http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/7178029/mia++sub+static.jpg
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/10520105/mia.jpg
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/7178097/mia++sub+static.jpg
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:29 (fifteen years ago)
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/24116155/mia++sub+static.jpg
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/29697735/mia++live+in+Portugal.jpg
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/500/7177993/mia++sub+static.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3078/2331096551_c84461bab2.jpg
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
http://c4.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/16/l_87cad90db0f848b454b08e64d159a78b.jpg
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
This is her, right?
http://www.behindthehype.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/mia420.jpg
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
boy, lex, that's really telling 'em...something
― a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
yea yea it's confusing that this thread started about one Mia and ended up about another, but like....that happened years ago, kind of weird to just start complaining about it now.
unless you're really dying to talk about german Mia right now.
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
ok not years ago more like a year ago, but geez who cares
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
Taking sides: M.I.A vs M.I.A vs M.I.A. vs MIA vs MIA vs Mia vs
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
i complained a year ago as well. just because you guys don't care about the german mia doesn't mean people who actually like her shouldn't care about her thread being hijacked? especially when there's NO SHORTAGE of m.i.a. threads to bump - why the FUCK would anyone choose this one?
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
otm
― internet hardmanning clark (haitch), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:32 (fifteen years ago)
and thread bombing was the best way to respond? i'm sure a mod request to split the thread is possible, it's been done before (re: the opening of The-Dream Love King thread originated elsewhere iirc).
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
posying a few images of the artist whose thread this is, is WAY less obnoxious than the multiple posters who've just gone "don't give a shit" about hijacking it
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:38 (fifteen years ago)
*posting
lex otm itt
― missingNO, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
i actually suspect forks probably didn't notice at first when he revived a year ago, given the confusion between MIAs IN THE ORIGINAL THREAD
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
the thread had also been dormant for six years prior to its revive. the names are MIA and M.I.A., it's at least understandable, it's not like someone revived a Michael Jackson thread with posts on Hootie and the Blowfish
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
original intent of this thread seems a lost cause. the debate is now just comedy. i mean it's like 2990 maya poasts vs?
anyway, i've enjoyed vicky leakx. it's clearly something of a retrenchment, a reestablishment of her core sound, perhaps in response to negative reactions (and poor sales), but i've always liked MIA-sounding maya, so i'm cool with that. also seems pretty sketchy, experimentally defaced, and nothing jumps out as an obvious hit except maybe "let me hump you" & "bad girls", but i like basically every fragment on here. be interesting to see what survives to the next album, and in what form...
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:48 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but the appropriate response there is "oh sorry i'll take it to one of the MANY threads for m.i.a." not "tell it to someone who cares"
i guess i'll see forks in his tonetta thread, talking about toni braxton
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
not saying that a mod decision to somehow break this into two threads would be unwelcome. dunno that that's even possible, but there's a clear break before the recent revive...
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:49 AM (24 seconds ago) Bookmark
can't imagine anyone who cares about tonetta not being pleased by this.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
i'll post about anthony
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
xxpost the original thread had 14 posts and half of them were mistaking MIA for another MIA. Big fucking deal.
most of the other M.I.A. threads were either polls or album specific. I and the other ilxors sincerely apologize for preventing fans of the german Mia from resuming their conversation six years later and resuming their convo....well, nowhere, because nobody did.
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
best part is that those initial 14 posts consist almost entirely of an argument about which mia the thread properly concerns
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
yep.
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
are you incapable of posting in the other m.i.a. threads, seriously?
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
i've said my piece, lex. at this point, i'm just messing, and you're keeping the discussion alive as much as anyone else. nor is there anything preventing anyone of us from starting a nice, clean, new thread specifically and clearly devoted to whichever mia they're excited about. not telling you to go do that, mind. just casting about for options...
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
Michaela Grobelny was a very fine DJ when I saw her a few years ago, has anyone seen her play recently?
― Chewshabadoo, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
xpost jesus if it means that much to you, request the thread split, but idg what you're so up in arms about. It's not like M.I.A. fans intentionally jacked an active thread about someone completely different.
The thread had been dormant and inactive for six years, nobody was talking about the german MIA (hell, half the people in the ORIGINAL thread weren't talking about her), and forks revived it about the other M.I.A., which then generated 3,000 posts.
the other m.i.a. threads as I said are mostly about specific albums or polls where it wouldn't make sense. and also who in the hell is going to post to them now after the conversation has mostly been held here in the last year?
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
Can the MIA thread be 'split'
there, we can move on with our lives
― metal panda (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
i've never seen her dj ;_;
i thought she'd been quiet recently, but it seems she quietly released a couple of EPs last year, which i'm now gonna check out...
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
We were lucky enough to have her play twice in Brighton. From memory she played more techno-y than her records would suggest, almost Detroit-y at times. Also seemed to have a love of the party - dancing on the floor after he set, which is all too rare among DJs.
I find her very hit and miss on her releases but like you I haven't checked out the recent tracks yet…
― Chewshabadoo, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
MIA aka Michaela Grobelny
New thread from mods for German MIA containing the initial conversation from this thread.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
FWIW I confine all of my M.I.A. talk to this thread because Lex uselessly rages about how it's the "wrong" thread even though it's not true, hasn't been true since the original 20 posts, and never will be true.
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
also lol @ claiming that confusing MIA and M.I.A. is the same as confusing Toni Braxton and Tonetta, who for one thing don't have the same name
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
Is it alright if I use this thread to talk about the hardcore band M.I.A.?
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
yes. they suck.
― a special freak who falls outside of all (Ioannis), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
No, this thread is strictly for discussion of the Chuck Norris movie
― i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Wednesday, 19 January 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:19 AM Bookmark
OTM
― The Reverend, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:04 (fifteen years ago)
don't think much to the new version of generation NEY. the demo was brilliant.
― piscesx, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:17 (fifteen years ago)
speaking of the MIA vs. M.I.A. confusion, the first mia thread was actually this mya 'gilang'.
started by me because i'd only heard the name said on XFM, never seen it written down. turned out there was a mya, and mia and an M.I.A. !
― piscesx, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:24 (fifteen years ago)
ugh why do people keep bumping this thread to talk about that m.i.a.? it's not like there's a shortage of threads that are actually about her.― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:22 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:22 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Skipping 2952 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.
― domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:24 (fifteen years ago)
why do people keep bumping this 3,000 post thread on some german artist no one's ever heard of ever?!?!?!
― domo genesis p-orridge (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:25 (fifteen years ago)
this is the newest and also the longest thread relating to the last album, so that's why folk kept reviving it as opposed to the others.
― piscesx, Thursday, 20 January 2011 02:27 (fifteen years ago)
^ informative
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Thursday, 20 January 2011 03:07 (fifteen years ago)
Vicki Leekx so fucking great
like, this is everything I wanted |\/|/\Y/\ to be
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
But MAYA was everything M.I.A. wanted it to be, which is why it's great.
― Call on me (Spinspin Sugah), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:40 (fifteen years ago)