Searched for a thread, couldn't find one.
So: Classic or Overreaching?
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
― milton parker (Jon L), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― minerva estassi (minerva estassi), Thursday, 12 October 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)
― milton parker (Jon L), Thursday, 12 October 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 12 October 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 12 October 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
(Suddenly dozens of "Flowers of Romance" fans sell the album back.)
― Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 12 October 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)
So our votes cancel each other out.
― Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Kevin Mulllligan (Reebock Mcentire), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:38 (nineteen years ago)
Anyhoo, classic. Been listening to it for 20 years, never gets old. Mood music, if you're in a really bad mood.
Lotsa discussion here as well: Metal Box -- does anyone hate this as much as me?
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:43 (nineteen years ago)
reptiliansi won't let you inif he knew we were here i'm sure he'd let us inno i won't let you in
Did I mention my The Flowers of Romance-as-breakup-album theory?
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Friday, 13 October 2006 01:34 (nineteen years ago)
― simon 803 (simon 803), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)
― 0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:56 (nineteen years ago)
― 0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
Here's a good interview with the engineer. Everything you ever wanted to know about recording The Flowers of Romance:http://www.fodderstompf.com/INTERVIEWS/nick.html
Stewart, Stewart. The more you listen the better it gets.
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Friday, 13 October 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Saturday, 14 October 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)
i've always thought the first record was Metal Box and the later were this one.
― jaxon (jaxon), Saturday, 14 October 2006 01:09 (nineteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)
― am0n (am0n), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 03:41 (nineteen years ago)
got this on vinyl finally!
this record is an excellent soundtrack for being in The Shed (TM Hank Rollins in Get In the Van)
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
the first time I heard "four enclosed walls," at the age of 16 or so, it made me so physically uncomfortable I wanted to jump out of my skin
― Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
this pretty much makes Metal Box sound like Look What the Cat Dragged In
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my god, people are reviving PIL threads. I feel so lucky. Must find this on my iPod, now.
― To Float Away On A Lifelong Song (Bimble), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
once 2nd Edition got fully canonized as The One To Get (not wedded to this opinion but as far as I understand it, that's considered the canonical PiL album) I was really surprised because Flowers of Romance always seemed like such an incredibly brave and original sort of dysphoria - it's got that album-as-cinema feel, I love 2nd Ed don't get me wrong but Flowers is just its own thing
― Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
"Under the House" is/remains some kinda ultimate genius but the whole album is up there too. Maybe there really was nowhere else for him to go after it.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, it's a great song and performance, as is the title track, but a lot of this sounds unformed to me. The songs map out a host of possible beginnings.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
(and I see I've posted the same thought 15 times on this thread. Carry on).
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know, I think a lot of that has to do with the obvious lack of Wobble -- his bass is 'supposed' to be there, it isn't, therefore it seems unfinished. Taking it on its own terms isn't easy (maybe isn't entirely feasible?).
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 April 2009 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
I've always wanted to write at length about "This Is Not a Love Song," which to me represents the distillation of the half-formed ideas, bile, and uneasy accomodation with the recording studio begun on FOR.
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:51 (seventeen years ago)
yeah but it's too ambitious. Flowers of Romance is so...sort of willfully middling. Destructive toddler in a room with nothing to destroy, not part of any dialogue that's really going on. "This Is Not a Love Song" is great but is swinging for the fences. FOR is playing in the toybox, that's part of its appeal.
― Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Monday, 6 April 2009 17:52 (seventeen years ago)
Happy with the PIL love, here. Thanks John D. and everyone else too.
― To Float Away On A Lifelong Song (Bimble), Monday, 6 April 2009 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
interesting to hear a funk/disco capitulation as the "distillation" of FOR's sonic entropy
FOR is answering a question nobody asked, TINALS is just asking "do you wanna dance?"
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
and I do like this is what you want... this is what you get, but it's hard for me to hear it as anything other than a retreat from the lip of the abyss lydon et al were peering into on metal box/FOR
that's not a judgmental statement either, it's hard to live longterm on the lip of the abyss without tipping over into it
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
maybe this also explains why I think liars are totally great-- dar1a g (daria.il...), October 12th, 2006 5:13 PM. (daria g)
― jaxon (jaxon), Saturday, October 14, 2006 1:09 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark
when pretzel walrus interviewed liars right after the second album came out, i suggested he ask them about whether FoR was a touchstone for their recording, and i think they were like WHOA WE LOVE THAT RECORD
― 69, Monday, 6 April 2009 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
it was a weird world PiL was creating/inhabiting... I think of them on american bandstand playing their bizarro metal box art rock in the middle of a crowd full of dancing people vs. lydon performing "this is not a love song" for the crowd on TOTP in a much more passive-spectator mode
there was some active examination of the provocation / reaction impulse during MB/FOR - "the method is the madness" - but that dissolved into more classic forms of the entertainer & the entertained on TIWYWTIWYG
and you can hear it in the music
clearly one is going to be more easily digestible than the other
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 18:51 (seventeen years ago)
pretzel walrus interviewed liars? awesome.
FoR still the coolest album ever made IMHO, inc the photo on the cover. gorgeous
― we are here to celebrate, worship and adore (daria-g), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:02 (seventeen years ago)
FOR is no leap into the abyss – it's Kabuki theatre, with lots of yuks (except for the title track).
One man's funk/disco capitulation is another man's funk/disco distillation of J. Rotten Lydon's sincerity and bad faith before it curdled into cynicism. ("I'm crossing over into enterprise" is one of my favorite Lydon bon mots).
― The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
kabuki has plenty of abyss I would say
― Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
It's hard to notice through the leering, though.
― I'm crossing over into enterprise (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
back dat abyss up
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
yeah Flowers sounds like it's all up in the abyss's guts IMO
I don't think it's as good as Metal Box...but I think it's close and perhaps even braver.
God, Lydon is so unhinged on this with the weird UK yowl half gone arabic...crazy ass vocal performance....
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
I know, I know, but can we see it on You Tube?
― To Float Away On A Lifelong Song (Bimble), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
what, the abyss?
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
now that you mention it, watching youtube *is* kind of like staring into the abyss
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
when you stare into the youtube, the youtube also stares into you
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Monday, 6 April 2009 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
youtube comments make the abyss seems like caddyshack
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 6 April 2009 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
There really should be a DVD of all of JR's TOTP Appearances.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:01 (seventeen years ago)
Definitely my favorite PiL album, by a wide margin. I love Wobble elsewhere (like with Czukay) but don't find I miss him with Ltd.
― Soundslike, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:31 (seventeen years ago)
Starts off Classic, but palls after a while, Lydon's melodic limitations are rather exposed
― Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
tevs geir jr!
― d20 riot tard (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:38 (seventeen years ago)
LOL, but it is amelodic and rhythm dominate, to coin a phrase
― Sacco, Vanzetti, Passantino... (Tom D.), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
pulled this out for the first time in a long while cos of this thread, it wails!
― goole, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
all the songs seems like they're a year long even tho they're all ~3 mins, but then the endings all seem very abrupt
― goole, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:46 (seventeen years ago)
Levine's electronics on this record are superb.
― Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 7 April 2009 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
was thinking about this thread of missing wobble - I love wobble's playing on metal box but I'm not sure if his bass is 'supposed' to be there on the flowers of romance?
always thought both "albatross" and "four enclosed walls" were perfect lead off tracks on their respective albums, laying down the rules of engagement. "four enclosed walls" is just drums + vocals + odd noises, and it's a complete song - when I listen to it and I don't think there's anything missing, in fact it's quite perfect.
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Tuesday, 7 April 2009 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
I only pull this out every once in a while, but every time I do, it really hits the spot.
― Austin, Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:03 (ten years ago)
35 years old today
― adam, Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:05 (ten years ago)
So fucking good
― lute bro (brimstead), Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:06 (ten years ago)
Wow, really?! I had no idea when I revived. . .
― Austin, Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:42 (ten years ago)
this is embarrassing, but i scored a cheap copy of flowers of romance yesterday, then got home and realized i bought the 12" single. no wonder it was $8. :(
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:45 (ten years ago)
I saw DJ Shadow do his "pass me a record and I'll mix it" routine at Other Music a few years ago. Somebody passed him Flowers of Romance, and he didn't get anywhere. After a couple minutes of fussing with the crossfader, he handed it back, flustered, and said something like "I'm not into that."
surprised he couldn't do anything with Atkins' drums on "Four Enclosed Walls"...I mean, that bass drum
― Master of Treacle, Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:46 (ten years ago)
/I saw DJ Shadow do his "pass me a record and I'll mix it" routine at Other Music a few years ago. Somebody passed him Flowers of Romance, and he didn't get anywhere. After a couple minutes of fussing with the crossfader, he handed it back, flustered, and said something like "I'm not into that."/surprised he couldn't do anything with Atkins' drums on "Four Enclosed Walls"...I mean, that bass drum
I was thinking the same!!
― lute bro (brimstead), Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:53 (ten years ago)
My mate was looking for a nice phono amp for his system and brought a bunch of records to the store to test out, of which one was this. It was a sweet setup, probably a $20-30k demo system in one of those acoustically treated rooms, no angles, just a couch, etc.
This record sounded ungodly.
As if I had never heard it before, my reaction was "so THIS is what John was going for!"
Not that you need that kind of environment to appreciate it, but it helped reveal a different aspect.
― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Monday, 11 April 2016 01:49 (ten years ago)
It's not really a good album but I appreciate it as gesture. Context matters too: at last night's Pearl Jam show it played -- LOUDLY -- over the PA system.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 11 April 2016 02:20 (ten years ago)
it = title track
I remember buying this on the first day and taking it home and playing it.
How to make an album that's minimal, but huge at the same time.
I was marginally disappointed that the "Pied Piper" lineup didn't do more stuff, but then PIL have a whole bunch of "didn't do a lot" about them, up to "Commercial Zone"
― Mark G, Monday, 11 April 2016 08:59 (ten years ago)
It took close to 30 years, but this album finally clicked for me.
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 30 November 2019 06:04 (six years ago)