2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Obama vs Clinton... THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!

McCain vs lolHuckabee... lol

HI DERE, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Symmetry required gabbneb to start this.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

YAY! I was second again!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Well done, sir.

jaymc, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

freakin' me out with yr. symmetry.

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.naderexplore08.org/

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

"fearful" symmetry, huh?

Aimless, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

1,000 new answers by midnight

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

ok, healthcare:

hillary needs to require the mandate because, besides being a good populist-sounding talking point, it would give her greater bangaining strength with insurance companies and health care providers. it seems probable to me that these negotiations would be piloted by lobbies who would guarantee their clients' co-operation in exchange for de-regulation or tax-breaks for the insurance and / or health care industries.

am i on the right track so far? y/n? i just want to drill down on this issue because everyone takes for granted that universal health care would be a nearly prohibitive measure to actually enact.

-- elmo argonaut

Posting this over from the other thread, 'cuz it seems like a good point. Is it true? Does a universal health care plan really require 100% buy-in to generate the $$$ necessary to leverage a manageable price?

contenderizer, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I can not take part in this historic thread.

Eric H., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

this in re: to g00blar

It's fucking hard, and strange, and random, to run a presidential campaign--even with Bill's experience with nat'l campaigns, anyone that thought she would 'know how to do it' and therefore have it easy is pretty much an idiot.

never said it'd be easy, but the clinton campaign thus far made some pretty foolhardy assumptions regarding (1) their underestimation of obama's legitimacy as a threat to her nomination, (2) their inability to plan beyond super tuesday and subsequent frontloading of their expenditures (leading to the financial troubles in jan 08), (3) their lack of control over bill's role in the campaign, who's been an on-again, off-again advocate. they took a lot of shit for granted and it's been catching up with them up to this point.

Does anyone believe that having whatever skills it takes to win your party's nomination have much relation to the skills it takes to be a president?

building coalitions, selling yourself and your ideas, managing/leading a staff. this is debatable, obv, but i think there is some overlap between the two.

m bison, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

http://radio.weblogs.com/0107064/MyImages/noraodonnell.jpg

Obligatory Norah O'Donnell content.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

okay, mark halperin has posted this image and "DEVELOPING":

http://markhalperin.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/bsmk.jpg

which is confusing the hell out of me.

http://thepage.time.com/2008/02/12/white-lights-lead-to-red-lights-which-indicate-the-exits/

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I will be sad watching the old thread slip down the New Answers page, like I was when Leonardo DiCaprio slipped down under the cold waves at the end of Titanic.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Health care (deep breath):

While it's true that eliminating free riders should lower insurance premiums (since those free riders, presumably people with few health care costs, could absorb the high costs of others), it seems to me like that's premised on having a single-payer system where there's one big pool of risk, not a whole bunch of separate pools (e.g. separate insurance companies) that just happen to include everyone. Plus, as Obama points out with some cause I think, just because there's a mandate doesn't mean everyone will actually sign up, as the Massachusetts plan has shown, in which case you still have free riders, they just owe the government money.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

What has to be kept in mind in all of this is that what we actually need is a single-payer system, but we're never going to actually get that, so any "universal" health care plan is necessarily a compromise. It's just a matter of what you're deciding to compromise on.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

thread should have been called THE REAPENING

kenan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Those are people who interpret exit polls on teevee. He means that we are now awaiting... Wait for it... exit polls.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

to christen the new thread

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i hereby christen this ship, the u.s.s. clownpants

m bison, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

wau

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC on teh gays.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee: Able to see his dick since 2007!

kenan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

In terms of costs, this is the image you want to keep in mind:

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/85xx/doc8565/Figure1-3.gif

That shows what's going to happen to Medicare/Medicaid costs as time goes on. If they continue growing at the same rate they have been (i.e. 2.5%), then they're going to take up 20% of GDP by 2050. ZOINKS.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Context here:

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/85xx/doc8565/Chapter1.5.1.shtml

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

i kinda feel slighted that the most prominent queer pundit out there right now is andrew sullivan.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Since 2008, Proud to be an official Dicklist member!

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

huckabee needs his own cable news show so we can watch him slowly fatten up again

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

M Bison, I agree with you abt Clinton's 'foolhardy assumptions'. I just don't think those mistakes have much to do with her 'managerial acuity' or whatever. Basically all the mistakes tell us is that she's not totally crushing Obama. Doesn't 'planning past Super Tuesday' just mean 'winning past Super Tuesday'? I don't know, I'm rambling, but I think most of the narratives about Hillary dropping the ball are much more something constructed by the press than anything really insightful. That said, I hope she's done.

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i kinda feel slighted that the most prominent queer pundit out there right now is andrew sullivan.

Don't forget Morbs.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

ban g00blar

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link

In terms of negotiations, giving insurance companies tax breaks or deregulation would kidna defeat the purpose, unless I'm misunderstanding your point. They're going to be more regulated, if anything. The idea is to basically bring them in and say "everyone in the goddamn country agrees that you're screwing us over, so this is what's going to happen." The obstacle is more going to be hospitals and medical professionals, I suspect, who are all against it because it'll lower their salaries.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, can i get a source on queer interests in politics without being subjected to this hack's 7,285 virulent anti-hillary posts?

xpost

haha, i didn't forget morbs but sadly he is not nearly as prominent a political commentator as he should be.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I just saw that Obama commercial linked on the other thread. It is massively dope.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i just heard james carvelle say "senator obama" but it sounded like "santo bama"

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

General posts to the obamahiphop forum
Are The Clintons Haters? Jan 14th @ 1:49 AM

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

James Carvelle could make "activist judges" sound like "santo bama".

HI DERE, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary is def a hater

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i just heard james carvelle say "senator obama" but it sounded like "santo bama"

LOL

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

lol >>> http://tinyurl.com/3ch8wj

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

thanking u

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

"His name rhymes with the word Iraq. His second name also does not need to comment, but Obama surname only one consonant differs from the embodiment of evil names (meaning Osama bin Laden. - "Newspaper. Ru") "- notes columnist The Daily Reveille.

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Depraved, however, to wound that Obama - Half (his father - black, the mother - white). Therefore, there is no guarantee observers say that black voters will support him, not Hillary Clinton, wife of the ex-president, whose American "blacks" just adore.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Obamy

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Can't wait until the weather is Obamy outside my office.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

what about Aravosis? (AmericaBlog)

daria-g, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

In terms of negotiations, giving insurance companies tax breaks or deregulation would kidna defeat the purpose, unless I'm misunderstanding your point. They're going to be more regulated, if anything. The idea is to basically bring them in and say "everyone in the goddamn country agrees that you're screwing us over, so this is what's going to happen."

I don't think that's the idea at all. That kind of draconian, oppositional, top-down imposition of a system would never fly in the free-market U.S., and I can't imagine either candidate trying it. Instead, I imagine that insurance co's and the gov't will work together to come up with agreeable rates and situational (symptom-based) response/cost plans. The companies involved will want certain guarantees and concessions, though expanded enrollment will be sizeable perk right off the bat. The more people the gov't can promise, the better their leverage - especially if the new heads aren't high-riskers who couldn't get insurance any other way.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080212/pl_afp/usvoteobamajapan

Murakami noted that Barack Obama's birthday, August 4, happens to be "Chopsticks Day" in the city.

kingfish, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

why tf is julian bond trying to get the dems to seat MI and FL???

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.mccainblogette.com/docs/postings/020708/20.jpg

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

shockingly, more Americans know of John Glenn's NASA career than his Senate career, which ended roughly co-terminously

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

well if thats not photoshop fodder

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.mccainblogette.com/docs/playlist/

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Here is the third addition to our growing collection of Blogette Playlists. This list consists of songs by some artists who get me moving in the morning ("Scissor Sisters"), pick-me-up in the afternoon ("Clap Your Hands Say Yeah"), energize me for a night out on the town ("Goldfrapp") and help me fall asleep at night ("Jimi Hendrix"). I hope everyone enjoys these songs as much as I do.

P.S. "Seu Jorge" is a genius.

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

john glens eyes are the size of grains of rice

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

almost as good as romney's ad exec son being a fan of elliot lipp and cinematic orchestra

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

"His name rhymes with the word Iraq. His second name also does not need to comment, but Obama surname only one consonant differs from the embodiment of evil names (meaning Osama bin Laden. - "Newspaper. Ru") "- notes columnist The Daily Reveille.

This is the funniest thing I've read today. Link plz.

(Okay, that was before I saw the "Hanna Montana Fans Love McCain" poster. That is now the funniest thing I've seen today.)

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

lolol >>> http://tinyurl.com/3ch8wj

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

too bad hannah montana fans can't vote

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

almost as good as romney's ad exec son being a fan of elliot lipp and cinematic orchestra

almost as good as using indie-anything as any sort of litmus test

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

who's talking about litmus tests? i think its funny

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Craig Romney's Friend Space
Craig Romney has 566 friends.

Trunkster

Peter Bjorn And John

The Cinematic Orchestra

M. Ward

Loney, Dear

of Montreal

The National

Jim Noir

Andrew Bird

Sharon Jones and the Dap-Kings

Sigur Ros

Dntel

The Bees

ELIOT LIPP

and what, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

"Seu Jorge"

max, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>worth repeating

the whole clintons have baggage / she's polarizing / etc. issue may not be "fair," but it wasn't invented for election season. it's just a fact!</i>

I'm still amazed that so many democrats could be unconcerned with or unaware of this aspect of Clinton as a candidate.

It could also be really painful to have these 90s partisan media-narratives brought back and the culture war debated indirectly around her persona. I can't see ever voting for McCain but the Dems might deserve the lose the GE on principal if they choose to reignite the Clintons conflict with the "attack machine."

Big Theo, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

SUSA has Clinton up 17 in OH, her lead due entirely to women - http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/02/12/surveyusa_clinton_maintains_doubledigit_lead_in_ohio.html

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

*sigh*

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

how many of those women are voting for Hillary because of what she symbolizes, I wonder

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Shakey Mo Kristol

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I was making a joke about daria's complaints about Obama/symbolism on one of the other threads deej

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

(btw there are few people I loathe more than Kristol, who reminds me of the prototypical smug rich Jewish kid at the bar mitzvahs I attended as a child)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

'prototypical'

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

YAH I HOPE HE JEW-DIES

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

were the Jews you knew all rich or only the ones who had bar mitzvahs? were they all smug or only the ones who were rich?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

and what about the christians' bar mitzvahs?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

aren't all jews rich?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i think only the smug ones?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

some are rich some wear funny hats

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

aren't all jews rich?

Some of us are.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Define "rich."

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I am Jewish. Some of my Hebrew school classmates were richer and more conservative and smugger and more assholish than others.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

wow this has a lot to do with primaries guys

dan m, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

jewmaries

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Some of my Hebrew school classmates were richer and more conservative and smugger and more assholish than others.

in a prototypical way

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Are you saying discrimination against Jews isn't worthy of discussion?

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

hey bill kristol is a world class asshole tho we can all agree on that right guys !!!!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

yr buddy speaks, andwhat - http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/02/12/ed-rendell-straight-talker.aspx

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ you guys

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

jews don't know about jesus

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

unless they're jews FOR jesus

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Oy vey. We already need a new thread to get back on track.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

VA exits - Obama ties Hillary among whites, wins Seniors

http://thepage.time.com/potomac-primary-exit-poll-data-from-fox-news/

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

guys lets go back to the old thread

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Women voters: Obama 58, Cliton 42

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Women voters: Obama 58, Cliton 42

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

so uh this is when people will be saying was the beginning of the end for hillary?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

ahahahaha

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

she will hold out until Ohio and TX no matter what

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yah but theres a good chance shes fukd right now

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

she is up 17 in oh

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

not for long

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

(in polls obv)

deej, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

fun parlor game from ambinder:

To the Secret Service (technically to the WHCA), President Bush is Trailblazer, Laura Bush is Tempo, HRC is Evergreen, Bill Clinton is Eagle, Dick Cheney is Angler, and Barack Obama is Renegade.

John McCain respects the Service but has said he is wary of their presence. On the trail, he sometimes has security around him, and those tough veteran buddies and his big burly advance guys provide a nice circle of protection..

But the United States Secret Service has not yet been authorized by the Department of Homeland Security to provide him with a detail, according to a Secret Service spokesman.

Opening up a can of worms here, but when they do, what should his code name be?

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

grandpa

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

McBane

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

shakey

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

waht

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

grumpus

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

no. 6

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

McClane

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

hanoi

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

juan

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

^

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

skeletor

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i29.tinypic.com/fthq9f.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

2:1?? that seems kinda unlikely

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link

3:1? I'll believe it when I see it (somewhere else) xp

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yah well the exit polls have been over-estimating obama the whole time but still...

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

obama walking down the street w/pizza and beers on tv

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

dr teeth

rockapads, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The Clinton campaign is releasing a radio advertisement aimed towards Hispanic voters in Texas that proclaims "Hillary is our friend,” and promotes the candidate's plan for universal health care.

"She respects our culture and understands the problems that affect our community," an announcer says in the thirty-second ad, which has been used to target Hispanics in previous primary contests. "Let's vote for Hillary…and we will have a better life."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/12/dems-look-to-texas/

omar little, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

subtle

rockapads, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://infocusmagazine.org/6.2/images/bsoc_hispanics_in_america1.jpg
lets all vote hillary! aiyee!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

hey so apparently next debate is here in austin

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:44 (sixteen years ago) link

will try to go

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

which candidate will be the first to drop some spanish

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the first to speak no doubt

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:49 (sixteen years ago) link

and in so doing win my vote

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i made cnn. jack cafferty just read my answer to his silly question about whether hillary can reign in bill for four years and keep him scandal-free. CLAY FROM PORTLAND WRITES...

Clay, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:51 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa rugged

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I better call my mom. she'll be so proud.

Clay, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

which candidate will be the first to drop some spanish

_________________________________

and in so doing win my vote

First candidate to sing Cheetah Girls' Fuego has my vote.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

waht did u write: lol no of course not dont be silly?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Gearshift

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:55 (sixteen years ago) link

something about "Considering he's already been in a few small-scale scandals since primary season began it seems unlikely that four years of intense scrutiny won't... lol bubba"

Clay, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC CALL VIRGINA FOR OBAMA BASED ON EXIT POLLS! BIG WIN!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

hmmm so is CNN - that means the exit poll margins must be ridiculous

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

lol hueg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/fox-demexitpolls-big.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

she purdy

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:12 (sixteen years ago) link

ouch

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:12 (sixteen years ago) link

so this is coming down to texas and penn, right? I mean, does HRC even stand a chance winning that few states in the primaries? where is obama polling everywhere else?

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

He's projected to win Wisconsin and Hawaii handily - Hillary's banking on Ohio, TX, and Pennsylvania but assuming that she'll maintain her leads in those states with this much momentum and money behind Obama seems dubious. It will come down to how much of the party leadership thinks she MUST win over Obama because she presents a better chance in the GE - but I don't think they're going to draw that conclusion. They'd be foolish to step in front of Obama's speeding train at that point...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

lol clinton spin: we knew we werent going to win - wtf is that supposed to even mean?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

uncle mo

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

that post was kinda a mess - what I mean is if it comes down to the superdelegates granting a decisive majority, their going to have to have overridingly powerful institutional and electoral reasons to back Hillary over Obama, and at this point I don't think they do. The party is going to come to the realization that the Clinton's national political capital is spent, and that the better option for the party is to get behind the dynamic populist that has a better shot at beating McCain. Hillary is running out of arguments for why she should get the nomination (minor policy differences on healthcare and delusionally self-serving "I'm more experienced!" talking points aren't gonna cut it.)

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't even want your stupid primary!

Eppy, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Hassan Nemazee, another national finance chairman for Mrs. Clinton, said he was also telling his network of allies not to get caught up in the headlines about Obama

“I’m telling donors and supporters: Don’t be overly concerned about what goes on in the remainder of the month of February because these are not states teed up well for us,” Mr. Nemazee said.

G00blar, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

superdelegates aside I think that if obama takes either texas or ohio then he's going to be so far ahead in pledged delegates that hillary is going to be out, or at least, it would make sense for her to bow out. but we'll see.

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah Hillary's mounting excuses sound like she's dismissing the electorate ("oh those negros don't matter, neither does THAT state cuz we won't win it in the GE, by the way the only states that do matter are the ones where I'm polling ahead even though I may not win them, etc.") That shit is not gonna play well - no one wants to back a loser.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

otoh I honestly can't conceive of Hillary bowing out gracefully. I predict some kind of scary meltdown/lashing out.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

"Nothing to see here; those states aren't gonna vote for us, so they obviously do not matter, duh." xposts

G00blar, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm ashamed she won my state but proud Obama won my district

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:23 (sixteen years ago) link

(and I have no doubt Obama would sweep CA in the GE)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:23 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain/Clinton '08

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm passing up an opportunity to hear obama speak in 10 minutes. instead, i will take a nap. and then eat tacos.

amateurist, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

You know you wanna

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

xp

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i have no doubt obama would sweep CA if the election were this week rather than last

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Tacos 1, Obama 0.

Eppy, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton/Lieberman 08

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Lieberman/Sharpton 12

amateurist, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

tacos/obama 08

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i'd prefer tacos to be on the other side of the ticket, but yeah.

amateurist, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:27 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man i want tacos

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Hassan Nemazee, another national finance chairman for Mrs. Clinton HRC, said he was also telling his network of allies not to get caught up in the headlines about Obama

“I’m telling donors and supporters: Don’t be overly concerned about what goes on in the remainder of the month of February because these are not states teed up well for us,” Mr. Nemazee said

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Um, let's try that again:

Hassan Nemazee, another national finance chairman for Mrs. Clinton Giuliani, said he was also telling his network of allies not to get caught up in the headlines about Obama

“I’m telling donors and supporters: Don’t be overly concerned about what goes on in the remainder of the month of February because these are not states teed up well for us,” Mr. Nemazee said

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

FOR PRESIDENT xxp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah gOOblar said that already

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

oh i see what you did

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 00:33 (sixteen years ago) link

DC 4 OBAMA SUPRISE!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:01 (sixteen years ago) link

"tacos/obama 08"

Obama/Richardson 08!

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:07 (sixteen years ago) link

i went into the booth tonight planning to vote tacos but I wound up picking the special, calabacitas con puerca, instead

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:10 (sixteen years ago) link

an obama/tacos ticket could not possibly lose

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

this election will be decided by cilantro.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:13 (sixteen years ago) link

is america ready for a spicy president

Clay, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

cilantro is very controversial

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

obama > chimichangas > tacos

maybe

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary is already in texas? seems desperate. is she gonna live there until the primary?

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:17 (sixteen years ago) link

tacos> obama > cilantro> chimichangas

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:17 (sixteen years ago) link

do you guys like tacos? I do!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:18 (sixteen years ago) link

TACOS FOR CHANGE

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:18 (sixteen years ago) link

chimichangas are clearly the john edwards of this debate here

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:18 (sixteen years ago) link

hey guys...TACOS ON A PLANE!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:19 (sixteen years ago) link

so if huckabee win virgina tonite mccain cant wrap up the nom until may 6th! i just heard this lol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:21 (sixteen years ago) link

"wrap up"

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, cilantro has some pretty high negatives.

jaymc, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't John Edward's window of opportunity to impact this race closing? If Obama edges closer to the nomination this month, he'll need Edwards' endorsement less-and-less, I'd assume. By contrast, HRC will be desperate for it up through Tx. and Ohio. So is Edwards waiting too long to endorse?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:24 (sixteen years ago) link

it tastes like soap to some due to genetic predisposition

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Pozole showing strong numbers

kingfish, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:25 (sixteen years ago) link

paprika will have it's say it Texas.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:26 (sixteen years ago) link

More resignations in Hillaryland: The Washington Post reports that Mike Henry, Hillary's deputy campaign manager and a figure who was brought in by outgoing campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle, has also resigned.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:27 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC calls VA for McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:29 (sixteen years ago) link

oh boo

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:31 (sixteen years ago) link

hrc = dun

is kind of too bad. take away the bill + marc-rich-pardoning sleaze and the fact that people really hate her for essentially no reason, i think she'd have been a good prez

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:32 (sixteen years ago) link

just tell me when i can bust open this champaign cuz Obama finally topped Hilz delegates en total.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't count HRC out yet.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:37 (sixteen years ago) link

(Also see SurveyUSA on Ohio: Clinton 56%, Obama 39%.)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:37 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary has been ahead everywhere 3 weeks out

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:40 (sixteen years ago) link

those numbers start shifting tomorrow

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:40 (sixteen years ago) link

a lot has changed since that article was written 9 days ago. Obama's gonna continue to catch up in OH, who knows how much.
xp

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't necessarily disagree. My only point: Don't count HRC out yet.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:43 (sixteen years ago) link

she's dead to me.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:46 (sixteen years ago) link

its too much fun to count her out

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:47 (sixteen years ago) link

she's dead to me.

MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: WHITE MALES HATE HILLARY CLINTON.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:48 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: ANTI-WAR TYPES HATE HILLARY CLINTON.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, okay. Fair enough.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: LOL JHOSHEA MAD.

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

HARDLY NEWS LOL

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Cilantro is like the George W Bush of herbs.

Nicole, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:57 (sixteen years ago) link

"and the fact that people really hate her for essentially no reason"

power-hungry corporate lawyers in bed with big chicken and decades-long marriages of convenience and credibility issues up the wazoo does not a hero make to some folks.

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 01:57 (sixteen years ago) link

some people hate her for decent reasons; many do not

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't even hate her. if she were running against Lieberman or Zell Miller I'd totally be reppin for her.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

THEY HAVE THE SAME HAIR, FOOL!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

you know what freaked me out recently? ciao bella's mint chocolate chip gelato. and don't get me wrong, ciao bella is god-like, but they use real fresh from the garden mint in their gelato and it's like eating an herb garden. waaaaay too strong for me. i think i must prefer fake mint. unless i'm having a julep. or tea or something.

i've made my peace with cilantro. we agree to disagree. and i've even grown a little fond of my old nemesis. now that every restaurant on earth no longer feels the need to dump an ounce of the stuff on whatever i'm eating.

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

i kinda hate her but sure theres a lot worse out there - its a little painful watching her clapping smiling getting the crowd pumped right now

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey remember Mark Halperin's cryptic message earlier? 'White lights lead to red lights which lead to exits'? You know, like on an airplane? That's in trouble?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

mark halperin is my favorite republican

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i hate everybody and even i think obama is awesome! that must say something. i even like his wife! and i hate everyone's wife! she was killer on larry king last night. flirty, cool, and friggin' smart as hell.

once obama hits texas and starts chowing down on some tacos, he'll have the latino voters eating out of his hand. just you wait!

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

did i mention that every town on martha's vineyard went for obama? we are way smart. ONE guy voted for fred thompson. i gotta find that guy.

scott seward, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

that would be a fun little project

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

yes Michelle Obama rules. and dresses sooooo well.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

their whole family is lookin good

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Ohio poll numbers are totally useless this early.

Nathan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

wow is anyone watching this hillary pandering to texas right now - surprised shes not wearing a cowboy hat

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Cilantro is like the George W Bush of herbs.

An abomination! I protest. The trick with cilantro is to use it sparingly. As opposed to Bush, who should not be used at all.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

xxp yes they are. witness VA results:

According to exit polls, Obama won nearly 60 percent of the female vote, a demographic that has carried Clinton to success in past primaries.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

"theres this phrase in tx, youve all heard it before, all hat and no cattle"

?!?!?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah I'm watching jh0. she was like translucently worried at first, before she got going.

Clay, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

she will be clearing brush in no time

brownie, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

HOOS NOT REALLY A TEXAN

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The trick with cilantro is to use it sparingly

I've been taught to avoid it completely. The one time I broke Mom's rule and used it on black beans = swill.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

None of you people have had proper Vietnamese cuisine, I can tell. Philistines.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i like cilantro and I vote

brownie, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I question the taco-enthusiasm of any person who defames cilantro

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

This cilantro kills fascists.

brownie, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i hate cilantro but i love brownie except when the browns are playing the steelers

mookieproof, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I went to a thai restaurant recently and ordered the stir fry. The definitely not-thai cook only put the following things in: chicken, lime, onions, iceberg lettuce, and cilantro. Worst Thai Ever.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

which is everyday in my mind :\

xpost

brownie, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf who of any ethnicity cooks iceberg lettuce?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I like how Hillary constantly rails against No Child Left Behind while conveniently avoiding the fact that she fucking voted for it to begin with

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

(sorry just checkin in while watchin her speech in El Paso)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

How tf is Hillary even allowed to get coverage for her ignore-the-polls-today-hey-look-at-me-instead rally?

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, so I'm away from television. Did she actually use the "all hat, no cattle" line in reference to Obama?

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's Texas "rally" is making me miss Ann Richardson

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

RICHARDS, holla

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

NASA's Ann Richardson:

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/images/content/99467main_9803548_t.jpg

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's in a zone again tonight.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

He kinda lives in a zone.

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

He's been peaking lately, tho. He understands building -- and sustaining -- momentum. But he'll be sorely tested in that regard in a GE.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Did she actually use the "all hat, no cattle" line in reference to Obama?

nah she was talkin about GW

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain: "That man is a dynamic speaker."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Romney was right. Up next to Obama, McCain is pretty much exactly like Bob Dole.

Hatch, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain talks like the real seymour skinner

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/The_Simpsons_4F23.png

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain's speech here is just so unbelievably sorry.

Clay, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, he's road testing an interesting theme against Obama right now: McCain -- unlike Obama -- isn't claiming to be a transformative figure that was sent here to save the nation; I'm a humble man who has been improved by those around me and I want to help the nation in turn.

It's not a bad line. He's just not great delivering it.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

He is a less offensive figure to me tonight.

Maybe he'll be more palatable as he needs to pander to the right less-and-less.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah that's what I mean. He sounds like even he's bored listening to his speech.

Clay, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost.

Clay, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Chris Matthews is making a good point re: McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain is surrounded by listless, elder establishment types, and he seems -- compared to Obama -- very listless and defensive.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

(Still, War Hero; Hawk; Maverick; Press LOVES him. Hard to beat).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought the press "loved" Obama now.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

the press is a drrty tramp, obv

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.politico.com/global/clintonshirt.jpg

Hatch, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:25 (sixteen years ago) link

The "ma" is for "Obama," obviously.

Hatch, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:25 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain is better at schmoozing with the press than he is at speaking to a crowd. He can't deliver a pre-written text worth a damn. Off-the-cuff sometimes he can sound OK.

Aimless, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought the press "loved" Obama now.

They do, Alfred. It's hard to tell, tho, whether the press' current love for Obama is analogous to Matt Drudge's "love" for HRC earlier in the election cycle (i.e., the love of a great story, aided by a seething hatred for HRC, who doesn't like or trust the press). Also, the press doesn't love Obama like it loves McCain. The press loves Obama, but the press loves McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"Ma Clinton"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:28 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain, like Hitchens, is only great when he's got someone to hate.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Hm. Is it me, or was Obama a bit more pointed in tonight's speech against Republicans? I mean, there was that savvy praise of John McCain, but I thought otherwise, Obama laid into the GOP pretty good.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

My dad: "Obama is the best stump speaker since the Kennedys. If you see the old speeches of Robert Kennedy and John Kennedy, they move people. Barrack Obama moves people."

The Reverend, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:40 (sixteen years ago) link

And then there's this:

http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/homepage/hp2-12-08q.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Warner's hair is a thing of beauty.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:46 (sixteen years ago) link

NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT, NED. Just two men showing some healthy affection for each other.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:46 (sixteen years ago) link

There's some nuzzling going on there.

Nicole, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:51 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain talks like the real seymour skinner

-- m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:08 (38 minutes ago)

CNN's Anderson Cooper is TEH REAL Simpsons character in this race! His upper lip can't keep up with all that he's saying, it's quite insane!

Also, has McCain stuffed several previous presidents in his left cheek? Is Nixon hidden in there somewhere, or should he seriously see a doctor?

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, has McCain stuffed several previous presidents in his left cheek? Is Nixon hidden in there somewhere, or should he seriously see a doctor?

He's suffered from malignant melanoma.

Nathan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:56 (sixteen years ago) link

He's suffered from malignant melanoma.

Didn't know that, thanks.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah - he's apparently in pretty good shape otherwise, but I wonder how he's going to hold up to the stress of a general election campaign. He's 71 years old! My grandparents are only a few years older than that, and they're pretty active for their old age - but I wouldn't want them running the country. I just don't think their bodies and minds could withstand the sheer weight of it.

Nathan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

ageist

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't heard much, thus far, about the fringe crazies' reaction to Obama's ascendancy, but I'm sure KKK/skinhead-types are apoplectic now.

Anyone seen anything on this?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:10 (sixteen years ago) link

False "madrassa" story about Barack Obama

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, but that's more like a GOP attempt to "Swift Boat" Obama, no? I'm talking more about base-level, frenzied skinhead-ish craziness.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:18 (sixteen years ago) link

they're writing angry letters to their representatives.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I would attempt a serious response but I'm too busy thinking about PIRANHA 3D: THEY FLY @ U FACE

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:22 (sixteen years ago) link

With crayons, maybe.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:22 (sixteen years ago) link

YES, I WANT TO SEE THAT BIDEO.

(Oh, will Piranha 3D get a wide theatrical release?)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, but that's more like a GOP attempt to "Swift Boat" Obama, no? I'm talking more about base-level, frenzied skinhead-ish craziness.

seems exactly like the latter to me.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:26 (sixteen years ago) link

What Tombot said.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I would like to see a copy of the minutes for the first skinhead meeting after obama is elected president.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Right! That's entertainment.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Skipping 192 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

whoah.

sleeve, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:35 (sixteen years ago) link

1,000 new answers by midnight

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:27 PM

A seer.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

8:32 P.M. discuss plans to assassinate president
8:45 P.M. keep brothers from moving to Canada
8:51 P.M. Coffee with extra cream and powdered sugar donuts ONLY!

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, of all the various bad political cartoons out there recently, this might take the cake -- thanks, Daily Telegraph!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/graphics/2008/02/11/ixd11big.gif

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:48 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, so many levels.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i love how the tornado couldn't give a shit that the woman has downs syndrome.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 04:56 (sixteen years ago) link

camilla paglia is pretty great at salon

remy bean, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:08 (sixteen years ago) link

oh this camille pagila?

On the climate-change front, Denis Dutton, founder of the superb Arts & Letters Daily Web site, has created a new site, Climate Debate Daily, as a forum for both sides in the ferocious controversy over global warming. The site's lucid dual format is exactly what has been needed to shed scholarly light on this heavily politicized battle, which has been very difficult to follow for everyone but fanatical true believers. Climate change, whether man-made or (as I think) natural, will remain a vital issue for decades simply because it is shaping or coercing government policy worldwide.

gff, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:15 (sixteen years ago) link

On another front, while I think McCain will be the favorite in a GE with Obama, I think it's interesting that the early line of attack he's taking is just like the one that HRC is employing, unsuccessfully ("My experience allows me to achieve change, not just talk about it").

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:17 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain v. Obama would be the biggest age-gap in a GE contest ever.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:19 (sixteen years ago) link

not even the 1932 shirley temple/will rogers match?

amateurist, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 05:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Democratic Races
Reporting
1st Place
2nd Place

DC 98%

Obama 75%
Clinton 24%

MD 67%

Obama 60%
Clinton 37%

VA 99%

Obama 64%
Clinton 35%

Jesus, he really DID get 3-1 in DC

Whereas:

Republican Races
Reporting
1st Place
2nd Place

DC 98%

McCain 68%
Huckabee 17%

MD 67%

McCain 55%
Huckabee 30%

VA 99%

McCain 50%
Huckabee 41%

The Huck ain't getting much traction there...

kingfish, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, but that's more like a GOP attempt to "Swift Boat" Obama, no? I'm talking more about base-level, frenzied skinhead-ish craziness.

as if there's a difference any more?!?

Eisbaer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Great headlines of all time - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/mccain

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:31 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, like Bob Dole in a Diet pepsi commercial

kingfish, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:33 (sixteen years ago) link

meanwhile, idiot from RedState whining about why the GOP don't support the RWA follower blogs the same way the democrats do their own supporters:

Erick Erickson, editor of the popular conservative megablog RedState, conceded that progressives currently enjoy an advantage over conservatives online—though he attributed it to an asymmetry in free time, since conservatives "have families because we don't abort our kids, and we have jobs because we believe in capitalism."

kingfish, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Welfare bloggers havin' abortions for fun.

Eppy, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 06:42 (sixteen years ago) link

66
All streams flow to the sea
because it is lower than they are.
Humility gives it its power.

If you want to govern the people,
you must place yourself below them.
If you want to lead the people,
you must learn how to follow them.

The Master is above the people,
and no one feels oppressed.
She goes ahead of the people,
and no one feels manipulated.
The whole world is grateful to her.
Because she competes with no one,
no one can compete with her.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 07:12 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain on Obama: ''That's not hope . . . . . . . . that's a platitude.''

BOOM! PRINT IT ON A T-SHIRT.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 12:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Does a universal health care plan really require 100% buy-in to generate the $$$ necessary to leverage a manageable price?

i think the main line of thinking is that once you allow any kind of opt-out you open the door to more opt-outs in the future and to a ghettoization of govt-funded health care

there is also the fact that young, healthy people will often choose not to get health insurance and if you continue to allow this it drives up premiums for everyone since your pool is composed of more old and sick people

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 13:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Erick Erickson, editor of the popular conservative megablog RedState, conceded that progressives currently enjoy an advantage over conservatives online—though he attributed it to an asymmetry in free time, since conservatives "have families because we don't abort our kids, and we have jobs because we believe in capitalism."

No - the time we spend not raising kids and not working so we can blog is more than equalled by the time conservatives save driving their giant SUVs, instead of utilizing mass transit. and ignoring the homeless or otherwise underprivileged. Right? Right?

B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:20 (sixteen years ago) link

that's not hope...
http://soer.justice.tas.gov.au/2003/image/559/ilw/p-platypus_m.jpg

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus, these people are very far down the rabbit hole

i know obama has an answer about young healthy people but i can't remember what it is now

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

a sex worker looks at who's really the pimp around here: bill clinton, the big pimp lobster of hope

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/tracy_quan/2008/02/whos_pimping_who.html

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain talkslooks like the real seymour skinnersawyer

-- m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 03:08 (38 minutes ago)

FIXED

jaymc, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021208DailyUpdateGraph2.gif

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Love these Gallup polls you've been posting. They're so aesthetically pleasing.

jaymc, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

They really are!

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago) link

the little edwards line is so sad

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

so is anyone else kinda psyched to see what sort of low-down desperate shit the clinton camp is gonna come up w/to try and save their asses?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm interested. But again, she isn't out of it. And I think that if Obama tries to make his own 'inevitability' case in a hamfisted way, it could cost him sometime soon.

The voters don't seem to like these self-annointments.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm interested to see how they'll spin it when questioned about obama's victory among their conventionally 'strong' demographics in VA

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i kind of think that they'll just do their best and bow out with class, i don't think they want to tarnish their legacy more. they might put up a fight about the florida delegates, but it might not matter by then anyway

akm, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20080213/i/r1797012930.jpg

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i really don't understand how the clinton camp expects to secure voter support in a general election across all the states obama has won if they continue to belittle the contests they lose and and explain them away with exit poll data. and total ad buy sums. and the unfairness of the caucus system. etc. ad nauseam.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

lol bow out w/class? these are cliiiiiintons remember.

she isn't out of it.

as far as the math goes she'll have to have blowout wins in ohio and texas to retake the delegate lead. maybe shes not out of it but she is in a very tight spot. everythings pointing toward obama wins in wisconsin and hawaii and then two weeks of nothing but the media speculating on how many of her super delegates will defect. yikes!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

btw remember, by clintonian logic --> if you're working class, then you're likely to be a clinton supporter. unless you're black and working class, in which case, you're just black.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts to the obama camp making the inevitability argument now. i agree i was a bit thrown off when i read that, thinking, is this really what they want to be saying right now?

i'm not sure it's the best thing to be saying at this moment, but who knows? obama has a big winning streak going on that definitely demands a lot more attention than some on the more cautious side of things might want to give. the obama camp clearly wants to step up the pressure that he's a winning candidate.

otoh, i'm still anxious about a hillary comeback. right now things slightly resemble the situation after iowa - a lot of the press saying "hillary's done, let's get this shit over with, etc." but then she came back.

i think the ohio/texas gamble is seriously risky, but i wouldn't be surprised if she pulls off a narrow win in both states. she'll obviously then make a big, blown-up case about it that might be a little difficult to contend with. it'll at least prolong the fight for a while.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i really don't understand how the clinton camp expects to secure voter support in a general election across all the states obama has won if they continue to belittle the contests they lose and and explain them away with exit poll data.

seriously.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

But I worry that it'll also allow the journalistic hacks who follow HRC the right amount of time for their Hills-is-back stories to influence outcomes.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/hillary-clearing-brush.jpg

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

he attributed it to an asymmetry in free time, since conservatives "have families because we don't abort our kids, and we have jobs because we believe in capitalism."

lol XD

sleep, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

oooh nice:

Puerto Rico Governor to Endorse Obama

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

(i doubt puerto rico will come into play, but this can't hurt in trying to appeal to some latino voters)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

otoh, i'm still anxious about a hillary comeback. right now things slightly resemble the situation after iowa - a lot of the press saying "hillary's done, let's get this shit over with, etc." but then she came back.

a couple differences between then and now: obama has built up a much more impressive resume than winning just the one barely populated state and polling well in the other barely populated state - and clinton needs to do more than eek out a win in the second barely populated state, she needs to win big in two big states. then it was all abt the mo - now its abt the mo and the math.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

although that comeback in nh has prevented the press from calling this thing. if they hadnt been burned the first time everyone would be writing her obituary right now.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't she 17 points ahead in Ohio or something?

Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

yah shes been way up everywhere 3 week out - then obama comes to town.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i32.tinypic.com/efwq9.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

then it was all abt the mo - now its abt the mo and the math.

yea this is true.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

the mo and the math.

Sounds like the new Clipse album.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not gonna tell Penn Jillette's joke.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't she 17 points ahead in Ohio or something?

take a look at this: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/About_that_Ohio_poll.html

not that it means clinton doesn't have an edge (right now i'm sure she's still ahead), but it might suggest that the edge isn't quite as large as 17 points.

apparently some of the data in the ohio poll relies on figures that haven't really matched up to what's been happening so far in other states (esp. re: independent turnout, black support for obama, etc.)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzGbj_ERlJ0

official clinton ad up in wisconsin, pushing the "if-he's-so-great-why-won't-he-debate-hillary" argument

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

the ad shows the things to come. i think we'll see the clinton camp getting a lot more negative over the next few weeks

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Uh, from "Republicans for Obama":

OBAMA SAID OBAMICANS!!
Tue, 02/12/2008 - 11:56pm — SandiLincoln

Tonight, Feb 12, during his speech in Madison, Wisconsin, Obama used the word Obamicans! YOU GUYS, we are an actual demographic and we need to be so proud of ourselves and our candidate, Senator Barack Obama, because we epidomize change. Changing party's, changing our mind set, and changing our world. YOU GUYS ROCK!

OBAMA 08~We are the ones we were waiting for!

Jordan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

epidomize.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

sounds like a bizarre sexual practice

Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

gawd, I thought I saw Meredith Hunter in that drudge photo for a second.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMICANS EPIDOMIZE!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

bill clinton, the big pimp lobster of hope

loooooool

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMICANS EPIDOMIZE!

-- jhøshea, Wednesday, February 13, 2008 4:25 PM

sounds like something you'd command a giant robot to do

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

if-he's-so-great-why-has-he-only-debated-hillary-like-18-times?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry I Epidomized Your Son

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

yah thats pretty much waht i was thinking hoos

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Honey, I Epidomized the Kids

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

gawd, I thought I saw Meredith Hunter in that drudge photo for a second.

Why are we fighting?! Why are we fighting?! Come on!

Formerly Painful Dentistry, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7CORHtxSZI/AAAAAAAAGZU/v0IAHZIybFI/s1600-h/IMG_8773.jpg

same girl, same jacket, in a less sucessful combo imho

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

worng thread homie

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

haha oops

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

favorite drudge headline of the morning:

MSNBC's Matthews: Obama Speech Caused 'Thrill Going Up My Leg'... 

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's new campaign song: "Panama"

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

team clinton adjusts its threatened 'no-debates' stance re: NBC, agrees (again) to the ohio debate:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/breaking_hillary_campaign_agre.php

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously?! xpost

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

No, goodness. Just a little joke about Chris Matthew watching Obama speak... ease the seat back... AIN'T NO STOPPIN' NOOOOOOWWWWW

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

God, I so wish!

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

MoDowd:


It’s not yet clear which prejudice will infect the presidential contest more — misogyny or racism.

(...)

As a possible first Madame President, Hillary is a flawed science experiment because you can’t take Bill out of the equation. Her story is wrapped up in her marriage, and her marriage is wrapped up in a series of unappetizing compromises, arrangements and dependencies.

Instead of carving out a separate identity for herself, she has become more entwined with Bill. She is running bolstered by his record and his muscle. She touts her experience as first lady, even though her judgment during those years on issue after issue was poor. She says she’s learned from her mistakes, but that’s not a compelling pitch.

(...)

If Hillary fails, it will be her failure, not ours.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

CMON, PENN JILLETTE JOKE

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, Erica Jong sees a vast patriarchal conspiracy:

Unfortunately the Hillary-Haters are in charge. They monopolize the networks, the newspapers, the talk shows -- both radio and TV. They are crossing their legs for fear of castration. They are wearing the body armor our troops never got. Or got too late to matter. They are determined that a woman will not prove herself competent as Commander in Chief.

What's their ammunition? Oh, it's simple. They call her Mrs. Clinton, not Ms. or Senator. They pull out those nutcrackers in the shape of her supposed thighs. They complain about her ankles -- too thick. They complain on Fox TV that "White women are the problem" -- (idiot boy Kristol, the brain-damaged scion of Irving who rose through nepotism like our unelected "president"). Then they say she has "baggage" -- which could mean wrinkles, or her husband, or her daughter Chelsea whom they say she is "pimping." Then they say she never divorced Bill -- as if it's anyone's business. Then they moon over Obama's rhetorical style. Then they make it appear that she's a drone or a worker bee and has no royal jelly. Or else she has royal jelly and is queen bee. And that's her problem.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

all the Times columnists have been pretty shitty lately imo ... Rich, Dowd, Krug

entire letters column today was given over to the reaction to Krugman's "Hate Springs Eternal" (obama is a cult leader, they're destroying the dem party w/ their anti-Hils venom, omg his health plan blah blah). dude is kind of being a huge baby. they only printed one letter that agreed with him.

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

xp, OK, I was curious, Morbs:

http://crackle.com/c/Penn_Says/Penn_Says_Hillary_Clinton_Joke_Predicts_the_Future/2180807#ml=fc%3d52%26fp%3d1%26fx%3d

jaymc, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

for those who dont want to sick though penn blathering:

hillary is complaining that unfair all these primaries being held during black history month when theres no white bitch history month.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i should get a pulitzer for that post

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

no, ppl should just post the fun parts of Dowd columns

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

"fun"

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

dood wtf Erica - we should call her Ms. Clinton!? People call her Senator Clinton all the time!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

okay what is this Jillette joke (he's a jerk and I don't have sound at work so someone gimme the gist)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh nevermind

x-post!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, and his schpiel is that when he did that joke in his act, he was worried that people would boo and get offended and whatnot, but they went nuts laughing and applauding and gleefully venting their hate, and he was shocked. And he learned from this that she doesn't stand a chance.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

august is white bitch history month

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Ex-President Clinton's '92 national campaign manager is reportedly lined up to endorse Obama.

Michael White, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/11495/thumbs/r-OBAMATARGET-large.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

THERE IS NO ESCAPE

Simon H., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

On a conference call with reporters just now, Hillary pollster Mark Penn unveiled the campaign's new message: Hillary, he said, is in the "21st Century solutions business," while Obama is in the "problems business."

haha omg what a steaming load of shit

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

someone get her a Century 21 realtor jacket pronto

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

this changing their message every week strategy doesnt seem to be working out too great

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

so fucked

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

the epidomization of 21st century solutionizing

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain taking some shots at Obama in his victory speech last night, perhaps a foreshadowing of his argument in the general:

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/campaign-2008/2008/02/13/after-victories-mccain-turns-to-attacking-obama.html

"Hope," said the former Vietnam prisoner of war, referring to the overarching theme of Obama's campaign, "is a powerful thing. I can attest to that better than many, for I have seen men's hopes tested in hard and cruel ways that few will ever experience."

But, he added, "To encourage a country with only rhetoric rather than sound and proven ideas that trust in the strength and courage of free people is not a promise of hope, it is a platitude."

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf is the "problems business"

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Even if Obama wins the nom, this isn't the last time we'll hear a version of that message. Obama says, "This won't be easy. Change is hard. We will need everyone's help. We're all in this together, we've all gotta pull some weight." It's uplifting and inspiring, all this JFK stuff, ask not etc. But any smart opponent of his is going to try to spin it so that Obama's saying, "He's trying to tell you that our glorious, unprecedented post-war period of wealth and dominance is OVER! AND WE HAVE TO BEHAVE LIKE EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD AND MAKE COMPROMISES AND WORK HARD! WHAT A BUMMER!" And then arrive at speeches on a gravy train with biscuit wheels.

Too little too late for Hillary, tho.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

bad wording there, they'll spin Obama's (I believe) truths into ugly pessimism.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Which is one of the big things I like about the guy -- his seeming lack of baby-boomer entitlement.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

eh mccain will just sit there babbling abt awz wars while getting his ass handed to him more like it

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's message = pessimism? can't see that one sticking.

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

kenan's meandering confused post off tm

deej, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

obamas message: "WELL WE ALL DIE SOMEDAY, RIGHT?"

max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"YEAH, SO, THE ECONOMY IS GOING TO SUCK, BUT WE DESERVE IT. VOTE FOR ME, OR DONT, WHATEVER. DOESNT REALLY MATTER."

max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I will be doing volunteer work for the ugly pessimism candidate

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Campaign strategy, morbs? ;)

Michael White, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Some more excerpts from McCain's victory speech that could be construed as digs at Obama:

When I was a young man, I thought glory was the highest ambition, and that all glory was self-glory. My parents tried to teach me otherwise, as did the Naval Academy. But I didn’t understand the lesson until later in life, when I confronted challenges I never expected to face.

In that confrontation I discovered that I was dependent on others to a greater extent than I had ever realized, but that neither they nor the cause we served made any claims on my identity. On the contrary, I discovered that nothing is more liberating in life than to fight for a cause that encompasses you, but is not defined by your existence alone. And that has made all the difference, my friends, all the difference in the world.

I do not seek the presidency on the presumption that I am blessed with such personal greatness that history has anointed me to save my country in its hour of need. I seek the presidency with the humility of a man who cannot forget that my country saved me.

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

i encourage john mccain to keep talking abt when he was a young man

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

as a criticism it just doesn't seem to have much bite

gonna be pretty hard, I think, for McCain to answer the charge that he wants 4 more years of Bush policy

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't mean a direct intentional pessimism, obviously, but if Obama says something that suggests that America needs to start treating India and China as serious economic powers, and talking to them at eye level instead of our usual podium, well... it's not to hard to twist that a bit to play on a great many people's fears about a tanking economy and America's loss of status and power, and omg wtf we can't make even compromises with China because that means we live in a big stinking loser country and pappy didn't die in WWII so we could etc etc etc. And don't think that's not about to come to a boil in a lot of people's heads anyway.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain is screwed

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

"Hillary is in the 21st century solutions business. She knows that we all need grow our electoral synergies and co-innovate outside the box."

sorry, i just can't get over the bullshit

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah she looks desperate, no doubt, and voters can smell fear.

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

David Brooks gave kind of an interesting assessment of the prospects for Republicans on NPR's election coverage last night. In the event of a McCain-Obama contest, he suggested that the GOP strategy would be to peel off white, working-class voters. Whereas, in a McCain-Clinton contest, the battleground would be independents.

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

the GOP strategy would be to peel off white, working-class voters

a.k.a. tax cuts tax cuts tax cuts

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

can you entice working-class voters by promising tax-cuts that don't benefit the working class? lol

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe someone's mentioned this already; if so, I apologize. I think HRC has more problems in Texas than she thinks. If I vaguely understand it right, delegates aren't apportioned in Texas simply based on the popular vote. The state is divided into 32 districts. Each district has one delegate who goes to the winner of that district. The rest of the delegates that come from a district are based on how many people voted from that district in the previous two election cycles (or something like that). In 2004, historically black districts in Texas experienced huge increases in voter turnout (apparently, a popular African-American was on the ballot for prominent state office in 2004, thus encouraging high-voter turnout in largely African-American districts).

So even if HRC wins high percentages of the Hispanic vote in Texas (which, at this point, isn't so certain anyway), those districts will likely yield far fewer delegates than traditionally African-American districts, where Obama is a very strong candidate.

So again, there may be serious trouble ahead for HRC in a state she needs to win by a substantial margin.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't say that very well, but I hope the point is clear.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, is the obvious counter to that although not guaranteed to work

xposts

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

can you entice working-class voters by promising tax-cuts that don't benefit the working class? lol

Hey- it worked for Reagan. He averaged 61% among white, working-class voters in '80 and '84.

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

hint: never ever listen to anything david brooks says. cause why? always wrong.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush also carried white, working-class voters in 2000 and 2004:

http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/donkeyrising/2004/12/bushs_reagan_lite_coalition.html

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah except the reagan figure in this race is obama

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

.....Bush failed to capture any of the northeastern or Pacific Coast states that Reagan had won easily in 1980 and '84, and he failed to make dramatic gains nationally among the voting groups that had moved into the Democratic Party in the 1990s. Rather, the key to Bush's victory was reviving Reagan's support among the white working class. According to the post-election survey by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Democracy Corps/Institute for America's Future, Bush enjoyed a whopping 24-percent edge among non-college-educated whites, compared with a 19-percent advantage in 2000. (Clinton had actually carried this group by a point in each of his election victories.) Insofar as whites still make up 77 percent of the electorate and non-college-educated whites represent a majority of the white vote, that increase alone accounts for most -- perhaps 70 percent -- of Bush's improved performance in 2004.

...

....Barring [successful Republican exploitation of a new terrorist attack], the Republicans' "Reagan-lite" coalition does not appear to have broad enough support to dominate American politics for the rest of the decade. That should open the door to the Democrats and their new coalition -- especially if they can find a way to both mobilize their new center-left and nominate candidates with some comfort level among white working-class voters. The results of the 2004 election suggest that's the right formula. If Democrats want to win and bring their majority into being by the end of the decade, they should adopt it.

-from that Ruy Teixeira article linked above

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

what will mccain do (WWMD!) on healthcare? will he just be calling any Dem plan commie socialized medicine or have some alternative "reform" proposal or what

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

gallup tracker for today has Obama ahead for the first time so far, 45% to 44%:

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021308DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

If nothing else, it makes me a bit skeptical when all of these conservative paragons are so united in their refrain that Obama would be the more fearsome Democratic candidate to face in the general. It starts to have a bit of that "Please don't throw me in that briar patch" ring to it. Head-to-head polls are pretty meaningless. You need to look at the swing states and the key voter demographics. By that measure, it should give us pause that Obama seems to be weakest in the demographic that was key to Bush's victories in '00 and '04. I take some consolation in the fact that some big swing state primaries are yet to come (esp. Ohio). If that state ends up deciding the nomination, I think that would be probably a good thing for the Democrat's general election hopes.

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Oversimplified to be sure (and long, be forewarned), but this is an interesting discussion of broad political narratives and Sen. Obama, by former Sec. Labor Robert Reich.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't make that out, can you find a version that's a little bigger...?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

THAT MAILER HAS BLINDED ME.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Opposed NAFTA! Really, I haven't heard anything from Obama that I disagree with. Usually I have to ignore a few compromises when I vote for someone.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh, sorry, i didn't know the images were so big :(

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL OBAMA IS HUEG

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Really, I haven't heard anything from Obama that I disagree with.

So, the CULT OF OBAMA has fooled you, too. Break free:

That's not hope. . . . . . . That's a platitude

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Usually when I join a cult, I notice little things like the Kool-Aid tasting funny. Not with this one.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

But this is special, "self-glory," "empty rhetoric" Kool-Aid.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

(Damn, too many commas).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

FLAVOR aid.

NOT Kool aid.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey, is there an election happening this year?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

FLAVOR aid.

NOT Kool aid.

-- Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:14 PM (Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:14 PM) Bookmark Link

Yeah, yeah,yeah, and Meredith Hunter wasn't really stabbed during "Under My THumb", not "Sympathy for the Devil".

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Is now the right time for me to make my "Okay now yr getting REALLY racial" joke?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

By that measure, it should give us pause that Obama seems to be weakest in the demographic that was key to Bush's victories in '00 and '04.

o. nate

Yeah. Then again, we can take consolation from the fact that McCain is similarly weak among at least one of Bush's key demographics.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Is now the right time for me to make my "Okay now yr getting REALLY racial" joke?

-- HI DERE, Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:18 PM (Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:18 PM) Bookmark Link

Yes. Hopefully it'll be funnier than the Penn Jillette joke.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Though I have to say that cancer is funnier than the Penn Jillette joke.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

who wants to start a thread for all the NON-prez elections this year?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

It isn't. It was an "oh, all black people drink Kool-Aid??????? thatsracist.gif" lowball.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Rasmussen also has Obama ahead for the first time nationally.

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

I think, in hindsight, today will be considered the tipping point in the dem primary race

(omg do you think obama has read gladwell? lol j/k)

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Then again, we can take consolation from the fact that McCain is similarly weak among at least one of Bush's key demographics

Sorry if I'm being dense, but what demographic is that?

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

evangelicals? republicans?

dmr, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

The former is what I meant.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

people w/ the last name "bush?"

xp

Will M., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

evangelicals?

Interesting point - but I've seen little evidence that Obama, with his social positions which are considerably more liberal than McCain's, would be able to attract many of them.

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

the goal is to get them to stay home

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

not liking David Brooks doesn't mean he's wrong. Ruy Teixeira's saying comforting things doesn't mean he's right.

the fact that Hillary beats Obama among white working class voters in Dem primaries does not necessarily mean that she is ultimately the better candidate to win their votes, and not just because of their trade voting records. such voters are, for instance, less mediated than those carefree, wine-drinking elites who love Barack. they've known and liked Hillary for years and years. that they have to meet the new guy doesn't mean that they're going to vote GOP.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

black voters might be more inclined to vote barack, of course, and it took some distancing by bill to push them over, but they've obviously gone huge for obama once they realized they didn't have to be on the clintons' side.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

It isn't. It was an "oh, all black people drink Kool-Aid??????? thatsracist.gif" lowball.

Only the blacks in Guyana.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Guyana, Mississippi!

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

"This is not Bill Clinton's backyard or his plantation."

http://newbrooklynnetwork.typepad.com/brooklyn_ron/2008/02/bill-perkins-sa.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

via Ben Smith:

"First Latina President"

Ken Vogel spots those words in a sign on stage at Clinton's event in Robstown, Texas.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

"first interracial co-presidency" am i right?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

"Hillary is our friend"

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

the goal is to get them to stay home

ostensibly by likening McCain's stated positions to Obama's (both against Gay Marriage amendment, pro-choice, pro-stem cell, etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

the goal is to get them to stay home

-- Shakey

No joke. 1000% OTM. Hopefully, that'll be McCain's great gift to this election.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain is pro-life.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

pro-choice

Um, McCain's pro-life.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/19/mccain-abortion/

xpost

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, but also pro stem-cell, which to an evangelical is not pro-life at all. (You know, because they're all fucking idiots.)

kenan, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Robstown, Texas.

wauuu what a campaign stop

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

In 1999, the “moderate” version of John McCain said that overturning Roe v. Wade would be dangerous for women and he would not support it, even in “the long term.”

flip-flop, etc

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

here comes the substance

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/02/obama-takes-it.html
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/002855.php

infrastructure is way up there on my list of what gubmint should do in a positive sense

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think that obama is trying to get them to stay home, i bet hes trying to get a decent part of the evangelical vote (as much as a pro choice dem can - which i bet is more than most "fuck red states dude!!! did u know they have lower IQs???" liberals would figure)

deej, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, but also pro stem-cell, which to an evangelical is not pro-life at all. (You know, because they're all fucking idiots.)

there's some expectation that he's gonna say we can develop stem cells in the lab now, so forget about the fetuses

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Misperceptions About McCain's Abortion Stance

o. nate, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think that obama is trying to get them to stay home, i bet hes trying to get a decent part of the evangelical vote

True enough. But overall, the more Evangelicals sit this one out, the better off Democrats are.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

The funny thing is that, from what I understand, Obama has as -- if not more -- detailed a set of policy papers as any other remaining candidate.
I mean, what "substance" have you heard in John McCain's speeches, other than "We must be vigilent against terrorists and support our military and cut taxes" and lots of other fairly empty platitudes.

I think the "Obama lacks substance" criticism is really just a shallow way of trying to both acknowledge and mitigate Obama's great strength as a stump speaker. See, e.g., the last Democratic debate. Obama's plenty substantive.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

its more like the right covering their ass cuz they haven't bothered to dig up any dirt on him - they exhausted the majority of the primary cycle gearing up against Hillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I followed a Drudge Report link to a Washington Times article about potential veep candidates. The article was missing, but these google ads appeared:
2008: God's Final Witness
Unprecedented destruction will come in 2008, leading to America's fall.
www.the-end.com
See Mormon Personal Ads
View personal ads of Mormon singles in your area. Join for free today!
www.LDSplanet.com

Eazy, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't you know who I am?!

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1712834,00.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

want to reiterate i really like this thread and i dont get why some folks are all "i vowed not to read it." even when the argument is stupid it brings together some good insights and serves pretty well as a one stop shop for election updates/perspectives both internal and outside. Also, liveblogging the debates was a riot

deej, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's got the papers, if anyone wants to see them. But while campaigning he doesn't need to be specific; every winner since FDR doesn't do much more than articulate principles instead of policy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

his campaign needs to kill this 'soaring rhetoric no substance' before it becomes Truth.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Looks like he did that this afternoon, if you follow the link to the GM speech.

Eazy, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

oh i know he's showing substance, but if the charge is repeated ad nauseam it's still gonna stick.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

deej i hope you're not including me in that. I very much enjoy this thread, despite myself.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

he just needs to preface his policy talk more like he did there: "i'm gonna dig into it here folks sorry no applause lines".

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a bit off topic, and i don't know what thread would be more relevant, but i got to axe bill clinton a question on a conference call today about free trade, so yay for college shit.

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

if the call were about the election i'd be all, dear mr pimp lobster of hope blah blah calm down on obama plz, but it the call was regarding his clinton global initiatives get-up.

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i would have asked him to agree to a debate with Michelle.

gr8080, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

she was awes on Larry King.

gr8080, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:44 (sixteen years ago) link

you do realize by not calling him dear mr pimp lobster of hope youve blown the chance to be a hero to us all - i mean if you got that on tape i dont know what id do

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

b clinton: why did you call me that
m bison: um internet joek
ilx: lololololololololol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

the temptation was there

m bison, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

BRAEKIN LOCAL NEWS: apparently the archbishop in town is upset that known abortion-looker-awayer hrc is speaking at a catholic university (st marys) today, oh noes all around.

http://catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=11774

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Keith Olberman:

"There are children who were unborn at the time of the first Democrat debate who are now walking."

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

how does a sentence manage to use the word 'unborn' and democrat as an adjective and not be george bush

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

so i went to the obama ri volunteer coordination meeting tonight, and i don't know if it's just because the organizers did a decent job of convincing me of the fact, but i think RI is entirely winnable due to the small manageable size of the state -- and due to how aggressively mobilized volunteers can reach the state. obama's good on the ground, and it's reasonable to suggest that ri will go for obama much like connecticut did.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:05 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9674

El Tomboto, Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't fully digest john cole's previous post on this from yesterday, but I can definitely buy this

El Tomboto, Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

That way, when they are blown out of the water in 2008, they don’t have to do any reflection, they don’t have to assess, re-prioritize, or re-think their policies. They can simply pin it all on McCain, claim he lost because he didn’t offer the voters a “real” conservative alternative, and get back to championing the end of the “death tax” and other important issues without skipping a beat.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

yah mccain is in third behind obama and hillary right now

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah that def seems like the plan

J0rdan S., Thursday, 14 February 2008 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link

So my friend who lives in Wash. Heights says a big story in the spanish-language papers right now is that Hillary's original campaign manager was Latina, and that was a big part of why she was getting such a big portion of the latino vote. But they are pissed that one of their own got fired. Has anyone seen any tracking polls specifically tracking hispanic voters since the firing happened?

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I already linked to this but I think that this was probably a considerably larger factor in the large latino and asian vote for hillary
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-chang/why-latinos-and-asian-ame_b_85359.html

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

That seems to be way more about the asians than the hispanics.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

how so? its entitled "Why Latinos and Asian Americans Went for Hillary" and his major evidence is "In Los Angeles, that meant securing Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's support, and the predominantly Latino unions that have supported him. She also landed the support of Fabian Nunez and Dolores Huerta."

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont see a spot in the entire essay where he focuses more on asians than latino voters

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:36 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost He has a whole lot of specific points about the asian vote ("the influential Chinese American Democratic Club" "Obama is from Hawai'i, has Asian family members, and is beloved there" "the Democrat from Punjab" "whether he'd promote affirmative action for Asian Americans") but for latinos all he has is the endorsement point, which I could've got from CNN. As for the emergent/insurgent thing, I have no idea if he's getting that from someone else, but it doesn't make sense--what about the voters that are neither? Is he getting this distinction from someone else or is he just using buzzwords to say that immigrant populations tend to follow the more mainstream candidate when they themselves are trying to attain mainstream status? And if that's all he's saying, won't they swing over to Obama if he's perceived as the mainstream candidate?

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:49 (sixteen years ago) link

no, you're not reading the article dude! the key to the whole article is that its about how HRC offers community leaders access to the halls of power, which barack cannot do; in return, those community leaders deliver the votes of their communities to HRC. He explains what emergent and insurgent means, and he doesnt imply that this covers all voters - he's just speaking about communities of immigrants (aka communities that do not have access to legislative power already)

whats so hard to understand?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:53 (sixteen years ago) link

So he's just saying that she got the latino and asian vote because she got the endorsement of community leaders? Well sure, but duh. I'll definitely agree that Obama's handling of those communities was a weak spot. I do disagree that he couldn't have gotten their endorsement, and again, if it's looking like Obama's going to be the nominee then I think community leaders might have more of an interest in backing him, at least by Chang's logic, no?

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

...yes but she got those endorsements early. the point of the story is that this is the ultimate reason why so many latino and asian voters went for hillary.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Does she have endorsements in OH/TX/PA yet?

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I want to feel good about the upcoming election, and I'm personally elated that Obama is winning, but does anyone really believe this will be a blow out?

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:12 (sixteen years ago) link

You mean in the GE, Fluffy? I think McCain will win it, narrowly.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

if obama gets through mccain is gonna go into full bully mode, mittzings 2.0 except they won't be as funny. mccain will be at his loosest and most formidable against someone he sees as an upstart, which is the view that's getting drilled into his head right now.

tremendoid, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

My cynicism has got to stop at believing that McCain would beat Obama, because Obama has a real chance and a gift at inspiring people -- at least long enough to vote for him. But I'm sure we're still agreed that McCain would show Hillary the meaning of pain.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant see mccain winning the GE, even if hillary somehow pulls it off

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:33 (sixteen years ago) link

We keep coming back to this. Understandably, I guess. Half of us think Hillary has enough support to win for whatever reason, and the other half of us keep saying, "You don't understand how many people sincerely hate this woman."

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:35 (sixteen years ago) link

no, i do understand that, i think most people here do. i think what they dont understand is 1. mccain old lol 2. mccain crotchety (nervous.jpg) 3. this guy wants ... MORE wars??

seriously the republican party is in shitty shape for a reason and mccain is awkward, gruff and OLD. he 'sold out' in the eyes of most of the independents who once thought he was a maverick. dems are voting in record numbers (or record numbers are voting dem)

seriously no matter how the dem primary plays out i think mccain is the long shot here

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't want to do any fundie-nutjob blogger's job for them, but why haven't we seen "insurgent candidate" deployed with a disparaging 'terrorist' connotation in regards to senator iraq hussein osama?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:42 (sixteen years ago) link

uh, we have, haven't we?

akm, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think McCain is a long shot. I think this election will be close. I feel cautiously optimistic about Obama. If I had to bet, right now I'd probably bet on Obama.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:54 (sixteen years ago) link

To restate things from the last thread, I might seriously sit out the election if it's McCain/Clinton. I couldn't sleep either way, I don't think.

McCain with his war, which I think he would handle better than Bush, but that might also be like saying that the Bismark sank and the Exxon Valdez didn't. And his pro-life stance -- I said before that he wouldn't be concerned with acting on it, and he has in fact SAID exactly that, but that was a few years back, and winning that bile-filled conservative base is looking pretty important to him. To throw a juicy bone to that base, he might in fact aggressively pursue to overturn Roe v. Wade. In lieu of a thank you card. Or if not abortion, some other frightening issue that he's always been a "maverick" about, but is kinda willing to give up now that he has to get more staunch conservative love.

The best argument against Hillary was by someone else, and I'm sorry that I forgot who. Elmo? Basically that she might actually prove to be a more divisive president than W, if that is even possible. Reaching across the isle would be finished. The so-called "culture war" would feel a pretty real "surge." And the government would be just as ugly, nasty, untrustworthy, and depressing as the last eight years. Shit, McCain can as least find the aisle.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

From MSNBC the night of the Florida primary:

Pat Buchanan: "What's McCain said he's for? 'The jobs aren't coming back. The illegals aren't going away. And we're going to have more wars.'"

Joe Scarborough: "John McCain's stated platform: 'Fewer jobs. More war."

A calculus-changing military/terrorism incident or an unexpected gaffe/implosion from the Dem nominee is the only way McCain has a legit shot at either Obama or Clinton.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago) link

You mean people are going to vote for a Democrat because they don't like illegal immigrants?

31g, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:10 (sixteen years ago) link

prob not, but they may stay home.

will, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary has actually worked fairly well with republicans in congress. too well, many dems would say.

mookieproof, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

...a little too quiet.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Joe Scarborough: "John McCain's stated platform: 'Fewer jobs. More war."

It's true, conservatives want to win this war, because RAH RAH, but they don't want any more of them. A lot of that base is wanting "real" conservatism back, and by "real" they mean isolationism. You have to go pretty far back to get to a time when conservatives really devoutly wanted that, before Bush (because, terrorists!), before the Cold War (because, Communists!), maybe all the way back to, say, NEVER.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:16 (sixteen years ago) link

WWII though...

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:17 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary has actually worked fairly well with republicans in congress. too well, many dems would say.

oh bull, Hillary works well with corporations who have shit-tons of money. Learned the trade from Bill, dontcha know.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

WWII though...

Heh. Yes. Everyone now understands that getting involved in that war was totally foolish.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

You mean people are going to vote for a Democrat because they don't like illegal immigrants?

No -- economy and war -- I just used the full quote, which was pretty lol when Buchanan delivered it.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

a history prof pal put it like this:

prolonged obama vs. hillary fight allows gop to concentrate on congress in 2008
+
even if hillary wins, she'll stir up the base of army ants
=
2010 gop gush in congress
+
2012 gop candidate true succesor... "savior".

strange equations but...

the funny thing about obama is that i think the gop hasn't figured out how to wreck on him yet.

gopper g. guppy: oh shit, he's black, what are we going to say?
trent lott: oh i know!
gopper g. guppy: shut up trent.

it's weird cause the other night on conservative talk radio i hear phil valentine, a conservative's conservitive, say, "obama is a nice guy. he really is. i don't agree with his politics, but i can't help but like him." it's one of those rare moments where i find myself mildly shocked. (or is it a trick? "oh see, i thought obama was nice, but look at this shitwtfombg?!?"

msp, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

OK. The non-cheap part of my post is that if conservatives hate McCain for being too far left (which is mostly what it's about, apart from the war), that's not necessarily going to benefit the Dems. Maybe people will stay home, I don't know.

xpost

31g, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

NOBODY wants fewer jobs and more war. It's what they said -- and the truth of it -- not who said it.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

It's what they said -- and the truth of it -- not who said it.

On the surface, and of course most people vote on the surface, so yeah. But man, the baggage that comes with "we want jobs and not war" when it comes from those two guys. "We want jobs, but we want the same old jobs we're used to, even if it means that American businesses can't be competitive in a world market in the long-term. And we want no war because it feels too much like a slippery slope down to treaties, agreements, concessions, trade agreements, GOD KNOWS WHAT HORRORS! We have found that the insides of our own asses are much warmer than hats."

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:43 (sixteen years ago) link

*cue flashy Fox News graphic of a bar graph of the median temperatures of each, with one long fat red bar labeled "Your own ass" and one sad short blue bar labeled "A hat"*

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:47 (sixteen years ago) link

The actual quotes from Buchanan and Scarborough were lotsa laffs in a schadenfreude kinda way.

The basic, obvious point is that the two biggest issues are likely to be the economy and Iraq and this is a candidate on the record as saying he doesn't know much about the economy and he wants to stay in Iraq 100 years and that there will be more wars.

Not scared of the scary old man. He's not winning the general.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 14 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

here we go

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/02/clinton_counts.html

By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton will take the Democratic nomination even if she does not win the popular vote, but persuades enough superdelegates to vote for her at the convention, her campaign advisers say.

The New York senator, who lost three primaries Tuesday night, now lags slightly behind her rival, Illinois Senator Barack Obama, in the delegate count. She is even further behind in "pledged'' delegates, those assigned by virtue of primaries and caucuses.

But Clinton will not concede the race to Obama if he wins a greater number of pledged delegates by the end of the primary season, and will count on the 796 elected officials and party bigwigs to put her over the top, if necessary, said Clinton's communications director, Howard Wolfson.

"I want to be clear about the fact that neither campaign is in a position to win this nomination without the support of the votes of the superdelegates,'' Wolfson told reporters in a conference call.

"We don't make distinctions between delegates chosen by million of voters in a primary and those chosen between tens of thousands in caucuses,'' Wolfson said. "And we don't make distinctions when it comes to elected officials'' who vote as superdelegates at the convention.

"We are interested in acquiring delegates, period,'' he added.

Clinton advisers rejected the notion that the candidate -- and the party -- would be badly wounded in the general election if the nominee were essentially selected by a group of party insiders.

"This is a nomination system that exists of caucuses, primaries, superdelegates and also the issue of voters in Florida and Michigan,'' states whose delegates currently will not be seated at the convention because they broke party rules by moving up their primaries to January, said Mark Penn, senior strategist for the Clinton campaign. But "whoever the nominee is, the party will come together behind that nominee,'' he said.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 06:49 (sixteen years ago) link

oh it's like that.

tremendoid, Thursday, 14 February 2008 06:53 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.soulstrut.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/snapgraem26wuch9.gif

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"We don't make distinctions between delegates chosen by million of voters in a primary and those chosen between tens of thousands in caucuses,"

You tell it. There is not a PRIMARY America and a CAUCUS America. There is a UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

AMIRITE, VOTERS?

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Enh, i dunno. I get the feeling they gettin' despit'. If Obama continues to blow out these contests, then hopefully all the superdelegates that the clinton camp can either con, cajole, or strong-arm into supporting them won't matter as much.

Gunna be a long year regardless. The Congressional election fun hasn't even begun in earnest yet.

kingfish, Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/040819/125922__election_l.jpg

You see, you can't interfere with destiny. That's why it's destiny.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:50 (sixteen years ago) link

It's weird that they would put this out before Texas & Ohio. Is everyone really that certain by now that she's going to lose the elected delegate count?

Dan I., Thursday, 14 February 2008 07:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Seems to be the buried message, doesn't it?

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 08:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the buried message is that Howard Wolfson is pretty fucking sad at his job. Jesus Christ, man.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 14 February 2008 08:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, that too. Seems a bit much that he's ready to just chuck in the rest of the primary elections just to favor whatever backroom arm-twisting they can pull off.

kingfish, Thursday, 14 February 2008 08:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder if he'll still be at his job in 4 weeks time.

kingfish, Thursday, 14 February 2008 08:09 (sixteen years ago) link

he's probably just saying that to get off the sinking ship faster.

Cosmo Vitelli, Thursday, 14 February 2008 08:11 (sixteen years ago) link

yay layout

StanM, Thursday, 14 February 2008 09:01 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary doesn't win the popular vote, then she's not going to get the superdelegates she needs to swing it her way. Because everyone understands that if there's any perception that she played dirty to get the nomination, it would be a fatal blow to her GE chances.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 14 February 2008 09:40 (sixteen years ago) link

she might actually prove to be a more divisive president than W, if that is even possible. Reaching across the isle would be finished. The so-called "culture war" would feel a pretty real "surge." And the government would be just as ugly, nasty, untrustworthy, and depressing as the last eight years. Shit, McCain can as least find the aisle.

why do you think this kenan? it's not a rare thing to think, i've just never understood why people think it

btw sy hersh came to speak at the university of tennessee recently and my parents went. they said he was shambling, absent-minded, hilarious and said basically anything that came into his mind

the two big points they came away with were these -

1) nobody -- not obama, not hillary -- is telling the truth about how fvucked america is in the middle east, about how it will be impossible to just withdraw anytime soon, regardless of how brilliant the plan is or how well executed, nor about how the recent drop in violence is real but based on strategies that don't work long-term

2) if there is a successful terrorist attack on american soil the republicans are going to win the election

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 11:20 (sixteen years ago) link

nobody -- not obama, not hillary -- is telling the truth about how fvucked america is in the middle east

McCain isn't telling the whole truth, either, but I think he's trying to tell as much as he can without completely politically hamstringing himself. Trouble is, MAN can he ever be bad at this. He is bad at covering his ass and not so careful about talking off the top of his head, and neither does him any service. He also changes his mind sometimes. Oh noes can't do that, it crushes my mind grapes.

This "hundred million years" quote of his (or whatever the number is up to) is the kind of not-awfully-calculated thing to say that opponents on both sides can sink teeth into, both anti-war liberals and -- shit -- anti-war ANYBODY, and also isolationist conservatives. But wait a second ffs, he never said he wants bloody casualties forever and ever. He said specifically that he did not, in fact. He said, "We've been in Japan for 60 years, we've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed. That's fine with me. I hope it will be fine with you if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where Al Qaeda is training, recruiting, equipping, and motivating people every single day." And then he explained it again on a morning talk show. Maybe I need a new barometer or something, but that does not sound like a red-faced teeth-gnashing warmonger to me. It does sound like an inconvenient sound bite.

He's kinda good at those: then there's the thing he said about "more wars," which was (looked it up) "There's going to be other wars. ... I'm sorry to tell you, there's going to be other wars. We will never surrender but there will be other wars." I just don't know how hawkish that sounds, especially not from a dude who was a POW for five years. When he says he's sorry to tell you, I kinda get the impression he's actually sorry to tell you. Throwing in the phrase "we will never surrender" was a little half-hearted attempt to maybe let some of his more bloodthisrty base know that he's not going to be a pussy, either, but the tone of the statement was not aggro warcore. And then you read any coverage that cites that comment, and the blogs and the god-help-us pundits, and suddenly the exact quote reads "I am going to kill people. Oh yes. Mark my words. Mwahahahaha."

I hate to defend a guy who has voted against every reproductive right that has been challenged in his presence, I honestly do. I have problems with the man! BUT HE IS NOT INSANE.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:20 (sixteen years ago) link

"We've been in Japan for 60 years, we've been in South Korea for 50 years or so."

What's kinda off-kilter to me about the reaction to this is that the hardcore isolationists, generally a bit insane in their own right, are the only ones who are reading the comment about "10,000 years" the way he meant it. They don't want us there not even to keep peace, not even a military base, nothing.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:27 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain said going into iraq was a good idea and he'd do it again, sounds pretty insane to me

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:32 (sixteen years ago) link

"I hope it will be fine with you if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where Al Qaeda is training, recruiting, equipping, and motivating people every single day."

this is, how you say, boooshit

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:33 (sixteen years ago) link

He may not be insane, but it's duplicitous to bring up troops in Japan or South Korea. He's effectively saying "we can make Iraq peaceful like Japan" when in fact no one believes U.S. troops could be deployed in Iraq without the expectation of casualties any time soon, like not within a generation at least.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:35 (sixteen years ago) link

kenan you haven't answered my question about why you believe govt under a hillary clinton presidency will be "ugly, nasty, untrustworthy, and depressing".

izzit cause she's "polarizing" and "divisive"?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xxxpost Yeah, i can't quite figure his sudden saddam-was-satan thing that he found, the way bush found jesus, all of a suddenly. I don't think the guy is some kind of super awesome mensch, don't get me wrong, plz. But it does seem like a lot of the big talking points on both sides are based on misinformation that is itself based on willful misinterpretation. I don't want him as president, but some of the shit everyone's pulling up against him is just rong.

it's duplicitous to bring up troops in Japan or South Korea. He's effectively saying "we can make Iraq peaceful like Japan" when in fact no one believes U.S. troops could be deployed in Iraq without the expectation of casualties any time soon, like not within a generation at least.

Yeah. But as bad as what he actually said was taken, that would have been even worse.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:42 (sixteen years ago) link

kenan you haven't answered my question about why you believe govt under a hillary clinton presidency will be "ugly, nasty, untrustworthy, and depressing"

The short version is, I do not believe she shares my views on what the country needs to do next, I do not trust her to stick to even her own views, and as icing on that cake electing her would cause more fistfights outside of bars than the country really needs right now. Ugly. Depressing.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:51 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah but why? why don't you trust her to stick to her own views, why would her becoming presidents lead to fistfights outside of bars (!!), and what specifically about her differences from obama bother you?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I know, I get it, you want the truth! etc, and I'll think about it all the way to work. I realized the first time you asked, though, that that's the kind of question that I should not go off half-cocked on around here.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:04 (sixteen years ago) link

drudge:

RASMUSSEN National Poll at 11 AM: Obama Takes Double Digit Lead: Obama 49% to Clinton 37%; Obama leads among women 46% to 41%... Developing...

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:19 (sixteen years ago) link

why don't you trust her to stick to her own views

is this a serious question??

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:27 (sixteen years ago) link

George Will brings the lolz this morning. He hopes the Dems do the sensible thing and nominate Obama:

With metronomic regularity -- the rhythm may arise from some strangely shared metabolic urge, which may explain the mystery of their marriage -- the Clintons say things that remind voters of the aesthetic reason for recoiling from them. Aesthetic considerations even cause many Republicans -- a coarse commercial breed, they are notoriously insensitive to higher things, but they are not immune to the repulsive -- to hope, against three decades of evidence, that Democrats can be sufficiently sensible to nominate Barack Obama, even though Hillary Clinton would be more vulnerable to John McCain.

Last week, in his 10-thumbed attempt to prevent his wife's Louisiana loss, Bill Clinton said that Obama has made "an explicit argument that the '90s weren't much better than this decade." The phrase "explicit argument" was an exquisitely Clintonian touch, signaling to seasoned decoders of Clintonisms that, no matter how diligent the search, no such thought could be found, even implicitly, in anything Obama has ever said. In his preternatural neediness, Clinton, an overflowing caldron of narcissism and solipsism, is still smarting from Obama's banal observation, four weeks ago, that Ronald Reagan was a more transformative president than Clinton.

Then in Virginia on Sunday, his wife, true to the family tradition of "two for the price of one," contributed her own howler to the growing archive of Clintoniana. She said she is constantly being urged to unleash her inner Pericles: "People say to me all the time, 'You're so specific. . . . Why don't you just come and, you know, really just give us one of those great rhetorical flourishes and then, you know, get everybody all whooped up?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:32 (sixteen years ago) link

m bison it was a serious question for kenan but if you'd like to answer i'm all ears. i really would love for people to spell these things out, i'm dumm and don't get cnn/comedy central/msnbc where i live!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought it was pretty much accepted wisdom at this point that whatever convictions she's had, she's been more than willing to jettison them if she thinks it would pay off dividends politically later (see: war vote, kyl-lieberman, land mines, etc). either that or she is more ideologically hawkish than i'd have thought. and either way is a problem for me. if the former, she's a coward who won't stand up for what she believes in the face of short-term political pressures. if the latter, she's genuinely into blowing shit up. i'm more inclined to believe the former is true.

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:41 (sixteen years ago) link

"i thought it was pretty much accepted wisdom at this point"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:42 (sixteen years ago) link

meaning i'm not the only one who thinks this...?

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:43 (sixteen years ago) link

the accepted wisdom on hillary clinton is so deep you need machinery just to shovel yourself out, which is why i asked the question (and why the responses keep seeming like "lady, if you have to ask...")

so thanks for specifics m bison -- the cluster bomb thing is disturbing

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,180 for "Hillary Clinton Is Tracy Flick"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:47 (sixteen years ago) link

arright, cool. i figured hrc had earned that reputation as a morally compromised type years ago, hence the 0_o.

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:59 (sixteen years ago) link

she has had that reputation but i think it's questionable at best whether she's significantly "earned it" more than any other senator

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:09 (sixteen years ago) link

s'ok its aaaall over now sit down try to relax

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago) link

can you enlighten us on the real hillary tracer?

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:16 (sixteen years ago) link

She likes reading by the fireplace on Sunday afternoons and always has a great filthy joke!

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

that describes pretty much anyone

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:20 (sixteen years ago) link

i hear she eats lots of hot peppers

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

hey you guys i've got a pretty filthy joke about two old ladies digging potatos, do you want to hear it?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

who knew she too was a pepperpot all along

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

only if you make one of them hillary

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:28 (sixteen years ago) link

make Madeleine Albright the other

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:30 (sixteen years ago) link

so hillary's digging potatos with madeleine albright and she lifts one up in her hand, admires it and says "you know, this one reminds me of my bill's balls!" madeleine albright goes "they're that big??" and hillary sort of smiles and goes "no, they're that dirty though"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:31 (sixteen years ago) link

screaming pimp lobster served with potato gonad au gratin

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago) link

So I'm kinda grumpy that the media so eagerly bought the Clinton line of "the superdelegates are up for grabs!" in the past, since without that being the fixed frame no WAY would Wolfson have been able to get away with basically conceding the election 2 weeks before the TX primary. I guess it was just a side-effect of the horse-race focus, but ugh. I hope they at least start calling him Hillary's Katherine Harris.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

yah ive said this before but the fact that news organizations are including super delegates in their count is just unconscionable. they can change their minds anytime - no one has any super delegates.

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

yea this is gonna get really ugly with the superdelegate race

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess Obama faced a lose-lose choice once the Clinton camp put the superdelegates thing into play--either go after the delegates too, which concedes the point, don't go after them and decry Clinton's tactics, which means they could've ended up without any superdelegates, or decry while still going after them, which would've looked bad.

On the bright side, the media's also pushing the "Obama has the momentum" frame pretty hard, so maybe that will counteract it and the superdelegates will do what they're supposed to do.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/us/politics/14senators.htm

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton helped secure more than $340 million worth of home-state projects in last year's spending bills, placing her among the top 10 Senate recipients of what are commonly known as earmarks, according to a new study by a nonpartisan budget watchdog group.

Working with her New York colleagues in nearly every case, Clinton supported almost four times as much spending on earmarked projects as her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), whose $91 million total placed him in the bottom quarter of senators who seek earmarks, the study showed.

Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the likely GOP presidential nominee, was one of five senators to reject earmarks entirely, part of his long-standing view that such measures prompt needless spending.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Has anybody in the Clinton camp said what you'd do with all the "undeclared" delegates from Michigan, if they were seated?

xpost see, this is why I want Hillary to stay my Senator...

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

oops -- that's the wrong link. here's the right one:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021303635.html

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

wow senators getting federal money for their state to spend on people, how corrupt!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

the nytimes link has these great tidbits:

Examples of (Clinton and McCain's) mutual respect typically include a tale of holding a vodka-drinking contest in Estonia.

and this:

And no, (Obama's advisors) said, do not expect Mr. Obama to dust off the lyrics to a song he performed on March 11, 2006, when he appeared as a keynote speaker at the Gridiron Dinner in Washington. His words were written to the tune of “If I Only Had a Brain.”

“When a wide-eyed young idealist, confronts a seasoned realist, there’s bound to be some strain,” Mr. Obama sang perfectly on pitch. “With the game barely started, I’d be feeling less downhearted, if I only had McCain.”

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

ny still sends way more out than it gets back

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

“Could we possibly have a nominee who hasn't won any of the significant states -- outside of Illinois?” Chief Strategist Mark Penn said. “That raises some serious questions about Sen. Obama.”

guh, the reek of desperation is so fucking pungent it's making me upchuck a little

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i know. it's so shortsighted, too. telling all the other states that they're not significant? it can't play well for HRC later if she happens to be the nom.

arrghh it just bothers me a lot, starting from the same "we only need the hardcore blue states + florida-or-something" mentality that won't win a general election

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/article/files/Horowitz-MarkPenn1V.jpg
your states sorry but they are insignificant

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

do you guys think voters are actually so dumb that they don't realize mark penn's talking about electoral strategy rather than any deeper significance?? (if they care at all what someone's campaign strategist said, that is)

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

wow senators getting federal money for their state to spend on people, how corrupt!

-- Tracer Hand

McCain opposes all earmarks, Obama is ambivalent (probably meaning he won't work to oppose), and HRC is super-gung ho about them. When we complain about Hillary's fondness for earmarks, we're not accusing her of corruption, but of being a machine politician, which she more-or-less is.

Her husband's administration supported NAFTA, and she's never publically opposed it; her voting record is distressingly hawkish and supportive of Bush's war efforts; she's presented no meaningful opposition to the Patriot Act or Bush's expansion of executive power; and (as we speak) she sat silent through the votes that might deny immunity to the companies that participated in Bush's domestic wiretapping program.

While I support Hillary on a range of domestic social issues, I don't see her providing any leadership or vision WRT the international, economic, and non-social domestic policy issues that matter to me. At the outset of the Bush admin, I would have placed more emphasis on the domestic stuff, giving her the edge, but that's no longer the case. I'm currently much more concerned with the issues she's weak on.

Plus, the "polarizing" bit really does matter. It's not her fault that so many people hate her, that Republicans loathe her, but they do. I won't waste my time fighting to nominate someone who will repel a big chunk of potential supporters while rallying the opposition. Given the alternative (Obama), it would be incredibly foolish to nominate her to run against McCain.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean i carry no torch for mark penn but there's this real "situation room" kind of vibe that creeps me out when people start seizing on little tidbits, snippets of quotes, and wonder how the rubes who are less sophisticated than "us" will react

contenderizer those are some good points but i disagree with you about a hillary/mccain matchup, i think she would look pretty good next to mccain -- that part's all speculation at this point though

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

as for "machine politics", if a senator can get the money machine to spit out money for my state i don't see what's wrong with that

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

If you don't count Florida and Michigan, Clinton has won 3 of the top 10 most populous states (CA, NY, NJ) and Obama has won 2 (IL, GA). Both Clinton and Obama have won 6 of the top 20 most populous states (she adds MA, TN, and AZ, he adds VA, WA, MO, and MD). It's not like he's only winning Idaho and Delaware.

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

even beyond begging the resentment of all the states clinton's already lost, penn's really reinforcing the idea that democrats are solely the party of coastal, cultural elites.

xpost do you guys think voters are actually so dumb that they don't realize mark penn's talking about electoral strategy rather than any deeper significance

tracer, your willingness to suffer egregious morons is only matched by your overconfidence in the average voter's bullshit detector.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

wonder how the rubes who are less sophisticated than "us" will react

yea i know he's talking about electoral strategy, but if i lived in a state like virginia (which is a big fucking state and could be up for contention in the g.e.) where i voted for obama and he won by a big margin, i would be a little disappointed in the fact that clinton's campaign is brushing the state off as insignificant, unnecessary or irrelevant in the contest

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

part of running a campaign is knowing how not to look like you're calling a bunch of states insignificant when you speak in public.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

as for "machine politics", if a senator can get the money machine to spit out money for my state i don't see what's wrong with that

-- Tracer

Agree. There's nothing wrong with it. It's the way the system works, and Hillary is very good at manipulating it to her state's advangage. But it still bothers me. I think it speaks to the kind of politician she is: not a bad politician or an ineffective politician, but a cynical, professional and compromised politician. The votes bison mentions up above are telling.

Bill was in many respects a great president and in many respects a troubling one. I came out of the Clinton era with bad feelings about NAFTA, the compromises with China, Bill's military misadventures, his immediate about-face on gays in the military, and the administration's clear preference for tactical expediency over strategic vision.

Of course, Bush makes Clinton's sins look insignificant in hindsight But they aren't. And Hillary was a big part of that. She was major policy architect and behind-the-scenes player during her husband's administration and has made no effort to distance herself from it. That missing box of Whitewater papers that the Clintons "couldn't find" when subpoena'd later turned up in her office (to say nothing of her behavior throughout that entire investigation).

Similar things could be said of McCain. Obama, on the other hand, is new, and perhaps that gives him an unfair advantage: he hasn't even had the chance to compromise himself. Still, I find it easier to support someone who hasn't yet betrayed my trust.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

ok i hear that

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Might have been posted already but did anyone catch this from yesterday? Mentioned via Balloon Juice:

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: On Wednesday, a top adviser to John McCain said more definitively than he has in the past that he will step down from the Arizona senator's presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.

"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."

McKinnon, who was a Democrat before serving as President Bush's ad maker in 2000 and 2004, said that he plans to be behind McCain "100 percent" no matter who the Democratic nominee is. He explained, however, that if the Democrats nominate Obama, he will be supporting McCain "from the sidelines."

...huh.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

he <3 obama

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

on the penn remarks -- on the other side, hypothetically, obama's advisors could have easily dismissed clinton's wins in new york and california by saying they are solid blue states that he'll carry them in the general election anyhow, but they haven't made that argument. instead they've said that NY and CA are vast states where he had less opportunity to meet with voters face to face, and where clinton enjoys high name recognition and a generally good reputation; they recognized that they have to make up those delegates elsewhere and worked hard to make up that deficit, and they did it without shitting on any state's value in a general election.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

ned, that is indeed veddy veddy interestink!

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Like I said upthread, it's not over yet. Now, mind you, I know Obama does better when he introduces himself to a state, but these polls were taken after HRC's recent losing streak, at a time when -- indirectly, if not directly -- Obama has been introducing himself to the Ohio/Texas/Penn. electorate. Despite all that, HRC seems to have leads that, if they hold, not only would be momentum-changing wins, but the kind of wins that could make this such a razon-thin race in terms of pledged delegates that the so-called Super Delegates could, in fact, swing the nomination one way or the other.

I hope it doesn't come to that. It would be an ugly fight that would show the party at its worst before a GE fight against a very tough GOP nominee.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Correction: These polls were taken before the Potomic primaries, so they were taken during (not at the end of) HRC's losing streak. My apologies.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

lol her losing streaks not over yet

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Close in Wisconsin, too.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

19 days until OH / TX / VT / RI -- if the vote was today it would be a different story, but that's a long time! certainly long enough for voters to change their minds.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i got yer poll right here

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Now that there's talk of an impending Edwards endorsement (probably of Clinton, apparently), it occurred to me that endorsements have probably been the non-story story of the campaign - Obama's success had less to do with Ted Kennedy's supposedly earth-shattering endorsement than his broad appeal and great speeches, and Clinton secured tons of state-level endorsements (as well as early endorsement from the NY Times) and those have had little to no effect.

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama, on the other hand, is new, and perhaps that gives him an unfair advantage: he hasn't even had the chance to compromise himself

Oh, bullshit. From The Nation's endorsement of Obama, by Christopher Hayes:

Had you told me a few years ago that the left of the Democratic Party would be split between Obama and Clinton, I'd have dismissed you as crazy: Barack Obama has been a community organizer, a civil rights attorney, a loyal and reliable ally in the State Senate of progressive groups. For the Chicago left, his primary campaign and his subsequent election to the US Senate was a collective rallying cry. ...We thought we'd elected our own Paul Wellstone.

That's not, alas, how things turned out. Almost immediately Obama--likely with an eye on national office--shaded himself toward the center. His rhetoric was cool, often timid, not the zealous advocacy on behalf of peace, justice and the dispossessed that had characterized Wellstone's tenure. His record places him squarely in the middle of Democratic senators, just slightly to Clinton's left on domestic issues (he voted against the bankruptcy bill, for example). As a presidential candidate, his domestic policy (with some notable exceptions on voting rights and technology policy) has been very close to that of his chief rivals, though sometimes, notably on healthcare, marginally less progressive.

And before Tracer and everyone comes in with natural-moving-to-the-center-blahblah -- it's still compromising yourself.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards endorsing HRC would be significant. More than anything else, it would make the endorsements of the remaining players who haven't yet endorsed -- especially Al Gore -- even more significant. If Obama can get Gore's endorsement, that trumps Edwards endorsing HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i got yer poll right here

O Rly?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

dr morbius, sorry but bullshit.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

under the morbius administration, legislation will be passed via gladitorial combat. no bill passed without partisan bloodshed!

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think Gore will endorse.

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards endorsing HRC just proves what a fake-ass faux populist liberal he is

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Lincoln Chafee endorses obama btw

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

where are we getting this edwards leaning hillary info? seems like v strange timing.

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I was gonna ask about that...

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

the edwards endorsement murmurings are just rumor-mill grist right now, take it with a cellar of salt plz

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

inference could be drawn from him meeting w/ hillary but canceling w/ barack? I haven't read it anywhere explicitly

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

yah thats all ive heard seems pretty tenuous

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i think this was what sparked the most recent rumors, via ben smith:

Edwards' aide Jonathan Prince made a previously unreported appearance at Hillary Clinton's Virginia headquarters last week, which has stoked a bit of chatter along the Edwards-Clinton lines ABC explores today.

Prince confirmed he was there, and said he was stopping by for lunch with his old friend Howard Wolfson, with whom he also dined on New Years Eve.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4281404&page=1

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

under the ILX administration, REFORM THRU EATING OUT CREDIT-CARD COMPANIES

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

waiting til hillarys behind to endorse her seems pretty clueless - but i guess edwards hasnt proven himself to be the master strategist so far

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

honestly edwards endorsement of hillz is gonna have a marginal impact i think, edwards supporters were the more-left and more-anti-hillary wing of the party weren't they?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbius I have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks for the actually realistic peek at Obama though.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/AP_EDWARDS_080213_ms.jpg
a v silly man^^^^

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer i know you like to play the cynic here but what 'evidence' is actually contained in that paragraph Morbs posted??? All it says is "Obama isn't actually as left as Wellstone!!!" which is like, well, yeah and? Who is? The only evidence is his voting on a single bankruptcy bill and the fact that his health care plan might be, you know, pragmatic rather than extreme left.

Obama's always argued - and as an Illinoisian I can tell you this has been his thing from day one - in a practical approach rather than a bomb-throwing leftist approach - yet he still has a very left-of-center voting record. He may not have been the 'most liberal senator' in the last year due to his campaigning keeping him from key votes, but it was a year or two ago that he actually had a record to the left of Dennis Kucinich.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards is a frauuuuud
You guys read that story about him telling Kerry the exact same "i've never told anyone this story before" story twice in two years, right?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama

-- Morbs

Granted. I should have said "compromise himself so thoroughly." But I don't think what you posted compares in any way to the gyrations and betrayals of the Clintons.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer, Obama voted to allow credit card companies to raise interest rates to over 30%.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Your own damn fault for having a credit card.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

deej take it easy, hard-charger

i just thanked morbs for a perspective on obama that wasn't omg-want-to-have-his-babies, that's all

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, Morbs, that I'll grant your point only to the extent that politics always tempers the rhetoric that gets you in the public eye with the compromises that make cooperative action possible. I just don't see any kind of trust-breaking betrayal in Obama's tactical compromises.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

wellstone moved to the center in hopes of a prez run too

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

oh there is plenty to critique about obama, i think we've all been critical of several things e.g. his debate performances, and I'm sure there's no way his presidency could possibly live up to expectations (lol heres hoping) but mis characterizing him as on par w/ the Clintons in terms of compromising his values is utterly misleading

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

contenderizer, in Morbiusrhetoric, compromise = betrayal. I don't know how long you've been reading his posts but it's becomes apparent pretty quickly.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

hahahaha deej you're basically repeating the greatet ever political chestnut, i.e. "my greatest failing? well.." (candidate appears to think deeply for a moment) "it's probably that i'm too honest"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

??? saying that he's given way below par debate performances = "i'm too honest"?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

hes a politician and a politician is gonna be a politician but the whole "wahhh why are no politicians honest" morbs game is way misleading, you need to set your expectations within the realm of reality

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

BREAKING NEWS: ALL POLITICIANS LIE.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha deej think about that last thing you just wrote and the likelihood of it happening compared to the likelyhood of the Earth spontaneously turning into a giant Skittle

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I had to defend Obama over Christmas dinner against my aunt, who saw the 2004 convention speech and thought Obama was "the second coming" but then grew disappointed when he ran for president and started "pandering" to different interest groups. I was like, "Hi, he's a politician."

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Lesson #9 from Robert McNamara: In order to do good, you may have to engage in evil.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Also we can vote on which spelling of "likeliyhood" is more aesthetically-pleasing in my last post.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

compromise on vital shit = betrayal.

for ILXpundits, compromise NEVER equals betrayal. Hence Wm J Clinton was in some ways "a great president."

I spent that entire Errol Morris film wanting to kick McN in the face.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

lickyhoods

Mr. Que, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

how so Morbius? everyone on ILX is pretty bitter about HRC's compromising

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

the likelyhood of the Earth spontaneously turning into a giant Skittle

SO NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

"everyone" = "most people" sorry

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i think you guys are very charitable and sophisticated regarding the moral triage that must take place on a daily basis for national politicians from illinois who are seeking a higher office and i patiently await your extension of the same courtesy to national politicians from new york

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont understand why its necessary to hold politicians to a higher standard of integrity than i hold myself

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

otm!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i will start getting mad about politicians compromising when i bike everywhere and give 30% of my income to the poor

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes Tracer Hillary and Obama are exactly the same.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama never spent the 80s on the streets of Chicago as an organizer and activist, and even if he had it probably never impacted the way he would lead.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

...

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

max voted to raise his cred-card rate to 30%?? I don't beeleeve it!

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs, u a legendary crank! never change xoxo

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC never spent years as a corporate lawyer, never voted for a war she didnt think would happen, and never pandered on issues like fuckin flag burning for political gain

there's pandering to interest groups and there is PANDERING to interest groups, Hillary's been in capslock mode for a minute

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary and Barack are exactly the same, where is he hiding the tits and where is she hiding the dick?

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i patiently await your extension of the same courtesy to national politicians from new york

Has been extended. Numerous times. Feeding hand now has little holey bite marks all over it. Lesson learned.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

never pandered on issues like fuckin flag burning for political gain

Actually, this strikes me as a pretty harmless form of pandering - a symbolic vote that will never go anywhere.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary and Barack are exactly the same, where is he hiding the tits and where is she hiding the dick?

she's not really hiding it LOLOOOLOL

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

there's pandering to interest groups and there is PANDERING to interest groups, Hillary's been in capslock mode for a minute

True. For the record, my aunt was an Edwards fan. Not sure where she stands now.

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary and Barack are exactly the same, where is he hiding the tits and where is she hiding the dick?

POLL

Mr. Que, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

(Personally I think HRC and BO are close enough to each other that many of the objections raised to either are manifestations of subconscious racial/gender biases.)

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah and i think you're nuts Dan

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

close enough except for IRAQ

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

lol now im on Morbs side

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

im voting for barack mostly b/c he went to my college

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: and number of tenured DLC scum on their Blackberrys

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I think you're nuts if you believe you can divorce the "black vs white"/"man vs woman" issues from this contest.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Everything I say or do manifests my many racial and gender biaseees. It's sort of my trademark.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i didnt say that, i think its so reductionist that it is RONG to singularly credit preference in a candidate along those lines though xp

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the fact is that both Obama and Clinton are laying out nearly identical policy platforms for what they hope to accomplish in office, and that either one will have to compromise significantly to get even a fraction of what they want to accomplish done. The question is, who will be able to strike the best compromise possible and make it happen? I tend to think Clinton has demonstrated more of the skills necessary to shepherd these things through a legislature, but Obama may have better ability to use the bully pulpit to get public opinion on his side. So which factor would be more significant?

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

there are lots of factors both conscious and subconscious impacting this thing, and certain elements weigh in more than for others. If I've been a supporter of Barack since before he even won the Dem primary in the run for Senate how does that long term 'affiliation' weigh against my supposed hatred against women?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej maybe you should learn to read before you participate in these threads?

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

many of the objections

yeah sorry missed this

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

misread rather

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha I wondered

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

what i think is so interesting about the reactions to hillary is that they fall into two broad categories: 1) she's too partisan and won't work across the aisle to solve america's problems constructively, i.e. she's a divider, not a uniter like obama; 2) she's a corporate crony, hawkish and right-wing, and has betrayed whatever convictions she once had (as a corporate lawyer?). the people who feel either one of these things feel them passionately. either one of these positions is right and the other is wrong, or the positions are more complex than is being made out, in which case the passion for one or the other is misplaced.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I think they are both true to varying degrees? She's like the anti-Obama that way; he works from the left but speaks to the center, she works from the center but speaks as an uber-partisan

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I think both are true in a way - I think she's too divisive as a figure to be effective in uniting people - nothing to do with whether or not she herself is a "uniter" in terms of goal/personality. xp

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

or maybe i like hillary and think she would be a good president but i just like obama more!

one thing i do side with hillary on is health care, cuz we all know that whatever proposal a dem makes will get seriously watered down, so why not start at a further point to the left? i would guess that hillary's plan, if it went through congress, would end up looking exactly like obama's. i dunno what obama's would look like by the time congress cut it up.

btw, is there any chance for the dems to replace the congressional leadership after the election?

YGS, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

or maybe i like hillary and think she would be a good president but i just like obama more!

This is pretty much my position.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah ill co-sign on that

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Thirded

Michael White, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Agreed.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

He'll be a better one-term prez than she'd be.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

what i think is so interesting about the reactions to hillary is that they fall into two broad categories: 1) she's too partisan and won't work across the aisle to solve america's problems constructively, i.e. she's a divider, not a uniter like obama; 2) she's a corporate crony, hawkish and right-wing, and has betrayed whatever convictions she once had

-- Tracer

Only the second bothers me (the lawyer bit is a non-issue).

The first doesn't bother me, 'cuz I don't hear much talk about how (or see any indication that) she won't work across the aisles. She obviously will and isn't radically partisan. What I do hear said is that Republicans, both voters and her fellow politicians, hate her with an irrational, virulent fury. This makes her a problematic nominee, and may fortell a difficult presidenct. When she's called a "divider", it has less to do with her than with other people's reactions to her.

That said, I'll be perfectly happy to vote for her, if she gets the nom.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

"presidency", that shoulda read

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno i want to agree w/ max dan ned ygs team of :-) but i think the iraq vote still kinda cancels out what good will i had for her ... i don't doubt that she's 'on our side' but in the context of a genuinely bad decision her modestly compromised decisions stand out more

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://barackobamaisyournewbicycle.com/

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't go so far as "like," I would accept Hillary as the nominee and vote for her vs. McCain but I'm not sure she's really on the right side of some issues I think are important. one example was that she seemed to go waffley on torture in one of the debates ("well I'd have to be in the commander in chief's shoes" or some such). I find her much more hawkish than Obama.

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

* Barack Obama folded you an origami crane
* Barack Obama held your hand when you were frightened
* Barack Obama told me to tell you hello
* Barack Obama recited a poem that reminded him of you

:D :D :D

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I couldn't look at it for too long, 'cuz I kept thinking a vampire guy would yell at me.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah dont get me wrong Hillary >>>>>>>>>>>>> McCain

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

if she's gonna get the nom she's gotta win fair and square, tho, or else McCain's gonna be prez, right?? people would go ballistic.

I think I'd consider superdelegates fair and square (an unfortunate outcome but all in the game) but not MI / FL

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i would still be surprised if the superdels went against the popular vote

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

one thing i do side with hillary on is health care, cuz we all know that whatever proposal a dem makes will get seriously watered down, so why not start at a further point to the left?

yeah, it's crazy to me that neither of them are going for anything approaching single-payer -- the c.w. is that it's simply politically impossible, they'd get accused of being socialists etc. but what better time than now do make this happen?? people are genuinely fed up, genuinely straining under the weight of their insurance obligations and are thirsty for imagination and simplicity. making sure everyone is part of the system is absolutely crucial in making universal health care a reality rather than slowly being stripped of its powers by republicans and becoming a ghettoized "insurance for poor people" (i.e. think of the same approach being used for schools -- if people weren't obligated to pay taxes for public education).

i think yance is right that anything will get watered down, so why isn't obama being bold here? he's got the duende -- use it for something! the same applies to hillary!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah aren't you glad we have good schools for poor people?

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

what i'd heard about this was that he had actually shot for a proposal that would be to the left of Hillary's, since he announced his first - and instead her proposal was to the left of his

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

dont have any idea how true this is, i just remember someone repeating it to me and could be received wisdom

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

it's crazy to me that neither of them are going for anything approaching single-payer

-- Tracer

The tipping point of a recession is not the best time to sell or embark on a massive, insanely expensive, new social program. (Or a war, for that matter.) Hell, single-payer was a hard sell during the cash-flush Clinton years.

The right thing to do is not always a good idea.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

we should send homeless people to medical school and then each of them is assigned to be a live with one american family and be their personal physician. two birds!

YGS, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

funny thing is if you wanted to make an analogy w/single payer to education its closest to vouchers!

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

I think that one difference between HRC and BO is that HRC cut her political eyeteeth during a period dominated by Reaganite politics and policies. She has spent her whole political life learning how to cut across that fact to get the votes to get anything done. This was good at the time and a useful skill. It has colored all her poliical instincts.

BO is attempting to forge a new coalition and create a new political ascendency, where Reaganite politics and policies are irrelevant except as a point of departure. If it works, we enter a new era.

HRC's past will make it difficult to impossible for her to be the one to make this happen. With her we will get a rigidification of the opposition and nonstop duelling, not because this is what she wants, but because this is what she inspires among Republicans. She would be able to govern, but only in fits and starts and by hard-won increments. Fillibusters would multiply like fleas.

With Obama, you will get either a breaking of the mold, or he'll be Jimmy-Cartered by midterm. I'm willing to bet he won't be marginalized, but will become the center of power and very popular.

Aimless, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

yah tax-hating americans + super-powerful insurance industry = no fucking single payer

even tho obv its be cheaper over all than paying the corrupt as fuck insurance companies - but for whatever reason people feel more comfortable giving them their money

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

all this hand-wringing about the superdelegates - why the hell would they decide to back Hillary against a popularly-endorsed Obama who by all accounts will fare better in the GE against McCain? They have no real politically sensible rationale to back her.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://info.wlu.ca/~wwwpsych/gnelson/paradigm-shift-cartoon.gif

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean if by mid-March Obama a) has majority support among Dem voters and b) faces better odds against McCain, all other rationales for supporting Hillary look pretty fucking foolish/inconsequential.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

post

-- aimless

I agree, though I think you're overselling the chance for some kind of hueg change. Try this:

(Clinton) would be able to govern, but only in fits and starts and by hard-won increments. Fillibusters would multiply like fleas. With Obama, you will get either a breaking of the mold mumble-something, or he'll be Jimmy-Cartered by midterm.

OTM

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

(a) is a possibility. But no one really knows the answer to (b), and Clinton certainly would never concede that point.

xpost

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Especially since many (most?) of the supers are elected officials, there would be political hell to pay if they were complicit in a backroom nomination.

xp to shakey

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

It's interesting that here in the US the thought of a nomination being decided by party insiders is widely viewed as tantamount to political armageddon, whereas in most of the world's democracies, that's the only way it's ever done.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i luv u guys but i got to get some work done this afternoon -- laterz!

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link

USA USA USA

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill Clinton isn't just hinting at trying to wrest those Florida delegates for HRC's saek – he's already admitted it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

where?

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/02/bill_florida_co.html

this is gonna end with bill swinging a machete around, isn't it?

m bison, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess France has primaries too. It seems that most democracies that follow the British parliamentary model do not.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Fake real conservative to endorse maverick. Someone somewhere will complain, doubtless.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

should i go see kumar talk about obama tonight? :>

Jordan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

(Personally I think HRC and BO are close enough to each other that many of the objections raised to either are manifestations of subconscious racial/gender biases.)

so the solid majority of under-30 voters, of either gender, have "subconscious" (don't you mean preconscious?) gender biases? or rather, they all have more or less the *same* gender biases?

this thread needs more humility, less accusation.

the health-care thing is very problematic; obama's plan doesn't convince me and i agree that this is the moment to strive for something broader, bolder even if it gets somewhat watered-down in the end.

i've been an obama supporter, albeit a slightly ambivalent one, for a while. so what i'm about to say is no doubt colored by my prejudices. but hillary's bullshit re. trying to admit michigan and florida delegates is... well, it's unconscionable. obama should agree to another debate and bring this up. bring a quote from hillary or from one of her campaign managers back when they agreed not to run in those two states. jesus christ. hillary could lose any edge over mccain from this bullshit alone.

amateurist, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

(b), and Clinton certainly would never concede that point.

she doesn't have to concede it - the superdelegates just have to realize it. and I don't see how they could avoid this realization, as it is rather super-obvious, even at this stage.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

either way I have no doubt the Clintons are gonna go down swinging and its gonna get real ugly - machetes and all lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

obama should agree to another debate and bring this up.

make joke re: "stolen election" of 2000

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

(we don't need ANOTHER stolen election, etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

as it is rather super-obvious, even at this stage

I wouldn't say it's super-obvious. As I posted a ways back, it's not enough to look at nationwide head-to-head polls. A better analysis would look at the likely swing states and the voting blocs that are up for grabs. The white, working-class vote has been a key factor in presidential elections stretching back to Reagan, as observers like Ruy Teixeira pointed out after the 2004 election. If Clinton remains stronger there, that in itself could be a reason to think she would do better than Obama against McCain.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

so the solid majority of under-30 voters, of either gender, (skip it) all have more or less the *same* gender biases?

Under 30s:

Hate mom
Like hot guyz
Wish Jay-Z would run

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

this is gonna end with bill swinging a machete around, isn't it?

That would be so cool and would turn me into an HRC supporter.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

is there any chance for the dems to replace the congressional leadership after the election?

Hi yance! Whyever would you WANT to? They're doing what's POSSIBLE!

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

funny thing is if you wanted to make an analogy w/single payer to education its closest to vouchers!

no. vouchers would allow people to opt out of publicly accountable schools and attend whichever private schools they wished. allowing people to opt out of some future national healthcare scheme would have the same disastrous effect on it as vouchers would have on the already horrible school system we've got.

it's a good point that public schools as a model for health care is not exactly a winning sales pitch. but i don't think many people would be in favor of abandoning the universal right to publicly-funded education. even voucher programs have never really gone anywhere. it matters too much.

The tipping point of a recession is not the best time to sell or embark on a massive, insanely expensive, new social program. (Or a war, for that matter.) Hell, single-payer was a hard sell during the cash-flush Clinton years.

single-payer health care would cost america much, much less than the current system. you're right about how much health care costs though. it's insane. when the children's defense fund was trying to get a bill passed that would guarantee coverage for all kids -- who are not an expensive group to insure; they don't get seriously ill very often and when they do it's usually treatable -- they calculated that a year of coverage for all children would cost as much as three months of the iraq war. that is a hell of a lot of money!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Hi yance! Whyever would you WANT to? They're doing what's POSSIBLE!

-- Dr Morbius, Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:03 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

so you admit to being a bitter goof throughout this thread because you'll only be satisfied when politicians can deliver things they are not able to deliver.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

"not able" is a self-fulfilling delusion in SO many cases, but keep on listening to the Spin Room

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

oh im aware, im supporting the candidate who was considered a long shot at the beginning remember? I just have to question the circular logic that insists you will be disappointed because candidates won't achieve, but the bar for achievement is set by their inability to meet it

how many years ago would you have been questioning the dems ever being able to nominate a black candidate for president?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

For me? 1.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, there is the possibility, unpleasant though it may be to contemplate, that some sort of national security event might happen between now and the election. If so, the very hawkishness which Dem primary voters perceive (and often dislike) in Clinton could turn into a very crucial asset in preventing a tidal surge of support to McCain. Dem primary voters who rate national security as higher on their list of concerns tend to favor Clinton over Obama.

xposts

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

VOTE YR FEARS

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

deej, this democratic congress has been awful, though! what have they actually accomplished, even in a ceremonial manner?

YGS, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think thats voting your fears, i think thats voting based on the fears of others xp

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Yancey OTM.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

is my rss reader slow, or is there no backlash coalescing against the wolfon's "we'll do it with superdelegates" and penn's "significant states" chat? quite apart from the relative truth of either statement, they both sound really bad.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

deej, this democratic congress has been awful, though! what have they actually accomplished, even in a ceremonial manner?

-- YGS, Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:15 PM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

uh oh yeah no i agree - i didnt meant to come across as capn save a FISA failures, I was more objecting to morbius' political outlook in general

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

if that happens, McCain wins. If not, I don't see how Hillary's positives outweigh McCains, especially given all her negatives. Obama, otoh, has a way better angle against McCain (youth, optimism, broad coalition excited about voting) - Hillary doesn't bring any of that stuff.

I'm not talking about polls at this point, I agree that this far out they're meaningless. But it is possible to conceive of what kind of campaign each candidate would run and what kind of appeal they would bank on. In that sense, Hillary is doomed to lose, imho.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

They held a ribbon-cutting ceremony for "GOOD GOV'T DAY."

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

(er many ex-posts)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

they calculated that a year of coverage for all children would cost as much as three months of the iraq war. that is a hell of a lot of money!

Is there supposed to be an irony buried here? So mysterious. Anyway, yeah, what we're talking about is a system that would be comparable in cost to keeping the Iraq war going forever. And single-payer would probably always be less expensive per covered individual than what we've got now, but I don't think it's fair to say that it would necessarily end up being cheaper period. The cost of maintaining gov't bureaucracies and social programs tends to balloon over time, as there's no direct penalty for overspending (e.g., bankruptcy, in the private sector).

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean if there's a nat'l security disaster while McCain and Clinton are running against each other, all McCain has to do is point out that he never wavered on Iraq, that he is the bigger hardass, etc. and there goes the nat'l security vote (inluding independents that the Dems need to win) to the Repubs.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

It's possible - but I'd still rather have Clinton than Obama in that match-up scenario.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

If so, the very hawkishness which Dem primary voters perceive (and often dislike) in Clinton could turn into a very crucial asset in preventing a tidal surge of support to McCain. Dem primary voters who rate national security as higher on their list of concerns tend to favor Clinton over Obama.

sure, clinton might beat obama in concerns about national security, but if national security ends up actually being the main issue in the general election, i really can't imagine that clinton could attract more voters than mccain on that subject, so it's kind of a moot point to make

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean if there's a nat'l security disaster while McCain and Clinton are running against each other, all McCain has to do is point out that he never wavered on Iraq, that he is the bigger hardass, etc. and there goes the nat'l security vote (inluding independents that the Dems need to win) to the Repubs.

exactly

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think i would - if you get a response along the lines of FEMA in N.O. then I think Obama's change message resonates even larger xps to o. nate

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

but if national security ends up actually being the main issue in the general election, i really can't imagine that clinton could attract more voters than mccain on that subject, so it's kind of a moot point to make

It's likely to be one issue among many, but I wouldn't ever call it a moot point. I think there's a bit of disingenuousness in the idea that perceived strength on national security won't matter because if it did McCain would win anyway - the truth is that the bigger the perceived difference in the candidates' relative strength on the issue the more voters will defect.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

It's hard to imagine which candidate would benefit or suffer most from imaginary disaster scenario. I wouldn't trust the results even if you polled everyone in the nation w/ such a question. Unknowable.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

One R. Santorum frets.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i wouldn't be so sure. the only 'national security event' i could predict is the surge failing, either the army getting even more broken down than it is or violence rising back to pre-surge levels. this would be a big anvil for mccain to carry.

but yeah, another big terror attack on US soil would change the game beyond reckoning; whether it would exactly mimic the shift to the right after 9/11 i'm not entirely sure. but it seems like a dumb thing to make the primary decision on in any case. "hillary MIGHT be SLIGHTLY better against mccain IF a VANISHINGLY UNLIKELY thing happened to us AND the public reacted exactly like they did in 2001."

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

deej OTM

and Clinton's war record is a liability on nat'l security, not a strength.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Santorum. He's named after buttfucking.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

rick santorum partially otm!

Were Pennsylvania and the other Republican states in the Northeast "conservative" states? No, they were all mixed bags ideologically. Ideological disagreements rarely split along partisan lines as they do today, because each party had robust "conservative" and "liberal" wings. In Washington, conservatives and liberals were divided on issues, but it was actually easier to find common ground because partisanship didn't work to exacerbate ideological divisions.

All that changed after the 1960s. The Democratic Party embraced the '60s Cultural Revolution, with its hostility to the military and traditional values. The GOP pursued Richard Nixon's Southern Strategy to court Southern conservatives away from the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party became the party of George McGovern and Ted Kennedy. After some stiff resistance, the Republican Party became the party of Ronald Reagan. The upshot today: If you are a conservative, you are a Republican; if you're a liberal, you're a Democrat.

The divide intensified due to the dramatic leftward shift of the Democratic Party. It has morphed into a made-in-the-USA Western European liberal party that seeks to grow the power of government, increase the public's reliance on Washington, wage class warfare, downplay national-security threats, relinquish our sovereignty, redefine the family, and substitute secular humanism for our society's Judeo-Christian underpinnings. As mainstream Democrats, both Clinton and Barack Obama see America as deeply flawed and needing massive "change."

he's right about the 'polarization' of US politics being a natural consequence of the parties' much more firm ideological sorting since the 60s.

tho it is funny how the existence of black people is entirely unmentioned in how and why these changes occurred and were persued... "funny" that is.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

but yeah, another big terror attack on US soil would change the game beyond reckoning

What about a small terror attack? Or an attack not on US soil but on an ally? Or any event that brings national security further into the fore-front of people's minds that it is right at this moment, in the middle of an Obama-mentum media frenzy?

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Read between the lines of that Santorum op-ed, tho:

Many of us want a leader who believes in his core that this race is a fight for the soul of America, her Judeo-Christian tradition, her sovereignty, her courage to defeat not appease or surrender to her enemies, her belief in capitalism and limited government, and her commitment to equality of opportunity, not result. We want a leader who's not interested in moving the country in the same direction as Clinton and Obama, only slower.

Is McCain that leader? It's a question that both he and conservatives will have to answer. My own doubts prompted me to oppose him and, finally, endorse Mitt Romney in the GOP primary. But general elections pose such questions in a different, more complex context, and the best answers come after a period of post-primary decompression.

Santorum -- who was openly, stridently opposed to McCain on cable news programs last week -- is now softening his rhetoric. Once the GE begins, it will be time for GOP'ers nationwide to come home, and they will.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

what about a giant sea turtle attack?

Jordan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

sy hersh says that any national security event between now and the election will hand it to the republicans without a doubt, fwiw

contenderizer, the overall cost of insuring the united states would be as little as half what it is now if the us moves to single-payer. i don't have links to hand but every study done shows massive savings. it's interesting that you say govt bureacracies always bloat over time; not all of them do. the social security administration's overhead has been something like 2% of total cost for decades i think. as far as worries about overspending go somehow i don't think that'll be a problem with an entitlement program.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

The last Santorum reads like rejected lyrics from Bowie's "Big Brother."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

*last Santorum excerpt

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Sy Hersh may be an expert on certain things (although what I've read by him in The New Yorker seems to have often landed wide of the truth) but I wouldn't necessarily consider him an expert on the electorate or political mood shifts.

xposts

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Worth noting in that Santorum piece:

While he's partially right about what's happened in the Democratic party over the last 40 years, he avoids mention of the concurrent rightward shift in the Republican party (towards religious fundamentalism, harsh militarism, and authoritarian centralization of power w/ the executive). More honest to say that the parties split in the sixties and have been moving away from one another ever since. Which is old news anyway.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

i could be wrong but i think single-payer is inevitable. the question is how long are we going to keep paying double and keep wrecking peoples' entire lives and leaving millions uninsured. the cw could be right that it's still politically unfeasible. who knows. but the day will come when people will be begging for it. it would be nice to set it up before that day arrives.

yeah o nate that's true

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

contederizer you think the democrats have been moving "away" from the republicans since the 1960s??

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

What about a small terror attack? Or an attack not on US soil but on an ally? Or any event that brings national security further into the fore-front of people's minds that it is right at this moment, in the middle of an Obama-mentum media frenzy?

considering the media, there will be no such thing as a "small" terror attack on US soil. also, considering how much the 7/7 london bombings shifted US public opinion on its central defense question (iraq) (ie: not at all), i don't think a foreign attack would mean very much either.

i think i've answered this, tbh: some 'event' that gets people scared again and starts tipping things toward mccain (or toward the right in some general sense) is not going to damage hillary any less than it would obama. he promised to fuck with pakistan if he had to!

xps

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

what about a giant sea turtle attack?

-- Jordan, Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:38 PM

mccain & obama have to trek across ny to save hilary. santorum has the camera.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

man-on-turtle

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

why does anybody care what this douchebag loser says - he's not even in office

x-posts

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ it's a philly paper. plus, he's hilarious

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Does Huckabee explode after getting bitten in the subway?

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

huckabee explodes but manages to get back to his original pre-explosion weight through exercise and dieting

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

someone please post Santy's concession speech photo again.

huckabee explodes but manages to get back to his original pre-explosion weight through exercise and dieting sucking on the blood of Jewish babies.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

man we're gonna NEED those human-animal hybrids

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz Alfred

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Kucinich gets away on the first helicopter.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

contenderizer, the overall cost of insuring the united states would be as little as half what it is now if the us moves to single-payer. i don't have links to hand but every study done shows massive savings.

I don't think this is true. In 2004 American families spent something like $500 billion on health care. I've read only that we should be able to save enough per person (given that we're now spending about $7,000/person) to pay for universal health care. And no more. See Physicians for a National Health Program site for details. We're not talking about cutting costs. We're talking about extending benefits while shifting the burden from consumers/businesses to the gov't.

And I didn't say the cost of administrative bureacracy tends to bloat over time. I said it "tends to". I think there's good reason to worry here.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

SEIU, who formerly endorsed Edwards, is set to endorse Obama according to Politico

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

contederizer you think the democrats have been moving "away" from the republicans since the 1960s??

Nah. It was true during the 60s/70s and to some degree in the 80s, but the tide has turned. I was mostly granting his point (which has some validity - Democrats did embrace youth culture 60s values, and that did drive a wedge between the parties) so that I could point out the bit about Republicans.

Sort of a yes/no thing. I mean, you see a lot more support for NORML, expanded free-expression (yay flag-burning), tree-hugging, gay smooches, etc. in the Democratic than the Republican party, even today.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, SEIU had not endorsed Edwards before, my mistake. But this is still a pretty solid union endorsement.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL @ John McCain Stealing HRC's Slogans Against Obama.

That slogan can't fail, Senator.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary should start saying 'my friends' a lot

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

ooo here comes mr. substance!

obama's credit card holders' bill of rights:

* Ban Unilateral Changes: Currently, credit card companies can unilaterally change the terms of a credit card agreement at any time for any reason with only a 15-day notice to the consumer. Barack Obama will ban these unilateral changes in credit card agreements unless companies have obtained written consent from consumers and have followed the rules and terms of the agreement.
* Apply Interest Rate Increases Only to Future Debt: Credit card companies often apply increased interest rates to both new debt incurred by the cardholder, as well as previously incurred debt. Barack Obama will require increased interest rates to apply only to future credit card debt, and not to debt incurred prior to the increase.
* Prohibit Interest on Fees: Credit card companies often charge interest on transaction fees, such as late fees or paying a bill by telephone. Barack Obama will prohibit credit card issuers from charging interest on transaction fees.
* Prohibit “Universal Defaults”: “Universal defaults” are a practice in which a credit card company raises an individual’s interest rate based on failure to pay a different creditor on time. Barack Obama will prohibit this practice.
* Require Prompt and Fair Crediting of Cardholder Payments: Barack Obama will require credit card issuers to apply payments first to the credit card balance with the highest rate of interest and to minimize finance charges.

plus he's picked up the National Infrastructure Bank idea from Chris Dodd

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

God my post about health care up there is all fucked up. I'm just gonna do it again...

contenderizer, the overall cost of insuring the united states would be as little as half what it is now if the us moves to single-payer. i don't have links to hand but every study done shows massive savings.

-- Tracer Hand

I don't think this is true. In 2004 American families spent something like $500 billion on health care. I've read only that we should be able to save enough per person (given that we're now spending about $7,000/person) to pay for universal health care. And no more. See Physicians for a National Health Program site for details. We're not talking about cutting costs. We're talking about extending benefits, without increasing costs, while shifting the burden from consumers/businesses to the gov't.

And I didn't say the cost of administrative bureacracy ALWAYS bloats over time. I said it "tends to". I think there's good reason to worry here.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

While he's partially right about what's happened in the Democratic party over the last 40 years, he avoids mention of the concurrent rightward shift in the Republican party (towards religious fundamentalism, harsh militarism, and authoritarian centralization of power w/ the executive). More honest to say that the parties split in the sixties and have been moving away from one another ever since. Which is old news anyway.

-- contenderizer, Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:40 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

nah the shift has definitely been on the part of the republicans reorganizing around key themes in the 60s ... the dems have been in a sort of freefall since the 50s, more or less, when conservatism was declared 'dead'

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

the republican party was basically dead in the 40s, it was recreated in grassroots movements in the 50s, thru PTA/PTO organizing, john birch society, anti-communism/'flouride in our water!' movements etc

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Fox News Radio host Tom Sullivan took a call from a listener who stated that when listening to Barack Obama speak, "it harkens back to when I was younger and I used to watch those deals with Hitler, how he would excite the crowd and they'd come to their feet and scream and yell." Sullivan then played a "side-by-side comparison" of a Hitler speech and an Obama speech. Sullivan mimicked the crowd during both speeches, yelling, "Yay! Yay!" When a later caller complained that Sullivan was "denigrating" Obama with the comparison, Sullivan said he wouldn't play it again, then begged: "Can I, please, one more time? Just one more time? Then I won't do it again. ... Until the next time."

Oh, hurray.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

also ayn rand-ish libertarianism

primary victory of goldwater in '64 the first signal that 'real conservatism' had returned. Repubs today prob see Ike as an even milder Clinton-esque moderate figure

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, don't count out McCain at all: Tough Guys Win GEs. He's a war hero, he was a POW, he's a hawk, he's supposedly a hotheaded tough guy. This election cycle may be different for a lot of reasons, so maybe a McCain-type won't win, but if it is such an election cycle, it will run against prevailing trends.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't want to get complacent, but I do take some comfort from articles like this:

Policy Shifts Likely As Candidates Share Some Similar Views

http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-AP406_CONSEN_20080213195214.gif

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary should support waterboarding to distinguish herself from mccain

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

the dems have been in a sort of freefall since the 50s, more or less, when conservatism was declared 'dead'

-- deej

I don't know that I buy this, not entirely. The aspects of 60s style countercultural thinking that the Republican party use to so effectively to foment anti-liberal hysteria really are part of the heart and soul of the modern Democratic party, at least as far as the electorate goes. City folk, pro-choice, pro homosexual marriage, pro relaxation of drug laws, worried about militarism, big on gun control, suspicious of country folk and people who wear religion on their sleeves. Those factors are arguably as key to the Democrats appeal as any representation of labor interests.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I support boogieboarding.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

uh yeah carter reagan bush clinton all real tough guys

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

check out the Gipper's chub.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

the dems have been in a sort of freefall since the 50s, more or less, when conservatism was declared 'dead'

-- deej

I don't know that I buy this, not entirely. The aspects of 60s style countercultural thinking that the Republican party use to so effectively to foment anti-liberal hysteria really are part of the heart and soul of the modern Democratic party, at least as far as the electorate goes. City folk, pro-choice, pro homosexual marriage, pro relaxation of drug laws, worried about militarism, big on gun control, suspicious of country folk and people who wear religion on their sleeves. Those factors are arguably as key to the Democrats appeal as any representation of labor interests.

-- contenderizer, Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:11 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah sorry that should have read 60s, obv civil rights etc. were huge successes from the dem side

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

unbelievable

fuck time magazine

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Bob Dole is a tough guy. BOB DOLE.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

primary victory of goldwater in '64 the first signal that 'real conservatism' had returned. Repubs today prob see Ike as an even milder Clinton-esque moderate figur

the FDR remaking of the party had so demoralized the GOP that Nixon was considered the "true" conservative when he campaigned for Ike's VP seat; all they had to run against Stevenson the first time was a return to a "cleaner" Washington.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

why do you hate reagan/freedom so much and what?

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i hate reagan, too, and time magazine kind of sucks, but to their defense, don't they generally make the presidential winner the "man of the year?" i don't know. i thought GWB got it both times he won

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think weve had a major candidate w/mccains sort of bad angry vibes since nixon

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Reagan was also a cover boy during the "Lady Liberty" hoohah of July '86.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

"man of the year" just means "newsmaker of the year" you guys - i mean i even won it a couple years ago

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

okay, so it looks as though both the SEIU and the UFCW are both set to back Obama. that's a big chunk of union support.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooooooooooool

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

uh yeah carter reagan bush clinton all real tough guys

Uh, except for Carter, yeah. Maybe not real tough guys, but perceived tough guys, and certainly perceived to be the toughest guy in the GE in that election cycle. And yes, Bill Clinton was considered more of your tough guy "Daddy" than Bob Dole.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Whereas Barack is like your cool uncle who lets you crash on his couch whenever your Dad is being, like, a total toolbag.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno man, ross perot was pretty tough

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

In their own ways, I think both HRC and Obama are exceptions to that rule, btw. Obama can win without being the toughest guy in the GE (tho I think he'll lose to McCain). HRC can lose while being the perceived toughest gal in the GE (and I think she'll lose to McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://earthhopenetwork.net/bush%20art/time_cover_bush.jpg

is this real?

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

yes

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

yah i feel yr pain clinton and that wouldnt be prudent ghwb were considered tough WHAAAATEVEEEER try again la times

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

old ass shining city on the hill reagan and im a uniter not a divider gwb can be added to the list

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel from whence the mccain boner

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

it's the portrait of bush on the cover of time up there that i can't believe is real -- it is really really bad!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.hermeswashere.com/images/TimeCover_BushResigns.jpg

i dont remember this happening

and what, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

OK romney endorsing live now.

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i like that he's an "american" revolutionary, too, it helps all those absent-minded people with american flags on their front porches who find it difficult to remember what country they live in

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

A-W-K-W-A-R-D

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

live?? the last thing they did was some pre-game concert in milwaukee!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

that would be so awz if bush resigned and gave the big thumbs up on the way out

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

like "i know guys, i fucked up! good times ahead!"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"no hard feelins, right stretch?"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

The "tough guy" thing makes a certain amount of sense. Except that it's wrong. Might be more accurate to say that America picks the father figure that it wants - or thinks it needs (I'm speaking historically and don't intend to slight Hillary, who could change this dynamic). So victory does entail winning a masculinity contest, but you'd have to be an idiot to say that masculinity = nothing more than toughness.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel from whence the mccain boner

I don't like McCain at all. But I think he will be the favorite (slightly, perhaps) to win the GE once the conventions are over.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

why? cause he's a rootin tootin tough dude + the press loves him? he doesn't have much else going for him

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

none of us has the slightest idea what politically suicidal things Hillary's desperation, McCain's bluster, or Obama's Jesusness might cause them to say in the next 8 months.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's Jesusness

lol

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

both dem candidates are more charismatic than john kerry, people have largely turned against the iraq conflict since '04, mccain is HELLA old, republican base is pretty shaky on mccain's qualities, huge dem voter turnout in primaries, republicans routed in midterm elections ... bad bad signs for mccain dude

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

im scared of a mccain presidency and i dont rule it out but the balls not really in his court right now

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

cause he's a rootin tootin tough dude + the press loves him

Yes.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej OTM. It's a mistake to discount McCain (appeals well outside trad Republican base, well-respected, comes across tough, sharp and honorable, war record, white guy, etc.), but he's got a very tough fite ahead of him.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

That and that McCain has the "straight-talking maverick" label going for him (which may be a canard in reality, but voters love the image). Also, he'll peel off independents and Democratic moderates (especially those who are a bit hawkish).

I'm not saying McCain is a heavy favorite, but I think he's smart money.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not so sure that voters love the "straight talk" image, like Joe Scarborough said it didn't exactly work for him in Michigan.

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021408dailyupdategraph1.gif

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Like I've said, McCain's problem has always been getting to the GE (because he's hated by lots of the GOP's core constituency, precisely because he hasn't always followed the party line), but he's in much better shape -- for exactly the same reasons -- once he gets to a GE.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Daniel, what do you think of the line "John McCain has sold out his principles in exchange for his party's nomination," or the notion that he's a respected figure fronting an effort to smuggle the GOP party line back into the White House? It's a strong charge, sure, but there's some support for that argument to be had.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

That and that McCain has the "straight-talking maverick" label going for him (which may be a canard in reality, but voters love the image)

This is indeed a canard, Daniel, since the GOP doesn't trust him and any independent who might have voted for him has read the paper trail of compromises – like today's SHAMEFUL waterboarding vote.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Elmo: I think that will be helpful against McCain. And I do think we ought to charge directly at his perceived strengths.

Alfred: You're right. But people generally vote on vague notions, not specific policy positions. The challenge will be to cast McCain in a new -- and negative -- light. Given that McCain's real constituency is the MSM, that won't be easy.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

so far "straight talk" has yielded one phrase that the Dem nominees are already beating McCain over the head with (100 years in Iraq) and another that they'll probably be using soon (I don't know much about the economy better get crackin' and read Greenspan's book)

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, who benefits and who suffers if this guy runs as a third-party candidate?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain cant help himself w/that 100 years in iraq stuff - its not straight talk its just a stubborn old man duh

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

the "100 years in iraq" thing is really overblown

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, regardless of who becomes president we will have troops there for a very long time

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain's support is not only shaky it's schizophrenic. among his supporters are people who are still enthusiastically pro-war, AND otherwise moderate-to-conservative types who are wholly disenchanted with the war. he skates on reputation but none of his candidacy makes much sense -- how long can this completely impossible coalition hold together based on personality?

i'm not saying it's going to be easy beating him cos yeah the press has a hardon for the guy, but there's a strong whiff of giuliani about him.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel's right. McCain's 'frame' is up in the air with the gop confusion and it's a matter of who defines it forcefully enough and quickly enough for any of those semi-abstractions to make any difference.

tremendoid, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

how long can this completely impossible coalition hold together based on personality?

Through his inauguration.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

im quite certain that bloomberg is just manipulating the media into raising his public profile as no one would ever in a million years actually vote for him - the nyc mayoralty has a term limit of 2 you know

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

"we're in a tough spot, my friends, but we gotta just grit our teeth and soldier it out, shit will happen and people will suffer and there's nothing we can do about it. so vote for me."

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Bloomberg is a police-state-friendly social "liberal." I think he'd make McCain easier pickings for Obama, but I also don't see him running now.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

one thing that doesnt bode well for mccain is that he was left for dead just a few months ago - then everyone realized they really hated the rest of the guys to they gave him a second shot - ie its not love

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel are you trying to scare us into fundraising or something? i think mccain is the best shot the GOP could have fielded this time around, but c'mon the deck is stacked against him pretty badly, and his liabilities are big.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

kerry 08 could beat mccain 08

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

what do you think of the line "John McCain has sold out his principles in exchange for his party's nomination," or the notion that he's a respected figure fronting an effort to smuggle the GOP party line back into the White House?

-- elmo

any independent who might have voted for him has read the paper trail of compromises

-- Alfred

It's foolish to predict how well or poorly a canditate will do by analyzing their actions in light of your own values. I don't think either of elmo's arguments are popular memes w/ potential McCain supporters, though the second will undoubtedly be an issue in the GE.

And Alfred makes too many assumptions, both WRT what independents believe and what they read.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

haha and i already talked to tremendoid i know hes just siding with dan to lower his own expectations

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"we're in a tough spot, my friends, but we gotta just grit our teeth and soldier it out, shit will happen and people will suffer and there's nothing we can do about it. so vote for me."

-- elmo argonaut

Try: "War is a hard business. I know that better than most. For that reason, I won't send troops into war foolishly. But once we're there -- and once we've committed ourselves to a dangerous mission -- we must see it through. We must do the things that other nations can't or won't, because we are a special nation, built on courage and grit. I will bring our troops home as soon as I can, but I won't make promises to you that I can't keep, and I'll always level with you. That is something you can take to the bank, and something I hope you'll vote on."

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

NM WINNER BEING ANNOUNCED NOW

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

No, I'm not trying to scare you. But I think McCain will be tough to beat. Obama can do it (I'm far less convinced HRC can), but it won't be easy.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

though i will say that one thing obama has over either of the other candidates is supporter enthusiasm. his base of support is a lot more solid than hrc's or mccain's (for now at least). and i don't think that's to be overlooked.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^ Yes.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

folks there are independents who legitimately feel they don't fit comfortably into either party and then there are independents who are just fkn clueless

xp, and the american people respond: "let me level with you president mccain, this war is a dog and we want it over with"

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Hope you're right.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

War is a hard business. I know that better than most. For that reason, I won't send troops into war foolishly. But once we're there -- and once we've committed ourselves to a dangerous mission -- we must see it through. We must do the things that other nations can't or won't, because we are a special nation, built on courage and grit. I will bring our troops home as soon as I can, but I won't make promises to you that I can't keep, and I'll always level with you. That is something you can take to the bank, and something I hope you'll vote on.

lol i hope you enjoy yr retirement

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL. Maybe McCain won't retire, but I'll have to as an armchair speechwriter.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

gr80 where are you seeing NM results?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

right now at least i think the line on mccain, which has the virtue of being true, is that he's bush's third term

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMA: 71,396
EDWARDS 2,157
DODD 81
KUCINICH 574
RICHARDSON 1,305
BIDEN 122
HILLARY 73,105

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

well shit

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL jack cafferty bagging on boring-ass NM election official

gr8080, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, $10 says penn/wolfson/et al. try to play NM as 'the end of the o-mentum'

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

oh well if you just look at the exit polls

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

continues the trend of obama losing by small margins and winning by big ones.

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

See Physicians for a National Health Program site for details.

Uh I'd trust them for info on health care about as much as I'd trust Exxon for info on energy policy.

Cutting costs is part and parcel of any healthcare reform package.

Single-payer is considered politically unfeasible because, while it would cost less per person, it would shift the costs from employers to the government, and while at the end of the day that money is still coming out of the pockets of American workers, the consensus is that Americans wouldn't really see it that way.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

don't snark man PNHP is a good organization. there are a lot of liberal and left wing doctors out there who hate insurance companies just as much as you do.

besides, for your analogy to work, the doctors themselves = the dudes working on exxon's oil rigs

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf @ "winning" by less than 2,000 votes

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

why is that wtf

a win's a win

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

or are you just saying "damn, tight contest"

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

'Cause Simon pointed that out already

Michael White, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

It's interesting if you read Obama's latest economic speeches, like the one he gave in Wisconsin yesterday, they sound like nothing so much as '90s Clintonomics redux. Bill Clinton was considered a "technocrat" (more neutrally) or a "triangulator" (more negatively) by contemporary commentators, for his micro-initiative approach to dealing with the economy. He was famous for having a targeted tax credit for every problem. Now look at Obama's speech - targeted tax credits galore. There's even a "Credit Card Bill of Rights" - remember the "Patients Bill of Rights"? Obama seems to decry NAFTA, but if you read what he actually promises closely, he's pretty moderate on trade as well: "I won't stand here and tell you that we can - or should - stop free trade." In fact, it's easy to close your eyes and imagine the whole speech being given by Bill Clinton in 1996. The irony, of course, is that Obama famously stated that the Republicans have been the party of ideas for the past 15 years or so, a none too subtle dig at Bill Clinton. It takes some chutzpah for him to make a criticism like that, when his own economicy policy is pretty much lifted wholesale from the Clinton playbook.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the "100 years in iraq" thing is really overblown

overblown, please, a fucking gift is what it is

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Only slightly more than: "bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran."

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

And Alfred makes too many assumptions, both WRT what independents believe and what they read.

-- contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:06 (51 minutes ago) Link

I knew someone would get it wrong. Here's what I tried to say: by the time of the general election, Obama or HRC should actively woo indepedents by reminding those swinging leftwards that McCain is a coward on torture and FISA, and those swinging rightwards that he has no clue what to do with the economy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

It's fairly easy if Obama doesn't pussy out because McCain's an old man.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

what most terrifies me about an Obama vs McCain election -- and no one's really talkign about it -- is the younger man showing deference to his opponent's age, seniority, and "life of public service." That twaddle sank Mondale in '84 before he even had a chance.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama has already been talking about McCain's "half century of service," which actually functions as a sly dig at his age.

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

It's interesting if you read Obama's latest economic speeches, like the one he gave in Wisconsin yesterday, they sound like nothing so much as '90s Clintonomics redux. Bill Clinton was considered a "technocrat" (more neutrally) or a "triangulator" (more negatively) by contemporary commentators, for his micro-initiative approach to dealing with the economy. He was famous for having a targeted tax credit for every problem. Now look at Obama's speech - targeted tax credits galore. There's even a "Credit Card Bill of Rights" - remember the "Patients Bill of Rights"? Obama seems to decry NAFTA, but if you read what he actually promises closely, he's pretty moderate on trade as well: "I won't stand here and tell you that we can - or should - stop free trade." In fact, it's easy to close your eyes and imagine the whole speech being given by Bill Clinton in 1996. The irony, of course, is that Obama famously stated that the Republicans have been the party of ideas for the past 15 years or so, a none too subtle dig at Bill Clinton. It takes some chutzpah for him to make a criticism like that, when his own economicy policy is pretty much lifted wholesale from the Clinton playbook.

-- o. nate, Thursday, February 14, 2008 4:46 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah you kind of have a point here ... I'm kind of hoping/assuming that Obama's just speaking that MOR language in economics but wouldn't actually practice it ...? im not really fluent in his talks on economics though.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

on other issues, i am confident that while he talks to the middle he is pushing from the left but i am not clear on his economic stance, and i know he has some more conservative economists in his potential cabinet

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

dudes, free trade/NAFTA is a train that left the station years ago. It ain't comin' back.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:10 (sixteen years ago) link

NAFTA was one of those deplorable eventualities that transcended party.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost doctors are like workers on oil rigs now?

Insurance companies aren't the only obstacle to health care reform.

Eppy, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

what most terrifies me about an Obama vs McCain election -- and no one's really talkign about it -- is the younger man showing deference to his opponent's age, seniority, and "life of public service." That twaddle sank Mondale in '84 before he even had a chance.

Here, I think you shouldn't worry, Alfred. Obama is plenty savvy. He's no Walter Mondale.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Insurance companies aren't the only obstacle to health care reform.

uh right but the group called "physicians for a national health plan" isn't one of them.

gff, Thursday, 14 February 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i28.tinypic.com/hv9onc.jpg

StanM, Friday, 15 February 2008 00:12 (sixteen years ago) link

uh right but the group called "physicians for a national health plan" isn't one of them.

Exactly. And the figures they provide aren't skewed high. They're lowballing it, if you ask the Republicans, insurance companies and physicians who oppose this sort of thing.

contenderizer, Friday, 15 February 2008 00:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I knew someone would get it wrong. Here's what I tried to say: by the time of the general election, Obama or HRC should actively woo indepedents by reminding those swinging leftwards that McCain is a coward on torture and FISA, and those swinging rightwards that he has no clue what to do with the economy.

-- Alfred

No, I got it the first time around. I was saying that McCain's track record on torture and the economy aren't silver bullets in the fight against him.

contenderizer, Friday, 15 February 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, and Hillary Scott.

contenderizer, Friday, 15 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

from that physicians site:

A universal public system would be financed this way: The public financing already funneled to Medicare and Medicaid would be retained. The difference, or the gap between current public funding and what we would need for a universal health care system, would be financed by a payroll tax on employers (about 7%) and an income tax on individuals (about 2%). The payroll tax would replace all other employer expenses for employees’ health care. The income tax would take the place of all current insurance premiums, co-pays, deductibles, and any and all other out of pocket payments.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 00:56 (sixteen years ago) link

totally OT i realize but

http://www.nybooks.com/images/tables/20060323img2.gif

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 01:06 (sixteen years ago) link

yes but where are the graphs for INNOVATION and CHOICE

gff, Friday, 15 February 2008 01:10 (sixteen years ago) link

financed by a payroll tax on employers (about 7%) and an income tax on individuals (about 2%).

It's doable, though the payroll tax they're talking about is a big bite (7%!!!) that would likely be passed on to employees in the form of lower wages and reduced benefits in other areas. That and/or higher costs for goods and services across the board.

But what they're talking about isn't what either Hillary or Obama are running on, right? It's just their thing.

contenderizer, Friday, 15 February 2008 01:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah. they're talking about what it would take for single-payer.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Representative John Lewis, an iconic figure from the Civil Rights era and one of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s most prominent black supporters, said Thursday night that he planned to cast his vote as a superdelegate for Senator Barack Obama in hopes of preventing a fight at the Democratic convention.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 15 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

John McCain's 23-year old daughter kinda has good taste in music.

I may have to switch my vote.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

dude was 49 when she was born!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 15 February 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

John McCain's 23-year old daughter kinda has good taste in music.

isn't this list the default when you first sign up for MySpace? or is that only if you sign up as a 23-year old white girl?

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I want to fuck a skanky Republican chick - m4w
Date: 2007-12-15, 9:31PM PST

I want to fuck a peroxide-blonde richbitch daddy's girl. I want to fuck a hotter, younger, stupider (if possible) version of Ann Coulter. You preferably grew up on Mercer Island and had your 16th birthday shown on "My Super Sweet 16." It's okay if you're only a republican because your parents are and you don't even know how many houses Congress has. At the very least I want to fuck a girl who wears a cross and thinks the Iraq War is a great idea.

I'm am a skinny-jean wearing hipster who goes to Evergreen, supports Dennis Kucinich and only listens to mix tapes of obscure 70's pop.
I am sick of cool, interesting girls who are more likely to make out with other girls than me.

I want the most bland, insipid cockgobbler on this side of the Cascades. I've always wanted to blow my load in your lip-glossed, bubble-gum chewing mouth, but class, social groups and a sense of morality have prevented me.

Your pictures get my smarmy pretension.

The Reverend, Friday, 15 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

David Bowie, Bob Dylan, Radiohead, Led Zeppelin, the Rolling Stones, the Who, the Beach Boys, Madonna, Jay-Z, the Smiths, Björk, Kanye West, the Cure, T. Rex, the Velvet Underground, 2 Pac and Dr. Dre, Elliott Smith, Modest Mouse, TV on the Radio, JAMC, Tom Waits, the Roots, Pulp, Blur, Ladytron, Spoon, Iggy and the Stooges, Goldfrapp, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah

"Tom is in your extended network"

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

isn't this list the default when you first sign up for MySpace? or is that only if you sign up as a 23-year old white girl?

The Cure and The Smiths are on the default playlist for all 23-year old white girls who sign up on MySpace? EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN! That pleases my nearly-40 year old self to no end.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 03:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Representative John Lewis, an iconic figure from the Civil Rights era and one of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s most prominent black supporters, said Thursday night that he planned to cast his vote as a superdelegate for Senator Barack Obama in hopes of preventing a fight at the Democratic convention.

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:43 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

pretty big deal

deej, Friday, 15 February 2008 03:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Rep. John Lewis and Sen. Barack Obama: I BET THEY'RE FRIENDS ON MYSPACE.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 03:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Link for Lewis? The story I saw had him considering switching, but not committed to it yet.

From MSNBC:

Since Feb. 5, superdelegate endorsements are 11-2 Obama over Clinton. (Clinton has also lost two delegates since then -- one today switched to Obama and Tom Lantos passed away.)

Don't think this includes another Georgia congressman (Dave Scott?) who switched today and certainly doesn't include Lewis.

Hubie Brown, Friday, 15 February 2008 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Key stat: Obama Leads McCain Head-to-Head (46% to 42% -- still very close), but McCain Leads HRC Head-to-Head (48% to 41%). Again, still all meaningless at this point, but it shows, I think, (a) why Obama is moving past HRC (he's a better matchup with McCain) and (b) that, even with Obama's momentum and massive rallies and with a moutain of money and enthusiasm at his disposal (i.e., perhaps at his peak point), he still is barely ahead of old, unexciting War Hero John McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

(Maybe, tho, McCain is also enjoying a "surge," of sorts, since he's all but wrapped-up the GOP nomination over the past 10 days).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 04:07 (sixteen years ago) link

he still is barely ahead of old, unexciting War Hero John McCain.

Yeah, but...this is the US electorate, right? What kind of numbers would an unbeatable candidate look like in a world where these elections typically come down to the greater of 49.x% and 49.y%? I'm asking seriously...how do these numbers compare to similar polls in reference to any historic blowouts? 84, 72, or 64...could a time-traveling Internet board have contained posts like yours?

Doctor Casino, Friday, 15 February 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think those head to head polls are very useful in predicting the way the election will ultimately fall - they are better at showing how dems would fair against one person than giving you an idea of how close it would actually be

deej, Friday, 15 February 2008 04:31 (sixteen years ago) link

could a time-traveling Internet board have contained posts like yours?

NEVER.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 04:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Not sure what you mean, Deej. If you're saying it's way too early to focus on head-to-head polls, I agree. But to the extent you believe that Obama is peaking (e.g., Tom Brokaw saying Obama's momentum is "nuclear" at this point), then I think it's instructive to note that -- even now -- he's polling nationally only about 4% above McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

kind of weird, since john lewis gave hillary an official endorsement a couple of months ago

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 12:54 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain trying very hard to distance himself from the ''100 Years in Iraq'' comment by saying he meant (a) like our continuing presence in countries like Korea or Germany (i.e., not a large-scale fighting force) and (b) only for the length of time and to the extent approved by the Iraqi Gov't. Who knows if it will work. Certainly, McCain's boxed himself in on the issue: The Democratic nominee will want a quick withdrawal from Iraq on a specific timetable, and McCain will vehemently oppose that.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 13:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno, seems to me the Dems are also in danger of boxing themselves in a bit over Iraq. After all, how likely is a quick withdrawal, whoever gets elected? Given that at this stage it would probably lead to Iraq completely falling apart. There's no good move for a Democratic president.

Zelda Zonk, Friday, 15 February 2008 13:26 (sixteen years ago) link

how likely is a quick withdrawal, whoever gets elected

about as likely as flowers growing out of my ass

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 13:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, that's partly the point. McCain -- like Bush -- having created a mess, is going to exploit the dificulties that the Democratic nominee will have in realistically proposing an alternative to (a) call Democrats ''weak,'' and ''without real convictions,'' ''negative,'' and ''defearist,'' while (b) using the muddle to drive the debate back to where the GOP is comfortable (displays of strength without demanding public sacrifice).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 13:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno, seems to me the Dems are also in danger of boxing themselves in a bit over Iraq. After all, how likely is a quick withdrawal, whoever gets elected? Given that at this stage it would probably lead to Iraq completely falling apart. There's no good move for a Democratic president.

And make no mistake: McCain wants this debate. It's the whole focus of his candidacy. Maybe he badly miscalculated, but I doubt it.

American voters like STRENGTH. They may, on occassion, want an inspirational, transformative figure -- like Obama might be -- but normally, they like the toughest looking and sounding guy in the room.

We'll see.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

uh yeah carter reagan bush clinton all real tough guys

-- jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 21:14 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 13:47 (sixteen years ago) link

So, I guess I'll say it again: Yes, except for Carter (which was an unusual election cycle), all the people named in that string were -- in their GE's -- the toughest looking and sounding candidates. (n.1)

____________________________
(n.1) And please don't give me Bob Dole v. Bill Clinton as an example. Yes, Dole may have been actually tougher than Clinton, I guess. But Clinton looked and sounded, at the time, tougher, more savvy, and more like your daddy than Dole did. Same with Kerry/Bush.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 13:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Daniel, I understand the point your trying to make, but I don't think your unifying theory of toughness holds up very well and there's not a lot of evidence for it beyond broad generalities. besides that, I don't think it's particularly useful to generalize the psychology of 'the average american voter' especially since the general electorate who voted reagan into the white house is of a different generation that the one who re-elected george w.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:02 (sixteen years ago) link

DUDE PLZ STOP IT THERE IS NOTHING TOUGH ABT BILL CLINTON OK GOD

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:04 (sixteen years ago) link

You're right, it's wrong to overgeneralize. But some observations can and must be made, at a minimum in order to plan and strategize: We're all making them on this thread, on blogs, on news shows, and certainly by the candidates themselves. I'm sure, for instance, that HRC carefully considered how her Iraq (and Iran) votes would play with voters -- on a whole series of levels, specific and broad -- before she cast them.

And Jhoshea, you can all-cap it if you like, but you're 100% wrong.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 14:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton was also very tough in a all-important "meta" catagory. He wasn't passive or a shrinking violet or let attacks just pass him by; he fought, not just defensively but aggressively/offensively, which made lots of Democratic voters' hearts leap.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 14:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway, Elmo, I understand your point, and there's obviously a lot to it, I admit.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

bill clinton's a hard lobster claw sheathed in the velveteen glove of a pimp.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:09 (sixteen years ago) link

yah yah blah blah all the winners look tough the losers look weak after the fact - mcain looks absolutely nothing like any recent president - hes an angry old man w/none of the ability to connect on the heart level that carter reagan clinton or gwb had - hes a second tier candidate whos abt to be completely exposed

im not sure how long youve been on these threads daniel but id guess if we went back a little way youd be a strong supporter of the hillary inevitability concept eh?

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton...wasn't passive or a shrinking violet or let attacks just pass him by; he fought, not just defensively but aggressively/ offensively

For NOTHING but his own viselike grip on power.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

No, but not for the reasons you apparently think. HRC's negatives were always sky-high, and her support was always thin. She made herself out to be the "inevitable nominee," and had great name-recognition, and that's what drove voters to her for awhile. It might have worked, if she prevented anyone else from appearing to be viable. Once Obama emerged, and people weren't drifting to HRC just based on her name and branding, she was headed for trouble.

And, as I say, normally HRC's thought-process (cast votes showing strength and hawkishness) is generally a smart move. But this election may be different. And that doesn't happen often, so I'm not just defining it ad-hoc.

Dr. M: You're right. But that's a kind of strength, too, and voter see it.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 14:24 (sixteen years ago) link

economist has a cover story on obama, offering a positive, if wary, overview, stopping short of endorsing him.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=10689547

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 14:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton taking on a more anti-corporate tone to her campaign, even calling out Obama by accussing him of caving in to special interests.

does she really want to pick this fight? isn't she pretty vulnerable herself on this front? (obama's camp responded to the charges by stating that she's "taken more money from Washington lobbyists than any Republican running for president."

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago) link

You're right, it's wrong to overgeneralize.

not always

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

dude i hate to be the one to break this to you but the giants are one of the worst superbowl teams ever and the pats are one of the best - this shit will not be close.

-- jhøshea, Sunday, 3 February 2008 16:31 (1 week ago) Bookmark Link

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

First of all, Clinton co-sponsored that nuclear regulatory bill that she's using to criticize Obama, and the nuclear energy company Excelon Corp. in question had also hired Mark Penn. I don't think she can push this very far without it backfiring.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

And this is besides the fact that she's talking directly out of her ass.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I caught some of McCain on Larry King last night. You can tell already that national security, the "War on Terrorism", and not letting the terrorists defeat us in Iraq are going to be the great themes of this campaign. I think if Clinton were smart, she would play up the fact that voters trust her more than Obama on national security issues, and point out that McCain is going to run on that.

o. nate, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

enemies list: tracer hand

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

honestly, i don't think that's an option for her. as soon as she mentions iraq and national security, she would be pressed by team obama to give another unconvincing explanation about why she authorized the war in the first place. it may be someone spun into a strength for use against mccain, but even then she comes up extremely short -- does any of her vaunted 35 years contain any military experience? -- and it's a huge vulnerability for obama to exploit.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

basically she's going to continue running on the economy and healthcare and hope to god that nothing horrible happens in iraq in the next 3 weeks.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Whereas McCain has to hope nothing horrible happens in Iraq by November.

Bets?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

No way to know, at this point, who benefits politically from further deterioration in Iraq. It depends (a point that you've made, more broadly, to me on this thread).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Precisely.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ Michael Reagan:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25026

Is that what the let’s-stay-home-on-election-day conservatives want? Do they want the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, as their president? Do they want the pseudo-Marist Barack Obama -- who reportedly has a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters -- hanging that photo in the Oval Office?

Do they want Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous former first lady, back in the White House enjoying all those furnishings she and her husband tried to swipe from the mansion?

Do they want a Democrat spending even more money that the government doesn’t have on scores of programs right out of Karl Marx’s playbook?

That’s exactly what they’ll get if they sit out the election and stay home on Election Day. That’s called biting off your nose to spite your face. Or even more to the point, political suicide.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

The furniture thief story is still circulating?

kenan, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

"scores of programs right out of karl marx's playbook"

"enjoying all those furnishings she and her husband tried to swipe from the mansion"

"a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters -- hanging that photo in the Oval Office"

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

the elephant never forgets, kenan.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

does any of her vaunted 35 years contain any military experience?

Not sure what you mean by "military experience" - she was never in the military, but she is on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

o. nate, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm about to go hear some reps from the Clinton campaign speak about health care at my work. Will report back.

(I think the Obama campaign is coming to speak on another day, hopefully)

Jordan, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

And Obama's on Foreign Relations, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs committees -- that doesn't mean he's got any military experience either.

But the idea the HRC is 'stronger on national security' than obama seems to have come from nowhere. Is there any evidence to suggest that she'd be a better commander in cheif, apart from public perception?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

she appears to enjoy cluster-bombing little children, that should count for something

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

pseudo-Marist?

mookieproof, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.marists.org/

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.maristsociety.org/

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC's Iraq/Iran votes were supposed to bolster her hawkish bona fides, FWIW.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

But the idea the HRC is 'stronger on national security' than obama seems to have come from nowhere. Is there any evidence to suggest that she'd be a better commander in cheif, apart from public perception?

It's the public perception that I'm talking about - a public perception which she seems to be unable (or unwilling) to capitalize on - despite the fact that McCain is bound to make it a major issue in the fall. It just seems unusually clumsy for someone who's considered to be such a smart campaigner. Perhaps Obama has really got her terrified to bring it up by constantly bashing her with the Iraq vote.

o. nate, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

she's a hawk?

remy bean, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

NY Times Editorial sez: Show Us The Money

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC's Iraq/Iran votes were supposed to bolster her hawkish bona fides, FWIW.

so you think getting on the wrong side of the most important issues of the day was a "strategy"?

dmr, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yall realize that hillary has been making speeches critical of the war, of the bush admin's approach to it, of the execution of it, and the rebuilding "efforts" for years right??

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

There's a difference between words and actions there, unfortunately.

Nicole, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

do you not remember 2003 and the immense popular support for the war, both in congress and in the general public? of course she voted for it. xxpost

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Nicole i agree -- it was a terrible vote

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

guess what: the clinton banner flies whichever way the wind is blowing.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

yall realize that hillary has been making speeches critical of the war, of the bush admin's approach to it, of the execution of it, and the rebuilding "efforts" for years right??

uh while this might be technically true its more accurate to say that hillarys stances on the war have followed behind public popular public opinion by abt 6 months

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

or what elmo said

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

George H.W. Bush (41) set to endsorse McCain.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, yeah. What th' fuck else is he gonna do?

kenan, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

cry in his beer

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Pegs Noonan on the zing:

The race is about "speeches versus solutions." Her unnamed opponent stands for the first, she for the second. He is all "words," she is "action." "Words are cheap," she said.

If they were so cheap, her inability to marshal them would not have cost her so dearly.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120302279226969393.html

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

boo-ya

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

hil v mathews round 1m http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/02/unrepentent_mat.php

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

so you think getting on the wrong side of the most important issues of the day was a "strategy"?

Yes, I do. A strategy that may have backfired.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

"may have"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

why anyone would want to vote for someone who makes such unprincipled AND totally stupid strategic decisions continues to elude me

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I say "may have," Shakey, because the nomination is still undecided.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama, at a presser this morning, makes a pretty good parry of Clinton's "solutions" attack:

"Yesterday, Senator Clinton unveiled her latest in a long line of slogans, which argues that she’s proposed solutions while others have not. Now, all of us have proposed plenty of solutions in this race. On some we differ. On many, we agree. The problem we have is not a lack of good ideas. It’s that Washington today is a place where good ideas go to die. They’re the victim of petty, partisan politics, point-scoring, and special interest influence that’s out of control."

http://thepage.time.com/obama-remarks-from-friday-press-conference/

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

It’s that Washington today is a place where good ideas go to die.

again with the zings

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe hill would have preferred to keep troops off the ground and go back to bombing the shit out iraq by plane?

artdamages, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh and sanctions - can't forget those.

artdamages, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

cool: bob kerrey, who endorsed hillary, calls the campaign out on the florida bullshit:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Kerrey_Sorry_Florida.html

(not that he has any say in the matter, it's just cool that someone who even endorsed hillary sees that it's kind of a b.s. move)

Mark Clemente, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, the call by the Clinton campaign to seat Florida & Michigan delegates is I think the least defensible move they've made in the campaign so far.

o. nate, Friday, 15 February 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

again with the zings

But they're still better zings.

Michael White, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

The health care talk was alright. Tammy Baldwin & Ann Lewis talking up Hilary and the universal health care plan. It was interesting to get some details on the plan, which does sound appealing on paper - if you like the health care plan you've got, stick with it, and if you don't like it or don't have health care you can choose from a federal menu of private and public plans (like government employees get now?). Paid for by tax subsidies and hopefully made cheap by low administrative overhead (comparisons with social security) and reliance on IT. They got some tough questions but there wasn't a whole lot of time for Q&A.

Jordan, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

(it's not enough to swing my vote or anything, but it sure would be great if something like that could actually get passed & implemented)

Jordan, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

But they're still better zings.

oh definitely! I was approving

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/qnmvj4.jpg

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Putin is such a gangster

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not really much of a Noonan fan, but this a good point:

To top it all off, Mrs. Clinton has, for 30 years, held deep respect for her husband's political acumen, for his natural, instinctive sense of how to campaign. And he's never let her down. Now he's flat-footed, an oaf lurching from local radio interview to finger-pointing lecture. Where did the golden gut go? How did his gifts abandon him?

What has happened to Bill? People can say what they like about his politics, but he did seem to have a good ear for what the public wanted to hear and he seems to have lost that now.

Nicole, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

9/11 changed everything?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

(Slightly more seriously -- seems like any pro in any field who, having gotten used to coasting by while at the top of the totem pole, gets lazy/befuddled/frustrated when things don't work anymore and starts to flail.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^otm

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

its cause hes not campaigning for himself - that remove is fucking w/his instincts

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill Clinton is like the Michael Jackson of American politics (sans plastic surgery)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

and sans fucking kids

sleep, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

IT IS BECAUSE HE IS CURRENTLY NOT GETTING ANY ON THE SIDE.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

its cause hes not campaigning for himself - that remove is fucking w/his instincts

-- jhøshea

Who knows, but this feels true. He's a creature of ego, and the role he's currently playing doesn't serve that (& isn't served by that).

contenderizer, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

whats the difference between michael jackson and bill clinton...?

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Founder of Boston tells Huckabee to quit playing his song
By HOLLY RAMER
Associated Press Writer

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) _ The chief songwriter and founder of the band Boston has more than a feeling that he's being ripped off by Mike Huckabee.

In a letter to the Republican presidential hopeful, Tom Scholz complains that Huckabee is using his 1970s smash hit song "More Than a Feeling" without his permission. A former member of the band, Barry Goudreau, has appeared with Huckabee at campaign events, and they have played the song with Huckabee's band, Capitol Offense.

Scholz, who said Goudreau left the band more than 25 years ago after a three-year stint, objects to the implication that the band and one of its members has endorsed Huckabee's candidacy.

"Boston has never endorsed a political candidate, and with all due respect, would not start by endorsing a candidate who is the polar opposite of most everything Boston stands for," wrote Scholz, adding that he is supporting Democratic Sen. Barack Obama. "By using my song, and my band's name Boston, you have taken something of mine and used it to promote ideas to which I am opposed. In other words, I think I've been ripped off, dude!"

Fred Bramante, who was chairman of Huckabee's New Hampshire campaign, called the allegations ridiculous. He said he attended dozens of Huckabee rallies in New Hampshire and other states and never heard Huckabee play "More Than a Feeling," other than when Goudreau campaigned with him in Iowa in October.

"Governor Huckabee plays 'Sweet Home Alabama.' Does that mean Lynyrd Skynyrd is endorsing him? He plays 'Louie Louie.' Does that mean The Kingsmen are endorsing him? To me, it's ridiculous," he said. "Never once has he said, 'The band Boston endorses me.'

Tensions between Scholz and some of the early band members date from the early 1980s, when CBS Inc. sued the band over delays in recording new albums. The company's Epic Records label recorded the band's first two releases: "Boston," in 1976, and "Don't Look Back," in 1978.

Scholz — who wrote, engineered, and laid down nearly all the instrumental tracks on the first album — countersued for the rights to the band's name and music. Three members of the original band, including Goudreau, testified for the record company, which lost.

In his letter, Scholz referred to Huckabee as the "straight talk candidate," but that label more often is applied to Sen. John McCain, who has had his own troubles when it comes to his musical playlist. Last week, McCain's campaign agreed to stop playing John Mellencamp's songs "Our Country" and "Pink Houses" at his rallies after the liberal rocker complained.

Mellencamp had supported Democrat John Edwards, who recently dropped out of the race.

Other candidates have had better luck selecting songs. Celine Dion said she was "thrilled" that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton used her song, "You and I" as her official campaign anthem. Obama frequently blares U2's "City of Blinding Lights" at his events.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

and sans fucking kids

banging underaged poontang, sleeping with 8 yo boys = eh, minor differences!

obviously I'm kidding (mostly) but there are some similarities regarding overweening hubris/colossal ego + sex scandals + bizarre self-destructive behavior and a general "disastrous love affair with America public" narrative

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

"Obama '08 - Together, we can redeem the English language."

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Note to Huckabee: Stop using BOSTON songs. Instead, use KANSAS songs.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

or Head East. That dude's all et up with Jesus.

will, Friday, 15 February 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Never been any reason to vote for John McCain.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 15 February 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

SEIU has made its formal endorsement for Obama.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's new wisconsin tv ads coming hard, fast, negative, and probably expensive

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm 100% sure the onion has, um, skewered the "rock star takes back his song from republican", but i wouldn't know how to find this.

tremendoid, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

when they do meet in debate again, she's ensuring that there's no way it'll be the same smiling, best-friends discussion of differences -- she could afford that when she was still considered the marginal favorite, but now she needs to come out swinging.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

what i mean is, i don't know if the "hillary is better at debates" conventional wisdom is going to hold up once she starts using them to launch attacks. "soft voice" hillary is gone forever.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

the next debate should be interesting. i see obama having a "there you go again hillary" type moment.

artdamages, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't know if this has been posted, so I'll post it :D

http://politicalmarket.cnn.com/

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, all of the prediction markets (intrade, rasmussen, & cnn) have obama as the heavy favorite for the nomination

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Last night I watched tv for about 45 min and saw an Obama ad for every Clinton ad (in Wisconsin). Kinda nice that the Obama ads are purely positive.

Jordan, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

what i mean is, i don't know if the "hillary is better at debates" conventional wisdom is going to hold up once she starts using them to launch attacks. "soft voice" hillary is gone forever.

She'll be fine at the next debate, even if she swings harder at Obama. Her debating success comes from her policy wonkery, not her "soft voice."

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Republican Gerrymandering Favors Obama in Texas

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

kind of bummed he's not making an appearance here.

His (half) sister is a prof. at the university and is appearing at events every day until Tuesday.

Chelsea is whoring here and on Maui till tuesday as well.

gr8080, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

(Tho, if she gets shrill, it could obv. hurt her. But by contrast, if Obama has another "You're likeable enough" moment, it will hurt him.)

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

For a candidate who prides herself on laying out nuances and details, I think Hillary's deliberate misreading and distortion of voting records and policies should be pointed out as disingenuous and in horribly bad faith, even insulting. I'm just hoping she gets called on it.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton surrogate Bob Kerrey, shooting his mouth off again:

“You don’t change the rules in the middle of the game. Period... No new vote and no new caucuses, either. Just stick to the rules that they agreed to,” Kerrey said firmly.

Clinton campaign needs muzzle their dude, lol

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ the remark was re: MI & FL btw

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

uh i wouldnt fuck w/him he is a war criminal after all

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

um so apparently Lewis did not actually switch???

deej, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.ajc.com/master/content/news/stories/2008/02/15/lewis_0215.html

deej, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/featuredtask.html

^^ "implicit association" test of political candidates, supposed to measure unconscious reactions to images of the political candidates -- interesting

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

the times reporter has stuck by his story fwiw

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

deej, when pressed to clarify, he said if it came down to a convention vote of delegates, he said he would side with obama:

"When I talked to Congressman Lewis last night, he said, "look, the voters in his district on Super Tuesday in Georgia overwhelmingly supported the candidacy of Senator Barack Obama. And he said he would quote, "never ever do anything to go against the action of them." So he says, if this comes down to be a super-delegate vote — which he hopes and believes it will not — that he will support Senator Obama. But even more than that, he says he's concerned about this campaign going into a long fight to the convention. He said it would be damaging to Senator Obama and to Senator Clinton. And he said unequivocally that he would cast his vote for Senator Obama."

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/times_reporter_reiterates_lewi.php

elmo argonaut, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.pollster.com/USTopzDems600.png

jhøshea, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9897/demsfortelecomimmunityag4.jpg

StanM, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

wow @ Obama's Juggernaut of Hope.

petey_carnum, Friday, 15 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

StanM's jpg OTM OTM OTM that is some messed up shit

kenan, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9872969-38.html

kenan, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Olbermann 4 president

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/77138/

StanM, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary may win popular vote in Texas but lose in the delegate count.

jaymc, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at olbermann so pissed off he's ACTUALLY STUTTERING AND SPITTING.

btw -- No one should be surprised that Hillary thinks it's a dandy idea to prevent any legal action against the telecoms that illegally, irresponsibly, and damn near gleefully agreed to let the government monitor all of your phone calls and internet activity. Yeah, what frivolous lawsuits those would be. :(

kenan, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Olbermann's been getting more and more muckrake-y over the last year. It's been fun to watch.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 15 February 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah. He funny.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 15 February 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

What does the suspiciously weasel-sounding phrase "failed to oppose" mean? Did they vote against it or not vote or what?

Eppy, Saturday, 16 February 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton didnt vote

jhøshea, Saturday, 16 February 2008 00:04 (sixteen years ago) link

News to noone at this point, I imagine, but Obama takes the lead in Tx.

Now, mind you, this may be an outlier poll, as two others out today show HRC ahead (and way ahead in one of them). But maybe the trend lines in Tx will favor Obama. The funny delegate-assignment system seems certain to favor him. And this possibly outlier poll is a headline in Drudge, which -- as we all know -- often dictates how the press covers a story.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton leads Obama among Latino voters 44% to 42%.

!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I am reading that correctly, right? That Obama's support among Latino voters is within 2% of Clinton's?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's gonna hulk smash on mar 4

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Mitt Romney: Illegal Immigrant

?!?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

In delegates in Tx., it looks that way. In the popular vote in Ohio and Tx., I'm less sure. Either way, the nomination appears to be his to lose.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary Rodham Clinton showcased her Hispanic support Friday, releasing an impressive list of 105 supporters from the Rio Grande Valley.

the valley reaaaaaaaaaaally loves clinton. dammit.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 02:03 (sixteen years ago) link

ok, i haven't read that story, but that's hilarious. See, it's not the number that's impressive, because it's quite pathetic, but look! Oscar de la Hoya... Carlos Santana... Jimmy Smits... impressive!

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 02:05 (sixteen years ago) link

?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

"SEIU has made its formal endorsement for Obama."

My people! Custodians unite!

scott seward, Saturday, 16 February 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Skot you must be a delegate to the convention.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 16 February 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

"scott seward casts his vote for...enthroned"

Eppy, Saturday, 16 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 04:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Enthroned/Ulver '08

gr8080, Saturday, 16 February 2008 04:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Ok, gotta come clean, I did not do my research re: Hillary and FISA. This is from Jan 28:

Today, I will vote against Republican efforts to shortchange the debate on the FISA Amendments Act, important legislation that would modernize our surveillance laws and give our nation's intelligence professionals the tools they need to fight terrorism and make our country more secure. Rather than allow the Senate the opportunity to consider important amendments to this vital legislation, Republicans are instead blocking meaningful debate on this bill by playing procedural games, choosing instead to score cheap political points at the expense of our Homeland Security.

This legislation deserves a thorough debate. Several provisions - including those which would have a profound impact on the civil liberties of Americans - need to be the subject of careful deliberation. For example, the bill under consideration gives telecommunication companies blanket retroactive immunity for their alleged cooperation in the administration's warrantless wiretapping program. I continue to believe that a grant of retroactive immunity is wrong, and I have cosponsored Senator Dodd's amendment to remove that provision from the bill. The Bush Administration has blatantly disregarded Americans' civil liberties over the past seven years, and I simply will not trust them to protect Americans' privacy rights. With the temporary Protect America Act set to expire on February 1st, I strongly believe that we need to pass balanced legislation that protects our civil liberties and the rule of law while giving our law enforcement and intelligence agencies the tools they need to protect our country.

Yeah, ok, pretty otm.

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 08:08 (sixteen years ago) link

And she didn't vote, presumably, because her schedule's a little tight right now.

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 08:14 (sixteen years ago) link

or because she didn't want her vote on the record.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 16 February 2008 12:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh of course. Obama found the time somehow. But the last few sentences there are well put.

I have reason to be especially suspicious of a Clinton when it comes to privacy, new media, copyright, any law that thinks ahead more than three years.

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 13:47 (sixteen years ago) link

hoos it's a small point but "muckraking" requires original reporting, which olberman does't do any of as far as i know

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 16 February 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, it's just angry punditry, and ordinarily i'd yawn, except a) he's not altogether wrong, and b) holy shit I want to be tuned in the night his carotid artery explodes.

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Yea, I seem to remember the EFF having issues with Bill

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Saturday, 16 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh hell yes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA

kenan, Saturday, 16 February 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

shaking of fist.

msp, Saturday, 16 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

more voting irregularities

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/nyregion/16vote.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Black voters are heavily represented in the 94th Election District in Harlem’s 70th Assembly District. Yet according to the unofficial results from the New York Democratic primary last week, not a single vote in the district was cast for Senator Barack Obama.
That anomaly was not unique. In fact, a review by The New York Times of the unofficial results reported on primary night found about 80 election districts among the city’s 6,106 where Mr. Obama supposedly did not receive even one vote, including cases where he ran a respectable race in a nearby district.

...

In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

dmr, Saturday, 16 February 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

upshot being, Obama will pick up a few more NY delegates

dmr, Saturday, 16 February 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/archives/2008/02/hillary_wheel.php

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 16 February 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/16/bill-clinton-obamas-ignoring-my-white-house-legacy/

bill cant stfu

deej, Saturday, 16 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

The goddamn Screaming Lobster of Hope is in Amarillo, Texas, giving the best stump speech I've seen of his all year: casual yet precise, passionate but restrained.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Firm, yet yielding to the touch?

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Minimalist yet expansive

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

hot but cold.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Rubbery, squeaky, yet yielding. Receptive. Lubricated.

Rock Hardy, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

pink, small, punctual.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

corpse-clit

remy bean, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Moderator, lock brain.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link

hoos it's a small point but "muckraking" requires original reporting, which olberman does't do any of as far as i know

-- Tracer Hand, Saturday, 16 February 2008 14:49

point taken

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 February 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm really beginning to <3 mark penn

“Winning Democratic primaries is not a qualification or a sign of who can win the general election. If it were, every nominee would win because every nominee wins Democratic primaries.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8551.html

gff, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Nice logic there Penny.

Simon H., Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:01 (sixteen years ago) link

the down time between primaries allows too much room for stupidity.

i'm enjoying the drama, but once there are actual nominees i want to please be placed in suspended animation until election day. my brain cells are dying just thinking about the stupidness of the general election.

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Among a crowd of hip and stylish Democrats, announcing one's skepticism about the cool kid would totally dampen the party.

how do you write a sentence like that without immediately gouging out your own eyes in abject wretched shame?

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

shouldn't Democrats who have complained that George Bush was elected on the strength of a popularity contest be nervous that this blossoming Obamadulation is getting out of hand?

yeah it really sucks how democratic elections are a popularity contest

wtf

deej, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:34 (sixteen years ago) link

writers who pose rhethorical questions with "Obamadulation" used as a noun should be drowned in pig shit.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:41 (sixteen years ago) link

slate = easy target tho

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:43 (sixteen years ago) link

went to an obama precinct captain training session this morning. crowd was spilling out into the street, maybe 500 people there. ran into three of my professors and some guy i met at a christmas party (so basically most of san antonio's democrats).

m bison, Sunday, 17 February 2008 01:57 (sixteen years ago) link

oh damn dude didn't know you were an sa guy.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 17 February 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

and "most of san antonio's dems" lol otm

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 17 February 2008 02:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Finally made a profile at my.barackobama.com. there's a million portland groups, shockingly.

kingfish, Sunday, 17 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

phonetic transcription of Barack Obama in RP please

youn, Sunday, 17 February 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

BEAR-ick aw-bum-AYYY

The Reverend, Sunday, 17 February 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1580960/story.jhtml

daria-g, Monday, 18 February 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Barack Obama: A riviting speaker whose words inspire and uplift. Vampires: Undead monsters who tear off your flesh and drink your blood.

My money's on the vampires.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

dude for the last time mccain is not actually a vampire

Eppy, Monday, 18 February 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

You sure about that?

http://www.sahbasucks.com/images/mccain-angry.jpg

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

stinkeye != vampire

Eppy, Monday, 18 February 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

c'mon that picture is hilarious

kenan, Monday, 18 February 2008 05:48 (sixteen years ago) link

phonetic transcription of Barack Obama in RP please

'bær ək əʊ 'bɑː(ɹ) mə(ɹ)

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 11:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. BAR-uhk o-BAR-mer

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 11:27 (sixteen years ago) link

c&p one of a million articles proclaiming hillarys superior unstoppable amazing organization

jhøshea, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

KEEPE OUT -- SEKRIT

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm imagining Obama tiptoe-ing in footie pajamas.

kenan, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Have we done the Obama reggaeton track yet?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

no, but obama girls vs giuliani girls is in my top 10 singles of 2007

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm still waiting for someone to do an Obama-inspired parody of Toto's "Rosanna."

jaymc, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i am waiting for a BBC presenter to talk about Bear-rack-ing the vote or Baa-rick-tober

gabbneb, Monday, 18 February 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh god. At least Jacques Chirac is out of power.

jaymc, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i like calling him "obama barack"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i think it's snappier

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i am waiting for a BBC presenter to talk about Bear-rack-ing the vote or Baa-rick-tober

BBC newsreaders pronounce his last name "Oh-Bomber" for some reason.

President Keyes, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhotic_and_non-rhotic_accents

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

obama girl says she wants him to "barack me all night"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

there was an event here called "barack the vote"

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't barack the jukebox.

Nicole, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

John Mayer and the guy from the Apple ads weigh in:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrPCkMSTH9A

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I love John Mayer so much!!

Johnny Fever, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

that video is old news. i never noticed jeffery ross in the mix before though! the weird thing is at the end where they all get in the same limo.

i think there is a one floating around w/prodigy from mobb deep talking about ron paul too.

artdamages, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

PoignantFeticide (3 days ago) Show Hide Marked as spam -6 Reply | Spam Yeah, John Mayer is a fucking douche. And he proves this here, even after he's had ONE APPLETINI.

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

he does kind of look like jd from scrubs

artdamages, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't barack the jukebox

Damn You

gabbneb, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

the john mayer thing could have been way funnier i think

artdamages, Monday, 18 February 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

The New Yorker has printed a long and glowing diary of life aboard John McCain's campaign bus. I kept looking for the hook, the twist, the counterintuitive angle, but it appears to be all about how John McCain is a really honest, unself-conscious dude, and a breath of fresh air among the "stage managed" campaigns of the Democrats!

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/02/25/080225fa_fact_lizza

First mention of "straight talk": first sentence.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Here I am.

Barack you like a hurricane.

President Keyes, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

faintings at Obama and Clintons = conspiracy(?)

Mackro Mackro, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

There's only one way!

There's only one way: BARACK!

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

KOBITFW!

Mackro Mackro, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack of Love

OMG that would be such an awesome reality show.

Nicole, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary could have her own, New York-style show. Bill is already pretty Tailor Made-ish.

Nicole, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's would be like "Hey Paula!"

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

The presidency is her Bratz movie.

Nicole, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021708dailyupdategraph1.gif

jaymc, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

My head is now spinning re: reality show ideas.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

omg john mayer

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/2/0/0/4d/b/AAAAAju5Y5EAAAAAAE25MA.jpg

StanM, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

zachparkman (5 days ago) +1
Reply | Spam
John Mayer is hilarious, drunk or not. Could you imagine smoking out with him. I bet he goes crazy on some conspiracy trips. That would be a great night! Smoke one, have an improv blues jam and talk about about the Bilderburg Group and the giant green lizards. When ever your in Virginia, John, feel free to stoip on in.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

o_O that that is really someone's idea of a "great night."

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC accuses Obama of...plagiarism.

[

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

...while emphasizing that she is the candidate of 'change'

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

The plagiarism wars are the nastiest turn yet in the Democratic presidential nomination race

Uh

"Or so we hope."

Eppy, Monday, 18 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

LOBSTER SLAP

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

ok gf is supporting hrc hardcore and i just asked her:

"if hil wasn't running, but condi rice was running on the gop side, would you vote for her?"

answer: "absolutely."

the head.

she is spinning.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoa, that is actually crazy, Hoos.

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

OK I think we need to clarify this. I'll be back later.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

what a sanity day this turned out to be

brownie, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

those plagarism charges would carry more weight if he were taking it from someone who wasn't a supporter and friend of his and who actually cared

akm, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I too live in a divided household.

I don't think either of us would vote for Condi though.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

The answer is whatever Beeps wants.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Wonder Pets for Prez, then.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I too live in a divided household.

Obama vs. Clinton, or something more unspeakable?

Rock Hardy, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

sunny supports ron paul

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

We actually have a $100 bet, made three years ago, on whether Hillary will be elected president.

I took the "no way in hell" position.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I too live in a divided household.

http://www.wtps.org/wths/imc/Teacher_Assignment/social_studies/borkowski/confederate%20flag.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://static.twoday.net/annabell/images/coke-vs-Pepsi.jpg

Mackro Mackro, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKJkfE1M9wA

roxymuzak, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

has obama crested?

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

has obama crested?

kenan, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

ok after an argument that actually involved me packing a bag and storming out, this is sorted.

household: divided. relationship: stable.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

My wife hates coffee and dislikes The Replacements. And yet, we still love each other and get along.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooool

didnt you guys just move in together

before anyone calls me deejmc i was just reading Hoos' blog

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

uh thats an xp

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

hoosbloggin'

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

BLOG HOOS aka the rssfeeder

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah we moved in back in nov

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

where hoos blog @

max, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

click on his name

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

"M'am, I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. My mind, my soul, and most importantly, my steendriver will not tolerate your blind genderism on our property. I have not and will not charge you a cent and you're free to take your business elsewhere. I'd rather not call the police, but if you insist on continuing to disturb me this way I will. Please leave. Or I'll leave, whichever."

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

my blog (totally not updated in a couple weeks):

http://neversleep.wordpress.com

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

oh hey someone decided to call hillary on copying every other candidate under the sun regardless of party

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Obama_responds_to_Clinton_call.html

gabbneb, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry, O, it is a big deal.

Posted By: Grant | February 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM
abuse iconREPORT ABUSE

deej, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

well if GRANT says so

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 18 February 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/wisconsin-dems.jpg

jhøshea, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm looking forward to voting tomorrow morning!

Jordan, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

What are the WI polls like?

Eppy, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

The recent polls conducted by Research 2000 for WISC TV, Rasmussen, Public Policy Polling, Strategic Vision have shown Obama leading Clinton in the Wisconsin contest.

Conducted on 13-14 Feb., the recent poll by Research 2000 for WISC TV has shown, Obama leading with 47% to Clinton’s 42% votes.

Rasmussen Reports’s 13 Feb. poll has shown Obama leading with 47% to Clinton’s 43% votes.

The 11 Feb. poll by Public Policy Polling has shown that Obama, with 50% votes, is leading Hillary Clinton, who has 39% of votes.

According to Strategic Vision’s 8-10 Feb. poll, Obama has lead with 45% to Hillary Clinton’s 41% votes.

However, American Research Group has different story to say. American Research Group’s Feb. 6-7 poll has shown that Hillary Clinton leads with 50%, while Barack Obama has 41% of votes in Wisconsin.

American Research Group’s recent one, Feb. 15-16 poll has shown 1% loss of Clinton’s votes, but still shows Hillary Clinton leading with 49% of Votes to Barack Obama’s 43%.

jaymc, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Those Has Obama Crested? articles are a good indication of one line of attack the GOP will make on Obama, if he makes it to the GE. That is, they'll say: "Look beyond the rhetoric and you'll see someone with a bleak, grim view of the country and its prospects. He's a pessimist, and we -- the GOP -- have an optimistic view of American specialness and power." Blah, blah, blah. Who knows if it will work, but this is one argument they're sharpening against Obama even now.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 18 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant wait to see obama v mccain in an optimism-off

jhøshea, Monday, 18 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

good interview w/obama foreign policy adviser really pointing out the lie that obama and clinton have basically the same ideas. right now their platforms may look similar but theyre operating w/differing values to inform their future actions.

id be surprised if there was anyone on the clinton team thinking like this:

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/02/18/samantha_power

jhøshea, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Uggh, why am I not surprised Dori Monson is behind something as idiotic as the fainting thing?

The Reverend, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Samantha Power is only 37?!?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

She has shot hoops with fellow Darfur activist George Clooney, and once proclaimed herself the "genocide chick."

Funny girl.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:55 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG OMG OMG READ THIS http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=02&year=2008&base_name=the_pete_rose_of_politics

has anyone been following this mccain loan situation? mccain actually agreed if he was losing to not drop out of the race so that he could get federal campaign funds to pay his loan back - he signed away his right to decide whether he was running for president or not in exchange for cash!

holy shit!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 00:50 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf

The Reverend, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 08:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan I agree with you that race and gender are informing a lot of the hateration on both "sides" here. But I think that's part of a larger problem with the way we humans think. We're trained to see differences between things and then tell ourselves stories justifying the differences we think we see. And there's also what I think has been called elsewhere "The Conservation of Virtues Fallacy" where we sharpen whatever differences exist by thinking that if one side is good at (x) then she necessarily has to be bad at some (y) that will balance that out. I honestly think that so much of this is just down to dumb pattern-recognition hardwiring and humans' natural solipsism. When the binary consists of a black man and a white woman it's a semiotic obstacle course that would give professors fits; I think a lot of people are tempted to slice cleanly through all this by just falling back on assumptions that feel comfortable to them.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 13:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks jaymc.

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:31 (sixteen years ago) link

This is getting a little out of hand:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8583.html

Clinton to go after pledged delegates?

(What's especially crazy about this is that dude claims he got the story from a Clinton aide, not an Obama aide! Why would they want to spread this around?)

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

fun fact I didn't know til last week:

Hubert Humphrey didn't win a single primary in 1968.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago) link

eh that article seems a little overblown considering this is the quote its all based on

“I swear it is not happening now, but as we get closer to the convention, if it is a stalemate, everybody will be going after everybody’s delegates,” a senior Clinton official told me Monday afternoon. “All the rules will be going out the window.”

which is just saying lol this could get real ugly - not we have a plan to steal delegates

but yah i dunno why the clinton camp seems so hell bent on reinforcing their rep as immoral political operators

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

the Journal is less dainty than some other publications

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120339381585476375.html?mod=hps_us_pageone

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago) link

jhøshea that's a catch-22 for clinton: if her camp doesn't go after delegates as hard as obama's they could be conceding the nomination; if they DO go after delegates as hard as obama's they're "hell bent on reinforcing their rep as immoral political operators"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer OTM both in this last post and the previous one where he agreed with me.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm sure it's already been mentioned here but obama has given more than twice the amount of money to superdelegate campaigns than clinton has. i'm glad i look this stuff up, otherwise given the thrust of "accepted wisdom" i'd have to assume that obama just doesn't understand that politics is a blood sport the way clinton does

xpost haha

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, the clinton camp isn't talking about superdelegates, but the pledged delegates chosen by primary & caucus results. big difference.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah gabb but the WSJ is also, um, full of shit too often to worry about

Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm sure it's already been mentioned here but obama has given more than twice the amount of money to superdelegate campaigns than clinton has. i'm glad i look this stuff up, otherwise given the thrust of "accepted wisdom" i'd have to assume that obama just doesn't understand that politics is a blood sport the way clinton does

i thought a decent chunk of these contributions to peoples' campaigns took place before obama was running for president? (i'm not sure how much of a chunk, but the figures cited went back as far as 2005)

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, it's a big difference between party leaders and elected officials and other insiders with superdelegate status on one hand, and on the other hand subverting the electoral process by wooing local delegates on a district-by-district basis

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo read the article again (including the quote that the story is hung on), and then maybe just reflect for a moment, and ask yourself whether obama's people will hang back and not lobby pledged delegates themselves

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

another possible headline for that clinton staffer interview:

"Clinton Camp Says Obama to Woo Pledged Delegates"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i was more talking abt them making themselves look bad in the media - why say these things now?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

because Mark Penn thinks he's Karl Rove: Puppetmaster

Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i think if either camp goes after pledged delegates, this shit is seriously fucked up.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

jhøshea maybe a better response would have been "we're not going to speculate on what might happen with pledged delegates"

which would lead to the following headline:

"Clinton Camp Won't Rule Out Pledged Delegate Lobbying"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

a third response could have been: "we absolutely won't lobby pledged delegates"

which could lead to the following headline:

"Obama Clinches Nomination"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

a better response wouldve been: were going to win this thing outright no worries!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

And the headline for that would be "Britney Spears: Back In Rehab".

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

a good reporter would see that for the evasion it was and press them on it, which is indeed what may have happened

xpost

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

lol so not an xpost

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer i get yr point, but you are really being purposely oblique here. yes it is a storyline that is dictating the framing of this, but are we to ignore the clinton camp's attempts to seat michigan and florida, which is clearly very germane to this sort of strategy? it would be very easy for the clinton campaign to say "listen, of course we want to win because we think we will be a better presidency, but how you win is just as important as whether or not you do." which is exactly the message the obama campaign has been sending out.

finally, this is what mondale did to hart in 84, as someone pointed out in an earlier thread. and as hunter thompson detailed in fear and loathing on the campaign trail, the trick to getting a pledged delegate to switched their vote is either blackmail, judicial appointment or some sort of sub-cabinet position. basically, a delegate says "my vote is for sale" and sees who is willing to pony up what. not a pretty process.

YGS, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah gabb but the WSJ is also, um, full of shit too often to worry about

pls to distinguish between editorial page and reporting

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

in this situation there no downside to being evasive as theres not a story unless you say stupid shit like this

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: ain't that America

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

That darn media

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo read the article again, and then maybe just reflect for a moment, and ask yourself

^^ hey bro, lighten up, no need to be a condescending prick

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought this was the thread for that! sorry elbro

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Look, if the Clinton campaign doesn't want to concede the nomination, they should keep campaigning and see how the primary votes go, which is what they are doing. I don't think this sort of talk is really going to help them in this effort. jhoshea otm.

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

it irritates me no end to see people -- people HERE! -- not only parrot the endless bullshit framing devices that political hacks employ in this campaign but justify them, too, especially when careful reading reveals how full of shit these "stories" are

the obvious backtrack here is to be like "well clinton's staffers need to be SMARTER in how they talk to the media, that's all i meant" and of course that's always true, but there really is a limit to how smart one can be, or how little one can say to reporters; the less information and access they have, the more they'll pounce on the tinest fragment and spin a 1000-worder out of it -- and the more they'll complain about how stage-managed and inaccessible your campaign is

i keep trying to keep that last debate between o and h in my mind, how sane they both seemed, how not-actually-full-of-shit they both were, how detailed and nuanced both were about their ideas, their policies, their past votes, and how totally out-of-place the binary competition metaphor seemed at that moment for what each wanted to do

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Ana Marie Cox:

I would really like to know what's involved in "getting pledged delegates to switch sides." Is it intimidation or just bribery?

...

This assumption says a lot about Clinton's "but-he's-JUST-ANOTHER-POLITICIAN" strategy, namely, that the Clinton team knows just what kind of behavior being "just another politician" necessitates. It's hard to figure out whether their increasingly desperate acts of projection are a cry for help -- or a flourish of self-hatred.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Following the Money Trail: The Democratic Party and the Business of Elections

Democrats' claims that they are the party of the common worker would seem a lot more plausible if they were not so heavily reliant on corporate sponsorship. As of January, Clinton received 56% of her funds from business groups and individuals, as opposed to only 11% from labor, while only 25% of Obama's funds came from business, none came from labor. Obama's relations with labor interests rival those of Republicans, as McCain Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee all similarly accepted between 0-1% of their funds from union members and labor organizations. Out of the seven major candidates in the 2008 Presidential race (Clinton, Obama, Edwards, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, and Giuliani), only Edwards received more money from labor than business (accepting 4% and 52% of his funds from business and labor respectively). It hardly seems coincidental, considering his campaign funding sources, that Edwards was the most populist, critical candidate of corporate America.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

it irritates me no end to see people -- people HERE! -- not only parrot the endless bullshit framing devices that political hacks employ in this campaign but justify them, too, especially when careful reading reveals how full of shit these "stories" are

im not sure if this was directed at me at all but i did begin by calling bullshit on that story

and are you implying that "hillary: win at all costs" is just a bullshit framing device cause uh...

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yes i am saying that it is a bullshit framing device

and yes i know you called that story out

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

also, why would obama have to go after clinton's elected delegates unless she succeeded in actually peeling some away from his column? that's some serious a priori justification going on

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

so you dont think that the hillary campaign talking abt seating florida and michigan even tho they previously agreed to disallow them says anything abt her character at all?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm with jhoshea on this, the clinton camp is being far too selective as to which voters, delegates, and states actually "matter" to align itself with any ideals higher than pure political brinkmanship.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I saw an interview with Obama in which he said he was willing to accept that there should be representation from Florida & Michigan, perhaps via freshly organized caucuses. Surely that suggestion contains as much political calculation as Hillary's?

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

no

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

and by the way,

brink·man·ship
n.

The practice, especially in international politics, of seeking advantage by creating the impression that one is willing and able to push a highly dangerous situation to the limit rather than concede.

i think this is a pretty accurate characterization of the clinton strategy right now.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

except instead of mutually assured destruction, it's a floor-fight over delegates at the convention

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

a comparable move by obama would be to suggest that they seat the florida/michigan delegates based on national popular vote totals

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone who really thinks Obama is more likely to concede for the good of the party/nation/etc is being naive.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

So Tracer, you are 100% sure that the Clinton aide didn't actually mean to say that to the reporter? Which campaign are we assuming is naive this week?

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is def more likely to bow to the will of the voters - the good of the party/nation/etc is just abstraction

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

or they could like, count the actual votes that people cast. obama and edwards withdrawing their names from the ballots wasn't part of any agreement or punishment for those states, it was a strategized piece of theatre. that's what you do when you know you're going to lose.

eppy not sure what you're talking about. i think the clinton aide said something that is pretty obvious and it got spun into "omg this is the clinton strategy".

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I still love and would vote for Hillary, but it's certainly interesting that her campaign is doing what it's doing, and there's meaning in the fact that a reporter thought he could make that frame out of that comment.

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44436000/jpg/_44436090_clinton_203body_ap.jpg

classic.

kenan, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

more on this story, "Clinton Spokesperson: We "Will Not Pursue" Obama's Pledged Delegates:"

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/clinton_spokesperson_we_will_n.php

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

We have not, are not and will not pursue the pledged delegates of Barack Obama. It's now time for the Obama campaign to be clear about their intentions.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i voted the hell out of some voting this morning. and i bought some banana bread at my polling place!

-- Jordan, Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:27 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Jordan, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

or they could like, count the actual votes that people cast. obama and edwards withdrawing their names from the ballots wasn't part of any agreement or punishment for those states, it was a strategized piece of theatre. that's what you do when you know you're going to lose.

yah cause im sure theyd be happier to just have no delegates W T F

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

besides it was a decision made by the party that all the campaigns agreed to

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Please locate... Black River Falls

...

Very Good Hillary!

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, you know, i do think this is just piss-poor message control from the clinton campaign, but i wouldn't put it past clinton to spoil for a convention fight

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ a TPM comment:

While we are on the subject, Obama has never explicitly spoken to the subject of whether he intends to hire a hit-man to assasinate Sen Clinton in the next debate. Sen Clinton has already ruled out such measures, and it is time for Sen Obama to make his intentions on this subject clear...

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

well it was a gamble. the gamble could come back to bite them. it's pretty clear from what i've been reading that florida and michigan will almost certainly be seated at the convention. the question is, does this happen just for unanimity's sake, after counting everybody else up, or do you throw those states' votes into the mix -- somehow?

frankly i think the punishment of stripping the delegates was bone-headed from the outset. and letting some people withdraw and hillary stay on the ballot was completely confusing. it was enough to get the candidates to agree not to campaign there. it took all the spotlight away. this way you're guaranteed to look like a weird, lever-pulling political machine. repubs stripped some delegates but not all, and allowed campaigning, which i think was a much better way to go.

there's meaning in the fact that a reporter thought he could make that frame out of that comment.

yes, but that meaning has almost entirely to do with the culture of national political reporters and their tribal mentality and solipsism, and i would argue very close to 0% to do with hillary clinton.

haha that tpm comment is great

jhøshea sorry: what decision are you referring to?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

to not seat the delegates and to not campaign

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama Bought Home Without Rezko Discount, Seller Says

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think any of them specifically agreed to "not seat the delegates" though? they agreed not to campaign. and none of them did. then when edwards and obama saw that, left on cruise control, they were going to get hammered, they pulled their names from the florida and michigan ballots in order to try and thoroughly destroy any vestigial legitimacy those ballots might have had. which makes sense, strategically, but it is a gamble. because of the situation we're now finding ourselves in. sorry if this is all obvious, i'm still working it out for myself.

what i still don't understand is why anyone was allowed to vote for the demoaratic presidential nominee in michigan or florida AT ALL, given that the organization in charge of the vote had decided 1) not to seat that state's delegates and 2) forbidden campaigning. the dnc really created this. whoever was ahead in those states -- it happened to be hillary -- would eventually try to get those delegates seated if things got this far.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i believe their names were only pulled from the michigan ballots

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost Oh, so it's OK then.

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer you're nuts

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

This election is well on its way to bringing 2 or 3 of you around to my views on Broken America. Hooray.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

also lol@ this quote from the wsj:

"It seems like someone else should be there," says Dan Leihgeber, a smelter in a steel plant here, who is supporting Sen. Clinton. "It's like there's someone missing."

that shit is classic right there
the disenchanted white male voter ;_;

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

This election is well on its way to bringing 2 or 3 of you around to my views on Broken America. Hooray.

I wonder how far away we are from the understanding that Hillary is not to be trusted.

kenan, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/id/2184491/

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

gabb help us out here - what was the justification for allowing people to vote in fl and mi, and counting those votes?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

they agreed not to campaign. and none of them did.

"Hundreds of thousands of people have already voted in Florida and I want them to know I will be there to be part of what they have tried to do to make sure their voices are heard," said Clinton before jetting to Sarasota and Miami for events on Sunday.

The Clinton campaign claims that the senator from New York is abiding by the no-campaigning pledge because Sunday's two Florida events were technically closed to the public. But the stops were treated as major news events in a state where many Democrats have expressed anger over the absence of the party's presidential candidates during a period when Florida is overrun by Republican contenders.

The truth of the Clinton strategy was writ large in a memo from top strategist Howard Wolfson, who announced on the day of the campaign's dismal showing in South Carolina that, "Regardless of today's outcome, the race quickly shifts to Florida, where hundreds of thousands of Democrats will turn out to vote on Tuesday. Despite efforts by the Obama campaign to ignore Floridians, their voices will be heard loud and clear across the country, as the last state to vote before Super Tuesday on February 5."

dmr, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

there is really no argument that the DNC caused the mess but I think you're still being too charitable to Clinton's campaign

dmr, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the Clintons are throat-slitting poli-gangsters, always have been. Zurprize.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

honestly that WSJ article is probably pretty accurate and my friends still in OH say that in the GE it would be hard to see folks they know voting for either clinton or obama

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack Obama Campaign Events in Florida

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

* Time N/A, Debate in Orlando, FL.

Monday, November 5, 2007

* 6 p.m., House Party in Sarasota, FL.
* 6 p.m., Fundraiser in Sarasota, FL.

Sunday, September 9, 2007

* Time N/A, Debate in Coral Gables, FL.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

* 3 p.m., Party Event in Miami, FL.
* 6 p.m., Fundraiser in Miami Beach, FL.

Friday, August 24, 2007

* Noon, Rally in Tallahassee, FL.
* 7:10 p.m., Party Event in Tallahassee, FL.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

* Time N/A, Speech in Miami Beach, FL.

Saturday, June 30, 2007

* 3 p.m., Forum in Lake Buena Vista, FL.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

* Time N/A, Fundraiser in Miami, FL.
* Time N/A, Fundraiser in Jacksonville, FL.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

* Time N/A, Fundraiser in Tampa, FL.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

* Time N/A, Fundraiser in West Palm Beach, FL.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

* Time N/A, Fundraiser in Hallandale Beach, FL.
* Time N/A, Fundraiser in Miami, FL.

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-presidential-candidates/tracker/candidates/barack-obama/states/fl/

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer i think you'd have a much stronger argument here if instead of denying that clinton is being opportunistic you just pointed out that if these tricks win her the nomination then its a sign of how well she would be able to perform against John McCain

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

hey tracer did you actually look up WHEN Dean stripped the delegates

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

cause it wasnt until late Nov. 07

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

at least in MI

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

(unless im wrong but im basing this on a Dec. 1st article saying that 'saturday' the DNC stripped MI delegates)

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

oh!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

obama eating into clinton's hispanic vote

The tracking data suggest [Clinton's] support advantage among Hispanics may be eroding, at least on a national level. In the Feb. 5-9 data, Clinton led Obama by nearly 2-to-1, 63%-32%, among Hispanic Democratic voters. In the most recent polling, the two are essentially tied among this constituency, with 50% preferring Obama and 46% Clinton.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

deej i think all candidates are opportunistic if they're any good at all

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah but what dnc rules is obama breaking??

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

the campaigns had to make early moves to schedule events in MI and FL cos the two states were threatening to move their primaries ahead of IA and NH! this is the actual controversy (which somewhat murkily has been blamed on the GOP too, now -- i'm not nearly wonky enough to look into that). dean and the dnc stripping their delegates for doing so looks a bit harsh, but it preserves the pride of place of "small states" (arguably helps out smaller candidacies)(yeah right), and the overall stability of the system.

i'm all for primary reform, but letting state committees race each other to see who can hold their events first is not the way to do it.

gff, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a crazy article about florida and the charge-countercharge the campaigns were making:

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/jan/28/me-clinton-obama-guess-states-weight/?news-politics

Don Fowler of South Carolina, a Clinton backer and a member of the national Democratic Party's rules committee, said, "Just the mere announcement that you're coming there could be interpreted as a breach of the rules."

But Clinton has accused Obama of violating the pledge as well, by airing a national television ad that reached viewers in Florida. Fowler called that "the much bigger problem, in my mind."

Obama denied that violated the pledge. He said he got clearance to run the ad from South Carolina Democratic Party chairwoman Carol Fowler, who is Don Fowler's wife. The two have opposing views on the boycott.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

gff what i don't understand is why votes even took place at all. what's the point?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the florida deal was that the gop moved their primary way up and there is a law that both party primaries have to be held on the same day. so the Florida dems were kind of stuck. they had an option to hold a later caucus that would count but instead they took their chances w/ the earlier primary and had the delegates stripped. (I think.)

dmr, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

because the state parties still have some autonomy from the national party and they can hold an event whenever they damn want, i guess. all the national party can do is say they won't pay attention to it.

xp

gff, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

also, if it's anything like MN, lots of other party business goes on at those events, it's not just a presidential candidate poll.

gff, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

what a palaver

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

new david brooks column happily offering the following metaphors for obama popularity:

-- drug addiction
-- psychological disorder
-- viral contagion

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Equally valid metaphors for David Brooks' columns:

-- brain farts
-- canine Slaverings
-- lunatic ravings

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

On the February 17 edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, host Chris Matthews asked his panel if "Barack Obama's oratorical ability on the lectern in front of big rooms will continue to be his winning edge?" In response, New York Times columnist David Brooks said: "Yes, but he's got to get away from colleges. Go visit a factory for once." In fact, Obama visited a Wisconsin General Motors factory, where he delivered what his campaign called a "major economic policy address" a few days before Brooks made his comment.

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

We have not, are not and will not pursue the pledged delegates of Barack Obama. It's now time for the Obama campaign to be clear about their intentions.

-- Clinton spokesman Phil Singer, via internet director Peter Daou

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=02&year=2008&base_name=pledged_delegates_too

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ comments

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

they shd lock the comments, that's perfect

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

what bothers me most about that quote is the grammar

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

we have not persue

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

lol pursue

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

We would absolutely not use these sorts of tactics. Senator Obama is focused on winning contests and earning the support of pledged delegates.

-- Obama spokesperson Tommy Vietor

i'm delighted they've all decided to play by queensbury rules i must say

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Hello pigfucking!

Eppy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

so both dem candidates have met with edwards, and while i know edwards is probably waiting to hitch his wagon to the candidate who will eventually win the nomination, isn't his endorsement becoming increasingly irrelevant with each passing contest? besides a news cycle victory, what does edwards' endorsement really bring?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:05 (sixteen years ago) link

It's irrelevant now.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I think Edwards could've scored a bunch of points by endorsing before 2/5, but at this point it's not really any more relevant to the process than an endorsement from any other senator or ex-senator.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

guys he has delegates

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

he is a superdelegate, and he does have delegates, but i don't think he can gift them to either of the other candidates -- he can try to persuade them to go for one candidate or the other but ultimately they decide on their own, y/n?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

y he "releases" the delegates

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

im sure whoever he endorses would swing a few of his delegates their way but yah prob not that big a deal at this point

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/021908DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

giddyup gallup still volatile, obama leads with 1% margin

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

lookit the one last edwards blip awwww

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

How'd it go from 7% to 1% in two days? Surely it's not that bullshit plagiarism thing, is it?

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yea i'm not sure what it is. in any case clinton's really been laying it on him recently. there's been so many headline of "hillary turns up heat" "hillary attacks obama" etc. that it might have had an effect

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

*headlines

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

or it could just be a one day outlier blimp sort of messed poll thingy

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

yesterday was a holiday - weekends and holidays notoriously less reliable polling

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

This thread has got Gallup het up.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

the tracking poll takes 3 days of polling into its daily numbers to minimize volatility, i think, so that dip is pretty remarkable. hard to say!

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

sat sun mon

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

dude i went to high school with forwarded me this on myspace, wtf:

Ok... now I've focused a lot on Hillary Clinton and John McCain and how I think we are big trouble if either of them get elected. But I really haven't devoted much time to Obama. And for the sake of being fair... I think I should.
Really though... all I need to do is post this and refer you to the myspace page for it to all be summed up. Just in case you haven't been following my work to closely though... I will try to spell it out.

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s131/rebekahmfarmer/Obama.jpg

Ok... what I have a problem with here is that A) the American flag is hung equal with the other flags... which it's supposed to be higher. B) It's next to Che who represents EVERYTHING the United States isn't. C)It's in an Obama for President office... which E)Is the same guy who won't wear the American flag pin or put his hand over his heard during the National Anthem.

And as most of you know... Obama belongs to the Trinity Church of Christ which sounds remarkably racist. Everything for the betterment of the black people and black this and black that. Is this where we are at people? Is this who you want? I don't even want to begin to examine the Islamic history of himself and his family. But it does get better!

Because it's interesting to know Obama also doesn't mind theft:

(some youtube vid that i'm not going to watch)

And you know what? He's going to get away with all of it because of the weak minded and weak willed afraid to offend or afraid to stand up.

You want to know what is really getting me right now? Here we are... 2008... and we are trying to select a President between a radical feminist hell bent on power, a thieving racist who has ZERO track record, and some old guy who claims to be Regan conservative just a few years after considering going to the liberal side and trying to ramrod an amnesty bill down the American peoples throat when over 80% didn't want it. And all of them… wanting open borders… all of them with some type of affiliation to the CFR… and all of them detached with the REAL American people.

I mean think about this for second. What do any of them have in common with you? Honestly? What do you think they are really going to do? Do you think they are going to stop the SPP? Do you honestly think they are going to secure the borders? Do you honestly think that was is going to be avoided? Do you honestly think that the troops are going to come back even when all three of them have admitted that under their plans… it would be impossible? Do you think that they are going to lower your taxes when all three of them are talking about raising them?

Jordan, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't even go there. One of my local blogs has been fretting itself into hernias trying to get media to attack Obama for the Che flag.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

wau

sleep, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

SPP?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Just so everyone's clear, that picture was taken BEFORE that office became an Obama campaign office.

Simon H., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

so I guess Wisconsin allows for same-day voter registration and is an open primary -- the name of the game is GOTV, i guess.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG! That's not Che. That's Willie Horton in a beret!

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

whoever put that flag up was a goddamn idiot though, jesus keep yr eye on the ball

M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

</gym coach>

M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

gym coach OTM

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:23 (sixteen years ago) link

right? god my generation is so stupid sometimes

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

somewhere in a dorm room is excitable red-eyed chatter comparing the relative merits of Bob Marley, Che, Scarface, and Obama.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

what a douche

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been out of the loop (FOR YEARS NOW, HAHA), but when I came up for air, I saw that Wisconsin is all of a sudden a dead-heat. What happened?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12159/thumbs/r-OBAMAMOMENTUM-huge.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

not sure, really, though i guess obama's lead was never really that significant - usually hovering around 6 or 7 points.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

krugman is "worried"

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

More like Doucheman amirite.

Nicole, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Every time pundits have declared a frontrunner in the Democratic race so far, that frontrunner stumbles. I'm concerned about Wisconsin tonight.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"Concerned" is too strong a word. I'd be happy if HRC is our nominee. I just think her chances against McCain are far worse than Obama's.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

stupid liberals always voting for the underdog

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't worry. Be happy. xpost

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

so i'm worried a little about the negative stuff - as i mentioned upthread it seems i keep reading tons of headlines about how clinton keeps slamming obama with criticisms -- but i don't hear much coming back from him.

i know obama claimed early on that he didn't want to run a negative campaign, and for the most part, i don't think he has, apart from campaign memos here and there ("hillary say/will do anything to get elected," etc), but i'm wondering if he'll need to cave in and go full throttle as clinton seems to be doing right now.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

there's not a huge pool of data to extrapolate any trends from, but with that caveat in mind, hillary did very poorly in SC after she was seen 'going negative' while campaigning there -- though obviously there are huge differences between SC and WI

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

god, David Brooks is such a douche. Apparently now the tactic -- on both the left and right -- is to write about Obama "fatigue."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I think Obama fatigue is a result of primary fatigue, and since Obama is the interesting story of the primary, primary fatigue has become Obama fatigue.

Euler, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

There's definitely been a rush of articles lately about Obama "cresting."

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Too much excitement; you know how it is. The man needs a nap.

Aimless, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Me, too.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Euler OTM, the Clinton campaign was unprepared for a post Super-Tuesday primary campaign, but then, neither was the press.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

she was smart to "focus" on TX and OH like WI was a lost cause.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought she really tried to step up efforts in the state, though, after her campaign finally realized that basically conceding the post-2/5 february contests was a dumb idea

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

ooh yeah now she can declare UPSET when really the state has been a close call

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

YES, SHE IS A TACTICAL GENIUS.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

cunning, cold, calculated

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

haha

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

If Clinton does pull a WI victory tonight, it likely won't be a sound victory (1-4 points, maybe), this could actually work out in Obama's favor. His momentum seems to ebb and flow and there's no question it's been ebbing the last week. A loss, even though it'll be a statistical tie, would only serve to kick enthusiasm back in gear.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

HE IS ALSO A TACTICAL GENIUS.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Democratic Presidential Candidates: Win by Losing.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

not saying her team didn't make post 2/5 mistakes, just that I wouldn't be surprised if they looked at the calendar, saw WI as their next possible victory, and set the benchmark for the following round, using WI as lead time.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

D, Esq. whats your take on karl rove??

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

this 'winning by losing' theory could explain the republican party's current platform! quick the dems need to throw their candidate under a bus, nominate biden!

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

stupid liberals always voting for the underdog

Not when they held their noses (or were just deluded) and voted for Billy!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

D, Esq. whats your take on karl rove??

Who is this Karl Rove of whom you speak?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I just want to mention how much I want to slap the "WHY CAN'T THE OBAMA BE HILLERY'S VICE PRINCIPAL OR VICE VERSER" crowd

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

wrong answer, Daniel

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, that Karl Rove. He's also a tactical genius.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I just want to mention how much I want to slap the "WHY CAN'T THE OBAMA BE HILLERY'S VICE PRINCIPAL OR VICE VERSER" crowd

i know, right?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

certainly a tentacled genius xpost

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

i get so sick of this, i just want obama to win okay? fuck i've been a vikings fan my whole life just give me this one god ok????

M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^^^^ this

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i get so sick of this, i just want obama to win okay? fuck i've been a vikings cubs fan my whole life just give me this one god ok????

fixed for my purposes

en i see kay, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

does anyone honestly give a fuck about these lame "plagiarism" attacks? is that really the best Hillary can do?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Best she can do? She's pulled to, what, within a point of Obama in WI in a week's time? She's doing okay.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

But, yes, please just let Obama wrap this thing up soon, for 1000 reasons I've set forth above.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

plagiarism hits harder than kindergarten ambitions. as soon as he's charged with stealing lunch money this thing is over.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Most LULZ I've had this week:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjrXhbQA2Jk

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, that needs to be put in a time capsule.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

The plagiarism attack is dumbass but the sort of dumbass thing that can get people's attention. I guess it's good to see if Obama can shake it off, because it's a sort of dumbass thing that will happen a lot in the general election and it would be good to see that he can overcome them.

Euler, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

are we seriously attributing the variance in Hillary's polling to the plagiarism thing

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i think its more the perception that hillary is asserting herself gives ppl more confidence in her abilities to take down mccain?

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

obama town hall in san antonio was well attended. venue only held maybe 3500 which was dumb because there was a line of people snaking around 10 blocks (altho he did talk to the people waiting outside first, so silver lining there for them). managed to snap a few photos, might could post em tonight.

m bison, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

are we still arguing about why hillary has a bump? she always does better on weekends - less elderly people are more likely to be out and about - and this was a 3-day one. remember the holiday travel day poll in december where she went way up?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

how could i forget

deej, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

are we still arguing about why hillary has a bump? she always does better on weekends - less elderly people are more likely to be out and about - and this was a 3-day one. remember the holiday travel day poll in december where she went way up?

You mean like the Washington, Nebraska, Maine weekend after Supertuesday?

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

xp lol

jaymc, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

You mean like the Washington, Nebraska, Maine weekend after Supertuesday?

I wasn't aware that one caucused from inside their house

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

jmc, i don't think you want to go after anyone for the sorts of trivia they store away

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

THE CAUCUS IS COMING FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not "going after" you, gabb, I just thought it was a good zing.

jaymc, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:34 (sixteen years ago) link

More Reasons Why I Want Obama To Wrap It Up Soon

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Someone at the DNC, or other party organization should be putting together a campaign apparatus in waiting that will take on the Republican nominee until a clear Democratic winner can take over.

this would seem a little more proactive than, say, bitching about tight the race is.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Shouldn't be that hard, right? Basically, if you're the DNC, divide your day into two broad categories: (a) Avoiding Disasterous Convention Fight and (b) Prepare Now to Beat Grizzled Old John McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

xp sorry gabb, I thought you were talking about voting weekend bumps.

Encounters Of The Bump And Grind

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I think we know who won here - http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/02/19/exit_polls.html

gabbneb, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

obamarama

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

holy shits!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

yay women xpost

youn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Women: Obama 51%, Clinton 49%
Families with income under 50,000: Obama 51%, Clinton 49%

http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/76858962.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1937EB7531422ED89F60F0DE3C6E3311298284831B75F48EF45

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 23:56 (sixteen years ago) link

pretty narrow margins but still...

man I just wish this was over and Obama had won already, these next few weeks listening to Hillary get more frustrated and desperate are gonna be real unpleasant

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Relieved to see he's (apparently) winning but if things are only going to get uglier I don't think I can stand to watch.

Simon H., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

putting this stupid plagiarism thing to rest

Having the "plagiarized" party on your side obviously a huge advantage here, I would think.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Without naming him, Axelrod then took a shot at Wolfson: "Our buddy in the ugly sweater will show up on your show and try to make this and other things an issue. Anything they can grab on to now."

haha HE CALLED YR SWEATER UGLY oooh snaps

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theautographgallery.com/gallery/2402.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

are we still arguing about why hillary has a bump?

BUN IN THE OVEN LOL

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I am a little surprised at how easily everyone has brushed off this whole "plagiarism" thing. It's not a deal breaker in regards to my support for Obama; but I gotta say it was sort of a let down. Here's how Learned about it...

I come in to the apartment after work, turn on tv, Chris Mathews is on. He shows a clip of the Obama response to all this "no substance" b.s. The whole "just words" argument was pretty nice.

Then, Matthews cuts the clip and follows it with the other speech (forgetting the Governor's? name). I just felt a little let down. I am a big fan of Obama's speeches, but lifting something verbatim is a little absurd. He could have easily referenced the other speech without skipping a beat.

Do you think that if Hillary's campaign was fueled in large part by powerful speeches (as Obama's certainly is), she wouldn't be receiving similar criticism?

Just want to get some responses here. Everyone is just calling it nonsense, but I think it may have done some damage.

Benjamin-, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Just want to get some responses here.

no shit

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:43 (sixteen years ago) link

well if obamas version of events is true the guy who originally said those words suggested he use them - which is a lot more like speech writing than plagiarism

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

That Chris Matthews ran this story (and Bill O'Reilly, Brian Williams, etc) suggests how much the punditocracy feasts on minutiae to keep itself entertained. Honestly, I wouldn't have cared had HRC been the one accused. These things keep the political classes entertained. I didn't give a damn about her LBJ remark either.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:49 (sixteen years ago) link

want some NRO fun? the only way that obama's mama and obama's daddy could have married would be that they was COMMIENISTS!

OH LAWD THERE'S STILL COMMUNISTS EVERYWHERE

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

actually kingfish i think that's an interesting piece, and one that might very likely be true. now as to its RELEVANCE that's a whole other deal, but certainly the circumstances of interracial relationships during that time frame are interesting, especially considering the obvious cultural opposition that they faced (and still face).

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 01:58 (sixteen years ago) link

the guy who originally said those words suggested he use them

and not to be all cap'n-save-a-O, but I wonder how much of Patrick's speech was informed by Obama's ideas, if they are in fact as close as both parties are suggesting.

will, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

#
# Seniors: Clinton 60%, Obama 39%

loldsters

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

both msnbc and ccn wont call it for obama but theyre saying he has a lead based on exit polls - i dont think ive heard them use this formulation before - its either calling it from exit polls or wait and see

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

I wouldn't be surprised if Patrick's speech was informed but the same ideas, but that line was pretty solid. you can hear the response in the crowd when Obama uses it.

I don't know. just thought it was kind of lame. probably because I saw the clips in succession on a talk show. If it were merely explained to me, or I read about it, the effect wouldn't have been the same.

Benjamin-, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain launching scare campaign 08 right now

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Man, this article. I know BritBart is a Drudge cohort, but this one appears to be from the AP wire. And two lines in it are amazing:

• Obama leading in Wisconsin over a “fading Hillary Rodham Clinton”
• Obama is “cut(ting) deeply into Clinton's political bedrock”

If that's the way the media stories read coming out of Wisconsin, it may be too late for HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain launching scare campaign 08 right now

What's he saying?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think ive heard them use this formulation before - its either calling it from exit polls or wait and see

no, they've said that before. they may be waiting for a few preliminary results to confirm - when they've called it before, hasn't it been in low-number caucuses? while the impulse is usually to be first, my cynical side says they're gonna wait a little while to keep the people who would turn their tv's off when the result is announced. guess is they know he won from the exits alone, but are gonna wait

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

he's talking about the growing threat against american lives, how leadership is called for and how "others" just want to sit down and make out with terror-supporters and bomb our allies.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

What's he saying?

My friends. My friends, my friends. My friends.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

basically it's bush since 9/11/rudy guliani's oh-so-successful campaign tactics

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

For such a "straight-talking maverick," McCain sure poaches the George W. Bush neocon playbook liberally.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

now dig at michelle obama -- "i am proud to be an american [unlike that bitch]"

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Clay, that's why I can't watch McCain's speeches. That phrase makes me crazy.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

oh my golly! He just totally did the John Locke from L O S T. "Don't tell me what we can't do."

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

and msnbc projects obama to win wisconsin

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, you're kidding. He implied that she's an ungrateful traitor?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

he did. the right is clamoring about this today. she made this "i am finally proud of my country" twice now in speeches, and so she is now indicative of blame-america-first liberals. as if african-american women have been living in an american utopia these past 222 years.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah Daniel, the "my friends" thing -- which he just seems to be ramping up more and more every speech I end up seeing -- is so grating. Something about how terribly sincere he seem, while it being such a disingenuous thing to say.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN just projected for obama as well.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Just tuned in (then off). One of the TV chatterheads says that, inside the McCain camp, their main strategy is to (a) position McCain as "The Patriot" versus Obama "The Confused Youngster" and (b) portray Obama as being to the left of M. Dukakis and G. McGovern.

It will be an ugly -- and familiar -- type of GE.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

BARACK OBAMA: AMERICA'S MOST LIBERAL SENATOR.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, that will be the line. That any "Blame America First," "Pessimist," "Not A War Hero," "Defeatist," and so forth.

Ugly. But Obama's the kind of candidate who can overcome it.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

my biggest obama fear, btw, is mcgovern-related: when everyone loved mcgovern it was because he was the anti-candidate, a non-pol who talked straight, obsessed with decency and honesty, etc. and so when the eagleton mess started and he waffled a bit, it suddenly made him seem more like a politician (which of course he always was) and less like a real movement leader.

what it also did was give the press a big opening to attack him. the halo was gone, and suddenly he was a bumbler, just another washington rat like all the rest. when obama flubs -- and of course he will -- he will similarly get hit hard, much harder than mccain, just because the expectations are so much higher. as much as the press has really aided him so far, it can easily destroy him as well.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

It would seem like it'll be that vs. "McCain is a Bush proxy" / "More of the same here and abroad" which should at least keep Obama coming across as less of an attack artist.

xpost.

Clay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I hear you, YGS, but I think Obama's more savvy -- and far more charismatic -- than McGovern.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

barack obama = black osama. end of story.

burt_stanton, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant see that "what a liberal he is!!" thing working v well, just like how during the confirmations of alito + roberts their reasonableness under fire from dem pols belied their actual nuttiness (esp in the case of alito)

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Besides, as between Obama and McCain, I think it far more likely that McCain will make flubs and flip-flops, which Obama can exploit. And, FWIW, I don't think McCain has ever been tested in the way he'll be tested by Obama.

And all this from somebody (me) who thinks McCain will be the favorite in a GE against Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

(McCain was tested by GWB, but that's a very -- very -- different kind of test. Obama won't win by secretly accusing McCain of having an illegimate black baby).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Remember the throngs of Republicans who were all like "I kinda like this McGovern guy"?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:34 (sixteen years ago) link

actually, gabbneb, mcgovern did VERY well with hardhats/wallace supporters in the beginning for this very reason

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago) link

aka democrats?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:36 (sixteen years ago) link

obama already has a Dem problem, just like McCain has a GOP problem

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry, what do you mean?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

(i.e., what's Obama's Dem problem?)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

some democrats aren't gonna be comfortable voting for him?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck 'em

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

that's what i say

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOYbFADoINE

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Why? Because he's black? Because he's liberal? Because he's cool and detached?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (sixteen years ago) link

because he's black and/or too young

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:40 (sixteen years ago) link

guys he's a muslim

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

do you want a president sworn in on the koran???

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

his nomination'll be a good way to axe the fucking lame dead wood from the plodding bulk of the toothless donkey party

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i tried to sink another metaphor into that sentence, but i couldn't

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

he's gonna make nancy reagan wear a burkha!!!

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

He's going to stone Bill Kristol to death on the steps of the Capitol.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

state dinners all halal

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

He's going to stone Bill Kristol to death on the steps of the Capitol.

Tempting.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

this is the most boring obama speech so far. it's all over.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

he stole it from mike wallace

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, so he came through with that wide margin here (WI) after all, huh?

Jordan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

now can he win PA?

http://www.geocities.com/lager57/sixpacks/yuengling1.jpg

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh we need more men like Victor Davis Hanson, spotting perfidy under every stone:

Re: Michelle Obama's astounding admission that she hitherto had no reason to feel pride in the U.S., and Obama's supposed Biden-like lifting of a campaign refrain from someone else.

The problem is deeper than occasional slips. For most of the last 25 years the Obamas' contacts have been largely confined to universities (Occidental, Columbia, Princeton, Harvard, Chicago) as both students and employees, or to government-sponsored social agencies, or to the incestuous world of Chicago minority politics. These landscapes have proven liberal, sympathetic, and non-confrontational. I doubt very seriously in those environments that the Obamas have had any of their sometimes bewildering statements seriously cross-examined or questioned.

Michelle Obama, true, recites a litany of slights and grievances, but more likely she encountered highly educated white liberal audiences that were not about to cross her or challenge her assertions-a world away from steelworkers in Ohio, the Nascar crowd, the Mexican Americans in LA, the hungry wolves of the D.C. press corps for whom controversy trumps even shared liberal ideology — or Clinton, Inc. for whom power, status, and adulation outweigh everything, including liberal head-nodding, white guilt, and identity politics.

The result is that finally out on the campaign trail both are beginning to enter an arena where most of America does not faint at an Obama rally, but resents deeply a candidate's spouse suggesting that she previously had no pride in her own country, and would think that generous college admission practices, scholarships, and loans were cause more for gratitude rather than resentment.

Some old cynical campaign veteran, cigar in mouth-a Tip O'Neill-type, with the more scars the better-should sit the two kids down, explain the no-holds-barred rules of the arena outside the university and liberal government agency, remind them that African Americans and elite white liberals probably make up about at most a fourth of the electorate, and emphasize to them that by the public's own standard of living, the Obamas have been very privileged and done quite well-and that Michelle and Barack should start to say something uplifting other than the current mantra that the U.S. is a depressing and unfair place and has only one chance of 'hope" and "change" and "redemption" by allowing Barack and Michelle to lead us out of our collective ignorance.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

WOW @ Obama on the war re: Ryan the soldier.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

remind them that African Americans and elite white liberals probably make up about at most a fourth of the electorate

like evangelicals?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, WOW @ "I'm not running because I think it's owed to me"

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, I can't fathom the sophistication of a mind that accepts nomenclature like "the NASCAR crowd" without irony.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

The result is that finally out on the campaign trail both are beginning to enter an arena where most of America does not faint at an Obama rally, but resents deeply a candidate's spouse suggesting that she previously had no pride in her own country, and would think that generous college admission practices, scholarships, and loans were cause more for gratitude rather than resentment.

***

i don't know who this guy is, but i hate him

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

actually the last sentence there is even more infuriating

"you're black?! you should be THANKING us for having it so EASY"

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

sentence, clause, whatever

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know anything about sentences

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/02/girl_interrupte.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link

8:45 p.m.: Obama continues to dominate in Dane County. He has not lost a single municipality with all of the following reporting: Albion, Berry, Black Earth, Blooming Grove, Blue Mounds, Burke, Christiana, Cross Plains
Deerfield, Dunkirk, Dunn, Mazomanie, Medina, Middleton, Perry, Pleasant Springs, Primrose, Roxbury, Sun Prairie D-3, Vienna D-2, Westport, York, Belleville, Black Earth, Blue Mounds, Brooklyn, Cross Plains, DeForest, Marshall, Mount Horeb, Rockdale, Shorewood Hills, and Middleton. McCain was also the victor in all of those with the exception of Christiana and Albion. Those communities went to Huckabee.

heh

Jordan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.lesinrocks.com/uploads/picts/visuels/20013/25477.jpg

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

you're god damn RIGHT he won wisconsin -- i think it was the sticker on the back of my car

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, WOW @ "I'm not running because I think it's owed to me"

Obama said this? That sounds like a swipe at McCain's line, delivered after the last round of primaries, that he (McCain) isn't "running because I think I have been delivered here to solve the nation's problems."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

who was it who remarked that McCain is pissed that it took this dude like 5 years to get where it took him 25.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama wasn't 894th out of 899 in his class, I'm guessing

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

that michelle obama comment is gonna be coming back around again and again dudes, i can see the avalanche of right wing strips now ... its another way to get at race w/out talking about race

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

OTM

gbx, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe it answers my silent question why we hadn't seen more of the fam and heard more from her - i think she can give an amazing speech, but she may not have the best political instincts.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, WOW @ "I'm not running because I think it's owed to me"

Obama said this? That sounds like a swipe at McCain's line, delivered after the last round of primaries, that he (McCain) isn't "running because I think I have been delivered here to solve the nation's problems."

He said it during his rally in Houston tonight (that's still going on as of 10:15 pm EST). I totally took it as a dig at Hillary's inevitable nomination.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Whatevs. How did McCain sound tonight, i.e., was he as listless and flat as he has been lately, or does he have renewed energy?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

at this point, who cares what mccain sounds like? it's a marathon not a sprint etc. for the same reason, if'n mccain tries to make michelle obama's comment as a major thing it will backfire, and if cindy mccain tries to inject herself into this then her record is wide open and that ain't good.

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

too early for worry, is all i'm saying.

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

i like obama on the civil rights tip @ houston

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm curious, Dimension.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man, bring on the michelle obama vs cindy mccain debate

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:25 (sixteen years ago) link

And wrestling match!

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:32 (sixteen years ago) link

oh god, i'm myspace messaging with the dude who forwarded me that ignorant bullshit.

Jordan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:41 (sixteen years ago) link

so obama started his speech before hillary was done with hers on purpose? kinda telling. it's a way of saying you are OVER. same with the way McCain just took on obama and didn't bother mentioning hillary. stick a fork in her already.

scott seward, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i hate to admit it but david brooks made me laugh today:

"They see her campaign morosely traipsing from one depressed industrial area to another — The Sitting Shiva for America Tour. They see that her entire political strategy consists of waiting for primary states as boring as she is."

scott seward, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:44 (sixteen years ago) link

from this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/opinion/19brooks.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

also laughed at "Ian McEwan-centered book clubs"

hey, i gotta call the funny when i see it.

scott seward, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 03:47 (sixteen years ago) link

WHERE'S YOUR SMUG SMILE NOW??
http://www.pnhp.org/images/photos/krugman.jpg

gershy, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

david brooks > krugman

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:21 (sixteen years ago) link

it's really something that he can not look like a dork in this picture, but someone he doesn't:

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e164/bobgeiger/obama_cowboy_hat.jpg

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

heh. "*nod*...Ma'am."

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

what was that about the Secretary of Lookin' Good?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, dude looks rad

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:34 (sixteen years ago) link

omg he looks sexy in that hat, how is that even possible

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:44 (sixteen years ago) link

barack obama: america's next top sherriff

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:45 (sixteen years ago) link

'scuse me while i whip this out.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:47 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks out:

A new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll suggests the battle for the Democratic presidential nomination between Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois is a statistical dead heat in Texas, which holds primaries March 4.

In the survey, out Monday, 50 percent of likely Democratic primary voters support Clinton as their choice for the party's nominee, with 48 percent backing Obama.

But taking into account the poll's sampling error of plus or minus 4½ percentage points for Democratic respondents, the race is a virtual tie.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"out monday" wow i am eons behind in this thread

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:48 (sixteen years ago) link

lol cosmo

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e164/bobgeiger/obama_cowboy_hat.jpg

Where the white women at? I only got 47% of you.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:04 (sixteen years ago) link

if'n mccain tries to make michelle obama's comment as a major thing it will backfire

Sounds like a job for... surrogates!

Aimless, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:12 (sixteen years ago) link

phew its a good thing there are no surrogates in american politics

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

obama in hat = morgan freeman in Unforgiven

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:44 (sixteen years ago) link

brokebarack mountain

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:45 (sixteen years ago) link

It's always good to have upper-crust conservatives around to remind us about the unabashed patriotism of the Rest Of America. You guys really keep me grounded. Thanks.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:48 (sixteen years ago) link

blackbloke mountin'

gershy, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:49 (sixteen years ago) link

ps That picture is awesome on so many levels.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:50 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary clinton: solutioneering new paradynamic concepts for the post-y2k millenium, for america, forver

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

he is quite good-looking, he looks surprisingly convincing in cowboy gear, and it reads, to me, as a subtle jab at Bush

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:52 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary clinton: solutioneering new paradynamic concepts for the post-y2k millenium, for america, forver

-- elmo argonaut, Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:51 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

is lol

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary clinton's campaign is the new dot com bubble, pass it on

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:00 (sixteen years ago) link

hilarious champagne dot cum bubble pass it on

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

bah, two more weeks of drawn-out shenanigans 'til Hillary's Florida.

Why can't Oregon's primary be NEXT week so there's something to do, and we can have the lolz of being ignored by the clinton campaign while attending michelle obama events?

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:04 (sixteen years ago) link

early voting started today and I forgot.

Texas Dem fuckers won't let me vote for D-Ku, so I guess it's Obama time.

milo z, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:05 (sixteen years ago) link

meanwhile, the ol' huckster is jus' gunna keep on huckin', it's all he know how to do:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Mike Huckabee said Tuesday passion for his beliefs — not his ego — was the reason he remains in the Republican presidential race despite near-impossible odds. Rival John McCain collected another primary win in Wisconsin and moved closer to the 1,191 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Huckabee hasn't won a contest since Feb. 9.

"Let me assure you that if it were about ego, my ego doesn't enjoy getting these kinds of evenings where we don't win the primary elections," Huckabee told reporters at a Little Rock hotel. "So it's got to be about something more than that, and it is. It's about convictions..."

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Waller County (redneck shithole near Houston) decided to have a total of two voting machines for early voting... located in the county seat, nowhere near the predominately black Prairie View A&M.

So the PVAM students marched the ten miles and got in line, forcing the county officers to let them vote, two at a time.

milo z, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 06:42 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 07:08 (sixteen years ago) link

FUCKING GOOD FOR THEM! That's awesome.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 07:09 (sixteen years ago) link

found it!

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5554045.html

Feb. 19, 2008, 6:58PM
1,000 Prairie View students march to courthouse for right to vote

PRAIRIE VIEW, Texas — About 1,000 students from Prairie View A&M University marched seven miles from campus to the county courthouse on the first day of early voting Tuesday to bring attention to voting problems in Waller County.

Students, joined by civil rights attorneys and local leaders, carried "Register to Vote" signs and wore shirts that said "It is 2008 and we will vote." The total crowd was estimated at about 2,000 people, police said.

Prairie View Mayor Frank Johnson praised the student protesters as "wonderful kids."

"Until they spoke up, there was only one early voting place in the entire county," Johnson said in a story for the online edition of the Houston Chronicle. "They spoke up but everyone is benefiting from what they are doing."

In January, county officials decided to eliminate all but one early voting site in the county. Last week, under pressure from federal officials, the county decided to open three early voting sites.

The county has a history of voting problems. After the 2006 elections, the state attorney general's office seized county election records after complaints that black voters' rights were violated. About 300 students at Prairie View, a historically black school, said they had to wait three to four hours to vote and ended up casting provisional ballots because their names were missing from election rosters.

vid of the KHOU story

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 07:22 (sixteen years ago) link

God, this election might be so fucking awesome.

en i see kay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Hawaii

Updated 42 minutes ago

County Results
Obama 2,258 77% 0 8% reporting
Clinton 666 23% 0
Uncommitted 4 0% 0

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:24 (sixteen years ago) link

lol satan

en i see kay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:25 (sixteen years ago) link

GRADY LARGE IN HAWAII

gershy, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:27 (sixteen years ago) link

cnn is running slow.

http://www.hawaiidemocrats.org/ has these:

**Preliminary partial results of the Hawai'i Presidential Preference Poll :

With about 40% of Congressional District One reporting, ballots cast in the district are reported as follows:

Barack Obama 4,302
Hillary Clinton 1,542
Dennis Kucinich and John Edwards received votes falling far short of the 15% required to be allocated a delegate.

With about 20% of Congressional district Two reporting, ballots cast in the district are reported as follows:

Barack Obama 1,134
Hillary Clinton 333
Dennis Kucinich and John Edwards received votes falling far short of the 15% required to be allocated a delegate.

Notice: The next preliminary partial result will be posted shortly after the live announcement at 11:00 p.m. HST**

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:29 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080219/BREAKING01/80219081/1001/BREAKING01

chaos reigns again. Word has it that they were preparing for 2x-4x the usual turnout.

Of course, they got _5X-10X_ what they were expecting, so there you go.

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, in vermont:

Ben & Jerry's Founders Endorse Obama

By LISA RATHKE

Associated Press Writer

The founders of Ben & Jerry's endorsed Barack Obama on Monday, and lent his Vermont campaign two "ObamaMobiles" that will tour the state and give away scoops of "Cherries for Change" ice cream.

"If there was ever a need for real change, and if there ever was a candidate to inspire us and make that happen, it's now," said Ben Cohen.

Added Jerry Greenfield: "Barack is showing that when you lead with your values and follow what you have inside that good things will happen..."

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:42 (sixteen years ago) link

aaaaaand CNN.com just called it

kingfish, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 08:46 (sixteen years ago) link

beautiful

The Reverend, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 09:53 (sixteen years ago) link

great!

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:19 (sixteen years ago) link

damn finally caught up w/ thread.

go texas students! can that please be all over sitiuation room/ hardball tomorrow?

gr8080, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:23 (sixteen years ago) link

also the clinton moving up her speech/ not mentioning the WI loss thing/ obama taking the stage before she's done thing is pretty rad

OBAMAPWN

gr8080, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Has she cried on stage today yet? Lucky tears, you never know

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:28 (sixteen years ago) link

:)

strgn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:31 (sixteen years ago) link

68% reporting

Obama 20,974 76%

Clinton 6,529 24%

gr8080, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i know it's just early voting, but still, that march one of the pinnacles of possibly the most massive election ever (cue swelling orchestra).

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:34 (sixteen years ago) link

local news carried some stories of fist fights breaking out at some caucus sites lol

i was so glad i got in line early, the place was a madhouse. they ran out of ballots within like two minutes of handing them out, and people had to write thier candidate's name on a piece of scrap paper. which is ridiculous because the ballots were just 3"x4" pieces of xeroxed paper.

after dropping my ballot in the envelope a few minutes past 7:00 PM (when we were allowed to begin) i left along with most others and there was still a line down the block.

the school cafeteria we were in got so crowded that two out of the six precincts had to move outside to vote. "precinct one go to the basketball courts, precinct two go under the big tree" lol hawaii.

gr8080, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 10:38 (sixteen years ago) link

that michelle obama comment is gonna be coming back around again and again dudes, i can see the avalanche of right wing strips now ... its another way to get at race w/out talking about race

yeah, some people feel like the line of attack on obama will be that he's an alien, strange somehow, not one of us -- i.e. he will be "dukakised".

i.e. WHY DOES THIS MAN HAVE A PROBLEM RECITING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE??

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 11:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i am being uncharacteristically optimistic, but i just don't see these fake scandals getting much traction. not in the primaries, but maybe not even in the general. we'll see how long it lasts, but so far the mood is different this year, from the media on down. i hear people (especially on the left) go on about mccain's strengths, but man... if this is the year we elect a 72-year-old war supporter, it sure doesn't feel like it so far.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 13:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Baby steps for me. I'm feeling really optimistic about Obama over Hillary right now, and if that all works out, then I'll deal with McCain.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah and i understand caution about mccain and the gop attack machine in general. still i wish i knew more liberals who seemed as confident as this year seems to warrant. overconfidence is bad, but confidence is good. whether the democrats go in with hillary or obama, they have by far the stronger candidate, in a year when even a mediocre democrat ought to be able to win. (if that all sounds painfully naive by the 2nd week in november, there'll be plenty of time to groan about what went wrong.)

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I heard most of Senator Bickle's speech last night, and I can see that shit working in an awful lot of states.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, i didn't know anything about cindy mccain until five minutes ago when I went looking...she should not throw stones at anyone

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

She's like some sort of Stepford cylon.

Nicole, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton's stepping to March 4 with some heavy 527 backing:

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/proclinton_527_prepares_for_oh.php

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain painfully whipping out his fake smile last night was pretty lol - you could actually see him thinking it through willing it into existence

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

this m. obama usa pride miniflap is getting me psyched for when mccain questions obamas patriotism - that one should be right in his wheelhouse.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm looking forward to see the steam shoot of of mccain's ears during a live debate

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.collegecandy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/barack__obama.jpg
senator mccain who has been an american hero for over 100 years would like to turn this into a who loves america best pissing contest when all of us love america so very much - the real question is how to move america past exactly these sort of retarded substanceles partisan politics and into a new era. vote change! i am so sexy! thank you and goodnight bitches!

http://punchup.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/john_mccain.jpg
AAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGG!!!!!!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

An interesting article analyzing the demographic breakdown of Obama's win over Clinton in Wisconsin:

How Obama Won Wisconsin

It shows that Obama has made up a lot of ground among the <$50,000 income demographic, union households, and white Catholics - though Clinton still narrowly beat him in that last category.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, I'm sorry I have to post some selections from my myspace exchange (this is a dude I was in a band with my first year in high school, and I'm not exactly surprised, but I am disappointed):

I am not racist, I don't associate myself with racists. In fact their are some African American's, who if they ran I would be more than happy to vote for. Victor David Hanson, Thomas Sowell, and even Condi Rice and shes a woman to boot! In hindsight, I can see your point on the racist thing, their is that little part about his church which preaches black advancement... blah blah blah, their is some truth to that part, but that wasn't what I was trying to shed light on.

the main points I was trying to point out are his refusal to say the pledge of elegance. I, not being a religious person can understand not wanting to say the "one nation under god" part, how ever I understand what that actually means: "we are one unified nation under a banner of common beliefs and principals". In my opinion if the president of the united states is not willing to "pledge" his "allegiance" to all of our common principals and beliefs, then he has absolutely no right to lead us.

...

Now his wife come out and says that for the first time she is proud of her country. For the first time?? She wasn't proud of the work and sacrifice that civil rights leaders (Martin Luther King, to name one) did to grant minorities the rights they have today? Yes, I agree that their still are problems regarding civil right in the various ethic groups in this country. However, I do not believe that is is me the white man who is oppressing, and keeping them down. If that were the case, their would be no Oprah Winfrey, Obama wouldn't even be a contender in the election. Ethnicity has 0% effect on how successful you can become in this country. Maybe instead of pushing the blame around, pull you pants up to your waste, learn to talk like a civilized human being, respect what an education can actually give you in this country. If we are still in this grossly racist country how can a man who represents a group that only equals 13% of the over population be leading in the primary elections?

I don't know what he's talking about, Barack is an elegant man.

Jordan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Here's another commentator, writing in the FT, who sees hope for the Republicans in his analysis of presidential election trends since 1968:

History’s hurdle for the Democrats

Like Ruy Teixeira, he identifies the key to the GOP's winning streak in the white, working-class voters who defected to the GOP starting around 1968, in the wake of the civil rights reforms.

His conclusion:

The Reagan coalition of libertarians, hawks and the religious right is indeed cracking up – but it is not clear that Republican ideological wars will help the Democrats. As long as the Republicans appeal more than Democrats to the white working-class populists whom George Wallace led out of the Democratic Party in 1968, then even in disarray they may be able to shut Democrats out of the White House for the eighth time out of 11 elections

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

In fact their are some African American's, who if they ran I would be more than happy to vote for. Victor David Hanson

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2007/november28/gifs/ppl_hanson.jpg

Hmm.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Jordan, reading that excerpt was really sad. Presumably people presented w/yr pal's education and opportunities should maybe LEARN HOW TO FUCKIN' SPELL. Anyway, I'm sure he didn't grow up in a 1BR apartment jammed with a family of (ISTR) five like Michelle Obama did.

Pledge of allegiance history: it was 'One Nation, indivisible' before the McCarthy squad added the God bit to distinguish from Godless Commies. John McWayne should be old enough to remember the change, and if he cannot, check for dementia...

William Rees-Mogg said that Obamarama is going all the way to the White House on R4 this morning, and he's a very, very old fart here.

suzy, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

isn't a prediction from Mystic Mogg the kiss of death, though?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i agree at how sad that correspondence is

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

my obj to the Pledge was always the "justice for all" bullshit

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Opposing view: Both sides must agree

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I am fine with "justice for all" as long as it is secondary to "justice for me, Dan Perry".

HI DERE, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.patrickruffini.com/2008/02/13/the-marketing-of-the-president-2008/

"Watching Obamamania unfold over the last few days, I have gradually come to the realization that we are living through the first Presidential campaign that is being marketed like a high-end consumer brand."

artdamages, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

If that were the case, their would be no Oprah Winfrey

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I am fine with "justice for all" as long as it is secondary to "justice for me, Dan Perry"

Not too late to run on that very platform.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Ruffini doesn't get out much, does he.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

The golden aureole which had blinded the right has dissolved, and now the attacks begin. The latest: Obama and Michelle Obama are "narcissists."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm going to buy popcorn in anticipation of the moment in a debate when the question is about the Patriot Act, or the limits of Presidential power, or Supreme Court nominees, and Obama gets to explain to his no doubt worthy opponent how the Constitution actually works.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

But Obama can't sound like a SMARTY PANTS, it alienates the masses!

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

golden areola? whose nipple you talkin about, alfred?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost He has some leeway this year. As long as he doesn't sigh heavily, I think he'll come off ok.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

i never noticed obama's logo before. it is pretty good.

artdamages, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

by the by, i phonebanked 2 hours for obama yesterday evening. it's the first time i've volunteered for a campaign. huzzah.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

what was it like?

artdamages, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

called numbers off a list compiled from unaffiliated and democratic voter registrations rolls. plenty of wrong and disconnected numbers, left lots of messages about the rally in RI with michelle obama today. when i did speak with someone, asked if they were voting on march 4 and who they supported and let them know about the rally. basically, it was winnowing down the list to identify supporters for GOTV and volunteering and identifying undecided voters for future targeting.

the location was in a real estate office, and there were maybe 10 people there. and free pizza.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

So no Che flags on the premises right?

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

glen greenwald gettin psyched for the general election http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/20/obama/index.html

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

That blog entry is interesting. I'm thinking, first off, this is all they got? "He's just a brand!" It made me think of Colbert saying to O'Reilly, "If you're just an act, then what am I?"

And of course secondly, it's not a bad point. Except I happen to like that Obama is being marketed smoothly and attractively. It's another issue on which he gives me hope for the future. "Oooh! I like Gill Sans!"

Couldn't do any worse.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I have gradually come to the realization that we are living through the first Presidential campaign that is being marketed like a high-end consumer brand.

Whoo my God is this ever bullshit.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo, do you actually think you made any difference? i know it's not quite the same but i volunteered on Super Tuesday for the phonebank at Hillary's HQ in Arlington.

Estimated that I spoke to approx 500 people over the course of the day and affected, maybe, 4 people's voting intentions. Waste of fuckin' time and money in my opinion.

(I'm not a big Hillary fan btw, not even Merican, just thought it would be an interesting experience)

Upt0eleven, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

upt0, i can't say whether or not i made a difference -- but i did get some satisfaction out of just having participated. phonebanking is pretty low-level volunteer work -- and it's probably not as effective at changing minds as, say, canvassing -- but i'd like to think it makes the campaign coordinators' and operatives' efforts easier and more effective.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

it occurs to me that had clinton just won 10 primaries in a row with the margins Obama did, he would be completely written off right now. the only thing keeping clinton alive is the name and legacy; but this campaign is finished.

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

x-post

perhaps. i enjoyed it and i was there from prety much 9am til 11pm. I liked having conversations with the few people willing to talk and explaining to them why I thought Hillary was worth voting for - pretty much ignored the script - but in terms of getting people out to vote who had already decided they weren't going to...

I just thought that considering the operation cost about a million dollars for that day alone (so i was informed by someone important) the money could have been far better spent elsewhere. no wonder the campaign revealed two days later how financially exhausted it was. this idea that Hillary has the efficient, experienced militarily precise campaign machine struck me as being a bit devoid of merit.

Upt0eleven, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

...had clinton just won 10 primaries in a row with the margins Obama did, he would be completely written off right now.

-- akm

Dunno about Clinton being finished, but the rest = OTM.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Can McCain effectively attack Obama on public financing when McCain used his certification for public financing as collateral on a loan to his campaign? I understand the intention of the attack, but I wonder if it will backfire if they push too hard.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton been ded - look for the media to start catching on leading to obama wins in ohio n texas - followed by clinton surrender

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

didn't Obama and McCain sponsor some climate change legislation? I can't see McCain getting very nasty – he'll let the right wing propaganda arm do his dirty work – but I do see a lot of stern finger-wagging.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

how does campaign financing work after the primaries? are donations reset once the nominee is picked, ie: if a person/group maxed out their donation to obama, can they re-donate to him once he gets the nomination? I'm just wondering since ti seems like so much of obama's donations have come from individuals.... if the charge was to point the finger about him taking loads of special interest money, I don't know that this will be the case

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

as obama and mccain turn towards each other and preview a general election fight, the clinton campaign is going to be largely forsaken by the press. her attacks against obama are going to be seen as supplementing mccain's attacks. obama will increasingly turn towards his presumed opponent, and mccain has all but written clinton off. but she'll get attention in the press when she goes negative. it doesn't look good for her.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton's only hope is to go negative.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

It might not "look good," but it's still her best shot. Her campaign probably hopes it can inspire a last minute panic about Obama.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

akm, the individual limit is $2,300 for the primary and $2,300 for the general election. if a campaign has accepted general election funds during the primary but loses the nomination, the g.e. funds have to be returned.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton went pretty negative up here and it didn't work -- in fact, polling data suggests that it backfired big-time.

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

the problem with clinton going negative is she can only hope to erode the positive associations people have with obama, but she risks increasing her negatives at the same time. if her only press coverage of negative attacks, she'll be quicly and popularly perceived as the negative, status-quo politician, and that's how she'll lose.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

it is incredibly unlikely, in any case, that obama will lose the primary for a lack of financial support

remy bean, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i like that clinton's latest attacks are "Obama uses WORDS to dazzle you all"

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>didn't Obama and McCain sponsor some climate change legislation? I can't see McCain getting very nasty – he'll let the right wing propaganda arm do his dirty work – but I do see a lot of stern finger-wagging.</i>

I dunno, I thought he was particularly aggressive in his speech last night.

YGS, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Byron York reports:

On the same conference call, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson pointed out the inability of an Obama surrogate, appearing last night on MSNBC, to name a single legislative accomplishment that Obama has achieved. "That is a major moment for voters," Wolfson said. In addition, Wolfson continued, "when you have Sen. Obama found lifting portions of speeches…that is a major moment for voters."

On another issue, Wolfson said he knew nothing about a new 527 group that is reportedly planning to spend millions of dollars attacking Barack Obama in Ohio. "I'm not familiar with the 527 group that has been reported on," Wolfson said. "I don't know anything about it." But Wolfson said it should not be an issue because other 527s have helped Obama in the past. "I can't imagine that Sen. Obama is in any position to make an issue of this, given that there was a 527, I think it was called Vote Hope, that spent millions on his behalf in California."

My response: if a voter can't identify any of Obama's legislative "accompmlishments," how is it Obama's fault?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton is screwed, as I have been noting for at least several months. give it up already lady

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i did actually see that msnbc bit with matthews, it was embarassing, but only for Watson, not Obama.

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

also, Vote Hope didn't do massive amounts of negative, attack ads against Clinton in California, or if they did, I completly missed them. I haven't seen ANY negative advertising from the obama side

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain will never win, I hope he gets the Rep nod after a bruising primary.

-- Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:41 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

still feel this way too

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Doing negative ads on Hilary seems like shooting fish in a barrell.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

im curious to see waht sorts of things obama starts saying abt mccain now - cause if his strategy toward hillary is any indication he'll have something deceptively good and he'll stick w/it - staying on message though out the general election

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

what he accomplished here in the primaries is bonkers - making the stacked experienced favored clinton campaign scramble looking like total amatuers - they were changing their message every day while obamas just kept playing - dude is ahead of the game and i am totes impressed1

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama Accomplishment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Funding_Accountability_and_Transparency_Act_of_2006

gr8080, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

also a McCain accomplishment, ironically

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

what if mccain secretly has obamamania

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

he does!

http://www.sfgate.com/blogs/images/sfgate/mlasalle/2007/07/02/mccain.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

(we can't run this photo often enough)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

someone pls to complete that picture, add sailor hat and can of spinach and pipe to make McCain into Popeye, thx

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

or Poopdeck Pappy

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

teamsters to endorse obama:

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/teamsters_plan_to_endorse_obam_1.php

lol @ Nothing says tough, or evokes "gruff," more than the Teamsters.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm a little worried that they haven't really defined mccain yet; i'm guessing it will be some variation of "more of the same"; still, you can't start this stuff too early

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

don't make me evoke my gruff son

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain/obama beef history: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/179217.php

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

crazy/cynical tired old man meme should work pretty well

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i remember that letter very distinctly -- many said at the time that it was a shot across obama's bow looking forward to '08

but i think the letter backfires on mccain like every other petulant, self-important, faux-ingenuous, green-ink letter-to-one's-detractor that has ever been written and i would imagine mccain would like to imagine that it never existed

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Doing negative ads on Hilary seems like shooting fish in a barrell.

It's more like - why bother when you can have the media do it for free? What's he going to say? That she's an amoral, calculating triangulator who will do or say anything to win? The press has already made that the conventional wisdom.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

^^

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

you know, you can toss out reams and reams of sexist garbage printed about hillary and still come to that conclusion

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

crazy/cynical tired old man meme should work pretty well

yah itll be that but more subtle and incisive.

it took me a while to appreciate how ingenious the politics of the baby boom v change angle was when applied to hillary - at first i was all wtf everyone loves the 90s? it turned her strength against her.

you cant be too obvious w/this stuff - peoples minds need a chance to do a little of the lifting themselves.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm a little worried that they haven't really defined mccain yet; i'm guessing it will be some variation of "more of the same"

it'll basically be variations on "he so OLD."

just like the subtext of a lot of the anti-obama stuff will be "he so BLACK."

it's gonna be a fairly ugly general election.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I am as guilty as anyone of projecting Bill's failures on Hillary and assuming her presidency would have the same priorities and the same failures, and that may be unfair -- but it seems more likely to me that it's not unfair at all.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

you know, you can toss out reams and reams of sexist garbage printed about hillary and still come to that conclusion

Sure, people could independently come to that conclusion - but the interesting thing is that the media has made it the frame through which they view and interpret everything that Clinton does. It's the inescapable subtext to any story about her.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

its true too!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

so you're not actually guilty of anything! score!

xxpost you guys are kind of gross. seriously

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

well, i am not actually guilty of anything.

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

omg everyone is guilty dont u see

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

But notice the kind of claim that it is - a claim that's just about impossible to disprove. It's the kind of framing device that the GOP has perfected in the past couple of presidential races: Gore was an inveterate exaggerator who felt superior to everyone else. Kerry was an effete flip-flopper. At bottom, it's a "character" issue. Once the frame is in place, it's nearly impossible to dislodge. No matter how sincere Clinton is, anything she does could still be construed as "trying to win".

xposts

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I am guilty of having a brain and distrusting a corrupt unprincipled liar when I see one

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmM2NDQ3ZWQ1YWM0Y2QyZTUxMDdkY2M2OTJlNGE5MWE=

Obama and I are roughly the same age. I grew up in liberal circles in New York City — a place to which people who wished to rebel against their upbringings had gravitated for generations. And yet, all of my mixed race, black/white classmates throughout my youth, some of whom I am still in contact with, were the product of very culturally specific unions. They were always the offspring of a white mother, (in my circles, she was usually Jewish, but elsewhere not necessarily) and usually a highly educated black father. And how had these two come together at a time when it was neither natural nor easy for such relationships to flourish? Always through politics. No, not the young Republicans. Usually the Communist Youth League. Or maybe a different arm of the CPUSA. But, for a white woman to marry a black man in 1958, or 60, there was almost inevitably a connection to explicit Communist politics. (During the Clinton Administration we were all introduced to then U. of Pennsylvania Professor Lani Guinier — also a half black/half Jewish, red diaper baby.)

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

that was to kenan's latest justification for clinton hatred, shakey, not yours

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yah but these frames dont come from nowhere - theyre cynical and reductionist but not entirely untrue is the thing

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

since the president is only the Corporate Manager these days, how could Hil's interests and priorities differ from Bill's?

Bill in NH two months ago was saying "Well, we still hafta solve those problems I talked about in '92..." YEAH, WHY is that fucking so?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

(I don't care so much about this "trying to win" frame crap as much as I care about the fact that she voted for the war, the patriot act, supporting and voting to expand NAFTA, etc.)

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Ethan, that article was so gross.

Nicole, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

It was discussed upthread, no? It does get grosser: OF COURSE your parents are multiracial – they're COMMIES!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

excellent detectiving guy!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's parents met while questioning McCain @ Hanoi Hilton

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

It's the kind of framing device that the GOP has perfected in the past couple of presidential races

Yes, but I very much doubt that the GOP is breaking into the Dem National Headquarters in the night (not yet at least) to dig up dirt about Hillary maybe having some shaky character issues. That story writes itself. And they'd almost certainly rather run against Hillary in the GE.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

That story writes itself

Sure, and the media needs to have some kind of storyline to follow. I understand why these frames take hold. But it still can make you wonder - what the media created, the media can also destroy.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

her record on the war from 02 to now indicates strenuously following the centrist CW -- i've no idea the 'character motivation' behind this, 'poll-driven' 'triangulating' or whatever -- it's kind of suckass on its face and reason enough to look elsewhere. her foreign policy crew is derived from this set of people, while obama's (and other candidates in the earlier part of the primary) were more frankly and openly against the iraq war

her campaign has been rooted in the brand power of the clinton name and in the inevitability of her win coupled with the value of her experience in the halls of power.

NONE of those things look good to me: 1. the name 'clinton' brings as much autonomic contempt among half the populace to make a thorough end to the bush/rove years really unlikely. especially in a year when the real flesh-eating zombies on the right hate their candidate openly, why give them an excuse to get out of bed on 11/2?

2. campaigning on inevitability looks pretty stupid when you're losing, and have to resort to increasingly strained threats to rig the deck (supers), fuck about with intra-party lawsuits to open up previously settled conflicts (FL & MI), or make offensive excuses about every contest you lose (mark penn).

3. 'experience' is a meme just as surely cemented by a somnambulant press, and has been discussed to death in any case. her operation certainly doesn't look that experienced -- witness the sudden complaints about the delegate rules in TX, whereas a group of 'canny operators' would know what they were and have a plan in place for them.

in other words my mind is made up about hillary clinton, pretty much independent of what 'the press' has ever 'said' about her -- i liked her just fine, a year ago. it's based on what has been straightforwardly reported what her campaign has done. chris matthews didn't just make up that penn called my state insignificant.

i don't like this idea coming from Tracer and o.nate that i'm following some kind of institutionalized misogynist meme pathway when i come to the conclusion that her candidacy is a dog and a sure loser in the bargain.

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I've said before, and I'll say it again- I'm not saying there aren't any good reasons to support Obama over Clinton. I'm not questioning anyone's motives on this thread either. I'm just pointing out that Obama has benefited from relatively favorable media coverage vis-a-vis Clinton.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

gff, it's an unfortunate teleology in a some feminisms that privileging a man over a woman for pretty much any reason makes one implicit in all injustice against women everywhere forever.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://atrios.blogspot.com/2008_02_17_archive.html#3701114073843181344

posting this here.... just because

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

the ironing is... oh so bitter.

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago) link

also via atrios. holy shit.

I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down.

-- Bill O'RLY

dmr, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

in other words my mind is made up about hillary clinton, pretty much independent of what 'the press' has ever 'said' about her -- i liked her just fine, a year ago. it's based on what has been straightforwardly reported what her campaign has done.

Me too. A couple years back I was against Hillary because I worried about electability. Then maybe a year ago, I began to read articles about her that cast her in a very favorable light, in terms of her sharpness in regards to the issues, and I thought, "Well, maybe she won't be so bad if she ends up winning the nomination." But any positive feelings I've had toward her have pretty much evaporated during this primary season.

jaymc, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

not to defend o'reilly but he probably didn't consciously intend to bring up those connotations, and the obama campaign aren't big enough crybabies to make a case out of it, I think (unlike the clintons and the whole 'pimping' comment)

akm, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

not to defend o'reilly but he probably didn't consciously intend to bring up those connotations

LOL, r u crazee

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont really see what the big deal about the oreilly comment is

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

if you read the whole transcript he's basically saying his crazy ass listener wants to lynch michelle obama and he dosnt

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

gimme a break O'Reilly is TOTALLY cognizant of subtext.

and come on ethan his statement implies that he's okay with a lynching party so long as there's "evidence"! wtf man

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

but yr right I didn't read the whole transcript.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

O'REILLY: Maryanne, Woodbury, Connecticut: What say you, Maryanne? Maryanne --

CALLER: I'm here.

O'REILLY: -- you're on the air.

CALLER: Here I am.

O'REILLY: OK.

CALLER: I just wanted to say that I think Michelle Obama is an angry woman -- is speaking, I think, with her real voice for the first time. And --

O'REILLY: But how do you -- what do you base that on? You're basing that on what?

CALLER: Well, your representative asked me not to talk about this, but I have a friend who had knowledge of her and said to me months ago, "This is a very angry," her word was "militant woman."

O'REILLY: All right. What I want you do then, Maryanne, if -- I want you to stay on the line.

CALLER: OK.

O'REILLY: Because it's not fair to Michelle Obama for you --

CALLER: Oh no, all I'm saying is --

O'REILLY: -- because we don't know who you are, and we don't know who your friend is, but we want to know. We want to know, OK. But it's not fair at this point for you to say, "My friend said X and Y," because we just don't know. But if you would give us your information, we would like to talk to your friend. And then whatever your friend tells us, we'll track it down. We'll do it in a fair and balanced and methodical way. That's how we're going to cover this campaign -- all of them, all of them. So stay on the line, give us your information. If indeed Michelle Obama is angry about something, if she has a history, we would like to know that, and then we can put it into some kind of context so that we can be fair to everybody.

You know, I have a lot of sympathy for Michelle Obama, for Bill Clinton, for all of these people. Bill Clinton, I have sympathy for him, because they're thrown into a hopper where everybody is waiting for them to make a mistake, so that they can just go and bludgeon them. And, you know, Bill Clinton and I don't agree on a lot of things, and I think I've made that clear over the years, but he's trying to stick up for his wife, and every time the guy turns around, there's another demagogue or another ideologue in his face trying to humiliate him because they're rooting for Obama.

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

If he's repeating "lynch" because that's the term his caller used, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. If he's the one who introduced it into the conversation, though, it's totally boneheaded.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

im not some kinda capn save-a-o' but dude is clearly exaggerating for effect - 'michelle obama is a crazy woman who hates america!!' 'now, lets not organize a lynching party just yet...'

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

dude, he introduced the lynching idea into the conversation

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

its pretty standard to exaggerate the position of someone you disagree in "now, let's not _____ just yet..." statements

and what, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually I think Ethan's right here.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

he could have said pitchfork party, what's wrong with a pitchfork party

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

@ Mr. Que

Okay, I see that he did. In that case, feck-a-Bill O'Reilly.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Lousy music on the stereo?

xpost

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Ryan Schreiber

xxpost

Nicole, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

You know, I'd love to jump in and get all excitable about Bill O'Reilly here, cuz he's a dick and I hate him, but I agree w/ and what. He's using that language to distance himself from the caller's accusations. At the same time, sure, I guess you could say he's pulling some NLP shit, introducing that specific phrase ("lynching party against Michelle Obama!"), but I'm not quite that paranoid. This isn't inspiring me to outrage.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah let's just go back to how hillary hating is sexist

kenan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

listened to rush on my lunchbreak field a bizarre call from some woman who claimed hillary clinton never had a chance because of the backsliding nature of the female sex going back to eve and pandora, in whose fabled box the only thing that remained after evil was unleashed in the world was HOPE o_0??lol

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't like this idea coming from Tracer and o.nate that i'm following some kind of institutionalized misogynist meme pathway when i come to the conclusion that her candidacy is a dog and a sure loser in the bargain

i'm sure you don't, but it's worth thinking about what we really know about hillary clinton and barack obama -- given that none of us has ever met them, given that the national political press is probably the most broken, tribal sector of a broken, tribal profession, given that frames around democratic "character issues" have been a signature of every election in recent memory, and given the fact that we humans love to create binaries and justify them to ourselves

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

So if you guys vote for:

Obama, you're a sexist and an ageist
Clinton, you're a racist and an ageist
McCain, you're a sexist and a racist

? Nice.

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

lol ageist

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't like this idea coming from Tracer and o.nate that i'm following some kind of institutionalized misogynist meme pathway when i come to the conclusion that her candidacy is a dog and a sure loser in the bargain

No offense, Tracer, but I don't like it either. Nobody here is saying "I like Obama 'cuz teh TV told me to." Most of us are making reasonably well-informed criticisms of Clinton's history and character.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess I have to vote for Dan Perry, but I'm a Dan Perryist.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Vote RuPaul! (male and female and black and 47 - but has grey wigs)

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: yeah, Dan Perry '08 - he promised he would run!

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I hate O Reilly, but that exchange with the caller may be the most reasonable thing I've ever heard him say.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Should I vote for Dan Perry, if I am a periodontist?

Aimless, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan Perry '08 - he promised he would run!

dude, lying politicians.

Jordan, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

meanwhile, RuPaul reminded me of this guy (sad picture though)

http://i27.tinypic.com/2zoxma0.jpg

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

But O'Reilly's like this! He can get protective in the oddest times and with the most unexpected people. I think he genuinely likes Obama. Slate ran a feature in 2004 about how EASY it is to get on his good side: you flatter his swollen ego (just not in a hotel room).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

his throbbing, swollen ego

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

For an example of the power of frames, think of what a field day the press would be having now if it was Clinton who was waffling on a pledge to take public financing in the general.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Vote Clooney and you're sexy and racy.

When I watched Super Tuesday results with Jenny and Jesse a few weeks ago, I suggested an Obama/Clooney ticket and they both liked that.

Eazy, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

...what a field day the press would be having now if it was Clinton who was waffling on a pledge to take public financing in the general.

-- o. nate

You mean like the MASSIVE field day they had when Clinton abstained from the immunity vote? Yeah, that got front page coverage from coast to coast. Totally unfair.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Um, she didn't abstain, she just didn't vote. Also, I think that Obama himself made public financing a much bigger issue when it was politically expedient for him to do so, and now that he's in a different situation, and it doesn't seem so expedient, he is back-pedaling. I don't really see the parallels in the case of the telecom immunity vote - hardly something Clinton made a cornerstone of her campaign.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

For an example of the power of frames, think of what a field day the press would be having now if it was Clinton who was waffling on a pledge to take public financing in the general.

omg this ^^^ is priceless - i can see why u are such a strong believer in the power of media distortion nate - obama never pledged to take public financing

lololololololololololololololololololol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I was gonna say...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

More about the idea that the press seizes on every possible angle to attack Clinton, while giving Obama a pass. The press (mainstream, as a whole) ignores most opportunities to attack both, which is as it should be.

Abstain: To refrain from voting.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

This seems to be a pretty fair fact-checker article:

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/the_obama_pledge.html

It's conclusion:

The Pinocchio Test
The Obama campaign has said different things at different times on the issue of public financing. While there may have been a little wriggle room in some campaign statements, Obama's affirmative answer to the Midwest Democracy Network seems unequivocal. Now that Obama is raising $1 million a day, his enthusiasm for public financing appears to have waned.

Two Pinocchios for the land-of-Lincolner

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

obama has an op-ed on his stance on public financing in usa today -- he reiterates the 'aggressively persue an agreement' line and expands on what he means, i honestly don't think he's been inconsistent on this point

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/02/opposing-view-3.html

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Nobody here is saying "I like Obama 'cuz teh TV told me to."

if anybody had, it would be pretty funny!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

enthusiasm /= pledge

stop fraaaaaaming god

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

nice dig at the Supreme Court in there - ah Con law professors

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Brillo, who is the hortatory leader of reactionary white ethnic males, with a history of 'controversial' racial commentary, is not so stupid as to call in even a veiled way for the lynching of anybody, but he is certainly sharp enough or sufficiently inclined to say something outrageous to introduce the notion on the fly by putting it in someone else's mouth, then distancing himself from it.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

new york post: Now that Obama is raising $1 million a day, his enthusiasm for public financing appears to have waned.

obama: im still v interested in perusing public financing so long as the agreement includes soft money too.

me: lolwtf

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

washington post, rather - although that blog post is more on the ny post level

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

is it still in "good faith" if he's betting on mccain's obvious need for soft money to spoil the agreement?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

eh who knows what hes betting on? it seems like a pretty stupid and pointless bet if thats the case.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

And about a half-hour into a speech here, the Illinois Democrat announced that he had to take a quick break. "Gotta blow my nose here for a second," Obama said.

Out came a Kleenex (or perhaps it was a hankie), and he wiped his nose.

The near-capacity audience at the Reunion Arena, which his campaign said totaled 17,000, broke out in a slightly awkward applause.

XD

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

but i really dont think this is a good fight for mccain considering the deceptive (possibly illegal) shit he pulled w/those loans.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

rofl @ nosewipe applause

StanM, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

but i really dont think this is a good fight for mccain considering the deceptive (possibly illegal) shit he pulled w/those loans.

-- jhøshea, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:59 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Perhaps this is why Huckabee is biding his time.....

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

no, to Republicans all money is FREE SPEECH!

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

(to most Dems too)

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

The Republican National Convention isn't till September. I can see Huckabee getting the nom if McCain taking a severe beating in the press, esp. if he faces criminal liability. (all unlikely tho)

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i keep forgetting that stupid RNC thing is going to be where i live, or almost, goddamn that's gonna be so fucking annoying.

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

obama: im still v interested in perusing public financing so long as the agreement includes soft money too

But the potentially misleading part is that Obama doesn't seem to have raised the soft-money issue before. Maybe he had it in mind all along, and he is a smart enough lawyer that his statement on the matter was crafted to allow for just such an exception, or maybe he hadn't thought about it. But he did make a big deal of being more committed to public-financing than his rivals, which was perhaps a bit disingenuous if he foresaw that there would be these other hurdles to making it happen.

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

lol m@tt i'm thinking of making some "GOP GTFO" tshirts. i bet there's gonna be some fun protests.

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

it's 'potentially misleading' only if you consider soft money to be beyond the purview of campaign finance reform, which would be singularly retarded.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

lol m@tt i'm thinking of making some "GOP GTFO" tshirts. i bet there's gonna be some fun protests.

-- gff, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:22 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

a friend of mine was actually trying to organize a "formal" protest, where everyone has neatly computer-printed signs and wears a suit and tie (male) or dress/pantsuit for women to counter-act all the "liberals are wacky hippies" stuff that will make the news...it's a good idea i don't know if he ever got very far with it though i should ask him...

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't understand your point. Soft money is outside the purview of the public election financing law, which constrains the amount the candidate can spend, but not the amount outside groups can spend. If Obama now thinks that public election financing only makes sense if it also includes a limit on soft-money spending, then why didn't he say so before? Especially when answering "Yes" to a questionaire that asked whether he would accept public financing if his opponent did.

xpost

o. nate, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah not to sound like a blue dog or anything but if the protest is all wobblies and code pink types i'm gonna be a little disappointed. hopefully the dfl or the nominee can throw a party or two at least! it should be a fun time. welcome to the twin cities! have a drink, we hate you! now go lose!

xp

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's playing the public finance thing like a good politician. when you're down, you make noises about public financing. when you're up, you sort of shrug. it's part of the game. the point of the game is to win. not to get all hung up making a stand on the principles of the rulebook. if obama thinks he's gonna have a money advantage in the general, which he probably would, then he'd be dumb to relinquish it. he doesn't seem dumb.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

o. nate, i'm not trying to be legalistic about this, just reasonable. any general election agreement to campaign spending limits / public financing that did not ALSO limit soft money spending would be a hollow gesture. if the objective is to impart some measure of fairness, then just limiting expeditures of the campaigns themselves would not be enough, because those very limits would cause a unprecedented influx of soft money from countless parties.

in short, agreeing only to campaign spending limits while letting soft money flow freely would obey the letter of campaign finance law but betray the spirit of fairness that is its objective.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

“Give me a break! I've got news for all the latte-drinking, Prius- driving, Birkenstock-wearing, trust fund babies crowding in to hear him speak! This guy won't last a round against the Republican attack machine. He's a poet, not a fighter.”

Machinists' Union pres Tom Buffenbarger

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/20/684411.aspx

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

ANNOUNCER: What do you think of Howard Dean's plan to raise taxes on families by $1900 a year?

MAN: What do I think? Well, I think Howard Dean should take his tax-hiking, government-expanding, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading...

WOMAN: ...body-piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freakshow back to Vermont. Where it belongs.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

He's a poet, not a fighter.”

i think this consistent underestimation of obama's willingness and ability to mix it up is only gonna help him. i don't know why it's been so under-noticed, he's had plenty of dust-ups. i think he kind of likes a little tough-guy stuff, that's what's not getting picked up on. and the longer people go not picking up on it, the better for him.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

(but maybe i'm just biased toward poker players.)

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah lolz Chicago politics is for pansies dontchaknow

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Mayor Daley? PUSSY

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

it's part of the game. the point of the game is to win. not to get all hung up making a stand on the principles of the rulebook.

yeah see this is the kind of calculating machine politics way of thinking that we need to move beyond

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn, the shithead's name is Buffenbarger. I guess I'd be pissed too.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

The silver-tongued orator from Kansas, Hawaii and Illinois?

Is the fact that Obama claims three states supposed to be a knock against him? Because you could say the exact same thing about Hillary (Illinois, Arkansas, and New York -- not to mention D.C.).

jaymc, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah see this is the kind of calculating machine politics way of thinking that we need to move beyond

mm-hm. look, it's not so much that obama is a different kind of politician than hillary. it's that he is possibly a better politician than her. they're all playing the same game, but their skill sets are different. you use what you've got. (you know, within legal limits etc etc.) if obama bound himself to public financing and lost, i don't think there'd be a bunch of happy pro-public-financing liberals.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, let's not confuse obama's message with his means. if you can play the game but present yourself as being above the game, that's some high-level playing. if you can win the game while seeming to be above it, that's some jedi-level stuff. but you still do actually have to play the game.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

its v possible that im being completely naive here but i do think obama has a legit interest in campaign finance reform - and might if his conditions were met agree to it in the g.e.

which is not to say that he not thinking well shit if i can raise like a mil every day maybe i should just forget the whole thing

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant believe o nate and tracer continue to be cynical about this ... i mean even considering the way that hes RAISED his million dollars a day is like, are you serious??? Its not like hes taking this shit from corporations or whatever. he's more than doubled Hillary's individual donor count.

deej, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

ya, obama has surpassed 500,000 donors in 2008 alone, and is well on the way to a million individual donors since his campaign began

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

its v possible that im being completely naive here but i do think obama has a legit interest in campaign finance reform - and might if his conditions were met agree to it in the g.e.

i think he does have a commitment to it, and maybe his response to mccain is more than posturing. but in the meantime, the posturing serves its own purpose, pushing back at the pushback. and in any case, having a commitment to public financing is fine but unilaterally giving up a likely advantage would be a questionable move. what's more important here, winning or virtue?

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

It's too early to even mention the v-word yet.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

vagina? vietnam?

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

except he prob thinks he can have both - which v well may be true

not that theres anyway in hell they can craft an agreement before the g.e. thatll control soft money

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

lol xp

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Vasectomy

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.vecernji.hr/system/galleries/pics/060525/a-borat2.jpg

"Vah-geene!"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080220/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_torture

wtf McCain your position MAKES NO SENSE

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been out-of-the-loop today. Sorry if this is redundant. I'm not sure I agree with this, but it's an interesting point about HRC making GOP talking-points that might harm eventual Democratic Nominee Obama in the GE. I mean, no one says that HRC is obligated to stand aside, but maybe seeing the writing on the wall, she shouldn't do what could be very serious damage to the party's nominee in the GE.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 20 February 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

deej did you leave your sarcasm receptors in your other pants??

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel i don't think that's an interesting point. it's made in every primary race, and you could say the same thing about obama's critiques of clinton.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

except that Clinton isn't going to win

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

so it kinda doesn't matter what Obama says about her at this point. Clinton's in the loser's seat now, and what she says (or her surrogates say) out of anger and desperation isn't going to help anybody, least of all her.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

theres gonna be a lot of pressure on hillary to step aside starting right abt now

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

well it's kind of true in every primary race, isn't it? You need to attack your opponent but not sully him/her so much that it could do serious harm in a general election (cuz we're all on the same side right?!)

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

What amuses me no end about the commentariat is the amnesia to which they willingly submit each election cycle. Does anyone really believe that -- after years in which we've learned about Nixon's back channels to China, Carter's quiet defense buildups, and Reagan's runaway NSC -- HRC or Obama would really pull ALL our troops out of Iraq or wouldn't consider offensive manuevers against a rogue state? Or that McCain would really commit troops in Iraq for 100 years? I mean, really? It's called "sending signals" to your base, but if any one of these talking meatheads calls it what it is he'd send 500 luckless cable network talking heads to the unemployment line.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ this is totally OTM, my wife and I were discussing the stupidity of hammering McCain about the "100 years in Iraq" thing last night. I mean clearly it was a rhetorical blunder on his part, but its blown way out of proportion.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

plz think of the 500 luckless cable network talking heads :(

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm being cranky, guys, but REALLY we're smarter than this -- talkign endlessly in Russertspeak about how things will "play out."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Alfred totally OTM. I'm always torn between pointing this kind of thing out and keeping my mouth shut because I want Obama to win.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the way it's discussed as a talking point is kind of stupid (lolz 100 years of Iraq war if you vote for zombie man), but it does betray a style of thinking about (or at least publicly talking about) Iraq as if it were Germany, Korea, or Japan, which it just ain't. If Dems hammer him on the 100 years because of this, however, I'm all for it, and think it's the smarter move.

xxxpost

en i see kay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think its ridiculous to hammer mccain on the 100 years in iraq at all - the dude may have not meant it in exactly that way but hes never met a war he didnt like - so it does sum up his hawkish attitude nicely

do you think its stupid to hit him on his charming bomb bomb bomb iran number because he was obv fucking around?

just cause neither of them are completely literally valid doesnt mean they dont speak to his insano war-mongering hawk-mind

not to mention that just being cool w/having a military presence in a peaceful iraq for a hundred years is kinda fucked up on its own

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

The thing is, I really DO think Obama promises more than he can deliver. All campaigning politicians do that, but he probably does it to an even greater extent. I still like him and want to be pres, but I'm wondering whether there's a point at which he should turn the intensity and hyperbole down slightly to avoid being vulnerable.

McCain probably just means a moderate-sized deployment of troops at a military base or some such, which is what we do all over the world. Joke's on him for being honest about imperialism, I guess.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Obama because his clarity bespeaks transparency, and the hint of a snarl in his delivery suggests that he's got plenty of guile, but c'mon. The history of the Republic is strewn with presidencies, failures and successes, whose governance had fuck-all to do with what they said in public.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry maybe im misunderstanding but why on earth does it matter whether or not a) mccain actually will spend 100 years in iraq or b) whether or not we actually believe him?? he said something really dumb and theres no reason not to repeat it as many times as possible in the hopes that enough people either believe it enough to not vote for him or on the other hand recognize it as representative of an unacceptable attitude about the situation. or is that too cynical?

max, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

the cynical side of me tends to agree with you max. I mean I guess if I were working on a campaign I'd absolutely grab hold of that line.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

if Obama were really clever, he'd confront McCain. "Does Senator McCain, whom I respect and admire enormously -- who knows the horror of war all too well, in fact, much better than I or Senator Clinton -- REALLY mean we're going to commit American troops in Iraq for a hundred years? Surely he misspoke." And if he delivers this at his airy best he'd leave the crowd in stiches.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry maybe im misunderstanding but why on earth does it matter whether or not a) mccain actually will spend 100 years in iraq or b) whether or not we actually believe him??

It means you don't have to pay too much attention to it. Some things are worth ignoring. Did you expect McCain to say anything else?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

he said something really dumb and theres no reason not to repeat it as many times as possible in the hopes that enough people either believe it enough to not vote for him or on the other hand recognize it as representative of an unacceptable attitude about the situation. or is that too cynical?

the cynical side of me tends to agree with you max. I mean I guess if I were working on a campaign I'd absolutely grab hold of that line.

taken straight from the Republican playbook. Fuck yeah, play that shit on repeat 'til everyone's sick to the back teeth from it.

will, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't mentioned this yet (or on the other thread either), but I thought some of you (and the press, of course) blew HRC's remark about LBJ and MLK way out of proportion: reading Caro's LBJ biography this week, I realized it was impossible for any other president without LBJ's mastery of Senate parliamentary procedure to have signed such landmark legislation. But the commentariat's motif tha week was "the Clinton campaign is RACIST omigod." I mean, these things are STUPID, ultimately, and a distraction.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

and I'm second to Morbs in loathing for HRC.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

taken straight from the Republican playbook. Fuck yeah, play that shit on repeat 'til everyone's sick to the back teeth from it.

-- will, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:20 PM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

O yeah I keep forgetting how the GOP invented campaign tactics

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

the LBJ vs MLK thing was just a kind a dumb comparison for her to say, it was very clumsy. She would've been better to point out that JFK couldn't get civil rights legislation passed, but LBJ could, and left MLK out of it entirely. Altho lolz in the popular mind because of Nam LBJ will always be considered the lesser prez of the two.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

(LBJ also a funny, nasty motherfucker)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess really the underlying issue with each of these rhetorical blunders is not the nature of the blunder itself, but the fact that the candidate said something stupid without giving it much thought. It belies a certain political ineptitude.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

like "duh, when you're trying to win black votes don't belittle MLK"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

eh when taken in the context of the other nastiness they were spreading around s. carolina i dont think the reaction was inappropriate.

in fact id go so far as to say the clintons permanently damaged their reputations w/that shit.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

again, smoke and mirrors. It's obvious to me what she meant, but, as Shakey said, her statement was clumsily worded.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

"It's all a parlor game."

http://www.jfk-online.com/100xlewin.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

if it was just that sure but there was a obv pattern w/the clintons and their surrogates to demean obamas candidacy by putting him in a little black box - then they got spanked in s carolina and rethought - but fuck them for trying it anyway

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

These candidates must dazzle their bases -- it's the only way to surprise the public (and bases) when they're president. Remember, these people grew up believing that the presidency is the most powerful office in the world; they invest in the myth of presidential greatness. Once they're president, they want to be great, and will stop at nothing to get it.

How else did Nixon triumph in China or Reagan negotiate with Gorbachev (Reagan was even willing to cut ALL ballistic nuclear missles when negotiating)? They'd spent YEARS appeasing their base and scaring the left with belligerence. If you want an example closer to our hearts, it's how Clinton got away with gutting welfare, don't-ask-don't-tell, and bombing a pharmaceutical plant (even if the extreme left was already suspicious).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

what are we talking abt now

jhøshea, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

shit said on the campaign trail has little bearing on reality, so we should stop wondering about banalities.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I do think there was something elitist about her quote, putting the slightly greater emphasis on the president who merely passed the legislation than on the people who fought to make it possible. Obviously it took some courage and political skill on Johnson's part, but it took a much greater amount of courage and political skill on the part of a whole movement to even get Johnson to that point in the first place.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_ask,_don't_tell

HI DERE, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

In a way the fact that she clearly didn't MEAN any harm by the quote, that she didn't think she was saying anything that would dishonor the memory of the civil rights movement actually belies a certain elitism.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

you know I just read a bio of Mao that painted a pretty ridiculous picture of Nixon's "triumph" in China - explicitly noted that Nixon gave Mao everything he was asking for (diplomatic recognition, seat on the UN council, promises to withdraw US troops, etc.) while getting basically nothing in return. Nixon seemed like kind of an idiot to do this. China at the time was poor, isolated, and desperate for military technology and political legitimacy.

(not to totally derail this thread or anything)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary was speaking on the subject of who's going to make the best president, not who's going to lead the most effective grassroots civil rights organization

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, if i had to choose right now between hilz and obama i'd go with obama but some of you guys are knee-deep in some bullshit right now

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

On "100 years", I guess I didn't quite get across what I meant. I'm all for hammering him on it, but there's a way to be all repetitious and Rovian about it without being that kind of disingenuous. He did not mean 100 years of full out war. But he did mean that "Hey guys, it'll be just like Japan, those bastards love us now!" and it shows he's thinking about the middle east, (again, or at least just talking about the middle east) in a really wrong and stupid way. Hammer him on that! He's an old fucker who either doesn't grasp the fact that we're not fighting the old wars, or he pretends not to grasp it.

If spun right, this could be even more damaging than "He's just a crazy hawk" because it ties into a narrative wherein he's way too old for this country and will deal with all of our problems, including war, in all the old, broken ways.

en i see kay, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

It's a triumph for inanity that the fact that Nixon was an unlikely president to open talks with China became "Only Nixon could go to China," and that that in turn became conventional wisdom.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah rly, Mao would've accepted ANY President from the US handing him all his demands on a silver platter

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

see that's the thing, those attacks from HRC end up looking like rookie mistakes in not-very-distant hindsight. whatever the merits of her statement, and the theater of overreaction to it, why would you want to get near saying: "don't you SEE, that other candidate you're maybe nervous about voting for, he's like martin luther king"

i mean, apparently i can never really know anything about a politician, but really the big overall narrative of HRC's failure is a failure to even live up to her own memes (the hideousness of her externally-generated memes notwithstanding).

this is where obama's branding (perish the thought) is actually pretty clever: make it about a few supposedly intangible things, and it can't be disproven! talk about hope, and voila, people feel some hope! this drives a lot of people nuts. on the other hand, talk about experience when you're fucking up left and right, talking about having it in the bag and then losing a bunch, talk about being canny and tough when your attacks are backfiring in the press -- not a good look.

many xps

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

shakey i've not read what you have about nixon in china specifically...and i can't believe i'm about to defend richard nixon! but the point of going to china wasn't to play hardball with china but further deepen a rift in the communist world.

gff, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Also Nixon going to China were a direct causal event to the creation of "Nixon In China" which is both awesome and has been a gateway in my life for extra $$$$.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

This book made a fairly strong case that Mao was already completely at odds with the Soviets by the late 60s, and had been ever since Kruschev denounced Stalin. By the 70s they weren't getting any more military technology, Mao had withdrawn all his personnel from Russia, was paranoid that they were going to invade/assassinate him, etc. Mao's goal was to court an image as a "champion of the global poor" in direct opposition/contrast to the Soviets. The Sino-Soviet split had been in place pretty much since the late 50s.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

without being that kind of disingenuous

hasn't Obama (or Clinton too, not sure) used a line something like "I would pull our troops out of Iraq as soon as possible .... my opponent sees us having troops in Iraq for 100 years."

is that disingenuous? seems fair to me. would mccain even argue the point?

dmr, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

The best part about that line is that you can turn around and say "We've done the analysis and the soonest we can start pulling troops out of Iraq is 100 years from now" after you win.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, if i had to choose right now between hilz and obama i'd go with obama but some of you guys are knee-deep in some bullshit right now

-- Tracer Hand, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:38 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

your whole 'hillary would be the nominee if it werent for THE MEDIA' thing is pretty out of hand dude

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 01:09 (sixteen years ago) link

So anyway, McCain fucked a lobbyist and called in a few favors for her:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?hp

Or, you know, such is the implication.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 01:36 (sixteen years ago) link

The plot thickens.

Learning the full details of the Keating Five story was a treat, but the charges of infidelity seem insubstantial, despite the presence of, according to the NYT, two sources.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

couldn't find any pics of Carol Mccain but lolblondefetish anyway.

Gavin, Thursday, 21 February 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

anytime anyone says "the plot thickens" i think of matthew lilliard's awkward delivery of same in 'hackers'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

this 'scandal' is a nonevent

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:12 (sixteen years ago) link

does anybody have a link or can maybe gimme a rundown re: this "obama pledged to use public finance then didn't" or somesuch stuff

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

this 'scandal' is a nonevent

^^^^ This. STOP GETTING MY HOPES UP, NYT AND WASH. POST.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

it's just the times treatment. it's so nyt to be like "ok here's the sex scandal for 2008 -- wait, read three pages about ethics, first."

YGS, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a real scandal - mccain fucked a lobbyist!

pretty otm http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/179402.php

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

talk about soft money

Hurting 2, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:40 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain fucked a lobbyist!
mccain fucked a lobbyist!
mccain fucked a lobbyist!
mccain fucked a lobbyist!
mccain fucked a lobbyist!

v satisfying to write!

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:43 (sixteen years ago) link

that mccain, he's shifty

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:44 (sixteen years ago) link

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/20/us/20mccain-190a.jpg
i fucked a mccain!

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:48 (sixteen years ago) link

looks like a mccain fucked you

roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

What a country!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE FUCKENING

gershy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:52 (sixteen years ago) link

this is maybe why huckabees been sticking around?

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:56 (sixteen years ago) link

She looks like a younger version of his wife.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

this is maybe why huckabees been sticking around?

You know, I was wondering about this earlier tonight...

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2008-02-21-biobig.jpg

poor woman

Pablo A, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i would stay in that lobbyist for 100 years

max, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago) link

a++

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12335/thumbs/s-ISEMAN-large.jpg

gwb runnin all up in that too

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:08 (sixteen years ago) link

this 'scandal' is a nonevent

deej say what? this could turn into march madness.

Cosmo Vitelli, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:08 (sixteen years ago) link

jaime pressly for the inevitable tv movie

http://www.lahiguera.net/cinemania/actores/jaime_pressly/fotos/726/jaime_pressly.jpg

gershy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 05:26 (sixteen years ago) link

MCain says it's a smear campaign - I don't think using gynecological terms at this time is a very good idea, John.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 06:55 (sixteen years ago) link

In 2000 I always had this idea that Gore should show up somewhere in a cowboy hat, just audaciously challenging Bush. I guess the idea wasn't as far-fetched as I had thought.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:31 (sixteen years ago) link

obama in cowboy hat is a total badass, gore in same probably would be lame

gershy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:35 (sixteen years ago) link

like a fatted pig wearing an ascot

remy bean, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:37 (sixteen years ago) link

blazing saddles lol

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:39 (sixteen years ago) link

would work if he had a beard and a bolo tie, tho.

Also, he was still around his fighting weight back then.

kingfish, Thursday, 21 February 2008 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link

So none of the other states were important, it's all Ohio and Texas: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4318311&page=1

"If she wins Texas and Ohio I think she will be the nominee. If you don't deliver for her, I don't think she can be. It's all on you," the former president told the audience at the beginning of his speech.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 08:22 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.blueindiana.net/upload/mccainwow.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

From this article, by the way: McCain failed to gather enough signatures to be on the ballot in a very republican district in Indiana

http://blueindiana.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=2020

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 08:30 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12353/thumbs/s-VICKIANDCINDY-large.jpg
girlfriend, wife

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Has McCain wagged his finger and said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" yet?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:10 (sixteen years ago) link

no in fact all hes said is yr sliming me dudes - which is a compelling non-denial in itself.

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Cindy McCain in 2016

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Has McCain wagged his finger and said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" yet?

Depends on what is is.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:15 (sixteen years ago) link

It's a vast left-wing conspiracy.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:18 (sixteen years ago) link

And he can't get it up far enou - wait, that's his arms, innit? Nevermind.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:19 (sixteen years ago) link

If the affair is true, and verifiably so, then kudos to the NYT for sitting on it until McCain had pretty much wrapped up the nomination.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:24 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently they were gonna run it in december but mccain lawyered up and started giving them shit

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Romney must be kicking himself

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:34 (sixteen years ago) link

l o l

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:35 (sixteen years ago) link

But unless there's a Linda Tripp in the mix somewhere, McCain should weather this fairly easily. I mean, if he denies it and she denies it, how can anyone prove it?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:39 (sixteen years ago) link

John McCain is holding a press conference at 9 a.m. ET.

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

aka right now

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

hes v disappointed in the nytimes piece its not true

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:00 (sixteen years ago) link

theyre just friends did not fuk

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:00 (sixteen years ago) link

not particularly close saw her at events etc

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:01 (sixteen years ago) link

"Like my illustrious predecessor Bob Dole, I could not have had sexual relations with that woman."

http://bp0.blogger.com/_Se19XAPwVi8/RbPNYwHY2hI/AAAAAAAAALA/bzZW5ZBu_2I/s400/dole69viagra.jpg

Euler, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:02 (sixteen years ago) link

he should resign why cause it look excitin

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago) link

his demeanor is pretty impressive this morning im enjoying it

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:07 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.hillaryclintonisyournewbicycle.com

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

so assuming this has salience in the campaign because of the wang, which democratic candidate draws the better contrast?

gabbneb, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

That's a rhetorical question, right?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:48 (sixteen years ago) link

as if it wasn't known already, Clinton's campaign having serious financial troubles:

January yields debt for HRC, cash for Obama

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary Clinton ended January with $7.6 million in debt – not including the $5 million personal loan she gave to her campaign in the run-up to the critical Super Tuesday elections, according to financial reports released Wednesday.

She reported a cash balance of $29 million. But more than $20 million of that is money dedicated to the general election. Her personal loan accounts for more than half of the remaining approximately $9 million, leaving just about $4 million in cash raised from donors.

But even that money is illusionary when measured against the reported $7.6 million in debts.

More than $2 million of the red ink is owed to chief consultant and adviser, Mark Penn.

it mentions that these numbers obviously don't include all the money that's come in since feb. 5, but you get the picture.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"illusionary"?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

not "accounted for", because that would be an accurate statement

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously, it's kind of astonishing how poorly managed clinton's campaign has been (and by contrast how smoothly obama's has been going).

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think "illusionary" is a word

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

woops:

Main Entry:
il·lu·sion·ary
Pronunciation:
\i-ˈlü-zhə-ˌner-ē\
Function:
adjective
Date:
1866

: illusory

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

for all the talk about the "clinton political machine" etc, she should've had this wrapped up by now

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha Tracer, that passed through my mind but then I went "so not gonna go there" because I figured I'd be wrong

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i think "illusionary" is a less efficient attempt to remember the actually good and correct word, "illusory" -- just cause somebody whom everyone was scared of in 1866 got it wrong doesn't mean we have to listen

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

illusionary sounds more awesomely cosmic

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean why is the dictionary so hellbent on force-feeding us these storylines????

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

"ladies and gentlemen... never before on stage has such an extravaganza of sensory delight been presented before a paying audience... behold! the illusionary grandeur of madame majestique!!!"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/21/us/21sat.337.jpg

ta-da!

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton could totally plagiarise the dictionary and be all "They say Obama is a visionary? MORE LIKE ILLUSIONARY, AM I RIGHT, EL PASO?"

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

http://jezebel.com/assets/resources/2008/02/mccainmashup0222108.jpg
wife, girlfriend

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

that my friends is evidence enough

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

trade that ho in for a newer model right?

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:26 (sixteen years ago) link

he like em blonde and flinty don't he

uh xp

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

well he already did it once before when his old model broke down

xposts

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Then again, even eight years ago McCain was pretty old. At that age, he probably just likes the female company rather than actually doing anything about it (if he still can).

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

4xpost: "Wipe your nose for us like you did in Texas!"

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^sound advice

roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

*blork*

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

bathtubs in the middle of a field people

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out

T-shirt slogan of the year.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

the nyt is tiptoeing around the sex stuff which is lolzy but kind of beside the point. here's the AP on what's really the problem here

The published reports said McCain and Iseman each denied having a romantic relationship. Neither story asserted that there was a romantic relationship and offered no evidence that there was, reporting only that aides worried about the appearance of McCain having close ties to a lobbyist with business before the Senate Commerce Committee on which McCain served.

The stories also allege that McCain wrote letters and pushed legislation involving television station ownership that would have benefited Iseman's clients.

In late 1999, McCain twice wrote letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications _ which had paid Iseman as its lobbyist _ urging quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh. At the time, Paxson's chief executive, Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, also was a major contributor to McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.

McCain did not urge the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal, but he asked for speedy consideration of the deal, which was pending from two years earlier. In an unusual response, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard complained that McCain's request "comes at a sensitive time in the deliberative process" and "could have procedural and substantive impacts on the commission's deliberations and, thus, on the due process rights of the parties."

McCain wrote the letters after he received more than $20,000 in contributions from Paxson executives and lobbyists. Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.

"Riding on the airplane was an accepted practice," McCain said Thursday, adding that he supported a change in rules since then. As for the letters, he said: "I said I'm not telling you how to make a decision; I'm just telling you that you should move forward and make a decision on this issue. I believe that was appropriate."

xp o jesus christ elmo

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

"you don't need an erection to eat a lobbyist out, but it helps!"

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Cui boner

kingfish, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

The published reports said McCain and Iseman each denied having a romantic relationship. They did admit to fucking though.

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

The thought of McCain going down on anyone is just...

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

More than $2 million of the red ink is owed to chief consultant and adviser, Mark Penn.

Talk about a poor investment.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"Rubbin on her clit / with my face cyst"

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.sfgate.com/blogs/images/sfgate/mlasalle/2007/07/02/mccain.jpg

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Mark Pwnn

gershy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

thread summary: you don't need an erection

contenderizer, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

...to have a good time.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder if he has false teeth? That would be all kinds of gross...

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

speak for yourself, chief

xpost

Euler, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

arghhhh

sleep, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't need teeth to drink lobbyist pee

contenderizer, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

too far

sleep, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

THX ELMO

sleep, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

for my new default masturbation fantasy

contenderizer, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/650000/images/_653304_lightsaber300.jpg

kingfish, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe he lovingly clutched her breasts in his hands and addressed them sincerely as "my friends"

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/POLITICS/02/21/mccain/t1home.mccain.thurs.07.ap.jpg

why would I cheat on my plastic wife?

akm, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

"Every man needs three women," McCain said in response to allegations that he'd cheated on his wife with a lobbyist, Vicki Iseman. "His wife comes first, of course," he said, before joking, "Unless I'm having an off night," presumably a reference to erectile problems.

McCain went on, saying, "The second woman's his mistress. And the third woman's his ho. That's where Vicki came in.

"So no -- the relationship wasn't romantic. But you do have to throw your ho a bone or two. That's what the Paxson stuff was about."

McCain then gave this reporter a high-five.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, Israeli newspaper prints racist Obama cartoon

http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2008/02/israeli-newspap.html

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't need an erection to have a good time.

new Prince single in 2020

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

"U Don't Need an Erection (To Have a Good Time)"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

meta question: is il* getting nastier?

contenderizer, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I know I already posted this pic, but

http://www.blueindiana.net/upload/mccainwow.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

that would be awesome if obama painted the whitehouse black tho

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Like I always say what's good for the gaze
Is always good for the camera
oh Vicki, oh, oh

Oh, baby -- love me right
Let me love you till I get it right, hmm
Can't you let the others be
'Cause with you is where I got to be

Oh, sugar -- where you been?
Hangin' out with your lobbyist friends
Listen, somebody's going to hurt you
The way you love, to keep hurting me, we say

Oh, oh Vicki -- let me love you till the morning comes
Oh, oh Vicki -- you know I want to be the only one

Oh baby, understand -- that I want to be the only man

But it seems you're screaming too hard
Now think yourself to have an only friend
Oh baby, it's plain to see
That my gummy mouth can fill your needs

I think you just threw up on me
Honey, baby, that's how this town can be

And we say
(repeat first verse)

Oh baby, it's 1-2-3
I love you baby honestly, hmm, I want to
Di a di da li a di a di da li

Oh, oh Vicki...
(repeat 2, 3, 4, 1)

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh baby, it's plain to see
That my gummy mouth can fill your needs

ddamn

contenderizer, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

maariv is barely a newspaper

Hurting 2, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

actually that might be unfair - I really just know that it's a tabloid. I don't know how bad it usually is.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

What does that Klingon text say on the front page?

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

(er, sorry)

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I couldn't really tell you, but if you want to know what the word "Obama" looks like in Hebrew, it's right above his head.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i love how primary results are front page news everywhere - the whole world is following along w/us!

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Some interesting folderol over at NRO:

I just got off the phone with John Weaver, the former top McCain campaign official who is now an informal adviser to the campaign. I asked him about his 1999 meeting on the campaign's behalf with lobbyist Vicki Iseman. He said he "had no reason to think" that McCain might have been having an affair with Iseman, but he was concerned about word he had heard suggesting that Iseman was telling associates she had connections with McCain. "This was a woman who was saying that she had special influence with John's committee staff and with him," Weaver told me. "I didn't believe that was the case."

"When you hear back from several people that this person is saying they can get anything done, then that is alarming," Weaver continued. So Weaver met with Iseman, at a Union Station restaurant, and told her to back off. He told me he didn't exactly say, "Get lost," but that that was the gist of it. "The discussion lasted all of five or six minutes in which I told her to cut that stuff out," Weaver told me. "I said, 'You need to stop this.'" Iseman's response, according to Weaver: "She was not happy."

It is not all that unusual for lobbyists to spread the word that they have good access with lawmakers; it's the currency of the realm in that business. "If a newspaper is going to run stories about lobbyists who claim they have special relationships with members of Congress, it will run out of ink," Weaver said.

Weaver told me he was contacted by the New York Times in December — he doesn't remember the precise day but says it was around the holidays. The Times wanted to do an interview; Weaver asked for written questions. Weaver told me the paper's reporters knew about the meeting with Iseman, asked a question about it, and he answered it, also in writing. (Weaver told me he did not answer the Times' other questions, because, he said, he didn't know anything about the specific legislative issues involved.) Weaver also told me that he emailed the McCain campaign exactly what he sent the Times, on the same day he sent it. Weaver told me the Times quoted his response on the Iseman question in its entirety.

I asked about the implications heard in some reports that Weaver, who left the McCain campaign during last summer's blow up, is disgruntled. Absolutely not, he told me. "From the day I left the campaign, including holidays — Christmas, Thanksgiving, Labor Day — not one day has gone by when I haven't talked to the campaign," Weaver told me. He is regular contact with top officials Salter, Charles Black, Steve Schmidt, as well as McCain himself and several of the campaign's surrogates. Weaver stressed that he would not do anything to harm the campaign. "When I first approached John about running for president in 1997, I badly wanted him to be president," Weaver told me. "And today, I badly want him to be president."

Though more amusing is Andy McCarthy essentially saying, "Feel sorry for you, McCain? FUCK YOU YOU PRICK."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i love how primary results are front page news everywhere - the whole world is following along w/us!

Asked about why he was so interested in the US presidential race, a Dutch PM said "Because it's going to be our new president as well", stating his view on how important the US is for the rest of the world.

Our vice-MP Wouter Bos even got reprimanded by MP Balkenende for saying he'd like Obama to win.

So yes, YOU ARE BEING WATCHED.

Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

goddammit, this is gonna turn into a lewinsky-in-micro situation: 'lol u nailed her' 'no i did not', when the real story is that he was super cozy with a lobbyist and doing favors for her and her clients. he's said he's never had anything to do with lobbying or lobbyists. straight talk my fucking eye.

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz @ former Romney campaign staffer complaining about the NYT not running this story in December on CNN last night. gee, bitter much?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm bitter! Candidate Mitt would have been so much more entertaining.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

personally I think this story is bullshit. Couldn't care less about the infidelity angle, and wau I am shocked - SHOCKED - that McCain is a hypocrite re: lobbyists. I guess it will hurt him with the Republican base, which is good, but lolz what are they gonna do now, all turn to Fuckabee?? yah right

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Sigh, Tammy plans to vote for Hilary, which doesn't surprise me:

Will Tammy Baldwin, superdelegate, represent the 2nd CD as well as Tammy Baldwin, Congresswoman?
February 20th, 2008

The answer appears to be no.

As a reward for winning every single precinct in Dane County, and for winning big in all the neighboring counties as well, Barack Obama will win five delegates from the 2nd CD, while Clinton will win three.

Unfortunately, unless things change, his actual advantage at the convention will be only a single delegate, since Tammy Baldwin is a superdelegate who plans to vote for Senator Clinton.

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

im glad for the u-fucked-her angle even though he probably didnt because it undermines trust in mccain and keeps what would be a kinda wonky lobbyist story in the news long enough for people to investigate it further

and what, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

oh he fucked her alright

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts - nah, the story may not have the meat on it that would normally warrant a lot of attention, but i'm pretty happy it broke. as others have mentioned (and TPM has a comment on it right now: Teflon John), the press doesn't really even touch mccain's contradictory or hypocritical statements at all. maybe this will be the start?

the "straight-talk express" crap is such bullshit but the press hardly calls him on it, so i'm digging the exposure of this admittedly thin story, because maybe it'll help start a "mccain full-of-shit" narrative to counter the straight talk one.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

the infidelity angle, even if false, at least shakes up the "war hero reformer" / "paragon of virtue in a corrupt system" image and brings him to a far more flawed, human level

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

^exactly

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

He cheated on his first wife, too. That's on the record.

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

but he's so ugly!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

whoah

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Time is cruel bitch goddess apparently

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

he wasn't always! he useta be kinda fetching in a corn-fed kinda way

xpost i was just gonna post that pic lol

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

he looks like an undertaker.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

??

Michael White, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

so i'm curious about this debate tonight. i'm kinda thinking the tone is gonna be harsh.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

um, yeah

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

or at least no democratic-party-love-in

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

lol navy

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

keep it on the gaymo thread gaymos

and what, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

yes, only straight pics here like, er, this ?

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n17/dhvoice/misc/vicki-iseman.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

"journalistic version of waterboarding"

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm glad McCain has his own overblown accusations to deal with so he doesn't just get free hits on Obama until the convention.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

deej's dismissal of this gives me confidence that it's got legs

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Almost 1600 comments on the Times story so far, most of them HILARIOUS.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Everyone's got a different conspiracy theory on this one, and no one seems to be focusing on the Keating thing.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill O'Reilly and Hugh Hewitt have material for their respective radio shows for days.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

And yeah, I am pretty sure more stuff's gonna come out on this.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i was really hoping this would be a non-starter

remy bean, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

well, now that the times piece has dropped, a lot of investigative types are going to scrub through mccain's entire relationships with iseman and paxson looking for more details, interviewing every associate who can be tracked down, financial records will be scoured for improprieties -- this is going to be big news for at least a full week, with repercussions following well into the general campaign season.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

lol iseman looks like a college gf of mine

uh so time to get ghoulish: who benefits on the dem side? does this matter? does it 'remind' ppl of lewinsky? does it suck up all the oxygen, leaving an momentum in stasis? OR WAHT.

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

any momentum

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

See above re: distracting McCain while the Dems straighten their shit out.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Son looks just like his old man:

http://mccainblogette.com/docs/postings/021408/00.jpg

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

only a little more date rapey

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

My sources tell me that McCain and Hillary also had an "unusual" relationship in the nineties. Katherine Wiley introduced them.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the story itself, as the Times printed it, probably with all the most salacious details lawyered out, is not a big deal

the real "what does it mean" is this -->

a lot of investigative types are going to scrub through mccain's entire relationships with iseman and paxson looking for more details

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

My sources tell me that McCain and Hillary also had an "unusual" relationship in the nineties. Katherine Wiley introduced them.

I am really tempted to write McCain/HRC fanfic.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

The presence of a Gene Simmons sex tape makes me worried that there is a John McCain sex tape.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost There's already Obama/McCain slash out there.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

the real "what does it mean" is this -->

a lot of investigative types are going to scrub through mccain's entire relationships with iseman and paxson looking for more details

It means they're being political journalists?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

meaning there's probably more to come imo

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

NYT has sounded the call and now the hounds have been released and they are out for the blood of the candidate, BLOOD I SAY

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

BLOOD: THERE WILL BE SOME OF IT

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

times story ain't exactly definitive

but then again they've been working it for months, maybe there's nothing more to get

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

whoever the sources were they haven't exactly been shy about telling their story if the Times, WashPo and TNR all had it

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

blowback = right now unites behind McCain against NYT

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Eh, it was bound to happen. If the Times hadn't gone after him, the Dems would have.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

well, the NYT-hating far-right arm of the party will unite behind him, sure, but isn't it just as likely that the scandal could shake loose some of his independent and moderate republican supporters?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Limbaugh added: “This is what you get when you walk across the aisle and try to make these people your friends. I'm not surprised in the least that the NYT would try to take out John McCain. Predicted this, in fact, way back in the early 2000s.

and there was the NYT, waiting in the cut for eight long years, waiting for the perfect moment to POUNCE with this mildly embarrassing story

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Though see Ned's link upthread going "boo hoo poor McCain his pet liberal paper has turned on him."

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I am really tempted to write McCain/HRC fanfic.

Necroslash = Nicole's secret vice.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

No, it just sounds like the ultimate horrible romcom.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Other things happening today:

-- Obama's campiagn manager David Plouffe is in NC -- an Edwards endorsement forthcoming?

-- civil suit of Peter Paul v. Bill Clinton et al. starts today in LA Superior Court

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://cache.wonkette.com/assets/resources/2008/02/hucksarmymccain.jpg

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

In the pocket of Big McCain.

If you're holding public office, what's worse: banging an intern or banging a lobbyist?

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

please let us not associate the name "McCain" with the word "banging"

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost Getting fucked by a lobbyist with a strap-on

Gavin, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

pols respect you more if you're banging a lobbyist. let no fuck go to waste.

Cosmo Vitelli, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

David Freddoso quotes a reporter friend.

The core of the story - that McCain's top advisers were concerned enough about his ties with a lobbyist to confront both the lobbyist and McCain about it - is clearly legit. That in itself is not a really big story — it's no bigger than Obama & Rezko, which is fairly inconsequential but entirely worthy of reporting.

My question: could the NYT have run the story without intimating that McCain COULD have had an affair with this woman? I think so.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

It's enough that, according to the story, McCain may have been done a favor for a lobbyist. This obsession with sex is such nonsense, and journalists love it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah it is nonsense (when has sexual shenanigans EVER impaired a politicians' ability to do their job? wtf) and I think it makes the Times look bad. I hate to side with Rush and Co. here but it makes the NYT look really opportunistic and calculating.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

This is the affair that Ron Rosenbaum, Larry Flynt, etc. were talking about last fall. If Flynt is involved, I'm guessing there's something pruient news (morally or sexually) on the way.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

deej's dismissal of this gives me confidence that it's got legs

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:48 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

haha what? im sorry dude ive practically been ms cleo on obama so far (cue tracer: "only because the media is 'on his side'")

i think you've confused me w/ jhoshea, i was an ny giants advocate

that said the only thing new about this is the sex angle, which could be untrue??? if it isnt, and more evidence comes out (because so far is there any? an unnamed source thought that MAYBE there was is enough?) then i agree this thing has legs - otherwise this is the 60th in a series of stories about mccain kind of maybe actually being influenced by lobbyists since 'straight talk express' angle appeared in '00, its mccain's personality that carries his maverick personality, his arguments with fellow repubs, etc.

i mean jesus dude, i'd be totally happy if i'm wrong here ... it wouldnt be the first time a sex scandal has seemingly willed obama into office

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

http://bigheaddc.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/weaver.jpg

This would be a great picture if it were just cropped a little more on the left side.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

The core of the story - that McCain's top advisers were concerned enough about his ties with a lobbyist to confront both the lobbyist and McCain about it - is clearly legit. That in itself is not a really big story — it's no bigger than Obama & Rezko, which is fairly inconsequential but entirely worthy of reporting.

^^^basically yeah i agree w/ this

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf gallup

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/022108DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

quit bouncin around like dat, man

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

ughhhhh

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

My question: could the NYT have run the story without intimating that McCain COULD have had an affair with this woman? I think so.

I think you'll find many in the journo world who would say that the NYT would not have run with this with the intimation if it did not have further evidence of same that it was not able to run with at this time.

gabbneb, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

huh?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

EXACTLY

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

english, man

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

actually gabb that's getting excelsiored! nice work

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I think you'll find many in the journo world who would say that the NYT would not have run with this with the intimation if it did not have further evidence of same that it was not able to run with at this time.

-- gabbneb, Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:43 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

if this is the case, :D

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm really hoping there's no photographic evidence, because there's not enough eye bleach in all of the world.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

The TNR story suggests as much.

xpost- sorry, no photos

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

"If John McCain has hired Bob Bennett as his lawyer," one commentator said on Fox News, "that's a big--you don't hire Bob Bennett to knock down a press story. You hire Bob Bennett because you have serious legal issues somehow."

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/20/201332/807/36/458633

comparison of obama and hrc's senate records

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

That's possibly the best thing ever posted on Kos.

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

shit yeah that is great

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

From the comments of that dkos post:

Only 10 percent of Clinton contributors did not donate the legal maximum $2,300 for her primary campaign. In contrast, only three percent of Obama donors gave the maximum. The rest of the cash came from small sums from many more people.

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

lol, Obama wants to run the country, Hillary wants to open a day care.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

So, how mudslingingly vicious is it going to get over the next couple of days? I hate when they do that :-/

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

the debate tonight should offer a pretty good preview

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah def looking forward to it and SO pissed i can't go to any of the watch parties

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm kind of nervous about the debate, hilz is a good debator. i did read though that obama's been preparing for this one more than any previous debate. but yea there'll be a lot of mudslinging coming up.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I predict Hillary embarasses herself big time tonight.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

is this televised?

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

what would be the point of a non-televised debate?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

what's the over / under on how many times we hear "speeches vs. solutions"

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

lots of reaction shots of Bill eating burritos

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

to the sound of a muted trumpet wah-wahing

remy bean, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess i meant on television that i can watch, and the answer is no apparently:

The debate, to be held on the campus of the University of Texas, will air live on CNN, CNN International and CNN.com from 8 to 9:30 p.m. ET. The debate will also air in Spanish on Univision at 11:30 p.m. ET.

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

what would be the point of a non-televised debate?

I dunno, ask NPR.

jaymc, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

you won't have access to a computer? xpost

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The debates are never on my NPR station...

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

do they show them on the computer?

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

ok fine i'll try watching it online, jeez.

(i don't like watching stuff on my home computer b/c i have no speakers right now, and only one working earbud, but no one cares about this)

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't have cable, so it's online for me, if I finish "Beverly Hills 90210: Season Three" in time.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yea, i hate watching stuff on a computer too, but it wasn't too bad watching the last one on cnn.com. that's what i'll do tonight, too.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Hit the gym, bro.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

jordan pick some earbuds before, dude. you can get a pair for like $10

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Brenda and Donna's trip to Paris is more interesting than the debate, I'd wager.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

nah, i go to the Y now, they have a tv or two but i think you need a radio tuner to get sound.

xp

Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Brenda and Donna's trip to Paris is more interesting than the debate, I'd wager.

Doesn't Brenda try a phony French accent on Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I really don't like debates. I hope that doesn't make me shallow. I guess I'm curious what the big zinger or catchphrase will be, but they'll play highlights endlessly anyway, right?

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Not liking debates isn't what makes you shallow, Kenan. </opengoal>

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

ho ho!

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i'm really sick of debates, at least until the GE.

akm, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

i usually hate them but im pretty psyched for tonite cause of whats hillary gonna try to pull?

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope Obama wears his new hat.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, true, this is a big deal kinda debate. And of course it's always good times to watch Obama orate. I guess I'll give it a shot. But I'm warning you two, you had better amuse me! *wags finger*

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.blackgoldhorses.com/2parade.JPG

What if he showed up like the guy on the right?

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

That would rule. But I fear that Hillary would counter by wearing a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader outfit. *shudder*

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

ever seen "blazing saddles"?

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

It's the first debate where Obama is in the lead, so it'll be interesting to observe how it'll affect the dynamic between them.

Simon H., Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yea definitely. in any case, i imagine that status will make it a lot easier for obama to rise above the mudslinging, assuming he doesn't throw much back.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

she: (cries a single fake tear)
(female half audience applauds, some put a fist in the air, others cry too)
he: (blows nose)
(both genders applaud)

he wins!

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

preview:

clinton: "I've been working hard to make sure our children have health-care while my opponent was busy drop-kicking a retarded babies into a swimming pool owned by tony rezko. as president, you have my word that i will submerge our children in various solutions. for america."

obama: "i've taken the liberty of bringing a stool sample with me tonight to prove once and for all the pleasant aroma of my excreta; some holistic practitioners claim it has healing properties."

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

ew.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

otm, somebody would have to fuck up pretty bad to sway the numbers at this point. Maybe by, say, letting fly a stream of crude and shocking epithets. That might change people's minds.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

More like:

Clinton: "Rezko, shallow, words, character, experience. Negative."

Obama: "Issues, ideas, platform. Positive."

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

where do the candidates stand on the issue of lord custos parodies?

and what, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Analysis: "Well, this night will certainly go down in the history of debate. Who would have guess that Barack Obama would stoop to using the phrase 'cum dumpster'?"

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

kenan your posts in this thread are terrible

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

if clinton goes very negative on him, i don't think obama's just gonna sit there and take it. he'll throw an elbow or two.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

dude kenan reign it in a little sheesh

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

No basketball analogies allowed with Obama. Leave that to Rove.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Does anybody still (or did they ever) change their mind based on a televised debate? I can't recall one that didn't have two clear winners, depending on what channel you were watching.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Does anybody still (or did they ever) change their mind based on a televised debate?

There's this Nixon/Kennedy thing you might have heard about.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yourenojfk.wav

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://youtube.com/watch?v=kica8hmSdAM

youcangoyourownway, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Does anybody still (or did they ever) change their mind based on a televised debate?

not since Lincoln and Douglas.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

my guess is that clinton will attack based on minor inconsistencies found in his record, obama will counter that she has distorted his record for political gain.

also, i would bet obama mentions his approx. 1 million individual donors at some point

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

There's this Nixon/Kennedy thing you might have heard about.

Yes, I have heard it mentioned. Didn't Nixon, like, show up drunk and forget to shave or something? That doesn't happen anymore.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Is it time for desperate measures yet? Cleavage, leg?

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The debates are never on my NPR station...

-- Eppy, Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:37 PM (44 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

No, I mean NPR held a debate a couple months ago that wasn't televised and broadcast only on NPR.

jaymc, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

where do the candidates stand on the issue of lord custos parodies?

That is one instance in which I am very pro-death penalty.

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Is it time for desperate measures yet? Cleavage, leg?

I don't think Obama will have to resort to that.

HI DERE, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

SO DID JOHN MCCAIN HAVE AN AFFAIR WITH A LOBBYIST? DETAILS PLZ, THX.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

deej goes negative on keenan!

Aimless, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I really have to stop googling everything I think of - thank god it's fake (right?) :-(

http://www.chickchatradio.com/ee/images/uploads/hillary_clinton_boobs_bill_cleavage.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

america is not ready to elect a buxom president

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary is ok though cuz her rack is kinda small

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

you guys aren't really helping to disprove the "anti-Hillary people are sexist" meme

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

true - I'm not voting though (a foreigner is I)

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

kenan your posts in this thread are terrible

-- deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:09 (37 minutes ago) Link

^this

gabbneb, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link

That NYT "bombshell" on McCain is much ado about nothing. The affair is the story, and other than gossip/anxious fears by McCain's advisors, I see no evidence of it in the article. If the NYT has the goods, they should have disclosed them. If not, why publish the article?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

You mean you don't love stuff like "Who would have guess that Barack Obama would stoop to using the phrase 'cum dumpster'?" and "I fear that Hillary would counter by wearing a Dallas Cowboy cheerleader outfit. *shudder*"? xp

Nicole, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

they didn't want to get slapped with a libel charge? beats me.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

and 'didnt nixon show up to the debate drunk and unshaven?'

and what, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

where would be we without kenan's well-informed opinions on political history

and what, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

ha, to think everyone thought the bombshell-in-waiting was about edwards.

gff, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

on a side note, NYT DOWNLOADS ON MCCAIN is one of the more nonsensical drudge headlines

dmr, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Article -> discussion/opinion/doubt = win
Correction -> too late, nevermind

(see that "Al Qaeda used female suicide bombers with Down syndrome!" -> worldwide headlines & shock. Anyone see the "they didn't have Down syndrome after all, says US army" article yesterday? Nope? Of course not, that's not headline news anymore.)

StanM, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

It's just like Drudge's story about John Kerry and his campaign staffer, except that it happened.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Nixon insisted on campaigning until just a few hours before the first debate started; he had not completely recovered from his hospital stay and thus looked haggard, sickly, underweight, and tired. He also refused makeup for the first debate, and as a result his beard stubble showed prominently on the era's black-and-white TV screens.

ok, not drunk. But not tanned, rested, and ready, either.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

point to kenan

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

not

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

they didn't want to get slapped with a libel charge? beats me.

So don't run the story. Or do more investigative work before you run the story. Or defend yourself from a lawsuit based on McCain's status as a public figure, which normally makes defamation much harder to prove.


Here, the NYT says they stand by the story, and they waited to run it until they felt it was "ready," in a journalistic sense. But there's nothing to it. A few McCain staffers became worried that McCain was having an affair with a lobbyist he spent time with. That's . . . it?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

so is wolf blitzer moderating tonight?

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

xxpost party on, garth.

I'm sorry for being disgusting and sexist this afternoon. Not on top of my game. Actually, I'm going to go home early.

kenan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I keep reading -- e.g., in Josh Marshall's TPM blog -- that there's likely more here and the NYT hasn't yet written the whole story.

But it isn't billed as the first part in a series. And if it's not the first in a series, why not put your cards on the table? If they're worried that they don't have enough to overcome a defamation lawsuit, maybe the NYT shouldn't publish it.

And I'm no McCain defender. Just seems wrong to me.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Hello pigfucking!

Eppy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL. Yes, that would be a good story. Start the rumors now.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

doodz what they reported wasnt nothing.

multiple former mccain staffers were worried he was having an affair w/a lobbyist whos clients gave him money and rides on their airplanes and for whom he wrote two letters to the fcc which the fcc commissioner deemed to be inappropriate. when mccain was confronted abt the relationship he admitted it needed to stop. all this was verified my multiple sources.

and this from john mccain whos main pitch is that hes the cleanliest guy in the biz.

the times then goes on detail many other shady mccain dealings w/lobbyists - putting the story in context.

you can take legitimate issue w/the use of anonymous sources. tho the times does claim to have two main informants and multiple corroborating witnesses.

the fact that they dont posses the bedsheets is a little beside the point. this is an article abt what total bullshit the virtuous mccain myth is. and i am personally v pleased to see anyone in the press question their mccain-crush.

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

nyone see the "they didn't have Down syndrome after all, says US army" article

yes I did read this. Al Qaeda only slightly less monstrous than thought! Still down with raping young boys, beheading innocents, and shooting corpses in the testicles though, last time I checked.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Iraq slightly less monstrous than having WMDs.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

the fact that they dont posses the bedsheets is a little beside the point.

CAN THEY PRODUCE THE "STAINED BLOUSE" OF THIS SCANDAL, PLZ? WE'RE WAITING.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://kxan.images.worldnow.com/images/209224_G.jpg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

this is in tx, btw

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

hey that looks like Obama's logo

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm surprised that graphic isn't a cowboy hat

Mr. Que, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

btw in same poll paul gets 9% >_<

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link

who's idea was it to glam up a pie chart by making it a glossy torus?

petey_carnum, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

the fact that they dont posses the bedsheets is a little beside the point. this is an article abt what total bullshit the virtuous mccain myth is. and i am personally v pleased to see anyone in the press question their mccain-crush.

-- jhøshea, Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:27 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

um dude mccain's supposedly pure record being a myth isn't news
the only twist in this is that in one specific instance, folks thought maybe he was also having a relationship w/ this person

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

rong

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the only way this is a big deal is if the situation gabbneb mentioned is true - there's something they just couldn't publish

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

not wrong. mccain's occasional backsliding into paying attention to lobbyists is readily available information, its just that in the grand scope of things his 'violations' (all of which are totally legal) aren't really all that notable compared to the worst senators. Yes it contradicts his image, but the maverick image is more about his willingness to piss off fellow republicans by advocating reasonable immigration platforms and actually doing something about campaign finance reform.

None of this stuff is breaking news - except the fact that some of his employees suspected that there might be a relationship involved

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

(all of which are totally legal)

(in theory)

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

it SHOULD poke holes in his status as the clean, honest senator - but i don't think it will, unless there's some verifiable evidence otherwise

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

well i wouldnt be surprised if more came out - but saying just cause you were aware john mccain is a scumbag there for its not news is a little uh - they gathered up a list of transgressions (including new info) that directly contradicts the general wisdom on the republican nominee for president - thats most certainly a worthy news story

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

its a worthy news story but without follow-up it will be mostly forgotten by the gen. election

not saying there won't be follow-up though.

deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah deej i'm inclined to agree that for people that follow this shit, mccain's ethics record isn't news. for millions of people who aren't pol-junkies, though, any major story that gives the media an excuse to point out inconsistencies in mccain's Myth is News and Informative and Worth Knowing.

xp damn

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

it's in for at least one news cycle and yeah will hopefully spawn follow-ups and in Wildest Dreams maybe even birth a narrative that McCain is a Facade

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

it SHOULD poke holes in his status as the clean, honest senator - but i don't think it will, unless there's some verifiable evidence otherwise.

Indeed, unless there's more there -- and there might be -- I think the NYT story will help McCain (he's already positioning himself, in his new fundraising efforts, as a victim of the leftist MSM, based on the NYT story).

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

It was hard to imagine what would get Rush & Co. on McCain's side without either side losing face, but here it is.

Eazy, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

now those dudes were totes ready to line up duh

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha the NYT hates mccain so much they endorsed him

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

and this shit is not going away - just think of the g.e. ads - john mccain says he hates lobbyists, john mccain luuuuuuvs lobbyists.

and i do think the media is ready to rethink their man-crush.

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

god i hope so

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:10 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Clooney: I'm the Hilary of the Oscars

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I think quite the opposite is going to happen. if anything this has generated a backlash against the NYT and directly benefited McCain, who since this story broke has seen an outpouring of support from the right as well as a spike in donations.

NYT screwed the pooch on this one.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

No amount of wishful thinking is going to change the fact that this is a sub-par gotcha story. I am by no means a fan of McCain, nor do I believe for one second his 'straight talk' shtick, but even I am sympathetic toward McCain on his one. I think his appeal to cross-over Dems and Independents in a GE will be his 'stalwart' stand on Iraq/nat'l security and I doubt this will affect much.

Michael White, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

what democrats are going to find his stalwart pro-war stance appealing? something like 70% of the american public want the war over and done

akm, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Wanting the war over is not the same as believing in timetables for withdrawl imposed by domestic political as opposed to military reasons. Given the huge but inchoate desire for an end to this morass, the Dems have mostly been cagey about what they want to do. McCain can use that to his advantage. I doubt it will work, though.

Michael White, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah McCain will paint himself as a "realist", i.e., the calm, rational voice of reason about defending our interests and democracy no matter how badly the war was initially handled etc. (never mind the fact that he can't keep himself from saying crazy shit like he STILL thinks the war was a good idea).

It won't matter tho. He doesn't have a prayer against Obama. The American psyche will favors the dynamic young man over the grouchy old weirdo every time.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

to be fair people all over the world are kinda put off by grouchy old weirdos

jhøshea, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

He doesn't have a prayer against Obama.

I wish I had my youthful optimism back.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

as a grouchy young weirdo, i think ppls are put off by us too
expo

Hunt3r, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Nobody sees McCain as a "grouchy old weirdo." The press loves him, Obama's never had to face a strongly negative campaign and is already on the defensive, we're going to be in Iraq for the next 10,000 years.

31g, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.hillaryclintonisyournewbicycle.com/

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

HILLARY CLINTON DOUBLE DIPPED YOUR CHIP

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:55 (sixteen years ago) link

HISLARY CILTON HAS A BUCKET

akm, Thursday, 21 February 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Meme's dead, dude

jaymc, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Nobody sees McCain as a "grouchy old weirdo."

maybe not yet, but next to Obama this will be the inescapable impression given

The press loves him,

the press loves him so much the most prominent paper in the country - that endorsed him - just made a blatant attempt to discredit him...? I think this love affair has been overstated.

Obama's never had to face a strongly negative campaign and is already on the defensive

He is?! He's killing Hillary right now! Whose tried to run a fairly negative campaign (or what do you call Bill's dumbass race-baiting and her distortions of his record?)

we're going to be in Iraq for the next 10,000 years.

Yeah that's a message the electorate is really excited about ennit. wtf lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

You read slate
XPOST

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

boing!

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Proof or no, backlash or no, a lot of people are going to get the gut feeling McCain did that lady. Especially when her picture pops up side-by-side with the wife.

Eppy, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think most people are going to give a shit. Liberals as a rule don't really care about infidelity, and conservatives don't trust the source. Its a wash.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's never had to face a strongly negative campaign and is already on the defensive

He is?! He's killing Hillary right now! Whose tried to run a fairly negative campaign (or what do you call Bill's dumbass race-baiting and her distortions of his record?)

Yeah his ability to stand up to Hill's HARD-HITTING accusations of plagiarism really fills me with confidence.

31g, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Liberals as a rule don't really care about infidelity

lol

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Liberals as a rule don't really care about infidelity, and conservatives don't trust the source.

There is... another.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Trying to beat McCain just PLAYS INTO MCCAIN'S HANDS don't you see??!?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 00:36 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN headline: Schneider: Clinton's got tough road to hoe

You can't hoe a road.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:03 (sixteen years ago) link

YES WE CAN.

El Tomboto, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't see Ann Richards and HRC swingin' back beers.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Think she'll bring up the plagiarism?

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:13 (sixteen years ago) link

ooh a Cuba question.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Not sure if "momentum" is the word Hillary wants to be using right now, in any context.

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Freeze interest rates for five years?

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:30 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ obama just basically called clinton "silly"

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:58 (sixteen years ago) link

haha Obama just hit that plagiarism shit outta the park

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ Hillary is totally falling on her sword here did she just favorably compare her position on foreclosures to Dubyas

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's "your words have to be your own words thing" is so disingenuous! I mean does she not have a goddamn speechwriter?

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I was thinking the same thing, Clay.

Obama's overall point, in his campaign, is to say imply that Hillary can't compete unless she resorts to distortions and misrepresentations. This is where he's flipping the script on Atwater/Rove campaigning.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:03 (sixteen years ago) link

He's sucked tonight. He looks like he would prefer reading Middlemarch in his favorite chair tonight.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Josh Marshall's right:
Okay, nastiness interlude didn't last long. Back to health care. Barack's answer was, I think, a good illustration of the bind Hillary's in at the moment. He keeps drawing back from fights and lays out policy differences which he says reasonable can disagree on, etc. Kind of like a boxer who won't let an opponent get in close or a football team ahead late in the game who won't call anything but safe ground plays that run the clock and give little opportunity to force a turnover.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

The National Reivew, of all places, has a good point too:
Barack Obama does make people feel good, which is remarkable given that he spends so much time talking about how bad things are. We're going broke, we're losing a war to a third world country, we're all working three jobs and still can't afford our meds, our souls are sick, etc., etc.

It's an amazing dichotomy. Hillary Clinton right now could announce she's handing out $100 bills and people would yawn. Barack could then announce he's taking the 100 bucks away, and people in the crowd would faint with excitement.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

okie, lol @ AP headline

"Obama, Clinton differ slightly on Castro"

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

shut up already barack with the 'i was born to a single mother' line

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack would like to tell you a story he's never told anyone before

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

hilary whooped his butt on the last question!

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

man that was boring

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

standing o?!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i feel like hillary had the last quarter of that debate totally in hand.

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I... guess. I dunno I missed some but all in all it was pretty yawnsome.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

my hrc friend was like "hil is gonna make me cry" re the bit about influences

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

WHO WON TONIGHT?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 02:53 (sixteen years ago) link

America won, as usual, Daniel.

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

no one wins in these (or any?) debates

Obama's goal was not to land a deathblow, but to avoid making a mistake. That's what he did. Hillary made a minor one, but these things just don't matter much.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah without Hillary blowing Barack out of the room this debate wasn't going to mean a whole lot. She didn't, so it doesn't.

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

the only thing blowing out of the room was Barry's pad of paper. I think he was using it as a distraction.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

America won, as usual, Daniel.

Thank G-d for that. I was worried.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll bet Jack ends up getting Claire killed.

Nicole, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoops, wrong thread.

Nicole, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

yea, i don't think hillary succeeded at anything she really needed to do tonight to make the debate actually matter. obama gave a really solid performance -- his iraq answers as always were spot on, he did a great job answering the commander-in-chief question, and all in all he gave a lot more beefed-up, specific answers.

he handled the plagiarism question almost perfectly, and his comments made hillary's remarks seem petty. josh marshall at TPM described it pretty well.

i don't know if i'd say there was a winner. hilz is a solid debator, i think, but as mentioned she really need a blowout and this didn't even come close. if anything, i think it only benefitted obama.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone going to ask Hill whether she came up with "change you can Xerox" herself?

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

haha

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the final statement from Hill was great

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently daily kos is abuzz with that last bit, people discussing whether it was a "valedictory moment or an effective concession of the nomination"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

which bit?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah hoos, there was certainly a tone to her voice there at the end where she almost seemed to have come to terms, perhaps, with the likelihood that she might not be president.

Clay, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

SEN. CLINTON: Well, I think everybody here knows I have lived through some crises and some challenging -- (laughter) -- moments in my life, and -- (interrupted by cheers, applause).

And I am grateful for the support and the prayers of countless Americans. But people often ask me, how do you do it, you know, how do you keep going,and I just have to shake my head in wonderment because with all of the challenges that I've had, they are nothing compared to what I see happening in the lives of Americans every single day.

You know, a few months ago I was honored to be asked, along with Senator McCain, as the only two elected officials to speak at the opening of the Intrepid Center at Brooke Medical Center in San Antonio, a center designed to take care of and provide rehabilitation for our brave young men and women who have been injured in war. And I remember sitting up there and watching them come in: those who could walk were walking; those who had lost limbs were trying with great courage to get themselves in without the help of others; some were in wheelchairs and some were on gurneys. And the speaker representing these wounded warriors had had most of his face disfigured by the results of fire from a roadside bomb.

You know, the hits I've taken in life are nothing compared to what goes on every single day in the lives of people across our country. And I resolved at a very young age that I'd been blessed, and that I was called by my faith and by my upbringing to do what I could to give others the same opportunities and That's what gets me up in the morning. That's what motivates me in this campaign. (Cheers, applause.) And -- and you know, no matter what happens in this contest -- and I am honored. I am honored to be here with Barack Obama. I am absolutely honored.

(Cheers, applause.) And you know, whatever happens, we're going to be fine. You know, we have strong support from our families and our friends. I just hope that we'll be able to say the same thing about the American people, and that's what this election should be about. Thanks. (Cheers, applause.)

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm only reading what's reprinted above, but yes, that's absolutely HRC preparing a dignified and graceful exit or concession.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 03:18 (sixteen years ago) link

And thank goodness for that. You know, after dozens of stories about what the Clintons would perhaps do to wrest the nomination from Obama, what depths they might sink to, HRC might actually restore -- or even enhance -- the Clinton brand if she is perceived as the person who refused to engage in those types of dirty tricks, and helped unify the party.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 03:21 (sixteen years ago) link

She might also be cannily positioning herself as underdog.

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Probably both! Neither one has it in the bag until TX/Ohio happen, I think. If she takes one or both she's the Underdog Made Good, if she loses both her Graceful Exit is prepared.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

SHE IS A TACTICAL GENIUS.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

kinda sucks that the "change you can xerox" line is in all the headlines right now

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

obama gave a great response but that ain't the headline

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

She might also be cannily positioning herself as underdog.

Dreamland
Home sweet dreamland

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:36 (sixteen years ago) link

what does that even mean

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

actual LOL

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:43 (sixteen years ago) link

bahhhhhh this kinda blows. i was hoping the plagiarism thing would die pretty quickly, but this puts it right back in. i guess no surprises there, the zing's gonna get the attention rather than any substance, but it still sucks.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Yahoo headline is:
Who won Texas showdown?
Clinton accuses Obama of plagiarism, but he calls charge evidence of a "silly season."

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

re: big final Clinton speech

"Moments later, an email popped up from her communications director, Howard Wolfson. They just couldn't leave well enough alone. The subject line: Final Moment.

"What we saw in the final moments in that debate is why Hillary Clinton is the next President of the United States. Her strength, her life experience, her compassion. She's tested and ready. It was the moment she retook the reins of this race and showed women and men why she is the best choice."

So that maybe wasn't so spontaneous, either. Just better rehearsed."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:53 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost hmm that's not bad, most of the others i've read just have her zing

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i lolled at silly season, knew that would get picked up.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 22 February 2008 03:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama seriously needs to stop doodling on that notepad, he looked like he was falling asleep.

31g, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought obama was great. strongest performance so far, and he had well-reasoned responses to the questions. hillary was just okay until the final question, which she absolutely knocked out of the park. i enjoyed the debate! not yawni at all!

YGS, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno. If I were an outsider I might agree that Barry's ppl are delusional. dude keeps rising in the polls, triumphing against the somewhat mythologized clinton machine while msm fans the flames of hype (simultaneously questioning that hype) and creates talking points about his fervent followers, and then you tune into this debate to find this reasonably intellectual speaker who makes some good points, misses some good opportunities, 'um's and 'uh's a lot and who avoids straightforward questions like "when were you tested?" in order to stay on message in obv and robotic ways.

then again i spend too much time trying to figure out how uninformed voters perceive this shit.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:13 (sixteen years ago) link

he def flubbed the last question, but i also doubt that was something either of them were prepared for, and he had to go first. so i think he basically just rattled off 90 seconds from his stump speech. even he seemed uninspired by it. but honestly that was the only time i really felt like he was messaging (check that: the special interests/lobbyists lines that i hate he uses but i'm sure that genpop responds to that kinda shit): he just came off as smart and thoughtful and responsible.

YGS, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

YGS otm, i havent seen all his debates but of the ones i have this was his best
his answer on the plagiarism 'issue' was A+++

i keep wondering wtf people like cosmo are talking about w/r/t msm fans 'flaming the hype' when all the newswires are busier highlighting her 'u xerox change lol!' zingers

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/id/2184696/

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Of course Barack is an ENFP.

en i see kay, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

flaming the hype: as in the last several months, where I've seen a lot of excitable babble about the new guy, and then a week later same heads are all "what's with all this excitable babble about the new guy?", at which point it self-perpetuates.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link

from http://dyn.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/index.cfm/category/Debates

Clinton Tonight: ?

You know, whatever happens, we're going to be fine. You know, we have strong support from our families and our friends. I just hope that we'll be able to say the same thing about the American people. And that's what this election should be about.

Edwards the December 13 debate:

What's not at stake are any of us. All of us are going to be just fine no matter what happens in this election. But what's at stake is whether America is going to be fine.

JuliaA, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:44 (sixteen years ago) link

actual roffles

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:49 (sixteen years ago) link

but obv. that's a pretty general feel-good stump speechlet

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

hehehe. I am not feeling all that great myself! Busy trying to get a new job, I think that will help (maybe.. because it might be related to politics, though not in the game directly)

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 04:59 (sixteen years ago) link

fhilarious

youcangoyourownway, Friday, 22 February 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm an ENFP!

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 05:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton, 92: "The hits that I took in this election are nothing compared to the hits the people of this state and this country have been taking for a long time."

Hillary Clinton, tonight: "You know, the hits I’ve taken in life are nothing compared to what goes on every single day in the lives of people across our country."

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 05:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Unflattering Candidate Photos: slideshow

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 08:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Pathetic. Phone us if you know how to beat Obama!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/22/wuspols222.xml

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 10:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i just thought i'd mention this here, since it hasn't been as far as i can see -- obama won the "democrats abroad" primary handily which adds i think about the same number of delegates to his column as rhode island has

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 11:45 (sixteen years ago) link

okay i've got a question: people are making a big deal about the standing ovation given at the end of hilz' closing remarks.

when i was watching it, i just thought they were giving a standing ovation because it was the end of the debate, it didn't really cross my mind that they were standing up for her remarks in particular. but now everyone's saying it was for her... what do you guys think?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 12:24 (sixteen years ago) link

lol hillary giving obama shit abt xeroxing lines then does it twice in the same debate - u r supposed to be the pro here hillary wtf

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 12:29 (sixteen years ago) link

The Clinton campaign at times found itself spending money on items that were not ultimately helpful. As part of their get-out-the-vote effort in Iowa, the campaign came up with a plan to have a local supermarket deliver sandwich platters to pre-caucus parties. It spent more than $95,384 on Jan. 1 at Hy-Vee Inc., a local grocery chain in West Des Moines, Iowa, in addition to buying loads of snow shovels to clear the walks for caucusgoers. Mrs. Clinton came in third in the Jan. 3 caucus. It did not snow.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/us/politics/22clinton.html

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i just like this a lot:

in addition to buying loads of snow shovels to clear the walks for caucusgoers. Mrs. Clinton came in third in the Jan. 3 caucus. It did not snow.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:04 (sixteen years ago) link

yah that article is quite zingy

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"She wound up spending at roughly the same rate as Mr. Obama, about a million dollars a day"!!

Am I alone in being kind of amazed at these figures?

ledge, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:08 (sixteen years ago) link

The US presidential campaigns combined have now cost over a billion dollars

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:09 (sixteen years ago) link

the whole situation is complete madness

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i26.tinypic.com/mllapx.jpg

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:12 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i27.tinypic.com/28v9bgj.jpg

lol drudge tryin to get obama assassinated

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Good, good, just checking. xp.

I mean it's pretty easy to see how things have got to this level - but are there any discussions or proposals for putting a cap on this spending? Sorry if this is an elementary question, just point me to a wiki link or something.

ledge, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:13 (sixteen years ago) link

would anyone else agree that Obama's Superbowl ad was one of the most astute and effective expenditures of the campaign?

cost a fortune but in terms of reaching out to the voters he was after he couldn't have done any better.

Upt0eleven, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:30 (sixteen years ago) link

'Police concerned about order to stop screening'

http://www.star-telegram.com/667/story/486413.html

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 22 February 2008 13:39 (sixteen years ago) link

... and there's going to be yet another debate! can you imagine these two debating FIVE TIMES between Super Tuesday and March 4, as the Clinton camp wanted?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's debate outfit bothered me. the white piping on the edge of her collar looked like two little antennae sprouting from her collarbones at times.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link

can you imagine these two debating FIVE TIMES between Super Tuesday and March 4, as the Clinton camp wanted?

I did end up watching most of the debate, and while I found it pretty interesting I just can't see what five more debates would accomplish.

Nicole, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

only heard the soundbites as usual -- isn't the irreconcilable opposition of "change you can Xerox" and "I'm honored to be here w/ Barck Obama" proof enough what an inept fraud Rodham is? Piss on her.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

"I am honored to be here tonight with that thieving word-thief Barack Obama" does present some cognitive dissonance

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago) link

also I don't know what this Wolfson guy looks like, but I would like to borrow Woody Allen's Giant Sock O' Manure from Annie Hall and use it on him.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder if McCain watches these debates too, lolling at these whippersnappers boasting about their experience

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

what's your deal with waste products, morbs?

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

they turn him on

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

The failure to check people for weapons at Obama's speech is ri-G-damn-diculous. I have great trouble believing it was a completely innocent mistake (maybe it was, but it seems (a) bizzare and (b) too coincidental to me).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

in addition to buying loads of snow shovels to clear the walks for caucusgoers. Mrs. Clinton came in third in the Jan. 3 caucus. It did not snow

That's kind of a dumb criticism. You buy snow shovels in case it might snow. When you make the expenditure you realize it may not snow, but if it does, you'll be ready. The cost of buying the shovels is considered worth it, in view of the possibility. Kind of the same reason people buy insurance. I can imagine the Times writing a zinger about that: "Mr. Smith bought travel insurance for his trip to Hawaii. He made the trip safely and without incident."

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel, in order for the secret service's lightening screening at a rally to be a 'coincindence,' it has to, you know, coincide with something. i think obama should have the benefit of weapons screening at his events, for sure, but i don't think it's a significant portent that they lightened security at one event.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

That's kind of a dumb criticism. You buy snow shovels in case it might snow.

sure. i just thought it was was phrased in a funny way. didn't really think it was a good substantive criticism of the clinton campaign (there are far better criticisms that can be made).

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, Obama reminds many people of JFK and RFK -- two v. popular Democratic leaders -- and JFK was shot to death in Tx., during an event as President. And, obv., Obama's black, which leads to reasonable fear that, if he isn't well-protected, he could be killed.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

With all that background, I'd say it's f---g outrageous for the Secret Service to do what it did.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

of course it's a reasonable fear, but it's a huge leap from recognizing those similarities and fears to attributing significance to such 'coincidence' and somehow implying that there's an inside job on obama's head in the works (and I'm not saying you said that, but that's the natural trajectory of this line of reasoning)

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i've supported obama over hillary for this entire race but when everybody is creaming themselves over what a great speaker barack is im really unimpressed with his debate performance - hillary sounds smarter, tougher, more specific, better prepared, she doesnt stutter and um and uh on every line, and she appeals to actual concrete ideals instead of really vague change rhetoric. i dont think obama is as conservative or moderate as everybody wants to pretend he is, but i do wish he would actually defend his liberal beliefs as liberal ideas instead of this mushy touchy feely bullshit. i can see why hillary wants more debates - i always end up hating her for the weeks of smearing and dirty tricks that lead up to them but coming away from the actual debate i really want her to be president, even if i know she wont do like 70% of the stuff she's talking about

and what, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah elmo but think of how if the secret service during the kennedy years had only realized that kennedy and lincoln had the same number of letters in their last name, they would probably have beefed up security in dallas

max, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

ethan's right, every time i see a debate i like hillary more

max, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

just saying -- there was perhaps a legitimate reason for pulling the weapons screening; the secret service is not obliged to justify that move. and to imply that it was somehow a planned or careless negligence shows pretty bad faith towards the secret service, who i would generally trust to do their job.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Ethan's got a point, but presidents aren't involved in debates. After this year we won't see th candidates in this context until 2012.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Hillary going to move the presidential office if she gets elected? Or is she really going to sit in the oval office every day, knowing her husband did not have you know what with that you know who there?

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

(also: OTM - debates and speeches are pointless and completely irrelevant re: actually being the president)

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

shes gonna sit there smoking cigars laughing maniacally.

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, unless there's a really good reason they're not sharing -- with us or, apparently, the Dallas Police, who were also upset by the order -- and given their stated reasons for the order -- they were worried abour delaying the event too long and the crowd ''seemed friendly'' -- I'd say they weren't doing their jobs well, at least in this limited instance.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought they both looked fine last night. I have grown to increasingly like HRC's stump speeches and debate performances and Obama, while not at his absolute best was okay, though anybody who is likely to choose or change their vote based on one debate is a bit of an idiot, imho.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

debates and speeches are pointless and completely irrelevant re: actually being the president

I agree with you on debates being a rather artificial, collegiate forensics team, type of competition, with limited relevance to the Presidential job description. Speeches, on the other hand, are an important part of what a President does - it's an important part of how he communicates his vision to the people.

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I too am impressed with Hillz debate performances up to the point that she drops a stinker like the Xerox line. Who the hell is advising her? Saying crap like that does nothing to help her likability factor. Basically, if Hill was just herself and brought it without having to resort to dirty tactics or crummy lines fed to her by her campaign advisers or her husband I would love her a whole lot more.

youcangoyourownway, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel, i definitely think it's an event worth noting but i really don't see any basis for outrage in one incident alone; if obama's security detail continues to show laxity -- if it becomes a trend -- it will and should raise some serious questions.

and again, that you don't think they have a good reason for not justifying the move to the public shows bad faith on your part.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

debates and speeches are pointless and completely irrelevant re: actually being the president

I disagree. The bully pulpit is a trump card various Presidents have used against recalcitrant Congresses. It can be very powerful when well used and a Pres who lacks the ability to appeal directly to the people (and the press), almost invariably pays for it.

HRC has a glaringly tin ear, sometimes.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Bad faith? How? Look, if they said, ''We had our reasons, and we can't share them with you,'' okay, maybe. But to offer a threadbare reason means you can examine it.

And I'm not suggesting intentional misconduct. I'm suggesting (particularly forseeable) negligence.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

And even though debates are not part of the president's job description, I think they do offer the public a chance to see the candidates put on the spot, forced to think on their feet, and to see how they react to pressure. So for that insight into their personality and intellect, as well as their ability to memorize lots of policy details, I think it is valuable.

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Saying crap like that does nothing to help her likability factor

A nice imitation of Tim Russert.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

woah, check cnn.com

HI DERE, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Reports: An officer escorting Clinton's motorcade in Texas has died after crashing her motorcycle

HI DERE, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

brenda February 21st, 2008 11:14 am ET
I have watched cnn for a long time, but with all the bad reporting about Hillary Clinton and pro reporting for Obama I and going to stop watching cnn. I am very upset because cnn was my resting and relaxing time. I am very disapported with your reporting.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

cnn was my resting and relaxing time

and what, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

brenda otm

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I am very disapported with you

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Wolf Blitzer is such a Hilz booster though!

Gavin, Friday, 22 February 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

as for this concluding ovation for Hil, maybe it came mostly from Obama's crowd?

http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/did_anyone_else_think_hillary_clintons_c

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know, at the time i really thought they gave a standing ovation because it was just the end of the debate!

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

that's what I thought too

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Really? I thought her closing statement was the high-point of her debate performance.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, I thought folx who actually attended these things would want them to go on forever, like gabbneb.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought her closing statement was the high-point of her debate performance.

I dunno I'm never moved by these bullshit "I feel your pain" rhetorical displays. that's just me tho. It seemed to me like everybody stood up and clapped cuz she a) made some nice speechifyin for once and b) it was the end

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

"let me tell you about [insert name], who lost their [insert precious possession], after so many years of [working hard/serving their country], that's not the America I know" = zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

you don't know any of these people and live in a hyperisolated bubble of security gimme a break.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

who is more isolated? ts: Hillary Clinton vs. Shakey Mo Collier

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sorry did you say something? who let you through my phalanz of armed guards and handlers?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess you can't hear me through the Teachers' Association representatives and firefighters who are thronging you for autographs

Tracer Hand, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess he can't hear you through the sanctimony.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm fairly certain Hillary Clinton - like the majority of the world's rich and powerful - can't remember, much less describe, the last time she went shopping for groceries, or rode a bus, or had an interaction with a stranger that was not mediated by several layers of security, press, and consultants. gimme a break. these people are not normal, average folk, the "I AM ONE OF YOU" rhetoric is always always bullshit.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm fairly certain the Cookie Monster - like the majority of the world's rich and powerful - can't remember, much less describe, the last time she went shopping for groceries, or rode a bus, or had an interaction with a stranger that was not mediated by several layers of security, press, and consultants. gimme a break. these people are not normal, average folk, the "I AM ONE OF YOU" rhetoric is always always bullshit.

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

thats not true cause why? i saw hillary on the 38 just the other day1

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

COOKIE MONSTER FOR PRESIDENT

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

HE UNDERSTANDS MY NEED FOR COOKIES

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I had to change the channel several times last night because, as an Obama supporter, it was just brutal to watch him ramble on in his answers. As noted above, he stumbles through these responses, lacking the confidence that Hillary obviously has.

Another thing. this one really bothers me. Obama has gotten into the habit of answering questions with "I will be happy to debate that this with you." ANd then moves onto a different subject. I just want to scream, You are in a debate now! I'm surprised Hil hasn't called him out on that one.

Benjamin-, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

dude cookie monster is not a chick

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

to go by hillary's remarks last night, she spends most of her time on the campaign trail having her arms grabbed at.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

cookie monster/tacos 08

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

dude cookie monster is not a chick

dude how do you know this

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

His mother calls him "son." BTW, plz do not front on this.

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Any cookie monsters I've ever known have been chicks.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Before his first cookie, he was called "Sid." This is not a girl's name!

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, voiced by Frank Oz!

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

so is miss piggy.

bug, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Frank Oz voiced Miss Piggy as I recall xpost

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/thumb/e/e1/Anth03sept08e.jpg/300px-Anth03sept08e.jpg

BE REAL PLZ

Her name is Miss Piggy, you fule!

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Everyone knows she is a drag queen anyway.

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Sid is totally a girl's name!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe cookie monster is a pre-op transsexual

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

In France he is called "Macaron."

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

How does one sex a muppet?

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

You gotta put the whole hand inside.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

cookie monster/tacos 08

unbeatable super-ticket u have my vote

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

That reminds me: in Mexico, Cookie is called "Lucas Comegalletas."

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

cookie monster == john sidney mccain

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

The reproductive techinques of Muppets are unknown. xposts

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

no wtf elmo

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Luke Cookie-eater?

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain is not fun for one thing

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

This thread has taken a wonderful turn.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2005/04/08/image686677x.jpg

'08

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

ANTHROPOMORPHIC APPLE 2008

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

smiling banana/The Grouchketeers '08

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

omg that psychedelic fruits and vegetables number on sesame st was an indelible part of my childhood, yayay

m bison, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

honeydew / beaker '08

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

"How can you tell a Grouchketeer? He's the one with the thumb in his ear!" -Hillary Clinton

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

theres no way im voting for smiling banana - just dont trust that guy

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

It'll all be in the hands of the superfoods.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

"Cookie Monster Fends off Accusation of Coke Orgies During Making of Sesame Street Fever"

http://www.goofspot.com/bamboo/images/cvr_sesamefever.jpg

"Me just friends with Bert," Cookie says

Eppy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh looks like the "cult" of cookie monster has infected ILX--guys, he's all cookies, no action

max, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

THOSE COOKIES DON'T GO ANYWHERE U SEE

Eppy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

these aren't cookies you can believe in, these are cookies - mmm, cookies.

Simon H., Friday, 22 February 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

craigslist.org / this video '08

life_coach, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

zero content, rhetorical cookies

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

kittens at lunch are gonna be tough for even tacos to beat, IMO

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Too many tiny bones and too much fur, compared to tacos, though, rox.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

that video is v well put together!

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

"Kittens lose debate after being fed peanut butter; dirty tricks suspected"

Eppy, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

The music is insane!

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

kittens at lunch=sucking on the corporate teat

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Kitten tacos vs. koala tacos.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 22 February 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

my hangover is so grateful to you all.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://youtube.com/watch?v=GyH1v8GRCGA

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

"help me find a thread on ILX" thread, 2010:

what was that thread again where we discussed sexing muppets?

oh yeah, the 2008 Primaries Thread 2.

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

ive totally agreed about obama's subpar debate performance so far but i thought last night he really owned it... he wasn't really 'uhhh'-ing at all, to the point that it seemed like he was consciously avoiding it, and his response to the plagiarism q was extra-eloquent. im really surprised everyone thought hillary aced that one ... and frankly i thought she'd totally killed him in the debates id seen previous

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Cuilean07 (6 days ago) Show Hide Marked as spam 0 Reply | Spam Isn't Elmo a bit young to be in a disco club?

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Are all the (HRC/BO) supporters expected to just automatically vote for the other Dem. candidate once the primaries are over, after months of being divided?

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

well yeah, what are they gonna do, switch to mccain?

dmr, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess some will stay home or whatever

dmr, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I know, stupid question probably. Don't have that kind of system over here (Belgium) - I can imagine some won't even bother voting anymore if their candidate doesn't win (so the longer this takes, the better news for McCain, potentially)?

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Depends, to a great extent, on what the losing candidate does. If he or she enthusiastically and gracefully endorses the winner, the losing candidate's constituents should mostly migrate over to the winner. But if it's ugly or unseamly or bitter . . . .

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Even if NY mattered, I wouldn't vote for Clinton v McCain. Hell, if Obama picked Richardson for veep I might not vote for him.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link

HOWZ ABOU"T NADER THEN MORB?

akm, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ what he said. I will not vote for Hillary. Or McCain.

we've been over this (scroll back 7000 messages lolz)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I know, stupid question probably. Don't have that kind of system over here (Belgium)

sorry didn't mean to sound so sarcastic

there are a few ppl on the thread who say they won't vote for Clinton no matter what. and on the other side I'm sure there are a few Romney or Giuliani die-hards who hate McCain enough to stay home or switch sides. but for the most part, by November people will probably fall in line with the person their party puts up

dmr, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

dood who is the gay cowboy behind Hillary in that pic

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean that's some serious rouge overload goin on

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

dog latin

gff, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.usaid.gov/in/images/Laura_Bush_with_muppets.jpg

Laura Bush with "Indian Muppets."

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

*gasp* MUPPETS OUTSOURCING!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

we've been over this (scroll back 7000 messages lolz)

ah, ok. brb

StanM, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama doesn't seem to be campaigning at all on Sesame Street.

roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I won't vote for Hill in a state that will swing Democratic anyway. I'm voting Nader.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man, i want to see obama riding snuffleupagus please please

elmo argonaut, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.willisms.com/archives/kofi%20muppet.jpg

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

what is your beef with richardson, morbs?

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbz hates teh fatteys

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Richardson = econ reactionary (not crazy bt teh gayz either)

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

btw it seems that mccain was largely successful in turning that ny times piece into an issue w/ the ny times rather than his own campaign and unless some more info turns up i guarantee its going to stay that way

aka deej otm, tracer hand zero :p

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll buy the econ reactionary charge, but I really feel the gay comment he's accused of making was Gotcha politicking at its worst, and that the guy has a stellar record of liberalism w/r/t social issues not disincluding homosexual rights.

remy bean, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Obv., it's a bit premature, and it's always easy to criticize in retrospect, but it's still interesting that post mortems on HRC's campaign are being written now.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Hold me closer, Tiny Dancer.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Obv., it's a bit premature

It seems very premature! Obama is probably going to be the nominee, but it is nowhere near a certainty at this point.

Nicole, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I feel like Obama MIGHT win Texas and then it'd be all over. but jeez the vote's a week and a half away.

dmr, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

It's premature, yes. I know things don't look good from my pov.

I live in DC so it doesn't matter whatsoever but I would have a real tough time voting for Obama.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

guys, just fyi, if you don't know, McCain looks funny when he's shaking hands or hugging or waving or pumping his fist, because his arm-raising ability is limited by like torture and stuff

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Why would you have a tough time voting Obama? xpost

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

:-(

back to muppet humor

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean sure he's not running a daycare center but what do you mean?!?!!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess daria doesn't care about health care.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

http://obamaaaaaaaa.ytmnd.com/

Hatch, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

yea daria i'm curious why you would have a hard time voting for obama. i'm hardly a fan of clinton and for the most part don't really like her for various reasons people have cited in these threads, but if she's the nominee, i can't really see myself NOT voting for her, unless there's some serious bullshit pulled that allows her to seize the nomination (e.g. michigan/florida). basically, if she wins it fairly and legitimately, i'll vote for her in the g.e.

i remember you saying in the other primaries thread that the only reasons you support hillary are 1.) healthcare and 2.) the fact that you think she has a better shot in the g.e. (please, please correct if i'm wrong, i don't want to misquote you). if that's all, why would you have a hard time voting for obama? would you go third party, or vote mccain instead?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

ive said numerous times i would refuse to vote for her bcuz of the war vote. if i lived in some kind of state where it mattered, i probably would vote for her anyway though.

i don't see what comparable issue there is to the war for hillary supporters though

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

he plagiarized a friend of his!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

if obama is the nominee i won't be voting for him because i dont think he can beat mccain in the general election

and what, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

haha

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

so more mccain related corruption fun

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

if obama is the nominee i won't be voting for him because i dont think he can beat mccain in the general election

Uh, self-fulfilling prophecy, anyone?

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that was the joek

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, look, I left my sarcasmometer off. Oops, sorry.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

The fact that people think Hillary is an evil Republican/"corporatist"/warmonger/etc. makes them total morons, but it's still a fact that they really believe it, rather than hating her because she's a woman.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i actively dislike clinton - but it wouldnt stop me from voting for her - i mean fuuuuck a republican srsly

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

The only way I'd vote for HRC is she woke up one morning and found herself transformed into Barack Hussein Obama.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link

The fact that people think Hillary is an evil Republican/"corporatist"/warmonger/etc.

No dingbat, she's an evil Democratic/"corporatist"/warmonger/etc. You know, the party's core values, the ones they've been acting on for the last 30 years.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah 40 years ago the dems never would have gotten involved in something like a war!!!

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

The only way I'd vote for HRC is she woke up one morning and found herself transformed into Barack Hussein Obama.

I'm thinking Diane Keaton and Chris Rock, kind of All of Me meets Bullworth. I think we can bring it in under 30 mil.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

well, deej, they got some religion from about 1971-78.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess daria doesn't care about health care.

? I don't think Obama does. part of my problem.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

What, because he's realistic in his assumption that FORCING people to buy it and FINING them if they don't is a dead end?

Johnny Fever, Friday, 22 February 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

its over, Hillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm generally just dismayed about a lot of things that happened/are happening during the primary, but.. well, I used to think HRC and Obama were pretty close on most policy stuff but actually his advisors are v centrist and look for markets to solve everything.. no wonder George Will and David Brooks seem to love him.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

imagine that, being realistic about what can be accomplished

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

there are some looney people up in the thread

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

"Holy buckets!" exclaimed Audra Ostergard of Nebraska. "Michelle Obama and I are playing phone tag."

holy buckets?

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually, daria has a point re Obama!

Dr Morbius, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

George Will's quasi-endorsements have been bizarre; he's practically licking Obama's balls. Isn't Will's career built on temperance and self-control?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I also had a going assumption among a lot of my friends that they were pretty liberal but I don't think they actually are, eg when it comes down to health care late-20s guys I've known for years & thought would be on the same page of this as a core value because, and they're pretty much "I don't want mandates so I don't have to pay."

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.wikia.com/muppet/images/3/30/Kerm.jpg

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

kermitse.cx?

m bison, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

But then I've also had a going assumption among a lot of (guy) friends (not ILXors) that they wouldn't have a knee-jerk "yeah right, like I'd ever vote for Hillary, I can't stand her" reaction and I was wrong about that too.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

this seems like such a minor policy point that doesn't warrant being blown up into some huge ideological divide wtf

they're both gunning for universal healthcare and realize that the transition is going to be slow and painful, they just have mildly different approaches. where they DO really differ (as Obama banged on about last night) is that he has a better chance of getting it accomplished because he's a less divisive figure and Hillary's already shown that she completely fucked it up once already BY BEING A DIVISIVE FIGURE.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

ive noticed a mentality w/in many republican arguments in the mainstream (ignoring the coultergeists, i mean) see themselves as the party of, like, sensible solutions. a lot of alignment w/ republicans on issues is related to the relative 'everybody relax'-ness vs. the relatively shrill liberal freak-outs. i.e. wouldnt it be fun if global warming weren't actually an issue and we could just be like, 'yo hippies chill out'?

Anyway i think obama's appeal to a lot of these dudes is how sensible he comes across, rather than shrill and the liberal version of fearmongering

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

But then I've also had a going assumption among a lot of (guy) friends (not ILXors) that they wouldn't have a knee-jerk "yeah right, like I'd ever vote for Hillary, I can't stand her" reaction and I was wrong about that too.

-- daria-g, Friday, February 22, 2008 4:07 PM (18 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

you really dont know any women who can't stand hillary?

lol ny

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

oh wait dc

whatever

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama may actually manage to get some compromises out of the Republican minority - Hillary's idea of "reaching across the aisle" is to vote for stupid shit like flag burning amendments and war resolutions and hassling Iran

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i know chicago is obama town but regardless pretty much everyone woman i know are pretty anti-hillary, sometimes to a stronger degree than i am.

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

you really dont know any women who can't stand hillary?

Personally? No, actually, I don't.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf @ that sentence, you get what i'm saying

every woman i know is pretty

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

huh? that's the first i've heard of the centrism of his policy people, like, ever.

"markets" (that is "people making decisions about what to do") will have their effect on health policy in any case. it's true that having 100% participation would lower costs rather than an opt-in system, but there's no way penalties are going to get everyone close to 100%. you can carrot-and-stick the populace as much as you want but there will always be people falling out (or trying to get out) of whatever system you build.

xp now now dudes, "looney" is a bit much

lol many xps

gff, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

hilary's taking that the position that since she tried and failed getting universal healthcare through before, now she's modified her plan into something that could maybe get passed, right?

xp

Jordan, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Where are you getting that from, Daria? I need to read up on that subject a little, but several sources suggest that Obama's economic advisory team -- and his economic policies -- are generally left of HRC.

For instance, at the broadest level, consider this 2007 WSJ Story, which says that "While Mr. Obama's economic platform is still in its formative stages, interviews with his aides and a review of his congressional record and speeches suggest that Obamanomics may place him somewhat to the left of New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton."

More later, when I have time. But I'm not pushing a viewpoint too hard; I'm more curious about what you've read that's left you with the opposite impression.(n.1)

_______________________________________
(n.1) By contrast, I've read a lot about the foreign-policy advisory teams of both Democratic candidates, and it's clear that -- in that area -- Obama's advisors are generally to the left of HRC's advisors.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Personally? No, actually, I don't.

-- daria-g, Friday, February 22, 2008 4:09 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

ok well i find that weird but i promise you that its a pretty widespread belief w/ progressive women in my state - that hillary is too divisive, too centrist etc.

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah right - the reason her plan went kablooey the first time around (and Obama pointed this out last night and rightly so) was that she was terrible at handling other peoples' ideas and alienated key people she would need to get anything passed (some even from her own party, like Leahy). Seeing as how she's as alienating as ever at this point in her career, its hard to believe that a second try would end any differently.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I know a number of women who don't like Hillary. My wife's opinion of her changed pretty dramatically over the course of the primary.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

hilary's taking the position that since she got bamboozled into supporting a terrible war she can use that experience going forward to uh do awz stuff!

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

ive read that obama has a fairly moderate economic team, actually
his foreign policy team is definitely far to the left of hillary's

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

(other women = my mom, young lesbian engineer coworker, one of my bosses, my bandmate, etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

(^^ daniel's note there) considering the presidency is almost entirely responsible for foreign policy, while domestic policy falls more heavily on congress, i put less weight on the domestic differences between O and H when i made my decisions anyway.

gff, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

But, I'm really talking about people I know personally, not generalizations. A lot of guys I've known for years who pretty well are left to far-left seemed to have dismissed out of hand the very possibility of ever supporting HRC a long time ago to the point where, now, it seems like they're just sarcastic about her. All the women I personally know who I've talked about this with maybe aren't all voting for her but don't react the same way.

But yeah, there are surely a lot of very anti-Hillary women as well. I guess I've just been struck pretty profoundly in the last couple months by the sense there's a complete gulf between my worldview and that of a lot of people where I wouldn't have thought I'd ever see one. Maybe it's just that we all spent eight years agreeing on how much Bush sucks.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

WASHINGTON, Feb. 22 (UPI) -- The U.S. Secret Service Friday denied reports that security measures at a recent Barack Obama rally in Texas were relaxed or deviated from established plans.

Secret Service spokesman Eric Zahren said there was no order from the Secret Service to stop screening people going to the Obama rally Wednesday at Dallas's Reunion Arena. He said that the event's security plans didn't involve having each participant pass through a magnetometer, as may be the case at other events.

The Fort Worth (Texas) Star-Telegram reported that some police at the event expressed concern about people not passing through metal detectors.

"Any allegations to the fact that we had suspended screening or deviated from the original security plan would be entirely inaccurate," Zahren said.

Obama, D-Ill., spoke before some 17,000 supporters at the rally ahead of the March 4 primary election in Texas. There were no security-related incidents.

While stressing that security preparations are different for each venue and event, Zahren said officials were happy with the security plan for the rally at Reunion Arena and the way it was implemented.

Limited use of metal detectors "in no way constituted a security lapse at this venue," Zahren said, adding that the security measures were developed with Dallas-area law enforcement personnel.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=upiUPI-20080222-125522-8554&show_article=1

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i know many lesbians who don't like hillary.

Jordan, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

oh come no one but daria likes hillary

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

The only women I know who support Clinton are over age 60 (e.g. my mother, and wives of senior colleagues). At our caucus the Obama section was packed with women; so was the Clinton one, but it was much smaller. Now I know: lol Kansas, we don't count, etc., but I gather this is pretty typical in the midwest.

Euler, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess I've just been struck pretty profoundly in the last couple months by the sense there's a complete gulf between my worldview and that of a lot of people where I wouldn't have thought I'd ever see one. Maybe it's just that we all spent eight years agreeing on how much Bush sucks.

That's a great point. I'm probably more moderate than many of the people in this thread, but Bush hatred has been a great unifier among all left-leaning minds for the last 7 years.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

you really dont know any women who can't stand hillary?

_____________________________

Personally? No, actually, I don't.

Plenty are out there, trust me. I spoke at length to the wife of one of my law partners recently. She was in the top 10 in her law class and is extremely bright. She's also Cuban-American, if that matters. She hates HRC, and it stems from HRC staying with Bill Clinton after he admitted his affairs. It's hardwired in her DNA that HRC stayed with Bill Clinton only because she had designs on a future political office. Based on that, she'll never see HRC as anything but cold and calculating and willing to put her personal ambitions above all else.

You can't generalize, I know, but I've been amazed by the amount of women I've met who can't stand HRC, and would never consider voting for her.

BTW, this, to me, is one of the biggest reasons Obama is surging ahead. Yes, he's an inspiring speaker and a very smart, savvy politician. But I think now that the GE is coming into focus, Democratic voters have increasing grave concerns about HRC's ability to win in November, and that's pushing lots of people into Obama's camp (they're looking for an alternative to HRC, and an inspiring alternative is even better).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

some even from her own party, like Leahy Moynihan

sorry, confusing my senators (again)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, re economics:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/22/85820/0188 is a recent piece, but this comment
http://www.mydd.com/comments/2008/2/22/85820/0188/12#12
links to a couple of essays about some of his advisers.

I wouldn't have tuned in to it if he hadn't been to the right of HRC on the health care issue
http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4004
& saying stuff about social security crisis.

Krugman's been attacking Obama like crazy for months, and again I couldn't quite put my finger on it other than he liked Edwards, but..

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

YES HE SOMETIMES USES CENTRIST RHETORIC. THIS IS BECAUSE HE THINKS IT'S MORE LIKELY TO PRODUCE LEFTIST RESULTS. RESULTS THAT MAY BE FURTHER TO THE LEFT THAN HILLARY. STOP BEING SO LITERAL.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Krugman's problems with Obama are of a more personal nature. Krugman's quite rational otherwise, but if he's your primary source about Obama's economic policies and instincts, I'd be suspicious.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe it's just that we all spent eight years agreeing on how much Bush sucks.

-- daria-g, Friday, February 22, 2008 4:18 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah this is otm

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

this kind of colossal fuckup should not be counted as experience

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

the most damning thing about Hillary's campaign, I think, is the revelation that she's basically the same kind of manager as Bush is.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

You can't generalize, I know, but I've been amazed by the amount of women I've met who can't stand HRC, and would never consider voting for her.

Yeah. Sometimes I wonder how the feminist movement ever happened in the first place. For real. Far as staying with Bill because of designs on future political office, I don't think it's true but I wouldn't actually care if it were, I don't know why it's anyone's business, unless ambition is unforgivable because you think someone should be off being a victim instead. The list of politicians who stay married to the same person because of designs on future political office is very, very, very long, it's just the usual way it goes is the one who's cheating has the designs on higher office.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

politically i've always thought HRC was ok, B/B+ maybe, and would make a fine enough president, certainly able to repair a lot of the damage of the past 8 years. but this was a political and intellectual position somewhat against my emotional reaction which is, and has always been, that she is just straight up irritating to listen to.

i think most people react to politicians emotionally first and decide which facts support that reaction. i've tried not to (really!), but there it is.

gff, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

FWIW, I agree with you, Daria, in your above post.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

She's also Cuban-American, if that matters. She hates HRC, and it stems from HRC staying with Bill Clinton after he admitted his affairs. It's hardwired in her DNA that HRC stayed with Bill Clinton only because she had designs on a future political office. Based on that, she'll never see HRC as anything but cold and calculating and willing to put her personal ambitions above all else.

This is EXACTLY why my mom, a moderate Republican with a college degree, can't stand her.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Krugman's been attacking Obama like crazy for months

i think it went something like this

early Krugman: Obama ... hmm he's ok
later Krugman: Obama's pretty bad
Obama camp: wait, earlier you said he was ok
Krugman: YOU DARE CHALLENGE ME, WTF, OBAMA SUXXX

total ego driven tantrum. that "Hate Springs Eternal" column was heinous.

dmr, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

That's one Hillary criticism that I'm not a fan of. It may be plausible, but I agree that the reason she didn't leave him isn't really anyone's business.

Jordan, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't either, but it's a generational (and maybe cultural) phenomenon. My mom, a Cuban-American, is a firmly pro-choice who knows she's the equal of any man, yet shit like what happened in '98 unearths stuff we don't understand.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Total double standard. Why they stay together is their business and in fact it may be less that Hillary is a cold, calculating power hungry bitch than maybe she still loves the guy she married over 30 years ago and they found a way to work something out. Who t f cares?

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary Threatened To “Demonize” Anyone Who Stood In The Way Of Her Health Care Plan. At a retreat for Senate Democrats, Hillary was asked by Bill Bradley, “whether the Clinton’s failure to meet their promise of submitting health care legislation to Congress in one hundred days… would make it more difficult to win passage… Perhaps some substantive changes might be required in the interest of realism, Bradley suggested. No, Hillary responded icily, there would be no changes because delay or not, the White House would ‘demonize’ members of Congress and the medical establishment who would use the interim to alter the administration’s plan or otherwise stand in its way.”

Ø Bill Bradley And Pat Moynihan Never Forgave Hillary For Treating Them As Enemies. “Bill Bradley and Pat Moynihan later said they were flabbergasted at Hillary’s words and attitude that afternoon, but each came to believe that the incident was indicative of something more revealing about her character… ‘That was it for me in terms of Hillary Clinton,’ Bradley said many years later. ‘You don’t tell members of the Senate you are going to demonize them. It was obviously so basic to who she is. The arrogance. The assumption that people with questions are enemies. The disdain. The hypocrisy.’ Lawrence O’Donnell explained the depth of Moynihan’s disappointment with the woman who would eventually replace him in the Senate. The senator ‘didn’t hold grudges, didn’t personalize such matters,’ said O’Donnell. ‘But the “demonizing” colored his perception of Hillary, and how she operated, for the rest of his life.’”

wow (from shakeys link)

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

This is EXACTLY why my mom, a moderate Republican with a college degree, can't stand her.

No offense against your mom, I do get (finally) that a lot of women including (especially?) professional, successful women agree. I'm incredibly dismayed about it. What a country.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

This is like a tertiary red herring - I don't believe at all that she's stayed with him for ambition - but someone pls to tell me who the last presidential candidate was whose spouse was known to have cheated on them.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

The only women I know who support Clinton are over age 60 (e.g. my mother, and wives of senior colleagues).

my mom is a professional, college-educated woman in her early '60s, who grew up in illinois to boot. she's practically hillary's demographic twin. and she doesn't mind hillary. but she voted obama because she thinks he matches up better against mccain.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

But maybe that stuff is for another thread. Do we have a feminism thread?

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

but someone pls to tell me who the last presidential candidate was whose spouse was known to have cheated on them

I just kinda assume they're all a bunch of philanderers. "power is the ultimate aphrodisiac" etc

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

oh SPOUSE, yeah I dunno

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

or, someone tell me the last Presidential candidate who was known to have cheated. OH RIGHT.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

but someone pls to tell me who the last presidential candidate was whose spouse was known to have cheated on them

Eleanor Roosevelt.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Video game regulation

On March 29, 2005, Clinton called the popular video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas a "major threat" to morality. She said, "Children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them. This is a silent epidemic of media desensitization that teaches kids it’s OK to diss people because they are a woman, they’re a different color or they’re from a different place."

Clinton's main concern was over the sexual content in the Hot Coffee mod portion of the game. She said that if the game's manufacturer did not change the game's ESRB rating from M (Mature 17+) to AO (Adults Only 18+), she would introduce federal legislation to regulate video games. In response to this threat, on July 20, 2005, the manufacturer changed the rating. As a result, the game was removed from the shelves of Wal-Mart, Target, Best Buy, and other stores.

[Five months later, Clinton introduced the legislation anyway. On December 16, 2005, Clinton introduced the Family Entertainment Protection Act, S.2126, a bill that would prohibit the sale of sexual or violent video games to anybody under the age of 18.

Stuff like this on her Senatorial record makes me think that she's wasn't really interested in doing anything substantive but viewed her job as merely a stepping stone to the presidency. Lots of totally calculated feel good "think of the children" and "tough war leader" bullshit saber rattling that someone mentioned upthread.

Can't fucking stand her phony ass.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

No offense against your mom, I do get (finally) that a lot of women including (especially?) professional, successful women agree. I'm incredibly dismayed about it. What a country

Prejudicies are irrational, right?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

But back to HRC: she reminds me of Daniel Plainview, in a way. Like many ambitious people, she knows naught but her own resolve to triumph. I sense no joy in the chase, or peace when it's accomplished -- you're always looking for the next campaign. That's why I'll always regard Bill Clinton as an average or below-average president.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

AWZ OBAMA HIESMAN ACTION !!!!!

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

On March 29, 2005, Clinton called the popular video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas a "major threat" to morality. She said, "Children are playing a game that encourages them to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them. This is a silent epidemic of media desensitization that teaches kids it’s OK to diss people because they are a woman, they’re a different color or they’re from a different place."

On one hand, I HATE when politicians mess with this stuff. On the other hand, if David Simon made the same point in a screenplay I'd immediately say OTM, because really, it's actually not cool for kids to think violence is no big deal.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

AWZ OBAMA HIESMAN ACTION !!!!!

-- jhøshea, Friday, February 22, 2008 4:51 PM (24 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

But back to HRC: she reminds me of Daniel Plainview, in a way. Like many ambitious people, she knows naught but her own resolve to triumph.

a) you're stretching
b) we get it: you didn't like There Will Be Blood.

Mr. Que, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.truthdig.com/images/eartothegrounduploads/AP_hillary_calculations_300.jpg
obama drinkin my milkshake :(

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

On the question of who's further to the left on economic policy: isn't Obama in favor of lifting the income cap for social security taxes, which Clinton has criticized as a massive tax increase?

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I was like who is Daniel Plainview? thanks. As far as knowing nothing but resolve to triumph.. well, that is unprovable but can be used as a narrative to explain everything that person does in a negative way. (Now I have to see this movie which I suspect I will not like much just to see if there are other things going on with this character.)

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.johnmccainisyourjalopy.com/

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

That's why I'll always regard Bill Clinton as an average or below-average president.

Because -- unlike top tier Presidents -- Bill Clinton was too ambitious? Hmm. . .

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

BILL CLINTON DRINKS YOUR MILKSHAKE.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

A somewhat amusing take on why Dems have tired of the Clintons:

Why Democrats Are Kicking the Clintons to the Curb

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the view that supporting Clinton is the feminist thing to do, is the kind of identity politics that Obama is trying to transcend. I think a lot of women find Obama's move appealing. Doing so doesn't make you anti-women, though it does make you anti-a-particular-woman.

Euler, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

BILL CLINTON DRINKS YOUR MILKSHAKE! HE DRINKS IT UP! Better.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 22 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Because -- unlike top tier Presidents -- Bill Clinton was too ambitious? Hmm. .

Clinton was nothing BUT ambition.

I like There Will Be Blood because, to quote Obama's critics, I can project whatever I want onto that blank canvas.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Peter Beinart discusses Obama and the "white, working class vote" problem:

Courting Joe Six-Pack

o. nate, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary on GTA was one of her best moments afaic

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Why Democrats are Kicking the Clintons to the Curb - WE NEVER LIKED THEM THAT MUCH. WE LIKED THAT THEY WON.

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

but now we have a guy who is winninger

gabbneb, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

We like Bill when he's a Good Time Charlie, not when he's talking trash. Part of the good side of "slick" was the idea that he kept his eye on the ball (his job) even when all the Whitewater craziness was coming down on him.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Ann Richards is much more the female Bill Clinton than Hillary is.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:10 (sixteen years ago) link

"eye on the ball" = bombing Kosovo and Sudan when it was convenient? passing NAFTA? demolishing welfare? passing the Telecom Act? Telling the FDA to permit pharmaceutical advertising?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Ann Richardson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Sure, Shakey, compared to going negative on the Republicans.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

It's like that quote I posted from the National Review on last night's debate: Hillary could say she's giving everyone a hundred bucks and the reponse would be tepid; Obama could say he's taking a hundred bucks from everyone and get folks cheering. Bill C. had the latter style.

Eazy, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:14 (sixteen years ago) link

eh, I guess so. Although I've always thought ordering the deaths of innocents to deflect media attention from your blowjobs during a particular news cycle was the height of wrongness.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist
ugh. I thought that column was written by a right winger.

daria-g, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1715434,00.html

^^^this is an on-point summation of the debate

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

"eye on the ball" = bombing Kosovo and Sudan when it was convenient? passing NAFTA? demolishing welfare? passing the Telecom Act? Telling the FDA to permit pharmaceutical advertising?

lol leaving out the popular at the time: trying to bomb some guy named osama bin whatever???

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

well the Sudan and Afghan strikes were part of the same operation (Operation Infinite Reach lolz)

Sudan slightly less defensible since it actually killed/harmed innocent people.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

(and this is a separate issue entirely but I don't really understand why the US thinks the most effective way to assassinate somebody is to indiscriminately bomb places - very weird)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

and kosovo indefensible because you know: who cares abt looming genocide.

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Kosovo indefensible because it could've been avoided if appropriate parties had intervened earlier

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link

but they didnt did they - so then what

the characterization of this situation as a media play by bill is just so wtf

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

jhøshea, OTM

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm referring specifically to the remarkably "coincidental" timing of both bombing campaigns with significant events in the Lewinsky scandal

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

yah i think we all got that part

jhøshea, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i think thats bullshit, its not like he was running for reelection and really needed a boost in the polls. the lewinsky thing was there no matter what

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i think conservatives must really be relishing this sudden change of heart by dems re: clinton, they've hated that dude forever

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

and its a very irrational hatred, not very linked to ideology

deej, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I think given Bubba's "always respond in the same news cycle"-style of press relations the coincidences are rather telling.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

(but yeah I confess this is me at my most conspiracy theorist-y)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I mostly liked Clinton as Pres. I thought he was too far to the right, of course, but considering the national mood, I wasn't sure any further to the left could get elected, but man, the shit he pulled when he left, kind of finally pushed me over the edge.

Michael White, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

to be fair to BC, i think his presidency was so painted into the "scandal" corner by various things that it became sort of impossible for him to do anything that wasn't perceived in some way as being related to whatever the scandal of the week was.

to be fair to BC's critics, a lot of what he did did seem sort of related to image damage control, so that sometimes it got hard even for those inclined toward sympathy to tell which things were and which weren't.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 22 February 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

regardless of all that, didn't clinton leave office with relatively high approval ratings? this seems weirdly at odds with the perception that HRC is hated by everyone

akm, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

bill /= hill

jhøshea, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 democratic primaries rosetta stone ^^^

jhøshea, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton's approval rating never dropped below 55%

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

which is more than you can say for some *ahem* presidents

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

most of the public didn't know or care about the hit on welfare, the Telecom Act, or executing mentally retarded black men.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

My parents despise(d) Clinton more than I do, and they had no clue about these things; their hate was of the irrational Limbaugh variety.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:40 (sixteen years ago) link

HilaryBlog:

CNN's Campbell Brown notes a 'standing ovation' in response to Hillary's closing remarks.

CNN political analyst David Gergen - Hillary's last statement 'was the most effective moment she's had on television, I believe, since the New Hampshire primary… she really scored on that.'

Politico's Ben Smith - 'Clinton's answer was a stronger performance.' "Clinton's answer was a stronger performance; Obama seems like he's about ready to get out of here."

CNN's Bill Schneider - Hillary 'just made an effective argument against John McCain.' "Clinton just made an effective argument against John McCain: Though the Arizona senator is a champion against wasteful spending, Clinton pointed to his support for the Bush tax cuts and the war in Iraq - both colossal expenditures unpopular with most Democrats."

NBC News' Chuck Todd - Hillary 'had a couple of very good moments on health care and the economy.' "Did she potentially win this debate on points; I think so; it was close but she had a couple of VERY good moments on health care and the economy that probably scored well in the various focus groups of undecided voters watching this debate."

New Republic's Michael Crowley - 'The subject of health care always brings out a formidable passion and policy fluency in Hillary.' "So much of the time politicians just seem to be going through the motions when debating the issues. But the subject of health care always brings out a formidable passion and policy fluency in Hillary. People can call her a phony for all kinds of reasons but it's clear she really gets and cares about this stuff."

ABC News' Rick Klein - Hillary 'sounds calm, in charge, deliberate.'

MyDD's Todd Beeton - 'Hillary Clinton just hit that closing response out of the park.' "Hillary Clinton just hit that closing response out of the park."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Politico's Ben Smith - 'Clinton's answer was a stronger performance.' "Clinton's answer was a stronger performance; Obama seems like he's about ready to get out of here."

this especially was o_O to me

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 00:55 (sixteen years ago) link

so maybe PRESS <3's MCCAIN is officially over now?

"John McCain’s campaign plane is usually a pretty jovial place to be. […]

But in the aftermath of today’s New York Times story looking at McCain’s dealings with a Washington lobbyist, the mood is decidedly different. Before McCain boarded his plane, reporters were asked to sit farther back than usual on the plane. And when McCain finally boarded the plane, he failed to offer his usual wave at reporters and opted to quickly take his seat. During the flight, the cabin was unusually quiet, save a few quick discussions McCain had with top aides Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter. Near the end of the flight, Schmidt came back to the press cabin, where, with cameras off, he railed against the New York Times for publishing its story.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 01:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The conservative "Swift Boat" attack machinery is gearing up for Obama:

Obama may face grilling on patriotism

o. nate, Saturday, 23 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Nader to appear on Meet the Press tomorrow. Speculation of another third-party run is mounting:

The Nader Question

o. nate, Saturday, 23 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

How is it that Nedra Pickler is still allowed to write articles? Seriously kids.

askance johnson, Saturday, 23 February 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Pickler's article was ridiculous. I remember the Dean people constantly in a fury over her (with good reason) in 03-04.

daria-g, Saturday, 23 February 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Did you guys happen to see Hillary on CNN SCREAMING and being totally irate about some mailers Obama sent out? "SHAME ON YOU, BARaCK OBAMA!" .. "YOU AND YOUR BIG RALLIES..." etc... it was frightenig. She came off as a desperate, angry school teacher or something.. wow. This might be her "Dean Scream" moment...

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Not unless all the networks and rightwing radio shows get ahold of the clip and play it over and over and over again

kingfish, Saturday, 23 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

She compared his "tactics" to KARL ROVE! She said he's "untested much like George W."!She challenged him to a duel in Ohio! SHE'S UNHINGED!

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12647/thumbs/s-HILLARY-CLINTON-OBAMA-MAILER-large.jpg
"YAAAAAAAAHHHHH!"

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I WOKE UP to this on CNN, so I'm a bit on edge today. *shudders*

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

it's gonna be an ugly week

remy bean, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

so she goes negative by claiming he's being negative & misleading.

who does this hurt?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

also lol @ hil comparing him to bush after saying that any dem comparing another dem to bush is "the most irresponsible kind of campaigning."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Enough of the speeches and the big rallies
Enough of the speeches and the big rallies
Enough of the speeches and the big rallies
Enough of the speeches and the big rallies
Enough of the speeches and the big rallies

gershy, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

“This election is about misleading, false and discredited attacks that interfere with voters being able to make an informed judgment,” she said.

loooooooool

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link

man i am never gonna hear the end of this when i get home tonight

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/02/23/hillary.speech.cnn?iref=mpvideosview

lol @ Hillary's hype man standing behind her and nodding at everything

31g, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

BTW I don't think she sounds crazy or desperate or anything in this clip, but I guess Howard Dean didn't either.

31g, Saturday, 23 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Whether she's overreacting or not, who knows. I'm more bummed that Obama would allow his campaign to actually engage in this kind of shit (shifty mailers).

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The mailers aren't strictly false.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

The Mailers were factual, she supports NAFTA and her healthcare plan WILL force you to pay...

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

and she's constantly repeating the "OBAMA WANTS TO LEAVE 15 MILLION PEOPLE UNINSURED" talking point, but when he (accurately) says that she will force people to pay (which SHE ACKNOWLEDGED) she goes crazy.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

and this is to random because these mailers have been around for months now

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

he should just bring a copy of the mailer to the debate and go through it point-by-point with her.

remy bean, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

They don't seem that shifty to me?

She did support NAFTA. Can't speak to the health care issue.

mad xps

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, I was just saying they're shifty in tone. They do LOOK like something a 527 might produce, rather than some official Obama campaign literature. If he's going to point out weaknesses, I'd expect him to do it in a completely upfront manner.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's Hype Man is Ted Strickland, for those tipping him as an Obama veep

gabbneb, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i think his campaign has been using some pretty rugged mailers for a long while now. whether it's below the belt or "rovian" i dunno, i haven't seen one!

but yes, hearing that it's destroying core democratic values to attack each other on healthcare policy is, how can i say, hard to take coming from Hillary... and of course it's phrased that to attack one another over "universal" healthcare is the issue. planned outrage, i love it.

gff, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

And if/when Hil drops out, you don't think he'd take the offer that O would likely make to ensure a pickup in Ohio?

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

this is some pretty normal campaign shit (both the mailers and the "outrage" over the mailers)

any little thing happens and people are like OMG IT'S GOING NUCULARRRR

dmr, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

planned outrage

goes well with canned zings

gabbneb, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

ZINGS U CAN XEROX LOLOLZ

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

The fact that Hillary Clinton has any credibility on healthcare is beyond me.

As far as that video goes - I think her campaign has realized that a) she's just not as inspiring or compelling as Obama and b) the "experience will bring change!" argument isn't working, so their last resort is to basically call him a phony for engaging in campaign tactics that are much less slimy than many of the things that have come out of the Clinton campaign. There was a Slate video recently comparing Clinton to Tracy Flick, and it was hilariously spot-on. I don't think this new line of attack will work. It reinforces the stereotype that she's angry, petty, and grating to listen to, and people who have lost manufacturing jobs in Ohio probably don't care about Obama's campaign tactics. They're more concerned with NAFTA, healthcare, and so on - so the Obama campaign mailing was pretty smart politics.

I only see this argument appealing to people who are already in Clinton's camp and are bitter about Obama's popularity. One person I know who is a huge Clinton fan was recently remarking very spitefully, "Just look how full of himself he is! It's all going to his head, you can just tell!" No wonder her support is so much weaker than his.

Nathan, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

xingz u can xerox

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

that video is kinda whoa! clinton maybe responding to the disappointment over her lack of aggressiveness in the last debate?

meanwhile according to the times shes all mellow and philosophical http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/us/politics/24mood.html

jhøshea, Saturday, 23 February 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

planned outrage

Aimless, Saturday, 23 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

http://poplicks.com/images/iseman-and-maverick.jpg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 01:19 (sixteen years ago) link

ha!

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 01:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"As part of that focus, Mrs. Clinton has avoided giving pep talks to her aides, because a pep talk might suggest that the campaign is heading in an irretrievable direction."

What's that line about boats against the current, borne back ceaselssly into the past?

Eppy, Sunday, 24 February 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

She might as well come off as a desperate, angry schoolteacher, the media treats her like that anyway, so fuck it. I thought the mailer she has there was pretty despicable, which is why I mentioned above re: not thinking Obama was much interested in doing anything about health care. It's pretty much a dead on copy of the Harry and Louise ads in the early 90's.

daria-g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

no it isn't

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I just think Obama's taking a more realistic stance on what can be accomplished re: healthcare. That said, the mailers were gross.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

yes, i agree with that

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/17/673452.aspx

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

let's keep the tall horses of morality stabled, daria

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I would reserve "gross" for mailers claiming that oh.... McCain has a black baby.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I should really go watch Election again, though. I'd probably see it completely differently now. Tracy Flick is kind of awesome

daria-g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Harry and Louise:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dt31nhleeCg

Obama flyer (warning, PDF):
http://www.politico.com/pdf/PPM44_080130_nd_obama_hrc_healthcare_plan_forces_health_insurance2.pdf

daria-g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

let's keep the tall horses of morality stabled, daria

How about no?

daria-g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh yeah, no argument there. South Carolina is second to none in slimy mail campaigns.

I thought that report Jason Jones did on The Daily Show about the company contracted out for most of these underhanded mailing campaigns was pretty hilarious, but also made my skin crawl.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8U00P7O0&show_article=1

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/harry_louise_again.html

^^^ read the date

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: How about yes? Really, as a Clinton supporter you have no room to call out Obama's "gross" tactics when theirs have been much worse, for a long period of time..

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, I'll shut up then. Bye yall

daria-g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Finally.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

damn dude

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

props to remy bean for bringin actualfax, though.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

yah maybe I was mean. o well, she's annoying

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i like daria, and i think she has been a real sport on these threads. but i cannot stand to hear contrived moral outrage over 'dirty politics' from a candidate that has been playing a scuzzy game since the beginning.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I like daria too. Sometimes I get tired of all the OMGOBAMA in this thread, even if I'm responsible for some of it. Also, it's probably best not to live in a bubble.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

it's not her clinton support that bothers me (I agree this thread could use more clintonis44-type people, as well as some MAC IS BAC people, just for balance), it's more her attitude about the whole thing. Plus, it seems like she's just supporting clinton to be different - what she said about Obama's speeches in the last thread was telling....

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

actually I guess she's not that bad whatever, i'm tired. DARIA COME BACK, etc.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

ok nobody tell dom but

Samuel L. Jackson to Stump for Obama in Longview, TX

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Since I didn't know about Harry and Louise I totally read that as Thelma and Louise for a while :-/

StanM, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:22 (sixteen years ago) link

anywayz here's obama's response to hilary's diatribe:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/02/23/obama.speech.cnn

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Can't see that video - what does he say, "that time of the month I guess" ? (*hides*) :-/

StanM, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

he seems to just dismiss it as 'of course she's trying to get attention, she's behind. it's smart, tactically.'

v v frontrunner brushoff, it seems like.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

It's pretty much a dead on copy of the Harry and Louise ads in the early 90's.

-- daria-g, Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:17 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

Probably not true, but that is the first thing I thought of when I saw it.

31g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I just don't get the strategy behind a move like this. It has been proven time and time again (most recently, 3 DAYS AGO) that Hilary does best when she is likeable, "human", etc. Why would she play into people's perceptions of her being a shrewd, calculating, duplicitous harpy?

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I like daria too. Sometimes I get tired of all the OMGOBAMA in this thread, even if I'm responsible for some of it. Also, it's probably best not to live in a bubble.

^^^^ This, and Remy's similar comment, too.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Probably because she needs to change the dynamic, somehow. Being nice is a tactic she's tried before, and there's no new wrinkle to it for her. But a politician has endless permutations on how to be nasty.

(xp to BW)

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I like daria too. Sometimes I get tired of all the OMGOBAMA in this thread, even if I'm responsible for some of it. Also, it's probably best not to live in a bubble.

yezir

Def wish we had a few more HRC people in thread.

McCain/Huck types might want their own thread?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think being all "LOL SPEECHES" is going to change the dynamic in her favor though...

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I think H. is also canny enough to suspect that enough of O.'s support is charisma-based, and if she can disrupt the halo for a few minutes, she might be able to drag a few Texans to her side.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I want the GOP-supporters here, too. Otherwise it can become too much of a (snippy) echo-chamber.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary is definitely playing an older kind of personality politics than Obama. I suspect LOL SPEECHES will play well on cable television, but in the immediate deconstruction that comes with internet politics, it is stale before it has had a chance to settle.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

x-post -- ARE there any here? Folks like Don and Keyth and the like have always seemed more flat-out libertarian and very disenchanted with the GOP anyway.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

if she can disrupt the halo

I think there's something to this, too. Obama's seen as "above politics," which is a large part of his appeal. If she can make him seem just like every other politician, it might hurt him badly.

I doubt, at this juncture, she has enough time to pull it off, tho.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

ARE there any here?

Don't know. But I'd like some to show up and participate. It would be healthy.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:53 (sixteen years ago) link

it's not her clinton support that bothers me (I agree this thread could use more clintonis44-type people, as well as some MAC IS BAC people, just for balance), it's more her attitude about the whole thing. Plus, it seems like she's just supporting clinton to be different

Oh c'mon, be real! She's been very clear: daria supports HRC because she wants universal health care. I don't begrudge her this.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: it's not so much being "nice" as it is being somewhat likeable and personable. you can attack someone and point out differences while still remaining personable. going to tv and being extremely condescending and, frankly, rude, saying "shame on you" like a teacher to a child while wagging her finger doesn't really help her...

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton supporters whine about 'the media' more than Republicans do.

milo z, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I've tried to be a contrarian as much as possible, and if HRC does, by chance, become the nominee, I'll likely not vote.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

nb: I know wackjobs who are convinced that the media coverage of the Democrats (and 'refusal to cover' the GOP) is part of a conspiracy to help the Democrats... and they still whine less than Clinton backers.

milo z, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i still don't know what 'nb' means

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

(as N.B.) an abbreviation for nota bene, a Latin expression meaning "note well"

gloolgle

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

BW, her particular tactic may not be a good idea (sounds terrible, frankly, tho I haven't seen the clip). I just think going negative is almost all she has left, especially if the negative attack is designed to knock the halo off Obama's head.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

(as N.B.) an abbreviation for nota bene, a Dog Latin expression meaning "note well"

Fixed.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, you're probably right. I don't get why she didn't just go all out on the CNN debate, then. There just seems to be two different, competeing strategies here, and it just makes her look bad.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

omg snorg girl on new york times page with hillary worlds collide

scott seward, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

here's a clip of her rant: http://youtube.com/watch?v=XjcT_sri_2E

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I actually think that the debate 'friendliness' this week seemed a little calculated from both sides, and disingenous. A polite coolness would have been more sincere.

I wonder if H. isn't planning to come out swinging in the next debate, with a tactical 'moral' advantage established w/r/t this story.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

well she pretty much set the tone for the next debate with that "meet me in ohio, let's debate" line.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

it's gonna be so awesome when Hillary concedes and I never have to hear about either of the Clintons again

milo z, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

A polite coolness would have been more sincere.

"Polite coolness" is Barack Obama's middle name. (n.1)

______________________________
(n.1) Well, actually, his middle name is Hussein, but that's something we try not to talk about.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

hah, i thought that as i typed it.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:17 (sixteen years ago) link

There just seems to be two different, competeing strategies here

Probably the case

31g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Ugggghhhh, that YouTube clip. HRC's delivery is not going to help her.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ SNL cold open sketch of the CNN debate.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Tina Fey gave an apparently sincere argument for Hillary in her SNL Weekend Update appearance.

o. nate, Sunday, 24 February 2008 05:37 (sixteen years ago) link

didn't watch it, but that's the first convincing argument i've seen for Hillary.

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 05:45 (sixteen years ago) link

How do you know it's convincing if you didn't see it?

o. nate, Sunday, 24 February 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Bitches get shit done is a sincere argument?

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

THE ARGUMENT:

http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/playing-fey.jpg

<3 <3 <3

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:14 (sixteen years ago) link

argument even more convincing when it's wearing glasses and not making a "so yer a wize guy, eh?" expression.

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i saw the snl thing

"texas and ohio step up, bitch is the new black"

o__0

dmr, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:17 (sixteen years ago) link

She looks like she has had a stroke or two, but I still love her.

roxymuzak, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:20 (sixteen years ago) link

roxy i need to verify you opinion with a quick litmus test. SJP: hotty or horsey?

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:25 (sixteen years ago) link

You are kidding me, right? This has been covered in great detail on the Lolhan thread (and surely in the gays' appletini bar as well).

roxymuzak, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Horsey for miles, though.

roxymuzak, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Anybody else smell the secret (?) disappointment in some lady friends lately as Clinton slowly fails to seal the deal? (or as Bill might put it, as we fail to seal the deal for her.)

dream vs. dream.

What's with Huccabee on SNL tonight basically zinging himself?

msp, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:34 (sixteen years ago) link

lols at me trying to trap you by confusing you w/ someone else on that thread.
xp

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:39 (sixteen years ago) link

???

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:41 (sixteen years ago) link

as for hilz, she may be on life support but def not dead. She's making her final push right now, and i'm guessing Obama's lost some momentum between the debate and this halo tarnishing hoohaw. Basically March 5th can't get here soon enough.

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Cosmo, you confused me with SURMOUNTER?!?

roxymuzak, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:47 (sixteen years ago) link

What's with Huccabee on SNL tonight basically zinging himself?

The longer he stays in the spotlight, the better the chance he'll get his own radio/tv job next year.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

as for hilz, she may be on life support but def not dead. She's making her final push right now, and i'm guessing Obama's lost some momentum between the debate and this halo tarnishing hoohaw. Basically March 5th can't get here soon enough.

AND OBAMA HAS PATRIOTISM PROBLEMS, TOO. IT'S GOING TO BE A LONG GE SEASON.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:57 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, r. if it makes it better, your indignation = LOLOLOL

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 06:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.rightwingnews.com/donate.png

31g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:01 (sixteen years ago) link

obama should be able to forestall the snob/elitist toolishness with a good old 'we must vote for the best, strive to achieve the highest' speech.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:04 (sixteen years ago) link

he will loose a lot of points to mccain if he tries to play the common people game, i think

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

lose

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:08 (sixteen years ago) link

at the moment, the only real access point to a snobamas meme is Michelle's comment, right? that she made the comment and not him makes for a pretty good firewall.

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:13 (sixteen years ago) link

He will lose . . . to mccain

Fixed for accuracy in soothsaying.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:13 (sixteen years ago) link

She's his wife, it's not much of a firewall. Anyway the problem isn't snobbishness but lack of patriotism/not wearing a flag lapel pin.

31g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:21 (sixteen years ago) link

nothing either obama has said (prior to the MO comment last week) is at all unpatriotic in word or intent, so the anti-patriotism crusade is bound to be a shadowplay of really insipid insinuation and spin unless either of 'em slip up again.

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:27 (sixteen years ago) link

dude puts out Superbowl ads and watches The Wire while Hannah Montana babysits his girls. WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT AMERICA?

Cosmo Vitelli, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think america is going to get behind the idea that a black woman not being all 100% gung ho patriotic is her being a snob

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:43 (sixteen years ago) link

agreed. but if it stuck on john kerry...

remy bean, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:44 (sixteen years ago) link

John Kerry's not even a likeable person in the first place.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/02/23/clinton-draws-bush-obama-comparisons/?mod=sphere_ts&mod=sphere_wd

Hillary Clinton adopted a new tactic today: Comparing the candidacy of rival Barack Obama to that of George W. Bush in his 2000 presidential run.

Criticism of the Bush Administration quickly shifted to her opponent. Without evoking Obama’s name specifically, she alluded to an argument her campaign has made for weeks that the Illinois senator relies on florid speech and is not specific enough about his plan for the presidency.

“Do you think people voting in 2000 knew what they were getting? People thought they were getting a ‘compassionate conservative,’ and it turns out he was neither. And we have lived with the consequences,” she told a crowd gathered in a Cincinnati State Technical Community College gymnasium.

“Bush promised change as a compassionate conservative and the American people got shafted and we’re going to have to make up for it now. So, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”

She reminded Ohioans, who played a major part in electing Bush, that he also ran a campaign based on change. “People have talked a lot about change in this election. Well, we have lived through some of the worst change anyone could imagine over the last seven years,” she said.

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 07:51 (sixteen years ago) link

a message to hillary:

hillary dude... sometimes you just get beat. sometimes your opponent is better. happens to everyone. even obama. srsly. sorry abt that. life is mad real. :(

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:01 (sixteen years ago) link

ahahah did she actually say "the American people got shafted"?

31g, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:05 (sixteen years ago) link

haha this speech is mad nasty

tremendoid, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:10 (sixteen years ago) link

now if she had said "the American people got shafted and we’re going to have to make up for it now. Fool me once, shame, shame on you. Fool me you cant get foold again!"

i would srsly reconsider my vote.

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:10 (sixteen years ago) link

why is huckabee on my tv screen?

kingfish, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:21 (sixteen years ago) link

times responds http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/business/media/21askthenewsroom.html

wothwhile

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, we have lived through some of the worst change anyone could imagine over the last seven years,” she said.

Most of it approved by you with your voting stick?

StanM, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

tina fey's hilary thing was brilliant, alas.

tremendoid, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i heard tina was some sort of nasty republican - people said that on the 30 rock thread

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/wtao8p.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i27.tinypic.com/x6cvvt.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 08:36 (sixteen years ago) link

just for a rundown of tina's comments:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/24/1161/99305

msp, Sunday, 24 February 2008 13:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i heard tina was some sort of nasty republican - people said that on the 30 rock thread

-- jhøshea, Sunday, February 24, 2008 8:32 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Link

-said people would all vote for mccain anyway in the end
-said people vote for obama out of white guilt (but in a good way)

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 13:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Get One Nader

Ed, Sunday, 24 February 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

she said she was a republican in some parade magazine profile from several years ago, but I don't know if it was true or not

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yay nader is running, wow I hope hilary gets the nomination so we can have a president mccain and all want to kill ourselves again

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link

loool over/under, nader gets 1%?

m bison, Sunday, 24 February 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Nader is perfectly positioned to pick up...Ron Paul supporters.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Tim Russert looks like he want to insert a potted fern into Nader's ear.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

gad, Russert is a douche.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

that doesn't sound like a douchey thing to want to do

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, as disappointing as it is to see clinton go super negative like this, it does give me hope that if she does win the nomination, she will be relentless on mccain's ass; so much for that much-heralded "friendship" we'd heard about

akm, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

No, but Russert's investment in the efficacy of our political parties is douchey; he's genuinely appalled that someone would not accept party politics.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

word up homos: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/24/nader.politics/index.html

burt_stanton, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

yah russert is the biggest sycophant in the whole fucking world

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn, someone already posted that Nader's running. Well, he's getting mine and my 5 semi-legal non-paid house maintenance interns to vote NADER 08.

burt_stanton, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

loool over/under, nader gets 1%?

i got a hundo on the under

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

over/under, nader gets 0.1%?

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I was thinking about Clinton's new "Obama = Bush" argument and I've concluded that it's a really gracious strategy for her endgame, actually. The reason is that it doesn't tarnish Obama in a way that will have repercussions should he be the candidate in the general election. I doubt the GOP will pull out the "Obama = Bush" argument. But if she went with the "Obama isn't qualified to be the commander-in-chief" argument, it could legitimize a damaging attack in the general election. I suspect this attack (which doesn't seem very convincing to me, anyway) was motivated by these considerations.

Euler, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i suspect it was motivated more by abject, panicked desperation

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i was talkin to someone last night who said he thought obama was the new tony blair

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

weak

Nicole, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

that's kind of mindboggling.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

just saw the fey/hillary clip... does it look odd to anyone else? she looks really uncomfortable going through it. maybe she knows her audience is probably anti-hillary, i dunno.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I was thinking about Clinton's new "Obama = Bush" argument and I've concluded that it's a really gracious strategy for her endgame, actually.

I was thinking about Clinton's new "aggressive" arguments and I've concluded that, if things aren't going well for her in the Ohio debate, she will reach across the desk and try to strangle Obama to death.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i was talkin to someone last night who said he thought obama was the new tony blair

Well he is running a lot of the Blair playbook

Ed, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

political systems are so different there's not much point in making the connect other than, if you don't like obama, you can say "he's the new tony blair".

people in 1996 were (iirc) saying that blair was the new clinton -- and what with blair's xeroxing clinton's triangulation steez, they had a point.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

The big question on Obama isn't whether he will govern as a centrist. He will. That's how the office works. The real question is whether he can, through the power of his position and the so-called bully pulpit, move the center leftward. I think he has a better chance of doing this than Hillary Clinton.

As for his running the Tony Blair playbook, that would come down to what substantive policies he lays out in his first six months, not how he chooses to fish for votes.

Aimless, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

just to bite, a little, blair became party leader, ie "presidential candidate" (but not), almost years before the next election, in 1994. he rapidly made symbolic gestures toward not being the loony left labour party of the 1980s, though nostalgists tend to forget how little chance of a revival there was for the labour left under any leader. (being specific, he ended labour's commitment to nationalization -- this was never going to come back on the table... until last week, in fact!)

but at that point 'old labour' had no rival to blair. his rival was also his ally, gordon brown. the party establishment was fucked by then, and his guy peter mandelson had assiduously put him and brown in good positions since the late 1980s.

i don't see strong obama parallels there.

on the other hand blair did usher in a new era of post-racial politics, his public-school-and-oxford education a radical break with british politics past, so yeah i concede that one.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Nadir.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Poll has Obama in front in both Ohio and Texas:

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/decision-analyst-obama-texas-ohio-mccain-022308005.html

StanM, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

jimmy the mod otm

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 24 February 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man, this is not good:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/24/hillary-clinton-mocks-bar_n_88194.html

plus she's wearing that awful yellow blazer again.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

thaaaat video holy shit ^^^^^

uh yah hillary we have your voting record to prove that people dont always do the right thing

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i am shocked and appalled that this photo isnt up on drudge yet - u slippin matt

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/12717/thumbs/r-CLINTON-MOCKS-OBAMA-large.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

pathetic.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa girl u mad!! i dunno what else she could do at this point other than get really negative, i guess we'll see how that goes. if your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left? still, it should be yet another lesson: you have to have managerial competence and a willingness to fight as part of your candidacy's values. but that's a baseline, innit -- running on those things as the central plank of your appeal is just not enough for people.

this thread, and my life-world at the moment, is Baraquiste central, so my sense of how turns like the yellow-blazer speech above will play out there in the world are a bit skewed. i can't see it doing her any good at this point.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

this thread, and my life-world at the moment, is Baraquiste central

what the hell does this mean?

and what, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Loyal Barack Obama supporters not liking Clinton attacks on Barack Obama shocker

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, Hil has seemed irritatingly fake to me since the "i ain't noways tired" speech a year ago at Selma, which was like listening to my aunt diane doing a chapelle skit or something... but apparently people liked it! it is a mystery.

xp it means all my political chat these days, online, friends, family, is with ppl strongly pro-Obama. i don't have any contact with people for whom hillary's style is resonating, so maybe i just don't get it.

gff, Sunday, 24 February 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Loyal Barack Obama supporters not liking lolling at Clinton attacks on Barack Obama shocker

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

if your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left?

yeah and the "watch out for false hope" message has really resonated so far

dmr, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

If your opponent has a lock on hope and sunshine i guess that's all you have left?

It's beginning to seem like Hillary & McCain are a divorced couple trying to warn their daughter away from dating some handsome poor loft artist type.

mulla atari, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa @ snl clips ... weird

deej, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Even though I support Obama I think Hillary & her style are just fine. She reminds me a bit of my mom's family. Her amping up the negative is really awful though.

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah and the "watch out for false hope" message has really resonated so far

-- dmr, Sunday, February 24, 2008 5:07 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Wait til the general election.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't have any contact with people for whom hillary's style is resonating, so maybe i just don't get it.

-- gff, Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:59 PM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

People who like Hillary might be basing their choice on something other than campaign style. It's a possibility you might consider.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link

her hair?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't get the 'she reminds me' thing - she reminds me of, um, everyone i know? her chief problem may be that she adopts different styles willy-nilly. maybe a good executive should be able to do that, but she does it with little finesse, and anyway people expect politicians, who now live in public more than ever before, to present a consistent image/message - in 2008 you can no longer target different groups in different ways, and she's still trying to get away with it.

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 is gonna be the first presidential election of the youtube era

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

God, Rodham is like Mary Tyler Moore in Ordinary People with this shrill "SHAME ON U, OBAMA -- BUSH BROUGHT CHANGE TOO!" hysteria.

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

lol good comparison

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

what is obama like

deej, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Franchot Tone.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

gabbneb otm

tremendoid, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

The negative strategy is a strange about-face from her graciousness at the last debate. I guess the "outrage" about Obama's mailings gave her the pretext to change tactics? Still, the disconnect is odd and hard to reconcile. I suppose at high-profile events, like the debates, she can be gracious, giving her a pathway to standing-down gracefully, but at lower-profile events, like individual rallies in Tx. and Ohio, she can be negative, in a final effort to derail Obama's momentum. Too little, too late on that front, I suspect.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

this should give her a bump actually. that and the 'unpatriotic' charges seem to be on a slow burn.

tremendoid, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I watched the "Hillary mocks Obama" clip up there, and frankly I thought it was pretty mild stuff. By now I've gotten used to reading about how Hillary has gone off the rails with negativity this time, and then when I watch the clip, it's utterly unremarkable, but I'm still surprised that different people react so differently to her.

o. nate, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Even Wait Wait Don't Tell Me was joking about being sick of hearing about "change" today. It's probably too late for a real backlash though.

also o. nate otm

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

By now I've gotten used to reading about how Hillary has gone off the rails with negativity this time, and then when I watch the clip, it's utterly unremarkable

Totally agree.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"OMG, she's gently parodying her political opponent! What a psycho hose beast!"

Hurting 2, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link

If she's adopted that mocking tone at an earlier point in the campaign, I hadn't noticed it. Hard-hitting, yes, but mocking and chiding and baiting Obama? Maybe I missed it.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, i would say the huffington video upthread is the first smart-sounding thing i've heard her say vs. YES WE CAN. too bad for her she wasn't saying that like 10 primary elections ago.

msp, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/magazine/01axelrod.t.html

^^^great article from april 07 that talks about how axelrod devised the strategy for marketing obama

deej, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I watched the "Hillary mocks Obama" clip up there, and frankly I thought it was pretty mild stuff

who has said otherwise?

gabbneb, Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

this has probably been asked before but is obama's david axelrod the same person as the musician david axelrod?

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

no

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

o

that sux.

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

songs of experience = hillary
songs of innocence = obama

gershy, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

axelrod probably could have produced a better song than will.i.am did

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain = earth rot

gershy, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:08 (sixteen years ago) link

obama = a divine image

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:09 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary = a little girl lost

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee=Mass in F Minor

Sparkle Motion, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

wow this article is excellent, great find deej

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah real well written too:

This is Axelrod’s Chicago, the old ward Democrats, and he started bantering with the guy. The firefighter asked Axelrod about Obama: “Everybody’s raving about him, this new black guy, but he doesn’t have any experience. Not everyone’s in love with him, you know.” And the guy grinned, confrontationally, and it just kind of hung there, like race sometimes does in Chicago, somewhere between tolerance and menace.

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 00:50 (sixteen years ago) link

David Axelrod looks like Thomas Friedman

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 25 February 2008 01:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Campaigning in Ohio today, Barack Obama said the American people would not be swayed by Ralph Nader's run for president.

"There you go. He's at it every four years," Obama said during a news conference.

Obama said Nader had convinced some voters that there was little difference between President Bush and Al Gore.

"Eight years later people realize Ralph didn't know what he was talking about," he said.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:13 (sixteen years ago) link

obama otm

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Yep. Josh Marshall: Ralph Nader is Bush's cheif enabler. Hopefully, casting him like this early will further diminish his impact on the GE.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Let me try that again: Bush's chief enabler.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

haha what do u really think o? about all that needs to be said though really, no matter how harshly.

tremendoid, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was Al Gore, for not carrying his home state.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i find this capn save a nader article kind of convincing

But Nader's not looking for Valentines from the Democrats.

Frankly, he's not even all that interested in popular approval.

The public-interest crusader worries far less about poll numbers and even vote totals than about saying what he feels needs to be said -- and using the forum of the electoral process to say it. And he is certainly not the first progressive -- inside the Democratic Party or out -- to suggest that Obama needs to be prodded on issues ranging from labor law to corporate regulation to single-payer health care and Middle East policy.

Nader's greatest value in any race is -- like Socialist Norman Thomas in his races against Democratic Franklin Roosevelt -- as a source of pressure on the Democratic nominee to address fundamental questions and perhaps to take more progressive stands on a few issues. As in 2000 and 2004, Nader's appeal will be determined in large part by the extent to which the Democratic candidate is willing to be bold.

Obama seems to understands this. Unlike Gore or Kerry, who never quite "got" the point of Nader's runs in 2000 and 2004, the Illinois senator appears to recognize that it is pointless to grumble about Ralph Nader as a "spoiler." Rather, the point is to be more appealing to progressive voters who might consider voting Green or independent.

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I agree.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Except: FDR didn't pay much attention to Norman Thomas.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was Al Gore, for not carrying his home state.

qft, FOREVER.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was Al Gore, for not carrying his home state.

Bush's chief enabler was the fucking insane electoral college system.

M.V., Monday, 25 February 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was the SCOTUS

Sparkle Motion, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

come on you guys a lot people enabled bush theres no need to play favorites

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was shitholes like Tennessee

Dan I., Monday, 25 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

BUSH HAD AN ARMY OF ENABLERS AT HIS DIABOLICAL DISPOSAL.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't want to do the Nader argument yet again, but you can put me down as someone who has seen the evidence does not consider him a spoiler even in 2000, and his chances of being one THIS election are next to nothing.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

but not blaming your shitty nominee is a time honored dem tradition. if it's not nader it's the media or some other dark, external force

gershy, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:19 (sixteen years ago) link

exactly.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrats also like to rag on Nader in spite of all the evidence because it allows them to feel self-righteous about their "pragmatism."

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the real question here is how many Cynthia McKinney votes will Ralph steal?

milo z, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

lol my hrc friend (of "hilary needs to put obama in his place" fame) just told me "if you and 536 other nader voters had gotten off your high horses in 2000 the world would look very different today"

we need to not be friends anymore i think

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 25 February 2008 03:40 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN poll:

http://images.politico.com/global/quickvote.jpg

*SMH*

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 05:46 (sixteen years ago) link

i voted for nader!

He'll get less votes this time than last time around.

kingfish, Monday, 25 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's secret service codename is "renegade"

max, Monday, 25 February 2008 06:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm voting for Nader a third time bitches.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 25 February 2008 06:20 (sixteen years ago) link

you dick!

Dan I., Monday, 25 February 2008 06:22 (sixteen years ago) link

how dare you exercise your democratic right?

remy bean, Monday, 25 February 2008 06:23 (sixteen years ago) link

you might as well vote for nader, it's not like ur vote counts anyway

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 06:24 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no mccain might win New York now cause of Jon

Dan I., Monday, 25 February 2008 06:26 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no if Cynthia McKinney's running I might not be able to vote for Obama :(

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 25 February 2008 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.gp.org/committees/pcsc/index.shtml

The Presidential Campaign Support Committee has approved a list of Green Party Presidential Candidates, according to the guidelines voted on by the Green National Committee.

GREEN PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES

Jesse Johnson – http://www.jesse08.org/
Cynthia McKinney – http://www.runcynthiarun.org/
Kent Mesplay – http://www.mesplay.org/
Kat Swift – http://www.bexargreens.org/katforprez/


DRAFT CANDIDATE:
Ralph Nader – http://www.draftnader.org/

kingfish, Monday, 25 February 2008 07:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I think she could do great things for this country http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3gTpqMVOVQ

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 25 February 2008 08:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush's chief enabler was Al Gore, for not carrying his home state.

anyone in tennessee could have told you that was gonna happen. tennessee hadn't been al's home for most of the 1990s, and in that interim was the '94 midterm elections. overnight the state went from 2 democratic senators and a democratic governor to republicans in all three seats. gore probably got a false sense of security because clinton won it, but clinton won it against candidates whom the local breed of gop loyalists recognized as pretenders and hacks. they didn't vote for clinton, but some of them probably didn't vote. but in 2000 against bush-cheney, the loyalists were excited again, and there was no way gore was going to carry that state. blaming gore for losing his state is ignoring that the state was in the later wave of sourthern strategy switches. democrats held on there for longer than they did in some other places, but they weren't gonna hold on forever, the currents were just too strong.

of course if gore's campaign somehow didnt know that, then there'd be some legitimate blaming.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 25 February 2008 08:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thepage.time.com/halperin’s-take-ways-mccain-can-beat-obama-that-clinton-cannot/

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm voting for Nader a third time bitches.

gotta stick together

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 12:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrats also like to rag on Nader in spite of all the evidence because it allows them to feel self-righteous about their "pragmatism."

name names

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/6hug6r.jpg

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:04 (sixteen years ago) link

my strawz, let me show you me clutching them

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:19 (sixteen years ago) link

fwiw, latest SurveyUSA head-to-heads against McCain - http://www.surveyusa.com/electionpolls.aspx - listed from most Clinton-friendly to most Obama-friendly

Clinton wins but Obama leads (barely) - Massachusetts, Ohio
Clinton wins and Obama likely wins - Missouri
Obama wins and Clinton likely wins - New Mexico, Minnesota
Obama wins but Clinton is tied - Washington (2/5 results)
Obama wins but Clinton trails - Wisconsin, Virginia
Obama wins but Clinton loses - Iowa (confirmed by Des Moines Register poll)
Obama leads but Clinton loses - Oregon
Clinton loses and Obama likely loses - Kansas

also
both lose soundly but Clinton by a much smaller margin - Kentucky (2/5 results)
both lose soundly but Clinton by a little less - Alabama
both lose but Obama by a little less - Indiana (2/5 results)
both win soundly but Obama by a little more - California
both win but Obama by a much bigger margin - New York

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://bp1.blogger.com/_MnYI3_FRbbQ/R8GWmphQGNI/AAAAAAAAAic/xhwHHIvuTjs/s400/msnbc.png

this obama patriotism thing isnt going away - well see if he has the chops to defend himself against the gop attack machine in the g.e.

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

from cnn.com

http://images.politico.com/global/quickvote.jpg

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:47 (sixteen years ago) link

scroll up a little, it's here already

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:49 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

jhøshea, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41WT5BY9DRL._AA240_.jpg

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 13:53 (sixteen years ago) link

In a discussion of recent comments made by Michelle Obama, Bill O'Reilly took a call from a listener who stated that, according to "a friend who had knowledge of her," Obama " 'is a very angry,' her word was 'militant woman.' " O'Reilly later stated: "I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down."

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200001?f=h_latest

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry if that was posted and I missed it

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link

it was, though i'm not sure what's supposed to be wrong with the big o's remark there

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:32 (sixteen years ago) link

"lynching party"

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago) link

er, which he says would be bad????

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link

"this is a fantastic movie to see if you're brain-dead or a moron"

movie poster:

"a fantastic movie"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link

bad... unless there's evidence that SHE HATES AMERICA

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link

still a poor choice of words

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link

gimme a break you guys

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, I bit the bullet and let the 90257816 skipped posts load and read the discussion, and I see it's been well covered. I still think it was an odd choice of words, but it's true that in the context he's being relatively decent.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

self-righteous Nader blamers, and proofs that he didn't cost Gore, can be found in the documentary film An Unreasonable Man.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Save-a-Ho'Reilly

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs i'm all in favor of breaking up the two-party system but nader's a cult of personality - he doesn't build movements and he does no actual organizing.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

gabbneb unlike you i try to suppose that what people say is reasonable or unreasonable despite who they are, not because of it

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

self-righteous Nader blamers, and proofs that he didn't cost Gore, can be found in the documentary film An Unreasonable Man.

oh yeah? do they prove that Gore would have lost New Hampshire if Nader wasn't in the race?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

only people say things

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry i should have said "unlike deej"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

do they explain why New Hampshire was the only state to go red in 2000 but blue in 1992, 1996 and 2004?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer, I don't disagree with your last 2 points. Even if Obama picks Sam Nunn for VP I'd rather vote for a socialist than Nader this time.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer, while I applaud your effort, O'Reilly has a history of saying and doing questionable things regarding race, so when he uses the phrase "lynching party" regarding a black candidate's wife it raises my eyebrow.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link

mocking a caller for using racial innuendo is a-ok with me, you should be applauding o'reilly, not me

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

what is the scripture again? "when a loathesome toad tells the truth on fox news, ye shall give obeisance as unto the highest of my cohort"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.drudgereport.com/cc2.jpg

This picture says everything you need to know about Bill Clinton.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago) link

"I don't want to go on a lynching party, unless of course she does hate America. In that case, yeah, go for it, we'll hunt her down."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

the caller does not use "racial innuendo," ("militant" is the closest she comes), O'Reilly does not "mock" her, and what he says is BARELY a defense of Michelle Obama. After which he defends Clinton against all those nasty Obama people.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"mr. o, i have a friend who says that the muslims in his town are very angry, very militant"

"well before i go off on a crusade against the infidel i'd like to get a few more facts in place, evidence, to say that's how they really feel"

omg o'reilly is saying he wants to go on a crusade against the infidel!!!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

"If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down."

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

"that's legit" doesn't refer to it being a legitimate point of view on her part; it refers to the lynching party, doesn't it?

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

ffs

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

No, I think it just refers to the viewpoint being "legit." Even I don't think O'Reilly would actually imply that a lynching party - even metaphorical - is "legit." I just think it was a bad choice of words. Anyway, I think impugning both of the Obamas' patriotism is far more offensive than the use of that phrase, and CNN is guilty of that too.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i don't think he means literal lynching party obv.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Your search - "you can get anything you want at sylvia's restaurant" - did not match any documents.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link

so the clinton campaign responds to the circulation of the "dressed" obama photo:

Enough.

If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry.

We will not be distracted.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck this shit

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

oh christ, that's just bullshit

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs i'm all in favor of breaking up the two-party system but nader's a cult of personality - he doesn't build movements and he does no actual organizing.

-- Tracer Hand, Monday, February 25, 2008 9:03 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

tracer what did u think of the nation editorial i posted

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i luv this "shame on you" "they should be ashamed" stuff going on now, right?

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

We will not be distracted.

from red-wine-drinking or job-hunting?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

lol^^

in any case this photo's awesome:

http://drudgereport.com/bc.jpg

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

beyond the wizard's sleeve

dmr, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

im concerned about gw's muslim roots

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

I mean, wow. This is just so unbelievably, transparently disingenuous.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.drudgereport.com/oa.jpg
i can understand stupid ppl being like OMG TERRORIST at this but is anybody currently undecided about o vs hillary gonna take clintons side because of this? they are desperate as fuck!!

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

daria bailed out of this thread just in time. "Fail to defend the indifensible" etc

Rock Hardy, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe not now but in the ge :-/ xp

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

if anything hillarys driving a stake in her own career w/ this shit, folks arent gonna be so quick to forgive this kind of dirty trick bs

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah but thats what im saying - im sure it could influence undecideds between mccain & obama, but not clinton & obama!! so why is she doing mccain's dirty work right now!?!

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i had been capn save-a-hillary with my obamaniac friends for months now but with this news today i seriously resolve not to vote for her

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

luckily it looks like i wont have the option

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm glad we're learning about all these amazing political skills in the primary not the general. HillaryCo doesn't seem to understand that the reason Bush gets away with this shit is because Bush is speaking the lines, not Rove.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

and because they run all their bullshit through a red-face test first

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:33 (sixteen years ago) link

m sure it could influence undecideds between mccain & obama, but not clinton & obama!! so why is she doing mccain's dirty work right now!?!

-- and what, Monday, February 25, 2008 11:29 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

This. And I've also been a capn-save-a-hillary.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

what makes anyone think that clinton's people are behind this photo??

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Uh because her camp failed to deny it, and the statement they did release seems hilariously disingenuous?

Simon H., Monday, 25 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Drudge said so; ClintonCo has tacitly admitted or at least not denied it

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

reality has a known obama bias

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/may2006/030506colbert.jpg

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Next debate should be fun.

Simon H., Monday, 25 February 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yea i'm seriously amazed at how poorly HRC's campaign has been run, i mean come on! this whole thing was supposed to be a cake-walk! (the primary, at least) i don't know how anyone could have thought this would be a smart move (assuming it was a move at all, were staffers just circulating the photo among themselves, not to the press?)

in any case, the blunders of hilz' campaign have been pretty astounding -- the money/funds-handling stupidity, bill's comments in SC, the complete failure to engage in/understand caucus states, the lack of a post-2/5 plan, the various leaks/drama among staff, the total lack of a clear message/presentation of hillary, etc.

just from a tactical viewpoint alone, i think the fact that her campaign has been so poorly managed could be reason enough to vote for her. nothing she has done has really indicated at all that she could run a fierce and competitive general election campaign.

contrast all that with how smoothly obama's campaign has been run -- the fundraising behemoth, the grassroots support, the incredible on-the-ground organization, the consistent messaging and clear presentation of the candidate.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama should wear a Whitewater t-shirt and a Monsanto cap for that next debate.

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

were staffers just circulating the photo among themselves, not to the press?

time well spent!

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

drudge: clinton people behind photo
obama people: wtf is with the clinton people behind this photo
clinton people: what's the big deal with us being behind this photo
tracer: what makes anyone think that clinton's people are behind this photo??

gff, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

from the Times yesterday

“She has a real military discipline that, now that times are tough, has really kicked into gear,” said Judith Hope, a friend and informal adviser to Mrs. Clinton, and a former chairwoman of the New York State Democratic Party. “When she’s on the road and someone has a negative news story, she says, ‘I don’t want to hear it; I don’t need to hear it.’ I think she wants to protect herself from that and stay focused.

that remind you of anyone else in politics?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

oh i see - clinton people didn't specifically deny it. it's just weird - for all the reasons 'and what' mentioned it makes no sense. for me, given drudge's history with the clintons, it seems like exactly the kind of right-wing shit-stirring designed to push people buttons and get the pigeons all atwitter and fighting amongst themselves.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

A spry Farrakhan sings Obama's praises :(

bnw, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck this shit

^^^^ This.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

man people like Farrakhan need to realize that the best way for them to support anyone is to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Simon H., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think farrakhan's support will hurt obama

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe not, but it can't help.

Simon H., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

It's probably the best time for this dumb stuff to circulate: he's the likely nominee, and at the same time he isn't running against McCain (or TBA) yet.

Better now than a month ago or in September.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

it seems like exactly the kind of right-wing shit-stirring designed to push people buttons and get the pigeons all atwitter and fighting amongst themselves.

Wrong the first part:

A few thoughts on this Obama photo that was circulated by the Clinton campaign, published on the Drudge Report. The first is that it is a sign of the desperation of Team Clinton. The second is that it is pretty nasty stuff, with its "he’s a Muslim and it should bother you" undertone. For the record, Obama is a Christian, not a Muslim, and the photo should not bother anyone (I recall President Bush had to wear some pretty wild outfits when he attended the APEC summits). And third, this will backfire in a big way. Twenty-four hours from now I suspect we’ll see virtually the entire Democratic establishment, and many others, condemning this tactic. It’ll advance the storyline that the Clinton campaign is spinning out of control – lurching from melancholy valedictory comments one day to faux outrage the next – and in its dying days.

During tomorrow evening’s debate, Hillary Clinton will be on the defensive and very much regret this stupid and ugly effort.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

you missed

Other than that, it was a swell idea.

02/25 11:59 AM

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

it will backfire among progressives. among conservatives and likely independents it will only continue this new accepted wisdom of obama as trojan horse, which is not only being spread by yr uncle (10000% chance the photo becomes a part of the obama jihad email) but by the ap now as well. again: fuck this shit.

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm going to make "obama jihad" t-shirts

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

oh god i knew by boy spengler would come through at some point and holy shit does he ever:

Obama's women reveal his secret
By Spengler

"Cherchez la femme," advised Alexander Dumas in: "When you want to uncover an unspecified secret, look for the woman." In the case of Barack Obama, we have two: his late mother, the went-native anthropologist Ann Dunham, and his rancorous wife Michelle. Obama's women reveal his secret: he hates America.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JB26Aa01.html

gff, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't even care who originally sent it. the fact that maggie williams is fucking playing it up with that incredibly ill-conceived quote is just as infuriating. obama is gonna have to run through a perfect storm of racism/xenophobia/jingoism to win this election. i honestly think this shit might sink him.

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

WOW @ went-native anthropologist!

remy bean, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno ygs - the republicans have a lot of cranky old fucks still working for them, people who opposed desegregation - i think we ain't see nothin yet

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

YGS: It might sink him, but I think Obama will handle it better than any losing Democratic presidential nominee of my generation (Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry). Those guys were passive; Obama, by contrast, seems much more savvy to me.

Doesn't mean he'll win. I think he'll lose to McCain. But I think he'll acquit himself well in response to this nonsense.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

"(assuming it was a move at all, were staffers just circulating the photo among themselves, not to the press?)"

uh yeah the clinton campaign privately going LOL LOOK AT THIS DARKIE SOMALIA ROFL is actually more offensive to me than circulating it with the rovian intent

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i think we have all known all along that this country was too fucking scared, too fucking nervous and upset about being made to feel uncomfortable to really take a chance on anything other than the typical red-blooded american male, and it's really coming out now. what we will hear for the next six months are arguments shooting off the michelle obama line, this ap story, and all of the rest. for an uninformed voter -- and god fucking knows that's almost all of them -- it's an easy shorthand to comprehend, so much easier than mccain's lobbying trysts or anything else. and the media, in a bid for fairness/appealing to those middle american voters who scare them so much, will play this shit up with rhetorical questions and more bullshit articles like the post's piece on obama the muslim. this shit is broken.

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, is Ron Paul back? If McCain somehow gets disqualified for breaking his own campaign financing law, maybe he's in with a chance?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/02/paul.html

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF guys? "Oh shit, they have an angle of attack. We'd better just give up before the GE starts so we don't feel too disappointed again."

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, is Ron Paul back?

haha I misread this as "is Ron Paul black?"

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

aw thats the democratic party i know & love!

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's time for John Edwards' closeup

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

the Elder has spoken:

BILL KRISTOL: Look, she needs to take Obama down, but the way to take him down is not to have a debate on his tactics. That’s the huge mistake here. “Shame on you, you’re running a campaign inconsistent with your message, you’re a little misleading in some leaflet you’re distributing, some flyer on health care” — that’s ludicrous at this point.

He’s riding a wave of euphoria. She needs to puncture it. The way you puncture euphoria is reality or, to be a little more blunt, fear. And I recommend to Senator Clinton the politics of fea

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

"the politics of fear"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

the politics of dancing

Mr. Que, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

He thought The Power of Nightmares was meant as a compliment to his dad.

Nicole, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i picture bill kristol helping his kid with his science fair project in the same way: "listen, joey, i just don't *fear* these sea monkeys enough..."

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Well they are creepy, those anthropomorphized bastards.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

BTW, I think it's best that this comes out now, especially if this is all the documentary ammunition the GOP will have with this line of attack. It's an ugly smear campaign that's easy to make but hard to erase. Obama needs -- and apparently will have -- a full season to respond. He should begin doing so early; right now. And he is.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

And I recommend to Senator Clinton the politics of fear . . . She needs to say not, “Ooh, this campaign tactic’s a little out of line.” She needs to say, “Let’s wait a second here. Is this man ready to run against the Republicans for president of the United States in a time of war? And is he ready to be president? He wants to negotiate on January 21st with Ahmadinejad. Here’s what Ahmadinejad has said about blowing up Israel. He’s never run a serious race. He’s not ready for the job.”

She needs to take on his qualifications to be president and his qualifications to beat the Republican nominee, not complain about little campaign tactics.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

"(assuming it was a move at all, were staffers just circulating the photo among themselves, not to the press?)"

uh yeah the clinton campaign privately going LOL LOOK AT THIS DARKIE SOMALIA ROFL is actually more offensive to me than circulating it with the rovian intent

yea i agree with you on that. though apparently the staffers were making a point about biased media coverage in favor of obama (e.g. saying "if there was a compromising photo of hillary it would have made the press ages ago, why is this not being published, etc?) though it's a gross situation no matter what.

i wasn't interested in defending hilz' staffers in any way, i think it makes them look incredibly ugly any way you look at it.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Kristol dumber than a bag of hammers

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

The real point of all of this is to put O on the defensive so he has to parry and thus put himself on H's level. Same reason she wanted more debates. If O is smart, he'll let her speak for herself and keep staying above it all. Don't throw rocks at the throne.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i wonder if hillary coming out w/ this makes it better for obama in the long run than if shadowy right wingers are dropping it??? they do hate hillary and the right wing largely finds her to be a liar so i imagine in many ways they will be torn wrt its dissemination

im just being hopeful

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

The decade of fear is coming to an end.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I think the key is to respond gracefully and look unscathed.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I sometimes fantasize that Hillary's just there to insulate Obama from ge attacks, and it's all a put-on, but reality seems crueler than that.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

haha crueler to her primarily

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Just because Rove and Bush have gotten away with eight years of distortion doesn't mean that others will be able to in their wake. That's what Hillary C.'s campaign doesn't understand.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the lunatic attacks that obama seems to inspire kinda works in his favor and the fact that he's calm through all of it just makes his attackers look crazed and desperate

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

im hoping for 1000 macaca moments in this campaign

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

^
this

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway -- tanned, rested, ready...ROMNEY! Uh.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, a little story on GOP converts to Obama.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah obama can take the high road like nobody's business - the problem is that his opponents (especially in the g.e.) are bullies, and bullies will poke you again and again and not let you go. he's going to have to choose a moment or two in which he retaliates and is seen to retliate effectively

it makes me sad that politics is basically reduced to fake pugilism

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at republicans hating on dems for carrying their fight on longer than the GOP and then after one measly nyt article suddenly theres 5 republicans running all over again

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not worried about a very significant percentage of the electorate actually thinking "Obama is a secret Muslim terrorist." I'm more worried about the people who will feel "uncertain" about him, that he's an "unknown quantity," etc.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

hurting i think the genius of axelrod's marketing around obama's 'story' and biography is the way they've managed to insulate him from that charge

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

they're selling him as a person and leader, not as a legislator, which is the main problem with hillary and mccain's attacks on him

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not sure if I agree with the "stay-above-it" strategy, tho. That's what Kerry did with the Swift Boaters. It's a tough call, I admit.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 25 February 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah who can forget how the vibrant, charismatic john kerry campaign was sabotaged by that

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not telling him to do that at all times in the general election. I'm telling him to do that against hillary when he's ahead and can probably win the nom simply by avoiding mistakes.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Also to be fair the Swift Boat shit was a lot more serious and harder to respond to than a photo of Obama in a lolturban. Which of course does make me wonder what kind of serious, well-organized smear the GOP will come up with this time and does worry me a bit.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

All the GOP can do is make his blackness indivisible from his executive "inexperience." And it's working! Callers to talk radios and, hell, my grandmother do this shit.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Plouffe has a fine response:
On the very day that Senator Clinton is giving a speech about restoring respect for America in the world, her campaign has engaged in the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we’ve seen from either party in this election. This is part of a disturbing pattern that led her county chairs to resign in Iowa, her campaign chairman to resign in New Hampshire, and it’s exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties and diminishes respect for America in the world,"

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

All the GOP can do is make his blackness indivisible from his executive "inexperience." And it's working! Callers to talk radios and, hell, my grandmother do this shit.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, February 25, 2008 1:04 PM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

what do you mean by this?

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, which is why he needs an older, white, 'experienced' veep.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Wes Clark Wes Clark Wes Clark

remy bean, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

The whole idea that "oh no Obama needs to hit back now [i.e., in some snarky way]" runs counter to the idea that the guy has won with double-digit leads in a bunch of states. His campaign knows that anger, outrage, distortion, and fear are not necessary parts of competition, and he (like Huckabee on his best days) is flipping the script, successfully so far.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

what do you mean by this?

This weekend my grandmother, a Republican says, "Yes, I've been learning about this Obama. His middle name is HUSSEIN and his mother is African. This man would be horrible if he was elected -- the worst president in history."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

we live in the fucking stone ages, with our ipods and our reflective clothing

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Wes Clark Wes Clark Wes Clark

-- remy bean, Monday, February 25, 2008 12:08 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

nononono
first of all hes in the tank for hrc but more importantly his whole candidacy was exactly what was wrong w/ the democratic approach in the last election, thinking we needed a campaign that was like a VFW meeting

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Grandma listens to late night radio, which broadcasts some spooky Oliver Stone-worthy conspiracy tripe. The personalities exploit racial and ethni fears as a matter of course.

(xxxpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there any Democrat she would vote for, A,LS?

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe this guy?

http://www.blackfive.net/photos/uncategorized/johnkerrysalutes.jpg

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

woops

http://www.blackfive.net/photos/uncategorized/johnkerrysalutes.jpg

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't really want to pick a Democratic candidate based on who would scare/offend L,AS's grandma the least.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

the last "real Democrat" was LBJ, she sez.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080223011336AA1ziz9

Has anyone seen Michelle Hussein Obama's tripe, and what do you think of it, if so?

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

found while googling for pics of michelle hussein :-[

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://home.wanadoo.nl/kraan90/image/husain,%20mishal8.jpg
be my 1st lady <3 <3

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Everyone around the world is watching and wondering if America is that easily fooled into voting for someone who truly wants to follow a socialistic agenda.

Canadians are going to wonder if America goes the way of Canada, then where will they go for decent health care?

Will Americans really adopt plans that are failing in Canada and Europe? Do Americans really want 55% of their earnings to go to taxes?

Do the American people really want bigger and more government intrusion in their lives. I am certain that other countries have thought the people here were much smarter than that.

Ask the Cubans who were forced into socialistic/communism.
They are still trying to make that treacherous trip to come here.

What do intelligent Americans think? I for one believe Michele and Barack want to gain the power to control business and even down to regulate how we care for our health. Yes, our security would be threatened by undermining intelligence and emasculating the military. Those tax increases will affect us all negatively!

-- Moody Red (Top Contributor)

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh there are some dumb fucking people in this world

max, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

She hates America, like all liberals.

true, sadly - if only the independent not so interested in the process voters could see this.

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ the idea we live in a "post-ideological world" when you read stuff like this

"post-ideological" just means "my ideology won"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

more like 'post-ideological' means that you don't advertise your ideology, you advertise your image

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

What do intelligent Americans think? I for one

That's a fail right there already, don't need to read the rest of the sentence.

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Everyone around the world is watching and wondering if America is that easily fooled into voting for someone who truly wants to follow a socialistic agenda.

Given the last thirty years of presidential history, the rest of the world must be even stupider than us.

remy bean, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

think its safe to say that none of McCain's wives ever wrote a thesis about black people. please keep that in mind when you are voting. for great justice.

bnw, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: at this point, I doubt anyone in the rest of the world really cares as long as someone else takes over in November - it can't possibly be worse than Evil Dick and his cowboy clown sidekick.

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

The wars in other countries are always near, never far away. The president is only the man who can get immunity, never plan ahead. Barack, gangs are permanent, wars are imminent, and the future is only bleak for us out here, never in there. When we turn on the television, or like my brother read daily in the news paper about political issues, we see change never coming. The president changes every 4-8 years, but lobbyist, judges,system makers, and rich people who contribute to their own change still remain. Every campaign is the same Hilary, when does it change. When are you going to see that every country, every person, every leader, lives by a greed that their own people can and will always understand, and that they see democracy not even working in the United States. There is no hate, only frustration and action on that feeling. So I ask, What will you do, that Bush couldn't do, that the last presidents decades after decades could not do? Comment on that!

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

"the rest of the world" is unanimous in holding the republicans responsible for george w. bush and assuming that their time is now over - there would be genuine incomprehension if any republican won, almost even more now than in 2004

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

actually although I posted that comment for its unintelligibility it kind of makes sense to me now!

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

meanwhile, the left wing conspiracy grows only larger: http://dlisted.com/node/24138

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Tell me why:

Kathleen Sebelius
Wes Clark
John Kerry
Bill Richardson

should and shouldn't be veep.

Ed, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

No one ever wants to see Kerry again.

Simon H., Monday, 25 February 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Kerry is a failure, Clark is a non-entity, Richardson is a bozo. Sebelius is best option but kinda stilted and perhaps unsuited for the trad VP attack dog role...?

Also - see separate VP speculation thread

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

JOE BIDEN!

NO?

OKAY :(

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i hate to be the asshole that says it but something tells me that if obama wants to win over independents and even some republicans, hes going to need an older white male VP

max, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

like Clooney.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Your 2008 Vice Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

you mean an older white male "centrist" guy, DONTCHA? that'll boost Nader nicely, kidz...

Dr Morbius, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Kerry is a very good and decent man who is death warmed over as a politician

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Kerry, I don't get the "kerry is stiff and has no personality" criticism

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

did you sleep through the last election?

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

compared to, say, al gore he really wasn't that bad

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I had the bizarre experience yesterday of watching an Obama event that took place in a lifeless void. Why? Kerry was the main attraction, acting as surrogate. I like him too, but come on.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Kerry might be more macho than Algore, but he's also way more boring

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

al gore has done a good job remaking himself, I don't think anyone regards him as boring and stiff these days. but I don't think kerry is ever going to get over that perception

akm, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently Hilary's campaign has been circulating this pic around:

http://drudgereport.com/oa.jpg

*SMH*

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

you are slow

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah it was posted upthread already along with their shrugging off of the accusation

ciderpress, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

hay I just got home from school I can't keep up with this thread.

The Brainwasher, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Al Gore on Futurama = funnier than anything Kerry's ever done in his whole life

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

"I have ridden the mighty moon worm"

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/thumb/b/bd/3136t.jpg/300px-3136t.jpg

Obama campaign has been circulating this picture.

Eazy, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://cbs3.com/local/Political.Stabbing.montgomery.2.662239.html

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Authorities said brother-in-laws Jose Ortiz and Sean Shurelds

paging safire

gff, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Ortiz was jailed on $20,000 bail. If convicted of a felony crime, he will not be able to vote in the upcoming election.

Jordan, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:53 (sixteen years ago) link

will the clinton campaign stop at nothing

max, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

a knife, yesterday:

http://llnw.image.cbslocal.com/175x131/WBBM1005stabbinggeneric.jpg

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i30.tinypic.com/zvs8i0.jpg

StanM, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Cheshire Cat to thread!

Aimless, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

latest dnc email blast

http://www.democrats.org/page/-/images/buttons/20080225_mccain_fec_button.jpg

dmr, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain and bush look like they have a forcefield

dmr, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Y'know, guys, I'm down with taking on McCain about the campaign shit, but "WE ARE FILING A COMPLAINT" isn't exactly the best rallying cry.

en i see kay, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

WE ARE WRITING A STRONGLY WORDED EMAIL

en i see kay, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://youtube.com/watch?v=mfL5zECvBJQ

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

o the bold lameness of the internets

El Tomboto, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Ted Kennedy Does Something Obnoxious But Kind Of Likeable Part One Billion

remy bean, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

In her speech following the Wisconsin results, Clinton articulated several contrasts between herself and Obama. The first was a contrast of style versus substance, speeches versus action. With this alleged contrast, she comes dangerously close to the line of evoking a long-standing stereotype about black men: that they are "slick."

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Just like her black husband, Slick Willie.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 25 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

stretching_it.jpeg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 25 February 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

ew

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I have a theory that, even though it would have been justified a few times already, Obama is going to hold off on the campaign equivalent of thatsracist.gif until the inevitable glaring attack on him, and then give a really nice "That's it, the American People and I are sick and tired of this blatant RACISM, and we're not going to take it anymore" speech at just the right time which will work wonderfully to his advantage. And, y'know, be a pretty nice moment in politics in general.

I tend not to read a lot of commentary/op-ed stuff, so this might be obvious or well-tread territory already.

en i see kay, Monday, 25 February 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

you are slow

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:36 (2 hours ago) Link

yeah it was posted upthread already along with their shrugging off of the accusation

-- ciderpress, Monday, 25 February 2008 19:37 (2 hours ago) Link

The 24-minute ILX news cycle.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN texas poll:

Obama 50% (+2)
Clinton 46% (-4)

margin of error 3.5%

dmr, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton camp now unequivocally denying they had anything to do with Obama turban photo:

"I just want to make it very clear that we were not aware of it, the campaign didn't sanction it and don't know anything about it," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said in a teleconference with reporters. "None of us have seen the e-mail in question. If anybody has independent reporting that they've done on it I would welcome it."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080225/ap_on_el_pr/obama_photo

o. nate, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_limited_hangout

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, according to that AP article, that's an AP photo, so it wasn't exactly secret.

o. nate, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Here's a fairly level-headed evaluation of the claims on both sides:

Breathe. Relax. The Drudge 'Dressed Obama' Photo, in Perspective

What's more, I'm reluctant to believe Drudge's account of the picture's provenance until I actually see the "circulated" email; it's totally possible that some anti-Democrat operative is attempting to tarnish both Clinton and Obama, bank-shot-style. As the New Republic's Jason Zengerle wrote when the Muslim-madrassa story first surfaced, "I suppose this information about Obama could have originated with people in Clinton's orbit. But let's not forget where this information appeared. And let's be on the lookout for who goes on the cable shows and wonders whether "Barack Hussein Obama" is "The Manchurian Madrassa Candidate." Something tells me it isn't going to be Hillary, or any liberal for that matter." Drudge isn't exactly a Hillary fan, or a reliable fact witness--to put it mildly.

o. nate, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

initial non-denial is still o_O

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope no one here is under the impression that Hillary wouldn't give something to Drudge.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://wonkette.com/assets/resources/2008/02/HillRI1.jpg

Hatch, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

ha that's pretty great actually

gff, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

they be like YEEEAAAAH when they song come on

gff, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

is there any existing pic from her current campaign where's she's not looking like that

latebloomer, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.snappedshot.com/uploads/Parody/deanScream.jpg

jaymc, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

"YAHH TRICK YAHH"

ciderpress, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^lol

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

o nate that is not an unequivocal denial

YGS, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain Withheld Controversial Abramoff Email

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/25/mccain-withheld-controver_n_88304.html

recently going not so smooth for senator mccain

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 00:44 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously.

McCain seeks to retract 'I lose' statement

On Monday morning, McCain had told reporters that if he can't convince the American people the United States is succeeding, "then I lose. I lose," according to the Associated Press.

"We quickly retracted that," McCain later said of the comment. "I was not allowed to retract it, obviously. I don't mean that I'll quote ‘lose.' I mean that it's an important issue in the judgment of the American voters.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 00:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Now is the season of a thousand lazy zings masquerading as political commentary.

Aimless, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

A 27-point increase in Obama's support nationwide since January 13. Astounding.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 09:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I havent heard any more than soundbites from either candidate and dont really follow US politics very closely but that is amazing.

I find it hard to get past the voice + wild bug eyes +sour lemon face+ pantsuit appearance of hillary, while Obama is the master of the soundbite. Personally he leaves me a little cold in a clinical way, I want to like him, RACIST maybe but theres a feeling I dont like about the guy, oddly Hillary feels more sincere and warm.

Kiwi, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 10:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Dodd to endorse Obama

gabbneb, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 12:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Another reason Hillary can't win: she's not left-handed.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08056/860162-294.stm

StanM, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 12:43 (sixteen years ago) link

^haha THIS^

British R4/World Service going APESHIT over the Somali ceremonial dress photo and how it might have got to Drudge. Also somewhat amazed to hear BBC naming Drudge at all. What I find properly hilarious is that Obama even manages to rock that look, or at least look less silly in ceremonial dress than every politician I can think of. Hillary does not appear to be able to make friends with textiles of any kind and it's like she's still stuck with some Color Me Beautiful book from the '80s.

It is funny to read the Obama autobiography with 20/20 hindsight. I recommend. Obama actually worked for a Nader offshoot in NYC for three months in say '83, trying to implement recycling programmes. Nader is turning into the Harold Stassen of C21, a quarter-century hence.

As to Hillary, feminism and man-management, and why women mark her down for 'standing by her man', if my mother is anything to go by, she would have LOVED it if HRC would have divorced the Screaming Lobster of Hope before embarking on her career in elected office. She might have even considered voting for her in such a scenario, and so would lots of women on the working to middle-class spectrum who are a similar age to Hillary, basically a whole generation of women who have raised families etc. in the fallout of divorcing men who didn't measure up.

I too want Americans to benefit from universal health care FREE AT POINT OF NEED and to have this necessary part of life somehow not dependent on a negotiation with a potential employer or if self-employed, or paying mega playground-bully money to some insurer in exchange for a $5K deductible. The NHS was set up in the UK when there was fuck-all money to do it but there was a collective will to make it happen, so the excuses people make for it being impossible in the current climate are pfffft, really. All I know is that one candidate can't make it happen whoever they are, it has to be bigger than an individual.

Obama is no Blair - I think he's more like a Kevin Rudd type.

suzy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 13:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Also if we're off talking about handedness, let's be really silly and talk about astrology like my mom and I were the other night (her dad was an astrologer).

McCain = Virgo male. Hillary = Scorpio female. Obama = Leo male. Bill Clinton = Leo male. Offhand I can tell you that McCain might be a bigger wonk than you might think (Virgos are anal), Hillary is total Scorp woman in that she has confused marriage to power with yr actual power, and Obama and Bill as Leos are engaged in a King of the Pride thing.

suzy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 13:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://drudgereport.com/nyc.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

working both sides of the street there. THEY CIRCULATED A SMEAR. AND HERE IT IS!

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama is no Blair - I think he's more like a Kevin Rudd type.

Rudd is pretty much the Australian Blair. Fervent Christian, economic conservative, on the right wing of the Labor party.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 14:32 (sixteen years ago) link

working both sides of the street there. THEY CIRCULATED A SMEAR. AND HERE IT IS!

Interesting that they chose a different photo than the one that originally appeared on Drudge. I think the Drudge one was more menacing and looked somehow more Islamic: Obama's bowing his head, in what could be construed as a prayer-like pose, and he looks serious - not smiling, like in the one that the Post and Daily News put on their front page.

o. nate, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

TEH GOGGLES! THEY DOES NOFINK! *sob*

http://i28.tinypic.com/25zt1l1.jpg

StanM, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I havent heard any more than soundbites from either candidate

I'm not sure anyone has.

Finger-pointing in Clinton camp

Lines that were meant to be funny or show fighting spirit — “change you can Xerox” or “Shame on you, Barack Obama” — instead came off as peevish.

Earth to Shrillary: YOU'RE NEVER FUNNY

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

that hillary photo is a trip!!!

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

ok lol at that hillz photo

sleep, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

the 70s gender-studies professor look is a good one for her

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

gross

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i think she looks awesome!

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

does anyone know what shes talking abt there - all the reporters are loling

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Jim O'Rourke has pants just like those.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

working both sides of the street there. THEY CIRCULATED A SMEAR. AND HERE IT IS!

-- That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:29 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

i loled

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ comment on politico:

"Barack Hussein Obama Jr Is A Muslim I can hear the noise of the House of Cards crumbling down: Since the Oscars, Americans now realize who this Trojan Horse is - Barack Hussein Obama Jr is the guy trying to destroy America from inside, while his Sunni Muslim cousin Osama is trying to destroy America from outside! This guy was born as a Muslim, has been a Muslim till he converted to a militant Black Muslim of Luis Farrakkhan-type at the age of 26. As a facade, he is attending a militant Black Trinity United Church of Christ of Chicago, where anti-White hate is preached by pastor Wright. With his wife Michelle he has been harboring resentments of America in their entire adult life. They hate America, they want to destroy it from the inside out. Barack Hussain O is UNELECTABLE, even if he steals the Nomination by hook or crook: 1. During time of war against Al Qaeda, Americans cannot elect a person of Islamic origin with low National loyalty and patriotism. 2. He is too anxious to wine and dine with our perennial enemies: Castro, Ahamedinajad and Kim Ill. 3. His knowledge of the International Politics is ridiculously poor, naive and terribly stupid. Americans can't just trust him. 4. He is a TAX and SPEND bleeding liberal, anxious to hike the SS tax and collect 1 trillion dollars from an ailing economy. 5. He goes around and promises tax cut for every faction of the Society. How in the world is he going to pay for it? He has no sense of fiscal responsibility. Americans just can't trust him with money. 6. In order to pander to some voters, he wants to condone breaking the law: he wants to give drivers license to illegal aliens! He should be knowing that issuing license is a State matter. Is he going to arrest the police and the Governors for refusing to give drivers license to illegals?! We are a land of laws. Instead of upholding the laws of the land, he encourages breaking the law! He is terribly stupid. 7. No bleeding liberal has been elected to the Presidency for the past 30 years. Why now? 8. He is a divider, a liar, a cheat, he hides his true identity from the American people. Therefore, Americans will overwhelmingly reject Barrack Hussein O for the Nomination and the Presidency of this great Nation. The House of Cards are crumbling, like that of Gary Hart, Teddy Kennedy, Chris Dodd and other bleeding FAR LEFT Liberals. Watch them routed out of National politics very soon. VOTE FOR REAL POSITIVE CHANGE; NOT for fuzzy stolen speeches! Vote for Hillary for the First Woman President of America. Make History, people. Cheers."

it almost reads like a bizzaro-political Dr. Bronner's label

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

well maybe just these lines (the slight rhyming):

Since the Oscars, Americans now realize who this Trojan Horse is - Barack Hussein Obama Jr is the guy trying to destroy America from inside, while his Sunni Muslim cousin Osama is trying to destroy America from outside!..militant Black Trinity United Church of Christ of Chicago, where anti-White hate is preached by pastor Wright... Barack Hussain O is UNELECTABLE, even if he steals the Nomination by hook or crook

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm annoyed by people disliking hil's more natural collegiate look. She looks kinda like my sister in the old photos. Anyway, I don't think she has a chance of winning the That 70s Show demographic.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/Hillaryhasasecret.jpg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

So she's always had those cheeks...

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i should hope so

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Fake cheek scandal!

YOUR CHEEKS SHOULD BE YOUR OWN!

kenan, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

No, Zelda korrekt, he's Kevin Rudd only in the sense of 'sorry, aboriginal people' and the professed Xtianity.

suzy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

People who aren't Roxy Muzak.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf w/ that "Since the Oscars" opening to the crazypants rant?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

SurveyUSA - McCain's only at 49% in Texas, with Hil at 43 and O at 41

gabbneb, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Almost every non-politics-following person I know seems to be under the impression that whoever wins the Democratic nomination will inevitably take the other as his or her vice president. I wonder how people who believe this will respond when this does not happen.

Dan I., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

A nice, in-depth look at the various convention-floor-fight/seating-MI-and-FL/super-delegate-arm-twisting/nefarious-Clinton-backroom-dealing scenarios by Michael Tomasky in the NY Review of Books:

A Possibly Super Problem

o. nate, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Almost every non-politics-following person I know seems to be under the impression that whoever wins the Democratic nomination will inevitably take the other as his or her vice president. I wonder how people who believe this will respond when this does not happen.

-- Dan I., Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:04 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I remember reading some crap on CNN where some pro athlete said that Obama/Clinton was the "Dream Team". lolz

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I know two people that have said that!
I was like http://ohnolookoutitsaraygun.com/argh-Picard.jpg

Dan I., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Even as pols go, does anyone doubt that Ojesus and Shrillary intensely dislike each other? as do their organizations? If faking authenticity is key, that ticket would be a nightmare.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

at the various convention-floor-fight/seating-MI-and-FL/super-delegate-arm-twisting/nefarious-Clinton-backroom-dealing scenario

this is not gonna happen now. all speculation is predicated on Hillary winning OH, TX AND PA by wide double-digit margins, which is not going to happen. She's not polling nearly that far ahead anywhere, and all the polling trending data indicates Obama is on the upswing and narrowing her leads with each passing day. (Plus, has she beat Obama by double-digits anywhere to-date?)

Hillary's done. It's all over but for the kicking and screaming.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Probably pretty ridiculous, but I keep forgetting that Hillary isn't a republican

StanM, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

all speculation is predicated on Hillary winning OH, TX AND PA by wide double-digit margins, which is not going to happen

Tomasky says that if Hils can keep Obama to within a 100-delegate lead after OH, TX, and PA, then the game's still on. I don't think she'd need double-digit margins to do that, though I haven't done the detailed delegate math.

o. nate, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

if Hils can keep Obama to within a 100-delegate lead after OH, TX, and PA

I think that's pretty unlikely given the way Texas is shaping up (and the fact that she could win the popular vote there and still get fewer delegates)

dmr, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.pollster.com/08TXPresDems600.png

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's line is like a comfortable eames lounger

remy bean, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf w/ that "Since the Oscars" opening to the crazypants rant?

-- Dr Morbius, Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:38 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

I assumed the reference was to this joke in Jon Stewart's monologue:

"You have to give Barack Obama credit, he's overcome a great deal. Not just he's an African-American. Barack Hussein Obama is his name. His middle name is the last name of Iraq's former tyrant. His last name rhymes with Osama. That's not easy to overcome. I think we all remember the ill-fated 1944 presidential campaign of Gaydolf Titler."

jaymc, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

and clintons line is like a omg i gave up my insano half pulled back hair and hideous stripey pants for this !!!!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Even as pols go, does anyone doubt that Ojesus and Shrillary intensely dislike each other?

listen morbs now you know we all love you and thats why we are all gathered here today... you have to stop w/the nicknaming... this is an intervention.

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

^Even BBC commentators referring to Shrillary at this time. Which doesn't make it right.

suzy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's done. It's all over but for the kicking and screaming.

Not necessarily. Obama may show up to tonight's debate wearing his Native Somali War Garb, which may alienate some voters.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

writing is on the wall in Ohio

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Shrillary Discusses Superdelegates at Black State of the Union lololololol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-__Ckx4Muj4

Plus, has she beat Obama by double-digits anywhere to-date?)

Massachusetts as per video.

Also, lol @ her being proud of getting a fucking disembodied head of Sojourner Truth put up over 4 years. That's the kind of leadership I want; feel-good do nothing bullshit.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.johnlumea.com/images/veruca_salt.jpg

"I WANT THE NOMINATION NOW!!!!"

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/22/michael-moore-insurance-_n_88057.html

Michael Moore said Friday. "Can you imagine, every time Sen. Clinton says that, the licking of the lips that goes on with these health insurance executives?"

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Ick.

suzy, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gC88Jz_3cbKywDYzCvon5M2_KZLAD8V25VQ80

mccain plays the good cop

deej, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

recommending that article shakey linked to a few posts back

jhøshea, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Asked whether the use of Obama's middle name—the same as former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein—is proper, McCain said: "No, it is not

I was not aware that Sadaam Hussein's middle name was Hussein.

President Keyes, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej: Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't get the impression -- from the linked article -- that McCain was just "playing good cop." Bush distanced himself from the Swift Boat ads, but didn't openly disavow them. By contrast, McCain just unequivocally disavowed Cunningham's remarks.

I don't like McCain, but I don't think I can fault him for this one.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I was not aware that Sadaam Hussein's middle name was Hussein.

His full name is Saddam Hussein al-Majid al-Tikriti, and Hussein is his father's given name, so it's functionally his middle name.

jaymc, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Choice Clinton quote from that Superdelegate Youtube video:

"So for some reason, people with those kinds of personal experiences which voters don't have; they see us from afar, they come to a speech, they see us on television, and they vote, and that's a part of the process, and an imporant part."

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Almost every non-politics-following person I know seems to be under the impression that whoever wins the Democratic nomination will inevitably take the other as his or her vice president. I wonder how people who believe this will respond when this does not happen.

-- Dan I., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 18:04 (2 hours ago) Link

This seems like great news to me, it suggests that the embarrassing infighting and planned outrages aren't really making an impression on people.

31g, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej: Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't get the impression -- from the linked article -- that McCain was just "playing good cop." Bush distanced himself from the Swift Boat ads, but didn't openly disavow them. By contrast, McCain just unequivocally disavowed Cunningham's remarks.

I don't like McCain, but I don't think I can fault him for this one.

-- Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:32 PM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i didnt really mean it as a criticism, just a way of acknowledging that its a performance on everyone's part. def enjoying/preferring the sensible discourse mccain's pushing

deej, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

That's the first time that I've actually lol at the Kane clip.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=4d40a39e-8f57-4054-bd99-94bc9d19be1a

The Audacity of Data by Noam Scheiber
Barack Obama's surprisingly non-ideological policy shop.

deej, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Despite Obama's reputation for grandiose rhetoric and utopian hope-mongering, the Obamanauts aren't radicals--far from it. They're pragmatists--people who, when an existing paradigm clashes with reality, opt to tweak that paradigm rather than replace it wholesale.

deej, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

replace it wholesale

obamanauts are suckers who pay retail for adjustment to their paradigms qed

Hunt3r, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah you're right, pragmatism has no place in government

deej, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

i didnt really mean it as a criticism, just a way of acknowledging that its a performance on everyone's part. def enjoying/preferring the sensible discourse mccain's pushing

McCain is also trying to veer the conversation of this election away from Obama's character.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah good luck with that

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

everyone knows American polity prefers intense policy debates vs. broad character evaluations when it comes to voting amirite lolz

not that McCain would win any policy debates either, what with his popular "I am FOR this unpopular" war stance

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

well you can see how well attacks on Obama's character have worked for Hillary's campaign. McCain can't use the same strategy.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

this has been making the rounds. o/t but megalolz

http://johnmanloveforcongress.com/

gff, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

manlove

gff, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

HIS WIFE'S NAME IS GINA MANLOVE

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

well you can see how well attacks on Obama's character have worked for Hillary's campaign. McCain can't use the same strategy.

-- Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:41 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Part of the reason Hillary's attacks have backfired is that it's a primary. McCain can be a lot more negative without suffering for it.

31g, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know why you all continue talking about the 2008 GE, sincethe results have already been leaked.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 26 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

http://memlinglinks.googlepages.com/hillary_clinton_net_wealth.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

NOW TEXAS DOESN'T COUNT EITHER.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought there was a debate tonight?

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:16 (sixteen years ago) link

TONIGHT @ 9. Suggest slogans here, e.g., HRC's Last Stand!

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:20 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL @ the Onion's "War for the White House" graphic.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess if cnn ain't hosting it, they don't care to say anything about it

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The Emperor of Ice-Cream

Call the roller of big cigars,
The muscular one, and bid him whip
In kitchen cups concupiscent curds.
Let the wenches dawdle in such dress
As they are used to wear, and let the boys
Bring flowers in last month's newspapers.
Let be be finale of seem.
The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream.

Take from the dresser of deal,
Lacking the three glass knobs, that sheet
On which she embroidered fantails once
And spread it so as to cover her face.
If her horny feet protrude, they come
To show how cold she is, and dumb.
Let the lamp affix its beam.
The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:25 (sixteen years ago) link

yea it's msnbc, and you can stream it live from their website i think

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:32 (sixteen years ago) link

That Wallace Stevens poem was supposed to be set in Key West, I think. Random trivia, but there it is.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:32 (sixteen years ago) link

wallace stevens opposes nationalized health care

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

and voted for Dewey and Eisenhower!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL @ MSNBC hyping this debate like an NFL Playoff Game: Tonight's Debate -- Obama v. Clinton -- Message v. Voice -- Which Will Win?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:44 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC was fun to watch in 2007 when everything was building up. Since the voting has begun, though, I feel icky just watching. They've completely lost control of themselves.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC is still my favorite of the cable news networks, but only because it has Keith Obermann, who I like, because he's bright, articulate and since he doesn't challenge any of my preexisting views.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Even Olbermann is becoming insufferable at times now. Why don't they just give Rachel Maddow her own show...like NOW?!

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, I like her too. She's bright, articulate and doesn't challenge any of my preexisting views.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i like them best cause when youve got mathews oberman and russert together in the same room its all kinds of delightful crazy self-regard bonanza

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, maddow is great. and olberman, who i have always loved, is really hard to take in big doses.

YGS, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 01:55 (sixteen years ago) link

ho snap!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:04 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton: nooooo dont u understand healthcare is myyyyy thing

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

obama: yr a whiner lady

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

comcast took my msnbc away a couple months back and their website's WATCH DEBATE LIVE NOW STREAMING VIDEO HOO HAH is not working. Please keep my updated with the zings.

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't worry about MSNBC's website. You can watch the debate on more obscure websites without bandwidth problems. I'm watching it from the website of the Zanesville Times Recorder:

http://www.zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see how Clinton bitching about the media is going to change any minds.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Just tuned in. Has HRC been this defensive all along? "Before I start, let me say that over the course of the past few debates, I've consistently been asked to answer the tough questions first, see SNL for an accurate parody of this."

OH MY!

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I've only vaguely paid attention, but she seems not terrible tonight - sober, serious, wonkish without being intellectual or using Senate-speak. The real Hillary. Show, don't tell.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

her campaign manager said something similar yesterday daniel. "SNL is really putting the screws to you media types!" it was pretty wow.

And thanks a bunch for the link, Nathan!

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

also I like her suit < / sexism> tho I think it was probably the wrong thing to wear on Tyra

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - No problem.

BTW, does anyone think Clinton seems pretty angry right now? Obviously her campaign has had some problems with MSNBC, and throughout this she's been walking a thin line between forceful and pissed-off. It's a risky move.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL at HRC citing David Gergen for support.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Besides fighting for labor and environmental protections, how can any presidential candiate rail against or repeal NAFTA?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Man Obama is stealing Hillary's talking points left and right

31g, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

hiiiiillary you were the first lady - that doesnt count as foreign policy experience gaaaaaaah

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama sure seems in control of this debate, but maybe I'm not seeing enough of it.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

theyre both looking pretty on point tonight

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary is maybe reaching a tad

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's answer was excellent -- but bombing a sovereign nation w/out its leader's permission?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

does tim russert think that he is running for president?

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama is v. comfortable on these foreign policy questions, despite his much-touted "lack of experience."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

im enjoying russert taking the role of iraq here

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

tim russert is winning this debate so far

ciderpress, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

GET OUT MY COUNTRY

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

tim russert drinks diet sunkist

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

tim russert is my new bicycle

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

nice Russert smackdown

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

BAD ANSWER, HRC. The whole point of Presidential campaigns is to consider hypotheticals.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.freesqueeze.com/images/TimRussert.jpg

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

(I know Russert is a hit-and-run artist, but the way he set them up on that question was pretty masterful).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

russerts gonna make them kiss the ring before the nights over

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:46 (sixteen years ago) link

No. Look at her stare. HRC is sizing up Obama for the kill.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

(OH, HAHA, I THOUGHT YOU SAID RUSSERT WOULD MAKE HRC/OBAMA KISS)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I don't think Clinton's strategy of yelling a lot is going to draw many people to her camp.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

...and russert doesn't let her make the kill

ciderpress, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

uh oh while they are away for commercial clinton might actually murder one of these two for cutting her off.

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

She will plow through Russert like a hot knife through butter to slash Obama's throat.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Thank goodness for the commercial break. Just enough time to catch 2 minutes of "Namaste Yoga" on FitTV.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/16_hillarydebate_lg.jpg
now let me ask you a question mr russert what if big russ came back to life and told you that if you killed one thousand american babies you and him could live for eternity in a cosmic rainbow cloud castle - WHAT WOULD U DO THEN HUUH?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:52 (sixteen years ago) link

oh this should be fantastic.

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:53 (sixteen years ago) link

gah the endless hillary fake smiling/laughing gaaaaaah

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Palpatine's laugh is warmer.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

This answer by Obama isn't as powerful as it could be. He has pretty detailed position papers and is well-versed on policy. He should say so.

(i.e., it's not just about 2 or 3 anecdotal examples of things he's done).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

The AP likes the phrase "trade jabs" a lot

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link

takes a fighter to lose lol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait what was the question I was "working"

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

LOCKBOX LOCKBOX LOCKBOX

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Question to Obama: What do you say about HRC's line that you're all "rhetoric and no substance"?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

(xp to Eppy)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

as president i would put senator clinton in a lockbox and not let her out for nine years

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

thx

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is starting to win now - all these clips of clinton being weird over the last week are looking rough

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

OK that was his best debate answer ever.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, Russert is trying hard to tag Obama now.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

soooo hillary whered the 35 million come from???

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

And he (Russert) hit him. There's no easy explaination for Obama opting-out of public financing (if he does it).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"Senator Clinton, the question is **WHY** won't you, not WHEN will you!!!!!!!!"

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

WAHT?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

"I've a little busy right now. Fuck off.'

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

did she say she's "a little woozy" here?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

YES OBAMA! What a savvy answer this is.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

obama certainly does have a number of easy explanations for opting out of public financing - for instance his g.e. opponent is breaking campaign finance law as we speak

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I know she said it's hard out here for a pimp to have fun on the trail

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I can hear the hacks now: "THIS IS HIS SISTA SOULJA MOMENT"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is not enjoying this line of farakaan questioning

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

STROKE THE JEWS HUSSEIN

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

a smooth attempt to "distance" himself from a loyal campaign supporter. I'm not sure it's working.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

the farakaan question is bullshit too, such an irrelevant issue

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary: I DON'T LIKE NAZIS EITHER

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Disagree, Alfred. I think he handled it fine. And he was really clear in disavowing Farakaan.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Please link choice clips.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:13 (sixteen years ago) link

t/s: denouncement vs. rejection.

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

See? He handled it fine.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary-- Denouncing Anti-Semites was politically risky move in New York

mulla atari, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

WHOA

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

God why isn't NBC playing the 30 Rock "Cleveland" song as the bumper music?

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha awesome

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

She used the "It depends on what the definition of `is' is" defense, he says, "OK, you wanna play. FUCK OFF."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMA: "WHATEVER HILLS"

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary hits the wall

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Is this streaming anywhere?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

So far this is by some distance their best debate.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Be warned that there's a super-annoying banner ad playing there

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.cleveland.com/live/video/

ciderpress, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:19 (sixteen years ago) link

this is actually kind of good, huh?

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:19 (sixteen years ago) link

This may be known as Obama's ORNALDO BLOOMPS moment.

He took down that Hillary thing HARDCORE. DAMMMNNN.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

That was a close save on the Farrakhan question, and it might not have been enough for Ohioans on the fence. He was lucky that he got a second chance - irrelevant or not, he should have been ready for it, and it's going to matter to some people in Ohio who are wavering on him.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Russert: "What's up with this Russian guy?"

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Putiy-patootey

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:23 (sixteen years ago) link

"Muh Ma Meved-divah. Whatever."

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

At least she didn't call him menudo

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Earth to Shrillary: YOU'RE NEVER FUNNY

Disproven in 12 hours!

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Eep. Clinton just had a very Bush-esque moment. "Mededeveva..whatever." (Chuckle)

Yeah, believe it or not, it's pretty damn important to know the name of the next leader of Russia!

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Or at least not pull the glib card.

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess come to think of it Russia is kinda like Menudo these days.

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Russert's Job Interview Question: "Tell me your worst quality."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

russert's being a badass

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Putin's puppet going to replace Ahmadinejad as the guy whose name is too evil to pronounce correctly?

mulla atari, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Terry Schiavo!

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:28 (sixteen years ago) link

"4 coming up and maybe more after that."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know about this last Obama answer. . . .

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Excellent Schiavo answer.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC won on the Russia question, btw.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

O copies the C closing statement from last time and does it better

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG that Schiavo answer was awesome

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought Schiavo answer was kinda lame, but it was a better do-no-harm answer than she would have come up with, probably

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama: "I'd be a better president because people do not hate me."

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama: "I AM IRON MAN."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:34 (sixteen years ago) link

wow she looks so fucking tired.

gr8080, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I like the perfunctory Clinton-Russert shake

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama: "I'd be a better president because people do not hate me."

LOL

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

that HRC line about being the first questioned and the pillow will haunt her for the next news cycle.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

NORRISTOWN, Pa. - Montgomery County authorities say a man stabbed his brother-in-law during an argument over who should get the Democratic nomination for president.
ADVERTISEMENT

What's more, Jose Ortiz, 28, who's charged with felony assault, is a registered Republican.

District Attorney Risa Ferman said Ortiz supports Hillary Clinton and Sean Shurelds supports Barack Obama. She told reporters Monday that the two got into an argument in a Collegeville home Thursday night and Shurelds tried to choke Ortiz. She says Ortiz then stabbed Shurelds in the abdomen.

Shurelds was taken to a hospital in critical condition, but is expected to recover.

Beatrix Kiddo, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:40 (sixteen years ago) link

that HRC line about being the first questioned and the pillow will haunt her for the next news cycle.

So true, and such an odd line-in-the-sand for her to draw tonight.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't watch SNL--is the pillow thing actually a joke they made?

Eppy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Is this the sketch she was referring to?

http://www.sodahead.com/poll/52744/

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Was HRC's answer that she'd like to have a "do-over" on her Iraq Authorization Bill vote a good or bad answer for her (politically)? I'm not sure.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:55 (sixteen years ago) link

How could it not be good?

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see how tonight helps her.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Eppy--yeah it was an actual joke.

31g, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

It arguably admits a major gaffe on her part that plays into Obama's narrative (that HRC's alleged "experience" is irrelevant if she displays bad judgment).

(xp to Remy)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Because you could play it off as "She's ready on day one to fuck up and then say 'sorry i totally fucked up i would like a mulligan please' as the world burns around her." xpost.

Clay, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I still think the most important moment of the night was Obama's bizarre aversion to an outright rejection of Farrakhan. I think that will only create problems for him in Ohio.

(I should note that it doesn't bother me personally. I'm not worried about the answer, and I plan to vote for him on the 4th.)

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Daniel,

I think it came across as honest (if obvious) without providing any new grist for discussion.

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:00 (sixteen years ago) link

chris matthews getting a boner over russert's ability to get hillary to admit she'd take back her iraq vote.

gr8080, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

nasty, grady

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

no one in ohio gives a rat's ass about louis farrakhan

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

do they?

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I think people do. Obviously his notoriety has diminished in recent years, but a lot of older voters remember him and some of the things he's said and done. If they were on the fence about voting for an African-American (as a lot of older, more moderate Democrats are), that might have been enough to keep them away from Obama.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't wait to see the exit poll figures on that.

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:21 (sixteen years ago) link

The Farrakhan thing is just something the Republicans can use in the ge.

31g, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

No, it's not just limited to the GE. I can definitely see it having some sway among moderate Ohio Democrats.

I may very well be wrong (and I hope I am), but we'll just have to wait and see. I mean, Obama got the opportunity to save himself (and Russert seemed pretty surprised that he wasn't ready for the question and didn't jump on it) - it'll just be a matter of whether or not his answer was decisive enough.

For her part, Clinton didn't miss a beat. She gave the answer that he should have given. It was one of her better moments.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

The Farrakhan thing is just something the Republicans can use in the ge.

I may be wrong, too, Nathan, but I don't think Obama's answer will cause him problems in Ohio or the GE. We'll see.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Matthews: if the wife's gonna cancel the husband's vote, maybe they should just stay home, amirite?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

that was kinda funny, axully

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

he didn't actually say that, but it was pretty close

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's a real stretch to think "the Farrakhan thing" will have any impact on Ohio. I doubt most voters know who he is, and the ones that do, and think it's a problem, are probably Republicans. Can this be played up in the general election? Maybe, but I doubt this one has any more legs than the other racist tropes that have come out.

I still find it hard, when I hear the name Farrakhan, not to automatically rap to myself "Farrakhan's a prophet that I think you ought to listen to", even though I know how the Farrakhan family treated Malcolm X as well as the nutty stuff he's said since.

Euler, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

It's kind of assholish to REJECT someone's endorsement of you, I mean.. I think Barack answered the question very well and repeatedly stated that he denounced Farrakhan's views on Israel/Judaism... that said, Russert was sort of being a dick about the whole thing but I guess that's his schtick. I knew this would come up, better now than in the GE I guess.

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:34 (sixteen years ago) link

You wouldn't hesistate to reject David Duke's endorsement, I assume.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:35 (sixteen years ago) link

What about Professor Griff's?

Euler, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't compare Farrakhan and David Duke...

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

but thats kind of besides the point anyway

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

what is he supposed to say "I DO NOT WANT UR ENDORSEMENT FUCK OFF", it's not like Farrakhan is campaigning for him

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I still find it hard, when I hear the name Farrakhan, not to automatically rap to myself "Farrakhan's a prophet that I think you ought to listen to"

Ha, ha -- Euler OTM

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Do people still care about Farrakhan? I mean, is there a significant population that Obama would have lost if he had just said "I reject Farrakhan's endorsement"? I assumed that there is, but I'm not really basing that on anything.

31g, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

There I agree, BW. Obama handled the question well, as I said above.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton lost ohio tonight.

YGS, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Think so? It would follow the pattern: HRC has a lead until Obama introduces himself to the state's electorate.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I sense another dynamic at work now, too: I think Democratic voters want this primary over, so we can avoid a nasty convention and focus on McCain. Plus, as electability becomes a bigger issue, it helps Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:43 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, just looking at what people are going to walk away remembering/regurgitating in the press: clinton's complaint about press treatment, her vigor during the health care debate that caused her to even interrupt williams and the fact that she was regularly blushing in anger and frustration. i thought her frustration was warranted, but it's beside the point, as people will only remember the result. obama was great. he has really gotten much, much better at these things.

YGS, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:43 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - I don't think it's a stretch. Farrakhan's a prominent anti-Semite, and I imagine Obama's answer is going to be problematic for lots of Jews, many of whom will be voting in Democratic primaries, and for other moderate Democrats who remember Farrakhan's heyday. I'm thinking of my grandmother, for example, or a lot of the blue-collar union guys I worked summer jobs with. They're part of the old Democratic coalition, and they're a little hesitant about voting for an African-American, and if this gets any significant media play over the next week, it could present problems for Obama.

Republicans are definitely going to make a big deal of it, though. Hopefully you're right, and it will be limited to them.

another xpost - rejecting endorsements of homophobes, anti-Semites, and so on, isn't really asshole-ish behavior. It's good politics.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i was kinda hoping Hillary would randomly cackle in the middle of serious Obama answer, apropos of nothing

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe. FWIW, I'm Jewish, and Obama's answer doesn't bother me. It may for some (I'm a Democrat, anyway, so maybe I'm not a good barometer).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought Obama's answer was great. Hillary's kind of bugged me.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I do not see what was problematic about his answer, really. You need to be specific Nathan.

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:47 (sixteen years ago) link

And now here's the MSNBC panel -- who helps set opinion -- saying Obama defused that very issue (Farrakhan).

.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary: Your people are so important I stooped to purportedly putting my career on the line for them. I hope you remember that and don't dump me for this glib new guy.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone who took issue with his answer is just nitpicking over semantics really...

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - the specific problem is that instead of saying, "Farrakhan is an anti-Semite and I don't want his support," which would have been easy and the best answer, he hedged and stuttered about how he "denounced" Farrakhan's words but didn't reject his support - he simply refused to use the word, even when pressed by an obviously surprised Tim Russert. He looked unsure of himself and kind of stuttered his way through the answer - admittedly, it reads better than it sounded. But his whole bit about denouncing without rejecting sounds like he's trying to have it both ways, and people who don't like Farrakhan are wondering, "Why doesn't he just say it already?" Instead he rambled on a bit about how the campaign didn't solicit his report, and it just sounded weak.

Worse, it gave Clinton an opening to make a strong answer on the same issue, and she flatly stated about an anti-Semitic group that endorsed her, "I made it very clear that I did not want their support. I rejected it. I said that it would not be anything I would be comfortable with. And it looked as though I might pay a price for that. But I would not be associated with people who said such inflammatory and untrue charges against either Israel or Jewish people in our country."

Luckily, Obama got a chance to save himself, but he screwed up the first answer and gave Clinton a chance to look principled, strong, and clearheaded in comparison. It was not a good moment for him, and it's more than just semantics.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:54 (sixteen years ago) link

And of course, by "report" I mean "support."

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

was out this evening, can anyone hook a bro up with a youtube channel for my debate fix? getting the shakes/cold sweats/paranoid it's not pretty.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

it's being rebroadcast right now

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:02 (sixteen years ago) link

the part that resonated more for me on that answer was him bringing up the help of jewish people in civil rights. i thought that was a nice point to bring up and definitely helped.

YGS, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago) link

tell me I'm not the only one who wants to see a Tim Russert slasher flick

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago) link

if I ever get access to a photo scanner, maybe someday I'll post gabbneb_Russert.jpg

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see the need to just flatly REJECT his support, Obama made it rather clear that he finds some of Farrakhan's views (namely his views on Judaidm/Isreal) reprehensible, which was what Russert was trying to bait him about.. like I said, it's not as if Farrakhan will be a surrogate campaigning for him, he's just voiced his personal support of Obama.. it's such a non-issue, really.

And I agree YGS, that black-jewish relations part was great.

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:06 (sixteen years ago) link

every time I hear "native garb" I think of the not-un-Brian-Williams-looking Roland Burton Hedley

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, how awful is Tim Russert as a moderator? Hilary is totally right about his dumb ass hypotheticals... plus he kept talking over Hilary....

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - Unfortunately, non-issues can matter a lot.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:08 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, you're right. I really doubt that this will hurt him though (at least I hope it doesn't...)

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Hilary is totally right about his dumb ass hypotheticals...

Yeah, because no president's foreign policy team should ever set up plans for things that could happen. They should be waiting for things to occur and then make decisions on the spot.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe it wasn't the best answer, vote-getting-wise, but she was totally right

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:34 (sixteen years ago) link

No, she wasn't. It's not unreasonable to ask for a response to a hypothetical situation (there were some interesting points made about hypotheticals in a Slate article earlier in the campaign).

There are lots of extremely smart, qualified people in government who spend most of their time preparing for hypothetical situations. It's not too much to ask how a President would respond to a plausible international crisis.

Nathan, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:37 (sixteen years ago) link

^^otm

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i liked the hypothetical, but what's kind of lame is that i'm not sure a GOP debate would get the same squirm factor. essentially the question is, "okay, you fucked up (even if you didn't, we're saying you did), what are you going to do about it and wouldn't you basically do what the GOP candidates are saying we should do?" let's put you into a (not so) hypothetical corner where your opinion is wrong and you're an asshole.

msp, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:09 (sixteen years ago) link

the hypotheticals were awful, refusal to answer was hillary's best move of the night

fuck a tim russert

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:20 (sixteen years ago) link

her trying to pull an anti-semitic card on barack was fucked up too

I think he defused it by laughing it off

"lol ok I reject AND denounce"

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I still don't see why Russert's hypotheticals were awful. If/when we withdraw from Iraq, Al Qaeda will almost certainly increase their profile and the decision on whether or not to RE-intervene will be on the table for the next four years. Asking what course of action a presidential candidate would take once in office is a pretty valid question, imho.

Maybe a timed debate isn't the greatest place to address the issue, but these are things that need to be asked.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:27 (sixteen years ago) link

it was like a TRIPLE hypothetical

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I kept wanting to say "and what if a unicorn appears .... WHAT THEN???"

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:33 (sixteen years ago) link

a red unicorn

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, maybe Russert was foaming at the mouth a little bit with his set up, but for Hillary to dismiss the premise altogether was a bad move.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 06:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, surprising to no one, Obama's church denomination is being investigated by the IRS, cuz, like, he spoke there, and stuff.

kingfish, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 07:02 (sixteen years ago) link

In other thoughts, this is of course really obvious, but I have a mixed feeling of both anticipation and apprehension for how the rest of the campaign is going to go. Just for the insanity of all the RWA follower-types losing their shit over a Democrat possibly getting elected, much less one of THESE Democrats.

I mean, there'll be all sorts of weird shit come summer, but once we hit october, it's going to be Jodorowsky-level unhinged. I mean, look at all the great fun we had in October 2006. So many mad political types running about like a Bloom County cartoon, only these assholes are probably going to be more violent.

kingfish, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 07:13 (sixteen years ago) link

dudes, the "denounce vs reject" thing showed Obama at his best. He showed how tedious the semantics game is.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:07 (sixteen years ago) link

the early returns are not kind to hillary

http://i25.tinypic.com/axi8li.jpg
http://i26.tinypic.com/25exq1c.jpg
http://i32.tinypic.com/znx9jd.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:29 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i32.tinypic.com/9898r6.jpg
http://i26.tinypic.com/xn6wxx.jpg
http://i29.tinypic.com/20qfllj.jpg

somehow drudge has the mildest headline?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:30 (sixteen years ago) link

now we are all drudge

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:34 (sixteen years ago) link

that nytimes article is unbelievably bad

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/us/politics/27watch.html

it accuses obama of mispronouncing massachusetts?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:36 (sixteen years ago) link

dude it's alessandra stanley - tv critic

i thought this bit was good -

When Mrs. Clinton insisted on adding to her remarks about Iraq when it was time for a break, the usually unflappable Brian Williams looked affronted. “Television does not stop,” Williams said sharply. “Can you hold that thought until we come back from a break?”

can you believe these f*cking people, that doesn't even make sense

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:50 (sixteen years ago) link

lol tv critic - i did not catch that - explains a lot

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 12:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Why I keep saying McCain will win the GE. McCain -- the grizzled War Hero -- is seen as stronger and tougher.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"Television does not stop. Can you hold that thought until we come back from a break?"

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:12 (sixteen years ago) link

My wife also thinks McCain will win for the same reason (couldn't actually read that article due to log-in requirement).

I don't know if that's the case. Obama could win on GOTV and charisma. One obvious comparison is Dole/Clinton, although McCain might not come off as kindly and grandpa-like as Dole.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I logged in with the first one here

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't underestimate McCain's age as a potential drag on his campaign.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe, Hurting. But Obama's on the roll of his life now, and he still at significant disadvantage vis-a-vis McCain. (xp)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:22 (sixteen years ago) link

still at significant disadvantage

whaaaa? hes way ahead in every poll and has been all along

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama is within the margin of error from McCain in that poll.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:27 (sixteen years ago) link

And you're talking about a very established, well-known candidate vs. an upstart at this point, so Obama still has the chance to win plenty of people over.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Not to mention that you're matching a candidate still fighting it out in primaries with one that's already the presumptive nominee.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:30 (sixteen years ago) link

lol one poll where theyre tied and like 20 that obamas ahead by as much as 15 points

mccain can win but the deck is srsly stacked against him - independents are all voting dem in the primaries - the gop is just hemorrhaging voters - its really hard to overstate the damage bush has done to the party - for further evidence see the 06 elections

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:41 (sixteen years ago) link

lol the gop still wont line up behind mccain - huckabee polling @ up to 40% in texas

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

tell me I'm not the only one who wants to see a Tim Russert slasher flick

You're not alone -- he was scary when he started screaming "GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY NOW!"

Nicole, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:49 (sixteen years ago) link

obama was great. he has really gotten much, much better at these things.

-- YGS, Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:43 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

^^^this

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:56 (sixteen years ago) link

that ny times article is awful, russert was an asshole to both of them, and he cut off obama a number of times also

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:56 (sixteen years ago) link

He acted like he was the one running for president.

Nicole, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:57 (sixteen years ago) link

If either of those two are elected he'll be running from the president.

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

We'll see. Let's put it this way, given how much Bush has damaged the GOP brand, I think most Democratic leaders and strategists would have been very surprised if you told them, six months ago, that they'd be running neck-and-neck or behind the GOP nominee in February. And don't discount the key findings of that poll: McCain seen as the stronger leader, and better equipped to handle Iraq and terrorism.

To me, much of what you need to know about this election comes from the early graphs of an article in the current edition of Rolling Stone:

Behind me, a pair of aging Soccer Moms in acrylic sweaters sing McCain's praises. "I can't even imagine being a prisoner of war," says Mom Number One. "It must be so hard."

"Yeah," agrees Number Two. "You know he won't surrender over there."

"Mm-hmm," says the first. Then, after a pause: "Oh, hey, you know what I watched yesterday? Saving Private Ryan. And We Were Soldiers."

"Oh, those are great war movies," says Mom Number Two. "Great war movies."

Another pause. Then, "Oh, I went to that new buffet," says Mom Number One. "The one with the salads. I have to say, I'm not that into sweetbreads."

I want to choke the life out of both of them. But how do you communicate to someone the sheer insanity of voting to bomb the fuck out of some distant country while you sit safe and cozy in the Virginia suburbs, evaluating sweetbreads — just so the world can keep on feeling like the heroic war movies you rock yourself to sleep with on Sunday afternoons?

The answer is you can't.

So again, we'll see . . .

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago) link

those women sound like REPUBLICANS. no one is saying that there aren't a lot of republicans in the US, and many of them support mccain.

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

also, I have a hard time reconciling people finding mccain as the 'strong leader on iraq' when every other poll states that americans want us out of iraq by a 2/3rds margin.

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sure they are, akm. And as to the disconnect between public opinion on Iraq and McCain's position on it, that's been true in the GOP primaries, as well. McCain -- for whatever reason -- cleans up among people who want us out of Iraq the fastest. I don't think it's because people don't know his position. I think it's because people vote on vague impressions (sometimes including vague impressions of policy positions) and character, less so on policy positions.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I call bullshit on that Rolling Stone article - there's no way two soccer moms were discussing great war movies and sweetbread buffets.

I DIED, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

That article is embarrassing.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

You're right that the article is analytically shoddy (lots of RS political coverage is), but that has nothing to do with the paragraphs I quoted.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link

no, I'm referring to the quotes being totally fabricated in order to advance the author's argument.

I DIED, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link

STRAWWOMEN

I DIED, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

OK that was his best debate answer ever.

Which one was that?

Obama: "If you've watched Saturday Night Live for the last year, Hillary's a haughty ice-bitch."

I turned on WNYC when I got home last night, and they were replaying the debate; I lasted 15 seconds of a Rodham nonresponse. You folks are masochists.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

daniel get a hold of yrself its one poll plz to look at million other polls that have obama up by double digits jeez cherry picking

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

You folks are masochists.

I gotta agree. (In that I'm honestly surprised so many of you are watching these debates still -- then again I've avoided them entirely, they strike me as being huge distractions at best.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:56 (sixteen years ago) link

when you don't have cable,have blown thru your batch of Netflix films, and are single, it's a decent way of spending 45 minutes.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm all of those things (Netflix aside) but have resisted this conclusion.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

it's a decent way of spending 45 minutes

that's true ... too bad they last for 90

I skipped the texas one but felt like this one was the last stand and I should watch ... there were a couple interesting bits but mostly I was annoyed at russert trying to manufacture news

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

For someone as dedicated to right-wing political blogs as yourself, Ned, I'm not sure that you're in a great position to be calling other people masochistic!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Hooray!

(I'll say that the big advantage with reading as opposed to watching/listening -- I don't have visuals and voices stuck in my head whether I want it or not.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

The debates I've seen have been 100,000,000,000,000,000% more informative than any coverage (and that includes the entirety of "liberal blogosphere")

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

that's true ... too bad they last for 90

That's when I return to Robert A. Caro.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer, I haven't watched any presidential debates since 1992, so I doubt I'm going to be won over now.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

this was the only debate that actually held my attention the whole time fwiw

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah me too

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary gave a pretty solid answer on the russia pop quiz question and the russ dawg still had to get in his smug knowitall schtick. "WELL if you had done yr homework like me you would know he is a 40-year-old law professor and amateur chess champion, his favorite color is green and he's a Leo"

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

the idea that listening to the candidates actually talk about their views -- rather than hearing them filtered through press/pundits -- is a distraction is tenuous at best

YGS, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Sunny said that Russert looks like an Aussie.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm perfectly willing to concede that 90% of my interest is for the histrionics.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i do have to admit that I think Hillary is more impressive when she talks about foreign policy, Obama often comes across as a little hesitant. I mean I voted for him and support him but I think she talks that talk a lot better than he does. I think he needs to work on this a bit before the GE (duh obviously he will)

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Russert went to my alma mater. /max

brownie, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary is a better debater, period. the parts where she gets tripped up are where the facts just aren't on her side, ie any discussion of the Iraq war or the back and forth last night over NAFTA. other than that she's usually really solid. (except for the attempted SNL zing which was axtremely dumb.)

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

the idea that listening to the candidates actually talk about their views -- rather than hearing them filtered through press/pundits -- is a distraction is tenuous at best

Position papers, speeches, voting records -- even, if you like, debate transcripts -- these are things all readily available for research and review. Words as well as actions can be accessed very easily, especially now, and you'll forgive me if I prefer to do so that way, at my own pace and in my own preferred way, rather than televised debates.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

AXTREME. extremely (xpost to myself)

aside from sounding like whining, does she think we switch medias for the general election? you have to live w/ these people. running against the media seems like a terrible strategy all around and I don't think most voters give a shit.

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I realized last night that what I don't like about her is that she's too sarcastic and comes across as patronizing. maybe that's what everyone doesn't like about her, I dunno, but it took me until last night to realize this.

akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

dont forget abt the plastered on smile! (srsly so strange)

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I can see the debates being of some value (tho not face value) if I hadn't already made up my mind and voted in a primary, but I have.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

there's an argument to be made over the importance of one's televised persona, but I am too lazy to make it.

bnw, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

There's an argument to be made for it, but I think it's safe to say that our present political system overemphasizes it.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I think a better argument to be made is that DEBATING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE JOB OF BEING PRESIDENT. Televised persona is infinitely more important to the "job" of being president than any kind of spirited mediated arguing and nitpicking.

Dimension 5ive, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, D5's putting it better than I could, and separating out the key point for me.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh and those grapes? I bet they were sour, anyway.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Amazing!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I think an even better argument is that presidential debates aren't real debates. They're just opportunities to land punchlines. OMG Hillary says she doesn't like NAFTA but before she said she wanted to marry it! A real debate might require candidates address what NAFTA is in depth and why it's important and place it in the larger context of free trade. Also not ask candidates about shit that presidents don't even have any control over, like whether illegal immigrants get drivers' licenses.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but it's obvious stuff like that that tends to get lost in political silly season.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I never thought I'd be saying this, but I actually found this recent series of debates to be relatively substantive. This will be the sixth presidential election I've voted in and I don't recall any debates in the prior 20 years approaching this level of nuance.

Not that the bar has been set very high.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I read that as "approaching this level of menace."

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I think they're probably better than they were the last two elections, which were the only ones in my lifetime where I was old enough to pay good attention. But yes, the bar is low.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's a menace sponge. McCain will vanish into his Black Hole.

Hadrian VIII, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

the last two debates were great, altho partly because obama's best performances were in both of them - less 'uhhh's and more substantive.

i really enjoy watching these tho i have no illusions about 'what they mean' or whether they in some way impact the person's ability to be a president.

Bragging about not paying attention to this shit is kinda corny to me

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

"ho ho I don't even watch TELEVISION"

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain will vanish into (Obama's) Black Hole.

Sounds like the beginnings of a 527 ad, to me.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

general election kinda startin already huh?

By LIBBY QUAID, Associated Press Writer
7 minutes ago

TYLER, Texas - Republican presidential hopeful John McCain mocked Democrat Barack Obama on Wednesday for saying he would take action as president "if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq."
ADVERTISEMENT

"When you examine that statement, it's pretty remarkable," McCain told a crowd in Tyler, Texas.

"I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq. It's called `al-Qaida in Iraq,'" McCain said, drawing laughter at Obama's expense.

Obama quickly answered back, telling a rally at Ohio State University in Columbus, "I do know that al-Qaida is in Iraq."

"So I have some news for John McCain," he added, saying there was no al-Qaida presence in Iraq until President Bush invaded the country.

Noting that McCain likes to tell audiences that he'd follow Osama bin Laden to the "gates of hell" to catch him, Obama taunted: "All he (McCain) has done is to follow George Bush into a misguided war in Iraq."

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

This will be the ultimate *zing!* election, won't it?

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Noting that McCain likes to tell audiences that he'd follow Osama bin Laden to the "gates of hell" to catch him, Obama taunted: "All he (McCain) has done is to follow George Bush into a misguided war in Iraq."

NICE

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah. This is why I think Obama will do well against the worst GOP attacks (e.g., he's a secret Muslim, an Islamofacsist, unpatriotic), and certainly better against those attacks than some recent losing Democratic Presidential nominees(e.g., Kerry, Mondale and Dukakis). He isn't passive. He'll fight back. I was worried about this earlier in the primary cycle, when he seemed soft in his approach to HRC when he was behind. But, it turns out I think, that he was, in fact, letting John Edwards hammer away at her for him. Now that he's got her in a one-on-one setting, he's able to deflect, absorb and turn-around attacks on him in a savvy way.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Give it up Hillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago) link

haha McCain is ahead on the economy. that'll change fast in a GE w/ Obama.

Simon H., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

so will the war issue

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't really imagine mccain being ahead on any issues except nat'l security once the GE gets rolling.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain can't keep from sticking his foot in his mouth about nat'l security - he's already done it TWICE! - and Obama will nail him on it. He voted for a stupid war, and continues to say it was a good idea. He hasn't caught Bin Laden. He, quite despicably, caved in on torturing detainees. McCain's got nothing.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

health care is a pretty stark division between the parties too

I don't know the ins and outs of mccain's position but I imagine it'll be something like "it's socialism" or "we can't afford it" .... leaving him as simply being "against change" (and by now I think most ppl want the health system changed) as Obama (or Hillary) talks about "here's how we get this done"

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i was a little disappointed to hear obama refer to the assassinated al-qaaeda leader as their third in command - lol most dangerous job in the world

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain's got nothing

except the precedent of 42 white men. Don't underestimate it.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I meant nothing in regards to nat'l security. Obviously he's got the Great White Patriarchy vote sewed up.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain doesn't want to be the next Bush

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

except the precedent of 42 white men. Don't underestimate it.

how many were taller than him?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

is there something wrong with McCain's hands? He seems to do the Bob-Dole-Grips-A-Pen thing a lot.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not positive, Shakey, but I think his hand and arm problems are a result of his time as a POW.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, broke his arms when his plane crashed just before he was taken prisoner. Can't raise his arms above his head anymore.

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, but maybe that's how he voted for the war?

"Hands up everyone who doesn't want to invade Iraq?"

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

(it's pretty incredible that they have the picture next to this by the way)

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

It is. You're going to see those pictures blasted across the nation through the GE, I think, to underscore the point: WAR HERO.

And he is.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

albeit in a war that had zip to do with "fighting for America."

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

"remember that last pointless war that wasted thousands of American lives and billions of dollars? no, the other one..."

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, Dr. M, in spite of that.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Oy vey. More of this to come all through November, I'm sure.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I respect the hell out of McCain. But would never vote for him, ever.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

He also compared Obama to the founder of Islam, remarking that both had a white mother and black father, according to the Associated Press.

im pretty sure farrakhan was talking about the founder of the NATION of islam

and what, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

but... Obama already "denounced and rejected" Farrakhan on nat'l television just last night.

(Also, Farrakhan not cool obviously but CIA DID push crack into the inner cities. fact)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

obama aint lying that hes got extensive jewish support in IL

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I respect McCain except for all the crooked shit he pulls/pulled-- keating, the loan collateral, shady deals for companies his wife is on the board of, cozy with lobbyists, etc

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I used to respect him but I snapped out of it in the last few years of watching him kiss bush's ass

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I respect the fact he could have gone home from 'Nam right after he was captured, but refused to do so unless the POWs who were captured before him. I also said I wouldn't vote for him, partially for the reasons you just listed.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I actually have cast a vote for mccain .... 2000 gop primary in virginia (open primary, you can jump in on either side .... thought it would be worth it to try and derail bush. didn't happen)

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I used to respect him but I snapped out of it in the last few years of watching him kiss bush's ass.

I've lost a lot of respect for him over this. But that doesn't negate the tremendous respect I have for him from his experience in Vietnam.

I just disagree with him on many key policy issues and I wouldn't vote for him.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.kansascity.com/445/story/508196.html

^^^^^on obama's improved debate performance

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Nicely put, this. ( "By threatening to throw the kitchen sink at Obama, the Clinton campaign simply confirmed the fact that they might be going down the drain. // Beating on the press is the lamest thing you can do. It is only because of the utter open-mindedness of the press that Hillary can lose 11 contests in a row and still be treated as a contender." )

StanM, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see why we should respect him MORE because he served in Vietnam, Daniel. The dastardly things he's committed as a senator aren't mitigated by his military service.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I obviously don't disrespect his war service, I just stopped kidding myself that as a politician he was any more than a marginal improvement over whatever typical gop hack you wanna name (xposts)

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't mean to say otherwise, Alfred. And you can look at that in reverse: The dastardly things McCain's done as a Senator don't mitigate his military service.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sorry. Guess I reflexively gag when a hack extols someone as an "American hero."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Did you see the Wiki picture of him, being fished out of the water in Vietnam, about to be taken as a POW? I don't like McCain, but he deserves tremendous respect for what he went through.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Guess I reflexively gag when a hack extols someone as an "American hero."

Haha. It just dawned on me that I'm the hack. True enough, I guess.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

to actually serve in vietnam, become a POW, refuse to denounce any part of it, and then blame anti-war protesters for "sabotaging" the effort - i dont respect that

and what, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I could understand it though

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm a hack too. I respect what he did in Nam. He could have gone home, but instead chose to stay in a box for 5.5 years. Folks around here don't do anything more heroic than refresh their browsers every half hour.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Is your finger getting numb on that mouse, Bill?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha. It just dawned on me that I'm the hack. True enough, I guess.

I don't think you've used "American heor" in the Hannity sense of the words, Daniel, so you're in the clear.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

American HORE

HI DERE, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

instead chose to stay in a box for 5.5 years.

lolz.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

"Is your finger getting numb on that mouse, Bill?"

I am definitely in that category, yes. I'm about as heroic as a ham sandwich. BTW, I'm not into the hannity shit either, in fact, I hate that fucking guy.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3d/Vietcapturejm01.jpg

Am I living in a box?
Am I living in a cardboard box?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i have to admit id never seen this before & its pretty bad ass:

McCain faced two experienced state legislators in the Republican nomination process, and as a newcomer to the state was hit with repeated charges of being a carpetbagger. Finally at a candidates forum he gave a famous refutation to a voter making the charge:

"Listen, pal. I spent 22 years in the Navy. My father was in the Navy. My grandfather was in the Navy. We in the military service tend to move a lot. We have to live in all parts of the country, all parts of the world. I wish I could have had the luxury, like you, of growing up and living and spending my entire life in a nice place like the First District of Arizona, but I was doing other things. As a matter of fact, when I think about it now, the place I lived longest in my life was Hanoi."

pwn3d

and what, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

ohsnap.gif!

sleep, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh now that is nicely played.

Suzy's mom to endorse Obama instead of "old, angry fucker." Film at 11.

suzy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Suzy's mom was calling McCain the old, angry fucker for once.

suzy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

no one says listen pal anymore

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

...actually they do too, IN SCOTLAND.

suzy, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm a hack too. I respect what he did in Nam. He could have gone home, but instead chose to stay in a box for 5.5 years. Folks around here don't do anything more heroic than refresh their browsers every half hour.

-- Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:06 (31 minutes ago) Link

But why do you respect him for that? Why is this particularly heroic? If he indeed could have gone home, then isn't it just plain stupid to stay there?

I just don't get the heroism-card that's being played out. A card from a terrible, useless war. I mean, I get it, but I don't get it...

*sigh*

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i think some people might call it heroic because the act showed solidarity with the other prisoners who were still there?

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

(i could be wrong -- isn't that what happened though?)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Basically, that type of decision is difficult to comprehend by today's standards where the number one virtue preached by our society is "get yours".

HI DERE, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Who cares is he's a "hero" or not? I just said that he deserves tremendous respect for what he went through during his military service. I can't see how that's a controversial point. (n.1)

___________________________
(n.1) And I'm not talking about what Bill mentioned (the 5.5 years). My comment is based on his fighting in a war and being a POW.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

@Mark, put that way, I can understand it, sure, on the point of solidarity.
I think pacifism blocked my view on this one.

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

"(i could be wrong -- isn't that what happened though?)"

Yes.

"If he indeed could have gone home, then isn't it just plain stupid to stay there?"

I'd like to think I would have made the same decision he did.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm REALLY not gonna say it's somewhat comparable to the subjective heroism of the 9/11 hijackers.

I'm really not.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

military rules stipulate that the first captured is the first get out, according to the laws (or maybe just traditions) of war captors don't get to decide which prisoners go free in an exchange, just how many. the NVA knew who McCain was (son of an admiral) and wanted to let him go as a goodwill gesture, or maybe cos they thought he'd be more valuable (i forget this point), but he refused, cos according to the rules every other prisoner was ahead of him in line.

gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Correct, first in, first out.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck you guys hes a hero

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

no ones asking him to be YOUR hero but we're talking about a specific context i dont think you have much of an argument

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

haha Morbz, never change.

Simon H., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

its really ok to admit that someone who would be terrible for the country as president may have in fact done some good things

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i know a lot of folks really like obama cuz he's seen as a liberal trojan horse, sneaking lefty politics under the guise of centrist speech making, and i've used this as a defense of him, but i really do respect that notion that we can raise the level of discourse beyond petty and misleading partisanship.

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

okay not to be dumb, but what exactly are mccains foreign policy qualifications besides being a POW? Thats all anyone ever mentions...

The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

he FOUGHT in a WAR what more do you want

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

he's old!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

In January 1993 McCain was named chairman of the board of directors of the International Republican Institute,[118] a non-profit democracy promotion organization with informal ties to the Republican party. The position would allow McCain to bolster his foreign policy expertise and credentials.

5 minutes on Wikipedia led me to this.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

you're an american hero

remy bean, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

failing to learn lesson about pointless wars after fighting in pointless war = "foreign policy experience"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

20 years and ranking member status on Senate Armed Services Committee isn't too shabby. There are people who have more foreign policy experience than he does, but he's got far more than Clinton or Obama.

I DIED, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

The central point of the McCain POW story isn't that he offered some heroic service to his country -- it's that he was willing to stay in a torturous situation based on abstract principles and codes that it would have been incredibly easy to rationalize his way out of holding to, something his supporters will tell you displays a very high level of integrity and dedication to ideals. Which is completely true, and nobody who hasn't stood around in a cage of mangled legs is going to have much rhetorical success trying to argue otherwise. A more important question, in terms of attacking the guy, is whether that same level of dedication to principle has been kept up throughout his time in government, especially in instances where the principle itself has been easier to fudge: pulling it off once does not mean pulling it off always.

nabisco, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahaha pardon me that's "stood around in a cage ON mangled legs"

I have no evidence that the North Vietnamese ever constructed cages out of human body parts, and suspect that they would not have done so due to the high possibility of escape

nabisco, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

US magazine brings out the cuteness guns

http://www.usmagazine.com/Barack_Obama_hes_just_like_us_022708

gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

is that a muslim tricycle

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

nice mini-turban

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

red white and blue handlebar streamers = proof of patriotism from a young age

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

was that taken before or after he decided to become president

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Would losing the popular vote in Texas and Ohio but getting a delegate lead in Texas be the worst outcome for Obama next Tuesday? It would allow Clinton a big storyline in terms of the delegate counts not reflecting the will of the people and might generate some actual sympathy from dems still wincing over the 2000 national election.

I DIED, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that's a stretch, but hey, I'm sure they'll try to spin it that way

dmr, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe ID, but I think -- and I hope -- it's an academic question.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/25flvso.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

WHAT'S HE HIDING

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

So, boxers or briefs? Bill Clinton said he wore boxers in a 1992 interview with MTV.

I don't answer those humiliating questions. But whichever one it is, I look good in 'em!

http://www.usmagazine.com/barack_obama_refuses_to_answer_boxers_or_briefs_question

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

haha okay that is a funny answer

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

lol im the shit kiss my ass us magazine

jhøshea, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Interesting article about Obama's 'Behavioral Economics' Philosophy, and how it can sheds light on the way he analyzes other issues, as well.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

hi i linked to that way upthread

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:55 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

deej, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:56 (sixteen years ago) link

behavioral economics = a rogue economist discovers a bunch of shit that is common sense to non-economists

but that's another thread

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton preferred briefs.

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

if Clinton had been honest he'd have answered "neither"

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

That talk radio host that McCain apologized for was on NPR today - he basically said he was barely a McCain supporter to begin with and now no longer calls himself one.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:41 (sixteen years ago) link

A big hint from Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., that he may get off the fence soon: "I don't think this race is over. But I may make a decision and do an endorsement," Richardson told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. He added that he doesn't feel bound to support Clinton just because New Mexico voted for her: "It was very close, Wolf, it was like half a percent. . . . So I think I have flexibility."

it was like half a percent! I could be veep for either one! no, srsly!

dmr, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:49 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

Does Obama go 'commando'?

petey_carnum, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't been forced to give this much thought to a politicians member since Lyndon Johnson.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 00:54 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.usmagazine.com/images/slideshows/slide4-barry.jpg

ok i know this is fluff, but THE MAN KNOWS HIS HOT SAUCE. louisiana hot sauce 4evar

m bison, Thursday, 28 February 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

that is an amazing tie to risk shaking hot sauce bottles around

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

louisiana 4 lyfe

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Clearly afraid to be photographed giving privileges to illegal Mexican hotsauce

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack Obama has the JUDGEMENT to select the most high quality hot sauce on the market. He has the PATRIOTISM to ensure it's an American Brand, and he has the COURAGE to pour Louisiana Brand Hot Sauce near a white shirt and that effervescent tie that will clearly bring CHANGE to white house

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Frank's is better

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

that is an amazing tie to risk shaking hot sauce bottles around

-- deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 02:37 (58 minutes ago) Link

You know these limousine liberals, he can always just buy another one

31g, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Frank's is made in New Jersey.

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 28 February 2008 03:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Louisiana Hot Sauce is the ONLY hot sauce for soul food/Southern cooking/cajun/creole.

I'm willing to allow other hot sauces for Mexican food or other cuisines.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:11 (sixteen years ago) link

no sriracha no credibility

roxymuzak, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I hear McCain likes some picante sauce that's made in New York City

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

get a rope

roxymuzak, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Louisiana is way overrated. Tabasco and sriracha are all a hothead needs really.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Cholula

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

sriracha for asian food, obv

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Sriracha + cider vinegar = perfect pepper sauce for peas or greens. No need for making any more of that stuff ever.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago) link

damnit it's midnight and you're making me want some greens

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Try the sriracha + vinegar, I'm more OTM than nabisco, srsly.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Middle Tennessee State poll: McCain beats Obama in TN, but leads Clinton under 50%

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/02/27/mtsu_poll_clinton_stronger_than_obama_in_tennessee.html

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Dang, this McCain bio they're running on MSNBC right now is pretty harrowing...especially the French documentary footage inside the Hanoi Hilton.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 28 February 2008 06:41 (sixteen years ago) link

z-post

As a former Tennessee resident, I can tell you that outside of Nashville and Memphis, the state is about as red as states can get.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 28 February 2008 06:42 (sixteen years ago) link

btw dudes obama rally tonight was awesome

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Can I ask another stupid European question? What is the point of these rallies? Only people who are already going to vote for the candidate in question are there, right?

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:39 (sixteen years ago) link

(apologies to other Europeans who aren't stupid)

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:40 (sixteen years ago) link

they are

a) fundraisers
b) to motivate people to vote
c) to scare up support

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Only people who are already going to vote for the candidate in question are there, right?

Not necessarily. In the bubble of Pol Junkies I'd forgotten that to a large national audience Obama is still an unknown figure. I overheard a half-dozen or so saying they were excited about the rally, but a lot more saying that they 'didn't really know much about him, but wanna check it out anyway. It looks like a big deal.' I get the sense from the rally that a lot of those people, who walked in largely unaware of O's Big Hope persona thing, walked out as supporters.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Cool, thx! I wouldn't think about going to see any politician I didn't already support or at least know of speak in my hometown, but then they don't do that kind of thing over here at all.

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 07:49 (sixteen years ago) link

They do in some European countries. They certainly do in France - they even have a special word for it: un meeting.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 28 February 2008 08:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Really? I thought the French hated borrowing words from English.

Tuomas, Thursday, 28 February 2008 08:51 (sixteen years ago) link

they couldn't hate it if they'd never done it

roxymuzak, Thursday, 28 February 2008 08:59 (sixteen years ago) link

finally saw the snl debate sketch that was some weak shit as executed.

tremendoid, Thursday, 28 February 2008 09:00 (sixteen years ago) link

The French have a vast amount of words borrowed from English. They rarely mean exactly what they mean in English though.

xpost

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 28 February 2008 09:07 (sixteen years ago) link

from informed comment:

So first came the question posed by Tim Russert and Barack Obama's answer in Tuesday evening's debate in Cleveland, which went like this according to the official transcript:

' MR. RUSSERT: . . . do you reserve a right as American president to go back into Iraq, once you have withdrawn, with sizable troops in order to quell any kind of insurrection or civil war?

SEN. OBAMA: . . . Now, I always reserve the right for the president -- as commander in chief, I will always reserve the right to make sure that we are looking out for American interests. And if al Qaeda is forming a base in Iraq, then we will have to act in a way that secures the American homeland and our interests abroad. So that is true, I think, not just in Iraq, but that's true in other places. That's part of my argument with respect to Pakistan. . .'

Note that Obama was simply responding to Russert's hypothetical, which assumed that the US was already out of Iraq but that in the aftermath, there was "insurrection" or "civil war." The world that Russert imagined was presumably one in which Iraq had firmed up enough for the US to get out, but then at some later time it developed substantial civil unrest. Russert was presumably attempting to find out if the Democratic candidates were adopting an isolationist position, of getting out and staying out. Obama implied that no, if al-Qaeda came back to Iraq and formed a new base years from now, he would "act" in such a way as to "secure American interests." He is not an isolationist. Note that he was not specific about how exactly he would act.

So then, according to MSNBC, McCain tried to make some hay, admitting he had not actually heard Obama's exact statement.

' “…I am told that Senator Obama made the statement that if Al Qaeda came back to Iraq after he withdraws -- after the American troops are withdrawn -- then he would send military troops back, if Al Qaeda established a military base in Iraq. I have some news: Al Qaeda is in Iraq. Al Qaeda, it's called Al Qaeda in Iraq, and my friends if we left they wouldn't be establishing a base, they wouldn't be establishing a base, they'd be taking a country. And I'm not going to allow that to happen my friends. I will not surrender. I will not surrender to Al Qaeda.” '

But Obama had not said anything of the sort. He was answering a journalist's question about the future. That McCain cannot be bothered to get the exact quote before he puts words in his opponent's mouth and makes a lot of wild, inaccurate charges, doesn't suggest he could be trusted with sensitive diplomacy or other presidential tasks.

Moreover, the allegation that he makes about there being 'al-Qaeda in Iraq' that could well take over the country is part lie and part insanity. The Sunni Arabs are no more than 20% of the Iraqi population. How could a tiny minority from within them take over the whole?

The technical definition of al-Qaeda is operatives who have sworn fealty to Usama bin Laden. There were only a few hundred of them. I doubt whether more than a handful of such individuals are in Iraq.

So there isn't any "al-Qaeda" in Iraq in the technical sense. There are "Excommunicating Holy Warriors" (Takfiri Jihadis), i.e. devotees of political Islam who are violent and willing to deploy terror for political purposes. They declare other Muslims who disagree with them "not Muslims,"-- thus the "excommunicating" bit. But there are only a few hundred foreign fighters. A small minority of Iraqis has associated with them. They don't call themselves 'al-Qaeda in Iraq.' The major such group is "The Islamic State of Iraq." And to say that they have "bases" in Iraq is pretty grandiose. They have some safe houses and try to take and hold neighborhoods, so far with indifferent success.

The idea that this small minority of violent Muslim fundamentalists could take over Iraq is completely crazy. They haven't even been able to keep their toehold in Baghdad-- the Sunnis have been largely ethnically cleansed from the capital by Shiite militias.

So the Shiites would not allow an "al-Qaeda" takeover of Iraq. Neither would the Kurds. Nor would most Sunni Arabs (as in al-Anbar Province, where the Dulaim tribe is at daggers drawn with the Excommunicating Holy Warriors).

Moreover, the neighbors would not allow the radical Sunnis to take over. Iran would sit on its hands while Shiites were massacred in Baghdad? Secular Turkey would allow this development? Baathist Syria? Hashemite Jordan (which played a major role in tracking down and killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi)?

McCain's assertions that "al-Qaeda" has a strong position in Iraq or has any chance of taking over the country if the US leaves are both inaccurate. One is an error, the other is a dark but insubstantial fantasy.

Obama replied:

'“I've got some news for John McCain, that is there was no such thing Al Qaeda in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade.

“I've got some news for John McCain. I've got some news for John McCain. He took us into a war, along with George Bush that should have never been authorized, never been waged. They took their eye off the people who were responsible for 9/11 and that would be Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, that is stronger now than at any time since 2001. I've been paying attention John McCain!

“John McCain may like to say that he wants to follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of Hell. But so far all he's done is follow George Bush into a misguided war in Iraq that's cost us thousands of lives and billions of dollars and that I intend to bring to an end so that we can actually start going after Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and in the hills of Pakistan, like we should have been doing in the first place. That's the news John McCain! '

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 10:04 (sixteen years ago) link

tl;dr or whatever right, but that was particularly satisfying for me

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 10:04 (sixteen years ago) link

and i think showcases the kind of thinking both of them are going to display in the ge

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 10:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I find that a really frustrating repetitive tactic on Obama's part - when other candidates question what he'll do about the war, he points out that they voted for it in the first place. At some point, that becomes irrelevant!

Maria, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Perversely I think McCain's going to get a lot of traction with Iraq. What coherent position can Obama come up with? It will be impossible to pull out all troops any time soon, without stoking a civil war that will make 2006 seem like a picnic. As president, he'd end up forced to keep troops in a war he never agreed with. However wrong, McCain's position is more coherent: he agreed with the war, he agreed with the surge, and he's going to keep the troops there.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think it would be incoherent for Obama to keep troops in a war he never agreed with - it's just practical. It's not like he can time travel and stop the war if elected president. I think he could quite coherently say the war was a mistake that he was against, and he'll bring a different philosophy to the White House, without advocating total withdrawal. But he's not! So you're right, McCain is going to get a lot of traction with this.

Maria, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think it would be incoherent for Obama to keep troops in a war he never agreed with

Perhaps not incoherent, but a very difficult message to enunciate: "This war was a futile mistake, but we're going to go on fighting" will not exactly stir either the pro- or anti-war constituencies.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:30 (sixteen years ago) link

"This war did not need to be fought. But we now have a responsibility to the people of Iraq and to our own citizens who have sacrificed so much to leave Iraq better than we found it."

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:52 (sixteen years ago) link

"This war did not need to be fought. But we now have a responsibility to the people of Iraq and to our own citizens who have sacrificed so much to leave Iraq better than we found it."

This is pretty much the line taken by every politician in Britain at the moment, and most people seem to agree with it.

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

So are the permanent bases that are being built going to be abandoned and the confiscated oil wells given back to Iraq? Nice!

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 13:00 (sixteen years ago) link

"confiscated" makes them sound like yo-yos that'll be given back after class.

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago) link

what's great about the "leave iraq better than we found it" line is that it can be adopted by anyone, agreed to by everyone, and leaves the door open to install a puppet dictator who will cut sweetheart deals for american oil companies while keeping russia and china out

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 February 2008 13:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Iraq: Take Only PIctures, Leave Only Footprints

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 13:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Dr. Halperin hooks the candidates up to the Dole-ometer - http://thepage.time.com/mccain-clinton-or-obama/

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 14:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Bloomberg's non-campaign ends.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Bloomberg for VEEP?

Ed, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

more like treasury secretary

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

its werid my mental image of hillary doesnt look like this - then in pictures she always looks like this

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ap_clinton_ohio_080228_ms.jpg

its cause this is a put on no?

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

say it b4, say it again

http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/9813/blackholesunag2.jpg

m bison, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

This has been troubling me all day:

If Obama was asked 'Boxers or Briefs?' was Hillary asked if she wore a Thong?

More disturbing than troubling.

Ed, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:26 (sixteen years ago) link

She clearly wears one of those remote control vibrating butterfly things - every time Bill pushes the button you see that weird smile on her face.

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

as a lurker i would like to note that daria was right

thomp, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

well, i have to say this has been a notable lapse

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ap_clinton_ohio_080228_ms.jpg

"Oh thank you for coming. Yes, he was such a good man and we'll all miss him so. No, I'll call you soon."

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

daria was right about what?

i think she caught a lot of really egregious shit on this thread, btw

gff, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

as a lurker i would like to note that daria was right

?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

People wouldn't have been as dickish to her if she hadn't put on fucking horse blinders for 80000 posts.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

She clearly wears one of those remote control vibrating butterfly things - every time Bill pushes the button you see that weird smile on her face.

-- StanM, Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:28 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i think daria got the shit she deserved, but you tards getting all kenan on this thread about hillary are making it harder to justify telling daria shes loco

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^this

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sfslim/2295439206/

daria-g, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/27/snl-writer-surprised-by-c_n_88817.html

Already, "Saturday Night Live" executive producer Lorne Michaels has ordered Downey to write another skit on the campaign for this weekend's show.

"That's Lorne," Downey said. "He likes to paint you in a corner and if you do it, your reward is to get to jump out of a deeper corner. I pray to God it's my last debate."

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i think daria got the shit she deserved, but you tards getting all kenan on this thread about hillary are making it harder to justify telling daria shes loco.

She's not loco. She feels strongly about HRC, the same way most of the participants here apparently feel about Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

oboatse is awes

gff, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Yahoo Answers: Is Barack Obama the Antichrist?

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack: 6 letters
Hussein: 7 letters
Obama: 5 letters
6+7+5=18=6+6+6

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

If you write obama+bush, you end up with obamabush. Do you spot "mabus" in the middle? Bingo. This is a strong indication that Obama will succeed Bush as president in 2008, further confirming the prohpecy.

and what, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

That's the kind of thing most people would miss.

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

RONALD + WILSON + REAGAN

Eazy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AntEx6Mp.hP2Jp2zNoPCw84jzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20080228060153AAKc05R

it gonna get reported soon so let just forget about the 1st ammement
In the 1st day in office he will paddren The Jena 6.
Michael Vick and O.J Simpons from any furture crime
he will also take away the right to vote for white women and spanish peopoe
how soon as he takes office will black people take over the usa
if he losses will black people start singing
we shall over come

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

She's not loco. She feels strongly about HRC, the same way most of the participants here apparently feel about Obama.

-- Daniel, Esq., Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:21 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i happen to feel that feeling strongly for hillary is loco

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

onima: waht
deej: I don't begrudge anyone's support of Hillary because until Obama threw his hat into the ring, I was right there with them.

HI DERE, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack Obama?
I'm doing a research project on the 2008 presidential candidates. My question... is Barack Obama the first Afrian American presidential candidate? If anyone could fill me in, I would appreciate it.

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
No, Jessy Jackson was the first but Obama is the first Muslim candidate. I know people (and he says he's a Christian) but I also know that Muslims lie as part of their religion like when Arafat said he's die for his country why wouldn't he lie for it.

and what, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Ahh yes, Arafat the muslim

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

headline on cnn when i was at the gym last night = "OBAMA'S RADICAL TIES"

sadly not about how totally radical his neckties are

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Jessy Jackson!

HI DERE, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

don't forget tito

dmr, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Jessy Monster Jackson

max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm gonna stop searching Yahoo answers, makes the BBC's "Have your say" look positively moderate.

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Nostradamus prophesized the name of the antichrist is "Mabus." This can relate to why Obama is the antichrist. If you write obama+bush, you end up with obamabush. Do you spot "mabus" in the middle? Bingo. This is a strong indication that Obama will succeed Bush as president in 2008, further confirming the prohpecy.

Uh, isn't Ray MABUS one of Obama's campaign advisors?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Mabus

onimo, Thursday, 28 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Jessy Jackson was the first

iirc, Shirley Chisolm was the first African American candidate.

Aimless, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

From wikipedia:

Shirley Anita St. Hill Chisholm (November 30, 1924 – January 1, 2005) was an American politician, educator and author [1]. She was a Congresswoman, representing New York's 12th District for seven terms from 1968 to 1983. In 1968, she became the first African American woman elected to Congress. On January 23, 1972, she became the first major party African American candidate for President of the United States. She won 152 delegates.

Aimless, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Are you going to correct the "muslims always lie" part of that moron's answer too?

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

iirc correctly, sally hemmings was the first african-american on the presidental staff

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Umm, isn't there a Nostradamus sub-clause of Godwin's Law?

OH NOES THE DEBBIL!

suzy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

FWIW the thing that pisses me off about the 'armageddon' narrative is how it shows each successive generation thinks EVERYTHING ENDS WITH THEM.

I can't wait until 2013. It'll be just like the Jehovah's Witless implosion of 1976.

suzy, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton campaign reports that they raised $35 million in february:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Clinton_raises_35_million_in_February.html#comments

(apparently other reports say $24 million?)

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

PP, I always have trouble with that conundrum about how to find out if you were shipwrecked on the Island of Truth-Tellers or the Island of Liars. How can you tell them apart?

Aimless, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

im gonna start posting this on the obama madrassa thread - there's 45 separate questions on yahoo answers asking if obama is the antichrist

and what, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

having mindless rube cultists as a core constituency is a huge elecotral advantage - you can feed them any old sh1t!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Aimless, you find the hippie who cuts the barber with the crewcut's hair and go with him.

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

(smacks forehead) I never thought of that before!

Aimless, Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

IT'S ALL ABOUT THE 'VOICE'

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.ideabg.com/clients/funtime/gal/photos/197k.jpg
its mostly the voice

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

But: Obama spokesman Bill Burton says his candidate has raised “considerably more than that.”

Ambinder: Obama team expected to announce raising more than $50 million so far this month. Permalink

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing that pisses me off about the 'armageddon' narrative is how it shows each successive generation thinks EVERYTHING ENDS WITH THEM.

the world is always ending

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

New Florida General Election Numbers

Mason-Dixon/Photo Illustration

From Mason-Dixon poll:

McCain leads Obama 47-37.

McCain leads Clinton 49-40.

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

kinda worried that these smears are starting to really take hold what w/ the turban picture being thrown on like 60 newspapers across the country

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Just imagine how bad the smear campaigns will if HRC is the nominee, and you'll worry less about what's coming Obama's way.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

not sure I would lend too much creedence on florida polls just yet considering McCain had the opportunity to campaign (and win) there last month and the democrats did not.

m bison, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway the amount of toxic bullshit floating around is worrisome, but obama's looked pretty adept at handling it thus far

m bison, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Florida is not a bellweather, who cares?

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

the world is always ending

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:28 PM

"Is It Thunderdome Yet?" A Rolling Looming Apocalypse Thread

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Florida is not a bellweather, who cares?

-- remy bean, Thursday, February 28, 2008 1:40 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

because it has a huge number of electoral college votes and is not solid blue or solid red?

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

And McCain might -- just might -- choose Florida Gov. Crist as his VP nominee.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

o fuk, then it would really be crist vs. anticrist

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

while i'm digging the fact that obama is polling better against mccain in various state match-ups, i really don't think these matchups really mean all that much right now. i keep seeing them cited everywhere, and they are certainly interesting to an extent. but really -- november is seriously far away. think back to iowa and consider how long this primary race has seemed (and it obviously started many many months before iowa). so much can happened between now and then that i don't really know how much anyone's 6 or 7 point lead means right at the end of february.

not sure I would lend too much creedence on florida polls just yet considering McCain had the opportunity to campaign (and win) there last month and the democrats did not.

exactly. one of the hundreds of factors to keep in mind.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

GUYS IT'S NOT EVEN MARCH YET. IT'S TOO EARLY.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's fairly safe to assume that Florida is in the R column

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

WHEN ITS MARCH THEN CAN WE

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's fairly safe to assume that Florida is in the R column

-- gabbneb, Thursday, February 28, 2008 2:08 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

only 8 years ago it was in question tho

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i'd really like to see virginia in play this year

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

you will

only 8 years ago it was in question tho

some places change faster than others. there was also a Southern guy and a more conservative Jewish guy on the ticket then.

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

also the old people got older

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

if Obama picks Sam Nunn, FL will be in play

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

xp - they do that

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

if Obama picks Sam Nunn, we'll find out how many of his starry-eyed collegiate supporters are total fucking idiots.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's fairly safe to assume that Florida is in the R column

OTM.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius i have a feeling you know how many already

gff, Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

At last - an open letter from Obama to gays:

As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws. I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage.

I’m running for President to build an America that lives up to our founding promise of equality for all – a promise that extends to our gay brothers and sisters. It’s wrong to have millions of Americans living as second-class citizens in this nation. And I ask for your support in this election so that together we can bring about real change for all LGBT Americans. Equality is a moral imperative. That’s why throughout my career, I have fought to eliminate discrimination against LGBTAmericans. In Illinois, I co-sponsored a fully inclusive bill that prohibited discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, extending protection to the workplace, housing, and places of public accommodation.

In the U.S. Senate, I have co-sponsored bills that would equalize tax treatment for same-sex couples and provide benefits to domestic partners of federal employees. And as president, I will place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws. I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage.

Unlike Senator Clinton, I support the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) – a position I have held since before arriving in the U.S. Senate. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples, which is precisely what DOMA does. I have also called for us to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and I have worked to improve the Uniting American Families Act so we can afford same-sex couples the same rights and obligations as married couples in our immigration system. The next president must also address the HIV/AIDS epidemic. When it comes to prevention, we do not have to choose between values and science. While abstinence education should be part of any strategy, we also need to use common sense. We should have age-appropriate sex education that includes information about contraception. We should pass the JUSTICE Act to combat infection within our prison population. And we should lift the federal ban on needle exchange, which could dramatically reduce rates of infection among drug users. In addition, local governments can protect public health by distributing contraceptives.

We also need a president who’s willing to confront the stigma – too often tied to homophobia – that continues to surround HIV/AIDS. I confronted this stigma directly in a speech to evangelicals at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church, and will continue to speak out as president. That is where I stand on the major issues of the day. But having the right positions on the issues is only half the battle. The other half is to win broad support for those positions. And winning broad support will require stepping outside our comfort zone. If we want to repeal DOMA, repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and implement fully inclusive laws outlawing hate crimes and discrimination in the workplace, we need to bring the message of LGBT equality to skeptical audiences as well as friendly ones – and that’s what I’ve done throughout my career. I brought this message of inclusiveness to all of America in my keynote address at the 2004 Democratic convention.

I talked about the need to fight homophobia when I announced my candidacy for President, and I have been talking about LGBT equality to a number of groups during this campaign – from local LGBT activists to rural farmers to parishioners at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where Dr. Martin Luther King once preached. Just as important, I have been listening to what all Americans have to say. I will never compromise on my commitment to equal rights for all LGBTAmericans. But neither will I close my ears to the voices of those who still need to be convinced. That is the work we must do to move forward together. It is difficult. It is challenging. And it is necessary. Americans are yearning for leadership that can empower us to reach for what we know is possible. I believe that we can achieve the goal of full equality for the millions of LGBT people in this country. To do that, we need leadership that can appeal to the best parts of the human spirit. Join with me, and I will provide that leadership. Together, we will achieve real equality for all Americans, gay and straight alike.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

its hard to be cynical about that!

max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

it's easy - that could be a setup for a Nunn pick

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant see him picking Nunn

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he's an outside choice, but I wouldn't rule it out

gabbneb, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

okay that is pretty badass

I dunno how many evangelical homophobes he's gonna convince but amen anyway

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Good for him.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

What's McCain's position on these issues?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

nunn would be an interesting choice; something of a maverick in his own right.

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

hmm, http://obama.senate.gov/press/060523-lugar-obama_bil/

remy bean, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link

has any candidate ever written TO gays so forthrightly? Without endorsing every one of Obama's strategy, I admire how he delineates the possible.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

regardless of what he REALLY believes (and I have no idea what that is) I'm sure McCain will issue some homophobic broadside if necessary to shore up his conservative credentials

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred where did that letter appear...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't remember reading that much text by a politician without encountering the word terrorism.

StanM, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGgx87

^^^^^^^^^obama gets his 1,000,000th donor

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

It's important to remember that McCain himself will not be doing most of the firehosing of his opponent. There will be hundreds of surrogates, loose cannons and other volunteers willing to step up and do whatever nastiness anyone can conceive of in order to keep the Dems out of the White House. About 95% of the time McCain won't even know what's going down until it's already out there. He'll keep his hands pretty clean.

Aimless, Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

firehosing of his opponent.

interesting choice of words

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

O'Aimless

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

plus McCain gets to routinely scold the shitslingers and look better and more noble than they are, w/o doing anything to really rein them in, and enjoying their effect on the campaign.

gff, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred where did that letter appear...?

Sullivan published it on his site an hour ago.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saBU6ux0hsQ

lol hil l o l

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

no offense but yr the last one to be clowning ms cleo, nostradamus

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

ALRIGHT EVERYONE WE NEED TO HAVE A LITTLE TALK HERE - I AM A PATRIOTS FAN - MY PREDICTING A WIN IN THE SUPERBOWL IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS KNOW TO NORMAL HUMANS WHO DONT HANG OUT ON THE INTERNET ALL DAY AS "TALKING SHIT" AND IS NO WAY INDICATIVE OF MY PREDICTIVE POWERS WHICH ARE BEYOND REPROACH IN SITUATIONS THAT DONT INVOLVE SPORTS TEAMS I AM ACTIVELY ROUTING FOR TY

FU DEEJ ET AL

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://content.ytmnd.com/content/3/c/9/3c948f9a119d69fb49d95995e1e64d13.jpg

max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

oops, my finger slipped

max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

and if max deej and whatever other sort of douches would like to see me repeatedly and consistently predicting an obama win while everyone else was all lol hillays got it in the bag just go back and browse some threads bitches

jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

lol 'et al'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I am still so so so so so happy the Patriots lost.

Un-patriotic to root against the Patriots? Maybe.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 February 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7629b522-e641-11dc-8398-0000779fd2ac.html

'concerns' on obama's shift to the left on economics

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

(re: trade)

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah ethan might be right about this becoming 1000s of 'macacas'

deej, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

a thousand little racist points of light

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

if I was Obama I'd just say "That's my name, don't wear it out! HUH HUH!"

Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:44 (sixteen years ago) link

The latest FAIR alert is pretty concise and otm. it'll be a cakewalk for obama if he can crack this nut in the ge, i think the past will matter a great deal in the discourse:

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3302

tremendoid, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

counterargument is that mccain was right about the surge when no one else was.

31g, Thursday, 28 February 2008 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think the ups and downs of the conflict count for as much anymore, most Americans are just generally fed up that we're there.

tremendoid, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

"right about the surge"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

this surge's "success" is gonna last for about as long as we keep handing out $10/day to former insurgents, which I don't foresee lasting all that much longer. Frankly, I think all this "the surge is working!" hoohah overlooks some of the facts about how Iraq's instability has been directly tied to US internal politics, and that people like Muqtada Al-Sadr have a tendency to time their activities to when they will have the greatest impact on American policy. Think about it - its the summer 2008, you are a disenchanted Iraqi who wants to see the US out asap, and the US is currently in the middle of deciding whether to elect a president that will stay in Iraq or leave asap, what would you do to help ensure that the one who wants to leave gets elected... (I'm not sure I know the answer to this question myself, but these kinds of motivations don't seem to be considered by the punditocracy when discussing how well the "surge" is going)

i don't think the ups and downs of the conflict count for as much anymore, most Americans are just generally fed up that we're there.

^^^this should also be taken into account

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:04 (sixteen years ago) link

five years after completely fucking a country, we've managed to temporarily make it slightly less fucked than it was six months ago. That's a real victory.

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:04 (sixteen years ago) link

al-sadr just extended his cease fire

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

and that ain't got shit to do with any surge far as I can tell

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

this was hilarious btw

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/kingston-caught-without-american-flag-lapel-pin/

On MSNBC’s Live With Dan Abrams last night, Rep. Jack Kingston (R-GA) said it was okay to “question” Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) patriotism because he doesn’t regularly wear an American flag lapel pin. Kingston claimed that “everybody” in politics “wears them.” Asked by Abrams if he was wearing one, Kingston had to admit he wasn’t, saying, “I will wear one and I have worn one.” Kingston then feigned ignorance about the irony between his criticism of Obama and his own lack of a lapel pin.

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

if he starts wearing a lapel pin, they'll probably make up some other shit like "Why does he refuse to wear the bald-eagle tie clip???

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:09 (sixteen years ago) link

hahah. what a douchebag

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think the ups and downs of the conflict count for as much anymore, most Americans are just generally fed up that we're there.

-- tremendoid, Friday, February 29, 2008 12:02 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Yeah this might be true

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

al-sadr just extended his cease fire

really? huh didn't see that. Interesting. I wonder if he's just biding his time for the US to leave and saving his ammo/cred for a major fight afterwards.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

the funny thing about the surge and post-surge strategies is that it makes the Republicans sound like there is NO scenario in which its okay to pull out troops. Things are going bad? We've gotta stick it out and make it work! Things are going well? We can't leave, everything'll be fucked up if we do!

The party of eternal war

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

But everything is going to be fucked up when we leave.

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:14 (sixteen years ago) link

everything was fucked up there to begin with. there are no win-win scenarios here.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

"I have smashed this vase, so I have a moral duty to jump up and down on the shards until it's glued back together"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

ok, maybe that's a little unfair.

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

You don't think Iraq would be better off if we stayed until 2012? Mccain might actually try to do that.

xpost yeah basically.

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway this is off-topic i guess

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

not particularly. it seems to me like the various parties are holding their breaths to see how long the US will stay. When we leave, they'll start in at each others' throats (Saudis backing the Sunnis, Iran backing the Shi'a, nobody backing the Kurds who will be fighting Turkey, etc.). However, if a public commitment is made to stay indefinitely, then the motivation for those parties to hold their fire will evaporate, and shit will start up again, with the primary goal being to get the US out.

at least that's how I see it at the moment.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

might be better, might be worse, might not make a lick of difference. Depends on a lot more than us.

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

like if we say we're gonna be there til 2012, I don't think Iraqis in general will be all "oh okay, that's cool, we can wait"

but Hurting OTM basically

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

It depends on American troops staying in Iraq for a 100 years.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

If McCain wins you will DEFINITELY see shit get worse in the short run.

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

why

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

for the reasons I stated - Iraqis will see it as a commitment to continued US troop presence, which they don't want and will actively fight against.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Because McCain has made clear he wants U.S. troops to stay, so any militant parties who want U.S. troops to leave are going to come out full force

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

what shakey said

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

and I don't even mean that as an argument against voting for McCain, at least not directly.

I'm not saying "Vote for Obama so the insurgents will be quiet," I'm just saying "Don't have the illusion that McCain is going to secure the country using an indefinite troop presence"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

there hasn't been a rolling Iraq thread in a while has there?

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, i meant to start one instead of hijacking this one, but i...didn't.

31g, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:33 (sixteen years ago) link

i started one, sorry for the dismal pun d00ds

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 00:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I wondered if Ned had stopped the precious tradition of the 'It's [month/year] in Iraq'. Shame.

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 29 February 2008 01:03 (sixteen years ago) link

It's February 2008 in Iraq

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 29 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Ah, that's good to see!

Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 29 February 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

There's not been as much to report on the rolling months thread this month because while there's been a lot of ugly business, a lot of it is in undercurrents. So far.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I have a question for you Americans : does Obama's personal history merely give racists a sort of an easy excuse, so they can attack his "cultural background" or "religious background" instead of coming with explicitly racist comments ("we don't want a black president")? If he was a regular, descended-from-slaves African-American without an Arabic middle name and a childhood in Indonesia, would the racists find other "cultural" excuses to attack him without speaking of race explicitly? Or would American people then accept him more easily?

Tuomas, Friday, 29 February 2008 05:55 (sixteen years ago) link

would the racists find other "cultural" excuses to attack him without speaking of race explicitly?

^yes

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 05:58 (sixteen years ago) link

What sort of attacks would a regular African-American candidate have to face then?

Tuomas, Friday, 29 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

not being authentically black by virute of middle class upbringing

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:02 (sixteen years ago) link

that wouldn't work though.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Depends on the candidate. Might get painted as too "angry" or "divisive," or as not being as "qualified" without real justification for the claim; might face sexual innuendos (Harold Ford Jr.). Hard to say because there have been so few in national races.

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:09 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah that Harold Ford Jr. smear campaign was pretty awful...

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:12 (sixteen years ago) link

yah associating him w/traditional stereotypes by saying hes not that kinda like bidens clean articulate routine. or saying plainly racist shit in the vaguest of terms. or having your more fringe surrogates in radio and the internet push racist messages to create a stir in the mainstream media where even if its being condemned the message is still circulating.

all of which is happening now - just not as grandly as the muslim angle.

even stuff like bill clinton comparing him to jesse jackson - which is just basically pointing out the fact that hes black (and therefor not a serious candidate).

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think most white voters would attack a black candidate for lacking *authenticity* (if anything they'd have more problem with a candidate that DID seem *authentically black*) and I don't see much evidence that black voters would either as long as the candidate had the right politics

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:15 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeah also you might see attacks implying that people ONLY like the candidate because of his race -- a lot of this is already happening with Obama, btw

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link

but who does the "clean, articulate"/ "not 'authentically' black" line-of-attack alienate? if anything it helps him in a weird, messed-up way.. paints him as a "safe"/"good negro" to majority of the electorate...

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link

the point of attacking his authenticity is to associate him w/the culture hes supposedly unlike - theyre tricky like that.

like just as long as obama and black have appeared in an argument where blackness is derided their job is done.

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah exactly. You hear defensive conservatives posit some *alternative* black candidate all the time to make themselves feel less racist. Hillary + Barack in primary = "Now if only Condi were running! She's so intelligent!"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:19 (sixteen years ago) link

(exactly was xpost)

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:20 (sixteen years ago) link

search: rove, trash talking, lazy, pickup basketball

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 29 February 2008 06:27 (sixteen years ago) link

barackobamaembarassedyouinthreeonthree.com

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 13:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20080228/i/r315812455.jpg?x=400&y=307&sig=8rYHTMnbyW0zvTfAYVf_hw--

muuuaaahhhhaaaaahhaaaaaa

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

endorsement today? Richardson for Hillary? Edwards for Obama?

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

is that the rumor? richardson didn't sound like he'd be endorsing the clintons in some quote I read yesterday

akm, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

haha "the clintons" i didn't even mean that consciously

akm, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

With either endorsement, does it really make a difference at this point? I could see where it might have been helpful a little bit earlier in the game, but it seems a little too late now.

Nicole, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

endorsement today? Richardson for Hillary? Edwards for Obama?

is that the rumor?

links?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i have a hard time thinking a richardson endorsement means anything now, NM already voted and no-one else cares (maybe texas? dunno)

akm, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

i could easily see both going the other way, but the richardson quote i saw sounded hillary-friendly

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

obv TX, and Edwards in OH

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

both candidates are in TX

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link

lol who would endorse hillary now

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I am so grateful for this thread keeping me as low as 20th on the monthly #posts toteboard. I almost feel like I have a life!

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary takes roves advice http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M70emIFxETs

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.hddvdprg.com/ endorses Hillary

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

(j/k)

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

lol who would endorse hillary now

improbable, sure, but someone whose constituency by and large supports her and someone who has a much better shot at getting a good position in her administration than in his might do so, if say their endorsement might be sufficient to keep both states in her column. i'm not saying there is such a person, necessarily.

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain?

gff, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

<A HREF="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/28/donohue/index.html";>So this 'McCain loves a bigot' story</A>.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Fuxor.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/28/donohue/index.html

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Click on the sponsor logo: to read this article and all of Salon for free

I already turned on my javascript, I'm not turning off my adblocker. Bye, Salon.

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Just google search 'mccain hagee donohue.' You'll find more than you'll want to know.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa mccain couldve stepped in something here

Donohue was particularly insistent that McCain's behavior would severely harm his standing with Catholic voters -- the group of voters which Karl Rove maintains is the key group for enabling the GOP to win: "This thing seems to be to be blowing up in his face. McCain has stepped in it big time." And Donohue further vowed:

He's not going to get away with this with the Catholic community. . . . We're going to get this out to the Catholic community and Catholic press around the country. . . . We're going to ride this out and see how far he wants to talk about this.

For Catholics, McCain's association with someone like Hagee is simply intolerable: "At that point, Catholics cannot join with evangelicals. To the extent you're going to insult my religion, all bets are off."

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

k thx (xpost)

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

this the guy - nice poster buddy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uViQ0hVV57Q

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Keep in mind Donohue's a grandstanding blowhard to the nth degree; still, Hagee is his own piece of work.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c219/talk2action/Pope_Donohue.png

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

haha see shit like this makes me glad McCain is the Republican nominee. He can't go a week without sticking his foot in his mouth/pissing off somebody

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

so polls have obama up in texas and w/in margin of error in ohio

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

there are apparently huge numbers of early voters on both states - not sure who this is going to help more, but i do know that the obama camp has really been pushing that (i imagine clinton's camp has been doing the same)

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

*in both states

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush... puppy... wire?

Tuomas, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

re the whole McCain-Obama Iraq flap -- isn't Al Qaeda in Iraq just a copycat instead of a franchise outlet, like a new Ray's Pizza in NYC?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, that's the best analogy for it I've ever heard Morbs

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

what constitutes "Al Qaeda" is highly debatable. If you include people who passed through Bin Laden's training camps in Afghanistan in the 90s and swore an oath to him, yeah there are probably some of those guys in Iraq. But the whole point of Al Qaeda's organizational structure is decentralization, so its unlikely anyone's taking direct orders from Bin Laden. Bin Laden's usual strategy is to give a trainee his blessing and a bunch of money (which was the case with Zarqawi), but there usually isn't a direct line of command in the traditional sense. Also Bin Laden's largely out of money at this point.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

to expand on that people always all lol every pizza place in new york is named rays - when really its a pretty small percentage

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

famous original al qaeda

max, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

okay that Hagee video is extremely lolworthy

"The Catholic Church is going be devoured by a 1920s socialite sitting on the back of a cheetah. Got it."

HI DERE, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ new clinton expectations game:

To: Interested Parties

From: The Clinton Campaign

Date: Friday, February 29, 2008

RE: Obama Must-Wins

The media has anointed Barack Obama the presumptive nominee and he's playing the part.

With an eleven state winning streak coming out of February, Senator Obama is riding a surge of momentum that has enabled him to pour unprecedented resources into Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont.

The Obama campaign and its allies are outspending us two to one in paid media and have sent more staff into the March 4 states. In fact, when all is totaled, Senator Obama and his allies have outspent Senator Clinton by a margin of $18.4 million to $9.2 million on advertising in the four states that are voting next Tuesday.

Senator Obama has campaigned hard in these states. He has spent time meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers, holding rallies, and - of course - making speeches.

If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there's a problem.

Should Senator Obama fail to score decisive victories with all of the resources and effort he is bringing to bear, the message will be clear:

Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there's a problem.

i.e. if obama doesn't win rhode island, this raises serious questions about his candidacy

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

right

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

"al-qaeda classic"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

(i guess that would be the mujahadeen in afghanistan)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

surely to be followed tuesday night by we won ohio and rhode island dont u see we have the mo now! and thursday morning senator obama ran a great campaign and i look forward to supporting him in the general election

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i have no idea if he's going to win ohio (or texas for that matter, polls are tight despite his lead), but is clinton seriously gonna try to get mileage merely if there's an obama non-sweep or tight victories?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

surely to be followed tuesday night by we won ohio and rhode island dont u see we have the mo now! and thursday morning senator obama ran a great campaign and i look forward to supporting him in the general election

haha

Mark Clemente, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

al qaedeep dish

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

is clinton seriously gonna try to get mileage merely if there's an obama non-sweep or tight victories?

i don't think her plan is to look as bad as possible so yeah

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date

lol again w/the caucuses do not count

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

In New Brunswick there were two unaffiliated chicken carry-outs a block apart called "Picken Chicken."

One of them, angered by the copycatting, had rechristened itself "The Original Picken Chicken"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.

sounding like the Huckabee campaign here

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary needs to go on Tyra.

Nicole, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

but she cant play bass :(

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

So the logic is basically "Obama doesn't have 100% of democrat support, so the candidate with even less support should win"

Hurting 2, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I take that back -- everyone needs to appear on Tyra.

Nicole, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know where else to post this

http://www.muslimgirlworld.com/

(sfw)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

How great would McCain on Tyra be?

Nicole, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i'd love for tyra to say something and he'd laugh his crunchy old geezer laugh and she'd stare at him and say "that wasn't a joke"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

obama responds to the new scaaary hillary ads http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/obama_respnds_i_will_never_use.php

its really sort of shocking and refreshing to see what it looks like when a democrat has enough confidence in their convictions to stand up to this kind of bullshit

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I said that a war in Iraq would be unwise. It cost us thousands of lives and billions of dollars. I said that it would distract us from the real threat that we face, and that we should take the fight to al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

There's your "Democrat war" for the next 4 years, changemakers.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

hey one war better than two right!

jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

There's your "Democrat war" for the next 4 years, changemakers.

you would rather not get bin laden?

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. I'm all for going after people that actually hit the U.S.

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sure occupying Pakistan and Afghanistan can turn into a black hole, too. Obama's "war on terror" figures to be just as endless.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

(and, of course, he's not withdrawing from Iraq)

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M70emIFxETs

^ lol @ rating

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

killing real actual alQ dudes is a good thing, imo. babysitting a civil war and paying $200bn+ a year for the privilege is not.

any 'nation building' project in afganistan is probably just as doomed long term as trying to remake iraq

xp "of course"

gff, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

The Hillary gameplan is to claim victory if she wins Ohio - which she's probably gonna do, by a small margin - and momentum if she wins Texas too.

lol at max

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: bet, gff?

I think "actual alQ dudes" are frequently going to be identified the way "Cong" were in Vietnam -- if they're dead, they're Cong!

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

sure, i'll bet. his stated timeline means it'll take what, two years?

how they are identified is sort of not the point -- alQ does exist, still. s

gff, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

ha whoops

somewhere.

gff, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

if Obama is smart (and I think he is) he will frame and approach catching Bin Laden and dismantling Al Qaeda as primarily a police/intelligence operation, and not a military one. Indiscriminate bombing and invading with large scale military forces accomplishes nothing and in many ways makes things worse.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Al Qaeda isn't ontological. We're paying lots of Sunnis in Iraq who were once "AlQ" (in Iraq), some of whom will be so again once we stop throwing cash at them.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/27/AR2008022703842_pf.html

xpost

Gavin, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm glad that Obama is highlighting what is so blatantly clear -- that Hillary is trying to win the election with almost exactly the same tactics that Bush and Rove used in 2000/2004 (even in her complain of Obama using "Karl Rove tactics"):

I do want to take a moment to respond, because the press is, I’m sure, curious, to an ad that Senator Clinton is apparently running today. It asks a legitimate question. It says, who do you want answering the phone in the White House when it's 3:00 a.m. and something has happened in the world. It’s a legitimate question. And we’ve seen these ads before. They’re usually the kind that play upon people's fears and try to scare up votes.

I don't think these ads will work this time because the question is not about picking up the phone. The question is, what kind of judgment will you exercise when you pick up that phone. In fact, we have had a red phone moment; it was the decision to invade Iraq.
Senator Clinton gave the wrong answer. George Bush gave the wrong answer. John McCain gave the wrong answer. I stood up and I said that a war in Iraq would be unwise. It cost us thousands of lives and billions of dollars. I said that it would distract us from the real threat that we face, and that we should take the fight to al Qaeda in Afghanistan. That’s the judgment I made on the most important foreign policy decision of our generation.

I will never see the threat of terrorism as a way to scare up votes, because it's a threat that should rally the country around our common enemies. That is the judgment we need at 3:00 a.m., and that's the judgment that I am running for as president of the United States of America.

Eazy, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

dismantling Al Qaeda as primarily a police/intelligence operation, and not a military one.

Absolutely what it always should've been... and an idea ridiculed by the MSM and all of Washington for 6-1/2 years. And particularly given his historic ascent to the White House, Obama will be expected to do plaenty of bombing to show he's really a president. To take that as anything but a given is Pollyannish.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama will be expected to do plaenty of bombing to show he's really a president.

What will he bomb that isn't already being bombed? Do you mean Pakistan or what? Because I don't think anyone would jump the gun like that.

Gavin, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno Morbz I don't see him doing a lot of military chest-thumping

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

He'll do it with a heavy sigh and "great reluctance," as befits a good self-described Chicago politician.

As for where, a good opportunity always knocks.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's candidacy indicates an exhaustion with military chest-thumping, yes? I've thought it's weird that no one in the MSM says that the "hope" message is basically a sublimated anti-war theme. O's the only candidate with even marginal antiwar cred.

Gavin, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Dr Morbius, I'm all for heavy doses of cynicism when it comes to U.S. politics, but this is just blustering.

Gavin, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe "plenty of bombing" is the wrong phrase; not as much as his predecessor. And that will satisfy the "left."

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius would you like to actually stake anything on this prediction? right now you sound like don weiner saying he'll bet his balls that giuliani get the nom

and what, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

is anybody laying claims to Don's balls, btw? does ILX have a trophy room?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

whats a wiener without its balls

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

banned

max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

He'll do it with a heavy sigh and "great reluctance," as befits a good self-described Chicago politician.

What Chicago politicans, machine or otherwise, have done this?

Eazy, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

what don't you remember when Mayor Daley bombed Cuba

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

now we're gettin' somewhere!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Dynastic entitlement, policies that build personal wealth and power, a populism that still negotiates for titans of industry: yeah, Obama is just another cog in that machine.

Eazy, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Sounds like the Clintons to me.

Bill Magill, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

WP: Possible GOP Lines of Attack Against Obama

To me, the standout quote is from HRC's chief strategist, Mark Penn:

"But the truth is, if he is ever in a general election, a lot of positions he took in 2003 and 2004 will come back to haunt him in a big way and a lot of the vetting that didn’t happen will happen. The independent and Republican support that he has had will evaporate really quickly.”

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 29 February 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah Penn's been real OTM so far hasn't he

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

no surprise here but I think Penn is full of shit - lol xpost

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

much rather have Axelrod running the ship

“They will try to rerun old races and battles and divide along traditional lines,” Mr. Axelrod said. “I think the country is eager for something else. And I think the country is not going to be so easily distracted. We are prepared to deal with whatever they offer.”

“I understand very, very well how facts can be manipulated,” he said. “I’m not going to get into specifics, but I know his record well, we know his record well, and we understand the areas that they might try to exploit. But I also am very, very confident that we can parry those kind of tactics effectively and show the same appeal with independent voters and some Republican voters that he has in Illinois.”

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

If Mark Penn was a doctor he would have been sued for malpractice by now.

Nicole, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

So, if this "vetting" he refers to would be so disasterous among independents, why wouldn't it help HRC for her campaign to do it now? Enquiring minds want to know.

Aimless, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I agree with all that about Mark Penn. I also agree that Obama's the much better nominee. Doesn't change my uneasiness about the GE, tho.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 29 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

AUSTIN -- The Texas Democratic Party is warning that its March 4 caucuses could be delayed or disrupted after aides to White House hopeful Hillary Clinton raised the specter of an "imminent" lawsuit over its complicated delegate selection process, officials said Thursday night.

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/502662.html

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently the clinton campaign is already denying that like crazy

gff, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts Uneasiness is good. Complacency will bite on the ass every time.

Just got off a call with DC friend whose ex-Clinton staffer hubby thinks HRC needs to get out ASAP for reasons of 'legacy preservation' - the campaign has done nothing so much as remind people about what was wrong with Clintons rather than what was right. Friend has voted across spectrum and thinks McCain = OLD whenever people see him and she hasn't had a look at that Popeye photo yet.

Oh and what a great LGBT policy statement - I agree with him on the whole 'civil union not actual marriage' thing - perhaps from Constitutional law perspective it can be argued that marriage = religion and civil unions = state? Keep it separated, yo?

suzy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

from Constitutional law perspective it can be argued that marriage = religion and civil unions = state

this has always seemed like the logical solution to me and I don't understand why its never really clearly spelled out this way (apart from homophobes demand to conflate the two, which goes hand-in-hand with their gay marriage will lead to me marrying a box turtle claims, etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it would be kind of funny if Shakey married a box turtle, so I support gay marriage.

HI DERE, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan Lacey could make the invite.

Eppy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

all these years the law has been holding me back

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMA '08: He'll let Shakey shack up with Myrtle.

HI DERE, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Sad face on Yertle.

Eppy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://zenandjuice.com/word/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/drawme.jpg

I now pronounce you...

Eazy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

lolposts, esp THOSE LIL GUYS.

Yeah, here in YURP you can't even invoke your deity remix at the town hall or bring God into the proceedings at all. Even in Britain with its state religion angle!

Another thing to do is to get God off the money and the Pledge of Allegiance for the same Constitutional reasons; these were only sprinkled with religious pixie dust during McCarthy. And in my aggressively secular high school with its even split of Catholics, Jews and Protestants we were always 'one nation, indivisible' without recourse to God. 90 per cent of students were believers and nobody had a cow, amazing...

suzy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

But suzy people FOUGHT and DIED for that money.

Eppy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

thats not gonna happen

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think obama gives a shit about those debates

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

My dad last night on McCain being a hero for not leaving captivity early: "So he's a hero because he followed the rules?" (My dad being a vet, fwiw.)

Eppy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

WHY I AM NOT PRESIDENT PART 3455564

One thing that totally impresses me about Obama is his ability to make a good case for resolution of a heretofore controiversial issue sensibly, using very measured language.

xpost with privileged people grafting/following the rules there's always this thing of OMG they did it like *us* have a cookie please.

Can someone repost Popeye for me? I'm scared to do a reload...

suzy, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Never mind, Popeye found and despatched to insider on maternity leave!

suzy, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I know not being in a contested race anymore puts him at a disadvantage but wow mccain only raised $12M in February vs. $35M for Hillary and I think close to $50M for Obama

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

How many college professors have we had as presidents? Woodrow Wilson, maybe?

kingfish, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

How many faculty brats have we had as a president? Would Obama be the first?

suzy, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

wait when was Eisenhower prez of Columbia?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

right before he was prez.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain not exactly running away from Hagee .... pretty weak stuff here

"Yesterday, Pastor John Hagee endorsed my candidacy for president in San Antonio, Texas. However, in no way did I intend for his endorsement to suggest that I in turn agree with all of Pastor Hagee's views, which I obviously do not.
"I am hopeful that Catholics, Protestants and all people of faith who share my vision for the future of America will respond to our message of defending innocent life, traditional marriage, and compassion for the most vulnerable in our society."

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

if obama said that re: farrakhan he'd be dead in the water

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

difference is Obama can easily afford to alienate the radical black muslim community. McCain has no such wiggle room when it comes to evangelicals.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

the other difference is the persecution of jews is on a much grander scale in modern times than persecution of catholics

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

haha yeah that too

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

PAPISTS!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

hey according to Hagee the jews only have themselves to blame

"It was the disobedience and rebellion of the Jews, God's chosen people, to their covenantal responsibility to serve only the one true God, Jehovah, that gave rise to the opposition and persecution that they experienced beginning in Canaan and continuing to this very day....
How utterly repulsive, insulting, and heartbreaking to God for His chosen people to credit idols with bringing blessings He had showered upon the chosen people. Their own rebellion had birthed the seed of anti-Semitism that would arise and bring destruction to them for centuries to come.... it rises from the judgment of God uppon his rebellious chosen people."

(sorry for just c+p'ing half of talking points memo the last couple posts .... slow day at work)

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I always suspected God was an anti-semite

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

YEEEEEELAAAAOW! EASY THERE!

gr8080, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

also hi dere isn't this what we're talking about when we say OBAMA WANTS TO BOMB PAKISTAN

???

gr8080, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

DAMN - http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/02/29/bonus_quote_of_the_day.html

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Is that really that "DAMN"-worthy?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL, certainly, PWN, maybe, but DAMN?

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought it was funny

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

they are gettin kinda cocky .... not even trying to manage expectations anymore, that guy and Plouffe are basically saying "this is over on Tuesday"

hope they're right

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

When's the last time Penn got a zing in like that?

Eazy, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

its basic math

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean no way is Clinton going to win either state by double digits, and that's what she would need to just pull even with his delegate count. When she doesn't get that, there will be HUGE pressure from the party for her to concede.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

*BREAKING* HIGHLY INFLUENCIAL SUPERDELEGATE SWITCHES TO OBAMA'S SIDE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe0BPwWAxnk

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Is that really that "DAMN"-worthy?

i thought it was. perhaps you missed the reference - http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/02/29/the_phone_is_ringing.html

gabbneb, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoever said this was the ZINGingest campaign ever was dead on.

Sparkle Motion, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary to do The Daily Show Monday night. Have her staffers not been watching the show lately? Won't this probably do her more harm than good?

Hatch, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

they should offer her as many pillows as she wants

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

fully expecting a phone-call-mid-interview gag

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

o wow obama campaign already has thier own "3am phonecall"

that is fucking fast

gr8080, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

just came here to post about it xp

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Your headline said "Pregnant" another anti-feminist post!

just another dem | 02.29.08 05:35 PM

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Come on Hillary, pack it in, try to get yourself a job on Obama's cabinet or you'll end up with nothing at all.

StanM, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

you know, she's really not that far behind obama... i see no reason for her to "pack it in" just yet.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

wow the turnaround on that ad is insane.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

she's too far behind to catch up without posting double digit victories in a couple big states, which is next to impossible to pull off.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

and certainly doesn't look likely given how things are polling and how badly Clinton's campaign is performing

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

im starting to feel sympathy for her, a sign that she really is finished

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link

even so, his delegate lead is really slight and he won't be able to get the required amount before the convention anyway.. lets be fair here.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

Re: Hillary not being that far behind, Marc Ambinder's rosiest scenario has her behind Obama by 60 pledged delegates even if she does better than expected in every upcoming contest. She can't win the nomination, unless the superdelegates change the outcome.

Hatch, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

that is fucking fast

THE QUICKENING

dmr, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

She should stay in the Senate. Better for policy wonks anyway.

Gavin, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Marc,

You say Obama will be closer to the victory.

Give me a break. This is the biggest fairy tale I have heard.

You do not want to roll the dice.

Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in 1984 and 1988. He was not close to the victory.

Give me a break. This is the biggest fairy tale I have heard.

Posted by eorse | February 29, 2008 4:49 PM

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link

even so, his delegate lead is really slight

this is simply incorrect, particularly in regards to how many delegates are left to claim

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:33 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

have you guys checked out hillaryis44.org? LOLZ FOR DAYS.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

and its been noted many times that the superdelegates will feel obligated by both internal party pressure and external popular pressure to back the candidate with the majority of delegates. Hillary "winning" the nomination on the backs of superdelegates would be a colossally stupid move in terms of the GE, and the Democratic Party on the whole is aware of this.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

you're right shakey, I just don't think we should count her out just yet.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2964115720080229?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true

^ o has a lead in tx, gaining in ohio

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/mccains-liberal.html

^ mccain accidentally calls himself a liberal

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama got what, like, 10 new superdelegate endorsements this week to Hillary's -2 since Super Tuesday? There's no f'ing way the superdelegates will toss the nomination to Hillary anyway. It's just stupid for her to stay in the race unless she wins huge next week.

Hatch, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

hahahaha McCain is the gift that keeps on giving

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

though i get the sense that post-nyt-story, it won't do much as far as getting the right wing attack dogs on him xxp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

big hoos you've done this a couple times now ... pretty sure those articles were both referenced upthread

deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG Hillary quits!

StanM, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Ah, remember the internet on 2008?

Eazy, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:08 (sixteen years ago) link

big hoos you've done this a couple times now ... pretty sure those articles were both referenced upthread

-- deej, Friday, February 29, 2008 11:45 PM

yeah i guess in a thread like this it's a safe assumption everything gets covered by somebody at some point. i'll back off.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG

But Republicans said it was just the faintest preview of what voters are likely to see in a general election — whether from McCain, the Republican National Committee or an independent group.

"It's a love tap compared to the Wu-Tang fist of fury that's coming at this guy in the fall," said Rick Wilson, a Republican media consultant.

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

quote from here

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

and they wouldn't do anything like that if Hillary was the candidate? What IS the point of this republican "just you wait" thing with Obama?

StanM, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:20 (sixteen years ago) link

More basketball metaphors on the way.

Eazy, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Even before the evening news, today's campaign news now is "New Clinton Ad Prompts Reply From Obama"

Eazy, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoever has the last word by printing deadline wins, and Obama's good at that game.

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 March 2008 00:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Yglesias is OTM here. It's pretty pathetic that HRC's top campaign advisors sashayed into a major conference call with the press on the heels of releasing that "3 am" television spot without being able to cite to a single significant nat'l security crisis that HRC has had to confront. Wasn't she a NY Senator during 9/11? Surely they could make something of that (tho, admittedly, in citing to 9/11 she'd be drawing from the same winning campaign playbook as Rudy Giuliani). But they didn't, which speak volumes.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 1 March 2008 01:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont believe republican reps are aware enough of wu tang clan to have this be a ref. to obama's blackness. i think he literally meant it as a reference to the old movies

deej, Saturday, 1 March 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/3277/weetangclanjl0.gif

deej, Saturday, 1 March 2008 02:34 (sixteen years ago) link

awesome

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 March 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

*BREAKING* HIGHLY INFLUENCIAL SUPERDELEGATE SWITCHES TO OBAMA'S SIDE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe0BPwWAxnk

-- The Brainwasher, Saturday, March 1, 2008 12:07 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Link

A+++

StanM, Saturday, 1 March 2008 08:50 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah well

Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

carter ii at best?

huckabee 12?

El Tomboto, Saturday, 1 March 2008 08:54 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no, will.i.am does it again. one of the people appearances was good for a lol, at least.

meanwhile, hillary wants you to know that she's gone off the deep end.

http://thepage.time.com/2008/03/01/dueling-videos-for-dueling-candidates-hit-the-web/

gabbneb, Saturday, 1 March 2008 13:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Doesn't a montage of Nicholson villains seem...lazy?

I would love it if the Obama campaign responded with a William H. Macy montage.

Eazy, Saturday, 1 March 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

It was funny but thousands of people have just been left with unappetizing mental pic of what Jack's 'morning salute' might consist of.

suzy, Saturday, 1 March 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah I love Nicholson but I think the fact that they've got "Col. William Jeffords" endorsing them speaks volumes.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 1 March 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

"You snotty bastard..."

http://www.worldinprogress.org/wip/images/few_good_men.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 1 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/2/105441/9335/675/467139

gabbneb, Sunday, 2 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

That blogger is an university professor, and she still believes in "subliminal messages to stimulate racist thoughts in the unsuspecting viewer"?! Doesn't she know the whole idea of subliminal messages had been proven invalid like decades ago?

Tuomas, Sunday, 2 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Clift: She's running the testosterone campaign, he's running the estrogen campaign, and only a man can run the estrogen campaign.

gabbneb, Sunday, 2 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Tuomas, Sunday, 2 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Btw, I wanted to ask a question about that Will.i.am Obama ad... Don't you think it's a bit scary, all those background voices constantly chanting "Obama", and the people in the ad joining them? To me it feels like there's a touch of something akin to religious fanaticism in it. Maybe it's just a matter of diffence in political cultures though? In here political ads tend to be more dry and matter-of-fact, and overt emotionalism is not usually seen as a good thing. Is that a typical American political ad?

Tuomas, Sunday, 2 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

It is a bit over-the-top even for American politics, Tuomas. And that's also been one of the Clinton campaign's favorite points of attack on the Obama campaign, with Clinton presenting herself as the more *rational* politician, although it doesn't seem to have worked that well.

Admittedly, I'm a bit put off by the Obama campaign style, but I like Obama and I just see his campaign as a necessary evil that's not really all that evil.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Although, to be fair, the Will.I.Am video is not an official campaign ad.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I just finished watching the last part of Century of the Self, which goes a lot into the transformation of American and British political campaigning from Reagan and Thatcher on, where political campaigns come to look much more like other forms of modern marketing, as opposed to the old model of trying to make what at least seems like rational argument for particular policy choices. Interestingly, Obama seems to have followed more in the footsteps of Bill Clinton in embracing that new style than Hillary Clinton has.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

omg @ that pajamas thing

gershy, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah. The first thing that comes to my mind when I see "N-I-C" is "Nice"

Hurting 2, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

aw

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/8781.html

gabbneb, Sunday, 2 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Falling Hillary

http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/hillary.htm

StanM, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

That's weird.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

will.i.am needs to go the fuck away from that campaign, he is unaware of how bad these things come off (to me). I mean, I'm willing to believe that not all of the US are haughty music snobs who find his work tedious and smug, but I'm not willing to belive that the rest of the US, taste aside, agree with that assessment

akm, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

See also: Falling Hillary in a Bikini!

no thanks

deej, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

er, disagree, I meant

akm, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

will.i.am vid is a Gap advert set to music.

suzy, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

At least Hillary's folks stayed away from the opening monologue of The Departed.

Eazy, Sunday, 2 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Current site graphic:

[img src="http://www.barackobama.com/images/sitedown_traffic.jpg";]

kingfish, Monday, 3 March 2008 00:46 (sixteen years ago) link

dammit

http://www.barackobama.com/images/sitedown_traffic.jpg

kingfish, Monday, 3 March 2008 00:47 (sixteen years ago) link

See also: Falling Hillary in a Bikini!

Ha! She's still wearing sensible shoes.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 3 March 2008 01:27 (sixteen years ago) link

But in recent days, Clinton campaign officials have suggested that if Obama doesn't win all four Tuesday contests — which also include races in Rhode Island and Vermont — it would signal "buyers remorse" and be reason to continue the campaign to the next major primary, Pennsylvania on April 22.

dmr, Monday, 3 March 2008 01:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't you think it's a bit scary, all those background voices constantly chanting "Obama", and the people in the ad joining them? To me it feels like there's a touch of something akin to religious fanaticism in it.

to be fair, i think we can partly attribute this level/variety of fervor to 8 years of pretty rough going (for almost everyone but especially Democratic adherents). But no, I don't think I've ever seen what could be called a rationally presented campaign for federal office.

tremendoid, Monday, 3 March 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

and of course he's not rare in trying to bottle and nurture this type of following, just rare in succeeding, and with such disparate constituencies.
This type of stuff is usually confined to such a narrow bandwidth that a Nader 2K or a Ron Paul scenario is about the ceiling of it.

tremendoid, Monday, 3 March 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

oh lol, senator clinton: "As far as I know" Obama is not a Muslim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ

Clay, Monday, 3 March 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

oh my fucking god

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 3 March 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

WORST SURROGATES EVER

http://www.observer.com/2008/stumping-clinton-steinem-says-mccains-p-o-w-cred-overrated

gershy, Monday, 3 March 2008 05:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://pwconservative.blogspot.com/2008/02/exclusive-pornstars-for-obama.html

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2008
-
"Actor " in Obama ad, Appears in Softcore Porno
-
In the "Yes We can" Video for Obama, One of the "Celebrities" (Eric Balfour) pictured here:

Has appeared in several extremely explicit films, A quick imdb.com search shows up one particular NC17 movie "Lie With Me", One of the only modern films to contain unsimulated sexual material.

http://imdb.com/name/nm0050156/

This is a slap in the face to all decent Americans, The type of content in these so called "Films" is degrading the entire moral fabric of this nation,

After all of the evangelical outreach Obama has attempted, I Find it astounding that he would want to risk it all.

Now while I understand that Sen. Obama cannot account for all endorsements, I Would appreciate if his campaign would apologize for this Ad, Given it's disrespect for Christian Values
(Thanks for the tip jocie)

Posted by PWConservative at 8:49 PM
-

[for extra lolz, count the number of comment he deleted in response to this post]

kingfish, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Hee:

More Supporters Barack Obama Needs To Denounce and Reject

[...]

Incidentally, the "Yes We Can" video is directed by Jesse Dylan, whose father Bob Dylan wrote "Subterranean Homesick Blues," which included the lyric "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows," which is where the violent, radical, left-wing group the Weather Underground got its name. And this is not Obama's only association with the 1960s terrorist organization. Obama once went to a party at the home of Bill Ayers, who was once a member of the Weather Underground and is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Does Obama endorse the Weather Underground's plot to foment a violent overthrow of the U.S. government? And how does Obama feel about Dylan's betraying thousands of very sincere fans of folk music by going electric? Why didn't Tim Russert ask him about that?[...]

kingfish, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:33 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost:
Brendan said...

I have another question: How did you recognize this guy in the first place?
February 28, 2008 11:40 PM

PWConservative said...

It came from an anonymous source, probably chelsea clinton

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Eric Balfour, also a former cast member of 24...a show the right loves to love. So, um...yeah, that's pretty much what some actors do. Work where they can find jobs.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"As far as I know" Obama is not a Muslim. <- sue her for defamation

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

FFS, these two are supposed to be on the same side! McCain must be enjoying this battle

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 06:51 (sixteen years ago) link

One of the only modern films to contain unsimulated sexual material.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 3 March 2008 07:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, the mere existence of NC-17 movies is a slap in the face to all decent Americans, The type of content in these so called "Films" is degrading the entire moral fabric of this nation, and it's all Obama's fault.

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 07:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.towleroad.com/2008/02/barack-obama-te.html

"An interesting moment came when he was asked a question about LGBT rights and delivered an answer that seemed to suit the questioner, listing the various attributes — race, gender, etc. — that shouldn't trigger discrimination, to successive cheers. When he came to saying that gays and lesbians deserve equality, though, the crowd fell silent. So he took a different tack: 'Now I’m a Christian, and I praise Jesus every Sunday,' he said, to a sudden wave of noisy applause and cheers. 'I hear people saying things that I don’t think are very Christian with respect to people who are gay and lesbian,' he said, and the crowd seemed to come along with him this time."

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 08:38 (sixteen years ago) link

the KKK does NOT endorse Obama: http:// www . kkk . bz (remove spaces, I'm not going to link there directly)

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 10:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Are they going for Hillary then?

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 March 2008 10:56 (sixteen years ago) link

oh lol, senator clinton: "As far as I know" Obama is not a Muslim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ

-- Clay, Sunday, March 2, 2008 6:50 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

Okay, fuck Hillary Clinton. If she wants to spout the rhetoric of the right-wing attack machine, she can go to hell for all I care.

The Reverend, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:32 (sixteen years ago) link

She kinda is a neocon though, isn't she?

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Err... I thought I was exaggerating, but

http://www.counterpunch.org/frank07252007.html
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_pt0cIudJ0

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:48 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ have you people lost your minds?? she begins by saying "absolutely not" and says she understands the kind of smears that are tried against national figures.

before you actually wish the fires of eternal damnation on people can you realize that you are engaging in the kind of bullsh*t meta-parsing scrutiny that NO ONE could EVER stand up to?

don't be surprised, if obama gets the nom, when cable pundits, blogs, etc start turning their context-free laserbeam on HIS words. i suspect you won't like it so much then. which is why you should resist this crap, beginning now. live by the drudge, die by the drudge. or tucker, whichever.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i agree that holbrooke suxx tho

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Just having a bit of fun, it doesn't matter who wins, they're all politicians :-)

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 11:55 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary wins in Ohio and loses in Texas (which seems quite possible), can she still win the nom?

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 March 2008 12:00 (sixteen years ago) link

a bit of fun

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 12:05 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry, i'll go now

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 12:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"Just a bit of fun"

Have these words ever ever been used to describe anything remotely good?

(Spin off from rear-of-the-year musings)

-- Tom, Monday, 17 September 2001 00:00 (6 years ago) Bookmark Link

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 12:19 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ have you people lost your minds?? she begins by saying "absolutely not" and says she understands the kind of smears that are tried against national figures.

before you actually wish the fires of eternal damnation on people can you realize that you are engaging in the kind of bullsh*t meta-parsing scrutiny that NO ONE could EVER stand up to?

yea, i agree with tracer hand here. she was pretty much unequivocal about the whole thing, very adamant that this is completely unsubstantiated.

i admit, the "as far as i know" line was kind of weird, but i think part of the awkwardness that some people might be reading into probably resulted from the fucking stupidity of the question. come on -- there's these underground internet rumors that obama's a crypto-muslim, and then you ask the other main candidate if she buys into those bullshit rumors? have you guys ever been asked something so ridiculous that it's hard to answer without looking partially like a fool because the question, well, was so ridiculous? that's kind of what seemed to me to be the case with this.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 14:34 (sixteen years ago) link

oh and apparently some other memo came out about the obama-canadian-NAFTA story, which isn't good for the obama campaign: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/The_Canadian_memo.html

this story seemed to get some traction on the web in the past week, but according to some polls, most ohioans 1.) don't apparently seem much difference between the candidates opinions on NAFTA, 2.)aren't even really sure what those opinions are, and 3.) if anything, see clinton as the more NAFTA-friendly candidate. so i'm not sure how important this obama-canada story is.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 14:48 (sixteen years ago) link

don't apparently seem much difference

*see* much difference, obv.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Print the rest of the memo, Ben, where Goolsbee says Obama wants to tighten labo(u)r and environmental standards. Also, as Goolsbee notes, this is was someone's own thoughts--not a quote of Goolsbee himself.

Posted By: David | March 03, 2008 at 09:23 AM

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

A senior foreign policy adviser to leading Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has told The Nation that if elected Obama will not "rule out" using private security companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq. The adviser also said that Obama does not plan to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009, when a new President will be sworn in.

...The irony is that it was Senator Obama who sponsored a bill in February 2007 defining a legal structure to prosecute State Department contractor crimes in US courts. Obama staffers say they will "fight like hell to get it passed." But it may not pass before the next President takes power. Even if it does and Bush signs it, serious questions will remain unresolved about how contractor crimes can be monitored effectively. The senior adviser acknowledged that Obama could find himself in a situation where, as President, he continues using forces he himself has identified as "unaccountable." The Obama campaign, in other words, may have painted itself into a corner.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/scahill

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs there is no irony in obama saying he might keep using contractors in iraq and wanting those contractors to be beholden to the rule of law. in fact, he almost certainly has to keep using contractors, they constitute a huge percentage of the coalition forces. it's either contractors or the draft, really.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

or maybe the WITHDRAWAL all the naifs are expecting.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/03/opinion/03krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

krugman is crazy

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Not awful, but a space filler.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs i bet that's what you tell all the guys

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

deej you think anyone who doesn't carry an obama rosary in their crotch is crazy

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, i think he's pretty great but you need to keep your head, otherwise you end up overdoing your own justifications for things he says and wind up advocating first strikes on pakistan

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Obama a Mac and Clinton a PC?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/technology/04link.html?_r=1&ex=1218517200&oref=slogin

O_o

(What's McCain supposed to be then?)

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain = UNIVAC, natch

elmo argonaut, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

an abacus

YGS, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

a magic 8-ball

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

a goddam handgun you fucking pencilnecks

gff, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, i think he's pretty great but you need to keep your head, otherwise you end up overdoing your own justifications for things he says and wind up advocating first strikes on pakistan

-- Tracer Hand, Monday, March 3, 2008 10:18 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

nah i feel you, i just dont get where all this clinton enthusiasm is coming from on his part

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

what clinton enthusiasm? in this column?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://hillaryclinton.com/video/141.aspx

fuck this

ann richards needs to haunt the fuck out of hillary

and what, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton enthusiasm? In my vagina?

(It's more likely than you think!)

HI DERE, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

when my radio shrieked at me this morning "AND WHO DO YOU TRUST TO FIX HEALTH CARE?" my response was "NOT YOU, BEEEEYATCH!"

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

(-- insert random link to vacuous obama ad/"controversial" obama rumor)

I'VE FINALLY HAD ENOUGH, HIS VERY SCENT MAKES ME ILL

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

daria you're still logged into tracer hand's account

and what, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

tucker carlson says hillary clinton is a neocon!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

ethan i'm logged into everyone's account. i, daria am actually the only other real person here besides you.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

'real'

Ed, Monday, 3 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

ok wtf whatever dude

StanM, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

very adamant that this is completely unsubstantiated

no, see the answer is that obama is not a muslim, or that he is a christian, not that rumors of his islamist radicalism are 'unsubstantiated', with only the faintest whiff of faux-naif enjoyment.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

rumors that hillary beats her husband are completely unsubstantiated, of course

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, if she wants to be the serious, experienced candidate, maybe she should stop being, you know, juvenile

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

but once again, anything she doesn't believe to try to get a reaction. Hillary Clinton for Best Troll 2008.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

love that this is the main picture on my google news page, it makes it look like obama's casting a spell

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2008/03/02/barackobama_wideweb__470x336,0.jpg

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

esp when its all crunched down to a smaller size so the ceiling looks like its swirling around him

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

compare http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/15744.JPG

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

if an electorate want to be a serious, experienced body of informed and purposeful opinion maybe it should stop these kinds of juvenile mind-reading games

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, so should every english lit dept

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

KROFT: “You don't believe that Senator Obama's a Muslim?”

CLINTON: “Of course not. I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that. I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.”

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

you think that exchange helps your argument?

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

well it certainly doesn't help yours!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The answer is "Of course not." Not “Of course not. I mean, that, you know, there is no basis for that. I take him on the basis of what he says. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that.” She knows better than to actually smirk.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

It certainly does.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

wait dude i found a new angle! when asked if she DIDN'T believe that obama was a muslim she said NO which means she DOES!!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know what the american people would do without these trenchant analyses

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

to each his own fairy tale

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

"fairy tale"? are you saying that because i'm black?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think "fairy" meant black

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

she's the one who's trying to hold onto working-class guys

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

now you're saying i'm gay??! when will this smearing end??

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

ann coulter's girl

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

were your last two posts accidental output from the gabbneb generator?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

two Ls in Hillary

http://www.theassassinationofhillaryclinton.com/

onimo, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/xdb37n.jpg

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

how insightful

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.factcheck.org/demos/factcheck/imagefiles/Image/11.16.07%20Clinton%20vs.%20Obama/obama_2.jpg

Of course. I mean, that, you know, there is a basis for that. I take her on the basis their marriage. And, you know, there isn't any reason to doubt that Bill loves having sex with Hillary.

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks, jhoshea

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

high fives all around!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

where's my dog pound?? hoo hoo hoo hoo

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

dammmnnnn its gettin heated up in this piece !

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, we're all down with the tastefulness of i-find-hillary-physically-unappealing.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf @ anti hillary art piece

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

how krugmanesque

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

now that's some shitty art

gff, Monday, 3 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess it's good that Hillary's using all of the lines McCain will, because when McCain revives them, Obama can tell America that he's acting just like Hillary.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://brentroos.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/opp.jpg

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

omg mccains face will go so red when obama hillaryizes him - cannot wait for this excellent zing

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

so after hillary's diminishing double-digit leads and a week or so of the polls tightening in both texas and ohio, a few now have her maintaining her leads (and in the case of ohio, even increasing them):

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/poll_hillarys_lead_in_ohio_gro.php

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/poll_hillary_takes_lead_in_tex.php

i don't know, they're just polls, etc., but i'm getting a little nervous. i know that even small hillary victories won't change the delegate count at all, but they would nevertheless give her reason to stick around for a while, and increase the intensity of the campaign, the likelihood of florida/michigan bs., etc.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i think it's gotten to the point that any further extension of the campaign isn't going to do any good for either dem candidate

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer the clinton/muslim bs is fair game for a few meta-reasons. i'm not as quick to agree that she's piggybacking on this rove-style at the same time as dismissing it, i just think it's another really bad performance from her.

how hard is it to say "no"? if you already have credibility problems (let's not debate the fairness of this all over again), why exacerbate them on a touchy subject your opponents are already going to make hay out of? just, you know, say no, this is bullshit w/o getting the verbal signal/noise ratio all dirtied up with "i have no reason to believe" and "as far as I know" etc etc.

it's just made an issue where there didn't need to be one. which means to me that, nefarious or not, she isn't nearly as good at politics as she says she is

gff, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

not sure if this is posted upthread but heres the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

ethan i'm logged into everyone's account. i, daria am actually the only other real person here besides you.

M.V., Monday, 3 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Naomi Klein: Obama, Being Called a Muslim Is Not a Smear

What is disturbing about the campaign's response is that it leaves unchallenged the disgraceful and racist premise behind the entire "Muslim smear": that being Muslim is de facto a source of shame. Obama's supporters often say they are being "Swiftboated," casually accepting the idea that being accused of Muslimhood is tantamount to being accused of treason.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Been a while since we've had some Gallup up in this thread:

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/030208DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

jaymc, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

lol naomi klein you cant possibly be serious

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Michy Obama profile in The New Yorker

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't believe in challenging the Islamophobia of the Great Unwashed, jhoshea? not "politic"?

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

It's at least less craven than "I love Jesus"

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

if thats what that article is saying i certainly missed it

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Um, Naomi, get real. The whisper campign isn't aimed at anyone who might accept your perspective. It is designed to plant doubts in the minds of the susceptible and to waste Obama's energy answering baseless rumors. That's what Swiftboating is all about.

It's not about whether the baseless charges should be considered legitimately harmful, but whether they are capable of doing harm.

Aimless, Monday, 3 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

some interesting things over at the daily kos from the weekend:

on obama generally outperforming polls (interesting especially in regard to polls' underestimating african-american turnout, which will play a role in both texas/ohio):
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/2/16596/61053/380/467458

on the impact of howard dean's leadership on new grassroots strategies (and how obama has capitalized on those strategies, while clinton has not):
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/2/1530/49441/494/466327

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary always ticks up in the closing day or two. She's certainly the favorite in OH, and she might pull TX out.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

she will not win tx, and this is the god's truth

m bison, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

she's going to be clobbered in houston, dallas, and austin, and probably the surrounding areas. she will win the valley and el paso, but these are not delegate heavy areas. polls are also probably not capturing the number of republicans voting in the dem primary for obama.

m bison, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

you don't think? i've been expecting it all along. xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

if the early voting tallies, the demographics, the polling trends, and the republican support are anything to go by, i'd say her chances of winning texas are slim. yall can tar and faether me jhoshea-pats style if i'm wrong.

m bison, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

just guessing like everybody else, but it seems likely there will be two complementary themes on wednesday: hillary resurgent (because she will win either ohio or texas, if not both), and "the race goes on!" then two threads breaking off from that: for hillary, a look at how she managed yet another "comeback" -- anonymous campaign staffers talking about how once she put the spotlight on obama, voters started second-guessing their enthusiasm, etc.; for obama, a "challenge": how does he react when he's put on the defensive, what's the campaign doing to reassure their supporters, superdelegates, etc.

the hell of it is, after tuesday there's just wyoming and mississippi -- neither of which will be determinative -- between now and april 22.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

how hard is it to say "no"?

she said no in just about every way you can. you are making sh*t up out of thin air because it suits your idea of hillary as a calculating politician who will inflect every response with subtle innuendo. not even the gods are as clever as you imagine her and her campaign to be. seriously, step back and breathe.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm assuming she'll lose on the delegate count, but it may be close enough in the vote that she'll claim a tie or victory.

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

yall can tar and faether me jhoshea-pats style if i'm wrong.

QFT.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 3 March 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

eh if she doesnt win both there will be insurmountable pressure for her to just give up

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i still think the nomination is obama's to lose, even if hillary pulls out narrow victories tomorrow. i guess what kind of sucks is that all that narrow clinton victories are going to do is prolong this shit when it isn't necessary to prolong it, and (obviously) increase the bitterness of this contest.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

a lot really depends on the media play of it. the narrative is stalled, and 'hillary strikes back!' makes for a good next act.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

tho maybe not as good as "shes ded!"

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

she said no in just about every way you can. you are making sh*t up out of thin air because it suits your idea of hillary as a calculating politician who will inflect every response with subtle innuendo. not even the gods are as clever as you imagine her and her campaign to be. seriously, step back and breathe.

what the fuck i just said the exact opposite

gff, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

btw i spent about two and a half hours yesterday calling texas voters as part of the moveon obama party thing. (mine was in bed-stuy and was hosted by a drag queen.) called about 100 people, talked to about 20. i have absolutely no idea how much good it did, but it was kinda fun.

YGS, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, I mean *I'm* getting psychologically tired of the whole campaign, but that's not a good enough reason for Clinton to drop out this week. What I am unsure about is whether it would be good for the Dem chances of taking the White House in November to keep the primary going until the convention. Maybe it would be to have people mostly on the same side of issues (as opposed to tactics/strategies) keep going at each other, rather than have the right-wingers get to focus. I just don't know.

Euler, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

a lot really depends on the media play of it. the narrative is stalled, and 'hillary strikes back!' makes for a good next act.

yea, and this will be the narrative for a while if she pulls off narrow victories. but there is a long time before PA, and fortunately i think the delegate numbers will sink deeper and deeper into the media's consciousness, especially because obama will likely net a few more delegates when wyoming and mississippi vote in a week or so. even the clinton campaign has been saying that this is a race for delegates (at least that was their line around 2/5)

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

between now and april 22.

fuuuuuuuuck

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

part of the moveon obama party thing. mine was in bed-stuy and was hosted by a drag queen.

SAN FRANCISCO Democrats! (or LUCKY CHENG Democrats!)

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Kroft: "But is Hillary Clinton a man?"

Obama: "Of course not. I mean — let me — I have no reason to believe she's a man. She had said she's a woman and I have no reason to doubt her.

Kroft: "And you are willing to go on record REJECTING these charges, or will you merely 'denounce' them? The charges that she is a man."

Obama: "Yes. No. As far as I know. COUGH-PENIS-COUGH."

Kroft: "Would you describe these charges as scurrilous?"

Hadrian VIII, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

have the campaigns released their February fundraising totals yet? anyone here have the numbers?

elmo argonaut, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's camp has done a real good job of pushing the media narrative into 'hillary has momentum' mode i think. reading thepage made me all worried again lol

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

plus shes pretty convincingly making the case that she'll push on past tuesday - implying to her supporters that hope is not lost, dont give up the fight etc, which seems like a good tactic regardless of whether it is true that she will or not (it will of course also inflame the opposition so maybe it will come out as a toss up?)

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

have the campaigns released their February fundraising totals yet? anyone here have the numbers?

not to my knowledge (you said "campaigns" -- clinton raised $35 million, mccain $12 million, but obama hasn't released them yet)

i thought they would release the number today, but maybe they're holding back in the event that clinton pulls off narrow victories. since they've already said that their number is "considerably more" than hillary's, it'd be a way to interrupt the hillary-comeback narrative, i guess.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

it better be more than $50 mil if he really wants that to effectively stop her - thats been the assumed amount since she released her numbers

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

fundraising numbers:

Obama
Semi-Pro
Clinton
Vantage Point

Dr Morbius, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

urmorbs post^

jhøshea, Monday, 3 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh come on, morbs isn't that old

gabbneb, Monday, 3 March 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

The National Weather Service is looking for freezing rain to cover most of the northern half of the state, which will be under a winter storm through Wednesday morning. The weather service says if temperatures fail to crack the freezing mark on Tuesday, a "significant" coating of ice is possible.

Across most of southern Ohio, there's a threat of heavy rain and flooding. The forecasters expect 1 to 2 inches of rainfall in the region on primary day, with even higher amounts possible in some areas.

maybe the senior citizens will stay home?

(my grandparents are 90 and support hillary, but i think they got absentee ballots)

Mark Clemente, Monday, 3 March 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

The Dallas Morning News gets hold of Clinton caucus "training materials," in which supporters are instructed to fight for procedural control of caucuses.

The materials say in part, "DO NOT allow the supporter of another candidate to serve in leadership roles."

It goes on to say, "If our supporters are outnumbered, ask the Temporary Chair if one of our supporters can serve as the Secretary, in the interest of fairness.

"The control of the sign-in sheets and the announcement of the delegates allotted to each candidate are the critical functions of the Chair and Secretary. This is why it is so important that Hillary supporters hold these positions."

Some of the moments on the ground in Nevada showed how crucial technical control can be, particularly when -- there, as expected in Texas -- nobody has any idea what the rules are. Really makes you love the caucus process.

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, now that smells disturbingly bad...

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 3 March 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

gff ok, sorry, so you were saying she f*cked up with her response? alright. i still don't buy that but i respect it.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

once again i am shocked, shocked that there is politics going on in this campaign

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

hey tracer what do you think about this kind of politics?

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/2/201352/0048/265/467565

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean really, how far does she have to go before you think 'you know, maybe shes being kind of sleazy?'

deej, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:32 (sixteen years ago) link

wow @ using people as signposts

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:37 (sixteen years ago) link

deej i think that's a third-hand comment from a blog, is what i think

let's assume it's all true though - is it sleazy to hire a marketing company to get fake "supporters" out to hold signs for you? dunno

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:51 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah it is, kinda

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean lolz get some real black supporters

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i lean more towards "something every candidate does but which no one is proud of and would be embarrassed by if rumbled" - clinton shoulda paid them more not to say things like "paid for"!!!

xpost well yeah, hard not to draw that conclusion - which makes me question the third-hand "reporting" and sudden vaulting to prominence on the biggest dem activist blog in the world

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 March 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

things which have resonance in people's preconceived narratives are the things which tends to get traction, and i think it's clear that the "liberal blogosphere" has determined that it is in fact hillary clinton who is the antichrist

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm so glad all of you enlightened white people are out there to pick up on the outrage on things like this; it really does offset my complete and utter apathy/couldn't-possibly-care-less-itude.

(nb I support Obama but getting outraged about Clinton paying some people to hold signs for her is really stupid.)

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

stuff white people like: sanctimonious outrage

will, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:12 (sixteen years ago) link

oh I'm not outraged it just seems kinda silly.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Do we notice, though, when a candidate does not stoop to the level of fabricating supporters or distorting facts or smirking? I think many Americans do.

Eazy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:14 (sixteen years ago) link

dailykos is outraged

max, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

(nb I support Obama but getting outraged about Clinton paying some people to hold signs for her is really stupid.)

yeah i see dudes on the sidewalk every day getting paid to hold signs for men's suit sales and strip clubs and haircuts. not sure where the horror at paid sign-holding comes from.

i bet hillary paid the people who produced her tv ads too.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

seems kind of irresponsible to run a word of mouth story like that without doing any research or questioning to prove that the people holding the signs were chosen to do so because they were black.

rockapads, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 01:13 (sixteen years ago) link

but i guess that's what blogging is all about.

rockapads, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 01:14 (sixteen years ago) link

So apparently Clinton made a remark lauding her and McCain's "decades" of experience, compared to Obama, who "made a speech in 2002." Seems like tricky territory to me.

Simon H., Tuesday, 4 March 2008 01:31 (sixteen years ago) link

er sorry, a "lifetime" of experience.

Simon H., Tuesday, 4 March 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

The rabid anti-Hillary media is really gonna run with that story tomorrow, I'm sure.

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

What a coincidence! I, too, have been having experiences all my life. I wish I could remember more of them.

Aimless, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

god, naomi klein is an idiot. I assume she'll also be all "why is it bad that they're calling obama articulate? it's an insult to the many articulate Americans." because in context they're both racist codewords, you jackass.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I just got back from my hillary-hating meeting, what did I miss?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Lots of reposted Drudge and Politico links.

Gavin, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

not a single lollable jpeg in over 2 days

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

that mccain/hillary one's pretty good.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:46 (sixteen years ago) link

You know, i could use some hot doggery in my life, famous or not

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

not a bad slogan

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Come to think of it, I've never had a NY hot dog. I just always assumed this was one of the many food areas that Chicago surpassed it. Is it like a Coney Island or something?

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

one of the many food the only area that Chicago surpassed it.

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

chicago is known for its bagels, right

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

cant forget that ol perennial fave the windy city cheesecake

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:20 (sixteen years ago) link

one of the many food the only area that Chicago surpassed it.

-- jhøshea, Monday, March 3, 2008 10:16 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i cant believe you would say this in this thread of all threads

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i didnt mean to cross out the food part

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://imgserver.cms2005.com/imgServer/5377194/CappuccinoMEDIUM.jpg

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

them chi-town black&white cookies can kill

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

PIZZA

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

and for you meat lovers out there, enjoy a second second city strip

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

pizza = "many"!?

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

crust toooo fattay

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

wuss

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:35 (sixteen years ago) link

got tickets to the election day obama rally in san antonio, but thats for after i spend all day the polling place holding signs and reminding people they can vote twice.

daerest politix thred: wear a suit? y/n
wear obama shirt under suit? y/n

m bison, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Wear tasteful, non-threatening business casual

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

"Look kinda lame" is your watchword here

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

wear obama shirt over suit y

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

this is basically my stock in trade, YAY

m bison, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link

In an e-mail message sent over the weekend to The Los Angeles Times, Mark Penn, Mrs. Clinton’s pollster, appeared to be distancing himself from the campaign’s operations when he said he had “no direct authority in the campaign.” Mr. Penn described himself as merely “an outside message adviser with no campaign staff reporting to me.”

Mr. Penn is a longtime friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton and serves — as he invariably describes himself — as the campaign’s chief strategist. This means he is involved in directing the message presented by Mrs. Clinton in her speeches and campaign advertisements, and the overall strategic thrusts of the campaign. He has also often served as the voice of the campaign — appearing on television and giving interviews pressing Mrs. Clinton’s cause.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:39 (sixteen years ago) link

One worker was pulled along by the crowd and ended up shaking Mrs. Clinton’s hand. “Aw, man,” he said. “Now I have to go home and wash my hands.”

gabbneb?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:42 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooooool

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaMccee1iOY

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

earthfender (22 hours ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply | Spam u go guys play ur part Obama 08'...lol, little rap lessons would do good also...

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

such times we live in

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

that's a fuckin' bitmap, mate...

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 05:33 (sixteen years ago) link

in other news, i found this whilst trolling around for batshit toons to post:

If principles matter, so does McCain

...Recently, some conservatives behave as if they have nothing to lose if McCain loses. But a McCain loss equals a Barack Obama win, and we have plenty lose from that...

Yer fookin' right about that, Chester, and I sincerely plan to spend the rest of my energies this year helping that to come about....

Heh. also:

Similar Articles
Texas, Ohio Could Decide Dem Nomination
Obama's Halo Not Attached with Superglue
Run, Hillary, Run!
Before Sending Your Child to a College, Ask these Questions
Obama Pushes Away From Indicted Donor
Clueless in Obama Nation
Clinton Says She's Pushing Ahead
Archives to Release Clinton Schedules
Obama Denies Assuring Canada on NAFTA
Hagee Endorsement of McCain Has Risks

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 05:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, here's an interesting bit, about Mccain trying to court both fuckhead religious conservative protestants _and_ Catholics

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 05:52 (sixteen years ago) link

ill concede on the people-holding-signs thing unless more info becomes available, was a kneejerk post i suppose

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 08:25 (sixteen years ago) link

"Hillary Rodham Clinton steeled herself for a day of political reckoning, defiantly telling reporters yesterday that her campaign is "just warming up" - and suggesting she'll battle on regardless of today's results in Texas and Ohio."

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-usclin045601124mar04,0,530124.story

StanM, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 09:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 10 of about 3,480 for "borat obama". (0.16 seconds)

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.willisms.com/archives/ivotedsticker.gif

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:34 (sixteen years ago) link

nice

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i mailed my ohio absentee ballot last week

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/03/AR2008030302769.html

note how on page one it is about obama dodging questions (and note, btw, that he gets blasted for being dull and too wonky!), and then page two it prints his answers, which sound pretty damn forthright.

YGS, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I have a feeling Clinton is going to do well enough today to soldier on.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:44 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^mark halperin has a big portion of that press conference up, he sounds entirely reasonable in it. that piece is a really weird interpretation of what happened. i think even daria would agree w/ that

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I have a feeling Clinton is going to do well enough today to soldier on.

-- Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 8:44 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

shes done a good job in the past 48 hrs of making it seem that way

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the storyline has definitely changed. if obama loses anything tonight (and he will likely lose ohio), then hillary is the comeback kid again, and obama becomes someone who "can't close the deal," which penn/ickes/etc will hammer at from now until the convention, and use it as a wedge to argue for the clinton campaign's continued campaign.

YGS, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

xxxpost - obama's had a rough week in the press -- the canadian NAFTA story, the rezko trial, the fact that clinton's pretty much been dominating the media narrative for the past week w/ all the kitchen sink attacks, and even the farrakhan crap got some attention.

but perhaps most of all is clinton's "media-is-against-us narrative", which has gotten a lot of attention and has even resulted in a lot more scrutiny on obama, i think. pretty much all of the polls taken in the past day or two show upward movement for hillary. i'll be very curious to see how all this plays out tonight. i'm definitely nervous.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

god dana milbank is a tool.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I really wish the press wasn't so goddamned self-loathing sometimes.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Since neither can get an overwhelming delegate lead, it's all about perception now isn't it? If Clinton has successfully lowered expectations so that people feel she has a right to soldier on even if she only wins Ohio, then she's halfway there.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago) link

the rezko trial has nothing to do w/ him

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

the delegate math is still absolutely in obama's favor, even if hillary pulls off some victories tonight. the delegate math won't change no matter how bloated the "hillary is the comeback kid" media story might be. there really isn't much of a path to the nomination for her that doesn't include 1.)huge, huge victories for the remainder of the primaries; 2.)seating the delegates for florida/michigan or re-doing contests there; 3.)taking the fight to the convention and building the lead with superdelegates.

all of these are a stretch, i think, especially 1 & 3. i don't really even see 2 happening, but there will probably be a fight for it if hillary has a good night tonight.

this is why it's really gonna suck if hillary soldiers on, b/c her path to the nomination requires a lot of far-fetched scenarios (winning the remainder of contests by huge percentages, getting superdelegates to ignore obama's pledged del. lead) or bullshit tactics (seating the florida/michigan tactics).

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

the rezko trial has nothing to do w/ him

yea i know. but it keeps a negative story that's even slightly related to him in the press

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

this "the press is too easy on obama" bullshit is like the press is marty mcfly and hillary's calling them chicken. AND IT WORKS.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton got to win ohio and texas or the super delegates gonna get tired of her shit fast - media narrative got no baring on that

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

it's never going to end, is it

kingfish, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I have a feeling Clinton is going to (proclaim she has) do(ne) well enough today to soldier on.

Which well-hidden segment of the press is self-loathing?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Jeff Greenfield, in a blurb for Thomas Patterson's "fuck the press" masterpiece Out of Order: "The most helpful portion of this book for a practicing journalist is the mountain of evidence Pattersonoffers that we journalists have become so jaded, so cnical, so detemrined to point out the manipulative aspect of campaigns that we have made it harder for our elected officials to develop any bond with the electorate. I think he's dead right about this."

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

but like, boo hoo. fix it or fuck it, you know?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, more to the point: Hillary staying in extends what has been a very successful, well-followed (and thus highly-viewed) narrative in the news media. She's definitely giving it her best shot right now but please also remember that the candidate who makes noises about 'soldiering on' one day seems inevitably to withdraw w/in 48 hours.

suzy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

It was clear a month ago that late February would be Obama's time to shine and today, if any, will be Hillary's.

Eazy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

so it's White B*tch History Month?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/Picture2.png

kenan, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

god dana milbank is a tool.

^^

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

thats not necessarily a good thing i think^^ xp

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

i think hillary's political skills here have been really strong in this past cycle ... im impressed with how the narrative really has kind of turned in her favor

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

er, this is how these things usually go. Hils has got fuck all to do with it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

the political press, awakening to its responsibilities, starts to look at minutiae a little closely, and thus the "turn-around narrative" kicks off.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

the media is afraid of pissing off the public and therefore follows polls. the campaign has moved to states in which she leads or is tied in the polls. ergo, the coverage is friendlier to her.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"starts"

"a little"

xpost

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yea, i think a big part of it has been the media-favors-obama narrative. with that as the underlying theme, it's facilitated a decent amount of press scrutiny on obama.

i'm also amazed at how little attention the delegate math gets in the media, when that is fundamentally what matters. there's been relatively little attention paid to the fact that even if hillary has a big night, it won't change the delegate count.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah right dudes i hate to sound like Daria Hand here but you cant have it both ways; either shes a sleazy manipulator or she's not, but its not "this is just the way the press works" when shes just used strikethrough on sleazy

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm also amazed at how little attention the delegate math gets in the media, when that is fundamentally what matters. there's been relatively little attention paid to the fact that even if hillary has a big night, it won't change the delegate count.

-- Mark Clemente, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 10:48 AM (30 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

but thats also because neither one of the candidates are going to reach the total needed to win

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary has done a good job of projecting the public confidence of a winner despite the fact that shes clearly fighting uphill here and i think she deserves credit for that

did anyone see her 'hello' to The View? Halperin linked to it. if she'd been doing stuff like that throughout the campaign i think she'd be in a better place right now

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

"uphill"

yuks

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

but you cant have it both ways; either shes a sleazy manipulator or she's not, but its not "this is just the way the press works

i don't like hillary but i'm not one to totally side with the "hillary is a supreme manipulative evil sorceress" crowd. i think you're pretty accurate about her political skills this past week, she's really shaped the media narratives lately in a big way. and like i said, the "media is against us" theme is a big part of that. when she first pulled that out, i thought it was a stupid, self-pitying move, but i think it ended up getting a lot of traction

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

well it has the benefit of being true!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

how so -- bcz they show her being uttterly phony too often?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - yea but i think it's a bit more complicated than that, there are a lot of things about her and her campaign that the media has given a free pass on

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

She's attempting to manipulate a natural tendency of the press and the press is falling for it, even though they know it's manipulation. The Clintons have always cried foul! And sometimes they're right, which is why the press responds to it.

This is just politics and Obama's doing it too, of course, just to a different set of tendencies. Meanwhile, McCain's getting way better treatment from the press than either of them. Hopefully this will give Obama the traction to tell the press they've been going too easy on McCain in the GE.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

well it has the benefit of being true!

-- Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 10:53 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

oh really? how did pushing questions about rezko obama answered over a year ago help make things 'fair' - they're not pushing her on releasing her tax docs

sorry man i dont buy the victimization thing. she started out with a huge advantage, she was the presumed nominee, and the press acted as such. obama's poll numbers jumping in january wasn't due to favorable press coverage

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary has done a good job of projecting the public confidence of a winner despite the fact that shes clearly fighting uphill here and i think she deserves credit for that

Yea, the 3 am phone call scare ads are the mark of a real winner and are not transparently desperate.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

they are to us but to the dem voter? i think she's solidified her competitiveness

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Hitchens: I'm amazed that campaigns use slogans instead of substance.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

It's unfortunate for Obama that Rez trial started yesterday; that is the real reason Obama has to answer the questions again, annoying as this must be for his campaign. Hillary bringing it up again might make the electorate bored of/resolved about the issue by the time McCain becomes a factor for Candidate Obama, so possible blessing in the long run if he does well tonight.

suzy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

deej in the last two months, two broadcasters have actually publicly apologized for making insulting personal remarks about hillary! one of them resigned!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

helping to contribute to a fake narrative about how persecuted she is

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I think no matter what the headlines are tomorrow the strategy of sitting back and taking double-digit losses week after week in order to win a couple of states by narrow margins (states you were ahead in by double digit margins just a few weeks ago) is ultimately a losing one.

President Keyes, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry, as Hitchens goes these days that's pretty good, and he's not amazed, he's heaving a sight at the dumbassery of it. Also he gets points for opening w/ the great Albert Brooks lines.

As for "We Are the People We Have Been Waiting For" (in which case, one can only suppose that now that we have arrived, we can all go home)

(btw, elmo, Obama apparently borrowed it from the hopis after Maria Shriver did)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah deej, they humiliated themselves in public because they just have this indefinable urge to help out hillary clinton

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer I think that's an argument against Hill's case--O'Reilly used the term "lynch mob" in reference to Obama and he's still sitting pretty.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah no one is humiliating themselves in public smearing obama, no sir

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

like I said above, Obama's done the same shit, or Obama supporters have--they pushed the narrative that the press is pro-Hillary because after 11 straight losses they still haven't counted her out, and then a lot more "hillary is done" stories started appearing.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

how about this pro-hillary column from a pulitzer-prize winning nytimes regular:

Has Hillary truly changed, and grown from her mistakes? Has she learned to be less stubborn and imperious and secretive and vindictive and entitled? Or has she merely learned to mask her off-putting and self-sabotaging qualities better? If elected, would the old Hillary pop up, dragging us back to the dysfunctional Clinton kingdom?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

you all maybe be taking this "media narrative" angle a liiiiiiittle too far

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

should we start posting Krugman columns?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

agian?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't mind her making the argument, I mind people thinking there's some sort of factual basis behind it. It's a campaign tactic. The press' favoritism is mood swingy.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Eppy show me the Krugman column -- or any media comment anywhere -- that lays into Obama's personality or character (i.e. says things like "imperious" and "secretive" and "dysfunctional") and i'll give that to you

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

uh "cult of personality"? like accusing him of being Stalin?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

C-

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm genuinely surprised that Hillary being a favorite media punching bag for years is even a controversial notion!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

uh "cult of personality"? like accusing him of being Stalin?

That's not a criticism of his personality though - it's a criticism of how some people react to him.

o. nate, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm genuinely surprised that Hillary being a favorite media punching bag for years is even a controversial notion!

-- Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 11:31 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

im surprised that you would argue this isn't in many ways her own fault!

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Eppy show me the Krugman column -- or any media comment anywhere -- that lays into Obama's personality or character (i.e. says things like "imperious" and "secretive" and "dysfunctional") and i'll give that to you

-- Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 11:26 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

maybe thats because he's, you know, likeable?

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the idea that the media's treatment of Clinton had nothing to do with real-world conditions is similarly ludicrous though.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Again, last year the media actually declared her the nominee.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

at some point you need to stop and take a look at why candidates are coming off a certain way, and realize that just because media framing is part of it doesn't mean that framing mall art is going to make it into the mona lisa

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

and immediately savaged her for being "imperious" and acting as if she were "entitled" to the nomination

guys seriously, have you been living on earth for the past 15 years??

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I do believe there's something weird a few of our colleagues have. They tend to be Roman Catholics, actually. People like Tim Russert, Chris Matthews, Maureen Dowd. They've had it in for Bill and Hillary Clinton since Monica Lewinsky. They feel that the Clintons are trying to put one over on us all the time.

-- Jeff Bercovici, March 3, 2008

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

(that sounds mean and i dont think hillary is the political equivalent of 'mall art' but regardless we're not electing media frames and the idea that everyone's been looking at obama and saying 'what a pretty frame' is absurd) xxp

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

So like the bad stuff about Obama the media should have been covering is a secret meeting with Canada? For real?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

let me get this straight guys. you're saying that when journalists are unfair to hillary clinton -- for instance, micro-analyzing an off-hand comment ("baking cookies"), or inventing scandals that end up being completely untrue (whitewater) -- this is her fault?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm saying that the media has been unfair to Hillary, but this does not mean that there are things they should be doing with Obama that they are not doing.

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

a non-secret meeting which the canadian consulate in chicago (via a right wing canadian politician) asked goolsbee (independent of and without the knowledge of obama's campaign) to clarify obama's position on trade and goolsbee reiterated obama's stances while specifying that obama was talking about what direction he wanted to go, not specific articulations of policy

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

let me get this straight guys. you're saying that when journalists are unfair to hillary clinton -- for instance, micro-analyzing an off-hand comment ("baking cookies"), or inventing scandals that end up being completely untrue (whitewater) -- this is her fault?

-- Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 11:42 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

once again ... obama has not been the victim of this???

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

to the extent that he has it's completely unfair! you don't see me going around telling people it's his fault!!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i didn't blame hillary for whitewater! you're reading too far into my position here

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

But NONE of it is her fault?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama thinks the Rezko thing is his fault!

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that what Hillary needs is a firm smack on the bottom and to be sent back to the kitchen, where Barack will be waiting to take her orders on what groceries he needs to pick up from the store after washing the car and trimming the lawn.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

/ pffft hahahahahaha

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Is McCain the slapper?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

inventing scandals that end up being completely untrue (whitewater)

lol

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs if you've got some evidence, ken starr is desperate to add an appendix to his hardcover smut story

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2211/2279374690_a7a434ff39.jpg

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

whoa awesome

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

why did obama steal giulianis mouth

and what, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karen-russell/whitewater-v-rezko-the-_b_83040.html

Investigators have examined the Rose billing records not only to determine the role Hillary Clinton may have played in the Castle Grande transactions, but more significantly to ascertain her role in their mysterious disappearance and subsequent reappearance. If someone had knowledge or possession of the billing records and knew that they were the subject of Federal investigative subpoenas, their failure to divulge or turn over the records could be the basis for criminal charges -- the obstruction of justice. The billing records found in Hillary Clinton's book room were a copy of an original version printed out from the Rose Firm computer in 1992, when the computer file itself was deleted. Webb Hubbell has testified that he recalls reviewing a copy of the billing records in response to press inquiries during the 1992 Presidential campaign. Hubbell says that he then passed the records on to Vince Foster who was, as far as Hubbell knows, the last person to have the records. Investigators believe the book room copy was indeed Vince Foster's. The copy contains notations, in red ink, that are Vince Foster's handwriting. These notations appear to be directed toward Hillary Clinton, including questions about some of the individual billings. Investigators believe this suggests that, at some point, this copy was passed from Vince Foster to Hillary Clinton for her review. In addition, investigators had the FBI conduct fingerprint analysis of the billing records. Of significance, the prints of Vince Foster and Hillary Clinton were found. The Senate Whitewater Committee concluded that Hillary Clinton was the person most likely to have put the billing records in her book room, or know how they got there. The Independent Counsel continues to investigate Ms. Clinton's involvement in handling the records. For her part, Hillary Clinton has said that she has no idea how the billing records came to be in her book room.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I agree that the anti-Clinton media bias doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's not part of a vast conspiracy - it has antecedents in various "objective" realities:

- Lingering anti-Bill resentment for various embarrassing scandals (Lewinsky, Marc Rich, etc) from his time in office.
- The Clintons have been in politics much longer than Obama has, and naturally have accrued more brushes with ethical grey-areas. Almost any politician who's been around that long has.
- There is a strong dislike of Bill & Hillary among a certain, not inconsequential segment of the population. Media personalities - the talking heads that populate CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, etc - need audience love and affection to survive. One way to get it is by sharing and catering to the prejudices of the audience. In this light, bashing Hillary is a relatively low-risk, high-return strategy.

o. nate, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

well that sounds like $60m well spent

xpost

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

guys, obviously hillary is paying a spiritual medium to channel campaign advice from the ghost of eleanor roosevelt

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

those aren't really the objective realities I had in mind. xpost

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

wasn't $60m about the Iowa caucus-night snack budget for the Clinton camp?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

It was clear a month ago that late February would be Obama's time to shine and today, if any, will be Hillary's.

-- Eazy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 15:52 (1 hour ago) Link

exactly, and his margins of victory changed the game. like superdelegates care about a manufactured comeback at this point. Unlike the media, they're tired and they want this thing OVER. If Hillary loses TX, and can't win OH by big margins (both seem probable) the pressure on her to drop out will be nearly unbearable. The ebb and flow of coverage is just noise.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:09 (sixteen years ago) link

what is a big margin? isnt she up by 10% in OH? thats a big margin

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

What this election should be about, is the media.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Look, Barack Obama is squeaky fucking clean. The one thing people have been able to find is Rezko, and he's admitted that was a dumb mistake. Every indication is that it was genuinely an error of judgment and that he's learned from it. If the media had dirt on Obama, do we really think they would be holding back on it?

In contrast, Hillary and Bill have any number of scandals in their past and present (not a few of which involve fund-raising), numerous instances of taking the wrong side on issues, and have made clear tactical mistakes in the course of this campaign. Sure, this is partially because they've been in poitics longer. But that doesn't mean that those things aren't there. It makes no sense to say that Clinton's biggest selling point--her experience--is a DISADVANTAGE in this one particular instance. If her years in politics has given her an advantage over Obama, then she has to take the drawbacks that go with that.

Barack Obama has (almost) no dirt on him. Hillary has lots. Which one is going to look better in the media?

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

tonight: my guess is that it's likely that RI & VT will cancel each other out in terms of net delegate gains. obama's set to win by a wide margin in VT but will likely lose by a smaller margin in RI, which has twice the delegates as VT.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer not to be a dick but i think you need to stop telling us the window is hopelessly dirty and start telling us what is really on the other side of it. is there something about HRC that ppl on this thread are missing? what would an accurate assessment of her potential as president look like? or her 'character' if you like?

i ask half-rhetorically, tbh. my point is, the press has no responsibility to be even handed, it has a responsibility to describe the real. i think, yeah, it fails with depressing regularity on the latter, but let's not confuse some half-hearted success at the former with doing its actual job.

i've made up my mind on these candidates so i guess that's 'bias.' so take it in the abstract: it's not as if ANY two candidates are going to have exactly equal and opposite flaws and strengths, equally compelling and distracting histories, equally measured policy proposals -- it's this weird kind of media psychosis that insists that, in the interests of 'fairness,' we pretend that this is true.

gff, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: different polls say different things, you louche hobbyists.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

was this posted? post/ABC poll:

“Democrats by more than a 2-1 margin say Hillary Clinton should stay in the presidential race even if she loses either the Texas or Ohio primary today. But if she fails in both, fewer than half say they’d want her to fight on. Many, in that case, have another idea for Clinton: the vice presidency.”

i don't know if there is really much to glean from this, especially when it's not clear how much people are paying attention to the particulars of this race (e.g. Many, in that case, have another idea for Clinton: the vice presidency., yea right)

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

gff 8080, asking the press to treat both sides of the argument 'equally' without testing to the veracity of each side is classic FOX-Rove bullshit, but sadly i don't think we're going to see the end of it during this election cycle

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

tom brokaw says 50 super delegates are abt to break for obama

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/?last_story=/politics/war_room/2008/03/04/obama_superdelegates

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

woah; that HUGE if it turns out to be true

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

they want this thing OVER

And, when you consider that in the past, the New Hampshire primary would have just ended a week or so ago, this toe-tapping impatience for a nominee is hardly justified. Among other things, it keeps the public interested in the race and focused on their party's candidates to the exclusion of the Republicans.

The downside that they fear is that one or the other candidate will commit a "murder/suicide" in a frantic attempt to gain the nomination - by knee-capping their opponent, succeeding in crippling them, but ultimately alienating the public's from both of them. I think that fear is overblown.

Aimless, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

no matter what happens tonight, watch for the Obama Crew to drop their Feb fundraising total to the sound of a timpani drumroll & cymbal crash -- either to soften the storyline of clinton winning in case of one outcome, or to bolster his victory in case of the other. a 50 superdelegate bonus would have an even greater effect.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

i hope to god matt y is right:

it seems that Hillary Clinton's consultants have won the spin war and two-thirds of Democrats want her to stay in the race if she wins either Ohio or Texas.

That said, this is the kind of thing that public opinion is just poorly informed about. Here's the reality of the situation. If Wednesday morning the only shot Clinton has at winning the nomination involves getting the superdelegates to overrule a large Obama lead in pledged delegates and/or somehow getting the Michigan and Florida delegations seated, then Clinton's chances of winning the nomination will still be extremely low, and the prospects of either person winning the general election would get quite a bit lower. Basically, Clinton would be completely burning years worth of goodwill built up by her and her husband in the progressive community and ending her shot at playing a leadership role in the Senate in exchange for a very marginal increase in the odds of her becoming president in January 2009. A choice like that would be bad for the country, bad for the party, and bad for Hillary Clinton. It would be good, primarily, for her campaign's highest-paid operatives who would keep getting their checks, and it would be good for John McCain.

I've thought about it, and I don't think she'll do it. I don't think she and Bill are that out of touch with reality, and I don't think that most of her key supporters are either. If her results today are good enough to give her a realistic shot at winning the nomination through winning primaries, then of course she'll stay in. But if the delegate math isn't there, then I think she'll get out.

gff, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

asking the press to treat both sides of the argument 'equally' without testing to the veracity of each side is classic FOX-Rove bullshit

This is true as far as it goes, but I don't think that's the answer. I don't think the media should start making unsubstantiated criticism of Obama's personality or character either. If the media started to mention Obama's "questionable patriotism" and "extreme liberal views" with the same regularity that they mention Clinton's "unlikeableness", "manipulativeness", or "underhandedness", there would obviously be no gain in objectivity or truth - though there might arguably be a gain in "evenhandedness". I think the real solution is for the media to back off the subjective impressionism altogether. They should focus more on reporting the facts - the candidates' records, policies, statements, actions, etc. - without constantly resorting to telling us who's more likeable, or doing a pop-psychology analysis of their motivations for us.

o. nate, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Most Media Observers Side With Hillary Campaign Claim That Press Has Been Harder On Her

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/03/most_media_obse.php

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Basically, Clinton would be completely burning years worth of goodwill built up by her and her husband in the progressive community

WTF?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess that means idiots who don't know they're not progressive?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

the press has been harder on Hillary? well that's newsworthy, seeing as she and Obama are exactly the same person running the same campaign. ffs.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Snap your fingers when you say that. Rhythmically.

Aimless, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Why should America listen to Jay-Z for any advice? The baloon is deflated. And this guy is an empty suite.

Nice try, Obama campaign. You aren;t in Chacago any more, where thuggery is accepted and Rezko signs the checks.

This Obama guy is desperate. What is this nonesense. Thank God we caught all his trash I can mantra. He is a lost candidate.

OBAMA IS A LIAR!!!!!!!!!!! I GUESS HE IS LIKE VERY OTHER POLITIAN

If I was constantly caught promising one thing, but doing another… I'd play it donn too!

Obama is just a toy action figure with patented speak action.
If you squeeze his hand he says one of three things:
I gave a speech once.
I always get misinterpreted.
I want to change the world.

What's he gonna say when he gets his hand squeezed by the president of Russia, China, North Korea, or Iran?

I want to say LOL, but I just can't laugh about this.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ that was said by tom brokaw actually

and what, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

the press will have a field day when the photos of Kim Jong-Il squeezing Obama's hand are published.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

And this guy is an empty suite.

http://www.wcghotels.com/hotels/elpgw/images/stock-suite-empty-org.jpg

dmr, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Thank God we caught all his trash I can mantra

max, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://yeswecanhas.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/3am-call.jpg

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, Jay-Z robocall going out to Ohio voters.

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I got 100 problems 'cause this bitch is one?

StanM, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

losing the nas vote

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

somebody must've posted the Jack Nicholson endorsement video, yeah?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

so about the celebrity robocalls -- i assume there's at least a small amount of research into demographics to determine whether or not a particular caller would be useful? most people in my grandparents' neighborhood in ohio wouldn't have a fucking clue who jay-z is

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

HE IS LIKE VERY OTHER POLITIAN

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

lol an old hs friend going to school in ohio just emailed me all hyped cause he got a jay call

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack-A-Wear

dmr, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

want to get really frustrated? http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/03/marc-andreessen-for-obama/

YGS, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

obligatory "Big Pimpin" joke

o. nate, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Jay-Z being pimped out in some weird way?

President Keyes, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

2:46pm EST and still no Drudge headline about voting irregularites.

President Keyes, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Not for nothin never happen
I'll be forever mackin
Heart cold as assassin, I got no passion
I got no patience and I hate waitin'
'O' get your ass in
An let's ri i i i iide

will, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I read homie's blog entry last night, and I guess if you decontextualize them like that "normal" and "smart" can come off as crytoracist comments ala "clean & articulate," but in context they struck me as measured considerations: guy is not just a politician who knows how to say the right things to the right people, he's an intelligent person who seems genuinely interested in his audience and doesn't come across as "above" anyone he speaks with.

Unless I'm missing your point, YGS?

xxxxxp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no i meant the comments! i like marc andreeson.

YGS, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/030408DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

there must be voting today.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz at Josh Marshall saying he feels Hillary's been maltreated when he passes on Drudge smears against her verbatim

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:23 (sixteen years ago) link

what?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, i hate to sound like a mommy, but don't you ever have anything nice to say about anything?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought it was very nice when he laughed at my Hillary/Barack joke upthread.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz at Josh Marshall saying he feels Hillary's been maltreated when he passes on Drudge smears against her verbatim

-- Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 8:23 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

no seriously tracer. i read this site just about every day, i must have missed something? what are you talking about?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't discern any stable position tracer has taken other than his preference for sifting for supposed hypocrisy and for weird devil's advocacy of hillary. sure, the horse of the state needs a gadfly, but there's a difference between critical insight and chafing cynicism, you know?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton's daily schedules as first lady are set to be released by march 20.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Jan. 29, 1993-- Kick off 2008 Presidential campaign.

President Keyes, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

my stable position: the national political press in america is almost always wrong about everything, including what counts as news

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Waste my vote on John Edwards? More like waste my vote on John HAIRCUT.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

so let's follow your advice and only refer to the press to make fun of this or that article.

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Amirite? *offers a fist to bump*

xp

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama aides refuting Clinton's peacekeeping in Balkans:

"She has talked about a dangerous mission to Bosnia, but news reports indicate that she was accompanied on that trip by Sinbad and Cheryl Crow," he said.

LOL

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

haw, her entourage

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/4/134227/0729/177/468654

this dailykos diary makes the claim (based on this toy: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/29/delegate.counter/index.html, which I looked at yesterday but was too busy to really futz with too much), that there is NO WAY clinton can win, unless she unexpectedly wins OH and TX by more than 10% each. Best case scenarios for her seem to indicate she still falls behind Obama by 8 delegates.

akm, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

dailykos OTM Hillary is screwed, drop out now plz thx

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope she recycles Romney's concession speech, just for lolz.

kenan, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

"I can't let this country fall into the hands of terrorists!"

kenan, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

dailykos OTM Hillary is screwed, drop out now plz thx

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 10:22 PM

i'd like to think this is true but i have my unfounded doubts

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

the major thing i don't understand about the whole "the press has been unfair to hillary" narrative is -- well, wouldn't she have gotten a little more positive press coverage if she won anything during the entire month of february? saying that the media reporting on his successes and her failures in each and every one of the post-Super Tuesday states constitutes some sort of bias is pretty fucking dumb.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/33uacf7.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

OTM Hillary is screwed, drop out now plz

Okay, I haven't paid attention today (partly out of fear that HRC will win both Tx and Ohio, and we'll continue to have a nasty primary fight while McCain consolidates his support). But is the above line based on some actual developments, or it is just Shakey being Shakey? (no insult intended, Shakey, I just know your feelings toward HRC).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

after assembling that it occurred to me that there prob a real version out there

http://bp0.blogger.com/_xkAiN-y_dL8/R3wnF8tHSSI/AAAAAAAAAgs/QIgAYfHaqn8/s400/AP96032502243.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i30.tinypic.com/suzsb8.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I kind of have to give Hillary kudos for trying to push Sheryl Crow in front of a bullet.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

look at that dailykos link - its simple math.

x-;ost

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I hear Hillary gave Sheryl Crow breast cancer - alert the DRUDGE REPORT

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Sinbad's teeth should shield Sheryl.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Is that Gen. Mark McKinney on the right there?

a few xposts

en i see kay, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

the simple math shakey mo is reposting from kos has been done repeatedly since the carolina primary by andrew sullivan commenters

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Possibly good omen for Obama in the early AP exit poll data? They say 20% of voters in Ohio and 25% in Texas were Independents. SurveyUSA--arguably the most reliable pollster--predicted significantly lower Independent turnout in each state, and had Obama comfortable winning Independents in both states (though by a larger margin in Texas than in Ohio). Could be enough to put Obama over the top in Texas and keep it closer than expected in Ohio. Maybe.

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Plz,plz,plz be true.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link

god that was a bad hair era for hill

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

ok, it was a bad hair era for most people

Eppy, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

First wave of Democratic exit polls….

By Jessica Wehrman | Tuesday, March 4, 2008, 05:19 PM

The first wave of Democratic exit polls are in: more women are voting then men, and the highest turnout is among white women, according to exit polls conducted by Edison/Mitofsky. The earliest results were gleaned from 1,020 Ohio voters.

Of those polled so far, 75 percent are white and 20 percent are African-American. Three percent are Hispanic.

Thirteen percent are between the ages of 17 and 29; 27 percent between the ages of 30 and 44; 33 between the ages of 45 and 59 and 26 percent older than 60.

Eighty percent of voters in the Democratic primary made their decision a week ago or more.

Fifty-nine percent considered the economy the most important issue facing the country, followed by 18 percent considering Iraq most important and 19 percent considering health care their most important.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I would also like to point out that I believe said bloggers' "simple math" about as much as the floater that McCain couldn't hold office because he was born in the canal zone. O RLY?

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

blogger math

Jordan, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

whatever tom. please to outline feasible scenario wherein Hillary wins all the remaining states by double digits and still doesn't have enough delegates to beat Obama.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, there's a finite number of delegates up for grabs, the math IS pretty simple

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

you're right clearly hillary is still running strictly for the purpose of burning her own money.

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

No, she just doesn't care about winning the pledged delegates. Her only hope is to almost catch up and find a way smear Obama so badly that he can't compete in the fall.

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the only way she can win unless she wins tx and oh by huge margins to to take this to the convention and fight over florida and michigan delgates, but i'm going to be very very surprised if she does this

akm, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

you're right clearly hillary is still running strictly for the purpose of burning her own money.

she's keeping it up cuz she's an egomaniac running for president and she's too bitter to quit without exhausting every single possible scenario, no matter how hopeless, far-fetched, or damaging to the party.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

there's this thing called overweening hubris

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

some info on hillary's game plan if she's still in it after tonight:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/hillarys_longshot_strategy.php#comments

What this shows, I think, is that Hillary's bash-the-press strategy is partly targeted at the super-delegates. If the Hillary camp can scrape together a big enough win tonight, it can spend the weeks ahead bludgeoning reporters into getting "tough" on Obama, in hopes that the press will poke enough holes in him to sow doubts among the super-dels about his fitness for the general election.

so hillary won't be doing the smearing herself, but rather getting the press to do the job?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

theres this thing called projection xp

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

so hillary won't be doing the smearing herself, but rather getting the press to do the job?

-- Mark Clemente, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 5:11 PM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

worked for the past week

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

yep

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

From our very own comments - which are piling in, thanks ya'll - here are the theories that are emerging for why Republicans are "crossing over" and voting Democrat today:

Mark: I'm a lifelong Republican who voted Democrat today. Rush Limbaugh had nothing to do with my choice; George Bush and his lunatic war in Iraq had everything to do with it.

JCLE: This is the first time I have ever voted for a D. I voted for Hil because if we have to have a D in the White House, Hil would not be near the nightmare that the Big O would be. His foreign policy by Kumbah Yah is scary to say the least.

PMS: At my local coffee shop, the GOP-types were going the other way... voting for Obama as the MUCH easier Dem to defeat.

Michael Crawford: Hillary is the most centered candidate out of Mccain, Obama and Clinton. Vote Clinton, at least you know where she stands on the issues, the other two will let subordiantes tell them what to do.

Barry Pierson (addressing everyone as "you people", so I suppose he's talking to all of us): They voted for Obama because they despise Hillary Clinton. Much to the disappointment of Democrats, these same Republicans will NOT vote for Obama in November.

Jeff: I am a very conservitive Republican and I voted for Hillary today. The Republican nominee is a pretty much settled so I used my vote to help set the stage for the general election. Hillary has very high negative numbers. Obama is little more than a cult of personality, which can be very dangerous.

Brian: I'm an ex-Republican who voted for Obama today. I am sick of the Republican party. McCain will be nothing but four more years of misery and bloodshed and shame.

Dustin: As much as I hated it, I also crossed party lines and voted for Hillary this morning. Given the rules in Texas, I will definitely play the game. ... why not vote for the lessser of two evils? McCain can beat Hillary

Kevin, resident peace-maker: I think people see that being a Republican or Democrat is merely a label. Picking a candidate to unite Americans is more important than the polarizing politics of the past 15 years. People want to move forward. Old school bipartisan politics is coming to an end.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yah hillarys still got a slim chance and shes gonna take it

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Michael Crawford?!

dowd, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Jeff: I am a very conservitive Republican and I voted for Hillary today. The Republican nominee is a pretty much settled so I used my vote to help set the stage for the general election. Hillary has very high negative numbers. Obama is little more than a cult of personality, which can be very dangerous.

would be pretty lol if this backfired and she, you know, beat mccain

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i've been hearing a lot about rush limbaugh's calls for strategic voting for hillary, and i'm just not buying that it'll play much of a factor. republican cross-overs have largely favored obama. whether that holds in ohio/texas remains to be seen obv., but i don't think republicans are really en masse going to strategically vote for hilz

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

its a pretty risky tactic

deej, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I doubt HIllary will beat McCain... nobody cares about her or they hate her, so I'm sure a lot of people who would've voted Obama would just stay home.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Guys, ILX just told me this thread has 666 new answers. This is clearly the work of Hillary.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/nffotd.jpg

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

what if obama sweeps all 4

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

that would be nuts but it won't happen

akm, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

but I think people didn't think that would happen a few weeks ago and it did so what the hell

akm, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Early voting probably makes exit polls off a bit.

mulla atari, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah if it really is a deadlock it probably means Obama wins Texas based on early voting and Clinton wins Ohio based on the same. But then again it might not actually be a deadlock at all.

Hatch, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently bill richardson is about to endorse obama. hmm.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:49 (sixteen years ago) link

ware u hearing this?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

that has been the rumor for a week, why would he endorse while voting was half over in tx? he'll wait until tomorrow

akm, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:55 (sixteen years ago) link

yah maybe part of the master plan w/those 50 super delegates brokaw mentioned to push hillary out

jhøshea, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Marc Andreessen: likes Obama

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:00 (sixteen years ago) link

dailykos is kind of turning into dailyracetwat

HI DERE, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

or maybe it's always like this, I never read it before

HI DERE, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

well it's always the last four letters anyway

Eppy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

eh it just looks desaturated and contrasty - a popular palate for painting political opponents ominous

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

VT called for McCain and Obama.

Eppy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

saying that the media reporting on his successes and her failures in each and every one of the post-Super Tuesday states constitutes some sort of bias is pretty fucking dumb.

what's even dumber is imagining that anyone here is saying this?

i'm not sure why it makes me so upset that so many people here really go for the "hillary = don corleone" line. or that so few of us actually seem to be listening to what others are saying. or that so few of us are responding to the strongest version of the arguments they disagree with, instead of the weakest. or that so many people here are fine to go with "conventional wisdom" about the democratic nominees, when the conventional wisdom over the last several decades has wound up being pretty uniformly hostile to progressive interests, and when the conventional wisdom about this race is peddled by such obvious boobs. and i'm not sure why it gets me all het up that people feel a need to take stark and defiant sides in this nomination, and gleefully pile into all the theatre that taking sides entails.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

just got back from voting in CleVegas. A bad ice storm has shut down the light rail which I usually take and would've prevented me from voting but thankfully my alarm malfunctioned last night. I had to drive into work and could drive to the polls afterwards.

I wonder how many potential voters have been shut out. I blame Diebold.

brownie, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I wrote in Brett Favre btw

brownie, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

THAT'S SICK

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

j/k.

Bernie Kosar always gets my vote.

brownie, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

;)

brownie, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

how quickly they forget brian sipe

mookieproof, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, i wasn't meaning to position that argument on anyone posting on this thread; i was merely trying to make a rather basic assertion that winning electoral contest will result in positive press due to the nature of political coverage, and in this case obama has benefitted from that.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN reporter lady, why the long face?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:33 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm not sure why it makes me so upset that so many people here really go for the "hillary = don corleone" line

i'm not sure why you believe so many people here go for it

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Ohio called for McCain yeah of course whatever

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 00:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Pundits are already talking of "cosmos shifting" back to Hillary based on exit polls. We already knew she'd probably win Ohio. How do they get away with such nonsense.

Benjamin-, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:05 (sixteen years ago) link

it's gabbneb's fault

mookieproof, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Have you seen the Texas early votes coming in? Crazy numbers - 750,000 counted so far, Obama up 58/41

carson dial, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link

!!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

old people vote slower?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's up in Ohio 62/36. 0% reporting.

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:36 (sixteen years ago) link

winning ever non-redneckpopulation center

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:36 (sixteen years ago) link

ooooooh shit Texas is up to 1% reporting! I need to stopping checking the nyt site.

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 01:41 (sixteen years ago) link

HRCfriend: ok so there are STILL people voting at my precinct in the PRIMARY and there are 500 people in line to caucus
Sent at 7:53 PM on Tuesday
me: shit
HRCfriend: i get up at 5 in the morning, i can't wait all night
me: i know right
HRCfriend: and people there had absolutely no clue what to do with that many people there
the people who were running it
me: wow
HRCfriend: yeah
me: and presumably nobody's name is on anything yet cause its nuts
HRCfriend: it took me a half hour to finding a parking spot and then i waited in line a while

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN SHITBIRD BILL BENNETT just referenced his Book of Virtues

Didn't he get busted for gambling away a shitload of money in AC?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

god, fuck you CNN for hiring this asshole

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill Bennett: 'The Bookie of Virtue'

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i'll be curious to see how this wraps up:

clinton camp has "emergency" conference call regarding the texas caucus, claiming that obama caucusers are blocking out hillary supporters:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/texas_battle_heats_up_clinton.php

if it's legitimate, we'll see, but i really wouldn't be surprised if it's an attempt to de-legitimize the caucus in advance, as it's expected for obama to win it

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:36 (sixteen years ago) link

meanwhile, no more huckmentum, he's out:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/04/huckabee-ends-presidential-run/ (no story yet)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

So a split decision tonight is likely: HRC wins Ohio and RI/Obama wins Tx. and VT. If that happens, what are the chances of HRC withdrawing?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.wegotyourrock.com/hardrock7/coreyhart1.jpg

Nicole, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

VT's been called for Clinton

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

you mean RI

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Rt. VT's been called for Obama, I thought.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, Obama's lead in VT is overwhelming now.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

ciderpress otm

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

that was a boo boo on my part

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:45 (sixteen years ago) link

"unnecessary encroachment.... 10-yard penalty"

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Even after the useless 2006 Congressional class, I figured the Democrats couldn't fuck up the perfect storm of Iraq, the economy, corruption and general ineptitude.

I wuz wrong.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

This sucks.

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

eh?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

live a little!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i was lying awake last night convinced we're gonna lose in nov

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

this mccain speech is really creepy.

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

wau

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link

helping business through lowering taxes and regulations

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's got a decent margin over obama right now in ohio -- cnn has her at 58% and him at 40%, with already 25% of precincts reporting

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

i was lying awake last night convinced we're gonna lose in nov

Prepare yourself now.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

R.I.P
http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2008/news/080218/mike_huckabee.jpg

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

this mccain speech is really creepy.

-- Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 2:55 AM

why creepy

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Even after the useless 2006 Congressional class, I figured the Democrats couldn't fuck up the perfect storm of Iraq, the economy, corruption and general ineptitude.

I wuz wrong.

Always depends on the candidates. If Romney or Huckabee was the GOP nominee, I'd say the nasty primary battle between HRC and Obama is irrelevant, and I'd feel pretty confident that we'd win the GE. But against POW/American-Pie Straight-Talking Sen. John McCain . . .

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

did u hear how he fucked a lobbyist

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain is the GOP fall guy.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

btw i assume its already posted but ya know gloria steinem sez dude's pow experience wasn't really that big a deal...

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

so hey if we've got gloria fucking steinem on our side

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

making brilliant, insightful commentary like that

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:03 (sixteen years ago) link

gloria stienem and ann coulter: united at last

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean she wrote a good-if-flawed book and has done some good shit but wtf steiny

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Bauers_conference_call_ambush.html

Obama's lawyer gets in on Clinton conference call

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.brokeland.com/tracerhand/powah.gif

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

(re: caucus violations)

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

john mccain is the GOP fall guy.

He's gonna fall onto whichever Democrat finally gets the nomination.

Tracer, that is brilliant.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

The dems will elect a GIRL or a BLACK DUDE and no matter which one it is they'll proceed to oversee a term in which they have to deal with 10x the economic and foreign policy problems Jimmy Carter had to deal with. After the left embarrasses itself, the GOP will return with whoever its white knight happens to be in 2012 to save us all from doom. There's no way John McCain wins this. There's no winning in it.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

fun sign caught by CNN camera at Mccain rally:

"EXPERIENCE

FOR

CHANGE!"

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:05 (sixteen years ago) link

So Drudge says HRC is closing the gap fast in Tx (51% to 48%) . . . .

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Eh, fuck this. I'ma watch this "Asian Martial Arts" thing on one of the docu channels for awhile. Another white guy/guido-looking UFC type gon' get his butt whupped by various senseis.

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

if her margin holds in OH there's no reason for Hilz to concede tomorrow, unless Obama's 50 magical superdelegates actually show up.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:07 (sixteen years ago) link

The dems will elect a GIRL or a BLACK DUDE and no matter which one it is they'll proceed to oversee a term in which they have to deal with 10x the economic and foreign policy problems Jimmy Carter had to deal with. After the left embarrasses itself, the GOP will return with whoever its white knight happens to be in 2012 to save us all from doom. There's no way John McCain wins this. There's no winning in it.

Now that's cynical.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Huck supporting McCain

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

No, Daniel, that's familiarity with the history of the Republican Party after Eisenhower.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Eh, fuck this. I'ma watch this "Asian Martial Arts" thing on one of the docu channels for awhile. Another white guy/guido-looking UFC type gon' get his butt whupped by various senseis.

As I always suggest during the downtime in political TV coverage: Namaste Yoga, on FitTV.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

or as Shakey might put it in his inimitable way, simple math

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Bush wasn't a white knight saving us from the doom of Bill Clinton. He came in campaigning on how to best utilize the "peace dividend."

Still, I basically agree with your view, so I'm not inclined to argue it much.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:10 (sixteen years ago) link

ick. the show is actually called "Mind Body & Kickin' Moves"

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:11 (sixteen years ago) link

wait is that a UFC progam or Namaste yoga program?

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

So using the Slate delegate calculator--if the current percentages froze in place HRC would have a gain of 18 delegates tonight.

mulla atari, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracer's Hilpatine graphic is the best thing I've seen in months.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Now that's cynical TOMBOT.

-- Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, March 5, 2008 3:08 AM

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

yada-da-dah-da-dah.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:17 (sixteen years ago) link

wait is that a UFC progam or Namaste yoga program?

I tink this is fox sports

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:19 (sixteen years ago) link

NYT has TX 50-48 for Obama with 14% reporting.

caek, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:20 (sixteen years ago) link

olberman on a sign spotted at hillary's rally aying "meet me in indiana":

"indiana's primary is MAY SIXTH. We're going to need some more chairs and some more water."

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:21 (sixteen years ago) link

This reminds me. I really need to find a local wing chun studio

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:23 (sixteen years ago) link

argh, just fucking call ohio for hillary already and get it over with.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary vs. Obama is so boring, there's nothing for any of these assholes to talk about but the 'process story.' At least there were differences between the Republicans.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

can you paste your remark at the top of this thread, milo?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:28 (sixteen years ago) link

NYT now has TX 50-49 for Obama with 15% reporting. Are caucuses expected to break for Obama?

caek, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Dude is now leaning his upper thorax on a blade, with his assistants breaking the bricks on his back with a sledgehammer

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Are caucuses expected to break for Obama?

-- caek, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 3:29 AM

he generally does better in cauci than she does

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

okay, that's over. Now what else is on....

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

If Obama loses by one vote in TX, it's my fault folks. Thought I'd be back home before today so I didn't vote early. My bad for keeping this charade going.

DALLAS IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN POPULATION CENTER IN TEXAS? The hell you say, CNN. I thought maybe that was Amarillo.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

your MOM does better with cauci

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:31 (sixteen years ago) link

BLACK FOLKS IN TEXAS LIVE IN THE BIG CITIES: NEWS AT 11

LOTS OF THEM LATINOS ALONG THE BORDER WITH MEXICO

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:32 (sixteen years ago) link

i like the cnn dude's multi-touch big-ass plasma. Thing must have cost more than my car.

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:32 (sixteen years ago) link

CRACKERVILLE BETWEEN EL PASO AND FT WORTH

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

it's just a big-ass iPhone

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

HOW ARE THE PARROTHEADS BREAKING IN SOUTH PADRE?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

H's campaign has imitated Rove's style so far, so it makes sense to have some ballot-challenging right about now.

Eazy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

they're old white hippies & my brown folx, i'm betting clintonistas all of em

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

shit guys

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope you die a horrible, painful death Bill Bennett

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC says 0-2% of caucuses for Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dayton, & Toledo have come in.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:38 (sixteen years ago) link

penis cancer penis cancer penis cancer

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:38 (sixteen years ago) link

hi guys

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:40 (sixteen years ago) link

how was the shot of golschlager?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama is Hispanic?

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:47 (sixteen years ago) link

depends on the campaign ad

Eppy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i'm not sure if it's been mentioned here but there's a deep-seated mistrust of black people in the latino community. it doesn't make any sense to me, but i've seen it in fam & extended fam and it's unsettling. combine that with the fact that hispanics of all ages outnumber young white liberals + clinton's been building a base here for yeeeeeeeeeeears with frequent visits during bill's presidency and the breakdown really isn't surprising.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

msnbc calling ohio for hillary

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:56 (sixteen years ago) link

cnn called tx for obama?!?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:57 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Considering how late they are to get to the votes from the major cities, I think that may be a bit premature, even at 50% counted.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

uh no?

xp

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

o rly

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

DALLAS IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN POPULATION CENTER IN TEXAS? The hell you say, CNN. I thought maybe that was Amarillo.

Milo, I feel you man, but you underestimate the magnitude of negative and moreso inaccurate stereotypes people have about Texas outside Texas. A lot of people don't think there are many black people in Texas. Also, CNN in talking down to viewers shocker.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Uhhhh. . . Drudge has HRC up in Tx., 50 to 48%. This primary fight isn't likely to be over tomorrow, I fear.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

uh no?

xp

-- gr8080, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 3:58 AM

i'm told it was on cnn.com for like 10 minutes, didn't see it

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

surely this will only add fuel to the SEE THE BIAS meme

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Yawn, Clinton "wins" Ohio and maybe Texas. Obama "wins" Vermont.

What are the margins and delegate breakdowns? ESPECIALLY in Texas, which apparently is implying a delegate lead for Obama even if he doesn't win the popular vote?

Actually, never mind. It doesn't matter. The Obama/Clinton race has turned into a stalemate Monopoly game where there are two people left and there's a major rent-cap on Boardwalk and Park Place, even though you know one of them is more likely to win. It's just a matter of how much longer.

What's more interesting is what happened today in the Republican races. Yes Yes McCain won. That's not the interesting part. Huckabee did PRETTY FUCKING GOOD in Texas. A lot of Dem poljunkies are ignoring still how split up the GOP voters are this year.

Which is a big pile o shit for McCain. If McCain chooses Huckabee as VP, goodbye independent voters. If McCain doesn't choose Huckabee, goodbye Christian voters.

Also, AGAIN, McCain = old, lol. I think the being old thing is going to make more of a difference than the 100 years In Iraq thing (sadly).

The polls today giving McCain the lead in the GE means jackshit. it's only March.

Again, I've stated this before so this will be the last, but while the race is for both the GOP and the Dems to lose, the GOP are way more fucked this time 'round. Then again, the President of 2009-2012 is fucked by proxy. Who knows though, maybe the little roulette ball will land on '00'?

Anyway, I'm glad this is over until late April at the very, *yawn*, least.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Huck did well in OH, too.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven’t been watching any of the media coverage, has Chairman Dean or Speaker Pelosi been on the air? Any talk of rerunning Michigan or Florida?

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:13 (sixteen years ago) link

lol confetti

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

god i am so fucking sick of this and the fucking divided household bullshit

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillz just said she's going on to the finish. Oy, I'm starting to get really fatigued.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:20 (sixteen years ago) link

This Hillary speech is a joke. I don't think I can handle four years of this bullshit.

circa1916, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:26 (sixteen years ago) link

This Hillary speech is a joke. I don't think I can handle four years of this bullshit.

Don't worry, you won't have to.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Texas primary back to 49-49

caek, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been wondering lately what's up with politicians and "small businesses." They seem to just love the shit out of talking about "small businesses."

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:29 (sixteen years ago) link

YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL. YES WE WILL.

gr8080, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I've been wondering lately what's up with politicians and "small businesses." They seem to just love the shit out of talking about "small businesses."

-- Hurting 2, Tuesday, March 4, 2008 8:29 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

lolamericandream

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:36 (sixteen years ago) link

OK, so Clinton wins by Ohio by, say, 60%. What's the difference between her delegate win and Obama's delegate win?

26 to 28 delegates?

So basically this undid the "mighty" Washington caucus win for Obama in delegate counts. *shrug*.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:45 (sixteen years ago) link

OMINOUS WARNINGS.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

And as I've noted repeatedly, there are some negatives out there that most of you don't even know about - but everyone in Washington knows about them, in detail.

JPGs or it's not true

caek, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:53 (sixteen years ago) link

If Hillary wins the nomination I'm probably just going to vote for Nader or some stupid shit. I don't have a hard on for Obama or anything, but how Hillary's conducted herself this campaign is such a turn-off.

burt_stanton, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:54 (sixteen years ago) link

in texas, denton at 0%, Dallas at 54%, and harris (houston) only at 14% reporting giving obama some chance of getting even with hillary

gershy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

What is Denton?

The Reverend, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

in texas, denton at 0%, Dallas at 54%, and harris (houston) only at 14% reporting giving obama some chance of getting even with hillary

El Paso is only at 12%. I predict Senator Clinton +4%.

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:59 (sixteen years ago) link

university of north texas, dallas

xp to rev

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 04:59 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, looking like 2-4% margin for her

gershy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:00 (sixteen years ago) link

TO PENNSYLVANIA

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

if the early voting tallies, the demographics, the polling trends, and the republican support are anything to go by, i'd say her chances of winning texas are slim. yall can tar and faether me jhoshea-pats style if i'm wrong.

-- m bison, Monday, March 3, 2008

Can we upgrade the punishment to pitchcapping?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:03 (sixteen years ago) link

So is this shit seriously going to destroy the Democrats' chances in the ge, or am I overreacting?

xpost

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:04 (sixteen years ago) link

It's going to hurt badly.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's obsession for power is both destroying her chances, and Obama's chances by doing the Republican's job of smearing him. Pathetic.

burt_stanton, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago) link

can someone explain to me (with some kind of figures) why hillary seems to be the one (at least on this thread) being accused of hurting the democrats by staying in, and not obama? is obama far enough ahead of her (by any measure) to label him the presumptive nominee, or are people saying that hillary is hurting the dems cause they dont like her?

max, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary only wants to win the nomination because she is evil, you see, whereas the other candidates should be given credit for their high intentions

daria-g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

If races continue to split down the middle and no one picks up any significant net gains, by the current count Obama should come through with the most. This is reasonably plausible.

Eppy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess i could go read everything i missed in the past couple weeks but fuck it

daria-g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

daria otm

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i half-heartedly made the argument that hillary is hurting the democrats by staying in to a friend and he got real pissed, and i realized i didnt have a reason in particular to believe that hillary should drop out over obama other than that i like obama

max, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I look forward to the pundits' rending of garments with nausea and hopelessness.

Eppy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the math that Hillary can't win on pledged delegates is pretty reliable.

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:15 (sixteen years ago) link

excuse me, "blog math"

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:16 (sixteen years ago) link

where might i find some of this blog math

max, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:16 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck a david axelrod, by the way. i think i'm going to go back to not reading the thread now. burn the witch!

daria-g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:17 (sixteen years ago) link

it's 3am, what blog do you trust?

gershy, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://bangbus.blog.com/

max, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I've said this before, but there's more evidence tonight: this Democratic primary has been all about who can take advantage of umbrage. Whichever candidate looks like they've been wronged last wins. First, HRC is perceived as unfairly positioning herself as the "inevitable nominee," so Obama wins Iowa. Next, the media (and Obama/Edwards) is perceived to be ganging up on HRC and acting like sexist pigs, so she wins N.H. Next, the Clintons are perceived to be playing on racial stereotypes, so Obama wins South Carolina. Next, Obama is perceived to be the "inevitable candidate," and HRC claims the media favors him over her, so HRC wins Ohio and probably Texas.

Obv., that's oversimplifying things dramatically, but it feels that way to me tonight. What a way to choose a nominee. Meanwhile, the Red Meat party is patiently waiting on the side of the road to pounce on whatever's left of the Democratic nominee after this primary is over.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:18 (sixteen years ago) link

gonna be a long summer

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.slate.com/id/2185278/

xxxxpost

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

So is this shit seriously going to destroy the Democrats' chances in the ge, or am I overreacting?

No, you've pretty much got it.

Nicole, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

dang, well at least i was right about obama taking dallas, houston, and austin. i got sunburned from being outside all damn day (i think my feet are brokens from standing forevs?) 250 came out to caucus tonight for two precincts, had to address large crowds of actual adults and organize them, precinct 2099: obama 4, clinton 3 delegates YAY too tired for punctuation

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

now i get to be precinct chair and vote again in 3 weeks. balls.

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Surely anyone who Clinton rags on is going to do well from that in a GE, since Clinton herself is so disliked? I can't see this primary doing any lasting damage to Obama that a summer won't cure.

caek, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:36 (sixteen years ago) link

can someone explain to me (with some kind of figures) why hillary seems to be the one (at least on this thread) being accused of hurting the democrats by staying in, and not obama?

It's not just that she's staying in, it's how she's staying in. The attacks she's making on Obama stand a much greater chance of hurting him in the general (should he come out on top) than anything he's throwing back at her.

Of course, the perceived negativity isn't helping her chances in the general either - playing into "what a bitch" rhetoric from the right if she gets the nomination.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm more worried about the head start McCain is being given and the general spectacle of the Dems tearing themselves apart.

xpost

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

doesn't matter who Clinton likes or doesn't like. Building a primary campaign out of "lol he's way too incompetent for this important job" = "EVEN HIS OWN PARTY DIDN'T THINK HE WAS CAPABLE OF LEADING THE FREE WORLD" in October.

Which is the problem with there not being any difference between the two of them, because there are no issues to disagree on so it had to get nasty and personal instead.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Texas primary called for Senator Clinton.

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I've disagreed with Daria for most of the two primaries threads, but I'm totally with her on this one.

LOL at this "destroying the Democrats". There are sooo many ways the Dems and GOP can fuck up themselves *after* the conventions. The mudslinging is just a sideshow, dooders.

Because, you know, the GOP is so unified right now, and people will NEVER FORGET SPRING OF 2008 THE ALMOST OBAMA-CLINTON TIE. LOL.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, when popular GOP pundits have to tell their followers to vote for "the weaker Democrat", that's not a good sign for the GOP.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I’m getting closer to predicting a Senator Clinton/Obama ticket. Strange.

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't imagine that happening.

circa1916, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder how many news outlets are going to completely ignore the Texas caucus.

Dan I., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

With this conference call/disenfranchisement thing, probably not many of them.

31g, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, the idea that Hillary will find more exclusive dirt about Obama than the GOP is kinda a) giving Hillary more credit than she deserves, and b) underestimating even the crippled GOP this year, or more to the point, underestimating politics of negative since, well, Thomas Jefferson's run?

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Pictures from a caucus.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:03 (sixteen years ago) link

gop pundits want dems to win in 2008 so they can blow shit up for 2010 and install the messiah (anti-christ) for 2012.... hillary is the poster child for a coulter/savage make-a-wish foundation book tour (burning) ... just as the dubya-presidency turned jon stewart into the butterfly, so would a hillary presidency for the righty-tighty pundits.

i think some in the gop realize that getting a gop pres, gop congressional control, and alito/roberts wasn't enough... either that or they're really not about hurting gays and killing baby killers. they know nothing actually gets done in congress without crushing your enemies, seeing them driven before you, and hearing the lamentation of their women! it's still the status quo unless they pound a 2/3 majority into congress and then it's elephantitus on parade.

daniel higgs was right when he swilled, "NOTHING IS EASY!" yeah, yeah, yeah.

msp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i half-heartedly made the argument that hillary is hurting the democrats by staying in to a friend and he got real pissed, and i realized i didnt have a reason in particular to believe that hillary should drop out over obama other than that i like obama

-- max, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 5:14 AM

^^ also occurred to me as i drove home this evening

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama still has a significant lead in pledged delegates and looks to maintain that lead. That should be reason enough to say if one should drop it, it should be Hillary over Obama. No?

circa1916, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:27 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>gop pundits want dems to win in 2008 so they can blow shit up for 2010 and install the messiah (anti-christ) for 2012.... hillary is the poster child for a coulter/savage make-a-wish foundation book tour (burning) ... just as the dubya-presidency turned jon stewart into the butterfly, so would a hillary presidency for the righty-tighty pundits.</i>

http://www.abrahamslady.com/items/LinenThreadLg.jpg
http://reneeashleybaker.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/david-lee-roth-jumping.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/57/Streetsharks.jpg

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Good night!

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Twinerothtoon?

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:46 (sixteen years ago) link

somebody jumproped some bodybuilding hammerheads

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:47 (sixteen years ago) link

thread jump shark

remy bean, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i half-heartedly made the argument that hillary is hurting the democrats by staying in to a friend and he got real pissed, and i realized i didnt have a reason in particular to believe that hillary should drop out over obama other than that i like obama

-- max, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 5:14 AM

^^ also occurred to me as i drove home this evening

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 12:21 AM (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

uhhhhhhh how about the fact that he has more delegates????

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:54 (sixteen years ago) link

by less than a hundred

remy bean, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:58 (sixteen years ago) link

and?

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't wait for the hillary supporters-- those who thought al gore was the rightful president because he won the popular vote-- to start to argue that it would be acceptable for her to win via super delegates if she loses the democratic popular vote

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean this is going to turn into the dem version of 2000 isn't it?? with florida again as the big controversy state?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:04 (sixteen years ago) link

would anyone be surprised if the florida/mich thing went to the courts?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

also i haven't been reading this thread this week so i apologize if these two things were brought up but:

- why hasn't anyone--dem ppl, media or otherwise-- called out hillary for how distinctly bushian her candidacy has become!? and i'm not talking about her negative ads as much as this mutated persona she's taken on as the "down home" candidate who doesn't have it in her to "inspire" people or make "great" speeches. honestly fuck her for that

- secondly, back to the super delegate thing, are there any staunch dems in this thread who'd consider not voting and/or voting for mccain if hillary wins the nom even if she doesn't win the delegate count? i mean wouldn't it be the dem part saying fuck you to it's constituency? i'd be inclined to say fuck you right back with a vote for mccain (not saying i am or would do this, but i'd give it some serious serious thought) or by not casting a vote at all (or writing in obama) (basically a protest vote i guess)

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Jordan, when has a non-incumbent nomination race been civil, polite, and happy happy?

It's like you guys forgot that political races aren't hugglez across the states or something.

Fuck. I just realized that EMP Pop Conference 2008 will have come and gone and people will still be playing with they Politigotchis here talking about Pennsylvania.

Escape!

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:13 (sixteen years ago) link

The Boredoms will commence their U.S. tour, as will Stars Of The Lid.

Meanwhile, Clintobamamemontum on the LOL PRIMARIES THREAD! Again!

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Y Eye will announce Obama endorsement.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't the Hillary narrative now going to be, Hillary wins the states that democrats can win in the GE? Especially with she win's PE which seems likely given the similarities with OH?

Ed, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:17 (sixteen years ago) link

What is up with all this talk of the "narrative," seriously.

Gavin, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:20 (sixteen years ago) link

so what's unlikely about this scenario:

clinton and obama spend three more months beating the crap out of each other and thus fueling the GOP smear machine for free with endless delectable word vomit readymade for context switching

it comes down to FLA and MI and clinton does some fucked up shit, manages to win on some technicality/court decision

the GOP, again armed with everything they need courtesy the Clinton/Obama shirfest and with human Democrats dispirited at what petty douchebags their nominal leaders have became, stop showing up at the polls in such numbers, thrash Hilary over all the experience she doesn't have after all and in Spring 2008, we're bombing tehran.

i, grey, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:21 (sixteen years ago) link

that is, the GOP, now cheery as heck, thrash Hilary for the sheer pent up hate of it

i, grey, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:22 (sixteen years ago) link

narrative = how the campaign are going to spin it in one easy word.

Ed, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:23 (sixteen years ago) link

If this night is like the other surprise nights in the primaries (how many have there been now? 5? 10?), the person who reclaims underdog status and can ride it for a few weeks has the advantage in the next big important vote.

1. I can't believe that 3am ad worked on the stupider Ohioans and Texans that decided to vote, but oh yeah...the masses are asses.
2. Obama's been cocky lately, and it's not attractive.
3. Clinton's been personable and funny, and if it makes me like her, I'm sure it makes normal people like her even more.

Now there's another 7 weeks of this build-up shit, and I want to strangle Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and Wolf Blitzer.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoever wins will face the consequences of what Monkeyboy and Dr. Evil Grin have been doing:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/opinion/04herbert.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Maybe it should be a Rep. who gets to find a way to pay for all of this and explain to his people why they're not getting the health care other developed nations have?

StanM, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:41 (sixteen years ago) link

.........

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:44 (sixteen years ago) link

True...one more Republican term could kill the party for the next 50 years.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link

MCCAIN/HUCKABEE 08

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:58 (sixteen years ago) link

EXPERIENCE THE MAVERICK EVANGELIZE CHANGEOSITY

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:59 (sixteen years ago) link

i've never seen so many chicken littles in one place since my grandma moved off the farm in oklahoma, GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 10:50 (sixteen years ago) link

can someone explain the caucus/primary thing in texas to me?

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 12:01 (sixteen years ago) link

because if:

i) clinton has a single-figure lead in the primaries
ii) obama's got a smaller single-figure lead in the caucuses
iii) the caucuses are only 36% reported

it seems like the math points towards it being too close to call once all the caucus results come in. also according to wikipedia (yeah i know) the texas caucus delegates aren't allocated until june somehow, which i don't understand at all.

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 12:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Of course no one is harming the democrats by suggesting that one of the potential nominees is an evil, heartless, manipulative person who cares about nothing but winning, and thereby taking up the standard GOP line.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:17 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^ Fair point.

As much as it pains me to see this primary fight drag on and get uglier, it's hard to imagine party leaders "demanding" that HRC step aside after she's won the primary contests in California, New York, New Jersey, Arizona, Ohio, Texas and -- while they're tainted, symbolic victories -- Michigan and Florida.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:27 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts to thomp

After last night's caucuses, the delegates awarded in each precinct go to a convention later this month to vote in the state senate district conventions. After that round whittles it down some more, delegates are awarded to go to the state convention in June, which will determine once and for all how many delegates will be awarded for the convention in Denver.

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:40 (sixteen years ago) link

it is like march madness but with less gambling and more drunkenness

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Newsweek does the math: Hillary's math problem

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago) link

collected analyses - http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/03/clintons_base_returns_in_force_and_at_just_the_right_moment.html#more

i've never seen so many chicken littles in one place since my grandma moved off the farm in oklahoma, GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES

i think you meant "nervous nellies"

Of course no one is harming the democrats by suggesting that one of the potential nominees is an evil, heartless, manipulative person who cares about nothing but winning, and thereby taking up the standard GOP line.

yeah, see, the people who keep propping up that strawman are you and the other clintonistas

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:57 (sixteen years ago) link

uhhhhhhh how about the fact that he has more delegates????

-- deej, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 6:54 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Link

by less than a hundred

-- remy bean, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 6:58 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Link

not to be a nitpicky pedant, but excluding superdelegates, obama's lead is still over 130 at this point.

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 13:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Hills could win each remaining contest by 20 points and still come short on pledged delegates. But winning 16 in a row, not to mention having the big states in her pocket, would make it more justifiable for the superdelegates to lean to her.

*Brit runs away.*

Upt0eleven, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:03 (sixteen years ago) link

except of course that's not gonna happen.

*runs away again*

Upt0eleven, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:04 (sixteen years ago) link

the reason people say clinton should get out is that it's virtually impossible for her to win the elected delegate count. the only thing she can blame that on are poor, overconfident political decisions made by her and her campaign. like those that helped O lose TX. if she wins, it's going to have to be on superdelegates, and she's going to have to establish herself as the more electable candidate. to do that, she's going to have to establish that a half-black man can't win her greater strength among working-class whites and catholics beats Obama's greater strength among independents, men and republicans, i.e. that it's more important that she hold on to Dems than he reach out to Indies. she'll have to address figures like those i posted above that indicate that while she does better than obama in certain states against mccain, she doesn't win any that he doesn't at least lead in, while she loses or trails in several states, including blue states, that he wins or leads in. she'll do this in part of course by arguing that he can go at the bottom of the ticket, but she's unlikely to promise that - who wants a veep who's more popular than they are - and at least some will be skeptical not just about the probability of the ticket but the probability that it would hold on to O's indies.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago) link

itals should be strikethru

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I know this has been dismissed as lunacy several times... But is there any chance of the Dem elders brokering an otherwise inconceivable Obama/Clinton ticket to stop the bloodshed?

The math I've seen indicates that Clinton has no probable shot at this without some crazy statistical miracle and/or superdelegate coup. Does she believe in miracles, or is she fighting for next in line? I guess I'm assuming that there is something guiding her other than '1st woman prez at all costs' though.

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:09 (sixteen years ago) link

the argument is not only that the continuation of the campaign that would hurt the party, in terms of time (which could go both ways) and resources, it's also that the process by which the candidate would win would hurt the party

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago) link

petey, lots of people wouldn't want an obama/clinton ticket

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:11 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i wouldn't want an obama/clinton ticket.

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:11 (sixteen years ago) link

just looking for some kind of ghost in the the hillary machine.

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Fournier: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap_campaignplus/20080305/ap_ca/on_deadline_clinton

Clinton has little chance of closing the gap because Democrats allocate most of their delegates proportionally, meaning the loser of a close contest earns nearly as many delegates as the winner. Even as she declared victory in Ohio, Clinton knew that Tuesday's results were unlikely to draw her much closer to Obama.

It doesn't get any better for Clinton after Tuesday. Just for kicks, pencil the New York senator in for landslide victories in Wyoming, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky plus narrow victories in Guam, Indiana, North Carolina, Montana and South Dakota — scenarios that give her a hefty benefit of the doubt and then some. And what happens?

She still trails Obama.

Her only hope is that a solid majority of the nearly 800 superdelegates support her over Obama. Party rules allow them to act independently, but it's almost unfathomable that these political animals would not ratify the results from primaries and caucuses.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

is the water ok?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Does the VP spot really sell voters on a ticket anyway?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

got it

Surmounter, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Why is everyone assuming that Florida and Michigan won’t be rerun?

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Also I don't believe for a second that 4 years isn't long enough to turn around 8 years of a failed administration. At least to a significant degree to make a case for a Dem second term. The Jimmy Carter II doom predictions are a little premature imho.

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

who's gonna clamor for that? xp

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:26 (sixteen years ago) link

im glad the mathmatically-impossible thing is taking hold with clinton now - hilzabee 08

and what, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC has come back, but not far enough

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago) link

david axelrod:

``We have not hesitated to draw distinctions between the candidates and we'll continue to do that," said Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod. "If Sen. Clinton wants to take the debate to various places, we'll join that debate. We'll do it on our terms and in our own way but if she wants to make issues like ethics and disclosure and law firms and real estate deals and all that stuff issues, as I've said before I don't know why they'd want to go there, but I guess that's where they'll take the race.''

look for big calls for her release her tax returns, plus those first lady pages come out in a couple weeks, don't they?

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link

So on to PA-- anyone seen polling #s? I live near Philly and only see signs for Obama and Ron Paul--even in the suburbs.

President Keyes, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 14:54 (sixteen years ago) link

You gotta hand it to the GOP, they know how to run campaigns. They are loving this. Thanks Ohio and Texas for four more years.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i think 2 weeks ago, hillary was up by something like 16 points, last week it shrunk to 6 points

xpost

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Why is everyone assuming that Florida and Michigan won’t be rerun?

so your argument, counsel, is that MI and FL should be punished for moving their primaries up by being given a decisive role in the nomination?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Why is everyone assuming that Florida and Michigan won’t be rerun?

somebody tell me why I'm wrong, but even if this is revisited, would it not hurt Obama? (i.e. Fla - lol old ppl and heavy hispanic pop., Michigan for a lot of the same reasons HRC did well in Ohio?)

I may be way off base...

will, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary hints at Obama/Clinton // Clinton/Obama ticket:

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/clinton.obama.ticket.2.669799.html

Speaking on "The Early Show" on CBS, Clinton said "that may be where this is headed, but of course we have to decide who is on the top of the ticket."

StanM, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Michigan is blue, Ohio is usually red -- I think Obama would do a lot better in Michigan than he did in Ohio. Even when Hillary was the only candidate on the ballot she only got about 40%, I think?

Nicole, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

(xpost to own post)

However absurd it now seems, this might be the only way out that wouldn't leave Dem delegates (is "disenfranchising" the word I'm looking for?) Dem voters.

StanM, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost hrc got 55, uncommitted got 40

m bison, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

omg this election this thread when will it end

btw i <3 clinton hinting at the superticket - its got pizazz and its def the best shot that second place finisher has at being president - losing then going back to the senate for 8 years isnt gonna help anyones chances - so YAY BRING ON THE SUPERAWESOMETICKET!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

aside from "black man + white woman = YIKES", what are the arguments against it?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

They're missing experience AND charisma! Oh wait.

StanM, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't get this "Hillary can't win because of delegate math" argument. Neither can get an absolute majority and will have to rely on superdelegates. It's a big assumption that the superdelegates will automatically go with whoever has clocked up the most delegates, especially if there's a difference of under 100. Let's assume Obama stumbles badly, Clinton gains a string of victories, and by June can claim that over the course of 6 months' campaigning, there's been a change of dynamic and the momentum has swung definitively to her. In such a scenario, I can't see the superdelegates being beholden to whoever just squeaks in on delegate count.

Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

(My supatickets, let me show you them) Actually, why not indeed? How different are their opinions really?

StanM, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

well yah clinton is hoping for Obama stumbles badly - but the chances of that are slim

maaaaaybe clintons backup plan is strongarming obama into picking her for veep aiming to be president 45

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, neither can get an unsuperdelegated win -- so what happens if between now and then we get a photo like this one:

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2004/04/gallery/scandals/ghart.jpg

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

god i love that photo

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

It's a classic.

Nicole, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

The memories.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I was just thinking about that opus picture after Tracer posted the original!

Nicole, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it might be my favorite of the book covers. (Though the Deathtongue-as-U2 pose on the back cover of the one before it comes close.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway, to answer Tracer's question, if we get a photo of Obama in a bikini sitting in Hillary's lap, we have a winning ticket for the ages.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

thread jump shark

-- remy bean, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 06:48 (8 hours ago) Link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark

ouch.

msp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

we need the Caspar Weinberger poem again.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://static.flickr.com/41/119420866_1d54b6853a_o.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

where's the Screaming Lobster of Hope been?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.sliderulemuseum.com/Ephemera/BloomCounty1988_SR_Aid.jpg

kingfish, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/2u97thz.jpg

SUPERTICKET SUPERTICKET SUPERTICKET !!!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

My God, he looks...demonic.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://bkmarcus.com/blog/images/comics/LikeSenility.gif

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man that Hart/ Rice photo has never failed to bring a smile to my face.

xxxp - LOL is that when Steve Dallas went nice and got a man perm? what was the impetus? head trauma or something?

will, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

space aliens Dolelized him.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

he looks like John Kerry (xpost)

Euler, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

or was it "Gephardtized" him?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

it is such a picture of perfect happiness

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i29.tinypic.com/2mzl5ch.jpg

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Seriously, reverse the heads.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

^

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Some Texas caucus results

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

The early results, though, Have Obama ahead -- sometimes by quite large margins -- in 21 of 31 Texas State Senate districts; Clinton leads, often by equally large margins, in the rest. (from Ben Smith/Politico)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i31.tinypic.com/24xospj.jpg

lol good call ned

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

she looks like Christian Slater.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://superherouniverse.com/wallpaper/fanart/bingham/batman/joker.jpg

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

kind of gross: (in Ohio): 20% of Democrats (and these are Democrats, remember) saying that race was a factor in their decision; of those,three quarters went for Clinton. (also from Ben Smith)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

again, the Clinton-Obama talk, real or not, is just sugar to make the superdelegate medicine go down easier

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1719614,00.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

don't call us, we'll call you

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Obama_says_it_is_premature_to_talk_about_a_joint_ticket.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha, glad to see that. What stage is bargaining again?

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Denial -> February doesn't matter
Anger -> The media is unfair!
Bargaining -> Hey where my veeps at?
Depression -> ???

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton will fight on for at least the next seven weeks, until Pennsylvania votes on April 22. To get an idea of how long a period that is in political years, the Iowa caucuses — remember them? — were only eight weeks ago.

OMG NO NO NO NO NO NONONONONONONONONONO

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

any word on why the networks only have 36% in for the texas caucus? it's been like that since this morning

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, I was gonna do the stages a while back too

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

...of grief?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

obama: "I hope people start asking is what exactly is this foreign experience she is claiming," he said. "Was she handling crises during this period of time? I haven’t seen any evidence that she is more equipped to handle a crisis.

"She made the experience argument and her ability to handle a crisis, so I think it is important to examine that claim and not just allow her to assert it," he added. "She has made the argument that she is thoroughly vetted. If the suggestion is somehow that on issue of ethics or disclosure or transparency that she is somehow going to have a better record than I have or could (better) withstand Republican attack, then that should be tested."

oh shit its on now hillary threw the red phone on the table and now its on pray for us all

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

jhøshea, february's the longest month -- we're out of those woods

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, here come those attacks on Hillary you guys have been talking about

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

i was a t a bar last night and they were playing the rangers/islanders game and theres like one guy watching the fucking shoot out then they put the election comes on and everyone immediately crowds around and and starts talking abt super delegates and the texas caucus - its a national obsession everyone is an expert - i blame the blogs

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

they should agree to both campaign against mccain for the next 7 weeks and not each other

max, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

i was a t a bar last night and they were playing the rangers/islanders game and theres like one guy watching the fucking shoot out then they put the election comes on and everyone immediately crowds around and and starts talking abt super delegates and the texas caucus - its a national obsession everyone is an expert - i blame the blogs

-- jhøshea, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 10:45 AM (41 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i think this is awesome

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

they should agree to run the fucking obama/clinton superticket i demand it !!!!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

having clinton as vp nullifies obama's independent appeal

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

jhoshea = bro for the ages.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Yo jhøshea, come to dazzle ships tonight broheems

XPOST

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

how pathetic is it that in this election cycle the Republicans rallied around their candidate, McCain (who a fair portion of the party doesn't even like) quicker than the Dems did around theirs.

most dysfunctional party ever.

Even so I still don't see Hillary pulling this out. At this point she's just damaging the party's chances in November.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

dazzle ships is 2 heathers jon?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

@heathers

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

the GOP didn't have a choice, Shakey

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

shakey the diff is that the democrats have more than one candidate who is actually somewhat fit to be president

xpost xackly

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

little factoid via yglesias

2,833,000 Texans voted for John Kerry in the 2004 general election, but 2,857,000 people voted in last night's Democratic primary.

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

interpret plz

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah you're right, shakey, i guess the democratic party needs to be more self-loathing to run a successful general election campaign

hillary's not dead yet, my condolences

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I imagine that big factors in that number are a) population growth and b) the fact that no sane person thought George Bush would lose Texas. It still may bode very well.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess the democratic party needs to be more self-loathing to run a successful general election campaign

I have no idea what you mean by this

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

i was a t a bar last night and they were playing the rangers/islanders game and theres like one guy watching the fucking shoot out then they put the election comes on and everyone immediately crowds around and and starts talking abt super delegates and the texas caucus - its a national obsession everyone is an expert - i blame the blogs

-- jhøshea, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 10:45 AM (41 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i think this is awesome

-- deej, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 11:46 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yah i mean fundamentally i think its a v good thing for the country that everyone cares so much - but on the other hand this election is driving me fucking insane

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

How Pennsylvania Shapes Up Demographically.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Sullivan: it's Limbaugh's fault.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

unbelievable

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

jhøshea, Heathers tonight

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

so theres talk of obama going negative
http://thepage.time.com/2008/03/05/change-versus-more-of-the-same-part-ii/

is that really a good idea?

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Clintons will NOT be stopped. Til McCain....

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

is that really a good idea?

we'll see! I think probably it is, its their only option. If they don't respond aggressively and control the news cycles, Hillary will press her advantages. otoh, Hillary will invariably respond with more "poor widdew me" antics and crying etc

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

(also I think where their going IS totally legit - Hillary's "foreign policy expertise" is bullshit, and the Clintons have all kinds of ethics skeletons in their closet)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

he should make a commercial of her bragging abt her "important work" in bosnia then cut to footage of her singing w/sinbad

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha, otm

roxymuzak, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

roflz

so apparently Hillary's victories last night have not narrowed Obama's delegate lead at all...? way to go shrillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the 'talk' of Obama going negative is now 'reality'. Or maybe, to be fair, he's just determined to get tougher with HRC starting now. Curious to see how this plays out.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Given the fact she is able to loan her campaign $5 million, you would think the Clintons would be able to hire an accountant.

lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i gotta go in a min but can someone explain to me why SUPERTICKET is so laughable on its face beyond the obv animosity b/w the two right now? would clinton as veep really kill o's independent appeal?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

dont mind the haters SUPERTICKET rules

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe they can work something out where obama gets to be president on odd days, hillary on evens?

Jordan, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

would clinton as veep really kill o's independent appeal?

it would kill his appeal to me.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary get to be president in 2016

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's turning to negative campaigning as a means of embracing Hil's tactics is like when your girlfriend is always throwing stuff at you in arguments but you're cool and collected but one day you snap and chuck a lamp and quite possibly you sleep on the curb that night.

nickalicious, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz

petey_carnum, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I am not okay with any arrangement wherein Hillary is in the WH/closer to the presidency

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

wimmin always be trickin us

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

can someone explain to me why SUPERTICKET is so laughable on its face

It isn't so much laughable as improbable. IIRC, the last time a nominee put his nearest challenger on the ticket as veep was when JFK offered and LBJ accepted. Since then similar offers have been made, but always rejected. Once a candidate sets his or her heart on the office of POTUS, being the vice seems like small beer and a step into obscurity.

It is only recently (post 1980) that the vice president has been given any real work to do at all. Reagan started it, mainly because he didn't care to work very hard and liked to delegate as much as he could.

Aimless, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't forget: Reagan's people floated the idea of a "co-presidency" with Ford in 1980.

I'd say it started with Carter, who actually, you know, MET with Mondale and treated him as a member of Cabinet.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

IIRC, the last time a nominee put his nearest challenger on the ticket as veep was when JFK offered and LBJ accepted.

Uh, Kerry/Edwards?

jaymc, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

And before that Reagan/Bush 1980.

President Keyes, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

SUPERTICKET

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

clearly you just like the sound of that word.

Simon H., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/030508DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

bahh i'm kind of reaching burnout right now. i need to take a break from reading about this election

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

lol voters are mindless drones

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/030508DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

-- Mark Clemente, Wednesday, March 5, 2008 1:37 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

motherfucker! what is wrong with you people

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

good analysis here - way to fuck it up Democrats

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I take comfort in the fact that the existence of this thread and just the hysterics and paranoia means that, hopefully this year for once, the Democrats actually have energy for this presidential election. (lol, except maybe for "omg I was too busy on ilx to vote!!!1")

Was the 2004 Primaries thread anything close to this on a level of micro-micro-micro-tea-leaf reading?

Just looking back at Democratic nominees for the past three decades or so:
Kerry
Clinton
Clinton
Dukakis
Mondale
Carter
Carter
McGovern

..I mean, there isn't a precedent for 2008 for the Democratic nominee candidates. There definitely isn't a precedent for the GOP situation in 2008 too, which is more key and more overlooked.

There definitely is a precedent for nominee races lasting until June as recently as Bill Clinton, fwiw.

So, follow Tracer's advice. Be vigilant yet chill. This is going to last until the convention. Enjoy Spring and Summer 2008 while you can. I love you guys.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, you can never use mccainbushhug.jpg enough this year

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Dems wasting time (and most importantly $$$) in-fighting while McCain consolidates campaign resources/money/hones message = C/D

this is bad bad bad for the Democrats in the fall, there's no denying it. all of us are feeling election fatigue, and there's SIX MONTHS to go. this "enthusiasm" will not last that long, it will be replaced by bitterness and disenchantment.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

And either way, a huge segment of the Democratic base will feel bruised.

Michael White, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

and the fact that Hillary is ensuring this in the hopes that she can finagle a coronation via some procedural loophole in defiance of the popular vote = FUCK YOU I HATE YOU ARRGHGHGHGH

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll vote for McCain over Hillary just to say fuck you to her and the DNC. xpost Hi there!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

and honestly I really am beginning to wonder to an uncomfortable degree how much racism factors into Hillary's voting bases of old white women and blue collar whites, etc. Much as I hate to say it.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

this is bad bad bad for the Democrats in the fall, there's no denying it. all of us are feeling election fatigue, a

I disagree – this is healthy! For the next two months the press, to McCain's annoyance, will focus on these two fools squabbling. Meanwhile the politicrats might actually air some useful Obama or HRC laundry.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

but... the money. this is draining all the Dems financial coffers, they won't have much left for the GE.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred will like this, then: Lots more negative campaigning to come from HRC, under the guise of "contrast" and "vetting."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary, for instance, is white.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary, for instance, is white.

I'm sure this is true. I mean, I take her at her word that she's white. I have no reason to disbelieve it. As far as I know, she's white.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing thats so weird about the 'hillary comeback' is that there was never a point at which it looked like obama was really gonna do better than he did last night - maybe in texas by, like, a percentage point. but nothing unbelievable. we all knew this was the likely result going in

again i gotta credit her strategists for making her perform as expected into MASSIVE HRC VICTORY HALTS OBAMA MOMENTUM

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

but... the money. this is draining all the Dems financial coffers, they won't have much left for the GE.

If you nominate, they will come.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

he thing thats so weird about the 'hillary comeback' is that there was never a point at which it looked like obama was really gonna do better than he did last night - maybe in texas by, like, a percentage point. but nothing unbelievable. we all knew this was the likely result going in

Exactly! So everyone: enjoy the weather! It's March!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

This is more or less what everyone else has been saying, but I just tried the Slate Delegate Calculator and had Hillary winning 60%-40% in every remaining contest, and she's still behind by 15 pledged delegates.

jaymc, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

David --

Our projections show the most likely outcome of yesterday's elections will be that Hillary Clinton gained 187 delegates, and we gained 183.

That's a net gain of 4 delegates out of more than 370 delegates available from all the states that voted.

For comparison, that's less than half our net gain of 9 delegates from the District of Columbia alone. It's also less than our net gain of 8 from Nebraska, or 12 from Washington State. And it's considerably less than our net gain of 33 delegates from Georgia.

The task for the Clinton campaign yesterday was clear. In order to have a plausible path to the nomination, they needed to score huge delegate victories and cut into our lead.

They failed.

...[lots of stuff about how i should send them money]

Thank you,

David

David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

Donate

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm glad David Greenburg agrees:

Like the calls for Al Gore to concede the presidency to George Bush in November 2000, this anxiety about the imagined consequences of a protracted fight misreads both history and the calendar. In 2000, pundits seemed not to know that contested elections in previous years—notably the 1960 race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon—remained officially unresolved until barely a month before Inauguration Day, and so they talked as if each hour of uncertainty brought the republic nearer to doom.

The calls to wrap up the Democratic primary race show a similar amnesia. To suggest that March 5 marks a late date in the calendar ignores the duration of primary seasons past. Indeed, were Hillary Clinton to have pulled out of the race this week, Obama would have actually clinched a contested race for the party's nomination earlier than almost any other Democrat since the current primary system took shape—the sole exception being John Kerry four years ago. Fighting all the way through the primaries, in other words, is perfectly normal.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm starting to realize that the pledge delegate, while a very strong argument, isn't a foolproof one. what if HRC succeeds at "vetting" and "contrasting" to such an extent that he's painted as a very, very weak candidate by the media?

let's say they split the remaining contests, and let's say hillary picks up a few a long the way. any delegate lead he's got won't really matter much if obama's viewed as a weak GE candidate

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. while the superdelegates are surely more likely to break for the pledged delegate leader, it's not absolute by any means, especially if hillary succeeds in painting obama as a candidate with serious faults

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

err *flaws not faults

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I think you're right. What most likely what will happen is that, barring some unforeseen scandal, they'll finish primary season about where they are now. Obama will have a 100-delegate lead (roughly 1,650 to 1,550), so it will be up to the superdelegates to decide this thing.

jaymc, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm starting to realize that the pledge delegate, while a very strong argument, isn't a foolproof one. what if HRC succeeds at "vetting" and "contrasting" to such an extent that he's painted as a very, very weak candidate by the media?

That's her endgame. She'll most likely be well-behind in pledged delegates by the convention. Her goal will be to say that the latest votes -- the ones that took place after she and Obama were "fully vetted and contrasted" -- favor her, show her momentum and show him to be weak. This, she hopes, will give her leverage over the superdelegates.

Next, we should explain the nuances of the NBA salary cap.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill Bradley dropped out on March 8 - no one but Gore was left after that, right?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

when he wins wyoming and mississippi that will be kind of hard to maintain, that the 'momentum has shifted!!!' she'll try to pull the same thing going into every state. "But now its shifted ... for real!!!"

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Next, we should explain the nuances of the NBA salary cap.

im pretty up on this if you have any questions

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Can we lock this thread until Saturday then?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I once corrected the NBA cap wiki.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Robert Reich fears HRC will damage the party. Funniest Line: "When (Dick) Morris was subsequently discovered to have a penchant for the toes of prostitutes the White House dumped him but kept (Mark) Penn on." And Reich doesn't strike me as normally being a funny guy.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

when he wins wyoming and mississippi that will be kind of hard to maintain, that the 'momentum has shifted!!!' she'll try to pull the same thing going into every state. "But now its shifted ... for real!!!"

Good point. It's hard to see her winning more than two in a row. For instance, he wins WY and MS, she wins PA, they split IN and NC, she wins WV, they split KY and OR, etc.

jaymc, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

they split KY

obvious lol

HI DERE, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

living in a swing state that could possibly go Dem if all the born-agains stay home because of McCain (which I honestly don't think they will) I don't have the luxury of sitting this one out, but I really, really don't want to vote for HRC.

will, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

(Reich) made his first video blog (vblog) debut on Vimeo.com on March 7, 2007 where he revealed he dated Hillary Clinton while in college.

wau

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I DID NOT KNOW THAT!

He certainly doesn't seem to favor her now.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

sex b/w them was like Yoda and Dooku fighting.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Hillary is like 8" taller than Reich.

jaymc, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is up twelve percent in the caucuses on forty percent reporting, incidentally

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

and honestly I really am beginning to wonder to an uncomfortable degree how much racism factors into Hillary's voting bases of old white women and blue collar whites, etc. Much as I hate to say it.

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:06 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

okay, i believe someone posted that there was an exit poll showing that 20% agreed that 'race was a factor influencing their vote', of whom 75% were clinton voters. n.b. can't find the exit poll in question &

20% of three million ish texas voters = 600,000.
75% of 600,000 = 450,000.

which = more than clinton's margin.

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yea, i posted that. it was linked from ben smith's politico blog, and there you can find the exit poll

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^the stats on race were based on Ohio

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/The_race_factor.html

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

btw intrade.com still has obama in the 70s

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

According to the DNC and RNC, Florida and Michigan have violated party rules by moving up their primaries. Today, we each will call upon our respective state and national party chairs to resolve this matter and to ensure that the voters of Michigan and Florida are full participants in the formal selection of their parties' nominees.

way to not apologize for yr state parties' fucking up their own primaries. crybabies.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yea, deej is right, it's from ohio

thomp i didn't read your post thoroughly

sorry

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

btw huge portions of dem voters are crazy racist, i dont know how this can be surprising to anyone

the thing is, many of all racist are also sexist

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

We must restore the rights of the more than 5 million voters whose voices have been silenced.

silenced by ineptitude

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

what i'm curious about: where on the net can one find a decent record of the advertising the candidates are doing, regarding what sort of advert to what kind of household, what percentage of them, etc. - i read somewhere that clinton was doing a big push advertising-wise around the time her gallup poll numbers got better, and i'm starting to wonder if this direct stuff makes a bigger difference than the 'larger media narrative'

xpost re: ohio - oops / :

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

(two million, four hundred thousand, three hundred thousand)

thomp, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

the best part of the whole thing is that if they hadn't moved their primaries up in an ill-fated attempt to assert their importance their states would have ended up being pretty fucking important ^_^

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

guys we can jerk off to the exit poll data as much as we want but there's simply no indication that all of the voters who said race was important were hillary supporters. it's perhaps just as likely that african american voters took race into account when voting for obama, isn't it?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

20% agreed that 'race was a factor influencing their vote', of whom 75% were clinton voters

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

A good number of the African-American women I know and am close to support Hillary over Obama. This includes: my wife, my mother-in-law, my sister-in-law, my mom.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

New haute game for disenfranchised Dems:

McCain Chicken!

"I'm SERIOUS! I really AM going to vote for McCain as a Democrat because of this!..... I will!..... Yeah?.... I will... uh huh!.... don't laugh guys, it's not funny"

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

btw huge portions of dem voters are crazy racist, i dont know how this can be surprising to anyone

OTM. The Civil Rights Act, busing, etc happened only 40 years ago.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I know I know it's just... disappointing

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

what i'm curious about: where on the net can one find a decent record of the advertising the candidates are doing

these two sites (along with others i'm sure) generally post the candidates ads along with info on when/where they go on the air:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/

(they also post endless minutiae about the race, e.g. conference calls, press releases, poll data, etc)

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I know a suprisingly large number of 45+ yr old middle class black guys who are HRC supporters, too, Dan. I think age skews the whole thing, too.

Besides the obvious nutjobs and racists, I think the way this pans out between the two camps on the race/gender front is who's turn is it? African-Americans or women? I've seen some pseudo-feminist special pleading in the letters to the editor recently but mostly the official HRC supporter line seems to be that she's got more experience, is less of a chimera, isn't making promises she can't keep, blah, blah, blah...

Michael White, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

"going...down?"

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.canada.com/gallery/dose_10ferrell/060803ferrell8.jpg

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

you know cindy mccain has to get on top cowgirl style or take it from behind because of mccain's arm problems, right? so HOW CAN CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS VOTE FOR A CANDIDATE WHO CANNOT ACHIEVE THE MISSIONARY POSITION?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

/kenan

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

hey, kenan does not have a monopoly on crass sexual commentary, thank you very much

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe he has some kind of harness oh jesus stop me stop me

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

that's right, you just imagined cindy mccain in a fuck-sling.

suffer.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

no, actually i didn't.

now you suffer.

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago) link

giving new meaning to the idea of a 100 year occupation

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

BEST-CASE: disenchanted Obama youth see Clintons steal nomination, help form actual liberal party

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

BEST-CASE: disenchanted Obama youth see Clintons steal nomination, help form actual liberal party

One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
Go ask Alice
When she's ten feet tall.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

hey as long as there's fuck slings, i'm there

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

20% agreed that 'race was a factor influencing their vote', of whom 75% were clinton voters

MSNBC exit poll also has 20% of voters saying race of candidate was "important", but of those they only went 57-43 to Clinton:

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/the_crucial_racist_vote.php

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

'only'

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

there's a difference between "important" and "a factor influencing their vote," so the populations may be different even if the percentages are the same

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

we don't need exit polls, though. it's quite clear that white people in Ohio and other industrial or interior Southern states don't like Obama as much as white people in other states.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, the full question was:

"In deciding your vote for president today, the race of the candidate was (choose one):
-Important
-Not important"

Which is not that different than the AP phrasing.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

or, industrial/Catholic. I think we can count MA and NH in this category as well.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

the AP phrasing makes it more ok for the respondent to be racist

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

white people in Ohio and other industrial or interior Southern states

lolz racists be landlocked

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Interestingly (or not) no one's complaining that she also got 60% of those who said the gender of the candidate was important.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

and how did those people vote?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

oh rite, i'm tired

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

how many of the voters thought Obama was a woman?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

the AP phrasing makes it more ok for the respondent to be racist

If this is the case, why did the question yield 20% in both cases.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, some tough guys seem to go for hillary because they figure they'll take the real woman over the fake one

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i already addressed that above, xp

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, the presumption that the polls are identical has to break down on one of the sets of numbers

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm just wondering when these fucking superdelegate endorsements are going to come out of the woodwork

akm, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

i already addressed that above, xp

So the racists were more likely to agree that race was a "factor influencing their vote" but that at the same time it was "not important" to their decision-making process?

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Or is that the non-racists who still thought race was "important" in their decision-making process did not find that race was a "factor influencing their vote"?

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, the presumption that the polls are identical has to break down on one of the sets of numbers

I think it shows you that these things have a wide margin of error.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

284,228 = still enough to win her the state, no?

lol bajillion xps

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:35 (sixteen years ago) link

oh shit naw it looks like she had 55,447 crucial nonracist votes

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

So the racists were more likely to agree that race was a "factor influencing their vote" but that at the same time it was "not important" to their decision-making process?

my proposition is that asking if race was a factor influencing the vote is value-neutral, and therefore more accepting of the notion that race could be a negative characteristic, while asking if it was important, a higher standard, puts more of a burden on the respondent, and also connects race to the notion of social importance. i think a racist respondent is more likely to admit that it was a 'factor' in their vote, while someone who is voting for Obama because they feel a sense of significance in helping a black man be elected is more likely to identify race as 'important' to their vote.

you're making the assumption that the same 20% responded positively on the race question in each survey, but that they answered differently when asked how they voted. i'm making the assumption that people answered the same as to how they voted, but a different, overlapping 20% responded positively on the race question. i think my assumption is more reasonable.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

you're making the assumption that the same 20% responded positively on the race question in each survey, but that they answered differently when asked how they voted. i'm making the assumption that people answered the same as to how they voted, but a different, overlapping 20% responded positively on the race question. i think my assumption is more reasonable

Of course it wasn't the "same 20%" - ie., different people were asked in each poll. What were the sample sizes? Of those the follow-up question was only asked of 20% of the original, an even smaller sample. There are sound statistical reasons to think that this result has a high uncertainty associated with it.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

value-neutral, and therefore more accepting of the notion that race could be a negative characteristic

and conversely less rewarding of race being a positive factor

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

did the exit polls reach the same overall candidate numbers?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

you're assuming it was a follow-up question. i'm not.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know the order the questions were asked, but i do know they didn't ask "are you a woman? ok, who did you vote for? how much dollars do you have? ok, who did you vote for? are you a racist? ok, who did you vote for?"

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Follow-up or not, the sample of those who answered yes is only 20% the size of the original sample - so generalizing on the characteristics of these people is more statistically uncertain.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/Clinton_Plan.jpg

Hatch, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

wait is this a neil strauss thread now?

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

xps

gff, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

i think kos thinks they should do the smear-y fighting for him?

deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Seems to be looking that way, yeah. That's also the John Aravosis strategy. AmericaBlog has come a long way since the Donnie McClurken nonsense.

Hatch, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

so generalizing on the characteristics of these people is more statistically uncertain.

ok, so we can say that of those for whom race was a factor, there was between a safe and a large majority who preferred hillary

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually based on the MSNBC poll, racists were only negligibly more likely to prefer Hillary than the average voter:

Amnong all Ohio voters she beat Obama 54-44.

Among those who said race was "important" in that exit poll, she beat him 57-43.

That's only a net swing of 3 points - which I'm sure is well within the margin of error of that poll.

o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

57% of 20% is 11.5%, i.e. 11.5 of Hillary's 54 voted on the basis of race (15 if you use the AP numbers), which is well outside the margins of error and victory both.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

lol waht?

Readers have been asking about why the Texas caucus results from last night have been so slow coming in. As of this moment, only 39 percent of the caucus precincts are reporting.

Eric Kleefeld called down to Texas, and the Democratic Party tells him, in so many words, that the caucus reporting was voluntary.

Precincts were not required to report results to the state party, but they set up a voluntary reporting system so that the media would have results to report. Nice of them, no?

In their defense, Texas Dems didn't go the route of the Washington State GOP and make a wild-assed election night pronouncement of a winner based on incomplete returns. But at least in Washington State, they promised a final count, and as far as we know, they got one, eventually, one way or another.

But in Texas?

We're told not to expect too much more in the way of caucus returns. Sort of makes sense. If you were going to comply with the "voluntary program," you probably would have done so by now.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/181717.php

jhøshea, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually based on the MSNBC poll, racists were only negligibly more likely to prefer Hillary than the average voter:

Amnong all Ohio voters she beat Obama 54-44.

Among those who said race was "important" in that exit poll, she beat him 57-43.

That's only a net swing of 3 points - which I'm sure is well within the margin of error of that poll.

-- o. nate, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:09 (3 minutes ago) Link

Except the "average" voter pool includes the subset of "racist" voters (I don't endorse that word here, BTW), so that skews the comparison you're trying to make.

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually based on the MSNBC poll, admitted racists were only negligibly more likely to prefer Hillary than the average voter

M.V., Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

per the CNN exit poll, about 7% voted for obama because gender was important.

14% were 65 and older. 20% were white and over 60.

interestingly, Clinton basically tied among OH indies (winning white indies) and repubs, unlike many previous states.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Haven't posted to ILX in a while but having been lurking on this thread in particular.

I think it's naive to dismiss race as a factor in Obama's white vote (or lack thereof) in some places but I don't think it's just a Southern issue (for the record: I'm a white Southerner and strong Obama supporter).

It's interesting that Obama seems to be doing best either in states with a large black vote in the democratic primary (where he wins so overwhelmingly that he only needs 25% or so of the white vote to win overall) OR in relatively racially homogenous states with a very small black population (Idaho? Nebraska? even Minnesota).

What this says to me is that it's easier for white voters, in mass, to support a black candidate in states with very small black populations, not because white voters in these places are less "racist" (a loaded word best avoided in most circumstances) but because their political thinking is less rooted in reacting to race or race-based identity politics.

In other words, white voters in more diverse areas are more likely to feel threatened by a black politician (or, more to the point, that politician's perceived constituency) or uncomfortably implicated in the effects of racial discrimination that politician makes people confront than white voters in heavily white areas.

The idea that only "racist" or Republican white voters are affected by race (if even unconsciously) is wishful/simplistic. As is the notion that this is only a Southern dynamic.

My two cents

-- Hubie Brown, Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:48 PM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I think this argument about the statistics is getting off track. If you take the exit poll result as your given and use that to adjust the vote count, then you'll come to one conclusion. If you take the vote result as your given, and use that to estimate the statistical significance of the exit poll result (taking sample size into account), you'll get a different conclusion.

In any case, I think the real reason the exit poll's disturbing to people is not so much the margin. Which is the more disturbing statistic: the 20% of those polled who said race was a factor, or the 57% of that subset who voted for the white candidate? I would guess it's the second subset that bothers people more than the first. It's hard to believe, with something like 90% of African-Americans voting for Obama, that race was not a factor in at least some of that support. However, if you voted for the black candidate, no one is going to get too upset if you admit that race was a factor in your decision. But if you voted for the white candidate and say race was a factor, you will probably be labeled a racist. There are some historical reasons for this, not all of which are bad. But there's a fundamental psychological asymmetry in how these results are interpreted, which goes beyond quantitative considerations of statistical significance. None of which is to say that racism isn't a very real and troubling psychological force, or that it doesn't affect the election in potentially unfair and destructive ways - but I do feel that these exit polls are a rather blunt instrument with which to measure it.

o. nate, Thursday, 6 March 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts to jhoshea

each precinct was given a folder with voter sign-in sheets and materials to conduct the caucuses. among them was a sheet with a 1-800 number to send the figures from your precinct in after they had been decided.

the sign-in sheets are due within 72 hours of the caucus' close (friday) so that counties can verify that all the voters were primary voters (had to vote in the primary to caucus).

official numbers won't really be determined until the summer anyway as there are a couple more rounds of this shit before it's officially determined who gets what delegates from the caucuses.

m bison, Thursday, 6 March 2008 01:40 (sixteen years ago) link

remember, democracy is perception.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 6 March 2008 01:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Can't we PLEASE lock this thread till Pennsylvania?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 01:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I believe it is said that memories are lost in reverse order.

youn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

The subtitle of this thread is looking bitterly ironic now.

31g, Thursday, 6 March 2008 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

what it do hubie? you're def doing work right now on this suns-nuggs game right now

J0rdan S., Thursday, 6 March 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, so caucus != primary? Obama won the Texas Caucus and lost the Texas Primary, apparently, so I guess they're not the same thing :-/ (I R 1 stupid european thought he knew what was going on but is now totally stumped again)

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:11 (sixteen years ago) link

well tx does it all fucked, you had it right to begin with but we went and confused everyone.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Bugger me, I am going to the RNC in september.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:20 (sixteen years ago) link

uh, why??

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Install and support the prompting system.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:31 (sixteen years ago) link

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:36 (sixteen years ago) link

/ drums fingers together sinisterly

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Ah well, at least you'll know where to go when you're not working. STATE FAIR.

suzy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 11:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton gameplan

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 13:33 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC'S GAMEPLAN IS FOOLPROOF.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually, it's pretty damn rational. Win most of what's left, close the pledged delegate gap to a small margin, win the "big states," take the shine off Obama, and charge into the convention with a message for the super-delegates about perseverance and loyalty and toughness.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah but there's no way for her to win w/o using superdelegates to undermine a popular vote / delegate count Obama lead. That's a reprehensible 'victory' in my view... and probably the GE voters who, you know, have a deep appreciation for the most basic definition of 'democracy'.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:16 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i was with you til the last part

and what, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:21 (sixteen years ago) link

haha fair enough. I think the Clinton camp is underestimating the amount of blowback that these backroom deals will generate in the modern media landscape.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there anyway to spin that other than Obama voters were cheated?

petey_carnum, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

If she can get a majority of the popular vote it's not that hard to spin.

31g, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah plus if shes close enough and something happens and obama bombs in some way, shes there to pick up the pieces

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah plus if shes close enough and something happens and obama bombs in some way, shes there to pick up the pieces

I don't think her strategy is to hope for Obama to bomb and then to pick up the pieces. I think her strategy is to bomb Obama to pieces.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama doesn't have to have some spectacular crash for Clinton to get the nomination. She has keep beating him, but the margins don't have to be great. If she can front up to the convention saying the momentum is definitively with her, and has been for months, then I don't think Obama's slim lead in pledged delegates will make a difference as to which way the superdelegates swing. I mean, what is even the point of superdelegates if their voting criteria is solely the popular vote?

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Margins do have to be great.

I've asked several prominent uncommitted superdelegates if there's any chance they would reverse the will of Democratic voters. They all say no. It would shatter young people and destroy the party.

I wouldn't lol much at the idea that the Democratic party wouldn't want a nominee who wins through superdelegates. As with so much with HRC's campaign, just because Bush got away with it doesn't mean she can too.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

but once its popular vote vs. pledged delegates 'the will of the people' is up in the air

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

another denial about obama's rumored bank of 50 superdelegates:

obama spokesperson Bill Burton: This is just a rumor. There is no secret stash of superdelegates that we are sitting on waiting to roll out.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

:(

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

well it wouldnt be a secret...

jhøshea, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

hey can we knock it off with this idea that the press is easy on obama? considering the nafta flap was cooked up by canadian right wingers and was initially floated about hillary, but that didn't stick well enough apparently (you can fault obama for not defusing the former well enough, but it was manufactured from the outset.) oh and the farrakhan business, for which we can thank one tim russert -- in the context of giving mccain a complete pass on his nutcase racist pastor.

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

er some odd syntax due to editing there: "you can fault obama for not defusing IT well enough"

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton Camp: Obama Attacks Suggest Campaign is “Unable to Make the Positive Case”

Getty

Senior adviser Ann Lewis scolds Obama on media conference call for stepping up attacks against Clinton after Tuesday’s votes, says instead he should talk about his “positive ideas” on the issues.

“I did not realize that their version of new politics is to recycle some of the same old Republican attacks on Hillary that have failed for years.”

Howard Wolfson says he doesn’t “believe imitating Ken Starr” is a way to run a nomination campaign. Permalink

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THIS SHIT

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

something happened in NYC today that will only help McCain in the GE:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/06/times.square/index.html

Beatrix Kiddo, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

hey can we knock it off with this idea that the press is easy on obama?

yea. i think whatever "free pass" or favoritism the press presumably gave obama before no longer stands.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:31 (sixteen years ago) link

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THIS SHIT

EVERYWHERE. They are the kind of people who elected GWB twice.

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

its just such a transparent attempt to reframe an apple as an orange

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

and thats not even touching on the hypocrisy of it

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Again, she's using Rove's strategies -- audaciously blame the other guy for doing what you're doing.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

right but calling her campaign shameless is just a cheap media narrative amirite

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

But they're using Rove's tactics in a way that resembles a star MBA grad trying to get his footing in the real business world.

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

gff OTM. obama's just doing the same thing maaaaaaaan!

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

did you guys hear her radio ad that presented itself as a news story about Obama's NAFTA 'lie' - only to say 'paid for by hillary clinton' at the end? Like, it was a fake news radio ad

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

what "rovian" things is the obama camp supposed to have said?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

deej did you hear the jimmy carter radio ad that presented itself as a johnny cash "song"?? what a bait and switch

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf are you talking about now?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean when carter starts using great musicians with personal integrity to further his own political ends it's like, who buys this shit

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer srsly wtf dude. you are relishing in just being reactionary against people who care. so not you!

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

are you dumb? xpost

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

there is a vast strategic and moral difference between presenting your political ad as a news story and presenting it as a song

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

are you implying that pop songs and false news broadcasts are comparable in information value to the voting public, or you just being a jackass? xpost

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

dude the faux outrage here over hoary old campaign tactics has reached epic proportions. if you guys are this sensitive now over things like, what, the clinton camp saying that obama is going negative, or a radio ad that pretends to be a news bulletin.. christ, your heads are gonna explode in the g.e.! it's as if no one here has ever followed a campaign before. sure, i'd prefer it if both sides dialed down their OWN faux outrage over every niggling issue but just cause they don't - and won't - doesn't mean we have to follow them down that road.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

and no one answered my question - what supposedly rovian accusation did the obama camp make?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

(just to have some context for the consensus here that the clinton camp is continuing its shameless jujitsu)

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/2007/12/08-15/15_seinfeld_lgl.jpg

What is the DEAL with those politicians?

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

dude, we get these are sop. we just don't like it in intramural fights, especially when there's good evidence that the losing party is less electable.

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

and no one answered my question - what supposedly rovian accusation did the obama camp make?

i think they just said she should release her tax returns?

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

This is an election news update with a major news story reported by the AP. While Senator Obama has crisscrossed Ohio giving speeches attacking NAFTA, his top economic advisor was telling the Canadians that was all just political maneuvering. A newly released document from the Canadian government shows that Obama’s senior economic advisor met with the Canadian Consul General and made clear that Obama’s attack on NAFTA were just, quote, “political maneuvering,” not policy. Political maneuvering, not policy. In fact, the document shows that Obama’s advisor also assured the Canadians that these attacks against NAFTA would not continue. Obama would not want to be, quote, “fundamentally changing the agreement.” As Senator Obama was telling one story to Ohio, his campaign was telling a very different story to Canada. How will Ohioans decide whether they can believe Senator Obama’s words? We’ll find that out on election day. Paid for by Hillary Clinton for President.

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

can i care about shit and make *your* head explode in the process?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

the NYT ran a brief today reporting that the Canadian prime minister denies any such conversation happened.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

gabbneb, doesn't that apply to the obama people too?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont know how you can be so in denial about a substantial difference between the way obama's campaign and hillary's campaign are running their 'attacks' - even now that obama's 'gone negative' he's not exactly using 'smears' - he was entirely forthcoming about rezko, right? she's just bringing it up again and again because the trial is going on. vs. her not actually releasing her tax information

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the rekzo "scandal" come down to the fact that they owned property next door to one another? is there anything more than that?

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

what is the big deal with hillary's tax returns?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

gabbneb, doesn't that apply to the obama people too?

by the "obama people" do you mean him and his surrogates or do you mean some dudes on the internet? because all we've seen from the former (so far) is "she's old news and the old way of doing business." also, the evidence is that she's less electable.

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

what is the big deal with hillary's tax returns?

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:11 AM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

dunno. why won't she release them?

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

She has said she'll release them in april anyway and there's twenty years of them in the PD, what gives other than the narcissism of the increasingly small differences between the two candidates.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't the rekzo "scandal" come down to the fact that they owned property next door to one another? is there anything more than that?

-- YGS, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:10 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

he purchased some land adjacent to his property from rezko
it was entirely above board but rezko was under investigation at the time

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

the extent of the scandal is that (a) he purchased land from rezko (b) while rezko was under federal investigation, and later (c) obama was found to have received donations from rezko associates (which funds were almost immediately disgorged from obama's campaign coffers)

that's pretty much it, i think?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

She has said she'll release them in april anyway

-- Ed, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:12 AM (16 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

when she had hoped to have the nomination locked up

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

the press has asked for tax returns to see where the clintons' $34 mil in income came from. think of bill's business dealings with that eastern european oil dude and how bill then got him on the opec-like board out of nowhere. see also: mark rich.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

"what is the big deal with hillary's tax returns?" is basically exactly what obama's said so far. but the actual big deal is the fact that she's married to a guy who has spent the last 8 years cozying up to the richest people on the planet, so the question is what sort of influence has been bought via a major foundation, next to which antoin tony rezko is a very tiny bear.

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

the obama camp is claiming that clinton's tax returns are relevant because of her personal loan to her campaign -- arguing that the public has a right to know where her money comes from if she uses it to fund her campaign

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

"release the documents!!!!" without any evidence of wrongdoing is the ultimate lame smear

ygs i have no idea about rezco, i honestly pay very little attention to these obvious random distractions except when they involve nubile young ladies or a length of rubber hose

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

She has said she'll release them in april anyway

-- Ed, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:12 AM

Reason #25 Why Electing HRC Would be More of the Same:

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

the press has asked for tax returns to see where the clintons' $34 mil in income came from. think of bill's business dealings with that eastern european oil dude and how bill then got him on the opec-like board out of nowhere. see also: mark rich.

^^^^

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

a fishing expedition, in other words

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

when she had hoped to have the nomination locked up

-- deej, Thursday, March 6, 2008 12:13 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yeah but the GE campaign is going on then?

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

does she have a choice at that point?

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess it IS possible that bill kept receipts for the money he paid to have vince foster killed, or for the bribes he paid to slavic oil barons

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Everybody in the place repeat after me:

'EITHER HILLARY CLINTON OR BARACK OBAMA WILL BE BETTER THAN JOHN MCCAIN AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess it IS possible that bill kept receipts for the money he paid to have vince foster killed, or for the bribes he paid to slavic oil barons

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:18 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

has obama actually inferred any of this?

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't it pretty to think so?

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

look basically i think you guys (and howard wolfson) need to quit whinin about s.o.p. campaign tactics because politics is a blood sport and whoever the nominee is (i hope it's obama) is going to have to get down in the mud and the blood and the beer if they actually plan on winning - at which point you will find yourself in the position of either being a hypocrite or actively hoping the democrats lose

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess it IS possible that bill kept receipts for the money he paid to have vince foster killed, or for the bribes he paid to slavic oil barons

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:18 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

has obama actually inferred any of this?

Contract killing be highly deductable.

Ed, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, ok, we get it, campaign theatre is well and truly bullshit, but it is some bullshit whose consequences will make a huge impact on the entire planet.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

look basically i think you guys (and howard wolfson) need to quit whinin about s.o.p. campaign tactics because politics is a blood sport and whoever the nominee is (i hope it's obama) is going to have to get down in the mud and the blood and the beer if they actually plan on winning - at which point you will find yourself in the position of either being a hypocrite or actively hoping the democrats lose

ok, so you can just forever hold your peace about any gender-based attacks on hillary, then

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i actually believe that there is a substantial difference between the way Obama has conducted his campaign and the way Hillary has conducted hers. I also believe that so far McCain has conducted a campaign reflective of Obama's moreso than Hillary's, and I would rather that the political discourse take that high road than reveling in smears and tactics that entirely distort the truth.

there is no distortion involved in 'release the documents.'

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

you're presumably also fine about people attacking hillary on the basis that she's a nerd with a freakish body shape

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

the NYT ran a brief today reporting that the Canadian prime minister denies any such conversation happened.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, March 6, 2008 12:04 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Link?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

here's why i am pissed, tracer: the clintons have been willing to burn any bridge they see fit to win the nomination. this is some last gasp bullshit, and sure we're naive but it would be nice to put policy/the party ahead of personal ambition so we can actually LEGISLATE. basically the whole clinton wing of the party has been unilateral -- whether it be burning dean or whatever else -- and it's clear (to me) that they view themselves as being above the party & the voters (the last part is definitely editorializing but there's truth there). the obama campaign has been much more issue-based and has focused way more on the voters/problems/legislation (yes SUBSTANCE) than the clintons have been, who seem eager instead to burn the best candidate we've had for president in years to the ground to ensure that they maintain control of the party. this is some fucking hubert humphrey shit.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

'EITHER HILLARY CLINTON OR BARACK OBAMA WILL BE BETTER THAN JOHN MCCAIN AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'

I'm not sure I agree with this, honestly. McCain and Clinton both horrible options.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

oh susanna we agree!!

for the record, i have no problem with obama asking clinton for her tax returns, it's a classic dumb campaign jab that works, just like the rezco thing, just like anything else so far - this has actually been a very tame primary fight when you think about it

gabbneb i don't get with sexism or racism, regardless of whether they've been s.o.p. in the past, and although "character" attacks are also par for the course it's almost impossible (in this particular primary fight) for them not to veer off into one of these two areas - in this respect i think clinton and obama themselves, with their own words, have been extremely disciplined. they probably realize that "character" attacks in general have been used solely against democrats in the g.e., with disastrous consequences for the entire planet

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

also YGS OTM

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

wait, is Obama too nice or too egotistical, I can't figure it out

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

ygs i don't really know the history of the bridge burning that hillary's done but the way you describe it, it does sound very bad

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ if the times is saying that PM Harper is denying anything happened, that's... totally wrong

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

hmm i wonder why obama didn't point that out from the get-go...

oh wait a minute

WHO CARES

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The (CTV) report (on Obama & NAFTA) wound up on YouTube and caused an uproar in the U.S. race — influencing the final days of the critical Ohio primary, with every indication it will also play a role in the upcoming Pennsylvania vote.

Mr. Obama has been pilloried by his opponents and faced the most aggressive questioning of his heretofore smooth-sailing campaign.

Clinton used the story to cast him as a double-talking hypocrite — winking and nudging at Canadians while making contrary promises to American voters.

Republican nominee John McCain — who proudly dubs himself a straight-talker — has also seized on the incident to paint the Democratic front-runner as anything but.

When Mr. Obama's campaign and the Canadian government denied the allegation, a leaked document was obtained by The Associated Press written by a Canadian diplomat. It chronicled a conversation between Obama economic adviser Austan Goulsbee and diplomats at Canada's Chicago consulate.

The Obama aide has challenged the wording of the memo and says it characterized the conversation unfairly. A government official said that memo was initially e-mailed to over 120 government employees.

Mr. Harper has rebuffed opposition requests to call in the RCMP and also investigate the source of the original tip that led to the CTV report that triggered the diplomatic tempest. But a team of internal security agents has begun an investigation that will see dozens of bureaucrats and political staff questioned about their knowledge of the leak.

"This kind of leaking of information is completely unacceptable. In fact, it may well be illegal," Mr. Harper told the House of Commons.

"It is not useful, it is not in the interests of the government of Canada — and the way the leak was executed was blatantly unfair to Senator Obama and his campaign.

"Based on what (investigators) find, and based on legal advice, we will take any action that is necessary to get to the bottom of this matter."

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

capn save a smear

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

and yes again i see the naivety there but i have been a political junkie since i was eight years old and obama really is a different candidate. i mean, it's the first time in my life that i feel like someone *like me* is running (and being an egotist, could there be a better type?), and despite the cliched calls to the carpet of lobbyists/special interests he has operated his campaign in a fundamentally different way. the clinton strategy has been to degrade the campaign so as to make him Just Another Politician by sullying him. they don't want a substantive campaign. they want an lbj campaign. a g.e. campaign w/ the gop will be different cuz there will be genuine differences at stake: it will be gay marriage, terry schivo bullshit, and that we know how to fight. and that we can unite on. it's this parse-and-slaughter that is so fucking degrading and makes us all look bad.

btw: everyone keeps talking about how bill didn't get the nod until june, but didn't the primary season start MUCH later then? like first primary in late feb???

xpost: when dean was a candidate in 2004, tracer, the clintons wanted him out because he represented a new direction of the party. they have constantly tried to undermine him and others who have wanted a different direction, whether it be the netroots or whoever.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, you have officially usurped the cranky crown from dr morbius

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ ok the "leaking of the document" and "the conversation" are two different events in play w/r/t to right-wing Ottawa possibly trying to tip an election here in the US, but yall should read that article!

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah ygs, the main reason my dad said he voted for obama is that he thinks obama's going to sweep a lot of that 90s DLC crowd out. which sounds pretty good to me. but i don't know if you can say that a politician wanting to keep Her Gang in power is particularly egregious or different than anyone else is, or would be.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

well, that 90s dlc crowd is so moderate! they are honestly the most conservative part of the democratic party, and i would definitely attribute the cowered nature of congress to that mentality. there's nothing wrong with being bold, especially when you are in the right!

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

btw: everyone keeps talking about how bill didn't get the nod until june, but didn't the primary season start MUCH later then? like first primary in late feb???

Early Feb., but you've got a point. Also, despite Jerry Brown staying in the race until June, Clinton seems to have held a pretty commanding lead by mid-March:

February 10, 1992: Iowa senator Tom Harkin wins his state's caucus. No surprise here. No candidate was challenging him.

February 18, 1992: Former Massachusetts senator Paul Tsongas wins New Hampshire. Clinton finishes second and brands himself the "comeback kid."

February 25, 1992: Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey wins South Dakota.

March 3, 1992: Mini-Super Tuesday. Clinton wins Georgia. Former California governor Jerry Brown wins Colorado. Tsongas wins Maryland. Harkin wins the Minnesota and Idaho caucuses.

March 7, 1992: Clinton wins South Carolina.

March 10, 1992: Super Tuesday. Clinton wins six southern states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas. Tsongas wins Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

March 17, 1992: Clinton essentially ends the contest with a win in Illinois (though Brown would briefly reemerge with a victory in Connecticut one week later).

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xpostage

I think Team Obama would be wise to start the HRC: can dish out, can't take it thoughtworm swiveling along.

The press decided Obama had an ego (see 'cocky' meme) some time at the end of last week. Ergo, an 'ego' he must have ;-).

suzy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

ygs i agree! it's totally on the basis of things like that that people should be choosing their candidates. have you noticed that the news media has failed to deliver even a SINGLE panel discussion examining in detail the legacy of the DLC, clinton's relation to it, obama's relation to it (or not?) the ny observer is the only organ i can recall that has even touched on the whole cadre of people behind hillary, and what direction an obama presidency would swing things.

one things that sort of complicates the picture is that goolsbee, obama's chief economist, is a fellow at the DLC's think tank.

suzy i think that line of attack against hillary would be very effective, because it sort of appears to be actually true.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

a question for the heads out there: how the hell did howard dean become democratic party chairman if he was so out of favor with "the machine"? no doubt there's an article somewhere about that, but i never read it.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

you'd have to search long and hard to find an academic economist of some prestige who wasn't a free trader, and thus, if a democrat at all, most probably in the DLC orbit

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

uh more garbled syntax there: my point is that economists are a conservative free-trade bunch, more or less.

it's interesting enough that obama has actual economists at the heart of his economics team, instead of public policy types like reich or finance types like rubin, like WJC had

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

it's sort of scary actually, although i guess if obama's ever short on can openers he'll know who to go to

/ oblique reference to a terrible joke about academic economists

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

love reich so much

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.callipygia600.com/callnugget/alljokes/econmist.htm

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

it's sort of scary actually, although i guess if obama's ever short on can openers he'll know who to go to

/ oblique reference to a terrible joke about academic economists

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, March 6, 2008 11:51 AM (51 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

http://991.com/newGallery/Toni-Basil-Over-My-Head-364858.jpg

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

i seem to vaguely remember dean moving to head the dnc as a compromise to drop out of the race against kerry? there is an 82% chance i am making that up.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah that guy is the business (lol see wut i did)

xp abt reich

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

open secret is that reich is an obama man, btw

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

from wiki:

Dean was elected Chairman of the Democratic National Committee on February 12, 2005, after all his opponents dropped out of the race when it became apparent Dean had the votes to become Chair. Those opponents included former Congressman Martin Frost, former Denver Mayor Wellington Webb, former Congressman and 9/11 Commissioner Tim Roemer, and strategists Donnie Fowler, David Leland, and Simon Rosenberg. Other prominent Democrats considered running but ultimately declined.

Many prominent Democrats opposed Dean's campaign; House Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Leader Harry Reid are rumored to be among them.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I though they appointed Dean to head the DNC because of his exemplary fundraising abilities as seen during his 2004 primary campaign?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

who's "they"?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

the 400-odd people who get to vote on the issue

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I went and got the original footage from the Clinton ad, and then compared it to 3 different video clips of the same debate from 3 different sources. I did this so as to take into account any editing, or quality issues, that might have accounted for Obama having darker skin in any particular video. None of the 3 video sources I found showed Obama nearly as black as the Hillary ad does. Click the image above to see a larger version. Look at his lips. Look at his eyebrows. Look at how the red MSNBC background has turned more purple. Clearly the image was darkened. The question is "why."
»
Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 4:26:47pm

hillary is a bad person. this isn't news to anyone what remembers whitewater wasn't about a blow job.
»
Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 4:36:31pm

I won't vote for Hillary simply based on how much of a slimeball she's been. She's got so much desire that she's willing to put her ethics under a rug to get the presidency. We don't need another President with ethical issues.
»
Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 5:13:44pm

I support Clinton's politics but I don't support the fact she seems so cutthroat.
»
Tuesday, March 4, 2008 at 5:00:47pm

Don’t vote for cut-throat politicians!
»
Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 10:57:09am

What I'm saying is... does Hillary's campaign really need to do this? She's said 4 times already that McCain would be better than Obama. What the Fuck is that? She should save the Bullshit for McCain. Look what happened to Kerry with all the swiftboat shit. Do we need Democrats doing the Karl Rove two step. Puhleeze.
»
Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 9:30:15pm

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

yup, ppl be hatin on hillary!! especially on teh intarweb

saying openly that the GOP nominee is a better pick than your primary opponent is totally unprecedented and really really fucked up, btw

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://brentroos.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/opp.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

oh, that picture was on this thread already. sorry.

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Kathy Karpan, a former Democratic candidate for Wyoming governor who is one of Clinton’s leading supporters in the state:

“I think we can win,” Karpan said, citing “the connection that the Clintons have with people in our state,” a network of support built during their White House years, when they vacationed at Jackson Hole.

“We are going to do very well with the rank and file,” Karpan said. “The question is, will those people who get captivated by e-mails” — Obama supporters — “be willing to sit through the call to order, the nominating and seconding speeches. It takes a little bit of patience and interest in the process to do this,” she said.

uhhh didn't you just lose, like, 10 caucus states?

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

ppl captivated by emails vs ppl captivated by hanging out in jackson hole

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

"captivated by emails" waht

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously, what is that even supposed to mean?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone read the WaPo story on the internecine squabbling in the HRC camp? A poisonous environment, by all accounts.

Sully's been on a roll lately:

It's Bush-Cheney all over again, but less disciplined, more narcissistic, more cynical. And this campaign, in retrospect, has exhibited all these patterns. The press is marveling at the Clintons' near-death political experiences in this campaign. Doesn't it all feel creepily familiar? It's funny, isn't it, how these two characters, long steeped in politics as a way of life, still manage to create psychodramas on a regular basis. They both live to nearly fail completely, treating any sort of stable success as some kind of invitation to more risk-taking, and then always relishing the last-minute, nail-biting self-rescue. Before too long, the entire story becomes about them, their ability to triumph through crisis, even though the crises are so often manufactured by themselves. We are reliving the patterns of the 1990s again. Because they are now directing the drama.

Remember: Bill Clinton could have settled the Paula Jones lawsuit easily years before he put the entire country through the wringer. Remember: Hillary Clinton could have killed what turned out to be the Whitewater non-story at the very outset by disclosing everything she could. Remember: the Clintons could have prepared for primaries and caucuses after February 5, as any careful candidate would. They chose not to do any of these things. Not because they are incompetent. But because they live to risk. They need the drama of crisis. We are learning that they have not changed - despite the ludicrous idea that Hillary Clinton is somehow more stable and reliable than Barack Obama. The same desperate need for attention by unconsciously seeking out near-disaster is with us again.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

did hillary really say that mccain would be a better prez? i don't remember seeing that.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago) link

She and McCain "offer a lifetime of experience" while Obama "made a speech in 2002" is the gist of it.

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

My family ran into former secretary of the interior James Watt on the streets of Jackson Hole while on vacation in 1988. This was second only to the vacation three years later in which my dad tried to get Rep. Gephardt's attention by shouting out "Hey Dick!" from beneath his Capitol office window.

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Apologies if this has been posted already, this thread is way out of control.

The DNC may give MI and FL a do-over?

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/dnc_encouraging_florida_and_mi.php

dan m, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess it's supposed to be an electability argument but it's pretty weird to unleash a quote that could be used against YOURSELF in the g.e.

"I think that I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House. I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience to the White House. And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002."

dmr, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF? It's this kinda crap that somehow sticks in regular/simple folks' minds...

http://g.photos.cx/necover-167-a9.jpg

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(I only look at popbytes once in a while in case there's music news, honest!) :-)

StanM, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

ugggggggggh

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

obama raised $55 million in february:

http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/barack_obamas_february_haul_ne.html

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

i think this is a serious argument to make to the superdelegates. clinton's no doubt done a fine job of fundraising february (b/c she finally figured out how to use the web for it), but obama's money-raising abilities are pretty remarkable to say the least

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that Enquirer headline hits for a triple: Terrorism, Corruption and Infidelity!

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

woah, awesome

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I dont think anyone had ever doubted the Cook County organization like Obamas would not be able to raise money. That is what they do best thru their patronage armies and bundlers. They may say 90% of the number of contributers were for less than $100 but the vast majority of their money is brought in thru bundlers and companies executives who all make $2600 donation along with their spouse. It works the same way as a lobbyist but they just call it bundlers instead for some reason.

Posted by: Vinny | March 6, 2008 2:35 PM

lol retard

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

if only other presidential candidates had been from cook county, then they would be bundling their way into record-shattering fund raising

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link

the enquirer 'terrorist' connection -- it's obviously playing to islamofear to sell papers -- but if it's about William Ayers (former Weatherman), then that connection's already made been floated in the press and died due to the circumstantial insignificance of their paths crossing

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

so apparently just about all of obama's $55 million can be used for the primary. any word on how much of hillary's $35 is available? i didn't hear it mentioned in many reports

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

30,000 of her 45,000 donors were first timers i believe so probably a fair amount

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(thats the amount since tuesday not Feb)

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

it would make sense for HRC to have raised thirty-five dollars.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

ha, yea $35 million obviously

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I know we're all reposting from TPM, but:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/mccain-v-clinton-final.jpg
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/mccain-v-obama-final.jpg

Eazy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah duh to anybody paying attention to the world outside of kos/this thread

El Tomboto, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

HE'S A FALL GUY

El Tomboto, Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

redux:

http://obeygiant.com/images/2008/03/obama_shep_print_final2.jpg

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/images/mccain-v-clinton-final.jpg

Imagine if Hillary doesn't win Arkansas. (Yeah, she was the first lady once, but is now kinda looked upon as a carpetbagger.)

That would be a 268-270 victory for HRC.

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

its only march homies

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

BIG HOOS, Lord Steendriver

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Hmm, Obama's having a rally in Columbus on Monday. Might have to go check it out.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Reporter: Senator, Howard Wolfson this morning compared Barack Obama to Ken Starr. How do you think he's acting like Ken Starr?

Sen. Clinton: Well, I'm not going to respond to that.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

ohio? seems a bit late for that.

or really really early.

xp nice

gff, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

hooray!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

No, Columbus, MS, about 45 minutes away.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Clinton: Well, I'm not going to respond to that.

either her taking the high road or just letting wolfson do her dirty work for her. she is right to distance her self from this kind of hyperbole though

akm, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Also Alfred's birthplace </.xls>

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

At this point I don't think HRC could locate high road even with help of seret service agents and GPS. This is the kind of dirt that doesn't wash off its perpetrators.

Right now their behaviour is alienating every Dem under 40 who is not Chelsea Clinton.

3am ad of my dreams: the phone rings. HRC answers. "Uhhbaby, Ah think Ah'm in trouble again..."

suzy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Those maps are beautiful, maaaan.

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

if she's using her campaign officials to launch attacks, clinton definitely hazards being called to account for those attacks. i understand why she wasn't biting on the question since the staged event was focused on her ability to be commander-in-chief. but if the candidate doesn't follow up on an attack her campaign made when confronted with it, the attack doesn't gain any traction. if she does follow up, she gets the dirt on her hands.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary, echoing her reiterating her earlier points (so i guess this is gonna be one of her themes, then, huh?):

“I think that since we now know Sen. (John) McCain will be the nominee for the Republican Party, national security will be front and center in this election. We all know that. And I think it’s imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold,” the New York senator told reporters crowded into an infant’s bedroom-sized hotel conference room in Washington.

“I believe that I’ve done that. Certainly, Sen. McCain has done that and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.

Calling McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee a good friend and a “distinguished man with a great history of service to our country,” Clinton said, “Both of us will be on that stage having crossed that threshold. That is a critical criterion for the next Democratic nominee to deal with.”

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Also Alfred's birthplace </.xls>

ILXor Alfred?! Huh.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Yep.

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

"As far as I know."

jaymc, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

infant’s bedroom-sized hotel conference room

haha, who the fuck are these reporters who judge a room's size like this?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

haha srsly

sleep, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

this is kinda fucked, right? i know she's trying to indicate that she'll be more competitive against mccain, but still....

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry messed up phrasing in my first line

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary, echoing her reiterating her earlier points

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary clinton '08: bigger than a breadbox

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

reporters crowded into an infant’s bedroom-sized hotel conference room

what a bizarre turn of phrase

boy it's crowded in here! this place is no bigger than an infant's bedroom!

xposts lol dammit

dmr, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Kogan switching to political reporting.

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

On the lighter side, 'Why Jesus Lost the Nomination'...by Deepak Chopra.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i kind of agree w/ halperin ...

deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

sure, but the characterization of obama "going negative" is pretty premature

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

email from mom:

Hi Kiddos and Obama fans:

Looks like the troops are stirring up every morsel of scandal that can be scratched out of the shallow dirt to discredit your man, Obama, today! I thought you all would be interested to know about Bill Ayers—now a prof at UI Circle campus. Evidently Obama has had some faint dealings with him in the past, and that has been in the news today and this week.

Ayers was one of the seven members of the “Weather Underground,” a group of extreme radicals who were genuinely terrorists, bombing sites throughout the US, seeking to completely subvert the US government. He turned himself in in 1981 and underwent few consequences for his actions.

The point of this is that your Grandmother and Grandad were very good friends with his family. His father, Bill Ayers, Sr. was president of Commonwealth Edison; his mom played bridge with Grandma and the couples frequently saw each other socially. I’m pretty sure they were at our wedding. I remember when the whispers of something going wrong with Bill Jr. at Michigan began, and recall so vividly the head-scratching and questioning, “What can we do?” That’s pretty much what parents of that era did as the social revolution rocked their family identities!

It looks like Ayers Jr. has found a satisfying career teaching on education at UIC, but it would not appear that he has altered his views significantly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_ayers

http://billayers.wordpress.com/

Thought this would interest you all!

Love to you today,

Moms

<3

gr8080, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/How-Candidates_redo.jpg

El Tomboto, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

As first lady, (Obama foreign policy adviser Susan) Rice argued, "you are not the person asked by the U.S. government to deliver tough messages or apply pressure. You're not the person who's responsible for the loss of life. You're not the person who has to make the sometimes recalcitrant bureaucracy deliver in the national interest."

via TPM:EC

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the press has completely boxed obama in until the next primary. if he does not swing back he is weak and not experienced and doesn't belong at the big kid's table. if he does swing back it is politics is usual, he is no kinda transcendent figure. the best he can hope for is planting -- through kennedy, through some far-flung ally -- some negative hillary pieces in the press. he has to turn them back on her, because he honestly can't afford to be viewed as someone callous or malicious. it damages the image too much.

YGS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

THANK FUCKING GOD SOMEBODY SAID IT xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF, Sen. Clinton? She'll happily damage Obama's chances against McCain in the General Election if he's the nominee, to preserve her chance of winning the Democratic nomination.

I'm not so worried about Obama being boxed in, Yancey. I want him to fire back. I analogize it to Rocky 2, where Rocky is hemming-and-hawing about fighting Apollo Creed, largely because Rocky's wife doesn't want him to. Finally, when she regains conciousness -- from what, a coma, I think? -- she says: "Fight, Rocky, fight!" Everyone cheered, despite Rocky's earlier, understandable reservations. He wins, and is still the same good man he was before! SO FIGHT, OBAMA, FIGHT.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 6 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's a fucked-up thing to say but I don't see how will it hurt Obama much in the general, if he wins the primary. is McCain gonna quote Hillary Clinton for an applause line? "Hillary says I have an experience edge!"

dmr, Thursday, 6 March 2008 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

more on the SUSA numbers

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 23:46 (sixteen years ago) link

here too

gabbneb, Thursday, 6 March 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

this whole thing blows goats. i just want obama to win.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 6 March 2008 23:59 (sixteen years ago) link

The Insane Vote For McCain

A Derek Erdman, Friday, 7 March 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/cb/BillAyersMugshot.jpg

i like this look

max, Friday, 7 March 2008 00:35 (sixteen years ago) link

She'll happily damage Obama's chances against McCain in the General Election if he's the nominee, to preserve her chance of winning the Democratic nomination.

You know, Obama ran ads in South Carolina saying Hillary would say anything to get elected, had his surrogates out there deliberately painting Bill's comment about Obama/Iraq as a "fairy tale" as racist, accusing Hillary of somehow intentionally denigrating MLK, had Jesse Jackson Jr asking after NH why Hillary didn't cry over Katrina, recently pushing the (false!) accusations from Drudge (!) that the Clinton campaign was sending out that photo.. This stuff is poison, and they know it, and it's dividing the party like nothing else, and they've been doing it for months.

daria-g, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

ok like whoa he is making the exact same face in the top left and bottom right

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

theyre discussing their shared love of scarfing

jhøshea, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary has to know that this Florida/Michigan shit is divisive and fatal. If she gets the nomination by winning PA and persuading superdelegates, I'd view that as legitimate, even if Obama is ahead in pledged delegates after Puerto Rico. But if she gets the nom by having the FL and MI delegates seated (without a revote) I will vote for McCain--because Arizona should have a Prez already, kidz!

mulla atari, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:14 (sixteen years ago) link

recently pushing the (false!) accusations from Drudge (!) that the Clinton campaign was sending out that photo..

maybe they should have denied it was them out the gate?
also what are you basing (false!) on exactly? because you really want to get health care hillary's camp wouldn't circulate that image like they did circulate the muslim rumor in iowa?

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:23 (sixteen years ago) link

had Jesse Jackson Jr asking after NH why Hillary didn't cry over Katrina

its a good question. maybe she should reconsider her next bit of political theater for something that isn't about her own ambitions

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Inside-US-poll-battle-as.3854371.jp

Samantha Power comes off as so patronizing in this article.

31g, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:49 (sixteen years ago) link

You know, Obama ran ads in South Carolina saying Hillary would say anything to get elected,
true, she'll DO anything to get elected, but she won't SAY anything. Obama's a liar!

had his surrogates out there deliberately painting Bill's comment about Obama/Iraq as a "fairy tale" as racist,
this is the first i've heard Obama had anything to do with anyone claiming that line was racist. If it's true yeah that's bad form.

accusing Hillary of somehow intentionally denigrating MLK,
oh plz, she said the line, context was known, that's fair political play

had Jesse Jackson Jr asking after NH why Hillary didn't cry over Katrina,
HAD JESSE JACKSON? show me the memo. besides, her tears were just about the most despicable act of hubris in this whole sordid circus.

recently pushing the (false!) accusations from Drudge (!) that the Clinton campaign was sending out that photo..
she wouldn't even categorically deny that her ppl didn't send out the photo. I watched the interview where she said (paraphrasing) "I didn't personally know anything about it. I'm sure people in my campaign wouldn't have released it. I don't know where it came from".

This stuff is poison, and they know it, and it's dividing the party like nothing else, and they've been doing it for months.

-- daria-g, Friday, 7 March 2008 01:08 (13 minutes ago) Link

here you forgot to signal you were suddenly talking about Hillary's campaign. otherwise it reads like you're batshit! just a heads up to proofread posts next time.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Cosmo you may want to invest in your own dictionary before accusing anybody else of needing to proofread

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Inside-US-poll-battle-as.3854371.jp

Samantha Power comes off as so patronizing in this article.

-- 31g, Thursday, March 6, 2008 7:49 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

anyone find it odd that they quote 'this is off the record'

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link

uh, the proofread thing was a joke.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

your functional illiteracy is not, or at least it isn't funny to me

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant believe a hillary fan would honestly argue that obama is dividing the party and hillary isnt. no one was arguing from this side that hillary was 'dividing the party' until it became obvious that she would never overtake the delegate count

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

but please NEVERMIND I'm not actually here! fuck this thread!!! aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrgh

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

im not even saying i agree that hillary is 'dividing the party' more than obama, although i have to say its a tempting perspective. but the notion that somehow you can live in a world where obama is the more divisive candidate is fucking nuts

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

or you could consider the perspective that there are many more obama supporters who absolutely refuse to vote for hillary should she win (see this thread) than there are hillary supporters who've said they're going to put a republican in office if obama gets the nod. Oh my god I can hear the gears turning from here, stop.

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean if you really mean actually divisive in a way that genuinely hurts the party's chances to win in November, Obama and his GOP supporters have basically got that all sewn up. Sometimes it helps to stop reading blogs and think for a minute!

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

that has nothing to do with what daria was calling divisive. and perhaps Obama supporters are increasingly hesitant to vote for her in a GE because of the game she's played against what many believe to be the best viable candidate in a generation. even if that's true, that's hardly his fault.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah obviously the task of the non-best candidate as determined by you is to roll over and go home. that's what democracy does.

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

who the fuck said that? of course it's her job to stay in the race. doesn't mean it won't engender huge amounts of ill-will if she wins the nom.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:36 (sixteen years ago) link

yes how divisive of him to bring in more new voters to the political process

gimme a break tom

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:36 (sixteen years ago) link

perhaps Obama supporters are increasingly hesitant to vote for her in a GE

and this is some kind of snake pussy bullshit to read on a board where several posters have stated that they fully intend to vote for fucking MCCAIN if the nomination doesn't go to Obama

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

when they talk about how obama supporters won't vote for hillary its not like shakey mo cuz he's bitter or something, they're talking about GOPers and independents and young people that otherwise wouldn't be touching hillary

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

and this is some kind of snake pussy bullshit to read on a board where several posters have stated that they fully intend to vote for fucking MCCAIN if the nomination doesn't go to Obama

-- El Tomboto, Thursday, March 6, 2008 8:37 PM (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i said i wouldn't vote for hillary because of her fucking war vote and i think that her retarded ass vote to send ppl i know to iraq is more fucking divisive, ok???

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^madd

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

this whole thread is maddddd

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

this 'lets be evenhanded about this!' thing is totally fox news-esque

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

there's like 2 ppl on this thread who said outright they'd vote for McCain.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

good I'm glad to hear that, I was worried we hadn't quite come full circle.

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:41 (sixteen years ago) link

or you could consider the perspective that there are many more obama supporters who absolutely refuse to vote for hillary should she win

these people are called independents. recent polls suggest that there are more democrats who would not vote for obama than not vote for clinton.

gabbneb, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Last I saw both were hovering around 30%

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:49 (sixteen years ago) link

recent polls suggest that there are more democrats who would not vote for obama than not vote for clinton.

-- gabbneb, Thursday, March 6, 2008 8:47 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

ughhhhhhhh

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

there are many more obama supporters who absolutely refuse to vote for hillary should she win (see this thread) than there are hillary supporters who've said they're going to put a republican in office if obama gets the nod

Do you have anything beyond the antecdotal here, Tom? Every poll I've seen suggests the number of "no, FUCK that candidate, I'll vote McCain" people is about the same for both.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 7 March 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

my anecdotal collection. note that this consists of about a dozen people, similar to most national phone polls, and includes people who do not have a land line or who are on the do-not-call list

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I firmly stand behind my made-up statistics. At least they're mine.

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

god you're a douche.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:08 (sixteen years ago) link

at least I know what "surrogate" means.

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:09 (sixteen years ago) link

had his surrogates out there deliberately painting Bill's comment about Obama/Iraq as a "fairy tale" as racist,

this is the first i've heard Obama had anything to do with anyone claiming that line was racist. If it's true yeah that's bad form.

if that's about this, she said HAD HIS, as in he pushed it.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:12 (sixteen years ago) link

awww u guys come on

jhøshea, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:15 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, this is pointless. i'm gonna go watch another bond flick and fondly remember when the cold war brought us all together.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:18 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain Chicken!

You know you wanna play.

"Which Democrat will actually vote for McCain? Find out!"

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:21 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone find it odd that they quote 'this is off the record'

-- deej, Friday, March 7, 2008 2:10 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

It doesn't count if you say it after the fact

31g, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:51 (sixteen years ago) link

daria, did you compile that list of obama's campaign atrocities yourself, or did someone, uh, xerox them for you? get real, please.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 03:59 (sixteen years ago) link

also, please explain how obama's campaign requesting clinton's tax returns justifies a comparison to a partisan witchfinder general like ken starr. thanks.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:04 (sixteen years ago) link

fwiw if i were a clinton advisor, i'd probably caution her against reminding everybody about what starr's investigation led to, but that's neither here nor there.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:08 (sixteen years ago) link

i said i wouldn't vote for hillary because of her fucking war vote and i think that her retarded ass vote to send ppl i know to iraq is more fucking divisive, ok???

^^this

For this alone, she's a coward and an opportunist and unworthy of the presidency. I've got family in Iraq and she can go to hell for that.

That said, I'd hole my nose and vote for her in the general because McCain's eagerness to bomb shit is too frightening.

When is Obama finally going to say, plainly "Senator Clinton voted to send our troops to war in Iraq purely as an act of personal political calculation. AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT."

Hubie Brown, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Uh, "hold," not "hole"

Hubie Brown, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Confused? You won't be!

After tonight's episode....of Soap!

Doot doot-doot doot doooot! doot-doo-doo-doot...

kingfish, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I am also waiting for someone to say that 8 years as first lady does not count as executive experience or foreign policy experience.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

obama ppl have been hinting at bringing this up

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 March 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

it's a completely logical argument!! like, drinking tea with the first lady of mongolia != foreign policy experience

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 March 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

she studied abroad for 8 years imo

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 March 2008 04:28 (sixteen years ago) link

half-joking btw. would also like to see a "when the phone rings in the white house at 3 AM, who's gonna be the person to vote for an awful and illogical war? the steadfast hilary clinton" counter ad.

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 March 2008 04:30 (sixteen years ago) link

hey guys, remember 'wag the dog' and how it was a pretty obvious send up of bill clinton bombing iraq in the midst of the monica affair? yeah, it's still like that: HRC's iraq vote was another instance of abusing military supremacy for political advantage. whereas bush used his political advantage after 9/11 to abuse military supremacy. same diff.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Guys I really like Obama but I guess I'm just not as excited about taking promising young political talent and throwing it into a boiling cesspool as you are

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:50 (sixteen years ago) link

There's this notion that the Bush administration tricked Congress with convincing bullshit, but the arguments for invasion would have been a grab bag of non sequiturs even had their premises been true.

M.V., Friday, 7 March 2008 04:54 (sixteen years ago) link

also worth pointing out that even at the time public support for iraq was barely over 50%. post-powell at the un it might've hit 60% but it wasn't like anyone was being asked to vote against candy or some shit

YGS, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Is anybody arguing with you guys? Are you arguing with someone else?

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

^should be the thread title imo

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 March 2008 05:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey, did you guys hear that Trent Reznor made like three quarters of a million bucks in like two days of downloads or their new album?

I guess it's pretty serious.

kingfish, Friday, 7 March 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Trent Hussein Reznor.

M.V., Friday, 7 March 2008 05:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Primaries Thread 3: THE QUACKENING

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 7 March 2008 05:11 (sixteen years ago) link

but please NEVERMIND I'm not actually here! fuck this thread!!! aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrgh

-- El Tomboto, Thursday, March 6, 2008 6:17 PM

This thread is an adaptation of Clerks.

Kerm, Friday, 7 March 2008 05:52 (sixteen years ago) link

buncha savages in this town

gabbneb, Friday, 7 March 2008 06:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Am I the only happy Hillary supporter on ILX?

I think it looks like if she wins it she'll put Obama in the running as a VP in order to "unite the party".

Colin_C., Friday, 7 March 2008 06:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i srsly doubt obama would give up his senate seat for vp slot (unless he was sure she was gonna lose)

gershy, Friday, 7 March 2008 06:26 (sixteen years ago) link

VP would be great for him because then all the inevitable shit is not technically his fault

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 06:27 (sixteen years ago) link

like, I am completely certain the next presidential term is going to be one of the worst ever, regardless of who wins, and I'd rather see somebody with "experience" get their name associated with it (cf that poor bastard Hoover) rather than somebody inspiring, because inspiration doesn't recover well from horrible disappointment (cf that poor bastard Carter)

El Tomboto, Friday, 7 March 2008 06:29 (sixteen years ago) link

OTMbot

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

It doesn't count if you say it after the fact

-- 31g, Thursday, March 6, 2008 9:51 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

then why do they keep quoting her after she says it

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 07:55 (sixteen years ago) link

when hillary says she's "crossed the threshold" for being trusted as the commander in chief -- to what is she referring? can she really be talking about the fact that she was wrong about iraq in the beginning? is this the same meme that's been heavily discussed over the last year or so, where those who were wrong about iraq are considered "serious people" and those who were right about iraq are not?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 11:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"Please speculate wildly in the comments"

http://gawker.com/364706/jouno-takes-redundancy-to-illogical-extreme

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 11:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Maureen Dowd’s twice-weekly nervous breakdown may draw attention from her colleague, Gail Collins. That would be a crying shame, because Collins is every bit as big an upper-class hack as her better-known lunatic consoeur.

This morning’s column is Typical Collins -- Collins by the numbers:

In paragraphs 1 and 2, Collins rolls her eyes at the thought of yet another big primary. Darlings, how will we survive it?

In paragraph 3, we get a complaint about Clinton’s “boring round-table discussions.”

In paragraph 4, we’re told that Obama plans to conduct “mind-numbing” policy chats of his own. (“I’m sure I speak for everyone when I say we’re all looking forward to that.”)

In paragraph 5, we see Deepest Collins -- the soul of an upper-class darling:

COLLINS (3/6/08): Ohio was great. I don’t know how anybody could not love a primary where the big scandal involves gossip about Nafta among Canadian diplomats.

Translation: NAFTA doesn’t affect my high kind! You working-class Ohio slugs can just go f*ck yourselves.

But then, Collins peddles this snark in every column. Question: If you couldn’t read their columns, would you have the slightest idea that such Antionettes exist?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 11:52 (sixteen years ago) link

deej for a look at "fair and balanced" and what that actually means these days with these two candidates, that whole article is worth reading - http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh030608.shtml

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 12:01 (sixteen years ago) link

hey guys, remember 'wag the dog' and how it was a pretty obvious send up of bill clinton bombing iraq in the midst of the monica affair?

He bombed just about every country but Iraq. Trying to, you know, kill Bin Laden. Which Hitchens mocks him for, in real time, here, embarrassingly referring to Bin Laden as "a sort of Arab version of Ken Starr."
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/09/23news.html

Thus Sang Freud, Friday, 7 March 2008 12:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd rather see somebody with "experience" get their name associated with it (cf that poor bastard Hoover) rather than somebody inspiring, because inspiration doesn't recover well from horrible disappointment (cf that poor bastard Carter)

You're half-right. I mean, Carter was supposed to represent "inspiration"? On what planet?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 7 March 2008 13:17 (sixteen years ago) link

click for way bigger

http://www.danzfamily.com/archives/blogphotos/07/hillary-clinton-faces-horizontal.jpg

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 13:21 (sixteen years ago) link

that gail collins column is maybe the worst thing i have ever read

YGS, Friday, 7 March 2008 13:59 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^this

tracer wtf

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I am amused that kingfish and everyone else appear to have traded places on this thread.

HI DERE, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago) link

He bombed just about every country but Iraq.

I don't know who you are, mystery lurker, but you're simply wrong.

CLINTON: Good evening.

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

That's December 16, 1998.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

the unflappable Obama? He, with the ice in his veins, who doesn't panic when he's losing or get too giddy when he's winning

http://images.elfwood.com/fanq/l/a/lajsla2/tuvok_ansikte.jpg

M.V., Friday, 7 March 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

will america elect its first black vulcan?

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:26 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/bill-clinton-in-wyoming/

“These boots are special,” he said. “Larry King gave them to me after I had heart surgery.”

lol Bill, this is not how to appeal to the youth vote.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/06/obama-aide-hillary-is-a_n_90339.html

fully willing to believe this is a have your cake and eat it to tactic no the part of the obama team

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago) link

"It is wrong for anyone to pursue this campaign in such negative and personal terms," she said. "I apologize to Senator Clinton and to Senator Obama, who has made very clear that these kinds of expressions should have no place in American politics."

looool

gabbneb, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago) link

stern hillary is stern

HI DERE, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago) link

hey guys, remember 'wag the dog' and how it was a pretty obvious send up of bill clinton bombing iraq in the midst of the monica affair?

That movie was written, filmed, and released before (about three weeks before, but still) the monica affair blew up. Also, there were (vastly underreported) weekly bombing runs in Iraq during Clinton's entire presidency.

Sara Sara Sara, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:48 (sixteen years ago) link

ha, deej, i think it's more a measure of a campaign advisor under pressure forgetting of the sanctioned message to vent. it's certainly an idiot thing to say during any campaign, but i don't think you can characterize it as calculated.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer wtf

-- deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:00 (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

deej you wanna throw a verb in there or something so i know what you're hornswoggled by this time?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

"If Obama is the nominee, we are doomed, " Limbaugh said on Feb. 6 to a Republican caller to his radio program.

On Fox News, Limbaugh listed "another reason why we need Hillary to stay in:" the Clinton campaign can attack Obama in ways the Republicans cannot. "Who was it that first used Obama's middle name of Hussein? It was not us. It was [Clinton supporter] Bob Kerrey, over and over again, former Democrat Senator of Nebraska."

"Who was it that talked about Obama not just using drugs, as he admitted in his book, but maybe even selling them and dealing them? It was Shaheen, Clinton's co-chair in New Hampshire."

Limbaugh's assumption here is that Obama will be the Democratic nominee.

"We want the Clinton campaign to keep pumping out these pictures of Obama dressed up as Bin Laden," he said on Feb. 26. "If Hillary loses this thing, all of that's going to come to a screeching halt. We want all the disruption in that party as possible. . . . We need to keep chaos alive."

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?bid=15&pid=294600

Dr Morbius, Friday, 7 March 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

"flummoxed" > "hornswoggled". Good word though.

dowd, Friday, 7 March 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

cheers?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs just because the nation regurgitates limbaugh as if he worth listening to doesn't mean you have to

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

down in the blood and the beer

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

deej you wanna throw a verb in there or something so i know what you're hornswoggled by this time?

-- Tracer Hand, Friday, March 7, 2008 8:59 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

the only double standard in this thread is how you treat me vs. yancey

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

'winky'

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I think knowing what the Gargoyle sez is intriguing, TH, it doesn't mean they're Words of Wisdom

Dr Morbius, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

dude all that is is a list of tough questions asked of hillary and the presumption that when the media says that they ask the tough questions of the frontrunner, they mean the frontrunner at that particular minute and not the person who has been the campaign frontrunner for most of the election

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

its not like she started citing past presidential debates or anything

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

ha, deej, i think it's more a measure of a campaign advisor under pressure forgetting of the sanctioned message to vent. it's certainly an idiot thing to say during any campaign, but i don't think you can characterize it as calculated.

-- elmo argonaut, Friday, March 7, 2008 8:51 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

i dunno. it implants the image that people think hillary is creepy and yet the aid has to apologize to obama also, reinforcing the meme that the obama campaign is all about playing nice. at worst this does no damage to obama (unless of course some memo leaks implying this was intentional)

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

idea of firing samantha power over this is fucking ridic; it's not like she intimated that hillary was, i dunno, a drugged-dealing secret muslim or something.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:37 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's stupid to make a big case out of this i think

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

idea of firing samantha power over this is fucking ridic; it's not like she intimated that hillary was, i dunno, a drugged-dealing secret muslim or something.

-- That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, March 7, 2008 10:37 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

the other thing is that obama would look weak if he fired her after hillary made a case out of it, there's no way he's gonna do that

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

another reason i suspect this was a set-up - it was a female advisor to obama that did this, if it had been a guy there would have been creepy misogynistic overtones

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

it was a half-decent attempt to save the campaign from embarrassment, but the clinton campaign is calling for the advisor's head right now, so it hasn't fully played out yet.

but fwiw, i'd caution people making 'candidate is a secret machiavellian mastermind' assumptions against clinton OR obama

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

another reason i suspect this was a set-up

dude, the puppet strings aren't there.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

MSNBC says she's gone. fucking idiotic.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

hey im just throwing a bone to the 'obama is just as manipulative!!!' crowd

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

lol captain save-a-brit here.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

lol im rong

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think this was a cynical move by obama to put out a 'hillary is a monster story' rly, and the comment was completely attributable and looked like a fuck-up. meanwhile HRC has not categorically denied the drudge leak, so yeah she does look a bit dirtier.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah sorry tracer i tried, i just cant get up the energy to pretend obama is just as sleazy as hillz

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I agree with hit it and quit it, this is pathetic - On Hillary's side and on Obama's side. Samantha Power is/was a pretty incredible surrogate - I saw her on Democracy Now! a couple of weeks ago - and an incredible asset to the campaign. And members of Hillary's campain have done far worse and haven't even been called on it, let alone fire. AND this was supposed to be off the record... between this and the Canada/NAFTA non-story leak, I'm thinkng there's something fishy going on here..

The Brainwasher, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.deletehillary.com/images/cookiemonsterhillary.jpg

Eazy, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

deej i don't think either of them are "sleazy"!! you are incredibly good at missing the point.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

good lord I hope if Hillary wins the presidency we don't get four years of playing the fucking victim

akm, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/6/64/250px-Alice-queen-hearts.jpg

left to right: clinton, power

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i hope we all get jobs and a horse to ride on

max, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

It's ridiculous that Powers had to quit over this, on the other hand, you're an advisor to a campaign in 2008 when everyone is scrutinizing everything everyone says, watch what you fucking say, right? DUMB

akm, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

She said "this is off the record" but it got published anyway: ?

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"That's the one thing that terrifies me," Ms. Power says. "That I'll say something that will somehow hurt the candidate." She says that in public lectures and interviews, she sometimes fights the urge to make unkind statements about other candidates. "That's just not Obama's style," she says. "Left to my own devices, I'd articulate my frustrations in a much harsher way."

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

from last october, apparently. via ben smith

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Archivists Block Release of Clinton Papers

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

She said "this is off the record" but it got published anyway: ?

well it's kinda hardball on the reporter's part but if you're talking to a source and they say some crazy shit and then go "wait wait it's off the record" after they said it ... and you don't care about pissing them off ... then it's probably fair game

dmr, Friday, 7 March 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

that or, as in this case, the journo is a no-mark and they figure it will bump their status.

the article itself gets into it:

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Inside-US-poll-battle-as.3854371.jp

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link


Ms Power's comments reveal how the inexperienced Obama campaign

nice and inaccurate editorializing there

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Even The Corner agrees:

I think it's too bad she lost her Obama-advising job over the Hillary "monster" comment. I wouldn't have reported it if she had said it to me and immediately asked to take it off the record. But then I think people should be encouraged to talk to fair-minded reporters rather than be made to fear returning journalists' phone calls.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Sometimes, public figures say something and then attempt to retract it by insisting it was "off the record" after the event.

But by then it is too late, particularly if it is in the public interest that the story be published.

In this instance, Samantha Power was promoting her book and it was established in advance that the interview was on the record

yah we got that the interview was on-the-record... because it was promoting a book... the paper was technically within its rights to do this, i guess, but their defence is really weak shit, puffing up spurious "public interest" as justification and even hinting that the interview was actually about the book SP was promoting. is it really in the public interest to know that an adviser -- not a campaign staffer -- harbours less than sisterly feelings toward her boss's political rival? schoolyard bullshit.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

This whole issue is ridiculous. Way overblown, she didn't have to be sacrificed.

Bill Magill, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

just because the nation regurgitates limbaugh as if he worth listening to doesn't mean you have to hillary has to go on his program

gabbneb, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

comments pretty much OTM

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Power should have said she was misquoted. "No, I said she reminded me of Grandpa Munster."

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

the paper was technically within its rights to do this

schoolyard bullshit

agree with both of these things

shady of them to print it, but whattayagonnado. if you are talking to some nobody tabloid reporter, don't start spouting off.

dmr, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

it's a shame all around. wtf was samantha thinking? obviously she wasn't. the journo saw gold, the editor saw influence, and now Obama's minus one quality advisor.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Sorry to derail and I know I MUST be the only one, but every time I look at this thread, some part of my mind wants 'primaries' to mean ape tits.

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at advisors winning elections

Dr Morbius, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link

now Obama's minus one quality advisor

maybe he can hire her back if he wins the primary

dmr, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

cuz no one will fire her over saying McCain's a monster.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Frankly, if she was unwise enough to make that kind of comment in front of any member of the press, what other lapses in judgment might she have harbored?

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

that's a joke, right?

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

and now Obama's minus one quality advisor.

Alright, I’ve tried to avoid this shit, but what? Quality advisor? Every misstep Senator Obama has made with foreign policy during this can be pointed towards her.

Muddling in Kenya on the eve of Mr. Annan’s arrival and playing hawk on the federal territories immediately spring to mind. Both of these smell of her extremely unpolished approach to policy.

She was purged this early because now that she is on the news networks the campaign is praying that KSG students are not asked about other suggestive comments she’s made in the past.

Mr. Goodman, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not saying the whole thing isn't a tempest in a teapot, but she got caught saying something impolitic and got sacrificed. How is this surprising?

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

What was wrong with Obama's conduct in Kenya?

31g, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton Again Suggests Shared Ticket With Obama

"I've had people say, 'Well I wish I could vote for both of you.' Well, that might be possible some day," Hillary says on the trail in Mississippi. "But first I need your vote on Tuesday." It's the second time she's hinted at running with Obama this week.

i can see why saying this benefits her. most dems like both candidates, but also think she's got more experience and thus should be at the top of the ticket if they run together? if people think they're going to run together anyways, they'd go with her at the top, i guess, with the whole experience narrative. also takes some of the negative slime off of her, makes her look like she's reaching out to him. kind of a weird move that automatically paints him as the secondary candidate and her as the frontrunner.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope he doesn't run with her - who wants to play second fiddle to a broken record

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Whomever loses this had best stay in the Senate.

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think New York or Illinois is in danger of giving up a vacant seat to a Republican.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

in IL you might be surprised

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Illinois may be!

kenan, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

this video's pretty funny, it's hillary's 3 am ad run together with those approval-meter things:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/3_am_tested.html

(he had the wrong video up for a little while, it should be corrected)

Mark Clemente, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, if Obama vacated his seat, Gov. Blagodonividaksisady would fill it with a Democrat.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

IL has some pretty strange and contentious state-level politics, on the realz.

The gov? I do not trust that man. I don't think anyone does, really.

kenan, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not so mauch that that I worry about, pp, but they're not going to want to get sullied by the administration of the other (which will likely only offer them a job infamously valued less than a pitcher of warm spit) and lose their seniority in the Senate.

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

it's warm PISS

Mr. Que, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

So it is, I see. I never knew that had been bowdlerized.

Michael White, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:55 (sixteen years ago) link

it wasn't bowdlerized it was CENSORED

Mr. Que, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

hillarys calls for obama to be vp are really disturbing and i think it could be effective :-/

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.webstar.co.uk/~afzal/images/topgun.jpg
"you can be my veep any time"

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

It's the second time she's hinted at running with Obama this week.

Sorry. Wrong construction to put on that comment. In HRC's mind, Obama would be a good successor, after her own two terms. In that way the voter could "someday" vote for both of them. Serially.

Aimless, Friday, 7 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yup, the thinking must be that it makes her look like the big one who's trying to heal the party, and will make him look churlish to say no... an Obama victory somewhere would make this look kind of silly, but i never have a good sense for how these things will play.

gff, Friday, 7 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Couldn't Obama say no by claiming to "want to get more experience"

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 7 March 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

couldn't Obama just ask why she's trying to put him in the passenger seat when he's got 100 more delegates?

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Couldn't he just say that he'd prefer to remain in the Senate, or that it's premature to talk about this? I think this is the least of his worries.

31g, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

there's some weird campaign logic in "obama is an slick empty suit kept standing only by the hot air of his rhetoric, and gosh, i think'd he make a great vice president."

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

couldn't Obama just ask why she's trying to put him in the passenger seat when he's got 100 more delegates?

Shril is like fat Muhammad Ali "winning" fights against stiffs in the late '70s, you gotta knock her out to win.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

dr morbius supports beating a woman til she's unconscious

and what, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama clearly doesn't want to work with a woman, he just sacked that adviser chick.

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama clearly doesn't want to work with a womanThat is, of course, exactly the impression the Clinton campaign was hoping to create with this. I'm really surprised Obama's people fell for it, to be honest.

Hatch, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, and her last name is Power, which further signifies Obama's misogyny.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

For what it's worth, her name also reminded me of Susan Powter for the first time in a while:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514X2ZATCVL._AA280_.jpg

jaymc, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:47 (sixteen years ago) link

=:

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

mm. that didn't work. nevermind.

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i see a susan powter emoticon, is that what you intended?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes! But it wasn't as impressive as I hoped it would be

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

susan powter IS fido dido

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

WAS (she has loads of hair now http://www.susanpowteronline.com/index.php/photos/ )

StanM, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) has consistently spoken out and voted against granting retroactive immunity for telecoms that participated with the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program. This stance was part of the reason he won the support of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), a leader on civil liberties issues.

One of Obama’s advisers on intelligence and foreign policy advisers, however, is someone who “strongly” supports telecomm immunity. John Brennan is a former CIA official and the current chairman of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance. In a new National Journal interview, Brennan makes it clear that he agrees with the Bush administration on the issue of immunity:

There is this great debate over whether or not the telecom companies should in fact be given immunity for their agreement to provide support and cooperate with the government after 9/11. I do believe strongly that they should be granted that immunity, because they were told to do so by the appropriate authorities that were operating in a legal context, and so I think that’s important. And I know people are concerned about that, but I do believe that’s the right thing to do. I do believe the Senate version of the FISA bill addresses the issues appropriately.

These corporations may not have been acting within law, which is why many of them are now pushing for immunity. They chose to break the law and profited greatly from doing so. (At least one company refused to comply with the Bush administration’s request because it knew the actions were illegal.)

Because they complied in illegally wiretapping their customers, telecoms currently face around 40 lawsuits. Telecomms have nothing to fear from going to court, as long as they can prove that what they did is lawful.

Brennan also warned the next president from making any partisan “knee-jerk” decisions on intelligence when he or she takes office.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/03/heilemann_monstergate_woke_the.html

But Monstergate, I think, reflects something deeper: the fact that many of the people around Obama have grown accustomed to, shall we say, a forgiving national press corps. Retroactive declarations of off-the-recordness happen all the time. Whether the journalist confronted with one chooses to let it slide or be a hard-ass is a matter of discretion. How much do you like the source? How much do you need the source? It's fair to say that many people in Obama's circle believe that Clinton is in fact a monster. Many have said something similar to reporters. And this was not the first time one of them slipped up on attribution. But until now, the press, as part of a broader pattern of kid-gloves treatment of Obama, has largely chosen to let those mistakes pass. And that has bred a certain sloppiness — one that, in the case of Power, has now come back to bite them.

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a 'gate' already?

this scotsman reporter wasn't national press corps, tho, she's a nobody.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 7 March 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah that editorial kinda sucks but i think its main point is that the press is turning its own narrative on the situation, i.e. "now we're treating obama like a frontrunner"

deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama supporter and former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski disagrees with Power's decision to resign: "I think an expression of regret for using an inappropriate description of Senator Clinton should have sufficed. And I don't think she should have resigned."

Ha!! Thanks for the input Mr. Brzezinski!

Mr. Goodman, Saturday, 8 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Hopefully he will re-hire her when he wins the nomination.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 8 March 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago) link

this was an unpaid advisory position right?
how 'fired' could she be really

deej, Saturday, 8 March 2008 03:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Wyoming

BHO: 58
HRC: 40

78% reporting

I think that makes it official.

The Reverend, Saturday, 8 March 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama better give up now, he'll never get double her scores, she's unbeatable!

StanM, Saturday, 8 March 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah they really needed a 90% landslide or the voters are having second thoughts

deej, Saturday, 8 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-experiencemar07,0,51719.story
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/08/wuspols108.xml

clintons foreign policy claims start to draw scrutiny

jhøshea, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2008/03/08/wuspols108a.jpg

gershy, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^^^ experience

gershy, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

have you ever been experienced

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC wants BHO as her VP? Even though he has more delegates? I thought this whole "the Clintons are delusionally power-hungry and will stop at nothing to bla bla bla" thing was just fighting talk, but... they really are?

StanM, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

In Clinton's case, she may well have exercised influence on foreign policy that is hard to document because she had a unique opportunity to offer private counsel to her husband, President Bill Clinton.

if her f.p. experience remains in the spotlight this is key. i wouldn't be surprised if Bill gets really generous about past achievements, things that are difficult to quantify or dispute. voters will have to sift through it.

Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

---------


Race: Wyoming
Updated 15 minutes ago

County: Table | Map
Obama 4,138
58%

Clinton 2,876
41%

Uncommitted 64
1%
--
91% reporting


---------

kingfish, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

"Uncommitted"? Why don't they just have an "Other" category?

kingfish, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

3 more days til the Mississippi primary, btw

kingfish, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

HRC wants BHO as her VP? Even though he has more delegates? I thought this whole "the Clintons are delusionally power-hungry and will stop at nothing to bla bla bla" thing was just fighting talk, but... they really are?

-- StanM, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:24 (54 minutes ago) Link

Wait how does the fact that she wants him as veep change anything?

31g, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Foster is slightly ahead with 90 of 568 precincts reporting.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQZZmxxd-dehJ1c_lUKFffsXLaxwD8V9KE8O0

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrat Bill Foster had a 53 percent to 47 percent lead over Republican businessman Jim Oberweis with 325 of 568 precincts reporting.

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:40 (sixteen years ago) link

if her f.p. experience remains in the spotlight this is key. i wouldn't be surprised if Bill gets really generous about past achievements, things that are difficult to quantify or dispute. voters will have to sift through it.

-- Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:27

apparently they're already claiming that hil was pushing bill to go into darfur in 94, and that "not following her advice is one of my greatest regrets"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:43 (sixteen years ago) link

oh gimme a fuckin' break

Simon H., Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

FOSTER WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Democrat Bill Foster had a 53 percent to 47 percent lead over Republican businessman Jim Oberweis with 534 of 568 precincts reporting.

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Su-Times now has 94% in with the same lead for Foster. He's up by several thousand votes. Friend says "uncounted votes are almost entirely from Kane county, which Foster has been winning."

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Sun-Times

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

lol way bad news for repubs there

deej, Sunday, 9 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Rock.

kingfish, Sunday, 9 March 2008 04:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill Clinton: Hillary-Obama Ticket Would Be "Almost Unstoppable Force" god this is so condescending to say right now!!! it kind of goes back to the inevitability thing that hillary used to have - "oh. she'll be the nominee anyway, so obama just suck it up and be the veep and you guys will rule! nevermind that the contest is far from over!!!" even though he's got a fucking delegate lead. errr.

Mark Clemente, Sunday, 9 March 2008 13:33 (sixteen years ago) link

well he's probably right, but it is kind of annoying, overlooking the fact that he still has a handy delegate lead and will probalby hold onto that lead until the convention

akm, Sunday, 9 March 2008 14:02 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG! http://godhatesobama.com/

StanM, Sunday, 9 March 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Mwahahaha.

suzy, Sunday, 9 March 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary Clinton, Fratricidal Maniac

The New Republic: Hillary Clinton's Continued Run Is Damaging The Democrats' Chances

StanM, Sunday, 9 March 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

And here's why she won't quit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMVOT-IH8sg

If she can't win the nomination in 2008 she'd rather endorse McCain: we're witnessing the beginning of the Hillary 2012 campaign.

StanM, Sunday, 9 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

"Uncommitted"? Why don't they just have an "Other" category?

My friend actually voted uncommitted. Because it's a caucus, some people might just be coming for the party buisness and don't necessarily want to support a particular candidate. They worked out their platform at the caucus, for instance.

Eppy, Sunday, 9 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Her desire to hold that office is so all-encompassing, I'm really surprised she didn't just run as a Republican THIS time.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

that's silly.

tremendoid, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh really? You don't think her secondary focus (behind trying to win this time) is setting up McCain for a win so she can stage a campaign again in the next cycle? The more I study her methods, the more I'm convinced her chief motivation is power at any cost.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

you're off your tits

Hurting 2, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

"The more I study her methods"

Hurting 2, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

"The more I study her methods"

As in reading the transcripts of her stump speeches, reading interviews with her staffers/campaign brains, watching news/interview footage with the candidate herself, applying logic to my conclusions...yes, studying her methods.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

if Hillary does end up endorsing McCain publicly, that's a punch in the gut for McCain's chances among GOP voters, as well as Hillary's chances among anybody in the future -- stressing the word *publicly*

Mackro Mackro, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain's already said he intends to have some bipartisanship in his cabinet if elected, and since nothing short of a superdelegate coup at the convention will put her at the top of the Democratic ballot this cycle, she's already laying the groundwork to make a case for herself in a McCain cabinet. Next step, 2012 campaign (because everyone knows that McCain will be a single term president if the cards fall that way).

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

she's not angling for a cabinet position. your theory is a screenplay with potential.

tremendoid, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

HALP! I've turned into Chris Matthews.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

"logic"

Hurting 2, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"Hmm, let's see. I'm running a very close race with my primary opponent. I think I'll deliberately damage him just enough so that he'll get the nomination but lose the election. Then I can get a cabinet position under the Republican president (everyone knows cabinet posts are great campaign launching pads!) and then I can run AGAINST him or his successor in the next election! Brilliant!"

Hurting 2, Sunday, 9 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

mwahahaha

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 9 March 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

a pretty good article on Clinton's "Path to the Presidency" memo released after Tuesday.

Clay, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

*Tuesday's primary victories, I should say.

Clay, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

it was already posted a little bit up but yeah really depressing

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:39 (sixteen years ago) link

oh, missed that, sorry deej. articles like that just cement in my mind what a colossal fuckup this whole thing might be.

Clay, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:43 (sixteen years ago) link

the biggest prob is that it really could tear apart the party ... she certainly can't campaign for him effectively after this

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Hi I'm Hillary Clinton and I'm running for POTUSA on the platforms of healthcare, experience and my continued excellence as a surrogate for the Republican candidate. Please consider me when you vote, America.

I mean who does this possibly help other than herself and McCain?

Clay, Monday, 10 March 2008 00:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/us/politics/09obama.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

This NYT article sheds some light on Obama's days in the senate.

It makes him seem very inexperienced but what is most damaging are the suggestions that he lacks the ability to stand up for something if it will make him look bad in any way.

Colin_C., Monday, 10 March 2008 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, according to lindsay graham

remy bean, Monday, 10 March 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

if Hillary does end up endorsing McCain publicly, that's a punch in the gut for McCain's chances among GOP voters. . .

Maybe Rush Limbaugh will publicly endorse Obama, to even the scales.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 10 March 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

after the ny times article musing about the possibility of obama being shot, this is only slightly lower on the pro hrc propaganda scale

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

It seems like the article overall paints him that way.

I get the impression that he didn't want to get involved with a lot of the legislation or politics because he didn't want to look bad or tarnish his shiny image.

Colin_C., Monday, 10 March 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yet he was cool w/ being 'most liberal member' of the senate?

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 02:39 (sixteen years ago) link

it felt to me more like he was a young member of an institution that values seniority more than anything else

YGS, Monday, 10 March 2008 05:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack Obama IS YOUNGMEMBER

gershy, Monday, 10 March 2008 05:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know if this is a stupid question or not but I'll ask it anyway: what is the point of Ralph Nader (or any other non-Dem/Rep)'s candidacy? If voting was compulsory like it is over here (Belgium), I'd see the point of having an alternative for the "lesser of two evils" choice, but since it isn't and the unhappy/uninterested can stay at home, why does he bother?

StanM, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:27 (sixteen years ago) link

so that the dem candidates feel obligated to address issues that nader could flank him on the left over

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link

nader couldn't flank if he had nAIDS and more gayness

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:49 (sixteen years ago) link

obama would eat him like some creature from before the extinction 50000 years ago

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:50 (sixteen years ago) link

discover fire gnawn

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:50 (sixteen years ago) link

mccaine will at least fragment the base so there won't be a draft. obama will get oft like bhutto, obv. unless america comes through on the dyke

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:51 (sixteen years ago) link

meaning Cheney's Daughter, MY NOVEL

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:52 (sixteen years ago) link

ftlol??

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:52 (sixteen years ago) link

"Liz?" asked Alice from the bedroom.

"Yes?" Liz was crashed out on the sofa watching the news.

"Where's my collar? The good one?"

"It's on the kitchen counter. I was oiling it."

Just a month earlier, this might have been an unusual conversation for Alice to be part of. But then Liz had introduced her to a world of sex that she had never imagined. It was a world of leather, chains, dominance and submission. But it was a world that had helped Alice in a number of ways. Despite spending most of their sexual 'sessions' crawling around, obeying commands or being tied up in some way, Alice felt safe. She cared for Liz and Liz cared back. It might have been a more elaborate erotic game than other people played, but Alice never felt like the 'inferior' member of the relationship.

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:53 (sixteen years ago) link

The freak will fall with the lamb, I guarantee it!

teresa, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:55 (sixteen years ago) link

oh wow look you've discovered an ILE thread about politics! such a wonderful experiment, full of potential. unfortunately your grant money's run out.

El Tomboto, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:56 (sixteen years ago) link

my advice? sober the fuck up and see a fucking doctor. peace!

TOMBOT, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Thank you, though. More questions about politics should be answered with lesbian book fragments.

StanM, Monday, 10 March 2008 07:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.kutv.com/content/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=fb646159-2cdf-42d6-8379-015f043cfc7f


"Senator Clinton hints that both of you could be on the same ticket. Do you see any circumstances where that would happen?" Mullahy asked.

"Not with me as vice president," Obama replied. "I am running for president."

"If she is suggesting that she is interested in the vice presidency, then obviously that is something we would take into consideration," he added.

StanM, Monday, 10 March 2008 09:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Alice picked the collar up. "Do you think it's dry enough to pack?"

"Should be, but wrap it up in one of the dish towels just in case, and we'll air it out a bit when we get there."

"Why did you have to oil it today anyway?" Alice asked.

"I forgot to yesterday. I just wanted it to look nice. Besides, you've been sweating in it a lot, and that dries up the leather."

Alice grinned at the "sweating" comment and gave Liz a quick kiss on the forehead, and then the taller girl drew Alice down for a slightly longer kiss on the lips. Then Alice looked disapprovingly at Liz's feet, which were resting on the nice oak coffee table her grandfather had given her. "Feet off the furniture. It's hard to find real wood furniture these days, and you don't want to scuff it," she said as she wandered back into the bedroom to finish packing.

StanM, Monday, 10 March 2008 09:30 (sixteen years ago) link

"If she is suggesting that she is interested in the vice presidency, then obviously that is something we would take into consideration," he added.

been waiting for them to go there. lol

dmr, Monday, 10 March 2008 12:59 (sixteen years ago) link

"There are elected delegates, caucus delegates and super-delegates, all for different reasons, and they're all equal in their ability to cast their vote for whomever they choose," Hillary told Newsweek, when asked how she can win the nomination despite the current delegate math.

"Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to. This is a very carefully constructed process that goes back years, and we're going to follow the process."

good luck w/ that

dmr, Monday, 10 March 2008 13:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Fact is, Power's correct. Hillary Clinton is a monster who will stoop to anything, urged on by her equally repellent husband and her ghastly advisers. What's more, a large number of liberals not only know this, they openly accept it, and will reward Hillary with votes should she somehow wrench the nomination from Obama. So why apologize?

Now, if Power had added to her "monster" blast that the best way to deal with Hillary is to have NATO bomb her campaign for 78 days, then have her arrested and taken to the Hague for a war crimes trial, it would at least be true to form. Of course, I'm not comparing Clinton's campaign to Milosevic's Serbia, simply because the Clintons have much more blood on their hands than did the Balkan strongman. And if Milosevic deserved his fate . . .

http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2008/03/monster-mash.html

Dr Morbius, Monday, 10 March 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp0iHOk0mEQ

meghan mccains account of big weekend press "social event" in sedona - MUST BE SEEN TO BE BELIEVED

jhøshea, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

How so? Her talking style? She's 24! Has changed quite a bit since this 1992 picture (that's her in the red glasses) though

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:McCain_family_at_christening_of_USS_John_S._McCain_%28DDG-56%29.jpg

StanM, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

is meghan mccain being pimped out is some weird way?

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

she. looks. just. like. him.

gff, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Taco Bell is the worst place to stop at when you're on a roadtrip.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:33 (sixteen years ago) link

white ppl look like this...

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

what is it with Republican families and color coordination? Someone plz run the Rick Santorum farewell photo again.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Anything for you, Alfred.

http://www.lies.com/wp/images/2006/11/santorum.jpg

jaymc, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

UNHAPPY SANTORUMS ARE UNHAPPY

Did they really show footage of the only black man at the table eating fried chicken? Did I really see that, in between MMcC talking about how the staff at their cabin are, like, rilly great?

suzy, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at the lil Santorum with the bug eyes and glasses.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Little Santorum also has two more chins than most of us. Waaah!

suzy, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain's daughter is a bit wonky.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

stepford child for sure

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

OMG THE GUYS FROM THE POLITICO GAVE MY MOM FLOWERS IT WAS SOOOOOO SWEET U GUYS SRSLY

jhøshea, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Mom's hair, Dad's figure.

suzy, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Mom looked ok in 1992. Anyone have any pixxxx of her in the 70s?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 10 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

The states won’t get the money from the DNC either. While the DNC has roughly $3.7 million in the bank, it doesn’t have much to spare. The party ended 2007 almost broke and, this year, is being far outraised by the Republican National Committee.

this factoid is rather disturbing re: the drain on the coffers of this extended primary season (plus $20m bill for "re-votes" in FL and MI etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

this is NOT an extended primary season – this is a "normal" primary season.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

not really. it started far earlier

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

that part is true.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

2005

Upt0eleven, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey, you two! Go get a room!

http://babble.com/CS/blogs/politicalnanny/billandhillaryhammock.jpg

(Found while searching for McCain in the 70s.)

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

"In Columbus,MS & wondering how somebody who's in second place is offering the vice presidency to the person who's in first place. Vote Tues!"

^ obama's twitter

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

lol twitter. here's the write-up:

COLUMBUS, Miss -- Sen. Barack Obama delivered an animated rebuke today of suggestions from the Clintons in recent days that he could run as her vice president.

“Now first of all with all due respect, with all due respect," he said here during a town hall meeting. "I won twice as many states as Sen. Clinton. I won more of the popular vote than Sen. Clinton. I have more delegates than Sen. Clinton. So I don’t’ know how someone in second place can offer the vice presidency to someone in first place. If I was in second place I could understand but I am in first place right now.

He referenced comments from Bill Clinton in 1992 that his “most important criteria” for vice president was that person must be ready to be commander in chief.

“They have been spending the last two or three weeks” arguing that he is not ready to be commander in chief, Obama said.

“I don’t understand. If I am not ready, why do you think I would be such a great vice president?” Obama asked the crowd, which gave him a standing ovation during his defense. “I don’t understand.”

“You can’t say he is not ready on day one, then you want him to be your vice president,” Obama continued. “I just want everybody to absolutely clear: I am not running for vice president. I am running to be president of the United States of America.”

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

nice!

Simon H., Monday, 10 March 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

"eff off, Monster"

Dr Morbius, Monday, 10 March 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

well done

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Geraldine Ferarro breaks it down for you:

"I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama's campaign - to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against," she said. "For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on her. It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign.

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she continued. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

UGH

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

It's been a very sexist media.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her.</i>

There's something missing here

Michael White, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

some media doesn't like her because why because it look sexist

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Geraldine Ferraro is a cunt.

The Brainwasher, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Some just don't like her.

she got this part right anyway. how unfair!!!

deej, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

opposition to Hillary is either sexist or emotional, got it

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll go with the first sentence but the rest is BUNKUM.

As a feminist I am very familiar with the racism v. sexism shell game where you make a feminist point to a lefty male and he opines race (or class) might be more important/more obvious a fight to him. Anecdotally speaking there's nobody I know, with poss exception of sister's trog of a husband, who'd point blank refuse to vote for a female presidential candidate. It's when she's HRC that people baulk; a reaction to an individual and not her gender!

suzy, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, i simply don't understand. is the implication that being black while running a national campaign is somehow a lucky advantage? "OH THANK GOD I'M A BLACK MAN, HOW LUCKY IS THAT?? NOW I CAN RUN FOR PRESIDENT AGAINST A WOMAN AND WIN, IT'S SO OBVIOUS." What grandma crazypanties is she wearing?

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

'uniquely hard on her'

Michael White, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

though i have the noxious suspicion that "lucky" is more implied like "you're lucky to have done so well, black man, but you are a fluke and your success goes against the established order of things"

elmo argonaut, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Michelle Obama already familiar with how 'lucky' she is.

suzy, Monday, 10 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

My daughter was at the Columbus rally this morning. She was bummed that they ran out of Q&A time before they got to her question -- she wanted to know his position on the right to death with dignity/legalized suicide.

Rock Hardy, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

What grandma crazypanties is she wearing?

I haven't followed this thread for a week or so, but this made me LOL.

One note, tho: IF YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT, PLZ FIGHT BACK NOW, SEN. BARACK OBAMA.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 10 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

she wanted to know his position on the right to death with dignity/legalized suicide.

in the last debate he singled his schiavo vote out as one of the things he regrets doing and that he no longer feels that congress had a right to intervene in this, so that might give you some idea.

akm, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

One note, tho: IF YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT, PLZ FIGHT BACK NOW, SEN. BARACK OBAMA

Fighting Geraldine Ferraro is as much a waste of time as Reagan respondng to Mondale.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, he didn't need to respond when Gloria Steinem said basically the same thing a month ago.

jaymc, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe, but the issue of assisted suicide is a very different matter from the issue of the appropriateness of Congress getting its nose into one patient's case. I think his Schiavo regrets were more about the latter and didn't address the former at all. xxpost

Rock Hardy, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't mean Obama should fight back against Ferraro or Steinem. I meant must start fighting back -- aggressively and now -- against HRC's comments and attacks.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 10 March 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

?!? he voted for that schiavo bullshit?!

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

COLUMBUS, Miss -- Sen. Barack Obama delivered an animated rebuke today of suggestions from the Clintons in recent days that he could run as her vice president.

“Now first of all with all due respect, with all due respect," he said here during a town hall meeting. "I won twice as many states as Sen. Clinton. I won more of the popular vote than Sen. Clinton. I have more delegates than Sen. Clinton. So I don’t’ know how someone in second place can offer the vice presidency to someone in first place. If I was in second place I could understand but I am in first place right now.

He referenced comments from Bill Clinton in 1992 that his “most important criteria” for vice president was that person must be ready to be commander in chief.

“They have been spending the last two or three weeks” arguing that he is not ready to be commander in chief, Obama said.

“I don’t understand. If I am not ready, why do you think I would be such a great vice president?” Obama asked the crowd, which gave him a standing ovation during his defense. “I don’t understand.”

“You can’t say he is not ready on day one, then you want him to be your vice president,” Obama continued. “I just want everybody to absolutely clear: I am not running for vice president. I am running to be president of the United States of America.

He's taking a lot in terms of style and cadence from Malcolm X, FYI. Well done.

tremendoid, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link

whole thing posted upthread yo

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

does anybody think this "mail-in do-over" proposal in FL and MI is actually a good idea? sounds pretty half-assed to me.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

?!? he voted for that schiavo bullshit?!

actually, no, not that I can see. He regrets not actively trying to stop it from passing

akm, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

(he went on vacation along with a bunch of other senators)

akm, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

*whew*

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

whole thing posted upthread yo

yeah i copied it

tremendoid, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

does anybody think this "mail-in do-over" proposal in FL and MI is actually a good idea? sounds pretty half-assed to me.

Supported (in at least a lukewarm way) by Gov. Crist, right? Tells you who McCain would rather face in the GE.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i think if I lived in those states I'd be pissed that my vote didn't count, so yeah, they should probably do something. both candidates have money and time to campaign there and I dont' think the outcome in either state would be significantly different from where it would have been had they done their primaries at the 'appropriate' time. I don't know who would win in either one, florida is obviously a freak anomaly state that never makes any sense to me. even if clinton wins both, i doubt it will be by big enough margins to eradicate obama's lead. he will have a lead into the convention.

akm, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

if McCain chose Crist as veep I wouldn't be too disappointed. The guy is an unrepentant moderate, maybe a discreet homosexual, and inoffensive.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah mccain is part of the 'everything' 9/11 changed i think

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

btw guise

With that middle name, I don't know, if he gets elected you know the Middle Easterners are gonna be dancing in the streets

:( :( :( not you too mom arghhhhhhhhhhh :( :( :(

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:24 (sixteen years ago) link

home for a couple days at spring break w/gf, sister, mom & mom. hilary signs everywhere and the anti-o smears flowing like wine guhhhhhhhhh

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

do what that guy did upthread and stab someone

max, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

if McCain chose Crist as veep I wouldn't be too disappointed. The guy is an unrepentant moderate, maybe a discreet homosexual, and inoffensive.

All true. But to the extent you think Florida is in play in the GE -- and Florida is clearly a state the GOP really, really wants (probably needs) to win -- McCain choosing Crist will help him tremendously here.

FWIW, I think Florida is GOP country in the GE.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, as far as Republican governors go, it could be a lot worse than Crist (I even voted for him in the last election...the Dem option, Jim Davis, was a douchebag).

xxxx-post

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:49 (sixteen years ago) link

OTOH, Crist isn't going to satisfy the GOP's hard-right wing. If McCain thinks he's got Florida in the "win" column, he may look elsewhere.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:56 (sixteen years ago) link

is there any good articles re: republican voters sabotaging the dem primary from here on out?

tremendoid, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 01:04 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost BTW she's nearly 18, cute, plans to study international relations and is a potential Obama convention delegate.

Karma zing!

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 01:05 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 Candidates: Gotta' Catch 'Em All!

Nathan, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

is there any good articles re: republican voters sabotaging the dem primary from here on out?

-- tremendoid, Monday, March 10, 2008 3:04 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i have been wondering about this too. rush was taking full credit for hill's texas "win" on wednesday morning, but i'd like to see a more objective look at whether he really did help sway the results.

gr8080, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 02:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/03/john_heilemann_and_joe_trippi.html

gabbneb, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

^^that's a pretty interesting exchange

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Barack did win Texas, but it's too late now: worldwide media already reported Hillary won.

http://experienceproject.blogspot.com/2008/03/barack-obama-won-texas-primary-right.html

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 06:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i29.tinypic.com/1zx6ttt.jpg

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 06:53 (sixteen years ago) link

he won a slight edge in delgates because he won the caucus part of the texas 2step, he lost the primary part by a fairly small amount. he needed to win the primary by a nice 8-10% margin to mortally wound her, but her momentum from press coverage of her "win" has already mostly been killed, esp. if Obama wins tonight in Miss.

gershy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 06:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Is everything about Texas this confusing? :-)

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 07:01 (sixteen years ago) link

texas is a feeling

gershy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 07:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Camp Obama fact-checks Clinton's foreign policy resume, find nothing to support her experience, making the case that Obama "does not use false charges and exaggerated claims to play politics with national security." It's a tough memo. It's about time. http://thepage.time.com/obama-foreign-policy-memo/

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Geraldine Ferraro is a cunt.

I've been saying "pig", in the weeks since her Times opinion piece defending the noblesse oblige of the superdelegates...

The superdelegates were created to lead, not to follow. They were, and are, expected to determine what is best for our party and best for the country. I would hope that is why many superdelegates have already chosen a candidate to support.

Besides, the delegate totals from primaries and caucuses do not necessarily reflect the will of rank-and-file Democrats. Most Democrats have not been heard from at the polls. We have all been impressed by the turnout for this year’s primaries — clearly both candidates have excited and engaged the party’s membership — but, even so, turnout for primaries and caucuses is notoriously low. It would be shocking if 30 percent of registered Democrats have participated.

If that is the case, we could end up with a nominee who has been actively supported by, at most, 15 percent of registered Democrats. That’s hardly a grassroots mandate...

Perhaps because I have endorsed Mrs. Clinton, I have noticed that most of the people complaining about the influence of the superdelegates are supporters of Mr. Obama...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/opinion/25ferraro.html

Can't you hear her sniff? If a bit too haughtily for someone with a "connected" husband?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:35 (sixteen years ago) link

ABC picks up the Clinton tax return story: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4421457

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:38 (sixteen years ago) link

It's about time...

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:39 (sixteen years ago) link

There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton played an important domestic policy role when she was First Lady. It is well known, for example, that she led the failed effort to pass universal health insurance...

hahahaha

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:39 (sixteen years ago) link

this tribalism is going to kill us, yall realize that, right?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:42 (sixteen years ago) link

wow that obama memo wow!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago) link

traacer u do realize hillary gave him no choice - the red phone was a riiiiiinnning

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:46 (sixteen years ago) link

obama does not so much assault clinton as he does simply assist her foot into her mouth.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:49 (sixteen years ago) link

yea that obama memo is some harsh shit. it is about time though. and yes to both of these:

u do realize hillary gave him no choice - the red phone was a riiiiiinnning

obama does not so much assault clinton as he does simply assist her foot into her mouth.

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton is good but she REALLY doesn't think she's going to win a rhetoric battle with Obama, does she?

HI DERE, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Firm but fair seems to be about the gist of it and once again Dan is right.

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Team Obama also calling for Team Clinton to repudiate Ferarro's comment.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

SHAME ON YOU GERALDINE FERRARO...

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey, for one sentence Ferraro in her shitbrick hit gold:

"Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship - that's the way our country is."

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton campaigner in WSJ - damn that Barack Obama and those meddling kids:

Supporters of Sen. Clinton also worry about young voters, male and female, who have turned out in large numbers for Sen. Obama. "Young students for Obama could stay home; that's one reason I am so furious at them," says Fran Reiter, former deputy mayor of New York and a Clinton supporter. "They are all excited about him, and they don't have any staying power. If Obama doesn't get the nomination, do they get angry again and crawl back into their apathetic hole?"

I am shocked, shocked...

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

haha

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I COUKLD JUST WRING THEIR APATHETIC LITTLE NECKS FOR BEING SO...INTERESTED.

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

That Obama Memo: IT'S ABOUT TIME. I hope it's the start of a trend for Obama.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

The Clinton campaign has responded to the memo, trying to characterize it as a "false attack":

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_clinton_calls_obamas_gre.html

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

The Obama campaign spends considerable time trying to "prove" that a private conversation between Hillary and President Clinton never happened.

I kind of agree with this, actually. That was the weakest part of the memo.

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

im not really sure why everyone is being all omg when will an obama atak - hes been good at refuting bullshit all along and when hillary took it to the next level he used his well-earned wiggle room to wait til after texas/ohio see if he even needed to make the party damaging move of hitting hillary where it hurts - since then hes been ramping up the push back

im pretty much through criticizing his campaign on tactical/strategic stuff - cause you know so far its been run insanely ingeniously

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

That Hillary memo was snoresville

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Weirdly tautological and seemed to have been written in about two minutes.

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

any time you can mention Sinbad it's a plus, though

dmr, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I kind of agree with this, actually. That was the weakest part of the memo.

You're right, but the way HRC describes her involvement makes it very hard to refute it any other way. Obama does say that "it's notable" that neither HRC nor Bill Clinton mentioned this private conversation in either of their memoirs. That's some evidence, I think, although admittedly weak evidence. But again, given the nature of HRC's claim, what else could Obama say?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

sinbad zing is a+

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

white people engage in diplomacy like this...

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah Sinbad made me lol

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.blackcomedycompetition.com/images/Sinbad.jpg

dmr, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i didnt see this posted ... was it?
http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/031008DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I REALLY REALLY hope there is a pic out there of sinband + HRC

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/sinbad-speaks.php

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

CLINTON-SINBAD '08

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

on the left

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5196J30ERPL.jpg

xxpost

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Benson!

Believe it or not, the woman on the far right is supposedly a Hillary impersonator:

http://www.hillarylookalike.com/photos/Sinbad_TeresaBarnwell_527x434.jpg

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I could see that

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

You're right, but the way HRC describes her involvement makes it very hard to refute it any other way.

No, I know. I meant it was the weakest part of the Obama memo for this very reason.

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

she can tell people she told bill anything during his term that he did wrong was a bad idea and no one can refute it. HOW CONVENIENT

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

its the hardcore serious hrc diplomacy corps!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

jingle all the way

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

sinbad looks weird there

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think that's Sinbad.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.bavf.org/images/flagweek_2000/togo_west_and_larry_babbitts.jpg

Sec. of Veterans' Affairs, Togo West.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Or as he's known to his friends, "Walter Oakes".

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Sinbad speaks

This is brutal: The comic Sinbad mocks Hillary's claims that their trip to Bosnia together was dangerous.

"I think the only 'red-phone' moment was: 'Do we eat here or at the next place.'"

(via a gleeful Obama campaign)

(via ben smith at politico)

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

oh no, Sinbad's gonna start being ACTUALLY funny? This is a new paradigm.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

More from Sinbad:

In her Iowa stump speech, Clinton also said, "We used to say in the White House that if a place is too dangerous, too small or too poor, send the First Lady."

Say what? As Sinbad put it: "What kind of president would say, 'Hey, man, I can't go 'cause I might get shot so I'm going to send my wife...oh, and take a guitar player and a comedian with you.'"

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Most Democrats have not been heard from at the polls. We have all been impressed by the turnout for this year’s primaries — clearly both candidates have excited and engaged the party’s membership — but, even so, turnout for primaries and caucuses is notoriously low. It would be shocking if 30 percent of registered Democrats have participated.

Is it me or is this not a bald-faced lie...? I believe its noted somewhere upthread that voting in the primaries in several states has EXCEEDED the number of Dem votes cast in the previous election.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Sinbad lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

turnout for primaries and caucuses is notoriously low.

So... "I think people of Ohio very clearly said it should be me." (top of the ticket) is BS too, since only 30% have participated, right?

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

This is too easy, Clinton campaign. Please try to find arguments that can't possibly be used against you for once.

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Supporters of Sen. Clinton also worry about young voters, male and female, who have turned out in large numbers for Sen. Obama. "Young students for Obama could stay home; that's one reason I am so furious at them," says Fran Reiter, former deputy mayor of New York and a Clinton supporter. "They are all excited about him, and they don't have any staying power. If Obama doesn't get the nomination, do they get angry again and crawl back into their apathetic hole?"

This is so ass-backwards. The sense of entitlement among HRC and her supporters regardless of the effect on the party annoys the hell out of me.

Michael White, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

basically they're saying too few democrats have voted. but the ones who like obama: too many.

dmr, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe HRC supporters are stingy and want to use their "president clinton" merchandise again. (or they've all still got their "president clinton" tattoos)

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Is she going to pick Tipper Gore as her running-mate?

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Silda Spitzer.

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

The wronged spouse ticket '08!

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

from Politico:

Nancy Pelosi tells Boston TV that a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket is "impossible."

"I think that the Clinton administration has fairly ruled that out by proclaiming that Senator McCain would be a better Commander in Chief than Obama. I think that either way is impossible," she said.

Also: "Nothing ever resolves itself -- it has to be resolved by some outside forces," she said.

Simon H., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Also: "Nothing ever resolves itself -- it has to be resolved by some outside forces," she said.

Yoda: "Wise and formidable, she is."

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

xxpost: Campaign song: Caught Out There (Kelis)

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

pelosi abt to drop hammer on clinton campaign?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Does Pelosi really have any more authority to tell Clinton what to do than Howard Dean does, though?

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: Unless the hammer is off the table, just like that Bush/Cheney impeachment :-/

StanM, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i think she just did

xps

gff, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

other than saying they "disagree with her" the clinton campaign hasn't responded to the ferarro thing at all. obama campaign saying ferarro's comment demonstrates a "wink and nod" strategy of suggestive racial statements made by the clinton campaign.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

well Pelosi said that the "dream ticket" was impossible, did she say something else?

akm, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Pelosi can't do shit re: Clinton gimme a break.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

member of obama's LGBT group resigned over an email talking shit about the clintons

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

"I think that the Clinton administration has fairly ruled that out by proclaiming that Senator McCain would be a better Commander in Chief than Obama. I think that either way is impossible," she said.

i.e. she just reiterated the Obama camp's characterization of Clinton's last round of attacks re: c-in-c readiness and experience

gff, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Nell Carter would make a great VP choice for Hillary

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

She ded.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah I know

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

other than saying they "disagree with her" the clinton campaign hasn't responded to the ferarro thing at all. obama campaign saying ferarro's comment demonstrates a "wink and nod" strategy of suggestive racial statements made by the clinton campaign.

Obama trying to seize control of the "umbrage advantage" that's been so critical to the 2008 Democratic primary.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton/Zombie Nell Carter 08

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

'_'

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton supporter/PA gov ed rendell, on meet the press: "But, Tim, you run against uncommitted, that's the toughest election to win. I'd rather run against an opponent anytime than against uncommitted, and Hillary Clinton got 55 percent of the vote against uncommitted."

this guy's gotta be fucking kidding, right?

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't even know what that means.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

pelosi certainly does have considerable power - the party muckamucks just havent yet decided to tell hillary its over

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

The grassroots support and fundraising efforts of Uncommitted have been impressive, it's true.

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think the Clintons acknowledge any authority higher than their own egos

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

xposts - it was in regards to michigan, where obama and edwards were not on the ballot and the other %40 of the vote were from people who showed up to vote "uncommitted"

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha okay that is some real WTF shit

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

UNCOMMITTED FOR PRESIDENT

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.freudfile.org/psihanaliza/ouroboros.jpg

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Campaigns that counted on uncommitted taking the youth vote are baffled by this year's race.

BleepBot, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

have you seen uncommitted's attack ads? BRUTAL

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

if she only got 55% and she was the only real choice, that don't look so good to me

akm, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Sadly, I don't think we're ready to have an uncommitted candidate become president yet. Maybe it's a generational thing. Personally, I'd be elated at the opportunity to cast my vote for a incorporeal, notional non-entity to the highest elected office in the country.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

GOD 08

suzy, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

y'know if uncommitted were a woman - of any race - he would not gotten to where he is

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Neither Hillary or Barack could stand up to McCain/God, of that I am certain.

The Reverend, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not sure God would get business conservatives into McCain's corner, though. What are God's economic credentials?

The Reverend, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

lengthy experience serving as invisible hand in free markets

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL at NO black folks appearing in crowd - except for a secret service guy - during telecast of HRC's rally at some high school in Scranton, PA last night

I live not far away from there and I know we're a SERIOUS minority in these parts, but, you know, LOLOLOLOL

Beatrix Kiddo, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

AFL-CIO preparing to mobilize against McCain on labor & economic issues

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL at NO black folks appearing in crowd - except for a secret service guy - during telecast of HRC's rally at some high school in Scranton, PA last night

Stanley is not an HRC fan.

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Ha!

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Stanley is a Nader Raider.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Michael was probably at the rally because Jan made him go.

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

didnt know nicole wrote office/hillary slash fic

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

make sure you have a part where dude from radiohead gets crippled

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain gets pregnant by Hillary through some sort of magical mumbo jumbo.

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain decides to raise the baby with the assistance of Kelly Kapoor.

Nicole, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN Mississippi Exit Polls

65 years of age and older: Clinton 56%, Obama 44%

17-29 years of age: Obama 67%, Clinton 32%

Democratic voters: 59% McCain unfavorable, 37% McCain favorable

Obama voters: 55% unsatisfied if Clinton is nominee, 44% satisfied if Clinton is nominee

Clinton voters: 72% unsatisfied if Obama is nominee, 26% satisfied if Obama is nominee

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton voters seem like assholes

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that's a marked shift from the conventional wisdom, though, which is that Obama voters hate Hillary but that Hillary voters could live with Obama. Then again, this is Mississippi we're talking about, so I'm wondering if some of the antipathy toward Obama among Hillary voters can be chalked up to racism.

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Mississippi is special in that regards and not at all like the rest of the country. (wtf)

HI DERE, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

its a well known fact that hillary voters are horrible racists and cannibals

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Geraldine Ferraro is getting righteously butchered by CNN analysts right now:

"She should know better, she owes Barack Obama an apology, she used to have class."

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh c'mon Dan, I know there are racists everywhere, but I'd think there'd be proportionally more of them in the Old South -- especially in the state where Medgar Evers and Emmett Till were killed.

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/125/pm6925_125.gif

jaymc, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

uh dont take this the wrong way ilx but thats a fine look patch right there

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

its a well known fact that hillary voters are horrible racists and cannibals

AND MONSTERS.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

shes a monster in command of a racist cannibal army

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yr behind the times, jaymc, polls have been clearly trending towards hil voters purporting to be more dissatisfied with the alternative than Obama voters

gabbneb, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

(That's dem primary hil voters)

gabbneb, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://home.cinci.rr.com/justamerican/images/Siren_animated.gifhttp://home.cinci.rr.com/justamerican/images/Siren_animated.gifhttp://home.cinci.rr.com/justamerican/images/Siren_animated.gif

ferraro: "Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up," Ferraro said. "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_8533832

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

oh stfu already

The Reverend, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

(directed at Ferraro, not you, jho)

The Reverend, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Can they call her the Vice-Biggest Loser now?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

hil vs obama has been useful in erasing my respect for dozens of people i previously liked

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

purging of the democratic party

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

srsly

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

PLZ TO KEEP TALKING, FORMER VP NOMINEE GERALDINE FERRARO. Obama may soon have "umbrage-mojo" for the duration of the primary season.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.petplanet.co.uk/shop_dev/assets/new_product_images/bob_martin%5C6261.jpg
"do you have a problem with crackers who whine about reverse racism in your party? run a black dude against hillary clinton & smoke em out"

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

hil vs obama has been useful in erasing my respect for dozens of people i previously liked

And what, sadly, OTM.

dowd, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

lol none of us are ever going to see or hear from her again xp

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferrarofl

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Spitzer & Ferraro.

*slomo car catapult*

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, if we're gonna have a New York Democrat flame-out, let it be a FLAME OUT

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otVGjh0zSDc

gaaaaaahhhhhh !!!!!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

find your inner whiteness.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

aint no party like a clinton party

mitt-romney-who-let-the-dogs-out.mpg

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

unwatchable

gff, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago) link

note she attempts to stop it half way through like hey guys that was great omg i pray no one sees this

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL at NO black folks appearing in crowd - except for a secret service guy - during telecast of HRC's rally at some high school in Scranton, PA last night

I live not far away from there and I know we're a SERIOUS minority in these parts, but, you know, LOLOLOLOL

-- Beatrix Kiddo, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:38 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

stevie, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:29 (sixteen years ago) link

it looks like that video had been digitally darkened. someone should look into it.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Riffing off of S Club 7. wau

HI DERE, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thepage.time.com/geraldine-ferraro-on-fox-news-channel/

major major stfu

deej, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i am shocked, shocked, that a rich old white lady could say things like this

and what, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Did we forget about Hilary4U&Me already? (wtf @ lyrics -- did they forget that Hil voted for Iraq?)

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

wow so this sort of thing happens to her pretty much everyday>=?

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:41 (sixteen years ago) link

That is the main reason why I am envious of Hillary Clinton.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Did Ferraro learn that finger wag at the end from Bill's Monica Lewinsky denial?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Even Hillary's gays are lame!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

she seems pretty fucking crazy huh

jhøshea, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

ferraro's just testing to see if she still has enough name rec to turn Mississippi into South Carolina 2: The Repeatening.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeqvEYptjoA <- lol@anime hillary dance

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:49 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA8Wy51Ionk <-- ok this is a real video, gross

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

lol, click & hold down yr mouse button at 0:51 in that band video

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

obama wins mississippi (in a landslide based on how early they called it)

jhøshea, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

hil vs obama has been useful in erasing my respect for dozens of people i previously liked

Sad but true.

Nicole, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 00:44 (sixteen years ago) link

wistful mostly but no disrespect

youn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 00:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i left a nasty comment on that band video... something tells me it will not be approved

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 00:47 (sixteen years ago) link

the memo is very strong, i think he can attack away if all of his statements come as stately as this.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Right. That's what I'm hoping: Obama's finding the narrow path that allows him to attack without losing his aura of dignity and grace.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Lol, should I RSVP for Gerry Ferraro award reception and speech on "Women in Politics" - Y, N, Maybe?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:16 (sixteen years ago) link

This VP pick could carry Oklahoma:

http://a872.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/78/l_db44827593e59164cd7bab474710d217.jpg

Eazy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:20 (sixteen years ago) link

lol wayne doesn't even know how he got there.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link

ferraro: "Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up," Ferraro said. "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"

Wow. I'm used to hearing the old "they get to wear their 'X', how come I can't wear mine?" argument from old stupid Southern white men, but I never expected to hear it from a Yankee liberal woman who was one of the biggest milestones this country ever experienced.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay, so can someone from America explain me this: why are Florida and Michigan still an issue in the Democratic race? Wasn't it known, on forehand, that the voting in these states wouldn't lead to any delegates being appointed? That it, basically, was a farce ?

Sure, I can understand why the Clinton team would want to bring those delegates in, but wasn't it clear that they wouldn't? How can this issue drag on so long?

Someone from the HRC team on CNN just said Obama should be carefull 'not to alienate the voters in Florida and Michigan' from him by opposing to letting those states enter the race after all.

Isn't that the world upside down? Weren't the rules - how strange they may be - clear from the beginning? Or, in even other words: Why doesn't anyone say to Hillary, concerning this issue: give it up, you knew about this before you bulged into this race, these are the rules that were set, quit whining about it!

I just don't get why this is still an issue. Is it HRC-camp clinging to some scrape?

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

scrape=scraps

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah but because of our electoral college system, winning specific states is much more important than the overall vote in the General Election. Michigan and Florida are considered swing states, meaning they're up for grabs in the G.E.

the race between Hillary and Obama is A) so close and B) so historic, that a lot of people are saying it would be really dumb to A) have two whole states be absent when it comes to deciding who gets nominated and B) get disenfranchised towards the Democratic party who really needs their votes in November.

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost: Sure, here's an American perspective...

I share your perspective on the Florida-Michigan problem, but I think it's an issue because the overall nominating race is so unexpectedly close. If either Obama or Clinton were running away with the nomination, it wouldn't be a problem, but every delegate counts right now, and writing off two big states is going to be controversial (especially since it's looking like Clinton might lose by a close margin, and those are Clinton-friendly states). The last thing the Democratic Party needs is a large sector of the party claiming that their candidate was denied the nomination because of a legal technicality.

I hope the party sticks to its guns - after all, rules are rules - but I'm not unsympathetic to the argument that the voters shouldn't be punished because the state party leadership did something stupid.

Nathan, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Alright, I can see that. But then still, it seems like people are questioning a - admitted - questionable decision of not letting these two states into the race. Now that's fair, but since the people have voted in these states, it's being made into a political issue now. Because the results are now known: HRC won, and obviously wants those delegates, whereas Obama couldn't care less, frankly.

It just seems to me that what really is the G.E. Party's problem is being made into a political problem now. And that doesn't look right to me.
Shouldn't the party just stand up, and back up the decision they have made earlier - again, how strange it may be - that they excluded these two states?

To me, it seems the Democratic Party is letting it linger, leaving it for Obama and Clinton to fight about it. Does the Democratic Party want to bring yet another thing in this race - between two democratics - to fight about?

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

xp

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

at the time it didn't seem like it would become an issue. few people saw a protracted battle at the outset.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro also argued that the campaign had shown sexism to be more pernicious than racism. "It's OK to be sexist in some people's minds. It's not OK to be racist."

DEMS CAN ALSO DO SHELL GAME. Yippee.

Memo to Geraldine: your appraisal of what equals racism and sexism is what's provoked this, not Obama's race or Hilary's gender. As to the 'race split' in the Dems the Guardian is talking about, pffffft.

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

did we mention CNN projects Obomber TX Caucus win yet?

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

The problem is that the votes probably weren't fair representations of how things would have turned out in a normal primary election. In Michigan, Obama wasn't on the ballot. In Florida, no one campaigned, and Clinton's name-recognition probably added a lot of votes that wouldn't have gone her way if both campaigns had toured the state (polls have shown a general trend of early leads by Clinton which diminish steadily as the voters are exposed to Obama).

If the race stays this tight - that is, if the votes are close in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and other upcoming states (and they probably will be) - Obama will care very much about a chance to get some of the delegates from Florida and Michigan. Both candidates need to convince the convention that they're the best pick to be President, and without a more convincing delegate lead, that will be a tough case for either of them to make.

The reason the Democrats aren't just letting the decision stand - and why it's going to keep lingering around - is that they can't afford to effectively cast off the voters in two big, important swing states. Democrats in Michigan and Florida want to have a voice in the primary, because it's one of the closest and most exciting in the party's history. If the national party denies them that voice (even for a good reason), they might just be angry enough to stay home on Election Day. That's the fear, anyway. The Party is trying to figure out if it should take that risk.

Nathan, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

6 weeks and 6 billion news cycles later, i wonder how many voters in those states will switch candidates.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:14 (sixteen years ago) link

at the time it didn't seem like it would become an issue. few people saw a protracted battle at the outset.

-- Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:05 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

exactly.

its been pointed out more than once on this thread how ironic it is that these two states moved up their dates in an effort to be more important in the nominating process and it only ended up making them pretty much the only UN-important states in the whole race.

also, the Republicans made a v v smart move by punishing the same states for the same rule-breaking by stripping them of only half their delegates, which makes the Dems look even more stupid now.

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

obama should call for a revote in fl and mi right now. Seize all that disenfranchisement mumbo jumbo

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

open up new theaters of combat to pour his money and organizational strength into while it still counts for something

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

xxxpost

@Nathan, thanks, I can see your point.

So the Democratic Party's issue with believability/reliability probably weighs less than re-entering the two states, in order to get a - votes wise - most honest election as possible. I can see that.
Long after this race, people will mostly remember the big highs and lows, who won and who lost, rather than some complicated party-problem regarding two states. So ultimately it won't hurt the party as much as this whole race will hurt the loser of the race.

(I come from a country with multiple parties. A change of rules like this would seriously damage the reliability of one party, with many other parties eager to dig into this and take away votes. But ofcourse, Clinton vs Obama is a battle within one party))

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

(Typing up the word party this much sure makes me want to put on some music and drink wine)

Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Ben Smith posts this Ferarro Flashback. She's talking about Jesse Jackson:

Placid of demeanor but pointed in his rhetoric, Jackson struck out repeatedly today against those who suggest his race has been an asset in the campaign. President Reagan suggested Tuesday that people don't ask Jackson tough questions because of his race. And former representative Geraldine A. Ferraro (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that because of his "radical" views, "if Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race."

Asked about this at a campaign stop in Buffalo, Jackson at first seemed ready to pounce fiercely on his critics. But then he stopped, took a breath, and said quietly, "Millions of Americans have a point of view different from" Ferraro's.

Discussing the same point in Washington, Jackson said, "We campaigned across the South . . . without a single catcall or boo. It was not until we got North to New York that we began to hear this from Koch, President Reagan and then Mrs. Ferraro . . . . Some people are making hysteria while I'm making history."

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

RIP

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Repeat after me: Barack Obama is not Jesse Jackson.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Regardless of who wins the nomination, can we even hope for Democrats to unite as a part after what is already appearing to be a very hotly contested and bitter race? I have heard so many people say that they will not vote if their preferred candidate does not receive the nomination. Given what little hope I have of seeing both of them on a split ticket, I really think that both Obama and Clinton (and their advisers) need to take great pains to avoid splitting the party and allowing that old geezer to win.

Hillary might seriously regret the day that she said that only herself and McCain were ready to lead the country, especially if she does not win the nom.

youcangoyourownway, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Elmo, we all know that. It's Ferraro with the problem here.

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

dems will line up just like repubs did. once the conventions end and the swiftboating/ad wars/sniping/armageddon gets going the choice will look pretty clear to most people.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:35 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks to the electoral college and me living in a securely Democratic state I have the luxury of not having to worry about voting for Hillary.

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i need to hear more foreign views of the primary here.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think her latest statements have been interpreted quite right but regardless, it's just a highly odd tack she seems to take at the racial question. slightly paranoic.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro I mean

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

on a different note,

Limbaugh was encouraging people to vote for Obama this morning, until Pennsylvania, when its time to vote for Hillary again. In PA you have to be registered Dem by March 24th or something in order to vote in April.

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I listened to the MS Elections Commissioner predict about a 10% voter turnout on the radio this morning. Looks like it was closer to 40%, if I remember the number of total registered in the state right.

Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Limbaugh is so deluded.

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:57 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks to the electoral college and me living in a securely Democratic state I have the luxury of not having to worry about voting for Hillary.

-- gr8080, Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:38 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i was gonna say the same ... except we did landslide for barack so maybe not???

deej, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

grady is implying that he's not gonna vote right?? i would not vote for hillary but this is the first election i could vote for and i don't wanna sit it out. by the same token i also don't want my FIRST VOTE EVER to be for hillary mf clinton. write in for barack?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link

first election i could vote in

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

nader80

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah illinois might be "in play" but i doubt it's anything more than a long shot for McCain.

Hillz grew up there.

gr8080, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Should Geraldine Ferraro provide a DNA sample to see if she's also partially African?
Maybe she got where she's cause of her good African genes?

By the way I am white-hispanic
3 hours ago - 3 days left to answer.

Answer this Question
Answers

*smile*
3 hours ago

I don't understand your question.
3 hours ago

um ... with respect to her comment -- how would that make any difference?
3 hours ago

Well, she is Italian. Most S. Italians have African blood.
3 hours ago

yes she should because italians were conquered by the moors and this accounts for the features that she has.
3 hours ago

gershy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

99%
reporting

Mississippi
Updated 4 minutes ago

County: Table | Map
Exit Poll


Obama

247,456

60%

17


Clinton

153,745

38%

11
--------

kingfish, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 04:48 (sixteen years ago) link

60-38? Still less than twice her score. I'm telling you, she's unbeatable.

StanM, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 05:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary is saving the Perez Hilton endorsement for when things really get rough.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 05:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Now up to 61-37

kingfish, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 06:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Tactical GOP Clinton voters clearly not that inspired on the day.

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

100% of the Clinton voters voted for Clinton. Beat that, Obama.

StanM, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 06:52 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

http://ravingblacklunatic.blogspot.com/2008/03/hes-supported-by-who.html

gabbneb, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 13:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theatlantic.com/images/issues/200802u/president-obama.jpg

and what, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 13:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I think I saw that bit back in December, 2000.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 13:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Shrillary's ticket to presidential candidacy was not her gender, biut her choice of mate

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Regardless of who wins the nomination, can we even hope for Democrats to unite as a party after what is already appearing to be a very hotly contested and bitter race?

It depends how much crazy McBickle brings to the table this fall. GHW Bush labeled Reagan with "voodoo economics" in '80 before becoming his running mate, don't forget.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.brokeland.com/tracerhand/McCainusesRALLYTHEBASE.gif

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:28 (sixteen years ago) link

donars!

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:33 (sixteen years ago) link

btw, when will Howard Wolfson be giving the Foreign Policy Aptitude test to Obama? The week before Denver, so he can have maximum study time?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:34 (sixteen years ago) link

http://blogs.pcworld.com/tipsandtweaks/archives/maptest.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I have heard so many people say that they will not vote if their preferred candidate does not receive the nomination.

this scares me, a million times more than the prospect of my preferred dem not getting the nomination. i really hope that the people who would prefer to waste their votes out of spite are in the minority, but it's very worrying.

lauren, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Very much agreed with this, but that sentiment seems strong in these parts.

Ed, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

6 weeks and 6 billion news cycles later, i wonder how many voters in those states will switch candidates.

-- Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:14 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

Florida may not change too much (demographics are in Hillary's favor), but recent polls show that if they conducted a do-over in Michigan (where Obama wasn't even on the ballot the first time), it'd be very close.

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

oh i'll get up bright and early to vote for hillary, even though i more or less hate her at this point, because i'm 100% positive a mccain presidency would be an unmitigated disaster.

maybe i'm in a tiny minority there but i think most democrats will come to that conclusion pretty quickly once this all shakes out. remember, everybody liked each other as of 3 short months ago.

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I certainly ain't wasting my vote on McCain or Clinton

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Hate is good!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

mostly people are just a little heated right now w/all this ill stay home talk

jhøshea, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

well i wouldn't give HRC any $$ in the general...

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

most registered Democrats will probably vote for the nominee anyway. I'm less sure about indies.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

you got to be kidding me:

Hillary spokesperson Phil Singer responds:

The path to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue goes through Pennsylvania so if Barack Obama can’t win there, how will he win the general election?

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Sullivan has an interesting catch here on the Ferarro flap, Limbaugh, & Wes Clark:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/limbaugh-ferrar.html

The comments referenced by Limbaugh came during Sunday's pregame show when the conservative talk show host offered the opinion that McNabb wasn't as good as the media perceived him to be. "I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well,'' Limbaugh said. "There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team."

Negative reaction did not come immediately. But on Tuesday, McNabb told the Philadelphia Daily News: "It's sad that you've got to go to skin color. I thought we were through with that whole deal." From there, the firestorm spread quickly. Democratic presidential candidates Wesley Clark, Howard Dean and Rev. Al Sharpton called for ESPN to fire Limbaugh. Others in both political and athletic circles also lashed out at Limbaugh's comments.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/obamadelmarc.JPG

and what, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:55 (sixteen years ago) link

So Hillary's total delegate pick-up on March 4: +6. Obama's delegate pick-up in Wyoming and Mississippi: +7. Which means that Hillary's actually lost ground since last month.

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I've only just realised (from the above chart) that Obama effectively won Texas.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think that the perceived swing in momentum to Hillary has as much to do with the shift in number of delegates as it does in the perception that Obama can't win the big, crucial swing states - and when he does win, it's usually because his younger, activist base gives him the edge in the caucuses - whereas Hillary does better in primary votes - which have a higher turn-out, are more representative of people how have jobs and families and can't devote several hours on a week-night to a political exercise, and are more similar to a general election.

o. nate, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

"who have jobs and families"

o. nate, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

"civic activists are privileged folks" is a damn foolhardy assertion to make without substantial evidence -- besides which, if your only evidence comes draws from voter demographics in democratic contests it's a perfect tautology.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not so much a question of who's more privileged as it is a question of which method - primary or caucus - is more representative of the will of the people and a better predictor of general election results.

o. nate, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, I made my point largely as a rejoinder against those Clinton talking points. I mean, this is something that Obama can use: "Why is Hillary claiming momentum when I've actually gained more delegates than she has in the last two weeks?"

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

considering that the current democratic primary system of caucuses and superdelegates were instituted to prevent the ascent of an outsider candidate sweeping the popular vote. obama's groundswell of organization has completely turned what was meant to stop candidates like him. i'm not going to argue contrary-to-fact hypotheticals here, but you can be sure that both candidates' stances on how fairly caucuses represent the will of voters is informed by gamesmanship and strategy, not the other way around.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

but you can be sure that both candidates' stances on how fairly caucuses represent the will of voters is informed by gamesmanship and strategy, not the other way around.

Sure, but underneath the gamesmanship, the question of fact still remains unanswered - and if there's any doubt about the relative accuracy of the caucus as a measure of electability, I would imagine that would weigh on the minds of undecided superdelegates.

o. nate, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not so much a question of who's more privileged as it is a question of which method - primary or caucus - is more representative of the will of the people and a better predictor of general election results.

it's not hard to turn this kind of argument on its head:

being able to win in caucuses requires both and an ability to figure out and adapt to the micropolitics of a given state; it's a good measure of the organizational skill of the campaign. you can win them if you figure out how and get people into it, which is sort of your responsibility as a candidate. (or you can give them up, and complain later, if you like that strategy.)

besides, the long-time party true believers (the kind who show up for meetings in off years, etc) (old women, to stereotype grossly...) are still heavily pro-Clinton. She may even see gains in the caucus states as the results get filtered through county and state delegate selection processes. "who has time" indeed.

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

since when is andrew "bell curve" sullivan a crusader for civil rights

and what, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

er i've got a stray 'both and' in my post, hasty editing.

gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

since he started backing obama? i have no idea. the substance of his post seems to be the apparent double standard in the clinton corp. as applied to the statements made by rush and ferarro.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2207/2329256094_f67bc6b92f_o.jpg

Hatch, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

who is that dude?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

“I will not be discriminated against because I’m white. If they think they’re going to shut up Geraldine Ferraro with that kind of stuff, they don’t know me.”

LOL

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

wayne coyne from the flamings lips, right? xpost

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I like how Obama is all 'will someone get the damned photo op out of my way, please?'

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

oh, okay. dude is way dapper! kudos.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess that means Obama has the annoying middle-aged innocent-psych-rock crowd sewn up

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

(wd still totally do Wayne tho)

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

thats a great photograph

jhøshea, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, crazy grandma ferrarro won't shut up and is just going to sit around, smelling up the clinton campaign

akm, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

If she was an old New York Italian mobbed-up grandpa, no media.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama Camp Memo on Clinton’s “Big State” Argument

From the Obama campaign:

FR: Iowa Governor Chet Culver, Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle, Washington Governor Christine Gregoire, Virginia Governor Tim Kaine, Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill

DT: Wednesday, March 12, 2008

RE: Debunking the Clinton Campaign’s Dubious “Big State” Spin

In an attempt to minimize the significance of Barack Obama’s success in winning more than twice as many states as Senator Clinton, her campaign’s supporters have attempted to diminish the importance of the states where Senator Obama has prevailed.

Senator Obama has scored important victories in each of our states – states that will play a decisive role in deciding whether or not John McCain will be given the chance to enter the White House and extend George Bush’s failed policies for another 4 years.

In each of the 30 primaries and caucuses that Obama has now won, including Mississippi yesterday, he’s shown the ability to motivate Democrats to turn out at the polls, win the support of blue collar voters in suburban and rural communities and attract the support of Independents and Republicans. That’s the kind of candidate Democrats need to nominate to beat John McCain in November, and it’s the kind of leader America needs to bring to Washington the kind of change we can believe in.

The Clinton campaign’s argument ignores relevant facts about how significant a role these states played in determining the outcome of the presidential race in 2004. In fact, Obama has won 7 of 9 of the biggest states that were close in the 2004 presidential election and have already selected delegates to the 2008 Democratic convention.

More than half of the votes that Senator Clinton has won so far have come from just five states. It’s also worth noting that polls in four of these five states show that Obama would be a stronger general election candidate against McCain than Clinton.

Obama Winning Vast Majority of Big States that Were Close in 2004

Nine of the largest states that were decided by a margin of 8 points or less in 2004 have already held a caucus or a primary to select delegates to the 2008 Democratic Convention in Denver. Obama has won seven of those nine contests – including four that Bush won.

Clinton Totals Padded by States Where Obama Does Best Against McCain

The Clinton campaign’s misleading argument about the importance of her performance in the largest states actually highlights the limits of her appeal and her ability to win the general election.

To turn the Clinton argument around, more than 55% of her popular vote total and nearly half of her pledged delegates have come in just five states. In four of them, polls show that Obama would be a stronger general election candidate against McCain than Clinton. In the fifth, Texas, Clinton admitted that she didn’t expect it to be “in the general election calculation.”

deej, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle

this dude rules, and he could not sound more wisconsin if he tried

deej, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

"Let me also say in 1984 -- and if I have said it once, I have said it 20, 60, 100 times -- in 1984, if my name was Gerard Ferraro instead of Geraldine Ferraro, I would never have been the nominee for vice president," she said.

SO, YOUR POINT?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BlYw6sOY4O4

deej, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

I just looked that up deej after your comment, and boy, you ain't kiddin'.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Grandma Geraldine is more attractive now than in 1984 though; back then she looked like she wore a Wendy's cheeseburger on her head.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

anyone hear old enough to vote for Mondale? How depressing must that have been.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

*haha, "old enough to HAVE voted for Mondale."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

That Obama memo is a good rebuttal, but it provokes as many questions as it answers. Why did they choose the top 9 close states to compare? Why not the top 5 or 10? What were the 9 states, and just how big are they? Why did they define "close" as a margin of 8 points or less - again why not some other number? Without some more detail on their methodology, it's easy to suspect they are carefully selecting their sample in order to provide the most favorable comparison for their candidate.

o. nate, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

After the caucus, I talked to a guy who said his first presidential vote was for Herbert Hoover. THAT's gotta sting.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I voted for Mr. Mondale. Alfred, you have no idea how depressing that was.

Aimless, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Mondale is the only D or R prez candidate I've ever voted for. I did hold my nose after his big pitch in the last debate was "Of course I wouldn't share SDI technology with the Soviets!" (trying to outhawk RR)

I went to a Mondale rally in the garment district where Ferraro yelled "You don't have to vote for Ronald Reagan just because you like him!" It being NYC, guy yells "We don't like him either!"

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

it's easy to suspect they are carefully selecting their sample in order to provide the most favorable comparison for their candidate.

you better be right about these explosive allegations

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

o. nate, don't worry, i'm sure the clinton camp is already cooking up their own special math.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

q.v. "lies, damn lies, and statistics"

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro yelled "You don't have to vote for Ronald Reagan just because you like him!" It being NYC, guy yells "We don't like him either!"

l o l o l

jhøshea, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i still think obama should push for reelections in fla and mi, he has a lot to lose but at least as much to lose in the GE if he keeps ignoring them. hope he doesn't have me killfiled too, i was just playing before homie.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

"my friend, i hear this talk of "the people" coming out of you almost constantly, but then I see you go along with a plan to disenfranchise two whole states in our union."

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

"my friend," "my friend," "my friend," "my friend," "my friend."

My head hurts already, and it isn't even the GE yet.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

i honestly wonder how many "motherfucker"s are slipping into hillary clinton's conversations recently.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i just know sen. mccain is going to be on zing patrol when/if obama emerges from this. He has to be seen as the aggressor from the outset, as a contrast to the "u old" narrative, and not even worry about being perceived as negative to have a chance to win.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I just wanted to post this again because it's awesome:

http://i28.tinypic.com/20hads9.jpg

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

i see her more spitting "cocksucker" as al swearengen would have done. darken her hair, give her a blue chalkstripe suit and a black moustache and she'd look just like him, too. xpost

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

then again as he's exposed to more scrutiny, mccain will seem as inspiring as a rotten cauliflower to all but the dimmest.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro yelled "You don't have to vote for Barack Obama just because you like him!"

gabbneb, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost Howdy, cowpoke.

Please someone photoshop a Cindy/Meghan hairdo onto head of McCain?

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Colbert cast Obama as Cleavon Little as Black Bart the other night

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.tvnz.co.nz/tvnz_images/tv2/movies/wl508_blazing_saddles_d.jpg

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Gene Wilder IS the Biden Kid

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

he Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows Barack Obama leading Hillary Clinton 47% to 42% in the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination.

deej, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SDHxaYhqAo

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

lololololololol

HI DERE, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Colbert cast Obama as Cleavon Little as Black Bart the other night

-- Dr Morbius, Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:48 PM (Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:48 PM) Bookmark Link

I've been preparing myself for "The president is a'near!" jokes since last fall.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

'What matters is that the Clinton campaign is convinced that Archie Bunker is voting in Pennsylvania in April 22, and they clearly will not struggle hard to repudiate any idea -- no matter how loathesome -- that can squeeze out a few extra voters in that regard.'. Not sure this is true, but it's an interesting view (or maybe it's a view that's by now widely echoed or denounced; I've been a little out-of-the-loop for a few days).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently olbermann is supposed to do one of his "special comment" polemics against the clinton campaign tonight -- presumably over ferarro's remarks

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I know Tracer won't agree, but I find Shril's "I have no reason to think he's a Muslim" far more vile than GF's ranting.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro also did a big 'look here sonny don't antagonize me' thing about Obama, reckoning she could 'help' him if he becomes the candidate. UGH.

suzy, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Let's speculate on Ferraro's chances of becoming HRC's veep nominee.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

they're equally vile, c'mon.

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

xp

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

haha alfred do you think there's even a 10% chance? cuz that would be interesting

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

clinton/ferarro 08 theme song?

jhøshea, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

boogie on reggae woman

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

don't stand so close to me

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro could debate McCain, it'd be like analyzing On Golden Pond

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

sucka nigga

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img.snlarc.jt.org/arc/chartn/GiRa-Baba%20Wawa.jpg

baba wawa want to know: wewe the wemarks made by gewaldine fewawwo wacist?

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

wol

StanM, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferarro's off the Clinton finance committee, apparently of her own will and not asked to resign by campaign officials (yeah, sure).

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/12/ferraro-quits-clinton-post/

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Geraldine's got some bitchin' hair.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

She's been fired because she's a woman.

StanM, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

GF was an obama plant!

omar little, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I know Tracer won't agree, but I find Shril's "I have no reason to think he's a Muslim" far more vile than GF's ranting.

-- Dr Morbius

maybe not far more, but more nonetheless

omar little, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

Not sure this ad is so "hip," but it's certainly true that HRC's "Choir Moment" was tremendously lame.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 12 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

WHOA

Geraldine Ferraro on NBC now, totally batshit.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

She implied that Obama's people did it.

"If anything, Obama's playing the race card."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah he's playing the race card by BEING BLACK

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

HOW DARE HE

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

from yglesias' blog

My outrage doesn't stem so much from Clinton's constant reminders of Obama's race, but rather Clinton's subtle reminders of how black voters don't matter.

By suggesting that Obama wouldn't be where he is today without the "black vote" presupposes that there's something wrong with those votes going to Obama. Meaning..."It's just those black people that are voting him."

If Ferraro and the Clinton campaign don't understand why this is insulting, then there's nothing we can do to enlighten them.

Posted by AKBY | March 12, 2008 3:54 PM

otm

tremendoid, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Fundraisers were given a presentation on Florida by Senator Bill Nelson, and one on Michigan by Senator Debbie Stabenow, and senior Hillary adviser Harold Ickes walked listeners through the challenges ahead. The presentations had a tone of optimism tempered by realism, the fundraiser said, adding that Ickes didn't try to persuade his listeners that she would be able to catch up with Obama in pledged delegates.

Rather, the clear message emerging from the presentations was that Hillary's success depends on the campaign's ability to persuade the super-delegates that they should be considering three "data points," as this fundraiser puts it, in considering whom to back: The pledged delegate count, the popular vote, and the specific states won by each candidate.

pledged delegate count - everyone seems to agree she can't catch up
popular vote - obama winning (after mississippi he's even winning if you throw in michigan on hillary's side)
specific states won - subjective

so ... comes down to florida and michigan I guess? what is their strategy really?

dmr, Thursday, 13 March 2008 00:47 (sixteen years ago) link

by "subjective" I mean that hrc's "I won the important states" spin argument seems unlikely to sway a superdel's vote if that's the only one of your OWN 3 CRITERIA that you have going for you

dmr, Thursday, 13 March 2008 00:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't stand that argument. It makes no sense. Who cares if she won New York and California? It's not like they're going to go to McCain in November anyway.

Nathan, Thursday, 13 March 2008 01:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know if this posted yet, but here's a bit that the dude at Raving Black Lunatic linked to, talking about the actual ratings increases for the networks for february.

In other words, pushing the narrative has the expected financial results.

kingfish, Thursday, 13 March 2008 01:16 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/ref/pageoneplus/corrections.html

Corrections

An article on Monday about an offer by two supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton to pay for restaging the Florida and Michigan primaries misstated the current standing of the Democratic presidential race. Senator Barack Obama has more delegates and has received more popular votes than Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. They are not in a “virtual tie.”

lol

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 01:50 (sixteen years ago) link

yea wtf @ that

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 13 March 2008 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i32.tinypic.com/262beqc.jpg

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 13 March 2008 06:44 (sixteen years ago) link

OH NOES what did Kermit do?

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 06:59 (sixteen years ago) link

also, WTF at going Right Left Left Right in their caption instead of L-R L-R

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 07:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Ha. Apparently goons were responsible for godhatesobama.com. (the site has since been expanded)

kingfish, Thursday, 13 March 2008 07:05 (sixteen years ago) link

His core beleifs, eh? Oh well. At least it all still links to the real Obama site and some lemonpartytubgirlonecupgoatse thing.

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 07:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The man from Olber talks about Hillary's silence re: Ferraro

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qXBXD2zizIY

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 08:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Non-YouTube link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23601041/

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 08:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Nice work Olberfella.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

"I'm sorry I said it" vs. "I'm sorry I got caught" : Hillary apologizes for offending minorities.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080313/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_s_apologies

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 08:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Worse still: Sorry for associating Obama & Jackson by mentioning them in the same sentence a couple of times? Hillaryous.

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 08:51 (sixteen years ago) link

lol!

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I really can't stand Olbermann's style. I so much prefer someone who can calmly dissect an issue with an awesome vocabulary over this blustering hyper-emotional personalized rant thing he has going on. Every time he says something like, "YOU, Mister President!" I cringe.

rockapads, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:06 (sixteen years ago) link

The special comment used to only happen 2 or 3 times a year, at most, when Bush or Cheney or Rumsfeld would do something absolutely appalling. Now he whips them out 1 or 2 times a month, usually over something that no one will remember in a couple weeks. I guess someone's got his ear and they're telling him the public eats it up.

Has anyone checked the sales of his book lately?

Seriously y'all, I used to love MSNBC the most of all the cable news outlets, but since late last year both Matthews and Olbermann have been almost insufferable.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:20 (sixteen years ago) link

usually over something that no one will remember in a couple weeks.

That says more about the number of appalling things they do than about him exaggerating, IMHO.

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:31 (sixteen years ago) link

you know what, those just aren't going to show up, are they.

thomp, Thursday, 13 March 2008 11:05 (sixteen years ago) link

three images per post

gr8080, Thursday, 13 March 2008 11:09 (sixteen years ago) link

did anyone else have classmates who thought it was hysterical to mark "pacific islander" for their race on state tests?

deeznuts, Thursday, 13 March 2008 11:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knBNX_evIOo

hahaha zomg corny fag rapping for hillary.... please please more viral video like this, clinton supporters, show the nation just how hip and with it you really are.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

"we don't need no bling / we got the real thing"

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I was just about to post that... I think we've found our Hillary/Ferraro '08 theme song.

Hatch, Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago) link

omg bottom left chubby toque dudes dancing amaze

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/2v0kile.jpg

lolololololololol

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

interesting that hillary is incapable of making her get off the tv

sooo you want to be president but you cant even get ferarro to stfu?

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

no way is ferarro going to turn down an opportunity to appear relevant, no matter how wrongheaded and damaging to the clinton campaign this is.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Elmo I saw that yesterday and wondered what sorority was having its rush week.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

i simply don't understand how Ferarro, who has even characterized her own VP candidacy as being predicated entirely on her gender, continues to bluff as an elder stateswoman. give it a rest, lady.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

http://store.barackobama.com/v/vspfiles/photos/TS26946-2.jpg

ok this is really cracking me up especially the shamrock apostrophe - plz dissuade me from buying it

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

go for it dude!!!11

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

A golden Ferraro oldie from her '98 Senate campaign:

Every time Gerry Ferraro runs for office, she is caught in the crosshairs of her husband's sleazy business practices. Now she's positioned herself for casino gold by dumping the partner who found her Foxwoods deal.

The woman who would be senator has made a career out of hostile denials about the escapades she joins in with her husband. They got her in trouble with the House Ethics Committee and the Federal Elections Commission in the mid '80s. Her only response to the mob charges in 1992 was that they were anti-Italian. Her know-nothing defense forced the Times's Maureen Dowd to conclude, "She does not seem to feel that as a former prosecutor, a public official and a savvy woman who was listed as an officer in her husband's real estate company, she should have made it her business to know more about 'John's business.'"

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost yeah you have to buy it

Mr. Que, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Her only response to the mob charges in 1992 was that they were anti-Italian.

!!! It's beginning to look like we could make a whole book out of these

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

btw, barney frank owes his entire political career to being a left-handed gay jew. just fyi.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

looks like jeremiah wright is back in the focus

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

i <3 barney frank - congressman from my hometown!

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - yea, apparently the comments are old, though, and obama already addressed them. they're just getting more attention now because a video was released

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

deej, there's definitely an effort to ignite a wright controversy, yeah, but with spitzer and ferarro dominating political coverage, i don't think many of the major media outlets are going to persue it -- not enough space of the page. the timing is hell of suspicious, too, pretty obviously the clinton camp wants this to play now so as to soften the impact of ferarro's comments.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

wtffff and nobody is talking about MACKEREL-SNAPPER HATER THE JEWS MUST BURN FOR CHRIST REV. HAGEE at all, this is utterly infuriating

gff, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain is alreay going to get free pass after free pass from the media, we need to get our own clusterfuck finished to actually go after him

gff, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno gff the nytimes has shown that they're willing to change their tune about him; there have been two high-profile investigative pieces that are painting a "john mccain: for sale" portrait of the guy.

i think with the right prodding the media may start to get bored of its hero tales about mccain. "john mccain: straight shooter" has become such a (fictional) truism that it's a little too "dog bites man" at this point. the press may need a reversal to keep their own interest in the story up.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I still find it troubling that Obama won't sever his ties with that guy, though. There are plenty of black churches and preachers around where you're not going to get an earful of crap like "The KKK runs America".

(The KKK in 2008, by the way, couldn't run a donut shop)

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I still find it troubling that Obama won't sever his ties with that guy, though. There are plenty of black churches and preachers around where you're not going to get an earful of crap like "The KKK runs America".

you think just maybe he was using the kkk as a provocative way of referring to white supremacy?

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Why only vanilla frosting?

xpost

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Wright's latest remarks are indefensible. This probably will become a story soon.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont know what on earth reason he would have to 'sever ties' with his pastor, and he's been going to that church for years so just switching to one of the 'plenty of other black churches' would probably not be the best political move

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I met a guy at a cooking class a few weeks ago who told me he and his wife go to Obama's (Wright's) church.

jaymc, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Wright's latest remarks are indefensible. This probably will become a story soon.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:59 AM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

plz post 'indefensible' remarks

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I met a guy at a cooking class a few weeks ago who told me he and his wife go to Obama's (Wright's) church.

-- jaymc, Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:59 AM (4 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

my coworkers at my last job did

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Barack Obama's pastor says blacks should not sing "God Bless America" but "God damn America."

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own "terrorism."

In a campaign appearance earlier this month, Sen. Obama said, "I don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." He said Rev. Wright "is like an old uncle who says things I don't always agree with," telling a Jewish group that everyone has someone like that in their family.

Rev. Wright married Obama and his wife Michelle, baptized their two daughters and is credited by Obama for the title of his book, "The Audacity of Hope."

An ABC News review of dozens of Rev. Wright's sermons, offered for sale by the church, found repeated denunciations of the U.S. based on what he described as his reading of the Gospels and the treatment of black Americans.

"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."

In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al Qaeda's attacks because of its own terrorism.

"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye," Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.

"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost," he told his congregation.

Sen. Obama told the New York Times he was not at the church on the day of Rev. Wright's 9/11 sermon. "The violence of 9/11 was inexcusable and without justification," Obama said in a recent interview. "It sounds like he was trying to be provocative," Obama told the paper.

Rev. Wright, who announced his retirement last month, has built a large and loyal following at his church with his mesmerizing sermons, mixing traditional spiritual content and his views on contemporary issues.

"I wouldn't call it radical. I call it being black in America," said one congregation member outside the church last Sunday.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

err i just watched the video now. yea hillary's campaign is gonna be stirring up some shit about this.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

internal numbers from the latest Rasmussen PA poll:

Comments by former Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro have caused a stir nationally and 66% of Likely Democratic Primary Voters have been following the story at least somewhat closely. Ferraro recently told a newspaper that "if Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position." Clinton voters are fairly evenly divided on Ferraro’s comment—39% agree and 47% disagree. Obama voters overwhelmingly reject Ferraro’s premise—93% disagree with her statement while only 4% agree.

Sixty-two percent (62%) of Black voters believe Ferraro’s comments were racist. Just 23% of White voters agree.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes Alfred I've read the article

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton voters are fairly evenly divided on Ferraro’s comment—39% agree and 47% disagree.

these are better-than-expected numbers

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

You're welcome.

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

to some degree i even agree - i think that the historic nature of obama's candidacy clearly takes some of the shine off of the historic nature of hillary's candidacy.

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama should just say he doesn't give a shit about God and get it over with.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

xp Alfred what do you find particularly indefensible about those statements - obviously they are indefensible in the political realm for just being unpopular and divisive but do u have actual objections to what they say?

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Constructing a parallel between Hiroshima and 9-11 is intellectually shallow, deej, even if, like me, you think dropping the bombs was a colossal waste of human life.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

and since we live in a culture and ILX thread in which the sound bite, there's no way that Obama can parse this man's rhetoric with the subtlety required.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

'constructing a parallel'? he's just talking about state-sponsored murder, and isn't he echoing MLK in this anyway?

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

*in which the sound bite rules,

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

and since we live in a culture and ILX thread in which the sound bite, there's no way that Obama can parse this man's rhetoric with the subtlety required.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:15 AM (10 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i agree w/ this; politically, its a problem for obama. but i don't think wright's arguments are indefensible on the facts

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm generally fine with those ABC quotes, but obv they're trouble to a candidate for Imperial Manager.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't find any of it particularly objectionable. I'm not running for President though.

er what Morbs said

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

i hope the 'hes just my crazy uncle' defense is effective

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

God, I wish Obama was an atheist.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

this is not the Rev with the gaybashing, correct?

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not one to throw around "state-sponsored terrorism," but if U.S. actions against Japan in WWII don't count, I don't know what does.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

God, I wish Obama was an atheist.

So his candidacy could crash and burn? I don't get it.

jaymc, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama should give his next speech in whiteface

StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

They may or mayn't have been defensible, but I don't think actions against Japan can be called 'terrorism'. They're called warfare.

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

To say that black people are the only people who feel this sort of anger and express it thusly is also intellectually shallow. You have to love America as an ideal a lot to express that much disappointment about how things actually are, and I don't recall Wright hating America, eh? It's not just Iraq that half of America has ambivalence about, it's seven years' worth of Bushista policy and the whipped cream and cherry on the top of that apple pie is the kneejerk patriotism.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

They may or mayn't have been defensible, but I don't think actions against Japan can be called 'terrorism'. They're called warfare.

Exactly.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

They may or mayn't have been defensible, but I don't think actions against Japan can be called 'terrorism'. They're called warfare.

-- Michael White, Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:21 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

The deliberate targetting of hundreds of thousands of civillians for direct attacks without even the pretense of a military target is terrorism.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Now I'd never suggest we sweep hundreds of years of slavery and racism under the rug, but haven't we reached a point now where ad hoc blaming of white America for every problem the poorer parts of the black community suffer from is just kind of nothing BUT inflammatory? The argument is more nuanced than that, and pretty much demands to be addressed at every occasion as such.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

haven't we reached a point now where ad hoc blaming of white America for every problem the poorer parts of the black community suffer from is just kind of nothing BUT inflammatory?

A large part of Obama's candidacy is based on this premise; and, like I said, there's some facts bobbing in Wright's stew, but they're strung together into generalizations.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

dropping the big bomb on civilans is not warfare by any stretch of the imagination

Mr. Que, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

(I'm waiting for someone to quote Curtis Le May's war tribunal remark, made soon after dropping the bombs)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

re: wright

if the clinton campaign really wants this to play -- and i maintain that it's not going to play a lot unless the clinton camp actually gets their hands in it, issues a statement about the "serious questions" it raises about obama's patriotism, bites on a pointed question from the press corp, whatever -- and then they run the risk of even more backlash and being perceived as being intentionally racially divisive. fox news will run with it, but i doubt clinton campaign is going to actively push this right now when ferarro's out there talkin' shit.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

since 9/11 started the Terrah War, it musta been warfare

semantics, semantics

(re LeMay, I watched The Fog of War again last night -- is that we'd have been prosecuted if we'd lost?)

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

lotta people in this world would call 9/11 an act of "warfare"

max, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

This is a class issue, not a race issue. If you are flat-out poor you are more likely to be at the sharp end of the problems that Wright describes.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess i should add don't really care what it's called by the way-- warfare, terrorism, defending one's country, etc--it still was wrong

Mr. Que, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ OTM

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:37 (sixteen years ago) link

@suzy: Yeah, that's the argument I've always tried to make whenever someone says "I like all kinds of music...except for country and rap." Anyone who thinks the US doesn't have a class system is blind.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Mr Que has a good point. We are all usually ready to countenance rather vile stuff if we agree with the ends and we are usually ready to condemn other people's actions when we don't agree with their ends. But anyway, I'll not digress further since we have covered this topic at length in other threads.

It WILL be troublesome for Obama when he gets associated with it or asked to repudiate it later.

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

i hope the 'hes just my crazy uncle' defense is effective

Except that you don't choose your uncles, but you do choose which church to attend - presumably because something in the message appeals to you.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

It is also good to hear what happens in 'segregated' space with a view to, y'know, addressing it and doing something positive to change 'the way things are'.

If you are part of what politicians condescendingly refer to as a 'community' you have traditionally gone to churches for the cohesion that is lacking elsewhere - and if you do not do so, there is a lot of pressure to join. Not all churches are conservative in their interpretation of belief. I'm glad Obama takes the values he does from his church but I consider his application and understanding are filtered through the mind of an intelligent person with free will and nuance.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain was the first person I ever heard refer to 9/11 as an act of war, and that was the moment when I realized everything was going to go really really wrong.

The Wright guy's a character, huh? Maybe he can join forces with Fred Phelps and Obama can sneak that evangelical vote right out from under John McCain's nose.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

He really is not comparable to Fred Phelps.

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see what's so "indefensible" about his comments. Maybe they're a big misguided, and Obama should've told him to put a lid on it a while ago because I knew he would eventually say something to get him in trouble, but there are some valid arguments there. And to act as though race is not a factor and it's PURELY a class issue is just wrong and is just as ridiculous as saying it's purely racial. The fact of the matter black people have been systematically opessed for centuries, and still are in many ways.. it's far more subtle than it was a few decades ago, yes, but it STILL EXISTS.

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 13 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

the week after 9/11, I heard/read "act of war," "we're at war" CONSTANTLY in the media.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i'll go along with this, and i'll say it again: if the clinton camp pushes this, it'll play out like they're willing to go to any length to secure political advantage, even so far as to revise the racial history of the US.

xpost to brainwasher

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

are all churches this political in their sermons these days? i grew up catholic and they never talked about anything other than scripture then.

akm, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

People in certain minorities do have to work twice as hard to get half as much, I'll agree, but in order to solve the problem without racially profiling its sufferers it's extremely important to have a discussion where class is at the wheel and race rides shotgun for a change. Obama's getting baited with this shit when he's perfectly capable of re-focusing discussion and turning it into a 'teaching moment'. Just sayin'.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

ok why doesnt obama directly respond to ferraro by saying 'i didnt get where i am because i'm black, i got here because i'm AMERICAN' thus responding to both race baiting and patriot baiting w/ a cheap applause line that may actually be effective?

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

or is it bad to even acknowledge?

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

No, that would be good, mail them, OK?

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

i am applausing already

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey Alfred! It looks like we're ever closer to our second vote this season. By mail, even!

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

are all churches this political in their sermons these days? i grew up catholic and they never talked about anything other than scripture then.

It probably depends on the congregation. After disavowing Catholicism when I was in high school, my parents and I went to a Unitarian church. And having had a positive experience there, I decided to try another Unitarian church when I got to college. I went once but didn't return because I didn't like how the sermon that week was basically "Re-elect Bill Clinton!!!" (admittedly, it was two days before Election Day) (also the fact that it was held in a high-school gymnasium was a big turn-off).

jaymc, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey Alfred! It looks like we're ever closer to our second vote this season. By mail, even!

I thought I read in this morning's NYT that Bill Nelson's plan was shot down.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I just saw footage on MSNBC of a pow wow in Tallahassee where they're trying to hammer out details.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the anger that Wright expresses in some of those statements is completely understandable and realistic, but unfortunately that doesn't change the fact that they do clash with the more unifying, conciliatory message that Obama is trying for. At some point these statements are going to make the news - if not now, then in the fall. Whether via a 527-organization Swift-Boating or a direct criticism from McCain's campaign, I think we can rest assured they will be aired. One possible net positive from these statements getting a full media airing is that by focusing attention on Obama's church, they could help to defuse the rumors that he's Muslim.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

obama has fully disclosed all of his earmarks for his time in the senate:
link

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Florida proposes June 3 Democratic primary re-vote

4 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Democratic party leaders in Florida are proposing a repeat presidential primary on June 3, according to a memo they sent to national party leaders and the two Democratic presidential hopefuls.

"We have reexamined every potential alternative again. Only one stands out as fair, open, practical and feasible at this time," said the March 12 memo, distributed to party leaders late Wednesday, according to the Politico website.

"We are positive that a combination vote-by-mail and in-person election can be conducted in the time available," the memo said.

It proposed a vote held June 3 at a cost of ten to 12 million dollars, though it did not address the contentious question of who would foot the bill.

National party leaders stripped Florida and Michigan of delegates to the Democratic National Convention because the two states violated party rules by moving the dates of their presidential primaries forward to January.

But the primaries were held regardless, even though Democratic presidential hopefuls largely respected pledges not to campaign in the two states.

Barack Obama and John Edwards, who has since dropped out of the race, had their names removed from the Michigan ballot.

Hillary Clinton won resounding victories in both states amid record voter turnout.

A staggering 1.75 million Democrats voted in Florida on January 29, with Clinton routing Obama 50 to 33 percent.

Even if Florida delegates are restored through a re-vote or some other mechanism, neither Clinton nor Obama appears likely to cross the finish line of 2,025 delegates needed to win the Democratic nomination.

But Democrats are haunted by the prospect of denying a voice to voters in Florida, the battleground state that controversially decided the 2000 election.

-----------------------------------------------------

Okay, looks like some kind of weird mail/polling booth mix. wtg Florida, can't we do anything that makes sense?

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama could easily defuse this (if disingenuously): "I find great solace in the Rev. Wright's church. His political statements, however, are deplorable."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

'deplorable' seems strong for TRUE FACTS that the public doesnt want to hear

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Right – which is why I added the "disingenuous" tag.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

one of Sully's readers sez to hell with the party:

Watching the Democrats self-immolate during this election, which should have been a slam-dunk for the party, has really made me question its abiity to lead this country at all, ever again. If someone, anyone, could explain to me how this party is fit to lead, please, let them explain. From its ineffectual performance in Congress since the midterms to its fratricidal primary warfare, the Dem party seems determined to prove that it has outlived its usefulness. Now, gifted with a candidate who represents a new start for the future--who offers an attempt to show the country how we can at least attempt to transcend the most divisive elements of racism, prejudice and partisanship (no, not get rid of them completely, but at least kick them a ways to the curb in the name of progress and solving this country's very serious current challenges), it has instead chosen a fight to the death to re-install a desperate, discredited monarchy that is taking refuge in the last century's cultural and identity wars.

What the hell?

And where is the party's leadership? Cowering in the shadows. Unlike the Republicans, who are at least attempting to unite around their candidate and present a grown-up face--and whose candidates were Emily Posts compared to the Clintons in their effort to maintain some of the party's dignity during the primaries--too many Dem leaders are standing around watching this ridiculous spectacle hands in pockets.

Gore? Edwards? Biden? Richardson? If they really backed the Clintons they'd have said so by now, but rather than come out and stand up for the future, they're hedging their bets. Hoping for Cabinet posts? The Republican drop outs, meanwhile, immediately moved to unity, endorsing McCain quickly.

Dems will say this is healthy. Democracy is messy! Oh, please. Maybe it WAS healthy. Now it's just nuts. No offense to the Palestinians, but you know that saying that "they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity?" Well, the Dems have become the Palestinians of U.S. politics.

This election will signal the end of my identification as a Democrat. I've had it. And I can't imagine I'm alone in thinking and feeling this way. Can't the party see this?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

on point

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

no offense to the palestinians

gff, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton campaign to respond to Obama's vote suspending earmarks for a full year: "Obama has clearly demonstrated his aversion to pork barrel spending. You know who else hates pork? Muslims, that's who."

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm only a Dem in primary season. By the time of the GE, I'm unaffiliated again. Every time.

Wish I lived in a state with open primary voting.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think there's nothing to Hillary's electability arguments, but I'm glad she feels the need to divide the party in scorched-earth fashion to avoid taking a risk on Obama so that we can take a risk on her.

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Drudge or the Clinton campaign could easily get the headline: "OBAMA MINISTER: 'GOD DAMN AMERICA'" -- but, again, the pre-Internet Rove strategies of the past have assumed that people won't look up the facts and context behind the statement and it wouldn't necessarily get traction in 2008 the way it would have in 2000.

Eazy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait - where did these verbatim quotes of the guys sermons come from? Why was anyone recording them?

dowd, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

people record sermons all of the time

The Brainwasher, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

the media does NOT have a very long attention span on these supposed "obama controversies" I've noticed. they last maybe one news cycle, have no effect, he wins another primary, and then no-one cares (rightly so)

akm, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

If these tactics still worked, this fall would be "GOD DAMN AMERICA" vs. "POPE IS A WHORE".

Eazy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Really? I'm guessing this is a USA-Europe divide, because I have never heard of anyone recording a sermon here.

dowd, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

It's going to be a great year for industrial dance remixes.

Eazy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost HAHA

Some of the larger British evangelical churches offer DVDs. Cashflow, baby.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, I'm Church of Scotland, and 'larger' evangelical churches in Scotland are tiny really.

dowd, Thursday, 13 March 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

what is ferraro's job now, exactly?

she should step down from it regardless

roxymuzak, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Sully OTM

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

"hillary clinton has never been called a nigger"

and what, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

this is kind of interesting:

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/03/12/should-obama-agree-to-seat-florida.aspx

raises the question of whether obama would benefit from simply conceding the florida delegates as they stand.

florida's largely clinton-friendly, and since he's likely to lose a florida re-vote anyway - though certainly not by as big a margin as he did in january - conceding the delegates-as-they-are would prevent any big clinton-momentum event spun by her w/ the media likely to follow.

What worries Obama managers in Chicago is the timing: if Florida is seen as a real re-do, and if the media portrays it as a wide open contest, a clear Clinton victory would give her a big bounce of momentum right as the primary window closes.

What's worse for Obama, taking the delegate hit that would result from seating Florida's delegation as is (in the neighborhood of a net 35 delegate loss), or going forward with a revote? The consensus--which seems right to me--is that he'd probably lose again, but by a narrower margin, with a delegate loss maybe half that, or less. What's more important--the delegates or the perception of late momentum?

it's a very interesting idea, especially considering the complete media bonanza about the clinton-comeback in ohio/texas, which had a real impact on the perception of the race, even though it changed virtually nothing about the delegate count.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

might also be used as some bargaining leverage -- e.g. we'll give you florida-as-is if you give us a michigan caucus (or split michigan 50-50?).

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

apparently Ferraro's been fighting multiple myeloma for 10 years

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

it seems fairly clear that Clinton intends to strike no "deals" whatsoever and will not concede under any circumstances until someone fucking tells her to give it up OR ELSE

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I think she'll drop out if it becomes clear that he has a stronger claim on electability, like if he won OH or TX. she's not convinced of that yet, and I might not totally be either.

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

but this bullshit where she's writing states off for the Dems in the Fall makes her the worst person in the world, afaic

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

A Kerry-level claim on electability?

Sullivan poster is overlooking that the rest of the GOP field was far more inept at attracting votes than Shril is, hence they "united" quickly.

If someone, anyone, could explain to me how this party is fit to lead, please, let them explain.

The fun part is neither is the other party, and if you consider a thirs, you're an "irrelevant" fantasist.

I have never heard of anyone recording a sermon here

Europeans don't have phones?

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I doubt Barack's opponents are going to jump on Ministergate as it defeats the much more effective Muslimgate

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

although it might pop up later when more people have realized he's not a Muslim

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Not on in church they don't, Morbs.

dowd, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

guys, you can't get to universal health care if your first bargaining position doesn't have an adult mandate, but it's totally ok to tell North Dakota and Texas to go fuck themselves

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i was speaking to a friend last night of the opinion that Hillary's still in the race not necessarily out of pure ambition or greed, but because she already owes so many favors to her strategic allies and supporters that there is tremendous pressure on her to remain in the race -- for the people who've supported her and who are banking on access to her administration, dropping out is simply unacceptable. it's true to how she does politics and is a lot more relevant than "power hungry woman," i think.

what say you folks? accurate y/n?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

that's a v. good point

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

she's still in the race because she still thinks she can win, and she may be right

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

people might have placed larger bets on her since she was "inevitable"

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

It is a good point. The moral of the story once again is not to write checks with mouth that your ass can't cash.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Hillary's still in the race not necessarily out of pure ambition

ambition, god forbid.

lauren, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, i'm not supporting her but criticisms like that (and things like "shrillary") do give me pause.

lauren, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

lauren, i'm not making any value judgements on ambition, but it does seem to be the most popular motive ascribed to her among her detractors

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

well, ambition and entitlement.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

being the front for a gaggle of professional poli-whores isn't part of ambition? see PRETZEL BOY: neocons

btw I call her Shrillary bcz she turned particularly shrill about 4 weeks ago. I hadn't before.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

i understand that it's something her detractors like to harp on. personally, i don't think that her ambition is somehow different from that of any number of other politicians.

lauren, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Not that interested in where she and her team get their massive sense of entitlement; more concerned how encompassing it is and whether she has enough grace left to see the handwriting on the wall and concede in an appropriate fashion if it comes down to that(and I don't think it has, to be fair).

tremendoid, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha wait you guys are defending the concept of a minister urging God to "damn" America for its crimes? I think I know what he was trying to say, but come on - that is strictly Phelps territory the way it came out. And unfortunately it plays right into the "Obama = an unsettling, alien presence" thing that's started to take shape -- predicted by Somerby, fulfilled by Dowd last week (Obama's "impassioned egghead advisers have made his campaign seem not only out of his control, but effete and vaguely foreign — the same unflattering light that doomed Michael Dukakis and John Kerry.") It's all complete horsesh*t of course, but horsesh*t is the currency of elections.

I've never understood the "entitled" criticism of Hillary either. What has Hillary said or done that betrays a sense of entitlement that goes beyond any other candidate? Is it because people have the feeling that she hasn't earned this perch she's on?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Or does any candidate painted as "the inevitable" nominee get this treatment? I don't remember people talking about Gore's sense of entitlement, or George Bush Sr's.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"I have so many opportunities for this country"

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not very impressed with Hillary as a politician, but it does seem that part of the criticism directed towards her is based on the implicit assumptions of how a woman should and should not be (for example, not overtly ambitious). The weirdest of all was to read those Germaine Greer comments, where she criticized Hillary because she is "cold and manipulative and bossy", and because her relationship with Bill is more rational than emotional. Okay, maybe that is her personal impression of Hillary, but doesn't she realize those are the very same arguments anti-feminists use against career women?

Tuomas, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago) link

What has Hillary said or done that betrays a sense of entitlement that goes beyond any other candidate?

She refuses to humbly surrender to Obama.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

How can a politician not be "ambitious"?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

(exception made for Fred Thompson)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

By putting the greater good ahead of cronyism.

Eazy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The Wright thing seems like it could completely sink Obama in the general.

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Penn_Im_a_huge_asshole

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

What has Hillary said or done that betrays a sense of entitlement that goes beyond any other candidate?

how about "no delegate's vote is set in stone, I'll steal the ones obama has already won if I have to"

dmr, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha wait you guys are defending the concept of a minister urging God to "damn" America for its crimes? I think I know what he was trying to say, but come on - that is strictly Phelps territory the way it came out. And unfortunately it plays right into the "Obama = an unsettling, alien presence" thing that's started to take shape -- predicted by Somerby, fulfilled by Dowd last week (Obama's "impassioned egghead advisers have made his campaign seem not only out of his control, but effete and vaguely foreign — the same unflattering light that doomed Michael Dukakis and John Kerry.") It's all complete horsesh*t of course, but horsesh*t is the currency of elections.

Again, I've been out-of-the-loop a bit, but if this is the image of Obama that's "started to take shape," it's a problem that he needs to address now. I'm a little worried about his ability to overcome these types of criticisms; not because he can't, but because he may be too over-committed to his public image as a politician that "rises above the fray." He needs to fight.

But I do that he will fight (and he's already started to do so, if those campaign memos of the past few days are an indication). I'm less worried about him falling victim to the same image problems as Dukakis and Kerry because he isn't them. Unlike Kerry (and HRC), he doesn't have to jump through hoops to explain his position on Iraq. And unlike both Dukakis and Kerry, Obama seems comfortable in his own skin. He's not awkward and doesn't appear to be trying to overcome elements of his personality that he fears won't appeal to voters. He's just a better candidate than they were (and than HRC is, in terms of their personal qualities, at least). Anyway, all of that makes me -- cautiously -- optimistic (I still think McCain will win the GE, mind you).

Sorry for the longwinded, incoherent post.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:44 (sixteen years ago) link

The Wright thing seems like it could completely sink Obama in the general

I think Obama tried to have a mini-"Sister Souljah moment" when he rescinded the invitation to have Wright introduce him when he announced his candidacy, but I think he may need to go a bit further.

Here's a blog post from TPM calling for Obama to speak more forcefully in repudiating some of Wright's remarks:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/crazy-like-an-uncle.php

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Re: the Wright stuff, I think Josh Marshall's analysis is spot-on. He assumes that people affiliated with Clinton are floating this stuff to the press, which seems like a safe bet to me. And while I do think Wright's comments are a problem for Obama, I really doubt this will sink him now or in the GE.

Hatch, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there any evidence that Clinton's campaign is pushing the Wright stuff now? It seems like Good Morning America and FOX decided to run with it on their own.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Details of a possible delegate plan under discussion:

–Michigan’s 156 delegates would be split 50-50 between Clinton and Obama.

–Florida’s existing delegates would be seated at the Denver convention—but with half a vote each. That would give Clinton a net gain of about 19 elected delegates.

– The two states’ superdelegates would then be able to vote in Denver, likely netting Clinton a few more delegates.

http://thepage.time.com/details-of-a-possible-delegate-plan-under-discussion

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

How could they not? xpost

Hurting 2, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

TS26946-MD Obama St. Patricks Day T-Shirt - Medium (back order)
1 $20.08 $20.08

Sub Total: $20.08
Tax: $0.00
Shipping: $8.36
Grand Total: $28.44

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there any evidence that Clinton's campaign is pushing the Wright stuff now? It seems like Good Morning America and FOX decided to run with it on their own.

Maybe they did, but they're not going to say the Hillary campaign gave them the story, which happens all the time.

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

really, it could have come from any number of parties interested in tying obama to wright's controversial statements, but don't fool yourself about the self-directing agency of media outlets; these types of 'newsworthy' stories are sold to the press by parties who need axes ground.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Obviously no one's pushing it publicly, but you better believe they are behind closed doors. What do you think they mean when they keep complaining that Obama hasn't been properly "vetted" by the media?

Hatch, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Is accusing the Clinton campaign of pushing unsubstantiated smears without any evidence of such wrongdoing in fact an unsubstantiated smear?

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

wait, hillary is the victim again?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

My apologies for the cognitive dissonance. Hillary is evil - Obama is good. Carry on.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

uh you know were not the media right

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:11 (sixteen years ago) link

putting our internet-message board "who leaked the story" speculation on the same ethical level as the leaker (whoever it may be) provoking controversy == you are a simpleton

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Re: Wright, is anyone actually paying attention to this outside of the blogosphere?

HI DERE, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

and not one person has said 'j'accuse' to hillary on this matter anyway

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

uh you know were not the media right

I know - though identifying who exactly the "media" is in the age of blogs is not as easy as it once was. Stories get traction on blogs and somehow make their way to more conventional outlets. I seem to recall the media parroting unquestioningly Drudge's unsubstantiated claim that the Obama-turban photos had been circulated by Clinton staffers.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah jhoshea stop being a shill for matt drudge

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

That was made worse by the HRC campaign's decision not to quickly and unequivocally deny their involvement in circulating the Obama photos.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

i am totally a shill for matt drudge as evidenced by the 1m screen shots on this thread

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe the Clinton camp fumbled the first denial, but still, wouldn't it have been a nice moment for Obama's campaign if they had said something like "There is an allegation that these photos were circulated by my opponent. However, until some evidence of this is presented, I will refrain from making any personal accusations." Instead they immediately and angrily jumped on it.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan, yes. My mom (aka Crawlwatcher) was on about Wright and his 'Afrocentric church' a couple of days ago, as has been covered in trashy mags/TV and is now thinking more about voting for McCain. All the while talking about the stupid, gullible people who fall for this shit.

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

The only thing America fears more than an angry black man is an old angry black man.

HI DERE, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

LOLZ Dan. Unless it's this man:

http://64.13.133.31/pics/up-33DRHBQFQSE5DBCS-l

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

btw as long as were talking ancient history it was pretty clear to me that the hillary people did circulate those obama turban photos

first all the non-denials which only got as definitive as "we dont know abt that"

then they already had their little divisive bullshit memes ready to go the next morning "his native clothing" indeed - this from one of the top clinton surrogates - stephanie tubbs jones is on tv everyday - she doesnt go off message

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnLSkWulPVE

of course the whole thing was dropped once they realized how bad they were looking

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: or COS!

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama was pretty chill and "let's move on" about it at the debate that next day, def. not on the attack

dmr, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

TS: Obama/Ruckus 08 v. Obama/Cosby 08

suzy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the reason for the first ambiguous denial was not that the Clinton camp was hiding some involvement in the photos - I think it's more likely they got a bit too clever thinking they could turn the issue around and make it look like the Obama camp was somehow dissing Kenyan native dress. Kind of a stupid idea perhaps, but not necessarily a sign of complicity.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Cosby/Ruckus 08

HI DERE, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

o nate all of their denials were ambiguous

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

How so? The top campaign brass claimed they knew nothing about it. How's that ambiguous? Either they knew about it or they didn't.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

o. natepaws

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

What else could they say? The only way that they could say for a fact that no one associated with the campaign sent it was if they knew who did send it. It's not like they monitor all the email accounts of everyone who works for the campaign.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

i think, o. nate, that both campaigns were intelligent enough to realize it was a stupid flap over a non-incriminating photo of a non-incident, and were ready to let it rest (or head to the blog universe for dissection and paranoid discussion)

remy bean, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Re: Obama "really can't win the General Election" -- Downticket Democrats believe Obama's coattails are longer than HRC's. Not a direct response, per se, but still good evidence.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

What else could they say?

"This is an obvious attempt to rankle ethnic prejudice against Senator Obama and we denounce any such divisive smears." Too straightforward?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, if you want health care, maybe you should pick the candidate more likely to help us get over the filibuster hump

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

"we'll take a look see if this came from our shop - if it did those responsible will be dealt with"

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

This, however, is a direct response to Penn's comment.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

"we dont know nothin - it took us all morning to come up w/that - care to try and prove it wrong - you cant right? ok now whats no bad abt obama in his native garb lol"

jhøshea, Thursday, 13 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

"Watching the Democrats self-immolate during this election, which should have been a slam-dunk for the party, has really made me question its abiity to lead this country at all, ever again. If someone, anyone, could explain to me how this party is fit to lead, please, let them explain. From its ineffectual performance in Congress since the midterms to its fratricidal primary warfare, the Dem party seems determined to prove that it has outlived its usefulness. Now, gifted with a candidate who represents a new start for the future--who offers an attempt to show the country how we can at least attempt to transcend the most divisive elements of racism, prejudice and partisanship (no, not get rid of them completely, but at least kick them a ways to the curb in the name of progress and solving this country's very serious current challenges), it has instead chosen a fight to the death to re-install a desperate, discredited monarchy that is taking refuge in the last century's cultural and identity wars.

What the hell?

And where is the party's leadership? Cowering in the shadows. Unlike the Republicans, who are at least attempting to unite around their candidate and present a grown-up face--and whose candidates were Emily Posts compared to the Clintons in their effort to maintain some of the party's dignity during the primaries--too many Dem leaders are standing around watching this ridiculous spectacle hands in pockets.

Gore? Edwards? Biden? Richardson? If they really backed the Clintons they'd have said so by now, but rather than come out and stand up for the future, they're hedging their bets. Hoping for Cabinet posts? The Republican drop outs, meanwhile, immediately moved to unity, endorsing McCain quickly.

Dems will say this is healthy. Democracy is messy! Oh, please. Maybe it WAS healthy. Now it's just nuts. No offense to the Palestinians, but you know that saying that "they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity?" Well, the Dems have become the Palestinians of U.S. politics.

This election will signal the end of my identification as a Democrat. I've had it. And I can't imagine I'm alone in thinking and feeling this way. Can't the party see this?"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, cited upthread, hoos.

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost
Also, I think it's a bit chicken-little-ish - there are many structural reasons why the GOP and Dem primaries have turned out differently, and I don't think it's quite as apocalyptic for the Dems as that post makes it sound.

o. nate, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I agree that Democrats should distance themselves from identity politics since the way they're going about it is inherently divisive both internally and externally but that excerpt basically reads like "WAAAAAH I WANNA BE A BORG" to me.

HI DERE, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ i agree. democrats could stand to stop worrying about the monsters under the bed. xpost

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

It's also trivializing otherwise heavyweight Democratic contenders. The race is degenerating into "So-and-so is a racist," "So-and-so is a sexist," "It's wrong to play the race card and call me a racist," and "It's wrong to play the gender card and call me a sexist."

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

More debates! Mark your calendars. April 16th on ABC and April 19th on CBS, Pennsylvania and North Carolina respectively.

Hatch, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

It's also trivializing otherwise heavyweight Democratic contenders. The race is degenerating into "So-and-so is a racist," "So-and-so is a sexist," "It's wrong to play the race card and call me a racist," and "It's wrong to play the gender card and call me a sexist."

-- Daniel, Esq., Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:12 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

both race and gender cards were played by hillary

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I do not deny it.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

not that the gender 'card' didnt have some truth to it, just saying

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Mark your calendars.

NO

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll watch the ABC one if Charlie Gibson does it again. I'm not terribly interested in watching Katie Couric do the one on CBS, though, if that's the case.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

The race has also devolved into "denounce" and "fire".

Let's give Kurt Loder a debate.

Eazy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

A friend sent HRC's interview this morning with NPR's Steve Inskeep. "She's a very convincing liar," she wrote.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://cache.opt.fimserve.com/contents/772/38/38772/Tshirt_retrobama_sd_728x90.gif

DECISION 2008

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

snarrrrrrky.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/news/2008/03/obama_campaign_skewers_clinton.html

BleepBot, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

this makes them look awful, why would they send out something like this?

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think it makes them look bad at all - the more they harp on the fact that Obama's won more delegates, more states, and more votes the less traction Hillary's non-stop re-framing effort looks like the pathetic narcissism that it is.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think it makes them look bad at all - the more they harp on the fact that Obama's won more delegates, more states, and more votes the less traction more Hillary's non-stop re-framing effort looks like the pathetic narcissism that it is.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

the other thing is a memo like this isn't exactly aiming at 'the people' - its aiming at journalists/people who are framing this argument. if you think the people voting in PA are avidly reading press releases linked on thepage you're kidding yrself.

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Matt Bai's executive summary of candidate demos with nice graph

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know, personally I think sending out emails to the press that read like dailykos comments isn't a good look, but maybe voters won't feel the same way. wasn't obama supposed to civil and inclusive or something?

xxpost yeah there are different audiences but I can't believe it's possible to send out something this obnoxious and petty and simultaneously present yourself as an inspiring voice of change.

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

uh, people are moody

HI DERE, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

I think this is a great example of the generational divide between the two campaigns. This is the off the cuff, casual, twitter style commentary that is the main mode of communication in "Web 2.0" It seems like one of my friends could have written it!

Sent by Patrick

^^ this is the first thing i thought of while reading this

(except i thought it in a considerably less herb-ish tone)

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

also in my head i did not say 'web 2.0' or 'twitter-style'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

HOOS you have a 'zing me' sticker on your back

deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Great response email by Obama. There's snark in it, but not the kind that will justify HRC getting indignant about it. And, after all, her campaign's initial email was hard-hitting and snide toward / dismissive of Obama's campaign.

Fight fire with fire.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't believe it's possible to send out something this obnoxious and petty and simultaneously present yourself as an inspiring voice of change.

Except that humor plays well than anger. It implies that he's ahead, that he's comfortable, and in charge. It also helps put the lie to her spin that she's got more experience; if they can counter her manipulations without looking too frustrated, HRC will be the one looking desperate.

Shakey, basically OTM

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

This is the off the cuff, casual, twitter style commentary that is the main mode of communication in "Web 2.0" It seems like one of my friends could have written it!

Yeah exactly. Is America really ready for a president who tweets?

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

even over Clinton

LOL

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway--I'm not really saying this is going to hurt his campaign in a significant way, just that it's absolutely painful to read.

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:17 (sixteen years ago) link

get that checked out

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Except that humor plays well than anger.

It's not really humor tho, just that exaggeratedly sarcastic "LOL yr argument is so stupid it's just funny to me!!!" tone that people adopt in message board arguments to hide their keyboard-destroying rage.

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

HOOS you have a 'zing me' sticker on your back

-- deej, Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:13 PM

yeah hence the 'distance myself' followup

where my surrogates at

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

that tone is called "glee," xp

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

no it's not

31g, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not really humor tho, just that exaggeratedly sarcastic "LOL yr argument is so stupid it's just funny to me!!!" tone that people adopt in message board arguments to hide their keyboard-destroying rage.

I didn't read it that way. I read it very much like the Obama campaign has generally played it. He's got a wry sense of humor that appeals, I think, and it's not as if the responses don't attempt to refute HRC's points.

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i like you, hoos

so does deej he's just shy

deeznuts, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The thing is I think they would make a wonderful ticket, with Obama as President. All their best and worst qualities matched!

youn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

That's just a reflection of personality, not of intelligence or ability.

youn, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think either one of them will ever be veep to the other and I frankly don't think it's the best ge strategy, but as his veep, I can see Obama at times say to his staffers re: HRC, "Release the hounds!"

Michael White, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL

gabbneb, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 13 March 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought the annotated email response thing was great!

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 14 March 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

y'all are getting really fragile if you think that Obama campaign response above is going to hurt him at all.

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 14 March 2008 01:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i like you, hoos

so does deej he's just shy

-- deeznuts, Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:22 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

ha not at all, hoos is the man. i just thought the 'my inner monologue was cooler than his' sentiments were ripe for zingin

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

both race and gender cards were played by hillary

-- deej, Thursday, 13 March 2008 21:26 (Yesterday) Link

Every time you say this, you play the "deej" card.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

honest assessment of the candidates?

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

breaking news: even my Hillary-supporting wife has now switched over to Obama. Even she now thinks Hillary wants to win at all costs. Which makes me feel a little tired of trying to be a cap'n-save-a-hillary Obama supporter.

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 02:55 (sixteen years ago) link

What finally pushed her away from HRC?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 14 March 2008 02:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it was something she heard Hillary say about why the Michigan primary should count. She got the feeling from it that Hillary had an inadequate sense of fairness.

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:02 (sixteen years ago) link

that was the proverbial straw, anyway

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:03 (sixteen years ago) link

y'all are getting really fragile if you think that Obama campaign response above is going to hurt him at all.

really struck me as a digital-age War Room type thing

it's not one news cycle per day anymore, they wanted to get their zings in before a story based on that Clinton email was even posted on the web

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. I loved it

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

dmr = http://www.cas.com/uploadfiles/Logos/logo_nabisco.gif

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 05:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Audio interview where Hillary claims she didn't say McCain is more qualified than Obama + YouTube clip where Hillary says McCain is more qualified than Obama:

http://donklephant.com/2008/03/13/clinton-claims-she-didnt-say-mccain-is-more-qualified-than-obama/

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 07:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Boy, the internet sure does suck, doesn't it, Hillary?

Here you are caught lying about Michigan:
http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/13/11136/3289/192/475758

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 07:31 (sixteen years ago) link

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120545277093135111.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

here we go folks

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:02 (sixteen years ago) link

"gave the sermon at the school's Andrew Rankin Memorial Chapel in Washington on Jan. 15, 2006"

??? why now?

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Is this a "hooray, our background digging team FINALLY found some indirect crap on him" moment?

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:13 (sixteen years ago) link

That WSJ thing is CRAP (and written by some neocon). Denouncing Wright as 'paranoid' is just inappropriate armchair psychology, but also classic establishment tactic to avoid substantive issues aka "teacher, he swore."

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:25 (sixteen years ago) link

"Mr. Obama's Trinity United Church of Christ" makes it look like he owns the place, too.

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Mr. Kessler, a former Wall Street Journal and Washington Post reporter, is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com

gabbneb, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Ruddy, who serves as editor-in-chief, describes Newsmax.com as "the leading independent online news site with a conservative perspective."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsmax

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Inside The Desperate Race To Stop The Next Attack

http://www.ronaldkessler.com/

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 12:51 (sixteen years ago) link

It's a pretty clumsy attempt to portray a bombastic preacher and local community figure into some sort of black Rasputin (i.e. Obama got his book's title from him, he's been Obama's mentor, Obama prayed with him before he announced his candidacy).

The closing graph that says "it raises legitimate questions" is the partisan newsroom equivalent of "hey, i'm not sayin', i'm just sayin'"

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, so he ISN'T a muslim after all?

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:01 (sixteen years ago) link

NYTimes has a much more interesting piece on Obama's momma:

Kansas was merely a way station in her childhood, wheeling westward in the slipstream of her furniture-salesman father. In Hawaii, she married an African student at age 18. Then she married an Indonesian, moved to Jakarta, became an anthropologist, wrote an 800-page dissertation on peasant blacksmithing in Java, worked for the Ford Foundation, championed women’s work and helped bring microcredit to the world’s poor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/us/politics/14obama.html

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:03 (sixteen years ago) link

ObamaMama ought to inspire feminists x1000000 more than HRC does.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I have to admit I didn't know his mom's name was Stanley Ann.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:16 (sixteen years ago) link

suzy8080

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Mr. Kessler, a former Wall Street Journal and Washington Post reporter, is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com

No relation!

Nicole, Friday, 14 March 2008 13:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Boston Globe examines Clinton's claim of credit for SCHIP, discovers that the drafting legislators say that the Clinton White House initially opposed the measure:

In campaign speeches, Clinton describes the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, as an initiative "I helped to start." Addressing Iowa voters in November, Clinton said, "in 1997, I joined forces with members of Congress and we passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program." Clinton regularly cites the number of children in each state who are covered by the program, and mothers of sick children have appeared at Clinton campaign rallies to thank her.

But the Clinton White House, while supportive of the idea of expanding children's health, fought the first SCHIP effort, spearheaded by Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, and Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, because of fears that it would derail a bigger budget bill. And several current and former lawmakers and staff said Hillary Clinton had no role in helping to write the congressional legislation, which grew out of a similar program approved in Massachusetts in 1996.

"The White House wasn't for it. We really roughed them up" in trying to get it approved over the Clinton administration's objections, Hatch said in an interview. "She may have done some advocacy (privately) over at the White House, but I'm not aware of it."

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/14/clinton_role_in_health_program_disputed/

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:16 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNTGRL0OJWQ

(Sean Hannity is an idiot - Colmes & Rev Wright OTM)

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago) link

No relation!

-- Nicole, Friday, March 14, 2008 9:32 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

lol how many ppl still on ilx would even know this? like 3?

and what, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

incl you, fatboy

Dr Morbius, Friday, 14 March 2008 14:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm just paranoid, I guess. Sorry.

Nicole, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:01 (sixteen years ago) link

The closing graph that says "it raises legitimate questions" is the partisan newsroom equivalent of "hey, i'm not sayin', i'm just sayin'"

Should've said raises new and troubling questions.

jaymc, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Nicole, are you related to

a) the guitarist for Interpol?
b) a guy I went to college with (I think he was from Traverse City?) who currently does improv in Portland?

jaymc, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Nope and nope.

I keep checking the detroit newspaper sites to see if there's any word on a new Michigan primary, but they still just have stories about Kwame and the dead stripper.

Nicole, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

are you related to the person I work for who runs the big credit card affinity consulting company in b0st0n?

akm, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Kwame and the dead stripper

For reasons probably related to crapulence and hypocaffeination, this sounds like an ill-conceived children's book title.

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

actually it sounds like a hot97 news item

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.njs4ever.com/images/kme.jpg

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i demand that the next administration somehow make itself 'featuring twista'
-- trife (...), September 10th, 2003 11:15 PM. (simon_tr)

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

:)

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama aide and Bill Clinton's former senior foreign policy advisor reiterates the argument (previously released in an Obama campaign memo) that Hillary is overstating her foreign policy experience in her White House days:

The point that I am making is that her claims of the nature of that experience are overstated. The fact is she did not sit in on national security meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the situation room. She conducted no negotiations. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy. She did not have her own national security staff. That's the fact.

http://nationaljournal.com/onair/transcripts/080314_craig_greg.htm

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

But she was married to someone who did! And Obama wasn't! So there! Ner ner ner ner!

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

and she's white!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

and unmale!

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

And it's really hard to be white, especially with an Ivy League education and your own security team.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Just like Jesse Jackson before her, she wouldn't be where she is now if she wasn't a politician. Just stating the facts.

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

is there an anti-excelsior thread?

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry :-(

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

If Obama were white and didn't have a funny name, he'd be where he is now only with less crazy e-mail forwards going around about him.

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

obviously farrero's a racist dumbass but i do thank that there's something to the notion that his being the first african-american takes some of the shine from her potential to be the first woman ... why feel the obligation of history when you can pick the superior candidate

its still a retarded argument tho, because obviously there are lots of other, more significant reasons why he is where he is

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/031408DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:21 (sixteen years ago) link

hurrah!

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

aw, I'm sorry! I was just being a dick.

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

this weekend's Stupid Controversy will be the Wright nonsense. Limbaugh and The Corner can't shut up about it. Chris Matthews was on "The Today Show" defending Obama today.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Hooray it's looking a bit less Crick & Watson, that poll graf.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

this is getting into primary fanfic territory, but i really want Obama to deliver a message that puts the victim-politics, anti-patriotism, AND funny-name memes to bed: that he <3 America like a son of a bitch because a life like his could not have occurred in any other country

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

it seems clear to me that his candidacy could be and should be a reminder not just of Selma and the triangle trade, but also of Ellis Island, even back to Plymouth Rock -- you know, "we were all slaves, or chance laborers, or refugees, or fortune hunters, or outcast pilgrims" etc. but then, i'm not a racist.

i've been thinking a lot about the identity game in this race, esp concerning older women's identification with HRC. i don't have any clear thought, but i liked both these pieces, about the old/young split w/in feminism:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michelle_goldberg/2008/03/hell_hath_no_fury.html

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080324/valenti

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Dang, a real now-I-feel-old moment: I'm reading the New Yorker profile of Michelle Obama and just realized we graduated high school the same year.

Rock Hardy, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ obv that line of rhetoric i've sketched out is touchy to say the least, and kind of glib w/r/t to the real state of race in this country. but the idea that the extent to which he is not white = the extent to which he is not a 'real american' needs to be taken on.

xp

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

that Goldberg piece is really good - the "feminist = Hillary supporter" axiom reminds me of the similarly flawed "Jew = Israel supporter" fallacy. The presumption involved in both cases irritates the hell out of me.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

If bill is first spouse then presumably as a former president he will be security cleared. I can't get the image out of my head of him wandering into the Situation room in his boxers t-shirt and dressing gown to dispense helpful advice.

Ed, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

possibly at 3am.

Somewhere a phone is rining at the white house, will Bill or Hillary get there first?

Ed, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill's . . . preoccupied.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 14 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

There's a video game in there somewhere.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill could be the Billy Carter of the Clinton II administration, with his own beer and everything.

Ed, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

obviously I am extrapolating here from an image of him lolling around the east wing eating a lot of pork rinds.

Ed, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Bubba Beer

Johnny Fever, Friday, 14 March 2008 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link

one of TPM's readers, on its home page:

The Wright time bomb appears to be detonating, now that the horse race narrative has stalled and the media needs new material. The inadequacy of Obama's response is deeply discouraging. I was very excited about Obama, but I suddenly think Wright is going to deal a death blow to him on the "electibility" front. Michelle Obama's comments and now the man who lead him to Jesus is saying "God Damn America", and all BO can say is "I disagree"? He has to thow him under the bus and then back up over him again, but it does not appear that he will. Not clear it would even help that much, given the depth and length of their relationship. Sad to say, but it's best this happen now rather than in October. As distasteful as her tactics have been, I suddenly think we may be better off in November with Hillary. Wright is cancer.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^bullshit

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

this will all blow over in a few weeks

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

it's going to come back in the GE.

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

He's got a tough decision to make about what to say, but I don't think he's said enough.

Hurting 2, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

first of all, it doesn't fit into a larger narrative ("wait, I thought he was a muslim!" etc). secondly, the guy serves no role in Obama's campaign nor is he a policy advisor or anything like that. third, there's no scandal, no wrongdoing, no conflict of interest, etc. just a "crazy guy" saying "crazy things". Politicians ALWAYS have supporters that mouth off irresponsibly (any number of examples on the religious right; Ferraro haha; etc.) All he has to do is put a little distance between himself and Wright and wait for it to blow over. This thing has no legs.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

(many xps)

that's what's so irritating about the ferraro flap: she said "ppl only like this guy because he's black."

1st response: that's offensive.

2nd response: that's not actually true at all.

3rd and most important response: wait a minute, geraldine, your position only makes sense if you think HRC is better purely on those kinds of identity grounds -- you think we have a chance to elect a (platonic) WOMAN and its being ruined by an attempt to elect a (platonic) BLACK MAN! and this basic "facial" contest is actually more important than comparing what they offer on the merits, or how they've campaigned, or what their records show on women's issues or any other kind of issues.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, here's what McCain's people are saying re. Wright, here on MSNBC:

Joe: So this isn't an issue for John McCain.

Charlie Black: I don't think Sen. McCain wants to get in the middle of a discussion about Sen. Obama's former pastor, or his faith. He believes that people who endorse you, people who befriend you, are entitled to their own views, but you are not personally held accountable. That when someone endorses you or befriends you, they are embracing your views - the candidate's views - not the other way around.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

well, he's on Obama's "African American Religious Leadership Council" - which just seems like a formaility to me but whatever. People on huffpo are acting like he's a senior advisor or on his finance comittee or something.

And really, I think McCain's pastor's comments are far more troubling. "Islam must be destroyed?"But I guess thats a more popular sentiment than black nationalism in America today.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

(btw here are some responses to Valenti's nation article i linked to above:

http://www.thenation.com/bletters/20080324/valenti

i know which ones sound thoughtful and which ones sound depressing to me, but yknow, i'm biased)

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

the fact that Wright is retiring (this month? next?) should help I think

I think it's understandable that Obama doesn't want to stab the guy in the back on his way out the door after a long career and I expect (hope) he will distance himself a little bit in the next few months

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Charlie Black: I don't think Sen. McCain wants to get in the middle of a discussion about Sen. Obama's former pastor, or his faith. He believes that people who endorse you, people who befriend you, are entitled to their own views, but you are not personally held accountable. That when someone endorses you or befriends you, they are embracing your views - the candidate's views - not the other way around.

that may be what they're saying in public but according to The Note the McCain campaign was emailing around that Newsmax WSJ story this morning

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i think that TPM reader is a bit off, but i do think the wright stuff isn't going to go away very easily.

sure, it cancels out the muslim rumor because it draws attention to his church, but it certainly plays well into 1.) the bogus obama-anti-patriot-anti-america narrative. sure, all those things of that narrative on their own are meaningless (the flag lapel pin, etc.), but presented altogether, it's a decent smear that might get a lot of ground; 2.) it also takes one of obama's appeals - the call to move bast bitter race antagonisms - and challenges it (wright as "angry black man", etc).

(obviously i don't buy into any of these bogus narratives, but i think some of this stuff will come back to haunt him)

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Charlie Black: I don't think Sen. McCain wants to get in the middle of a discussion about Sen. Obama's former pastor, or his faith. He believes that people who endorse you, people who befriend you, are entitled to their own views, but you are not personally held accountable. That when someone endorses you or befriends you, they are embracing your views - the candidate's views - not the other way around.

-- suzy, Friday, March 14, 2008 6:07 PM

Yeah I think homie doesn't wanna get into the "whose endorser said more offensive shit" contest. Hagee is a fuckwit he hasn't even made an effort to distance himself from.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:16 (sixteen years ago) link

He has to thow him under the bus and then back up over him again

This is exactly what he must NOT do if he wishes to retain his appeal. The punitive one-upsmanship fed by cynical media and demagogic populism in this country is revolting. We are or should be smart enought to criticize some of Wright's more egregious statements without demonizing him or tossing the baby out with the bathwater and if Obama stoops to the level of Bush or Clinton, it will lessen his appeal.

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

multi-x-post (is there any other kind?)

There doesn't need to fit into a larger narrative, because competing narratives can always be floated by surrogates outside the campaign. This isn't as effective as having it in the stump speech and repeated endlessly, but a competing "scandal" narrative can be picked up by the press, get legs, and do a fairish amount of harm among the undecided.

Most presidential campaigns will find a way to get every scrap of bad news about their opponent into the media by some avenue. If they can't make it stick, they'll just drop it and go for the next mafia-hit piece to see if it does any better.

Aimless, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

the fact that Wright is retiring (this month? next?) should help I think

He retired in February.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Why are people so offended by what he said? Maybe some of you could give some insight - it all seems perfectly rational to me. I guess the "gov't created AIDS to kill off the black man" conspiracy theory type stuff can be pretty off-putting, but it's not like he's the first person to ever say this. And it really isn't that farfetched! The whole "gov't planted crack in black neigborhoods and funded drug trafficking" .. um, this is pretty much historical fact, no? "God Damn America", taken out of context, is pretty inflammatory and offensive I suppose, but in the context of his sermon it makes sense - even if you don't agree. American foreign policy in the mid-east and support of Israel's (illegal) occupation leads to terrorist attacks on american soil! Blowback! None of this is radical, it isn't a stretch at all. We were not attacked by "evil men who hate our freedom" (they are evil, yes, but there is more to it than cultural differences). No one is blaming the 9/11 victims for 9/11, that would be absurd...

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The whole "gov't planted crack in black neigborhoods and funded drug trafficking" .. um, this is pretty much historical fact, no?

Planting crack in black neighborhoods is a fact?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah I think homie doesn't wanna get into the "whose endorser said more offensive shit" contest.

^^^OTM

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I knew this would become an "issue" - obviously Obama has to appeal to everyone and Wright's views aren't exactly mainstream, therefore he's a liability - but I'm still kind of taken aback by how people are reacting to this.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Planting crack in black neighborhoods is a fact?

Yes - see SJ Mercury News investigative journalism pieces in the early- mid-90s with direct evidence of the CIA importing heroin into LA

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(er not heroin, CRACK)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(CIA heroin stuff happened in the 70s in the Bay Area - shipping heroin back to the US from 'Nam)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll check it out.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm trying to find the info for you.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

do you have any links? Not because I doubt you – my mom called last night shouting OMIGOD CRAZY BLACK MAN SPEWING CONSPIRACY NONSENSE.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Webb's Dark Alliance article series

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

and the whole AIDS thing, I mean have you heard of the Tuskegee Experiment? The Gov't purposely infecting black people with Syphillis?

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

He retired in February.

huh! so much for that theory. I think I must have read the "retiring next month" bit in a story that came out in January when Wright first said the Bill Clinton comments

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago) link

sad fact: a lot of people have a hard time understanding why black people may not have a wholly positive outlook on the united states!

i agree that this is a serious political problem for Obama, and he has to figure out a way to minimize it. i'd like to give every american a 'history of race in america' class but that isn't going to do it, i'm afraid.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

But conservative evangelical leaders can say that 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina were divine retribution for the immorality of New York and New Orleans, respectively?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

and the whole AIDS thing, I mean have you heard of the Tuskegee Experiment? The Gov't purposely infecting black people with Syphillis?

The rumor and fantasy are starting to fly fast and furious here. It's a long stretch from the Tuskegee Experiment (which didn't infect anyone with syphilis, it involved not treating syphilis) to the idea that the government created AIDS.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

FYI the San Jose Mercury News retracted a lot of Webb's reporting and backed away from the stories under heavy pressure. doesn't mean it was all not true, but just saying. I don't really know the whole backstory behind it.

dmr, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not passing it off as fact, I'm just saying that it isn't farfetched when you take history into account.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:30 (sixteen years ago) link

and the whole AIDS thing, I mean have you heard of the Tuskegee Experiment? The Gov't purposely infecting black people with Syphillis?

Yeah, this I knew.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't personally believe it but I can see why some people would

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

He has to thow him under the bus and then back up over him again

___________________________________

This is exactly what he must NOT do if he wishes to retain his appeal.

This back-and-forth is a good illustration of the box Obama is in because of Wright's comments.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 14 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not passing it off as fact, I'm just saying that it isn't farfetched when you take history into account.

I think it is farfetched.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

whatever

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Some Webb/San Jose Mercury News postscript info: http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0818-33.htm

Sara Sara Sara, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, this I knew.

Government never infected anyone with syphilis:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_experiment

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I think what Obama's campaign could do is push exposure of Rev. Wright's more positive, uplifting sermons (which, I am certain, eclipse the negative, conspiratorial ones in number by a huge proportion) and push exposure of Sen. Obama's own speeches made to church congregations.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

o. nate, i hope you're not implying that not treating syphilis is somehow more defensible than deliberate infection.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

He's not implying that at all, dude.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

fair enough. but i think it's pretty fruitless toil to examine all of the claims made by rev. wright for verifiability, as none of that is going to reduce the controversy. the larger theme -- that african americans in this country still face systematic & institutional oppression in addition to quotidian, interpersonal bigotry -- is really the more important theme here.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

elmotm

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Q: I don't know if you've seen it, but it's all over the wire today (from an ABC News story), a statement that your pastor (the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's South Side) made in a sermon in 2003 that instead of singing "God Bless America," black people should sing a song essentially saying "God Damn America."

A: I haven't seen the line. This is a pastor who is on the brink of retirement who in the past has made some controversial statements. I profoundly disagree with some of these statements.

Q: What about this particular statement?

A: Obviously, I disagree with that. Here is what happens when you just cherry-pick statements from a guy who had a 40-year career as a pastor. There are times when people say things that are just wrong. But I think it's important to judge me on what I've said in the past and what I believe.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/14/jeremiah-wright-obamas-_n_91555.html

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

"anyone who believes that african americans do not face institutional oppression should be reminded of the efforts to disenfranchise black voters in florida in the 2000 elections"

^^ proposed 2-for-1 wright/florida talking point for obama

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I totally agree elmo (lol). My question is - why does that offend people? Is it just the way he said it? Do they not want to face the (obvious) truth? This whole idea of "race doesn't matter/ we are all Americans" is fine and dandy, and it would be nice of that were the case.. but it really isn't. Obviously. Right?

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

wait, why is everyone giving o. nate a pass?

i dont think its paranoid for many black americans to be suspicious of the origins of AIDS when it 1. disproportionately affects the african-american community and 2. its a well-known fact that the american gov't had experiments where they sat in a lab watching people suffer from syphilis untreated.

sorry that i don't see 'infecting with syphilis' and 'not treating syphilis' as being all that different, but they're not

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

and its not like the tuskegee experiment, which happened in some of yr parents' lifetimes btw, is some isolated incident

i dont think its good to encourage the idea that AIDS was a government conspiracy but no, its not all that farfetched

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Perhaps we should move the government created AIDS conspiracy theories to another thread.

If Rev. Wright had simply said "African Americans face discrimination", there would be no controversy. Trying to equate his more outlandish statements with that uncontroversial statement is deliberately missing the point.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

"race doesn't matter/ we are all Americans"

The fudge here is that some folks will hear it that way and other people will hear it more as nationalism trumps racial differences.

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

o. nate, what is the "point," in your opinion?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

The point is, is Obama doing enough to distance himself from Wright's statements?

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

no, i mean -- what is the "point" of rev. wrights statements?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I have no idea what his point was.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

if you mean that in terms of 'in order to win the election,' no i dont think he is and i imagine his advisers agree and will presumably do something about it at some point now that this is a media firestorm

if you really think he should HAVE to 'distance' himself from them, i think thats nuts; all he SHOULD have to do is say 'yeah AIDS probably not a conspiracy, although i understand why ...' blah blah blah but of course thats no politically feasible because we live in a country with a large number of goofballs

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

NEWS FLASH: AMERICA HAS PERPETRATED VILE, INDEFENSIBLE ACTS AGAINST ITS OWN CITIZENS.

LATE UPDATE: AMERICANS ARE FUCKING AMNESIACS.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Sure, it has. See also: every other government that has ever existed.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Government violated basic Hippocratic oath principles with Tuskegee, however. People probably don't wanna hear about smallpox blankets either.

The problem with explaining institutionalized racism to LMC whites is they always feel like you're calling *them* bigots rather than engaging with why black people might feel badly treated 140+ years after the end of the Civil War. They reason since they're not being discriminatory to the best of their knowledge, that there should not be a problem. See also 'Michelle Obama is lucky/should be grateful' meme.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Sure, it has. See also: every other government that has ever existed.

-- o. nate, Friday, March 14, 2008 2:03 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

yet you think its farfetched that it would happen again?

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

fair enough. but i think it's pretty fruitless toil to examine all of the claims made by rev. wright for verifiability, as none of that is going to reduce the controversy. the larger theme -- that african americans in this country still face systematic & institutional oppression in addition to quotidian, interpersonal bigotry -- is really the more important theme here.

I can't get on board here. This kind of reasoning was tossed around when Fahrenheit 9-11 was released – "Oh, sure, Moore included a few outright lies but THE WAR WAS STILL A MISTAKE." Dude, you can say the war was a terrible calamity without resorting to Moore's distortions.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

yet you think its farfetched that it would happen again?

I think it is farfetched that AIDS was created by the government.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

o. nate, i don't know if you're being deliberately obtuse or what, but calling attention to the fact that America has done WRONG SHIT and continues to do so doesn't make you a traitor. The mindset behind those calling for Rev. Wright's head is "MY COUNTRY, RIGHT OR WRONG," and that anyone who reminds us of our inglorious past must hate America.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno, it was pretty easy to get stuff past Reagan.

But really, can we relocate all this conspiratorial discussion to a different thread? I've got a headache from rolling my eyes so much.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

what about an american president, revered by conservatives who will be voting for mccain, who said in his official memoirs that he wondered if aids was a punishment sent from god?

and what, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

proposing that America can learn from past misdeeds and transcend the dark chapters of its own history -- that America can fulfill its promise DESPITE its history -- this is the idea I find simultaneously more pragmatic and more hopeful.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

i look forward to lots of federal incidents surrounding right-wing backwoods secessionist nutjobs during the obama administration

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I think lineage of how AIDS spread from Africa is quite clear to scientists these days, and its first known victims weren't American at all.

Tuomas, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it is farfetched that AIDS was created by the government.

-- o. nate, Friday, March 14, 2008 2:07 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

i dont think its 'farfetched,' i think its wrong
i think its understandable, based on past evidence, why some people might not see it as being farfetched

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I agree with both of those points.

Tuomas, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

shirts and skins

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:32 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.janeelliott.com/

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF her videos are all $295 each!

Johnny Fever, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.yourdailymedia.com/i/u/N85REtHR.jpg

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Educational videos are always crazy expensive. xp

Nicole, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think its 'farfetched,' i think its wrong

OK, this is some serious semantic hair-splitting.

Anyway, I do think Obama has to be very careful about how he responds to this Wright stuff. It's particularly dangerous for him because he still remains largely a blank slate to a lot of people, and things like this run the risk of defining him.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

'incorrect' and 'inconceivable' are not synonyms, buddy.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

just to be able to mention "Farrakhan", "Nation of Islam", "militant black", and "Barak Obama", in the same sentence over and over again, like neocons did with "Iraq", "Saddam Hussein", "Osama bin Laden", and "9/11", is enough to make an impression on people whose opinions are based on impressions formed from snippets of news shows, newspaper headlines, and other methods of disseminated 'knowledge' (who i believe make up the majority of people, as cynical as that may be).

i'm not sure how important those types of people are to who gets elected in 2008, but this seems like one of those news stories that has the potential to enter the sort of national consciousness that is the basis for Jay Leno jokes, SNL bits, and water cooler conversations. if that happens; i think Obama is finished.

rockapads, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i think you need to calm down. it's serious but not fatal. it will hurt him in pennsylvania but he has the time to make it up, and i think that's doable.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha now suddenly it's the obama foax who are like "everybody just stay calm"!!!!!!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

nah im still freaked

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

but im glad you're proud that hillary's managed to make him as unelectable as she is

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

do you ever stop being an asshole???

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

haha you like it dont lie

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

good work extrapolating the opinions of millions from a single post on the internet, tracer, your insight is blinding.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

well you're the one gloating about this whole thing (xpost)

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link

shirts and skins 

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

camp HRC didn't 'make' the wright thing. but coming after farrakhan, power, and ferraro, it's another link in a pretty depressing chain of competitive umbrage-taking, that (SAY IT LOUD) camp HRC has been ready willing and able to play with... god can't wait for this to be finished.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

it is amazing how tribes can ascribe motive to neutral statements

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

gff that's an admirable job of almost finding a way to make wright's past statements "another" example of hillary clinton "playing the race card"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

you must be so glad the shit you are full of doesn't stink.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:21 (sixteen years ago) link

the most inflammatory wright stuff is in no way justifiable by obama (despite the strenuous efforts here to do just that!) but using it as some kind of proof that obama's got "problems" or whatever is horsesh*t, as i've already said quite clearly on this thread -- i am not gloating about this in the slightest, it makes me sad and angry that the words of probably a pretty good guy are getting chopped and twisted in order to smear obama

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

are you kidding? i don't think the wright flap has anything to do with HRC! and i said so! i'm depressed, equally depressed, you might say, that the campaign has descended into a contest of whose personal miseries and offenses are worse and who needs to apologize for what and how deeply. i don't think it does anyone any favors going forward and it's just gloomy to sit through.

but yes i think the farrakhan and ferraro incidents are creepier and much harder to excuse. wright may be more damaging in the long run, however.

xps

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

The media went digging after Wright because they sensed a bit of a story there, regardless of who is assisted by it in the campaign. The real winners are various media companies because people are tuning it in, hence ratings value, hence more viewers/page impressions/listeners, whoa nelly more expensive advertising results. Please remember that above all else Election 2008 has gripped the US and the world well beyond the two before it; the audience is massive and keeping all these balls in the air makes it stay that way.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

saxomous (11 minutes ago):
I was an Obama supporter until this morning when I saw all of this.
I will not vote for a man whose pastor for 20 years, who married him, and baptized his kids acts like this.
Who knows what Obama has in the back of his mind, and how much anti-american hatred the Obamas have.
I was ready for change, I had hope...
and now its all gone because Barack Obama is no better than Clinton.
SHAME ON YOU OBAMA
God Damn America
How bout God Damn you asshole.

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Veltanschaung (17 minutes ago):
Don't tell us this is the Church in which Barack an Michelle got married in?! He got title 'Audacity of Hope' from this "priest of Hate"! Incredible! This "hatemonger Priest" is the OBAMAS' SPIRITUAL ADVISOR?!!!!!

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

ajrep (41 minutes ago)
The blacks in this country need to shut the hell up and get back to work before NO ONE likes your sorry, whining, lazy ass. Racism in America as we knoiw it is mainly coming from the blacks!! Get over it. No one owes you anything you hate mongers.
Bombeni (47 minutes ago)
Well, Obama you are going down. It's official. You played plenty of American dupes but I had your racist muslim anti-American ass pegged from day one. Yeah that's right.

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

http://wonkette.com/368112/barack-hillary-agree-to-be-nicer

Read comments, lolz

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

it's another link in a pretty depressing chain of competitive umbrage-taking, that (SAY IT LOUD) camp HRC has been ready willing and able to play with

that's why i said "almost", gff

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

the difference between you and me elmo, is that you are playing a tribal game - a game of shirts and skins, where everything "they" say and do is proof of their evilness, and everything your guy says is proof that he is indeed the true honest one - i am not playing that game

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

it makes me sad and angry that the words of probably a pretty good guy are getting chopped and twisted in order to smear obama

OTM. I'm fully confident that Rev. Wright is actually a pretty stand-up guy, and I think it's part of the job description of any preacher worth his robes to occasionally unleash a few WTF eye-rollers. Sad how it will be used though.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej, those are shills.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

It's refreshing to see that stupid ass shit pushed by the likes of WSJ and Fox hasn't caused the Demopcratic electorate to turn on each other and unsheath theior knives, at least, eh?

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks for telling me about my own opinion, prick.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:29 (sixteen years ago) link

welcome to the internet!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

What's sad is that McCain's "bomb Iran" song seems to be thought of as just for laffs, while Obama's pastor's comments, which don't involve killing people, aren't thought of as just for laffs.

yay America

Euler, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyway, I do think Obama has to be very careful about how he responds to this Wright stuff. It's particularly dangerous for him because he still remains largely a blank slate to a lot of people, and things like this run the risk of defining him.

this has been said 100000000x about every near-scandal that's hit Obama and he's handled them all gracefully

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

we're doomed i tell you

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the 'uncle who occasionally says crazy stuff' angle is good, 'cause I bet even evangelicals occasionally disagree with their pastor.

Michael White, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

DMX on the presidential race:

Are you following the presidential race?
Not at all.

You’re not? You know there’s a Black guy running, Barack Obama and then there’s Hillary Clinton.
His name is Barack?!

Barack Obama, yeah.
Barack?!

Barack.
What the fuck is a Barack?! Barack Obama. Where he from, Africa?

Yeah, his dad is from Kenya.
Barack Obama?

Yeah.
What the fuck?! That ain’t no fuckin’ name, yo. That ain’t that nigga’s name. You can’t be serious. Barack Obama. Get the fuck outta here.

You’re telling me you haven’t heard about him before.
I ain’t really paying much attention.

I mean, it’s pretty big if a Black…
Wow, Barack! The nigga’s name is Barack. Barack? Nigga named Barack Obama. What the fuck, man?! Is he serious? That ain’t his fuckin’ name. Ima tell this nigga when I see him, “Stop that bullshit. Stop that bullshit” (laughs) “That ain’t your fuckin’ name.” Your momma ain’t name you no damn Barack.

So you’re not following the race. You can’t vote right?
Nope.

Is that why you’re not following it?
No, because it’s just—it doesn’t matter. They’re gonna do what they’re gonna do. It doesn’t really make a difference. These are the last years.

But it would be pretty big if we had a first Black president. That would be huge.
I mean, I guess…. What, they gon’ give a dog a bone? There you go. Ooh, we have a Black president now. They should’ve done that shit a long time ago, we wouldn’t be in the fuckin’ position we in now. With world war coming up right now. They done fucked this shit up then give it to the Black people, “Here you take it. Take my mess.”

Right, exactly.
It’s all a fuckin’ setup. It’s all a setup. All fuckin’ bullshit. All bullshit. I don’t give a fuck about none of that.

We could have a female president also, Hillary Clinton.
I mean, either way it doesn’t matter. I don’t care. No one person is directly affected by which president, you know, so what does it matter.

Yeah, but the country is.
I guess. The president is a puppet anyway. The president don’t make no damn decisions.

The president…they don’t have that much authority basically?
Nah, never.

But Bush pretty much…
You think Bush is making fuckin’ decisions?

He did, yeah, he fucked up the country.
He act like he making decisions. He could barely speak! He could barely fuckin’ speak!
Can’t be serious. He ain’t making no damn decisions.

Well Barack has a good chance of winning so that might be something.
Good for him, good for him.

max, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

tracer, your elitist stance does not excuse you from the same fallacious elisions in logic that you accuse others of indulging and which you yourself have indulged in. and for whatever it's worth, being critical of all sides of an argument does not mean you've transcended it.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

p.s. fuck yourself.

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i think my posting history on these threads shows something better than tribalism.

tracer i also think sticking with above-it-all equanimity is its own kind of tribalist pose -- americans and people all over the world have seen enough evidence to make a decision about this race, even through the media's great cloud of unknowability, as you'd have it.

xp2 MW: yup, mccain can't push this too hard cos he needs Hagee's evangelicals AND those seduced by the whore of babylon in november... talk radio will still have a field day with it.

xp2 ahem.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

DMX for secretary of defense

Euler, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

when i started reading that interview for a second i thought it was someone doing custos

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

holy shit DMX

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

xp haha deej me too

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

So did I.

Nicole, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama respons on HuffPo:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack-obama/on-my-faith-and-my-church_b_91623.html

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

"Your momma ain’t name you no damn Barack."!!!!

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

do you think custos is actually dmx

max, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

you should feel honored that i didnt react the same way to '-- max' that i would to '-- StanM'

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

dmx is bullshitting about dudes name (sorry we cant all be named EARL homie) but this is real talk:

"With world war coming up right now. They done fucked this shit up then give it to the Black people, “Here you take it. Take my mess.”"

and what, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Obama's response in that Huffington Post link; if he can spend the weekend saying that a bunch of times, this could be a net plus, since it emphasizes his Christianity (so it can knock the Muslim rumors out for a while at least).

Plus, he's basically saying that we shouldn't hold a retiring dude's words against him, which is kind of a dig against McCain.

Euler, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost to and what: yeah, I think the Republican kingmakers would actually be kind of happy to lose this one; that's why they stuck it to McCain, instead of someone they really wanted in office (e.g. probably Jeb Bush).

Euler, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

He should've went more in depth about what Rev. Wright teaches, and the good things he's done to uplift the people of his congregation, but overall I think it's a good response.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

+ points for mentioning his military service, lol

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

funny it just occurred to me i have no idea to what church Hillary belongs to or anything.

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

church of the poison mind

Euler, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

haha oh god no way

Through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the Fellowship. Her collaborations with right-wingers such as Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) grow in part from that connection. "A lot of evangelicals would see that as just cynical exploitation," says the Reverend Rob Schenck, a former leader of the militant anti-abortion group Operation Rescue who now ministers to decision makers in Washington. "I don't....there is a real good that is infected in people when they are around Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer."

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html

(article may be tendentious bs, still reading)

(but, you know, LOL)

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

"There is a real good that is infected in people when they are around Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer."

Martin Van Burne, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

i like how he describes Jesus talk as a vector for getting INFECTED BY GOODNESS

xpost haha

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ DMX. i loved it

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

i heard the government infected people with real good

deej, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Actually, I've heard that exposure to low levels of Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer can help you develop an immunity.

Martin Van Burne, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Pat Buchanan: McCain 'will make Cheney look like Gandhi'

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 14 March 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he just means that Cheney's bald.

Martin Van Burne, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

"In an ideal world, I think, people would spend a lot less time parsing remarks by people other than the candidate and then demanding that that candidate disavow them; and more time trying to figure out what we can infer from a candidate's relationship to someone, if we imagine both parties as actual human beings, rather than as walking position papers who relate to each other only via agreement and disagreement on policy."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

When Clinton first came to Washington in 1993, one of her first steps was to join a Bible study group. For the next eight years, she regularly met with a Christian "cell" whose members included Susan Baker, wife of Bush consigliere James Baker; Joanne Kemp, wife of conservative icon Jack Kemp; Eileen Bakke, wife of Dennis Bakke, a leader in the anti-union Christian management movement; and Grace Nelson, the wife of Senator Bill Nelson, a conservative Florida Democrat.

Clinton's prayer group was part of the Fellowship (or "the Family"), a network of sex-segregated cells of political, business, and military leaders dedicated to "spiritual war" on behalf of Christ, many of them recruited at the Fellowship's only public event, the annual National Prayer Breakfast. (Aside from the breakfast, the group has "made a fetish of being invisible," former Republican Senator William Armstrong has said.) The Fellowship believes that the elite win power by the will of God, who uses them for his purposes. Its mission is to help the powerful understand their role in God's plan.

Clinton declined our requests for an interview about her faith, but in Living History, she describes her first encounter with Fellowship leader Doug Coe at a 1993 lunch with her prayer cell at the Cedars, the Fellowship's majestic estate on the Potomac. Coe, she writes, "is a unique presence in Washington: a genuinely loving spiritual mentor and guide to anyone, regardless of party or faith, who wants to deepen his or her relationship with God."

The Fellowship's ideas are essentially a blend of Calvinism and Norman Vincent Peale, the 1960s preacher of positive thinking. It's a cheery faith in the "elect" chosen by a single voter—God—and a devotion to Romans 13:1: "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers....The powers that be are ordained of God." Or, as Coe has put it, "we work with power where we can, build new power where we can't."

gff, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:16 (sixteen years ago) link

That Obama response on Huffington Post is good and quite persuasive when read in full. However, my worry is that this little storm in a teacup won't be decided by long, reasoned arguments and statements of fact - it will be decided by soundbites. Obama needs a strong soundbite to counteract the inevitable YouTube clips. I'm not sure if condemning the statements is going to do it. Sadly, this campaign season has been marked by lots of silly statements that got blown out of proportion and only died down when someone quit the campaign. Now obviously Wright was never in the campaign and he's now retired, so maybe that won't be necessary this time, but it seems like the pattern so far has been that condemning the statements hasn't been enough.

o. nate, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The concept of the Elect = WASP Entitlement 101 xpost

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

In a rare Senate appearance yesterday, McCain failed to attract support for a halt to pork-barrel spending, losing on a 71-29 vote. An angry McCain told voters today that he was only “doing the Lord’s work” but unfortunately was doing it “in the city of Satan”: mccain83.jpg

Later in Springfield, Penn., McCain told voters: “We were voting on major issues of profound consequences with no discussion, no debate and 10 minutes to vote.

“Anyone who had the misfortune of watching it will know how hard it is to do the Lord’s work in the city of Satan,” said McCain, who has served four-terms in the Senate.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

you should feel honored that i didnt react the same way to '-- max' that i would to '-- StanM'

-- deej, Friday, March 14, 2008 9:48 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

?

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.dia.uniroma3.it/~sperduto/images/peace.jpg

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Sure, no problem - I just didn't know.

StanM, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

That Hillary Bible Study is almost as funny as what will happen when they ask her who came to pray with Bill post-Monica.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

He act like he making decisions. He could barely speak! He could barely fuckin’ speak!

uh pot calling the kettle black here

btw DMX is a fucking moron and his music sucks

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

He got blood on his dick cuz he fucked a corpse.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone who had the misfortune of watching it will know how hard it is to do the Lord’s work in the city of Satan,” said McCain, who has served four-terms in the Senate.

lol the reporter sounds quietly incredulous that this man has been in DC so long.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

God hates earmarks?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean, really? Is that in the Bible somewhere?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

God loves earmarks. Ever heard of tithing?

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

btw DMX is a fucking moron and his music sucks

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, March 14, 2008 9:53 PM

lol stfu

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 14 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

eh I never liked him

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

next controversy, plz. this one is already played out.

rockapads, Friday, 14 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

DMX interview could not have come at a better time thank u maxxx <3

gr8080, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama releasing his response through the Huffington Post seems like a good strategy.

Eazy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

He's also going to appear on Olbermann, Hannity & Colmes, and AC360 I think.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

hannity & colmes?!!

and what, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:16 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah this is what I hear.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno if that's such a good idea

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's christian god will surely protect him, much as he protected daniel in the den of lions, amen

elmo argonaut, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he sent it out to a bunch of outlets, not just HuffPo. Some dude on CBN has posted it with "Obama has sent us a statement here" blah blah blah.

Rock Hardy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno if that's such a good idea

it's about time he appeared on one of the wingnut shows! If he's in good form, he'll destroy Hannity as casually as Hitchens did last year.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

HuffPost lists it as "Obama Exclusive", so I would think that any attempt to put credit elsewhere is just to avoid mentioning the site. (This is why it's a neat strategy for Obama: Drudge, for example, never links to Huffington Post.)

Eazy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

ben smith @ politico links to some additional rezko details (not sure how "new" they are) that obama stated in a recent interview. they don't indict him in any wrongdoing, so it didn't really change much about the situation. just perhaps that rezko donated more to his earlier campaigns than was perhaps known:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Your_Friday_Rezko.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-obama-rezkomar15,0,2968927.story

Indicted Chicago businessman Antoin "Tony" Rezko was a more significant fundraiser for presidential candidate Barack Obama's earlier political campaigns than previously known. Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for the first three offices Obama sought, the senator told the Tribune on Friday.

Obama also said for the first time that his private real estate transactions with Rezko involved repeated lapses of judgment. The mistake, Obama said, was not simply that Rezko was under grand jury investigation at the time of their 2005 and 2006 dealings. "The mistake was he had been a contributor and somebody involved in politics," he said.

In an extensive interview that he hoped would quell the lingering controversy over his relationship with Rezko, Obama said that voters concerned about his judgment should view it as "a mistake in not seeing the potential conflicts of interest."

dunno if this will get any traction. but there's likely an obama strategy to getting this out now - along with all the earmark details he released - so that he'll be able to hit clinton harder on the transparency issues, esp. the tax returns, white house papers, etc.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:31 (sixteen years ago) link

oh and jeremiah wright is no longer on the religious council of the campaign.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

As long as he didn't pardon Rezko, he's got one up on the Clintons...

Eazy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

(This is why it's a neat strategy for Obama: Drudge, for example, never links to Huffington Post.)

I don't get why this is a neat strategy at all. Wouldn't you want this message disseminated to as many people as possible, not just people who read liberal blogs?

jaymc, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:35 (sixteen years ago) link

i was wondering the same thing

Mark Clemente, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Because it's news that Fox can't ignore.

Eazy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Apparently MSNBC/CNN and not Fox doing best ratings-wise during the 08 campaign. This might be good background when analyzing who goes after what. As for Drudge, how soon we forget OMG TURBAN PHOTO and Obama people have not.

suzy, Friday, 14 March 2008 23:48 (sixteen years ago) link

lol @ Sean Hannity saying Obama should resign from his senate seat.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

lolololol why

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Because of THE TERRIBLE DISGRACE?

Aimless, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Of his former pastor once saying some stuff!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Greta Van Sustren has an unfortunate face.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

sean hannity should resign from life

deej, Saturday, 15 March 2008 01:54 (sixteen years ago) link

It's kinda great that whenever something goes wrong with his campaign Obama immediately just goes on TV everywhere giving his own take on it rather than just releasing a statement and hoping it'll just go away by the next news cycle. It's somewhat refreshing.

Clay, Saturday, 15 March 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

the 2nd part of his interview on AC360 was amazing.

This whole attempt by people to paint Obama as this "post-racial" figure had bothered me for a while now, because there are still issues that we have to get over as a country and as a people.. his words were very profound.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

great discussion going on on CNN right now.

this kind of needed to happen.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 02:38 (sixteen years ago) link

this fits again:

It may take from now until November to repudiate every supporter or potential supporter who has said or done something regrettable but it will be time well spent.

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 03:30 (sixteen years ago) link

hopefully Obama's pastor is voting for Hillary

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 15 March 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

or McCain

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 15 March 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

is there a joke somewhere in there

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Any link to AC360?

Obama is conducting himself well right now but I'm worried about the blog comments all over the place from shills, freepers and others who don't realise how racist they're being, or are delighting in having a vent for their bigotry. This should make all of us ill. They think Obama is prevaricating somehow, they can't put a finger on why they can't trust him but they're glad to have the perfect excuse not to. I mean, it's all very well for us to say these critics share a communal brain cell and lack a spelling dictionary but they are all coming out of the woodwork at once. RAIIIIIID! What Obama is going through right now is proof that people whites will identify as black still have to work twice as hard for half as much, and are expected to be very grateful for that, if not to personally go around and thank whitey one by one for being so fucking magnanimous. Everyone else who isn't some shade of brown isn't expected to offer more than token thanks to the larger society for achieving things through individual hard work or the institutional assistance all Americans are entitled to.

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 09:19 (sixteen years ago) link

im real worried about this, this shit has some traction
did the obama campaign really not know/think these speeches wouldn't air?

deej, Saturday, 15 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

they did know, everyone who was following this early on knew that eventually this would become big, but I guess they didn't think it would cause THIS MUCH of a reaction. He already "denounced and rejected" some stuff Wright said and tried to distance himself from him way back in 07.

suzy otm, I'll try to find the AC360 vids for you.

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

this whole thing has me really depressed though. maybe I'm too emotionally invested in this thing lol

The Brainwasher, Saturday, 15 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

If this still has the same full head of steam on Monday as it did on Friday, then I'll be worried. Joe Public forgets about politics on the weekend, though.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't worry BW, I found a transcript. I don't think the people who had decided they're for Obama or are Dem ticket voters are going to be abandoning Obama because of this. I think there are enough of these to win in November. But there are hella bigots using this latest controversy as an excuse to express their racial anxiety like the blowhards they are -- and we all know people who are like this. Anyone who's ever been on the wrong end of bullying knows the form, where your oppressor baits you to force a situation where s/he can say you are 'too angry' and therefore haven't 'earned' their tolerance.

I'm pretty comfortable with Wright's speeches and his criticisms of America and I know damn well that Afrocentrism is not a black supremacy movement.

Also good on HuffPoPo yesterday, substance and LOLs: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/orlando-lima/im-not-racist-some-of-m_b_91548.html

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain, at a town hall meeting in this Philadelphia suburb, was asked if he had concerns that anti-American militants in Iraq might ratchet up their activities in Iraq to try to increase casualties in September or October and tip the November election against him.

"Yes, I worry about it," McCain said. "And I know they pay attention because of the intercepts we have of their communications ... The hardest thing in warfare is to counter someone or a group of individuals who are willing to take their own lives in order to take others."

and what, Saturday, 15 March 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf

and what, Saturday, 15 March 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

No, Ethan, it's FUD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

The speech Obama just gave at this rally in Indiana a moment ago re-addressed the Jeremiah Wright issue waaaaaaay better than any of his cable news appearances last night did. I think he may have gotten on top of this after all.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I just saw the clip from "Hannity & Colmes" -- he was as unflappable as ever.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 15 March 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Johnny, the gist was?

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 19:01 (sixteen years ago) link

He made mention of Robert Kennedy speaking to citizens of Indianapolis while standing on the roof of a car, sharing the news of MLK's assassination, telling people this was not the time to fragment and further divide among racial lines, but to come together and lift each other up. He also said that he will not stand for any assumption on anyone's part that the views expressed by his pastor are also his own.

That's what I wanted to see. Not just a rebuke of those things, but a turnaround of the conversation.

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 15 March 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't find a pic of RFK at that announcement, but I did find this, the transcript & audio of the event.

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain, at a town hall meeting in this Philadelphia suburb, was asked if he had concerns that anti-American militants in Iraq might ratchet up their activities in Iraq to try to increase casualties in September or October and tip the November election against him.

Hasn't been one of their lines for like 4-5 years now? Not that such considerations shouldn't be made, but this weird-ass myopic narcissism, that all shit in the world occurs just to affect America & its voting patterns in certain elections.

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^This. But the correct term is not myopia, it's PARANOID NARCISSISM.

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

omg omg i'm sitting in a coffee house in s. minneapolis, never been here before, and mayor rybak (obama's mn campaign chair, i believe) is sitting next to me with a table full of ppl talking convention stuff -- can't really hear what's up but shit is seeeeriouuusssss

gff, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

give her some advice from this thread

max, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

tacos/obama 08

-- jhøshea, Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:26 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Link

max, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

r.t. rybak is a dude lol feminized liberals

gff, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

wait, Minn is going to be where the RNC takes place, right? See if you can snag a pass and worm your way in.

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

how's the dem senate primary going there, anyway?

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

"mayor i'd like to present you with what i'd like to call 'the morbius plan'"

xp ciresi bailed. franken 08! :/

gff, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

We in Oregon also have a GOP senate seat that's being targeted. I've met one of the candidates.

kingfish, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahahaha, Franken. Apparently so obnoxious at my HS they - the district - paid for him to go to Blake by way of expulsion. I have not paid much attention to this one yet.

MN is going to be where the RNC takes place and if you look upthread you will see that one poster is already going for workses and may have AAA pass.

Gff, is K Ellison also there? He is co-chair of MN Obamarama.

suzy, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

no k. ellison; congress is in session so i hope he's keeping busy.

the mayor has left the building. exciting!

gff, Saturday, 15 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6173 of them)

is it time for Thread 3?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 15 March 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Hoos, I think they have to get to 10,000 posts and crash half of ILXors' browsers before anyone does anything that sensible.

suzy, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:01 (sixteen years ago) link

was just thinkin cause the other was locked @ Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7238 of them)

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Only if you call it P2008: OUR MESSAGES, LET US SHOW YOU THEM.

suzy, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:09 (sixteen years ago) link

...if you say that in a Scottish accent it means you've been to the shops and have come back with stuff.

suzy, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11 (sixteen years ago) link

can we call it

MY FRIENDS, THE THIRD 2008 PRIMARIES THREAD

gr8080, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Every time I hear "my friends..." I throw up in my mouth, a little.

suzy, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

can we call it

MY FRIENDS, THE THIRD 2008 PRIMARIES THREAD

-- gr8080, Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:13 AM

^^^^ a hoos likes this idea

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracy Morgan on SNL responding to Tina Fey's Hillary endorsement 3 weeks ago: "Bitch may be the new black, but black is the new president, bitch."

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 16 March 2008 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

ha

kingfish, Sunday, 16 March 2008 04:31 (sixteen years ago) link

The "McCAIN IS OLD" sketch was hilarious.

The Brainwasher, Sunday, 16 March 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

FINALLY! They found something for Darrell Hammond to do this season.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 16 March 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Ad for a Belgian university:

http://i32.tinypic.com/2u7ro00.jpg

StanM, Sunday, 16 March 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's Indiana speech yeseterday.

Eazy, Sunday, 16 March 2008 19:46 (sixteen years ago) link

good shit.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 16 March 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Amid all the righteous noise made about Rev. Jeremiah Wright, it was David Gergen on Anderson Cooper's show who made the most pertinent observation. The veteran GOP operative with bipartisan ties informed the audience that black America is having a different conversation than white America, so one cannot apply the CNN, Fox, or MSNBC framework to African-American concerns.

Gergen's insight came and went with little comment, since the Wright media spasm is largely a white creation. Who cares what those with no political power think? That it took a power broker like Gergen to make this obvious, important point further reveals how fixed our "national dialogue" remains....

I've been pretty hard on the Obama campaign, and still am; but if anything would soften my view, it's this bullshit furor over Jeremiah Wright. If you are white and don't listen to black talk radio, now would be a good time to start. Wright's opinions are not deemed crazy there, and you'll hear much stronger denunciations of imperialism and racism than you ever will on a white liberal's show. Sure, some dementia is present: this is America, after all. But contrast the opinions exchanged between African-Americans to those expressed on the corporate kabuki programs, or worse, white reactionary broadcasts. Which do you think is closer to what's actually going on?

http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2008/03/land-of-chains.html

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 13:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/2ldj2oh.jpg

HAPPY ST PATTYS BITCHES

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:28 (sixteen years ago) link

lol the ups guy was all heres yr obama tshirt

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:28 (sixteen years ago) link

popular delivery that day, was it?

kingfish, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:32 (sixteen years ago) link

kudos you are truly black irish today hooray

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link

from first read @ msnbc:

After releasing all of Obama’s Rezko records and sitting with Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times reporters on Friday, the Obama campaign has upped the ante for Team Clinton. Yesterday, the Obama camp asked Clinton to release all of her tax records, disclose all of her earmarks, and make the donations to the Clinton presidential library and foundation public. The Clinton camp, in response, says Obama should release his tax returns for every year he's been in public office and every earmark he requested as a state senator. The pushback is obvious: try to cloud the lack of disclosure in the Clinton campaign with questions of lack of disclosure on the Obama front. This is the road the Obama campaign clearly wants to go down. The question is whether bareknuckles politics ultimately hurts Obama's image or whether a fight for disclosure brings back the bad news of the Clinton years Democratic voters -- and superdelegates -- might be tired of.

seems so bizarre to me -- The Clinton camp, in response, says Obama should release his tax returns for every year he's been in public office and every earmark he requested as a state senator. i.e. "i'm going to challenge you to do something that i'm extremely reluctant to do myself, take that!!!"

Mark Clemente, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago) link

more interesting stuff from first read:

Clinton’s super problem: By our count, the Clinton campaign hasn’t publicly announced the support of a new superdelegate since just after February 5. Indeed, since Super Tuesday, Obama has gained 47 new superdelegates, while Clinton has lost seven (including Eliot Spitzer). Does Clinton have a bigger problem on the superdelegate front than folks realize? Why do we think party leaders -- who saw the Democrats lose governorships, state legislatures, and the control of Congress during the Clinton years -- suddenly jump on board the Clinton campaign? Isn't this the reason the Clinton campaign has only been able to keep uncommitted supers from climbing board Obama's bandwagon but they haven't been able to woo a new super to their side in a month? ? Isn't this also an explanation for why the Clinton campaign has done so poorly in the caucuses? The caucuses are made up of the activists who follow this stuff closer and think about things like electability and who can help the party keep Congress, etc. If Clinton's not winning over caucus activists, why should we believe she'll win over a large enough chunk of superdelegates to overcome Obama's pledged delegate lead? Ultimately, her best chance is to convince supers that Obama is completely unelectable on par with McGovern, an argument that might have been helped a tad by Rev. Wright.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

And beyond the supers... Heed the Grand Moff Ickes:

A pledged-delegate loophole for Rodham?

After the 1980 battle between Jimmy Carter and Ted Kennedy, her chief strategist Harold Ickes noted, the party changed a rule that required pledged delegates to stick with their candidates no matter what. The current rule, adopted in 1982, states that pledged delegates "shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them." A "good conscience" reason for a delegate to switch, Ickes told NEWSWEEK, would be if one candidate—such as, say, Clinton—was deemed more "electable." If delegates believe she has a better chance in November than Obama, Ickes said, "you bet" that would be a reason to change their vote. (He added, however, that the campaign is "focused" on winning over uncommitted superdelegates "at this point.")

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:51 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/03/17/many_voting_for_clinton_to_boost_gop/

For a party that loves to hate the Clintons, Republican voters have cast an awful lot of ballots lately for Senator Hillary Clinton: About 100,000 GOP loyalists voted for her in Ohio, 119,000 in Texas, and about 38,000 in Mississippi, exit polls show.

StanM, Monday, 17 March 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago) link

IT'S RUSH HOUR

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

sooo both democrats and republicans believe obama to be more electable and he has an insurmountable lead in pledged delegates

hmmmm

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

seems so bizarre to me -- The Clinton camp, in response, says Obama should release his tax returns for every year he's been in public office and every earmark he requested as a state senator. i.e. "i'm going to challenge you to do something that i'm extremely reluctant to do myself, take that!!!"

You've never been married, have you.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

it would not surprise me in the slightest if hillary goes after the pledged delegates (assuming this thing goes to the convention, which i still don't think will happen), but i don't know how successful she'd be. aren't pledged delegates some of the most adamant supporters of the candidate they pledged to support? barring some enormous catastrophe for obama (and no, i don't think wright is going to be that catastrophe, even though he is/will be a problem), i don't see obama's pledged delegates ditching him.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - ha, i haven't been married, no. i know what you mean, we've done similarly hypocritical things in personal relationships. i guess i was saying it's a bizarre move for the campaign because it's just so transparent - hillary's very clearly, very publicly shown reluctance to release her tax returns (it was even asked at one of the debates), so it seems like a weird move to make when it could so easily backfire.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i could be wrong on the backfire, though, as it all depends on how it's portrayed by the media, blah blah.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, it's a silly tactic but so is asking for her papers in the first place. I personally can think of few things I care less about than Hillary Clinton's tax returns.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i25.tinypic.com/2md1dlf.jpg

hahahahahaha

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: I can think of many (like what expatriates think about them?).

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

How exciting for you.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link

didn't she say she's been 'vetted'?

gff, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's gearing up to assault clinton on transparency -- he recently sat down with the hicago Tribune and answered all questions they had regarding his relationship with Rezko, his campaign has released the list of charities where the Rezko contributions went, plus the disclosure of earmarks and tax returns... he's been laying the groundwork for the assault by airing out everything of his that could be brought into question.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Veteran columnist/activist Doug Ireland writing in NY's Gay City News on supporting Obama (w/ eyes wide open):

Half a Cheer for Obama

Bill Clinton's paradigmatic triangulation - at the urging of Dick Morris - which destroyed the social welfare programs inherited from Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson was not only supported by Hillary, but according to George Stephanopoulos' memoir, when Bill wavered Hillary insisted that he go through with it. Obama wrote in one of his books that the Clintons' evisceration of social welfare was the right thing to do, and criticized FDR's New Deal.

While Obama did oppose the war in Iraq from its inception, a politically popular thing to do in his Illinois state senate district, which included the University of Chicago's anti-war campus, and Hillary voted for the war, both have voted numerous times to continue fully funding it - and Obama went to Connecticut to campaign for Joe Lieberman against the primary challenge to his re-nomination by anti-war candidate Ned Lamont.

Both Clinton and Obama support the Constitution-shredding Patriot Act, the endlessly wasteful war on drugs, charter schools (which would destroy public control of public education), the dreadful bureaucratic nightmare that is the No Child Left Behind Act, a Real ID national identity card, and the death penalty.

Both oppose single-payer health care, which is the only real way to achieve universal coverage, and instead favor complicated, Rube Goldberg-like, pro-business schemes that genuflect to the insurance companies and HMOs.

The programmatic affinities of the two candidates reflect just how unsettlingly far to the right the Democratic Party's center of gravity has moved in these last decades....

Five of Hillary's top fundraisers have pled either guilty or no contest to various crimes. For just a taste of Hillary's sleazy frequentations, Google the names of Denise Rich, Peter Paul, and Norman Hsu, or examine the public record of her boodling presidential campaign chairman, the notorious bagman Terry McAuliffe...

But if there is one thing that makes it imperative that Hillary Clinton be defeated, it is the ignoble race-baiting tactics she and her campaign have deployed in this year's primaries and caucuses in order to try to win votes, from false fear-mongering designed to inflame Latinos in Nevada to Bill Clinton's repeated playing of the race card in the run-up to South Carolina... Such stomach-turning cynicism recalls the worst days of Richard Nixon's race-based "Southern Strategy" and the scarcely-coded panderings to prejudice of George Wallace. It must be repudiated, and decisively.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Both Clinton and Obama support the Constitution-shredding Patriot Act, is incorrect, as Obama wasn't in the Senate in 2002.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link

2001, rather.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

He supported the reauthorization of the Patriot Act in 2006.

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on S.2271 - USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Mr. President, four years ago, following one of the most devastating attacks in our nation's history, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act to give our nation's law enforcement the tools they needed to track down terrorists who plot and lurk within our own borders and all over the world - terrorists who, right now, are looking to exploit weaknesses in our laws and our security to carry out even deadlier attacks than we saw on September 11th.

We all agreed that we needed legislation to make it harder for suspected terrorists to go undetected in this country. Americans everywhere wanted that.

But soon after the PATRIOT Act passed, a few years before I ever arrived in the Senate, I began hearing concerns from people of every background and political leaning that this law didn't just provide law enforcement the powers it needed to keep us safe, but powers it didn't need to invade our privacy without cause or suspicion.

Now, at times this issue has tended to degenerate into an "either-or" type of debate. Either we protect our people from terror or we protect our most cherished principles. But that is a false choice. It asks too little of us and assumes too little about America.

Fortunately, last year, the Senate recognized that this was a false choice. We put patriotism before partisanship and engaged in a real, open, and substantive debate about how to fix the PATRIOT Act. And Republicans and Democrats came together to propose sensible improvements to the Act. Unfortunately, the House was resistant to these changes, and that's why we're voting on the compromise before us.

Let me be clear: this compromise is not as good as the Senate version of the bill, nor is it as good as the SAFE Act that I have cosponsored. I suspect the vast majority of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle feel the same way. But, it's still better than what the House originally proposed.

This compromise does modestly improve the PATRIOT Act by strengthening civil liberties protections without sacrificing the tools that law enforcement needs to keep us safe. In this compromise:

We strengthened judicial review of both National Security Letters, the administrative subpoenas used by the FBI, and Section 215 orders, which can be used to obtain medical, financial and other personal records.

We established hard time limits on sneak-and-peak searches and limits on roving wiretaps.

We protected most libraries from being subject to National Security Letters.

We preserved an individual's right to seek counsel and hire an attorney without fearing the FBI's wrath.

And we allowed judicial review of the gag orders that accompany Section 215 searches.

The compromise is far from perfect. I would have liked to see stronger judicial review of National Security Letters and shorter time limits on sneak and peak searches, among other things.

Sen. Feingold has proposed several sensible amendments - that I support - to address these issues. Unfortunately, the Majority Leader is preventing Sen. Feingold from offering these amendments through procedural tactics. That is regrettable because it flies in the face of the bipartisan cooperation that allowed the Senate to pass unanimously its version of the Patriot Act - a version that balanced security and civil liberties, partisanship and patriotism.

The Majority Leader's tactics are even more troubling because we will need to work on a bipartisan basis to address national security challenges in the weeks and months to come. In particular, members on both sides of the aisle will need to take a careful look at President Bush's use of warrantless wiretaps and determine the right balance between protecting our security and safeguarding our civil liberties. This is a complex issue. But only by working together and avoiding election-year politicking will we be able to give our government the necessary tools to wage the war on terror without sacrificing the rule of law.

So, I will be supporting the Patriot Act compromise. But I urge my colleagues to continue working on ways to improve the civil liberties protections in the Patriot Act after it is reauthorized.

I thank the chair and yield the floor.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER POLITICIAN
SAY ONE THING AND BE MISREPRESENTED AS BELIEVING ANOTHER

deej, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

But I urge my colleagues to continue working on ways to improve the civil liberties protections in the Patriot Act after it is reauthorized.

and has that happened, and did he truly think it would?

That's the point, deej -- you can SAY anything...

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah if only he could somehow strongarm everyone into believing what he believes. its almost as if he has to work in a representative democracy with people who disagree, representing people who disagree

deej, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

OK somebody photoshop a wistful Obama's face on Cusack's body holding up that radio, please please please.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

fine deej, YOU WIN; how bout all of Ireland's other points?

(I knew that was comin, TH)

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i28.tinypic.com/fok4fl.jpg

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

YES

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

HELL YES

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Will America hear the music?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah if only he could somehow strongarm everyone into believing what he believes. its almost as if he has to work in a representative democracy with people who disagree, representing people who disagree

-- deej, Monday, March 17, 2008 12:32 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

morbius only participates in democracy as outlined in the bestselling self-help book 'the secret'

and what, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I only participate in democracy as outlined by a mob stoning inbred Southern gangbang nerds.

Love you guys "voting against beliefs" = cleareyed virtue. No wonder THESE ARE GREAT CANDIDATES!

Dr Morbius, Monday, 17 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/03/usa-todaygallup.html?csp=34

........

deej, Monday, 17 March 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I only participate in democracy as outlined by a mob stoning inbred Southern gangbang nerds.

ILEpitaphs

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

heh...The college I work at in PA just sent around a flustered e-mail about the security risk posed by the flood of Obama campaigners showing up on campus.

President Keyes, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

lock up your daughters!

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

How much does it benefit to McCain to get to fly to Iraq and look concerned/Presidential while the Democrats are still giving each other purple nurples?

milo z, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

considering he's there at the same time as Dick Cheney, who's calling the war a 'successful endeavor', and that their travel to the area provides a context in which journos can write up the newest suicide attack... debatable.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

they also get to bring up mccain's "safe stroll through the marketplace" accompanied by gunship helicopters

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/17/obama_plans_speech_on_race_1.html

guess we'll see whether the Wright thing gets put to bed

dmr, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

According to WaPo, Obama's giving a speech tomorrow in PA. About race.

In the comments following the report I saw this, it's part of a larger post:

When Senator Obama's preacher thundered about racism and injustice Obama suffered smear-by-association. But when my late father -- Religious Right leader Francis Schaeffer -- denounced America and even called for the violent overthrow of the US government, he was invited to lunch with presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush, Sr.

Every Sunday thousands of right wing white preachers (following in my father's footsteps) rail against America's sins from tens of thousands of pulpits. They tell us that America is complicit in the "murder of the unborn," has become "Sodom" by coddling gays, and that our public schools are sinful places full of evolutionists and sex educators hell-bent on corrupting children. They say, as my dad often did, that we are, "under the judgment of God." They call America evil and warn of imminent destruction. By comparison Obama's minister's shouted "controversial" comments were mild. All he said was that God should damn America for our racism and violence and that no one had ever used the N-word about Hillary Clinton.

Dad and I were amongst the founders of the Religious right. In the 1970s and 1980s, while Dad and I crisscrossed America denouncing our nation's sins instead of getting in trouble we became darlings of the Republican Party. (This was while I was my father's sidekick before I dropped out of the evangelical movement altogether.) We were rewarded for our "stand" by people such as Congressman Jack Kemp, the Fords, Reagan and the Bush family. The top Republican leadership depended on preachers and agitators like us to energize their rank and file. No one called us un-American.

suzy, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Who is s/he?

Michael White, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/a_last_minute_hurdle_erected_i.php

The proposed primary re-vote legislation in Michigan prevents those who've voted in the Republican primary from voting in the re-vote.

Fair enough, right?

But about 32% of the those who voted in the GOP primary, according to the exit polls, were Democrats or independents.

It's a fair bet that many of them were Obama supporters, as he was not on the original Michigan ballot.

This could be a dealbreaker for the Obama campaign in Michigan.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost Someone called Frank Schaeffer, who I cross referenced in HuffPo, where he contributes. In the WaPo blog post he continues:

My dad's books denouncing America and comparing the USA to Hitler are still best sellers in the "respectable" evangelical community and he's still hailed as a prophet by many Republican leaders. When Mike Huckabee was recently asked by Katie Couric to name one book he'd take with him to a desert island, besides the Bible, he named Dad's Whatever Happened to the Human Race? a book where Dad also compared America to Hitler's Germany.

The hypocrisy of the right denouncing Obama, because of his minister's words, is staggering. They are the same people who argue for the right to "bear arms" as "insurance" to limit government power. They are the same people that (in the early 1980s roared and cheered when I called down damnation on America as "fallen away from God" at their national meetings where I was keynote speaker, including the annual meeting of the ultraconservative Southern Baptist convention, and the religious broadcasters that I addressed.

Today we have a marriage of convenience between the right wing fundamentalists who hate Obama, and the "progressive" Clintons who are playing the race card through their own smear machine. As Jane Smiley writes in the Huffington Post "[The Clinton's] are, indeed, now part of the 'vast right wing conspiracy.' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-smiley/im-already-against-the-n_b_90628.html )

Both the far right Republicans and the stop-at-nothing Clintons are using the "scandal" of Obama's preacher to undermine the first black American candidate with a serious shot at the presidency. Funny thing is, the racist Clinton/Far Right smear machine proves that Obama's minister had a valid point. There is plenty to yell about these days.

suzy, Monday, 17 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

damn i read some schaffer back inna day, never saw the nazi ish. the strain ran through all his work though. didn't know his son had moved left?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

He could have moved left. More importantly, someone pointing out the blindingly obvious about the religious right from his vantage point has to be taken seriously by those he criticizes.

suzy, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

somehow I don't think that's going to happen.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

(ie partisanship trumps logic every time)

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

full transcript of Obama on News Hour here:

http://thepage.time.com/transcript-of-obamas-interview-on-newshour/

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ so sharp

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

dmx speaks out on the presidential race

Are you following the presidential race?
Not at all.

You’re not? You know there’s a Black guy running, Barack Obama and then there’s Hillary Clinton.
His name is Barack?!

Barack Obama, yeah.
Barack?!

Barack.
What the fuck is a Barack?! Barack Obama. Where he from, Africa?

Yeah, his dad is from Kenya.
Barack Obama?

Yeah.
What the fuck?! That ain’t no fuckin’ name, yo. That ain’t that nigga’s name. You can’t be serious. Barack Obama. Get the fuck outta here.

http://www.xxlmag.com/online/?p=20332

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

that fucking guy

HI DERE, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

You’re telling me you haven’t heard about him before.
I ain’t really paying much attention.

I mean, it’s pretty big if a Black…
Wow, Barack! The nigga’s name is Barack. Barack? Nigga named Barack Obama. What the fuck, man?! Is he serious? That ain’t his fuckin’ name. Ima tell this nigga when I see him, “Stop that bullshit. Stop that bullshit” “That ain’t your fuckin’ name.” Your momma ain’t name you no damn Barack.

So you’re not following the race. You can’t vote right?
Nope.

Is that why you’re not following it?
No, because it’s just—it doesn’t matter. They’re gonna do what they’re gonna do. It doesn’t really make a difference. These are the last years.

But it would be pretty big if we had a first Black president. That would be huge.
I mean, I guess…. What, they gon’ give a dog a bone? There you go. Ooh, we have a Black president now. They should’ve done that shit a long time ago, we wouldn’t be in the fuckin’ position we in now. With world war coming up right now. They done fucked this shit up then give it to the Black people, “Here you take it. Take my mess.”

Right, exactly.
It’s all a fuckin’ setup. It’s all a setup. All fuckin’ bullshit. All bullshit. I don’t give a fuck about none of that.

We could have a female president also, Hillary Clinton.
I mean, either way it doesn’t matter. I don’t care. No one person is directly affected by which president, you know, so what does it matter.

Yeah, but the country is.
I guess. The president is a puppet anyway. The president don’t make no damn decisions.

The president…they don’t have that much authority basically?
Nah, never.

But Bush pretty much…
You think Bush is making fuckin’ decisions?

He did, yeah, he fucked up the country.
He act like he making decisions. He could barely speak! He could barely fuckin’ speak!
Can’t be serious. He ain’t making no damn decisions.

Well Barack has a good chance of winning so that might be something.
Good for him, good for him.

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

posted and discussed above

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont read above theyre just gonna do what theyre gonna do i aint really paying mch attention

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:46 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN: NO FLORIDA DO OVER

gr8080, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:48 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz Florida incapable of holding an election

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

oh god so it begins

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

hahahahah bill sez "if dems used the same delegate allocation rules as the republicans, then hillary would be ahead"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

"if hilary had won more votes, then hilary would be ahead"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Bill comes back out of the woodwork = Beginning of the end for Hil

o. nate, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

If Dems used the same rules, Gore would be finishing up his second term.

Eazy, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

if i were in charge dmx would be president

jhøshea, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

DMX/BDP fresh for '08

Eazy, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN: NO FLORIDA DO OVER

Where are you seeing this?

jaymc, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

on CNN

El Tomboto, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

No, I know, there's just nothing on the website right now.

jaymc, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

Michael White, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks.

jaymc, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:34 (sixteen years ago) link

give it up Hillary pt 9 million

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v208/jcoombs/03-17-08_1523.jpg

remy bean, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

uh waht

HI DERE, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

guy at the market told me i was the third person to snap a cell phone pic of that

remy bean, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:48 (sixteen years ago) link

uh why leave it up

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

some weird berkeley free speech thing?

remy bean, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Ask the guy for his fucking Sharpie in the name of free speech plz.

suzy, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

he forgot "bitches"

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

"Sen. Obama holds up his original opposition to the war on the campaign trail, but he didn't start working aggressively to end the war until he started running for president*. So when he had a chance to act on his speech, he chose silence instead," Clinton told an audience at George Washington University.

*vomits blood of murdered children*

dowd, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:58 (sixteen years ago) link

t he didn't start working aggressively to end the war until he started running for president

she's one to talk eh

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously this election has made me hate the Clintons more than I perviously thought possible

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz Bubba "rebutting" Sinbad re: Kosovo trip

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 17 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

xp
Indeed. I was so happy at the start of this campaign - 'two candidates I would vote for!'

But all this makes me question not just Clinton, but half of the Democratic Party too.

dowd, Monday, 17 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm only a "democrat" for the purposes of primary voting. If I lived somewhere with open primaries, I'd never declare party affiliation.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Tracy Morgan on SNL responding to Tina Fey's Hillary endorsement 3 weeks ago: "Bitch may be the new black, but black is the new president, bitch."

-- Johnny Fever, Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:23 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link

SNL hates youtube:

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/play.shtml?mea=229454

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 01:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Hey, Newshour's on!

kingfish, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

If this still has the same full head of steam on Monday as it did on Friday, then I'll be worried. Joe Public forgets about politics on the weekend, though.

-- Johnny Fever, Saturday, March 15, 2008 7:15 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's big speech on wright and the role of race in the campaign going on soon

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Link to live stream please?

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Shakey, I wasn't aware that CNN/Opinion Research Corporation polls were now binding plebiscites.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't watch it as i'm at work but there should be a streaming link @ cnn.com front page

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Found one, there's a shit-ton of American flags and they're waiting.

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, dude filling "airtime" on the cnn stream is sooooooo awful.

en i see kay, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

drudge has the prepared text of the speech up:

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashos.htm

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:43 (sixteen years ago) link

it's on

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link

lol.

Mr. Goodman, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago) link

well, I'd love to audit his constitutional law class.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago) link

that drudge text is really good.

31g, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Faulkner quote! I LOVE YOU OBAMA!!!!!

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

That one's knocked out of the park. I'm so ready for that guy to lead this country.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

lol, he bit a WJC line

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:01 (sixteen years ago) link

It's interesting watching the Corner flail a bit on the speech. Even Lopez only admits to seeing 'nits,' which figures (in that they're trying to overblow them).

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Faulkner quote!

"I'm hard to get, Steve. All you have to do is ask me."

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

This isn't going away, but this is a damn fine attempt at damage control.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

"I'm hard to get, Steve. All you have to do is ask me."

?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago) link

(he helped write the screenplay/it was on tv the other night)

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

oh is that Big Sleep reference? okay gotcha

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:09 (sixteen years ago) link

To Have and Have Not

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

where will Obama "lead" us? No one has a clue. (and I voted for him)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

obama will lead us through the stargate, duh

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn, this is so good.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he knocked that one out of the park

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

The Corner looks flummoxed:

Well there is something honest about that. To be disloyal would be wrong, because it's hard to believe Obama hasn't known for quite a while what Wright was all about. Talking about "bitterness," he's excusing Wright for his extremes ... and he's saying, White folks, meet 'the black community.' We're part of America too, just like my white grandmother who was afraid of black men walking on the street. We're America, and we're coming together through me.
--------------
He's good. And Hillary Clinton saw it coming ... why she's wisely said that a speech isn't an achievement. If "white guilt" votes, Obama just won the nomination. The election is another thing, because Wright is still YouTubed and there is still the 3 A.M. phone call you want McCain, if any of those running, answering.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

is there a stream of this shit that fucking works

fuck cnn

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

here's an entire you tube of the speech:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwj0gLriTnk

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

nice try

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

wow that speech

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF?

The strange thing about this speech is how much better it reads than it sounds. Obama’s speeches are usually the other way around: as written they’re cringe-inducing piles of painfully meaningless platitudes, but Obama gives them passion and cadence and makes them sound great. This speech as written is pretty deft and intelligent; it’s serious and interesting and is about the most effective way available to him to deal with the Wright mess, though it’s still unsuccessful in the end. But as delivered it is amazingly bloodless and dull; part moral hectoring part awkward defensiveness.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

eh he def went for a more sober than usual tone - it seemed totally appropriate

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Afred, is that from the Corner?

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Yup.

Reactions are mixed (Goldberg: "It had some lovely moments and he came across as a remarkably classy and decent guy"; meanwhile K-Lo knows in her heart that only guilty white liberals could feel touched by this piece of oratory).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm not down with "israel's not the problem, radical islam is!"
also not down with "welfare made black people's problems worse"

i guess dude's got to play that game, though

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

regardless of what's actually in his head about such issues

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

let the gross simplifications commence!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm not down with "israel's not the problem, radical islam is!"
also not down with "welfare made black people's problems worse"

I guess I'm that much closer to not casting my meaningless November vote.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

(if tracer's simplifs are accurate)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

but this - freakin bravo:

"But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races."

my hat, were i wearing one, would be off -- a politician who's actually going THROUGH the difficulty instead of around it!!? now i've seen it all

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs, those were points mentioned in passing and hardly the central points of his speech (although I'm not really down with those two points either).

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i think an overlooked landmine lurking in wright's sermons was his condemnations of israel, which could be very easily exploited in the g.e., not necc as anti-semitic but as proof that obama doesn't have the right grounding and framework to lead america internationally, so he's heading this off at the pass

welfare snipes have become de rigeur for democrats, like some penance for the party having once supported generous unemployment benefits, decades ago

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

"israel's not the problem, radical islam is!"

I'm down with this. Israel's not anywhere near blameless, but fuck radical islamists.

Bill Magill, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

He's not talking to Democrats all that much, here, he's talking to the electorate as a whole.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not a Democrat, and he aint talkin to me

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs, did you read or watch the speech?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:57 (sixteen years ago) link

no, he's talking to people who might be skeptical about voting for him, many of whom are Democrats

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

fuckin sweet speech

max, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Great speech. I'm a Democrat, I already voted for him, and I hope to do so again in November.

Bill Magill, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow that speech!

As someone who doesn't know what to fill out for ethnicity on the census (can I just mark "everything"?), this one really hit home.

Euler, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

super-minor quibbles aside (as noted) - this speech is amazing

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

"We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change."

i wonder how whiny pundits will get about this one

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Am I insane to think this speech has somehow managed to net an advantage out of the whole Wright controversy? It was an excellent speech, speaking directly and tolerantly to a deeply uncomfortable issue, and integrated flawlessly into his larger campaign themes. I suppose it depends on how it will play in the media and what clips the news shows pull from it, but I'm optimistic as the initial reactions have been overwhelmingly positive.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Just echoing what everyone else has said - incredibly stunning speech.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Predictable grumbling from the right about how Obama hasn't "transcended" race at all, but none of the Obama guys I know speak of him in transcendent terms.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

(speaking for myself, I got bored in the last few minutes)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

also, nice touch calling his candidacy 'imperfect,' sounding humble but not chastened.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link

wasn't obama's entire point that america itself hasn't transcended race?

xpost

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not a Democrat, and he aint talkin to me

Fair enough, Morbs, but be honest; you subscribe to a fairly minority political point of view in the US and this man wants to get elected.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I noticed Obama's own eyes seemed to glaze as he discussed welfare inequalities, as if he knew he was making a concession; he's much better when he articulates contradictions. In that sense, it's one of the best I've ever head. Rarely do you see a pol who accepts his own paradoxes and expects voters to be adult about it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Fair enough, Morbs, but be honest; you subscribe to a fairly minority political point of view in the US and this man wants to get elected.

I'm not sure I've ever seen Morbs explain what he's for; only who he's against.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

The anecdote at the end about the mustard sanwiches or whatever was a bit bizarre.

I doubt if this speech will make a lot of difference either way. People already impressed with Obama will be even more impressed. People who are not so impressed are probably not at this stage of the game going to be aroused by transcendental calls to unity. For people who think he's 'too black', a speech about race is only going to entrench those feelings, whatever the speech's ultimate message.

Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

That story wasn't bizarre to me. Kids do the damnedest things when financial matters throw their families for a loop.

RW: Pundits be whinin'.

The speech needed to be effective rather than a stunnah, in the 'speak softly so people must pay attention carefully' mode. This it was. Also love the judo move of saying disowning Wright would be akin to disowning black community. Obama/Judo 08

Many of the header links to stories start with 'Obama refuses to disown pastor' but I just got the MomCall (the only reason this is interesting is because she's an avg 63 y/o swing voter with grievances and zero concept of identity politics and they don't post here much). She reckons a) he's out of the woods and b) she doesn't think the GOP will try to restart this if he's the nominee. To the second point: wait! 527s? She also thinks the Clintons are behind every single smear including releasing the Wright bats.

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, I've had enough of the mustard sandwiches, though i'll take them over the cleft palate. the speech will have a big impact on the media. how that impact translates to voters - i.e. how the nets edit and play it - will determine how it impacts voters.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

the flipside is the purchase wingnuts will gain by isolating certain statements and asking what they mean

gabbneb, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

well, hopefully the speech addressed and resolved the wright storyline well enough for the major news outlets to let it drop (until the fall, that is).

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:40 (sixteen years ago) link

the speech will have a big impact on the media. how that impact translates to voters - i.e. how the nets edit and play it - will determine how it impacts voters.

-- gabbneb, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:39 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this^^^^^

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Poll: McCain, Obama, Clinton in dead heat

i'm starting to get sick of this too-close-to-call bullsh1t

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:47 (sixteen years ago) link

via Ambinder: "CBS News is reporting that eight years worth of Hillary Clinton's schedule as First Lady will be released tomorrow by the National Archives."

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

comment there: attempt to draw attention away from Obama's speech?

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah the Wright flap has sucked up her oxygen for a while

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

imna have a mustard relish sandwich right now!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, the mustard sandwich lobby has Obama firmly in their grip

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm starting to get sick of this too-close-to-call bullsh1t

It's a bit suspect that they're taking a "margin of error of 3%" to mean they're dead level.

It would be just as fair to have the 3% error swing the other way and say "Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would both statistically kick Republican John McCain's ass in a general election matchup, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll indicates."

onimo, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

nah, the release of her schedules has been in the pipeline for at least a few weeks as I recall reading about the disclosure of those documents before. no clue as to whether those schedules will be an asset or liability for the clinton campaign, it will probably cut both ways. xxpost

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

8:30 am = Make small talk with Malawi president
8:45 am = Approve ghost-written bits of It Takes a Village
9:30 am = Nap.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

fantastic speech

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

8:30 am = Make small talk with Malawi president
8:45 am = Approve ghost-written bits of It Takes a Village
9:25 am = Phone the Irish, get them to sign peace treaty
9:30 am = Nap

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

you forgot 3:00 am - answer Batphone

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Charles Murray, author of The Bell Curve, reacts:

I read the various posts here on "The Corner," mostly pretty ho-hum or critical about Obama's speech. Then I figured I'd better read the text (I tried to find a video of it, but couldn't). I've just finished. Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I'm concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant—rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America. It is so far above the standard we're used to from our pols.... But you know me. Starry-eyed Obama groupie.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

the sherriff is a-near, indeed

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I just finished watching the video in full (it's up at Youtube). Wow.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

link?

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Dude probably scribbled that speech out in 20 minutes on the back of an airsick bag on the way to Philadelphia.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

just reading that speech was pretty :-O

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

you think he wrote a considerable portion of this himself? The NYT alluded to it earlier today.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf is limbaugh talking about
http://thepage.time.com/limbaughs-reaction-to-obamas-speech-on-race/

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

he was reported to have been working on the speech through 2am last night

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

you think he wrote a considerable portion of this himself? The NYT alluded to it earlier today.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:04 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i dont doubt that he wrote much of it
the campaign alluded to him staying up until 3am the night before writing it

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that is the sound of one limbaugh flailing, desperate to find a fingerhold on a smooth surface

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link

YouTube video is down already :-(

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh wait - go to video.google.com & search "obama race speech" - one of those must be the full speech

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Limbaugh can't figure out that Americans DO see each other as members of ethnic groups while not seeing themselves as victims.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Full speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

you can also locate it at the obama campaign website

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Also Watching Now (27)

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

no elmo, I haven't had time to read it yet. And I can't say I'm looking fwd to it based on the pulls.

"that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America"

As someone said, Clintonite tripe.

"a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel,"

"Like" Israel? Just to, y'know, pick one stalwart Middle East ally at random. I may vomit.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Richardgwm (44 minutes ago)
-3
Reply
Do we really want a President who is an eloquent speaker?

We've just spent seven years under a President who is an eloquent speaker, and look where it has gotten us.

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

man stfu morbius you secondhand hack

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks jf

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah for real morbius please stfu

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:13 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe you should stick to panning movies you haven't seen, morbs >:P

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

We've just spent seven years under a President who is an eloquent speaker, and look where it has gotten us.

hahahahahaha

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

what do you expect him to say Morbs? I'm sure that Obama has a more nuanced view of the situation in the mideast than "ISLAMIC TERRORISTS HATE OUR FREEDOM", but to implicate Israel or American Foreign Policy in any way would just not be a good move at all politically. And Obama is a politician, when it boils down to it. A moral and forthright politician? Yes. But a politician nonetheless, I don't really blame him for that

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

i support any speech that causes morbius to vomit

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs, you know your Gore Vidal – you don't get elected preznit unless you appease the Israeli lobby.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link

wait I thought Morbz hated Gore Vidal

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

^ this

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:17 (sixteen years ago) link

elmo, where on the Obama site? I can't find it and youtube is blocked at work.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm totally unfamiliar with the Bell Curve dude - Ned/Dan care to explain?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

this speech is serious

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link

no Shakey, i am FOR Gore Vidal, to answer Rock Hardy.

I'm well aware that Obama is a pol, thx. Which is why I can't get into any of this. Have fun with yr messiah.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

^ this

-- Ned Raggett, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:17 AM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ifoughtthelaw.cementhorizon.com/stop-posting.gif

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs please never shut up

<3

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGBbJv

michael, it's here ^^

it's a youtube embed, though, so not sure it will work if youtube is blocked. full text accompanies, tho

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:20 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius, read the fucking speech you idiot

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

goddamn <3 this guy

bnw, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i29.tinypic.com/jhqzie.jpg

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm so tired of this "messiah" thing.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_bell_curve

HI DERE, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, I read it hours ago, but thanks, elmo!

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooooooooooooooool brainwasher

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs, you know your Gore Vidal – you don't get elected preznit unless you appease the Israeli lobby.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:14 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

gore vidal is the og truther too -- can't take his shit seriously.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Let's just call Morbius "Dr. Momus" from now on.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

eth baby, just stfu till you have more brilliant stories about hanging out w/ washed-up moronic rappers

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

ah so its not so much the reaction (which seems reasonable to me) as to who's saying it - thx Dan

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

no Shakey, i am FOR Gore Vidal, to answer Rock Hardy.

Is there some way this relates to, you know, the real world?

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius lol come on guy

this is an amazing speech

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:26 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously anyone who hasn't read it, and gives even half a shit, just take 15 minutes and read it and if you still want to take potshots then have a ball

OBAMA SPEECH IN FULL: A MORE PERFECT UNION
Tuesday, March 18th, 2008/ 10:17:53 ET
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

**VIDEO**
“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign – to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together – unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction – towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.
I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners – an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.
It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one.
Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.
This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.
And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.
On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.
But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.
As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way
But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:
“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”
That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.
But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.
Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments – meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.
A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families – a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.
And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.
Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.
Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.
This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.
For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.
Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.
In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.
We can do that.
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.
That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.
This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.
This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.
I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.
There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today – a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.
There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.
And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.
She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.
She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.
Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”
“I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.
But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

END
**VIDEO**

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

soon as I finish WORK (foundation of our stalwart generation)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:31 (sixteen years ago) link

man this speech just gets better & better

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there some way this relates to, you know, the real world?

ok, you're on the list

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

wtfcnn

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/etienne_saint/witemen.jpg

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:32 (sixteen years ago) link

god damn it what is the fucking point of removing this video from youtube multiple times. its not like i'm trying to see an SNL skit.

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

My GWB-supporting evangelical Mom is totally feeling this speech, btw.

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

grady can you not get this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU its from baracks official channel so id be surprised if yt took it down

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Just use this one, it's "official" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

lol yt

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe hill fans keep flagging it

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

more like whitey amirite

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks dudes

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends.

try and find anybody running for president, democrat or republican, who would say this

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

yea this speech was amazing

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

So, I'm on a conference call, and I CAN'T STOP WATCHING THAT GIF WITH THE KARATE GUY KICKING THAT GIRL (GUY?) IN THE HEAD! Riviting TV.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh yeah, the Obama speech was really, really good.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:45 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah this is a genuinely ballsy speech. fuck it im in love with this guy.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

you forgot to say 'no homo'

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:46 (sixteen years ago) link

...OR DID HE?????

HI DERE, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:47 (sixteen years ago) link

What do you get when you fall in love?
A guy with a pin to burst your bubble
That's what you get for all your trouble.
I'll never fall in love again.
I'll never fall in love again.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, in Iraq, McCain mixes up Sunni and Shiite -- corrected by Joe Leiberman at his side.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

"so ballsy it turned deeznuts gay" bumper sticker for sale @ ebay L@@K now

StanM, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm so glad i'm not old and jaded like dr. morbius

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

100% serious, not being snarky

gr8080, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Sounds like O bagged just about every undecided older mom type going.

xpost McCain hahahaha, he just made himself every dumb jock who ever went to my high school.

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

you will be, gr80, if you're lucky.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I CAN'T STOP WATCHING THAT GIF WITH THE KARATE GUY KICKING THAT GIRL (GUY?) IN THE HEAD!

^this

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

hes doing exactly what everyone here advised him to

maybe barack reads 2008 primaries thread

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:54 (sixteen years ago) link

o_O

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

if morbs were actually jaded he wouldn't be posting at all. it is very important to him that we know at all times that he is different and special, because of his interesting opinions.

can't wait to get home and rock these utubs. corner reax have been completely hilarious, those ppl are playing tea party on the train tracks and they fucking knoowwww ittttt

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Display Name cool dreamhouse
Time Zone America/La_Paz
Creation Date 1 week ago

xpost

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's Lies [John Derbyshire]

Not so much lies as a sort of slippery sleight-of-mouth. I'm starting to really dislike Obama.

"Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation … came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land."

Segregation was not "the law of the land" in the 1950s. It was the law in a minority of states.

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius why do you even pay attention to politics. seems like an incredible waste of time and energy if you hate all the people with a chance

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends.

try and find anybody running for president, democrat or republican, who would say this

Kucinich? Sharpton? w/out tossing a "welfare, big problem" bone in with it?

who r u again, gff?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:57 (sixteen years ago) link

<3 barack's youtube avatar. v. myspace
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0a4yZnMLp8k/default.jpg

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

oh it's more off center on the page :(

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not sure I've ever seen Morbs explain what he's for; only who he's against.

-- Rock Hardy, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:27 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

---

no Shakey, i am FOR Gore Vidal, to answer Rock Hardy.

-- Dr Morbius, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:19 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Way to ignore my pronouns. Also, does being on your list have anything to do with the real world?

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Fun With Names [John Derbyshire]

I have enjoyed much harmless merriment from contemplating the names of African politicians. There's been a bit of a lull recently, since the passing of such as the Rev. Canaan Banana and Oginga Odinga (father of the loser in December's contested Kenyan election).

Now a new generation of can't-help-but-smile African onomastic pioneers has taken the stage. Let's give a hearty welcome to Tokyo Sexwale, Enoch Godongwana, and Playfair Morule.

^^^^ this is in the middle of all the reactions to obama's speech

fuck the corner

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

john derbyshire doesn't like a popular black person? gtfo!

xps ooh gettin hot in herre

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Product Placement [John Derbyshire]

In the dead air while they were waiting for Obama to show up, FNC did an interview with someone form the Heritage Foundation. I don't know if they shipped the guy over to a Fox Studio or if Heritage has their own TV room; but on the bookshelf just behind the interviewee's left ear I saw the spine of Liberal Fascism. (Which you should buy through NRO! We get a cut!)

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe he meant legitimate candidates, Morbs.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

No mention of Abdelaziz Bouteflika?

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah im sure lyndon larouche could say a lot of stuff too

morbius do you understand how democracies work?

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, all props to Dennis and Al but no way could thay have delivered a speech a speech like this that wouldn't be dismissed out of hand, let alone be picked up and appraised by every major news outlet xxxpost to morbs

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Sounds like O bagged just about every undecided older mom type going.

xpost McCain hahahaha, he just made himself every dumb jock who ever went to my high school.

What did McCain say?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link

RH, I meant I generally share Veedle's view of the bread & circuses of our collapsing republic. And yeah, list reminds me who's a waste of time; very utilitarian.

This democracy now works like Family Feud. SURVEY SAID...!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Dumb jocks at Suzy's high school talked about rival sects of Islam?

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

so was james van der beek a dumb jock at suzy's high school

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link

morbz yearning for the iron fist of a dictator here

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:05 (sixteen years ago) link

in what sense should democracy not work like family feud?

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:05 (sixteen years ago) link

No, fuck off, dumb jocks in my HS used Jewish guys as human cribsheets.

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v296/WilliamCrump63/FFBOARD5.jpg

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

lol kud0s

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:07 (sixteen years ago) link

hey morbs for real you should hang out on the listserv for the left business observer (u know, doug henwood's magazine). it's a lot of more radical-than-thou nyc soljas and they all hate obama, no falling for any neoliberal messiahs for them, no sir. dennis perrin posts a lot! you'd love it.

that's http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/lbo-talk.html

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:08 (sixteen years ago) link

in what sense should democracy not work like family feud?

In the sense that you vote before you use your Pundit Calculus to figure out who the salt of the earth, the unwashed masses -- you know, morons -- might like.

no, gff. I prefer to try to save souls jerk off here. But srsly, I DON'T HATE OBAMA.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

lol formatting

HI DERE, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

at least gimme points for a diff Blazing Saddles quote

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theroot.com/media/96/Obama%20supporter%20tearing%20up_Obama_2008_hopk-HomepageImageComponent.JPG
A supporter tears up while hearing Sen. Barack Obama's wide-ranging address on race in Philadelphia.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

gr8 picture.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

ban morbz for trying to make me picture him jerking off

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

RH, I meant I generally share Veedle's view of the bread & circuses of our collapsing republic. And yeah, list reminds me who's a waste of time; very utilitarian.

This democracy now works like Family Feud. SURVEY SAID...!

-- Dr Morbius, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:03 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I'm gonna keep a running tally of how many posts you make while you're "working" and too busy to read the speech. this is like #8 on just this thread.

Xpost - #9, #10 ....

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Courage and grit. This nicely states why I think Obama won't fall prey to the same problems that killed the campaigns of, say, John Kerry. He's a different kind of candidate.

(Mind you, I still think he'll lose the GE, but I'll be proud to have him as the nominee).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

interesting take on the speech: http://www.theroot.com/id/45336

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

finally, Obama has proxy tears to fight Hillary's.

Simon H., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

all right, glad to have you here!

obama/souls jerk off 08!

holy shit xps

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/gallery/screenshots/lists/news_198.jpg

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

^yes!^

he was definitely sending his masturbavibe straight through the interweb to one individual, ethan, bypassing other thread viewers :/

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:17 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^Ol Man Simpson

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

guys let's all masturbate

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I can totally here Morbz sayin "there sure are a lot of ugly people in your neighborhood"

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

My mom and sister totally have dubs on their avatars Selma and Patty...

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

guys let's all masturbate

I did this morning, thanks.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

dave, replying to andwhat, Rock Hardy & gff takes slightly less brainpower than remembering to hold myself when I pee.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

thanks guys

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

ban morbz for trying to make me picture him holding his dick when he pees

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

btw gff is probly the smartest dude on this thread

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah rly. 24 hr moratorium on dick talk starts now xps

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:22 (sixteen years ago) link

ban andwhat for making me able to anticipate his last post verbatim

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah because we never know what you're gonna say morbs

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:24 (sixteen years ago) link

good job guys!

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:25 (sixteen years ago) link

we need to turn to sexier things, like poll numbers. Daniel, where are you? How's Obama doing this hour?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

btw Obama is now officially not a Muslim

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:27 (sixteen years ago) link

we need obama to come in and sort some stuff out on ilx

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

awesome reasonable Christian dude for the win

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/031808DailyUpdateGraph1.gif

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:29 (sixteen years ago) link

that is like when you listen to those really good records and the left channel crosses over to the right channel and the right channel changes places with the left channel and it sounds like the band just rotated around your head

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

this graph makes me lol for some reason

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Any PA numbers?

Ed, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

DNA. xpost Ed did you shot speach?

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:31 (sixteen years ago) link

we need to turn to sexier things, like poll numbers. Daniel, where are you? How's Obama doing this hour?

Don't know. Mr. Que apparently has me covered upthread.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Offering up this moment's latest poll numbers is my only contribution to society.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I am shotting.

Ed, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

This is what bar conversations were like on the day of the "I Have A Dream" speech.

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Tomasky: http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2008/03/imperfect_union.html

suzy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

ha that graph is funny! oh well...

aren't those always 3 days behind as a rule?

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

air america is basically replaying the speech now and oh man <3 <3 <3 obama

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/gallery/screenshots/lists/news_198.jpg

-- omar little, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:16 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this is the best morbius yet

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:48 (sixteen years ago) link

can someone find an mp3 of the speech?

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

The Root article is really depressing but im reminded that similar-minded articles were written that obama wouldn't get as far as he already has. pessimism is always right only when everyone is overwhelmingly pessimistic. i reject the article's conclusions in the end, not because they aren't well thought out or largely accurate (they are) but because i am genuinely hopeful

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:51 (sixteen years ago) link

what article deej?

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:56 (sixteen years ago) link

The alehouses sounded like this on the day of the Gettysburg Address as well.

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 19:58 (sixteen years ago) link

The juicebars sounded like this the day Ford pardoned Nixon

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

XPOST http://www.theroot.com/id/45336

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

The pardoning wasn't about ideas and ideals.

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

SAVING US FROM MORE PAIN

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

"A More Perfect Union" MP3: http://sundaygang.com/obama/2008/03/18/speech.mp3

shanecavanaugh, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

"We know from the 2004 "Swift Boat" campaign against Senator Kerry that, in this era of multiple media sources, viral attack campaigns are very hard to combat and can be effectively deadly"

BUT unlike 2004 'viral campaigns' now extend beyond the reach of politicians & corporations; cf colberts white house speech, which to be honest this 'event' reminded me of.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Michelle Malkin responds:

Obama’s bottom line: Everyone’s a victim. You’re part of the problem if you keep talking about Jeremiah Wright. Everyone’s churches have crazy demagogues. Schools need more money. Leave illegal aliens alone. Never mind all the black grievance-mongers who have built careers sowing seeds of divisions. Look at all the talk show hosts and conservative commentators! Elect Obama. Fixer of souls.

what a toxic cunt, amirite?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

you're so rite.

lauren, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The right now thinks Obama's fully embraced "blackhood," abandoning his super awesome specialness.

You Obama guys: you never bought this "transcendence" stuff, right? The Obama supporters I've met seem taken with the man's immense gifts, not because he meets a Platonic ideal.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i just like his suits

jhøshea, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:23 (sixteen years ago) link

can you clarify that alfred because i really have no idea what yr talking about

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

the man's immense gifts

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

the man's immense .gifs

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he means the whole narrative of Obama as a "post-race" figure and all that stuff.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

which is and always was bullshit but a lot of people ran with it

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's success as a death knell to "the race problem" / "if barack can do it why can't you" etc.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:26 (sixteen years ago) link

who's saying that, exactly?

dan m, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Every Obama critic I've ever met harps on his "cult's" fascination with his specialness – how he won't "play the game," he'll avoid partisan clichés, etc. But this is totally incorrect. To me he's a superb politician who doesn't appeal to people's fears, which means, of course, that opponents twist this to mean that he fills their head with uplifting banalities.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

just because an Obama critic says something about Obama's supporters, it don't make it so.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Not one of the Obama fans I know regard him as "transcending race" or "lifting us" out of partisan politics. The dude seems like the only politician of his generation who hasn't squelched his natural intelligence in the way that Garry Willis once accused Nixon of doing for the sake of victories.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link

just because an Obama critic says something about Obama's supporters, it don't make it so.

erm, that's my point! But now that we're on the subject, why are some of you guys supporting him?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Start at the beginning of the thread...

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

he's got a better u.s. serving/self serving ratio then most pols, let alone those running for president.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

he went to my college

max, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I am supporting Obama because his positions and record align more closely to my own beliefs than any other candidate running.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

he's a babe

horseshoe, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

also it is not totally painful to listen to him speak - which is not the case with Dubya, or Hillary, or McCain

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Robbie Baitz puts it well:
If there was any doubt about what we have missed in the anti-intellectual, ruthlessly incurious Bush years, and even the slippery Clinton ones, those doubts were laid to rest by Barack Obama's magisterial speech today.

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

insofar as Obama's blackness is not the primary characteristic I ascribe to him I guess he does "transcend race" - but implying that he should somehow NOT transcend race seems, well, implicitly racist.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

he's a babe

-- horseshoe, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:32 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

OTM

max, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

"like omg a black man is running for president and the first thing that comes into your mind isn't that he's black! you CRAZY"

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

alfred, i wouldve been 100% behind you before today (and i was 100% an obama supporter before today) - i understand where yr coming from but todays speech was without question not 'clever' or politics as usual in any way. it was a guy telling america what he believed & why he believed it.

maybe im naive, i dunno. im open to arguments that say as much.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't really think a president by him or her self can change things in any drastic way but obama seems like a sort who could do a little bit more in a positive manner than anyone else, and what he would represent as a face and a name to the rest of the world might be a little bit better than the assholes we've had over the last 28 years. mccain is barely better than bush and i don't trust hillary to do anything other than tread water, at best.

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

There are a lot of reasons, really:

1. I think that the coalition that Obama has amasses will really help the democrats win elections nation-wide, get a working majority, and they'll be able to actually CHANGE things instead of bitching about how they don't have enough votes to do anything. Foster winning that House seat is a good example of how powerful the Obama brand can be.

2. His approach to foreign policiy (more fluid, less dogmatic) and the people that he surrounds himself with (Samantha Power, Susan Rice,etc.) make me confident that his approach to leadership will be a lot different than what we've seen for the past few decades...

3. Judgement. I know it's become one of his talking points, but I really do believe that he has displayed superior judgement to both Hillary and McCain, and he does have the "judgement to lead".

4. He seems like a nice, centered, moral and I'm just going to be blunt - it would make me proud to have an African-American president. It won't change the way our government is run, obviously, but symbollically it would be incredible.

Initially I was rooting for Joe Biden, so it's not as though I was always for Obama, but he has really impressed me. The way he has run his campaign, the way he has stood tall and gracefully in the face of conrtoversy, etc. His honesty and forthrightness is refreshing. I think he'd be an excellent president.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I am supporting Obama because his positions and record align more closely to my own beliefs than any other candidate running.

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:32 PM (7 minutes ago)

and this... though I disagree with him on a few things.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i think barack has very real convictions but is too pragmatic about them to earn the trust of a certain sector of the left (gay middle-aged men living in nyc). ive thought about this previously, that he's somehow compromising himself; ultimately i think he just realizes its necessary to make some compromises to accomplish what he wants to. which i have the nerve to surmise are good things. xps

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah I disagree with him on a few things too, whatchagonnado

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

The war, his stance on PATRIOT, the smart people he surrounds himself with w/r/t foreign policy, plus homie talks a real good talk and that would be a welcome change for public perception of the US after 8 years of duh-bya.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

not disowning rev wright was about the most telling and awesome part of the whole speech today, btw.

Cosmo Vitelli, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

also the most unexpected, from a traditional political strategy standpoint

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

letting the guy off the campaign bus without throwing him under it, dude is a new breed of candidate for reals

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=cfa88bd9-5eba-4bfc-b775-62079514d9d9

I think this is pretty much otm.

31g, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

i think the key was more this:

"Black anger" and "white resentments," he said, have "distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle-class squeeze: a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices and short-term greed."

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i think obama's clarity & transparency is maybe what impresses me most - the playbook for dealing with unpopular or controversial friends is to either not mention it ever never or disown them completely... saying outright that its complicated and that dude has a lot of good traits but also some bad ones and then tying this to the black community and then everyone.... that is some honest, upfront shit

and what, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sure Rush characterizes that as alternately class warfare and/or "ignorance of basic economics"

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link

many xposts

which is why I'm curious what effect this will actually have

I think the mainstream (non-Fox) media will be wowed by this and change their coverage accordingly

on the other hand, it's a really nuanced speech and you can pull all kinds of little bits out of it and misrepresent them ... according to TPM fox put up a headline "Obama: Wright is like family"

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

The second way in which Obama's speech may have come up short was the scant attention it devoted to social failures within the black community. This, again, was a theme that Bill Clinton used masterfully to establish himself as both a student of black culture and someone unwilling to indulge its worst excesses. It's true that Obama did urge blacks to avoid "becoming victims of our past," and take "full responsibility for our own lives--by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them." But this was a small part of his speech and not at all its tonal emphasis. Yet it seems quite likely that millions of white voters still see black America as indulgent of criminality and insufficiently devoted to education and work. Obama's fleeting lines about victimhood and reading to children do little to address that audience. As an alternative, Obama might have benefitted from invoking the example of Bill Cosby, who has morphed from comedian to one of black America's sharpest internal critics.

uh

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:51 (sixteen years ago) link

LIKE YOUR CRAZY UNCLE

xpost uhx1000 who said that shit?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

new republic article someone just linked

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:52 (sixteen years ago) link

that is some honest, upfront shit

He could have taken the tried and true route and ditched Wright, but he opted for a certain level of candor and ambiguity which speaks well for him both intellectually and morally. I'm not doe-eyed but he seems pretty decent for a politician.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Everyone's got someone in their family with views more extreme than their own, so it's a fair enough analogy.

Drudge printing the entire speech means that a lot of folks will read/see it in its entirety versus the sound bites. As I've said earlier, I think this year is a turning point as far as the Rove/Atwater strategies that relied on voters not being able or willing to find primary sources themselves. Now, with YouTube, etc., TV news and commercials are not the be all and end all of information.

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

what omar said (really)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah what I'm talking about is the central point that this isn't necessarily going to appeal that much to people who don't already like Obama, not so much the stuff about Bill Cosby.

31g, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah WTF with the Bill Cosby riff

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

then why so hard on us, morbs??

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Also: could Obama really have gotten away with completely ditching his pastor of 20 years? It was brave of him to defend Wright but at the same time I think it was kind of his only option.

31g, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not trying to be hard, deez. Just trying to add a little balance and/or tamp down undue optimism.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs theme song: "Stop Thinking About Tomorrow"

Eazy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah WTF with the Bill Cosby riff

you gotta be pretty deep in the weeds to see that speech as a real missed opportunity for a Sister Souljah moment

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

from another mess. board:

I listened to about 15 minutes of Rush Limbaugh today. One dittohead after another found the speech inspiring, and Rush sounded like he was about to have an aneurysm. He finally stopped taking calls and went solo to explain "what's really going on here", at which point the show descended into complete incoherence.

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:05 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha awesome

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha cognitive dissonance

deeznuts, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

oh the poor thing

gff, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs, what happens if we all fall in love with Obama and we're generally not disappointed? Perhaps the difference between us is that, despite us both being old curmudgeons, it's really me the more 'old and bitter'; I don't have any great hopes about politicians changing the country since they're often behind the wave actually, and I certainly don't agree with all of Obama's points, but I think the way he's running and the better part of his priorities are sound.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

alfred, i wouldve been 100% behind you before today (and i was 100% an obama supporter before today) - i understand where yr coming from but todays speech was without question not 'clever' or politics as usual in any way. it was a guy telling america what he believed & why he believed it.

I'm not against you, bro! Let's just say I wanted an update.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm going to forgive the fact that Obama got that Faulkner quote wrong

akm, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, ditching his pastor would have been the most cynical move.

It's fairly clear from my posts on this and the other threads where my sympathies lie. I'm trying to read my, er, coalition.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

at least he's attributing now, akm

remy bean, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

well Michael, I was pleasantly surprised to see a recent clip of him saying that the debate about the Palestinian situation is more wide-ranging in Israel than it is here; which is why I found today's "stalwart ally" quickie a bit of a regression. Maybe someone told him the previous remarks were too much like Hil's "kissing Mrs Arafat" photo.

me gotta go

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah he got the quote wrong but hey he quoted faulkner

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

"I think he's a great motivational speaker, but what I hear from him I could go hear at my church on Sunday from my pastor, and to me he just seems all fluff," said 40-year-old Maria Aguirre on the morning of the Texas "primacaucus." "If Clinton doesn't manage to win the nomination, then I will vote for McCain, because he's got experience and if someone has to answer the phone at 3 o'clock in the morning and if it can't be her, I'd rather it be McCain."

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

who are these idiots

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i like obama a lot more than how my post might read, btw, so much so that i can't imagine how weird and kind of awful it would feel to vote for hillary in a general election.

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

lol is that quote real or did you cut and paste that together from the various media narratives over the past few weeks.

The Brainwasher, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

if someone has to answer the phone at 3 o'clock in the morning and if it can't be her, I'd rather it be McCain.

tracy morgan otm

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

one of my least favorite things about watching news shows give the viewers' opinions is they basically just post a bunch of comments from viewers who have swallowed one narrative line - "obama too inexperienced!" "obama will bring change!" rather than people offering any kind of insight or unique perspective

lol is that quote real or did you cut and paste that together from the various media narratives over the past few weeks.

-- The Brainwasher, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:20 PM (3 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

very real

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I rather think it was Maria Aguirre who has been mentally cutting and pasting from various media narratives.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

i should just ignore the faulkner pedantry, but adding two words that merely amplify the import of the quote hardly constitutes "getting it wrong."

horseshoe, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

one of my least favorite things about watching news shows give the viewers' opinions is they basically just post a bunch of comments from viewers who have swallowed one narrative line - "obama too inexperienced!" "obama will bring change!" rather than people offering any kind of insight or unique perspective

You think they're going to give these people anywhere near as much time as a shrill talking head?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I am supporting Obama because his positions and record align more closely to my own beliefs than any other candidate running.

Now that Edwards is out, this is me too. ALSO: he's been in the game long enough to know how it's played, but can play the "washington outsider" when he needs to subvert the game and actually get shit done. Kobiyashi Maru, yknow? And I think he might be charismatic and inspiring enough to get most of the country to back him up when he does attempt some real changes.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost a quote is a quote is a quote is a quote is a quote

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

okay mister obama now make a speech like this every 2 weeks forever plz

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

And I think he might be charismatic and inspiring enough to get most of the country to back him up when he does attempt some real changes.

Rock is making a good point. Whether through fear (Bush) or hope (FDR), the bully pulpit can be very powerful at forming and changing public opinion and eventually politicians have to listen to it.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred, fie! He is a Senator of the Republic!

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

A college administrator standing on the sidelines of a rally at Temple University last week complained that she hadn't been able to "connect" with Obama in part because his speeches lacked specifics. A young law student from Cotulla, Texas, suggested Obama fans were being had and said she'd have a hard time supporting him.

"If Barack Obama wins, I'll have to wait. I've told people, I have to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga," said Vanessa Russell-Evans, 26. "As a woman and as somebody who's wanted Hillary to run since I was 10 when she became the first lady, it's almost like it's being taken away... (by) someone who is saying a lot of poetry, a lot of fluff, a lot of stuff that I feel that, you know... (George W.) Bush did that eight years ago. He ran on a campaign that was compassionate conservatism. It was this wave of coolness, and I feel that Obama's campaign is like that, too. It's this wave of coolness; everybody's sort of being sucked in. I mean, the rallies are sort of like revivals.... People are fainting."

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

As a woman and as somebody who's wanted Hillary to run since I was 10 when she became the first lady

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link

what fucking twerp.

lauren, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

what A fucking twerp, sorry. i read that quote and the red mist descended.

lauren, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I have to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I have to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga
I have to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga
I have to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Ha ha, I was just going to post that!

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

what the hell is she even saying there, gah

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:34 (sixteen years ago) link

She may be unaware of it, by I read it as an admission that she's full of shit.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

it reads like a total non-sequitir

horseshoe, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

that she has to do a lot of self-cleansing, meditation and yoga? (xxpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

that quote made me angrier than the stream of racist, hate-mongering comments from m1chelle malk1n's site that my friend has been forwarding to me all day.

lauren, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

what's she going to "wait" for? weird.

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

a vision quest.

lauren, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:37 (sixteen years ago) link

A president has very little time in which to use his political capital, and if Obama gets elected I suspect he'll be the most legislative strong-armer since the first six months of Reagan's term. This is where "charisma" and intelligence count. If he wins, a large portion of Washington will genuinely want him to suceed.

(that right-wing media will remain suspicious is a moot point)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

it's almost like it's being taken away...

Seems to be a common thread among outraged Clintonites.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

You know what pisses me off? If HRC's campaign hadn't resorted to being so vicious, I wouldn't have any problem with much of her campaign. I think it very well could be inspirational to have a female president and it comes right back to the whole 'well behaved women rarely make history' bullshit wherein women give themselves an excuse for treating other people as means because the ends justify it. How is that feminist? I'm down with saying that Nixon was a son of a bitch, but not so down on imitating his way of doing business, and if certain feminists want to merely ape the worst behavior of the men who once had the monopoly on power here because they feel entitled to it a priori, they're not only going to alienate people like me but they're selling short the very real transformative possibilities of feminism.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah gf & her mom have been reiterating this since december.

fwiw, gf is taking down her clinton signs because she now thinks she's essentially out of the race.

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

juan williams thinks he should have thrown wright under a bus

Williams, a FOX News analyst, questioned why Obama allowed himself to remain publicly associated with Wright. He said Obama did not address the “judgment and character” issues that he’s running on.

“I think he had to take responsibility … and that’s what he didn’t do,” Williams said.

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

of course that's what juan williams thinks

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

hasn't Bill Kristol thrown Juan Williams under the bus yet?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

With the Wright thing and HRC basically out of the last several news cycles, I'm def getting a sense of exhaustion from the Hil people.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I think they're ready to get out.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Sometimes it's like MWhite and I share a brain...

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it very well could be inspirational to have a female president and it comes right back to the whole 'well behaved women rarely make history' bullshit wherein women give themselves an excuse for treating other people as means because the ends justify it. How is that feminist?

Um, seems like you're straw-womaning here, but if any feminist actually uses the quote that way they're obviously distorting it. "Well-behaved women" is supposed to imply women that are too ladylike and afraid of stepping out of line to get anything accomplished, which is in turn supposed to hint at patriarchy. It does NOT suggest that you should be a complete jerk in order to get things accomplished.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

fuckin

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://xs225.xs.to/xs225/08122/oreo988.jpeg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Sometimes it's like MWhite and I share a brain...

It wouldn't be the first time I've been accused of having half a brain.

Hurting, it shouldn't suggest that, but I hear it all too often. I am so tired of the conflation of ladylike and timid. Some of the fiercest and most stalwart people I have ever known were extremely well-raised and well-mannered ladies.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Opps, substitute shouldn't, plz. My half-brane not work so good today.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Listened to Hannity on the way home. He was REALLY reaching hard today.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

hasn't Bill Kristol thrown Juan Williams under the bus yet?

lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Listened to Hannity on the way home. He was REALLY reaching hard today

did you see his junk?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

The lazy idea that we should set ridculously low standards for throwing people off the bus, an idea that appeals to the combatative, holier than thou politician and the journalist looking for an exciting fight to cover is pernicious and practically Stalinist. I am quite pleased that Obama eschewed it in this case.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

haha meanwhile McCain having trouble distinguishing between Iran and Iraq lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Williams, a FOX News analyst, questioned why Obama allowed himself to remain publicly associated with Wright. He said Obama did not address the “judgment and character” issues that he’s running on.

I'm probably stating the obvious, but OF COURSE Obama wasn't going to completely disassociate himself from Wright. What a disingenuous comment to make.

I listened to the whole speech today. I thought he handled it about as well as possible - disavow the inflammatory views but don't turn your back on your longtime pastor. The rest was a pretty good essay on race in America, but I think it could have been written in a more direct language so that it would get through to more people. I'd like to see him find more of a happy medium between his *inspirational* rally speaking style and his headier essayistic style that can at times make him come off like the law school valedictorian giving his address.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.mentorhuebnerart.com/images/pubs/strikeahappymedium.jpg

remy bean, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd like to see him find more of a happy medium between his *inspirational* rally speaking style and his headier essayistic style that can at times make him come off like the law school valedictorian giving his address.

The introductory remarks creating a historical context -- the great problem of slavery for the Framers -- was about as plainspoken as one could hope! I wish my high school teachers had been this direct. Hours ago upthread I said that this is the mark of a good teacher.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

The Democratic National Committee seized on John McCain's apparent gaffe while discussing Iran earlier Tuesday, saying it raises questions whether the Arizona senator "can be trusted to offer a clear way forward."

The misstep in question occurred during a news conference in Jordan earlier Tuesday, when the presumptive Republican presidential nominee repeatedly said Iran was supplying al Qaeda. Iran is predominately a Shiite country and is not aiding the Sunni dominated Al-Qaeda.

McCain ultimately corrected himself after Sen. Joe Lieberman whispered in his ear.

"I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al Qaeda. I am sorry, I am sorry," the Arizona senator said.

DNC spokeswoman Karen Finney quickly pounced on the misstep.

"After eight years of the Bush Administration's incompetence in Iraq, McCain's comments don't give the American people a reason to believe that he can be trusted to offer a clear way forward," she said. "Not only is Senator McCain wrong on Iraq once again, but he showed he either doesn't understand the challenges facing Iraq and the region or is willing to ignore the facts on the ground."

McCain's campaign immediately responded, saying the "Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates’ judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief.”

The DNC later sent out a transcript of McCain's interview Monday with conservative Hugh Hewitt, during which he appeared to make the same mistake.

"As you know, there are al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they’re moving back into Iraq," he told Hewitt.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

how has obama not used this for a campaign theme?

Jordan, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

infuriating responses to obama's speech from the right; all the more infuriating because of the degree to which the speech is being wholly distorted

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

how has obama not used this for a campaign theme?

-- Jordan, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:28 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

he needs to use 'change (makes you want to hustle)' by donald byrd

deej, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Shakey, I don't mean to sound like a mere partisan dick to McCain and this is akin to something that Sarkozy said at one point, too, but wtf kind of statement is that, dude? Al Qaeda have less hatred for Jews and Christians than for Shi'ites whom they consider to be apostates and thus deserving of death. It really worries me that something so basic escapes them.

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm well aware of the Sunni/Shi'ite split - that McCain can't keep it straight (either because he's a bellicose idiot or because conflating all Islamists together as "evil terrorists" suits his political agenda) is pathetic. Also remarkably similar to Dubyaco's neocons traditional inability/unwillingness to recognize these distinctions.

or were you just asking me a rhetorical question

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:34 (sixteen years ago) link

When I say "more direct," I mean he has a tendency to unnecessarily break up sentences with clauses, taking some of the punch out of statements that should be very powerful (not to mention making them impossible to soundbite - is that the intention maybe?). Kerry had a tendency to do this as well - admittedly a much more pronounced tendency. Obama often avoids this pitfall, but today I felt like his speech could have been better edited.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Shakey, I know YOU know the difference but how can Senator Vote-for-me-'cause-I-am-better-on-national-defense McWarhero make such a boneheaded error? It actually frightens me when I hear shit like this. What, if they don't this aspect of the region their visiting, is going on in their heads with people like this? As Abe had it, you can fool all of the people some of the time, etc..., but even his natural electorate has to (or at least should take pause) when for whatever reason their candidate can't count up to 4 or can't remember which one's the brake and which one's the accelerator!

Michael White, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't know, Hurting. Both in spoken and written form, there's a lot of beats, lots of declarative sentences.

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

FWIW a pro-Obama friend of mine seemed less impressed by the speech than I woulda guessed: "Have you read 'Audacity'? A lot of that stuff is right out of the book. It was a pretty good speech but in a general election, independent swing voter sense it still doesn't answer the question of why you put that guy on your campaign steering committee."

dmr, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm still concerned about that too. Obviously from a personal point of view I liked the speech, but I didn't need any reassuring about his ties with Wright to begin with.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:47 (sixteen years ago) link

At very least, he's addressing it extensively and early, and whatever he did seems to be baffling conservative commentators and making it hard for them to counterpunch.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:49 (sixteen years ago) link

"John Edwards. Senator John Edwards -- remember him? -- who's been conspicuously silent since he dropped out of the race, will endorse a Democratic candidate probably before North Carolina, certainly before North Carolina, possible before Pennsylvania. And our own Mark Halpern on the page says it's going to be Senator Hillary Clinton."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Edwards waited far too long for his endorsement to make much difference.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 March 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link

clintonite clinton-lite to endorse clinton...developing...

balls, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

is the 'is mccain a warhero really?' thing the left version of the right's 'is obama black really?' ? how likely is it to get more traction than the right's version did? when's the last time a leftwing version of a rightwing tactic worked better than the right's version did?

balls, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't seen anybody on the left questioning his war hero status...?

Otoh, I think a fairly strong case could be made that his war experience rendered him totally fucking nuts.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I think McCain was probably nuts long before then.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't seen anybody on the left questioning his war hero status...?

ya rly, where are you getting this, balls?

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean I saw muttering about it on the RIGHT, but not from the left (who tend to concede national security dick-waving contests)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

shakey read above; admittedly i haven't seen this anywhere in the real world. and yeah re: 'nuts', alot of his more personal grudges 'fuck protestors, yes to vietnam/iraq to the bitter end fuxors' i could vaguely nod politely at and not really engage seriously if it was just the cantankerous bitter old vet (the way ppl patronize morbs for example) but coming from someone who can enact policy eh, not so much. that said no need to deny his backstory - guy is the biggest warhero to see november in any of our (excepting morbs of course) lifetimes. and bob dole was funny and reagan was good in the killers and nixon...i can't think of anything nice to say about nixon. point being that nice decent guy whatevah i don't need to tear down the man to vote against him or to get others to vote against him - his politics in general but ESP his politics on the most important issue right now (war or economy - take yr pick) are fundamentally wrong and (perhaps)(thankfully) out of step w/ the american ppl and THE VERY THINGS he is making the cornerstone of his campaign. obama isn't gonna have to work very hard to paint mccain as '4 more years of bush' since mccain's half determined to do it himself. which is why the one thing i really like about obama's speech today is that while yes, yes nuanced, genuinely thoughtful speech actually dealing w/ race in america in a way noone in our (excepting morbs) lifetimes has given, but what i really take away from it is how it works into the (unspoken? i don't know) central theme of obama's campaign ie. (gabbneb get ready to cream all over yr pate) 'change vs. more of the same'.

balls, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:34 (sixteen years ago) link

although lol even at this the right is better at it than the left since the left version of questioning mccain's warhero status is hippydippy 'is there such a thing as a warhero really?' whereas the murmurings on the right were 'maybe perhaps he was a collaborator w/ the viet cong?'. you will never beat the right at limbo.

balls, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago) link

admittedly i haven't seen this anywhere in the real world.

then why suggest it here...?

xpost PROJECTING, MUCH?

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:43 (sixteen years ago) link

What's most horrifying about McCain is that, of the generals we've elected president (Washington, Grant, Eisenhower; I won't count Taylor), he's the only one whose war lust is part of his campaign. Goddamn Grant, one of our least impressive presidents, had as his campaign slogan, "Let us have peace"! A banality, sure, and it signalled his party's later betrayal of Lincoln's principles, but telling.

More and more the only Cold War president I admire is Eisenhower, who still did his share of fucked up shit in Guatemala and responding to Brown vs Board of Education, but he'd seen enough blood in his lifetime to pause before committing American troops ANYWHERE, even in Little Rock.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Andrew Jackson? I guess he wasn't a general.

Gavin, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Neither was McCain though.

Gavin, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:56 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain is a general d-bag imo

omar little, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:56 (sixteen years ago) link

well more than war lust it's a replay/continuation of 'we coulda/shoulda won vietnam' myth that the right's been hanging (bizarrely successfully) on dems for thirtyodd years updated for a new war/new generation cf. kinison v. dangerfield.

balls, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 23:58 (sixteen years ago) link

no one on the Democrats' side has said, "Who cares?" History has proven it didn't matter.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:00 (sixteen years ago) link

been enjoying these threads but just loved the way the two Obama stories on Yahoo right now basically dovetail

Analysis: Obama grabs race issue
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080318/ap_on_el_pr/obama_race_matters;_ylt=Anxh28oVs5flhUWtM1OCPINh24cA

Most of the speech was fairly high-minded, with few if any overt appeals for votes. Obama doubtlessly raised eyebrows in many circles, however, with a populist pivot that named a new villain in the racial divide.

"Black anger" and "white resentments," he said, have "distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle-class squeeze: a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices and short-term greed."

Obama's Bid Doesn't Have Support of Most Black Corporate Elite
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080318/pl_bloomberg/aomovfb7iaz8;_ylt=AlmhAeo9WyiJ8aOfPBxpxOus0NUE

March 18 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama's quest to become the first African-American president is being run without the financial support of much of the black corporate elite.

Less than one-third of the 191 black members of the boards of the largest 250 U.S. companies have contributed to the Illinois senator's campaign, according to Federal Election Commission records. The list of board members was compiled by Black Enterprise magazine.

Milton Parker, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

duh, they're hillary supporters. alot of black pols did the same bet hedging themselves and came to vocally regret it once the votes came in; black ceo's can afford to play 'wait and see' longer. i'd be surprised if come november bob johnson was a heavy mccain contributer. that said if obama was in a market sistah souljah bob johnson would make a beautiful one. maybe wait til after north carolina though.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

what

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:29 (sixteen years ago) link

someone explain the killfile thing to me again

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:30 (sixteen years ago) link

McCain's campaign immediately responded, saying the "Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates’ judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief.”

This reminds me of the Dick Cheney line that, when violence escalated in Iraq in 2006, it proved that the insurgency was at its "last gasp" and throwing every last resource into the affray out of desperation. This sort of sad stuff seems to satisfy the faithful, though.

...the real culprits of the middle-class squeeze: a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices and short-term greed.

This line, if pursued by Obama, will no doubt elicit the old "fomenting class warfare" bromide from McCain with the required tsking and finger wagging. However, if the Fed sparks off 15% - 20% inflation by the election (which isn't wholly out of the question the way they're going right now) then the electorate will be in the mood for much more red-meat "eat the rich" rhetoric than this little opening tidbit.

Aimless, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:58 (sixteen years ago) link

shit it's an amazing speech

banriquit, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 00:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4473132

hasselback can kiss my ass

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 01:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I've got no real hate for Hasselback, because she's not smart enough to arrive at conclusions herself. She just listens to Hannity on her way back home every afternoon and then recycles his bullshit the following morning.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 02:52 (sixteen years ago) link

BTW, Hannity today said "I'm no longer a Republican." I don't know if that's a relatively new thing or what.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 03:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Great, if all the dudes of his ilk exit the Republican party officially, they can go back to at least being a little more respectable an opponent.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 03:43 (sixteen years ago) link

this is getting into primary fanfic territory, but i really want Obama to deliver a message that puts the victim-politics, anti-patriotism, AND funny-name memes to bed: that he <3 America like a son of a bitch because a life like his could not have occurred in any other country

-- gff, Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 PM (4 days ago)

o man did i call it or what.

just watched the address, and yeah it's really something. very careful, clear, measured. you could tell he was working a smaller room (sort of wish the cameras were farther back in these things, demme-in-stop-making-sense style). maybe it wasn't his A game but the speech had a cumulative power, i think it's better in reflection, and that's unfakeable.

agree with the general tenor of most liberal commentary (and charles murray, heh) that this is a singular gem of analysis and rhetoric -- you can tell this is a dude who has spent a lifetime explaining difficult shit to people. the self cribbing and the dig at ferraro was a bit much, i guess.

politically, what will this do? i don't know. it's a remarkably beautiful end to an ugly news cycle, but it'll never be done with. hannityland is immune to fact but also to embarrassment; we're going to be hearing about wright forever now. the science says bullshit sticks; once the negatives come up they never go down again. he expects america to be very patient and attentive. maybe that's presidential, maybe it's stupid. if i were to make a prediction, though, i think that this speech will have a long, long shelf life, maybe it will be a real long term blessing.

in pure electoral/charater-ological terms, can anyone believe that either HRC or mccain have the guts or the brains for an address like this? does anyone have any idea what they think this country is and where it comes from, and what their place in it is? it's not mere words; i can't think of another candidate in my lifetime, not even poor sweating Bill, who sees this country as it is with this kind of clarity. and to be able to summon up this kind of acuity in the middle of a huge political crisis is astonishing. here's john dickerson:

Even if you didn't buy everything he said, you might be impressed with a person who can take on such a subject so quickly with such scope. Obama managed to chart the topography of the black church and failures within the African-American community as well as put his finger on the elements of anger that exist in the white community. Remember also that he did all of this while in the middle of a sleep-stealing, gut-punching presidential campaign, which is like writing the speech while riding backward on a flaming unicycle.

my longass .02, thx.

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 03:44 (sixteen years ago) link

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/20080318SheehanBerkeley.jpg
lol left wing 'morans'

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:07 (sixteen years ago) link

rip?

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1658599/bio

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:13 (sixteen years ago) link

http://minx.cc/?post=258049

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Now, once again: Watch Wright's relish -- his nearly orgasmic delight -- in saying "America's chickens... have come home... to roost." Watch this blackhearted monster dance and flutter his hands in a happy flourish as he celebrates and exults in the deaths of 3000 Americans and foreign nationals, all civilians and all innocents, as it represents a vindication of his sickening worldview and a well-deserved comeupppance for the nation he so deeply hates.

Now, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama: As your disgusting spiritual mentor and political guide is publicly celebrating the terrorism of 9/11 as blatantly as the Palestinian terrorists did that very day, and as excitedly as Al Qaeda does:

Would you say these comments are merely "controversial" or potentially "controversial"?

Would you like a second try at that, you rotten bastard?

How many prisoners did he minister to to cancel out this disgusting celebration of mass murder on a mega scale?

How much Hope and Change have you actually delivered to cancel out your own voluntary, bear-hug embrace of this repellent seditionist?

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I read in wiki that he had enlisted in the Navy. But, Obama says he was a marine. Which is it?

Posted by: Mack at March 18, 2008 03:58 PM (6b+T9)

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay reading that broke my brain.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

both:

He then joined the United States Marine Corps and later transferred to the United States Navy where he worked as a cardiopulmonary technician.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Mack, the correct answer to the question "was Jeremiah Wright in the Navy or the Marines?" is, "who gives a damn what some America-hating racist demagogue did between when he got out of school and when he started attracting thousands of America-hating racist supporters?"

Posted by: bgates at March 18, 2008 04:04 PM (z6drm)

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus fucking harold christ

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:25 (sixteen years ago) link

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120588322321046835.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago) link

"Ms. Ferraro was, at worst, saying that Mr. Obama is helped because many Americans want to vote for someone who is black."

hahahaha fuck this guy

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Noncompassionate conversatism

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

also lol dems be vaugely populist shocka

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:36 (sixteen years ago) link

the number of people who would vote for somebody just because he/she is black is probably roughly equal to the number of people who would vote for somebody just because she is female

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i eagerly await the wsj's 'revelation' that homie was a community organizer that 'men like us have fought against for nearly a century'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:40 (sixteen years ago) link

cavalcade of stupid editorials continue

http://www.slate.com/id/2186845/

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:43 (sixteen years ago) link

deej are you giving us a cross-section here or am i to understand you're seeking out the stupid/frustrating ones

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:47 (sixteen years ago) link

stop the presses mickey kaus is a big prick

max, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:48 (sixteen years ago) link

When even Joe Scarborough on MSNBC says "What Barack Obama did today was historic," and Chris Matthews says "I've never heard a speech so free of BS on race as I have in the one by Barack Obama today," then something is up.

Around the blogosphere, reaction was generally positive to Obama's speech in Philadelphia. James Fellows of the Atlantic, who lives in China, watched it and was very impressed:

This was as good a job as anyone could have done in these circumstances, and as impressive and intelligent a speech as I have heard in a very long time. People thought that Mitt Romney's speech would be the counterpart to John Kennedy's famous speech about his faith to the Houston ministers in 1960. No. This was.

At Tapped, the American Prospect blog, Kate Sheppard compared it to Martin Luther King's famous "I have a dream" speech:

King's speech may have been more powerful rhetorically, but this speech really laid down the complexities of race in America in a way that someone with Barack Obama can appreciate in unique ways.

More reaction...

Fellows's colleague at the Atlantic, Andrew Sullivan - an Obama supporter - was effusive:

It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.

Eve Fairbanks at the New Republic's The Plank put the speech into the context of Obama's campaign:

I do think Obama defined his candidacy more in terms of race today, but I guess from my perspective that's a good thing. His calls for 'change' always left me a little cold: change what? After hearing his speech, the 'what?' feels clearer.

Ana Marie Cox on Time's Swampland blog wonders if the speech worked:

Who was Obama talking to? Who was listening? Would any working class white person change their mind after listening to this speech? Would anyone who had decided that Obama has been tainted by Wright now be swayed to vote for him?

On the progressive-left blogosphere, reaction was more muted than in the conventional media. At OpenLeft, one poster headlined it "incredible," and commented: "His biggest gamble is to treat the subject with the depth and seriousness and complexity that it deserves."

Jerome Armstrong at MyDD struck a different note, and was highly critical of what he saw as the politics behind the speech:

What Obama wants to do is pivot it back to Clinton vs Obama, and get the Republican attack on him through Wright off the table, so he's equated Wright and Ferraro multiple times in the speech.... This is pretty ugly and unfair though of Obama, to equate statements by Ferraro with Wright. Obama goes on and on about how great a person Wright is, without a single kind word about Ferraro, just rubbing it in further. I believe the campaign has reached a new low.

Over at the National Review's The Corner - always a harbour of differing opinion - there are some strong reactions or counter-reactions. Charles Murray - that's right, the author of The Bell Curve - posted:

Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I'm concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant - rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America. It is so far above the standard we're used to from our pols.

But several others at the Corner were less impressed. Stanley Kurtz replied:

Far from pulling a Hubert Humphrey or a Tony Blair and casting the radical left out of the party, Obama seems to see his job as getting the rest of the country to adopt a stance of relative complacency toward the most egregious sorts of anti-Americanism - all under the guise of achieving national unity.

Over at Daily Kos, a series of open threads on the subject racked up over 2,000 comments from readers. One, from a reader in Britain, read:

Here in the UK, that speech could never have been made. While racism certainly exists here, it is never acknowledged in the way that Barack Obama just did in his speech. I am heartened by seeing such an honest and heartfelt examination of the issue, and have never been as proud of my country as I was today, watching from abroad.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

lol worldnetdaily haaaaaaated it

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

awesome

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

SPECIAL OFFER
Blacks exploited by their own leadership
Civil-rights establishment makes lucrative career out of keeping racial strife alive
--Shop.WND.com

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:03 (sixteen years ago) link

my old roomate used to refer to WND for all his 'analysis'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:10 (sixteen years ago) link

pundit on today's Talk of the Nation whining about "well why didn't he address this BEFORE"

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:12 (sixteen years ago) link

even clinton was saying complimentary things about this speech, and she hadn't even HEARD it

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:17 (sixteen years ago) link

this is a gimme for her. all she has to do is smile politely and she comes out ahead.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:24 (sixteen years ago) link

this is keeping him in the news cycle and her out of it, though

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Pundits still be whinin'? Who knew?

What a bunch of UGH. Not surprised at all when RW get all entitled about needing 'explanations' and 'repudiations', then get their fucking explanation etc, cue reconfiguration of goalposts. They didn't like that explanation and want another one. Nothing Barack Obama does is ever going to satisfy these people.

Reading the comments upthread has made it seem like all these conservative pundits have moved their goalposts to a moon made of cheese.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:29 (sixteen years ago) link

like until akm mentioned it, asking "what did hrc think of this" hadn't even occurred to me or (i imagine) a lot of people (?)

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:29 (sixteen years ago) link

up until today i think hillary was perfectly happy staying out of this news cycle. PA's a long ways away. as for the conservative pundits, nothing brings out the sharpened knives like overt threats to the natural order.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:40 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/black_guy_asks_nation_for_change

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 06:52 (sixteen years ago) link

From a Guardian commentator:

That's why the speech exemplifies the deepest virtue of Obama's campaign, which is its stand against the politics of picayune bullshit.

Americans have endured election after election in which endlessly amplified talking heads have harped on risible questions of style and shallow analysis of dubious microtrends (Microtrends, of course, being the title of a book by Hillary Clinton's chief strategist). Who can forget all the blathering about Al Gore's embrace of earth tones and the implications for his masculinity? Or speculation as to whether John Kerry's windsurfing would sink him? George Bush had to drive the nation into multi-fronted catastrophe before we stopped hearing about what a fine beer-drinking companion he would make (and that despite the fact that he's a teetotaling recovering alcoholic.)

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 08:40 (sixteen years ago) link

why is it I still laugh at the Onion despite the fact that it's the same joke over and over again

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 08:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Also @ person upthread incredulous re. jocks having to learn the difference between Shia and Sunni - or black 'charismatic' churches, for that matter - in HS. It's a crime when they don't. What's school for? YMMV but I have no doubt that potentially divisive issues such as race and religion can be turned into 'teaching opportunities', even for morans, as this was my experience:

By far the most influential {religion studies] program now in use is that developed by Lee Smith and Wes Bodin of St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Originating in a suburban system near Minneapolis, their course on world religion grew out of a controversy about school holidays. The local community, approximately one-third Lutheran, one-third Jewish and one-third Roman Catholic, was sharply divided. The high school elective course that Smith and Bodin developed has significantly improved interfaith relations. Its carefully crafted materials (filmstrips, tapes and texts) are used nationwide -- indeed, throughout the English-speaking world. Funded by three successive grants from the U.S. Department of Education, the project was able to develop class-tested materials and to enlist the support of recognized historians of religion.

An important aspect of Smith and Bodin’s material is their encouragement and support of pluralism. Each student is expected to be what he or she is religiously; there is no advocacy. At the same time, clergy in the communities where the course has been used report that younger members of their congregations come to them, seeking information.

At the beginning of the Minnesota course, Smith and Bodin ask students to identify religious agencies (synagogues, churches, hospitals, schools), places and persons that they know in their local community. The list turns out to be a long one. Why should all that it represents be taboo in the American public-school curriculum, when it is so deeply a part of American life -- past and present? The NCC’s Kelley reported that recently a leading born-again Christian remarked in public that a great door had been opened by the Supreme Court’s decision on teaching about religion, but it has not yet been walked through. There will have to be more recognition of the need to walk through that door before major dilemmas are overcome.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 09:57 (sixteen years ago) link

believing that the education of children is for liberals to control 2

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 10:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Conflation of unstated liberalism with basic common sense part 2957463

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 10:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Also @ person upthread incredulous re. jocks having to learn the difference between Shia and Sunni - or black 'charismatic' churches, for that matter - in HS. It's a crime when they don't. What's school for?

I wasn't incredulous that they have to learn the difference. I was incredulous that not knowing the difference between rival sects of Islam reminded you of high school jocks, of all things. I mean, yes, many probably don't know the difference, but when are they ever talking about it? "Oh fuck bro, I totally meant 'Sunni' when we were talking earlier about the problems in Kurdistan."

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 12:35 (sixteen years ago) link

An excellent response by Michael Crowley, probably the best I've read yet.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 12:56 (sixteen years ago) link

LOLs. Though in my school it was more like "Shauvot? Is that Jewish for Sabbath, dude? Do you get a free day for that one too?"

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 12:58 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't help but wonder if mlk would've been raked by the media we've got today. seriously, watching the morning news was kind of sickening today. "he didn't distance himself enough from wright" blah blah.

wtf?

sure, i still think the speech was no mlk glory hallway-lou-yeah, but damn.

i have a question for america: do you have a butthead friend that says stupid or at least very opiniated/controversial shit? do you disown that person?

i mean, because i have a load of ultra-conservative family and friends. some of my in-laws are downright embarassing southern bama buttheads who think michael savage is a genius, but are they occasionally funny and actually really nice people? yeah. do i respect their advice on some things? sure. even tho they're lunatics as far as national politics goes, that's not a reason to cut them totally out of my life.

i'm having a really hard time getting the story fed from the media. don't people get that being a politician means sort of well... being polite to people who are on your side 75% of the time, even tho their pretty weird on that other 25%?

nonstory elevated.
m.

msp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 13:30 (sixteen years ago) link

ugh, proofreading is not my friend. i disowned that asshole.
m.

msp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 13:31 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah msp i think that's what the "he's like family" line was trying to convey - we've all got at least a couple of family members who are shitballs insane when it comes to politics but we don't disown them

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 13:36 (sixteen years ago) link

lol http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/play.shtml?mea=229108

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

i just did slate's delegate calculator with the highest estimate for clintons 26 pt lead in pennsylvania and it still leaves her 110 delegates behind obama

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I wasn't incredulous that they have to learn the difference. I was incredulous that not knowing the difference between rival sects of Islam reminded you of high school jocks, of all things. I mean, yes, many probably don't know the difference, but when are they ever talking about it? "Oh fuck bro, I totally meant 'Sunni' when we were talking earlier about the problems in Kurdistan."

This happened all the time when I was in college.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i can't help but wonder if mlk would've been raked by the media we've got today.

No doubt in my mind. Just watched this agitprop doc, War Made Easy, which features a clip of MLK's 'Beyond Vietnam' speech in '67. He called the US government the "leading purveyor of violence in the world." THAT King would be demonized (and was condemned then). And get "distanced" by Obama, you know.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:07 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^^ hi dere missing the point of Obama's speech, namely that we aren't living in the sixties and we've progressed beyond sixties rhetoric.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link

arizona state, right? xp

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:09 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: No, not missing it. The US is still the leading purveyor of violence in the world.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:10 (sixteen years ago) link

And get "distanced" by Obama, you know.

I think you'll find his Wright response is a little more nuanced than that.

Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Um, my point wasn't that King said something that was incorrect, my point was that the media response to King's statements would have been different and would have generated a different political response because it was a different era.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Simon, I read it. He "condemned...the statements... that have caused such controversy." Joe Lieberman, who Barry endorsed in the '06 CT primary over Ned Lamont, has said way more fucked-up shit than the Rev has. Just not "controversial."

Yes, Dan, I accept that.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:16 (sixteen years ago) link

and I know Lieberman isn't Obama's rabbi, so please don't go dere.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:17 (sixteen years ago) link

WAIT OBAMA A JEW

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

The reactions to Obama's speech in the media and elsewhere are a pretty good litmus test of who's a nasty partisan tribalist provocateur and who's actually sane.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

strangely a lot of nasty partisan tribalist provocateurs liked it too

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean, pat robertson and jerry falwell blamed 9-11 on hot gay sex and those guys get invited to whitehouse to have bbq and hang out.

what's more crackpot, that 9-11 was caused by our questionable foreign policy over the last several decades or that it was caused by abortion rights?

nobody's disowning the gop preachers.

msp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:24 (sixteen years ago) link

What's the difference between a nasty partisan tribalist provocateur and a reasonable person whose value system is antithetical to yours?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

ABT TEN DOLLARS LOLOLO !!!!!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

(im aware that that doesnt make any sense)

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Juan Williams _really_ the only guy NPR can find to cover all this stuff(aside from mara liasson)?

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: and where does making a pass at exonerating Israel in the midst of their current atrocities fit into your tribal values?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

What's the difference between a nasty partisan tribalist provocateur and a reasonable person whose value system is antithetical to yours?

Thank you for asking this.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

On Juan Williams -- there's definitely a disingenuous expectations game that's coloring a lot of the reaction to the Obama speech in order to tamp down its significance; According to the prescribed rules of Washington politics, there was an objective that Obama needed to accomplish (distance himself from Wright once and for all) but he failed to do so (when in fact, I think, he accomplished something far more important). I understand where this argument can be explained as the reflex of a political analyst, but covering the political angles and not the actual content serves the public really poorly.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link

OK elmo, what's the significance? It's an intelligent, decent speech when it's not making its overt, pandering political points; but mighty few people are likely to be citing (or remembering it) 3 months from now.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago) link

According to the prescribed rules of Washington politics, there was an objective that Obama needed to accomplish (distance himself from Wright once and for all) but he failed to do so (when in fact, I think, he accomplished something far more important

Listening to Cuban talk radio now, I've made the exact same observation. Someone called in and said (in Spanish), "If he HAD condemned this man, you'd be accusing him of being a typical politician and that his career was finished." The moderator spluttered and cut her off.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

morbus you crazy, it's a huge huge speech. people will be talking about it for the entire election

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:40 (sixteen years ago) link

YAY Cuban radio caller. HI DERE in Wake The Fuck Up OTM.

Yeah basically I'm going with the hope that the tribalist provocation industry will undermine itself by arguing in circles until it goes batshit insane and that most people will recognize the narrative arc rather than be drawn in. I will sell bags of all these popcorn for $2 if people want to settle in and watch.

Morbius, the nuances of getting Israel to do anything reasonable WRT its neighbours without pitching some handbagger of a hissy fit for even *mentioning* Palestine in mixed company are perhaps beyond you, as you are now doing exactly that yourself prompted by Obama's mention of Israel. But we do have to begin by taking responsibility for an alliance of 60 years, hence the use of the word 'stalwart', before that happens. This should be an obvious point of embarkation.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs i think you are very wrong about how long/in what context this will be remembered. honestly i would put money on this thing being printed as a pamphlet/small book, and the only awkward part of it will be all of the stuff about wright ("who's that??") once we get some distance.

and yes it is v frustrating to see the media hold the speech up to a standard that obama v clearly was not addressing. he overshot it on purpose, wanting to raise the level of discourse, etc., and they're all like "wait what about the tawdry????"

YGS, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I fully expect that persons who I sincerely disagree with on fundamental issues can find fault with Obama's speech, and I wouldn't dismiss such a person's interpretation of the speech -- as long as a reaction was offered in good faith and addressed the facial arguments of the speech.

I would not group those reactions in with those who willfully misinterpret the minutiae of Obama's speech and couch their reactions in bad faith and sarcasm.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago) link

that was a major xpost to dan

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs, I would think that someone who knows as much about American political history of the last 50 years as you do would understand that the successful candidates -- the ones who get elected -- make concessions all the time. I'll take Obama's far less onerous contradictions to LBJ's circa 1960.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

so far above the standard we're used to from our pols

most OTM comment i've seen about the speech.

darraghmac, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

"a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."

Morbs, I am all for criticizing Israeli policy but I rather think that Obama is half or at least a third right here. The problems of the Middle East are as much about radical Islam but surely also undemocratic governments and under-developed economies. The economic woes of Egypt can't really be blamed on Israel any more than the parlous state of human rights there. The Sunni/Shia rift in Iraq and between Iran and its Arab neighbors cannot be blamed on Israel. The many problems of Lebanon may be exacerbated by Israel but it's certainly not the cause.

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I understand concessions, I don't have to like them, and I don't find all of Obama's neecessary to victory. (omg, recent McCain Nation article -- he shd just quote that in all his stump stops)

The presumed necessity of "taking responsibility" for things that have been around for 60 years (ie, continuing them essentially unaltered in perpetuity, or until you're forced to change) is part of why who the president is doesn't matter as much as people think. (And I am not blaming Israel for all the woes of the Middle East; they do their part, and Obama has in the past seemeed willing to raise this.)

Yance, if Obama truly thinks he has a shot at raising the level of the discourse regulated by the transglobal media-infotainment behemoth, maybe all you starry-eyed fans are right and he IS a dreamer. Of course, if he's elected prez the speech will be written about and remembered by strategy wonks.

Que, will people also be talking about the Obama folx playing with the huge huge number of flags that would appear behind him (final count: 8)?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Que, will people also be talking about the Obama folx playing with the huge huge number of flags that would appear behind him (final count: 8)?

conspiracy folks, perhaps. people who don't want to focus on the substance of the speech. here's a shocker: politicians manipulate their images alla time. this includes flags.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:54 (sixteen years ago) link

schedules of HRC's First Lady Business have been released:

http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/hrcschedules.html

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:55 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see "order hit on Vince Foster" anywhere.

milo z, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:56 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: yes, Que. They manipulate their remarks too, in essentially similar fashion.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Where's the 1998 "I'm running for president in ten years, BUDDY, ultimatum" entry?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

m white otm - obama wasnt saying lol isreal is dandy. he was comparing the gross simplification that israel is at the root of all middle eastern problems to the gross simplification that racism poisons everything possibly good abt america.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago) link

^This.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago) link

There's a decent amount of mileage to the idea that Obama's speech was too smart for American politics, sadly. I hope that enough people are tired enough of our politics being stupid to actually pay attention to it and follow the intended narrative.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

*Sigh* Dan, I fear you may be sadly OTM.

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Victor Davis Hanson: remember Don Imus!

The new sophistic Obama, however, would recount to us all the charity work and good that Imus had once done and still does, that we don't understand the joshing of the shock-jock radio genre that winks and nods at controversy in theatrical ways, that Imus was a legend and pioneer among talk show hosts, that Obama's own black relatives have on occasions expressed prejudicial statements about whites similar to what Imus does, that we all have our favorite talk shows, whose hosts occasionally cross the line, and that he can't quite remember whether he'd ever been on the Imus show, or whether he ever had heard Imus say anything that was insensitive — and therefore he could not and would not disown a Don Imus.

This is the real message of the Obama racial transcendence candidacy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

^^ this is what i'm talking about when i say disingenuous misreading.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Ol' Vic's just unhappy that this little war thing keeps continuing without resolution. He is tired and needs to lash out.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

This happened all the time when I was in college.

lol Harvard

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I saw that ridiculous comparison start to gain a bit of coverage. National broadcaster who picks on college students on national broadcast and is therefore a bullying bigot is not like niche minister who believes himself to be speaking truth to power in his sermons. Most people get that. The straws (and straw men) these people do clutch at.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link

im thinking the speech was actually pretty clever in delivering a couple messages pretty simply and clearly - wright is my crazy old uncle who i love but dont agree with and i understand that everyone regardless of race suffers in similar ways - and then surrounding them w/lots of sophistication and subtlety.

compelling that these messages dont really have that much political appeal but are rather spoken in the language of everyday concerns.

ive said it like 1mx on this thread but obama is a fucking ingenious politician.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, I was happy that Obama's speech made the cover of the free tabloid aimed at young city dwellers that the Chicago Tribune puts out, and that the coverage was mostly positive.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago) link

"a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that these 'perverse and hateful' ideologies are a result of the conflict rather than the origins of the conflict? How much sense does it make to talk about radical islamism in 1948? Nationalism, yes, but the Al-Qaeda types come about later, and emerge from conflict.

Either way, it's not a big point in his speech, and it's wrong to focus too much on it. But I don't think it helps to counter a worldview that blames the middle-east on Israel with one that blames it on islamism.

dowd, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

man, whatever, the israel thing was necessarily because of the legions of assholes painting wright as anti-semitic - if you genuinely think obama is going to govern as some kind of zionist lieberman type u madd

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I understand why he said it, and I think it was necessary. I think the statement was incorrect, but that doesn't mean it wasn't expedient.

dowd, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:26 (sixteen years ago) link

and what otm. what obama needs right now is just one person from the anti-defamation league to come out and say "dude did alright we trust him" and this *could* end the news cycle.

YGS, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

all events and actions have myriad causes some of them stretching back hundreds or thousands of years - but once you start behaving like al quaeda et al you lose the right to blame - which is obamas point here

sure israel has been horrible but to look at all the other horrible actors in the middle east and then point at israel is retarded

i mean we could just all point at hitler - pretty much everyone hates him right

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

I know I do, the Nazi fuck!

onimo, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Now, turning from God and race, back to Mammon... why are some of Wall Street's most nefarious firms stuffing Obama's coffers? Pam Martens of Counterpunch:

On February 10, 2005, Senator Obama voted in favor of the passage of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005....

Senator Obama graduated Harvard Law magna cum laude and was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. Given those credentials, one assumes that he understood the ramifica­tions to the poor and middle class in this country as he helped to gut one of the few weapons left to seek justice against giant corporations and their legions of giant law firms. The class-action vehicle confers upon each citizen one of the most powerful rights in our society: the ability to function as a private attorney general and seek redress for wrongs inflicted on ourselves as well as for those similarly injured that might not otherwise have a voice....

So, how should we react when we learn that the top contributors to the Obama campaign are the very Wall Street firms whose shady mortgage lenders buried the elderly and the poor and minority under predatory loans? How should we react when we learn that on the big donor list is Citigroup, whose former employee at CitiFinancial testified to the Federal Trade Commission that it was standard practice to target people based on race and educational level, with the sales force winning bonuses called “Rocopoly Money” (like a sick board game), after “blitz” nights of soliciting loans by phone? How should we react when we learn that these very same firms, arm in arm with their corporate lawyers and registered lobbyists, have weakened our ability to fight back with the class-action vehicle?

...Who better to sell (Wall Street's) agenda to the millions of duped mortgage holders and foreclosed homeowners in minority communities across America than our first, beloved, black president of hope and change?

http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/16601

http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=548&Itemid=1

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

GODWIN

NEW THREAD

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Sure, but to say that the conflict "emanates" from radical Islam - ie the source or origin of the conflict is radical Islam - is just as dumb as the anti-zionist explanation. When a conflict has involved many generations, dozens of administrations of dozens of countries and millions of people, it no longer makes much sense to talk about blame one way of the other - and that certainly isn't the way to solve anything. But like I said, it was a small art of a speech and I understand why he had to say it, I just disagree is all.

dowd, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

x-posts, obv

dowd, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont think he was using emanate in a historical sense here - more like where the hate is radiating from

not that im saying you can really separate these conflicts from their histories

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama, today:

There is a security gap in this country – a gap between the rhetoric of those who claim to be tough on national security, and the reality of growing insecurity caused by their decisions. A gap between Washington experience, and the wisdom of Washington’s judgments. A gap between the rhetoric of those who tout their support for our troops, and the overburdened state of our military.

http://thepage.time.com/full-text-of-obamas-iraq-speech/

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

(x-post) Yeah, I guess that makes sense. Anyway, nothing more boring than talking about the middle east. Back to polls, graphs and zings...

dowd, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

lol yah

re obama on national security: wow someones not afraid of heavy lifting

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"Sen. Obama and his campaign like to talk about transparency. We call on him to back up his words with action and release his schedules and other records from his time as an Illinois State Senator."

oh noes they want schedules!! lol

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

huckabee on Obama's speech and Wright:


HUCKABEE: (Obama) made the point, and I think it's a valid one, that you can't hold the candidate responsible for everything that people around him may say or do. You just can't. Whether it's me, whether it's Obama...anybody else. But he did distance himself from the very vitriolic statements.

Now, the second story. It's interesting to me that there are some people on the left who are having to be very uncomfortable with what Louis Wright said, when they all were all over a Jerry Falwell, or anyone on the right who said things that they found very awkward and uncomfortable years ago. Many times those were statements lifted out of the context of a larger sermon. Sermons, after all, are rarely written word for word by pastors like Reverend Wright, who are delivering them extemporaneously, and caught up in the emotion of the moment. There are things that sometimes get said, that if you put them on paper and looked at them in print, you'd say "Well, I didn't mean to say it quite like that."

JOE SCARBOROUGH: But, but, you never came close to saying five days after September 11th, that America deserved what it got. Or that the American government invented AIDS...

HUCKABEE: Not defending his statements.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Oh, I know you're not. I know you're not. I'm just wondering though, for a lot of people...Would you not guess that there are a lot of Independent voters in Arkansas that vote for Democrats sometimes, and vote for Republicans sometimes, that are sitting here wondering how Barack Obama's spiritual mentor would call the United States the USKKK?

HUCKABEE: I mean, those were outrageous statements, and nobody can defend the content of them.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: But what's the impact on voters in Arkansas? Swing voters.

HUCKABEE: I don't think we know. If this were October, I think it would have a dramatic impact. But it's not October. It's March. And I don't believe that by the time we get to October, this is gonna be the defining issue of the campaign, and the reason that people vote.

And one other thing I think we've gotta remember. As easy as it is for those of us who are white, to look back and say "That's a terrible statement!"...I grew up in a very segregated south. And I think that you have to cut some slack -- and I'm gonna be probably the only Conservative in America who's gonna say something like this, but I'm just tellin' you -- we've gotta cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told "you have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can't sit out there with everyone else. There's a separate waiting room in the doctor's office. Here's where you sit on the bus..." And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.

MIKA: I agree with that. I really do.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: It's the Atticus Finch line about walking a mile in somebody else's shoes. I remember when Ronald Reagan got shot in 1981. There were some black students in my school that started applauding and said they hoped that he died. And you just sat there and of course you were angry at first, and then you walked out and started scratching your head going "boy, there is some deep resentment there."

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i heard that hillary has like a cabinet drawer full of skee-ball tickets that she's hidden from everyone except the chuck e. cheese redemption center

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:53 (sixteen years ago) link

A Huck/Obama contest would have been pretty interesting.

Sparkle Motion, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

yah it totally wouldve

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

the FOIA requests for Clinton's schedules were made back in 2006, and this was really set to occur without prompting from either campaign. And FWIW, Clinton camp is being a little too self-congratulatory about its transparency when the disclosure was the result of a FOIA request.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

holy shit re:scarborough/huck

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Props to the Huck for that.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Scarborough is an oaf, but that is an exchange I can't say I'd ever have thought I'd see.

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

what obama needs right now is just one person from the anti-defamation league to come out and say "dude did alright we trust him" and this *could* end the news cycle.

-- YGS, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 15:27 (26 minutes ago)

yeah good luck with that... dana milbank at a 3-way surrogate QA on israel. Dan Kurtzer for Obama, Ann Lewis for HRC, Lawrence Eagleburger for McC:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/17/AR2008031702440.html

The skepticism continued through the question time. Daroff said he had "heard in the hallways here" that Obama "doesn't see the U.S.-Israel relationship as much of the mainstream of the Senate or the Jewish community sees it."

Kurtzer blamed such sentiment on "attack dogs" and writers of scurrilous e-mails. "He's right within the mainstream of American society and Jewish community concerns," TBA said.

Next question to Kurtzer: Obama's assertion that he needn't have a "Likud view" -- that of Israel's right-wing party -- to be pro-Israel. Kurtzer explained that Obama wanted to see a "plurality of views." Silence in the room.

To that, Lewis retorted: "The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel. It is not up to us to pick and choose from among the political parties." The audience members applauded.

Eagleburger piled on. "There's a distinction between those you do talk to," he said, "and those who declare themselves as intent on the destruction of the state of Israel. And if that's their policy, I think we ought not talk to them." More applause.

A conference attendee from Richmond pressed Kurtzer on Obama's "judgment about not disavowing Reverend Wright's views earlier." Another question prompted a back-and-forth about whether Obama had been advised by Brzezinski, who won the enmity of pro-Israel groups for, among other things, accusing Israel of the "killing of hostages" in Lebanon.

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Ywah, color me a little shocked.

Hopefully Obama's defense speech will get the attention it needs - probably it won't, though.

Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ, i hope she didn't mean that the way it came out

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

shocked in ref to Huck exchange xp

Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

notes on defence speech:

i) it's dealing with the good old bush-era conceits WITHOUT ACTUALLY USING the terms 'war on terror' or 'axis of evil'
ii) "First, in addressing global terror and violent extremism, we need the kind of comprehensive counter-terrorism strategy I called for last August. ... We need to give our national security agencies the tools they need, while restoring the adherence to rule of law that helps us win the battle for hearts and minds. This means closing Guantanamo, restoring habeas corpus, and respecting civil liberties. "

thomp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i may be reading too much into this, but the idea that it's necessary for the eh war on terror to have moral accountability to 'win' it is a pretty good elevating-the-discourse move

iii) it's very concrete for an obama speech, in terms of 'as president i would do x, y, z'

thomp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's approach is very similar to the one I was hoping for in 2002.

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

iv) not as rhetorically amazing as the race speech, unfortunately
v) full of usual useful stuff for people to meaninglessly pick at, - here's a list - positive mentions of nixon and reagan, america 'facing down fascism', also 'shining beacon of democracy during cold war', american-focussed historical problems viz. how long was world war ii again, etc -

thomp, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

here's the vid of Huck on Joe Scar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTFLOu8fjxU

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm guessing you're all almost done w/ the Counterpunch money-trail articles.

first one to REAL WORLD! buys lunch

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

wright discussion starts at about 3:20 xpost

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Just came here to post this article about that Ann Lewis quote re: Israel

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/18/top_clinton_deputy_the_role_of/

StanM, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee is almost the epitome of a rational person whose beliefs are antithetical to mine (I say "almost" because I am not convinced he's rational).

HI DERE, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee should run for Senate when his governorship term is up - he could become the new McCain - ie., the Dem's favorite Republican maverick.

o. nate, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

he should replace jay leno as host of the tonight show

jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

he's more rational than tyra lol

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

damnit I want to read that TPM thing about the Israel quote but I keep getting a browser error. Fuck an Internet Explorer.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I would buy satellite radio if I could listen to the Morning Zoo with Mike Huckabee and DMX.

Eazy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

In Tuesday's Washington Post, Dana Milbank reports on a debate between McCain, Obama and Clinton deputies at a United Jewish Communities(the old UJA-Federation) event in Washington on Monday.

According to Milbank, it was the usual Jewish organizational political event where candidates or their representatives try to outdo themselves by demonstrating their "fealty to Israel."

Ann Lewis, a top Clinton aide, tore into Obama (she is the campaign's main Obama attacker on Jewish issues) for having said that "unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, then you're anti-Israel" and that the "the debate in Israel is much more open than it often is in the United States."

Lewis rejects that view. "The role of the presidents of the United States is to support decisions made by the people of Israel." Netanyahu, Rabin? Not our business to prefer one over another. Not our business to help Israel achieve peace and security rather than maintain the deadly status quo.

That's an amazing statement in so many ways.

The role of the President of the United States is to implement policies that best benefit not the people of Israel but the people of the United States. That is why George HW Bush and Bill Clinton openly tilted toward Rabin and Peres during their terms in office. Doing so was right for America, and for Israel too.

In any case, the role of the President is not to "support decisions" made by Israelis, Brits, Germans or anybody but Americans.

Lewis was debating Ambassador Dan Kurtzer, an Orthodox Jew who was our ambassador to both Egypt and Israel and is an outspoken Obama supporter. I don't know about Lewis but Kurtzer has been involved in Jewish life as long as I have, which is our whole lives. He said the anti-Obama smears in the Jewish community are lies spread by campaign "attack dogs."

That is true, of course. No one believe Obama is anti-Israel just as nobody believes he is anti-white, a Muslim or an anti-American. But that won't stop rival campaigns and their deputies from spreading the lies.

Nor will it stop Jews from supporting Obama. No doubt Milbank is correct. There probably was alot of anti-Obama sentiment at the UJC meeting. So what? The overwhelming majority of American Jews were neither in the room nor represented by anyone who was. Jews have voted in the primaries like the rest of Democrats. Jews under 60 are overwhelmingly for Obama, over 60 for Clinton. In neither age category, is it Israel that determines their vote but rather what's good for America.

Yesterday I spoke to a student at a large midwestern univerrsity with thousands of Jewish students. He said he was the "loneliest kid on campus." "I'm Jewish, I'm male and for Clinton. I think I'm the only one. All the Jewish kids are for Obama."

Even the women, I asked.

"There are a few Jewish women for Hillary but they keep their heads down. Hillary does not have much Jewish support. Period."

That is no surprise. Jews have been at the forefront of anti-war and civil rights activities in this country from time immemorial. It would be startling if the children of the kids who came to Washington by the hundreds of thousands to protest the Vietnam war and then worked to elected Bobby Kennedy, Gene McCarthy and George McGovern had shifted rightward. They haven't.

The older folks (with the exception of types like me who are pretty comon among Jews) just don't get the kids' music. What's new about that?

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Hmm, apparently Huckabee has denied he has any designs on the Senate (and his governorship is already over):

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20080308%5cACQRTT200803082111RTTRADERUSEQUITY_0046.htm&&mypage=newsheadlines&title=Huckabee%20Says%20He%20Won't%20Run%20Against%20Pryor

o. nate, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

this just in:

michigan mulligan: so not gonna happen

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks, was just going to do that - that's the TPM article you couldn't read, Hurting 2. (xpost)

StanM, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

xx, that is

StanM, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:39 (sixteen years ago) link

rational /= 'reasonable' dan! pretty much everyone on this thread (far as i know - i could be wrong) is reasonable. even morbs is REASONABLE in a enraged/engorged mclaughlin-germond luvchild way. pretty fucking slim few are RATIONAL. i mean dear god was this place always like this? ponderous! anyhow what gets me about huck is that his reasonableness is clearly rooted in his faith as much as his batshit 'lock up the gays!' unreasonableness.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, basically says what I thought.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee should run for Senate when his governorship term is up - he could become the new McCain - ie., the Dem's favorite Republican maverick.

picturing a Wire season-closing montage set to "You Can't Always Get What You Want" with McCain walking morosely down the steps of the Senate, followed by a Huck's Scarborough appearance.

Simon H., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is slamming out historic speeches every day now

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

dude's the lil wayne of speeches

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

" - sasha frere jones"

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I still wouldn't rule out a 2010 Senate run for Huckabee, when the other Arkansas senate seat is up for election. I think that he probably was just ready for a rest from campaigning this year, and the goodwill and recognition he built up this year will still be around in 2010.

o. nate, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

even morbs is REASONABLE in a enraged/engorged mclaughlin-germond

ewwww, ewww, ewww

So none of you really care about where Obama's getting his $$$ from, huh? Even if it's the subprime/pre- and post-post-Katrina bandits? I thought his was a NEW politics...

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

thank god we have a 100% clean money candidate like Ralph Nader with such a realistic shot of winning the white house

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Hooray for impotent moral absolutes!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Three cheers for accomplishing nothing!

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

So none of you really care about where Obama's getting his $$ from, huh?

He's not demonstrated any inclination to return political favors based on donations in his presidential campaign, so until that happens, I can't say I care all that much.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

lol nader's money is pretty far from clean.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Wasn't that the joek lol

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Well observed there, balls.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

you people kinda deserve what yer gonna get.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

What's that going to be?

dan m, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Whereas you will continue to live happily in the nation of Morbius.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Ixnay on the Uckabeehay as Enatorsay, easeplay.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, I guess Perrin has been lurking...

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

What's your favorite speech, Morbs? What sets the standard for you?

Eazy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

pp what can you tell me about yr boy mark pryor? some hot chick i know (jena knows her too) is interning w/ him.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:58 (sixteen years ago) link

eazy he already said kucinich or sharpton up above.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

McGovern '72 (balls, indeed)

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

TPM:EC on why the Michigan mulligan wouldn't have mattered anyway:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/michigan_post.php

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: not speech, candidate.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

But, but Morbs, what's your standard for a politician who has won an election?

Eazy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link

you people kinda deserve what yer gonna get.

-- Dr Morbius, Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:54 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

The fact that nu-ilx doesn't let us ban people from individual threads?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah the way he caved on eagleton, what fortitude. if only obama had been brave enough to handle this rev. wright situation the same way.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I SEE, NO MISTAKES ALLOWED

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean jesus mcgovern wasn't even the best candidate in 72 for fuxx sake.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Mark Pryor is probably more conservative than Giuliani or Bloomberg, a classic blue-dog Democrat. His dad was governor and senator as well. He's popular in the state and is running unopposed for re-election this year. (He's only served one term so far, making the fear of the Republicans not sacrificing anyone even more astonishing.)

Huckabee versus Pryor would've been a close race. They're both social conservatives with a huge populist touch. If Huckabee runs against Blanche Lincoln in 2010, it won't be as close for Huck. He lost a lot of support from local Republicans during the primaries, he'll be quite a bit more faded by then, and everyone just adores our Senator Blanche.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

where were you in '72, balls?

Don't answer. seeya.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at morbs 'caving in to nixon campaign at a time when liberalism was still powerful/relevant is okey dokey - not caving in to limbaugh/hannity at a time when liberalism is dead/buried is wishy washy' twostep.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

You know Morbs if you dropped the sanctimony I imagine a lotta people in this thread might be more receptive to your points. And Dennis Perrin is the worst kind of bombthrower.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

that dennis perrin post could be michael savage

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Know who McGovern's campaign manager was?

Michael White, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Dr. Morbious, you call yourself "DR MORBIOUS", I'm therefore not going to take anything you say seriously. I picture you wearing a cape and gnashing your teeth behind a mask, punching an iron-gloved fist into the palm of your other gloved hand, so angry about your irrelevance

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

apologies if you are in fact a Dr. named "Morbious"

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

MW, Gary Hart.

take "balls" seriously instead.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I picture you wearing a cape and gnashing your teeth behind a mask, punching an iron-gloved fist into the palm of your other gloved hand

Dr. M = MF Doom

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i am starting to doubt that dr. c is really a doctor, he is probably one of those internet people who like to call themselves a doctor. probably has aspies.

-- cutty, Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:23 PM (5 months ago) Bookmark Link

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

http://elections.foxnews.com/files/2008/03/clinton_pa_031808.jpg

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

the more relevant question, seems to me, is where were you in 1980, and can anybody tell me what happened to the incumbent, and the incumbent's party

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

how deeply involved was warren beatty in the mcgovern campaign? i've read stories but figured they were akin to hillary and sinbad facing down mladic.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

where were you in '72, balls?

sometimes the answer is in the question ;)

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

lolz

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:20 (sixteen years ago) link

"Yes, yes -- front, back, on our knees, bent over, sprawled out, switched up, port, stern, aft, the whole fucking thing!"

"Gotcha! Watch the teeth, lube the hands, steady strokes, maintain the rhythm!"

^^ morbs if any ilxor tossed this kind of gay baiting bs your way you'd flip the fuck out

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

you're an idiot.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

no really you would

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i kinda took issue with that myself

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

be honest morbs, if jaymc tossed that yr way you would flip out now, don't be coy. you'd be on chat in like 3 seconds.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

"Yes, yes -- front, back, on our knees, bent over, sprawled out, switched up, port, stern, aft, the whole fucking thing!"

"Gotcha! Watch the teeth, lube the hands, steady strokes, maintain the rhythm!"

funny enough this seems to be morbz's policy on dennis perrin

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:32 (sixteen years ago) link

that perrin post is like a bad hip-hop skit

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

being smug about obama's cult of personality is pretty rich coming from a ron paul endorser

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

did perrin srsly endorse paul or are we talking morbs who has completely ceased to amaze me

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i meant perrin but that works for both

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2008/01/pauling.html

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

loooooool holy shit

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Whatever Paul actually believes about minorities and queers is not the real concern here. What bothers liberals, TNR's James Kirchik among them, is that Paul is the only presidential candidate who is seriously running against the state. This includes anti-imperialism and calls to end the Drug War.

this is disingenuous AND nonsensical. Lolz at all those pro-imperialism pro-drug war librulz...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Think the Branch Davidians were paranoid?

http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050418/050418_waco.h2.jpg

Then vote Hillary or Obama. And sleep tight.

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

some bold, insightful commentary from tim mcveigh dennis perrin there

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

from that Perrin post on Paul, proving that ethan is a subliterate lil fuck:

I may not agree with most of his beliefs, nor that of the anti-statist right overall

so another lie, and bye thraid

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

haven't you said bye like 47 times now

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs you keep promising to go away but you keep coming back. MORE POLITICS AS USUAL.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

lol morbs resorts to the marge schott defense. saw it coming btw.

balls, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Word leaked out yesterday evening that Obama was coming to Portland to the hockey arena. Tickets were free and are already gone, of course.

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Guardian reporting Hillary generally nowhere to be found when policy relevant to "experience" being reported YET was in WH when Monica happened.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:01 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/19/hillaryclinton.uselections20081

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

http://images.politico.com/global/naftasked.jpg

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i already have the scheds from 96 on my flash drive

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

why didn't the press come to you then?!?

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

bias

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

anti-hoos

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

So none of you really care about where Obama's getting his $$$ from, huh? Even if it's the subprime/pre- and post-post-Katrina bandits? I thought his was a NEW politics...

-- Dr Morbius, Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:48 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

hes getting it from over 1 million people, including me

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, to attempt a serious response to that:

wall street has and will always have a shit ton of money to throw around, and will spend on politics. i can't really do anything about that, i can only control what i do with my own money.

it seems unlikely to me that Obama will do anything for these people because they've given him a lot of money, & having a shitload of tiny donors like me insulates him from needing them too much...hopefully. big donations like that don't come from enthusiasm and belief, like an individual, they are tactical. the minimal chance at some access down the road is worth whatever figure they've given (a pittance, no matter how big it looks).

wall street types are betting people: if they're giving Obama money it means they are betting he's going to win.

gff, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

^^otm

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Today: yet another pretty great speech (on foreign policy)

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGBFrl

StanM, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:54 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i already have the scheds from 96 on my flash drive

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, March 19, 2008 4:07 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

whats your sched manana?

and what, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Sully links to this American Conservative post that's worth reading. Highlights:

I am more sanguine about Obama’s Wright problem, in part because I was not aggrieved by Rep. Paul’s association with that newsletter business, and because I generally regard most anti-racism crusades as a lot of hyperventilating by professional activists and hacks. It still puzzles me how angry and even hateful words are regarded as virtual stoning offenses, but warmongering is a mainstream, respectable, even “responsible” thing to do. For the most part, the former are awful but do no real harm, while the latter leads to the slaughter of thousands, but it is the former that disqualifies someone while the latter is virtually a requirement to wield executive power.

The telling point is that most of Wright’s critics on the right were primarily offended by his “anti-Americanism,” a term that they deploy so frequently that one wonders if even they know what they mean by it any longer. It was his offenses against their sense of what nationalism requires that have bothered them the most. Meanwhile, the reaction in Middle America generally will often be similar to the one this reader reported: mockery and disbelief. Imagine that you are someone living in the middle of the country and have been lectured to your entire life about the prejudices that you need to overcome, and then you hear that Obama, the great reconciler, has ties to someone who possesses what you have been conditioned your entire life to believe is the absolute worst sort of sentiment, and then add to that the recognition that Obama’s actual politics are far removed from yours and then guess what the response will be to his speech addressing this issue. The very resentments that Obama was explaining in his speech, for which he demonstrated at least some understanding, were inevitably going to be summoned up by any major speech he gave on this question; it is a pity that his supporters cannot make some similar display of understanding. For my part, I have given Obama the benefit of the doubt on this, probably to the annoyance of many of my readers–should the same courtesy not be extended to his critics?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama thinks O.J. did it.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:36 (sixteen years ago) link

the Wright thing is pretty obviously hurting Obama in the polls:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105205/Gallup-Daily-Clinton-Moves-Into-Lead-Over-Obama.aspx

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Most of that was taken prior to Obama's speech yesterday.

Having said that, I think the speech -- great as it was -- will help him far less than I gather many of you think it will (especially in the GE).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

It's only March and the GOP are still palpably more worried abt facing Obama than Hillary. Who may well have her own problems to rise above in the next few days.

suzy, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:45 (sixteen years ago) link

man rap moves fast with the internet:

Crooked I, on this week's hip-hop dx freestyle over the big dreams beat:

"this how us criminal's ride
i talk reckless like john mccain's spiritual guide
i talk greasy like barack obama's preacher
but on the lyrical side
so greasy it's like my lyrics are fried"

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I don't think the speech is going to help him enough either. Question is more whether the media continues to run with the issue and how it plays the issue. Obama's opponents (I think this is primarily the right's doing but maybe Clinton too) have gradually been planting doubts in people's mind, building this narrative that Obama is a mysterious stranger who can't be trusted and is secretly anti-American in some way or other. The Michelle Obama comment played into that, the Wright coverage really fueled the fire, and now they're going to try to make political hay out of other connections Obama has, and even more tenuous ones may stick if people buy the overall narrative. That's my concern anyway.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm almost afraid to hear my in-laws' take on this. They had started to come around to supporting Obama, and they're exactly the sort of voters who I fear could be swayed by this sort of thing.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:53 (sixteen years ago) link

BTW, I think Gabbnebb above called me a "Clintonista," which I just want to clarify is not true. I much prefer Obama. I'm just concerned this issue isn't going to go away so easily, and I hope the Obama is crafting an ingenious strategy to deal with this without looking overly defensive.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

the Obama campaign

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

dude its March. the media is hyperventilating about this crap right now because the primaries are draggin on and they need fodder. there will be bigger issues than this that bubble to the fore between now and the convention, and especially between the convention and the GE.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess you know you live in berkeley when nothing wright said sounds very surprising or shocking at all. he sounds like everyone I knew in college.

akm, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ yeah, I was like "lolz, Ice Cube record"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, none of it sounded shocking to me either - had lefty grandparents, went to a mostly black high school in DC, etc. But I think it's obvious a lot of America does not appreciate the context of Rev. Wright and Trinity Church.

Believe me, I hope this does blow over. I'm not suggesting anyone switch their primary vote. Even if this turns out to be real baggage for Obama I still think he's ultimately the stronger Dem candidate.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 22:11 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing that caught my mom off guard -- she got most of what Wright was saying but the bits about manufactured AIDS broadsided her, she was shocked to see the crowd applauding a 'conspiracy theory' -- and I found myself talking about that sample at the beginning of PE's "Meet The G That Killed Me" & Ice Cube records released 18 years ago, these ideas are multi-platinum mainstream

Milton Parker, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton bluntly challenged Barack Obama to agree to new primaries in Michigan and Florida on Wednesday and said it was "wrong, and frankly un-American" not to have the two delegations seated at the Democratic National Convention

deej, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Which is of course bullshit, since dude said repeated that they should be seated.

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i need to get out of this bubble more often to keep myself from flipping out and doing things like spending half an hour googling reactions to the speech out of fear it was poorly received and now oh noes the election is over and mccain is presidetn

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:39 (sixteen years ago) link

yea i know. this shit is driving me insane. i waste hours and hours reading blogs/news netorks/polls/campaign memos/talk show transcripts/right-wing wingnuts' reactions/this thread and i've been pretty consistently stressed out basically since the south carolina primary.

my girlfriend just reads the emails the obama campaign sends out, for her updates. she's not stressed at all and certainly doesn't have campaign rhetoric running through her head when she's falling asleep at night.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

http://portland.craigslist.org/search/sss?query=obama

People going nuts for tickets already

kingfish, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Somebody quite a ways upthread asked for "foreign" perspectives on this race, so I'm going to try and put across something that's been bothering me a lot since this Reverend Wright controversy.

But first of all, I have to say that this entire thread (which I've lurked all over in its entirety!) is testimony to a healthy, surviving democracy in America that has clearly -- if not fully escaped -- at least survived the ravages of the cynical neocons thus far, which you have to say is a victory in itself.

Also, that suzy is consistently, profoundly OTM over the course of this long, long thread, even if she isn't the only one (just the most consistent/prominent).

But here's my take on Reverend Wright:

What exactly is so reprehensible about what he said? To someone who is a citizen of a country that still believes in the separation of church and state (Canada, y'all, in which that remains largely true, thanks be to Whatever), the difference between "god bless America" and "god damn America" is quite honestly pretty fucking negligible. Why should this even matter to politics? It's an empty slogan whichever way you slice it. The fact that the former is the dominant mainstream soundbite, ubiquitous as any other two- or three-word phrase coined since 2001 (mission accomplished, bring it on, let's roll), makes as much difference to the economy, the failed war in Iraq, health care, education, etc., as does a sticker declaring "Support Our Troops" slapped slightly askew yet prominent on the hornet-yellow ass-end of an H3.

Okay, the "US of KKK" is pretty silly and inflammatory and old-skool, but I think Barack dealt with that one in his speech, pretty much by not going there fully. In other words, it's a generational thing, and he was careful to acknowledge where the madness of our (collective) crazy uncles originates -- within the pain of the past -- while urging all of us (and as a non-American I hear this call too) to move forward and onward, assimilating the traumatic strands of history while simultaneously reconciling them, perhaps coming to terms with them in order to transcend them.

I know this is boilerplate preaching to the choir, but hear me out.

Last but not least is his declaration that 9/11 was the hawkish chickens of late 20th Century U.S. foreign policy returning to their henhouse. Let me state the obvious that most U.S. commentators are studiously, assiduously ignoring: of course it fucking was. Alongside a defensive, self-pitying aspect of fundamentalist Islam, 9/11 was a perfect storm of ugliness, horror and outrage. Personally, I still feel traumatised after witnessing the events of that day as portrayed on our TV screens. I dearly wish that those 3000 people -- representing a cross section of the world, really -- hadn't died that day, and so horribly. But my sorrow for those people does not preclude my sense that American foreign policy was partly responsible for the vicious and callous attacks as carried out by Bin Laden and his deluded, murderous followers, as well as incompetence on the part of a new administration both steeped in Cold War anachronisms and hellbent on not heeding the real world warnings of their loathed predecessors, the Clinton administration. Reverend Wright is completely rational in his assertion that foreign attacks on America tend to follow egregious foreign policy on the part of the United States internationally. Hell, I'm English by birth, and I always understood that the IRA attacks on the English mainland followed British foreign policy in Northern Ireland, however complex the issues. It's simple logic.

So why is Obama, brilliant and perhaps even revolutionary as his speech was, unable to completely extricate himself from this mess? I have no idea. I know that the media is trying to paint him into a corner of effete Yankee intellectualism a la John Kerry, as well as sow seeds of outsider doubt in regard to his "differences". There's a palpable sense of resistance toward Obama that feels like racism and yet is so diffuse and amorphous that you cannot make that accusation directly toward any one source. Which indicates the depth to which racism infects America (something I don't feel any smugness about, given my own country's record vis a vis First Nations peoples).

I don't know. I just think that the existence of the so-called netroots, of the slightly unhinged and bloviating blogosphere, of youth and passionate hope in the pursuit of the concrete instead of the fantastic, of this (and the previous and the next) thread of ilxors grappling with this historic race, all of this gives me hope that some of the disastrous consequences of the last seven or eight years can begin to be undone, even if it might mean unpicking one thread at a time.

Sorry if the above is a bit of a rhetorical jungle, but someone did ask earlier for different (non-American) perspectives, and this is as honest and uncensored a viewpoint as I could muster, given my own biases and my white Anglo-Irish-Canadian working class background.

Lostandfound, Thursday, 20 March 2008 04:32 (sixteen years ago) link

any bible-reader who has any passing familiarity with the book of jeremiah could tell you that wright was not the first guy to invoke the prophetic device of calling woe, woe unto his corrupt, backsliding nation.

just sayin'.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, that suzy is consistently, profoundly OTM over the course of this long, long thread, even if she isn't the only one (just the most consistent/prominent).

uh what? didnt she start posting in this thread pretty recently?

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't think the religious aspect of the speech has gotten enough attention. it was almost as much about religion as it was about race. all that church talk, bonding over crazy pastors that they love, was a curve ball around the filter of the religious right media. he turned it into a church story. i don't know how successfully, because i'm probably not one of the people it's aimed at. but i think mike huckabee's reaction is kind of telling.

tipsy mothra, Thursday, 20 March 2008 05:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej, I have been all over these threads but more intensively than usual in the past week or so.

Elmo, that's the basis of cheap, ironic laughs over here in Atheism Corner, where we have read Bibles an' ting. When you consider that this C21 Jeremiah has beefs, comes from a line of ministers and also has a scholarly, loyal pal called Barack it just becomes LOLtastic. Huckabee knows his Jeremiahs from his bullfrogs and we already know he can do irony.

Lostandfound, I do notice a disturbing 'hmph, he seems like an honest man and a decent person but he still has to CONVINCE ME' amongst undecided white voters whose institutionalized racism is still couched in sentences like 'I'm not racist, but...' Also they do not realise that it's a white privilege thing - they don't feel privileged - to be able to keep moving the goalposts on a black man the way they do, to be able to say 'I liked him but NOW THIS, disappointed ex-Obama voter, he's just One Of Them' or worse, as if they are waiting for a way to be excused from supporting a candidate that all rationality would suggest is the best of the three still standing.

Among this cohort is also a tendency to vilify Michelle Obama for appearing to complain about America when she's so lucky and because of her opportunities she's entitled to zero beefs whatsoever? Fuck off, there is no threshold you pass where you suddenly have too much money or opportunity to tell your own damned country it could be doing better.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 06:49 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>To someone who is a citizen of a country that still believes in the separation of church and state (Canada, y'all, in which that remains largely true, thanks be to Whatever)</i>

Isn't the Queen the head of state there? ie head of the Anglican Church?

I doubt that Obama's speech, good though it was, will have much effect where it needs to now, ie white blue collar voters. Giving a speech about race - whatever its content - is ultimately going to have the effect of making him look 'more black' to white people who already have doubts about Obama's supposed 'otherness'.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 20 March 2008 09:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Zelda, the irony of countries like Britain or Canada being less spun by religion than America despite having a state role for religion (and by giving religion a state role, some here argue that it is effectively ring-fenced) is not lost on ILX. I always explain American religious fucknuttery away to my London neighbours as being evidence of why America historically needed a cordon sanitaire between church and state and continues to do so. Being as it was initially colonized piecemeal by different groups of white religious refugees given to fire'n'brimstone (or not) the writers of the Constitution wanted not just to break with the British tradition but to ensure that no one religion would dominate the new country.

The other point I am keen to address is the privileging of WWC/LMC voters in this cycle, the creation of this spooked demographic frightened of the Other. Sure, they feel this way, but with all the facts in, are they entitled to? No. Obama's speech was right to say this media pandering gets us exactly nowhere as a country. It is totally racist to repeatedly demand Obama delayer himself one step further than any of the other candidates because he is a black man with a pastor whose comments are not as incendiary as their manner of delivery comes across to white ears. I am reminded of the archetypal black candidate running against a corrupt insider who is disproportionately hounded for unpaid parking tickets. It is totally classist to expect that the WWC/LMC voter's doubts will only become more entrenched when these people are also human beings with a boredom threshold and a sense of fairness. There are lots of ways to underestimate a demographic so let's not do it here as it is only March.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Speaking of moving the goalposts, Adam Nagourney now says that Clinton doesn't just need to get as many delegates as Obama. Oh no. Now, he says, Clinton needs also to gain a lead in the total popular vote. But not even that would be enough to legitimize a Clinton nomination! In addition to getting more delegates and the majority of the popular vote, Nagourney decrees that Clinton must beat Obama "soundly" in Pennsylvania "to buttress her argument that she holds an advantage in big general election states." And here I was thinking that this was just about the delegates!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:40 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost to Suzy

I agree we're in unchartered waters with Obama's candidacy, and we'll just have to see how that plays out. But we've reached a point where Obama felt he had to give a major speech explaining 'blackness', and his own relationship to it. No other candidate will have to do anything like this. It's a dangerous moment for Obama, who up until recently has been (just about) able to portray himself as a post-racial candidate. This could open up his candidacy, but it could ghettoize it as well.

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:40 (sixteen years ago) link

He swiftly followed that speech with a meaty and challenging speech about defense, so I think he realizes what you're saying and is moving on

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:51 (sixteen years ago) link

He may be moving on, the question is whether the media will. Media was all over the race speech, the defense speech, not so much...

Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:55 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not just up to the media.

I'm very YAY about two substantial addresses in as many days about concrete things affecting America and its place in the world, with real and challenging ideas about policy. Totally needed.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 10:57 (sixteen years ago) link

the world is quite YAY about them too. A politician who seems to believe that there are more important things than politics is an unusual thing to witness, especially when compared to the homogenous bunch of nomarks we have in the UK.

Less YAY about this however: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7305731.stm

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 20 March 2008 12:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Dick Morris on Obama: This too shall pass:

Will the Gospel According to Jeremiah Wright sink the Obama candidacy? Not very likely.

Let’s start with two basic facts:

(a) Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) has already won the Democratic nomination. It’s over. Regardless of how the remaining primaries and caucuses go, including Michigan and even Florida, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) can never catch Obama in elected delegates. His current lead of 170 pledged delegates will not be overcome no matter what happens. Even if Clinton beats him by 10 points in each of these primaries, he will still lead among elected delegates by over 100. The superdelegates will not override the will of the voters unless Obama is in jail. They will not let themselves in for a civil war by overruling a black man who is beloved by the young by going over the heads of the electorate and naming the candidate that lost the primaries as the nominee. Regardless of how damaged Obama may be by the Wright tapes, it will not provide sufficient cover or cause for them to do so.

(b) Wright’s rantings are not reflective of Obama’s views on anything. Why did he stay in the church? Because he’s a black Chicago politician who comes from a mixed marriage and went to Columbia and Harvard. Suspected of not being black enough or sufficiently tied to the minority community, he needed the networking opportunities Wright afforded him in his church to get elected. If he had not risen to the top of Chicago black politics, we would never have heard of him. But obviously, he can’t say that. So what should he say?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 12:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Speaking of moving the goalposts, Adam Nagourney now says that Clinton doesn't just need to get as many delegates as Obama. Oh no. Now, he says, Clinton needs also to gain a lead in the total popular vote. But not even that would be enough to legitimize a Clinton nomination! In addition to getting more delegates and the majority of the popular vote, Nagourney decrees that Clinton must beat Obama "soundly" in Pennsylvania "to buttress her argument that she holds an advantage in big general election states." And here I was thinking that this was just about the delegates!

"as many Total delegates," you mean, i.e. a superdelegate lead. he's saying she needs all those things to justify her being the nominee despite Obama's unsurmounted elected delegate lead.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 12:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Editorial/reaction to Obama's "A more perfect union" speech on Ballerstatus, a hip hop culture/news site by Eddie Huang (founder of Hoodman clothing)

http://www.ballerstatus.com/article/editorialscolumns/2008/03/4303/

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm very YAY about two substantial addresses in as many days about concrete things affecting America and its place in the world, with real and challenging ideas about policy. Totally needed.

yeah I hope he keeps using this Wright spotlight to make substantive, brilliant speeches on policy before the media goes ADD again.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 20 March 2008 13:45 (sixteen years ago) link

And here I was thinking that this was just about the delegates!

didn't Nagourney get these ideas from Clinton's campaign? total popular vote is a yardstick they introduced when it became clear she would not catch up in the pledged delegate race.

dmr, Thursday, 20 March 2008 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Nagourney is merely relating Clinton advisors' decree goalposts. They're doing the same thing Bill is when he goes to a state and says Hillary can't win unless you guys do it for her - recasting a probable/expected result as a sign of momentum/victory.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago) link

i do think if clinton won the popular vote and obama was plummeting in the polls and late primary results that shed have a pretty good argument to make to the super delegates even if she wasnt the pledged delegate leader

its gonna take more than this wright thing to make it happen tho - clinton would just have to dominate from here on out

as it stands now most politicians dem and repub alike seem to agree obamas got longer coattails and a better shot in the g.e. - those perceptions are really what hillarys got to overcome here

obv im not looking forward to watching the clinton slime machine try to bring down obama for the next few months

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

i do think if clinton won the popular vote and obama was plummeting in the polls and late primary results that shed have a pretty good argument to make to the super delegates even if she wasnt the pledged delegate leader

Right. HRC's strategy is this (tho she wouldn't say she must win the overall popular vote; just show big momentum in the final primaries) and to make Obama so "toxic" that he's considered unelectable going into the Democratic convention.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama now joining Clinton in losing indies to McCain.

Burn the witch.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sure HRC's response would be that Obama will come under these same attacks in the GE. But I don't think that's a good answer, at least in terms of the Democratic base. The GOP nominee is expected to attack Obama, so I doubt those attacks would cause the core Democratic base to switch sides or stay home. But when HRC attacks Obama that way, it may cause such resentment and mistrust among HRC's supporters that they will stay home (if not switch sides) in the GE, should Obama be the nominee.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:27 (sixteen years ago) link

(from ben smith:)

Here's an interesting note from the Inquirer, offering an interesting opening to Obama where he's weakest, with working class white guys: He apparently killed on their bastion, the city's main sports talk radio station.

Sen. Barack Obama called into sports radio 610 WIP this morning, charming the usually rambuctious morning talk show hosts and winning their endorsements.

"People are really swept up," said host Al Morganti. "It's almost like teenaged girls at a concert. It's goofy"

Swept up by Obama's words, the hosts bid him goodbye.

"If there's anything we can do to help you carry Pennsylvania, let us know," said one jock.

Said Obama: "Maybe I can stop by the studio some time." "Could you stop by after you're President?" one responded.

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Wait, does anyone even have evidence that Hillary's campaign engineered this as opposed to GOP folk who don't want to face Obama in the GE?

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, Barack:

On Friday, March 28, Barack Obama will be dishing and discussing the issues on ABC's The View (11 am/ET) in what the show is billing as a "no-holds-barred" interview.

The presidential candidate last joined the morning show in November 2004 to promote his book. This time around, Obama will be covering a range of topics — from the personal to the political — including his relationship with his wife and family, his recent remarks on race, the Iraq war and his views on religion and life on the campaign trail, among other things.

"I am really looking forward to my return visit to sit down with the ladies of The View," he said.

I hope he chokes Hasselback to death, but sadly I don't see that happening.

Nicole, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Jay Jay French wants to rock. He also wants Barack.

So the Twisted Sister guitarist has rerecorded the heavy metal band's anthem, "I Wanna Rock," which has become "I Want Barack."

French, a lifelong liberal Democrat whose mother campaigned for John F. Kennedy, said Barack Obama, who is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, has energized a new generation of voters who previously felt left out of politics.

"He has excited so many people," said French, who founded Twisted Sister in 1973, in a telephone interview Tuesday. "He has given sincere hope to people who have been out of the arena for years."

French plays guitar on the track, which features Paulie Z., singer for the band Z02, on vocals and lead guitar. They call the band Jay Jay French and Friends and stress this isn't a Twisted Sister project because that band's members are split on the presidential candidates.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Hurting: I'm talking about HRC's "3AM"-type attacks, but there's some obv. evidence that HRC's also willing to at least let the "Obama Muslim" stories survive (e.g., "I have no reason to believe he's a Muslim"). And she doesn't have to directly raise the Muslim arguments; she can note that they exist and that they make Obama unelectable in a GE, thus indirectly propelling the negative stories about Obama forward.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Dee Snider's already endorsed HRC. A song about Obama would surely represent a shocking volte-face for the crimped crooner.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i do actually think this was the best time for the wright thing to break - they knew they were going to have to deal w/this - weve been hearing abt this guy for a year - nows good when obama pretty much got the nomination sewn up and theres plenty of time for this to play itself out before the g.e.

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't be so sure Obama has the nomination sewn up, but I get your point.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

"pretty much got the nomination sewn up"

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I wouldn't be so sure Obama pretty much has the nomination sewn up, but I get your point.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

This is basically a contest between two different potential Democratic coalitions - the traditional one in which coastal and northern urbanites seek enough white working class voters in the Northeast, Great Lakes and edges of the south to go three yards over the electoral college line that hasn't worked so well in recent years but is looking up this time due to Iraq and the economy, and an alternative in which we risk losing more of our traditional swingable adjuncts while trying to pass to previously-unfamiliar quasi-libertarian and populist (in the traditional sense) types, particularly in the West and upper midwest/plains states, who have become more willing to look our way with the right guy.

I'm not sure which is the better strategy, though the polls if they can be believed consistently give the alternative a marginal, if potentially riskier, advantage, but I admit to preferring the alternative coalition brand. No offense to those from the racist states. XD

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

There's plenty of evidence that just because an issue comes up and gets whacked down in the primary doesn't mean it won't come back, zombie-like, in the G.E.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

insurmountable pledged delegate lead, destroying hillary in super delegates since super tuesday, winning the florida/michigan situation, lol hueg popular vote lead etc

but dont let any facts get in the way of yr eeyore routine daniel

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yah tracer obv these things can continue to do damage - still i think this was a good time to get the initial shock n awe part of the situation out of the way

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Wright will definitely come up in the GE, and be a big deal. Lots of things will. There's a big market for reasons to rule out Obama that are socially acceptable to say, like "he's a terrorist."

Mark Halperin has said that successfully casting Obama as the other/non-American is the *only* way for McCain to beat him in the general.

Xp - Hillary can still win despite the insurmountable elected delegate lead.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

but dont let any facts get in the way of yr eeyore routine daniel

Don't let my expressing a reasonably-grounded fear get in the way of your snide remarks.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm not a mccain booster but i trust his campaign to not actually stoop to those pandering measures. although, i have no doubt there will be 527s sprouting up like fungus to promote fear of a black president.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i take it you've all seen the obama/malcolm x/public enemy mashup video put out by laura ingraham's producer then

gff, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

srsly daniel 90% of yr post here are like "i think mccain will win"

i think were all well aware of yr generally pessimistic outlook by now

in the future when composing a post that starts like "I wouldn't be so sure Obama has the nomination sewn up" try following it w/one of these "because" then just let it flow from there ok.

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary's politeness re: the wright 'issue' is coming to a close

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:00 (sixteen years ago) link

No, he won't personally get his hands dirty.

Daniel, my swing voter sample is now on the fence between McCain and Obama. While I think you are right to be cautious it's a long way from November, and actually still a long way from Pennsylvania.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link

It's not just the South I'm willing to lose, tho. As long as we do the electoral college dance, I can live without Romneychusetts too.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I've repeatedly set forth the "because" clauses you mention, tho -- like virtually anyone here -- I'm sure you can find counterexamples. And I've repeatedly set forth why I think McCain will win, while admitting lots can change between now and November.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, hillary camp wtf -- what is the substantive distance between hillary's surrogates pressing the meta-concern to undecided superdelegates of how the wright issue hurts to obama's GE electability vs. pressing the wright issue directly to the voters?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:05 (sixteen years ago) link

We done Huckabee's response to the Obama speech yet?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNwMPNxwHmQ

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

OK, everyone get some air. We have a loooooong time.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link

We need more 'coastal elites' to take over the interior West. Here, here's your electoral college.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Jeremiah Wright doesn't know nothin' about burnin' no crosses, Miss Hillary. Unlike the Klan.

They just jumped the fucking shark. Again. Is this Sea World?

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:08 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah that lanny whateverhername thing is pretty little-o-underscore-big-o

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:10 (sixteen years ago) link

the first two replies to that Lanny thing are pretty major pwnz

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

and she's a man: "Mr. Davis, a partner in the Washington, D.C. office, is a member of the Litigation Group"

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:12 (sixteen years ago) link

He was WH counsel in the Clinton admin

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Lanny Davis is a man

Mr. Que, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

obama's address today on the war & the economy:

http://thepage.time.com/full-text-of-obamas-speech-the-cost-of-war/

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:15 (sixteen years ago) link

god the whole comments thread is one pwn after another!

gff, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:18 (sixteen years ago) link

HILLARY CLINTON CAMP SHAME ON YOU WHY DESTROID THE PARTY YOU GONNA LOOSE ANYWAY. REMBER THIS MAKE A DIRTY POLITICS AGAINST OBAMA AND NOVEMBER NO BLACK GONA VOTE HILLARY SHAME ON YOU

Posted by: ERIC BARTHEL | Mar 20, 2008 12:22:34 PM

otm

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

One could even call them racist.

passive voice cop out

Gavin, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

that's not passive, it's subjunctive.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

ABC --

One interesting event in Sen. Hillary Clinton's just-released schedules from the 1990s comes on Nov. 10 1993, when the former first lady was to serve as the closing act during a briefing on NAFTA, the trade agreement she now assails…"It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation," said one attendee. "Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is a still a question about what Hillary's position when she was First Lady, she was totally supportive if NAFTA."

Obama campaign now making this case to the press in their daily conference call

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

1. If a white minister preached sermons to his congregation and had used the "N" word and used rhetoric and words similar to members of the KKK, would you support a Democratic presidential candidate who decided to continue to be a member of that congregation?

so Wright saying "white people are oppressing black people" is equivalent to the KKK murdering blacks. stfu Lanny.

dmr, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

c'mon it's a clever thought experiment! what if martin luther king had been WHITE! i bet black people wouldn't have listened to him as much. thus proving the hypocrisy of the civil rights movement.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

but guys white and black experiences are totally interchangeable dontchaknow

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 March 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

lol xpost

youn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link

HOORAY! Over on HuffPo, one of my heroines is putting the boot in to Hill's own religious alliances:

huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link

UH www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

UH did I not mean: www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that article. It also nicely illustrates how embedded is in the Washington establishment, perhaps helping Obama's argument that she isn't the candidate to bring real change.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow, that article. It also nicely illustrates how embedded HRC is in the Washington establishment, perhaps helping Obama's argument that she isn't the candidate to bring real change.

Fixed.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

speaking of huffpo one of my favorite professors wrote a great open letter to geraldine ferraro:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/p-gabrielle-foreman/an-open-letter-to-geraldi_b_91956.html

max, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Damn! That is really impressive.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Onion classic this week.

Eazy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

i was watching some of the cable news last night and the daily show this AM which show "highlights" of the reaction and am i wrong or is this speech -- this great, thoughtful, speech -- actually going to hurt obama???

that seemed to be how it was being received.

even through all the bush stuff, the last 8 years and the war and everything i guess i always thought that ppl could be convinced if they just heard this said the right way by the right person -- not some d-bag like kerry -- but now even this might just get chewed up in the maw of all those hideous white asshole talking heads....like that makes me more depressed than 8 years of bush ever could, that maybe now there's not even a chance of any kind of real dialogue about race or anything else.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

It's been a conservative strategy for some time now to turn white guilt on its head and make it seem as though it's actually white people who are the perennial victims of both racism (or "reverse racism") AND false accusations of racism. It reminds me of that Zvi Rex quote: "Germany will never forgive the Jews for the Holocaust."

Obviously this perverse twisting of the race issue wouldn't work if it didn't play on people's very real guilt/denial regarding their own racism and their fears of black people.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama took a step toward addressing that, but it's a really tricky issue.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:22 (sixteen years ago) link

It was a smart speech. Generally, most people don't trust people smarter than themselves.

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:24 (sixteen years ago) link

However at a Thursday press availability in Terra Haute, Indiana after a report surfaced that the Clinton campaign was pushing the Wright story to superdelegates arguing that the relationship hurt Obama's electibility -– Clinton refused to deny that her campaign was pushing the story.

When asked, Clinton ignored the Wright portion of the question and said “well my campaign has been making the case that I am the most electable that I have said that for a year or more that I am the person best able to make the challenges that our country faces as commander in chief.”

When Clinton was then asked specifically if her campaign was pushing the Wright story –- she shrugged and took the next question, ignoring the reporter.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Isn't it Terre Haute?

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

What a fucking twat xpost

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:33 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, that's disturbing. But ultimatey I think it's better it comes out now than in the GE as said above.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

If Gore or Kerry had made such a speech in 2000 or 2004, unless it was at the convention almost everyone would either read/see the highlights or read a transcript of the speech. Now folks can watch it anytime or read the transcript immediately.

Reading about the runup to the Iraq War has been a reminder of how soundbites and headlines have been essential to campaigning and politicking in the past few decades. We may be changing to a higher level of substance, as YouTube replaces CNN Headline News as a source of information.

Eazy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I think Obama's dealt with this well - addressed the issue in a high-profile speech that caused a lot of chatter, then immediately getting out a series of statements on other matters that are of undeniably higher importance to the country and the campaign (the war/the economy). I don't see how else he could've handled this. Wright will damage his momentum over the next couple weeks but I don't think this will last too long - tho echoes of it will probably return in the GE once he gets the nom.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Joe six pack spending half an hour a day watching speeches on youtube?

Ed, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

Ed, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

the worst thing - as has been already noted - is that Clinton is using this stuff to damage his standing with DEMOCRATS, which is bad for the party.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Joe six pack spending half an hour a day watching speeches on youtube?

Jill Sixpack with a deskjob and headphones is.

Eazy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:38 (sixteen years ago) link

2 million views in two days.

Eazy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago) link

A McCain campaign aide actively pushed an incendiary, racially-charged video that uses the controversial words of Barack Obama's pastor to tar Obama as unpatriotic -- despite the fact that McCain himself has suggested that Obama shouldn't be held accountable for Wright's views.

The aide, Soren Dayton, who works in McCain's political department, has been suspended from the campaign, a McCain spokesperson, Jill Hazelbaker, confimed to me.

lol dude posted the link on twitter

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

the worst thing - as has been already noted - is that Clinton is using this stuff to damage his standing with DEMOCRATS, which is bad for the party.

Hooray! Destroy the party! If it doesn't see Obama's obvious intelligence as "electable," then it shouldn't just be destroyed, but eviscerated, its ashes sprinkled on FDR's grave.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 18:59 (sixteen years ago) link

haha what are you going to replace it with?

31g, Thursday, 20 March 2008 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

haha what are you going to replace it with?

http://www.wanprc.org/prrs/images/Proboscis%20Monkey.JPG

Ed, Thursday, 20 March 2008 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry dude, i'm too stupid to understand what that means

31g, Thursday, 20 March 2008 19:23 (sixteen years ago) link

he wants to replace the democrats with some weird monkeys

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 20 March 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., expressed support of a proposal floated by Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen to hold a superdelegate primary in an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper.

The idea calls for a two-day superdelegate primary in June to reach a fast decision towards a party nominee, in anticipation of the race still being deadlocked between Clinton and Obama after the last contests wrap up.

Obama said, "I thought that actually Gov. Bredesen of Tennessee had an interesting proposal...That would probably be the best way to insure that at lest there's a couple of months before the convention."

Superdelegate Primary: good idea? y/n?

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

y

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Superdelegate SLUMBER PARTY!!!!

max, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

At least that would put shit out in the open and keep it from being some kind of closed-door decision.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:10 (sixteen years ago) link

sounds like a convention

31g, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Senator Hagel: US may need another party (article doesn't mention Dem. party at all: does he know they exist?)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080320/ap_on_re_us/hagel_book

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

lol Hege1s0n

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:18 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbe1aswKhhY

LOL pauly shore on a geraline ferraro tip WTF ok

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Come on Eeyores, keep your eyes on the ball, don't lose heart!

http://www.mtv.com/shared/media/news/images/v/Vaughn_Vince/sq-with-dodgeball-fox.jpg

Euler, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.newsoxy.com/img/news/obama_poll.jpg
serious obama is serious

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

waitaminute, Obama is BLACK?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link

No no, that's Robert Downey Jr. in blackface. Don't worry.

StanM, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

That's just a still from Miami Vice.

Eazy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama needs to get his shirts sized properly.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:56 (sixteen years ago) link

“I do not understand what Sen. Obama is afraid of, but it is going to hurt our party and our chances in November and so I would call on him, once again, to join me in giving the people of Florida and Michigan the chance to be counted as we move forward in this nominating process,” the former first lady said at the outset of an Indiana press conference.

Clinton went to Michigan this week to make her case. However, it appears that efforts in both states to hold a re-vote are coming up short. The Clinton campaign is saying that Obama’s refusal to strongly support such primaries is part of the problem.

“I do not see how two of our largest and most significant states can be disenfranchised and left out of the process of picking our nominee without raising serious questions about the legitimacy of that nominee,” Clinton said.

dmr, Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

They opted to disenfranchise themsleves

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

#
6.
March 20th,
2008
2:01 pm

One does not have to be a Republican to agree with this author’s analysis. As unfortunate as it is on a certain level, Obama’s candidacy is now fatally flawed.

Furthermore, my earlier hypothesis regarding the completely uncritical drum-beat in favor of Obama by the MSM and Republican talking-heads appears to have been correct.

I.e., the purpose of the Obama push was to “kill off” Hillary early; failing that, if she had been nominated despite the Obama challenge, she would have been seriously weakened, and therefore an easier opponent for McCain.

There is no question that Obama’s connections were known to those were pushing this agenda; their goal all along was to make Obama the Democratic candidate, after which he would have been defeated by the Reverend-argument.

Fortunately, this information came to light before Obama was confirmed the Democratic candidate. Now, there is still a chance of a Democratic president.

I feel sorry for the Obama supporters; they have been seriously used.

(However, I would be surprised this comment on the NYT pages…they have been a part of the Obama chorus.)

— Posted by XYZ

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I feel sorry for the Obama supporters; they have been seriously used.

:(

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:01 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gyXVIfZ2F2CTuuxH3_93vuTP-ywwD8VHAH2G0

obamas ncaa brackets :D

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Jill Sixpack with a deskjob and headphones is.

otmfm

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Huckabee's comments re: Wright = awesome, I hope they get more coverage

Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:22 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

The Democratic presidential candidate and avid basketball player selected North Carolina, Kansas, Pittsburgh and UCLA in his Final Four bracket, and is counting on North Carolina to beat UCLA in the championship game.

The state of North Carolina, with 115 delegates at stake, holds its primary May 6.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

wow huckabee!

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

also lol:

"I've got my own T-shirts, man," Obama said in the radio interview. "Our T-shirts are superior, what can I tell you."

Obama 2008: superior t-shirts

petey_carnum, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

man the amount of completely disingenuous shit that comes out of Hillary's mouth is really quite something.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:33 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder if daria still supports her.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:38 (sixteen years ago) link

she does

Mr. Que, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Daria excluded, I wonder how many people who actually pay close attention to her still support her.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

plenty

Mr. Que, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the thing that some people are not understanding about the support Hillary is getting is that some people are banking on Hillary's insider status as a positive rather than a negative; her campaign is being run like it is because she's been around the wordsmithing/"big lie" block and, while it may come across as manipulative and dishonest, it also comes across as being very cognizant of the type of dealing and manipulating you have to be capable of to get any modicum of anything done in American politics. Combine that with arguably more tangible positions on touchpoint topics like health care and it really shouldn't be a surprise why people are still behind her.

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

also, the guy shes running against is black

and what, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm not surprised by her support or her actions Dan. I am sorta disappointed in how blatantly dishonest and manipulative she's willing to be.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Wake me up when she revokes her support for universal healthcare, decides against a rapid withdrawal from Iraq, speaks in favor of keeping Guantanamo open, etc. I'm rather less concerned about the usual to and fro of politics, and would still happily support her if she won the nomination.

o. nate, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan, OTM.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes e, but not necessarily because they're thinking "I could NEVER vote for a black man!"

I know several people who would rather see the current situation blow up in the face of the first woman President rather than the first black President under the logic that people are more likely to forgive a white woman who makes a mistake than a black man. I also know several people who are convinced that Obama will be murdered the instant he wins the election and are therefore super-hesitant to vote for him. Neither of these positions are particularly rational and I've heard them pretty much exclusively from people of color.

Shakey: I'm not because if she's willing to manipulate people so that she can get her way, maybe she'll be able to manipulate Congress and/or foreign leaders into doing what she wants them to do, which, if it matches her campaign platform, will be an end result not far from what Obama is aiming for. They are running a clear-cut "the ends justify the means" campaign and I won't criticize them for that. (They won't be my first choice because of it but I'll still vote for her over McCain pretty much any day of the week.)

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost

This is why I'm so excited about Obama: it's his metapolitics that says the "big lie" politics are what's wrong with American politics. I believe he'll do what a president can do to get us past this (which sadly isn't very much: our culture has to get past this too, and that's the real issue).

Euler, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:57 (sixteen years ago) link

It's very Kennedy vs. LBJ, ain't it?

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Most people will vote for a hypothetical *black man*. It's when the guy actually starts to look like there's anything capital B Black about him that people start to raise doubts, and the doubts usually come in disguised or coded language, often with the voters themselves unaware of the racial subtext of what they think.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, like I said before most of the "not voting for a black man" rhetoric I've heard has come from black people. (Granted that's not really a shock if you think about it.)

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha, do you think you're going to hear it from a white person, Dan?

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

... No, hence the last parenthetical in my previous post.

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:03 (sixteen years ago) link

It's very Kennedy vs. LBJ, ain't it?

Kennedy told his own Big Lie all through the campaign (the "missile gap," which Eisenhower and Nixon knew was horseshit).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I mean it's not like anyone has ever said "I wouldn't vote for a black guy" to me either. But like I said I don't think voters are often aware of the subtext of the fact that they're uncomfortable with his "angry church" or the fact that he "just doesn't seem trustworthy" or whatever.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:06 (sixteen years ago) link

This is why I'm so excited about Obama: it's his metapolitics that says the "big lie" politics are what's wrong with American politics. I believe he'll do what a president can do to get us past this (which sadly isn't very much: our culture has to get past this too, and that's the real issue).

100% agree

dmr, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Shakey: I'm not because if she's willing to manipulate people so that she can get her way, maybe she'll be able to manipulate Congress and/or foreign leaders into doing what she wants them to do, which, if it matches her campaign platform, will be an end result not far from what Obama is aiming for

I understand this, Dan (and note the "maybe" in your sentence), but HRC has been so feeble that she reminds me of all those feckless congressmen on Tim Russert's show, fluent in the Beltway banter and little else. For a while Obama's virtues for me were strictly negative: he didn't sound like HRC, McCain, or Giuliani.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

One thing I like a lot (probably the most) about Obama's message is that it's vague and mutable. He's not going into an unknown situation with a cast-in-stone plan that will almost certainly be blown out of the water by the first unexpected occurrence; he's going in with a series of overarching goals and a general methodology for getting there, with the idea that he will survey the lay of the land and adjust his strategies accordingly to acheive his goals. At least, that's the message I take away from his campaign; I don't know how much of that is "how I would be President" transferrence.

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Dan, it really upsets me to read how fearful some of your friends are.

I would feel less hesitant about Hillary as a President if I believed even a little that she was willing to attack her Presidential battles with the venal gusto she has applied to her candidacy.

I knew about Wright because I was introduced to him not through soundbites but through Obama's first book, and although the "controversial" tenor of the speech excerpts is somewhat present it is also very apparent that Wright is better than that. Interestingly, Wright is speaking in Florida tomorrow and this will obviously be mobbed by press. One can only hope this encounter will help and Wright will deliver a better form of jeremiad.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

No, that's exactly what I told my mom last week when she dismissed his campaign's lack of specifics. "The good candidates NEVER get specific in a primary, and the great ones never do in the GE either."

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:14 (sixteen years ago) link

I would feel less hesitant about Hillary as a President if I believed even a little that she was willing to attack her Presidential battles with the venal gusto she has applied to her candidacy.

And there are LOTS of left-liberals who want vengeance for 8 years + of GOP smears, but ulitmately what's left? It's not even fun angry-sex.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

There's definitely an odd backlash among some bizarre subsubsubsegment of the black population that's basically like "I don't know if he's prepared for this plus he'll get shot;" I think it's part of why Clinton won MA.

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

(ie my representative sample is tiny so I don't know how widespread the attitude is but I've heard it more than once from people who don't intersect)

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe they're just understandably fearful and preparing themselves for the worst?

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link

we should all be praying that mccain actually wins so we can pound the last nail in the GOP's coffin and kick that fucking party to the curb for a decade and some change

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

MW OTM.

BTW I have heard people - even Democrats - say that Obama's race is a negative for them. People are just not entitled to use *anyone's* race as a yardstick in an election contest any more.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Some of the older, professional black guys in my building almost wear their Clinton support as a badge of pride, as if only fools and dreamers were behind Obama.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, one guy in particular was adamant that Romney was going to be the next President so it's not like everyone saying this has their pulse on the tenor of America.

HI DERE, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Lol at monolithic black American experience. My neighborhood was once majority black and I wonder how some of them are going to vote. Some of them are really religious and really conservative by the sound of them.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:24 (sixteen years ago) link

by the time the GE rolls around they'll be voting for whoever promises them jobs the most effectively. that's not to say anything about your neighborhood. that'll be the whole country.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago) link

99% of black and white people i know in IL are voting obama

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

And there are LOTS of left-liberals who want vengeance for 8 years + of GOP smears, but ulitmately what's left? It's not even fun angry-sex.

The best revenge would be achieved by taking the high road to the White House.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Suzy OTM

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

_______’s unexpected prominence on the election calendar has brought it weeks of the sort of attention traditionally reserved for early-voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire. _______s are rushing in record numbers to sign up as Democrats so they can vote in the primary, The Associated Press reported.

^^^In every primary news story ever^^^

G00blar, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Tom, I would concur with your dour assessment wrt McCain except that I genuinely think that the country is almost but not quite held together with duct tape at this point and we can't afford to let it get too much worse.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

am I the only person who has this parallax view regarding how in the fuck mccain managed to actually win the GOP nomination? this is a guy who ran out of money last year. like twice he completely ran out of money. he's a crazy doddering old man who's been eaten alive by his own party in previous elections and for all intents and purposes is the least likely to hold on to his own "base" in the GE. the dude should have had a snowball's chance in hell to beat romney and giuliani et al in the primaries, who talked them into fucking everything up against this schlub?

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

You know, Tom, that perplexes me, too. Is it 'cause the Repubs think he's their best hope in a GE? Is he a sacrificial offering in a losing year. Did they hold their nose and vote for their best candidate with (what they think is) their best issue? No Repubs love this guy.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's totally that he's a fall guy. The people who fund and run the GOP, for the most part, all got where they are by being greedy, devious, cutthroat sons of bitches. I think they see the writing on the wall for the next four years and they put this poor old man out there to get humiliated one last time.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

They don't WANT the next term. the next term is going to be hell on earth for this country.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Do you really think McCain is any less an SOB?

1. Romney didn't gain traction.

2. Ron Paul was no one's favourite martian after all.

3. Hey! Giuliani! 9/11 does not give you (202) area code.

4. Huckabee has a very promising career...on television.

Which leaves one fake maverick who <3 Reagan and therefore business as usual. Oh, and moderate GOPs/swing voters like him a lot.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:39 (sixteen years ago) link

not that theres not party leaders mucking around but this is sort of self-selective too - like who in their right mind really wants to run from the republican side this year

romney and especially giuliani were super weak candidates

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's totally that he's a fall guy. The people who fund and run the GOP, for the most part, all got where they are by being greedy, devious, cutthroat sons of bitches. I think they see the writing on the wall for the next four years and they put this poor old man out there to get humiliated one last time

Walter Karp to thread. Seriously. Which is why the GOP, despite its genuine carping, genuinely WANTS her to become the nominee -- she's most likely to continue the tone and policies of this administration.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

lets see what the dems can do w/this shit-cake we cooked them up!

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Do they, Suzy? I used to have some admiration for him but he sold out on a variety of issues and if he's so friggin' smart about the war, why does he act like a navy officer instead of an advisin' and consentin' US Senator all this time the Bush Admin has been fucking up?

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I used to listen to NPR in the the shower in the morning for years. About 2005, the clock radio in the bathroom broke and I never replaced it, primarily 'cause waking up and listening to the latest venal, asinine, craven or just plain wrong thing the Admin were up to was becoming perilously close to bad for my general welfare. If Obama won, I might just get a new one.

Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

WTF apparently this "typical white person" thing Obama said about his grandmother in a radio interview is gaining traction.

I give up, America. Stupid has won.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

Johnny, links?

Re. McCain I'm just talking about people my mom knows who were either a) in Vietnam b) Reagan Democrats who got stuck c) racist or d) aren't as bothered about sellout issues as you are.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/obama-grandmother-typic_b_92601.html

Now they've just spent almost an hour talking about it on MSNBC, and probably FOX and CNN too (but I haven't been watching those).

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link

grrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

J0rdan S., Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

i quit america.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 20 March 2008 22:57 (sixteen years ago) link

I never read the Huffington Post. Does it seriously allow imbeciles to post shit like that?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link

The truth is that racism works both ways and some of us blue collar folks

eat a dick

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

'some of us blue collar folks'

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Ferraro Fires Back
Offended by comparison to fiery pastor

Geraldine Ferraro complains about Obama lumping her in with his controversial pastor, whom she calls a 'racist bigot'

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

What else are they going to talk about on tv? The war? Depressing. The economy? Depressing, and hard to understand. Race? Titillating! And talking about Obama, I'm sure, gets the ratings up. So this is just win-win for them, even if lose-lose for America.

The Clintons helped make this media culture so profitable (blue dresses, etc.) and they're using it now to their advantage.

(apologizes for sounding so sanctimonious)

Euler, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:05 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,339949,00.html

^^^^^^actually ... not bad??

Fifty-seven percent of Americans do not believe Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama shares the controversial views of his former spiritual mentor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright,

Most Americans — 72 percent — are familiar with the comments made by Obama’s former pastor.

this means the story has kind of hit its threshold to some degree, right?

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

nowhere to go but up ... unless more bad shit happens

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

What he described abt gran on radio is also in that first book, basically she gets hassled at the bus stop by an aggressive black guy; it's the first time she has felt threatened by someone from another race. She tries to get her husband to drive her the work to next day and to avoid the issue, but Obama finds out after he sees they're upset about something and they're reluctant to share it. She's ashamed to her core to have to admit that she's scared of a random black guy first to her husband and then, more upsettingly, to her grandson.

We have all been in situations where someone who is different to us in belief or skin colour or strength has made us feel stranger danger. In some cases there are reasons to feel shame for that, and some not.

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

is this "typical white person" line seriously getting traction? it doesn't seem to noted on any of the networks' webpages. what are they saying on the tele?

Mark Clemente, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

if hillary called her BLACK GRANDMOTHER a 'typical black person' im pretty sure people would be forgiving.

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

but that would be because she was black

lol racial double standard

deej, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

comments on huffington blog are mostly encouraging, though.

stevie, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

xxxxxxxxposts

stevie, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:13 (sixteen years ago) link

barack should just be using that onion article as his response to this. "did you chuckle at this? then what's the problem with what I said?"

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

onion article was completely hilarious to me btw

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

speaking as a black man

El Tomboto, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

lol, yeah one of the more common reax to the obama speech i've seen is OUTRAGE that anyone could think white racism is as bad, destructive, hateful, powerful as black racism. in a weird way the timing of this thing couldn't be better - obama still basically has the nod (though when he gets whupped in pennsylvania i'm ready to hear the 'obama: fatally crippled?' spin), and it's a long long way to the election. some worry that this is branding him and huge mccain bounce in poll numbers is a little worrying right now. still it's MARCH, so this could be very old news by the convention even and what ends up coming out of this could be 'well, he really isn't a muslim apparently'. tombot otm in a mccain loss not being so bad for the gop (this is the coulter line of thought roughly right? ie. 'same policies' w/ hillary and let the dems bear the blame). mccain got lucky thru circumstance - huckabee scared the gop base (- fundies) alot more and struck them as 'our dean' which of course meant the ball bounced to their kerry. romney wins iowa instead of huck (or let's be honest - romney's a methodist instead of a morman) and that race is very very different.

balls, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I think it's part of why Clinton won MA.

I think MA is more industrial compared to the other NE states, and its urban residents more balkanized.

gabbneb, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:22 (sixteen years ago) link

boston's very segregated y'say?

balls, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

comments on huffington blog are mostly encouraging, though.

-- stevie, Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:13 PM

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:38 (sixteen years ago) link

but yeah fwiw it's incredible (and maybe a measure of the success of the penn speech) to see liberals talking about race and admitting long-hushed maybe barely-conscious discomfort & fear

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:42 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i27.tinypic.com/16m4ac.jpg

jhøshea, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Drudge are also flagging up a story about Bill Clinton and his good pal Rev. Wright!

Has someone called the karma police on behalf of Obama?

suzy, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

WaPo has the passport story ... it was supposed to break tomorrow morning, but I guess we'll see it soon.

Mr. Goodman, Thursday, 20 March 2008 23:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Or, maybe not, from Drudge:

MORE... WASHINGTON TIMES SET TO SPLASH THE DEVELOPMENT, NEWSROOM SOURCES TELL DRUDGE REPORT... MORE..

Mr. Goodman, Friday, 21 March 2008 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

i just turned on Larry King and Obama is on via satellite but i think theyve already moved on to other topics

gr8080, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:19 (sixteen years ago) link

[Ohio:] For Obama, it’s a 17-point swing against him since the last SurveyUSA poll taken just three weeks ago, going up from up ten on McCain to down seven. Clinton has slipped four points over the same period but still leads McCain by six.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:26 (sixteen years ago) link

If the polling continues to slide for Obama in Ohio and Missouri, and if McCain continues to do well in Michigan and Pennsylvania, the Democrats simply cannot afford to nominate Obama. That, in fact, is the express mission of the superdelegates — to avoid a general-election disaster like George McGovern, and not to simply rubber-stamp the popular vote or the pledged-delegate leader.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:28 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^ hotair.com

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I am an Obama supporter, but am now taking another look at Hillary Clinton. I am turned off by the way Obama has handled the Wright situation so far. I felt offended by the way he seemed to stereotype whites as racist in his comment about how his grandmother is a "typical white". I felt inspired by his words and campaign of hope, but his essential acceptance of Wrights words in church casts doubt onto his judgment. I am now concerned if my judgment that Obama was the stronger candidate against McCain was correct. I hope the media continues to pursue this story, because I for one still have concerns about the inconsistencies in Obama's story and the impact of this controversy on his electability in the general election.

Posted By: thornton | March 20, 2008 at 07:47 PM

max, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:38 (sixteen years ago) link

the next set of polls will be more favorable to Obama. getting 2M people to watch a 40 minute vid on youtube is a good start. of course a better way to convince whitey he's not the devil is to keep calling talk radio stations and discussing how his brackets are going.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:43 (sixteen years ago) link

discussing

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 21 March 2008 01:45 (sixteen years ago) link

All of those polls are meaningless. I said so when Senator Clinton was up, I said so when Senator Obama was up and now I’m saying it now that Senator McCain is up. Direction surveys do not begin to harden till mid-August at the earliest.

Mr. Goodman, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

actually theyre only meaningful when obama is up

jhøshea, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

dumb question, but what sorts of things did wright say that were so amazingly offensive? the stuff i heard on the radio was, frankly, a bit paranoid around the edges (the feds selling crack to the inner city, etc.) but not particular offensive.

amateurist, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

particularLY

amateurist, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

"god damn america"

jhøshea, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

so were people actually OFFENDED at that or just "offended"?

amateurist, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

eh who knows?

jhøshea, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

I think typical white people enjoy being offended about things.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:27 (sixteen years ago) link

is it just me or is the clinton campaign's behavior in this campaign growing more disingenuous, dishonest, and craven by the day? and it seems to be working. i'm really depressed.

(sorry for not being too sophisticated about this, but i'm so busy with work that i can only stick me head out and read a bit of news on occasion.)

amateurist, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i say this as someone who was by no means a clinton-hater in the past.

amateurist, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

thats pretty much the consensus of this thread

jhøshea, Friday, 21 March 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I think for every person genuinely offended by "God Damn America" there are five more people who are just sort of startled by it and not really offended but are worried that if they don't act offended their co-workers will think they're not patriotic enough.

Hurting 2, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

the scary thing about the wright flap is that in the wake of 9-11, bizarro nationalism created a climate of fear and self-censorship lest anyone be branded unpatriotic. six years of royal executive fuck-ups later it's acceptable (if not encouraged) in most quarters to mock the head of state, ruling class etc. but god forbid you implicate the country itself (in practical terms the voters who elected these buffoons but in bizarro nationalistic terms George Washington, Gen. Patton, Elvis, det. john mcclane etc.) the fear mongers immediately return to center stage with their brand and everyone cowers, even piling on the guilty party so their own patriotism won't be questioned.

I thought after Iraq and a laundry list of other blemishes we could handle an open/honest discussion about America's place in the world and God's heart, but apparently the architects of this rah-rah culture worked some impressive voodoo shit on us back then that will continue to rear its ugly head from time to time.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:13 (sixteen years ago) link

or what hurting said.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:15 (sixteen years ago) link

i generally believe the feds did sell crack to the inner city kids

remy bean, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:17 (sixteen years ago) link

the scary thing about the wright flap is that in the wake of 9-11, bizarro nationalism created a climate of fear and self-censorship lest anyone be branded unpatriotic.

I think America was pretty much always like this.

31g, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:19 (sixteen years ago) link

yep xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:21 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeah like most countries, but it became particularly toxic and powerful afterwards.

Cosmo Vitelli, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

i generally believe the feds did sell crack to the inner city kids

I thought this was related one of the things that John Kerry dug up around '85 or so, with the Iran-Contra funding and drug-running to the U.S. etc.

kingfish, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:26 (sixteen years ago) link

huckabee amazingly honest, clear-headed and forgiving: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/huckabee-defend.html

jermainetwo, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:27 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe he can replace McCain as the batshit conservative it's ok for liberals to like.

31g, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:31 (sixteen years ago) link

That's fine with me if he brings some inclusiveness and optimism and forgiveness and tolerance to the table.

Eazy, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:41 (sixteen years ago) link

He also wants to bring guns and creationism, so I'm not totally onboard.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:53 (sixteen years ago) link

we have posted the huckabee thing like five times already

akm, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i generally believe the feds did sell crack to the inner city kids

what GS level was that job?

gershy, Friday, 21 March 2008 04:57 (sixteen years ago) link

(sorry about the repost, missed some hidden messages)

jermainetwo, Friday, 21 March 2008 05:19 (sixteen years ago) link

like I've said before, the news cycle on this thread is about an hour

Hurting 2, Friday, 21 March 2008 05:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I think typical white people enjoy being offended about things.

you can take my capacity for hypocritical phony outrage when you pry it from my cold dead frontal cortex.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 21 March 2008 05:29 (sixteen years ago) link

stuff white people like

31g, Friday, 21 March 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

i didn't get a ticket for tomorrow's rally, but i did get to see the obama caravan roll into downtown tonight. 5-0 was everywhere, about 3 dozen motorbike cops. I was on my bike and stopped as they roared by me. I was the only guy on the street at the time, and I waved. I think I saw him on his phone.

in other news, we've hit 8K messages on this thread, time for a new one?

kingfish, Friday, 21 March 2008 06:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, a new one.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 21 March 2008 06:40 (sixteen years ago) link

yep

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 06:44 (sixteen years ago) link

2008 Primaries Thread 3: Oh God It's Still Happening

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 21 March 2008 06:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Symmetry required gabbneb to end this.

The Brainwasher, Friday, 21 March 2008 07:01 (sixteen years ago) link

symmetry got raped and thrown off a hotel balcony.

TOMBOT, Friday, 21 March 2008 07:02 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.