a shape-shifting lizard creature from the planet VulcanThat's actually Taylor Swift, yeah?
That's actually Taylor Swift, yeah?
Based on how easily Trump and the conservative echo chamber were able to turn Anthony Fauci- who at one point was polling as more popular than Trump- into a punching bag, I’m concerned about how hard they are going to go after her. Especially with the added dimension of massive sexism that is always so successfully deployed against women in power
― epistantophus, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:21 (three months ago) link
IDK, the Swiftie Army is not something I'd want to tangle with
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:26 (three months ago) link
🇯🇵 Statement from the Embassy of Japan on Taylor Swift’s Reported Travel from Japan to the United States ✈️🏈 Are you ready for it? pic.twitter.com/wFKadehTJk— Japan Embassy DC🌸 (@JapanEmbDC) February 2, 2024
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:27 (three months ago) link
Will Jack Antonoff comply with his Congressional subpoena?
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Friday, 2 February 2024 20:27 (three months ago) link
Xpost I mean, does it matter (from a legal perspective) how they go after her? Obviously I don't want anybody going through a harassment campaign from edgelord Republicans, especially not a Black woman, but public opinion isn't going to have any bearing on the case itself.
― never trust a big book and a simile (Neanderthal), Friday, 2 February 2024 20:28 (three months ago) link
they're looking absolutely desperate with the taylor swift thing, just completely pathetic.
― omar little, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:28 (three months ago) link
people were not "fans" of Dr. Anthony Fauci the way they are with Taylor Swift, they ain't gonna win this battle
― frogbs, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:30 (three months ago) link
tbh I'm surprised they didn't issue a statement that they're planning to send Air Force One to pick her up
― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 2 February 2024 20:30 (three months ago) link
Taylor has been given shoot to kill orders
― never trust a big book and a simile (Neanderthal), Friday, 2 February 2024 20:31 (three months ago) link
Taylor Swift is...the Transporter.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:32 (three months ago) link
speaking of which the other day this whole thing was brought up at the record store and an older guy started talking about how some art organization he was a part of in the 80s did a big event that was sponsored by Trump Tower and featured a speech by the man himself. apparently Trump arrived with some woman who clearly was not his wife, spoke for about 5 minutes and left, then just outright refused to pay a dime, which caused this organization to fold. I believe the way he put it was "fuck that guy, he's a huge asshole and I hope everyone knows it"
― frogbs, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:34 (three months ago) link
Taylor Swift should fly Concorde, which I recall is how Phil Collins was able to get from London to Philly in time to play both cities for Live Aid.
― henry s, Friday, 2 February 2024 20:45 (three months ago) link
I remember that Collins stunt All Too Well
― Washington Post Malone (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 2 February 2024 20:50 (three months ago) link
I do like the idea that someone like Taylor Swift can be so rich and successful that she owns a private decommissioned Concorde.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 2 February 2024 21:14 (three months ago) link
"Blank Space (Sonic Boom Remix)"
― dead precedents (sleeve), Friday, 2 February 2024 21:15 (three months ago) link
Here's the Wahington Post's latest on the Fani Willis stuff, it goes into lots of details of all the ins and outs. The bottom line is that the accusations may be ridiculous and technically unrelated to the actual case, but there are still many ways for this to go completely off the rails.
Gift link:
https://wapo.st/3UqCHCl
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Friday, 2 February 2024 21:26 (three months ago) link
I'm sorry, but this is a don't shit (fuck) where you eat type situation and easily avoidable.
Even if there are no merits.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Saturday, 3 February 2024 00:01 (three months ago) link
A love affair with someone you supervise automatically carries plenty of pitfalls. Often it's a bad idea. But this stuff happens everywhere all the time and I haven't heard a whisper that it wasn't consensual. The 'ethics' charges Trump's lawyers raised are all bogus afaics.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Saturday, 3 February 2024 01:03 (three months ago) link
It's complete bullshit and a transparently craven move by the Trump team plus GA politicians to undermine the case. I just think it has a non-trivial chance of being consequential bullshit.
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Saturday, 3 February 2024 01:32 (three months ago) link
Took them long enough, but this is good news
BREAKING: Donald Trump is *NOT* immune from prosecution, DC Circuit rules.Details TK pic.twitter.com/U0rgc5kNXd— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) February 6, 2024
― Muad'Doob (Moodles), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 15:09 (two months ago) link
Your move, Sam and Clarence.
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 15:14 (two months ago) link
and Ted and Alice
― badpee pooper (Eric H.), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 15:21 (two months ago) link
Photoshop that sucker!
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 15:22 (two months ago) link
I didn't pay attention in Civics/Gov't class, but how does SCOTUS decide whether to take up or decline to hear a case? Always seemed a mystery to me
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 6 February 2024 18:07 (two months ago) link
whim
― the absence of bikes (f. hazel), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 18:08 (two months ago) link
Until Taft led a successful effort to reform the cert process, they pretty much by law had to accept almost every appeal.
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 18:09 (two months ago) link
(four of nine them have to want to hear it)
― the absence of bikes (f. hazel), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 18:09 (two months ago) link
supposedly the justices discuss whether the case presents elements not adequately addressed by precedent and appropriately settled during appeal, thus requiring SCOTUS review. in reality, what f. hazel said.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 19:50 (two months ago) link
I don't have much faith in the Supreme Court either but I don't think they're going to rule on the side of "the President can break the law"
― frogbs, Tuesday, 6 February 2024 19:56 (two months ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG3V3CTUliI
― Chyiv Kyiv (Fetchboy), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 19:56 (two months ago) link
― frogbs, Tuesday, February 6, 2024 1:56 PM
What, in the judicial histories of Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kav and Barrett, makes you think such a thing?
― that's when I reach for my copy of Revolver (WmC), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:25 (two months ago) link
Biden if they ruled that way: "Oh great!" *immediately has them arrested for roffles*
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:26 (two months ago) link
Right, it's all an issue of timing. Give it a year, rule the (GOP) president can declare himself king for life
― badpee pooper (Eric H.), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:30 (two months ago) link
^^^That's what the Founding Father would have wanted... a Christian Monarchy
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:31 (two months ago) link
where is the lie?
― badpee pooper (Eric H.), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:34 (two months ago) link
(said everyone who never read a single founding document)
I saw a real document today that Ben Franklin signed. There were wax seals even. I didn't read it but I think I'm better than you guys now.
― Beyond Goo and Evol (President Keyes), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:36 (two months ago) link
said everyone who never read a single founding document)
― badpee pooper (Eric H.),
srsly?
― poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:37 (two months ago) link
ferioufly
― Virginia Wolfman (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:41 (two months ago) link
no, of course I'm not being serious
― badpee pooper (Eric H.), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:43 (two months ago) link
I love my irreligious Masonic founding fathers.
― B. Amato (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 21:50 (two months ago) link
feriouflyi love this post so goddamn much. like my entire mentality fees validated lolalso, the founders were radical dipshits about the even-possibility of tyranny and would have roasted trump on a fucking spit long before now. in my amateur student opinion.
― a single gunshot and polite applause (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 6 February 2024 22:59 (two months ago) link
Just a little something
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/feature/intro-chesebro-docs
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 February 2024 18:43 (two months ago) link
Hmm, sounds familiar:
During the interview with prosecutors, Chesebro cast himself as the latest in a long line of attorneys to be victimized by Trump and those around him. He blamed the campaign for throwing him under the bus in the years after the Capitol insurrection, suggesting that the campaign ordered him to stay quiet, while also casting him to the Jan. 6 Committee as a rogue attorney, all while refusing to pay his legal bills. “It’s been a real lesson in not working with people that you don’t know and are not sure you can trust. It really went south for me,” Chesebro told prosecutors. “I had a wonderful apartment in NYC that I had to sell for a $2 million dollar loss, and lost almost all my net worth because of the attorney bill.”
“It’s been a real lesson in not working with people that you don’t know and are not sure you can trust. It really went south for me,” Chesebro told prosecutors. “I had a wonderful apartment in NYC that I had to sell for a $2 million dollar loss, and lost almost all my net worth because of the attorney bill.”
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 February 2024 18:47 (two months ago) link
if only there had been some clue that this might happen! lol
― Surfin' burbbhrbhbbhbburbbb (sleeve), Monday, 12 February 2024 18:49 (two months ago) link
I mean if an upshot of everything Trump-legal-related are a bunch of arrogant types who happen to be lawyers getting constantly hosed by their client while even more arrogant types who happen etc. line up for inevitable future hosing, then I welcome these obvious idiots getting theirs.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 February 2024 18:52 (two months ago) link
Cheesebro can go fuck himself. He knew exactly what he was doing.
― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Monday, 12 February 2024 18:55 (two months ago) link
theorizing, in early stages, went even further than previously known, imagining a Jan. 6 that lasted for not hours but days, an intervention by Supreme Court justices that they presumed to be loyal to President Trump, and a vice president who upended his constitutional duties, allowing the U.S. to descend into chaos
Good to have documentary confirmation. There were open speculations about this train of events even before Jan. 6. Most likely they were fueled by leaks coming from people involved in the conspiracy, especially since the reach of the conspiracy by necessity extended to many hundreds of people, not all of whom were all that bright. Such huge conspiracies are impossible to keep secret and coups d'etat are always preceded by insistent rumors of a coming coup.
No matter what the indictments say are the charges brought by the special counsel, the reality was treason.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 12 February 2024 19:00 (two months ago) link
I think his own attorneys are clearly not happy with him, per this first story in the overall series:
Attorneys for Chesebro downplayed his involvement to TPM, casting him as a lover of legal theory who lacked both the influence and understanding to impact the Trump campaign’s plans. “If you meet him and ask one straightforward question you’ll get 12 different ways it could be,” Chesebro attorney Manny Arora said.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 February 2024 19:01 (two months ago) link
"He's a confused legal moron who drives us nuts but he's paying us for now."
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 February 2024 19:02 (two months ago) link