The Locking of the Avril Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (792 of them)
yuk yuk yuk

Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Friday, 18 June 2004 12:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Well I stand by my opinion that:

A) ILX is obsessed with me (especially the hstencil guy who is sooo desperate to rip me a new asshole he inadvertedly ripped a friend of mine's one in the process and THEN started on me only after he saw his fault. Fucking moron).

B) Avril Lavigne is well hot. Love these lips!

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:07 (nineteen years ago) link

how old are you cman?

Jon Williams!!!!! (ROFFLE!@!@!@) (ex machina), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:09 (nineteen years ago) link

hahahaha you're still ugly, Ralphie.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey man, I got "Aguirre, Wrath of God" for 2.97 last night!! It was in the middle of a whole rack of softcore and "erotic thrillers" on dvd, all at 2.97 ea as well (I didn't buy any of them though, sorry)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:10 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.travisdart.com/people/avril/avril.jpg
"But can you not see that I barely have lips at all?"

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Never seen it Norm. I picked up some Hong Kong kung fu flicks fairly cheap recently though. Pick of the bunch is "Ninja in the Dragon's Den", which has the funkiest disco soundtrack ever (sung in English to boot)!

hstencil: get a life dude. I'm flattered that you want to spend so much time on me, but it's only taking up valuable time that you could be spending doing something far more worthwhile for this world... and yourself.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:14 (nineteen years ago) link

dude I figure if you can go on and on about chicks and their appearances, you're fair game for anyone else, Ralphie.

WAX ON, WAX OFF!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:16 (nineteen years ago) link

more pix of c-man's head pls.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Sure I'm fair game. But you've made your point already. I could look any way, shape or form and you'd still be unhappy. In this sense, you've LOST any, ANY mild humourous effect you might have initially had by slagging me off!!! But, hey, if it makes you happy dude please carry on.

(P.S. If you drop me an email I'll send you some more pics. I'm happy to oblige).

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:18 (nineteen years ago) link

"Aguirre, Wrath of God" is one of those films dir werner herzog, starring klaus kinski, soundtrack florian fricke/popol vuh (see also "Nosferatu", "Fitzcarraldo", "Cobra Verde"). It's kind of a little bit like "Apocalypse Now", only set in the time of the conquistadores, and filmed on 1/10000 of the budget. I think it's fucking great, though I suspect it's perhaps not to yr taste.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

no way dude you'll sign my email to porn sites!

xpost

ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

no, if you looked more like Dan K., I would've laid off by now.

PAINT THE FENCE!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Wanna guest review it for my column?

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Is it a short column? And thin?

Comment dits-on...eh... le NA? (Nick A.), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Sure I'm fair game.

Calum Robert Waddell is fair game? Oh good.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:34 (nineteen years ago) link

SAND THE FLOOR, NED-SAN.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:35 (nineteen years ago) link

For fuck's sake.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:38 (nineteen years ago) link

But you've made your point already.

Calum to be fair I don't think you get to complain about people who've made their point already and who continue to go on & on & on & on & on & on & on long after everybody'd gotten the point & moved on

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:38 (nineteen years ago) link

(hahaha J0hn OTM)Calum Robert Waddell

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link

now I have an image of Dan as Sinead O'Connor as the Virgin Mary in "The Butcher Boy" saying, "Fer fuck's sake, Francie!" in my head

mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Um, yay?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Is the movie of the Butcher Boy as completely harrowing as the book?

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:50 (nineteen years ago) link

quick question - what was wrong with this one? (apols if I am missing something...)

reclusive hero (reclusive hero), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically C-Man's eternal tactic is to try and salt in 'serious' threads among everything else. Like him in general, it's obvious and tiring as an attempt to show he's a good citizen. Apparently Momus is the only one who buys it these days.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned I do think it's rather more complex than you do. Which is natural, 'cause Calum has this pathological Ned-obsession. But still. Positive reinforcement is the ONLY method of behavior mod ever shown to work, so locking his "American band vs. British Band I Really Like, O Where Have the Good Old Days Gone" threads isn't gonna accomplish much, unless it makes people feel better, which admittedly it might.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:58 (nineteen years ago) link

(xpost) Yes, but there's nothing wrong with that thread. If you want to ban him, surely it's easier to just ban him?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 18 June 2004 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

calum's like larry flynt!!

..., Friday, 18 June 2004 14:00 (nineteen years ago) link

someone should write a william mcgonagall style epic poem, entitled "the locking of the avril thread"

"beautiful insightful avril thread!
what a pity andrew nf rendered it dead
all those thoughts and opinions forevermore stopped
when the devil of wh3rd rendered it locked

In the summer of the year two thousand and four
when young calum's threads had become such a bore...

(etc etc for something like 100 verses)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link

it is difficult/impossible to ban a poster.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Pashmina I kiss you so hard for the McGonagall ref & sendup

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Is the movie of the Butcher Boy as completely harrowing as the book?

probably not quite, but still pretty damned harrowing. to my dismay, not the best date movie.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Positive reinforcement is the ONLY method of behavior mod ever shown to work

Except when someone takes advantage of that to assume it is an indulgence on the mods part and therefore open to abuse.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't know how many times Pash's last post must be repeated before people understand this. (And the reason it is difficult is because the board code was never coded with security/authentication in mind, not because it's an inherently difficult problem.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:11 (nineteen years ago) link

This sounds like a subject for one of those old dramatic paintings:

http://jacketmagazine.com/11/px/seven-poussin.jpg

The Locking of the Avril Thread

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 18 June 2004 14:12 (nineteen years ago) link

with musclebound ilxors in wrenching hieratic poses.

or would it be bosch?

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:35 (nineteen years ago) link

rs we addressed the movie treatment of the thread title upthread

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:36 (nineteen years ago) link

just to point out, it's fair to say that the vast majority of not entirety of threads that have been locked recently have been locked because they are STUPIDO rather than actually outrageous or offensive, no?

stevem (blueski), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:36 (nineteen years ago) link

ILXOTR 2 - TLOTAT

ken c (ken c), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link

with musclebound ilxors

We’re building fires that will burn until morning
The smell of books and hot stone surround us
Tough is the leather that strapped to my skin
Strong are the bonds that we make
We feel the steam as it rises around us
Up from the soil that is cracking it’s back
Tough is the leather that strapped to my skin
Strong are the bonds that sing
Work till you’re musclebound all night long
Work till you’re musclebound all night long
Gotta work till you’re musclebound all night long
Gotta work till you’re musclebound all night long

(aka, any given day in a mod's life)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link

that's the prob, stevem--the majority of threads are pretty stupido, how come so few get locked?

RJG (RJG), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry, I came to the party late without doing my homework.

Rockist Scientist, Friday, 18 June 2004 14:51 (nineteen years ago) link

That's quite a mixed metaphor. Unless you normally do homework for parties.

Comment dits-on...eh... le NA? (Nick A.), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, but there's nothing wrong with that thread. If you want to ban him, surely it's easier to just ban him?

I just want to chime in that I agree with this. It makes no sense to lock a thread just because of who starts it rather than because there's any offensive content in it.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:57 (nineteen years ago) link

i wouldn't say the majority are rjg. i'm not sure your thread should've been locked either, tho it was kind of funny in a way.

stupid threads include ones started because the author didn't use the search function first (tho fair enough if they state they did but found nothing tho another poster may know of a previous thread)

they also include threads that are repetition in premise e.g. most of calum's threads. nodody else really does that, that's why they get so much attention when discussing this issue. they make a few people laugh (but for the fifth/tenth/fiftieth time tho?) but seem to irritate more. if anything most people are indifferent and ignore them and that's fair enough too. there appears to be no 'solution' to this 'problem'. but surely everyone would agree that making the same not-that-funny-in-the-first-place joke over and over again on a much loved and valued message board is bad form? the 'tone' of them seems 'disrespectful' as well as half-baked opinions are spouted without real foundation. not that this is offensive, just kinda annoying really.

i don't mind the copycat threads so much altho i guess that joke wears pretty thin pretty quick too.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 18 June 2004 14:58 (nineteen years ago) link

the reason it is difficult [to ban posters] is because the board code was never coded with security/authentication in mind, not because it's an inherently difficult problem

More proof that lockism is the new rockism -- authentication is to lockism what authenticity is to rockism!

Momus (Momus), Friday, 18 June 2004 15:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Lochism, surely. I mean, if we're going to invoke McGonagall...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 18 June 2004 15:00 (nineteen years ago) link

i applaud andrew

kephm, Friday, 18 June 2004 15:03 (nineteen years ago) link

You know that bit in "Roger Rabbit" where the bad guy gets out the canister of "dip", and jessica rabbit goes "oh my god..it's dip!!" I was going to try to find a pic of jessica rabit, and add caption "oh my god it's calum meta!!!" (yes I know it's not funny really) the only thing is, I google image searched for "jessica rabbit" and I forgot I have safe search off by default. OMG WTF????

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 18 June 2004 15:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically C-Man's eternal tactic is to try and salt in 'serious' threads among everything else. Like him in general, it's obvious and tiring as an attempt to show he's a good citizen. Apparently Momus is the only one who buys it these days.

I don't care who starts a thread! If it's interesting, it has a right to live. It should only be aborted if it contains something really scary. The thread I linked had nothing wrong with it whatsoever. I agree with J0hn -- positive re-inforcement is the only solution. What's wrong with someone trying to show they're a good citizen? Even if it's a ruse, if it's taken at face value it may well settle into a permanent attitude. As for 'tiring', the tiring thing is surely running around trying to lock any and every thread by a particular poster. At the moment all anyone is proving is that Calum is right when he says 'ILX is obsessed with me'. He must be loving it.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 18 June 2004 15:11 (nineteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.