Petition for Annoying Jews of ILX Board

What the shit is this for fuck?

annoying fake jews board also?

hi dere

I nominate chaki and myself as mods of the Controversial People of Latino/Chicano Extraction board

yeah, so many posters would now be banned.

pls can we have a "WASPS Only Board [MUST HAVE AT LEAST TWO MAYFLOWER ANCESTORS]"

remy is pretty brown. ive seen him.

nobody reps for the celts anymore

someone find cutty and hurting.

There should be a star beside each Jewish user's name.

*

thats a great idea, pp.

nobody reps for the celts anymore

Oh fuck them, they get way too much attention anyway

this is getting off to a great start!

lolocaust

i want a picture of a pierogi next to my username

http://static.flickr.com/24/44998078_8fb73070fc.jpg

Noooooo too many Aline Kominsky Crumbs!!!

well MLK day is over

i support

jordan sargentberg

im jewish, my dad converted so i'm missing the goldenweiss last name

ethan padgettstein

i dont think you can be jewish if your dad converted unless your mom was the og jew.

the o.jew, as it were

http://members.arstechnica.com/x/palsyboy/fail_-_i_have_a_dream.jpg

it is fun to say "o.g. jew"

oh jee joo

oooooh jeeeeeeee jooooooooo

(I support, jews are gay)

http://www.soulwalking.co.uk/%A5Artist%20GIF%20Images/OJays-77.jpg

(especially the homosexual hollywood-ones)

OG JEW
http://www.adeedo.com/images/starburst.gif

I'm reporting all of you to the Elders of Zion

i dont think you can be jewish if your dad converted unless your mom was the og jew.

-- chaki, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:07 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this is what i meant, my mom's side are all o.g. jews

stop saying og jew

like rasputin?

sounds like something you might sneeze

when you sneeze, it sounds like "oh jee joo"? i would like to hear that, most people have one-syllable sneezes

I got OG cowboy Jews for ancestors

(^^^ house was later turned into a brothel)

but were the hoes jewish?

i love mah jews

http://a.abcnews.com/images/TheLaw/nm_shapiro_070917_ssv.jpg

OJ, Jew.

truth: sometimes i forget i am not a jew

sometimes i forget i am a jew.

PICTS PLEASE

Radiohead – OK Comjewter

pix of annoying jews???

Belle and Sebastian - I'm Waking Up to Shabbos

ZOG = "zionist occupied government." The standard Protocols-esque theory that a shadowy Hebrew government runs things. To people like the JewWatch assholes (who live in St. Louis, lucky me), it's very real indeed.

― mike a, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 5:55 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

So is that what those ZOGSports t-shirts I keep seeing are about?

oh right

i was ready to be outraged but i wasnt after i watched it

again, im not v entrenched by cirtue of mostly ignorance.

What are his views on the creation of Israel?

i'd assume they took exception w/ an assertion that the victims of the shoah justified a nationalist self-determinated jewish movement like zionism, but i defer to darragh who actually watched the doc which i have not yet.

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/111371/simon-schama-and-bbc-attacked-over-story-jews

it's p much all in the story mordy quoted. not much a controversy tbh.

claiming it was “alarming” that Professor Schama should be allowed to discuss the Shoah.

I'm generally a supporter of Palestinian rights, but branding it alarming that a Jewish man can put forth his opinions on the Holocaust is rather alarming in itself.

that's a bit of editorializing. they get specific later & it's a bit different

Their complaints followed Prof Schama’s explanation that “it was not just what the Nazis did to the Jews, but what the rest of the world failed to do that makes the moral case for Israel”.

In the letter to Ms Hadlow the activists wrote: “We find it alarming that the BBC is giving a platform to an openly pro-Israeli commentator to make the ‘moral case’ for Israel.

“Schama’s views will go unopposed, unchallenged and unanalysed. This is a far cry from the balanced and impartial broadcasting that the BBC claims to champion.”

I dunno, sounds like I'd have some issues with his his views, but is the programme purporting to be anything other than Schama's opinions?

I can understand the objection. I think if a "historian" did a long program on "the history of the Palestinians" that concluded with editorializing on why Israel should not have been founded, folk would be pretty upset

Yeah fair point.

yeah it is purporting to be objective history, going by history of britain, but saying something "makes the case" for something isn't an absolute endorsement of that case & the bbc say "dissenting voices" are included.

i think the BBC often editorializes in the other direction; it's not like the UK media is lacking for pro-Palestinian voices.

i doubt palestinian activists agree w/ that

well sure - no one ever feels like their side is getting a fair hearing (i remember there's a great beirut study to that effect) but c'mon - ever read comment is free, listen to the bbc, notice all the london-based arabic newspapers?

http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jpiliavi/965/hwang.pdf

i think there's a feeling that the bbc in particular is a bit dodgy in this respect

look at the beirut hostile media study in that case. pro-israel commentators frequently make very strong cases that the bbc is not pro-israel (ones that i have to agree w/ as a regular listener of the bbc)

I keep reading this thread title as petitioning to annoy jews.

eg this website is totally devoted to the topic (nb i don't read this site so i can't vouch for its quality of argument): http://bbcwatch.org

look at the beirut hostile media study in that case. pro-israel commentators frequently make very strong cases that the bbc is not pro-israel (ones that i have to agree w/ as a regular listener of the bbc)

― Mordy , Monday, September 30, 2013 11:35 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I think it's become pretty clear that media critics on both sides are convinced that every media outlet not 100% following their respective platforms is biased toward the other side. That said, there is a difference between subtle editorializing in individual news articles and presenting a long-form historical documentary that culminates in an argument for the state of israel. And whether the BBC is usually biased a different way has nothing to do with whether that's an appropriate way to present the subject.

did you watch the documentary, hurting, or are you just going off the articles you've read on the topic?

bc certainly if a historian argued that the shoah was a large factor in the creation of the state of israel, they wouldn't be arguing for a moral right for israel to exist - just acknowledging a pretty stale historical fact that 99% of the world agrees w/ (that killing 6m jews helped galvanize the creation of the state)

this is maybe a different topic but i think it tangentially relates to the prevalence of holocaust denial in islamic society - presumably bc its fact alone makes such a persuasive case for the state of israel/zionism even w/out explicit editorializing.

isn't there like a billion and a half muslims in the world? how prevalent is holocaust denial among them really

i don't think Schama wd claim to be an objective historian; i don't think any historian today wd make many claims to objectivity. his case for Israel as it reads up there cd be argued as a causal one as well as a personal opinion

really prevalent? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial#Holocaust_denial_in_the_Arab_world

i don't think any historian today wd make many claims to objectivity

well true but perhaps "presented as objective history" is quite close all the same

"the arab world" isn't the same as saying islamic society, just for starters

I was trying to be inclusive towards the persians

Maybe you can Gabbneb and Shakey Mo to post on your Annoying Jews of ILX Board

I have no memory of what prompted this

how prevalent is holocaust denial among them really

it is really prevalent

that's not the only time I ever remember him saying something vaguely anti-Jewish, fwiw

I don't really care it's just weird that gabbneb and I would ever be on the same side of anything lol

It was an hourlong programme focusing on the foundation of israel and developments since in context of a series on the history of the jews, told by a historian with a trait of personalising the subject.

Attacking him for mentioning that he thought israel had a right to exist (i suppose more correctly stating one of the justifications for same) seems to be the reaction of a viewer just waiting for the chance to jump.

Fwiw he addressed from various povs the thoughts of israelis who were uneasy about the placement of their settlements on cleared palestinian villages, israelis taking advantage of available housing on disputed expansions, interviewed ppl re the changing borders after and since 67, and there were varying degrees of doubt and belligerence throughout without much in the way of input from him.

The only person he took pains to clearly disagree with advocated (in as many words) a return to the biblical borders. Schama found it visibly difficult to engage with this guy and admitted as much in the next section where he and another guy dismissed these views as near enough lunacy.

He finished with a final piece p critical of the israeli state as is imo, but certainly not denying its right to exist nor asserting that, as an outsider, he had much right to a judgement at all.

In no way an hour of propaganda imo, he was never gonna present an arab case for redress in this series.

PICTS PLEASE

― Laurel, Tuesday, January 22, 2008

^^ far better post than this thread deserved

did anyone make reference to the canonical sunny successor post re: "annoying" ?

uh

look idk how to say this sarahell but the jews have a different canon

Didn't know about The Story of the Jews until today but found it on video and the history graduate in me had a nerdgasm finding out about the Geniza collection because omg

geniza collection is super cool - i visited the JTS archive in college and was really amazed

The bits in the archive they showed looked incredible, including the kids' doodles.

Found it on vimeo, not video, I should say.

This isn't really the thread for it I know but I just barrelled through the whole thing and I really loved it. Anyone complaining about that last episode is ridiculous, although I do recognise that I'm coming from a position that is if not in lockstep with Schama's at least close to it. Still, it's pretty damning of the settlements and, in a way, the pitfalls of nationalism (which, as is pointed out in the last three episodes, is one of the major sources of the horrors in Europe). Given that, I just can't understand someone complaining to the BBC.

Pardon me, but is this the thread where ILX gathers to annoy jews?

There should be a star beside each Jewish user's name.

― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:33 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Pardon me, but is this the thread where ILX gathers to annoy jews?

― Aimless, Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:17 (2 hours ago) Permalink

no, you merely petition for the right to do so here

can I get a star next to my name

it'll cost ya

You gotta work for it

Please, sir! May I annoy some jews?

http://thehpalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oliver_twist_david_lean_0.jpg

Pe-ti-TIOOOOON ...PETITION!

No one gonna post Alec Guinness from that film?