Is Rolling Stone racist?

Normally, I wouldn't care about RS; but for once, I'm actually looking forward to the next issue...for the letter column...I can't wait to see what kind of reaction/response this cover will have in the next issue.
I'm not sure if it'll be chilly or hot, so bring both a sweater and suncreen...and possibly a flak jacket.

Ta-Nehisi: you should sum up your posts and mail them into the magazine.

dude, i'd fuckin' buy MULTIPLE COPIES just to see these guys with that logo on the cover.

America needs to be better exposed to their smiling visages.

http://www.stclairevents.com/images/huun-huur-tu.jpg

Version #1
Headline: Is Tupac Really Dead?
Cover Image: Tupac on a slab, a coroner poking him with a stick.

Version #2
Headline: Are the Stripes, the Hives and the Vines really three seperate bands?
Cover Image: Five vaguely new-york rocker fellas in black shirts and white ties posing out

Version #3
Headline: The Le Mystère des Voix Bulgares Revival Starts HERE!
Cover Image: 300 Bulgarian women in cheesy peasant folk dresses all trying to pout in a sultry, sex-kittenish way. Failing.

Rolling Stone, at least originally, was a ROCK magazine, right? If memory serves correct, the only vaguely "rock" musicians that have been on the cover in the past year-or-so have been Phish and Dave Matthews band. Have they given up any attempt at remaining a "rock" oriented magazine then?

i should probably not post when i'm either (a) really drunk or (b) not really awake.

Heh that's my new signature.

HA: What was the purpose of putting Eminem on the cover of Rolling Stone?

JL: We were attempting to explain about Eminem and his work.

HA: What does it mean to call him a 'genius' in terms of being the most covered hip-hop artists at Rolling Stone? Why not Jay-Z on the cover?

JL: I can't speak to the way he's been contextualized. He outsold anyone else by two to one. Our job is to cover him in any way that we can. It's a commercial proposition. At a certain level, it's that reductive. A commercial proposition is part of it.

What would it take for Jay-Z? It would take the confidence that we would be as successful with those covers. hip hop covers haven't been extraordinary successful for us in the past. We're not trusted as a hip-hip authority?

HA: Well, why put Enimem on the cover?

JL: As he might agree, he's blown up bigger than that. It did work when we did it before. He's the biggest thing in the music industry.

HA: What does his whiteness have to do with this?

JL: It's not incidental. To say that it's not a factor is ridiculous. He said that he'd sell 1/2 the records if he wasn't right. Obviously it has something to do with it.

HA: In the article, it says 'no one denies that his race has a lot to do with his popularity?' What does that mean?

JL: I don't think it's a simple question. What do you think?

HA: Please tell me first.

JL: It's part of what of what he says is a big factor. He's more acceptible to a broad-based audience. He makes pop singles too. It's been a factor since the start of his career.

HA: By saying the 'genius', how's that different than 'success'?

JL: We wanted these stories to address his particular genius, whatever it is. We hoped that we might explain some of that.

HA: By hailing this artist and having him on so many covers, to have a cover that says 'genius' for him but not have Jay-Z on the cover...

JL: This mistakes us for a hip-hop mag. Also, Britney's had more Rolling Stone covers than Eminem.

HA: Do you see the use of 'genius' as...

JL: I see it as a cover line of what some of the intention of the piece and to attract the eye of a potential reader...

HA: And it has no other context where a white man dominates a black artform?

JL: Harry, I answered your question already.

"I hate all this crap! But I'm going to give you FUCKERS what you want! Now, a Nickelback cover."

hee hee.

with sticks.

i like the personable touch that only pointy sticks can provide.

http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ld/projects/trc/2002/manual/images/bilingual/stick.jpg

Trife is pretty rational though so I'm not sure where you're going with this.

BUFFY: You named your stake?

Kendra: (a bit embarrassed) Yes.

BUFFY: (smiles) Remind me to get you a stuffed animal.

(1) Is Rolling Stone simply bowing to critiscism and backpeddling furiously by putting him on the cover in an effort to save face?

(2) *WHO*GIVES*A*FUCK*ABOUT*AMERICAN*IDOL*ANYWAY?

*=This was an actual comment made by the owner of MTV, re "black music" before they bought out by Viacom.

Bump for Twitter's trip back into the time machine to Dec. 2010.

People don't like Elvis?

^I mean, I don't really either, but that seems to be what people are upset about the most.

people seem to be mad at dylan at #7 best singer ever.

but all my favorite singers couldn't sing

this thread is so good actually

We need to bring TNC back to ILM.

"bob dylan can't sing" is the most boring and eternal of takes

otm

Is Vibe racist? They only put black people on their cover.

Post #4, lol... very efficient thread

I am done

I agree 100%.... I love Tom Waits, but he is NOT a great singer.

— The Rev (@revchristopher) October 21, 2019

how can you like tom waits and also think that he's not a good singer? he can do things with his voice that absolutely nobody else can, or would even think to do. you don't need to have to sound like a pure angel to be a good singer, fergodsake.

he can do things with his voice that absolutely nobody else can, or would even think to do

Thank God.

Anyway, he said great singer.