― Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 04:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 04:22 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 04:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 04:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Fushigina Blobby: Blobania no Kiki (ex machina), Monday, 12 September 2005 20:46 (eighteen years ago) link
lack of earnestness might not be much of a problem in itself, but as i see it has no other redeeming features...it's badly written. what happens when they run out of adolescent taboo subjects to cover.they should do a 'msuic' special, or a 'film' special.joke's worn thin
― daavis sztaayenszz, Monday, 12 September 2005 21:47 (eighteen years ago) link
― donut Get Behind Me Carbon Dioxide (donut), Monday, 12 September 2005 21:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 08:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 08:30 (eighteen years ago) link
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 08:31 (eighteen years ago) link
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 09:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― N_RQ, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 09:09 (eighteen years ago) link
There was a funny thing on one of their DVDs where they showed a video for a Queens of the Stone Age that was some naked Japanese guy jumping around with a picture of the editor's (or someone's) face over his naughty bits. It was brilliant.
I don't think it's up to white people to decide when the word "nigger" is okay to use, btw.
― recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 23:35 (eighteen years ago) link
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 00:03 (eighteen years ago) link
see
This sounds like the worst thing
for more
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 04:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― Cool Raoul (Cool Raoul), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 13:56 (eighteen years ago) link
Wait, so if I mock someone making racist jokes, I should be pro-racist jokes because the humor I like is based on their idiocy? Momus, you're reaching.
― mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 14 September 2005 14:03 (eighteen years ago) link
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 14 September 2005 14:22 (eighteen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 3 June 2006 07:01 (seventeen years ago) link
Racist jokes are not satire, Mike. It seems clear to me that Vice and Nathan Barley inhabit the same world, a world of irony and meta-commentary. Very few people think that Vice is actually racist; they simply feel greater or lesser degrees of discomfort with its racially-themed language. Vice plays on all the same ambiguities as Nathan Barley did, in terms of whether it celebrates or condemns the culture it portrays. Sure, Nathan Barley is one step more meta than Vice -- it contains a portrait of Vice (in the Sugarape Vice issue episode-- but Vice is already meta. (And this thread is more meta than both. Any racists here, or just people using the word "nigga" protected by layers and layers of meta-quotation?)
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:16 (seventeen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:23 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dan (If I Could Turn Back Time) Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:26 (seventeen years ago) link
this is kinda true, actually. reading about music is like reading about architecture. boring for the most part unless there are nice pictures to look at.
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Dan (Yay Cliche Subversion) Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:38 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm with Dan on the archival value of this thread. The Cher quote maybe not so much.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:42 (seventeen years ago) link
Now, I suspect that the same people who have problems with Vice's post-PC version of racial politics will be having problems with American Apparel's post-PC version of sexual politics, and will think of AA's adverts as "sexist". Am I right? Do we need a separate thread for condemnation of AA's "sexism"? Or do people not get as worked up about sexism as they do about racism?
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:53 (seventeen years ago) link
american apparel-C/d?
I want to bone American Apparel.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:54 (seventeen years ago) link
― jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link
-- Alex in NYC (vassife...), January 8th, 2005.
I've never heard of this company!-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), January 8th, 2005.
Ha ha ha, you guys are so funny! How does it go?
ObliviousAnnoyedStill annoyed, but less soFinally accepting
Why not just give in now? Save yourself all the angst? Because your initial resistance is a crucial part of your later acceptance? You don't want all that emotional investment to have been wasted...
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― Courtney Gidts (ex machina), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Courtney Gidts (ex machina), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:27 (seventeen years ago) link
Other than this being completely fucking wrong; I bet 90% of kids I went to college with don't even know what Vice is.
― Courtney Gidts (ex machina), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:35 (seventeen years ago) link
Scott OTM about whether all this was already done, better, in the early nineties - people who think Vice is on the cutting edge are like people who show up to the burned-out room where the party happened last week and announce that they're ready to get funky now
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link
i had a dream the other night that i was watching mtv with someone and there was this old hole video on (it was "miss world" i think, but that doesnt't really matter since the song was completely different.) so c. love was gyrating around and she had these huge breasts and kept flashing her vagina (it was shaved), to which i exclaimed "my god!" repeatedly, more shocked/horrified than excited. i said to my viewing companion: "it's hard to wonder now how anyone ever fell for this as some sort of feminist statement."
i don't know how this fits with maura's statement but i don't want the dream lost forever. (her coochie is still burned into my memory.)
-- jess
― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:44 (seventeen years ago) link
Jake on the floor is a pretty typical one. Naked or semi-naked hot young boy, informally snapped in a situation which might be spontaneous, photographer's friend or lover rather than standard issue model. It combines Araki's intimate relationship with his models with Nan Goldin's scummy settings. Both these influences, by the way, were not accessible to Americans in the early 90s. And they're very evident in the American Apparel look which, I say again, will be a big part of how we look back at the 00s, whether we know it comes via McGinley and Vice or not.
What's very interesting to me is that Dov Charney is now championing Mexico City (there's even a free paper in his stores called Mexico City) as a style leader, and Mexican kids as cooler than American ones. This extends down to things like how sexy it is not to tweezer your eyebrows or shave your armpit hair. I'll make a bold prediction and say that in ten years young American women won't do either.
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 June 2006 13:47 (seventeen years ago) link