The sequence as a whole definitely follows a hump-shaped curve - slow to start, peaking around the middle, a steep decline in the last couple of books (although they still have their moments).
― Ward Fowler, Tuesday, 2 July 2024 11:52 (two months ago) link
Oh yes, she says the first book was heavy going but 2 and 3 are excellent and very funny
― imago, Tuesday, 2 July 2024 19:10 (two months ago) link
i must admit i think the first three are as good as anything else in the sequence. agreed the last few have their moments and the arc of widmerpool is grotesque and fascinating.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 2 July 2024 19:25 (two months ago) link
I started this a few years ago and stalled after the first book. I enjoyed it but I felt the creeping fatigue of what Fizzles called 'the fetishising of the decadence of the english class system and its artefacts' even in that short book .
― I would prefer not to. (Chinaski), Tuesday, 2 July 2024 21:05 (two months ago) link
Tolerance for the first book depends on how much of goings on in a quasi-Eton setting you can take, I suppose. Much of it reads like a slightly melancholic version of Jennings & Derbyshire. But the early appearances of Widmerpool and Uncle Giles lend it an air of absurdity and are already well-realised comic characters with (in Widmerpool's case) a sinister edge. It "opens up" more in subsequent books and (FWIW) the war trilogy is some of the best writing about WWII that I have read.
― Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Wednesday, 3 July 2024 09:12 (two months ago) link
Melancholic version of Jennings? I'm nicking it off her when she's done
― imago, Wednesday, 3 July 2024 09:13 (two months ago) link