Cameron's going to spend twenty more years making a film just to win you over and he's going to call it "2 THE MAX"
― the terius of a goon (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link
2 the max in imax this fall
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link
tbf this is a year where 2012 got some critical props
― da croupier, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link
you max, me blue box office killing alien
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link
gotta admit, after seeing Nine I'm a little more invested in seeing that fail miserably
― da croupier, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link
Guido guido guido!
― ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link
starring Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson as MAX; the common man who could take no more
― the terius of a goon (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link
a friend saw yesterday and said it is easily the worst film of the decade, fwiw
― akm, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:33 (fourteen years ago) link
gawker apologia is so pathetic ("all that stuff you thought was gonna suck about it is um in there, but its AWESOME TRUST US!" = yeah, whatever)
― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:40 (fourteen years ago) link
unfortunately the hype for this has been so carefully and exquisitely managed no way is this going to bomb
These are the schmucks who spoiled the Top Chef finale, so I hope the whole gawker office has an orgy with Joe Lieberman and they all die from some slow painful std.
― ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 21:42 (fourteen years ago) link
oh armond
― what u think i steen for to push a crawfish? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:00 (fourteen years ago) link
i am seeing this tonight - worried
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link
do you have a phone you can liveblog from?
― "can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link
John Justen and Fluffy Bear will watch it.
― that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link
― akm, Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:33 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
no way this is worse than transformers 2
― krampus activities (latebloomer), Tuesday, 15 December 2009 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link
you'd pray, but turning megan fox into a cgi smurf seems a step further into the dark side and I can imagine missing Bay's crudity (when not in its presence).
― da croupier, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 00:24 (fourteen years ago) link
ok so this was way way better than expected
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:18 (fourteen years ago) link
pro tip: see in 3d, see in imax or similar
i should clarify, the value of this film is not in the script, but yer eyes will prob fall out of your head a few times
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:28 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXCpYgd338U
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:38 (fourteen years ago) link
lol
― krampus activities (latebloomer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 05:42 (fourteen years ago) link
wanna say anything more about it? was the dialogue not as stiff as expected? the reverse colonialism cliche plot not as cliche as initially assumed? the furry porn not as blatent as the hype makes it seem? or does it just look really cool and thats enough?
― "can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:28 (fourteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBjKubN6zhU
― caek, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 12:38 (fourteen years ago) link
if the film works at least on a laserium level (which everybody's saying it does) then I kind of want it to do better than the star wars prequels, even if i can't muster much enthusiasm to see it myself
― da croupier, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 12:45 (fourteen years ago) link
wait why would anyone see this *not* in 3D? that shouldn't even be an option. glasses go on at start and stay on until a quarter through credits.
― dragon movies (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:13 (fourteen years ago) link
-------wait why would anyone see this
there you go!
― The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 14:30 (fourteen years ago) link
very uninterested in a film that's sole virtue is that it "looks pretty"
― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:28 (fourteen years ago) link
that's nice
― Restless Genital Syndrome (HI DERE), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:29 (fourteen years ago) link
dude its so far beyond "looks pretty" its srsly a fucking quantum leap in CGI and 3d. tbh they should never have shown previews, because they look like crap but the real thing is just O_O
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:31 (fourteen years ago) link
totally do not give a shit about technological advances, remember how "awesome" the Star Wars prequels or the Matrix or whatever were advertised as and those films suck because they have no ideas. I like ideas and acting and dialogue and content and stuff like that. call me crazy!
― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:33 (fourteen years ago) link
and also the script is prob on par with or better than your usual BIG ACTION MOVIE, which is still to say not a good script, but it has only a few howlingly bad moments, which compared to most of the blockbuster shit shoveled out there is pretty good.
xpost
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link
dont know that crazy is what id call you
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link
its srsly a fucking quantum leap in CGI and 3d
I'm all fine with this being the ultimate demo reel for Weta, since they're going to be working with Guillermo del Toro for The Hobbit -- and Smaug will be spectacular.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah, think i'm just going to wait till a film takes the new technology and actually does something good with it.
good storytelling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical innovation.
if we were still in b&w but making films as good as the third man, i wouldn't give a toss about how i'd have to use my own imagination to imagine smurf porn.
― "can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:38 (fourteen years ago) link
whole lot of morbsin' going on in this thread
― .81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:40 (fourteen years ago) link
hmm, yes, like the _the hobbit_, that's obviously not going to suck.
― Dean Gaffney's December (history mayne), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:41 (fourteen years ago) link
(tbf I guess the Matrix has ideas, just a lot of stolen ones badly smashed together)
― Magnolia Caboose Babyfinger (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:42 (fourteen years ago) link
Ha, I meant in like 10 years time when I can finally afford a blu ray player.
― "can´t you be just normal?? be normal just once!" (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:43 (fourteen years ago) link
because they have no ideas
they clearly have fucking ideas, just not particularly interesting ones.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link
lotta first year film studenting going on in this thread morelike
― moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:44 (fourteen years ago) link
ya srsly let yr mindspace percolate fools, movies is not just one thing
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:46 (fourteen years ago) link
hmm, yes, like the _the hobbit_, that's obviously not going to suck
Haha. Was gonna say - ppl hatin on this are sitting on their thumbs waiting for THE HOBBIT??
...
― DavidM, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link
hee hee hee
― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:47 (fourteen years ago) link
james cameron has really soldout since his dogme start
― nostragaaaawddamnus (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:48 (fourteen years ago) link
i am surprised to not hear more comparisons with district 9 in the reviews i've been reading - both are about evil corporations mistreating aliens and the unlikely humans who go native and basically turn into aliens themselves, then turn against their former corporate masters
― akira goldsman (s1ocki), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link
and both feature dudes in robo-suits
I have no problem seeing this movie for its visuals. Of course it would be great if it had a good script too, but a not-so-crappy script is fine by me, if it looks cool enough to make me forget the flaws in it. Movies are an visual medium, "good storytelling" is only half of the equation. None of the classic movies are classic only because of their story.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link
district 9, no boobs
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link
robo-suits are likely to paper over a certain amount of bad script tbh
― moron oil (Gukbe), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link