Why in the name of all that is holy do people like Guided by Voices?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (398 of them)
i've come to the conclusion indie kids don't like anything. at all.

jsamson, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:51 (twenty years ago) link

Matthew, that's hilarious, because I REALLY wanted to like it. And in fact when I sold CDs last night I deliberately kept the GBV best-of out of the pile so I can give it another chance, because I was tired and cranky when I wrote what I wrote. But I still stand by it.

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:12 (twenty years ago) link

i like songs:ohia but the guy has a case of cotton mouth sometimes

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:17 (twenty years ago) link

what was this thread about?

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:17 (twenty years ago) link

Alright, fair enough. I was only going on the language you were using in this thread, Michaelangelo.

But seriously, just play it here and there without thinking about it much, and see what happens. You may be surprised a few months from now.

Also bear in mind that that Best Of has a weird tracklisting - try to stick to the songs at the back end of the running order, because Pollard put a lot of his best pop tunes way in the back for some weird, self-defeating reason.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:20 (twenty years ago) link

gather round and let me tell you the story of the lucky promo CD that escaped getting sold back due to second thoughts by alt-weekly music writer.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

Who are Guided By Voices?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:22 (twenty years ago) link

i thought matthew's last phrase read "self-defecating"

4mateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:22 (twenty years ago) link

does ben goldberg still read ILM?

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:25 (twenty years ago) link

did he ever?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link

Nice to see this thread come up again. I'm all for debating the relative merits of Pollard's catalog. But Matos, the fact that it's taken someone who considers himself a serious music journalist/rock critic/fucking god ten years to finally get around to listening to GBV says a lot more about you than the band.

Rich Miller, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:17 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, like he has a life

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:29 (twenty years ago) link

Frankly, I really don't think that GBV should be required listening for a rock critic or anyone else. From all I've heard they seem pretty solidly mediocre to me. The only thing notable about them is the intense cultish following that they attract. But considering that their cultish following is a lot smaller than, say, Phish's - I don't see any particular reason for singling them out as required listening.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:30 (twenty years ago) link

Ha ha! That was too snarky. What I mean is it's not like Matos is posting as "M Matos Walking Dictionary of Indie Rock" or something. Everyone has holes in their musical exposure that other people would consider significant, you just can't hear everything. I've never heard The Fall, for instance!

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:30 (twenty years ago) link

x-post

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:31 (twenty years ago) link

So then is GBV any more (or less) required listening than say, Ween?

christoff (christoff), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:33 (twenty years ago) link

About the same, I'd reckon. Neither are particularly essential to an understanding of contemporary popular music.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:35 (twenty years ago) link

the logical knots this thread is tying itself into to decry one man's dismissal of one band are quite something

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:35 (twenty years ago) link

It's rather painful to watch a shocked herd of sacred cows trying to have an orgy that will never succeed.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:46 (twenty years ago) link

Not enough lube, DB.

Ha ha! That was too snarky.

No, Rob, it was not snarky enough. There seem to be an influx of people like Rich these days...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:49 (twenty years ago) link

ok that made absolutely no sense. Is that a Bob Pollard lyric?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:49 (twenty years ago) link

xp

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:50 (twenty years ago) link

Did "Sacred Cow Orgy" make the Best Of?

double xp

BrianB, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 20:55 (twenty years ago) link

Should anything be required listening? I mean, really.

I think the thing that bugs me the most is when people who openly admit that they haven't heard much of Pollard's catalog feel that they can make these sweeping judgements of the man's body of work without really knowing what they are talking about. It's one thing to not like it - that's fair enough - but to throw around these uninformed opinions about a rather large body of work is ridiculous and unfair.

If you want to get the most out of Pollard's work, you really ought to immerse yourself in it. I seriously don't think you're going to get the GBV otherwise, except for invidual songs/albums here and there. GBV just isn't built for casual listening, so it's no shock that they turn off dilettantes in droves. Pollard rewards devotion and obsession, and I think that's because he seems to find that part of music fandom to be the most enjoyable.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:10 (twenty years ago) link

Should anything be required listening? I mean, really.

Most of ILM to thread over the past few years! (It seems.)

GBV just isn't built for casual listening

Then WHY BOTHER LISTENING?

Sorry, I just think this is a bit silly. It has to grab your attention on some level immediately -- everything does -- otherwise why would you want to pursue it further?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:13 (twenty years ago) link

I love it when people get pissy about other people not caring about their favorite band.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

Mm. Or genres even.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

Well, Pollard has hundreds of catchy songs! That's the easy answer for me, Ned. I can't speak for others, but most anyone who likes Pollard will tell you that "catchy songs" is one of their top reasons. Plenty of the songs are immediately lovable, and some take a few listens before they sink in.

What I mean by 'casual listening' is that they just aren't the kind of band that you can just buy one of their records and slap it on and 'get' the band. If you want to 'get' them, you need to put some time and effort in. But most of the best GBV records can work simply as good rock/pop albums - Isolation Drills, Universal Truths & Cycles, Bee Thousand, Alien Lanes, Mag Earwhig, Under The Bushes, Speak Kindly..., Waved Out all can work on that level, pretty much. It's not as though it's Merzbow or something.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:21 (twenty years ago) link

If you want to 'get' them, you need to put some time and effort in.

Eurgh. I thought you were supposed to like music and then pursue your interests, not get a validation for having heard most everything.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:23 (twenty years ago) link

I guess there is no way to make a case for the joys of completism with you, Ned?

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:27 (twenty years ago) link

"It's rather painful
to watch a shocked herd of sacred cows
trying to have an orgy that will never succeed. "

"Just sacked my band! I love the WHO." *NOW A HIGH KICK*

"GEE BEE VEE" X Way too many goddamn times

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:27 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, as someone currently plowing my way through everything Jandek has recorded so far, you can. But there's a difference between making a case for it and saying "You can't KNOW the band until you've heard, well, just about everything." Say somebody comes along and hears a compilation of Jandek stuff -- whether he threw it together or someone else -- and says, "Ugh, no thanks," well, that's his or her choice, yeah? Sitting down and saying, "Well, see, if you hear Telegraph Melts and White Box Requiem and The Beginning THEN you'll understand!" sounds like whining to me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:29 (twenty years ago) link

Nice to see this thread come up again. I'm all for debating the relative merits of Pollard's catalog. But Matos, the fact that it's taken someone who considers himself a serious music journalist/rock critic/fucking god ten years to finally get around to listening to GBV says a lot more about you than the band.

Insert "How many hipsters does it take to screw in a light bulb joke" here.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

This is like debating the appeal of anchovies, mustard or bourbon.

christoff (christoff), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:34 (twenty years ago) link

See, Matos, you've obviously missed to the World Music Critic Organization forum three years ago that gave preservation honors to Guided By Voices. Your license may now be in jeopardy.

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:35 (twenty years ago) link

Point taken, Ned.

I don't think anyone really needs to hear ALL of Pollard's work to 'get' him, I just think they need to get an impression of a) his best pop songs and b) the differences between his many records. Actually, I think that if Michaelangelo isn't going to be impressed by that Best Of (which isn't perfect but does give a good sampling of great songs from several eras of GBV), he probably never will be.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:35 (twenty years ago) link

what's amazing to me is that anyone would have to listen more than once or twice to gbv hits in order to like them. i dont think they have to 'seep in' in order to work, but i do think they age well. i mean, how many more hooks do you need? shit, most of the early gbv tunes are basically 2-minute hooks, and little else. its like eating pure candy. and if pollard's voice is "bad", who are you comparing him to? luther vandross? he is a ROCK performer. what do you expect?

p.s. please quietly disregard all of the above comments if you are a fan of yes, queen, king crimson, emerson-lake-palmer, and/or rush. it is obvious why you don't understand.

"long live rock",

the OX

http://www.johnentwistle.com/

john entwistle, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:38 (twenty years ago) link

But going back to the Jandek thing, I think that ties in with what bugs me on a personal level. I've got about 13 or 14 Jandek records, which by my last count, comes out to something like 1/3 of his catalog. I've heard enough to know that I like it sometimes and other times it's just boring and hard to listen to. Some of those records may be better if I went back and listened to them some more, and others were either so bad or uncomfortable/frightening that I really don't care to go back to them again. (The recent spoken-word recordings is a great example of the latter.)

I've heard enough from all over his career to get a sense of his progress and breadth of what he's done, but I still feel uncomfortable talking about his career in a broad sense because I feel like I'm missing too much to have a fully informed opinion. When I read what some people have to say about Pollard's work, it really grates on me when it is clear that he's being dismissed or misunderstood because the writer hasn't had a lot of exposure to the work. It's maybe unrealistic for me to expect every writer to be an expert in what they are writing about, but I surely prefer it if the person at least knows what they are talking about.

This is just one of my hang-ups, I suppose.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:45 (twenty years ago) link

A: "Hey, what's up?"
B: "man, i don't know if i'm ready to deal with you.. i don't know if i like you"
A: "Uh, ok" (*asshole*)

next day...

C: "Hey, A, what's up"
A: "alright, talked to your friend B. I thought he was a real asshole, which made me sad because you told me such great things about him"
C: "Oh, you just have to get used to him, but seriously, trust me.. he really is a GREAT GUY! You just have to give him a chance"

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:49 (twenty years ago) link

If only bad records WOULD adjust and get better for me so I could like them! How beautiful!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:49 (twenty years ago) link

C: "You just caught him on a BAD DAY. seriously, B's the coolest fucking person ever."

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:50 (twenty years ago) link

A: "Grrr... B still kinda pissed me off though."
C: "See, I guess you just may never 'get' B, then. He's just one of those guys who you either love or hate"

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:51 (twenty years ago) link

C: "All of us think he's a genius. I mean, come to think of it, i'm wondering if there's something wrong with you not recognizing what an amazing guy B is"

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

But Donut Bitch, people really are like that.

And Ned, are you trying to say that you've never come around to liking a record that didn't move you right away?

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

p.s. please quietly disregard all of the above comments if you are a fan of yes, queen, king crimson, emerson-lake-palmer, and/or rush. it is obvious why you don't understand.

The irony here being that Pollard is a HUGE and VOCAL prog fan. (Though maybe not fan of all of those particular bands...)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

But Donut Bitch, people really are like that.

Yes, they are. *sigh*

donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:54 (twenty years ago) link

i think ned might be saying he's rarely come around on a band or album he outright hated. and who would bother to give something they hated the amount of time it apparently takes to "get" gbv?

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

or maybe hate's the wrong word. even that implies a visceral response. maybe just terminal boredom.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

nb: i'm nominally a fan, but y'all know that already

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:56 (twenty years ago) link

the anteaters rushing in to offend detractors of Matos' "GBV SUX U R ALL GAY" revival is about as lame as ILM gets, sorry dudes.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 21:56 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.