Mulholland Drive - theories please.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (321 of them)

Diane and Betty are different characters tho

Οὖτις, Monday, 13 March 2017 23:34 (seven years ago) link

are they though, are they really

mark s, Monday, 13 March 2017 23:35 (seven years ago) link

Lol

Οὖτις, Monday, 13 March 2017 23:37 (seven years ago) link

Betty's just Diane's dream self, surely.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Monday, 13 March 2017 23:37 (seven years ago) link

They're old people there's no suggestion that they exist at all let alone grandparent anybody

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:00 (seven years ago) link

xp - i figure they're two sides of the actress archetype, one innocent, the other fallen

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:04 (seven years ago) link

I know that darragh but most people in dreams are real versions of people we think about often.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:07 (seven years ago) link

Real is a strange word to use there.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:07 (seven years ago) link

there's no suggestion that they exist at all

they obviously exist because they're in a paper bag & then get all huge

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:10 (seven years ago) link

"mulholland drive or avatar

― b'hurt's tauntin' (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:21 (four years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink"

In OPO, so what was the worst film you ever saw? thread.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:46 (seven years ago) link

Betty is the viewer as actor, Diane is the actor as actor. I'm the guy by the dumpster

mh 😏, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 00:56 (seven years ago) link

idg why anyone would assume the grandparent relationship, it doesnt match up w anything they do or say onscreen. Unless one just assumes they're grandparents because of the age difference beteeen them and Diane/Betty. The other theories in Ross's link make more sense imo.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 01:00 (seven years ago) link

I've come around on lynch btw

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 01:02 (seven years ago) link

I'm sure he's relieved

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 01:30 (seven years ago) link

I thought they just met on the plane because she seems like one of those excruciatingly naive and eager ppl who wd just make friends with other nice ppl on a plane for no reason?

Fluffy Saint-Bernard (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:00 (seven years ago) link

Also standard lynch trope of nicey-nicey white America feeling horribly creepy and staged

brat_stuntin (darraghmac), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:08 (seven years ago) link

I'm coming over to this grandparents thing.

They didn't meet on the plane because the plane and the old people we see aren't real, they are a fever-dream. So the old people are likely to be people Diane thinks of often.

Now I have that suggested to me it makes little sense that they are just "old people" because they are likely to be people she knows well in her real past.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:22 (seven years ago) link

But everyone's roles in her fever dream are mixed up - so why would her actual grandparents be sn exception

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:24 (seven years ago) link

And why would she be flying on a plane w her grandparents and then ditch them to go stay at her aunt's.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:24 (seven years ago) link

I don't think they're an exception, I just think that people turn up in your dreams that you're close to but not in the relationship you have them in in your daily life.

Heavy Doors (jed_), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:29 (seven years ago) link

While her grandparents are not 100% confirmed, it's a possibility - and comes up in many interpretations of the movie. Another one here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0166924/faq

It's Lynch - I think you can read it either way, his movies are good for that.

Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 02:34 (seven years ago) link

ok in the first 2h of the movie they're she met on the plane
in ✌️️"real life"✌️️ yeah idk they're prob her grandparents, w/e

Fluffy Saint-Bernard (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 03:00 (seven years ago) link

I never bought the dream/real life distinction where this movie is concerned. I think it's about the interaction of Hollywood archetypes, powers & players (first 2/3) and the movie that eventually results (last 1/3).

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 03:39 (seven years ago) link

i think this movie was about Oliver North

waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 03:43 (seven years ago) link

you do not

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 03:44 (seven years ago) link

I never bought the dream/real life distinction where this movie is concerned.

there's literally a part where a character says "time to wake up" and everything is not dreamy anymore

kurt schwitterz, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 17:49 (seven years ago) link

yeah, but see above

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

not dreamy, still boring

mark s, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 17:53 (seven years ago) link

i shouldn't say i reject the fantasy/dream vs. ugly reality interpretation. that story's obviously present & central. i don't think it's sufficient, and it bothers me that it's treated as the film's one and only meaning.

Not raving but drooling (contenderizer), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

It kinda bothers me that it fits the film so well, though. I've come to prefer Inland Empire, which is much more open to multiple satisfying interpretations, imo.

Frederik B, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 18:46 (seven years ago) link

still the most coherent thing I've read about tit: http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/mulholland_drive_analysis/

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 18:54 (seven years ago) link

obv it doesn't matter if The Parts Don't Fit Together considering the movie comprises connective material fleshing out a scrapped TV pilot.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 18:54 (seven years ago) link

mulholland drive is good, fuck the haters

mh 😏, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 20:07 (seven years ago) link

Lost Highway is finally available to rent on Amazon instant video. I've been wanting to watch that movie for years, but it's never been available on streaming.

how's life, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 21:41 (seven years ago) link

prepare to be disappointed

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 21:44 (seven years ago) link

I really like it, but it has its flaws like any Lynch film.

Moodles, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 21:48 (seven years ago) link

It's near the bottom of the pile for me, just above Wild At Heart.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 21:50 (seven years ago) link

OTM Οὖτις, Lost Highway is the Lynch film that is guilty of everything idiots think all Lynch films are guilty of.

lilcraigyboi (Craigo Boingo), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:05 (seven years ago) link

Lost Highway does a surprisingly good job of capturing the mood and tone of the 90s, for a work from a director that makes films that seem detached from any specific time period

mh 😏, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:06 (seven years ago) link

went on a first date to lost highway when it was out in theaters, biiiiiiiiiiiig mistake

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:07 (seven years ago) link

LH doesn't surpass its promising opening credits or Bill Pullman playing furious sax in that club. The rest is self-parody, down to Robert Blake in Dean Stockwell makeup.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:08 (seven years ago) link

stick with meshes of the afternoon, only 18 mins long -- it didn't need remaking

mark s, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:13 (seven years ago) link

I can't argue either of those points. I, too, thought "wow, fake Dean Stockwell!" the last time I saw it. xp

mh 😏, Wednesday, 15 March 2017 14:14 (seven years ago) link

two months pass...

Watched the remaster on the big screen last night for the first time since release and the film really benefits from it. Hard to see what the new print actually adds - there's a far greater distinction between the film quality in daylight/studio and low light (particularly the car driving around), but some scenes look like they were broadcast on TV, never mind filmed for it.

I hadn't paid attention before to Betty explicitly revealing the plot three times in the first phase. I've forgotten the third one but when she enters Ruth's apartment for the first time she says to Coco "It's like some kind of dream" and then when she and Rita go to phone the police about the car accident she says "We can do it. We can pretend we're other people."

Diane sees The Cowboy two times. According to his conversation with Adam, this potentially means she's "done bad".

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Tuesday, 23 May 2017 14:04 (six years ago) link

ya not to mention her crawling into bed and falling asleep being one of the first shots of the movie

seeing this in a theater made me realize how incredible the sound editing is, so much skillful silence

he not like the banana (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 23 May 2017 14:08 (six years ago) link

These are pretty much the exact arguments re: the first 30 minutes of FWWM being Cooper's 'dream' (scare quotes because I don't think Lynch's use of dreams is straightforward enough to refer to instances like these as 'just a dream').

human/hutt hybrid (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 23 May 2017 14:16 (six years ago) link

This is far and a way my favorite Lynch film. It's his funniest, most suspenseful, most affectionate, most purely entertaining movie—every scene is just a joy, even the ones that barely connect to the other ones. I remember wanting to clap when I first saw it in theaters and the cowboy instructed us to count how many times we saw him. So fun.

Very much enjoying the new TP season because it feels structurally similar. Just a succession of disconnected scenes that are so good on their own I don't even care how they all fit together.

Evan R, Tuesday, 23 May 2017 15:27 (six years ago) link

Saw it in a theater a couple weeks ago and I was blown away. Last saw it in 2007 right before Inland Empire. So much better than I remember.

flappy bird, Tuesday, 23 May 2017 15:31 (six years ago) link

I don't want to jinx it somehow, but yeah, new TP is closer to Mulholland Drive as a reference point than nearly anything else

mh, Tuesday, 23 May 2017 15:34 (six years ago) link

Very much enjoying the new TP season because it feels structurally similar. Just a succession of disconnected scenes that are so good on their own I don't even care how they all fit together.

yeah, and since the disconnected scenes end up sorta making sense in retrospect, it rewards close and repeated viewings - i think that'll be the case with the new TP as well

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 23 May 2017 15:34 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.