Roman Polanski, or pardon me but your poll is in my neck.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1039 of them)

lol AP

am0n, Sunday, 27 September 2009 17:53 (fourteen years ago) link

:-)))

young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 September 2009 17:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home.

Cousin Larry Soetoro (jeff), Sunday, 27 September 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

He is OFF the team.

Cousin Larry Soetoro (jeff), Sunday, 27 September 2009 17:58 (fourteen years ago) link

SHAME ON THE SWISS

am0n, Sunday, 27 September 2009 18:00 (fourteen years ago) link

"But it still seems utterly ridiculous to me for America to still claim his head on a platter."

He drugged and raped a girl. Apparently this wasn't the only incident. It's in a way ridiculous to still go after him but then a crime is a crime. If it were my daughter I'd probably have lynched him 29 years ago.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 27 September 2009 19:07 (fourteen years ago) link

He drugged and raped a girl. Apparently this wasn't the only incident

BUT HE MADE CHINATWON

Super Cub, Sunday, 27 September 2009 19:25 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah I mean I like his movies too but what he did was against the law and he should serve some legal penalty for it.

it's pretty weird that Angelica Houston was there and was like, 'well she wasn't really like a 13 year old, she was like a 25 year old' ok cmon lady.

akm, Sunday, 27 September 2009 19:30 (fourteen years ago) link

But I mean hey, it's been THREE DECADES.

the only reason it's been three decades is because he ran away. i think the main thing it illustrates is that becoming a fugitive is generally a bad idea. legal systems don't forgive and forget. what sentence was he looking at then? i think he'd have been better off to have served it.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:01 (fourteen years ago) link

i can't understand what joan z. shore is whining about. not like the swiss gov't had any choice anyway.

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:03 (fourteen years ago) link

more like joan z. sure is stupid

velko, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:04 (fourteen years ago) link

some of y'all are cap'n save a pedo

a light salad of Adorno, Heidegger, Derrida and Esteban Buttez (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

New cap'n save a pedo legislation.

bamcquern, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

it's not his fault a 13-yr-old seduced him

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Anjelica Houston is a nonce.

bamcquern, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link

i love how that huffington poster's indictment of the swiss is: laundering nazi gold, denying women the vote, serving a warrant on a statutory rapist.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:13 (fourteen years ago) link

what sentence was he looking at then? i think he'd have been better off to have served it

According to BBC website:

"He was initially indicted on six counts and faced up to life in prison."

Not entirely surprised he skipped the country on that basis, but as you say the justice system has a long memory.

Bill A, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

dude should have resurrected his drag look from The Tenant to escape detection

http://www.pop-pervert.com/files/men_as_women-06.jpg

velko, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

if the americans wanted to arrest him,they could have done it many times on the past decades.
Polanski didnt hide while being all over the world.
thats why the swiss are weird about it.
my guess is that this arrest story will end as fast as it begun,cause right or wrong - no one seems to give a fuck about that case.

Zeno, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:31 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't honestly care either way but i thought the us had tried a couple times and failed because he didn't show up where he was supposed to?

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link

"but on the legal facts this is BS"

Whuh?

"what sentence was he looking at then?"

It wasn't entirely clear. Originally the plea bargain called for it to be something ridiculous like probation plus some community service and like six months in a minimum security prison. The judge decided at the last moment that this was crazy for the (anal) rape of a 13 year old and began to try to figure out a harsher (but presumably not anywhere close to life) sentence and then Polanski decided he'd had enough and ran away.

Alex in SF, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:37 (fourteen years ago) link

and france has a different extradition agreement from switzerland so they had to know he was leaving france ahead of time. it's not so easy for the us to set up the arrest + extradition that they could have just done it. i don't know. xpost

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:37 (fourteen years ago) link

"if the americans wanted to arrest him,they could have done it many times on the past decades."

They could have? I wasn't aware he'd entered into any country that had extradition treaties with the US.

Alex in SF, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

I always thought Jack Nicholson deserved some measure of opprobrium for knowing Polanski would use his house for pedo fun. What can you say, Jack? It was the seventies.

Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

it's not like catching bin laden...
you gotta give the u.s. more credit than just waiting passively for him to show up where he suppose to other than actively go and take him by force.
plus,theres a thing called the interpol, which was never used.
conclusion: the u.s. don't care.

Zeno, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:39 (fourteen years ago) link

i haven't researched it but i don't believe they could have showed up and just taken him. it's also a state case. the DA had to ask the us justice dept to make the warrant, which was sent to switzerland to use their extradition treaty. so there's 3 separate governments involved.

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link

"The girl was just a few weeks short of her 14th birthday, which was the age of consent in California."

Pretty sure it was 18 even then.

Alex in SF, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link

but on the legal facts this is BS.

― A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius)

not a juris doctor iirc

velko, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:44 (fourteen years ago) link

"he'd entered into any country that had extradition treaties with the US"

he was, for example, in Israel.

Zeno, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't buy any of the arguments that Polanski doesn't deserve anything he gets at this point. This was a pretty despicable crime (he DRUGGED and then ANALLY RAPED a minor fer crying out loud) and the fact that he's a famous great director and seventy-six years old and once in Israel doesn't mean he should walk away scot free. So whatever happened that resulted in this, good on the Swiss.

Alex in SF, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link

^otm

truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:48 (fourteen years ago) link

anyone else arguing otherwise is honestly insane

truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:49 (fourteen years ago) link

i didnt say he doesn't or does deserve this,
i'm just saying that objectively no one except from the swiss seems to care.
at least uo to this point.

Zeno, Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link

huh? the swiss didn't arrest him all by themselves!

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:51 (fourteen years ago) link

hey man he had a rough half decade

xpost

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link

"objectively"

Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:52 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-mew-polanski28-2009sep28,0,6506344.story?track=rss


The Los Angeles County district attorney's office learned last week that Polanski had plans to travel to Zurich this weekend, said Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the district attorney's office.

Prosecutors sent a provisional arrest warrant to the U.S. Justice Department, which presented it to Swiss authorities. On at least two previous occasions, the district attorney's office has received reports that Polanski had travel arrangements to countries with extradition treaties with the U.S. and prepared paperwork for his arrest, Gibbons said.

"But in the end, he apparently found out about it and didn't go," she said.

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:55 (fourteen years ago) link

oy vey, expect to see a lot of this saving o' the p'do
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2009/09/the_outrageous_arrest_of_roman.html

(anal) (velko), Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:58 (fourteen years ago) link

haha [here's a whole bunch of facts that are irrelevant] [therefore, i conclude switzerland is ridiculous]

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:00 (fourteen years ago) link

just to be clear, my comment upthread was meant to be facetious.

Super Cub, Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link

arguments for arresting polanski: he committed a serious crime by drugging and raping a pubescent girl

arguments against arresting polanski: it happened 30 years ago!!!!! and, you know, he was in the holocaust!!! and besides, the swiss!!! you know!!! nazi bankers!!!

fleetwood (max), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link

and chinatown!!!!!!!!!!!

fleetwood (max), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:02 (fourteen years ago) link

he has already paid so much in lawyer's fees. just let him go.

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

He did commit a crime, but he has paid for the crime in many, many ways: In notoriety, in lawyers' fees, in professional stigma. He could not return to Los Angeles to receive his recent Oscar. He cannot visit Hollywood to direct or cast a film.

i mean, is this actually something that was written by a human or what?

truth bomber ginsburg (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Part of the transcript.

Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

he can't even visit hollywood! isn't that enough?

steamed hams (harbl), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

also the victim doesn't want him to go back on trial and would rather just let it die

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

it was the 70s,anal sex with almost 14 year olds was all the rage. lighten up!

(anal) (velko), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link

I am certain there are many who will harrumph that, following this arrest, justice was done at last. But Polanski is 76. To put him on trial or keep him in jail does not serve society in general or his victim in particular. Nor does it prove the doggedness and earnestness of the American legal system. If he weren't famous, I bet no one would bother with him at all.

Little starbursts of joy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 27 September 2009 22:04 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.