ATTN: Copyeditors and Grammar Fiends

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5060 of them)

oh right, that's completely true -- that's a big point of utility for it. (and makes defining it as just "timely" sort of ... bad, actually.)

nabisco, Thursday, 1 October 2009 00:31 (fourteen years ago) link

I thought it was even more wussy than "timorously."

Beth Parker, Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:29 (fourteen years ago) link

so you know how everyone has that one grammar thing that they can't ever get right? your/you're, who/who, it's/its etc. well mine is effect/affect. can someone help me 2 understand :-/?

baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

ha - who/that**

baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:41 (fourteen years ago) link

WHO THAT

wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

affect is usually a verb, ie "[x] affects [y]"
effect is usually a noun, ie "[x] has an effect on [y]"

that's the simplified version i guess

wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

Copyeditors and Grammar Fiends, we that

baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

thank u kev

baby girl lemme snrub up on you (J0rdan S.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:45 (fourteen years ago) link

it gets really fun when you realize that "to effect" can be a transitive verb meaning "to bring about" ie "obama hopes to effect change..."

also forms of "affect" can refer to emotions, ie someone's "affective state"

wH1N1 g. swinegarten (k3vin k.), Friday, 2 October 2009 20:48 (fourteen years ago) link

UH so i'm doing a GROUP PROJECT *searches desk drawer for bullets* and this girl sent me this part of the project that she was responsible for. and it included this sentence (the project is about urban legends, ours is the bermuda triangle) (college!!):

Our conclusion is that the Bermuda triangle could be a supernatural but then the events having occurred in other similar areas is either aliens also or they shake the foundations of the legend.

bighoos (steen) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:43 (fourteen years ago) link

like....whaaaaatttttttt

bighoos (steen) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:43 (fourteen years ago) link

for the record: i am in college

bighoos (steen) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:44 (fourteen years ago) link

That's fucking poetry.

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:45 (fourteen years ago) link

college as in university?

Not the real Village People, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Don't edit any of that. Just pass it in as is.

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:48 (fourteen years ago) link

yes, as in, you had to apply and be accepted to be allowed to take classes

bighoos (steen) (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:49 (fourteen years ago) link

The semester before I graduated one of my friends and I found a draft of a paper written by a group of business majors that literally consisted of them outlining the manner in which they completed whatever set of tasks they were assigned to do. So there were entire paragraphs that consisted of shit like: "Then we sent each other the information over Facebook and decided to meet up. Jonny led the meeting and emailed us the minutes afterward. This was good. The project went well. Then AIM crashed and we lost half of the work so we had to talk over Facebook some more. That was bad."

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:50 (fourteen years ago) link

man i wish i posted here when i was in freshman english - so many lolsome (but very, very depressing) peer review papers

we beat so many gimp (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:54 (fourteen years ago) link

scratch that, i'm glad i didnt post here when i was a freshman tbch

we beat so many gimp (k3vin k.), Monday, 12 October 2009 02:55 (fourteen years ago) link

You'd be surprised how many *English majors* can't even write well.

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:56 (fourteen years ago) link

( The English major thing came to mind b/c of this thread I'm posting to concurrently: The Useless College Degree )

kshighway1, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:57 (fourteen years ago) link

I am one of these but it's really because I can't force myself to write perfectly when I realize that I'm posting to *ILX*

dyao, Monday, 12 October 2009 02:59 (fourteen years ago) link

http://twitter.com/fakeapstylebook

Alba, Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Here's something I've long been stymied by. (Fine, "by which I've long been stymied.")

We use a comma in "The millionaire wanted to ski, but he didn't have the proper apparel" because "he didn't have the proper apparel" can stand alone as a complete subject-verb sentence, right?

And, conversely, we don't use a comma in "The millionaire wanted to ski but didn't have the proper apparel" since "but didn't have the proper apparel" is all part of the same predicate beginning with "wanted."

But what if I were to say "The millionaire wanted to ski but not before noon"? Or "The millionaire wanted to ski, but not in the traditional sense of the word"? There's no subject following the "but," but there's also no verb. I feel like I probably punctuate these on a case-by-case basis, depending on how long or complex the sentence is (i.e., what's most readable). Anyone know if there's a rule, though?

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Aw, such a good candidate for the comma roundtable

I've noticed that in the UK the comma is usually left out of ALL of these. Why I'm not sure. ("Why, I'm not sure.")

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh, I forgot about the comma roundtable!

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Also btw:

If you’re a fan of my usage tips and Garner’s Modern American Usage…

I have a favor to ask of you as a loyal reader: In the next few hours or days, would you please go to www.amazon.com or www.bn.com and buy one or more copies of the new third edition of Garner’s Modern American Usage as holiday presents? In fact, keep this gift possibility in mind through the end of the year, won't you?

I need your help in sending a message to the major bookstore chains: they’re not stocking the book because they’ve told Oxford University Press that they consider usage guides a “defunct category.” It’s maddeningly unbelievable. Please help me show them that they’re stupendously wrong.

Meanwhile, in the coming months you might ask about the book when you’re in a bookstore: ask the managers why they don’t stock copies, and encourage them to do so.

If you’re curious to see what effect you’re having, watch the rankings on Amazon.com or Bn.com in coming days and weeks. We’ll be alerting the major chains to those numbers, and we want to get as close to the top 50 as we can. If you're trying to order and see that the book is labeled "out of stock," order anyway: the effort is also to ensure that the online booksellers keep adequate stocks.

In return for this favor – it’s a grassroots effort – I’ll be happy to inscribe copies that you send to LawProse for that purpose, if you (1) include a filled-out FedEx airbill for returning them to you, and (2) suggest an appropriate inscription.

Thank you for whatever help you can provide in this endeavor to show booksellers that the concern for good English is alive and well.

Bryan A. Garner

M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Thursday, 22 October 2009 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

The world needs a 208 page style guide on keeping it short.

Large Hadron Collander (onimo), Friday, 6 November 2009 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Twitter exists so people can write books about it right?

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 15:56 (fourteen years ago) link

When people abbreviate long words because they can't fit in a tweet . . . seriously.

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 15:57 (fourteen years ago) link

"How are you going to monetize Twitter?"

"Have the people working for us put out shitty books!"

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 15:58 (fourteen years ago) link

"Funniest Tweets of All Time"

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 15:58 (fourteen years ago) link

When people abbreviate long words because they can't fit in a tweet . . . seriously.

srsly

Large Hadron Collander (onimo), Friday, 6 November 2009 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Sorry, meant http://search.twitter.com/search?q=srsly

Large Hadron Collander (onimo), Friday, 6 November 2009 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

"this is seriously not good; I've been throwing up shit since last night. &srsly, what happened to my 'walls' ?! s'all gone now."

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:03 (fourteen years ago) link

If I ever vomit and my walls disappear as a result, I promise you I will NOT tweet about it.

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:04 (fourteen years ago) link

When people abbreviate long words because they can't fit in a tweet . . . seriously.

― kshighway1, Friday, November 6, 2009 10:57 AM (8 minutes ago)

seriously what?

k3vin k., Friday, 6 November 2009 16:07 (fourteen years ago) link

you know abbreviated words have the same meanings as their corresponding full words, right?

k3vin k., Friday, 6 November 2009 16:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Who needs full words!

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

I wouldn't want to read an edition of Crime and Punishment where every other fucking sentence had three abbreviated words in it.

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Abbreviated words have the same meanings as their corresponding full words while having the added benefit of making the person typing them look like a fucking dunce.

kshighway1, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

grow down

k3vin k., Friday, 6 November 2009 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

stfu u 2

TGAAPQ (Mr. Que), Friday, 6 November 2009 16:11 (fourteen years ago) link

<3 Q

sarahel, Friday, 6 November 2009 16:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Talking of abbreviated words...

What is the correct abbreviation for 'committee'?

I think it's 'cttee' but it looks wrong and at 5/9 letters is a piss poor abbreviation.

Large Hadron Collander (onimo), Friday, 6 November 2009 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link

(piss-poor?)

Large Hadron Collander (onimo), Friday, 6 November 2009 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.