New Burial album. More info?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (643 of them)

The album suddenly clicked for me, first thought it was a bit samey and maybe kinda boring even, but last night, in the dark, with headphones, it just, wow.

StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 09:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Very samey, very boring. One track sounds almost identical to a track on the debut (I mean, even within the extremely narrow confines of this guy's style it was like "have a second idea please").

unperson, Thursday, 8 November 2007 11:44 (sixteen years ago) link

There's a digital release for that Bloc Party remix too, by the way (£0.79, available from Monday)

http://www.7digital.com/artists/bloc-party/flux-(1)/

StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:22 (sixteen years ago) link

copy & paste that whole line (or click the second of the four identical yellow/black covers you see there)

StanM, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I emailed bleep and the flac release is delayed for a few days on their site. I guess I could buy it on boomkat, but my american dollars are not so great for such a thing.

mh, Thursday, 8 November 2007 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link

i liked him before he started playing the PR game and doing broadsheet interviews.

-- titchyschneiderMk2

Are you from the planet Assclown?

Yes, base your opinions on music on irrelevant extra-musical factors, well done.

jim, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

And he's done about 3 interviews and they all pretty much cover the same ground and he's preserving his anonymity. So either way you have no point.

jim, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Concerning that 7digital download I bought: it's a DRM protected WMA file, which I didn't know in advance (I wouldn't have bothered then), but the "license this file" button (which only works in Internet Explorer because they use some ActiveX crap) doesn't do anything. Why it doesn't work, I have no idea, I only know I've paid for something I can't listen to. No idea how I can solve this either, there's no help on there for when the button doesn't work.

StanM, Monday, 12 November 2007 09:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't really feel much of the first one but I'm loving this. More vocal snippets = a good thing in by book.

Matt DC, Monday, 12 November 2007 10:21 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno man, demoting todd the god to an archangel seems a little rude.

r|t|c, Monday, 12 November 2007 10:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah this is def better than the first one, though he does still seem to a lot of the old windtunnel brrrrrm and then i dunno, echo woodblocking his 2steps so they sound like footsteps. but yknow i have tried to clear my mind and let myself fall under burial's alleged spell, and then i resd something like this

i wonder why he changed the original 'homeless' to 'dog shelter' and called another tune 'homeless' ???

-- pollywog

and how am i not supposed to crease up? truly dread to think of the sheer acreage of skunk i'd have to get through before my face got as po as some's.

r|t|c, Monday, 12 November 2007 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I hadn't noticed that, perhaps because I'd been spending so long wondering why there are two tracks called 'Untitled'.

Matt DC, Monday, 12 November 2007 15:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Yay, 7digital solved the problem & I've got the Bloc Party wma now. I know it's still pretty new, but I think I can safely say that for the second year in a row, a Burial remix is my favourite track of the year.

StanM, Monday, 12 November 2007 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Hmm yes all the Burial crit keeps on piling up in front of Burial's music barring the way.

In retrospect I think what allowed me to embrace Horsepower Productions' genteel garage so wholeheartedly 5/6 years ago was the fact that even then very few people had cottoned on to the notion of taking any garage that seriously, and even yr Hyperdubs had a much more clear-headed approach to writing about the stuff.

Tim F, Monday, 12 November 2007 21:50 (sixteen years ago) link

i dont like this anywhere near as much as the first album so far. he seems to be trying to make his music more danceable this time or use more conventional 2 step rhythms so half the album seems stuck with virtually the exact same drum programming on every song. which is fine, but it leaves this kinda between home listening and a very weird sort of more conventional 2 step production style, without really satisfying either side. he was more inventive IMO when he had fractured 2 step programming, rather than trying to go UKG-proper. apart from that, it just doesnt seem as affecting as the last one. arch angel isnt as good as people keep saying, mainly cos the vocals (which are a bit shit to begin with) are so clean - it doesnt fit the music right. the vocals only really work when he manipulates and fucks around with them a bit, and layers and cuts them into the track directly. maybe my opinion will change when i hear it a few more times but it seems to use a lot of techniques/familiar sounds from the last one, just not as effectively.

titchyschneiderMk2, Monday, 12 November 2007 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

"Are you from the planet Assclown?"

are you kode 9?

titchyschneiderMk2, Monday, 12 November 2007 21:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Hugely superior to the first album. What isn't hugely superior is the fact that the vinyl is badly pressed. http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=31755&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

jim, Tuesday, 13 November 2007 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I would be legitimately annoyed about this if I hadn't bought it from a shop where one of my best mate's works and so I won't be ridiculed for returning a Burial album because it's "hissy".

jim, Tuesday, 13 November 2007 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

- apostrophe after mate

jim, Tuesday, 13 November 2007 22:04 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeah the vocals...

...cut em up randomly in 'recycle' spread em over your keyboard and play them manually in real time using your pitch shift wheel, record and add effects

pollywog, Tuesday, 13 November 2007 23:47 (sixteen years ago) link

good plan bitch.

titchyschneiderMk2, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 00:03 (sixteen years ago) link

oh yeah the vocals...

...cut em up randomly in 'recycle' spread em over your keyboard and play them manually in real time using your pitch shift wheel, record and add effects

sometimes the effect is haunting and beautiful... (shell of light)

... other times not so much. (first half of near dark)

i do think the vocals are too prominent in this album. if i was a cynical guy i'd say he read too many of his own reviews and went for what he thought people liked best about the first one.

just my initial impressions - i still need to listen to this more. somehow it seems kind of formulaic and less... "deep" than the first album to me.

rockapads, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 00:38 (sixteen years ago) link

good plan bitch.

^^^i bet u suck a mean dick...

...maybe shoulda got spaceape in to vocalise some shit and given his vox the treatment

I try but I just cant listen to more than 2 of his trax in a row if i'm actually listening (it's them bloody drums aaaaarrrrrrrrrggghhh) but to have it loop in the background continuously makes it like one loooooong song that i kind of like...

...gotta be sum remixes coming out pleeeease

pollywog, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 00:52 (sixteen years ago) link

"i do think the vocals are too prominent in this album. if i was a cynical guy i'd say he read too many of his own reviews and went for what he thought people liked best about the first one.

just my initial impressions - i still need to listen to this more. somehow it seems kind of formulaic and less... "deep" than the first album to me.

-- rockapads"

nah, id say he was just trying to copy the shit out of Groove Chronicles "Stone Cold" which incidentily you can hear on El-B's myspace page:

http://www.myspace.com/ghostrecordings

i mean, this album is blatantly an abstracted version of that track right there. as it is my favorite 2-step jam, that is all good with me. i wouldnt say it is formulaic, id say that he just stuck to a more obvious song structure, and even within that he did some nice things (the false ending of "untrue", the off timing on things coming in on "raver", etc) to trick it out. i would say that this one is more "deep" than the first one, though.....

pipecock, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

<i>nah, id say he was just trying to copy the shit out of Groove Chronicles "Stone Cold" which incidentily you can hear on El-B's myspace page:</i>

Well that ties in with my theory that Burial is EL-B anyway. EL B = Bury EL. Buck & Bury, ghost hardware, stone cold dead and buried... I mean c'mon ???

And in his last interview he said he wishes he were a ghost. The anonymously ressurected ghost of 2 step ..:)

pollywog, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 05:05 (sixteen years ago) link

If Burial was El-B you'd have to assume his drums and basslines would be better...

Tim F, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 05:30 (sixteen years ago) link

"i do think the vocals are too prominent in this album."
"somehow it seems kind of formulaic and less... "deep" than the first album"

OTM.

i dont think his drums or basslines are meant to be 'better', the rickety, weird, distant quality he gives them is intentional. otherwise it would just sound like normal or 'proper' garage.

titchyschneiderMk2, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 09:35 (sixteen years ago) link

^^^exactly...

Burial is the ghost of EL-B :)

pollywog, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 09:51 (sixteen years ago) link

I think its more likely he wishes he was El-B.

And even El-B's ghost would engineer better drum sounds than he does.

Its far more likely that this is some random friend of Steve and Martin's who just likes his privacy.

If its incredibly subtle marketing I'm gonna be pissed.

Siah Alan, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 09:54 (sixteen years ago) link

The 30 second samples make this sound more upbeat and more vocal-driven than his first, not so unrelentingly dark....is that true of the album? (I'm sure I could read this thread and glean that, but wtvs.)

The Reverend, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 10:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"i dont think his drums or basslines are meant to be 'better', the rickety, weird, distant quality he gives them is intentional. otherwise it would just sound like normal or 'proper' garage."

ha ha the problem though titchy is that Burial's beats do sound like normal or 'proper' garage - just a slightly weak and generic version of same (though this may be a slight improvement over just badly programmed earlier tracks like "Southern Comfort"), and recorded from a room down the hall. El-B's Ghost releases were much more avant in the rhythm section.

I'm not really trying to criticize Burial, who i think is often excellent - it's just that his skills lie elsewhere.

Tim F, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 10:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought we established ages ago that he's JX?

Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 11:45 (sixteen years ago) link

youre right tim w/r/t to this new album - it sounds like hes trying to make more normal 2step but failing terribly. he needs to go back to making abstracted 2 step rather than 2 step proper. it sounds wrong in his hands. i hope this isnt the road hes going to try and go down more.

lol@recorded from a room down the hall. hes like the garage ariel pink.

titchyschneiderMk2, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 13:34 (sixteen years ago) link

"Buri" Al Yankovich

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 13:35 (sixteen years ago) link

i cant listen to the first half of his album too much. bit too repetitive. its like one long track that goes on until track 6.

titchyschneiderMk2, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 13:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sort of surprised people are treating this as anything other than an ambient record that happens to be influenced by 2-step.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 13:46 (sixteen years ago) link

well, the first one WAS really moving. this one though is a bit ersatz and direction-less.

titchyschneiderMk2, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 13:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Just you wait until you happen to listen to it in the right place/time/state of mind. (it suddenly clicked for me, maybe it can still do so for you)

StanM, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 14:03 (sixteen years ago) link

"well, the first one WAS really moving. this one though is a bit ersatz and direction-less.

-- titchyschneiderMk2"

after listening to this new one more and more, i feel the exact same way. except about the opposite albums. the space ape track on the first one always irritated me, i would skip it basically every time i listened. and the shortness of the ambient cuts always made me want more. it now feels like he had something to say, but wasnt quite there yet. now i feel like is is really there, he found the direction and really made a much better listening ALBUM.

pipecock, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 14:58 (sixteen years ago) link

HATED the Space Ape track on the first album. Although the Kode 9 and Space Ape album is mostly marvellous.

Tim F, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

The Spaceape track on Burial was my favourite by far. Would love to more Burial with an MC, just like I always preferred ukg with rappers like that MJ Cole Roots Manuva track.

bass, Thursday, 15 November 2007 07:49 (sixteen years ago) link

.... but the Roots Manuva remix isn't even very good!

At least shore up your argument by referring to an actual bona fide garage-rap classic!

Tim F, Thursday, 15 November 2007 08:32 (sixteen years ago) link

would love to hear an entire genre like the shy fx remix of pd syndicate's "ruff like we"

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 15 November 2007 08:38 (sixteen years ago) link

we'll call it "thugstep"

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 15 November 2007 08:38 (sixteen years ago) link

j/k

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 15 November 2007 08:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i like the bloc party remix a lot.

J0rdan S., Thursday, 15 November 2007 09:02 (sixteen years ago) link

<quote>At least shore up your argument by referring to an actual bona fide garage-rap classic!</quote>

I was the biggest so solid and oxide/neutrino fan...

...nothing to do with burial, just thought I'd mention that

fuck did those fellas have some mean ass beats and vids...

pollywog, Thursday, 15 November 2007 09:49 (sixteen years ago) link

"fuck did those fellas have some mean ass beats and vids..."

ang tite mr shabz ;)

titchyschneiderMk2, Thursday, 15 November 2007 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

admittedly, i know nothing about Burial and always sort of was like, "those crazy britishes."

but "Archangel" has been stuck in my head since i dl'ed from a blog a week or two back, and uh....i really kinda like this?

the table is the table, Thursday, 15 November 2007 23:08 (sixteen years ago) link

admittedly, i know nothing about Burial and always sort of was like, "those crazy britishes."

...he's the latest bit of fad music for all the jaded ravers and music crits who came though the the last 25 yrs and have now realised the british music industry ran out of ideas, realised the drugs don't work anymore and the music dosn't really stand up on its own without them

the anonymity represents the underground that doesn't exist for people to move into the mainstream light from anymore so you're better of staying wherever you are...

...it's all a bit sad really and you must understand burial in the overall evolution of the 'hardcore contuinuum' out of london and in relation to kode 9's hyperstitious beliefs otherwise you're not seeing the big picture

or you could just listen to it and think 'eh whats all the fuss about ?'...he's got some nice bits he's got some shit bits

pollywog, Friday, 16 November 2007 00:33 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.