It seems a pointless and sort of tautological thing to say whereas "Grin and bear it" is very descriptive and useful.
― Are Animated Dads Getting Hotter? (Tom D.), Monday, 31 May 2021 11:14 (three years ago) link
Greet and bear it, Tom.
― Alba, Monday, 31 May 2021 11:37 (three years ago) link
Grin and bear say hi to me
― Nostradamusferatu (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 31 May 2021 12:22 (three years ago) link
"pouring over" a file or a picture, etc. What are you pouring on it? aaaargh
― assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 4 June 2021 05:24 (three years ago) link
that's just a misspelling. It's supposed to be poring over
― pj, Friday, 4 June 2021 05:25 (three years ago) link
yes I realise that, it's a misspelling which grates on me with the same irritation as "warrantee"
― assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 4 June 2021 05:26 (three years ago) link
I love a nice pored-over coffee
― mark e. smith-moon (f. hazel), Friday, 4 June 2021 06:24 (three years ago) link
hmmm I'll allow it
― assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 4 June 2021 06:36 (three years ago) link
"bio break"
Nope. No need. Just say short break. Ugh.
― Benson and the Jets (ENBB), Thursday, March 1, 2018 10:04 AM bookmarkflaglink
yes, this comes up a lot at work lately.
I JUST NEED TO KNOW YOU'RE AFK, I DON'T NEED TO KNOW STUFF IS COMING OUT OF YOU
― Feta Van Cheese (Neanderthal), Friday, 4 June 2021 12:22 (three years ago) link
The thing where people name some supposedly relevant characteristic about themselves followed by "here". I'm not sure why this makes me want to puke so but it does. Considerably worse than "as a...", which is bad enough.
― Noel Emits, Monday, 7 June 2021 19:52 (two years ago) link
User of "here" here. I'd just like to say you are irrationally intollerant of a perfectly reasonable usage, Noel Emits.
― Noel Emits, Monday, 7 June 2021 19:54 (two years ago) link
ppl using 'begs the question' because they think it's a fancy way of saying 'raises the question'
― mookieproof, Monday, 7 June 2021 21:56 (two years ago) link
at this point, that is what it means
― Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Monday, 7 June 2021 22:12 (two years ago) link
NO IT ISN'T
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Monday, 7 June 2021 22:20 (two years ago) link
I'd guess that it is used correctly a tiny fraction of the time. The incorrect usage comes up so much more often that it has essentially taken on that meaning.
― Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Monday, 7 June 2021 22:25 (two years ago) link
it's definitely a lost cause but it makes me think twice about whether whoever's using it is a good writer
― mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Monday, 7 June 2021 22:26 (two years ago) link
We should just stop using the phrase, it’s illegal now
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Monday, 7 June 2021 22:33 (two years ago) link
it's a medieval mistranslation from Latin, which is turn was a bad translation of the original Greek, so it was already wrong to begin with
― mark e. smith-moon (f. hazel), Tuesday, 8 June 2021 01:23 (two years ago) link
it's an awkward phrase when used correctly; used incorrectly, it's posing of the worst sort
brad otm
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 8 June 2021 01:41 (two years ago) link
I think it’s too commonplace to be seen as posing. I hear it misused all the time and it never fails to jar even though I rationally agree with Moodles.
― Alba, Tuesday, 8 June 2021 01:58 (two years ago) link
Tbf for all the descriptive use it serves it might as well be replaced with "humouring the buzzard." I'm afraid you have presupposed the conclusion in your argument there my good man, quite plainly humouring the f out of that ole buzzard, I dare say.
― Noel Emits, Tuesday, 8 June 2021 08:38 (two years ago) link
(I don't think people think it's fancy, I think they just think that's what it is).
― kinder, Tuesday, 8 June 2021 09:27 (two years ago) link
This is slightly outside where this thread normally goes, but the terms "Brother-in-law" and "Sister-in-Law" have always annoyed me because they are used both to mean your spouse's sibling and your sibling's spouse. And then there's also no word for your spouse's sibling's spouse, so you just have to say "my wife's brother's wife" which is very awkward.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 June 2021 13:44 (two years ago) link
oppor-chance-ity
― Maresn3st, Thursday, 10 June 2021 13:46 (two years ago) link
you would say "my brother-in-law's wife", no?
― cancel culture club (Neanderthal), Thursday, 10 June 2021 13:47 (two years ago) link
xpost
You mean people other than couthy Glaswegian pensioners say this?
― Are Animated Dads Getting Hotter? (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 June 2021 13:49 (two years ago) link
And then there's also no word for your spouse's sibling's spouse, so you just have to say "my wife's brother's wife" which is very awkward.
We need a word that means that, which also means your sibling's spouse's sibling.
― Alba, Thursday, 10 June 2021 14:26 (two years ago) link
I hear it misused all the time and it never fails to jar even though I rationally agree with Moodles.
It was being misused from the moment it was translated into English, so there's no real basis for approving of the "correct" usage and disapproving of the more recent "incorrect" one. At best, they're equally wrong. Using "begging" as the English translation for the Latin "petitio" is like translating the English phrase "running the show" into another language as "flowing the show". And then hundreds of years later people try and justify the bad translation by saying something like "water is so powerful that its flow sweeps away everything, so it is in control".
You should just use "assuming the conclusion". It's an accurate translation of the original Greek phrase.
― mark e. smith-moon (f. hazel), Thursday, 10 June 2021 14:57 (two years ago) link
I won’t be doing that. But thank you for the explanation. I think I’ll still get annoyed by it being used instead of “raise the question” though. The phrase must just die.
― Alba, Thursday, 10 June 2021 15:06 (two years ago) link
let’s just bugger it instead
― Long Tall Arsetee & the Shaker Intros (breastcrawl), Thursday, 10 June 2021 16:28 (two years ago) link
I assume your pardon?
― Alba, Thursday, 10 June 2021 16:37 (two years ago) link
Usages that annoy the shit out of a mathematician acquaintance of mine: people describing things (usually coronavirus infections) as growing 'exponentially' when they're merely increasing at an uneven rate. Basically if it's not the formula in the first paragraph here (that I can't figure out how to paste in): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_growth, then it's not exponential. Apparently.
― I gave it my all and my all wasn't enough (Matt #2), Thursday, 10 June 2021 19:10 (two years ago) link
I'd noticed that and let it slide cos it seemed to be a byproduct of the same reason some people think "penultimate" means "really really ultimate"
― cancel culture club (Neanderthal), Thursday, 10 June 2021 20:05 (two years ago) link
people should stop using words
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Thursday, 10 June 2021 20:41 (two years ago) link
and start making sense
― Long Tall Arsetee & the Shaker Intros (breastcrawl), Thursday, 10 June 2021 20:43 (two years ago) link
"OMG that's so random!"
But they don't mean 'random' at all, they mean lame or bogus.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 June 2021 21:01 (two years ago) link
Do they? I think it’s usually more like “weird”.
― Alba, Thursday, 10 June 2021 21:11 (two years ago) link
People use the words "random" and "surreal" in ways that make me want to punch them in the throat.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, 10 June 2021 21:15 (two years ago) link
I guess it can be interpreted as weird or odd as well, but never in a good way...
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 June 2021 21:19 (two years ago) link
― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, June 10, 2021 2:15 PM (sixteen minutes ago)
do you have a normal reaction to anything
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Thursday, 10 June 2021 21:33 (two years ago) link
random originally meant fast
― mark e. smith-moon (f. hazel), Friday, 11 June 2021 03:14 (two years ago) link
your mom was so random last night
― cancel culture club (Neanderthal), Friday, 11 June 2021 03:17 (two years ago) link
they don't mean 'random' at all, they mean lame or bogus
yeah, and what about when people say 'bad' but they really mean 'good'? or when they write 'phat' instead of using a word that really exists? it's kee-ray-zee!
― What's It All About, Althea? (Aimless), Friday, 11 June 2021 03:19 (two years ago) link
> the terms "Brother-in-law" and "Sister-in-Law" have always annoyed me because they are used both to mean your spouse's sibling and your sibling's spouse.
the rules for second cousin once removed etc are similarly confusing but because they are, if I'm reading them correctly, asymetric.
― koogs, Friday, 11 June 2021 05:41 (two years ago) link
The thing I get with highly imprecise or hyperbolic use of words is that while I'm perfectly aware of what's likely to have been meant, my brain will also provide a literal reading.
It can be both annoying and amusing. Amusing is better obviously but then I have to hold back from sharing too many bad jokes as it often isn't appreciated ;-(
― Noel Emits, Friday, 11 June 2021 12:59 (two years ago) link
I just introduce my family as "friends, friends of friends, and some of my gift service clients"
― mark e. smith-moon (f. hazel), Friday, 11 June 2021 13:55 (two years ago) link
I’ve referred to my wife’s sibling as my brother-in-law and to his spouse as my sister-in-law but never really considered the implied incestuousness until now
― joygoat, Friday, 11 June 2021 22:02 (two years ago) link
I’ve never been able to keep track of the conversation when ppl constantly refer to their relatives by their relation. Siblings I get but “my sister in law’s husband” is so much more confusing than “Jeff, my sister in law’s husband” who is then Jeff going forward. How important could it possibly be for conversation participants to know the full relation??
― weird woman in a bar (La Lechera), Friday, 11 June 2021 22:36 (two years ago) link
They should all just be referred to as “my relative” be they wife, son or second cousin once removed.
― Alba, Friday, 11 June 2021 22:48 (two years ago) link