was a meta clusterfuck so here i am

ha xp

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:28 (thirteen years ago)

back then rap fans had a notable new album to discuss every 6 weeks or so, now there's a notable new mixtape every 6 hours.

i do not think that we agree on what notable means btw some dude

― the right to beef at (darraghmac), Friday, February 8, 2013 9:27 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

REALLY, "notable" is too far? i feel like that's a fine word to mean 'something that multiple people are listening to and interested in talking about,' it's not like i said "significant" or "important" or something.

dirty drone barack boy (some dude), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:56 (thirteen years ago)

i mean it's pretty much an indisputable fact that an hour of new music by a rapper that pretty much any hip-hop fan has at least heard of used to be a weekly or monthly occurrence and is now a daily if not hourly occurrence.

dirty drone barack boy (some dude), Saturday, 9 February 2013 02:58 (thirteen years ago)

these rap chaps ought to exercise some bally self-control, is what our dear friend is flailing at

imago, Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:01 (thirteen years ago)

same as the noise scene. people make a tape a week. rap and noise. its easy to consume a lot of it though. even when its not memorable. its like weird candy you like. metal fans too. an infinite appetite. courting a porn-y audience isn't hard. just keep it coming.

scott seward, Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:08 (thirteen years ago)

it just struck me as strange usage tbh- imo if you think there is a notable album/mixtape coming out every 6 hours you need to raise yr ceiling of notability

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:11 (thirteen years ago)

this is v much an aside tho, it's not notable tbh

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:12 (thirteen years ago)

This has the feel of the very initial exchanges of a terrible, magnificent war

imago, Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:13 (thirteen years ago)

ha not at all, fwiw i recognise the ability to catalogue reams and reams of new content as a very ilm trait/talent. maybe ilf does similar but i couldn't really think of an equivalent off my head

the right to beef at (darraghmac), Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:16 (thirteen years ago)

hah it occurs to me that i have no idea what kind of music darragh likes

mookieproof, Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:22 (thirteen years ago)

i guess 'notable' has an air of 'exceptional' to it but all i meant was, like, famous. someone pretty famous, like has has hit singles and been on TV and stuff, drops a new mixtape like at least 4 times every day. that wasn't true 10 years ago.

dirty drone barack boy (some dude), Saturday, 9 February 2013 03:22 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.