The Inevitable Montreal Expos Relocation

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (114 of them)
oh, he did that Beer Frame fanzine in the 90s. Sort of: 'rock critic-style' reviews of quirky consumer products and design, both new and old. I guess he's got a website now:

http://www.core77.com/inconspicuous/

He's a smart and funny cookie.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Friday, 19 November 2004 06:39 (nineteen years ago) link

he did uniwatch for the voice originally (or at least i read it there first haha), it moved to slate briefly when the voice stupidly stupidly got rid of their really great sports section, now it's at page 2 which is the perfect place for it.

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:17 (nineteen years ago) link

my friend got runner-up in one of their baseball quizzes!

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 19 November 2004 08:18 (nineteen years ago) link

aha, i've been to that website! i don't think it's been updated for years, though.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpcDBuM2RlBF9TAzk1ODYxNzc3BHNlYwN0aA--?slug=ap-expos-namechange&prov=ap&type=lgns

washington NATIONALS, folks

John (jdahlem), Saturday, 20 November 2004 01:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I hear it may be changed to something less bland in a year or so.

Chris Kahrl of BP summarizes the Nationals' two signings last week: "Jim Bowden flushes a bunch of money down the drain in Washington."

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 20 November 2004 18:11 (nineteen years ago) link

well, i have to confess, i'm a little confused by the guzman signing, but even adjusting for coors field, i'd have to imagine vinny castilla is an upgrade over tony batista. i would guess glaus was maybe out of his price range?

this is what sucks about mlb jerking dc around so long. they're still calling the shots! the franchise needs 1) owners 2) that will spend money or bring in sharp baseball folks that know how to maximize their dollars.

you didn't expect mlb to hire a sabr dude, did you?

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Saturday, 20 November 2004 22:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Is this one intentionally phallic?

http://espn.go.com/i/magazine/new/uni_ds_wash.jpg

boldbury (boldbury), Sunday, 21 November 2004 01:09 (nineteen years ago) link

was the washington monument intentionally phallic??

John (jdahlem), Sunday, 21 November 2004 01:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe, but it doesn't have to giant balls at the base of it like that logo does.

boldbury (boldbury), Sunday, 21 November 2004 03:40 (nineteen years ago) link

i think dick clark productions would sue, were that logo to be used. well, maybe anyway.

maura (maura), Sunday, 21 November 2004 04:50 (nineteen years ago) link

ha point taken bb

John (jdahlem), Sunday, 21 November 2004 16:02 (nineteen years ago) link

well, phallic or not, that logo is conspicuously similar to the udc logo.

(and, yeah...i think the monument is intentionally phallic. y'know...father of the nation?)

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Sunday, 21 November 2004 17:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Castilla on the road last year: .218 / .281 / .493
That's the slightest of upgrades for way too much. Awful signing.

Dude, you'd be surprised at the number of "SABR dudes" MLB -- and mlb.com in particular -- is employing these days to make a mint (see the late chapters of my latest book recommendation).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 November 2004 15:24 (nineteen years ago) link

http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/index.jsp?c_id=was

maura (maura), Monday, 22 November 2004 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

ugh...well, as i said, dc needs actual owners asap. i would guess that at this point, it's probably bowden's team for 2005, right?

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Monday, 22 November 2004 17:28 (nineteen years ago) link

now that they're called the nationals, how long before mlb moves them to the AL?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Monday, 22 November 2004 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm sorry to see the Green Party activist who bumrushed the podium at the naming announcement was NOT Ron Artest.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 November 2004 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link

D.C. really sucks at naming teams. Nationals/Capitals/Wizards???

bnw (bnw), Monday, 22 November 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't forget the BULLETS!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 22 November 2004 21:35 (nineteen years ago) link

And the Potomac Basin Indigenous What-The-Fuck-Evers.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 22 November 2004 21:35 (nineteen years ago) link

FOGGY BOTTOM!

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 22 November 2004 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked the Washington Bullets names. All of DCs other team names have sucked though (except the Redskins whose name is just beyond sucking into the realm of superhumanly awful and bizarre at the same time.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 22 November 2004 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I like the Redskin color scheme, though. Maybe, to save the colors & kill the embarrassment, they can change their name to the Washington Bacon Cheeseburgers.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 22 November 2004 22:18 (nineteen years ago) link

The Washington BLTers has a nice ring.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 22 November 2004 22:19 (nineteen years ago) link

the bullets were baltimore-based first, though.

as for the skins, they should change the helmet logo back to the 60's "r" and call themselves the washington servicemarks. washington's legal population would applaud!

i like "nationals" just fine. the logo is pretty weak and i'm not wild about the proposed unis or resurrecting the "w" hat given the current political climate.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 23 November 2004 14:29 (nineteen years ago) link

So the Nat'ls are going to play in All-Star uniforms throughout the season?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 00:50 (nineteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...
linda cropp, political genius?

mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:30 (nineteen years ago) link

maybe?

especially if tony williams doesn't run, she's got to be a favorite if the mlb accepts the newly amended proposal. she could then claim responsbility for holding mlb accountable to the people of dc AND bringing a team to dc.

a lot of ifs there, though.

jonathan quayle higgins (j.q. higgins), Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:23 (nineteen years ago) link

thirteen years pass...

Stephen Brunt, who I view as a pretty smart analyst, was on the Fan yesterday talking about this. (Weird to say, but I lived one street over from the Brunts as a kid; we played street hockey. Lost track of him after high school, then one day he was everywhere sports-related.) He said that for the longest time, right up till six months ago, he was certain Montreal would never get another team. He's revised that, and now he thinks it will happen.

clemenza, Saturday, 22 December 2018 01:02 (five years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.