origins of fear/hatred of disco

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (343 of them)
Jeanne: the aforementioned biz fallout (you couldn't call anything disco by 1980, even if it was disco) had a lot to do w/it. Plus Reagan getting elected.

BTW, another great book I just read: The Fabulous Sylvester by Joshua Gamson, extremely well written and full of amazing, deeply researched detail about black drag in L.A., San Francisco during the '70s, and how people in the disco world dealt with the fallout. Similarly, there's a new book about Chic called Everybody Dance that's not so well written but has a lot of great info.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck, the essay is more about gay life and disco, written from a gay and academic perspective. It has very little to do w/what you're talking about (which would make an interesting essay topic itself)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

by Queen I mean Freddie Mercury, obviously.

And I mean those LATER Silver Convention albums (e.g. *Madhouse*), after they stopped having # 1 pop hits (though I doubt very many people bought the albums with those #1 hits on them either, actually.)

xp

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

So technically Matos, it didn't have much to do with another genre coming in and pushing disco out of the limelight the way grunge ousted hair metal?

Je4nne Ć’ury (Jeanne Fury), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

more on this homophobia = machine-o-phobia please...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Jeanne, grunge did not oust hair-metal!

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

no, not really, unless lite-pop pushed it out! by 1980-1 the charts were full of, like, Air Supply and Barbra Streisand's Guilty (produced by Barry Gibb! though it's not a disco album), at least to my memory. plus stuff like Foreigner. I think it was just a retrenchment of what had already been popular pre- (and during, aside from) disco, only more polished and synthed-up.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

haha Chuck you didn't go to my high school. grunge TOTALLY ousted hair metal there.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

some # 1 hits in 1980:

please don't go - kc and the sunshine band
rock with you - michael jackson
call me - blondie
funkytown- lipps inc
upside down- diana ross
another one bites the dust - queen

so disco ws displaced by, um, disco, basically

----

king's x, faith no more, janes addiciton, and living colour had already displaced hair-metal on MTV and the charts before grunge came along, michaelangelo. the cause and effect thing was a total myth...

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

in other words, hair metal was already on the way out, or already out, before grunge came along. the romantic myth of grunge replacing it really came later, when people decided to make it in "history". but by '91 pretty much the only hair-metal left on mtv was adult ballads by extreme (who weren't really hair metal anyway, they were funkier and artier, like faith no more) and mr. big. ugly kid joe, who were basically punks, preceded nirvana by several months. etc etc

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah there's that quote in the Lawrence book...

"The disco department was renamed the dance music department. It was an issue of semantics. All this music was happening, but we couldn't call it disco." Caviano started giving interviews saying, "It's dance music! It's dance music!" while simultaneously blaming the media for disco's decline.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

ALSO Madonna was basically disco, right? I mean, she even had the guy from Chic produce her like a virgin album.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Those songs Xhuck listed above may each have a number of disco facets, but none of them were anything resembling what was considered disco in the 70s... "Funkytown" being an interesting exception.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

(granted, I don't remember "Please Don't go".. I stopped listening to KC right around Saturday Night Fever)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

In the disco died story, "Funkytown" is usually seen as disco's last gasp innit?

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

But yeah, after 1980, it was really a plan on terminology more than a change in the music itself.

Xhuck, Lethal, you're also forgetting Kano's "I'm Ready" which was more disco than anything listed above, which became a big hit in 1981.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

in other words, hair metal was already on the way out, or already out, before grunge came along. the romantic myth of grunge replacing it really came later, when people decided to make it in "history". but by '91 pretty much the only hair-metal left on mtv was adult ballads by extreme (who weren't really hair metal anyway, they were funkier and artier, like faith no more) and mr. big. ugly kid joe, who were basically punks, preceded nirvana by several months. etc etc

Matos is right, Chuck. I was 16 in 1991, a big metal kid. Obv. there had been little inklings of things that we liked that started to get us out of hair metal, like Faith No More and Janes...and Metallica's Misfits covers - which are totally underrated as a big thing for getting metal kids like me into punk - but after Nirvana, things were DIFFERENT for us...we all totally jumped on the alternative bandwagon....it was a big thing to us, just typical small town (pre Internet!) kids with little in the way of exposure to punk and alt stuff before that.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Kano never even hit the Top 40.

And I'll be damned if I can understand how blatant Eurodisco moves and Chic songs sounded nothing like "anything resembling what was considered disco in the 70s," but I've argued with that bizarre perception repeatedly on other threads, and don't have the energy to do so again here. Suffice to say that disco encompassed many, many different sounds in the '70s. The idea that it suddenly turned some drastic sonic corner in 1980 (or '81 or '82 or '83) is completely absurd. It changed it name, basically, or rather, it had a name change thrust upon it. And it continued to change, like it always had.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost: Don't forget Jane's Addiction
(Guns n Roses & Mettalica also set the stage for grunge)

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Kano was the #1 hit at the Top 40 station I listened to in L.A. I remember jumping up and down when they announced it. (KIIS FM?) Maybe they were just a regional phenomenon? Perhaps they were big on R&B radio, which spilled over to the local stations?

Which reminds me to mention, we seem to be talking strictly in the context of Top 40 here. R&B radio was far less trigger-happy to drop disco off their playlists just yet. (Probably because all the musicians behind those disco platters already joined new R&B/dance/funk bands that were less anonymous, and just carried the disco/funk along with them...)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

apologize for not having time right now to go over new posts - will say glancing through someone touched on and i think lots of music WAS pretty darn disco but those elements were ignored for some reason (why?)-- thinking definitely Pink Floyd and also often Steeley Dan.

Susan Douglas, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I think Chuck has a point, though--hair metal was kind of on its way out, but Nirvana totally sealed the coffin in that respect. sort of like there was rock and roll before "Heartbreak Hotel" but that record made it official.

obviously the big differential re: disco dying is terminology, because 1980 was a HUGE year for disco. but 1980 was also the year when disco "died"--and turned into a verboten word if not sound.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

S.O.S. Band, Con Funk Shun, The Gap Band, The Jacksons.. all had big R&B hits in 1980... Rick James would come along a year later...

Disco definitely lived on, just incognito and a bit more mutated into what we now call 80s funk/R&B.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

ah! but funk and disco were considered EXTREMELY different back then--in fact, few music people disliked disco as much as hardcore funkateers. see George Clinton, for example. (and yes, he did a couple disco tracks, but later renounced them.) Rickey Vincent's book Funk has loads on this ideological/musical split.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

the funk vs. disco wars were not at all unlike the rock vs. disco wars. maybe MORE heated because funk got stigmatized as "disco"--"fake, phony, mechanized bullshit" rather than "live, played by people," etc.--by white media. when disco fell, funk fell with it--it's one of the major reasons for P-Funk's collapse (that, and all the drugs)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

surely they're still considered very different, and split along similar battle lines too? the whole fake phony ("gay" or perhaps if people are being polite "girly") thing still exists as a common criticism of disco or particularly discoey deep house, and the authenticity thing seems to me to be quite big in funk/soul, though it's interesting how alot of people heavily into disco nowadays discuss it in terms of authenticity, at least alot of guys I know from work etc.

I think it threatens to sort of ruin a genre really, this "this is the old stuff, yes sir" sentiment. I remember Simon R saying something about how difficult it was for him to enjoy Aretha Franklyn because he kept thinking of the stuffiness of the language used around soul and I empathised alot with that.

This is a bit of a tangent perhaps, sorry!

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:40 (nineteen years ago) link

ah! but funk and disco were considered EXTREMELY different back then--in fact, few music people disliked disco as much as hardcore funkateers. see George Clinton, for example.

...

the funk vs. disco wars were not at all unlike the rock vs. disco wars. maybe MORE heated because funk got stigmatized as "disco"--"fake, phony, mechanized bullshit" rather than "live, played by people," etc.--by white media. when disco fell, funk fell with it--it's one of the major reasons for P-Funk's collapse (that, and all the drugs)

Heh, I wasn't saying the MUSICIANS were embracing the abandoned disco puppy. Just R&B radio. In this one Rick James greatest hits CD, he describes "You and I" by basically saying "Yeah, we hated disco, but our record company wanted something disco-ey, so I made the first 10 seconds of 'You And I' disco-ey, then brought on the funk."

Rick James's success in 1981 with his fifth album Street Songs (namely "Give It To My Baby" and "Super Freak") was a major milestone, as, acc. to Bootsy Collins, it really brought the funk back into Top 40... given your prelude there, Matos. (Then again, i thought the Gap Band did that a year before, but I guess they didn't strike it as big as James did.)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

the funk vs. disco wars were not at all unlike the rock vs. disco wars. maybe MORE heated because funk got stigmatized as "disco"--"fake, phony, mechanized bullshit" rather than "live, played by people," etc.--by white media. when disco fell, funk fell with it--it's one of the major reasons for P-Funk's collapse (that, and all the drugs)

This brings up the Mojo Chic article...did you read that? Nile and co. were totally about the "real musician" thing...they wanted to be respected like a great rock band and Nile has this anecdote about having Kurtis Blow open for them and being totally disheartened because (as he saw it) Chic's brand of pro muscianship was being usurped by the drum machine, etc....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

(Quincy Jones admitted stealing the bass line progression of James's "Give It To Me Baby" for the song "Thriller"... and then Thriller comes along.... boom.)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

"Quincy Jones admitted stealing the bass line progression of James's "Give It To Me Baby" for the song "Thriller"... "

good on Quincy, this has always been GLARINGLY obvious to me, and MJ lovers seem to hate it when I point out this rather obvious cop.

And again: MORE GAY ROBOTS k thx (where did Spencer go?)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link

"Suffice to say that disco encompassed many, many different sounds in the '70s. The idea that it suddenly turned some drastic sonic corner in 1980 (or '81 or '82 or '83) is completely absurd. It changed it name, basically, or rather, it had a name change thrust upon it. And it continued to change, like it always had."

OTM I think it was Dan Selzer on that other thread who would not call anything after 1980 "disco". he had been brainwashed!

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:04 (nineteen years ago) link

The claim that "there are a host of reasons why some people don't like machines which are related I think to why those same people don't like homosexuals" sounds completely absurd to me

Why exactly? This is a pretty old idea. I guess I should clarify that the discomfort is not necessarily conscious and people probably would not even make the connection in their own mind - but the causes are similar.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't mind what machines do in the privacy of their own home, but do they have to be so upfront about it? The other day, this computer calculated pi to 80 decimals right in front of me and the kids!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:13 (nineteen years ago) link

This is a very gross simplication of what I think Spencer's getting at, but it's this "It.. just.. ain't RIGHT is all!" sentiment.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

"It just ain't RIGHT is all" ---> "it's not the natural order of things... it's not the way things should be" ---> ????

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:16 (nineteen years ago) link

xxxpost
I actually don't fully subscribe to the Empire of the Beat equation. I think the related 'unnatural' qualities of homosexuals and machines (and by extension disco) have more to do with their challenge of origin myths (whose privileging is also related to logocentrism and the obsession with authenticity).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:17 (nineteen years ago) link

---> some very ingrained form of puritanism. Again, subconscious. People don't have to be outwardly religious to have this mindset. It's hard to describe, but I think that's getting at it. (or am I?)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:18 (nineteen years ago) link

A lot of this can seem pretty off-topic, but I would say that the disco era really put these ideas and anxieties on full display.

This whole discussion has got me craving the new Daft Punk album for a number of reasons!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:19 (nineteen years ago) link

thx for clearing that up Spencer (the "unnatural" thing didn't occur to me at all - mostly cuz the whole judgment of something being "unnatural" seems fundamentally flawed to me)

now I can go back to fantasizing about my new, healthy, all-natural gay robot-a-go-go band, the Sperm Trees.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Quite a thread. Now if I only didn't have to be working this afternoon. And now waiting on a FUCKING IDIOT TO FINALLY TAKE ME OFF HOLD. (Nobody here, thankfully.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Now I may go listen to "The Wanderer."

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha Shakey, I don't know if you're kidding as I don't feel like I've given a full explanation. I'm unable to really elaborate on it at the moment, but I certainly plan to.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:40 (nineteen years ago) link

First of all, give up the idea that hatred against disco had anything to do with rascism or homophobia. It didn't. Not at all.

There were several other good reasons for people to dislike it though:

- Rockers felt threatened by the polished sound, completely free of noisy guitars
- Prog fans disliked it for the same reason they had also disliked bubblegum and the teen oriented glam stuff, and would later dislike punk: It was too musically simple
- People preoccupied with rock ideologi disliked the fact that there were people behind caring more about constructing hits to bring them money rather than about making good music.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm kidding, I do not have a new all gay-robot band called the Sperm Trees.


YET.


x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

And, yes, indeed (and some of you funk fans seem to ignore): Funk fans disliked it because the disco beats were too simple and too machine-like

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't doubt that all those reasons are correct at the subtext level, Geir, but the real reason is what Matos and Chuck have suggested: the bottom fell out of the market, supply exceeded demand, etc. It's simple economics.

(By the way, straight males might have listened to Sylvester and Chic's "Real People" album more carefully if they'd realized they would have gotten laid if they'd danced to those hits. Most indie boys nowadays know that dancing - well or badly - makes you 10 times hotter. Here in Miami we have the swishy mid '90s Britpop to thank for that development).

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Of course, disco lived on in a way. Those 80s soul weekenders were pretty close to disco, as was a lot of 80s Europop. And today you will hear artists from Daft Punk to Annie using discofied 4/4 beats. But the original disco sound, with strings and all, more or less died in the late 70s/very early 80s.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link

The supposed subconscious machinephobia = gayphobia thing still completely eludes me. (and this ranks with the more cryptic comments I've ever seen on ILM: "the related 'unnatural' qualities of homosexuals and machines (and by extension disco) have more to do with their challenge of origin myths (whose privileging is also related to logocentrism and the obsession with authenticity)") What if I explained to you that the disco sucks crowd was way more likely to be working on automobile assembly lines than to be, uh, Amish or something? People in the Rustbelt LOVE machines; machines are their LIFE. (Why the hell do you think techno and house were invented there, for Crissakes?) ROCK MUSIC depends on machines -- or at the loud heavy kind that came from Detroit always did. (And a lot of it, from Iggy to Alice Cooper was blatantly androgynous, too. Detroit rock fans had no problem with Bowie singing "Panic in Detroit," either -- and Bowie's diamond-dog decadence blatantly influenced disco, as well.) So sorry, I don't buy it.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Spencer, read the essay before ascribing an "Empire of the Beat" equation. He's talking about stuff a lot differently than we are here (as I keep pointing out!)

xpost that proves my point!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck as per usual, we'll just have to agree to disagree. There are a number of texts which elaborate on this theory so I know I'm not out of my mind - or at least I'm not alone, haha.

What is cryptic about it? For the record, I do not think that homosexuals and machines are 'unnatural'.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:03 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.