So.... any experiences with this?
I'd think that anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first place... it still doesn't keep me from perusing the place (I'm disgusting, yes) every once in a while. Curious about this (the whole "pic-for-pic" process), I perused the internet for a relatively unknown handsome actor... finally came up with the doctor from Firefly and found a very reasonable candid pic. I mail it to her and get spammed the fuck out for the next 10 days, emails coming from 432978052 different email addresses so that I was never able to identify just one to mark as spam. For whatever reason, the onslaught stopped today.
And yeah, that's about it.
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:46 (thirteen years ago) link
mfm - 23 - wna review indie in hot tub
― gospermaban sim gishel (acoleuthic), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:47 (thirteen years ago) link
OK there is a very simple and easy way to do this.
Step 1: Be gay.
You're welcome.
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:49 (thirteen years ago) link
you trolled for nsa pussy on craigslist with a picture of gordie howe, you're the reason nobody can trust the internet!!
― A B C, Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:49 (thirteen years ago) link
everybody could couchsurf without fear were it not for ilx's kelpolaris
― A B C, Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:50 (thirteen years ago) link
remind me why this dude is not banned and whiney is?
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:51 (thirteen years ago) link
But seriously did the fact that 51 users voted to ban you not make you stop for one second and think "maybe I am doing something that a large number of people find offensive or distasteful or generally unappealing, and maybe I should try to modify my posting style"?
Unless you are a sock, in which case I am p. impressed.
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:52 (thirteen years ago) link
http://i54.tinypic.com/11l4yvn.gif
― i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:53 (thirteen years ago) link
What the hell is so wrong here? I got banned for my obvious "fucher of white ppl" thread, this one at the least is coherent and a legitimate topic. Would you rather talk about computer parts?
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:54 (thirteen years ago) link
I'd think that anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first placeI'd think that anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first placeI'd think that anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first placeI'd think that anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first place
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:56 (thirteen years ago) link
kelpolaris is a troll fwiw
― jagger reupholstered my pussy (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:56 (thirteen years ago) link
http://media.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/photos/images/2010/nov10/cat_show_sm/cat_show_26.jpg
l,r: kelpolaris, the dead hand of conservatism
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:58 (thirteen years ago) link
I am going to let you in on a secret: all of those people did not ban you based on one thread alone. And to be honest, yes, I would rather talk about computer parts. What is so wrong here is you making statements like "anyone who flagrantly advertised the need for sex is quite clearly unattractive in the first place". I mean, naïveté and mild self-loathing just aren't v good colors on you, dude.
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:58 (thirteen years ago) link
TBH it feels sort of embarrassing even trying to argue things like this with you as I am probably the fool here.
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:00 (thirteen years ago) link
anyways just in case kelpolaris goes off to a better place, gotta ask what does yr username refers to?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:01 (thirteen years ago) link
xpost
Opinions happen, guy. I just am having a hard time finding how ridiculous it is that somebody is actually arguing against the notion that those who are incapable of proper relationships and thus resort to begging for sex on the internet is going to be incredibly attractive in the first place. If it comforts you, why yes I do loathe myself enough that I visit the subsection of craigslist. I'm sorry it offends you somehow, but come on.
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:05 (thirteen years ago) link
jesus christ shut the fuck up
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:05 (thirteen years ago) link
Continue clicking on this thread - great solution.
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:08 (thirteen years ago) link
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpghttp://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcc3ui3iSD1qewv1lo1_500.jpg
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:09 (thirteen years ago) link
Yes. Your username. Is it Kel Polaris or Kelp O'Laris?
― Julian Osage Orange (kkvgz), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:10 (thirteen years ago) link
It really has no significance... I go by different variations of "kelp" depending on website, and to separate them (for no particular reason other than that I can) I tack on a random word. Kelpolaris is just something I came up with after seeing the neighbor's Polaris parked across the street. Not that exciting.
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:13 (thirteen years ago) link
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_v90sk9rKJpA/SwKvVQte7GI/AAAAAAAAArY/10Ky8Z219wQ/s1600/_MG_1066.jpg
― Julian Osage Orange (kkvgz), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:14 (thirteen years ago) link
So on the crazy off-chance that you actually are being earnest and not some crazy troll who is really good at pushing buttons:
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:18 (thirteen years ago) link
oops i made a generalization, i should reconsider constantly reinforced stereotypes in the name of the 389475 other anomalies that make some cases not so much like the others.
― Chester, Your Majesty (kelpolaris), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:23 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah there's that earnestness
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:24 (thirteen years ago) link
I will admit to having perused the w4m/ce CL postings from time to time very recently. Thing is, I just got out of a six year relationship, which itself was on the back of another 3+ year one, so I'm ready to remain single for a good long minute. The trick is making sure said 'minute' does not also entail inadvertent celibacy. The main dilemma I've encountered in this situation is that, anytime u go on the internet looking anything nsa/m4w (CL included), ppl basically react like yr some gross old perv likely to end up getting busted by Chris Hansen or something. So fuck it, I guess I'll start going out to the bars on weeknights and such. I may not be looking for an official gf just yet, but fuck being alone all winter too.
fwiw, I only sent out a few responses CL (& never actually posted anything myself). Of the inquiries I submitted, I seem to recall a 100% spambot response rate, so I sorta got the notion that all these ostensibly skeezy, diseased & desperate humanoids trolling for dudes out there are actually, for the most part, purely fictional entities.
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:38 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah to be fair I think there's some major gender/power dynamics issues involved w/r/t the perception of men seeking sex with a woman (creep!) or a woman seeking sex with a man (slutty nympho/prostitute!) versus a man seeking sex with a man (commonplace!)
― 〈font face="papyrus"〉live, laugh, love〈/font〉 (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:45 (thirteen years ago) link
since this thread has taken a non-fuckheaded turn:
I've had several NSA hookups from CG. A couple really great, where both of us were on the same page as far as what we expected, most mediocre, and one that was pretty much the worst "date" I've ever had.
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:55 (thirteen years ago) link
plain old hooking up is fine and all, but I'm all for having some of the basic courtship rituals intact, actually, just so long as boundaries could be agreed upon and upheld - alas, this seems to be an impossibly elusive concept at this point. It doesn't help too much that the last time I dealt with the whole loldating thing was in 2005 & now I'm in my thirties! things done changed.
xp
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:56 (thirteen years ago) link
Can I just say from a female straight perspective, I dont find asking for casual hookups on the internet blind particylarly attractive myself. Doesnt mean the ppl asking for it are "unattractive" but the act itself is skeezy as, when there's plenty of easier ways to find casual poon, cmon. The internet's full of psychos ffs.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 02:59 (thirteen years ago) link
See, that's the thing. You just assumed I was looking for 'casual poon,' when clearly what I am looking for bears more of a similarity to actual 'dating,' tho it is not quite that either. Actually, Trayce, you just upheld the very stigma I was complaining about. I guess it is unavoidable?
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:05 (thirteen years ago) link
these ostensibly skeezy, diseased & desperate humanoids trolling for dudes - btw, in case this didn't translate, it was simply a dig at preconceptions of women who might look for casual suitors on the internet as being wayward, unclean or what not. really, just the same old tramp/whore stigma dressed up a slightly different way for the times.
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:10 (thirteen years ago) link
Which is utter bullshit to anyone who has ditched Christian morality.
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:11 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah but pillbox says he's looking for bears so what's the problem?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:12 (thirteen years ago) link
haaaaaaaaaaa
― gospermaban sim gishel (acoleuthic), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:13 (thirteen years ago) link
y'know, I almost went there
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:13 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm just looking for bears in all the rong places I guess.
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:17 (thirteen years ago) link
Pillbox sorry, I was actually referring to kelpolaris' original post, I didnt even read what you'd said, sorry! :/
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:29 (thirteen years ago) link
*and*, I was very specifically referring to *BLIND* internet based hookups of a causual type as being - to me - a bit skeezy. Dating sites are a different thing, Ive used them myself.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:30 (thirteen years ago) link
this thread has taken a turn for the bonkers, but stevie D OTM; the 'who' is v important when we perceive these things.
imo, sex is gross, don't do it, you might get sick and die.
― not everything is a campfire (ian), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:31 (thirteen years ago) link
I dont want to go out with Pete Townsend though ow ow stop throwing things at me.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:32 (thirteen years ago) link
look all i'm saying is that if u have a copy of 'live at leeds' it's easier to get laid okay?
― not everything is a campfire (ian), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:33 (thirteen years ago) link
OHHH well, thats perfectly sensible.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:34 (thirteen years ago) link
*checks admin log to see if kelpolaris is gone yet*
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:39 (thirteen years ago) link
lol and last week i wondered if my kelpolaris suggest ban was uncharitably quick
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 2 December 2010 03:43 (thirteen years ago) link
there's plenty of easier ways to find casual poon, cmon.
Its been 6 years since I've been single, but I never found this to be true as a straight male. Casual "poon" (or even just "hooking up") was almost non-existent once I left college. 99% of the girls I ended up being involved with in any sort of casual basis were people I met through friends or already knew somehow. Striking up conversations with random strangers in public always always blew up in my face.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:40 (thirteen years ago) link
I mean, obviously I'm the common denominator there and it says more about me than anything else, but I've never really felt like I was horribly awkward in social situations. I mean, getting to know people and making friends? I'm generally pretty awesome at that. But if I've ever gone into it with any inkling of sexual attraction, it just never happened.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:43 (thirteen years ago) link
I was a little trite saying that, I must admit. I just always got the impression guys found it really easy to score if they didnt mind who they picked up at a bar, but thats a horrible generalisation and I retract it.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:44 (thirteen years ago) link
Well, there was my problem! I had relatively high standards and morals (i.e. no taking advantage of really drunk people).
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:46 (thirteen years ago) link
But I feel like I'm taking this thread way more seriously than I should. Someone post an imagebomb zing for me.
Its my prob too fwiw, Ive become more fussy than my ... er... league warrants, so to speak.
― Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:47 (thirteen years ago) link
you guys are actually contributing and not making ridiculous a priori judgments — what's wrong with that?
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:48 (thirteen years ago) link
though I can't stop looking at Kim Jong-Il staring at corn
― for the next throbbing minutes (corey), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Pillbox sorry..
http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6418/sallgood.jpg
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 05:55 (thirteen years ago) link
You just assumed I was looking for 'casual poon,' when clearly what I am looking for bears
― Two and a Half Muffins (Eazy), Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:20 (thirteen years ago) link
Yes, my freudian slip is already well documented at this point. *lolredbandanalol* actually, some of my best friends are bears. I'm sure they'd find this whole thing rather comical.
― kelolpapyrus (Pillbox), Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:32 (thirteen years ago) link
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/39175/thumbs/s-MYSTERY-large.jpg
this man has a book he would like to sell you
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:54 (thirteen years ago) link
A good gal friend of mine (not someone I've dated) has done this on weekend mornings.
― Two and a Half Muffins (Eazy), Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:55 (thirteen years ago) link
I like the section dedicated to people who passed each other on the streets or in the supermarket. Most of the posts consist of losers saying some variation of "Girl I saw in the red convertible last Saturday, damn you fine, are you readin' Craigslist?".
― That's not a "laugh track", it's an audience and you're in it. (MintIce), Monday, 6 December 2010 14:12 (thirteen years ago) link
I always wondered if those Chance Encounters posts ever actually work
― Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link
like, it seems just as likely as shouting "IS THAT YOU" out of your window until the person you're looking for shouts back "YES! SQUEEE!"
― Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Monday, 6 December 2010 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link
Anyone awake and would like to come over and lick and suck my breasts. I can orgasm from having them sucked and really need it right now. Not looking for intercourse but I will jack you off while you suck my tits. Respond with "Tits" in subject line if interested.
― Opinions happen, guy. (crüt), Monday, 6 December 2010 15:31 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm into giving a woman lots of oral and available today, now thru 2pm.
http://images.craigslist.org/3n63mb3l45O05Y15T2ac6b53c78e31fe21277.jpg
― Opinions happen, guy. (crüt), Monday, 6 December 2010 15:34 (thirteen years ago) link
A+ DN
― patrick NAGL (corey), Monday, 6 December 2010 23:51 (thirteen years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/eZx250V.jpg
― 龜, Monday, 4 April 2016 12:14 (eight years ago) link
personals pulled
https://www.craigslist.org/about/FOSTA
In the most ideal of situations, a bill like FOSTA *could* play a role in fighting off sex trafficking. In reality though, the bill (as is the case here) is causing a chilling effect that gooses sites like Craigslist to close up at least part of their shop and actively hurts consenting sex workers who rely on the website. As drastic as it may seem, it’s easy to understand the *why* of Craigslist’s decision to avoid the consequences of FOSTA, but the question now is whether other sites frequently used by sex workers will follow suit.
https://gizmodo.com/craigslist-is-shutting-down-its-personals-section-1824011480
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 March 2018 12:12 (six years ago) link
i guess no one else is pourin' one out for freely available bizzyness
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 March 2018 14:53 (six years ago) link
I guess you didn't ctrl-f before reviving
― just noticed tears shaped like florida. (sic), Friday, 23 March 2018 16:45 (six years ago) link
i don't even know what that does.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 March 2018 19:12 (six years ago) link
Craigslist hilarity
revived yesterday w/r/t the issue (I missed it as well)
― sleeve, Friday, 23 March 2018 19:27 (six years ago) link
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/a-eulogy-for-craigslists-casual-encounters-and-all-the-sex-i-found-there_us_5ab52083e4b0decad04989ab
― Lee626, Friday, 23 March 2018 23:17 (six years ago) link