Andrew W.K.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (439 of them)

You probably know about his new album of classical piano solos that just came out. Possibly you know of his forthcoming tour with a string quartet. But have you heard about the Gundam Rock album due on 9/9/9?

Also, he is on Red Eye tonight but you probably knew that already.

everything, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:07 (fourteen years ago) link

you're assuming a lot

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:08 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd hate to assume that I was the best informed person on Andrew WK matters on this board.

everything, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 23:12 (fourteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

WOW

O time thy pyramids (Abbott), Sunday, 13 September 2009 22:27 (fourteen years ago) link

A. Ant W.K.

bamcquern, Sunday, 13 September 2009 23:57 (fourteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Well, that took a long time. Close Calls With Brick Walls is finally getting a North American release. Double CD with a disc of unreleased and rare tracks. Feb 23 2010.

everything, Tuesday, 15 December 2009 23:48 (fourteen years ago) link

i own this: http://www.discogs.com/Andrew-WK-Close-Calls-With-Brick-Walls/release/1777968 version of it. The pressing is atrocious.

Pedro Paramore (jim), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 00:34 (fourteen years ago) link

but obviously it looks amazing.

Pedro Paramore (jim), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 00:38 (fourteen years ago) link

I was really into that record for a little bit and just recently listened to it again. Some songs are actually really atrocious. But there's some really amazing stuff on here as well. I think "Don't Call Me Andy" is my current favorite.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 16:46 (fourteen years ago) link

"Don't Call Me Andy" and "Pushing Drugs" are the best ones.

just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 16:59 (fourteen years ago) link

i believe the key is that wikipedia lists him as an "entertainer" before "rock musician."

strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Which is why this thread is on I Love Everything, rather than I Love Music.

xpost. Nah. Best tracks are "Hand on the Place, "Not Going To Bed", "One Brother" and "When I'm High". I don't know of any atrocious songs on this album. I mean, there's the three or four short filler numbers which are about 40 seconds long. Other than that it's solid as a rock. His best album by a mile.

everything, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Also "Into the Clear" is amazing.

everything, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

I take that back. Not many atrocious songs. I don't like "Las Vegas, Nevada" or "The Background", and sometimes the production grates on me. But I'm glad he really just went crazy with this. It feels like every song is a weird experiment and sometimes it really works and if it doesn't then it just sounds really odd and it's a nice place anyways. My version also has "This Is My World" which I totally love.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Man, "Hand on the Place" and "When I'm High" are really awesome too!

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 20:18 (fourteen years ago) link

One of the experiments which doesn't really work is the Roxy/Sparks inspired number "Dance With Me". Maybe if it was done with more humour or elegance it would be okay but instead it's a bit of a mess. "Las Vegas Nevada" is a disappointingly poor relative to "Ace of Spades" lyrically speaking. The hedonism associated with gambling seems really manufactured and using Las Vegas rather than a winning card as the principle symbol weakens the whole thing. Cos you know, most people in Vegas are amateurs, there to lose a set amount then go home. For Lemmy it's literally win or die. This song almost sounds like a real ad for Las Vegas, which may well have been the goal. I know Andrew WK is pretty successful at licensing his songs, ringtones etc. To me, that's a turn-off if it's too obvious.

But nothwithstanding these details, it's one of the few albums from the last few years where I'll almost always listen to the whole thing from beginning to end. Yeah, there are two or three weaker songs like The Background and Las Vegas. But it's one of my favourite albums of the decade. Now set to be one of my favourite albums of the next decade too.

everything, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

cool thing about AWK is that it's still impossible to say why exactly he's doing what he's doing the way he's doing it. he's inscrutable. he presents this super-earnest, half-crazed motivational speaker/kid's show host front - all positive, all the time - but then he carefully creates this absurdly elaborate backstory/mythology with creepy occult-psycho overtones. his music seems like pop, but also like a ghastly parody of pop, and the tension there never comfortably resolves. there's a big andy kaufman streak in what he does, down to the faux (or is it?) quasi-autism shtick. all of which inclines me to respect him. i like jokes that never quite give the punchline away. and close calls w brick walls is a hell of a lot better than i expected. everything OTM abt the wonders of "hand on the place", "one brother", etc. but "pushing drugs" is pretty great, too.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 22:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, good post. I've never really been able to make much sense out of the various sides of his personality/art. It's a baffling persona that raises questions every time I listen to him - even more than Kaufman (of course in Kaufman's case we have decades of hindsight to help us sort out the facts/motivations/intentions). Like you, I really like the unresolved nature of it. The joke without a punchline as you say.

I took a friend of mine who's in his sixties to see Andrew WK this summer and he was blown away because it reminded him of "proper" showmen that he'd seen in ye olde days like James Brown etc. Afterwards my friend went off totally inspired, read all the weird stuff and then later said to me that he takes it all at face value and was loving the ride because the whole point is about entertainment. I honestly do find him to be an amazingly inspiring figure. The show I saw this year was about a life-changing as anything is likely to be at my advanced age. Just him, a keyboard and an ipod.

everything, Wednesday, 16 December 2009 23:03 (fourteen years ago) link

Just him, a keyboard and an ipod.

which is weird, because this is the same format he chose in his early solo career around 2000-2001.

quiet and secretively we will always be together (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link

listening to this again, cuz i haven't thought of it in a while. i can't go so far as everything in loving EVERYTHING about it, but it's awful damn good, if somewhat bloated.

the songs that work best, imo, are those that wander a few steps from the aerobic motivational triumphalism that he's made his stock in trade. i get wet throwbacks like "not going to bed", "when i'm high" and "into the clear" get old fast, especially in comparison to the more varied & inventive material surrounding them. "i wanna see you go wild" & "you will remember tonight" are the best of that bunch: the latter's got cool & creepy messianic lyrics and the former just slays non-stop.

have the sense, though, that CCWBW would work better if there were just a little bit less of it to go around (which is probably the ultimate missing-the-point critique where AWK is concerned). the long set of mutated/inverted party jams that closes the album is a good example. they're all worth a listen, but collectively, they oversell the point. gems like "big party" and "we will boogie" struggle to stand out.

this seems to result from two things: 1) CCWBW is a concept album, and 1) most of lyrics are very simple and repetitive. so in order to make a point about the ghastly frozen emptiness of the scenario he's describing, WK needs an entire song like "we're not gunna get old". and it works, drives the point home w/ a sledgehammer - but it also drags the album down a bit. it's suitably grim & suffocating, but not very musically interesting. (i do like "las vegas nevada" though, which seems more cheerfully subversive than straight-up celebratory.)

and on that note, GOD this is a creepy fucking record. cryptic lyrics that read super-funtime-positive only on the surface, hopeless mirror-box solopsism, vaguely fascist calls to annihilation in the moment, not-so-vaguely homoerotic misogyny, digatally altered vagina-like WK mouths all over the insert art. it's more a subtle sort of psychological horror movie than the "party party" pep talk it pretends to be, and i guess i like that too. reminds me of BOC (touchstone for all music appreciation) and the flaming lips. creative, fearless and weird as hell. but you've probably gotta be something of a geek to really appreciate it.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Thursday, 17 December 2009 07:24 (fourteen years ago) link

point 1) and uh, point 1)...

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Thursday, 17 December 2009 12:16 (fourteen years ago) link

It's a very good point.

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Thursday, 17 December 2009 12:32 (fourteen years ago) link

What do y'all think about Nardwuar as bipolar hyperactive funtime with dark underbelly persona/artproject in comparison to AWK?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 17 December 2009 17:30 (fourteen years ago) link

It's a fair comparison I guess. They both have their uniforms. Both of them have formidable performance skills. They both share huge generosity of spirit and a fierce dedication to making sure everyone has a good time.Having seen them interact in person it's obvious that they are soulmates in certain ways. They are like brothers. Nardwuar seems more guarded because he comes off as really irritating at times (a trait that he has toned down in recent years, which I believe a natural result of being older).

For both, there is always a question of how much of their personality is "an act". To me, there's no mystery about Nardwuar. I've known the guy long enough to know that his regular personality is similar to what he presents on stage or on TV. It's a more obvious "punk" persona, with his addiction to obscure singles, all-ages shows and outmoded media, his challenging interview style and his songs which follow the fairly standard comedy punk tropes of light-hearted protest songs, homages to unusual people and of course self-conciously bizarre topics such as being addicted to cheese, having unusual rashes and that kind of thing.

Andrew WK's real personality is unknown but I suspect he is quite different - a more modern kind of guy. In interviews he can come across as earnest, focussed and very intelligent. It seems he is an astute businessman who knows how to create songs that will be appealing for ringtones, movie placements etc. Beyond that he really knows what he's doing with the branding of himself marketing his ideas, building his mystique (for example that piano album, touring with a string quartet), creating work for mass consumption (the TV shows and Japanese albums) while maintaining more underground connections (drumming with Boredoms, appearing with Fucked Up, doing split singles with obscure garage bands etc).

Andrew WK is perfectly natural and at-home appearing on TV. Nardwuar's forrays into mainstream media always come across like he's a gatecrasher.

So yeah. I don't really know where I'm going with this. They are alike but different.

everything, Thursday, 17 December 2009 19:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Okay, now to respond to contenderizer's epic post. You are listening to the US vinyl version which is made more bloated with the addition of the last five track. The regular version of the album has 18 songs of which three are really just breathing spaces between hurricanes. This version does not seem like too much to me, although at almost 50 minutes that's quite a long album. I'm not sure what the north American version will look like but I suspect that it will be 18 tracks long, with the bonus numbers moved over to the extra disc.

I agree that "Not Going To Bed" is an I Get Wet throwback, but not "Into The Clear" which is a very interesting song about personal transformation whose lyrics say a lot about whichever dark place AWK came from, and where he is trying to go. To me this song exemplifies the conflict between his confused personas and is one of the best songs on the album. It's also the song that is most similar to his Japanese stuff and was perhaps written with that in mind.

There is nothing else I can do but fight against all odds
Against the deadly soul that's living in my heart
I won't give up, I won't give in
I won't give out or fall apart
This is the mountain I must climb
This is my time
And all at once the shadows disappear
I move around the side and into the clear

That's pretty long distance from the party tunes on I Get Wet. From anyone else that might come across like a load of rock'n'roll feel-good redemption nonsense but from a guy with AWK's history it's an acknowlegement that the party persona is not necessarily natural and a recognition that the fun comes with a price, including a huge mental effort it takes be happy. As such I think this is a very important and honest song for AWK.

everything, Thursday, 17 December 2009 20:58 (fourteen years ago) link

what makes "into the clear" feel like i get wet is the spirit of triumphant, mountain-climbing maximalism (quite literally what the song's about in this case). that kind of thing's okay - it's arguably what AWK does best - but a little goes a long way in CCWBW's somewhat more musically varied context,and unfortunately the song just isn't that memorable.

yr right that i should distinguish between the album proper (ending w "the moving room") and its bonus tracks. the extra stuff fits in with & fleshes out the concept, so it's easy to blur the line, but the 18-track version of the album definitely feels more manageable. on that note, it's tempting to rope in the korean bonus tracks, too. though they're almost too literal about the MPD/insanity angle, "i want your face" and "this is my world" feel like necessary pieces of the puzzle, and the other two like interesting expansions. american tracks are less crucial wr2 the storyline, but i enjoy the more leftfield stuff like "i've got know fear" and "we will boogie".

it's a strange record, and though i like it, i don't know that it's a great one. AWK's primary "thing", his bigger-louder-moremoremore aesthetic - coupled with his steinman-esque ear for anthemic cheeze - is also his achilles heel. if the tunes & lyrics aren't up to snuff, it all starts to grate. in that spirit, i do wish the last 8 songs were a bit more fully developed. most of my favorites are in the opening 10 and the bonus tracks.

(fwiw, i think the lyrics to "into the clear" are neither feel-good redemption nonsense nor an important and honest statement. i read them as part of a disturbing fictional narrative about fragmented identity and the way different aspects of a broken personality move in and out of the foreground of consciousness. but that's just me, and one of the nice things about an album this sprawling & ambitious is that it can mean different things to different people.)

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Thursday, 17 December 2009 23:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Isn't "clearing" cribbed from/referring to Scientology? (it feels as though both AWK and Scientology are fixated with eliminating barriers to expressing your "true" potential) I think he's a cool dude, but his "embrace everything to the max -- don't listen to those voices of doubt" message is kind of harmful and insidious. Sometimes those voices of doubt have sensible and principled advice!

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 17 December 2009 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

okay, that's a real good point. part of the subtext/mythic "backstory" for CCWBW plays w tom & nichole in ways i don't quite understand. blurring the line between AWK & tom, implying that he slept with nichole, etc. which supports yr reading of "into the clear".

one read for the album is that it's about supressing aspects of yourself in order to become more marketable, and that the all the insanity & self-improvement stuff just supports that.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Friday, 18 December 2009 00:17 (fourteen years ago) link

and i take back my hedging about the album's greatness. it IS a great, and the 2nd half holds up just fine, but i'm kinda embarassed to admit how much i like it. which is lame, but so be it.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Friday, 18 December 2009 00:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Tom Cruise? I never really considered that aspect. Maybe that's what the final verse of "When I'm High" is about. The scientology connection has certainly crossed my mind. But only because of that one word. He's obviously no scientologist. I think the strongest theme is about his own mental struggles and the ways he's dealt with stuff in his own life (often described as "nightmares" or "shadows"). It's given an extra dimension because he's embraced this motivational role and so his stories are often presented in that context. It can be confusing as to who he's addressing or singing about, or who's voice he's speaking with. I guess that helps listeners apply them to their own experiences, but it sure makes it difficult to puzzle out AWK's personal story.

everything, Friday, 18 December 2009 01:05 (fourteen years ago) link

The recurring theme of cloth or fabric being removed or ripped to reveal light, clear sky or whatever - I think that's a reference to visualization techniques to do with self-empowerment.

everything, Friday, 18 December 2009 01:17 (fourteen years ago) link

I think the strongest theme is about his own mental struggles and the ways he's dealt with stuff in his own life (often described as "nightmares" or "shadows"). It's given an extra dimension because he's embraced this motivational role and so his stories are often presented in that context. It can be confusing as to who he's addressing or singing about, or who's voice he's speaking with. I guess that helps listeners apply them to their own experiences, but it sure makes it difficult to puzzle out AWK's personal story.

― everything, Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:05 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

it's kinda weird to me that you read this as a personal story (not that i think yr wrong to do so, mind). the whole thing, including most of AWK's non-musical public presentation, seems like performance art to me. he clearly works hard to create doubt abt his sanity, his identity, his intentions, dark forces pulling the strings, etc - cryptic talk of nightmares & shadows being part of that. all of which tends to depersonalize the result. i like it, but more as a mysterious form of conceptual media play than as an earnest statement of self.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Friday, 18 December 2009 01:23 (fourteen years ago) link

x-post

the recurring theme you mention is very hard to pin down, though obviously present. sometimes it expresses itself as a simple clarity of mind & intention, related to self-improvement. but at other times ("the moving room", parts of "into the clear"), it seems to concern perception as a form of becoming, as though to see is to be, or to make things exist. at the same time, there's a sense that this becoming is conditional, and not really controllable - that one's existence is dependent somehow on a kind of seeing that arrives from outside oneself ("hand on the place").

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Friday, 18 December 2009 01:36 (fourteen years ago) link

When I first heard "Kicks and Bricks" -- at the end of hearing the new sound of CCWBW -- it really stuck out and sounded like the Andrew from the first two albums was a totally different person than the Andrew from the third. Brought back those conspiracy thoughts.

I love LOVE the crazy bonus songs, "Let's Go On A Date", "I Want Your Face", god yeah that record is really cool.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:29 (fourteen years ago) link

Nardwuar....I saw one interview he did and he just came across a really smug hipster asshole.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:30 (fourteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilKuJOe2goA

everything, Friday, 18 December 2009 06:34 (fourteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

i dont understand

s1ocki bomaye (s1ocki), Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link

me either

girl moves (Abbott), Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:47 (fourteen years ago) link

Andrew W.K. is living, breathing performance art.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

was that ever seriously in doubt>?

s1ocki bomaye (s1ocki), Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:48 (fourteen years ago) link

I was on board with it basically from the beginning. Andrew Wilkes Krier is a really weird dude. Very nice, but really, genuinely weird. I'm not sure how the whole Steev Mike thing fits in, and I think when he says he was a different person, literally, he's not convincing. It's the same guy that's always been Andrew W.K., but it's not the same Andrew W.K. if that makes sense.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

hahahaha you seriously believe that he is a living, breathing being?

hahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH FOOL

you know nothing of the profound evil lurking beneath this man's visage......
you know nothing of what he is capable...

listen to me or don't...that is your choice.....
but when i tell you that in due time you will regret having known about Andrew W.K.... you had better beleive me when i say that you will have wished you had believed......

(15)(14)(5)(16)(9)(5)(3)(5)..(13)(9)(19)(19)(9)(14)(7) (6)(18)(15)(13) (2).

iiiijjjj, Sunday, 3 January 2010 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

The most plausible scenario to me is one or more members of the group of people who organized AWK as a merchandising interest
split not too amicably, forcing Andrew to assume the role full-time, but because these ex-AWKers held some part of the domestic album release rights, AWK group
could not release close calls etc... for a while.

It might very well be that this was planned all along, but it doesn't make much sense to delay an album release to conjure up the mystique of legal trouble.
If there is any consistency in how AWK operates, it is in taking full advantage of any synergistic opportunities that comes his way.

There is a kind of evil in this "embrace everything" attitude. You might not think it's possible to cheapen a song like "It's time to party" by having it appear in an expedia commercial, but both the music and its fans are degraded just a little bit by that.

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 3 January 2010 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link

AWK is way too weird to be merely a media creation, unless the idea was to make an unpredictable crazy guy a rockstar and then go from there. Perhaps he honestly thinks there's been more than one Andrew "playing" the part but that really doesn't mean its so. I just hope that a lot of this actually is planned and staged for promotional effect because I would hate to think Andrew is truly suffering from delusions and split personalities.

As your Dentist I recommend smoking: (Viceroy), Sunday, 3 January 2010 19:24 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm not sure what you mean by too weird to be a media creation. I personally think Andrew came up with the basic template of what he would like to achieve, but why wouldn't he enlist outside help to meet his goals, which are pretty simple: "don't be a wimp; achieve immortality"?

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 3 January 2010 19:40 (fourteen years ago) link

The conspiracy nuts were right!

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 3 January 2010 21:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Watching the Rockfeedback interview where he 'lays this out'.

http://www.rockfeedback.com/tv/direct/channels/297400/726538/

He's saying he's a physically different person than the original Andrew WK but then he says everyone is a different person from back then so who knows maybe he is talking about the replacement of cells that make up the human form. Tried reading the forum on his official site but the conspiracy stuff is so thick there it's baffling.

Apparently CCWBW is coming out this year alongside a bonus disc of rare and unreleased material called "Mother of Mankind"

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_BzbVmjyhvHI/Szn0LgMmeUI/AAAAAAAABTA/qDGRJ0JC2ak/s400/AndrewWK_CloseCallsWithBrickWalls_2CDdeluxeEdition_SlipcaseFrontCover.jpg

MOTHER OF MANKIND

1. We Party (You Shout)
2. High Five
3. Let's Go On A Date
4. We Got A Groove
5. Sarah Notto
6. I'm A Vagabond
7. I've Got Know Fear
8. Big Party
9. Who Knows?
10. Coming Bad
11. Can You Dance With Me?
12. Kicks And Bricks
13. A.W.K.
14. I Will Find God
15. This Is My World
16. Young Lord
17. We're Not Gunna Get Old
18. Kill Yourself
19. I Want Your Face
20. Jewel Street Man
21. The Party God

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 4 January 2010 02:45 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.