the right to be fat?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://youtube.com/watch?v=YDakFfLQDF4&feature=dir

pc user, Monday, 29 October 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

NAAFA shreds

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 29 October 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

omg, these fattays have the motivation to congregate and protest sizism but they don't have to motivation to change their sedentary lifestyles

cutty, Monday, 29 October 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

cutty bringin it

gff, Monday, 29 October 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)

Do you think people do not have a right to be fat - that those considered obese should be locked up in containment camps until they lose weight?

The Real Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 11:58 (eighteen years ago)

Community service would be more productive.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:07 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzNzDJ_XGOU

The Wayward Johnny B, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/186/397684800_0b2ef13ce4_o.jpg

stevienixed, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)

shitbeus (16 hours ago)
i find the larger woman to be much more attractive than normal women. i like to feel dominated and i find this video extremely arousing.

^"Good old" youtube comment box :/

Pashmina, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:20 (eighteen years ago)

youtube comments are certainly something, yes:
well ive just been sick im a sise 8 and after this i feel a sise 58 omg stop and look in too a clean mirror.... fat mallow heads.... all they do is eat then they want help to loose it all cheek

Øystein, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

Loose or else!

The Real Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:37 (eighteen years ago)

cheek

Øystein, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)

I really don't much care about peoples' weight, except my own (though not to a point where I actively try to change it or worry about it (just wouldn't want to be fat or be able to feel my ribs)), and my fiance's, shallow as that may be. Anyone else can get the fat, it's their prerogative & pretty pointless and mean to mock them for it.

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

but such fun!

um, i'd worry about my own weight more than anyone else's, the only people i'd ever mock about their weight are brothers or close mates.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

they don't have to motivation to change their sedentary lifestyles

I literally thought Cutty was quoting the YouTube comments box

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

abbott otm really, some people obviously have to put a whole lot more work into it than others and im not mad because some folks have different priorities, awesome fat people > boring skinny people

obesity as a national epidemic is another issue but it should be treated in a systematic way, not a lame moralizing one ... folks who do that are worse than hitler fundamentalists who think christianity is the best birth control.

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

Sometimes people in our nation have dumb ideas about how to solve things. Like I say, "If people can't be righteous, they'll at least be self-righteous."

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

Like this is only specific to the U.S.A. tho. :P

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

i recognize my post has no nuance and might not perfectly represent what i think but it seemed like a fun thing to throw out there.

i might start appending this to all my posts

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand

lock thread

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

I don't care how fat people are, I just wish everyone would dress better.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

Criticizing fat people as being too lazy to be thin is a lot like criticizing poor people as being too lazy to be rich. Fat is not a moral issue. It doesn't even come close.

Would fat people be better off thin? In some ways, probably so, but only within a very limited scope. Being thin won't make them smarter, happier, more caring or loving, or even necessarily better workers, better neighbors or better parents. It wouldn't even guarantee them good health, only somewhat better odds of good health.

Aimless, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)

would poor people be better off rich?

ken c, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

(necessarily?)

ken c, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

If everyone else could just get style and walk in a straight line, my life would be so much improved. It's not the fat people I object to having to look at on the subway, it's the ugly & unpleasant ones.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)

It's not the fat people I object to having to look at on the subway

unless i'm looking at them taking up two seats :)

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

people being lazy and sedentary and being a drain on a nation's resources and support systems is totally a valid moral and political issue (see good old Protestant work ethic, etc.)

makin fun of fat people, discriminating against them, gettin all self-righteous however = not helpful (or very nice)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

I don't care how fat people are, I just wish everyone would dress better.

This is my wife's manifesto.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

people being lazy and sedentary and being a drain on a nation's resources and support systems is totally a valid moral and political issue (see good old Protestant work ethic, etc.)

maybe i think too highly of behavioral psychology or something but to me its a non-starter as a moral issue and is much better dealt w/ as a simple exercise in implementing a system that makes healthy living the shortest distance between two points

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

Being thin won't make them smarter, happier

I dunno. I've been watching a lot of bad "I'm a fatty, help!" reality TV shows lately (don't ask), and no one ever seems really happy with themselves when they're obese. Once they start shedding the pounds, and start looking healthier, they seem much happier.

Body image issues are a harsh mistress.

molly mummenschanz, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

people being lazy and sedentary and being a drain on a nation's resources and support systems is totally a valid moral and political issue (see good old Protestant work ethic, etc.)

People of any weight can be sedentary and a drain on a nation's resources and support systems, of course.

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

http://washington.uwc.edu/depts/compsci/cps109f05/eatoe1740/images/hungry%20hippos.jpg

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

what is this system you speak of deej

People of any weight can be sedentary and a drain on a nation's resources and support systems, of course.

I was thinking of healthcare costs, disability costs, etc.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

one time a fat guy in a restaurant ran out of food so he slid up to my table a put on a bib and poured hot sauce up and down my arm. he sharped his knife with his fork and got ready to dig in.

how idd ii escape this almost lethal encounter with a fatso? find out after the jump.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

i don't know how anyone can get behind the fattay at work who eats chocolate bars for breakfast--

"i applaud you for being you, fat person, keep it up!"

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NjTWvl8x-U

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)

i don't know how anyone can get behind the fattay at work who eats chocolate bars for breakfast

oh, go ahead, play coy. You know you and everybody else in the office has already got behind her.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

Assuming that a fat person is a drain on a nation's resources and support systems is specious and stupid. I'm fat, but I pay more in taxes than a minimum wage worker in the US makes. I also don't have any health issues, my BP/cholesterol/A1C is enviably low. But I do lack style and should dress better, that's true.

Jaq, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

kenan, i was imagining a fat dude, but you can spin this any way you desire, you chubby chaser

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)

I am so over all this classification shit ever since I checked the BMI charts some years ago and learned that I score as "overweight" and nearly "obese". Clearly the people they're interviewing on that segment are the kind we THINK about as "obese" or at the very least "fat", but if the statistic that 2/3 of all Americans are "obese" is based on government BMI charts, it's a total public opinion-fuck.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

is this fat dude like the imaginary aspie dude?

ken c, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost you know it. sheeit... get em fat enough, and it doesn't matter if it's a dude or not.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

but what if breakfast chocolate eater happens to be hilarious?

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

this fat dude is imaginary yes, but the aspie is a female, and we've been getting along better due to my exceptional people skills

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

there's no need to get personal or point fingers at specific people at your job or whatever - when a country has a population like ours, that is increasingly sedentary and overweight, that results in per capita increases in consumption of all kinds of resources (food, energy, gas, etc.) and results in an unhealthy populace that requires ever-increasing healthcare support and costs. This is simple math. Americans in general - myself included should think about consuming less as simply being civically responsible.

x-posts

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

breakfast chocolate eater is a simulacrum of all fat people with disgusting eating habits in offices everywhere

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

anyone who doesn't think America in general is TEH FATTEY should visit other countries

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)

there is a way out.

http://www.healthofchildren.com/images/gech_0001_0001_0_img0006.jpg

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

there's a habit issue to diet and activity, but huge class-based issues of availability and cost as well. you ever try to get decent vegetables or go jogging in a shitty part of town?

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, I remember reading the BBC harping about the equivalent problem in MERRY OLD. Also, have you seen the European tourists in New York lately? Not a looker among them.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

quit spamming your website kenan

dan m, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

choglit ghettos

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

one thing is for sure, if we are going to solve big and multi-faceted social problems, we need to figure out who to blame, first.

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

and make sure it is not us, in any way.

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

We should be looking at better ways for fatteys to contribute to our society. One idea just off the top of my head is that they could make a great self-organizing levee system.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

let's blame illegal immigrants

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

xp Crowd control barriers.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, let's blame feminists -- it will even almost be true, which is an unexpected bonus.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

let's certainly blame the fat feminists, who are of no use to anybody

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

Excuse me, I am very useful. So there.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

Fat, ugly, hairy bitches. Never forget.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

All I know is I get really annoyed when I receive customer service emails at my job that read like "I NOTICED THAT YOU DON'T HAVE ANY NFL SHIRTS IN SIZE 6XL, WELL WHY NOT??? HAVE YOU EVER WATCHED A FOOTBALL GAME ON TV, THERE ARE A LOT OF REALLY FAT SPORTS FANS AND LOTS OF AMERICANS ARE REALLY REALLY FAT TOO. WE ARE A POWERFUL CONSUMER BASE AND YOU NEED TO MAKE MORE SHIRTS IN 6XL BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT SERVING THE DEMOGRAPGHIC."

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)

let's certainly blame the fat feminists, who are of no use to anybody

-- cutty, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:05 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

don't you have a photo of you and...?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

this fat dude is imaginary yes, but the aspie is a female, and we've been getting along better due to my exceptional people skills

http://content.answers.com/main/content/img/PosterThumbs/icecube.jpg

Smoove

gabbneb, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

just going back to a time when there were some sensible points being made ...

no one ever seems really happy with themselves when they're obese. Once they start shedding the pounds, and start looking healthier, they seem much happier.

Body image issues are a harsh mistress

hmm. not sure body-image issues are necessarily the key reason for them feeling better -- i mean, if they've started exercising (which they surely have) then the proven boost/kick/whatever you want to call it which you get from that is probably got a lot to do with it.

anyway, sorry to derail. wonder how many xposts there'll be?

xpost fewer than i thought

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

Andrew, how big is 6xl? That's like...~!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

i can assure you there is no photo of me and a fat feminist

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

Also, I'm sorry, but I can't accept that anyone who can't properly wash themselves because of their fatness or has to use a motorized wheelchair to lug their fatness around can be even remotely considered "healthy."

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)

jon are you confusing cutty with chaki

and what, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)

Elmo, is anyone arguing that? Maybe I missed it.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

All I remember is something about a vagina costume

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, there was an incident involving me, a vagina costume, and beth fattay from the gossip, but i do not think someone took a picture

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)

maybe you dreamt it?

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)

a 6XL t-shirt is 65" in circumference. That's almost 5 1/2 feet around. xpost

Laurel, I was commenting on the "fat people can be healthy, too" argument, which is certainly true... but only up to a point.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)

It's not a very interesting argument when the bar of "fat" has been lowered to encompass "normal" people as well.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

5 1/2 feet around

LOL

sleep, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

no, Laurel, the choice is before you: anorexia, or obesity. choose.

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

It's not a very interesting argument when the bar of "fat" has been lowered to encompass "normal" people as well.

-- Laurel, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:19 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

lowered from what? do you propose that there was an actual different quantitative limit at one point

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

my happiness requires others to be miserable. sorry about that!

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

It's not a very interesting argument when the bar of "fat" has been lowered to encompass "normal" people as well.

more likely that definition of "normal" distorted by limited sample pool of overweight people. seriously, step outside the US - the difference is kinda shocking (and oft commented on by first-time visitors to the US, in my experience)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

no, Laurel, the choice is before you: anorexia, or obesity. choose.

-- gff, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:20 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

how can the US be obsessed with dieting/being skinny and also be criticized for being the fattest country in the world?

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost my happiness requires others to be squeezable.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

I dunno actually, Jon. I have a feeling it has, but I couldn't say when or where or by what. My earnestness specialty is motherhood & the myth of the nuclear family, not so much weight & body image through history.

Also maybe Shakey didn't hear me earlier but if I am nearly "obese" by the scale that's giving us statistics about all Americans, we might want to re-think.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

so is my wife, fwiw, I'm aware of the scale you're referring to.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

Altho I have been retaining water like kerazy latey. u_u

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

what's obese

RJG, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

My feet are cold, and this thread is making me want to snuggle.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

Calculate your BMI here, RJG

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

fat girls have nice pillows

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

i saw a fattey in bordeaux last weekend and it kind of blew my mind

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)

xp Goosedown from overstock.com, tyvm.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)

it was like when i saw a black dude in wells-next-the-sea

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)

BMI is bunk, guys, but there are much more accurate, albeit more invasive ways of actually determining how much fat you carry on your body

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

I'm normal

RJG, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

"I NOTICED THAT YOU DON'T HAVE ANY NFL SHIRTS IN SIZE 6XL, WELL WHY NOT??? HAVE YOU EVER WATCHED A FOOTBALL GAME ON TV, THERE ARE A LOT OF REALLY FAT SPORTS FANS AND LOTS OF AMERICANS ARE REALLY REALLY FAT TOO. WE ARE A POWERFUL CONSUMER BASE AND YOU NEED TO MAKE MORE SHIRTS IN 6XL BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT SERVING THE DEMOGRAPGHIC."

the irony is, the effort they'd expend by taking out the stitches and putting in extra fabric to get around their Michelin brand torsos would probably drop them a shirt size, AND introduce them to something more exciting than football: sewing.

Seriously, do all of these 6XL people think they are a huge (ll no pun int'd) buying demographic? Is it like, "shit, we should make 6XL shirts for fatties, or else we'll lose their business to another team, or to hockey"? Gimme a break.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

You cannot tell me this is not dead fucking snuggly (nsf the 16th century). Winter is coming, ppl, get yer priorities straight.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

this sounds simple-minded but i think the biggest problem americans have with health is that there is no place to go for a walk, actually the entire concept of going for a walk has just ceased to exist for most of the country

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

dude nfl football is way more exciting than sewing

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

tracer otm the number one correlator with obesity is the length of a person's driving commute

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

xxp That seems v reasonable, actually.

xp to Tom: does not compute

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

nobody walks anywhere anymore
except me

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

Dammit I was zinging football. OTM about commuting.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

i walk places all the time dudes

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

people who live in big cities walk. (note: This is why los angeles does not count.)

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

and i don't mean "let's put on athletic shoes and go for a power-walk in the subdivision" i mean a walk that takes you past interesting things, that is pleasurable in and of itself, that encourages lingering and detours

xpost haha one time the lovely emma b wanted to go for a walk in tennessee and i was just like "what." and finally i got my head around it and was like "there are no sidewalks. we'll be killed." she's like "you live in the country! i can see mountains from here! and you're telling me we can't go for a walk???" so we did. after about 10 minutes a car stopped and this guy rolled down his window, with the rest of his family inside, and says, "your car break down?"

xpost yeah i'm not talking about big cities, obv

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

Elmo, why does it "annoy" you to get an email like that?

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)

it's just funny that even riding the train or taking the bus everywhere is still healthier because you're not doing all the physically passive, stress-inducing shit that driving involves

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)

i hate driving now that i live in a big city it suuuuuuucks

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

It annoys me when I would love to buy an article of clothing but they don't make it big enough to fit me. That happens a lot.

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

Plus there are lots of stairs in the subway. And it doesn't go through the drive-through, altho I have often wished it did at around 3.57 in the AM.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

Mr. Que where do you live? If it's like New York City or something, then of course you walk a bunch. If it's a place less suited to a good walk (the best way to walk to the store is along an interstate highway or something) then you'd probably walk way less.

I walk a lot more now that I live in Montreal than I did when I lived in Ottawa, because my neighborhood is walking-friendly. Living in Ottawa, the only walking I did was to and form busses. Every friend I have there who gets a car gains twenty pounds. I wonder if there's a correlation between "crappy places to own a car" and "not fatness."

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

i believe that, as tom said, there literally is

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

weird, our internet crashed a few times so i did not realized i xposted so far, sorry for repeating points mentioned jsut up from me

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

the invention known as the bicycle works wonders

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

my bicycle got stolen and my gf's broke and the one i found under a bridge is awesome, but also in awesomely bad shape and too small for me and i am SCARED of the people who run the bike co-op and i don't know how to fix it and i am too poor to buy a new one... perhaps i should GET MY THIEF ON

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

I walk as much as possible, driving in SF sucks and is not advisable and the only reason I bought a car at all was so that we would have it for the baby in case of emergencies. Living near where I work has always been a huge priority for me, commuting is fucking stupid on so many levels.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

It annoys me because we DO offer some shirts in size 6X, but there are very real business constraints -- printing, warehousing, product sell-through rates -- that prevent us from making every shirt in every size. It annoys me because, as body types they are way way outside of the norm, they require a specialty product that costs significantly more to produce, but they hide behind this statistic of FAT AMERICA and put on a show of indignation because they can't accept that they are in the superfat minority.

xxpost

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)

OWN UP TO YOUR SIZE AND ACCEPT THE FACT THAT BUYING MASS-PRODUCED CLOTHING MAY NOT BE AN OPTION FOR YOU. These are the life costs of your "fat pride."

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

Kinda like how I sucked it up re: finding cheap, mass-produced 36" pants. I look like I shop for floods AND I DON'T COMPLAIN (except on ILX)

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

36" inseam, i mean.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

I wear 36/36... outlet stores, dude. Also, work clothes (Carhartt, Dickies).

dan m, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

Dude, elmo, take 10 deep breaths. Maybe do some yoga.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

BMI maths say I'd still be "normal" at only 144lbs. I'm 6'2".

Kerm, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

I think the phrase "life costs of your fat pride" has a nice ring to it

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, Kerm, they're skewed way way low. Like, I'm sure there are a few people in the world who are healthy and happy at 6'+ and less than -150 lbs, but there are also lots of healthy ones at 5'3 and 150+ lbs. Like me!

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

Just deleet the redundant minus sign in your heads, pls.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

"like meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

You have to squeal really loudly for that to work, though.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)

who are healthy and happy at 6'+ and less than -150 lbs

this is me, roughly (altho I've put on a couple "sympathy" pounds during pregnancy)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

so to sum up: cuddlestein r people too

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

I wear 36/36... outlet stores, dude. Also, work clothes (Carhartt, Dickies).

What kind of outlet stores are you talking about? When I hear that term, I think "places where they sell a bunch of Old Navy out in the sticks where you need a cr to get to except Old Navy is not only awful, but they only go up to a 34" inseam because despite my hating them, I CHECKED."

I never thought of Dickies... I've never even owned a pair, actually. Are the esspensive?

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

My parents live in a fairly rural area and are very very athletic -- running or swimming 3 times a week. I walked across Williamsburg with them and they were ANNOYED by it. WTF

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)

levis online store

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)

maybe walking thru williamsburg is annoying for non-health reasons

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)

or just walking anywhere with jw

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)

BLAMM

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)

i walk a couple miles a day and im pretty fat

chaki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

A year and a half ago I was working for a construction company slinging lumber and concrete and shovels and ladders around all day and I got down to 195 (almost out of the "overweight" class) and people started asking if I was eating lunch.

Kerm, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

Who the hell would go to an outlet to buy Old Navy? It's outlet prices in the STORE, already.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

yes, but without the quality you expect from factory rejects

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)

I just meant like the Levi's Store or that kind of thing, not department stores. Tombot OTM on the online thing. Dickies used to be cheap but they may have been further co-opted by hipsters so who knows now. Carhartts are $$$ but will last a long time.

dan m, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

oh btw, guys, when your girlfriends tell you that they think your beer gut is "cute"--they don't mean it

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

cutty are those organic miles though?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

@Laurel: My moms, for one. There must be one near the Canada border because she keeps buying shit for my siblnigs there.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

xo to cutts How would you know, you can't remember the last time you had a beer.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

I dunno if carhartts will actually last too much longer, I give them about a year or two before baggy asses are back in and urban outfitters starts carrying them

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

Haha oh god, xP. Altho, xo... well, maybe if it was for good luck.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

i can't remember that last time i had a beer gut either

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

That is not a choice that I, or anyone I might date, should have to make.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

levi's online site, at least the canada one, sems to say that they only go up to 34" inseams. alas.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)

but this thread isn't about long legs, it's about fatties. clearly i digress. NO FATIES

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)

my butt keeps getting fatter, but the rest of me stays the same.

bell_labs, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)

fat feminist over here.
i actually do think i would be happier with my appearance if i lost 20 or 30 pounds. which i am trying to do. but keep being seduced by sweet potato fries.

also i do think beer bellies are cute.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)

^^not a problem

xpost

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not fat and I don't walk anywhere.

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)

This thread's gaining a lot of weight.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)

maybe walking thru williamsburg is annoying for non-health reasons

-- gff, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:05 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark

it was like 10 am (lol my parents are puritans) and they were annoyed by the fact no one was out and nothing was open

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)

they wanted the ultimate urban experience

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)

That BMI thing is some bullshit. I agree that I am overweight now but I apparently need to weigh 155 to not be overweight. When I did weigh 155 (at age 19), you could count all of my ribs.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)

The only thing open past 8:00 pm in Brooklyn are bars. I should bring my father to Williamsburg, though - in the 70s he had a mustache, wore a headband, and was obsessed with Steely Dan.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)

my butt keeps getting fatter, but the rest of me stays the same.

This means you are steatopygous. Not everyone can say the same.

Aimless, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

old person ass looks weird.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:28 (eighteen years ago)

someday I will be old and I will be damn thankful for old person ass.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)

holy shit i am almost overweight according to bmi, thats insane.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)

steatopygous female:
http://barclay1720.tripod.com/hist/images/ongewoman.jpg

Aimless, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

according to bmi i am "normal" which, as anyone who has met me can attest, seems somewhat insane since i am shaped like a pre-pubescent girl

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

I am "normal" as well, at 5'11" and around 160. In order to be "underweight" according to this BMI chart, I would need to get down to 132 pounds. I have not weighed 132 pounds since I was 14 years old. That would not just be underweight, it would have to be the result of internment.

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

i think the important question you're all forgetting is: why do fat people have that weird smell?

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)

because they're hiding pizzas and burritos under their armpits?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, when i put in my lowest weight (around 114lbs, i think, at 5'5") it fell well within the normal range. i think it errs a bit on the side of slenderness, but then again the medical obesity threshold isn't very high.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)

this is me, roughly (altho I've put on a couple "sympathy" pounds during pregnancy)

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:03 PM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

haha wait shakey mo is a woman or was that just a bad joke?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, i weigh around 165 now, which is way less than i weighed all through high school, and it's just barely in the "normal" BMI range

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)

I'm 5'8" 141 lbs and my BMI is in perfect Normal range. I don't know what you chuckleheads are talking about

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

sympathy pounds = man gains weight when his wife is pregnant, perhaps due to sharing in the ben & jerry's and/or soil.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

im trying to lose weight

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

also, while "not being fat" might not lead to happiness, pretty much everyone agrees that regular exercise (even walking a mile or two a day) is better at curing depression than any pharmaceutical.

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

oh do they

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

say that to my personal trainer cousin who committed suicide last year

latebloomer, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

j/k

latebloomer, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

do you guys think that being skinny is like having money in this country? like, 70% of skinniness is concentrated in 30% of the population? so that we're simultaneously the most anorexic and the most obese country in the world?

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

no i do not think that, once again thanks for playing

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

i think it helps a little w/low-level depression, not clinical

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

do you want to redistribute wealth??? WHY NOT REDISTRIBUTE WEIGHT WHILE WERE AT IT??? that would be FAIR after all WOULDNT IT???

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

xpost but pretty much everyone agrees! what are you, some kinda communist?

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

GUYS THE BMI IS WHACK WHY ARE ANY OF YOU LISTENING TO IT

ANY REASONABLY ATHLETIC PERSON WITH MUSCLE IS GOING TO BE "OVERWEIGHT" BY THESE STANDARDS

Moralizing obesity across the board is stupid and counterproductive. I have known plenty of women who are "chubby" or whatever but are also hell of strong and run marathons. lol genetics. being a big boy or girl is fine as long as you are actually mindful of your health (<---crucial). when shit gets bananas is when massive 300lb people are wheezing up the stairs or getting diabetes or what have you and still try and claim that how they are CHOOSING to live is not unhealthy. me saying that fast food + sedentary life + not giving a fuck = unhealthy watch out is NOT the same as saying lol fat fuck i hate you.

ps max is right about exercise

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)

drr thank willm xpost a million.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)

DID YOU GUYS KNOW THAT EVERY SINGLE NFL RUNNING BACK IS OVERWEIGHT?!??!?!??!?!! WHAT HAVE WE BECOME

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

haha kenan why you being such a dick?

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

im probably 20 pounds of fat away from being "healthy" and i know from experience that when im even vaguely in shape i'm way happier than when im not.

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

its possible to be "fat" and "healthy"--im just pointing out that exercise often (tho not always) correlates to both "happiness" and "less fat"

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

as long as i can buy clothes at the regular store i'm good

carne asada, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

omg, these fattays have the motivation to congregate and protest sizism but they don't have to motivation to change their sedentary lifestyles

-- cutty, Monday, October 29, 2007 5:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

even tho cutty is harsh, this is at least sorta true.

i guess what's weird about major, morbid, holy shit obesity is that it is a health issue that is (a) genuinely modern and (b) may actually begin to effect the population via pathways traditionally outside the purview of, like, infectious disease. should a mega-fatty be charged for two seats on an airplane? well, yeah, actually! should we start making airplanes bigger in order to accomodate them? no! but once you start having zero tolerance for what is actually an affliction (brought about by life choices, perhaps, but a genuine affliction all the same), then you get into weird leper colony stuff

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

(xposts Sorry, max... it's fall again, and I am allergic to ragweed, mold, and categorical statements about what everyone knows to be true about other people's health.)

kenan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)

gbx otm x1000

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)

most alarming to me is how some of your more thoughtless morbidly obese people are raising their children. esp since meeting a 200 pound 11 year old puts the lie to the argument that (major, morbid) obesity is "just genetics." really? where were these kids in the 1970s??? are you saying we've had a major overhaul of the collective genetic stock in the last 30 years? wowzer!

individually, a person being heroin skinny, skinny, normal, overweight, obese, morbidly obese, gargantuan etc is not really a problem morally or a reason to not like them or be pals or whatever. what's alarming is when the rate of obesity is one the rise in a given population.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

do these genes make me look fat?

carne asada, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

another bummer: eating healthy can very frequently cost more than eating poorly. so, in some parts of the country, we have a burgeoning population of obese people (esp children) that really only have access to shitty, sugary foods with basically no nutritional value, and they're getting diabetes (a complex, life-long condition) AND they don't have healthcare! and, if they're kids, it's not really they're fault, right?

WHAT TO DO.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

educate

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

people aren't going to eat right unless they care about eating right. which seems to be a minority position these days.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

Well sure but when people start going 'DO YOU KNOW WHAT WEIGHT-RELATED HEALTH PROBLEMS ARE COSTING US? X000 PEOPLE DIED FROM DIABETES LAST YEAR' like the guy in that filmstrip, it's like...people who are "fat" as opposed to actually fat are not the ones raising healthcare costs. Even if I had diabetes, it would not really be obesity-related diabetes and therefore would not count as a cost of obesity being levied on the American public.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

PUBLIC HEALTH IS IMPORTANT PPL

c.f. AGING BOOMERS, FAT KIDS, UNINSURED IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR EXOTIC AILMENTS, THE COMPLEX INTERACTION OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PSYCHOLOGY AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR POPULATIONS, BREAKING: RICH PEOPLE HEALTHIER THAN POOR PEOPLE (IS THEIR RECURSIVE FEEDBACK?), T/S: CUTTING-EDGE CANCER TREATMENTS v. CHEAP DRUGS FOR AFRICA, etc.

xp yeah, but i think a lot of people don't even know what eating right even means. esp since we're crazy for fad diets and quick fixes and don't know how to cook for ourselves and forget that we have vegetables in our fridge until it's too late and fuck why'd even bother buying fennel anyway, who eats fennel

xxp well yeah, Laurel, some people just have diabetes

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

This thread is depressing the living shit out of me, but I figure instead of pretending it doesn't exist anymore I can offer to answer any questions/field any anger/whatever, from the perspective of the truly morbidly obese... does this hold any appeal, ILXy friends?

If you've seen huge people when you're out and about and wondered anything about how they deal with shit, I can maybe offer my perspective.

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

we've had no-fat, no-sugar, no-carbs fad diets - I eagerly await the "no protein!" fad diet.

which will hopefully trim down the population considerably.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

why have we allowed fast food into our cafeterias? why can't anyone just make their kids come around to liking adult food earlier? is their something developmentally necessary about only liking PB&J and spageddy until it's too late to know how to feed yourself?

xp ben boyerr i'm sorry if we're being jerks here :-(

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

fwiw, i look at this as a genuine public health issue; no moralizin' (or at least i try not to)

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

PB&J and spageddy are not unhealthy foods.

nickalicious, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

I hate fennel, it tastes like anise.

gbx, yeah, but if I fall into "overweight" category by (stupid) gvmt standards, and I am diabetic, I assume my medical costs are being applied toward the OBESITY EPIDEMIC OMG etc etc which is really inaccurate.

xp NOOOOOOOOOO THEY BE TAKIN MY PROTEEEEN

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

I drink V8

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

without liquor in it, even

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

ben boyerr i'm sorry if we're being jerks here

No, no, don't worry about it! I'm fascinated by the discussion... and I just figured I'm probably the only huge person on here, so I thought I might offer that perspective by answering questions - even if they're brutal!

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)

I mean I would like to see the inventor of that government scale do a 5 minute sword dance with 2-beat pas de basques.

xp Ben, I am totally pro that NAAFA rally on the youtube vid, but duh that's prob a little too EARNEST ACTIVIST for ILX in general and also did not seem like the battle to fight on this thread. I can start, though...?

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

pb&j and spaghetti are healthy compared to a whole diet of mcdonald's, kfc, chips, school food that is way worse than that, etc.!

xxxpost

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

TOMBOT = madman

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

actually nick is right w/r/t pb&j and spageddy, i should have subbed fries and a chicken nuggets

and yeah, laurel, you're probably right, but the fact that childhood obesity is on the rise seems to be pretty well-supported.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

I eagerly await the "no protein!" fad diet

you missed the '80s, then? heard of "vegetarianism"?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

lol gabbneb

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

(yes i realize there is protein in some of those non-foods)

gabbneb, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

btw i was referring to myself: i basically only ate pb&j and spageddy and the odd curry until i got to college. and i guess i turned out ok.

gabbneb going for the low-hanging fruit, kudos

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

ive been drinking vitamin juice when i can lately too. i dont worry about eating remotely healthy but im also not remotely fat. not that there's anything wrong with that.

i dont understand how a) pb&j + spaggeddy is significantly different from what kids have been eating for the past 200 years (as nickalicious sez) or b) how laurel could be considered fat

xps

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

why have we allowed fast food into our cafeterias?

CA has taken steps to ban this shit (no soda sold in schools, etc.). Thanks Governator!

JESUS CHRIST FUCKING X-POSTSSSS

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder waht tyra.gif has to say about all this

carne asada, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

GUYS I WAS WRONG ABOUT PEANUT BUTTER (<--- nuts and oil!) AND JELLY (fruit, sort of) AND SPAGHETTI (carbohydrates and vegetables and maybe some meats!)

find and replace with fast food and tv dinners

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

fat people do get charged for 2 seats!
ever seen that show AIRPORT
sadly i have. while huffing on the treadmill trying to slim down. (not kidding here)

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

Hey guys have you ever been watching tv with a 6 yr old and a commercial for LUNCHABLES comes on? It can be 9:30 at night and the moment it's over I WANT LUNCHABLES. That shit is fucked up. Who the fuck are you LUNCHABLES and how did you develop such an incredible stranglehold over children's imaginations?

nickalicious, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

That woman who said (altho GRANTED we only have her word to trust on this but FUCKING H if you're not going to believe anyone why bother?) that her blood pressure, cholesterol, etc etc were normal but she can't get insurance b/c of her weight...that shit is NUTS. Not like America(tm) gives a shit about the other guy having health insurance ANYWAY but come on dudes.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

"btw i was referring to myself: i basically only ate pb&j and spageddy and the odd curry until i got to college. and i guess i turned out ok."

i think typically you cant eat pretty much anything you want until you get THROUGH college, as long as yr not one of those kids who's allowed to drink all the soda & eat all cans of icing (i mean this literally) any time they want.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

lunchables sounds like something that wouldnt be too caloric - 5 crackers, 5 little tiny slices of meat, 5 slices of cheese - but yet it has like 800 calories. where did they come from?

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

fat people do get charged for 2 seats!

I'm pretty sure that's still only on Southwest Airlines.

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

I tried to eat a can of icing once, only the icing turned out to be Crisco.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

And what about those studies that show that when a very overweight person is put on a "regular" diet/calorie allowance, their bodies respond chemically as if they're in an extreme starvation situation? Hi that's not good at all, I need the soft tissue in my eyeballs...FOR SEEING WITH.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

ben, in all sincerity and with kid gloves, who/what do you blame for your obesity

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

er blood pressure, cholesterol, etc etc were normal but she can't get insurance b/c of her weight

I'm in this boat, for the most part (I have other health problems but they are unrelated to my weight).

Anyway, this thread is really depressing and I wish I hadn't read it.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

The thing is weight is like the second factor looked at in underwriting health insurance, right after whether or not the person is a non-smoker. I'm sure there are companies or programs out there that will take a bit of a deeper look into someone's health/history, but, especially in the case of individual life/health policies of which thousands/millions are sold a day, that costs too much in clerical manpower to be profitable.

nickalicious, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

Woah Laurel, what studies are those? They sound like the inverse of the "Supersize Me" experiment (in effect, not in execution/scientific rigor).

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

lol laurel ive seen pics of u & ur srsly not at all fat

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

ben, may i ask if yr doctor has recommended any course of treatment (if s/he even feels any is necessary), or is it just "eat right and try to exercise?"

not all kids have hummingbird metabolisms (esp if they're not playing around all the time), so eating poorly will catch up more quickly.

i haven't watched the thing, laurel (coffee shop wif no headphones), but yeah, that is riduculous, and no doubt based on the same BMI that seems so clearly to be ineffective

xpost city

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

so who's stopping these fattyies from eating?

Heave Ho, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

idiocracy.avi

Kerm, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

Laurel, any sane nutritionist wouldn't immediately pull the basement out of someone's caloric intake, much as they wouldn't feed a pigroast to a kid from sudan.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

About those studies: if I read it, it was prob in the Times or the Economist or some similar media outlet. It was specifically a voluntary study/experiment, though, not a normal nutrition allowance.

xp I am clearly not fat, that's exactly my point. I am lol sturdy peasant but perfectly normal, and the fact that the BMI chart puts me into nearly "obese" for being short and sturdy is, as already agreed, ridiculous.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

Whoa-ho, this thread exploded! I'm startled bcz it was like hell of three lonely posts yesterday. Exponential! Quit making our world's server costs rise w/these fatty fat threads!

Hey computer man...everyone has some kind of health problem, don't care if people are fat, ain't gonna criticize 'em. Keepin' it concise & positive in the oh-seven.

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

laurels: also, studies like the one you cited are exactly that: studies. you can't know if pulling the caloric plug is a good idea or a bad idea until you just go ahead and do it to a cohort of subjects (sorry, bros!). someone says "huh, totally thought that was gonna work" and some other dude looks smug and draws up a different plan.

biochemistry: serious business

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

Don't worry about kid gloves, honestly...

ben, in all sincerity and with kid gloves, who/what do you blame for your obesity

Myself, absolutely.

may i ask if yr doctor has recommended any course of treatment

I spent a lot of money enrolling in an outpatient program at UCLA a couple of years ago, which my doctor recommended to me. It was an interesting mix of group meetings, prescribed diets, and therapy. I lost 75 lbs. over about 3 months (but I still had a long way to go). Then I got very ill (totally, 100% unrelated to my obesity) - as in unable to work for 6 weeks and/or leave my house - and I gained all of it back. It was incredibly depressing. After that I have continued to struggle with the "eat right and exercise" orders but with minimal success.

Ben Boyerrr, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

re: lunchables, this is a pretty great article:

http://slate.com/id/2149531

six adults and four kids eat and review nine different pre-fab lunch thingies.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

100 calorie packs will cure obesity

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

They will cure my ability to have a peaceful grocery store trip. I get an impulse to throw boxes of those at the wall in contempt. I can't even really pinpoint why they piss me off.

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

No no no, I am totally down with the studies, you gotta find things out somehow. I'm just saying that human bodies are WEIRD, MANG and we know so little about some of this stuff...in situations of ACTUAL MEDICAL OBESITY like we all love to complain about takin' up our insurance premiums and being a joke a la What's Eating Gilbert Grape? and so on, I pretty much assume it is 100% not the fault of the individual (all else being equal). Thyroid imbalances, stomach conditions, metabolic settings...too much to second-guess.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

Oh yah me too, and even though people should not be condescending and smug about the obese just because it's fucking mean, that's an 'empirical reason' some people get behind about not mocking people.

I just hate MEAN.

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

I tried to eat a can of icing once, only the icing turned out to be Crisco.

-- HI DERE, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 8:46 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

story of my life :-/

latebloomer, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)

Like, there was a Time Magazine article (back when I got it for free at work) last year about the bacterial colonies that live in all our stomachs that we don't notice/take for granted after the original period of maybe not feeling so good...we adjust and feel better but the bacteria STAY...and that some studies of people's medical histories were showing that they experienced unusual weight gain following exposure/infection to these bacteria, but everyone had always assumed the gain was due to other factors like aging, lifestyle... You could hardly make this shit up, it's so science fiction.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)

guys there's no silver bullet. obesity as a mass (ha) phenomenon has plenty of antecedents: a) lots more cheap (shitty) food available & b) people moving around less in their daily lives. both those have a ton of underlying causes, some of them maybe classifiable as "lol its yr fault fatey" and some totally not. some of them are even good things! but tip any of those factors a little more toward "eat more/do less" and wahey, more overweight people.

srsly cutty what is your compelling interest in this issue.

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)

i know only a little bit about the byzantine metabolic pathways that dictate where and how your body uses the food it takes in, but it's all regulated by loads of equilibria. where the issue gets fraught is that, without question, SOME part of the population registers these equilibria differently, and shunts food into different uses differently than someone else (aka, their being genuinely obese really IS beyond their control, and drugs are required along with dietary controls). other people have disrupted these equilibria over the years (type II diabetes), whether it's their own fault or not. sometimes you can reset your body (whoops, too much beer in college, better hit the weights!), sometimes you can't (again, type II diabetes).

i think being "big" was latched onto as a health-insurance thing because, when we first started looking at the data, there were some compelling correlations between obesity-as-measured-via-the-body-mass-index and other conditions, like heart disease and what have you. more nuanced statistics no doubt exist or are being created, and the health insurance companies are ignoring them so they don't have cover as many people, period.

xp bigtime yow

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.hessdesignworks.com/Illustrations/Corn.jpg

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

srsly cutty what is your compelling interest in this issue.

gff--i am very health and exercise oriented. also i think it is ridiculous that overweight people would gather and protest for the right to be fat.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:09 (eighteen years ago)

subsidize the shit out of a complicated starch that most of the people and livestock can't digest properly and you can ruin any country's diet

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:09 (eighteen years ago)

also, i think gff is right in the general sense: any number of these underlying complexities tend to get tipped out of whack pretty quickly when our bodies stop doing what they were designed to do as recently as a hundred years ago.

xp TOMBOT otm

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)

i see overweight people on the streets, and the subway, and wish they cared a little bit more about themselves.

i understand it's not easy to be fit. i'm not blessed with perfect metabolism but i compensate for it with my lifestyle. i work 9 hours a day and also manage to get cardio 6 out 7 days a week.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

oh shit tom otm. there a days when i think of the corn industry as a world-historical crime. so much arable land put to growing something that is no good for anyone, and we subsidize the whole thing, and it impoverishes the rest of the world, which continues to be poor and starve.

xp ok cutts thx 4 clarifying. do you have any good exersize regimen tips? i have been trying to get into better fighting trim & would like to avoid gyms if poss

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

there ARE days

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

eat 6 meals a day. 45 minutes of cardio a day.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

Overweight? Blame the bacteria in your gut

Cutty, dood, you are a roadie: yr required to be obsessed w/ your diet & weight. That is not a normal level of deprivation and possib not sustainable long-term.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, in all sincerity & w/ kid gloves, is this a sympathetic concern or more of an aesthetic one?

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

Okay I think people are forgetting that corn is TASTY.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

xp I mean, awesome for you, but you know it's v v non-standard even for fit people.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

there's other factors pushing the subsidization of corn (and soybeans) tho - namely that agribusiness was eager to copyright them because they're the easiest and simplest ingredient to bio-engineer, and are also the most widely-used food ingredients (soy and/or corn is in almost everything). Copyright that and presto you have a precedent for corporate monopoly of the food supply, and what a glorious future that will lead us towards amirite lolz *shoots self in despair*

so many x-posts

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

i dont understand how a) pb&j + spaggeddy is significantly different from what kids have been eating for the past 200 years

there's a little part of the world oh right around here:

http://www.brittany-ferries.co.uk/media/images/5/1/AquitMap_293x280_1.jpg

where they do not eat pb&j or pasghetti very often. of course even there, kids become instantly magnetized to "Flunch" and other fast-food chains like it's crack. maybe as they get older the peer pressure to eat better stuff starts having more sway. food is the #1 topic of conversation in that part of the world, after all. peer pressure -- i.e. eating in groups on a regular basis -- has been shown in a study to be a big reason why the frenchies are healthy in spite of all the duck fat and cognac. if you're with a bunch of other people, you tend to eat slower because you're talking more, and you also don't go back for thirds and fourths because it would be rude and also because there's just not enough on the table.

or you could just try having three glasses of red wine a day.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,2201580,00.html

last weekend the lovely emma b's mom said "yesterday we did something strange." i said, "what was that?" "we did not have any wine with our food!" and i said yes, that is pretty strange for you guys. then emma told me that her mom was actually talking about LUNCH.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

it's both. i sympathasize with those who don't give a shit what they look or feel like.

laurel, i do way more than 45 mins a day, i'm saying what regular people should do. yes, i'm a roadie, yes i'm obsessed, but that's a separate discussion.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

This thread makes me wish I wasn't chained to a desk at work and was instead outside ... doing anything, really. Even just walking.

jaymc, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)

basically everyone really ought to get some kind of hobby that involves more than just sitting there.

exercising purely for exercise's sake is depressing if you know that you're starting in the hole, and that it's not going to be fun like ever. playing a game or doing a fun sport is worth doing ANYWAY, and has the added benefit of being good for you. once it start paying dividends, it's easier to see how training (as opposed to fucking around) can be even more beneficial

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

Hahaha I know, I read the daily bike log, remember?

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

sweet corn is great! this is a tiny fraction of the corn-based garbage we eat. actual ears off an actual cob is not the problem. industrial seed corn, liquefied for its sugar/carb/filler content and put in every food you can think of (hello, soda pop) is just gross. (dan i'm pretty sure you're funnin but just to be humorless completist about the argument and all)

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

6 tiny meals?

xpost

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

corn on the cob = A+++++++ would eat anytime

who the fuck is drinking straight corn syrup, fuck that fucker

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

BASKETBALL: the great equalizer. set picks. lay out scrawny bike riders. drain threes w/impunity. being big /= not having coordination

xp dan anyone that is drinking soda, wtf, dude, science? i mean there's some fizzy water in there i guess.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

I can't play any fun sports anymore since the fucking Dept of Parks taped off my local b-ball court and spent the last 2 years doing JACKSHIT with it besides tearing up all the concrete and leaving a bunch of unused equipment lying around. SO ANGRY SHAKEY MO SMASH NOW

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

the corn people eat as corn on the cob, that has some flavor to it, is as gff points out almost NOTHING like what makes up most of our food bulk in HFCS, beef, chicken, etc.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

True about hobbies, gbx! Plus even the proud beautiful fatties at the rally in that video were having workshops to help people get stretched out and be as mobile and flexible as possible -- I think that's totally fair. We're only seeing a tiny portion of the overall conference or the group's aims, based on one newscast.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

lol, peer pressure is usually the reason why i overeat/eat foods that are terrible for me. i can maintain on my own, but hanging with dudes and talking about food leads to sweet sweet indulgence

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

also, is there truth to the thyroid trouble = massive weight gain thing? i had a teacher in HS who weighed 400+ pounds & said she was unrecognizable before she had her thyroid problem. all i ever saw her eat was a pair of beef jerky's for lunch. she couldn't wear anything other than velcro sandals because her feet were so fat.

xps corn syrup is terrible, no doubt, but i fucking love canned corn.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

the 6 meals don't have to be tiny, but they have to be substantive healthy and should contain a protein, a starchy carb and a fibrous carb. aim for 300-400 calories a meal. front-load your day with more calories and taper off throughout. don't eat after 8-9pm.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

and jaymc is otm. i am feeling restless and should probably ride a bike somewhere, very quickly. can't go running cuz of a stress fracture >:(

lol, peer pressure is usually the reason why i overeat/eat foods that are terrible for me. i can maintain on my own, but hanging with dudes and talking about food leads to sweet sweet indulgence

-- Jordan, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:20 PM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

haha, me too. esp in the context of fast food. i'm usually *shrug* it's where everyone else is going

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

corn syrup drinkers? hm dunno but you could ask:

http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKO

xps lol

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

Lunchables Mess With Your Mouth Chicken Dunks
Contents: Breaded chicken nuggets, Sour Tongue Tasting Fizz, ketchup, Starburst, Capri Sun 100-percent juice
Look/Convenience GPA: 1.73
Taste GPA: 0.35
Nutrition GPA: -0.80

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

oh front-loading calories, i'm terrible at that

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

ALSO STAY AWAY FROM FUCKING HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, JESUS

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

Lunchables Maxed Out Ultimate Nachos
Contents: Tortilla chips, mild salsa, nacho-cheese dipping sauce, nacho-cheese seasoning packet, bottled water, Kool-Aid tropical-punch flavor powder, Air Heads candy
Look/Convenience GPA: 2.13
Taste GPA: 2.23
Nutrition GPA: -2.00

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

ps i shit @ work in the am usually too

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

i had pasta for breakfast today!

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

playing a game or doing a fun sport is worth doing ANYWAY, and has the added benefit of being good for you.

playing sports/games with people = way less fun for me than exercise, 'cause i suck at most sports. i'd rather do individual shit like, uh, exercise.

xpost, i thought the eating at night = bad thing is a myth?

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

There is more water in soda than corn syrup, ergo drinking soda is not drinking straight corn syrup.

It is good to know that corn pisses people off! I have hours of entertainment ahead of me now.

(xp: Tracer that article was amazing precisely for that first utter abomination)

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

haha, me too. esp in the context of fast food. i'm usually *shrug* it's where everyone else is going

-- gbx, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:22 PM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

also i think with guys nights outs there is a genuine pressure to outeat everyone else

jesus christ the xps!!

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

Wow NEGATIVE nutrition, that's some kind of achievement.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

a lot of this stuff is common sense. eat some fruit instead of a chocolate bar. don't eat cheese on everything. don't go for a second helping. stop drinking all that beer.

if you are overweight most likely you need a lifestyle overhaul and it's not easy, but the happiness you will feel in the long run is worth it all.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

I just wanted to say that I'm making a real effort these days to keep it under four Baby Ruths in any twenty-four hour period.

nabisco, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

U fatty.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

hd, the last crate of (DIET) coke i bought said something like "DID U KNOW COCA COLA IS HYDRATING?? ALL BEVERAGES ARE HYDRATING, DUMBASS." i honestly didnt know that & still kind of suspect it to be bullshit.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

god my required caloric intake is going to spike bigtime once i start work :-/

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

There are things in this world, Big Terrors, that I just get tired of hearing about and one is High Fructose Corn Syrup. Whineyface out. (=me)

Abbott, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

Jordan it is a myth, but it can go hand in hand with, say, eating in front of the tv and zoning out so much that you keep eating until you realize you don't have any hands.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

Because you've eaten them. In case that wasn't clear.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

lololololololol to deeznuts (xp and tracer)

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

CUTTY WHAT ABOUT W33D???

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

speaking of which, ive heard weed actually raises yr metabolism, is this true? xps !!!

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

weed has no calories, unless i eat a pot brownie

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

if you are talking about lung health, i vaporize my weed which is certainly the lesser evil of all weed consumption methods

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

re: diet coke... it is hydrating in that it puts liquid in your body sure, but caffeine is also a diuretic = makes you pee = makes you need more liquid in you, which is probably part of the reason that everyone who drinks diet coke appears to drink a gallon of the shit a day. UGH. And nobody I know who does this is healthy!

don't get me started on diet coke.

i also learned recently that one of the major reasons that gatorade is so "hydrating" is that it specifically PREVENTS you form peeing (salt = less surface area for liquid to osmose into your body = less pee)

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

vapezilla.jpg

will m. - try using science

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

lol typos: "form peeing"

"I can pee in a square! OH SHIT I DRANK GATORADE, NO SQUARE PEE FOR ME."

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

PURE UNCUT GATORADE is SO LOADED in ELECTROLYTES (salts, basically) THAT IT CAN......DEHYDRATE YOU

basically, if it is a hypertonic solution, which osmotically drives water OUT of cells, in order to equilibrate to isotonicity. water it down, however (powder), and you can actually drive water into cells via the same process

(AFAIK, obv there is more to it....but surface area is sort of not relevant, unless you're talking about crenating cells and surface area:volume ratios and shti)

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

diet coke also has serious diabetes implications

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

I thought gatorade was isotonic, that was the point of the stuff

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

People who drink gallons and gallons of diet soda because "Hey... diet!" are dumbasses.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

you'd think so, tombot! but i'm fairly certain i recall my biochem prof telling me otherwise??? maybe i'm wrong.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

i probably shouldn't have been so strident. sorry.

anyway, a packet of gu or a banana + water is probably better than gatorade anyway

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)

http://wardmulroy.com/gatorade/DOCS/1/content(9).html#ans17

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

"two chili fries and, uh, two large diet cokes"

http://www.bier-am-hbf.de/images/cine/true_romance_7.jpg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

it's how we roll

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

ok maybe i misremembered the fact as it was told to me by a pretty science girl and the breadth of my "science" knowledge = 0ºC makes water get biger and everything else get smaller. Plus I was busy talknig to a pretty girl and apparently not, you know, learning anything

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

What did she weigh?

nabisco, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

i find it incredibly hard to exercise and still eat dinner before 8-9 pm. i dont get off work until 6. What if i have to buy groceries? stop at the store? run errands? does this mean i have to get up @ 6 in the morning to run? If so now i should be going to bed between 10-12. If that's the case then by the time i get home from work (7-8pm) i have exactly two hours to do non-work related activities ... whatever my interests happen to be. so empty.

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

when i go running after work i'm eating at more like 9-10 pm

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

true (when i exercise i usually dinner between 8-9:30!)

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think there's anything wrong with that! the only reason i don't eat even later is because the lovely emma b starts turning into the grumpy emma b if we don't eat by 9:30.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

as far as people who drink diet coke all the time... fuck, this one fucking guy (diabetic, iirc, type 2 i think as well) drank no water and only diet coke because "what's the point of drinking water? i don't like it as much as diet coke." a bunch of us nerds would play ultimate frisbee once a week (fuck you, at least it was exercise) and he would bring a big bottle of DIET COKE and drink it when he wasn't running. he wasn't in shit shape, but he was definitely in the worst shape of all of us (and this was all computer nerds, just to reiterate, brought together by a love for COMPUTERS). God, drinking diet coke after running around. DISGUSTING.

thing is, him and this other guy (who is just really pedagogic and loves researching this shit) found that there is absolutely no proof that diet coke is not a good substitute for water 100% of the time. I'm no scientist, but every heavy-diet-drink-drinking person I've ever met is not healthy in any way, and I doubt it's only because that the shit isn't part of their "Active lifestyle." There's something in that shit thatm akes people sick, especially in those doses.

Will M., Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

i've been having trouble forcing myself to eat at home just because of this tight schedule and my need to do non-work activities at some point in my life. never mind socializing, meeting up for drinks w/ friends, etc.

i end up spending too much money eating out as a result

seriously cutty how do u balance these things?

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

I think what cutty points out about frontloading calories is important. it used to be breakfast was the largest meal anybody ate during the day, and you had all day to burn off the pancakes and sausage and grits or whatever. Now we skip breakfast, stuff ourselves at 8:30pm because it takes an hour and a half to get home and pick up a bucket of chicken, squat in front of the television or the computer until 11:30 or later and then spend the rest of the night passed out turning our late, oversized dinner into extra gut and ass.

We were all a lot better off when we used to drink at work.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

(not nec bcz of the drinking at work. that was just the old endemic disease that we've replaced with the topic of this thread)

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

God, drinking diet coke after running around. DISGUSTING.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

I sympathize 100%, deej.

jaymc, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

drinking at work = YES

just liquor, though (duh). I quit drinking beer for about 6 weeks (and admittedly began to ratchet the cardio up a bit) and lost 10 lbs. quick.

Fuck you, good health.

will, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

I feel soul-crushing guilt every time I have a hunger pang, even if I haven't eaten for two days.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

o_0

deeznuts, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:55 (eighteen years ago)

you should probably not be skipping food for two days at a time

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:55 (eighteen years ago)

seriously cutty how do u balance these things?

you pretty much get it--i wake up at 5:30. exercise before work. "non-work activities" need to be prioritized accordingly. i try to get to bed as early as possible. repeat.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

thing is, him and this other guy (who is just really pedagogic and loves researching this shit) found that there is absolutely no proof that diet coke is not a good substitute for water 100% of the time
-- Will M., Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:48 PM (5 minutes ago)

what, kidney damage isn't proof enough?

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, dinner was a problem when i was in a relationship and wanted to go to the gym, except that dinner was at like 6:30, so it was either don't exercise or don't eat together. that sucked.

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)

it used to be breakfast was the largest meal anybody ate during the day, and you had all day to burn off the pancakes and sausage and grits or whatever.

"you" = britishes, right? afaik pretty much no other culture fetishizes big breakfasts like we do.

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

"we" british/american/australians

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

i mean i dont know a ton about nutrition but it seems to me that calories are calories and it doesnt matter when during the day you consume them

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

you should probably not be skipping food for two days at a time

It's not a normal state of affairs. I'm just saying. Threads like this and the judgments that people feel they have a right to make about fat people make me feel terrible guilt about ever being hungry at all. It's not a healthy state of mind to be in.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

the french certainly do

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

consistent consumption of aspartame is a one-way ticket to chronic toxicity
again, probably better off with some booze

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

Whooooah I don't think that's true, max: best way to gain body weight is to eat and then NAP. Which is my favorite weekend calendar entry, pretty much.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

I mean at least that's what sumo wrestlers do, along with their quite rigorous workouts and giant caloric feeings, they take naps right after.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

SCIENCE seems to agree with me:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/02/060202080832.htm

http://www.livescience.com/health/060201_night_munchies.html

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

really? what about working out and then eating? i thought that it's good to get your metabolism up before you eat, and that what you do after doesn't matter that much?

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

calories are calories and diurnal metabolism is diurnal metabolism

so yeah being awake and burning all day really helps tear down a heavy breakfast

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

WHOA. melissa. NOT EATING is the worst thing you can be doing. your body in starvation mode will store everything as fat when you finally do eat. you are just making it worse. eat more, but eat LESS each meal. you are seriously fucking your metabolism up.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

i thought the french were the "continent" in "continental breakfast"

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:02 (eighteen years ago)

i mean really guys i think the best advice is, uh, "eat less, more veggies, get off your ass every day."

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:02 (eighteen years ago)

trying to fine-tune WHEN you eat and all that stuff strikes me as just making you unhealthy thru neurosis instead of fatness

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

wow max that sounds like EXCELLENT SCIENCE
they took a DIFFERENT SPECIES, induced weight gain by REMOVING THEIR REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS, and then pretended this has anything to say about human beings with testicles or some such shit
jesus christ

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

thnk u Dr. Bot

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)

max I'm just saying this "eat less" crap is a bunch of fuck
we didn't have to eat less two generations ago and nobody called our grandparents a nation of fatties

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

people smoked and drank and ate meat and woke up every day to start all over again and on top of all that shit the men had higher sperm counts

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

then they all died of cancer and heart diseas!

bell_labs, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:07 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah but what a life....

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

cutty do you eat before you run in the mornings

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

j/k

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

haha yeah they never got to find out how awesome it is to turn 85

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

not running, cycling. i have a cup of coffee then go. after 45 minutes, i eat an energy gel.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

i figure you eat a meal afterwards, but if you eat before, what is it that you eat?

I found myself slimming down pretty quickly when running 3 miles a day 4-5 times a week

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

oops xp

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

what is this energy gel

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

err disease

sorry 3/4 of my grandparents were alcoholic fat smokers and died in their 60s or early 70s. the one who wasn't fat = still alive

bell_labs, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

Our grandparents were eating more "real" food, though, and less HFCS and TVP and processed foods (or at least, processed foods were just starting to take off as pre-prepared foods promised the Housewife of Today a more efficient, healthier dinner as proven by science). They may have been eating steak and eggs and the same canned veg all the time (grey, I mean, green beans, anyone?) but at least it was food.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

i found it kind of neccessary to have a little SOMETHING in my stomach ... when i was running after work i would eat a clif bar around 4-5 p.m. and then run around 7-8 p.m.

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

energy gel = 100 calories to replaces the glycogen burned during 45 mins workout

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

sometimes i would also eat a baggy of peanuts

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

i used to ride 40 miles a day and i would eat an entire baguette with my dinner

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

then i usually eat oatmeal w/banana, 1 egg/1 egg white

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

I mean the benefit of real butter and real meat and stuff like that is that at least when you eat it YOU FEEL FULL. It's not as good as eating healthy foods LIGHTLY, but it's better than eating lots of highly processed foods that don't fill you up but add lots of calories and bad fats and stuff.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

tom u kidding?? ppl DEFINITELY ate less 50 years ago. im pretty sure my grandfather wasnt choking down a double bacon cheeseburger and a 72oz coke with dinner 4 nights a week!

also "eat less" only helpful if you GET OFF YOUR ASS, too.

xp laurel OTM

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)

how long does 40 miles take???

i will eat an entire baguette because it is there

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060901161230.htm

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

one of my grandfathers ate bacon for breakfast every single day and drank a 12 pack of crappy beer.

bell_labs, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

how long does 40 miles take???

2.5 hours of riding at moderate pace

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1447051

Results. Marketplace food portions have increased in size and now exceed federal standards. Portion sizes began to grow in the 1970s, rose sharply in the 1980s, and have continued in parallel with increasing body weights.

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.hindu.com/ms/2004/12/01/images/2004120100110601.jpg

cent: cutty
clockwise from lower left: ilx

gff, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:16 (eighteen years ago)

oh ok. i might have done 40 miles a couple weekends ago! but now it is cold and i won't be able to do it again until spring :(

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

I don't get it gff

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

hey guyz.

some good points here.

i think what worried me about the doc was that these women were saying they weren't going to conform to some skinny fashion model idea of beauty. which, of course is fair enough.

but...they were also saying that they thought it was a positive thing to be, like, fucking morbidly obese. well, i'm glad you're not letting vogue tell you how you should look, but heart attacks aren't much fun. my dad had one a couple of years back and he's not even that big. they seemed to be trying to tie health issues to body image issues, like they were all part of the same thing. dodgy.

pc user, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

yeah about 2.5 ... at my absolute fastest i did 32 in 1 hr and 45 mins.

at the time though i worked from 2 pm in the afternoon to 8 at night, with no school happening either, so i could get up around 9 am, eat breakfast and then go ride @ 10 am, get back around 12 or 1 and then shower and go to work.

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

ok ok ok uncle people eat more overall than they used to

I got off my real point though which is that I think our entire lifestyle is fucked up now, watching diet and exercise so much is because we've made poor adjustments in other areas. risk homeostasis/production pressure of the economy/chronic over catastrophic etc

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

no i totally agree w u 100%

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

this thread oh jeez

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

the real problem is the retarded ass 8-9 hour work day, silly holdover from industrial era bullshit

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

xp which is why i think things like "eat less at night!" are sort of useless when the problem has way more to do with the way our lifestyle is tied up in the auto/agribusiness/white-collar economies which force-feed us shit and dont let us move

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

working in an office i have 0 incentive to finish my work ahead of schedule because i'm still going to be sitting in the office all day.

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

I work 4x10 shifts right now, I can't wait to start growing a tub

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

tell me i can finish my work and leave in 6 hours and i will DO IT

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

One of my grandfathers ate lentils and freshly slaughtered goats and stuff. And maybe smoked a little. He lived through the entirety of the 20th century.

nabisco, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

deej, consider getting up early. it's really not hard once you slide into a routine. you'll find yourself well-rested and rising at the same time every day if you do it right.

my co-workers are always whining about how tired they are. sorry i can't relate.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)

(Grandfather was also skinnier than you, and had thicker hair.)

nabisco, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, you are the hyperhealthy friend that everyone simultaneously admires and thinks is a total dick for being so healthy.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

I seriously doubt that last bit nabisco

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

it does kind of take a degree of dick-style narcissism to put such a strong emphasis on your own physical well-being

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

it balances out because cutty will be lonely when all his friends die 15 years before him

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

Given all the hatred and negative pressures on fat/obese people, some of whom could probably do something about their size but many of whom would -- LET'S FACE IT -- simply have to work a lot harder than the rest of us and still only achieve some percentage of "normal" weight loss for their efforts, I think it's more than fair to promote ACCEPTANCE OF WHERE THEY ARE NOW so someone gives people fucking permission to NOT HATE THEMSELVES. Improvement in fitness & healthy & body chemistry is prob the most desirable outcome but we're talking about a lifetime of struggle.

The resident scrawny computer geek population of ILX does not have this problem by and large, you can talk about fried chixen and cheeseburgers with glee but there are people, some of whom have commented in this thread, who cannot achieve even an average metabolism/weight/size/whatever by anything except drastic means, and they need hope and to be valued and all that softie earnest crap that ILX hates or else where is the motivation to even try?

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

dan OTM :(

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

Ha, Tom, I can't tell if you're trying to compete with Ethiopian mountain farmers on the "slender" scale, or if that's a bald joke.

nabisco, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

So I back "fat appreciation" or whatever -- you gotta love yourself regardless. And also go to yoga & have some kale.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

but you have to understand for the years 2005-2006 i was a drug addict alcoholic.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)

whoever said hating fat people for being lazy is like hating poor people for being lazy was totally OTM

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)

I've just always been one of those people who basically doesn't have the patience for more than 30 minutes of exercise every couple of days or so because I'll just start thinking "what the fuck is the point of this? I could still get mugged or hit by a truck or wind up with a total asshole for a boss"

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

yeah my grandfather never lost his hair at all, and he, like, worked on that manhattan project! wtf.

Jordan, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:31 (eighteen years ago)

Tom: you are skinny minnie, though. Blah blah that has its own pros and cons I know I know...but your life as a tall and skinny person is very different from life as a fatty.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:32 (eighteen years ago)

I was still speaking to the cutty regimen and my strong philosophical differences with it. I believe in taking care of yr bod and all but there are all sorts of ways to betray yourself

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:36 (eighteen years ago)

you guys might be sick of me going on and on about ver frenchies but here is a typical day's food for somebody in the southwest of france:

breakfast:

- o.j.
- coffee (or not)
- yogurt with jam
- fruit
- croissant

lunch:

- shrimp
- pork loin with potatoes, piece of bread
- endive salad with dressing
- cheese and more bread
- 1 glass red wine
- optional dessert (a piece of chocolate maybe)
- optional coffee

dinner:

- nuts
- some kind of liqueur

- soup
- tuna casserole
- two glasses of red wine
- salad
- cheese and bread
- optional dessert (like a pear tart)
- optional coffee
- optional cognac

snacks are pretty non-existent. i have one friend there who is trying to lose weight so she runs and i think eats a little less than what i outlined above but the basic schematic holds for just about everybody. and they are not "magic" people, they just walk and bike pretty much everywhere.. i dunno.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:37 (eighteen years ago)

oh, you dunno, huh?
sounds like MAGIC PEOPLE to me then

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:37 (eighteen years ago)

VOODOO PEOPLE even

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:38 (eighteen years ago)

its spelled VOUDOU in the south of france

max, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

different strokes for different folks. i'm not preaching here or telling anyone how to live their lives. my regimen works for me and i'm the happiest i've ever been. neurosis doesn't enter into it. i don't dread getting out of bed at 5:30 and getting on the bike. i look forward to it.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

"so someone gives people fucking permission to NOT HATE THEMSELVES."

it's good they don't hate themselves. it's not so good for them to die of a heart attack/diabetes.

pc user, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

also i guess when i say things like "cheese" and "bread" i mean actual cheese and actual bread, without hydrogenated invaginators and added glyco-syrupanes

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

oh dude there's this thing they do and for some reason i love it. when you're done with whatever meaty thing you've been eating and there's still some meaty juice or soup down in the bottom of the plate, instead of soaking the rest of it up with your bread you pour a little bit of red wine in your plate, pick up your plate with your hands and slurp it up - it's called the "chabrot". maybe that's the secret.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

Lots of people who aren't obsese die of those things, too, Mr pc user, and they don't even start out with the evolutional handicap of having very protective body chemistry that stores food extremely efficiently against the threat of starvation.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

it's good they don't hate themselves. it's not so good for them to die of a heart attack/diabetes.

Can't you see how these things might be related, though? Many of these women hate themselves so much that they can't leave the house (and thus live active lifestyles, etc.). And the media is really not helping at all with that perception. I know that when I walk around I don't want people to look at me and think of how I am emblematic of The Problem With America.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)

melissa, do you want to be accepted the way you, which in turn will make you feel good about yourself, or do you want to to change what you are and feel good that way?

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)

"the way you are"

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)

i'm guessin a little of both, cutty

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

they don't even start out with the evolutional handicap of having very protective body chemistry that stores food extremely efficiently against the threat of starvation.

haha yeah as if in a massive drought/food shortage all teh fatteys are gonna be sitting around living off their stores of fat instead of quickly dying of heart attacks and dehydration

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)

I want to be accepted the way I am, absolutely. It would help immensely if I wasn't saddled with all this guilt and self-hatred and feeling like I am an unforgivable monster on top of everything else. Because, you know, I've been trying and failing for years and my whole sense of self-worth is tied up in how I look and every time I fail I sink a little further down. If I could try to lose weight separately from all that psychological bullshit maybe I could actually accomplish something.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)

Lots of people who aren't obsese die of those things, too, Mr pc user, and they don't even start out with the evolutional handicap of having very protective body chemistry that stores food extremely efficiently against the threat of starvation.

-- Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:43

ok, ok... there are people with slower metabolisms BUT this does not account for the rises in average weight in western countries over the last 50 years or so. have people's metabolisms magically slowed down on average? of course not, it's a lifestyle thing. it would be more productive if these women said "i want to lose weight for my health" rather than "i'm not going to lose weight because i'm not some sucker for diets/fashion" it should be two different issues.

there are people who naturally bigger, but nobody is naturally morbidly obese, that is a lifestyle problem.

pc user, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)

^^^ Yes. and this has been pointed out several times so far on this thread

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:55 (eighteen years ago)

ok, fair enough. since i started it, i felt compelled to contribute just to show i wasn't some troll mocking the overweight.

pc user, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:56 (eighteen years ago)

removing the social stigma of being fat you feel from others is still not going to change how you feel about yourself, though

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

The social stigma plays a huge part in how I feel about myself.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

aw Mel Caramel!! I made a couple of cruel jokes up top that I'm sure you didn't like. But I make cruel jokes at my own expense all the time, too. I think you have to let people see your vulnerability, I think that's very important on the battling the psychological bullshit front. Making jokes at your own expense does that. (Of course some people go WAY overboard with this but that's a separate issue I think, and probably still pretty healthy all things considered)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

without the social stigma, what motivation do you have to lose weight?

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)

pack of wild dogs chasing you?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)

What has also been pointed out several times is that "morbidly obese" is the far end of the spectrum of this problem, the bulk of people in that video and the fatties we are mostly referring to are just FAT. For god's sake. There is a woman in the broadcast who is fat by "normal" standards but states that her cholesterol, blood pressure, and other applicable measurements are PERFECTLY HEALTHY and yet she can't get health insurance. Obviously she also cannot get any appreciable level of public acceptance, since all y'all already wrote her off by proxy.

You have no idea what size a "fat" person that you see in public or on television would be if he or she WEREN'T dieting and working out, and people aren't all going to get the same results from the same lifetyle changes. We need to accept and stop hating because there are people eating steamed whitefish and greens and tofu who are never going to get back into a size 12 or whatever, while I can have cheeseburgers if I want them and the most I do is complain about my thighs sometimes.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)

Cutty, for shame. Without the social incentive of public awards & approval, what incentive do you have to perform at such a high level?

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)

You think it's a motivating factor? It's not. At all. It's the factor that leaves me with a crippling social phobia that has contributed significantly to weight gain (weight gain, I might add, that originally had nothing to do with unhealthy eating; that has come more recently as I've just plain given up). I'd like to lose weight to feel better physically and have more energy.

xposts

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:06 (eighteen years ago)

granted I only watched the first 10 seconds or so of the clip that started this thread (no sound at work, what's the point) but I think there's DEFINITELY some morbid obesity goin on there, sorry. If someone's boobs and/or forearms are bigger than my head...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:07 (eighteen years ago)

Oh right, god forbid we offend the sensibilities of someone tall and naturally skinny.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:08 (eighteen years ago)

sounds like you are in an endless catch-22. the social stigma isn't going anywhere.

cutty, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)

fwiw I'm not "offended" wtf

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:10 (eighteen years ago)

I really feel like there is this assumption for some people on ILX that fatties are the "other" and that there aren't any fatties on ILX. Pssst...Fatties hide on the internet.

I'd like to come out as fat. I'm fucking huge, thats why I don't post photos of myself anymore. That's why I only ever post photos that I've taken of other people.

Now don't get me wrong, I don't agree with this whole fat acceptance thing, but I can't seem to lose weight and I certainly am not one of those people who eats a chocolate bar for breakfast, I just seem to lack any self-control with any kind of food (Be it a carrot or a plate of hot chips) and I hate every day of my life because of it.

Kate, non masonic, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:10 (eighteen years ago)

Shakey Mo, how about if you send the circumference of your head measurement to my secret lab and I'll get right on developing a SMCI for measuring obesity by your standards.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha its a deal!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

boobs bigger than my head are pretty kewl

chaki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:15 (eighteen years ago)

"You have exceeded the 55 Shakey Mo Head limit, off to fat camp with you!"

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:15 (eighteen years ago)

No I thought we agreed that fat people are needed in New Orleans to fortify the levees. Weakling toothpicks like myself can be the shims, to create a seal.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

sounds like you are in an endless catch-22. the social stigma isn't going anywhere.

But it would be nice and helpful if it did. Seriously, I don't even know what kind of point you are trying to make here.

All I'm saying is that it's a huge struggle with no easy solution. There's so much more to it than "lol lazy fatties", and that includes how the social stigma contributes to cycles of overeating and inactivity fueled by self-hatred, in addition to very real physical inequalities that make it much more of a struggle for certain people.

I mean, seriously, it's not rocket science that I would feel better physically and mentally if I lost weight, and being condescended to as if I haven't figured that out yet is completely maddening and insulting, especially considering that I have been trying for years and years.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

when i was in san francisco for four days i ate the following:

- cheese omelette
- 5 coffees w/ milk
- shared fish and chips with friend
- cup of clam chowder with lots of oyster crackers and shared calamari with friend
- shared bread pudding w/ friend
- ramen w/ spicy tofu
- bagel
- approximately half bottle of fernet branca
- 4 whiskey & cokes
- a few crackers at japanese tea garden
- 3 coca cola classics

and i walked i'd guess 6 hours every day, uphill, upstairs. WHEN I GOT HOME I HAD GAINED 10 POUNDS.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:30 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, i'm assuming that you don't go out so much anymore to keep up your schedule? i wouldn't know, though, because i don't go out anymore (and go to the gym more often).

lauren, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:32 (eighteen years ago)

my point is i guess is that there is such thing as being genetically doomed to be somewhat of a fatty because the friend i traveled with ate significantly more than me (there were several meals that she ate alone while I sat there) and she LOST weight from all the walking.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:32 (eighteen years ago)

you said you were drunk most of the time in the other thread! LIAR

chaki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:33 (eighteen years ago)

hence half the bottle of fernet branca! okay it was more like a whole bottle.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:34 (eighteen years ago)

SEE

chaki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

this anecdotal case wherein you drank three cans of pop, a cheese omelette, fries and pudding proves that even healthy eating can't help a person lose weight

deej, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

you can't gain 10 lbs in 4 days. you're just retaining water.

moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

Would you guys agree that most people's weight loss efforts fail because they only try to tweak their status quo lifestyle, rather than pursuing something like a broad lifestyle reboot?

It seems to me like we hear a lot of "all you have to do is exercise and eat right" and when people try to attach "exercise and eat right" to their pre-existing lifestyle they fail, because there are so many other factors that influenced and generated the activity and diet patterns that got them overweight in the first place, and these factors are rarely ever addressed.

I think people want to believe that they can be who they've been, and live the lives they've led, and with some modest changes to their diet and a couple trips to the gym or the park their bodies will transform before them. The reality is if you want your body to change significantly, you've usually got to start living a substantially different kind of life that accounts for or modifies your interests, your hobbies, your habits - everything.

What's odd is that lots of people I talk to think that's impossible or would require some superhuman level of willpower, but I don't think it's much different from changing jobs. Who here couldn't start going to a different place of work with vastly different protocols for basically the same tasks, practically overnight? Nobody ever says "well, I'm so used to taking I-205 to exit 12, and filling out these forms this way, and sitting at a cubicle in this corner of the building, and walking this way to get to the watercooler... I don't think I can work anywhere else."

Am I even close to the money?

Kerm, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

you are otm.

i know that fat people lie about working out and eating habits because i do it myself.

chaki, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

Chaki, so do skinny people. I know countless of skinny people who say:"Man, I eat so much!" and then you add up the cals/food and they eat a lot less. Or they (unconsciously) move a lot more than your "average" person.

melissa, do you want to be accepted the way you

So if she dropped 40 kilos (for whatever reason), she's not Melissa anymore? I mean, shit, I know what you mean, but still...

I used to weigh about 125 pounds, something I doubt I will ever reach again, because, if I'm being honest to myself (and my body) isn't really "me." I'll forever try to gain that weight even though my mom's convinced that my diet was crazy. (This week she said, referring to that period:But you only ate like 50 procent of the normal amount!") That said, I'll forever feel a fattie, because deep down that's what I am/feel. And yes yes I know I am not obese but I can't escape that nagging feeling I am.

Let's all go back to Rubens time and gorge ourselves on cakes.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)

Kerm, that's entirely possible. What I'm saying is that no matter what changes they make, some people will have greater success with weight loss than others. And when you meet or see someone who you consider "fat" you have NO IDEA what they're already doing (or not doing) to be healthy or fit or happy.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

So very true.

stevienixed, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

I grew up in a household where snacking was rare and there was little pop in the house and for that I was very lucky. I think the best thing was that dinner and lunch (in the summer) was always prepared from scratch and that carried over to me. I almost always prepare my own dinner now from "scratch". A piece of protein and some sides. It was a habit I learned early and now I have a hobby- cooking. I drink way too much but a bottle of wine is the price I'll pay.

I fall off the wagon when I'm desperately hungover, then I crave pop and McDonalds (yesterday I ate a Double Quarter Pounder, large fries and a large frutose-ade, it wasn't good at all and I think I'm finally done with that).

The price of gas motivated me to move a transportation hub where I have to walk 15 minutes to get there and another 15 to get to work. I'm hardly burning calories but when I started I was tired just doing that now I'm not so it has done some good. At least I get some fresh air (ha cleveland air so, um).

Then I decided to start doing simple calisthenics. I could not do 10 push-ups or 25 sit-ups (I weigh 165 and am 6-1) and still can't. I stopped trying because it bored me to death. I could be cooking instead.

that's my story and I'm sticking to it etc

brownie, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

i learned this from interviewing a cross-country runner from colombia: "it's not just about a few good workouts" she said, "it's about consistency"

xpost or what Kerm said, writ small

xxpost brownie your story is touching!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:51 (eighteen years ago)

without the social stigma, what motivation do you have to lose weight?

-- cutty, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:01 PM (42 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

UH

kerm is right, i think. when i moved to montana, there were very drastic changes to my lifestyle, simply from the change of setting. i was doing schoolwork, which had a more flexible schedule, i wasn't surrounded by drinking buddies and casual midweek barhopping, exercise in a beautiful outdoor setting was readily available, etc. etc. i came back to visit chicago after about 2.5 months and i was getting comments on looking healthy and thin, and i LEFT as a relatively healthy and thin person.

i was lucky in that moving did the changing for me; i didn't show up thinking "better drop some weight and start training," i was just happy to be in the mountains, which are like a natural get up early and do shit motivators.

brownie also otm: i was only allowed apples and cheese as a kid, and i'm a little grossed out when my roommate decides to put down an entire bag of chips in a non-stoned, non-hungover context.

he is also the least healthy eater i know, i think, and is wasting away

MILLIONS OF XPOSTS

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

social stigmas are stupid and counterproductive, which i thought would have been made obvious by now.

however, cutty is right in that, for some, going all out and bonkers and getting up at 5.30am and training like mad WILL be necessary to undo the last XXX years of your life! i think a lot of people (MYSELF) trick themselves into thinking that running once a week for a few miles means that they've "been running lately."

far better to do 15 minutes of light exercise in the morning every fucking day then it is to save it all up for saturday, blow out early because you're not conditioned, but feel tired and satisfied anyway, and then feel like you've earned a chocolate shake. consistency is everything, full stop.

gbx, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

Because the truth is that for most of us, with modest changes to diet and beer consumption and a few workouts a week, we WOULD see some weight loss/fitness gain. I know I would, because I've done it! We'd all plateau eventually and have to make more extreme changes to continue the arc, but that's dependent on your final goal anyway.

And part of the point of fat acceptance is that it has to be okay to choose not to spend your life pursuing something that's unreachable by anything but, say, surgical means, or a lifetime of being married to your workout until your joints wear out from the stress; not everyone is mentally suited to be an extreme athlete (not extreme in risks taken, but extreme in making it their primary pursuit/time-constraint in life). Maybe people would like to concentrate on being better musicians, or better accountants, or having a wider variety of pursuits and hobbies and skills than just putting in a few hours of cardio every day. Those of us with physiques in the "normal" range can afford that and not suffer public derision -- people we think of as "fat" deserve the same consideration.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)

Oh fuck so many xposts.

Laurel, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)

I think that as with smokers, people almost feel as if they are performing some sort of moral or altruistic act by stigmatizing fat people ("saving them from themselves", etc.). Except the problem is that a smoker can put away their cigarettes for the moment. They can hide it around people they know are especially judgmental. I have to continue being fat all day. There's nothing I can change or do in that moment when I'm just walking around, *being myself*.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

to wit: "i don't really smoke" or "i'm quitting" = yeah well i still bum a smoke at the bar every now and then (guilty)

not smoking means not smoking. quitting drinking means not drinking ever. exercising regularly means that you're actually doing it every fucking day.

i loved my bike commute, and made a point of making it a rain or shine thing. if i hadn't done that, i would've driven a lot more frequently when the weather was bad, and that would have slackened my standards in general. i mean, this is why people get trainers (CUTTY), or opine about how much more fit they were when they played X sport. yes, you were younger, but mostly it's because you HAD to show up to practice, and someone was there to YELL AT YOU. as someone completely lacking in self-discipline, i find the only way i can make myself do stuff is if i like doing it anyway. hobbies are the answer.

xp "people we think of as "fat" deserve the same consideration." = OTM. but my point still stands, i think!

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

i'm bewildered by the fact that mandee thinks her SF eating log was healthy?

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)

i only have a trainer to tell me HOW to train, not to motivate me to train. i was riding everyday without him.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:05 (eighteen years ago)

Laurel you were right about not making assumptions about a person's health and habits by their appearance, but nobody requires several hours of cardio a day to avoid being way overweight.

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)

if you are not an endurance athlete, there is no benefit from more than 45 minutes of cardio a day

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

No but they might have to do drastic things in order to get down to a size 8-10 or whatever is considered acceptably "normal". Some of the women in that video were probably very healthy size 18s or so, and are you saying that we should be forcing them, through social pressure, to make exercise far more important in their lives than it is in most of ours, just so they can be the same size my friends are without working out at all?

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:09 (eighteen years ago)

Cutty and gbx excepted, apparently, because they are both already extremely athletic people, basically they are in the very top ranks of anyone I know.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:10 (eighteen years ago)

xp cutty i know he's not out there with you, just that some people don't even know how to make a plan for training, is all. if you're showing up w/o anything to work with, it's nice to have someone help and say "do this today."

They can hide it around people they know are especially judgmental. I have to continue being fat all day. There's nothing I can change or do in that moment when I'm just walking around, *being myself*.

precisely why destigmatizing is good. a person shouldn't feel bad for walking around being fat all day because other people are deriding them. nor should they for being short, tall, or whatever. being yourself is AOK because that's the only choice you have.

i think there's some talking at cross-purposes here, tho. for some reason, i guess some non-fat people seem to think that fat people are walking around chomping huge legs of lamb and demanding that obesity be seen as something we all should aspire to. when, obviously, that is not the case, and the truth is somewhere between that and skinny people demanding that the fattys stop being fat all over the place because it's ruining their view of the other skinny people.

i mean, if your obesity is a genuine health issue, work towards fixing it. if you're just bigger than most, but not unhealthy, fuck 'em. and if you ARE unhealthy and are OK with that, then, well, that's cool, too, just don't say you weren't warned.

xxp oh c;mon laurel that probably isn't true

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:11 (eighteen years ago)

i mean for me, maybe not for cutty, obv.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)

fat people are not carbon-neutral

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:13 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, i'm assuming that you don't go out so much anymore to keep up your schedule? i wouldn't know, though, because i don't go out anymore (and go to the gym more often).

-- lauren, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:32 PM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i hardly go out at all. since i gave up drinking, being social in a bar has no appeal to me. i'm happier this way, though.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)

Uh hi gbx, no one I know personally bike-commutes except you and ddb and my roommate and the bike girls. No one I know rock climbs, there's one marathon runner, everyone else is at a more or less "yeah fine I guess I'll go to the gym/yoga class" level of participation if any.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, I hang out with the noixe bored, c'mon.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

i had a point about the food diary
just not sure what it was now! oh i know it wasn't healthy just wouldnt have expected to get so fatty in such little time.

homosexual II, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

since i gave up drinking, being social in a bar has no appeal to me. i'm happier this way, though.

we lost a good soldier. never forget partying cutty.

chaki, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:18 (eighteen years ago)

i guess my point above laurel was that, for some people, getting down to HEALTHY size/fat levels/cholesterol/etc. may, in fact, require RIGOROUS training, in the same way that it would require a weekend warrior to become a competitive triathlete. not everyone is fucking jerod, you know. if you're 450 and even hoping to get down to a perfectly healthy 230, it is NOT GOING TO BE EASY. IT IS GOING TO BE VERY VERY HARD. YOU WILL HAVE TO TRAIN LIKE AN ANIMAL. no shortcuts, etc.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:18 (eighteen years ago)

I found a BIG factor for me was ALCOHOL. It is the worst empty calorie ever. I spent the last 6 months seriously depressed and pretty much not eating (I did eat healthy when I did, mind you) and I didnt lose all that much weight because I kept hammering the wine and cider, despite the fact I walk a lot and dont eat a lot. Booze is fattening as all shit and does something weird to yr metabolism and insulin in large doses.

Trayce, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

pourin a forty for cutty

http://www.trailjournals.com/images/gear/6039903.jpg

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

you have to imagine that tipped over and spilling some gatorade

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

when i went on an all whiskey diet for 8 days i lost a ton of weight!

chaki, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

gbx OTM all over with a sensitivity that i cannot muster.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

Okay fair enough, gbx. I guess everything everyone is saying can only possibly be applied to "some" people so it's all relative. But I think you're overstating the link between weight and health, which is something that is still up for research and in flux in the news...there are lots of reasonably healthy people who are still fat and that should be cool. Could they do MORE? Oh absolutely. So could we all. But the rest of us don't HAVE to do more in order to feel good about our public appearances, that's the burden I would like to see gone.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

basically, what gbx is saying, it is all or nothing. make the lifestyle change yourself and stop blaming the social stigma as a roadblock.

i hate to sounds like tony robbins here, but it's fucking true.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/healthy.bodies/interactive/timeline.fad.diets/14.1993.powter.jpg

chaki, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:31 (eighteen years ago)

But I think you're overstating the link between weight and health, which is something that is still up for research and in flux in the news...there are lots of reasonably healthy people who are still fat and that should be cool.

what i said applies to under-nourished skinny-ass dudes who are chronically tired, too, though laurel. if it's clear that your lifestyle is not doing you any favors, you might want to think about changing it. for some people who are already healthy, that means drinking a bit less at the weekends, cutting down on meat, running one or two more days a week. for other people, with more work to do, that means NOT drinking, NEVER going to fast food restaurants, NEVER allowing yourself a treat because you did exercise, becoming a recluse and putting your nose to the grindstone. for some people, this will be depressing and intolerable, and maybe not worth the time. for others, they'll realize that they're feeling better in general, and maybe it's worth digging deeper into it.

but your last sentence is OTM. then again, so is cutty's: the social stigma should neither be a roadblock nor a reason to feel bad about yourself. it's just what some other jerks think.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:33 (eighteen years ago)

it's just what some other jerks think.

-- gbx, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 7:33 PM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

^^^ pat and glib and at least 60% insensitive, but also true, in the end

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:35 (eighteen years ago)

i don't know about cutty, but i feel like i'm trying to be a cheerleader, and be helpful, but mostly i'm just coming across like a dick that doesn't worry about this shit much. so sorry about that.

nb i still haven't actually watched the youtube link!

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:36 (eighteen years ago)

Not to be stupid (but I am, I know) but if you are overweight (in a healthy way) is that still not bad for certain aspects of your body? Doesn't it for example put a lot of pressure on your bones?

stevienixed, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:38 (eighteen years ago)

in my case, i wasn't obese, i was an alcoholic with a drug problem. obv these aren't readily apparent physical issues that result in immediate social stigma, but i am became disgusted with myself. and i made the changes in my life that i needed to make.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:40 (eighteen years ago)

Laurel, I'm not sure if its what you were talking about upthread or not, but the number of calories required to maintain weight is largely unaffected by bodyfat. So if you add 30lbs of fat to a person's build, the calories required to keep that fat on them are very insignificant. If you added a lot of fat to your sedentary, "normal sized" friends and they made no changes to their lifestyle, they'd stay fat. If you take a large person who is maintaining their weight, and got them to lose a lot of bodyfat over a period of time and then go back to their old "fat" eating habits, it would take them a long time to gain it all back.

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

in my case, i wasn't obese, i was an alcoholic with a drug problem

aiming close to home, eek :-/

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:43 (eighteen years ago)

make the lifestyle change yourself and stop blaming the social stigma as a roadblock.

cutty, have you ever been fat? fat enough to be made fun of? fat enough to feel totally emotionally and socially crippled? i know that you've got good intentions here but you're coming off like an asshole. "social stigma" might just be "what jerks think" but it leads to very real, very damaging anxieties which are not altogether unlike the kind of addictions that keep people drinking or smoking. not all of us have the kind of brain chemistry or psychological makeup that allows us to turn around one day and start running, especially not if you're starting several pounds in the hole already and are desperately afraid of being guffawed at while they run.

i was pretty fat for four or five yeas in middle school and high school. ive since lost a fair amount of that weight (not all of it) but its left me with a whole set of problems and anxieties that im still working out. i can only imagine what its like for the truly obese, who've had to deal with this their entire lives.

p.s. evan i appreciate your sensitivity a lot and for what its worth i think youre pretty much on point. this is a psychological thing and as such is all about framing. being a cheerleader is way better than looking down from your high horse (or high bike), which just makes people feel worse and makes the task seem impossible.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:45 (eighteen years ago)

i have good intentions, i ask important questions, leave the sugar coating to evan

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:47 (eighteen years ago)

this thread made me go to the gym even though i'm still getting over being sick and save my chocolate croissant for breakfast. you fuckers.

Jordan, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

this thread made me sit late at work instead of finishing my work

deej, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

YOU HAVE TO WAKE UP ONE DAY AND WANT TO CHANGE YOUR LIFE. ALL OF IT. WHETHER IT'S DRUG ADDICTION OR OBESITY.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

(as opposed to the 1000 other ilx threads that have tempted me to go eat ribs, pizza, sandwiches, burgers, nuevo cuisine, etc.)

xpost

Jordan, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)

i hardly go out at all. since i gave up drinking, being social in a bar has no appeal to me. i'm happier this way, though.

ha. i think i resemble that remark. if you feel like going to the movies or to the greenmarket, you know who to call.

lauren, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)

see! people like me in real life.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)

let's collaborate ASAP

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)

done. i will always be, uh... "voluptuous," though.

lauren, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:51 (eighteen years ago)

i haven't read whole thread but am gonna agree with gbx abt a lot of things! and laurel abt some things! and other people prob. wld not do whiskey diet b/c wld obv die. but anyway, even though i'm well within 'normal' weight zone i totally judge myself way more than any of those people in that video - i'm like, hey, as long as you're actually happy, and everybody's happiness zone is different.

re: kinds of exercise that is enjoyable vs that that is harder to be motivated to do: i've been doing this 40-min each way bike commute for a few weeks every day and damn i LOVE IT SO MUCH (i get to ride some of it through a park and some along the canal!) and also damn if i can't eat anything i want and drink beer and still lose weight! (the way home is mostly uphill, which at first was slow and slightly painful but is now quick and only slightly lung-busting but that is my own fault - the city built an awesome wide bike path!) but anyway, v v soon it is going to be too miserably cold for this long commute and the bike paths will be closed and the streets trecherous :( :(

but yeah so i still have my ymca membership but have realized that i actually hate working out with other people in a gym! i used to like it but i realized i only liked going at times when there were only abt 5 other people there. impossibly now with work schedule :/ now i just want a little exercise bike for my bedroom or something b/c riding a bike and listening to music is something i like even if it's in my house.

real point is: food is good and beer is good and i am slightly vain and manageably competitive and like having visible thigh muscles and being able to pass people on hills on my bike. if people have a right to be fat then we also have a right to be ripped.

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:53 (eighteen years ago)

and by "gave up drinking," i mean "sometimes get drunk in my house," but hey! basically the same thing.

xpost to cutty

lauren, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:53 (eighteen years ago)

total xposts
shld say something abt stigma, need to think
xpost

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)

Social stigma can be very real and very irrelevant at the same time.

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)

voluptuous is a good thing, tho, see. xposts

rrrobyn on point, kerm otm again. you cannot discount social stigma, and the psychological problems that stem from of it. you can, and must, however, decide that for as long as they persist, it's your responsibility to say fuck you and make the change.

...he says, cracking third beer.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:56 (eighteen years ago)

maybe we just have a right to be happy

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)

i just want to make i clear: i dont disagree with the fact that all of us need to stop at some point and change our lifestyles if we want to get healthy. im just saying that you can either be a total condescending or obtuse prick about how difficult that is, or you can be sympathetic to it.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)

or 'content' or whatever it is i don't know i don't want to be a buddhist monk or anything i just want to be mostly okay with certain things that i can control and chill abt the things i can't and change the things i can possibly rage against them
xpost to self

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)

i know cutty is being abrasive (assuming you are singling him out), but it sounds like he is at the very least passingly familiar with how difficult that can be, if not more so.

highfives for rrrobyn forever

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)

max, yes
stigma is some brutalizing heavy shit that a lot of people are just not equipped to battle w/o some help
stigmas re: fatness and mental health are unfortunately two of the most socially acceptable stigmas around ugh

xpost back atcha

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:05 (eighteen years ago)

xp: no i think he cleary knows how difficult it is to turn your life around! i just think he could be a little bit more sympathetic to the differences between getting healthy from a position of being fat and getting healthy from a position of being an addict. im not claiming that one is harder than other, just that they require different kinds of encouragement and levels of realization.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:06 (eighteen years ago)

whatever tho--im not really mad it can just be aggravating to see a dude whos clearly in better shape than anyone on the board going on about "fatteys" and how "social stigma" shouldnt be an excuse or anything.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)

There was a point in my life where I was drinking milkshakes after every dinner because I was trying out for sport teams and I weighed 130lbs and I was over 6 feet. I was told time and again that I was too skinny to do the things I loved (football, basketball and baseball) and was singled out in gym class as being an "ectomorph" by the jerk gym teacher. Eventually I said fuck it I'm joing the golf team- I was again lucky that the public school even had one. The overweight kids had it worse of course. Every Middle and High School gym teacher I ever had was a fucking asshole.

I don't know what it's like today but gym class made me hate exercise. And gym teachers.

xpost to the world!

brownie, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)

well yeah.

c.f. shut up and paint, man! the song is in your heart, if you just listen to it! skydiving is just stepping out of a plane.

xp to max

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)

altho secretly all of those things are true. i mean, it really is just stepping out of a plane, right?

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:10 (eighteen years ago)

"fatteys" is a meme from classic noise board

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:11 (eighteen years ago)

the golden age

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:12 (eighteen years ago)

DAEREST FATTEY,

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:13 (eighteen years ago)

so i made a joke from this boards past--don't fucking call me out for using it again. it has nothing to do with how fit i am in my life. it's still funny.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:14 (eighteen years ago)

people pay good money for this kind of browbeating, people.

da croupier, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:14 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, while I understand your main point and the hard-won personal experience that you are drawing upon and while what you say has a measure of validity, I think you are being much too dogmatic and intolerant by insisting that the path you took would amount to the same thing for others as it was for you.

Lives are complicated things and perfectly valid choices that one makes in one segment of life will inevitably narrow all one's choices. You know what others should do, because you did it and it worked out for the best. But they are not you.

This problem is cognate to what I call the mechanic's fallacy. Every specialist, such as a mechanic, or dental hygienist, or child psychologist, can tell you that there is a particularly good way to approach car maintainance, or flossing, or child rearing, and they will advise you to spend whatever time and effort it takes to change your oil every 3000 miles, brush so many minutes after each meal, or talk about your child's fears of monsters.

The difficulty comes when you try to take every "correct" piece of advice and make every "correct" choice. You discover you can't, without becoming crazy and running as fast as you can from chore to chore. Plus, you must get at least 7.5 hours of sleep every night, eat only organic foods, inform yourself thoroughly on all local political issues and chew each bite a dozen times. And so on.

Your advice may be good, but not everyone is going to take it, and they may well have very good reasons not to - like doing everything else in their lives.

Aimless, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)

shit was before my time

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:17 (eighteen years ago)

I HAVED NO IDEA WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW!
-- underwater ghost ship picture (skowly), Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:50 PM (9 months ago) Bookmark Link

same as it ever was

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:17 (eighteen years ago)

I think you are being much too dogmatic and intolerant by insisting that the path you took would amount to the same thing for others as it was for you.

cutty did not do this

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:18 (eighteen years ago)

everybody otm

brownie, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:19 (eighteen years ago)

YOU HAVE TO WAKE UP ONE DAY AND WANT TO CHANGE YOUR LIFE. ALL OF IT. WHETHER IT'S DRUG ADDICTION OR OBESITY.

You simply have to!

Aimless, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)

Sometimes people give you shit about something because you need to do something about it. That's how stigma works. That doesn't mean they're right, OR WRONG. People being jerks is a lame excuse for you to blow it.

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:21 (eighteen years ago)

it's funny because i was going to cut and paste that as an example of him NOT saying that everyone has to take the same path. realizing that changes need to be made /= making the same changes as other people.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)

xp to aimless.

and yes, aimless, you actuall DO HAVE TO DO THAT. are you taking offense at the "ALL OF IT" part, or the changing part? i don't really see your point.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:23 (eighteen years ago)

actually you just have to take an interest in yourself, instead of worrying about other people taking an interest in you

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)

the rest is butter

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)

"I'm gonna keep letting my self down because people aren't encouraging me right" is bullshit.

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)

maybe everyone should take a moment and re-read my posts. i'm not as bad as you think i am. this seems to be a reoccurring theme lately.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:25 (eighteen years ago)

if you are a drug addict or an alcoholic or can't control eating habits or sleep around when you shouldn't, the simplest solution to the problem is to STOP DOING THAT THING. and if that habit has permeated your life so much as to make itself a chronic, ever present problem, then yes, the only thing you can do is to decide that you need to change. and possibly change like a lot.

also, tombot OTM.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

you don't have to want to change your whole life, though, just the parts you would rather do without. like a big ass, or a cocaine habit, or binge drinking, or staying up too late, or cutting your arms up. I'm on a "go me" kick right now but hell if that means I'm going to spend my weekend out being in the sunshine when I have perfectly good videogames at home. I got simple goals, for me.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

cutty:

http://www.finishing-school.net/images/menu.jpgp

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:28 (eighteen years ago)

The sticking point is "wanting", not "all of it". A lack of desire is not always the obstacle. The implication is that, if they really wanted it enough it would happen. This is a false conclusion.

Aimless, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:28 (eighteen years ago)

Who's stopping them?

Kerm, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)

you have to want it for the right reason cf. my post above.
if other people are the reason why then other people will very shortly become the reason why not.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)

no, actually it isn't. it's the necessary conclusion. unless you see the hand of god pushing morbidly obese people into shape, what else makes it "happen"

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)

xpost to aimless

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)

cutty YOU HAVE A BIG EGO.
these other people DO NOT.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)

The sticking point is "wanting", not "all of it". A lack of desire is not always the obstacle. The implication is that, if they really wanted it enough it would happen. This is a false conclusion.

-- Aimless, Tuesday, October 30, 2007 8:28 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

you're right, but probably not for the reasons you think you are.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)

so do you!

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:31 (eighteen years ago)

I know, takes one to know one! I didn't for a really long time though.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:31 (eighteen years ago)

i'd venture to say your ego is bigger than mine actually, but i like you and i value your posts

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)

HUGGLEZ

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:33 (eighteen years ago)

how long till aimless' three paragraph rebuttal

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:33 (eighteen years ago)

I'm just saying the transition from self-disgust to self-interest is really the key and it's hardly straightforward. It's easy to gloss over though because the english language seems kind of lacking in words to describe it

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)

and it's especially tough if you were raised to think of all self-interest as selfish and bad

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)

as an ex-obesey and current pudgy (went from ~260 to about 185 presently at 5'11"), it does take something to get out of an emotional rut to actually start the process of getting healthier. I lost the bulk of my weight 5 or 6 years ago and prior to that had this rly shitty cycle of being sad about being fat and then getting fatter cos i was sad about it. i became vegetarian for ethical reasons then, but it sure as fuck helped that i wasn't eating hot pockets anymore. exercised pretty frequently, like 5 or 6 times a week for about 45 minutes each of incline walking. pretty sedentary now, unfortunately and i think i was up to 195 at one point a month or so and i got all oh hellll no not gonna be 200 lbs again but i am back at my equilibrium weight again, roughly.

m bison, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)

awesome! good work, keep it up!

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:42 (eighteen years ago)

OH HELLLL NO

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:42 (eighteen years ago)

there's also a thing with any kind of stigma where there's a natural and not entirely wrong-per-se impulse to be like "fuck these cockfarmers and their judgments, i am going to do whatever the fuck i want" -- which in the end, of course, gives just as much -- if not more -- control to the judgmental cockfarmers in question

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:46 (eighteen years ago)

aaaaand Tomboto has said that already in a difft way.. i am going to bed!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:47 (eighteen years ago)

thinking back to when i first started exercising regularly (3 or 4 years ago?) it would have discouraged me to focus on losing weight, i don't think i even weighed myself for 6 months at least. i remember saying in my head a lot that it was about making a lifestyle change, not getting ripped/skinny/etc. in a couple of months.

(of course another factor was that my relationship was dissolving, so that kind of freed me to focus on selfish stuff more, which i think was actually healthy)

Jordan, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:47 (eighteen years ago)

word to that

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:10 (eighteen years ago)

I wish the extra-cultural thing tracer brought up had caught on. It's mind-boggling to watch America's struggles with weight from inside of another culture (I'm American but I live in Japan). I teach at elementary schools here, and after doing it about seven months i saw a program on TV about American schools. The size of the Americans, after getting used to my kids, blew my mind. I agree with Laurel et al. that the social stigma is unfair and counterproductive, but is it not OK to try and change our society's values so that all of our kids don't look like little elephant men?

adamj, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:13 (eighteen years ago)

in other words, WILL SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?

adamj, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)

you have some good advice, cutty. i need to start going to the gym, i think i'd feel a lot better - i'm low energy a lot of the time. and then wouldn't worry so much about what i eat so i don't gain weight.

daria-g, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:21 (eighteen years ago)

re: other countries, hell, here in the US it's weird enough going from a big city to hometown back in a rural county, i'm like omg, everyone is very big here. where was that study that showed the most likely influence on someone gaining weight was their friends' weight?

daria-g, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)

I thought about going to the gym because of this thread but I had dinner plans.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:32 (eighteen years ago)

(I'm American but I live in Japan). I teach at elementary schools here, and after doing it about seven months i saw a program on TV about American schools. The size of the Americans, after getting used to my kids, blew my mind.

Maybe I have a very skewed view but, whenever I'm in the US, it strikes me that most teenagers seem reasonably okay. It's when they graduated from college, get married, have a job, the trouble starts.

That said, in Japan they are just so extremely skinny. Young'n'old.

stevienixed, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)

xpost - i don't really know what to do at the gym, i hate all those machines, but can't go running when it gets cold (eyes start watering + i get these awful stabbing pains in my ears even if i have them covered, it sucks)

i was on campus @ my undergrad recently and it struck me that the students all seemed.. bigger than they did when i went there. used to be everyone stayed on/near campus and was outside all the time. when i dropped by it was a beautiful fall afternoon and almost no one was to be seen, now most everyone drives home for the weekend

daria-g, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

i am still in awe of processed food industry and the general blind eye to its connection to health issues on all fronts incl obesity. b/c on one hand it appears that 'going organic' and eating fresh foods is gaining prominence in the certain media spheres, the reality is that corn syrupolase and palmaticsoy oil are in freakin everything that has a primetime tv advertising budget

while exercise is one thing, and i think we are meant to move as much as possible, the rapid switch in the last 50+ yrs (time enough for a few generations to learn how to not eat well) to food that more about being sold (economy) than about being eaten (community) plays a huge role in why people are fat. on one hand, yes, the individual does have to wrest control but obv not everyone is doing that or able to do that or 'wants' to do that. if you are convinced that eating chips and hot dogs and sugar-coated cereal and things is the way it has been and always will be even if at the same time someone's saying that it's 'bad' for you, it's hard to break that so-called habit. it's become a part of one's identity - and food is so huge in identity formation, esp b/c y'know we eat from day one. mostly to say that food is obv as cultural/social an issue as it is an individual one, tied up in multileveled issues of power and control - oppression/repression work in tandem but bucking up won't nec get you where you want to be in all cases.

(still haven't headed over to that feminism thread or anything to drop some foucault crit etc but wld be similar reasoning)

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:46 (eighteen years ago)

also re: japan - guy, they lost the war

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:47 (eighteen years ago)

guyS i mean and also what i mean is years of poor nutrition for over a generation will f up a lot of things healthwise

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:48 (eighteen years ago)

the article linked to in this thread: NUTRITION cover story in Times Magazine (Jan. 24, 07) covers a lot of what we're saying. and is smart and on point.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:53 (eighteen years ago)

that said, it's funny/gross how wealth since wwII has generally translated into MORE rather than better
xpost
i will read that and not just b/c that is my birthday

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:56 (eighteen years ago)

oh yes i have read that i think posted in that thread

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 02:57 (eighteen years ago)

So spot on, rrrobyn. Also if you were a pudgy kid and you were made conscious of it all the time, your relationship with even HEALTHY foods is fucked up. You've got to get past that if you're going to see any long-term changes, that's a big part of the seismic shift that gbx and others are referring to even if they don't know it. Easy to say when your rel'ship with food is NOM NOM MAKES BODY WORK HARD BOOYAH, though.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)

Like, it's really good to substitute carrots for cookies, but it's even BETTER to grow (with therapy or personal realization or whatever) to a place where you can say "I don't need that carrot right now just because it's there." That can mean undoing decades of self-loathing and harmful attitudes/punishments/criticisms, though.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:04 (eighteen years ago)

Hahaha which is maybe closer to the drug addiction analogy than anything else on this thread.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:05 (eighteen years ago)

yeah being a fat kid fucks you up bad.

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)

The problem with drug addiction analogies is that you can never go cold turkey with food.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:06 (eighteen years ago)

key word i think: relationships
this is where the 'science of food' gets to me - you can count all the calories and portion sizes and vitamin content of foods you want but that only changes the language you use - the relationship at core remains the same - it's the difference btwn discussion and discourse, where discourse takes into account the context and reasoning behind the language

xpossts

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

No, absolutely Melissa.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)

i wish i could give an actual 'solution' though - i guess the solution is all highly individual? therapy? sports? quiting yr job? finding god? actually loving yrself instead or who you think you should be? etc?

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:12 (eighteen years ago)

Dean was ahead of his time. RIP HOMIE

jeff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 03:15 (eighteen years ago)

robyn, i think the japanese were thin before the war, too. pretty sure <i>everyone</i> was.

the reason i brought up japan was because it is like america, where corporations run the country and as with everything else have commercialized the idea of eating. but the crap doesn't sell as much here, for instance the Coca Cola corporation sells way more bottles of cold, unsweetened tea than cans of soda. cultural ideas about nutrition are still very important. my problem with the 'it's ok to be fat' mantra is that children are learning that, too, thus perpetuating the culture that says it's OK to eat the garbage the American food industry feeds us (well, you. I got the fuck out).

adamj, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:13 (eighteen years ago)

According to my mum the Japanese (or Budhists?) think that you should eat 80 procent. I guess in the US it's more 120 procent. :-)

stevienixed, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:15 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i was being a bit facetious and generalizing there

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

here's some advice to you kids in yer 20s, early 30s. if you are skinny/thin/fit, keep it up because you're gonna hit your mid-30s and your metabolism is gonna slooooooow down, and at that point job & family responsibilities are gonna probably be such that getting in exercise routines is gonna be tougher. i gained 20-25 pounds over a 5 year period in my late 30s, but i had such a "margin for error" that it only bumped me up into "normal" range. at that point, i realized i had to change some things and did because the 5 pounds a year track does lead to fatteyland eventually. now i'm fine at 175 and 6'1" but trying to lose large amounts of weight past 40 is hard, so leave youself a resonable "cushion" (ha) and you'll be well positioned when U R OLD.

gershy, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

xpost
i think in the US it's mostly carbs when it comes down to percentages!

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

wait i need to wear my glasses if i'm going to have the screen this far from my eyes - i thought that said 80 percent protein adn i was confused. i am still confused. i am tired. i am not hungry tho.

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

what is procent??

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:23 (eighteen years ago)

%

electricsound, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:24 (eighteen years ago)

haha yeah i figured but of what? what is this mythical 100% perfect place?

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 04:25 (eighteen years ago)

as if all the rest weren't enough:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7069914.stm

There is no new research involved in this document: the panel examined 7,000 existing studies over five years.

The result, they say, is the most comprehensive investigation ever into the risks of certain lifestyle choices.

They see body fat as a key factor in the development of cancer, estimating its significance to be much higher than previously thought.

"But if people are interested in reducing their cancer risk, then following the recommendations is the way to do it," said Professor Martin Wiseman.

"Cancer is not a fate, it is a matter of risk, and you can adjust those risks by how you behave. It is very important that people feel that they are in control of what they do."

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

Holy fuck, that article is over the edge. Completely bonkers. And it ends with "cancer specialist Professor Karol Sikora said: "There's absolutely nothing magic about 10 bullet points to prevent cancer. The main message I would have is not to worry about it, to enjoy life..."

Hahahahahahhahaa. Right.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

that article is so hacky. bacon causes cancer? pseudo-scientific journalism, pls to fuck off.

bell_labs, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

oh FCOL
cancer in who
kludging 7,000 separate studies together like that seems like a recipe for a big load of horseshit - different controls, different sample sizes, different populations, possibly different ANIMALS involved, etc.

kludging 7,000 studies together in order to pick a TOP TEN list of "recommendations" sounds like one of the most flawed methodologies I can think of, but then again, I don't know the real guts of how they did it.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

Linds, preserved meats do contain sodium nitrate & nitrite, and a lot of people suspect it's a carcinogen of some kind...studies on animals in the '70s suggested that it was.

The FDA's current position is that sod nitrite is safe, but then there's this: "National Academy of Sciences...1981 report stated that nitrate does not cause cancer, although some population studies have found an association between high exposure to nitrate levels and certain cancers." So uhhh it doesn't cause it but there's some correlation between cancer and nitrite levels, thanks a lot guys.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

I started out feeling self-righteous reading this thread, because I've lost a good amount of weight by denying myself foods I used to eat regularly and running 3-4 times a week.

At the same time I have a lot of socio-economic, cultural and circumstantial advantages that make this possible. I don't really see a simple "it's the fatty's fault" vs. "it's society's fault" answer.

I have the money to buy whatever food I think will be healthy and tasty, within reason, but at the same time I see people with less money loading their carts with sodas and chips and cookies that are not even that cheap. If a person can afford a McDonald's value meal for lunch, they can also afford a turkey sandwich with some veggies on whole grain bread and just skip the damned fries and soda.

Our advertising promotes the idea that healthy eating is not manly, or that it's not giving you that "break" that you "deserve." (as though the indegestion and sluggishness following fast food consumption is stress-relieving). It also generally discourages self-denial, for obvious reasons.

But yeah, a lot of fat people are still partly to blame for being fat - even with so many cultural factors working against them, there are also plenty of opportunities for change. And taking a line of "it's not their fault," just further encourages the slide into gluttony.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

My mom didn't let us have hot dogs or ham or stuff, and bacon rarely, like for holiday brek only.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

just further encourages the slide into gluttony.

You clearly weren't feeling any less self-righteous by the end of the thread, either.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah I'm not happy with the "no bacon" part of their recommendations.

Our advertising promotes the idea that healthy eating is not manly, or that it's not giving you that "break" that you "deserve."

I think this is as close to a smoking gun as we will ever have in the "why are so many Americans teh fatteys" question that gets posed again and again in every second-section newspaper lifestyle supplement ever.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

True or False: some fat people "love" to eat.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

http://m.assetbar.com/uuabwrsWJ.gif

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)

Speaking of lifestyle supplement features, one reason the "Mediterranean diet" works is because the food actually fucking tastes good, unlike some unconscionable concoction by a *nutritionist* (who is basically just the other side of the same cultural coin)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

what are the responsibilities that come with the right of being fat?

ken c, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

If a person can afford a McDonald's value meal for lunch, they can also afford a turkey sandwich with some veggies on whole grain bread and just skip the damned fries and soda.

it always surprises me how not-so-cheap mcdonald's is, at least in nyc. dollar menu aside, a quarter pounder value meal costs more than a freshly-made deli sandwich from most of the places around my office.

lauren, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

keeping to the right of the aisle on your 'jazzy' to facilitate traffic flow in the grocery/ wal-mart

x-post

will, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

or left if you're in the UK etc.

will, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

is most of turkeys' bulk made from corn nowadays too?

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

If a person can afford a McDonald's value meal for lunch, they can also afford a turkey sandwich with some veggies on whole grain bread and just skip the damned fries and soda.

it always surprises me how not-so-cheap mcdonald's is, at least in nyc. dollar menu aside, a quarter pounder value meal costs more than a freshly-made deli sandwich from most of the places around my office.

yeah @ this. I recently made a trip to the nearby Wendy's because of time/ work constraints and ended up spending right at $6 for a 'value deal' (no biggie anything, either). Man, I can eat way better for perhaps a dollar or so more at semi-close meat & three (w/ grilled catfish), hippie lunch counter, or lunch menu at greek deli.

will, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

It is odd how a place like McDonald's, which was invented, Holiday-Inn style, as a sanitized counterweight to all the vaguely suspicious mystery-meat roadside burger joints staffed by some dude wearing a bandana who calls himself "Dip", has come to be the epitome of bad health and mystery meat itself. But still it retains some palimpsest of this "trustworthy" past. It has this weird cultural authority that draws people to it.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

well that's industrialism, innit. people wouldn't drive a homemade car, but you think a toyota off the line will function with robotic precision. i don't think of "mystery meat" when i think of mcdonalds, i think of something ruthlessly and relentlessly regularized. an anti-mystery! i mean, i don't know wtf goes in that stuff but i have certainty that it's been mapped down to the molecule by someone.

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, it's a mystery but at least it's an anonymous mystery.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

and it ain't chinese!!!

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)

McDonalds "meat" = 30% wadded up newspaper, 30% corn starch, 30% lead, 10% "love"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)

The new Angus Burger is good though!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)

And I'm serious. I eat red meat like maybe once a month at most, just for a fix, and last time I needed my fix I got an Angus burger at the drive thru on the way home. It was the break I deserved!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

(I'm not sure why I'm capitalizing "angus" like it's the burger's given name)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

because it's the proper name of a cow

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

at least "love" is high in protein

xxxxpost

ken c, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)

Ah! So it is! (xpost)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

ok i know dick all about beef cattle, but isn't this "angus" nonsense of the past couple years the biggest fake-distinction marketing hoo hah since forever? like saying your cold medicine has a "histamine blocker" when antihistamines have been on the shelf since 1931?

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think it's likely McDonald's used any Angus beef before they started using it as a selling point.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

ok what's special about angus beef then? i thought it was just another beef breed, possibly one of the more common beef breeds, and indistinguishable at the level of taste, at that? like calling your gas "arabian" or something.

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

don't make me go wiki this

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

in england calling it angus has dubious associations with famously terrible chain called 'angus steakhouses'.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

like calling your gas "arabian" or something.

or calling your bottled water "spring water"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)


What are the requirements for Certified Angus Beef® (CAB)?
Market animals that are at least 51% black that exhibit Angus-type characteristics are eligible for CAB® evaluation. They must meet all ten of the following criteria to be certified by USDA Graders and labeled with the Certified Angus Beef® brand.
Modest or higher marbling
Medium or fine marbling texture
"A" maturity for each, lean and skeletal characteristics
10 to 16 square inch ribeye area
Less than 1,000 pound hot carcass weight
Less than 1 inch fat thickness
Superior muscling (eliminates dairy influence)
Practically free of capillary rupture
No dark cutters
No neck hump exceeding 2 inches

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

USDA has some standards for certified angus

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

well there you go

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

NO NECK HUMP

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

Wait a minute I may qualify!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

oh I didn't see that about superior muscling

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

Superior muscling (eliminates dairy influence)
Practically free of capillary rupture

no beat up old dead dairy cows, thx.

how nice

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

hot carcass weight

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

gross

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)

must reply "och aye" when greeted

ken c, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

i'd give that hot carcass some neck rump.

darraghmac, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

What does that even mean?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

The right to be well-marbled

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/c/c2/180px-ColonelAngus.jpeg

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

lean and skeletal characteristics

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

Market animals that are at least 51% black that exhibit Angus-type characteristics are eligible for CAB® evaluation.

waht

HI DERE, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)

angus cows are traditionally black in coloration, right?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)

(tries to come up with a joke about a mixed-race AC/DC cover band, thinks better of it)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

it looks like Angus are either black or red

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's awesome for cutty, living the healthy lifestyle he's got going, and I don't want to cast aspersions on it because I wish I had that level of self discipline -- but energy gel? really? why not a banana? energy gel is for triathletes and marathon runners who need to consume calories so they don't pass the fuck out during competition or training. i don't really understand how you can decry HFCS as the devil but then eat a pre-metabolized sugar pack every day.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

i eat an energy gel when i am doing cardio in excess of 45 minutes, like anyone should. i am in the triathlete/marathon runner catgory as a road cyclist who is in training. when the fuck did you think i was eating energy gels, sitting at my desk?

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

if i leave my apartment in the morning, without eating, i need an energy gel so i "don't pass the fuck out" during training.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

i guess my main question is: why eat the chemical jelly at all? i don't get it.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

it has to do with the word "training"

nabisco, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

what i know abt gel packs is that they are pretty much INSTANT energy b/c they are such simple sugars (my bro is diabetic and these things are kinda what keep you alive if your blood sugars are out of control, esp during onset of childhood diabetes when everything is a mess). more instant than juice. they will keep you from fainting too, which is sometimes a worry for some people re: exercise.

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

fair enough. but in the context of "real food good, processed food bad," the sugary gel gets an exception because it augments your ability exercise for longer periods of time?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

i kind of consider it more medical than foodical

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

it's food technology

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

the right to be fat
http://yoism.reality-movement.org/images/PlayRushApologizes.JPG

ken c, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

what about emergen-c vitamin packets? do these actually do anything?

bell_labs, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

emergen-c packets have like 25 calories.

CLIF ENERGY GELS are 100% organic and made from brown rice.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

i am just suspicious of sporty supplement technology ever since i drank one of these things, thinking it was gonna be like gatorade or red bull or something, and i felt like i was gonna have a heart attack:

http://www.vitaminbungalow.com/prod_images_large/reg.jpg

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

ok, energy gels have nothing to do with that. you don't know what you are talking about.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.clifbar.com/eat/shot_family.cfm?location=shot

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

and the fact that you are trying to "catch" me doing something unhealthy or hypocritical is pretty funny

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

facemeat

RJG, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

90% organic, sorry

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

anyway this thread is about the "right" to be fat, not the details of my training regimen. if i brought any of those details up, it was because someone was asking me if i eat before i leave the house, etc.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

how do the gels taste?

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

i will concede that i don't know much about your crazy nutritional technology! i'm not trying to "catch" you in anything, cutty, but i don't understand how gel would be preferable to, you know, food.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

elmo i dont think cutty was one of the ppl saying that we should only eat "real" and not "processed" food b/c the gels would be a pretty clear example of hypocrisy there

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

i eat the gel DURING the workout, it's in the back of my cycling jersey, it's small, compact, and it's instantaneous energy delivery. the banana you were speaking of before gets eaten AFTER the workout.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

unless you are a performance athlete, there is no need for an energy gel in your life. it's not nutrition.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

jesus christ now they're talking about the 7000-paper metaresearch bullshit on television. wtf fuck you crap science

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)

Also cutty as far as I can tell is considerably more into fitness than necessary for just not-being-fat purposes.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

also seriously guys can we never say "eat the gel" again

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

Cutty, after you get off the bike, do you wipe the sweat from your brow first, or eat first? Because if you cool down first, I was wondering, doesn't that mean you would have time to just have the banana? Plus then you have a sweaty towel lying around and you have to put it in the dirty laundry, that takes time too.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

I don't know about your house but we have like the 55 foot-long hallway of doom at my house, walking to the laundry basket is something I have to schedule.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

I don't eat breakfast first, though. Ooh that reminds me: front-loading washer or top-loading?

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)

just make sure to eat within 45 minutes of any cardio-type activity. you really should have electrolytes of some sort immediately after, though.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

drink your pee

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

in gel form

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

ENERGY PISS

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

w/ some facemeat

RJG, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

Because I was thinking wiht a top-loading washer you have to lift the clothes up higher to put them in. That's probably like 15 more calories burned per load! Radical changes, man, I am going to make a DIFFERENCE.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

XTREME URINE FORCE

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

possibly

rrrobyn, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

I gotta say, my friend eats those goo things in between dance sets (she and her husband also run marathons). She describes them as a) disproportionately expensive but you can put one in your sock for later which you can't do with too many things, and b) like eating flavored Elmer's paste, which, well...you can put them in your sock for later, which you can't do with too many things.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

i'm quite fond of the strawberry flavored ones. the trick is to let it sit in your mouth for a few seconds before attempting to swallow so your saliva can begin breaking down the starches. swallow it too soon and you're likely to gag.

i'm not encouraging this behavior in anyone. i have a specific training routine.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

what i am encouraging is choosing the right foods. making the right choices. not entertaining every single one of your foodie urges with stuff that is bad for you.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

What, like that dark chocolte Toblerone in my drawer? Damn, man, that's cold.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

you know what everyone, do what makes you happy! eat that whole tub and ice cream and curse me while you do it.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

what makes me happy is peak performance, fitness and feeling good about myself.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

One or two squares of fine dark chocolate is actually a pretty good way to satisfy the sweets urge without doing too much damage. We make sure we keep a bar or some individually wrapped squares at all times.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:02 (eighteen years ago)

im going to eat a cheesesteak later with sweet peppers and not think about you at all!

chaki, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

i'll try this gel stuff if i ever need to practice for the blow job olympics

bell_labs, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)

energy gels really are instantaneous energy, and awesome when you're in the middle of doing something (which is the key here, people: they're super lightweight and only meant for mid-exercise consumption).

i actually like the flavorless ones, with a bit of water.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

if that's your life's goal of endurance, god bless you

xpost

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

anybody else hear "blow job olympics" in their head to the tune of "viva las vegas"

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

Tom, I was with you on that " Rock the Casbah" computer keyboard thing, but not so much this one....

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

Something the taskbar? I forget.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

lock the taskbar

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

bj olympics gonna set my soul
gonna set my soul on fire

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)

the trick is to let it sit in your mouth for a few seconds before attempting to swallow so your saliva can begin breaking down the starches. swallow it too soon and you're likely to gag.

jeff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

it's not semen, it's an energy gel

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:16 (eighteen years ago)

you can pretend i'm talking about semen if you like

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

it's small, compact, and it's instantaneous energy delivery

jeff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

it's in the back of my cycling jersey

jeff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

it's not semen it's an energy gel
and i'm just the devil with love to spare
blowjoooob olympics
blowjoooob olympics

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

If there's semen in the back of your cycling jersey, you've got bigger problems. Or else there's some truth to those roadie jokes.

Laurel, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

i'd hate to get semen in my lycra

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

I just want to point out that I train even harder than Cutty, and am even fitter.

Therefore I demand that other people be chubby, so that there are more soft things in the world.

It's important for the safety of our toddlers.

nabisco, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

shall we have a fitness off?

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

or an OTM off

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

Compromise: SHOES-OFF

nabisco, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

P.S. I am not fit and was totally lying.

nabisco, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

You know I could actually see downing an energy gel halfway into a gig being a not bad idea.

nickalicious, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)

as a drummer, i can vouch for this

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

its the organic version of a line of coke

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:34 (eighteen years ago)

Someone's gonna come along and mash up those posts: "I could actually see downing an energy gel halfway through several lines of coke"

nabisco, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:38 (eighteen years ago)

who's fat

RJG, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)

it's the jagerbomb for recovering alcoholics

xpost

electricsound, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)

professor just said that the CDC recommends as a goal for people under 30 to "be physically active for 60 minutes or more per day on five or more or more of the past seven days"

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)

45-60 is a good range

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

anything past 60 and you are getting into endurance instead of general fitness

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:15 (eighteen years ago)

I climb one of the tallest escalators in the hemisphere every day

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:16 (eighteen years ago)

That must be tough.

I think "physically active" can just mean walking, though?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)

anything that raises your heart rate 20 bpm above resting counts

also adolescent obesity has doubled nationwide since the 90s (even taking into account the recent change in the definition of obesity in the early 00s)

pretty much the entire south has an adolescent obesity rate of <30% and the rest of the country is at >10%-20%

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)

er that should be >30% for the south

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

i am excited to be starting a job that requires constant physical activity.

gbx, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

i would be too

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

what job?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)

porn star

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)

Ya right making o faces for close-ups is not "constant physical activity"

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:30 (eighteen years ago)

you burn way more calories during sex than walking up the hemispheres tallest esclator

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:31 (eighteen years ago)

i should admit my #1 motivation for getting in better shape is to be better in the sack.

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

actually i shouldn't have admitted that

gff, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

for me it's so i don't look like a potato-filled sack xpost

electricsound, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:39 (eighteen years ago)

Actually reading about just how much being over the top of the BMI chart or even in the upper healthy range (which I still kind of am) actually increases your risk of all kinds of health problems really does motivate me.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

let's face it, weight makes people so freaking defensive

i am posting from a public health seminar and i just saw a roomful of graduate students, totally postal, in the space of 10 minutes - everyone agreed that we needed an "sustained, outcome-oriented, multicomponent school nutrition programs" and then went fucking nuts about the idea of weighing students and measuring their BMIs, comparing it to "police state" conditions

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

i should amend that, it's an educational policy seminar and the dude talking to us is a public health guy

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:44 (eighteen years ago)

hey cutty, do you have any tips for colder weather running?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:44 (eighteen years ago)

let's face it, weight makes people so freaking defensive

i am posting from a public health seminar and i just saw a roomful of graduate students, totally postal, in the space of 10 minutes - everyone agreed that we needed an "sustained, outcome-oriented, multicomponent school nutrition programs" and then went fucking nuts about the idea of weighing students and measuring their BMIs, comparing it to "police state" conditions

I think this is part of the problem, honestly. Part of losing weight for me was realizing "wait, this isn't a freaking disability, it's just the result of a bunch of habits I can change"

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

generally, it's all about the gear. base layers, gloves, good wind stopping material and a warm hat--you'll be fine after about 10-15 minutes of exercising. i like the cold.

cutty, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

Actually reading about just how much being over the top of the BMI chart or even in the upper healthy range (which I still kind of am) actually increases your risk of all kinds of health problems really does motivate me

more things i learned today: the CDC found that nutritional education in the last 20 years has led to significant nationwide increases in nutritional knowledge but has not led to any significant nationwide changes in lifestyle, eating habits, or weight/BMI

food for thought

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:47 (eighteen years ago)

the CDC found that nutritional education in the last 20 years has led to significant nationwide increases in nutritional knowledge but has not led to any significant nationwide changes in lifestyle, eating habits, or weight/BMI

this is totally unsurprising

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

speaking as a person who really wants to avoid HFCS as much as possible and finds myself consistently defeated at every turn unless I feel like spending $2 for anything besides flat water, yeah, no shit

quit fucking subsidizing corn, seriously

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:49 (eighteen years ago)

also, make french fries taste bad

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:49 (eighteen years ago)

we dont need the govt to increase nutrition education we need it to stop pumping money into corn

xp exactly

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:50 (eighteen years ago)

HFCS makes EVERYTHING taste bad. one of the best things abt LA = readily-available mexican coke w/ real sugar

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:51 (eighteen years ago)

(not that sugar water is "good" for you but its better for you that corn syrup water)

max, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:51 (eighteen years ago)

"the govt"

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not sure the CDC, dept of Ed and the dept of agriculture necessarily share policy goals

moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 23:53 (eighteen years ago)

as if there's something wrong about measuring the results of policies. it's so fucked up. this thinking is everywhere. I think it's because once you accept that outcomes are the triggers for action it means a hell of a lot more responsibility to think through the tough nut of the problem. (I'm thinking specifically of discrimination law here, which constantly skirts right up to the edge of recognizing measurable inequality as illegal but never quite does it.)

There is a big potential pitfall with "outcome-oriented" policies -- ginning the numbers. As explored by television shows like "The Wire" and Adam Curtis' "The Trap" and exemplified by No Child Left Behind. But without being able to show that what you're doing has tangible results, what's the point? Sometimes I wonder if this kind of non-outcome-oriented public policy has anything to do with America's defiantly non-outcome-oriented (in a macro way) economic policies... like "fuck a Five-Year Plan, let's wangle the interest rate and pass some tax cuts and whatever happens afterwards we'll just go 'oops'". It's like this almost religious conviction that you can't actually have a plan for anything that can be measured on its success or failure, you must simply guess, that is the honorable way

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 November 2007 00:00 (eighteen years ago)

that's its own vicious spiral: 30 years (50 years?) of bad public policy decisions has left people feeling so badly burnt by stats that nobody's even willing to argue from stats anymore

i mean, we just wangled for an hour about the social implications of encouraging youth to focusing on body image - when jesus christ people, the prevalence of clinical obesity is anywhere from 5 to 30 times as high as eating disorders.

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 1 November 2007 00:09 (eighteen years ago)

guys, there are at least anecdotal incidents of doctors being harangued and even sued for telling parents that their children are fat and need help.

also, i start work as a bike courier on friday. no more ilx (yay!). as much as i like the cold, however, shit's about to get REAL in chicago, weather-wise, so we'll see how it goes. still, i'd rather be freezing on a bike than bored at a desk.

gbx, Thursday, 1 November 2007 00:33 (eighteen years ago)

jesus christ people, the prevalence of clinical obesity is anywhere from 5 to 30 times as high as eating disorders.

huh, that's pretty important. i'd pictured things instinctively as being evenly bell curved, with ana's off one end and the overweight off the other, but yeah that makes no sense.

gff, Thursday, 1 November 2007 05:04 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.pcrm.org/magazine/gm07autumn/health_pork.html

sanskrit, Thursday, 1 November 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

that's a pretty great graphic

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 November 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)

nice uh 'journalistic conversation' here:

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-11-07-voa63.cfm

then

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN0758730720071108

gff, Thursday, 8 November 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

Everyone's so fucking afraid of not condemning the overweight strenuously (or loudly) enough. Just once I'd like to see someone write "Oh gosh, who even knows, anymore? Probably the happy medium was the healthiest way all along!"

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

what about this study?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-cancer07nov07,1,1727260.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

>On Tuesday the Million Women Study in the United Kingdom found that overweight and obese women are at higher risk of developing and dying of cancer. Specifically, the study found that excess weight causes cancers of the esophagus, endometrium (uterine lining), ovary, kidney and pancreas, as well as leukemia, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

I thought the high-risk strains of HPV were the only causes of uterine cancer? Oh well. More important, I'm not registering for the Chicago Trib to read that article. :)

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't realize it was reg-only. odd, as i'm not registered.

lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

at any rate, i think it's interesting as the findings were released almost simultaneously with the study mentioned above that says being overweight isn't a risk. spokespeople from both groups are now jousting over which is more valid.

lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)

Oh no, sorry, I was thinking of cervical cancer! Anyway, yes, that jousting is why I say really, can't we all just get along and eat delicious foods and go for a ride/walk and get tired and hungry again? Then we can have a nap and some cocoa.

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)

PICK A TEAM! you can't have it both ways, yo.

Will M., Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

i'm on laurel's team forever with that manifesto

darraghmac, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

any diet and exercise plan that involves a nap is the diet and exercise plan for me

max, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

It's fall, maybe a long walk with a dog on wet leaves, or a winter expedition to the beach to see how the lake has frozen into bergs and the dunes are wind-sculpted, or a bike ride to Roosevelt Island for a noize show where we'll grill bleu cheese-stuffed hamburgers. This is the life for me.

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't realize it was reg-only. odd, as i'm not registered.

-- lauren, Thursday, November 8, 2007 11:29 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

did you follow link from google

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)

no, but from another site, so duh. i guess that explains it.

lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

There is a big potential pitfall with "outcome-oriented" policies -- ginning the numbers. As explored by television shows like "The Wire" and Adam Curtis' "The Trap" and exemplified by No Child Left Behind. But without being able to show that what you're doing has tangible results, what's the point? Sometimes I wonder if this kind of non-outcome-oriented public policy has anything to do with America's defiantly non-outcome-oriented (in a macro way) economic policies... like "fuck a Five-Year Plan, let's wangle the interest rate and pass some tax cuts and whatever happens afterwards we'll just go 'oops'". It's like this almost religious conviction that you can't actually have a plan for anything that can be measured on its success or failure, you must simply guess, that is the honorable way

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, November 1, 2007 12:00 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark Link

the problems are 1) centralization 2) not just fucking with the figures but making reaching "the figures" the all-consuming thing. this sounds okay because the figures measure 'performance', right?

but if you try to break down everything that, say, a school or hospital ward does into separate things, then try to find indices of quantifiable 'performance', it ends up in semantic games. x practice = y index -- but it's also lots of other things. the people who draw up the plans for this kind of testing typically have no practical experience of working in the sectors they're dealing with and their ideology comes from the management consultancy field. which obviously has rather different priorities.

it ends up playing into the hands of an uncomprehending media -- hence 'waiting lists' becomes the most important thing to action, because they perceive patients and pupils as 'shareholders' (ok 'stakeholders') as a result of this market ideology.

you don't need to 'guess', i would think that if a school was doing badly it could be handled locally if local authorities were empowered to do it.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

whoa funny, when i posted those two stories, the reuters headline was "Put down that fork: being fat is still unhealthy, experts warn"

gff, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)

OH NOES, "BEING OVERWEIGHT COULD LEAD TO OBESITY"

It's enough to make a girl have lunch early.

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)

I'm hungry. Clif bar for brek in cold weather is perhaps insufficient.

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)

PUT DOWN THAT FORK

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

DROP THE FORK, BONG!

darraghmac, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)

the people who draw up the plans for this kind of testing typically have no practical experience of working in the sectors they're dealing with and their ideology comes from the management consultancy field. which obviously has rather different priorities.

-- That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, November 8, 2007

do people actually do anything at cambridge other than take naked photos of themselves

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)

eh? the targets are drawn up in london by dept of health (contracts out to consultancies), and/or by quangos which are composed of ex-civil servants and private sector hires. the stat-gathering is done by regional executives (names change every few years) comprising the same kind of staff -- very unusual to recruit from nhs. but by that stage the priorities are set -- talk to people who work in hospitals and they're mostly wtf about it.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

hmmm so i suppose all of those public health and educational policy PhDs have no practical experience in their sectors?

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

Black beans and rice and veg making me SO HAPPY right now.

Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

hmmm so i suppose all of those public health and educational policy PhDs have no practical experience in their sectors?

-- moonship journey to baja, Thursday, November 8, 2007 5:53 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

well probably not actually -- but there can't be more than a handful of these working on policy in the UK, and they sure as hell don't run things! surprisingly, the DoH's priorities are largely political.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

i'm trying not to do a total experience vs abstract knowledge thing, actually -- governing ideology at the top is about 'tranferable skills', which in turn is about the ability to change people's jobs and move them around. there isn't any disinterested intelligence guiding things, and it would be naive to think there could be -- what i can state as fact is that no-one trusts govt stats, least of all people in hospitals, and that independent reports, such as the one last week about unnecessary deaths in kent, often mention the focus on stats as a contributory part of management's negligence viz their hospitals being shitholes.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

zing

mookieproof, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

maybe this is cultural difference between US and europe? is this about the pitfalls of a civil service class?

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

haha like our appointees are any better at this shit!

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)

"transferable skills" = Ivy J.D.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)

maybe i just happen to live in an area where the agglomeraation of big-name research universities has a lot of sway over how the public sector + corporate sector do things?

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)

ha. I live in an area where you can shove all that science right up yr fat ass, lobbyists be holding another happy hour.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)

2) not just fucking with the figures but making reaching "the figures" the all-consuming thing. this sounds okay because the figures measure 'performance', right?

anyway this is OTM, the nice thing is that most public sector policymakers *where i live* have the good sense to realize that figures make up one possible assessment out of lots of possible ways to measure outcomes and a balanced approach to assessment is a better idea than placing your faith in one measure or another

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)

placing your faith "entirely" in one measure or another

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

That's a distant memory for public sector workers in the UK.

Noodle Vague, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

oh man the hits just keep coming

http://feministing.com/archives/008060.html

(nb haven't checked out any of the links, but holy shit)

gff, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

kind of hilarious?
the fact that people take it seriously is terrifying. clearly dude should be out of business.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

the dog is kind of overweight too, you don't see him yelling at the dog.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

purina is totally stuffed with high fructose corn syrup, it's such a crime

gff, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

"Save The Chubbitos"

sleep, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

true! i went to a new pet store and the guy there told me that the food i was feeding my cat (nutro max) was the equivalent of kitty count chocula

bell_labs, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

you should only feed your cat pieces of elephant

max, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

she is thin, but sometimes she eats paper or cardboard until she throws up.

bell_labs, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, so she's a model.

HI DERE, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

maybe i should tape pictures of skinny abyssinians over her food bowl so she will not think she can just let herself go.

bell_labs, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

dr ben is on iams weight control bcz when he eats the regular stuff or even if I give him just one can of fancy feast it goes directly to his GUT which was ATROCIOUS for a while

El Tomboto, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

Bell is clearly just looking for an excuse to cover her walls in pictures of me

nabisco, Thursday, 8 November 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://blog.wired.com/cars/2007/11/its-a-fat-world.html

Kerm, Thursday, 8 November 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

the people who draw up the plans for this kind of testing typically have no practical experience of working in the sectors they're dealing with and their ideology comes from the management consultancy field. which obviously has rather different priorities.

Is it too late to OTM this in a totally off-topic way? My mother is a teacher and has to spend weeks before every inspection week drawing up minute-by-minute lesson plans which are not allowed to be deviated from in any way. Because if the class looks blank then you shouldn't find time to explain further, or if one of them says "oh, I see, but what about this related thing?" and that's tomorrow's lesson you don't get to say "ah, well, see..." and skip ahead a little, you just have to say "no, shut up" and carry on. I mean if you stopped reading off a bit of fucking paper for a moment and started speaking like a real live human with actual knowledge and understanding then of course we'd have to write on the paperwork that you must be a terrible teacher.

Froth. As you were.

(I feel like I should say something on-topic at some point because this thread's been pretty interesting through all its twists, but, uh, I'm not a skinny person and right now after failed diets and daily TV news reports about how fat people are terribly unhealthy for some new (or not) vague reason and PS also just generally disgusting, like we hadn't got the hint yet, I can't really summon more than incoherent frustration)

a passing spacecadet, Thursday, 8 November 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

My mother is a teacher and has to spend weeks before every inspection week drawing up minute-by-minute lesson plans which are not allowed to be deviated from in any way. Because if the class looks blank then you shouldn't find time to explain further, or if one of them says "oh, I see, but what about this related thing?" and that's tomorrow's lesson you don't get to say "ah, well, see..." and skip ahead a little, you just have to say "no, shut up" and carry on. I mean if you stopped reading off a bit of fucking paper for a moment and started speaking like a real live human with actual knowledge and understanding then of course we'd have to write on the paperwork that you must be a terrible teacher.

this is actually somewhat off the money

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

i will explain a little later when i have a moment, i literally just finished doing an observation of a physics teacher (we call them observations, not inspections) and i have to grab lunch

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)

nah, actually that would be tacky and even more off-thread. maybe we could start a thread called "professional development: c/d" or "making teachers write lesson plans: c/d" if anybody wants to hear me evangelize about my work.

i'll just say that my mom has been a teacher for 20 years and she finds the shift towards intensively documenting her practice as frustrating as your mom does, and if any administrator is "docking" your mom's evaluation for veering from the plans they're a grade-A fuckup of an administrator who is misintrepeting the whole process.

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

how does a diet fail?

cutty, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

Again, this is how the system seems to have gone over here. I agree the principle is sound but it's administered by idiots in the UK.

Noodle Vague, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)

I thought this was a clip from The Day Today or Time Trumpet.

Spencer Chow, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

seems that way

cutty, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)

this thread or those links?

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 8 November 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)

he is talking about the original youtube vid

cutty, Friday, 9 November 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah sorry, coming to this late.

Spencer Chow, Friday, 9 November 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)

four years pass...

http://www.salon.com/2012/08/28/anti_obesity_the_new_homophobia/

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 12:56 (thirteen years ago)

For example, the goal of Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move! campaign is no less than to “end childhood obesity within a generation,” that is, to create an America with no fat children in it.

Love this campaign, btw. Seeing the commercials on tv this summer really encouraged me and my family to do so many after-dinner activities instead of laying around like normal. We'd see Michelle up there and she'd say "let's move" and it was like a rallying cry.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:18 (thirteen years ago)

"an America with no fat children in it"!

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:23 (thirteen years ago)

aka Hollywood

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:26 (thirteen years ago)

At least Swift was funny.

ledge, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:27 (thirteen years ago)

Interesting article. Without saying too much about my work I work at a research institute in an obesity prevention program that deals heavily in preventing childhood obesity. I have feelings about it.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:32 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2012/07/smoking_and_obesity_are_both_public_health_problems_but_cigarettes_are_worse_than_fat_.html

i wanted to discuss this one when it was published. it seemed really wrong-headed to me in its attempts (like the salon article) to minimize the correlation between obesity and health problems. the cause (stopping fat-shaming) might be good, but doesn't it make more sense to compare obesity to alcoholism? aka something that shouldn't stigmatize the person suffering from it, but that does require treatment.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:38 (thirteen years ago)

Kill all fatties imo

I am one who socks (latebloomer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)

"an America with no fat children in it"!

― Mordy, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:23 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

aka Hollywood

― just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:26 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

trying to think of any exceptions to this

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)

comic foils who are mostly dead

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)

there was that one kid who was a star on the youtubes for being a g and joyriding in his mum's car

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)

Chris Christie joke

buzza, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)

it's a hard thing to traverse imo. because I really hate the hell out of any grownup who thinks "aha - in fat people, I have a group to whom I can be a total asshole - everybody gets to be uncool to fat people!" at the same time, people feed their children garbage. children have a right to not be eating garbage, and should get enough information about food that they understand "just because it makes you feel good doesn't mean it's good to eat as much of it as you like" - children should be given actual good information about food, not "Don't let anybody tell you what's good for you!" nonsense.

but I'd sooner a world full of the morbidly obese than a world full of people who think they get a pass on being a dick to people who don't measure up to their standards of how people oughta look

we don't wanna miss a THING!!! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:02 (thirteen years ago)

but doesn't it make more sense to compare obesity to alcoholism? aka something that shouldn't stigmatize the person suffering from it, but that does require treatment.

It makes sense to me, but google "healthy at any size" and you'll see a lot of people who disagree. I think fat shaming is terrible, but I don't think the solution should be to tell people that there aren't any health complications related to being significantly overweight.

NR’s resident heavy-metal expert (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:02 (thirteen years ago)

both those posts otm

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:05 (thirteen years ago)

aero basically said everything i feel about this ish there

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:05 (thirteen years ago)

I'm going to say this as calmly as I can:

There are definitely health complications due to having an inactive lifestyle, and due to eating rubbish food.

There are perfectly thin people who eat rubbish food and have an inactive lifestyle.
There are overweight people who eat healthily and have an active lifestyle.

You cannot tell by looking at someone solely at someone's weight or lack thereof, and determine whether they are healthy or not.

Yet many, many people feel perfectly justified making ~vague deathfat health threats~ based solely on that: whether or not they measure up to some arbitrary visual standard.

Add in to that: 1) the highly gendered policing of weight and appearance and 2) the multibillion dollar industry set up to make vast profits on betting that people will fail, repeatedly, to lose weight, and you have one unholy clusterfuck which has nothing to do with health.

my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:08 (thirteen years ago)

but I'd sooner a world full of the morbidly obese than a world full of people who think they get a pass on being a dick to people who don't measure up to their standards of how people oughta look

― we don't wanna miss a THING!!! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:02 PM (2 minutes ago)

this is a false opposition, not just formally but because hatred & abuse of fat people is just as likely to entrench them in a spiral of self loathing & overeating as it is to shame them into 'change'

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)

we shd educate kids about the dangers of an unhealthy diet and lifestyle, more so probly than drink and drugs and cigs, but recognise scumbag bullying for what it is and not tolerate it. also recognise that as with so much of everything else education ain't enough if society does nothing to address poverty and social inequality and all that other good stuff that won't get addressed.

yeah it's not possible generally to judge the state of somebody's health by looking at them, but advocacy groups that claim no lifestyle decisions have an adverse effect on people's health don't help anybody, understandable as that stance is

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:12 (thirteen years ago)

but I'd sooner a world full of the morbidly obese than a world full of people who think they get a pass on being a dick to people who don't measure up to their standards of how people oughta look

why can't we have both? oh wait, we already do

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)

we shd educate kids about the dangers of an unhealthy diet and lifestyle, more so probly than drink and drugs and cigs,

I'm pretty sure that education of alcohol as unhealthy is incredibly limited, and mostly public service announcements about why you shouldn't drink and drive or binge drink. Very few things about systematically wrecking your health over decades, in my experience, although that's the risk.

I also take issue with the idea of not being able to judge health issues based on appearance -- if someone is of average height and 400 pounds, they're fucked. These people are very, very rare compared to those who are just overweight or obese, though.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)

if someone is of average height and 300lbs, they might be fine tho

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)

put it another way then, let's not judge people's health issues or pass off said judgement as concern

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)

cos tbh i think as an adult you're entitled to speed your inevitable end anyway you choose to but if you make people feel shitty about their appearance and position in the world then you're probably a bit of a tosser

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

if you make people feel shitty about their appearance and position in the world then you're probably a bit of a tosser

― just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:27 PM

what about that doctor who has the same effect even though they imagine themselves to be 'helping' their (non)patient?

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:28 (thirteen years ago)

i meant exactly what i said and i feel the same way. there are interventions and advice that do not need to be destructive of esteem.

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)

true, I think as a society we owe it to everyone to educate about health choices, make sure foods and the ability to participate in physical activities are available to everyone, healthcare includes mental health, and so on. you can give people the means, but it's up to them

I have kind of an odd stake in this in that my dad is currently incredibly stressed out about a work situation. Not to get into details, but he's in management in a construction-related industry and one of their ex-employees they had to let go has brought a lawsuit against them. It's frustrating because my dad liked the guy, but he was really physically incapable of doing that job without injuring himself. He was on workers compensation for a while, came back to work, and ended up re-injuring his back or knees shortly just by doing the job. They sent him to doctors, talked about possible options, but there really wasn't a job he was qualified for that they could offer that would not involve physical labor, and the short of it was that at his current size, he could not do work without injury.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

There was also the issue that, as a small business, their medical insurance rates were about to be bumped up because this one guy was distorting the risk pool.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:35 (thirteen years ago)

no one feels good about themselves when an intervention is occurring, no matter what about. ppl should be empathetic and understanding, but, for example, you would never hear someone say that alcoholism is a legitimate health choice (or smoking) and that telling a loved one to get help for it is infringing on their esteem. w/ fat acceptance movement tho i hear the claim that no interventions should ever occur. eg healthy at any size. the political movement has borrowed a lot of the language + thinking of civil rights, feminist, glbt, etc rights movements, but i'm not sure it is actually comparable. xxp

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:36 (thirteen years ago)

well, actually, i have heard smokers get angry about society infringing on their right to do what they want w/ their body, and at some point w/ anything if someone makes it clear that it is their choice to live the way they are living, you should live + let live i guess.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)

I haven't a clue how to address personal freedom versus shared liability for healthcare costs. If anything, it's a good argument for the largest possible shared risk pool for insurance and giving people the education and options to live healthier, whatever that means.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)

the same situation ought to apply as to somebody who was incapable of work thru drinking or drug use or any kind of illness tho. the obvious problem is that we introduce a moral component into those conditions that does nothing to help prevention or treatment or stigma and varies from one individual or company to another and creates an area of licence for discrimination that governments are yet to legislate against

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:42 (thirteen years ago)

in what way are these issues not comparable to other civil rights issues? because they are purely matters of personal choice. like sexuality used to be?

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

body type and weight are seen as "who you are", though, where outside of recognized addiction, drinking and drug use are seen as choices. not really comparable.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

See, weight isn't a matter of personal choice, completely. Genetics and environment play into it strongly. Drinking and drug use, if there's a physical or psychological addiction, are no longer a choice issue.

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:46 (thirteen years ago)

I was visiting a lil cousin who is like 3 and whenever he saw a fat person he would shout THEY'RE FAT

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:47 (thirteen years ago)

he would only do it around me tho because he was trying to be cool

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:47 (thirteen years ago)

Firstly, maybe you could learn to examine your prejudices and the soundness of your own supposed facts before you go about policing who does and does not get to "use civil rights language"

Secondly, it's Health At Every Size. Not "Healthy at every size." You might know that if you googled it, or read the book or any of the literature. They are pretty clear in what their approach is:

1) eat better/more healthily
2) be less sedentary/more active
3) be less concerned with weight and more concerned with 1 and 2

That's it. No subtext, no agenda beyond that. It's really quite strange to see a movement I am happily very familiar with get twisted into something way beyond what it is.

my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:49 (thirteen years ago)

i think those distinctions exist now but may prove to be more blurred in the future, in the same way that addiction is much more readily accepted as an illness than it was 50 years ago. which isn't to say that replacing a moral model of addiction with a medical one is truer or solves anything or helps any addict but is to say that we can envisage a time when the "you poor ugly fat bastard you should stop eating burgers" vision of weight mightn't be the dominant view

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:49 (thirteen years ago)

(xxxp)

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:49 (thirteen years ago)

in what way are these issues not comparable to other civil rights issues?

nothing to do w/ choice. a) obesity like smoking + drinking can be positively impacted through treatment - race/sexuality/etc cannot and more importantly b) obesity, smoking + drinking have a detrimental impact on a person's health, while those other things do not.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

Being fat and speaking out against bullshit like shaming fat people for their health/concern trolling plus also spreading the gospel that my health is nobody else's business and I don't give a fuck if my being fat offends your aesthetic sensibilities is kind of ~my thing~ but I do not have the time or energy or will to argue in this thread today. But since it's my thing I feel like I should least step in and say WCC is completely OTM, and anybody who thinks that fat people are a burden on the healthcare system or don't know that they are fat or don't understand food is a condescending fool. So is anybody mindlessly conflating weight with health.

carl agatha, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:53 (thirteen years ago)

xp

in any society where access to treatment is inequitably distributed, conditions that can be positively impacted thru treatment become civil rights issues. prejudice against people with "medical" conditions, treatable or otherwise, is also a civil rights issue, eg mental health, AIDS, etc etc

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:53 (thirteen years ago)

also what carl just said

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:55 (thirteen years ago)

not everyone can afford gwyneth paltrow's personal trainers or want them

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:55 (thirteen years ago)

those civil rights issues are different tho. no one would ever argue that ppl have overstated the link between AIDS and health. that's more about respecting the dignity of the person, making treatment available to them, etc.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:55 (thirteen years ago)

it's not "mindlessly conflating weight with health" to suggest that there is - or at least can be - a relationship between weight and health, though, right?

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)

Secondly, it's Health At Every Size. Not "Healthy at every size." You might know that if you googled it, or read the book or any of the literature. They are pretty clear in what their approach is:

Ah, sorry. I misspoke/mistyped. Thank you for educating me.

NR’s resident heavy-metal expert (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)

mental health is a little more complicated in my eyes but maybe getting a little off-topic.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:58 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, we need a topic for hierarchies of acceptable prejudice or something

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 15:59 (thirteen years ago)

Nicole, it was mainly the way that Mordy took your inexact misremembered phrase and ran with it in a way that clearly indicated he didn't have faintest clue what he was talking about, quelle surprise.

my god it's full of straw (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:00 (thirteen years ago)

xp "prejudice" in all forms is wrong, so that's really not germane imho. there is obv a difference between making treatment, healthy food options, education, etc available to all citizens and trying to cure gay people. part of that difference is acknowledging that one of those things is harmful to your health and the other thing is not.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:01 (thirteen years ago)

one day they will invent the anti-obesity pill - then will be penalization if people dont take it?

Sweet Yin Yang ☯ (Latham Green), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:03 (thirteen years ago)

anybody who thinks that fat people are a burden on the healthcare system or don't know that they are fat or don't understand food is a condescending fool.

I'm pretty sure overweight people have more health issues and need more health care than the average person, right?

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:04 (thirteen years ago)

I mean it's the same thing as smokers, right? Obviously I don't think the overweight should be made fun of, but to think that they don't need more health care is pretty blind.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

unhealthy people definitely have more health issues than healthy people, we shd do something about this

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

whenever this issue comes up I can't help but think of a brief Stinky/Buddy exchange in Hate when Stinky says he never trusts fat people. Why? Because they got fat by ripping off skinny people.

chicago rap twitter luminary (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

I feel bad that the second I looked at this thread title I thought, 'You gotta fight, for your right... to fatty.'

I am by no means the healthiest person when it comes to eating/drinking/smoking but I consciously decided to lose about twenty pounds about five years ago. I've kept most of it off and permanently altered my eating habits but the most important thing to me is less the weight than how I feel. Extra weight isn't just hard on your heart, it's also hard on your knees and back.

Ogni tanto mi piace un'occhiata del Tevere (Michael White), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

Latham Green otm

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:07 (thirteen years ago)

those of us in countries with state pensions have some legit concerns about them being disproportionately hogged by old people, too

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:07 (thirteen years ago)

grind up the old and feed them to the obese

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:08 (thirteen years ago)

the way america treats 'fatness' is properly schizophrenic

like the other day i read a fawning profile of paul ryan

The latest edition to the presidential ticket may pack a hefty punch on the policy side, but at 162 pounds and 6 to 8 percent body fat, Paul Ryan is as fit and trim as his budget plan.

The Wisconsin Republican is not shy about his intense health regiment, often candidly responding to questions about his infamous addiction to the P90X exercise program and steering clear of sweets and fried treats on the campaign trail.

Ryan's devotion to physical fitness has not gone unnoticed by a growing contingency of online admirers. As thousands gathered in Virginia to watch Mitt Romney announce Ryan as his running mate, thousands more took to Twitter and Google to find out more about the House Budget Committee Chairman's rumored six-pac abs.

so now politics as well as other branches of the entertainment industry is embracing fat-fascism: the trim, fat-free overlords obtain to certain recondite standards, while the lower orders must despise themselves for being even slightly zaftig

and all the while the state of affairs is perpetuated by agribusiness and its distorting effects that mean poor people often have access only to corn syrup enhanced crap

the effect is to create an esthetic analogue to agamben's 'homo sacer': the figuration of deficient biopower, tissues of abjection, the idea that unless you are an athletic ubermensch, you are less than nothing

fat fascism co-opts the rhetoric of 'pro life' so that ALL bodies are now to be regulated and abused by fascists in the same manner

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:10 (thirteen years ago)

I blame the boomers.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:10 (thirteen years ago)

Hi,

I am quite skinny.

I don't assume that fat people are fat people because they are not skinny.

I spent years trying to put on weight, health reasons. (small bowel op, iymk)

So, I shall always look/be skinny. Apart from the usual guybelly.

I know, tears, right?

Mark G, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:12 (thirteen years ago)

Also, the media have all this "OMG skinny girls are a bad role model" and "pressure on kids" and all such, to be thin..

And yet, childhood obesity.

I dunno.

Mark G, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:13 (thirteen years ago)

6 to 8 percent body fat

so Paul Ryan is either a fitness nut, or a psychopath, or both

(see we can judge this stuff too)

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

"You must ask yourself - why do you seek the thin? Is it for His glory, or yours?" _ Indiana Jones and te Last Crusade

wjhat it means is if you want people to be thin so they are healthy/happy that is one thing but if you want them to be thin so you are not effected by their hgealthcare costs - knighty wil smite you

Sweet Yin Yang ☯ (Latham Green), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

Obvious Patrick Bateman-stylee psychopath. xp

NR’s resident heavy-metal expert (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)

re NHdaS:

sure, but recognizing that fat-fascism exists doesn't oblige us to deny that obesity can cause (or at least increase the likelihood of) certain health problems. worse, in limiting ease of mobility, it can restrict the obese person's access to the exercise that might make obesity less unhealthy.

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)

1) eat better/more healthily
2) be less sedentary/more active
3) be less concerned with weight and more concerned with 1 and 2

In bold, inside a box.

That's the one.

Mark G, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)

future social network will require BMI rating next to username next to number of forum posts

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)

There's Morbs OBE's ahem, Morbidly Obese, there's PoshSpiceThin, and there is the rest of us.

Mark G, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:19 (thirteen years ago)

sure, but recognizing that fat-fascism exists doesn't oblige us to deny that obesity can cause (or at least increase the likelihood of) certain health problems. worse, in limiting ease of mobility, it can restrict the obese person's access to the exercise that might make obesity less unhealthy.

― i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:18 PM

the whole thrust of fat fascism is to say that exercise is NOT FOR YOU

it is to create a caste system where valid, productive 'exercise' is the preserve of the elite

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:21 (thirteen years ago)

oh jesus i shouldn't have opened thread i find myself vociferously agreeing with contenderizer (and mordy)

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:22 (thirteen years ago)

xp to nakh "It [torture] assured the articulation of the written on the oral, the secret on the public, the procedure of investigation on the operation of the confession; it made it possible to reproduce the crime on the visible body of the criminal; in the same horror, the crime had to be manifested and annulled. It also made the body of the condemned man the place where the vengeance of the sovereign was applied, the anchoring point for a manifestation of power, an opportunity of affirming the dissymmetry of forces."

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:25 (thirteen years ago)

So is anybody mindlessly conflating weight with health.

― carl agatha, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:53 AM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark

can someone elaborate on this? links to articles/studies? as others have said itt, obv not every fat or obese person is gonna die in their 60s just like not every smoker is going to get lung or throat cancer, but clearly there is a correlation between being overweight and being at-risk for a myriad of health problems, right? is that not just science?

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:25 (thirteen years ago)

Some people are big-boned, Jordan

latebloomer, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:26 (thirteen years ago)

I've got a big bone.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)

the whole thrust of fat fascism is to say that exercise is NOT FOR YOU

it is to create a caste system where valid, productive 'exercise' is the preserve of the elite

― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:21 AM (3 minutes ago)

i wouldn't say that's the "whole thrust", but yeah, i can see how that's part of it. not sure it rebuts what i was saying, though. was it meant to?

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)

what other groups of people can we think of who "burden" the health care system more than most

anorexics (we should educate them about EATING, right?)
athletes (wilfully putting their bodies at risk!)
people who work long hours in stressful jobs (god they just WON'T LEARN what's good for them!)

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)

sorry, that was stupid

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)

athletes live longer + are healthier than gen pop xp

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:28 (thirteen years ago)

there's a correlation between weight and circulatory system function and a bunch of other shit, and then a correlation between that and disease/mortality rates, sure

I personally don't want to be super-fit because if I have a statistically-unlikely heart attack I want them to be able to crack through my chest and use a rib spreader, which is more difficult to do through rippling pecs, I'm told

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:29 (thirteen years ago)

athletes live longer + are healthier than gen pop xp

yes, and they also require the services of the health care system more than most

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

a few more minutes, guys, and we'll have some slash fiction

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

anorexics (we should educate them about EATING, right?)
athletes (wilfully putting their bodies at risk!)
people who work long hours in stressful jobs (god they just WON'T LEARN what's good for them!)

― lex pretend, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:28 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

this is bad trolling but also all actually true in a sense

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

Athletes (in some disciplines more than others) are more likely to have injuries requiring treatment than non-athletes, is what Lex was getting at. If you break an ankle playing football, well, you didn't have to go and play football, why should the taxpayer pay for your injury?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

lex otm - fat fascism's cloak of HEALTHINESS as a normative ideal has little to do with actual health

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:32 (thirteen years ago)

I'm in hospital fuck loads because I exercise. Also, if you live longer, you cost the state more in pension and old age costs. I think it probably all, just about balances. Apart from smoking, fuck smokers. Dirty fuckers.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:33 (thirteen years ago)

I'm fat, I'm somewhat unhealthy. And shame is EVERY reason why I'm both of those things and continue to be. That's my own problem. I'm not your* problem to solve.

(*generic "your", not directed at anyone)

It's nice that this is treated as some kind of philosophical conundrum that can be picked apart and coolly analysed. If only I could be shown the 'right' way to live...

I'm not saying anything really. These discussions usually don't bother me because I just unbookmark and move on. I'm interested in the discussion but it's almost impossible for me to engage with it on any level except to say what I've just said.

Frankly I don't think this is a situation where critical distance helps or even moves anything forward. But that's just my personal feeling on the matter.

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:34 (thirteen years ago)

if anti-obesity groups were serious about dealing with health issues they'd go after the food industry rather than fat people

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:34 (thirteen years ago)

"fat fascism" = self-important persecution complex nonsense.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

Food industry is fucking crazy.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

in some cultures being overweight is seen as a sign of prosperity and well being

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

I'm in hospital fuck loads because I exercise.

yeah i never got injured at all til i started exercising regularly!

Apart from smoking, fuck smokers. Dirty fuckers.

disgusting addicts, especially when they go outside the pub/club for a fag AND LEAVE ME BY MYSELF >:(

lex pretend, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)

"fat fascism" = self-important persecution complex nonsense.

― look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:35 PM

so fat people are never discriminated against, victimized, ostracized? well forgive me but i can quite imagine how someone on the receiving end of that might feel persecuted

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:38 (thirteen years ago)

waitaminnit, who is nakhchivan now?

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)

lol cutty. great guy.

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)

our very own paul ryan

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)

yeah everyone I know who's been in hospital in the past year was because of active sport (or having babies, we should totally ban that) except one guy who is the hands-down most active, healthiest guy I know and he nearly died of a cardiac arrest.
there's no such thing as 'the average person' when it comes to health (cf 'overweight ppl' vs 'average ppl' stupid argument upthread)

kinder, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:41 (thirteen years ago)

the important thing in all of this is simple: respect the personal autonomy of others, and that applies to EVERYONE

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:42 (thirteen years ago)

Except for fat people

latebloomer, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:43 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe what it all really comes down to is that the Old Testament behavior modification technique of shaming is quite effective at getting ppl to do relatively easy things like not swearing or not farting in public but when it gets to harder things like not fucking in 'unapproved ways' or conforming to idealized one-size-fits-all body images, it's not. There's a great attachment to shaming in many cultures even when it's ineffective - in America, it not only validates the Bible but it means you can demonize somone else and feel better about yourself even though, objectively, you're just being a puerile jerk.

Ogni tanto mi piace un'occhiata del Tevere (Michael White), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:44 (thirteen years ago)

"fat fascism" = self-important persecution complex nonsense.

― look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:35 PM

so fat people are never discriminated against, victimized, ostracized? well forgive me but i can quite imagine how someone on the receiving end of that might feel persecuted

― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:38 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yes, fat people are subject to a fascist regime. They are herded into concentration camps, summarily executed by military police, taken to secret prisons where they are interrogated and tortured. If not literally, then metaphorically, via ad campaigns, seeing thin models on television, having people make hurtful comments to them and having their doctors be pushy about their weight.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:45 (thirteen years ago)

not everybody is lucky enough to work in a store that sells fitness equipment, lb.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:45 (thirteen years ago)

this whole "burden on health care" is a stupid debate for many reasons, but "healthy people break their ankles" is not one of them

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)

MW otm

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, we need a topic for hierarchies of acceptable prejudice or something

― just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:59 PM (47 minutes ago)

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)

“The reality is that fat people are often supported in hating their bodies, in starving themselves, in engaging in unsafe exercise, and in seeking out weight loss by any means necessary. A thin person who does these things is considered mentally ill. A fat person who does these things is redeemed by them. This is why our culture has no concept of a fat person who also has an eating disorder. If you’re fat, it’s not an eating disorder — it’s a lifestyle change.” —Lesley Kinzel

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)

remember kids, because pinochet never killed people for being fat, fat people aren't 'real' victims

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)

everybody is a 'burden on health care'!

i don't know the numbers otoh, but there's some figure (in the US) that a single-digit % of people incur 50%+ amount of the healthcare costs. i mean, some people are just not healthy! or old! or broke!

no doubt some healthcare economist has tried to cost out obesity, i dunno the wonk stuff there tho.

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)

Cost of obesity is very high in healthcare.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:52 (thirteen years ago)

Or at least that's what fat hating statisticians want us to believe anyway.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:53 (thirteen years ago)

Most of the people who incur most of the healthcare costs are those who only seek out emergency treatment, rather than regular doctor visits, and it's usually linked to poverty or w/e iirc

your native bacon (mh), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:53 (thirteen years ago)

I think you mean fascisticians xp

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:53 (thirteen years ago)

there is actuarial evidence that moderate 'obesity' is a lot LESS harmful than the cardiovascular payload suffered by people overworked in high-stress, high-competition, 80+ hour a week professional environments

the difference is, we congratulate those who poison themselves with cortisone

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:54 (thirteen years ago)

yes, fat people are subject to a fascist regime. They are herded into concentration camps, summarily executed by military police, taken to secret prisons where they are interrogated and tortured. If not literally, then metaphorically, via ad campaigns, seeing thin models on television, having people make hurtful comments to them and having their doctors be pushy about their weight.

― look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:45 AM (1 minute ago)

this seriously and rather cruelly understates the intensity of the loathing and contempt that american culture habitually directs at fat people. it's more than a few hurtful comments and images of glamorously thin people. the message that to be fat is to be horrible, shameful, unlovable and worthless is deeply ingrained in our culture, and incredibly harmful.

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:55 (thirteen years ago)

are you all just joking around b/c there is definitely a fat studies field in academe that is prob full of foucault/'discipline and punish' refs, don't know if agamben is trendy there or not

seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:55 (thirteen years ago)

I quoted D&P above!

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:57 (thirteen years ago)

i wouldn't say agamben is trendy as such, daria.....foucault is definitely a canonical figure in fat studies, of course

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:58 (thirteen years ago)

xpost yep i noticed. first chapter really gets your attention

seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:58 (thirteen years ago)

I am morelike a cannonball figure in fat studies.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

this seriously and rather cruelly understates the intensity of the loathing and contempt that american culture habitually directs at fat people. it's more than a few hurtful comments and images of glamorously thin people. the message that to be fat is to be horrible, shameful, unlovable and worthless is deeply ingrained in our culture, and incredibly harmful.

― i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:55 PM (4 minutes ago)

can we quote this for truth every time ilx starts hating on fat people under the pretence of 'concern'

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:01 (thirteen years ago)

Anyone else catch that thing - Gawker? - about the woman complaining about being confused for pregnant based on her post-partem belly weight? A whole bunch of people responded, basically saying, yo, you're the editor of US Weekly, a publication dedicated almost exclusively to "baby bumps" and weight gain rumors. It's all your fault!

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:03 (thirteen years ago)

xxp

Yes. Though I would also suggest to stop feeding the troll. He's been on a manic LOL PLEASE ALLOW ME TO BE AN IGNORANT DICK roll lately. It's pathetic.

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:05 (thirteen years ago)

the message that to be fat is to be horrible, shameful, unlovable and worthless is deeply ingrained in our culture, and incredibly harmful.

― i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:55 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I find this idea hard to accept since pretty much everyone has at least one or two overweight people in their immediate family and probably more in their circle of friends, workplace, etc. My brother is fat, and my dad is fat. I love them both very deeply. I want them both to lose weight, because, in their cases, it's clearly causing health problems. The last time I saw my dad, it was clearly difficult for him to take a long walk with us -- this was upsetting to me. They are both wonderful people who are loved by many family members and friends. I think they would both find the idea that the culture makes them feel that they are "horrible, shameful, worthless" because they are overweight to be at very least an exaggeration. And I think that people who feel that kind of deep shame have likely internalized it from an early age, and it's probably often about more than just what the media says about fat people, but I realize that this is armchair psychology and generalization.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:06 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think equating the stigma attached to being overweight with the stigma attached to being gay, or using emotive terms like "fascist", is helpful to any side of this discourse.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:06 (thirteen years ago)

It's also bullshit. x-post

Melissa W, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:06 (thirteen years ago)

capitalism is great at giving us 'sugar'. not metaphorical in this one case though.

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:08 (thirteen years ago)

Capitalism is great at treating us all like thoughtless, instinctive, know-nothing babies.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:10 (thirteen years ago)

"great at treating us all like" or "reveals us to be"

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)

I find this idea hard to accept since pretty much everyone has at least one or two overweight people in their immediate family and probably more in their circle of friends, workplace, etc. [...] I think they would both find the idea that the culture makes them feel that they are "horrible, shameful, worthless" because they are overweight to be at very least an exaggeration. And I think that people who feel that kind of deep shame have likely internalized it from an early age, and it's probably often about more than just what the media says about fat people, but I realize that this is armchair psychology and generalization.

― look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:06 AM (1 minute ago)

no offense, but i think the contempt directed at fat people is so "ordinary" within our culture as to be all but invisible, unless you make a real effort to see it.

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)

Let's go with "encourages us on a number of levels, many of them subliminal".

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)

hurting, you're kinda being an idiot rn

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

yeah

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

I would also suggest to stop feeding the troll. He's been on a manic LOL PLEASE ALLOW ME TO BE AN IGNORANT DICK roll lately. It's pathetic.

― some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:05 AM (7 minutes ago)

uh, was this directed at me? if so, why?

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:15 (thirteen years ago)

No. Hurting 2.

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:16 (thirteen years ago)

dick is the german word for fat

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:17 (thirteen years ago)

xp, should have guessed

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:18 (thirteen years ago)

x-post you're on a roll today, huh?

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:18 (thirteen years ago)

my employer has one tentacle of business in those information kiosk/terminals used on trading floors. they know the news people click on those down to the second. celeb trash pap kstew kardashian stuff is widely consumed. this is in ostensibly the most information-dense hyper darwinian environment in the world!

my feeling is this example extends to all things. people's baser appetites are unstoppable. it's a matter of scale and availability.

you used to need to travel to literal ends of the earth for a pound of sugar. now, the pipeline from ground to artery is quite a bit more efficient. social shame directed at the fat is a kind of blindness.

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:19 (thirteen years ago)

http://kateharding.net/faq/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/

Don't always like Kate Harding, but this is all OTM.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)

Eh, a lot of that is true and some of it is not. 7,8, and 9, however, are key.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:24 (thirteen years ago)

is sitting worse than fat

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:24 (thirteen years ago)

i don't know how to evaluate the claims of that blog post in light of other things i've read. eg from WHO Raised BMI also increases the risks of cancer of the breast, colon, prostrate, endometroium, kidney and gallbladder. Chronic overweight and obesity contribute significantly to osteoarthritis, a major cause of disability in adults. Although obesity should be considered a disease in its own right, it is also one of the key risk factors for other chronic diseases together with smoking, high blood pressure and high blood cholesterol. In the analyses carried out for World Health Report 2002, approximately 58% of diabetes and 21% of ischaemic heart disease and 8-42% of certain cancers globally were attributable to a BMI above 21 kg/m2.

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:31 (thirteen years ago)

2. Poor nutrition and a sedentary lifestyle do cause health problems, in people of all sizes. This is why it’s so fucking crucial to separate the concept of “obesity” from “eating crap and not exercising.” The two are simply not synonymous — not even close — and it’s not only incredibly offensive but dangerous for thin people to keep pretending that they are. There are thin people who eat crap and don’t exercise — and are thus putting their health at risk — and there are fat people who treat their bodies very well but remain fat. Really truly.

this is crucial indeed

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:32 (thirteen years ago)

even those of us who are fortunate enough not to suffer fat prejudice should remember it

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 17:32 (thirteen years ago)

This is mostly for the ladies, though? Fat dudes have been ruling the roost since forever. Pretty much any position of power, you could envision a fat guy taking office there.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 18:13 (thirteen years ago)

not all of the world is as open-minded, tolerant and equitable as new jersey, philip

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)

Capitalism is great at treating us all like thoughtless, instinctive, know-nothing babies.

― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:10 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"great at treating us all like" or "reveals us to be"

― goole, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:12 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"constitutes us as"

max, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 18:18 (thirteen years ago)

I'm gonna question the idea that 'there are fat people who treat their bodies very well but remain fat.' I'm unaware of any medical condition that reverses the basic calories in/calories out equation - if you 'treat your body well' but keep eating more than you expend, you're going to remain fat. That's your choice, etc., but I'm not sure you can say that people who do so are "treat[ing] their bodies well." Being heavy isn't good for you. (Which doesn't mean that being thin is inherently good, or that a heavy person can't live a long, wonderful life - but statistically, if you're carrying 100 extra pounds above average, you're in for health issues down the road.)

nb: I got on the scale this week and weighed in heavier than I ever have - I've gone from big to straight-up fat IMO (6'1"/260) due to complacency and so on. Given that I've had more knee and other joint pains lately than ever before, it was a wake-up call. I've set up a place in my shop to lift weights and started cleaning up my diet and personal habits. My goal is to be back to ~230 by the end of the year (aggressive, but I tend to be able to lose a moderate amount of weight quickly) and continue on from there until I'm in the 200 range.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:15 (thirteen years ago)

How about people with hypothyroidism?

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:21 (thirteen years ago)

I'm unaware of any medical condition that reverses the basic calories in/calories out equation

jury very much out on whether this is what makes people fat in the first place

goole, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:24 (thirteen years ago)

i don't think that's true. jury is out on other contributing factors. but cico is a big part of the equation no matter what.

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:27 (thirteen years ago)

xp eh, disagree - the calorie equation isn't as simple as long thought, but energy expended vs energy taken in remains the model

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:29 (thirteen years ago)

this calories in/calories out thing always smelled fishy to me.
if your body extracted the entire caloric content of food inputed, then human poo should not be able to burn, right?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:30 (thirteen years ago)

How about people with hypothyroidism?

Fair enough - that's an issue. But hardly representative of all heavy/obese people and an issue that can be treated and weight can be lost.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:31 (thirteen years ago)

here's a graph i just found on google images

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-a4snO-7u3Eo/T9YeNp-fskI/AAAAAAAAFBQ/I9j_BInRaZQ/s1600/Calorie%252Bintake%252Band%252Bobesity.JPG

flopson, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:32 (thirteen years ago)

here's another quote about the Health at Every Size movement that seems relevant:

Health at Every Size acknowledges that health is multidimensional, some aspects of which are within our control and some aspects beyond our control. Health includes genetics, effects of past behaviors, current behaviors, and access to things like healthy foods, safe movement options and affordable evidence-based healthcare. With HAES the focus is on practicing healthy habits and allowing your body to settle at whatever weight it settles.

a swarm of sentient bees (reddening), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:38 (thirteen years ago)

this calories in/calories out thing always smelled fishy to me.
if your body extracted the entire caloric content of food inputed, then human poo should not be able to burn, right?

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:30 PM (2 minutes ago)

that's a joke, right? cuz i don't think anyone has ever suggested that the human body extracts every available calorie from food. the inefficiency of the mechanism doesn't change the fact that you still have to burn as many calories as you do take in order to maintain a stable weight.

i know your nuts hurt! who's laughing? (contenderizer), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:39 (thirteen years ago)

if anti-obesity groups were serious about dealing with health issues they'd go after the food industry rather than fat people

for the record, I see the latter a lot more than the former

since Michael Pollan/Supersize Me/Food Inc/Fat Sick And Nearly Dead, there are too many docs and tv shows taking on the SAD to count

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:40 (thirteen years ago)

Alternate title for this thread: Gov. Chris Christie - C or D?

this is the dream of avril and chad (jer.fairall), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AI86f3-qFeY/UAZEJwmMDjI/AAAAAAAAA-M/fVVD5H_M6p8/s1600/Diabetes+BMI.JPG

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)

"the inefficiency of the mechanism doesn't change the fact that you still have to burn as many calories as you do take in order to maintain a stable weight."
if some foods or preparations of foods or foods eaten under certain conditions have varying degrees by which their calories are absorbed, then monitoring your caloric intake simply by counting calories seems pretty bogus, and turns "just burn more calories than you take in" into unusable advice.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)

sdrawkcab

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:53 (thirteen years ago)

statistically, if you're carrying 100 extra pounds above average, you're in for health issues down the road.

This statement seems badly set up?? "If you're not average, whatever average is, you will experience the results of being not-average in that way, whatever those results may be." Uh, duh? People with tiny bones, esp women, are more at risk for bone mass loss & osteoporosis. People who put more weight on their feet & knees may have more probs with those joints. People whose bodies are poor at processing cholesterol safely will have higher incidence of heart disease, on average, even if their diets are healthier than some people's who have lower incidence. Etc?

check the name, no caps, boom, i'm (Laurel), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:58 (thirteen years ago)

plus the whole "average body type" - again, if that exists - "equals average level of healthcare needs during yr life" seems suspect on a bunch of levels

just one little Tayto (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)

I don't see how the effects of "processing cholesterol poorly" (disregarding arguments about the impact of dietary cholesterol) are akin to statements about the effects of carrying too much weight.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 20:05 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't say "average body type."

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 20:05 (thirteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLI0cyUJoyg

flopson, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:24 (thirteen years ago)

i hate to wade into this thing, but

1. other than assholes, no one would suggest that obese people should be treated with anything other than complete respect and understanding. in typical ilx fashion, many of us are attacking a strawman representing the asshole that they WISH was present so they could be publicly debunked. also, some people on ILX are assholes so it's possible i missed a post where someone was being really ignorant.
2. other than ignorant assholes, everyone understands that some people are just naturally larger (or smaller) than others, and that even with a big change in exercise and eating habits it's going to be incredibly difficult to lose weight. personally i'm painfully aware of this (literally) because i'm very thin and i can't gain weight NO MATTER WHAT. my butt hurtz when i sit, literally.
3. being overweight or underweight can lead to negative health consequences. not for every single person, but on average. not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer. everyone knows a 96 year old who still smokes a pack a day and drinks jack daniels every night. but on average, smoking is not good for you. if you're really overweight, you're at greater risk for a number of health conditions. am i really wrong on this? if so, please tell me (i'm sure you will!). to understand this and not try to communicate it to people seems criminally negligent.
4. the link posted above (http://kateharding.net/faq/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/) has a number of good points, but leaves the reader with the perception that there's absolutely nothing to be done if you're overweight. true, diet+exercise doesn't work for some people. as i just mentioned, i have been unable to increase my weight despite upping my caloric intake to 3500+ per day for 60+days. so yeah, i get it, it doesn't work for some people. but it does work for some people, and i would never dare to tell other thin people NOT to try to change their habits. give it a shot! it might work well for you, and if doesn't, at least you know! again, that seems almost criminal to try to suppress that kind of information and conflate it with "shaming" someone.
5. again, all of this is recognizing that there really ARE people out there who wrongfully stigmatize obesity and assume that it's 100% behavioral, 0% genetic. those people suck.
6. "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." right on, Michael Pollan. it's (generally) more healthy, and regardless, it's better for the environment.

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:35 (thirteen years ago)

also, whoever said we should be focusing efforts on food companies upthread (lex, i think?) otm

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:42 (thirteen years ago)

also everyone should exercise regardless of whether or not it results in weight loss

40oz of tears (Jordan), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:46 (thirteen years ago)

even akinyele?

flopson, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:48 (thirteen years ago)

also assholes should defend themselves on their own, imo

some white dude (Turangalila), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:08 (thirteen years ago)

not sure abt the conflation of impossibility of gaining weight w/the impossibility of losing weight, granted their are prob other factors at work like weird shit w/intestinal parasites via our futuristic sterile surroundings and what not, but if you look at contemporary hunter gather cultures or people who live similarly closer to the earth there are not as far as i know any obese people, likewise with looking at old bones and people frozen in ice or whatnot, so im suspicious re there are people who just cannot lose weight, this is not a value judgement at all btw, and fwiw a lot of the science showing that people cant lose weight exercise doesnt work etc often seem p flawed after just a cursory glance, apologies if this has been covered i did not read the thread

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:18 (thirteen years ago)

of course yes losing weight is not the same as never putting it on all sorts of weird things can occur etc

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

btw from that link zs posted

4. Diets don’t work. No, really, not even if you don’t call them diets. If you want to tell me about how YOUR diet totally worked, do me a favor and wait until you’ve kept all the weight off for five years. Not one year, not four years, five years. And if you’ve kept it off for that long, congratulations. You’re literally a freak of nature.

i lost 25 pounds 5+ years ago and havent put it back on

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:20 (thirteen years ago)

literally!

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:22 (thirteen years ago)

just getting used to my new status over here, feels good

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:23 (thirteen years ago)

ice cream diet

buzza, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:23 (thirteen years ago)

lol one of the things i did was to stop eating ice cream constantly

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:24 (thirteen years ago)

9. In any case, shaming teh fatties for being “unhealthy” doesn’t fucking help. If shame made people thin, there wouldn’t be a fat person in this country, trust me. I wish I could remember who said this, ’cause it’s one of my favorite quotes of all time: “You cannot hate people for their own good.”

i dont support shaming people but to argue that it has not throughout history been an effective coercive technique is just silly

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

When some people refer to "shaming", are they referring to all the outreach by colleges and medical think-tanks trying to educate people about a growing obesity problem?

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:34 (thirteen years ago)

lol one of the things i did was to stop eating ice cream constantly

― lag∞n, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:24 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Wish I could do this, btw, except with cheese.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:38 (thirteen years ago)

not sure life is worth a damn without cheese and wine tbh

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:42 (thirteen years ago)

It's been a staple food, and I should probably just work more exercise into my day, but if I had a shot at getting back into a 38 or 36 waist again, I'd go for it.

how's life, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:44 (thirteen years ago)

one day they'll figure out how to put reserveratol in ice cream and i can stop this wine nonsense.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:46 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1839708,00.html

Melissa W, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:48 (thirteen years ago)

2. other than ignorant assholes, everyone understands that some people are just naturally larger (or smaller) than others, and that even with a big change in exercise and eating habits it's going to be incredibly difficult to lose weight. personally i'm painfully aware of this (literally) because i'm very thin and i can't gain weight NO MATTER WHAT. my butt hurtz when i sit, literally.

Metabolisms and bone structure and so on play a role, sure - but that 'naturally larger or smaller' is very different from obesity as it exists in the west today. Chalking up the obesity epidemic to these natural differences is wrong, IMO.

I have 8-inch wrists, so I'm built large - which means that the male model look is probably out for me. At ~165, I'd have no muscle mass to speak of. 200 is, in my experience, my ideal weight as far as physical function and looks. But my frame is not the reason I weigh 260 right now - milkshakes with my girlfriend and going out drinking and eating a shitty breakfast are why I weigh 260.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:09 (thirteen years ago)

Chalking up the obesity epidemic to these natural differences is wrong, IMO.

here's what i said:

some people are just naturally larger (or smaller) than others

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:11 (thirteen years ago)

There's a hitch. The people who successfully overrode their genes were burning a stunning 900 kilocalories more per day than their less active counterparts, which amounted to three to four hours of moderate exercise daily. "That's a lot," acknowledges Rampersaud, who tracked participants' physical activity for seven days using accelerometers. By contrast, the volunteers in the "low" activity group were doing about two to three hours of gardening, housework or brisk walking each day. That's the kind of activity many people in the general American population — which, unlike the Amish, relies on cars and dishwashers and washing machines — would consider a serious workout.

one of the biggest issues i've had re weight is that my lifestyle is so sedentary. i work in an office at a desk all day typing and using the phone. and then drive home. and then play video games. i've had to consciously make an effort to do even this kind of low activity that the article is describing (going to the gym, adding sports to my lifestyle, going on walks -- ie: stuff i kinda hate doing but i realize i need to do it to stay at least somewhat in shape).

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:11 (thirteen years ago)

right, Z_S, but you're still linking "naturally larger" to obesity

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:15 (thirteen years ago)

it's a fine line between husky and fatso though.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:19 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, i really do think that there are some people that are "naturally" inclined to be obese. and yes, in cavemen days maybe they wouldn't be the case. but in today's world - where people are generally more sedentary (people who drive all the time and work office jobs get almost zero exercise), food portions are waaaaaay the hell too big everywhere almost anywhere you, corn syrup is in everything, some people actually think the segway is a good idea, etc - that same caveman might be 30 pounds heavier.

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:26 (thirteen years ago)

ya I don't think there's any doubt that some people are inherently better at packing on the pounds than others

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:28 (thirteen years ago)

so im suspicious re there are people who just cannot lose weight

from what i understand the hard part is keeping the lost weight off? like if you have been overweight for any significant amount of time your body will actively try to get you back to that weight by conserving calories more efficiently?

Lamp, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:34 (thirteen years ago)

by making u eat ice cream

lag∞n, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:36 (thirteen years ago)

bill clinton seems like a dude who trends towards huskiness, and has managed to reverse course, but he's got the resources of an ex-president at his disposal, plus the grim reaper's scythe at his throat. dude looks like he could have an ice cream, though.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:38 (thirteen years ago)

like he actually looks healthier in his burger-gobbling pizzalord heyday.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:40 (thirteen years ago)

from what i understand the hard part is keeping the lost weight off? like if you have been overweight for any significant amount of time your body will actively try to get you back to that weight by conserving calories more efficiently?

Personally, I think this is where exercise and type of exercise comes into play. If you put on muscle via strength training and build energy via cardio and keep training (combined with leading a less sedentary lifestyle in general), rather than just restrict calories/diet, you're more likely to keep the weight off. Juke the metabolic set points just like fat does.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:48 (thirteen years ago)

I can track my slow weight gain over the past 7 years to two things:

1) age
2) gradual change in diet for the worse (fewer home-cooked meals, ones that are saturated in fats and butter, more soft drinks and beer/wine and less water)
3) larger portion sizes
4) drastically less exercize

I was able to halt my weight gain by changing the size of my portions and drinking fewer soft drinks. I am pathologically unable to start exercising otherwise I'm sure I'd be losing weight; whenever I go on vacation, I do a lot of walking and I always lose 5 to 7 pounds.

I am writing this not to say that my experience is universal, but to say that the tips ppl put out there for losing weight and keeping it off would ABSOLUTELY work for me; I have not made the decision to actually do it and, without that firm decision, I don't have the willpower to actually make it happen. I also don't think I'm a special snowflake; while I recognize that it wouldn't work for everyone, I find it really hard to believe it would only work for me.

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:50 (thirteen years ago)

4. Diets don’t work. No, really, not even if you don’t call them diets. If you want to tell me about how YOUR diet totally worked, do me a favor and wait until you’ve kept all the weight off for five years. Not one year, not four years, five years. And if you’ve kept it off for that long, congratulations. You’re literally a freak of nature.

i lost 25 pounds 5+ years ago and havent put it back on

― lag∞n, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:20 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

do I win this contest, kept 60+ pounds off for 10 years
still chubby though, I like food more than I do exercising

Farrah Abraham had many songs/ many songs had Farrah Abraham (m bison), Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:55 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't step on a scale for like 3 years and recently found out I was 20 pounds lighter than I thought I was, I recommend walking a lot and making sure that you get both pizza *and* burritos in your weekly diet

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)

I don't want to give away any other secrets because I am writing an ebook

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)

you must have had one weird trick

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:03 (thirteen years ago)

like he actually looks healthier in his burger-gobbling pizzalord heyday.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ya well he's a 65 y/o heart attack survivor now

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:04 (thirteen years ago)

I think there are definitely some pretty difficult philosophical arguments in all this about the limits of free will in the face of capitalism (or any social order, really), i.e. if you have to, or at least feel strong pressure to work long hours in a sedentary job AND are constantly confronted with food options that are not only unhealthy, but unnaturally so (e.g. made absurdly calorie-dense and yet unsatisfying by addition of vegetable oil products and corn syrup and the like), it's going to take a lot more "will" to overcome those forces and maintain proper calorie intake, exercise, etc. I mean shit, I was in the office from 9am until 1am yesterday, and I'm there late again today, and I'll probably eat Chipotle tonight, and it will probably be hard to turn down a little cheese and sour cream (although I'll at least ask them to go light on it). And it may just be unrealistic to think we can get everyone to sufficiently change their habits in the face of these enormous challenges.

That said, I am unconvinced by the "healthy at any weight" approach both scientifically and psychologically. One thing I do know is that a couple of months ago I told my dad "I want you to start exercising regularly, because I want you healthy, and so does [my six month old daughter]." I said this out of genuine concern and pain at having seen him have trouble taking a long walk and experiencing other weight-related problems. He has since started to walk an hour every day and has already lost some weight. Obviously this is only an approach I could take with a family member (and really, a parent, as opposed to a sibling or child). But I think that always treading lightly over the subject can do people a disservice. I don't mean fat people need to be constantly told to lose weight, but I think the idea that DOCTORS shouldn't tell them to lose weight, out of sensitivity, is absurd.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:05 (thirteen years ago)

Lose weight when you're old and the skin doesn't tighten up as easily, right?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:05 (thirteen years ago)

I had chipotle tonight

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:06 (thirteen years ago)

I lost about 35 pounds 7 years ago. I put back on 15-20 but I know exactly why and when. It was when got a car and stopped walking everywhere and moved back to the US and started eating out more than I had been. I am in the process of losing it and have about 10 more to go again but it's slow going and frustrating. I'm doing this for a number of reasons including health ones but mostly because I just feel better in every way.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:06 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, Milo that's right.

I don't know why I posted that btw. It just seemed like we were sharing.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:06 (thirteen years ago)

ya all everyone has to do is walk everywhere, it's magic

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)

You're sort of not wrong there. It is pretty amazing how much of a difference that made for me.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:08 (thirteen years ago)

walking is good but a lot of people respond to excersize by just eating more

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:09 (thirteen years ago)

When I went to Rutgers, which has two campuses on opposite sides of a small city, I lost like 20 pounds just because I started always briskly walking to and from classes on the other campus (maybe a 20-30 minute walk each way).

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:09 (thirteen years ago)

well the thing about walking-to-work/store type walking is that you don't really think of it as exercise that you earned soda-points for, its just what you had to do to get somewhere

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)

for the first time in my life I am gaining weight

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)

or like, actually having the ability to gain weight

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)

I guess a lot of this is "It's hard, don't expect people to do it" vs. "It's hard, don't shame people for finding it hard."

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

Standing up, much less walking, is a huge thing.

Summers in Texas are definitely worse than when I grew up - there are at least 30 days a year that it's unhealthy for kids to be outside, playing, from noon until 7 or 8. I imagine worse summers and more people living in hot-as-balls places like Phoenix can't help childhood obesity.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:12 (thirteen years ago)

I don't expect people to do it, that is why we need to force them to do it

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:13 (thirteen years ago)

Off-the-cuff comments like in that Time article: "skip dessert!" "take the stairs!" really get me irritated. Making banal observations on either side of this argument-- just like "diets don't work!" on the skeptic side-- are just destructive and provide people with a rose-coloured and inaccurate view about what is really required re: weight loss / weight gain.

nedless summer (Ówen P.), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:14 (thirteen years ago)

Some of the studies I work on are looking into the early determinants of obesity including including prenatal influences like how much the mom weighs and how much she gains during pregnancy. It's pretty fascinating stuff.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:15 (thirteen years ago)

skipping dessert and taking the stairs are actually good ideas, doing lots of banal things adds up

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:18 (thirteen years ago)

janeane garafalo only eats one big meal a day.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:23 (thirteen years ago)

if u eat a lot of desert skipping it is prob yr single best move

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)

any interest in a health and wellbeing board? we have the nutrition nazis thread and one about the gym but I'm wondering if there'd be more to talk about on an ILHW?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:26 (thirteen years ago)

I gained a bunch of weight once upon a time because a Jamba Juice opened up a block from my apartment and I didn't realize that the Caribbean Passions were basically fruit juice milkshakes and ~550-600 calories apiece.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:26 (thirteen years ago)

yah sure "skipping dessert" is OK, I guess, but there's still a currency of dessert

nedless summer (Ówen P.), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:27 (thirteen years ago)

i.e. "I skipped dessert at lunch, I can have it for dinner," says Mrs. P in 2008

nedless summer (Ówen P.), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:28 (thirteen years ago)

I have been ridiculed by friends for years because we went out once for drinks and dessert and I ordered a small cheese plate

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:28 (thirteen years ago)

I don't encourage cheese-plate-shaming but DJP you should've known better

nedless summer (Ówen P.), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:31 (thirteen years ago)

you could probably have cheese plate if you cut out all sugary drinks instead.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:32 (thirteen years ago)

xp: step off, it was a great cheese plate

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:33 (thirteen years ago)

also people who drink alcohol all the time and a lot of it, they often end up fat, weirdly

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:33 (thirteen years ago)

fat, but jolly

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)

i drink alcohol all the time and i'm thin and that means that everyone's experience is just like mine

Thanks WEBSITE!! (Z S), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)

unlike Chris Christie?

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)

re dessert i've found trader joes frozen yogurt is super delicious and is basically just cold yogurt. it's my goto replacement dessert

Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:35 (thirteen years ago)

I think there's actually some evidence to the contrary re: hardcore alcoholics, they're often very skinny.

Binge-drinking liquid bread is a no-no, though.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:36 (thirteen years ago)

also, from my experience w/ WW alcohol has a ton of calories (tho beer has surprisingly few - beer gut is a lie!)

Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:37 (thirteen years ago)

my weight loss did mysteriously coeside w aging out of the getting wasted four nights a week demographic

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:37 (thirteen years ago)

I drink alcohol like once a month. :|

Melissa W, Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:38 (thirteen years ago)

maybe we should rename "beergut" to "beer-induced jerkygut"

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:42 (thirteen years ago)

i drink alcohol all the time and i'm thin and that means that everyone's experience is just like mine

if you are under 40 I want you to get back to me on this one a year or two after you hit 40

we don't wanna miss a THING!!! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 30 August 2012 00:59 (thirteen years ago)

If all you do is drink martinis, single malt scotches, and red wine, you will not get fat. It says so in Leviticus.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:01 (thirteen years ago)

re dessert i've found trader joes frozen yogurt is super delicious and is basically just cold yogurt.

Yeah but that's because most yogurt is so packed with sugar that it's basically warm ice cream.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:09 (thirteen years ago)

but not trader joe yogurt! plain non-fat!

Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:13 (thirteen years ago)

also tart yum

Mordy, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:14 (thirteen years ago)

A 16oz container has 240 calories - the same as a 20 oz bottle of coke.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:18 (thirteen years ago)

this whole discussion is semi-lol to me because I'm currently at my parents' house snacking on cucumbers picked from their garden, making this week the healthiest eating I've done in maybe 18 months

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:20 (thirteen years ago)

Who eats 16 ounces of yogurt in a sitting?

boxall, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:23 (thirteen years ago)

well, dan's eating 16 pounds of cucumber in one sitting

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:25 (thirteen years ago)

hey let's not be judgmental

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:25 (thirteen years ago)

brb, running out of cukes

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:26 (thirteen years ago)

since this has largely become a personal experience thing i successfully started going to the gym regularly 4 yrs ago after a long period of being full-on sedentary; i haven't really "lost weight" but i have successfully changed my behavior to the point where i feel MUCH worse if i don't get regular exercise. this is pretty amazing considering how hard i suck at forcibly changing my behavior and the result is that i really bristle when reasonable public policy messaging about, like, eating better and getting moderate exercise is targeted from a "fat acceptance" perspective.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

How big is an average serving of yogurt? 8oz? The site I looked at said 240 for a 2-cup container, maybe that's not 16oz?

I'm as guilty as anyone but if you're worried about weight you just shouldn't have 'dessert' at all outside of special occasions.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:33 (thirteen years ago)

6oz, 130 calories is what I read off the label of the kind I buy, which I think is fairly typical.

You'd also hope that the nutritional content (would "value" be the wrong word here) is more than half a bottle of Coke.

boxall, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:36 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299454/Beware-office-feeder-They-tempt-sweets-treats-tuck--to.html

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:36 (thirteen years ago)

i really bristle when reasonable public policy messaging about, like, eating better and getting moderate exercise is targeted from a "fat acceptance" perspective.

But isn't your experience the entire point of fat acceptance? That it's possible (and a worthy goal) to get healthier without necessarily losing weight or making that your goal? That losing weight doesn't have to be the underlying message of campaigns aiming to get people to eat better and exercise?

some white dude (Turangalila), Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:45 (thirteen years ago)

well, yes and no--fear of becoming a rotund office drone by the age of 30 was a tremendous motivator for me to get off my ass. so i've basically "maintained" and recognize that if i made some other lifestyle changes i could actually probably lose some weight.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:49 (thirteen years ago)

I went from 6'3 235 to 190 because of cutty starting the first Nutrition Nazi thread and have kept all the weight off. It must have been 3 years now or close.

svend, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:51 (thirteen years ago)

wow!

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:55 (thirteen years ago)

I'm 5'8" 141 lbs and my BMI is in perfect Normal range. I don't know what you chuckleheads are talking about

― burt_stanton

buzza, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:58 (thirteen years ago)

but not trader joe yogurt! plain non-fat!

I have a tub in my fridge right now so I went and looked. A cup has 15 grams of sugar, which is a little more than a tablespoon. It's dessert, dude!

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:13 (thirteen years ago)

I lost 40 pounds 2 years ago just by balancing out my meals & upping my healthy foods like veggies whole grains nuts etc and walking every day. Kept it off for about 6 months and then fell off the wagon. Been lolshamespiral ever since and am back at my original weight. The positive thing I guess now is that I know how to do it, and I can do it, I enjoyed how I felt when I was doing it and a lot of the things I did while I was losing the weight have become habit since then...so it's not like it will be hard or unfamiliar. IT's just the doing.

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:14 (thirteen years ago)

6oz, 130 calories is what I read off the label of the kind I buy, which I think is fairly typical.

You'd also hope that the nutritional content (would "value" be the wrong word here) is more than half a bottle of Coke.

― boxall, Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:36 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Right. A calorie is a calorie, but there's still a difference between eating even 240 calories worth of yogurt (which will probably be relatively filling and supply you with protein and calcium) and 240 calories worth of coke (which will just make you feel shitty and not be satisfying at all)

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:14 (thirteen years ago)

ok at least there was an Akinyele track posted

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

I decided to never talk about weight, ti's fucking hard because goddamn try it sometime. I mean it's easy but you'll very quickly realize how goddamn many conversations you can't talk in. "Talk about weight less; talk about Akinyele more" – me "Oh yes you will be licking my dick tonight" – Akinyele

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:28 (thirteen years ago)

It's good, I'm practicing my listening skills, but what I am listening to is a bunch of bullshit about how many weight watchers points everyone's lunch is. *suicides*

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:30 (thirteen years ago)

never wouldve pegged u for an akinyele fan

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:31 (thirteen years ago)

could you steer the conversation towards trader joes desserts in the same way seemingly all of ilx threads converge upon trader joes desserts?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:32 (thirteen years ago)

god Akinyele got me through so many graveyard shifts
<3 him

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:33 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't figure out all these songs were Akinyele until years later though bcz it was a bunch of unlabelled CDs my gay roommate had burned for me

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:33 (thirteen years ago)

that's right I pointed out he was gay for not any reason
I am awful

The Equalizer Busy Equalizing (Crabbits), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:34 (thirteen years ago)

hahaha

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:34 (thirteen years ago)

crabbits otm, it creeped me out how for a while it was all I thought/talked about. def filling brain with other enjoyable pursuits is key.

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:36 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah. I intentionally no longer engage in body talk with friends/associates irl. My co-worker keeps whining about how fat she thinks she is and I just ignore it and change the subject.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:41 (thirteen years ago)

ignore it and put on unlabeled akinyele cd

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:43 (thirteen years ago)

I ignore it rather than engage in some sort of "Oh stop, you're not fat" convo with her. We have more interesting things we could be talking about.

I have no idea who akinyele is btw. Is that bad?

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:45 (thirteen years ago)

yes

call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:45 (thirteen years ago)

:(

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:46 (thirteen years ago)

:0

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:46 (thirteen years ago)

(quietly googles, says nothing)

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:50 (thirteen years ago)

put it in yr mouth (kale)

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

lol

call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:53 (thirteen years ago)

lol I get it (thankyou google)

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:57 (thirteen years ago)

not that anyone asked, but i will share more bc i have gotten more and more interested in this topic the more ive gotten interested in feminism.

i was always a husky kid but i started to really get bigger from the time i was about 11 until i was 16 which is when i was at my largest (~260 lbs, 5'11"). i got a lot of concern trolling from my mom throughout my childhood, and she would say that she didnt want me to turn out like my half-sister (not her kid) who is p big.

at 16 i did start exercising but i went vegetarian then vegan (not for health reasons) and i can probably attribute maintaining this weight due to that since i dont exercise in any meaningful way anymore (and havent for years). ive come to accept my current body (give or take 10 pounds) as my new normal though ive never felt it was a "nice" body.

i think when my wife and i started dating, we had one of those up until 3 shutting down the restaurant and talking outside dates and we talked a lot about our body issues. one of the things i remember was that her mom gave her slim fast when she was 9 i think. maybe her mom was projecting because she was on some intense no fat diet plus crazy amounts of running. but for most of her childhood, my wife and her friends had this intense pressure from home, at school, and in the world at-large that she was always in danger of being ugly because of weight.

Farrah Abraham had many songs/ many songs had Farrah Abraham (m bison), Thursday, 30 August 2012 02:58 (thirteen years ago)

im trying to think if this is illustrative of they ways that fat stigmas affect men differently from women but im having difficulty articulating it

Farrah Abraham had many songs/ many songs had Farrah Abraham (m bison), Thursday, 30 August 2012 03:00 (thirteen years ago)

That is not an uncommon experience, sadly.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 03:00 (thirteen years ago)

Your wife's, I mean.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 03:01 (thirteen years ago)

my mom's mom made her take diet pills. I think this kind of parent-to-child transferred anxiety is often at the heart of these things.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 03:03 (thirteen years ago)

We have talked about this sort of thing a lot on the girl thread, it plays a big part in a lot of situations, def.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 30 August 2012 03:05 (thirteen years ago)

I can understand skepticism of the upper end of BMI but idg all of the weird comments itt about the lower end of the bmi range. I guess this is not the thread to discuss that other (probably more common) side of male body image issues though.

wk, Thursday, 30 August 2012 04:30 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/30/science/low-calorie-diet-doesnt-prolong-life-study-of-monkeys-finds.html?_r=1&ref=science

this fuckin study

how's life, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:34 (thirteen years ago)

Well, that's very thin though.

9.5 stones for a 6 ft man?

Mark G, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:41 (thirteen years ago)

why does every monkey study end with "the monkeys died" ;_;

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:41 (thirteen years ago)

tbf scientists were trying to make them immortal, they just failed

iatee, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:51 (thirteen years ago)

Only one dog dies in this study: The Three Dogs scenario - A 'thinky' thing...

Mark G, Thursday, 30 August 2012 13:51 (thirteen years ago)

One of the downsides of co-habiting with someone who loves cooking and food in general ("a foodie" I guess, *sigh*) is that I put on a noticeable amount of weight. We used to have a proper meal every night and it was always too tempting to come back for seconds. Now that we no longer live together, I've made a conscious effort to eat fewer carbs and generally curb the amount I eat. I'll have smaller evening meals and avoid pasta, bread (my ultimate downfall are sandwiches because they're so easy to get hold of on the way back and forth to work etc)... I've also been cycling slightly further to work in the mornings and evenings. I feel like I've lost weight, but the scales don't seem to register.

I don't know how I feel about my weight. It's something I think about in private. I'm probably slightly over my ideal weight and not very toned. If anything I'd like to lose weight in order to improve my posture. I find myself compensating for a beer belly and moobs by drawing myself in or stooping, and if I lost weight I'd be happier walking around.

Click here to read in HD (dog latin), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:23 (thirteen years ago)

I feel like I've lost weight, but the scales don't seem to register.

This is the worst. You change your habits, you kick some ass, you're feeling good, you feel like you've got a healthy glow or something, then you look at a scale and it's all like "244".

how's life, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:28 (thirteen years ago)

Not getting drawn in to the larger thread but I don't understand why anyone cares about weight as a number? Measure your waistline at the same time every day instead, that will tell you more about your changing fitness, I think.

check the name, no caps, boom, i'm (Laurel), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

otm

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:36 (thirteen years ago)

Oh yeah, no doubt. And I realize that there are a lot of variables that go into health and fitness and whatever. But if you've been like, pounding it for a couple months and you see that dusty scale sitting there and you're like "I wonder..." and the scale's like "psyche, fool!"

how's life, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:37 (thirteen years ago)

But...who cares?? The scale tells you a data point that is way less connected to your fitness than you think. It's like having a mirror to tell you that your hair is brown? Okay not really but hyperbolically.

Do your pants fit? Can you bike up that hill and not feel taxed? Etc. Functional fitness is the only kind that really matters to almost everyone, afaict.

check the name, no caps, boom, i'm (Laurel), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:40 (thirteen years ago)

my trousers are falling down when i walk, is that good enough? Losing weight sucks, now I have to put extra holes in my belt.

Click here to read in HD (dog latin), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)

xp:

The scale tells you a data point that is way less connected to your fitness than you think.

That's what I said!

how's life, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)

laurel otm, i have no idea why anyone fixates on WEIGHT. if you exercise you'll put weight ON in muscle. just look in the mirror!

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)

being fat sucks

carne asada, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:47 (thirteen years ago)

I don't currently have a mirror other than the bathroom cabinet. Not having a mirror for a while can be a real weird thing - you catch yourself in a window and it's like "oh okay, that's what I look like eh?".

Click here to read in HD (dog latin), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:49 (thirteen years ago)

even worse is when you see yourself in a picture. fuck that

carne asada, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:51 (thirteen years ago)

Which cinema is that on at?

Mark G, Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:52 (thirteen years ago)

If you're a thin person with little muscle mass, then exercise will probably make you gain weight, in fact. If you're big and it's soft stuff with not much fitness underneath it, exercise will probably make you lose weight...for a while.

If you're "overweight" but not "fat" (bear with me just for the example's sake), exercise will probably not change your weight v much? Results vary greatly by individual.

check the name, no caps, boom, i'm (Laurel), Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)

i was pretty fat 6'2" about 265 lbs and was weak as shit. with a mix of lifting heavy shit and metabolic conditioning i was able to lose wight while gaining strength, now down to 205 . but the change in body composition is hueg. I think the lifting was the most beneficial because i have been down to this weight before with mostly aerobic stuff but i looked terrible.

carne asada, Thursday, 30 August 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)

how do people w/out mirrors know if their clothes look good, this is mystifying, like many people do not own full length mirrors how do they survive

lag∞n, Thursday, 30 August 2012 18:14 (thirteen years ago)

feel good, look good

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 30 August 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON6tBq2Up_o&feature=relmfu

good weightwatcher jokes then segues into jokes about playing minesweeper with lou reed

Philip Nunez, Friday, 31 August 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)

If you're big and it's soft stuff with not much fitness underneath it, exercise will probably make you lose weight...for a while.

If you're "overweight" but not "fat" (bear with me just for the example's sake), exercise will probably not change your weight v much

If this were true, how would athletes be capable of maintaining an athletic physique? Wouldn't they either have to exercise ever greater amounts or wind up gaining back weight?

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Friday, 31 August 2012 02:02 (thirteen years ago)

what does "maintaining an athletic physique" have to do with how much you weigh?

Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Friday, 31 August 2012 02:03 (thirteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:National_Football_League_2008.svg

blank, Friday, 31 August 2012 02:04 (thirteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:National_Football_League_2008.svg

blank, Friday, 31 August 2012 02:04 (thirteen years ago)

agggh NFL_LOGO.JPG

blank, Friday, 31 August 2012 02:05 (thirteen years ago)

NFL players actively try to gain large amounts of weight -- not really what I mean by athletic physique

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Friday, 31 August 2012 02:05 (thirteen years ago)

what does "maintaining an athletic physique" have to do with how much you weigh?

― Lil Swayne of Pie (DJP), Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:03 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I mean sports where athletes get down to low body fat -- if exercise really didn't keep this fat off then no athlete would be able to maintain low body fat

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Friday, 31 August 2012 02:06 (thirteen years ago)

oh right they deon't get exercise

blank, Friday, 31 August 2012 02:06 (thirteen years ago)

news flash: athletes are special; not everyone needs to be an athlete to be healthy

blank, Friday, 31 August 2012 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/bittman-is-alzheimers-type-3-diabetes/

Mordy, Thursday, 27 September 2012 13:23 (thirteen years ago)

“Adopting a sane diet, a diet contrary to the standard American diet (which I like to refer to as SAD), would appear to give you a far better shot at avoiding diabetes in all of its forms, along with its dreaded complications. There are, as usual, arguments to be made for enlisting government help in that struggle, but for now, put down that soda!”

I like his recipes, but this smug condescension makes me want to exile him to douchebag island.

controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Thursday, 27 September 2012 13:42 (thirteen years ago)

being condescending to fat people is one of life's little pleasures

adam, Thursday, 27 September 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)

Bittman is one of my least favorite people ever.

Jeff, Thursday, 27 September 2012 14:30 (thirteen years ago)

He didn't used to be this bad but then he read some Pollan and got all holier than thou.

Jeff, Thursday, 27 September 2012 14:32 (thirteen years ago)

I love How to Cook Everything, but usually avoid anything he writes now because he became unbearable.

controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Thursday, 27 September 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

I have no scientific articles to back this up, but from my own experience and that of other people I know, I think your body adjusts to certain diets. If you eat nothing but vegetables and soups for a month, your body will start to crave them.

When I had surgery I couldn't drive or even walk too far and I ate a lot of deliveries. After three weeks of this, I only craved pizzas and burritos and lots of cookies. That's not my normal diet.

I used to live upstairs from a convenience store...every morning I craved chocolate donuts and Mrs. Field's cookies. I was so unhappy with myself! Before that I ate a bagel or oatmeal every morning.

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Italo Night at Some Gay Club (Mount Cleaners), Thursday, 27 September 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)

bittman's post-pollan nose-in-the-air cookbook, "food matters" has some really good ideas/recipes if you can get past the lame title and bitchy flavor text.

adam, Thursday, 27 September 2012 16:25 (thirteen years ago)

you have the right to remain fat. anything you eat or drink can and will be held against you in a court of lol.

am0n, Thursday, 27 September 2012 16:31 (thirteen years ago)

i flipped through how to cook everything recently, and it didn't seem less condescending than that article. "to really experience popcorn you have to pop it over a stove!" "you really have to eat ice cream fresh or it's not the same! everyone must buy an ice cream machine." stuff like that.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 19:26 (thirteen years ago)

also, you probably should put down that soda!

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 19:27 (thirteen years ago)

I never read the text in that, just the recipes.

controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Thursday, 27 September 2012 19:53 (thirteen years ago)

Lots of people revealing themselves as sorta assholish on this thread, unsurprisingly

homosexual II, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:02 (thirteen years ago)

Don't want to perpetuate it either, but why do people (mostly men, it would seem), want to simplify this sooo much? It's only okay if someone is fat for certain reasons? I feel like as a fat woman, my experience is beyond what most of you can comprehend (except, that is, other fat chicks).

homosexual II, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:06 (thirteen years ago)

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/bittman-is-alzheimers-type-3-diabetes/

― Mordy, Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:23 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

“Adopting a sane diet, a diet contrary to the standard American diet (which I like to refer to as SAD), would appear to give you a far better shot at avoiding diabetes in all of its forms, along with its dreaded complications. There are, as usual, arguments to be made for enlisting government help in that struggle, but for now, put down that soda!”

I like his recipes, but this smug condescension makes me want to exile him to douchebag island.

― controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:42 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

being condescending to fat people is one of life's little pleasures

― adam, Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:10 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Bittman is one of my least favorite people ever.

― Jeff, Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:30 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

There's nothing in that article about weight or being fat or fat people, so IDGI.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:06 (thirteen years ago)

Sorry, there *IS* some stuff about obesity but it's not the point.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)

soda causes obesity

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:10 (thirteen years ago)

standard american diet does not necessarily cause obesity

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:11 (thirteen years ago)

maybe some health thing happened to bittman between "everyone must buy an ice cream machine!" and "put down that soda!" but still seems the same amount of condescending.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:13 (thirteen years ago)

red meat, sugary desserts, high-fat foods, and refined grains.[1] It also typically contains high-fat dairy products, high-sugar drinks,[2] and higher intakes of processed meat

my parents have been eating lasagna for a week but that's not typically their diet, they eat chicken and brown rice and salad but they also drink soda and i think that kills them.

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:20 (thirteen years ago)

i think stuff like this

Put as simply as possible (in case your eyes glaze over as quickly as mine when it comes to high school biology), insulin “calls” your cells, asking them to take glucose from the bloodstream: “Yoo-hoo. Pick this stuff up!”

When the insulin calls altogether too often — as it does when you drink sugar-sweetened beverages and repeatedly eat junk food — the cells are overwhelmed, and say, “Leave me alone.” They become resistant. This makes the insulin even more insistent and, to make matters worse, all those elevated insulin levels are bad for your blood vessels.

makes me mad on behalf of my mom, who studied genetics, drinks soda, eats rice and is obese

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:23 (thirteen years ago)

childish anti-intellectualism is nagl in someone whose public persona is now 'when are people going to realize the facts about how they're living???'

j., Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:28 (thirteen years ago)

cola is pretty delicious. i'm drinking a 2 liter right now. btw if anyone wants my coke rewards points it's: F9XPPP50LRR46H
yeah i probably shouldn't have bought four 2-liters and a case for the office.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:31 (thirteen years ago)

i don't really get what's so horrible about that article

call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:35 (thirteen years ago)

peoples get pissy when you take away their pepsi

Mr. Que, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:43 (thirteen years ago)

soda causes obesity

― the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:10 (27 minutes ago) Permalink

standard american diet does not necessarily cause obesity

― the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:11 (27 minutes ago) Permalink

I mean obviously soda/SAD does not necessarily = being fat, and neither does being fat necessarily = you are someone who eats SAD and drinks soda. I don't really think that's Bittman's point though. He's not saying "don't be fat" he's saying "don't eat this diet and drink soda, because it's bad for you." I mean really that doesn't contradict the healthy-at-any-size philosophy.

look at this quarterstaff (Hurting 2), Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:45 (thirteen years ago)

it's not the argument that's condescending, it's the zinger lines and 1st grade biology lesson

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:46 (thirteen years ago)

i don't know, he make obese people sound like masochists

the late great, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:47 (thirteen years ago)

i dunno that article really has more the tone of an overconcerned mom who is forwarding you something alarming passed around the office.

i realize i've been pushing a lot of cola on my co-workers to justify opening up a whole 2-liter.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:54 (thirteen years ago)

do you keep it in your desk drawer where people in a more civilized time would have kept a bottle of bourbon?

adam, Thursday, 27 September 2012 22:10 (thirteen years ago)

not gonna lie, have thought about putting liquor on the company's costco orders.
but i usually put on kettle chips instead.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 27 September 2012 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/the-domino-theory-redux/?hp

The goal of right-thinking people, then, is to change the rules and somehow make it more difficult for the marketers to do their job. This can be done by legislation, executive mandate or — in some places, like California — referendum. Legislation to impose a significant tax on soda — a penny or even two per ounce – has failed everywhere, though it’s come close, especially in Philadelphia. After failing to pass legislation for a soda tax, Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed (and will evidently institute, five months from now) a ban on large sizes of soda in many New York City places.

right-thinking people, huh

j., Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)

Now the California cities of Richmond and El Monte have put the soda tax — which has been endorsed by the United Nations, the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association, The New England Journal of Medicine, the Institute of Medicine and many others, and which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention commissioner, Thomas Frieden, has called “the single most effective measure to reverse the obesity epidemic” – on the Nov. 6 ballot.

Mordy, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:14 (thirteen years ago)

are those meant to be the right-thinking people?

i'm just saying, A+ rhetorical strategy there, bittman.

j., Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:16 (thirteen years ago)

i guess that language is sort of unnecessarily provocative, but yeah, the soda ban is a good idea

xxp

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:17 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, i found that piece an incredibly compelling defense of the soda tax

Mordy, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:19 (thirteen years ago)

soda is too cheap and at that level demand is relatively inelastic. you'd need to make it seriously more expensive than liquor before you'd see serious consumption declines.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:56 (thirteen years ago)

more expensive than liquor, seriously

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:03 (thirteen years ago)

for serial.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:07 (thirteen years ago)

http://larryharwin.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/tumblr_ks2tx9pwte1qa2q7do1_500.jpg

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:10 (thirteen years ago)

soda is too cheap and at that level demand is relatively inelastic. you'd need to make it seriously more expensive than liquor before you'd see serious consumption declines.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:56 PM (12 minutes ago)

you're right, it's too cheap

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:10 (thirteen years ago)

i support banning soda altogether, except yellow gatorade

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:12 (thirteen years ago)

I don't drink much soda anymore but Bittman is so smug it made me want to drink some.

controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:14 (thirteen years ago)

I think we should just do public soda-shaming

has important things to say about gangnam style (Hurting 2), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:15 (thirteen years ago)

pro-big soda has already co-opted occupy language, wouldn't be surprised if post-feminist language is next

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:28 (thirteen years ago)

Nicole otm re Bittman except I still drink shittons of diet coke but that's diff in terms of this stuff becasue not sugary.

(✿◠‿◠) (ENBB), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:53 (thirteen years ago)

i want to holler at bittman to shut up and get back in the kitchen and make me some recipes kind of like when in cartoons someone starts shooting at another dude's feet to get him to dance

j., Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:57 (thirteen years ago)

soda is too cheap and at that level demand is relatively inelastic. you'd need to make it seriously more expensive than liquor before you'd see serious consumption declines.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:56 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

people also can substitute other cheap drinks such as water and less sugary drinks. if water is $1 and soda is $2 then some people now pick water.

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:18 (thirteen years ago)

ok so my sample size is limited to some random kid the reporter asked, but they're all "so are you gonna stop buying squirt because of the new tax?" and the kid is all "helllll no, it's just another dollar, whatevs"
and the kid is right! if you want squirt, the extra dollar is not a deterrent. and water doesn't taste like squirt.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:23 (thirteen years ago)

you might slowly buy fewer squirts without even thinking about it tho, because you can't buy it w/ pocket change anymore etc.

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:25 (thirteen years ago)

what are "so-called fruit juices"?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:27 (thirteen years ago)

I mean the point isn't to bum people out or to get them to switch to cheap health shakes, it's to create one more little barrier to jump over, some people aren't gonna jump over that barrier, and that adds up

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:28 (thirteen years ago)

one time in a chinese restaurant i witnessed an hilarious conversation between a party from texas and the waitstaff re squirt and how it was not available in new york

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:29 (thirteen years ago)

the large-soda ban makes way more sense as a deterrent not necessarily because demand is inelastic but because value increases so much as you buy larger quantities because they can price it that way because it's so cheap to produce, people who want more soda can still get it (by buying 2 smalls, say) but will be forced to pay an amount that better reflects that they're actually getting that much more

flopson, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:33 (thirteen years ago)

except that the vast majority of soda in not consumed in the form of giant fountain drinks

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:34 (thirteen years ago)

ya true, i mean the same really applies in supermarkets it's like i always have to face the choice of paying 25c more and getting twice as much soda. i guess a tax per ml could work

flopson, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:35 (thirteen years ago)

it doesn't matter what % of soda is consumed how, the total amount of soda that would have been consumed as giant fountain drinks will be lower

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:36 (thirteen years ago)

unless you think someone will be like 'man I didn't get my fill at mcdonalds, I think I will marginally increase the amount of soda I consume in other forms throughout the week'

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:36 (thirteen years ago)

'just to fuck w/ bloomberg'

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:37 (thirteen years ago)

that works if the point is to lower the total amount of soda that is consumed as giant fountain drinks

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:38 (thirteen years ago)

however if the point is to have an appreciable effect on peoples health then youre prob gonna want to go w/something more wide ranging

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:38 (thirteen years ago)

what if you had to climb a really high ladder to get to the soda, like two stories & maybe one of the rungs turns out to be a snake when you reach for it

flopson, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:39 (thirteen years ago)

I agree and I think some people itt and fascist bloomberg would prob be okay w/ a wide ranging health tax, but look at what a clusterfuck trying to make one form of soda a tiny bit more expensive in a super left-wing city was.

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:40 (thirteen years ago)

people be lovin their squirt

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:41 (thirteen years ago)

the right to squirt

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:42 (thirteen years ago)

'everyone should always be able to eat as much cheap awful food as possible' is an issue that seems to speak to people across the political spectrum

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:43 (thirteen years ago)

outlaw coca cola / legalize cocaine, weight issue solved

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:44 (thirteen years ago)

ok so my sample size is limited to some random kid the reporter asked, but they're all "so are you gonna stop buying squirt because of the new tax?" and the kid is all "helllll no, it's just another dollar, whatevs"
and the kid is right! if you want squirt, the extra dollar is not a deterrent. and water doesn't taste like squirt.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:23 PM (19 minutes ago)

...

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:45 (thirteen years ago)

i believe in instituting a tax on fast food unless its artisanal like shake shack then it should be subsidized

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:47 (thirteen years ago)

I went to a newly opened shake shack the other day, and they had tables made out of old bowling lanes that said "crafted in brooklyn"

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:49 (thirteen years ago)

except that the vast majority of soda in not consumed in the form of giant fountain drinks

― lag∞n, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:34 PM (14 minutes ago)

recent data actually show some promise that even a marginal decrease like this can be pretty beneficial, at least in children. obv more needs to be done

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:53 (thirteen years ago)

peoples get pissy when you take away their pepsi

― Mr. Que, Thursday, 27 September 2012 20:43

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d1/SuicidalTendenciesAlbum.jpg

(╯︵╰,) RIP (am0n), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:57 (thirteen years ago)

I went to a newly opened shake shack the other day, and they had tables made out of old bowling lanes that said "crafted in brooklyn"

― iatee, Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:49 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol god bless em

lag∞n, Thursday, 11 October 2012 04:05 (thirteen years ago)

water doesn't taste like squirt

the whole MUST HAVE FLAVORIFIC SUGARY SWEETNESS AT ALL TIMES, DAMN THE CONSEQUENCES mindset is just so, i dunno, childish. it's not even like water tastes bad.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 11 October 2012 06:18 (thirteen years ago)

You guys have a drink called "Squirt"? Ew.

Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Thursday, 11 October 2012 06:35 (thirteen years ago)

On the subject of punitive taxes though, it can have some pressure, but it's gotta be more massive than a dollar or 2.

We pay $16-$20 for a pack of smokes here. Most of that is tax. Smoking rates have gone down and I imagine at least some of that might be due to the cost.

Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Thursday, 11 October 2012 06:37 (thirteen years ago)

The product received its name because the drink was claimed to "squirt" into one's mouth like a freshly squeezed grapefruit.[1]

In 1941, a mascot named "Lil' Squirt" was introduced to the product line's marketing to personify the brand. The mascot proved useful in broadening public awareness of the product.

Walter Galt, Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:13 (thirteen years ago)

Even worse!!

Ah I cant talk, we have a popular line of cheese here called Coon :/

Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:15 (thirteen years ago)

My last randomly-assigned ilx password had the string of letters "coon" in it. :\

borscht and bikinis (how's life), Thursday, 11 October 2012 10:25 (thirteen years ago)

Squirt rools

The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:25 (thirteen years ago)

i think ppl may be overlooking that whether or not a tax increase acts as a deterrent, it also acts as a revenue genrator. If sales and consumption don't decrease then at least there's extra income generated that can be ring-fenced to cover idk health awareness, offset the costs of healthcare etc

Randy Carol (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:30 (thirteen years ago)

I think you're overlooking the instant American phobic reaction to taxes regardless of what the money can or will be used for

The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:38 (thirteen years ago)

i meant itt tho

Randy Carol (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:39 (thirteen years ago)

so did I

The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:40 (thirteen years ago)

Cleveland/Cuyahoga County use their alcohol and cigarette taxes to build football and baseball stadiums. Then smokers complain that they aren't allowed to smoke there EVEN THOUGH THEY BUILT THEM GODDAMNIT.

Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:44 (thirteen years ago)

they should build a smaller smoker's stadium on the side

The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:46 (thirteen years ago)

tax soda, use money to subsidise cabbage

Randy Carol (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:46 (thirteen years ago)

there should be a national tax on cities stupid enough to pay for stadiums

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:06 (thirteen years ago)

Move all their teams to Baltimore. Baltimore will have like 22 football teams and 15 baseball teams.

Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:07 (thirteen years ago)

smoker's stadium for smokers to watch smoker-only teams. I like it.

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:08 (thirteen years ago)

smoker's stadium will be a dome, obv

iatee, Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:09 (thirteen years ago)

An airtight dome iirc

Tom Hardy & the Batbreakers (Phil D.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)

on to the next one

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1209443

la goonies (k3vin k.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 15:23 (thirteen years ago)

I believe they should tax lil squirts

乒乓, Thursday, 11 October 2012 16:41 (thirteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/why_the_war_on_fat_is_a_scam_to_peddle_drugs/

Mordy, Thursday, 25 October 2012 17:22 (thirteen years ago)

The comments are just precious.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:36 (thirteen years ago)

(on the linked article)

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:36 (thirteen years ago)

here's one that I found yesterday. even as a fat person i find i am guilty of these from time to time.

http://lovelivegrow.com/2012/10/21-things-to-stop-saying-unless-you-hate-fat-people/

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)

“Someone her size shouldn’t be wearing THAT!” is depressingly common.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:45 (thirteen years ago)

As is "“That guy must own stock in Cheetos,” as a way to jokingly say, “That guy is fat.”

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:47 (thirteen years ago)

I see so much of this on facebook it enrages me.

Lots of posts from guys with like dumb macros about "A woman who isn't curvy is like wearing jeans without pockets," type shit, lots of pics of Honey Boo Boo's mom, lots of body policing.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:48 (thirteen years ago)

Example: Reader AmandaLP suggested, “The one that bugs me the most is ‘diet talk,’ or the constant justifying of food choices. ‘oh, I can have this cupcake, I deserve it, I worked out,’ as if people who don’t work out don’t ‘deserve’ tasty treats. Or the ‘No, I was bad for lunch so I’m having a salad,’ as if they have to punish themselves for eating tasty food.”

I do this (to myself, I don't monitor other people), but I don't think of it as moral value. I just think that if I ate poorly at one meal I should try to make it up at the next by eating better (and vice-versa). I think the morality prism is problematic but the tradeoff part isn't hateful.

Mordy, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)

We’ve all heard that fat people are at increased risk for certain diseases (diabetes is the popular one to joke about),

But it's not a joke!

People with pale skin are at increased risk for skin cancer, but skin cancer isn’t casually tossed into conversations about them.

I must have had conversations with 10 different people in which someone reminded me to put on sunblock this summer.

how's life, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)

what is so bad about jeans without pockets is my question

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)

some of these idk

Mordy, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:51 (thirteen years ago)

I guess you hate fat people then?

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:53 (thirteen years ago)

ugh last time I was staying with the in-laws a slightly large gentleman won a rollover lottery jackpot and I got to hear five minutes of hysterical self-congratulatory laughter at "oh, he won't have long to enjoy it before the heart attack DO YOU GET IT ha ha"

thanks, that is a totally kind-spirited observation that also makes the fat person at the table (that would be, oh, me) feel totally awesome

doxxy fule (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

Either that or I don't accept the authority of the author. Take your pick! xp

Mordy, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

Example: Reader AmandaLP suggested, “The one that bugs me the most is ‘diet talk,’ or the constant justifying of food choices. ‘oh, I can have this cupcake, I deserve it, I worked out,’ as if people who don’t work out don’t ‘deserve’ tasty treats. Or the ‘No, I was bad for lunch so I’m having a salad,’ as if they have to punish themselves for eating tasty food.”

dieting is ok until the notion of 'deserving' come into play. deserving or not deserving food makes no sense and it is simply social pressure.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:57 (thirteen years ago)

"Since permanent, significant weight loss is not possible for most people, and since intentional weight loss itself may have negative health effects, recommending weight loss is cruel and unethical."

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:58 (thirteen years ago)

Okay Mordy which of these are questionable to you I am curious

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

6. Literally anything about dieting, eating less, or exercising more in the context of fatness.

8. Equating fat with health.

10. Recommending weight loss as a treatment or solution to anything, even if you are a doctor.

17. Making any statements about “childhood obesity”.

10 seems especially problematic to me.

Mordy, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah I'd say based on the above you just hate fat people

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:06 (thirteen years ago)

salad/"tasty food" is kinduva weird dichotomy

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)

oh dear

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:08 (thirteen years ago)

The only one I contest is probably #10, but only partly.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:11 (thirteen years ago)

12 is ridiculous

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:12 (thirteen years ago)

#10 is poorly phrased/explained.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:13 (thirteen years ago)

#16 is just common sense.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:14 (thirteen years ago)

No, 12 is not ridiculous. I think what this is trying to say is that diagnosing someone as "overweight," vs "morbidly obese" SIMPLY BY EYEING THEM UP is ridiculous. Just call them fat.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:15 (thirteen years ago)

Also those terms (obese and morbidly obese) are based on BMI which most people agree is kinda bullshit

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:16 (thirteen years ago)

xpost: actually i agree with that -- i don't think the writer expresses that too well tho.

most of them boil down to 'don't make shitty remarks about ppl's appearance' which is OTM obv.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:17 (thirteen years ago)

its written in very sensitive fat acceptance language that can be kinda eye roll inducing but if you distill it down to its essence i think its good. at least it has reminded me to think twice about what i say.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:18 (thirteen years ago)

as an overweight person ("obese" by bmi standards, i guess), i think the recent disavowals of the links between obesity and health problems must be some kind of weird, misguided, feel-good thing. it's preposterous to say that mordy (or anyone) would "hate" fat people based on those criticisms. That really does a disservice to people who actually experience actual hate because of their size. like, yeah, fat jokes and shit like that are really mean and awful, but you can't lump say the Institute of Medicine or other professional scientific groups who have been studying and speaking up about the health problems in our country in with some shitty comedian or whatever.

how's life, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:21 (thirteen years ago)

funny that this thread's been bumped b/c I just read a horribly offensive article about Aidy Bryant & how horrible it is that Americans aren't shaming fat people all the time. said article is not worth linking here obv.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:22 (thirteen years ago)

most of them boil down to 'don't make shitty remarks about ppl's appearance' which is OTM obv.

Yes, I wish the writer was more succinct. I have a problem with flowery tumblr-style social justice writing, I tend to dismiss it even when there are probably some good points made.

Sug ban (Nicole), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:23 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah the article is already kinda shitty by including "unless you hate fat people" in the title and I don't think Mordy probably *hates* fat people. But if you read through this and find yourself bummed you can't say any of these things any more I'd say you need to think twice.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:26 (thirteen years ago)

^^^

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:28 (thirteen years ago)

"But if you read through this and find yourself bummed you can't say any of these things any more" - to what extent is this an accurate description of what Mordy has posted itt?

boxall, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:29 (thirteen years ago)

I hate the term "morbidly obese."

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:29 (thirteen years ago)

Wasn't related to what Mordy said, was just a statement.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:31 (thirteen years ago)

I remember being diagnosed as obese by the BMI test and it really bummed me out, my running got to be much worse, when i struggled i was telling myself 'I'm fat' it it and it took me a good 2 years to stop thinking of it. It really doesn't take much. And I am far from being fat. I wonder how many kids got ruined by that stupid test.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:32 (thirteen years ago)

tbh the word 'fat' seems as bad/negatively-connotated to me as any of those other terms but i have no idea what we should do about that.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:34 (thirteen years ago)

dropping the national conversation about health and obesity would be terrible. I'm happy when my wife points out that my eating behaviors could kill me. I need to stay healthy for my family. It causes me to think about different ways I can improve my life and decrease my risk for diseases like diabetes and heart disease.

how's life, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:36 (thirteen years ago)

like, I dont want to "accept" the fact that sometimes i like to eat half ablock of cheese in one sitting. good for anyone who at least makes me reflect on that.

how's life, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:38 (thirteen years ago)

*sigh*

that's great that you would like that conversation to continue, but the concern trolling most of us experience due to the national conversation about health and obesity is really fucking annoying tbh

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:41 (thirteen years ago)

Stuff after "Any questions?" on that blog post is nuts.

boxall, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:41 (thirteen years ago)

"eating behaviors" does not equal body shape and size tho! the problem is that dialogue about this stuff often seems to focus more on the latter than the former.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:42 (thirteen years ago)

(x-posts)

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:42 (thirteen years ago)

the word 'fat' makes people very uncomfortable. when i call myself 'fat' i get a lot "ohhhh you're not fat!" or "you're just CURVY" or "FULL FIGURED"

fat is simpler i guess.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:43 (thirteen years ago)

how's life, thin people with good metabolism can eat a block of cheese in one sitting and are excluded from the conversation about health and obesity.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)

I don't know. It's one thing to say "mentioning the correlation between fat and health problems to a fat person, particularly in the context of a fat-positive conversation, is shitty and derailing", but it's another thing to state, as the blog author does repeatedly, that there is NO correlation and anyone who says there is ever is a fat-hating dickhead.

emil.y, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:45 (thirteen years ago)

even if you are one of those person who won't never get fat, bad eating behavior will have serious consequences, nobody escapes that.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:53 (thirteen years ago)

I think the general rule, at least among strangers and acquaintances, should be do not pass judgment on states or traits perceived to be negative until the person brings it up and for the person who brings it up, do not continue to discuss if the other person does not respond.

youn, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:54 (thirteen years ago)

how's life, thin people with good metabolism can eat a block of cheese in one sitting and are excluded from the conversation about health and obesity.

― homosexual II, Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:44 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

some people can smoke a pack a day and never get lung cancer

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:55 (thirteen years ago)

some people don't smoke and get lung cancer

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)

it's all very confusing

difficult listening hour, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:57 (thirteen years ago)

life is sooo unfair

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:57 (thirteen years ago)

Example: Reader AmandaLP suggested, “The one that bugs me the most is ‘diet talk,’ or the constant justifying of food choices. ‘oh, I can have this cupcake, I deserve it, I worked out,’ as if people who don’t work out don’t ‘deserve’ tasty treats. Or the ‘No, I was bad for lunch so I’m having a salad,’ as if they have to punish themselves for eating tasty food.”

dieting is ok until the notion of 'deserving' come into play. deserving or not deserving food makes no sense and it is simply social pressure.

― Van Horn Street, Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:57 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

this is otm, particularly the part about deserving, and it drives me CRAZY! whenever someone says something like that out loud to me irl i can't help but call attention to it. there's no controlling what people think, but people should consider controlling or at least think about what comes out of their mouths as well as what goes in.

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)

i realize that's probably asking too much

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:02 (thirteen years ago)

eating healthily is abnormal the way obeying traffic laws is abnormal, because /everyone speeds/ and /everyone eats poorly/

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:03 (thirteen years ago)

being fat doesn't mean you're an unhealthy eater. for christ's sake.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:05 (thirteen years ago)

not at all!

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:07 (thirteen years ago)

being fat is totally normal

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:08 (thirteen years ago)

i know! i wasn't talking about that. unless you weren't talking to me.
i just wanted to express my distaste at what is food hedging, sociolinguistically speaking

you don't need to apologize for what you eat any time, anywhere. when people say out loud that they're "sinning" or imply that they are being being deviant when they eat a carb/demonized food of the day it makes me want to scream.

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)

the application of 'sinful,' 'decadent' 'deviant,' etc etc to food is maybe the most puke-worthy linguistic development in the last 50 years

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:12 (thirteen years ago)

sorry, I think I misunderstood what was being said.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:14 (thirteen years ago)

I really get annoyed when people rip a restaurant for having huge portions. Huge portions are totally rad.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:18 (thirteen years ago)

the application of 'sinful,' 'decadent' 'deviant,' etc etc to food is maybe the most puke-worthy linguistic development in the last 50 years

this is what i was trying to say
it's like the word "flawless" and makeup

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:24 (thirteen years ago)

I don't mind huge portions places as long as there's no shaming for taking food home or sharing plates. And they have food that travels well if you are taking it.

it's like the word "flawless" and makeup

ooh, zing

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:25 (thirteen years ago)

no face goop is gonna make me flawless
i know that for a fact

similarly, i know there's nothing sinful about eating a brownie.

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

although honestly if taco bell started selling "deviant taco salads", i might wonder what was in them

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

I guess I only believe in sins against yourself or against society, and brownies are neither in my book

if this "deviant taco salad" involved doritos locos tacos, I may take a look

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

http://theworstguy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/decadent.jpg

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:29 (thirteen years ago)

emily, there is no correlation between fat and health.

there is a correlation between sedentary lifestyle and poor eating habits and health.

sometimes fat people happen to do both of those things. sometimes they do not. sometimes thin people do these things. sometimes they do not.

also: it is none of your concern.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:47 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.neontommy.com/sites/default/files/users/user620/IndulgeLALogo.jpg

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:49 (thirteen years ago)

also: it is none of your concern.

― homosexual II, Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:47 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

shouldn't the health of others be the concern of any compassionate person?

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:52 (thirteen years ago)

well, there's a correlation between health and appearance/manner that's not a one-to-one. It's a double correlation: someone who appears overweight, or acts in a way out of the norm, may be in fact not taking care of some aspect, and therefore be at risk for poor health. But some people naturally tend to have a higher body mass, or have a different personality so they're not physically or mentally ill.

So fat -> maybe sedentary/eating unhealthily -> maybe at risk of poor health. A maybe B, B maybe C, means deciding C from observing A is a leap beyond common courtesy

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

also: it is none of your concern.

Devil's Advocate, but if obesity has a public cost (via healthcare or w/e), then it's everyone's concern.

As noted before (maybe that was a different thread), I think the "eating healthy and not being sedentary" but remaining fat thing is rarely true. Outside of relatively rare medical conditions, BF% is a product of what you eat and how you live.
Likewise, the BMI is of questionable use when you start to talk about people with a lot of muscle (that's what can make a person with low BF% appear overweight or obese on the BMI) - but even then, it's arguable that the extra weight is not a good thing for joints/overall health in the big picture.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:00 (thirteen years ago)

well sure, but it's also true that two people, given the exact same food and exact same lifestyle, maybe have very different weights

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:01 (thirteen years ago)

I have a friend who eats really no more than I do, actually gets more exercise, and is about the same height/age and gains a shitload more weight than I do

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:02 (thirteen years ago)

this isn't an indicator of his lifestyle as much as it is my metabolism

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:02 (thirteen years ago)

emily, there is no correlation between fat and health.

there is a correlation between sedentary lifestyle and poor eating habits and health.

― homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 21:47 (12 minutes ago) Permalink

I understand what you're getting at, but this just isn't true. There actually is a correlation between being overweight and health. Correlation doesn't mean "if you are fat then you automatically have health problems."

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:04 (thirteen years ago)

Hurting, for every study you cite that links overweight to adverse health effects I can find one that says there is no link.

Milo, how is your concern going to anything about it?

Matt, concern trolling and shaming isn't helpful

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:08 (thirteen years ago)

shouldn't the health of others be the concern of any compassionate person?

to me compassion entails the belief that an individual maintains their own body and gets to make the final call about these things. compassion and trust go hand in hand. concern trolling someone about their weight implies a lack of faith in that person to make their own decisions about their lifestyle, that you know what's good for them, etc. i get where the impulse comes from, since often the target is a loved one, but at the same time saying "i'm just worried about your health..." to a fat person is a misguided and kind of shitty thing to do.

these wilburys taste like wilburys (donna rouge), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:10 (thirteen years ago)

shouldn't the health of others be the concern of any compassionate person?

to me compassion entails the belief that an individual maintains their own body and gets to make the final call about these things. compassion and trust go hand in hand. concern trolling someone about their weight implies a lack of faith in that person to make their own decisions about their lifestyle, that you know what's good for them, etc. i get where the impulse comes from, since often the target is a loved one, but at the same time saying "i'm just worried about your health..." to a fat person is a misguided and kind of shitty thing to do.

― these wilburys taste like wilburys (donna rouge), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:10 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^^ this

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:11 (thirteen years ago)

didn't we do almost the exact same thing the last time this thread was bumped

ie ppl fatsplaining, concern trolling, "think of the health of the nation"/ "we are just trying to say that this is what the medical organizations have to say" vs it's a v personal thing and almost impossible to talk about in generalities without seeming dismissive of a whole lot of ppl

imo

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

#3 is the worst.

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6110/6238462222_555acfd4e5.jpg

kinder, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

it's like this conversation doesn't really sink in the first 500x you have it or something

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:16 (thirteen years ago)

Hurting, for every study you cite that links overweight to adverse health effects I can find one that says there is no link

surely the whole point of the word 'overweight' is that your weight is above that which is healthy? Not necessarily in the way a lot of people use it (that person is bigger than I would like them to be) but when we're talking in terms of health?

kinder, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:17 (thirteen years ago)

to me compassion entails the belief that an individual maintains their own body and gets to make the final call about these things. compassion and trust go hand in hand. concern trolling someone about their weight implies a lack of faith in that person to make their own decisions about their lifestyle, that you know what's good for them, etc. i get where the impulse comes from, since often the target is a loved one, but at the same time saying "i'm just worried about your health..." to a fat person is a misguided and kind of shitty thing to do.

― these wilburys taste like wilburys (donna rouge), jeudi 25 octobre 2012 22:10 (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Weight gain could be an indicator of a wider problem and if I love the person, then yes, it might concern me. I think that is what happens most of the time.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:17 (thirteen years ago)

xp uhhh just realised that can be misread. I meant by definition you can only call someone overweight if their weight *is* causing health problems and not due to being underweight.

kinder, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:18 (thirteen years ago)

I am like seriously having a long, hard bingo sigh over here at some of you.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:18 (thirteen years ago)

weight gain can be a concern of anyone who digests food imo

atlas sug (bnw), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

donna rouge w/ the booming post

xp homosexual II u are doing god's work

Neutral Coliseums (Matt P), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

fatsplaining

thinsplaining, surely?

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:20 (thirteen years ago)

Can I just tell you something, Van Horn Street, as someone who has been spoken to about weight "out of concern" since I was probably 9 years old (and weighed 80 pounds).

It doesn't fucking work, ever. So just keep it to yourself.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:20 (thirteen years ago)

xpost lol, sure

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:21 (thirteen years ago)

pleasantplaining

kinder, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:22 (thirteen years ago)

hamsplaining

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:24 (thirteen years ago)

to me compassion entails the belief that an individual maintains their own body and gets to make the final call about these things. compassion and trust go hand in hand. concern trolling someone about their weight implies a lack of faith in that person to make their own decisions about their lifestyle, that you know what's good for them, etc. i get where the impulse comes from, since often the target is a loved one, but at the same time saying "i'm just worried about your health..." to a fat person is a misguided and kind of shitty thing to do.

― these wilburys taste like wilburys (donna rouge), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:10 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It's not "concern trolling." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concern_troll#Concern_troll

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:24 (thirteen years ago)

I think the implication is you don't actually give a shit about health or whether people you perceive as overweight are sedentary or eat the right things like you're saying, you just want them to do whatever it is to make them not be fat.

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:26 (thirteen years ago)

Hi, everybody! I just got back from out of town, thanks for having this thread ready for me!

Hey something that I think is good to say is that thinking about weight and having feelings about weight is something that can take a lot of time & energy that people could use for better stuff like being better people, getting smarter, being thoughtful, developing talents/skills, caring for others, etc. But when you're fat (and being "fat" is relative, so you're never "safe" from being considered fat simply compared to someone else or an average around you, regardless of your actual size or fitness), a lot of non-fat people think you don't deserve that extra time and energy to be yourself, they think you should use up as much of your resources as you need to to be not-fat, no matter how much time or work it takes, and what else it takes away from in your life.

That is just not the case, and it's a terrible depiction of life. Everybody gets to be more than their size, and no one has to make their size their life priority. I think w/r/t fat acceptance as a thing, the way I see the purpose of it is to move society into thinking that it's okay to choose things about yourself other than your weight to prioritize for cultivation/improvement.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:27 (thirteen years ago)

It is concern trolling in most cases (perhaps not in the one cited precisely) because most time its just disgust dressed up as 'concern'...

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:27 (thirteen years ago)

like if my friend who does half-marathons and shit and eats twice as many greens as I do is overweight, you're still bothering him before you bother my whiskey-swilling meat-eating ass

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:27 (thirteen years ago)

xxp And even my saying THAT is a value-judgement about fat that--see, this shit is hard--I am sorry to have made, but I think realistically NO ONE WHO IS FAT LOVES BEING FAT, OKAY? IT'S NOT LIKE ALL OF SOCIETY'S SHITTY PRESSURES HAVE GONE UNNOTICED.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

Can I just tell you something, Van Horn Street, as someone who has been spoken to about weight "out of concern" since I was probably 9 years old (and weighed 80 pounds).

It doesn't fucking work, ever. So just keep it to yourself.

― homosexual II, jeudi 25 octobre 2012 22:20 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I badly summarized an idea that I believe you won't be opposed to. My sister once got a big weight gain over a period of 3 months, which is nothing wrong and I never talked to her about the gain itself. However, it was indicative of a bigger problem that needed to be dealt with (stress at school, bullying) and in that sense, it caused concern. Once the bullying was over it and the her grade got be better/less important for her, the rest fell into place and she is very comfortable in her body.

Van Horn Street, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

I think it kind of depends. I have been overweight most of my life, but I have a healthy diet and have maintained the same shitty weight for a long time. But I think it's a different story if you see that someone seems to be spiraling out of control, with a significant weight gain over a somewhat short timespan. But there are better things to do than criticize. You could try being a better friend, for example. Hey, do you wanna go for a hike? Play tennis? Go bowling? Let's go! Do you wanna go to a restaurant with me? I know this great healthy place that I love. Let's go for a walk! Let's volunteer at the dog shelter!

Rather than "hey you are getting fat and you should check yourself" or whatev.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

I think the implication is you don't actually give a shit about health or whether people you perceive as overweight are sedentary or eat the right things like you're saying, you just want them to do whatever it is to make them not be fat.

― d-_-b (mh), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:26 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fine, this is also not "concern trolling"

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:29 (thirteen years ago)

Hi, everybody! I just got back from out of town, thanks for having this thread ready for me!

Hey something that I think is good to say is that thinking about weight and having feelings about weight is something that can take a lot of time & energy that people could use for better stuff like being better people, getting smarter, being thoughtful, developing talents/skills, caring for others, etc. But when you're fat (and being "fat" is relative, so you're never "safe" from being considered fat simply compared to someone else or an average around you, regardless of your actual size or fitness), a lot of non-fat people think you don't deserve that extra time and energy to be yourself, they think you should use up as much of your resources as you need to to be not-fat, no matter how much time or work it takes, and what else it takes away from in your life.

That is just not the case, and it's a terrible depiction of life. Everybody gets to be more than their size, and no one has to make their size their life priority. I think w/r/t fat acceptance as a thing, the way I see the purpose of it is to move society into thinking that it's okay to choose things about yourself other than your weight to prioritize for cultivation/improvement.

― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:27 PM (22 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yes, also this^^
As someone who has struggled with weight, I spent a great deal of my teens and twenties putting life "on hold" for when I was thinner.
I'll buy new clothes when I've lost weight...
I'll try dating again when I've lost some weight...
I feel ugly and fat, I am going to stay home tonight (instead of going out dancing)
I want to wear something scantily clad, sexy, or revealing but I am not thin

fat acceptance has basically given me my life back. because I don't put things ON HOLD any longer for some thing that may not happen. I might be thinner at some juncture, yeah - but the fact of the matter is, I will always be a fat person.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:31 (thirteen years ago)

matt no one cares about the proper def of concern trolling.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:31 (thirteen years ago)

good contributions matt armstrong

max, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:31 (thirteen years ago)

YES IT IS

Because the "concern" is health, the actual thing you're thinking about is aesthetics, and health and aesthetics, while not on opposite sides of the coin, are still not the same issue. You're not implying to us "I want fat people to be healthy", you're implying "I want fat people to not be fat" i.e. not exist

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

Matt you're arguing about semantics, move on

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

thanks max

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:32 (thirteen years ago)

yeah actually I change my mind I see what you're saying mh

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:33 (thirteen years ago)

xp homosexual II u are doing god's work

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:33 (thirteen years ago)

I think it's pretty rare that someone would ever "concern troll" someone they love about their weight tho

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:34 (thirteen years ago)

In general if someone is trying to get someone they love to change their diet (like I do with my parents), it's because they want to help them be healthier. Or even perhaps to be happier with their appearance. But not "disgust."

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:35 (thirteen years ago)

"Hey, I care about a fat person in my life?" = "Some of my best friends are (x)!"

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:35 (thirteen years ago)

matt.
move on from the concern trolling. you're missing the point.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:36 (thirteen years ago)

To suggest someone should eat better to be happier with their appearance pretty much implies they are gross to you, Matt.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:37 (thirteen years ago)

my weight fluctuates a lot (probably b/c of Crohn's disease) and it's always annoying when my family comments on my weight. "You look like you've been 'eating well,'" followed six months later by a comment on how I should get pants with an elastic waist so they won't sag.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:38 (thirteen years ago)

"gross" is too strong as is "disgust"

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:39 (thirteen years ago)

Imagine if I was just a person contentedly living their life, not mentioning my appearance or unhappiness about it when someone said, "You know, Mandee, you'd be happier about your appearance if you just tried to cut down carbs and exercise a bit more. It worked wonders for my sister."

IN WHAT WAY DOES THAT NOT IMPLY THE PERSON THINKS THAT I AM DISGUSTING?

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:39 (thirteen years ago)

They are projecting THEIR unhappiness with my appearance onto me.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:40 (thirteen years ago)

feel like there's this interconnection between how bodies look to us, how that look is like a sum of the quantifiable measures of desire, how those same measures are transparently measures of "health"... this is complicated ideology imo but it sort of boils down to: boys don't like being told that the world doesn't revolve around their gaze/desire? "food" for thought, lol

Neutral Coliseums (Matt P), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:40 (thirteen years ago)

replace "boys" with "patriarchy" or something

Neutral Coliseums (Matt P), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:41 (thirteen years ago)

eh fat guys have it pretty rough too

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:42 (thirteen years ago)

Um..hmm. There are different ways of being a fat guy, obviously--some are more acceptable than others? Like think "barrel-chested" versus men who put on weight around their hips, for instance. The first type is the slow/dumb but well-meaning husband on like 70% of sitcoms, so he's being insulted by a stereotype but at least he's still considered a lovable man and appropriate husband or love interest. The second type is...insulted as being...unmasculine? They get nothin.

It's all complicated to hell by gender.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:45 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe you should make meals for your parents or go biking with them instead of telling Internet people you are sad for them because you have fatty parents

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:47 (thirteen years ago)

Matt P, I think that is a booming post btw. Thanks!

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:47 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe you should make meals for your parents or go biking with them instead of telling Internet people you are sad for them because you have fatty parents

― d-_-b (mh), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:47 PM (35 seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I tried for years and at this point in their lives I've just given up.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:48 (thirteen years ago)

at a certain point it's their own business and I've said all I can say

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:49 (thirteen years ago)

Then stfu about it?

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:49 (thirteen years ago)

I haven't brought it up with them in about 10 years

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:50 (thirteen years ago)

Are you trying out new rhetoric on ilx, because I don't think they'll like this shit either

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:52 (thirteen years ago)

"Hey, I care about a fat person in my life?" = "Some of my best friends are (x)!"

― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:35 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I was just a little personally offended that trying to talk to people about their weight is never a reflection of compassion, since personally I know that is why I've tried with some people.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:58 (thirteen years ago)

I trust my parents and I have compassion for them, I just don't want them to die ya know?

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 22:58 (thirteen years ago)

Trying to talk to people about their health, based on knowledge of their habits and lives, when you know them well and do it in a productive way, is cool. Coworker shaming and talking about weight, which is likely based on a visual metric alone, not so

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:00 (thirteen years ago)

You've reached that point in the thread where the worst will be assumed abt all your intentions/motivations, is all. Don't sweat it, don't fight it, it's done. xp

boxall, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:01 (thirteen years ago)

I am about to get a haircut. Men's Journal on the table in front of me has an article: SKIP BREAKFAST, FEEL BETTER: The New Science of Painless Fasting

wtf

d-_-b (mh), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:04 (thirteen years ago)

Hurting, for every study you cite that links overweight to adverse health effects I can find one that says there is no link.

I don't think this is true. Study after study indicate that being overweight or obese has a real impact on quality of life and medical costs.

Milo, how is your concern going to anything about it?

That's irrelevant. My concern isn't going to get troops out of Afghanistan, either, but as a citizen and taxpayer, I should still have an opinion. The evidence says that combating obesity, particularly in children, is good public policy - lower medical costs, greater productivity, etc..

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:04 (thirteen years ago)

Low-level fasting is one of the new hot research topics - going a full 24 hours once a week or just trying to eat within a narrowed window (so that you're going 16-18 hours without eating - and sleeping for 8 of those) appears to help keep blood sugar levels regulated (which helps with weight).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:06 (thirteen years ago)

Coworker shaming and talking about weight, which is likely based on a visual metric alone, not so

― d-_-b (mh), Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:00 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

totally agree. but donna was saying that "I'm just concerned about your health" is something that shouldn't be said. And I don't buy that, if you're worried about a loved one it's ok to say something.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:06 (thirteen years ago)

does anyone itt really think that kids shouldn't be encouraged to eat healthier? i thought the issue was not personally being rude to the ppl you encounter.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:08 (thirteen years ago)

going a full 24 hours once a week or just trying to eat within a narrowed window (so that you're going 16-18 hours without eating - and sleeping for 8 of those) appears to help keep blood sugar levels regulated (which helps with weight).

I do this more often than I should out of laziness & I can't say it's made me feel healthier.

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:09 (thirteen years ago)

idk it might be because you aren't really a spartan?

Neutral Coliseums (Matt P), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:22 (thirteen years ago)

that was supposed to be a lighthearted joke, it might have come across weird

Neutral Coliseums (Matt P), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:30 (thirteen years ago)

board descrip

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:30 (thirteen years ago)

but as a citizen and taxpayer, I should still have an opinion

lmao

max, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:32 (thirteen years ago)

Matt, like I said above, people will eat healthy and exercise when and IF they are ready to. Expressing concern won't do much good. My parents expressed "concern" about my weight starting at the age I was 9. I won't go into the dirty details, but it was extremely damaging and mentally stressful and ultimately, I believe, contributed to my lifelong struggle with my weight.

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:37 (thirteen years ago)

Milo:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4468001.stm

http://www.jabfm.org/content/25/4/422.full

THE TAKE AWAY HERE IS: the weight itself is not the health risk. The health risk is in sedentary lifestyle and poor eating that SOMETIMES, but not in all cases, comes with being overweight.

... for cryin' out loud...

homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:42 (thirteen years ago)

"Your BMI is 30.1 - obese

Your weight is substantially above the healthy range for your height, which means you have a higher than average risk of developing diseases associated with obesity."

biked 12km to football (2 hrs) and 12km back, feel p good tbh

i will fondue, and i will killue (darraghmac), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:48 (thirteen years ago)

Matt, like I said above, people will eat healthy and exercise when and IF they are ready to. Expressing concern won't do much good.
― homosexual II, Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:37 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

You're probably right. And maybe I shouldn't have even brought it up in my family. But at least sometimes, expressing concern is done with good motives.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:54 (thirteen years ago)

my brother gets a lot of "concern" about his weight from people (including family members who have been pleaded with repeatedly to stfu about it but still persist, which is cause for suspicion about their motives imo) and all it does is make him unhappy.

estela, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)

homo2, according to the first link, a BMI of 30+
"The researchers found that the people who had BMIs higher than 25 but lower than 30, which meant they were moderately overweight but not obese, did not have a reduced life expectancy.

The people who lived the longest of all were those with BMIs of 25, which lies between the ideal and overweight margins.

In comparison, there were 112,000 extra deaths among the obese category and nearly 34,000 extra deaths among the underweight category.

From the second:
"Above-normal body mass index (BMI) is associated with decreased functional ability and health status2 and increased risk of chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, which often cause further decrements in health.3"

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:02 (thirteen years ago)

lmao
― max

My concern isn't going to get troops out of Afghanistan, either, but as a citizen and taxpayer, I should still have an opinion.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:04 PM

boxall, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:03 (thirteen years ago)

okay, guess I found some bad articles I didn't really read thoroughly before posting

I guess you can continue hand wringing as a concerned citizen...

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:06 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah again, look at the sentence above, it's an analogy, not a literal statement that fat ppl are his concern as a citizen or a taxpayer.

boxall, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

I'm not wringing my hands. I smoke and I should lose weight (I'm active but my diet is pretty bad ATM). My attitude toward most things, even matters of health that impact healthcare costs/etc. is pretty laissez-faire. I don't think we should punish and shame people for smoking or drinking too much coke or whatever.

But at the same time, I'm not going to pretend that tobacco, booze and being fat aren't, overall, bad things to use or be.

Like I said, the concern point was just being devil's advocate - if something has a cost to society, you have a stake in that as a member of society and if you want to be concerned, you get to be. Kinda like helmet laws or mandating seat belt usage.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

emily, there is no correlation between fat and health

― homosexual II, Thursday, October 25, 2012

this just isn't true fyi. it's difficult to conduct carefully controlled randomized trials on this topic for a lot of reasons but the results of that study posted above don't prove that losing weight isn't beneficial to health. it shows that losing a modest amount of weight didn't reduce negative cardiovascular outcomes in patients who were already diabetic, overweight/obese, and already on proven mortality-reducing therapy for their diabetes and cardiovascular disease

all mods con (k3vin k.), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

add to this that we don't actually know how to turn fat people into thin people long term (5+ years)

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/magazine/tara-parker-pope-fat-trap.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:14 (thirteen years ago)

not being sarcastic, but one method could be via thread of getting sw0le - anecdotally, the people I know who've kept weight off did a lot of solid strength-training to put on muscle. Extremely-low calorie diets mean you lose lean mass at roughly the same amount as fat, and light cardio probably isn't enough exercise to counteract the effects fat has had on one's metabolism.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:20 (thirteen years ago)

read the article, because there is a hormonal response due to the weight gain

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:28 (thirteen years ago)

or rather that causes the weight gain (after a weight loss)

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:29 (thirteen years ago)

right, so something that counteracts that hormonal response may be called for, above and beyond light walking; there is a hormonal response to intense exercise as well.
It would be hard to study that, but like I said, the folks I've known who dropped significant weight and kept it off for years all lifted.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)

what we really need in this country is the right to be not fat, not exercise all the time, and still be able to eat all the food at these delicious restaurants

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:36 (thirteen years ago)

Either that or I don't accept the authority of the author. Take your pick! xp

― Mordy,

was this a threat?

i will fondue, and i will killue (darraghmac), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:39 (thirteen years ago)

milo, my sister has a huge amount of weight, lifts weights, and has to eat ~1500-1600 cals a day in order to not gain weight. anecdotal evidence, but, still.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:43 (thirteen years ago)

has LOST, rather.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:44 (thirteen years ago)

and she like, lifts. lifts. like she could hold you like a baby probably.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:44 (thirteen years ago)

Pretty sure I recall milo writing elsewhere that he is a person in the mid-200s of lbs himself.

boxall, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:45 (thirteen years ago)

6'1", ~240 currently

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 00:51 (thirteen years ago)

visited my parents last month; the first thing my mom said to me was 'you've gained weight!' the second thing was 'you should come for a walk with me in the morning. but be prepared because i walk fast!'

so i did. she doesn't walk fast at all and was panting after a mile. apparently she honestly thought, as a woman in her late 60s, that she was in better shape than someone 30 years younger who lives 51 steps up from street level.

i mean yeah i should go to the gym more, but meanwhile i smdh

mookieproof, Friday, 26 October 2012 00:55 (thirteen years ago)

I went on a walk with my parents, who also walk every morning... and their comment was, "you walk pretty good." my dad also gets out the blood pressure monitor every time I come over and is in disbelief I do not have high blood pressure every time. like i rigged it.

i'm telling y'all, being a fat person is exhausting and the amount of body policing, concern trolling, and general asshattery is seriously fuckin g annoying so the reason I am so passionate about this is that I love you people and I do not want you coming off as assholes or insensitive to fat people.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 01:01 (thirteen years ago)

exhausted a fat person or two in my time iirc

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

I'm in a really strange position wrt to all this stuff. I have had some form of an eating disorder for pretty much as long as I remember and so really want to support all the non-fat talk, obesity doesn't equal health problems, anti-fat shaming stuff. However, I also work in an obesity prevention program at one of the top research institutes in the country with some of the most important people in the field and pretty firmly believe that the fat doesn't equal unhealthy equation doesn't actually add up the way people want it to.

I have no idea how to reconcile these two things tbh. In my personal life I've made a conscious effort to stop talking about food or weight or any appearance related stuff with my friends. If my co-workers start complaining about being fat I just ignore it but that's sort of as far as I've gotten although even that has been a huge step for me.

ENBB, Friday, 26 October 2012 13:49 (thirteen years ago)

Example: Reader AmandaLP suggested, “The one that bugs me the most is ‘diet talk,’ or the constant justifying of food choices. ‘oh, I can have this cupcake, I deserve it, I worked out,’ as if people who don’t work out don’t ‘deserve’ tasty treats. Or the ‘No, I was bad for lunch so I’m having a salad,’ as if they have to punish themselves for eating tasty food.”

dieting is ok until the notion of 'deserving' come into play. deserving or not deserving food makes no sense and it is simply social pressure.

― Van Horn Street, Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:57 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

this is otm, particularly the part about deserving, and it drives me CRAZY! whenever someone says something like that out loud to me irl i can't help but call attention to it. there's no controlling what people think, but people should consider controlling or at least think about what comes out of their mouths as well as what goes in.

― these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:01 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I totally agree and within the last 6 months or so I've made myself stop saying these sorts of things. I just want to say that it can be really fucking difficult to do this esp if you've spent the better part of two decades being programmed to think this way. I can't remember a time when I didn't think of food in terms of good foods v. bad foods or weighed whether or not I'd been good enough to deserve something. This is just to say that I think for a lot of people this sort of thinking is so deeply planted in their brains that they don't even realize what they're saying and that even if they are aware, it can be tremendously difficult to undo that sort of of thinking.

ENBB, Friday, 26 October 2012 13:53 (thirteen years ago)

Realizing that you've been programmed to think that way is a good wake up call -- and obvs I believe in the power of language wrt influencing thought. Change the language, the thought will hopefully (eventually) follow.

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Friday, 26 October 2012 14:10 (thirteen years ago)

Absolutely. I'm just saying that it can take a lot of work and time to undo. Sadly.

ENBB, Friday, 26 October 2012 14:14 (thirteen years ago)

I actually had to tell my co-worker that I wouldn't engage in any food/body talk with her anymore because it was too much! We have better things to talk about! She forgets sometimes but then I just give her the stink eye and she stops herself.

ENBB, Friday, 26 October 2012 14:15 (thirteen years ago)

I have had to call a few close friends out on making shitty comments about other women's bodies. "Is my ass as big as HER's? Please tell me it's not." Etc. I have one friend who is very guilty, always talking about how fat she is (she is probably 10 pounds overweight), how she's HUGE, how other people are huge. Now she at least keeps it to herself.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 14:25 (thirteen years ago)

Matt, like I said above, people will eat healthy and exercise when and IF they are ready to. Expressing concern won't do much good. My parents expressed "concern" about my weight starting at the age I was 9. I won't go into the dirty details, but it was extremely damaging and mentally stressful and ultimately, I believe, contributed to my lifelong struggle with my weight.

― homosexual II, Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:37 (Yesterday) Permalink

Don't you think there's a bit of a difference between doing this to your 9-year-old daughter and doing it to your adult parent? I mean I think it's terrible that you went through that and of course your parents were wrong. But at some point we become adults, and I think we have a kind of responsibility (if anything, to ourselves) to develop resiliency to the things people and society say to us. I know that when I told my father something to the effect of "I'm tired of hearing excuses why you don't exercise, and I want you to be healthy so you can watch your granddaughter grow up," it actually got through to him, and he started exercising. I didn't use the words "fat" or "lose weight" fwiw, but I don't care if I shamed him a little, because sometimes shame is a great motivator to do things we need to do.

Now I have absolutely no idea what you weigh and I could not care less, and if you are healthy then you are healthy. As I said, the fact that there's a demonstrated correlation between weight and health in no way implies that your weight is causing you health problems. I absolutely agree, also, that it is inappropriate in almost all cases for an individual to tell another individual to lose weight. And it's especially gross when someone does this to a child, or when someone who doesn't even know you that well, like a co-worker, does it. At the same time, I think there has to be some balance between acceptance and ability to recognize something that actually is a kind of national problem. I think the best ways to address the problem are not shaming individuals but doing things like requiring gym every day in schools (I say this as a person who FEARED gym class), offering healthier school lunches and maybe even regulating the food industry more heavily, or at least foods that are marketed to children.

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)

why not talk about healthy food choices and the necessity of physical activity and just leave weight out of the conversation?

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 15:29 (thirteen years ago)

^^^

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:17 (thirteen years ago)

Because high BMI/weight is linked to drastically increased risks of certain health problems

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)

Hurting, I had no issue with what you said to your father until you said "because sometimes shame is a great motivator to do things we need to do."

No. No, it's never a good motivator. Sorry.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 17:23 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think my dad needs you to protect him from shame.

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

this is kinda tl; dr...but I kinda want to lend some support to the positive talk in the thread so here I am.

I'm kind of in two camps with regards to weight.

I was a pretty slim child, and for most of my teens...but I always believed that I was overweight. My Mum dieted a lot and was very health-conscious, as well as just mean kids who when they want to be mean would call you fat just as a way of making sure you felt shunned...it sounds kinda weird but it's only within the last 5 years or so that it really hit home to me that I really didn't have weight 'issues' at all as a child, I was just made to think that I did by people who were careless.

I learned weird habits back then, like I couldn't eat candy bars in front of people...90% of the time was in the car, and I stuffed the wrappers in my purse, the way I did when I was in school. That's something that's only changed in the past few years.
I never saw anyone about it, never really tackled it with anyone, but I just eventually knew it was a way of thinking that wasn't going to fly and I had already worked on myself mentally via therapy so building on that experience made it a lot easier.

I put on quite a bit of weight after I was married, probably 100 pounds, and from there I went in the complete opposite direction. The past 10 years was the first time I was around someone who didn't commment on my weight, who didn't say I shouldn't eat something, who still told me I looked nice when I felt like boiled garbage, who really did show me unconditional love and it wasn't tied to food or exercise or punishment. And that was good for me! For a while at least. But not exercising and eating what I wanted and going really far with the fiddle-dee-dee mental attitude was kind of a bad opposite end of the spectrum, because I was doing *nothing* as far as physical activity, and I ignored the fact that I was heading towards type 2 diabetes. A pre-diabetic diagnosis early this year was enough. to be honest, I didn't need the test to know. I knew. I could tell that I was heading that way. And on top of that I didn't feel good, I didn't feel well, I felt uncomfortable. and, to be honest, I had been kind of scared by the weight I was carrying for a while.

I've been working on my health for the past month, and I'm tackling it in my own way. And that's the way I feel about it. This isn't about how I look to other people. this is about how I feel, and I want to feel healthy. If I lose some weight, that's okay, but my goal is Health, whole body, whole mind. I'm re-learning how to think about food, not demonizing 'bad' foods, and the kinds of things that have been talked about itt. I'm training myself not to go down the rabbit hole with calories and nutritional data and working on some kind of pass/fail daily schedule that would beat my fragile self-esteem to a pulp, which I've done before and it didn't really work that well for me. I need longer term habit-forming behaviours, not just weight-loss mania.

I'm taking as long as I need to to form better habits, to form better thought processes about myself and about food. I'm not doing this to look a certain way. I'm focused on doing this to feel more like me, and less like someone who gets a panic attach when her feet start itching :)

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:36 (thirteen years ago)

Okay, that's fine. Sounds like some of you prefer to reserve the right to shame your loved ones, and that's your call. I am just saying, in general, shame is shitty and you're kind of being a dick to the people who are closest to you.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 17:40 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think I was being a dick by telling my father (in softer words) "Hey, wake up, you don't exercise at all, you are starting to have difficulties breathing and walking, you are causing yourself damage, and you continue to make excuses and do nothing about it while eating an unhealthy diet and not exercising" -- maybe "shame" is not the right word, but there is such a thing as a wake-up call. Not everything in life can be done gently.

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:49 (thirteen years ago)

And a 60-year-old man who would respond to that kind of talk by sitting around feeling sad that someone "shamed" him has other issues as well.

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)

Hey Hurting, this may sound crazy and your dad looked like a rly nice guy in the wedding pictures, but I don't actually care about his happiness specifically. I don't think anybody is trying to "protect" him from being shamed by you, again, specifically. But if you think shame is a useful tool...has it been applied to you? Do/did you respond well to it? Often shame leaves a bad feeling about the person and the act(ions) you were shamed into and one common response to being embarrassed or ashamed is avoiding things associated with the bad memory. Which is maybe deal-able if it was a one-time kind of thing but not great for trying to get someone to want to change their life every day and keep doing it on their own, and to feel as trusting & connected to you as before.

Outside of your specific situation, shaming is bad policy in general for lyfe and for being compassionate to other ppl, and we should DEFINITELY not be basing health policy or anything on it.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)

ive been encouraging my father who is a chronic over eater and layabout to eat better/get more exercise and it seems to be working, i have no idea if itll put any dent in those habits long term tho

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)

Shame works on some people, it doesn't on other. It does on me, honestly. You just have to be aware of it. I don't know how one can generalize a situation that is so deeply personal.

Van Horn Street, Friday, 26 October 2012 17:58 (thirteen years ago)

How about default no-shame people until they specifically say, "Hey, I like to be shamed, it's a good motivator for me."

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:00 (thirteen years ago)

okay, guess I found some bad articles I didn't really read thoroughly before posting

― homosexual II, Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:06 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

fwiw i agree mostly w/what homo is saying except the cherry picking of scientific research to support ones position

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:02 (thirteen years ago)

MY Cherry picking? I didn't really cherry pick. I randomly googled and hastily posted.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:04 (thirteen years ago)

you said it was a bad article because it disagreed w/you is the cherry picking

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:05 (thirteen years ago)

Specifically googled. Either way, it was a dumb move because what studies say or don't say isn't really my point at all.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:05 (thirteen years ago)

This is just really 'deal with people with a convenient amount of sensibility and respect', and it applies to everything.

Van Horn Street, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:06 (thirteen years ago)

Shaming is a form of punishment, let's be clear. It is punishment for acting in ways that are outside acceptable norms for whatever one is defining the "group" as: a family, a town, a work-force, etc. That's pretty harsh for the social "crime" of having not made it your top priority to remove your fat from the world that other people have to experience.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:09 (thirteen years ago)

thats is a much better argument than shaming doesnt work, shaming is unkind, and sometimes works

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:10 (thirteen years ago)

Look at how mookie's mom's attempt to use competition as a motivator worked against her -- shaming has a way of working against the person using it to motivate as well (ime).

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:14 (thirteen years ago)

off-topic a bit, but my parents have put on a fair amount of weight, much of it in the last five years, mostly due to stress eating. things I could do that would actually make them live healthier, and probably lose weight:
- help them take care of my grandfathers, as they're doing most of that work
- take them more meals or cook for them at their place, rather than going out to eat when we meet up
- start hanging with my dad some more and do things to help him keep his mind off work stress, like projects or biking (he expressed a little interest)

the thing is, I'm not going to complain about their weight because frankly, I do a little bit of these things but I really don't want to do most of them! I help a little here and there, but it's a bit more than I'm willing to tackle

on the other hand, I think one of my grandfathers lives off of microwaved bacon

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)

so do you guys think I should just shame them a little, seems easier than helping out

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

I bet ILX would be a p boring place if people tut-tutted about *makes drinky-drinky hand motion* as much as they do about *makes eaty-eaty hand motion*

*triumphant sauce horns* (crüt), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:22 (thirteen years ago)

xp Plus it might get them to stop asking you out to dinner, dropping by to say hello, acknowledging you in public. So if that sounds good to you, then some birds, fewer stones, etc.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)

if i could be bothered changing my username it would be 'makes eaty-eaty hand motion'

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)

The health problems both caused by and statistically correlated to obesity are well-established. Once you get past that simple observation everything goes to hell pretty quickly.

Just to get a taste of this hell and how it operates, I would point out that this thread is titled: "the right to be fat?" as if there were a threshhold of body fat percentage, beyond which one forfeits some portion of one's human rights. The mere fact that this proposition merited a question mark indicates how fucked up the whole issue has become.

Aimless, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)

but that's the thing. grand dad who eats microwaved bacon and nothing else might actually be far less healthy than the parents who have gained weight. it's just assumed because of the weight gain that their health is suffering. which you cannot diagnose for them because you're not a doctor.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:49 (thirteen years ago)

also though the dude is old and let him eat his bacon rite

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)

my grandfather smoked a pack of bacon a day and lived to be 99

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:52 (thirteen years ago)

is granddad who eats microwaved bacon medically obese?

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 18:52 (thirteen years ago)

*sigh*

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)

btw, I regret using the word "shame" because I didn't mean in the sense of "shaming" someone. I more meant in the same sense that my grandfather finally quit smoking and got in shape when I was four years old and he tried to pick me up and couldn't and felt deeply embarrassed by it. Maybe "wake up call" is what I'm going for. But I recognize that these issues are very complex for a lot of people. I was fat as a kid and got made fun of for being fat, and I know how it feels. But getting in shape for me meant I had to both (1) kind of detach myself from the stigma and shame kids made me feel when I was younger AND (2) recognize that I had more will power and self-discipline and control over my life than I was admitting

Knut Horowitz, Able-Bodied Investment Banker and Ladies Man (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 October 2012 19:00 (thirteen years ago)

My parents both have bad backs (both have had spinal disc fusions), which weight gain is in itself bad for, and my mom is on cholesterol-lowering medication? Like I said, I'd never say anything about weight, but I do feel bad that they're stressed and it's taking a toll.

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 19:14 (thirteen years ago)

also my grandfather has so many issues regarding hygiene and god knows what else that the bacon thing is no issue at all. it'd be nice if he threw away his paper plates he made bacon on or wiped out the microwave occasionally. my parents seriously threw one out because it was uncleanable.

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 19:15 (thirteen years ago)

xp

And that worked for you, Hurting. That's great!

The pitfall comes when someone with a personal life story about how they overcame an obstacle and found a better path forward then turns around and insists that their story proves that their way forward is the only way, or the best way, or that other ways do not work because those ways did not work for them. I have noticed that tendency in several of the posts itt.

Otoh, you were very clear about relating your experience as something you learned about yourself, not as a truism for all. I commend you for that.

Aimless, Friday, 26 October 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)

I've got a solution for all of this

*drinky-drinky motion*

d-_-b (mh), Friday, 26 October 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)

but that's the thing. grand dad who eats microwaved bacon and nothing else might actually be far less healthy than the parents who have gained weight. it's just assumed because of the weight gain that their health is suffering. which you cannot diagnose for them because you're not a doctor.

We're talking about the aggregate. Yes, someone who's obese might be perfectly healthy and live to be a 100, just as someone who was of average build and ran marathons might drop dead of a heart attack and someone who never smoked might get fucked with lung cancer - but statistically, they are less likely to do so.

You keep arguing that 'fatness'/BMI/etc. are unrelated first to diet and second to health outcomes, neither of which is statistically true IMO.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 26 October 2012 20:21 (thirteen years ago)

man, bless you for your work in this thread, mandee

horseshoe, Friday, 26 October 2012 20:35 (thirteen years ago)

milo my point is

for the millionth time

don't make assumptions based on statistics about someone, because it's rude

I do not "keep arguing about fatness/BMI/ being unrelated" I think I said it once. What I keep arguing about is that it's a nice, humane gesture to someone to not meddle in their own health. that's between them and their doctor... I understand this applying to close loved ones in certain instances, but otherwise its not your biz.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 20:58 (thirteen years ago)

the thing is yes, in most cases someone is overweight due to poor diet and lack of exercise. that is not true in all cases. some people are on medications that cause them to gain weight. some people have PCOS. some people have low functioning thyroids. some person might eat a lot and not move and not actually give a fuck what you or anyone is concerned about. someone might be on birth control pills that have caused them to gain the freshman fifteen. WHO KNOWS. That's the point: WHO KNOWS - YOU DON'T - so, stop fat shaming, diagnosing people based on the way they appear to you in the first 15 seconds you glance at them, and focus on your own health and fitness.

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 21:04 (thirteen years ago)

i can't bear to read all this because i am teetering on the edge of killing someone already but can all this be summed up with the "don't be a shithead to other people" principle?

charlie the luna (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 26 October 2012 21:07 (thirteen years ago)

yes

Gandalf’s Gobble Melt (DJP), Friday, 26 October 2012 21:08 (thirteen years ago)

jesus christ, you people

charlie the luna (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Friday, 26 October 2012 21:09 (thirteen years ago)

angry people dishing out sensitivity lessons

bnw, Friday, 26 October 2012 21:10 (thirteen years ago)

hey man dont jerk shame

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 26 October 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)

being sensitive is not a bad thing in my mind

homosexual II, Friday, 26 October 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)

shaming is unkind, and sometimes works

some ppl respond well to playing for bobby knight; i was never one of them.

even when bobby knight's shtick worked, however, he was an asshole

(nb bobby knight is a former american college basketball coach known for his aggressive and occasionally unhinged and abusive tactics)

mookieproof, Friday, 26 October 2012 22:26 (thirteen years ago)

milo my point is

for the millionth time

don't make assumptions based on statistics about someone, because it's rude

I do not "keep arguing about fatness/BMI/ being unrelated" I think I said it once. What I keep arguing about is that it's a nice, humane gesture to someone to not meddle in their own health. that's between them and their doctor... I understand this applying to close loved ones in certain instances, but otherwise its not your biz.

― homosexual II, Friday, October 26, 2012 4:58 PM (3 hours ago)

let's think of a hypothetical cigarette smoker who is vigilant about not exposing anyone else to secondhand smoke. does the same apply to this person?

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:00 (thirteen years ago)

that describes me when i was a smoker and i would say yes

whining boom (electricsound), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:02 (thirteen years ago)

for the record i agree with pretty much most of what you've been saying, or at least since you backed off from the "obesity isn't correlated with poor health" stance upthread. fat people, kids especially, are ostracized and bullied, often mercilessly, and it isn't the place of total strangers to concern themselves with the health of others

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:04 (thirteen years ago)

xp

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:04 (thirteen years ago)

xp

There is this parable in the Bible where Jesus recommends removing the log in one's own eye before troubling with the mote in another person's eye. However hard it may be to believe, giving people unsolicited advice about how to run their lives or how to become healthier rarely has any effect other than to expose your own smugness or arrogance.

Compassion, which has been cited a few times upthread as a justification for lavishing such unsought advice on others, whose faults you think you see more clearly than they do, does not live in the same neighborhood as this kind of veiled aggression. Real compassion has to do with understanding the sources of the pain of others, not making a list of their presumed inadequacies and handing it to them for quick and easy reference.

Aimless, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:12 (thirteen years ago)

I'll think that advice over lol

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:18 (thirteen years ago)

don't have much to say to that - nice post man (xp). i think i do disagree w/ M and maybe some others that it's always inappropriate to frame weight changes as a matter of health, as long as your concern is rooted in some underlying cause and is genuine. and even then, there's a sliding scale of appropriateness - a spouse bringing something like this up is probably more OK than like, one's boss

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:22 (thirteen years ago)

do what you like, lagoon. the only advice in there came from Jesus. feel free to ignore it. xp

Aimless, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:24 (thirteen years ago)

i think a boss bringing this is up is pretty illegal. so yeah. very inappropriate.

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:26 (thirteen years ago)

oh no ne should offer advice except jesus! and it's totally ok to consign it if you agree w/his points and that somehow doesnt constitute offering advice

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:27 (thirteen years ago)

I agree that we should all be sensitive to each others feelings but telling people to not offer advice or opinions is just ridiculous as it constitutes like 80% of human communication, its something we all got to deal with, and that bible quote is like half a step from complaining abt haters

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:27 (thirteen years ago)

there's nothing wrong with having concern, the issue is do you know how demoralizing and condescending most of that concern comes across? very little of it is presented as genuine. most of the time it comes off as smug and rude. so why risk being a dick?

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:28 (thirteen years ago)

I am also kind of shocked i have to keep reiterating this and people keep bringing up these very particular instances in which they would like to possibly come across as an asshole to their loved ones

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:31 (thirteen years ago)

i have plenty of friends who smoke -- not only are they shortening their lives, but omg as a taxpayer i may be forced to financially support their future ailments! yet somehow i manage to not be a dick about it

mookieproof, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:31 (thirteen years ago)

ime the only people who think about weight or comment about other people's are skinny liberals so

rhino what boys like (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:31 (thirteen years ago)

It's weird and gross that there's a level of obstinacy about the right to judge fat people that there isn't about hardly any other group. The more people cling to that right the grosser it gets, and the more it starts to seem like the problem is with them, that they can't relax and let another person live with their own choices.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

when my dad hauls out the blood pressure monitor every time I come over and tells me I should go to the gym, I love the guy, but I also think, why is he so insensitive?

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

and his insensitivity and lack of compassion and empathy makes me think he will never understand me

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

tbf your dad would probably be a dick if you were a marathon runner too

d-_-b (mh), Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:46 (thirteen years ago)

when my dad hauls out the blood pressure monitor every time I come over

Wait, what? HII, that totally sucks.

My point the last time I posted wasn't that it was okay to make remarks, I kind of felt like that was clear, but maybe not? I dunno, I think threads like this are dangerous, because they are specifically demarcated to discuss issues that are contentious, but those very discussions often tread similar ground to stuff that is hurtful in day-to-day life. Or to put it another way, if you're discussing what is or isn't okay, you are going to talk about stuff that isn't okay to say, even if only in order to state your boundaries. I do still disagree about the science, but again, that is only in reaction to a specific article, it is not the sort of thing I would ever just walk up to someone and say, b/c, well, why the fuck would I ever want to? I don't consider anybody else's weight my concern, though I do reserve the right to judge if a family member's weight gain is related to poor health practices (because I *am* in a position to ascertain such a thing factually, rather than by assumption).

(Please forgive me if I waffle, I am a tad tipsy.)

emil.y, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:48 (thirteen years ago)

though I do reserve the right to judge if a family member's weight gain is related to poor health practices (because I *am* in a position to ascertain such a thing factually, rather than by assumption).

Maybe this should be more like "I do reserve the right to judge if a family member's weight gain is related to poor health practices if I am in a position to ascertain such a thing factually, rather than by assumption".

emil.y, Saturday, 27 October 2012 01:50 (thirteen years ago)

re: smoking, bloomberg was opposed to anti smoking measures because smokers died earlier, i.e. costing tax payers less.
i dont think theres any way to get around that even the most benign public policies promoting health are still going to implicitly put forth the message that being fat is not ok. even jesus seems to be getting more ripped every year.

Philip Nunez, Saturday, 27 October 2012 02:58 (thirteen years ago)

There's a world of misery and judgment between "being fat AND/OR UNHEALTHY is not ideal" and "being fat is not okay." Recognizing and living the difference would give back dignity and common courtesy to a lot of people, especially if the difference is not just in people's words and actions, but also in their actual thoughts.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:01 (thirteen years ago)

sw0le jesus

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:04 (thirteen years ago)

iirc jesus was a great big lad originally

but with socks instead of football (darraghmac), Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:04 (thirteen years ago)

the eat a sandwich brigade should stfu also.

estela, Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:06 (thirteen years ago)

at least until theyre willing to proffer a sandwich

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:08 (thirteen years ago)

a loaf and two fishes

but with socks instead of football (darraghmac), Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:19 (thirteen years ago)

some people want to think everything can be controlled, it's a form of magical thinking. someone i knew who was dying of aggressive pancreatic cancer said he wished people would stop blaming his dilemma upon his prior negative thinking. he was too tired to be very mad about it but imagine saying something so horrible and unfounded to a terminally ill person.

estela, Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:22 (thirteen years ago)

if a public policy is pointing to an ideal that isnt fat, thats basically saying being fat is not ok. actually it seems even more cruel. they really ought to replace bmi charts with, i dunno, maybe a range of how many pullups you can do? (which would still capture fat people, but maybe less healthy fat people?)

Philip Nunez, Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:28 (thirteen years ago)

i will smite you in all athletic pursuits, but fuck pullups

mookieproof, Saturday, 27 October 2012 03:41 (thirteen years ago)

maybe pullups are the common enemy we need to unite all bodytypes together (except for swole jesus who looks like he could crank out 50 no sweat)

Philip Nunez, Saturday, 27 October 2012 04:04 (thirteen years ago)

Pull-ups are evil when most of your muscle mass is in your lower body. Fuck 'em.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Saturday, 27 October 2012 04:25 (thirteen years ago)

^^for real

whining boom (electricsound), Saturday, 27 October 2012 04:25 (thirteen years ago)

agreed the 'eat a sandwich' brigade needs to stfu too

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 05:04 (thirteen years ago)

brb, gotta do some pull-ups and eat sandwiches

d-_-b (mh), Saturday, 27 October 2012 15:31 (thirteen years ago)

there was an article in the times the other day abt how its v hard for most women to do pull ups

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)

it's hard for most people to do pullups. i'm going to do them someday.

Online Webinar Event for Dads (harbl), Saturday, 27 October 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

why did i post on this thread idk

Online Webinar Event for Dads (harbl), Saturday, 27 October 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

it was an otm post

2016: Forks' America (crüt), Saturday, 27 October 2012 15:58 (thirteen years ago)

have we talked itt about Georgia's "Stop Sugarcoating It" campaign? because it is the worst thing.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/WashingtonPost/Content/Blogs/ezra-klein/StandingArt/ht_childhood_obesity_ads_tk_120102_wg.jpg?uuid=DTJ9yjYeEeGv32eQb8lRSQ

2016: Forks' America (crüt), Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:00 (thirteen years ago)

o sht

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:01 (thirteen years ago)

fat prevention!

Online Webinar Event for Dads (harbl), Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:03 (thirteen years ago)

i like that the kid on the left is still working it

max, Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:09 (thirteen years ago)

call me fat on a statewide advertising campaign all u want, i still give good face

max, Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:10 (thirteen years ago)

i don't feed my kids

buzza, Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)

kids should roam the wilderness in feral gangs is what i think

--bob marley (lag∞n), Saturday, 27 October 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

thats the worst thing ever. totally fat shaming. gross, georgia.

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 17:11 (thirteen years ago)

Haha kid on left totally cute, A+ at making eyes.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Saturday, 27 October 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

what's the eat-a-sandwich crew? sounds interesting

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Saturday, 27 October 2012 17:45 (thirteen years ago)

oh you're nothing but skin and bones. you must not eat enough. look at that! nothing but a salad for lunch. you should eat a sandwich!

Aimless, Saturday, 27 October 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)

http://thebadsport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Jared-Fogle-and-Kim-Kardashian-300x226.jpg

buzza, Saturday, 27 October 2012 18:00 (thirteen years ago)

basically people who like to judge thin people as automatically having a eating disorder and the most common phrase is "______ really needs to eat a sandwich"

homosexual II, Saturday, 27 October 2012 18:04 (thirteen years ago)

ha i just noticed the same exact comment on an acquaintance's photo (said person is constitutionally thin and couldn't gain weight if he tried)

toto coolio (clouds), Saturday, 27 October 2012 18:20 (thirteen years ago)

what's the eat-a-sandwich crew? sounds interesting

― lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Saturday, October 27, 2012 1:45 PM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

there's actually a subboard here full of them

all mods con (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 October 2012 19:19 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah eat-a-sandwich is something I've moaned about a lot on here. Also 'i want to wear something revealing but i'm not curvy enough' etc.

kinder, Saturday, 27 October 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)

wait what's this? i thought i had heard everything

'i want to wear something revealing but i'm not curvy enough'

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Saturday, 27 October 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't think it was my place to say, but...rather.

purveyor of generations (in orbit), Saturday, 27 October 2012 20:13 (thirteen years ago)

is this something ppl say when they want someone to say "oh no YOU LOOK FINE"? guess i've never noticed that but w/e

people should just stop talking about other people's bodies

these albatrosses have no fear of man (La Lechera), Saturday, 27 October 2012 20:17 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah it was kind of an empathetic response to what homo said upthread. I've had comments to that effect when out. I don't give a shit anymore, mind

kinder, Saturday, 27 October 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)

ha I really shouldn't try and post from my phone.

kinder, Saturday, 27 October 2012 22:51 (thirteen years ago)

Southwest the first airline to offer an additional seat for fat people for free? Interesting.

http://www.southwest.com/html/customer-service/extra-seat/index-pol.html

homosexual II, Saturday, 10 November 2012 02:18 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/health/study-suggests-lower-death-risk-for-the-overweight.html

Mordy, Wednesday, 2 January 2013 01:20 (thirteen years ago)

Kinda "rah rah" for my cynicism level but I'm going to be earnest and post it anyway:

http://vagendamag.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-year-new-you.html

grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Friday, 4 January 2013 14:47 (thirteen years ago)

Shit, my grandma is 97!!! And has never been skinny a day in her life! It's your activity level... When people are in their 80s and too thin, they start to look really vulnerable!

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Italo Night at Some Gay Club (Mount Cleaners), Friday, 4 January 2013 14:56 (thirteen years ago)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BAMt5fTCcAA_qku.jpg:large

Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Thursday, 10 January 2013 02:47 (thirteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

we are having a 'biggest loser' competition at my work and I'm pretty annoyed about the whole concept.

also this is disgusting: http://www.dietdoctor.com/more-insane-dieting-the-bulimia-machine

homosexual II, Monday, 4 February 2013 19:58 (thirteen years ago)

having a 'biggest loser' competition at my work

what the actual fuck

:C (crüt), Monday, 4 February 2013 19:58 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, like, everyone puts in $20, the person who loses the most weight wins it all. really a great way to promote 'health'

homosexual II, Monday, 4 February 2013 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

times like these when it REALLY sucks that you can get fired for slapping coworkers

:C (crüt), Monday, 4 February 2013 20:02 (thirteen years ago)

optional or mandatory?

Aimless, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:03 (thirteen years ago)

ugh a coworker set up an informal biggest loser thing years ago - only her friends signed up because oh I tooooooooootally want you to be the judge of how successful I am in my weightloss you micromanaging POS
HATE

shaming is such a great way to lose weight u guys!

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 4 February 2013 20:04 (thirteen years ago)

I would never discuss weight with coworkers. This is mind boggling.

Van Horn Street, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:10 (thirteen years ago)

Don't they understand that plot lines from The Office are supposed to be satire?

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 4 February 2013 20:14 (thirteen years ago)

we are having a 'biggest loser' competition at my work and I'm pretty annoyed about the whole concept.

They tried to organize one at my workplace but it had to be cancelled -- everyone hated the idea and no one signed up for it.

Ulna (Nicole), Monday, 4 February 2013 20:17 (thirteen years ago)

psst.. get them to add a pullup requirement and it will probably fizzle out as well. apparently everyone hates pullups.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:26 (thirteen years ago)

what kind of places do you guys work? sounds like there's not enough real work for these ppl to do.

sarahell, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:28 (thirteen years ago)

don't diss pullups

iatee, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:30 (thirteen years ago)

yeah? if pullups are so great, why aren't there pullup bras?

Aimless, Monday, 4 February 2013 20:36 (thirteen years ago)

New anti-obesity initiative aimed at kids "Be Anything But Fat!"

Cunga, Monday, 4 February 2013 21:23 (thirteen years ago)

nobody likes a FAT serial killer

#guy #guy fieri #poop #hallway (zachlyon), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:24 (thirteen years ago)

'Was she a great big fat person?'

The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

xxpost sarahell the biggest loser thing at my office was setup as a lunchtime/afterhours thing, it wasn't a 'work' arrangement.
but that coworker def had too much time on her hands, no question

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

i'm gonna start a 'tallest person' contest at work

mookieproof, Monday, 4 February 2013 21:29 (thirteen years ago)

I understand that workplaces where people work together and feel like a team are more effective, but I feel like it goes overboard into some bullshit where there all of your community needs get wrapped into your workplace. I mean, I understand that you mainly only socialize with me and other parents of kids on your kid's soccer team, but that's not my problem.

mh, Monday, 4 February 2013 21:31 (thirteen years ago)

brother's workplace had a biggest loser thing, everyone seemed to enjoy it, he lost idk 35 pounds, profit idk

ben foster five (darraghmac), Monday, 4 February 2013 21:45 (thirteen years ago)

I'd be most embarrassed by the fact they named it after a reality television show

mh, Monday, 4 February 2013 22:52 (thirteen years ago)

biggest loser at my work was really popular. so bizarre. yet another reason why working from home (out of state now too) rules.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 01:03 (thirteen years ago)

I know people who are subject to a fat tax at work. If their weight, checked periodically, goes into a certain range, they pay more for medical benefits. I've been told this is at the behest of the insurance companies, saying premiums will go up for everybody if too many fatties. That's where a lot of this Nanny State stuff comes from: Free Enterprise. (Insurance co.s also believe in Climate Change, shockingly enough, so for inst they've been cancelling homeowners insurance for years, before seemingly unlikely stuff like H. Sandy materializes)

dow, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 01:37 (thirteen years ago)

what are your thoughts on obama shooting skeet

mookieproof, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 01:43 (thirteen years ago)

Pretty sure charging individual employees a higher rate is straight-up illegal? idk

mh, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:13 (thirteen years ago)

i'm gonna start a 'tallest person' contest at work

― mookieproof, Monday, February 4, 2013

finally a way i can actually achieve

a basset hound (strongo hulkington's ghost dad), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:14 (thirteen years ago)

I wonder who is the tallest ilxor.

Ulna (Nicole), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:29 (thirteen years ago)

every work place / insurance company that gives you $ for healthy living is effectively creating a fat tax

iatee, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:31 (thirteen years ago)

just more politely

iatee, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:31 (thirteen years ago)

husky tax

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:36 (thirteen years ago)

hussy tax

:C (crüt), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:37 (thirteen years ago)

These are all govt. workers I'm talking about; their unions go along with it.

dow, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

dow did 9/11

mookieproof, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 03:27 (thirteen years ago)

people in my office used to do a contest called "5 in 5" where you had 5 weeks to lose 5% of your body weight. (you paid $100 at the beginning, and you got your money back if you made it, plus a share of the pot from the people that didn't make it.) it was really annoying, especially since most people would just starve themselves for a few days before the end, drink no water the day before, and "win."

eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 04:20 (thirteen years ago)

Alabama's where I was referring to; some other states, like West Virginia, have tried it, but dunno where it's still in effect.

dow, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 14:02 (thirteen years ago)

It's ridiculous. I willingly run more than is considered healthy and constantly have orthopedic issue. Because of this I see several specialists and physical therapists many times a year. My health insurance should be more expensive because of this.

Jeff, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 15:06 (thirteen years ago)

In the long run, someone who runs a lot or has athletic issues will likely cost less than a smoker or obese person.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 15:46 (thirteen years ago)

In the (disappointing) Roger Ebert memoir, he cites only two times he ever felt embarrassed for being fat. The first was when he was at a tailor's in Thailand, inquiring about an $85 suit special, and they told him he was more of a "$100 kind of guy." The second was when he was at some museum in London and saw an old chair with a sign inviting people to sit on it, but before he could a guard intervened with a "nonononononono .....!"

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

Just another fat American

Sir Lord Baltimora (Myonga Vön Bontee), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:12 (thirteen years ago)

I think people who do too much exercise are kinda a minor factor in this

iatee, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

in terms of health care $, smokers apparently are a push because the shorter lifespans make up for the uptick in increased care.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:35 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, see? I'm doing you all a favor.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:38 (thirteen years ago)

This particular program is not mandatory, but the whole idea behind it is annoying. They also have "free fruit" day where they bring in oranges. They think these things are going to turn a fat person thin? Really?

homosexual II, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:39 (thirteen years ago)

I'm down with free oranges but I bet it's not paleo or bad for glycemic index or something.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:44 (thirteen years ago)

also free oranges probably better than the free chips and cola i ordered for the office.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:44 (thirteen years ago)

I hope it's not too healthy because I ate an entire grapefruit this morning. Wouldn't want to slow down the process of doing myself in.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:45 (thirteen years ago)

ugh our office has free fruit day. they've also started this 'wellness' thing where you can walk x miles a day and some weird thing to do with taking your blood pressure. thankfully it's all opt-in stuff and I am all about deleting those terrible emails

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

my office has free beer day

:C (crüt), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

also box wine. that's kind of a fruit.

:C (crüt), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

lol

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:51 (thirteen years ago)

they've also started this 'wellness' thing where you can walk x miles a day and some weird thing to do with taking your blood pressure. thankfully it's all opt-in stuff and I am all about deleting those terrible emails

― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, February 5, 2013 1:46 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Yeah my work has a new thing along these lines too. I can't go into much detail because of the alacrity with which I ignore it.

They've done several Biggest Loser rounds too. tbf the participants have been p evenly divided between men and women but still ugh.

On the other hand, ppl go pretty nuts with the self-destructive antics on our company outings.

there were chinchillas, these weird little rat animals, in cages (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:51 (thirteen years ago)

i want free fruit

mookieproof, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:52 (thirteen years ago)

we do get free beer once a month, and the occasional office parties are definitely drunkfests so I guess it all balances out

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:54 (thirteen years ago)

So envious of these "free beer" workplaces.

Ulna (Nicole), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:15 (thirteen years ago)

the first year my office did a free beer afternoon, they bought TONS of beer, all kinds of awesome good beers too, and people literally stayed on the back patio til like, 6 or 7pm (the event started at 3pm) - no-one would leave til all the beer was gone.

after that they bought about a third as much beer, and made sure it was just crappy heinekins and michelobs and stuff that people would only drink a couple of.

but yeah, the friday afternoon beers on the patio is pretty cool

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:20 (thirteen years ago)

Once after grocery shopping I ended up with a bag of clementines that must have been bought by the customer in front of me, so I brought it to work so we had free fruit that week.

tokyo rosemary, Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:51 (thirteen years ago)

Being buzzed at the office is about the worst thing I can imagine, office-wise, but I will admit that doing pullups with colleagues runs it very, very close

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

they were passing around a birthday card for a fat coworker that was shaped like an ice cream sundae with the directive "indulge on your special day!" or something.

administrator galina (Matt P), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 20:45 (thirteen years ago)

i think i wrote "paris awaits!" because i overheard she booked a trip to paris, where no one cares if you're fat iirc

administrator galina (Matt P), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 20:46 (thirteen years ago)

maybe she's going for the chocolate. birthday cards are the worst. this person is capable, energetic and has other interests besides food or not-eating-food, as far as i can tell. *vents*

administrator galina (Matt P), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 20:52 (thirteen years ago)

I know people who are subject to a fat tax at work. If their weight, checked periodically, goes into a certain range, they pay more for medical benefits.

ok, I thought the "periodic weight checks at work -> fat tax" thing made me angry, but the "5 in 5" thing sounds actively dangerous, what the hell people. so I was briefly glad I don't live in the US

but then I remembered trying to get life insurance here in the UK, and apparently being a fatass who once was on antidepressants whose side-effects necessitated an ECG and the world's most useless 2-minute appointment with a psychiatrist means I should pay 3x as much as friends who do dangerous sports and (further tedious health details excised). also my office never offers free anything. so, maybe...

a panda, Malmö (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 5 February 2013 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

This particular program is not mandatory, but the whole idea behind it is annoying. They also have "free fruit" day where they bring in oranges. They think these things are going to turn a fat person thin? Really?

I don't know if anyone actually thinks that. It's good to be promoting eating more fruit. If only to offset the selections in the vending machines for one day.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 01:38 (thirteen years ago)

Free fruit day seems weird to me, we have fruit trucked in every week for the breakroom, like theres always a giant bowl of fruit and no one ever eats the damn pears and apples so at the end of the week they all go off and get chucked out, it is a disgrace.

Manti and the Catfish (Trayce), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 08:02 (thirteen years ago)

About the only thing I get free at work is coffee, which I'm *grateful* for because a university I worked for charged us for every cup of coffee we drank from the coffeemaker. It was ridiculous.

Ulna (Nicole), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 13:23 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, no free coffee/tea here either and we pay for our Christmas meal, which was cancelled last year as nobody signed up. Meanwhile a friend works for a different department of the same place and gets free coffee and the dept pays for restaurant meals several times a year including two Christmas outings too.

Grumble.

a panda, Malmö (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 13:54 (thirteen years ago)

I moved from corporate law firm to public sector one December and in the same week went from bonuses, free champagne and lavish free Christmas do, to a second Christmas meal which I had to PAY FOR and had the shittiest comedy entertainment and a disco with the lights on at 3pm. Totally worth it tho right.

kinder, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:15 (thirteen years ago)

I loved the free fruit at a temp gig. I need more fruit consumption daily and that was a free and convenient delivery system.

The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 17:58 (thirteen years ago)

ugh our office has free fruit day. they've also started this 'wellness' thing where you can walk x miles a day and some weird thing to do with taking your blood pressure. thankfully it's all opt-in stuff and I am all about deleting those terrible emails

― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, February 5, 2013 1:46 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this does not sound terribly oppressive to me, idk

manti 乒乓 (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 18:14 (thirteen years ago)

these things are offensive because they are not actually enough to create sustainable weight loss.
they are kind of patronizing and simplistic.

"make small changes!"

etc

and also, right next to the flyer about the Biggest Loser competition is a flyer about Girl Scout cookies.

homosexual II, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:03 (thirteen years ago)

Walking x miles a day actually will have a major effect on sedentary people, though.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:04 (thirteen years ago)

Mile o' x

kinder, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:07 (thirteen years ago)

obv I don't know the full context the walking thing sounds like it's about "wellness" and not about weight loss?

"Biggest Loser" is just the worst name for anything ever. really "funny"!

ron paulstretch (crüt), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:08 (thirteen years ago)

should propose "the weakest link" wellness program which is just elimination round arm wrestling.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:14 (thirteen years ago)

I haven't been to a WW mtg in almost two years but I do remember the "make small changes" thing being part of their program.

The biggest problem is the Biggest Loser thing, tho. It's the all the horribleness of American reality tv production applied to a critical health issue and propagating the idea that this is a good way to lose weight which just compounds all the worst aspects of American fad diets of the last three decades.

The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:18 (thirteen years ago)

Come to think of it, is there any critical societal issue we can have a mass/national discussion about at _all_? We have no mechanism for doing so due to the thickheaded coarsening stupidity of broadcast and online media

The New Jack Mormons! (kingfish), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:21 (thirteen years ago)

isn't the discussion itself the problem? if you had a filtering mechanism for forward discourse, it would end up being experts giving top-down mandates.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:32 (thirteen years ago)

the right to be fat?

☏ (am0n), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:33 (thirteen years ago)

i feel like enlightened discourse would just be nate silver poring over mortality/obesity stats while dr oz is bound and gagged in the other room.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:37 (thirteen years ago)

weird sex dream

downton arby (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 19:40 (thirteen years ago)

The basic information about good habits which can improve one's health or bad habits which can undermine it is not hard to come by and pretty much everyone, if pressed, could name three or four of the top five. Simple stuff like not smoking, not overeating, getting regular exercise. The problem is getting them to act on that knowlege.

Unbelievably stupid-sounding stuff like The Biggest Loser (as seen on TV!) are worthwhile for one reason only: they motivate people who wouldn't otherwise take any action at all. Sure, there are much better ways to change habits and get motivated, but they just aren't happening for a lot of people. Something crappy is sometimes better than nothing at all.

Aimless, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 20:01 (thirteen years ago)

"weakest link" obviously wd be a competition to find out who has the wateriest shits

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 20:04 (thirteen years ago)

djp abusing ex mod powers surely there ^

ben foster five (darraghmac), Wednesday, 6 February 2013 22:00 (thirteen years ago)

Why does this thread have 1600 answers when The Body Politic or Fatty Fatty Two By Four Can't Get Through The Bathroom Door has like, nothing.

It underlines the stupidity of bullies: a two by four could easily fit through the bathroom door. Better thread title though.

how's life, Thursday, 7 February 2013 11:48 (thirteen years ago)

the question mark invites discourse

Mordy, Thursday, 7 February 2013 15:26 (thirteen years ago)

I would tell you the answer but it would get all Candyman up in this thread.

Ulna (Nicole), Thursday, 7 February 2013 15:30 (thirteen years ago)

lol

I wasn't serious, you know. I just found that as a Random Thread result and it's such an ilx thread title.

how's life, Thursday, 7 February 2013 15:35 (thirteen years ago)

more re fat tax etc.:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/02/20/172098418/money-replaces-willpower-in-programs-promoting-weight-loss

dow, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:18 (thirteen years ago)

Probably as good a place as any to post this piece of fantastic reporting:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/magazine/the-extraordinary-science-of-junk-food.html?hp&_r=0&gwh=2B91152368F3DE9D5008D3794AB091EF

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:43 (thirteen years ago)

Definitely raises the possibility that "education" on healthy eating is a losing battle, although one that should be fought anyway.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NEXT PAGE »

the extldrinary science of junk food

ledge, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:47 (thirteen years ago)

Readability

Jeff, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:52 (thirteen years ago)

the end of that reminded me of someone here (rrobyn?) being mad @ baby carrots

johnny crunch, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:56 (thirteen years ago)

It was rrobyn. I believe that's also the day I found out that baby carrots were not actual things that just grew perfectly formed like that. MIND BLOWING information, that was.

go to party leather (ENBB), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:56 (thirteen years ago)

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Save
E-mail
Share
Print
Single Page
Reprints

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:58 (thirteen years ago)

omg @ 'baby-cut' carrots

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:01 (thirteen years ago)

next thing you're gonna tell me is that baby corn is made from adult corn

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:01 (thirteen years ago)

SEE?!

go to party leather (ENBB), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:02 (thirteen years ago)

wait sorry, you guys really thought that little carrots grow like that, perfectly cylindrical and with no stem or peel?

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:02 (thirteen years ago)

Emboldened by the success, the company’s development wing pushed even harder, inventing a Yoplait variation that came in a squeezable tube — perfect for kids. They called it Go-Gurt and rolled it out nationally in the weeks before the C.E.O. meeting. (By year’s end, it would hit $100 million in sales.)

and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:03 (thirteen years ago)

I fucking love go-gurt

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:04 (thirteen years ago)

You also love kewpie mayo iirc

and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:04 (thirteen years ago)

wait sorry, you guys really thought that little carrots grow like that, perfectly cylindrical and with no stem or peel?

― space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:02 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

LISTEN I JUST NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT IT, OK?

I mean I guess if I did I would have assumed they'd been pruned and peeled but yes I just always thought tiny little carrots grew like that. :(

go to party leather (ENBB), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:05 (thirteen years ago)

have you ever even HAD kewpie mayo?!

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:06 (thirteen years ago)

you'll find me in the break room, bottle of kewpie mayo in one hand and a go-gurt in the other, squirting both into my gaping mouth at the same damn time.

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:07 (thirteen years ago)

We used to make fun of the kids who brought lunchables. I'm not really sure why, I guess it was sort of a "your mom doesn't love you enough to make you lunch" schtick. Feel pretty bad about that now.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:09 (thirteen years ago)

dang, that's cold! who are "we"?

and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:11 (thirteen years ago)

i didnt think it was possible to not like kewpie mayo!

just sayin, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:14 (thirteen years ago)

when I get engaged I'm gonna do it with a baby-cut ring. baby-cut carrot ring that is!

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

I think if you pull up carrots early, when they're smaller, they might actually be sweeter then? But of course that has never been where "baby carrots" actually came from.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:21 (thirteen years ago)

Their tools included a $40,000 device that simulated a chewing mouth to test and perfect the chips, discovering things like the perfect break point: people like a chip that snaps with about four pounds of pressure per square inch.

amaaazing

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:22 (thirteen years ago)

I want a crunch machine now

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:22 (thirteen years ago)

The thing about spaghetti sauce was interesting. I'm definitely in the "extra chunky sauce" 1/3 (such a fucking gross description). But weirdly I've found that the most reliable way to find good sauce is to buy the one with the fewest grams of sugar.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:23 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe less sugar just correlates to higher quality ingredients and less need to add sugar.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:24 (thirteen years ago)

sawce

:C (crüt), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:26 (thirteen years ago)

think I'm gonna pick up a cherry vanilla dr. pepper today

乒乓, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 16:38 (thirteen years ago)

it's so cheap and easy to make good homemade sauce out of canned tomatos

in a chef-driven ambulance (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 17:07 (thirteen years ago)

Not easier than opening a jar.

Jeff, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 17:30 (thirteen years ago)

the idea of a fat tax is fucking disgusting to me

I made the mistake of participating in a "wellness survey" at work (actually, it was demanded of us that we fill it out), and I listed my true weight. Now I get a really special e-newsletter, the latest of which had a huge article about LAP BANDS :/ :/ :/

homosexual II, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

ugh

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

We used to make fun of the kids who brought lunchables. I'm not really sure why, I guess it was sort of a "your mom doesn't love you enough to make you lunch" schtick. Feel pretty bad about that now.

― space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:09 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

dang, that's cold! who are "we"?

― and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:11 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

IDK, just kids on the playground. It wasn't a rich school or anything -- public, urban, pretty mixed. Something seemed gross about Lunchables also, even in seventh grade. I hated bologna.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:22 (thirteen years ago)

For me growing up lunchables were desirable by kids. But they were too expensive for my family so I got the same stupid ham sandwich every day.

Jeff, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:31 (thirteen years ago)

i don't recall lunchables being a thing, maybe i am too old

i really hate the name tho

железобетонное очко (mookieproof), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:33 (thirteen years ago)

I remember lunchables.

My dad always made me weird shit like salami on buttered bread and all I wanted was peanut butter and jelly.

go to party leather (ENBB), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 19:13 (thirteen years ago)

lunchables were definitely a delicacy but only if they weren't the ham/cheese crackers boxes

This is called money bags. (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 19:15 (thirteen years ago)

the more packaging the more delicious it was

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 19:24 (thirteen years ago)

packaging should be completely outlawed. think abt it. as long as we have capital punishment let's at least have it for packaging things.

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 19:34 (thirteen years ago)

Like the individually wrapped potatoes they sell at my grocery store? MAN THOSE MAKE ME SO MAD.

go to party leather (ENBB), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:07 (thirteen years ago)

those bags of chopped onions @ trader joes make me so angry

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

Lunchables were/are fucking gross, IMO

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:18 (thirteen years ago)

i would still eat lunchables pizzas today if my mom still bought them for me

This is called money bags. (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

I dream about lunchables pizzas sometimes

I'm on Picasso's side here. (crüt), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:24 (thirteen years ago)

I liked lunchables because they were trendy at my 5th grade lunch table

homosexual II, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 22:54 (thirteen years ago)

how would you do an artisanal lunchables that doesn't end up being a bento?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:05 (thirteen years ago)

doesn't Starbucks pretty much do an interpretation of lunchables?

homosexual II, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:24 (thirteen years ago)

oh man, if i showed up at grade school with this, my trading options would rest on that lone cookie
http://www.themenumom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2011-08-28_17-07-38_333.jpg

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:46 (thirteen years ago)

unlike a lunchable, that looks delicious

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:46 (thirteen years ago)

^^ELECTRIC CHAIR xp

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:47 (thirteen years ago)

for real that shit is infuriating

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:49 (thirteen years ago)

that's supposed to be a cookie?

This is called money bags. (zachlyon), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:52 (thirteen years ago)

outlaw packaging, make people skinny i mean healthier and stop poisoning everything, 2 for 1

administrator galina (Matt P), Wednesday, 20 February 2013 23:52 (thirteen years ago)

mmmm a peach that tastes faintly of hardboiled egg (i assume that's an egg?)

and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:08 (thirteen years ago)

apple, not peach, iirc

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:09 (thirteen years ago)

i guess i thought it was a nectarine, but it's just a yellowing egg-scented apple

and that sounds like a gong-concert (La Lechera), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:11 (thirteen years ago)

nectarine imo

железобетонное очко (mookieproof), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:13 (thirteen years ago)

That is no cookie :(

Jaq, Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:13 (thirteen years ago)

guys the ingredients are on the label

i see boy george has lost some weight (brownie), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:15 (thirteen years ago)

would you believe it if it said horse meat

железобетонное очко (mookieproof), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:16 (thirteen years ago)

teh horse who liked lunchables

i see boy george has lost some weight (brownie), Thursday, 21 February 2013 00:17 (thirteen years ago)

why dont they have that at the starbucks i end up hatefully buying coffee from on a weekly

purp (roxymuzak), Monday, 25 February 2013 23:12 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/04/look-how-quickly-the-us-got-fat-1985-2010-animated-map/274878/

i really would like to see data like this tracked next to corresponding data on food insecurity & malnutrition

goole, Thursday, 11 April 2013 21:44 (thirteen years ago)

Sooo...

I would consider myself a lifetime fatty (yo, been fat for 20 years... WOO).

I just had a moment of gratefulness for, of all things, TUMBLR--which gave me my life back about two years ago. I think getting into fashion (not high fashion.. not fashion designers... just finding awesome clothes for my awesome body) finally made me accept my fatness and made me realize life is meant to be lived and not put on hold.

HERE'S TO ALL MY GREAT OUTFITS FROM THE PAST. Thank you for accentuating my rad bod.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/15f850f9f5353e8da64ca94aff459494/tumblr_mkjyvzrtUe1qztqkgo1_250.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbl0qvtaaB1qztqkgo1_250.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfh0iLB321qztqkgo1_250.png
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5h33gAwkx1qztqkgo1_250.jpg
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m37di0NG4w1qztqkgo1_r1_250.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2w9b3cudm1qztqkgo1_250.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwmhg0wmbV1qztqkgo1_250.jpg

homosexual II, Friday, 12 April 2013 20:51 (thirteen years ago)

Have I told you lately that I love you?

Airwrecka Bliptrap Blapmantis (ENBB), Friday, 12 April 2013 21:34 (thirteen years ago)

so classy, so fab, so everything

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 12 April 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)

I just thought this thread needed some positivity rather than a bunch more articles about how sad and fat we all are.

homosexual II, Friday, 12 April 2013 22:09 (thirteen years ago)

good stuff

Spottie_Ottie_Dope, Friday, 12 April 2013 22:14 (thirteen years ago)

Homoll, you are smart and creative and beautiful. Keep rocking.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 12 April 2013 23:31 (thirteen years ago)

OMG THE PEACH BLOUSE AND LIPSTICK LOOOOOOOOOOVE

Love the others too, but that really blew me away!

quincie, Saturday, 13 April 2013 15:44 (thirteen years ago)

Also thanking u for the positivity. I always felt pretty good in well-cut work clothes (suits and such), but I'm now pretty much full time in a bathing suit. Not used to seeing so much of my body all the time, and am having to get used to it.

quincie, Saturday, 13 April 2013 15:46 (thirteen years ago)

I'm sure your bod looks fab

homosexual II, Saturday, 13 April 2013 20:19 (thirteen years ago)

homoII fyi I have been feeling v inspired by your outlook since I saw yr post

thank you

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 13 April 2013 20:42 (thirteen years ago)

fucking booming post, you are awesome homo 2

not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 13 April 2013 21:27 (thirteen years ago)

for sure. imo secret of style is not hiding your awesomeness

the kind of man who best draws girls' eyeballs (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 13 April 2013 22:19 (thirteen years ago)

seems a kinda platitudinous statement maybe but I MEAN IT

the kind of man who best draws girls' eyeballs (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 13 April 2013 22:20 (thirteen years ago)

Can't wait for FATKINI weather

homosexual II, Saturday, 13 April 2013 23:22 (thirteen years ago)

mandee, wow

<3

purp (roxymuzak), Sunday, 14 April 2013 14:45 (thirteen years ago)

thanks for the encouragement everyone!

Oh and if you want to follow me on tumblr, I mostly reblog NSFW stuff, but I also do post pics of outfits and shit, and also I love following u back: landofconfusion.tumblr.com

homosexual II, Sunday, 14 April 2013 18:39 (thirteen years ago)

sweet tumblr. i like the embedded wallace stevens recording, and in general the endless opportunities tumblr offers for recontextualization.

Pat Finn, Sunday, 14 April 2013 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

in general the endless opportunities tumblr offers for recontextualization nude

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Sunday, 14 April 2013 18:57 (thirteen years ago)

love love love yr tumblr mandee

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 14 April 2013 18:59 (thirteen years ago)

oops homo sry :)

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 14 April 2013 18:59 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, despite my flippancy, it's p great

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Sunday, 14 April 2013 19:00 (thirteen years ago)

Ooo, gonna stalk that tumblr! And yeah, there are many great fat-positive fashion tumblrs that have pulled me back from self-hatred.

emilys., Monday, 15 April 2013 22:24 (thirteen years ago)

love it.

emilys., Monday, 15 April 2013 22:34 (thirteen years ago)

I'm the r-n-d you just followed back homoII but I don't tumbl much anymore. Love yours though!

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 01:31 (thirteen years ago)

Roxy Music cover model makeup, why have I not tried this?!

tokyo rosemary, Tuesday, 16 April 2013 02:34 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

Do we have a thread for fat-pos fashion?? I've gone down the margieplus.com rabbit hole so far today, and carl agatha sent me down another one last week sometime and I wonder which ones everyone else loves too.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 23 May 2013 14:43 (thirteen years ago)

Yes, please.

ps. I love the direction in which the fat girls have taken this thread

emilys., Friday, 24 May 2013 01:24 (thirteen years ago)

cosign

siouxsan sarandon (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 24 May 2013 01:29 (thirteen years ago)

Her presentation is kind of grating, but message is otm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUTJQIBI1oA&list=UUChwLxQnCa24jDkQ1ZJSBwA&index=30

emilys., Friday, 24 May 2013 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

xxxp: I started one
Venezia Victims No More: Cool Clothes for Larger Ladies

You must be very cold in the sack. (sarahell), Monday, 27 May 2013 05:30 (thirteen years ago)

I wish the video could have presented a fresh and easy way to hop off the stigma treadmill.

Instead, what we get is the standard identity politics stigma treadmill: A social stigma is internalized by its victims, the fat. Stigmatized people are, as a result, each other's worst enemies (an astonishing amount of this video expresses hostility towards other fat people). An effort is made to step magically free of the stigma by sheer force of will, sass and feist. We, the victims, are to assert pride in our difference. Society, for its part, is asked to de-hierarchize some of its most fundamental, reflexive values and replace them with a worldview in which things - bodies - are not "better" or "worse", only different.

The victims are to demand respect for their differences. Society, even if it can't de-hierarchize its fundamental values, is to police its terminology and its commentary, to exercise sensitivity and restraint, to create taboos on vocal judgment. Meanwhile, a strange reversal is supposed to take place: at the very moment society is refraining from using the word "fat", the fat themselves are supposed to be reclaiming it as "queer" and other minority-stigmatizing words were before it. The market is asked to provide more choice, and, finally, fatness is demonstrated to be something beyond personal choice and therefore not a question of existential responsibility, not a "lifestyle choice" or an "orientation" you could actively blame anyone for.

While all this sounds like a reasonable set of aims for activism - fatness following femaleness, blackness, gayness and other former stigmas into the broad church of toleration and normality - the outcome is a foregone conclusion. The repression of the stigma will prove impossible to police. Repressed disdain, hammered down here, will pop up there. It will turn out that even the solutions proposed by the victims are confirming and reinforcing the very stigmas they hoped to banish. "Politics" will shrink down to trivial issues of respect, language-policing, and etiquette, when it should be expanding to become a worldwide, utopian class politics. The stigma treadmill will slip endlessly beneath the feet of all minorities until such time as they can clan together and bring into existence an entirely new order which radically rethinks all values, not just those of "my special difference". It's ironic, isn't it, that the one thing fat pride doesn't seem to encompass is a broad and united front.

Grampsy, Monday, 27 May 2013 13:33 (thirteen years ago)

Repressed disdain, hammered down here, will pop up there.

This is where you lose me. Repression of feelings is not what is being sought, but rather an expanded understanding and compassion within which those feelings can no longer exist. Kindness as a default approach to others would seem to provide what is needed.

That there will always be angry and cruel people who seek to drag others into their misery seems a given. You can try to find whatever sparks of decency they retain and feed those, rather than their anger and resentment. But it would seem more useful to reset the tone of society by converting the great masses of the thoughtless and confused, who drift along with the prevailing breeze. They can be swayed; it's who they are. Perhaps you can't build much of a utopia from them, but you can probably build a reasonably decent society. It's worth a shot.

Aimless, Monday, 27 May 2013 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

Was in town doing a bit of clothes shopping today and literally every shop I walked into, within thirty seconds I'd overhear the phrase 'make me look fat' being said by women to their friends in some way or another.
The group of 4 young women in one corner of my office cannot mention food without the word 'fat' creeping in there, like some superstitious belief that if you mention food you have to acknowledge its calorie count. I'm getting really resentful of how this word/sentiment is ALL AROUND ALL THE TIME even when I do my best not to give a shit about "loving my body" or even "having an opinion on what my body looks like to others" urghghgh

kinder, Monday, 27 May 2013 18:04 (thirteen years ago)

Yep. There are certain of my friends who just cannot get through a SINGLE conversation without talking about their weight, their diet, their workouts, whether they're gaining or losing weight. They're never good enough, and they always have time and energy to spare for criticizing their bodies. I think & talk about my bod and I'm aware of it and I have vague desires that it be this or that but nothing like the stuff I just sit and listen to from people.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 27 May 2013 18:17 (thirteen years ago)

Mostly I wish my body were taller, so you can see what realm of unreality I'm working in just to start with.

Thinking about VBO, trying to embrace mine lately. I saw a pretty woman yest in a tight shirt whose sides and belly were bulging slightly above her jeans; she looked happy. I smiled.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 27 May 2013 18:20 (thirteen years ago)

this will sound kinda silly & livejournally but I've been watching tons of Rupaul's Drag Race (why because it's awesome)....but a really profound by-product has been seeing some of these queens embrace their bodies in a way that has really burrowed into my head. They take all the things that I internalize, and it's like, they *accessorize* with insecurities, just adorn themselves with them...the whole process of glamming up is like this incredible armor, but it's armor made out of yourself?

I am not explaining it right and am sounding v corny but it has really, truly rattled a lot of things loose in me, and I am really starting to examine my own shame & insecurites in a new way, and questioning my internal monologue. I need to be me now, and embrace ~all this~ today. Because that's who I am. I can still want to change and work on being healthy, but I can't mothball THIS me, because this is the only me I've got.

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 27 May 2013 19:14 (thirteen years ago)

V cool, VG.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 May 2013 19:23 (thirteen years ago)

I need to be me now, and embrace ~all this~ today.

people who are well on their way to figuring out how to live

Aimless, Monday, 27 May 2013 19:24 (thirteen years ago)

feeling fat and sassy today

also wearing glittery blue spandex leggings. as pants.

homosexual II, Monday, 27 May 2013 21:11 (thirteen years ago)

I think that joy nash video is okay. What is observed as hostility against other fat people I think she was meant to try to be encouraging and empowering. It's very basic fat acceptance stuff (I find the part about exercise and eating right being vital kinda cringe-worthy.. as... honestly I don't think health is anyone's business and also its a red herring for most fat hate). I find the message about 'living now' needs to be taken to heart, or at least that was something I struggled with during most of my 20's.

homosexual II, Monday, 27 May 2013 21:14 (thirteen years ago)

stay classy, academic psychology

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BLykUGQCAAALudM.png

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 2 June 2013 23:40 (thirteen years ago)

#truth

ttyih boi (crüt), Sunday, 2 June 2013 23:41 (thirteen years ago)

1) this guy is a psychologist?
2) no wait he's an EVOLUTIONARY psychologist. I get it now.
3) "carbs"? really?

ttyih boi (crüt), Sunday, 2 June 2013 23:42 (thirteen years ago)

You know, he's right: I can't think of a single obese doctor of philosophy

emilys., Monday, 3 June 2013 01:02 (thirteen years ago)

no idea how i'd write papers if i couldn't eat carbs

the white queen and her caustic judgments (difficult listening hour), Monday, 3 June 2013 01:18 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/march/1361848247/karen-hitchcock/fat-city

And yeah, I'm in exam block, it's all eating all the time.

Popture, Monday, 3 June 2013 01:29 (thirteen years ago)

If you don't have the discipline to make your bed every morning, floss after every meal, iron your shirts, cut up your credit cards, shoot five hundered free throws every morning before work, keep a pet, and only eat peanuts in the shell, then you don't have the discipline to write a dissertation. QED.

Aimless, Monday, 3 June 2013 01:43 (thirteen years ago)

if you don't have the discipline to see without glasses, etc.

Theodor Adorbsno (Merdeyeux), Monday, 3 June 2013 01:45 (thirteen years ago)

Oh, Jesus. What could go wrong? http://smilesizeist.tumblr.com/

emilys., Wednesday, 12 June 2013 07:35 (twelve years ago)

i like where the current wave of internet photo-shaming is going.

but olives are valuable too (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 12 June 2013 07:46 (twelve years ago)

three weeks pass...

Democrats Push Christie to Support Gay Marriage
By KATE ZERNIKE

Democratic lawmakers say Gov. Chris Christie is standing in the way of history after last week’s court rulings.

j., Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:25 (twelve years ago)

???

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:32 (twelve years ago)

Analysts say Christie refuses to budge and will continue to throw his full weight behind the issue.

best null wave (bnw), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:41 (twelve years ago)

http://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/march/1361848247/karen-hitchcock/fat-city

And yeah, I'm in exam block, it's all eating all the time.

― Popture, Monday, June 3, 2013 1:29 AM (1 month ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that article is rife with ugly, fat-shaming language full of simplistic, narrow minded solutions (JUST EAT LESS, GET BARIATRIC SURGERY, FAT IS UGLY AND GROSS) and I am depressed you even posted this piece of drivel. I am also extremely depressed that this person is a doctor.

Here is a doctor who has some compassion and who readily admits he judged his patients and that he was wrong.

http://www.ted.com/talks/peter_attia_what_if_we_re_wrong_about_diabetes.html?source=facebook#.UcoczWt5hm1.facebook

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:42 (twelve years ago)

okay so fat jokes about Gov Christie are really dumb, go away.

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:42 (twelve years ago)

What kind of solutions aren't "simplistic and narrow-minded"?

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:47 (twelve years ago)

"curing" obesity

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:49 (twelve years ago)

milo did you actually read the article or are you just here to debate semantics?

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:49 (twelve years ago)

yeah, there's no shortage of other, real things you can criticize the guy for xp

IKEA-Guinea (donna rouge), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:51 (twelve years ago)

I read the article weeks ago, doesn't seem offensive to me. Obesity is a health issue and a public health problem - if I were a doctor in that field, I'd probably treat it as I would smoking.

But sure, semantic - how is "eat less" (which is not exactly what the article says) simplistic and narrow-minded? Eating less isn't simplistic and narrow-minded, it's fundamentally good advice. Will it work for every last overweight or obese person? No - some thyroid issues (which can be chicken and egg with obesity), low testosterone in men (ditto), etc. But for the vast, vast majority of people it's sound.

The fundamental calories in/calories out equation (even if you want to argue that not all 'calories' are the same, which is true) works.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:55 (twelve years ago)

Oh gosh this is all news to me, thanks so much for distilling it all down for me so I can understand what it is the article is saying!

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 16:58 (twelve years ago)

Um... I didn't say anything about what the article says. I asked you what makes "eat less" simplistic and narrow-minded advice, and what would constitute non-simplistic advice.

Making fun of Christie for being fat is nagl, of course, and not the reason he should be criticized - situations like that should be unacceptable. It's no better to make fun of someone for their weight than their ethnicity or sexual orientation. If, otoh, a starting position is that it's offensive to ever offer negative views on obesity in general, there's not much to talk about.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:07 (twelve years ago)

jesus christ milo.

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:08 (twelve years ago)

Not sure I understand Dr. Attia's insulin theories. Will have to watch that ted talk later.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:10 (twelve years ago)

i don't care about chris christie being fat but cmon you have to admit 'standing in the way of history' makes a pretty sublime fat joke

j., Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:10 (twelve years ago)

if you read the last revive, milo, the point of this thread was no longer about obesity as a public health issue. it was about people feeling ok about living their lives even though they might not fit some ideal society tells them to aspire to.

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:10 (twelve years ago)

j., this isn't the thread for that

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:11 (twelve years ago)

who made you the boss of what threads are for

j., Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:12 (twelve years ago)

did you read the comments on the last several revives?

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:13 (twelve years ago)

I'm glad the last revive was about that, but a link was posted about obesity as a health issue (and a public health issue) and a point raised about advice given to the obese.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:13 (twelve years ago)

i guess. i am hesitant to speak about that stuff because i've never had a weight problem, and assume that people who struggle with their weight probably have different metabolisms than the average thin person.

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:18 (twelve years ago)

Jesus christ, milo, just start a thread called "Being a dick to fat people" and stop cluttering up this one.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:19 (twelve years ago)

^

Treeship, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:21 (twelve years ago)

xxp I don't know many people who "eat less" or eat healthier than my wife does and she still struggles mightily with her weight, so yes, Treeship is correct.

This amigurumi Jamaican octopus is ready to chill with you (Phil D.), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:24 (twelve years ago)

recent point of this thread is also to question the extent to which obesity is actually a health problem and how controllable it actually is

and whether it means a gd thing to tell a fat person to lose weight as if they don't hear that every day of their lives?

ty based gay dead computer god (zachlyon), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)

xxp - how dare I respond to someone posting an article and criticizing it.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)

recently an internet friend on fbook posted that, after years of having an eating disorder and then more recently years spent being extremely healthy, eating well, exercising etc and losing a ton of weight to get to what most people would call "average build", his doctor told him he still needs to lose 25 more lbs. it was nice to see a dozen random people commenting that doctors don't know shit about weight

ty based gay dead computer god (zachlyon), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:32 (twelve years ago)

Doctors should really just give out hi5's and stfu when u think about it.

dj hollingsworth vs dj perry (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:34 (twelve years ago)

A dozen random ppl, thats where i want my advice to come from

dj hollingsworth vs dj perry (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:35 (twelve years ago)

not totally getting the pt there

ty based gay dead computer god (zachlyon), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:36 (twelve years ago)

Him, you, the dr or me

dj hollingsworth vs dj perry (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:38 (twelve years ago)

was that supposed to be a zing

ty based gay dead computer god (zachlyon), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:39 (twelve years ago)

The dozen random ppl, the jury, a symbol of the power of the ppl, ~mankind, lyfe, the universe~

dj hollingsworth vs dj perry (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:40 (twelve years ago)

xp no

dj hollingsworth vs dj perry (darraghmac), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:40 (twelve years ago)

I read the article weeks ago, doesn't seem offensive to me. Obesity is a health issue and a public health problem - if I were a doctor in that field, I'd probably treat it as I would smoking.

― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, July 3, 2013 9:55 AM (15 seconds ago)

the primary problem with the article is one of tone. it too frequently lapses into angry incredulity and barely disguised disgust. from the opening paragraph:

Emily was white and loud and the fattest person I had ever seen outside a caravan park. She looked different from the rare very fat people I’d seen in Australia. She smelt good and her climate-controlled house meant she did not sweat.

note the "interesting" observation about emily's race. some more, from midway through, on questions not asked of fat patients:

Have you ever eaten to the point of vomiting spontaneously and then kept on eating? [...] I do not ask them to describe the biggest meal they have ever eaten or if they’ve ever eaten two dozen doughnuts in one sitting.

the author's expressions of disgust frequently move past light comic exaggeration into something sharply barbed. it's true that "personal responsibility" is important in weight management, but she forces the point like a long-held grudge, as though offended by the suggestion that obesity is anything but a dangerous and disgusting moral failure.

she concentrates primarily on people weighing 250 kg or more (550 pounds!) but swerves to address beauty standards and weight acceptance. the extremes don't present a fair picture of the means. fat acceptance is not about telling people with grave health & mental problems that it's okay to eat themselves to death while demanding that doctors somehow save them. it's about rejecting the sort of hostility the author indulges in, rejecting our culture's distorted sense of health and beauty.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:41 (twelve years ago)

as a fan of competitive hot dog eaters, i respectfully disagree with the calories that pass through mouth - calories burned through exercise equation.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:44 (twelve years ago)

there's definitely stuff in that article where the tone makes me cringe ("morbidly obese" etc.). Aside from that, I think it raises some good points but it's way overlong and that makes it hard to even discern what the point is. I don't think she's just saying "eat less" so much as "yes, techinically eating less is the solution, but the food industry conspires with other factors (genes, compulsive tendencies, metabolism) to make that as difficult as possible. I thought she was kind of throwing her hands up at the idea that doctors can just keep telling people to "eat less" because it obviously doesn't work very well, or at least it's an uphill battle against all of the forces in society telling you to eat more.

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 17:49 (twelve years ago)

I was mostly disturbed by the horrible language that contenderizer just pointed out

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:04 (twelve years ago)

and I always find it terribly interesting when people defend their right to be an asshole in this thread!

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:13 (twelve years ago)

to get this thread in a more positive direction, Modcloth announced they're going to start making their plus size clothes up to size 30!

http://www.refinery29.com/2013/07/49314/modcloth-plus-size

homosexual II, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:19 (twelve years ago)

Being obese is not a moral failing. It's a threshold defined by a ratio.

Aimless, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:27 (twelve years ago)

yeah.

also: wish there were blogs about clothes for bigger guys. only one i've found is called (wait for it) "chubster" (ffs) and it sucks. i've lost a lot of weight recently, but it's still hard to find decent stuff to wear.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:35 (twelve years ago)

The idea that gorgeous women with fairly average bodies are desnigated as "plus-sized" certainly doesn't help.

frogbs, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:47 (twelve years ago)

I think that exact point is made in the article

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:50 (twelve years ago)

aha- didn't really read the whole thing but it seems like societal pressure to conform to a certain body type and the idea that some people are massively obese and need help are two different things

The problem as I see it is there's so much misinformation out there about losing weight, because people want simple solutions - things like "6 meals a day!" or "no carbs after 6 PM!" or "replace one meal with this one weird old shake!", stuff that's designed to sell you XYZ and is very hard to stick to. Its easy to blame the junk food industry but the health food industry isn't much better!

frogbs, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:54 (twelve years ago)

Well you see, they both have "industry" in the name, which is a strong hint that in both/all cases, what they care about most is making a profit.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Thursday, 4 July 2013 03:19 (twelve years ago)

it's tricky because you can never opt out of eating. people talk about developing a "healthy attitude toward food" as if it is this simple thing that most people have already figured out. obsessive calorie counting is fucked, but so is the existence of mcdonald's.

Treeship, Thursday, 4 July 2013 03:26 (twelve years ago)

i constantly bicker with my friend, because he frequently reminds me that regardless of physical conditioning, dietary health, bloodwork #s, etc., if you are fat, you are unhealthy and need to lose weight. it drives me crazy listening to him, because controlling what he eats and not overreating comes naturally to him. i think it comes naturally to a lot of people, so they just assume that everyone who doesn't share that trait is some out-of-control slob. pinning it all on self control is simplistic and reductive because it ignores the social and psychological factors that cause someone to eat more than they should, as well as ignoring metabolic factors (for instance, my good friend in college could put away 5000 calories a day and stay rail-thin whereas 2500 a day makes me gain weight - however, I'm supposed to cut calories to show I have self control and to stop being a drain on the system). "just eat less" is as effective a solution for obesity as telling a depressed person to "look on the bright side." and it's dickish to post about how "eat less" is a perfectly reasonable solution to obesity on this particular thread, because the thread has hundreds of testimonials from actual fat people about how that mindset has social & emotional implications that are counterproductive and deeply hurtful.

eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Thursday, 4 July 2013 07:47 (twelve years ago)

I'm far from skinny - right now I'm 6'1" ~260-265. Everyone in my immediate family is overweight or obese - my father is 5'10" and was probably 280-300 for his middle-aged years (now slowly dropping weight because he's a Type 2 diabetic); my brother is 6'4"-6'5" and wears 54 waist pants. I'm not approaching this from the POV of someone who's been fit or a paragon of self control in my life. I know the mental beatdown of "I'll start the diet tomorrow, really" or getting stressed out and drinking a coke when that's the first habit you're trying to break or realizing that you ate an entire loaf of French bread over the course of a day. I've felt unattractive because of my weight - I still feel this way when I'm shopping for clothes (nothing ever looks right, as it would on one of my skinny friends). There's a whole bunch of shitty shit to deal with when you grow up a husky kid and turn into a fat adult.
At the same time, there's really only one person who can fix it - me.

I didn't say "eat less" was a solution to obesity at all, I said it was generally "good advice" and questioned how it was simplistic and narrow-minded. Saying eat less isn't "pinning it all on self control" - but self control is a part of weight loss, as it is with accomplishing anything. Dedication to revising years or decades of ingrained bad habits, dedication to exercising on a regular basis. If that's a non-starter because we shouldn't say that obese people should lose weight, there's not much to say - that's just ignoring the statistical realities of obesity.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 4 July 2013 08:18 (twelve years ago)

this is the most toxic thread on the entire board imo

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 July 2013 08:36 (twelve years ago)

There's a whole bunch of shitty shit to deal with when you grow up a husky kid and turn into a fat adult.

I grew up a skinny kid who turned into a fat adult. My doctor said it was pretty common for tall kids like myself to put on weight as adults - we eat so much because we're growing so fast and once the growing's done, it's hard to change your approach to portion sizes.

But it's been like solving a mystery trying to get to the (big) bottom of my size problem. Like, I can probably list a few dozen factors that go into it! From working an office job to commuting on the bus each day to needing food to boost mental energy to weird compulsive shit like eating spoonfuls of peanut butter straight from the jar in the middle of the night (recent habit - no FUCKING idea why I do this).

I'm not rushing it these days - trying to yo-yo diet or anything. I only start to freak out if I put on weight and start bulging at the seams of my clothes. Ripped trousers are no fucking fun.

how's life, Thursday, 4 July 2013 12:22 (twelve years ago)

this revive's impetus, really. people for whom fat jokes are "too good resist" are just the worst assholes around

tight in the runs (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 4 July 2013 14:05 (twelve years ago)

needing food to boost mental energy

this impulse is one of the worst of my many bad mental habits

like, how many times have I given up soda or junk food for a week or so and then one morning I'm tired or headachey or just feeling a little not-quite-there and it's like "I shouldn't do this, but an ice-cold can of Coke and some reassuring carbs will fix this right up, so... just this once", except it never is just that once

sigh

slippery kelp on the tide (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 4 July 2013 17:36 (twelve years ago)

this is the most toxic thread on the entire board imo

― for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:36 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So I'm fat. When I'm not meddling with my metabolism, I've always been, maybe not fat, but definitely not skinny, which people tend to perceive as fat. I've also been slender to shockingly skinny three times in my life through sheer force of will at least until living on 500 calories a day becomes unsustainable, at which point I go back to being fat (and usually fatter than I was before I lost the weight). So I'm fat. It's just the way my body is, and eating less or exercising more doesn't change a damn thing about the size of my body. Eating well and exercising, which I do, means that I'm quite healthy by all the metrics that doctors use to judge health, unless of course the doctors judge health primarily by body weight, in which case I guess I should live up to the "morbidly obese" label and just drop dead. I'm also much healthier mentally now that I'm fat than I was when I was constantly restricting calories because, frankly, the amount of self-loathing required to voluntarily starve yourself is about as unsustainable mentally as a 500 calorie/day diet is physically.

Anyway, my point, per NV's post, is that every time I see the title of this thread -- "the right to be fat?" -- it reminds me that there are people who think I don't have a right to my own body, the body without which I would not exist. So it comes down to people smugly considering my right to exist. I'm so grossed out by the fact that there are people who post on ILX who would see me disappear because my body doesn't conform to their aesthetic preferences or the dominant social ideas of what is acceptable weight-wise.

I guess I just want to remind people who think fat people are morally inferior, or gross, or just need to have some will power and eat less and exercise more that these opinions hurt people. Not those faceless fat bodies jiggling along in unfashionable clothing that they always show on frantic news reports about how a wave of obesity is coming to drown us all in used deep fryer oil (although hey guess what those headless fat people are also human beings with lives and feelings who also have a right to exist!) but actual people that you interact with and possibly even like. And that you have no right to debate whether I or any other fat person has a right to be fat, a right to have bodies, or a right to exist.

Anyway, I'm out. I hate this thread. It makes me feel like shit. Every time I see the title pop up it's a nice reminder of all the people who would rather I be miserable, starving, or dead than exist in the world the way I am, so I'm not coming back for follow up or anything. I just wanted to get this shit off my chest.

carl agatha, Thursday, 4 July 2013 18:11 (twelve years ago)

This hot woman's VBO says you are OTM and gives you a round of applause.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/1b6cfba1f65539298fd7a61ef1964034/tumblr_mp1fw8Ewkp1qml6dpo2_r1_1280.jpg

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Thursday, 4 July 2013 18:16 (twelve years ago)

booming, carl

sjuttiosju_u (wins), Thursday, 4 July 2013 18:18 (twelve years ago)

How to Be a Fat Bitch

It was possible that the group next to us was making a joke at my expense because they were giggling and looking over at us. I suppose if they were concerned with what I was wearing or eating, they felt I was not behaving as a good fatty should. I side-eyed that shit with a curled lip and went back to my beer and slice and laughing with my hot bearded partner. I wasn't hiding, covering myself or turning down a meal because I am not ashamed of my body and not striving to become a thin person.

There are a lot of situations like this, where as a fat bitch, you are compelled to go against what is considered normal and have to be fearless and brave. By not covering or changing our behaviors when we are out in public, we are sending a message that we are living our lives as fat people and not embarrassed of who we are. Being visible at the beach in a bikini, ordering a double whatever and strutting our stuff is empowering.

I can't help but feel a sense of accomplishment when I have overcome a moment of hesitation when being visible. These are my proud moments where I am being my true self and taking bold action in the eyes of my observers. The visibility of fat people is political and something you are definitely not obligated to do. There are ways that all fat people modify their behavior or hide their fatness in order to get through their day and take care of themselves - and that's okay too. It's interesting to think about the things you might do though.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Thursday, 4 July 2013 18:36 (twelve years ago)

I'm a "skinny", unattractive guy with an enormous belly due to eating shit and drinking everything. Moobs and diabetes will be along later. I probably could look okayish but my habits, which are not gonna change, ensure that I'm sallow, puffy, dehydrated, and depressed.

Point being that, ok, it sucks that we've decided that there must always be 1000 extant ways to make people feel shitty about how they look; but it sucks almost as much that even tho I clearly "deserve" it more, all these hot & healthy fatties will get so much more shit. Because I weigh less. This sucks.

sjuttiosju_u (wins), Thursday, 4 July 2013 18:41 (twelve years ago)

hey carl you won't read this post and maybe you'll just shake your head at the thread going back up to the top again instead but that was a great post and much <3 to you

also sorry if i've said anything on this thread which made anyone feel bad, i am a fattey myself but i admit that that doesn't stop the bad sizeist thoughts and possibly also (accidentally) ilx posts. e.g. sometimes this terrible thought creeps into my fat head when i see other people going "they're big. so am i. i must work out whether i am bigger than them as this would mean they are better than me and i want for once not to be the fattest person in this room" and then wonder what the fuck is wrong with me, please boil my dumb evil head now

slippery kelp on the tide (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:14 (twelve years ago)

Hey aps, it's not you, okay? Ease up on yourself a tiny bit. When someone is drowning, as fat people (I'm going to say especially women because beauty standards = worth, obviously) are drowning in hateful messages of worthlessness and invisibility and being Xed out, they'll grab anything to stay alive (I learned this from the dinner party scene in Dune). Hate the system and reject all the feelings it encourages you to have, don't boil your head which is neither dumb nor evil but just wants to BE, and it deserves to.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:17 (twelve years ago)

I really love all my wimmens, right at this second especially the fat ones. I am actually crying right now because fuck it. It's summer and it's goddamn too hot to live, put on a sundress and show your belly outline and your beautiful fat knees and do something you want to do.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:22 (twelve years ago)

carl what you said was 100 times more righteous and more sensible than my drive-by bitterness - i want to sing along - ILX people are mostly v. good people more or less, and whatever y'all think about health issues and the fucked-upness of western eating habits some of you need to just take a step back and think about how much more unhealthy size-shaming is, and how much damage it does to so many people every day, and let's ask ourselves if we must discuss a subject that is self-evident to most of us then can't we apply a bit of extra consideration and extra compassion before we throw another brick of hurt out into the world all careless like??

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:30 (twelve years ago)

i have this coworker who has a thin build and is naturally somewhat muscular. she has gained a few pounds over the past year. less than 10. no one would not call her skinny. about half the words that come out of her mouth are about her "big ass," "look how fat my arms are," "i look so disgusting," "look at my stomach in this picture," "i can't eat avocados," etc. like she actually said "look how fat my arms are" while i was standing in her office and i don't have enormous arms but skinny arms aren't in my genes and you can see her biceps clearly. my arms just look like arms. then the other day she was talking to my secretary who is not thin and has a large stomach about how fat she felt when she was running. another time she was talking about how in college she once weighed 150 lbs and it was disgusting. i am 5-6 inches taller than her but i weigh almost 30 lbs more than that! it doesn't make me feel fat necessarily it just makes me feel like she is constantly looking at me and others and being disgusted. i feel sadder about how she might be making "fat" people feel. she's so unaware of everything. for the wrong listener her comments could just pull someone down with her. and i know they exist but it's hard to imagine a man having those thought patterns. i can't remember ever hearing a man talk about calories and fat as much as she does. it really sucks.

veryupsetmom (harbl), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:32 (twelve years ago)

i don't know that this is "the most toxic thread on the entire board", but a lot of currents cross here: judgment, empowerment, cruelty, self-doubt, advice (helpful and not), sensitivity, insensitivity, etc. as a result, it does get rather unpleasant from time to time.

i've struggled with my weight for most of my life. personally, i do consider it a "problem". over a certain threshold, i feel physically limited, even incapable. i don't like that. i'd like to be easily able to run a few miles, climb a mountain, jump a couch, climb a rope - things i can do when i weigh less (or at least could when i was younger). i can also find well made, reasonably priced clothes that flatter me. i'm happier with my appearance, overall. and yeah, i feel less shunned and shamed by those around me. at the same time, i understand that my situation and views are mine and mine alone. other people will come to terms with their bodies, cultures and lives in different ways.

anyway, httv is 100% otm up above:

[telling a fat person to] "just eat less" is as effective a solution for obesity as telling a depressed person to "look on the bright side."

both suggestions arguably consist of "good advice", but problems like these don't arise from a lack of helpful suggestions. for fat and depressed people (i should know, i'm both), the world is a fucking SEA of crushingly naive but ostensibly "helpful" advice. 99 times out of 100, they're worse than useless. of course calories in/calories out is basically true. of course eating less will aid in weight loss. everybody knows this shit, even fat people. we don't struggle to understand these simple concepts. we struggle to love ourselves, to be accepted as we are, and to make choices we can live with. these things can be much more difficult than they perhaps seem, for reasons far to complex to solve by application of bromide.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:35 (twelve years ago)

tbh, i envy people who can accept themselves, fat or thin or whatever else. i can't even imagine that. it's the only thing my therapist has suggested that makes me feel completely hopeless. how the fuck does someone even begin to do such a thing?

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:38 (twelve years ago)

it's hard to imagine a man having those thought patterns

Probably because men are not socialised to think their appearance = their worth as a person.

It's insensitive and thoughtless to say that shit, but it's her problem. If she's gained weight, then that's her body that's changed in ways she's not happy with and saying that is not necessarily a judgement on you or others, just literally "I am heavier and I don't like it."

gyac, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:40 (twelve years ago)

tbh, i envy people who can accept themselves, fat or thin or whatever else. i can't even imagine that. it's the only thing my therapist has suggested that makes me feel completely hopeless. how the fuck does someone even begin to do such a thing?

if one of us could find a definitive answer to that we could be zillionaires :\

in all sincerity tho, i think it might be tied in to also accepting other people - i think from childhood most of us are kinda taught to do neither

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:43 (twelve years ago)

all-time post ca, if u ever see this

ty based gay dead computer god (zachlyon), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:45 (twelve years ago)

wait but it IS good advice to tell a depressed person to look on the bright side, and that's basically what cognitive therapy is - teaching people who aren't good at looking on the bright side how to do it

the late great, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:50 (twelve years ago)

you must be very popular around depressed people

eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

wait but it IS good advice to tell a depressed person to look on the bright side

are you kidding

reet pish (imago), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

i think it might be tied in to also accepting other people - i think from childhood most of us are kinda taught to do neither

To Kill a Mockingbird to thread!

Aimless, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

starting CBT in a week or two and and i know what you mean dude, but it's not really the same thing as "somebody's got a case of the Mondays" eh?

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:53 (twelve years ago)

ytth i have had clinical depression for most of my life and have been in and out of treatment centers for about 10 years. my depression is not an inability to look on the bright side, it's just a strong tendency not to.

the late great, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:55 (twelve years ago)

ime you don't tell a depressed person to look on the bright side, you show them the bright side and allow them the freedom to accept or reject it

reet pish (imago), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:56 (twelve years ago)

i'm not saying that all depressed people need is a pat on the back and a glib "look on the bright side!"

but at the same time, on a very basic level mastering depression is just a matter of learning to look on the bright side

the late great, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:57 (twelve years ago)

that's a good point imago

the late great, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:57 (twelve years ago)

pretty sure you and imago aren't talking about the same thing, tlg. when I hear "look on the bright side", I typically think of friends/family who, in response to a loved one being depressed, can't fathom why they are and dismissively tell them to 'snap out of it', as if it's got a switch.

I know my last major depressive episode in 2007, I didn't recover because someone encouraged me to look on the bright side, I had to be retaught at how to look at things to realize there WAS a bright side where I had previously not seen it.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:57 (twelve years ago)

Telling someone to do something they don't know how to do is futile. Patiently teaching them how to do it and encouraging them through their failures until they learn takes a lot longer and requres x1000 more effort than just tossing out a flippant piece of unsolicited advice. No comparison between the two.

Aimless, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:58 (twelve years ago)

xxxpost

Neanderthal, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:58 (twelve years ago)

i agree with late great but i think people who haven't looked into the clinical effectiveness of CBT and learned optimism mightn't get what you're saying

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:58 (twelve years ago)

side so bright mothafuckas wanna fine me

Neanderthal, Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:58 (twelve years ago)

there's a big difference between suggesting that someone "look on the bright side" and actually helping them to do that. cognitive therapy isn't advice, it's re-patterning.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 19:59 (twelve years ago)

also: carl agatha rules ok

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 20:00 (twelve years ago)

tho I remember being cheered up at my first ever psych session in 1999 simply cuz shrink had a huge-assed booger hanging out of his nose and it seemed ridiculous how over the course of a half hour he seemed to be blind to its presence.

Neanderthal, Thursday, 4 July 2013 20:01 (twelve years ago)

i think "telling" is the operative here that is causing this latest revive to bring up some heavy emotions on this thread. espeically in the context of obesity, "telling" a fat person anything smacks of the paternalistic and judgmental idea that the person being "told" lacks the basic capacity to do some obvious thing him or herself and is thus defective in some way. this operates the same with depression, and your post admitted as much by splitting out "telling" and "teaching," even though you were conflating them. moreover, the whole point is that people should have agency over their feelings and their bodies and shouldn't have to withstand anyone who presupposes that they know better telling them how to improve themselves, ESPECIALLY when the "helpful" interloper has no idea the medical, social, or emotional causes behind the underlying issue. if you feel for yourself that looking on the bright side or learning how to do so would improve your depression, that is fantastic that you've at least been able to identify that, but it still doesn't mean that it's fair to go around to other depressed people telling them that they need to do exactly what you did. just like the motivational speaker i saw in jr. high school who used to be fat but then got skinny by exercising REALLY HARD wasn't really helping me out by telling my whole class of kids that if you really put your mind to it, you too can stop being fat.

eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Thursday, 4 July 2013 20:05 (twelve years ago)

actually that's EXACTLY what i do

the late great, Thursday, 4 July 2013 20:14 (twelve years ago)

you tell groups of high school kids that they can become unfat by putting their minds to it?

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 21:00 (twelve years ago)

if so, i imagine you're putting the few fat kids in those groups through yet another hour of quiet hell

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Thursday, 4 July 2013 21:01 (twelve years ago)

all high school assembly/motivational speakers are ridiculous liars obv

Romantic style in da world (crüt), Thursday, 4 July 2013 22:54 (twelve years ago)

man, i really appreciate the fact that our high school motivational speakers covered the topics of the hidden epidemic of teenage satanists and the evils of drugs

Gregory Bateson is always appropriate (sarahell), Thursday, 4 July 2013 23:07 (twelve years ago)

about half the words that come out of her mouth are about her "big ass," "look how fat my arms are," "i look so disgusting," "look at my stomach in this picture," "i can't eat avocados," etc. like she actually said "look how fat my arms are"

I have a friend like this woman, and most of the time I feel confident enough not to think that I am implicated in this and I just tell her, "Honey, you are fine. You look great." But sometimes it's a real challenge not to feel like she thinks I am fat and gross but because she is my friend she isn't going to come right out and tell me this.

Gregory Bateson is always appropriate (sarahell), Thursday, 4 July 2013 23:12 (twelve years ago)

in all sincerity tho, i think it might be tied in to also accepting other people - i think from childhood most of us are kinda taught to do neither

― for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Thursday, July 4, 2013 12:43 PM (5 hours ago)

that's an interesting point, noodle. i've tended to see it the other way around: judgement and rejection of others as an inverted expression of self-loathing. with your suggestion and cognitive therapy in mind, i wonder whether we might learn self-acceptance by consciously being more accepting of others, choosing to follow different mental patterns.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Friday, 5 July 2013 01:19 (twelve years ago)

it's hard to imagine a man having those thought patterns

Probably because men are not socialised to think their appearance = their worth as a person.

Certainly men don't face this to the same degree, but speaking as someone whose weight has fluctuated over 100 lbs over the last seven or eight years, I can tell you that for some men - perhaps many - self-worth can certainly be directly tied to weight.

Simon H., Friday, 5 July 2013 01:43 (twelve years ago)

i have no question about that! but it's not "normal" for men to talk about calories at lunch

veryupsetmom (harbl), Friday, 5 July 2013 01:49 (twelve years ago)

I only talk calories at lunch when I'm discussing the best way to raise the temp of one gram of water by one degree celsius.

Aimless, Friday, 5 July 2013 01:55 (twelve years ago)

lol :)

veryupsetmom (harbl), Friday, 5 July 2013 01:55 (twelve years ago)

but it's not "normal" for men to talk about calories at lunch

― veryupsetmom (harbl), Thursday, July 4, 2013 6:49 PM (21 minutes ago)

yeah, overweight men are supposed to feel ashamed and never talk to anyone about it ever. it's great.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Friday, 5 July 2013 02:13 (twelve years ago)

thought of this thread reading a book review in sunday times:

"Shriver understands that hunger is one thing for those who are literally starving and a very different thing for the rest of us. No matter how much we have, we’re never content. Unlike less conspicuous habits of consumption, obesity makes our disappointment in life visible."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/30/books/review/lionel-shrivers-big-brother.html

scott seward, Friday, 5 July 2013 15:32 (twelve years ago)

i wonder whether we might learn self-acceptance by consciously being more accepting of others, choosing to follow different mental patterns.

This is absolutely crucial, it is profoundly necessary to change your eyes and mind when you look at people, because if you continue the mental conversation in which they're bad and wrong for whatever reason (fat, ugly, frumpy), you will have same words running through your head when you look at yourself.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Friday, 5 July 2013 15:56 (twelve years ago)

Also once you let up on the negative judgements all the time, the world you build in your head starts being a lot nicer place to live in. By making space for others to be who they are, you make space for yourself too.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Friday, 5 July 2013 15:58 (twelve years ago)

I know that sounds self-helpy but I swear to god.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Friday, 5 July 2013 16:03 (twelve years ago)

yeah, i do like the idea. i find it really goddam hard to apply the concept, though. i'm almost as attached to the stern judgment of things outside myself as i am to tearing my own ass down (think nakh once started a thread about this).

i was recently asked why i think it's so important to hold standards, to break things & people into groups according to how successfully i think they're negotioating this or that cultural obstacle course. i couldn't really answer the question except to say that it allows me to maintain a safe position of mental superiority, and i suppose i find that reassuring.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Friday, 5 July 2013 16:27 (twelve years ago)

the older i get the more i think that attitude is a sore broken bone from deep in adolescence and needs to be cured, permanently

for many people a really special folder makes a huge difference (Noodle Vague), Friday, 5 July 2013 16:52 (twelve years ago)

Well, one way to start finding not-thin bodies beautiful is to be around not-thin people who think their bodies are beautiful and who are treated accordingly by others. It normalizes the sight of...of bodies, of less of a person not always being considered more valuable. The reason fat-positive ppl insist on their right to go out in public and be normal people who eat and do stuff and have lovers and ARE NORMAL isn't just for themselves, although it's for themselves too. It's to normalize all kinds of bodies, because that changes the mental landscape.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Friday, 5 July 2013 16:54 (twelve years ago)

I've only ever dated girls who were curvy or plus-sized. that's always what I've found beautiful. not that I don't think thin girls are beautiful, too, cause I do, but my preference is more for girls with a few extra pounds.

Neanderthal, Friday, 5 July 2013 17:09 (twelve years ago)

fetishism won't help either btw

reet pish (imago), Friday, 5 July 2013 17:16 (twelve years ago)

not speaking at all about 'fetishism'

Neanderthal, Friday, 5 July 2013 17:17 (twelve years ago)

just ensuring we don't head that way, brah

reet pish (imago), Friday, 5 July 2013 17:19 (twelve years ago)

I was very offended at half of my friends that were splattering "fuck society, big girls are sexier" memes all over the place cuz there's no reason why we have to disparage one group to appreciate another. it's not zero sum game.

Neanderthal, Friday, 5 July 2013 17:20 (twelve years ago)

xpost I understand

Neanderthal, Friday, 5 July 2013 17:20 (twelve years ago)

I don't know if this is necessarily a comfort, but a lot of people with body dysmorphia have expressed that their dysmorphias don't really extend past themselves so all your skinny mates probably think you're cool and might even think you're skinner than them.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 5 July 2013 17:24 (twelve years ago)

Well, one way to start finding not-thin bodies beautiful...

just to be clear, most of my external contempt is directed at things like bad industrial design, affliction shirts and applebees.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Friday, 5 July 2013 18:04 (twelve years ago)

Then you could try to teach yourself to ignore those things. The energy you spend hating (anything, others, yourself) could always be put to better use IMO.

free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Friday, 5 July 2013 18:24 (twelve years ago)

true. plus what does such arbitration accomplish, other than making me feel like an accomplished arbiter?

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Friday, 5 July 2013 19:10 (twelve years ago)

hug monsanto

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 5 July 2013 21:37 (twelve years ago)

I feel so awful that certain people have such terrible experiences upon reading this thread that it makes them feel bad about themselves. I want to start a new thread about body positivity and fat experiences that have nothing to do with dieting, eating, the weight loss industry, etc - because I view those things as harmful. The rest of the world talks about that enough, and it gets tiring.

The way I see it is, a fat person shouldn't have to share their story just in order to not be treated as a moral failure. I could tell people about all the times I TRIED TO BE 'GOOD' and how I have bad genes and etc and the point is I shouldn't have to. You can't visually estimate my health with a single glance. Also, being found as attractive or as a sex object isn't a solve. I shudder when I hear things like "curves in the right places" or "more pushin' for the cushin'" because is that supposed to make everything all better?

I am a fat woman, I eat a LOT, not going to lie, and I love the way I look - TRULY. I wear whatever I want, and I don't care if anyone decides to fatcall me. I have women come up to me all the time and tell me I am beautiful, and those compliments are appreciated, and I hear from women even half my size: "I wish I had your confidence." I can't tell you exactly how I got there, but most of it was rejecting the modern attitude about health and size and changing how I looked at beauty. Because really, it was never about my health before, I mostly felt I didn't deserve to even be seen because I felt disgusting and unwanted due to how film, television, men, and the fashion industry treated me.

No one has to prove they're healthy to you just to not be judged. It's no one's responsibility to be healthy. I shudder when I hear fat people try to prove their case for how healthy they really are. It shouldn't matter. Just don't be a dick. You don't know anyone's story. Don't treat ANYONE as though you know their story based on your own tiny set of experiences. Don't cite medical journals, because you look like a dick. 'Calories in/calories out - it's simple!" is not helpful.

homosexual II, Saturday, 6 July 2013 00:34 (twelve years ago)

homosexual II otm x100

Treeship, Saturday, 6 July 2013 00:39 (twelve years ago)

I say lock the thread. This one is a hideous beast.

homosexual II, Saturday, 6 July 2013 00:49 (twelve years ago)

agreed

also otm

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 6 July 2013 02:20 (twelve years ago)

people for whom fat jokes are "too good resist" are just the worst assholes around

And they say the fattehs are the ones with no self-control!

emilys., Monday, 8 July 2013 00:28 (twelve years ago)

homosexual otm, except that i'd hate to see this thread shut down. i find it interesting and even helpful. i like that it's unbounded and allows people to approach the subject from any which way, even when someone's being an asshole about it. tbh, i'd probably get less out of a KIP thread.

Me and my pool noodle (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 03:26 (twelve years ago)

I feel like everything that could be said on this thread has been said, and I agree with Carl Agatha---I roll my eyes at the absurdity of the title every time it pops up in my bookmarks.

emilys., Monday, 8 July 2013 09:02 (twelve years ago)

...Which is not to say I think it should be locked, but I would like to move on to a more fun-loving fat thread.

emilys., Monday, 8 July 2013 09:04 (twelve years ago)

Venezia Victims No More: Cool Clothes for Larger Ladies

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Monday, 8 July 2013 09:26 (twelve years ago)

I feel like everything that could be said on this thread has been said, and I agree with Carl Agatha---I roll my eyes at the absurdity of the title every time it pops up in my bookmarks.

― emilys., Monday, July 8, 2013 2:02 AM (2 hours ago)

sure, the title is lame. one of the positive things about this thread, though, is that it's much-used and inclusive. it's nice to have an open forum for general discussion of personal issues, politics, whatever -- anything related. would hate to lose that.

Twerking Was MADE So Why Can't She Do It ? (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 11:15 (twelve years ago)

but i desist. if people find this thread hostile, offensive, gauche or w/e, then i can't argue that they should keep posting here.

Twerking Was MADE So Why Can't She Do It ? (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 11:22 (twelve years ago)

I appreciate many of the feelings against this thread but would also like some kind of place (not necessarily here!) to put fat acceptance/politics links or general idk ~feelings~ rather than just "here are some clothes other large ladies look nice in"

(the clothes threads are nice and inspiring and please carry on having them though. bonus points if anyone can find Larger Lady Styles which don't do the revivalist polka-dotty thing as that stuff is not very me, but I know, maybe I should consider getting over that if that is the one true flattering style for someone my size, or maybe if only I understood clothes I could contribute too in different styles, of course)

slippery kelp on the tide (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 8 July 2013 11:37 (twelve years ago)

if actual fat people don't feel this is a friendly thread to participate in, and other people think it's perfectly comfortable to post fat jokes about politicians, I just wonder if ILX is capable of handling an actual fat acceptance thread in a positive manner.

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 14:40 (twelve years ago)

personally, i tend to assume that there will always be a certain percentage of folks who can't contribute to [discussion x] in a positive, respectful manner. i just hope the percentage is small and that unacceptable bullshit gets called out. which seems to be the case here, more often than not.

i mean, i'm an actual irl fat person, and i find the thread friendly enough, overall.

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 14:48 (twelve years ago)

'I don't like this' is a terrible reason to lock a thread, IMO.

If no one responds to it, the thread dies on its own.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 14:59 (twelve years ago)

Maybe there could be like, a "me, milo z, and contendo dealing with our size issues in our own way and racing for the cure thread" kinda thread and then a separate "body positivity/acceptance, nice clothes thread" thread.

how's life, Monday, 8 July 2013 15:07 (twelve years ago)

the few, the proud...

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 15:39 (twelve years ago)

Whats the tipping point for being allowed to post itt so

dub job deems (darraghmac), Monday, 8 July 2013 15:50 (twelve years ago)

seems more a matter of welcome posters jumping ship

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 16:14 (twelve years ago)

i like to think i look like
http://i.imgur.com/3tMYBIW.jpg
but then i get real, now it's closer to
http://imgur.com/iSlN3qB
what the heck happened i used to be hawt. never exercised, living used to be enough but now i need to lose a good 20-25 pounds.
thanks for reading my cool story.

Sébastien, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)

The thread title contains an implied hostility that I would find very sinister, if I were its target. For that reason alone I would endorse continuing the discussion in a new thread and locking this one.

I also think it is an excellent idea to post a link in each thread to connect them, so it isn't necessary to repeat every argument made here in the new thread.

Aimless, Monday, 8 July 2013 16:51 (twelve years ago)

how about a general body acceptance theme? larger people do not have the market cornered on having mixed feelings about their bodies.
or just go nuts and make a whole board called I LOVE MY BODY

free your spirit pig (La Lechera), Monday, 8 July 2013 16:54 (twelve years ago)

yeah, a fresh new all-purpose body acceptance thread would be nice. have to admit that there is some awful garbage in this one, that and an awful title.

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 17:02 (twelve years ago)

HERE YA GO

body positivity!!

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 18:00 (twelve years ago)

kinda lol but mostly sad at Sebastian posting what he did after all that. New thread otm

reet pish (imago), Monday, 8 July 2013 18:56 (twelve years ago)

has to be okay to talk about not always feeling super positive though, right? much of the value of a thread like this, imo, is that it provides a safe place to talk about experiences that may be hard to share elsewhere.

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 18:59 (twelve years ago)

i mean, i'd hate to think that people want to rope off as "toxic" any discussion of less than totally upbeat feelings on the subject

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:01 (twelve years ago)

This can be that thread.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:14 (twelve years ago)

or u guys could stfu?

flopson, Monday, 8 July 2013 19:14 (twelve years ago)

Like, I'll probably avoid that thread because anything that starts with 'keep it 100% posi' is also an invitation for ILXors to get aggro when you aren't completely in sync with their idea of positivity or whatever.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:15 (twelve years ago)

I think the major distinction would be the difference between "I don't feel I'm as healthy as I should be and I think losing some weight would help me feel better" and "my fat is awful and ugly and I feel like shit". The first attitude considers weight as purely subsidiary to good health and well-being, which is essentially a positive approach, while the second is wholly toxic.

Aimless, Monday, 8 July 2013 19:17 (twelve years ago)

xp I know, it's so surprising that policing people's bodies isn't seen more positively.

Tottenham Heelspur (in orbit), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:18 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, that still doesn't sting no matter how often you throw it out there. I haven't policed shit.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:20 (twelve years ago)

i miss cutty

the late great, Monday, 8 July 2013 19:22 (twelve years ago)

okay, yeah, this thread is done

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:23 (twelve years ago)

he was coming from a good place, i think

the late great, Monday, 8 July 2013 19:25 (twelve years ago)

Seemed like it. Lots of people upthread saying things that sound mean but were just the style of ILX at the time, vs. the cuddly atmosphere now.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 19:30 (twelve years ago)

tbf he was pretty harsh about it

the late great, Monday, 8 July 2013 19:32 (twelve years ago)

I'm in an interesting position in that I work in an obesity prevention research program affiliated with the top medical school (or one of) in the country and yet I've struggled with my weight/food issues/eating disorders for as long as I can remember. I'm better about it now but damn I wish I could find some of the strength that you ladies have found and I say this at my lowest weight in years where I'm still unhappy with how I look. When you're force fed this shit from such a young age it's fucking hard to rid yourself of, that's for sure. The last time I went to see my parents one of the first thing my mother said was "Wow doesn't Erica's figure look nice?". Hi mom! Nice to see you too. The thing is, she thought she was just being nice. ANYWAY.

Since there is a new body positivity thread that I think is really awesome and important, I will say here that I do believe obesity is a public healthy issue and I find it hard not to acknowledge it as such for a number of reasons. That said, there is a lot of stuff coming out now about how diets are bullshit and temporary do not work in the long run and some very interesting stuff about where/when and why obesity might start. The following are written by folks in my dept. I find the developmental origins stuff fascinating from a sciencey standpoint.

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/87/6/1587.full

http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/OkenANGxp1.pdf

Airwrecka Bliptrap Blapmantis (ENBB), Monday, 8 July 2013 20:00 (twelve years ago)

Thanks for those links, ENBB! Obesity is a public health issue; anyone who disagrees is being a dick in his/her own way. But clearly we need to separate "obesity as public health issue" from "body judgementalism" or we are all going nowhere fast and being huge dicks in the process.

quincie, Monday, 8 July 2013 20:31 (twelve years ago)

otm

Airwrecka Bliptrap Blapmantis (ENBB), Monday, 8 July 2013 20:31 (twelve years ago)

We also need to separate out "obesity" from "body image". There are a ton of people who do not fall into the category "obese" who think they are fat and gross and who spend vast amount of psychic energy on trying to conform to some societal ideal of attractiveness, and that societal pressure has no real connection to public health concerns.

Aimless, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:05 (twelve years ago)

Yes, of course.

Airwrecka Bliptrap Blapmantis (ENBB), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:07 (twelve years ago)

feeling extra motivated to get back into shape so i can back away from this issue. 4 hours of stationary bike a day for a couple weeks should do the trick. i did it once. good opportunity to listen to some podcasts.

Sébastien, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:17 (twelve years ago)

four hours?!?!?

the late great, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:20 (twelve years ago)

societal pressure has no real connection to public health concerns.

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Matt Poop (Matt P), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)

newsflash: public health is a social invention

Matt Poop (Matt P), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)

it's also how fat policing gets its legitimacy

Matt Poop (Matt P), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:28 (twelve years ago)

i don't want to get into the same debate again, other than to note that the 'public health' defenders in these threads are oddly compulsive about how rational and self-evident their appeal is.

Matt Poop (Matt P), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:36 (twelve years ago)

so, then you do?

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:38 (twelve years ago)

xp :4 h or more if i can/feel like it. up all night, up all day. pretty much. should start to take it easy before i get to 40 tho.

Sébastien, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:39 (twelve years ago)

feeling extra motivated to get back into shape so i can back away from this issue. 4 hours of stationary bike a day for a couple weeks should do the trick. i did it once. good opportunity to listen to some podcasts.

― Sébastien, Monday, July 8, 2013 5:17 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Wow, that's some will power. I have a hard enough time getting to the one hour mark on one of those things. Best of luck w/ that! stay hydrated, too!

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:39 (twelve years ago)

http://www.bigfatblog.com/bmi-change-1998

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:49 (twelve years ago)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=obesity-an-overblown-epid

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:50 (twelve years ago)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15942543

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:50 (twelve years ago)

Or here's just a master list for you all to read if you'd like to

homosexual II, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:53 (twelve years ago)

(y) thanks for those links mandee!!

crüt, Monday, 8 July 2013 21:54 (twelve years ago)

We also need to separate out "obesity" from "body image".

Since my body is obese, there's no possible way to separate "obesity" from "body image."

Also, just FYI, telling obese people that they are a public health problem in the same breath that you say body positivity is awesome and important is some serious bullshit.

carl agatha, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:05 (twelve years ago)

I'm not sure that converting a statement ("obesity is a public health problem") into a personal attack ("obese people are a public health problem") is fair play.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 22:20 (twelve years ago)

I'm comfortable with what I posted.

carl agatha, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:21 (twelve years ago)

I think Aimless meant that body image isn't solely linked with obesity, since body dysmorphia isn't strictly confined to just those who are obese.

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:24 (twelve years ago)

From homo's links:

Under the proposed guidelines, which are to be announced later this month by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), 25 million more Americans would be considered overweight -- including two baseball third-basemen: Chipper Jones of the Atlanta Braves and Cal Ripken Jr. of the Baltimore Orioles.

This line of argument annoys me. No, BMI does not differentiate between lean mass and total mass particularly well and it will lump high level athletes into the overweight population - but they're athletes (well, lol baseball - this argument is usually made with NFL receivers or something) and by nature fringe cases. That doesn't mean the BMI is completely irrelevant or wrong for the vast majority of people, few of whom are pushed into 'overweight' or 'obese' because of lean mass.

Look at that again. The average woman is overweight.
This proves once again that the BMI labels are meaningless. If everyone is "overweight", then no one is overweight.

And I mean, just... no.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 22:27 (twelve years ago)

does this thread's endless dishing out of popcorn.gif contribute to a public health problem?

crüt, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:31 (twelve years ago)

It's certainly worse for my blood pressure than my weight is.

carl agatha, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:32 (twelve years ago)

hmm, according to that BMI calculator, I'm like .3 away from being overweight. humorous considering how skinny everybody says I am. is it me or do BMI calculations tend to get more fuxxored with taller people?

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:34 (twelve years ago)

4 hours of stationary bike a day for a couple weeks should do the trick.

Whoa, that's dedication I can't comprehend.

I can do 30 minutes on a cardio machine, tops, and then my brain can't handle being in that one place any more.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 8 July 2013 22:36 (twelve years ago)

BMI was always a back-of-the-envelope measure and is p much a crock for individuals.

that said, if you're going to use it at all be aware that its failure to account for lean body mass inserts bias wrt not only against people who lift but also against anyone above average height (and tilts in favor of those below average height for the same reason).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9816596/Interactive-calculator-do-you-win-or-lose-with-the-new-BMI.html

resulting post (rogermexico.), Monday, 8 July 2013 22:43 (twelve years ago)

I'm comfortable with what I posted.

― carl agatha, Monday, July 8, 2013 6:21 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Well, I'm glad you are because not only was it wrong but it was unnecessarily bitchy which is surprising from you tbh.

Airwrecka Bliptrap Blapmantis (ENBB), Monday, 8 July 2013 23:40 (twelve years ago)

most most of us wind up deciding for ourselves how healthy our weight is. we may or may not consider the official guidelines (which may or may not be accurate), but i imagine most of us put more emphasis on how healthy we feel day to day and how good we imagine we look.

i mention this because i believe it's perfectly okay to decide that you want to live or eat differently, to decide even that you'd like to lose some weight. to make such a decision is not necessarily an act of self-rejection (though it can be just that). self-transformation can be an act of love & generosity. we're all free to be and become whatever we want. i feel a moral imperative to support that kind of autonomy.

i want to say "yes!" to fat acceptance without saying "no" to the wide range of positive choices people might make about their bodies and lives. then again, maybe i'm misconstruing things in sensing that there's some kind of subtle opposition between the two.

twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, 8 July 2013 23:41 (twelve years ago)

my BMI is .5 from being "overweight" and apart from the standard bit of belly fat I'm slim as fuck. 6 feet and 160 pounds is in the middle of "normal" BMI for a guy and that's pretty skinny! I was "normal" at 6 feet 140 when I was sick from Crohn's episode and wasting away, BMI is of pretty limited use.

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Monday, 8 July 2013 23:55 (twelve years ago)

i want to say "yes!" to fat acceptance without saying "no" to the wide range of positive choices people might make about their bodies and lives. then again, maybe i'm misconstruing things in sensing that there's some kind of subtle opposition between the two.

― twerking for obvious reasons (contenderizer), Monday, July 8, 2013 11:41 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think that's absolutely possible. For me, and I'm not like a fat acceptance spokesperson by any means so this is just my POV, recognizing bodily autonomy is one of the key tenants of accepting one's fat. Also, don't hate the player, hate the game. If somebody wants to diet, that's their business. I have no interest in policing or commenting on what people put in their bodies (through any orifice, come to think of it). But I'll still point out diet industry hypocrisy, for example.

carl agatha, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:07 (twelve years ago)

we need to create a combo obesity/gun control thread for milo

also, stop taking Sébastien seriously jeez

mookieproof, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:17 (twelve years ago)

if sébastien resembles fedor emilanenko in any other respects then u are advised to take him seriously

The pathetic deluded pride that attends ignorance (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:22 (twelve years ago)

There is no way that someone who is 5'4"and 175 lbs. is "obese" using any reasonable definition of the word, athlete or not.

I'm 5'9" and 196, and never vary by more than a few pounds except over the winter, when I often get up to around 205. I'm also 44 years old and don't have the metabolism I had even ten years ago. But I bike back and forth to work 8 miles every day, put over 100 miles a week on the bike, and am about to do a 328-mile charity ride from Cleveland to Cincinnati, so I really can't be bothered to give a shit whether anyone thinks I'm heavy or not.

This amigurumi Jamaican octopus is ready to chill with you (Phil D.), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:26 (twelve years ago)

That said there are plenty of OTHER things I hate about my body that have nothing to do with fat, weight, BMI, etc. (e.g. body hair) but that's another thing altogether.

This amigurumi Jamaican octopus is ready to chill with you (Phil D.), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:28 (twelve years ago)

Im at around 203 atm and a quick bmi sez i should be nearer 175. Even tho i cycle, run or play football four or five times a week i wouldnt argue with that, i def need to drop at least another 20lbs for me to feel good about my weight/appearance.

dub job deems (darraghmac), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:34 (twelve years ago)

tbf, even the people pushing BMI say that health problems statistically arise mostly in the obesity range, not so much in the overweight range. You can also modify the ranges based on frame size to some extent.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:38 (twelve years ago)

i'm 5'11, 250lbs, and the last time i had a physical, my doctor told me that not only was i obese, but that i was borderline MORBIDLY obese. he then gave me a bunch of pamphlets about groups i could go to that could help me control my eating habits and live a healthier lifestyle and other kaiser-mandated stuff to make sure i couldn't sue him. i have internalized a many years of comments about how i'm fat and disgusting, though, so the pamphlets, the doctor, the BMI chart, and everything else managed care throws at the epidemic of obesity rolled off my lardy back.

eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 04:12 (twelve years ago)

Morbidly obese, that's very goth of you!

homosexual II, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 04:26 (twelve years ago)

I have no interest in policing or commenting on what people put in their bodies (through any orifice, come to think of it).

hawt!

how's life, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 10:37 (twelve years ago)

ytth, im sure ive seen pix of you and you never struck me as anything like morbidly obese wtf!

It is like ganging up on Enya (Trayce), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 10:49 (twelve years ago)

when reading sébastien's posts keep in mind that he has spent a lot of time thinking about how humans can transcend their physical bodies completely and live like rhizomes!

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 10:49 (twelve years ago)

Like to me, when people talk about "being fat", I think of when Bender became human in futurama and turned into a giant Akira doughball. THATS fat, no one in this damn borad is "fat" like that hesus.

It is like ganging up on Enya (Trayce), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 10:51 (twelve years ago)

haha tracer. sure! also, i wanted to test out my feeling on the subject : i don't like how i look right now, can i say it how i feel it or i have to weight my words not to "police" other people about their appearance, because i don't want to do that. contenderizer addressed this shortly after my post about roping every negative comments under the toxic label. also thought the thread would get locked, wanted to give a shout-out to cutty, i also think he was coming from a harsh but good place.
lost a good 4 pounds since that drunk nite. .. Harsh joke : makes me think rehab don't shy away from using god as a last resort, maybe some of em should try fat shaming too. "stop drinking them liquid calories!" sort of works for me?!

Sébastien, Sunday, 14 July 2013 17:48 (twelve years ago)

if done right , writing a brief post that addesses different conversation strands in a playfully ionic + hopefully not too cyptic way is the closest i'll eve get to "rhizomic writing".

Sébastien, Sunday, 14 July 2013 19:59 (twelve years ago)

Cutty was coming from a shitty place, IMO

emilys., Wednesday, 17 July 2013 09:18 (twelve years ago)

he's from brooklyn, right?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 17 July 2013 09:26 (twelve years ago)

Wasn't this thread supposed to get locked

how's life, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 10:42 (twelve years ago)

No

mundane peaceable username (darraghmac), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 10:57 (twelve years ago)

Oh awesome.

how's life, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 11:00 (twelve years ago)

it's like yin & yang see

IIIrd Datekeeper (contenderizer), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 11:47 (twelve years ago)

Cutty was coming from a shitty place, IMO

― emilys., Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:18 AM (2 hours ago)

cannot be said enough

or well it can but keep going anyway

IIIrd Datekeeper (contenderizer), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 11:48 (twelve years ago)

http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/this-is-why-policy-should-be-evidence-based/

k3vin k., Friday, 19 July 2013 12:07 (twelve years ago)

thank you based policy

IIIrd Datekeeper (contenderizer), Friday, 19 July 2013 12:18 (twelve years ago)

i'm 5'11, 250lbs, and the last time i had a physical, my doctor told me that not only was i obese, but that i was borderline MORBIDLY obese. he then gave me a bunch of pamphlets about groups i could go to that could help me control my eating habits and live a healthier lifestyle and other kaiser-mandated stuff to make sure i couldn't sue him. i have internalized a many years of comments about how i'm fat and disgusting, though, so the pamphlets, the doctor, the BMI chart, and everything else managed care throws at the epidemic of obesity rolled off my lardy back.

― eh mec, elle est ou ma caisse? (ytth), Monday, July 8, 2013 11:12 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

ytth, im sure ive seen pix of you and you never struck me as anything like morbidly obese wtf!

― It is like ganging up on Enya (Trayce), Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:49 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

The medical definition of obesity is probably what most of us would consider chubby and morbidly obese is not far behind.

ytth, anyone who can sport a "One Direction" belt with such style is doing just fine imo.

educate yourself to this reality (sunny successor), Friday, 19 July 2013 14:33 (twelve years ago)

pp and I have a family friend who is really really overweight and its put so much stress on his body (hes in a wheelchair and needs to pull on things to get up etc) none of us are sure if he last much longer. Back in Australia a friend of mine was dating her boss who bore a strong resemblance to Robbie Coltrane in his larger days. He was an ex-junkie whose liver was all kind of messed up. Talk of a liver transplant was bandied about but he needed to lose all the weight so the doctor recommended a gastric bypass so they could do the transplant. within a couple of months he was thin and set for the liver transplant. all this to say why the hell haven't drs stepped in and recommended a gastric bypass for our friend? would it not be covered by insurance? is it considered unnecessary plastic surgery? it seems totally necessary to me at this point.

educate yourself to this reality (sunny successor), Friday, 19 July 2013 14:49 (twelve years ago)

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/22/penn-state-faculty-object-details-new-preventive-health-care-plan


It’s increasingly common for colleges and universities, like other businesses, to offer the employees they insure incentives for staying healthy. And that makes sense; experts agree it’s a lot cheaper to treat illnesses earlier rather than later, or to prevent them altogether. But instead of offering “carrots” to its employees for seeking preventive care, Pennsylvania State University starting this fall is opting for the “stick,” imposing a $100 monthly surcharge on those who don’t meet new health requirements.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Penn State’s “Take Care of Your Health” initiative has some faculty up in arms.

“I care about my health – I try to exercise every day and I eat pretty well,” Matthew Woessner, professor of political science at the Harrisburg campus. “But I resent that my employer requires that I submit to medical exams, essentially. There’s a fine line between encouraging employees to be healthy and requiring them to comply with health screenings.”

Larry Backer, a professor of law and past Faculty Senate president at Penn State’s main campus in University Park, agreed.

“The coercive feature is novel, at least at Penn State, though program administrators tried hard to mask it in the language of choice and consequences,” he said, noting the Senate wasn't consulted on the plan.

In addition to publishing a web page, Penn State mailed employees brochures detailing what it says is part of a strategic plan to better control health care costs. By November, faculty and their spouses or domestic partners covered by university health care must complete an online wellness profile and physical exam. They’re also required to complete a more invasive biometric screening, including a “full lipid profile” and glucose, body mass index and waist circumference measurements. (Mobile units from the university’s insurance company, Highmark, will visit campuses to perform these screenings.)

Employees and their beneficiaries who don’t meet those requirements must pay the monthly insurance surcharge beginning in January.

Read more: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/22/penn-state-faculty-object-details-new-preventive-health-care-plan#ixzz2Zoa0UVWP
Inside Higher Ed

it itches like a porky pine sitting on your dick (Phil D.), Monday, 22 July 2013 22:10 (twelve years ago)

http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/this-is-why-policy-should-be-evidence-based/

― k3vin k., Friday, 19 July 2013 12:07 (3 days ago) Permalink

This seems like a pretty poorly designed study.

Methods. Before and after New York City implemented calorie posting on chain restaurant menus in 2008, we provided daily, per-meal, or no calorie recommendations to randomized subsets of adult lunchtime customers (n = 1121) entering 2 McDonald’s restaurants, in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and collected receipts and survey responses as they exited. In linear and logistic regressions, with adjustment for gender, race, age, and day, we tested for simple differences in calories consumed and interactions between variables.

Ok, so you "educated" people about healthy eating by handing them a little pamphlet immediately as they entered a McDonald's, and when that didn't have an effect you concluded that calorie labeling doesn't matter?

undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Monday, 22 July 2013 22:37 (twelve years ago)

Personally I have used calorie information to make decisions lots of times. For example, the food at the cafeteria in Costco is like WAY more caloric than I thought it would be, and I have many times (though not always) said to myself "fuck it, I'll eat at home" on realizing that a single slice of their pizza has like 800 calories. Calorie labeling also got me to pretty much stop eating things like muffins on a regular basis (I had no idea they were so caloric pre-labeling).

undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Monday, 22 July 2013 22:38 (twelve years ago)

http://i.lvme.me/eiju8ip.jpg

H3LP, Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:03 (twelve years ago)

Calorie labeling also got me to pretty much stop eating things like muffins on a regular basis (I had no idea they were so caloric pre-labeling).

me 2

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:09 (twelve years ago)

yeah, it doesn't make sense that one chocolate chip cookie can be 300-400 calories at times. They're so tiny and un-filling!

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:13 (twelve years ago)

i pay a hell of a lot of attention to calorie labeling and other nutrition info. i make veggie wrap sandwiches for lunch most days, and if i can choose between 100 and 70 cal wraps, i'll almost always go low. more fiber, less salt, etc. i get kind of obsessive about it, tbh, and keep a written running count of my calorie intake throughout the day. those little guys add up!

IIIrd Datekeeper (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:24 (twelve years ago)

if i were to go to mcdonald's*, i'd have a pretty clear idea what i was gonna order walking in the door. probably a couple cheeseburgers, maybe fries and/or coke (how i used to play it). i knew in advance that shit was bad for me and that it came with WAY too many calories.

some helpful piece of shame-paper handed to me by an intrusive stranger wouldn't have made me order one cheeseburger instead of two. it would only have made me that much more irritated.

* which no, gross chemicals, meatmurder, etc.

IIIrd Datekeeper (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:32 (twelve years ago)

Calorie labeling also got me to pretty much stop eating things like muffins on a regular basis (I had no idea they were so caloric pre-labeling).

Likewise with me for fruit juice. I used to get a 16 oz bottle regularly with lunch, then noticed how calory-heavy they were for not much vitamin/fillingness payback. Now it's eat fruit and drink water/iced tea or do without.

nickn, Tuesday, 23 July 2013 19:15 (twelve years ago)

Calorie labeling also got me to pretty much stop eating things like muffins on a regular basis (I had no idea they were so caloric pre-labeling).

― undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Monday, 22 July 2013 23:38 (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what sort of muffins were you eating?

Selena Gomez is very Neotenous for Caucasoids (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 23 July 2013 23:22 (twelve years ago)

paul bunyan's coconut muffins for giants

neil degrasse (m bison), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:09 (twelve years ago)

lol

Treeship, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:23 (twelve years ago)

your standard size blueberry, bran, apple, banana or w/e muffin from any coffee shop or bakery can easily have 400-500 calories. They're actually worse than donuts.

undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:25 (twelve years ago)

!

Treeship, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:27 (twelve years ago)

like, the freshly baked ones not the packaged ones full of chemicals?

Treeship, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:27 (twelve years ago)

chemicals =/= calories

yes

undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 00:30 (twelve years ago)

best way to get around donut v. muffin decision is to get a couple of both

neil degrasse (m bison), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:28 (twelve years ago)

empty carbs

the late great, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:46 (twelve years ago)

empty some crabs? yes, please.

even the beatles had a coinstar machine in their living room (Crabbits), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:46 (twelve years ago)

explain how i can feel so full from eating so many empty carbs, brah

neil degrasse (m bison), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:48 (twelve years ago)

fuck carbs

Treeship, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 01:48 (twelve years ago)

“I care about my health – I try to exercise every day and I eat pretty well,” Matthew Woessner, professor of political science at the Harrisburg campus. “But I resent that my employer government requires that I submit to medical exams, buy health insurance essentially. There’s a fine line between encouraging employees to be healthy and requiring them to comply with health screenings.”

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 09:21 (twelve years ago)

omg can't believe i have to get a physical and some blood work, what's a lipid profile, that sounds like racial profile

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 09:23 (twelve years ago)

http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/this-is-why-policy-should-be-evidence-based/

― k3vin k., Friday, 19 July 2013 12:07 (3 days ago) Permalink

This seems like a pretty poorly designed study.

Methods. Before and after New York City implemented calorie posting on chain restaurant menus in 2008, we provided daily, per-meal, or no calorie recommendations to randomized subsets of adult lunchtime customers (n = 1121) entering 2 McDonald’s restaurants, in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and collected receipts and survey responses as they exited. In linear and logistic regressions, with adjustment for gender, race, age, and day, we tested for simple differences in calories consumed and interactions between variables.

Ok, so you "educated" people about healthy eating by handing them a little pamphlet immediately as they entered a McDonald's, and when that didn't have an effect you concluded that calorie labeling doesn't matter?

― undescended listicle (Hurting 2), Monday, July 22, 2013 6:37 PM (2 days ago)

yeah i mean, aaron carroll is like my favorite person, but i'm a little less...pessimistic than he is about some public health measures to fight obesity. and i agree that this particular study (http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301218 if you care) has some limitations. but it's necessary to look at the whole of the evidence when talking about public health measures like this, and overall the evidence for menu labeling hasn't been great. personally, and this is mostly faith-based, i don't think there's much of a downside with this issue, and i think more transparency is desirable

although tbf i am one of those people who uses food labeling at fast food joints to order the most calories for the cheapest price (4 double cheeseburgers is like 1000 calories for 5 bucks!), so that phenomenon definitely exists, but i sort of doubt it's a problem on a large scale

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 09:46 (twelve years ago)

stoplight system has been proven to work best i thought? i.e. big labels that are either green, yellow or red to indicate overall healthiness

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 09:49 (twelve years ago)

I never heard of the stoplight system but it sounds good, like surgeon general warnings on cigarettes

Treeship, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 13:34 (twelve years ago)

The stoplight system is what the food industry in the UK has been battling against because it very clearly demonstrates how full of shit a lot of processed food actually is.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 13:52 (twelve years ago)

have to admit i've never even heard of the stoplight system, is it a UK thing primarily? sounds like a good idea though. putting "stoplight obesity" into pubmed yields just 2 results, one of which is this paper on a small but somewhat encouraging study http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00446.x/full

this makes sense - calorie counts are a good idea (and again i don't necessarily oppose them) - but red/yellow/green is a lot easier to interpret, and you'd think the red foods would have enough negative association to make something happen in terms of offerings and choice, which is what this paper describes. i bet part of it (for better or worse...) is the reluctance to order "red" foods in front of others

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:06 (twelve years ago)

i can upload that pdf if anyone wants to read it

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:14 (twelve years ago)

Don't violate copyright law dickhead

waterface, Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:26 (twelve years ago)

when i visited a friend at the google sales office in SF for lunch, i noticed their cafeteria used the stoplight system

⚓ (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:37 (twelve years ago)

Don't violate copyright law dickhead

― waterface, Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:26 AM (18 minutes ago)

my man with the cold water

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:44 (twelve years ago)

btw if we're going to continue using this thread to discuss obesity-related public health, maybe we could rename it

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:45 (twelve years ago)

maybe you could start a new thread

⚓ (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 July 2013 14:47 (twelve years ago)

sure

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 July 2013 15:03 (twelve years ago)

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/local/localbrad/10593409._Too_thin__City_Gent_is_dropped_as_mascot_after_19_years/

What about the right to be thin?

how's life, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 17:29 (twelve years ago)

regretting bumping this thread, which really ought to have been locked weeks back.

how's life, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 17:31 (twelve years ago)

Almost posted in this thread the other day - I recently had a 6-month checkup at my doctor's office. As I've mentioned, I'm 5'9", and my weight usually holds between 190-198. I'm far from a perfect specimen, but I'm healthy enough to bike to work every day, and biked just under 350 miles in four days two weekends ago for charity. (I posted a pic in the July WDYLL.)

My doctor, in going over my health, noted that, "I see you've lost a few more pounds [I dropped from 198 to 192], and that definitely moves you out of the 'obese' category and down to 'overweight.'"

"Obese?!" That's how stupid these BMI charts are. I refuse to believe that any sane human being would have looked at me anytime in the last several weeks and said, "That guy is obese." I swear to god I'm going to PUT ON weight just to spite my doctor now.

Here's the storify, of a lovely ladify (Phil D.), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 18:49 (twelve years ago)

smh at people thinking size of food or price has something to do with caloric content

carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:08 (twelve years ago)

is 'stoplight system' all based on calories and fat? What's the criteria? A lot of healthy foods could fit that criteria. Coconut oil, for instance. I eat a lot of it. It has a lot of calories. And tons of fat.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:45 (twelve years ago)

kind of thinking that having fats in your diet is necessary but I don't know if coconut oil is essentially much better than any other fat, especially in the pretty small quantities you use cooking oils/fats (with the exception of deep frying)

google tells me dr. oz seems to think so, though

carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:49 (twelve years ago)

Dr oz also believes in homeopathy. Opinion voided.

Jeff, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:51 (twelve years ago)

it's good for people on autoimmune diet protocols because it isnt a vegetable oil nor does it contain dairy fats.

homosexual II, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:51 (twelve years ago)

my cat likes to eat coconut oil if I leave the jar open and has really nice fur

carlos danger zone (mh), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

I think the most important thing is that the mascot is obviously a young boy, whereas the man playing it is pretty obviously an old geezer.

how's life, Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

if 5'9"/198lbs is obese then I was obese at one point in my life.

HOOS next aka won't get steened again (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 6 August 2013 19:52 (twelve years ago)

I thought the "consensus" now was that sugar is the main devil, not fat

A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Wednesday, 7 August 2013 01:09 (twelve years ago)

Sugar is even more caloricly dense and people eat a lot of it, yes

carlos danger zone (mh), Wednesday, 7 August 2013 01:26 (twelve years ago)

There is never consensus.

Jeff, Wednesday, 7 August 2013 06:38 (twelve years ago)

The Animals are Also Getting Fat

They love junk food. Who the hell is surprised about this?

the rofflestomper (dandydonweiner), Monday, 12 August 2013 02:07 (twelve years ago)

six months pass...

http://gawker.com/your-doctor-is-probably-not-fat-shaming-you-1535358667

death and darkness and other night kinda shit (crüt), Monday, 3 March 2014 22:49 (twelve years ago)

crazy how much medical knowledge the people in the blog posts linked therein have

k3vin k., Tuesday, 4 March 2014 03:32 (twelve years ago)

The thing is, I know that the science behind "fat=unhealthy" is bad. I've read numerous studies on the subject and I've written about it. I could have countered her on purely medical grounds with discussions about set points and health as a complex issue

k3vin k., Tuesday, 4 March 2014 03:37 (twelve years ago)

doctors are just shills for the fashion industry.

james franco, Tuesday, 4 March 2014 13:01 (twelve years ago)

one year passes...

"Your BMI is 30.1 - obese
Your weight is substantially above the healthy range for your height, which means you have a higher than average risk of developing diseases associated with obesity."
biked 12km to football (2 hrs) and 12km back, feel p good tbh
― i will fondue, and i will killue (darraghmac), Thursday, 25 October 2012 23:48 (2 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

still this, on the button. have my doubts.

deejerk reactions (darraghmac), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:31 (ten years ago)

you have a right to be fat so just aim for that 29.999

Rainham area Rilke (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:51 (ten years ago)

Allow me to recommend my forthcoming self-help book Eat Like a Fawn, Feel Like a Million Bucks.

Morris the Florist meets Horace the Taurus (Aimless), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:52 (ten years ago)

inspiring stuff lads thanks

deejerk reactions (darraghmac), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 18:01 (ten years ago)

deems la, that is a very crude pro-forma metric, as you will know
if you really want to know about your risk of develping metabolic diseases then do some proper tests

Rainham area Rilke (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 18:10 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.