Amazon Kindle (ebook thingy)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2885 of them)

I don't see anything about a Mac version, but I'm sure they'll release one eventually. I've tried the Kindle app for the iPod Touch, but I found it really hard to read anything that way. I don't think I'll be buying many ebooks until the technology matures a lot more.

kshighway1, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

Amazon Yawndle

luol deng (am0n), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

a future of nothing but glowing screens and handheld electronic devices is a depressing and impersonal one.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i'm never reading an e-book

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

i refuse to let books die! over my dead body!

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

exactly

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

^^^

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

it's like some horrible '70s science fiction film where a man checks books out of libraries but instead of an actual book they're copied into his brain stem and he reads them in five seconds and dinner is a capsule, each capsule being marked w/words like "meat" or "vegetables" or "fruit".

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

i was talking last night about how so many people are protective of books but no one gives a shit about dvds getting replaced by downloads/streaming

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

people don't really seem to bond with dvds/microfilm/laser discs/lots of other dead media (says the guy with the cassette tape tattoo)

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

because watching a movie has never required you to be holding onto something?

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

i mean that's a totally different thing

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

also, the cheapness of recordable cds & dvds renders them kind of worthless and disposable in a way books never were/are

like moses, the townfolk like the red sea (stevie), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

hey i didn't say it was like a deep thought or anything

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

and yet people are totally protective of vinyl

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

i think it's the whole flipping of the record thing + the relative care that is put into LPs maybe.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

i think with videos, the leaps and massive improvements are all about convenience without really losing quality--it's just as good to watch a video on your laptop vs. a big tv, there's not much difference. but with books, the kindle and ebooks aren't really an improvement. i dunno.

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

maybe because you look at 12" vinyl cover while listening to music, but rarely scan the dvd box when watching the movie?

like moses, the townfolk like the red sea (stevie), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

yeah dvds, etc. have very few characteristics that lend themselves to becoming fetish objects. books and records have a lot of them. xp yeah cover design is one example

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

this is to books as frozen dinners are to cooking

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

a good book with a good index (if we're talking non-fiction of course) is an amazing piece of "technology"

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

i think the only dvds that people really feel excited about are particularly elaborate releases that come complete with tons of interesting extras, booklets, etc. that's why criterion does so well.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

yeah and criterion has really nice covers and the dvd boxes feel heavy because of all the stuff in them

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

I think, with vinyl, you're looking at a very tiny percentage of people. Same as with books, I think in the end we'll see the e-book (by and large) replace the paper format. I also bought an ekindle but have yetto start a book on it. I am still trying to finish The Informers (paperback). In the past I'd never have thought of not caring about books (or records or..), but now, fuck, who cares about paper format books? In the end I don't give a shit about my book collection, I care about the stories in'em. Also, the ekindle is portable and you don't need as much space to store your books. Same goes for MP3s: I prefer that over boxes of CDs. Although I have to admit I hold on to my vinyl. Also hold onto my CDs because my husband refuses me to toss'em out. Ah well.

I don't care about objects (DVDs, CDs,...) honestly. It's a mindset and I have changed. (Not saying it's better of course, just... different.)

Mainly bought the ekindle because that way I can easily knit and read. I can't do that as well with a paperback. I bought a few of those stands but not that great...

Nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

I think, with vinyl, you're looking at a very tiny percentage of people. Same as with books, I think in the end we'll see the e-book (by and large) replace the paper format.

i find that extremely depressing : /

i don't think the world is well-served by what may be the eventual total reliance on electronic devices.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

My wife got a Kindle recently and it's been interesting to observe how it has affected her reading habits.

The library remains her first resort for most stuff (she's a librarian). Anything she wants to be able to loan to others still gets purchased as a hard copy. She's also decided that the Kindle is lousy for diet/health books, because it's not simple to flip through to relocate a particular recipe or chart or whatever.

The Kindle has become her primary means of consuming genre fiction, especially the urban fantasy she previously bought by the pound in rack-sized paperbacks. For the most part, these are not books she's likely to lend or re-read or want to show off on shelves.

The biggest selling point for her: if she needs something to read, she goes online and downloads it immediately, no trip to the store.

I have yet to read more than a few pages on the thing myself, but it's a very usable device, and being able to change the size of type is a plus. I can't see buying Kindle content myself, but I understand why she likes it.

Instant gratification for customers + the absence of shipping and inventory costs make these gadgets cash flow machines for Amazon.

Brad C., Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

i just don't trust ebooks not to become unreadable for some reason and require replacement. i'm glad you guys enjoy yours, but the idea that they'll replace paper books worries me, just because paper books are so durable.

Maria, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

i can see why people who read a lot of genre-fiction type stuff might like it, tbf

harbl, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

it's fun to predict the future, though. back when i worked at record stores like 10+ years ago, people would walk in and say: "WOW THEY STILL MAKE RECORDS," and we'd say yeah they do. but we kind of suspected that records were on the way out and would be gone forever pretty soon. now it seems like vinyl is as strong as ever--maybe even stronger? i mean, you can buy records at Borders now! and i think there are a *lot* more people who love books than records. i just don't see the kindle as destroying books, sorry.

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I think mainly I bought the Kindle for my trashy reading (Charlaine Harris and the like).

xxxpost Why? Why are electronic devices so bad? (Serious question)

Que, that's why so many recordshops have closed here: no sales. Just kidding.... sort of.

So what if they are durable, Maria? The kindle (or rather books on it) are also "durable" in a way: you can download'em ad nauseam

Nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

electronic devices aren't bad in and of themselves, just the idea that everything in the world should be replaced with an electronic device is kind of silly and childish.

jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

there's just something rather beautiful about books and the notion that another glowing screen will replace one of the basic, cheap things that makes life wonderful is completely 100% awful.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

not to get all "emo"

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

nathalie - for now, yes, but who knows what the reading technology/format/drm protection is going to be like in ten or twenty years? we don't really have any electronic format that's proven as durable as paper books. this is not really an issue for most of us, if it's stuff you're not worried about "owning" (i get most of my books out of the library anyway and don't own them)...but in a very hypothetical sense if ebooks replaced paper books to the point that paper became unavailable i think we'd end up losing a lot.

Maria, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

I'm buying as many physical books as I did before I got a kindle in April, but I'm reading twice as much. I rather not read a physical book on the bus/while I'm eating lunch at my desk/waiting for appointments.

Jaq, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

i don't want to live in a world where all of these libraries and beautiful books are replaced by a single thin, electronic reading device. yes i know, i know, maybe someday, "hey people won't even MISS books!" but i just think if they do that's because people won't know what they're missing. people want everything *now* and they want everything convenient. sometimes i'm afraid technology is turning everyone into an ADD gadget junkie.

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

Wasn't there an Onion article about that? "Most of time spent being entertained by illuminated rectangles" or something?

Bloggers Might Ride (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

I share the love for dead tree books, from my cold dead hands, etc., but some of this discussion seems strangely familiar.

Managing a Digital Music Collection

Brad C., Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

I adore print books lots and am seriously in romantic love with certain branches of the Chicago Public Library and I want an ebook reader (not a Kindle though) so bad I could spit, for the following reasons:

1. With the right reader (so not the Kindle), I can borrow ebooks from my local library, saving me a trip and the inevitable fines I rack up because the library is not totally convenient to anything I do, and also sparing me the skeezy experience of finding food and bugs and whatnot crushed between the pages of the actual books I check out.

2. I will no longer be confined to reading great big books only at home, since I won't have to factor in their weight and portability into the foot-and-public-transit commute equation. I would have killed somebody for this technology when I was in law school. Then I would not have had to make the choice between back pain or the ignominy of a rollie bag.

3. I can bring as many damn books as I want with me when I travel and save room in my suitcase for other important things like excessive shoes.

4. I can reduce my household clutter because with an ebook reader, even if I buy a book instead of checking it out of the library, it will be in electronic format instead of sitting on a shelf taking up valuable small apartment space and gathering dust and possibly embarrassing me when my smarter friends come over and peruse my bookshelves.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

I feel like physical books are on the way out, but it'll be a longer, generational road. Maybe, like vinyl records, there will still be a market for the physical product of books for a long time, but maybe it'll also be more of a collectors thing and not where the bulk of sales are. Definitely, as I've gotten older, I feel less of an attachment to physical things... simply being able to have a library worth of books in my pocket is an increasingly attractive idea (more so than having a room full of books in my apartment), cleaner, more efficient and easier to move. Still, a book reading device as appealing as the best mp3 players has yet to arrive, though I'm sure its time isn't far away.

Jeff LeVine, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

Totally. I mean, I have a 15-year-old paperback copy of Wuthering Heights because I love that book and I reread it occasionally, but I'm attached to the story, not the physical book. I just keep it around because I never know when I'll want to grab it and read a bit of it. I'd be just as content to have that in electronic format.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

the more stuff gets turned digital the crappier tidying ur room will become, u know when you just end up spending all night going through all ur shit and getting v. nostalgic

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

or, when I went looking for a quote i thought was in Air Guitar (it was in Invisible Dragon) and ended up basically rereading Air Guitar and probably enjoying it the most I ever have.

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

also, just picking up my copy of tender is the night reminds me of reading it on a bus in Spain

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)

also when you move and you have to dump a ton of books there is a definite sense of i dunno, being curatorial abt ur collection and with endless disc space, shit like that just disappears

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

Ha, not having to move a ton of books is a huge check in the pro-column for ebooks as far as I'm concerned. That shit's heavy.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

just tryna turn a negative into a postive!

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 19:39 (sixteen years ago)

How many of you who are into the Kindle or another e-reader are also digital media people when it comes to your music collection? (Meaning you don't buy CDs or vinyl very often or at all.)

kshighway1, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

K, can't really address that as I don't listen to much music anymore. :-( But when it comes to films: I used to buy tons of DVDs, I don't anymore. Same applied to music (before I stopped listening).

Anyway off to check amazon for some trashy novels. SEE YA. :-)

Nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)

I am a digital media person when it comes to my music collection. A lot of this is my husband's influence, though. If we hadn't started dating, I would probably still have dial up and 8-tracks.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 10 November 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.