Mac OS X: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (153 of them)

IIsi had to be at least 4.0

stet, Friday, 18 April 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

(and if it had MultiFinder it was at least 5.0, which didn't last long before 6 came out)

stet, Friday, 18 April 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that the Multifinder thing was a guess on Ed's part. But it was certainly a IIsi.

libcrypt, Friday, 18 April 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

It also had a 21" monochrome Radius display that required a special card. Pops gave it to me in about 97 and I maxed out the RAM to like 24MB or something and put NetBSD on it.

libcrypt, Friday, 18 April 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link

IIsi had to be at least 4.0

Nope. The IIsi initially shipped with System 6.0.7 (which was really just 6.0.5 patched to run on the IIsi and the LC)

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 18 April 2008 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

http://lowendmac.com/ii/macintosh-iisi.html

Obviously I'm confused about something. Pops DID give me a IIsi; maybe that's not what I used when I worked for him. I moved to Richmond in 1990, and for a year before that, I was washing dishes for a retirement home, so there's no way I was using a IIsi for layout.

libcrypt, Friday, 18 April 2008 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeh, sorry, it's the plain II that used 4.0

stet, Friday, 18 April 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Bloody hell, the 10.5.3 updater is 420MB!

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 19:16 (fifteen years ago) link

4:20

am0n, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 19:20 (fifteen years ago) link

lol update is hueg

But it does say it fixes some issues with Active Directory binding. I haven't gotten full-on LDAPped-up yet, but do ya think that might also help fix the fact that there are hissy fits when mounting and unmounting NFS volumes?

Time will tell, I spose.

kenan, Wednesday, 28 May 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Question, and I don't want to ask on the I Hate thread: Is it wrong of me to feel deep within my soul that installing Symantec Norton Anti-Everything on my Mac at work is a stupid fucking thing to do? Am I wrong to suspect that this is another instance of our clueless IT department not understanding that this isn't Windows XP? Am I a bad person if I actually feel a bit insulted?

kenan, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:11 (fifteen years ago) link

it was only 198MB for me but that is still pretty hoofing.

Ed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Is it wrong of me to feel deep within my soul that installing Symantec Norton Anti-Everything on my Mac at work is a stupid fucking thing to do?

no, it is a fucking stupid thing to do

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I wouldn't install norton anti-everything. There was a good article on Ars a while back on the good open source alternatives to stuff like that for Windows, Linux and OS X. An AV-tool is a good thing if only because it'll stop you passing through any windows nasties.

Ed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah because I spend sooo much time forwarding ppt files with pictures of Jesus to my grandma. Fuck this, I'm not an idiot.

kenan, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Ran the update and haven't noticed any problems so far, at least.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:42 (fifteen years ago) link

The only problem I've had -- and this happened with the 5.2 update as well -- is that after the update, Time Machine will try to back up the whole system again, and that's dandy, but for some reason if your machine goes to sleep during that first big backup, Time Machine will get stuck and never stop "preparing" to update. Solution: turn off the energy saver and "put hard drive to sleep" features for a while.

kenan, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I was mere suggesting that there might be something that would satisfy your support team and not add a layer of software that will treat you as a moron.

Ed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:48 (fifteen years ago) link

my brother - who's just got a macbook, his first mac - installed the last update and it somehow messed with his safari, so he's getting 'unable to load nib file' errors every time he tries to open it. And then expecting me to know what to do to fix it. urk.

permanent resolution, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost Yeah, I know -- there's a nice beardo smart guy that comes around, and I'll ask him what we should use instead. Something lightweight will be fine. There's just no reason for us to be installing this giant suite of "parental controls" and the like -- uh... the OS already does that, but Gee Thanks Symantec!

kenan, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

here's a similar question: any reason to install antivirus software in a virtualized environment (say, a VMware install of Windows XP)? If I got something I can just wipe that virtual OS out by deleting it and resintall, right? I only have this for browser checks and slsk (which isn't working very well) anyway.

akm, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes you can but that is a pain. See the above Ars article for open source windows de crapping tools.

Ed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

VMware or Parallels?

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Changes week by week almost as they add new features. Parallels, I think has the edge right now being able to interleave windows apps into os x.

Also on the windows wiping thing, if your xp is legit then you will come up against the windows activation limit if you reinstall from scratch every time.

Ed, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 16:41 (fifteen years ago) link

good point. I ran/run AVG for antivirus stuff on windows, has worked fine for me in the past.

akm, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 16:42 (fifteen years ago) link

I try really hard to not be biased toward or against Macs but there's one thing I can't for the life of me understand.

The hardware looks like this:
http://techpaedia.com/apple/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/MacBook.png
which is slick and stylish but fairly conserrvative white goods design.

But the OS looks like this:
http://www.cnet.com.au/story_media/339283264/leopard-osx_1.jpg

Which looks like it was designed by a well meaning 14 year old star trek nut with no self control.

It's got fake 3D icons with several inconsistent perspectives, those cliched semi-transparent reflections that are now laughed at when used on the web, the style of the strip across the top of the screen clashes with the strip on the bottom, and the background image is the sort of abstract tosh knocked up in a 1000 photoshop tutorials mixed with an old school 8bit starfield and it's mostly PURPLE.

Okay, a lot people might like the budget sci-fi look, but why are the hardware and the software so, so inconsistent?

mei, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:30 (fifteen years ago) link

i feel your pain

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:32 (fifteen years ago) link

because it's a computer

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:33 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah the stock desktop with leopard (that purple thing) is atrocious. it still comes up when I'm logged out, have to find some way for it to disappear. it looks like a bad video game

akm, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:36 (fifteen years ago) link

"because it's a computer" Huh?

mei, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:47 (fifteen years ago) link

That black laptop and it's black themed aero fit, as does the speccy and it's RYGC stripe (but I have to point out (as a COMPLETE NERD) that the screen shot isn't from that computer! It's from a later 128k spectrum).

mei, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:49 (fifteen years ago) link

it's not even from that, it's from some emulator

google image search is gay

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 22:59 (fifteen years ago) link

but i know what you mean, you'd think the mac desktop would look more like this

http://server.ericsbinaryworld.com/images/blog/21oct_fluxbox.png

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 23:09 (fifteen years ago) link

lol linux

DG, Tuesday, 3 June 2008 23:10 (fifteen years ago) link

but lol Linux can look like almost literally anything, both the box and the interface.

http://www.dvc.uk.com/acatalog/hp4300.jpg

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/Screenshot1_sm.jpghttp://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/Screenshot2_sm.jpg

kenan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 00:10 (fifteen years ago) link

mei, replace this file:

/System/Library/CoreServices/DefaultDesktop.jpg

then repair permissions with disk utility

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 00:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Which looks like it was designed by a well meaning 14 year old star trek nut with no self control.

Yup. Got outta hand, didn't they? But it is customizable, more all the time. Possibly the worse it looks, the harder people try to make it easy to customize.

kenan, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link

This is much more like it should look to match the hardware!

http://www.guidebookgallery.org/pics/gui/desktop/empty/macosx102.png

mei, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 08:05 (fifteen years ago) link

okay so I have to backup 350GB of data from my hard drive to our xraid; I'm guessing making a disc image is the best way to deal with this issue. How long is that going to take? I started doing it and it was taking forever so I cancelled; but we were also having some connection problems to the raid (maybe these were my fault for trying to shove this much data onto it during work hours, who knows).

akm, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Best to use something like RsyncX to create the image, it will make recovery a whole heap easier.

Ed, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

mei otm. 10.3 was the last I liked, and even it wasn't that great.

stet, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah it seems that making that image the raid is overloading our server; you'd think it would be able to handle something like that. I'm inclined to just copy directories over one by one; it's going to take all day but at least they'll be in smaller chunks.

akm, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

purple itunes? gay!

DG, Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

one year passes...

Your search - "snow lolpard" - did not match any documents.

Suggestions:
* Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
* Try different keywords.
* Try more general keywords.

Did you mean to search for: "snow leopard"

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Monday, 24 August 2009 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Bet you didn't know that OS X keeps a separate list of all files you have downloaded. Now you do.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 14 July 2012 22:50 (eleven years ago) link

one year passes...

is there a way to set the finder's 'find…' to search by name (or any other preference setting), so that it sticks as the default?

j., Friday, 14 February 2014 21:38 (ten years ago) link

four years pass...

I was doing some cleanup and maintenance on my mother's mid-2010 iMac and discovered that it won't run Mojave, but it will run operating systems up through High Sierra. It's currently running 10.8 Mountain Lion and the machine has 4GB of RAM. What's the best/speediest OS for this machine?

ILX Moderator: It's Like a Pressure Wash for Your Insides (WmC), Saturday, 9 February 2019 16:48 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.