xpost Honestly, I think I'll take Obama appointing 90 Federal judges even if it means the Dems losing the Senate. Because the Dems can easily retake the senate, but those appointments are for life. Now let's see how the president screws up his advantage.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 November 2013 15:52 (twelve years ago)
He's going to nominate a bunch of deceased turkeys.
― Ian from Etobicoke (Phil D.), Friday, 22 November 2013 15:54 (twelve years ago)
I like this simplistic Wonkblog quote:
"The only thing worse than a Senate where the majority has the power to govern is one where it doesn’t."
― sleeve, Friday, 22 November 2013 16:13 (twelve years ago)
Apart from the three empty seats on the DC Circuit Court, there are ninety other empty seats on the federal bench. President Obama has had fewer judges confirmed than either Bush or Clinton, and the vacancy rate is far higher than it has been:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_11/with_the_filibuster_gone_time047908.php
― curmudgeon, Friday, 22 November 2013 16:47 (twelve years ago)
Yeah I feel like this has been going on for both terms not just this one..
― panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 22 November 2013 17:42 (twelve years ago)
it has. this move was necessary for the admin to leave any mark on the judiciary, which it needs to do because the GOP is getting really bold at the legislative level.
― combination hair (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 22 November 2013 18:18 (twelve years ago)
And again, that part of this gamble is vital, because the legacy of the courts will outlast Obama and the, dunno, two presidents who follow him. These Federal courts, but particularly the DC court, are like lil' Supreme Courts, and they play really important roles. Given the Supreme Court is sort of dick heavy right now, it's important to have these lower court checks in place. Anything to make it harder for Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito to go all Old Testament, er, Original Document on America.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:14 (twelve years ago)
spoken like someone who does not believe in the Devil
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:16 (twelve years ago)
my gosh
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/6cced1bcc581250dd41ef65103127343341f48d7/c=228-368-1392-1242&r=x513&c=680x510/local/-/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2013/11/20//1384967146004-medal00006.jpg
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:21 (twelve years ago)
http://www.csmonitor.com/var/archive/storage/images/media/images/1001-strangle/8744953-1-eng-US/1001-strangle_full_600.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:22 (twelve years ago)
otm
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:25 (twelve years ago)
Both parties have been guilty of delaying and blocking qualified judicial nominees of presidents from the opposing side, particularly for this important appeals court. We believe a filibuster should be rarely invoked. But now that it is not an option, the result is likely to be that the partisanship of Congress will seep increasingly into the judiciary, as presidents feel no obligation to search for balance or moderation in their nominations. As Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) warned before Thursday’s vote, “When we have the majority, when we have a Republican president, we put more people like Scalia on the court.”
washington post editorial, today
― goole, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:34 (twelve years ago)
we were already there
this changes nothing
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
the WaPost editorial page is a cloaca.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:36 (twelve years ago)
“When we have the majority, when we have a Republican president, we put more people like Scalia on the court.”
Yeah, like that wasn't the plan, anyway. "Gosh, now you've done it, now we'll have to appoint people to roll back regulations and Roe v Wade, look what you made us do."
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:37 (twelve years ago)
too liberal for Scalia tho lol
xp
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:37 (twelve years ago)
Now now, isn't this what took down George Allen?
i think the republicans should have gone nuclear years ago when they were threatening to
― goole, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:38 (twelve years ago)
I love how Grassley freely admitted he WANTS justices whose jurisprudence coincides with his beliefs.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 20:39 (twelve years ago)
I'm embarrassed to even link to this, but seriously this woman is an idiot and deserves tomatoes hurled at her.
its funny republicans threatening to continue their past practices, keep fucking with us and well appoint more justices like the ones we already appointed warning u
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:43 (twelve years ago)
Some of the nominees may not be as leftward as we'd like:
While some liberals and conservatives may have visions of a looming slate of dyed-in-the-wool Obama liberal nominees, few students of the president’s nominating record expect him to make a bold move to try to reshape the federal bench.
Stone said he doesn’t expect Obama to capitalize on the so-called nuclear option by quickly nominating a slate of liberals.
“It’s not his style to take advantage of this by stuffing it down the throat of Republicans and suddenly jamming them with 20 liberal judges. Lyndon Johnson might have done that, but that’s not Obama’s style,” Stone said.
“I don’t think the White House will nominate a steady diet of real progressives, but it does seem to me a chance to put some real superstars on the bench,” Yeomans added.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/senate-nuclear-option-filibuster-100250.html
― curmudgeon, Friday, 22 November 2013 20:57 (twelve years ago)
"Lyndon Johnson might have done that, but that’s not Obama’s style,”
God bless u LBJ, even if u killed JFK
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:01 (twelve years ago)
can't believe anyone still buys the bullshit line that "too much partisanship" is what's wrong with american politics, but hey it's the wapo
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:08 (twelve years ago)
yeah but COMMUNISM
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:09 (twelve years ago)
LBJ had his virtues, that's for sure
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:11 (twelve years ago)
kinda wish he was still pres, tbh
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:15 (twelve years ago)
lol sez it all:
http://healthyinfluence.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/JFK-and-LBJ.jpg
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:17 (twelve years ago)
haha wow that is great
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:20 (twelve years ago)
otoh he knew Vietnam wd be a disaster and went ahead, so fuck him
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:27 (twelve years ago)
LBJ was a world class asshole
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:36 (twelve years ago)
sometimes assholes get shit done
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:37 (twelve years ago)
most presidents are
― mookieproof, Friday, 22 November 2013 21:37 (twelve years ago)
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, November 22, 2013 4:37 PM (23 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Shit Said by Every Libertarian Ever
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 November 2013 21:38 (twelve years ago)
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner),
this is description not criticism
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:38 (twelve years ago)
dude callin me a libertarian, them's fightin words
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:39 (twelve years ago)
You don't need to be an asshole to get shit done. An asshole is someone who uses the tactics of a bully to get whatever it is they want.
Fuck assholes.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:41 (twelve years ago)
feel like we're in Team America territory here
― Ayn Rand Akbar (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:41 (twelve years ago)
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner)
I do.
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:42 (twelve years ago)
Dammit Al I KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO SAY THAT.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:42 (twelve years ago)
Also, I tried last night but was rebuffed.
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:43 (twelve years ago)
i knew you were going to gay that
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 November 2013 21:43 (twelve years ago)
can't put an asshole into an asshole -- it's geometry
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:44 (twelve years ago)
(sorry, couldn't resist)
lolz make it stop
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:44 (twelve years ago)
that's what she said, right?
― the objections to Drake from non-REAL HIPHOP people (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:45 (twelve years ago)
i knew you would say that too
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:45 (twelve years ago)
she said, "NO."
― Multiple Miggs (dandydonweiner), Friday, 22 November 2013 21:46 (twelve years ago)
ew take it to the dating problems thread
― lag∞n, Friday, 22 November 2013 21:46 (twelve years ago)