New Order:Sublime or Ridiculous?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (181 of them)
That was the first NO video I ever saw -- and at the time I had no idea what they actually looked like.
So of course I was watching the video and thinking "WTF? This can't be them!". I was relieved when I discovered the truth.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Sonically, "Get Ready" is basically "Brotherhood", except with far better tunes.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Except for "Bizarre Love Triangle" of course.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I've listened to Brotherhood a lot more -- by default, of course, given that I've had it since 1988 -- and both it and Get Ready are tres spiff in their own rights.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 July 2004 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Have the New Order cd's been remastered yet? I notice on Amazon.co.uk that the date against most NO cds is now 2000, but none of them say [remastered] after the title. The original Brotherhood cd sounded awful compared to the vinyl (side one of which is the best thing they've ever done).

jamesbion, Friday, 30 July 2004 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link

what's up with above cdr-makers skipping over "Touched by the Hand of God'?

My first portable disc listing upthread is f*cked up!

Here is the correct tracklisting:

Ceremony (re-recorded vers from FAC 33T/Substance)
Temptation (5/87 from Substance)
Blue Monday (12" vers. from Substance)
Confusion (5/87 from Substance)
Thieves Like Us
Sub-culture (Robie remix from Substance)
Perfect Kiss (extended vers. from Substance)
Bizarre Love Triangle (12" mix)
True Faith
1963 (94 edit from Best Of)
Touched by the Hand of God
Fine Time
Round & Round
Run
Regret

(same running time 80:56, still chronological)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 30 July 2004 14:59 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah! That disc is seriously sounding exciting to me. I'll think I'll make myself a copy!

sexyDancer, Friday, 30 July 2004 15:57 (nineteen years ago) link

martin m: Nope. I hated them to death growing up in the 80s and early 90s - they were quite possibly my least favourite band as a kid. After I discovered and loved Joy Division years later, I bought the first few NO records out of curiosity re where the band went after Curtis' suicide. They do have their strong/interesting points (mostly in the rhythm section), and I did enjoy a number of songs (particularly "Everything's Gone Green", "Procession", "Age of Consent", "The Village", "Leave Me Alone") for a while - tellingly, those are all songs where they still had more of the live drums and guitars. In the end, though, they're just not really my thing while Joy Division remains one of my favourite bands of all time. I'll admit that a lot of it has to do with the different voices but I also dislike a lot of the synth sounds/production style in esp the later New Order, which strike me as more thin and cheesy-sounding than even some other synthpop. And I also just don't really think that tunes like "Your Silent Face" really sound that inspired to me. I always found the vocoder track on PCL to be just horrible. For me, bringing electronics into 80s pop was done in much more appealing ways in nearly every other area - funk, hip-hop, fusion, hard rock.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:17 (nineteen years ago) link

And, I'll clarify, I do totally love some synthpop songs like "Enjoy the Silence" (which seems to me to achieve more succesfully what NO set out to do) or even stuff like "Video Killed the Radio Star" or "99 Luftballoons" or "Take On Me".

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I also dislike a lot of the synth sounds/production style in esp the later New Order, which strike me as more thin and cheesy-sounding than even some other synthpop.

I have to disagree with this since New Order almost never sounds cheesy to me in a these-are-old-electronics kind of way. The sounds have come out surprisingly timeless. As much as I love Joy Division (top 10 band for me), I would say that Ian Curtis heavy vocal style is perhaps the most dated sounding thing on my compilations (except for maybe "586" which sounds like a tv show theme from 1986)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:48 (nineteen years ago) link

the cheesy part of NO is the lyrics, which can usually be ignored.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Except sometimes they are sweetly, perfectly brilliant. Bernard S. never pretended to be a poet and was only a lyricist by default, and somehow he made it work.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:53 (nineteen years ago) link

are you ADMITTING TO LISTENING TO LYRICS????

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Nice try, dude.

... in 1988, I picked up an issue of Musician that I still have around for some reason -- I think I got it for the Pink Floyd article on the cover. Figures. Anyway, besides that, there was an informative enough article (for young me, at least) about Joy Division and New Order. New Order had released their Substance compilation the previous year, godlike assemblage that it was, and Joy Division's own Substance collection was about to come out. New Order had on the strength of merely two singles, "Bizarre Love Triangle" and "True Faith," had become one of my favorite bands, and I had taken the plunge into getting their CDs as quickly as possible in the last months of my high school existence. None of them had lyrics printed in their sleeves, as it happens, and I found out why in the article. Near the end, Bernard Sumner said something that turned out to be rather important:

"If you want to print your lyrics, that must mean you feel you have a message that's very important....To us, that sets the lyrics apart from the music and makes them more important than they really are. I try to develop an atmosphere with lines that are conducive to the feeling or emotion of the song."

I think I was initially disappointed in this stance, especially since I really wanted to know more of what was being said in the songs. But it turned out to be the turning point, and while I can't say when for sure, some little while after I stopped explicitly caring about printed lyrics, reading along with them or any such thing. I returned to square one, in ways. I just listened, and it was not only remarkably freeing, it made sense. One doesn't have a lyric sheet when suddenly hearing a song for the first time on the radio or on TV or on computer or via a passing car or whatever.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link

have we done a "printing lyrics in liner notes c/d" thread??

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I love Bernard's lyrics as part of the the song as he says above. However, on 'Get Ready' I felt like he was actually trying to say something which made me cringe.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:10 (nineteen years ago) link

what is the name of that "protest" song they wrote, from Low-life? egads.

but yeah i generally thin that the "feel" of the singing in the context of the song makes it quite easy not to worry about any infelicities in the lyrics.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I really think Bernard is singing in characters. NO songs seem more like stories to me.
I think the cheesiness of some of the sounds (fairlight stabs!) is an act of liberation from the expectations of the dour raincoat crowd. It's playful. See the "Club" disc of Retro for reference.

sexyDancer, Friday, 30 July 2004 17:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Again, the sounds all just seem perfectly deployed on the vast majority of the records - i.e. they didn't just say "oooh, that's a cool sound, let's throw that in there somewhere". I suspect that the New Order recording environment was highly conscious and critical between members, probably weeding out any non-timeless, less-than-perfect, not-quite-the-sound-of-eternal-bliss parts.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Me wibbling on more about Technique.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 July 2004 17:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Barney got far worse as a lyricist as he went on in his career. I sort of see Technique as the start of that--some touching songs, like "Guilty Partner" and "Love Less," but some really dumb ones like "Round & Round" and "Mr. Disco". He even started to re-use lousy rhymes--he wrote three songs around the Technique period that use the "tomorrrow"/"sorrow" rhyme. And by the time of Electronic, he had gotten nearly unbearable.

However, the lyrics to songs like "Bizarre Love Triangle," "Temptation," "Thieves Like Us," and the other early classics when he was just starting to find his own voice identity mean far more to me than anything Ian ever wrote. Ian was obviously fascinated with death, but I think Barney was even more fascinated with life--love, passion, music, confusion, and all the rest--and I find that just as powerful.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:00 (nineteen years ago) link

early classics when he was just starting to find his own voice identity mean far more to me than anything Ian ever wrote. Ian was obviously fascinated with death, but I think Barney was even more fascinated with life ... and I find that just as powerful.

Well said, Doc.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Barney's lyrical talents certainly peaked on "Technique" with "All the Way", "Love Less" and "Run". Even the mantra-like simplicity of "Fine Time" works thanks to its slick and mechanical delivery. He had the Neil Tennant simultaneously-funny-and-sad thing working for him here, and hasn't done much like it since.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 30 July 2004 18:49 (nineteen years ago) link

And most of all.

he got looooooooove technique

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 30 July 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I havn't listened to anything of NO since Brotherhood, after being very into Joy Division when I first heard Movement I couldn't believe how good it was, and VERY different, to what else was happening, I love "power curruption and lies" but from there on it leaves me flat.
That time in music when "movement" came out still sends shivers down my spine. I will misquote Peter Hook years ago "I don't like a lot of music, but the music I do like I get more out of than anything else in life"

amen

Tim Dixon, Friday, 30 July 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

You know, I should emphasize that they were very important in my 'musical development' (ha), maybe more than I might let on when I get sick of all the "better than Joy Division" talk. Being able to go back to what I'd hated as a child and appreciate at least some of it in a new way, to be able to get something out of those beats and synths really was important. They did in a weird way kind of get me into a new of hearing pop music, of being able to embrace the idea of produced, synthy studio pop and dance, which was a gateway into embracing all kinds of things from fusion to prog to AOR to hair metal to pop/dance as well as IDM and electronica. (I wonder if even minimalism could go in there.) I could trace on some level my liking for things from Magnetic Fields to Immersion to Building Castles Out of Matchsticks to being able to accept New Order. I just never listen to them anymore.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 31 July 2004 02:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Nothing wrong with thinking of it that way -- some music is the perfect gateway drug that you never feel the need to go back to.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 31 July 2004 02:53 (nineteen years ago) link

CEREMONY

tk, Saturday, 31 July 2004 04:03 (nineteen years ago) link

This is where I break from most other hardcore New Order fans: outside of "Chosen Time" and "Dreams Never End," I can't stand Movement.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Saturday, 31 July 2004 04:14 (nineteen years ago) link

This thread is an example of why I'm so happy I discovered ILM. I've loved JD/NO since 1979/80 when I saw the former play live, and I was devastated and thrilled by their beauty. NO's sparkling tangential arc away from the dark JD mothership has been fascinating and, on occasion, just as gorgeous. But it's been goofy and dumb, too, which is important.

So, yeah, sublime and ridiculous, of course.

David A. (Davant), Saturday, 31 July 2004 04:59 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost: Actually Andrew, I'm with you on that one.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Saturday, 31 July 2004 07:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't imagine anyone actually "hating" New Order. Just can't do it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 1 August 2004 15:55 (nineteen years ago) link

I can, but when I imagine this person I totally want to punch the guy.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 1 August 2004 17:52 (nineteen years ago) link

New Order are so good musically it doesn't make the slightest difference to me what lyrics Bernie comes up with. If there are New Order songs/albums I don't like as much as others, it's not because of the lyrics, it's because of something else. With New Order, you're just going to get bad lyrics here and there - it comes with the package.

I recall Bernard saying he was having trouble with the lyrics for the new album, so, I have no reason to believe anything will change in that respect. Don't like it? Too bad. That's New Order.

Bimble (bimble), Sunday, 1 August 2004 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

royxmuzak: I'd be worried if you didn't look so sweet in your band photo;)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Sunday, 1 August 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

eight months pass...
(Haw, I've just now seen that, Sundar.)

Anyone else going to see them in Hyde Park? Anyone else already seen them this year/seeing them somewhere else?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

The Japanese version of Krafty is superbly ridiculous!

mike h. (mike h.), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Ok, anyone seen them ever?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 19:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I did in '85, '86 and '87. They sucked in '87 only. Gave up on them after Republic though I still love their ridiculously sublime earier stuff.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link

The live '93 version of "As It Is When It Was" on the box set is worth the price of the set alone. I believe Hooky when he admits that, when mixing the live tapes, he cried remembering how good they were that summer.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Is that on the Retro box set?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:59 (nineteen years ago) link

yuppers.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 14 April 2005 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Anyone else already seen them this year/seeing them somewhere else?

Saw them for the first time last weekend at the Fuji Rock Festival. It was worth every minute of the 15 year wait. They did Krafty in Japanese on MTV Japan and then repeated the feat in front of 20 000 people later that evening. The set-list was very well balanced and also included 4 Joy Division songs. I don't know what else can be said about these guys, but I love the hell out of them.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:41 (eighteen years ago) link

They did Krafty in Japanese

!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:45 (eighteen years ago) link

They even put the words up on the big screens so the crowd could sing along. Barney's pronunciation was surprisingly good. Those in attendance were duly impressed.

J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:55 (eighteen years ago) link

The Japanese version of "Krafty" is on the US itunes store now, btw. I can't find it on Soulseek.

Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:58 (eighteen years ago) link

http://s42.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3OYEBOKL1KI7Z365CSMF0U0US6

mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 8 August 2005 21:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Awesome. Thanks Mike.

Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 8 August 2005 22:26 (eighteen years ago) link

seven months pass...
So thanks to a tip-off from a friend I was able to download and enjoy this show:

22 JUN 82 Rollingstone - Milan, Italy 60

Truth, Dreams Never End, Chosen Time, ICB, Leave Me Alone, Denial,
Procession, 586, Temptation, Everything's Gone Green, When I'm With You

Some absolutely brutal performances of Movement-era stuff -- and it's all topped off with a performance of Sparks' "When I'm With You!" What a band.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:06 (eighteen years ago) link

(And said Sparks cover -- apparently the only time ever they did it, and definitely nowhere near as polished as the original -- is amazing. They completely New Orderize the song, and it balances on the verge of suddenly collapsing and coming back together just so -- Bernard goes 'this is why we don't do encores, this is a bad idea!' at one point, and yet somehow it still works.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:29 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.