Post a controversial music opinion

Parson's larger point (if you're really interested) was what amazing stuff '60s producers were able to achieve with limited production technology – It used to be part of the job, fighting to get all these great sounds. It inspired you. Now you can get them at the push of a button, and while that's benefited the overall sound quality of the music I don't think it's benefited the music itself.

i generally agree with this but there's no possible way i could have known that's what he meant by what you posted.

alot of the real hooks of "Be My Baby" are created by contrast against the Wall of Sound - the isolated intro drumbeats giving way to it, the vocals alternately blending with it and emerging out of it.

this is part of the production and arrangement!

basically, spector is a piece of shit on every level, glad he he died in prison.

the wall of sound is great and immediate, when i was a kid and heard "be my baby" on oldies radio is just sounded great, you don't have to think about it or have it explained, that's why millions of kids fell in love with it. it just jumps out of the speakers. and that's because they *aren't* perfect sounding records, they are *exciting* sounding records.

spector's legend definitely minimizes the contributions of other players, writers, producers and performers who were just as important as he was to them being great records.

but to pretend like it wasn't a great sound and hugely influential on the beach boys, the beatles, springsteen, and many other artists and producers is silly. springsteen and brian wilson very open about emulating it.

I can't imagine "Be My Baby" drums without the echo!

Spector productions are ground zero for songs vs. records. He made great records.

there's no possible way i could have known that's what he meant by what you posted.

I know, that's why I expanded on it! (I felt I owed it to Parsons to elaborate, given your uncharitable dig/interpretation of the brief initial passage I posted)

no i gotcha, was kinda being a dick to alan parsons

this is more like it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm2uJEMqPYk

i hear reverb, disrespecting the purity of the song

also if you play the chords with any elaboration you're disrespecting the purity of the song. actually playing an instrument is disrespecting the purity of the song

this is part of the production and arrangement!

that was what I meant?

I really like a lot of stuff that Spector inspired-- Beach Boys, John Lennon, Bruce Springsteen. I like The Ronettes and The Crystals. "Wall of Sound" is not good, though, never was. I guess it must've been pretty amazing to hear a tonne of reverb on everything when all this stuff was coming out, but it just sounds like a mess. The truly brilliant producers of that era as far as I'm concerned were all in Detroit

Beyond stanning for Shadow Morton specifically, I'd say you can listen to comps full of girl-group songs, and they'll pretty much all "sound better" than those muddy Spector productions... admittedly, part of it may be poor mastering on those ABKCO CD's from the '90s (I haven't heard later reissues, after Sony Legacy started handling the Phillies stuff instead, so don't know if they were remastered or what).

i just wish the alan parsons project could have had the chance to do "be my baby" justice

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvFbBR4XOg

Saying that Spector's productions sound like crap now (in terms of audio quality, hi-fidelity, etc.) seems to be largely missing the point. Most stuff sounded like crap by modern standards back then. Lots of it can be "cleaned up" using modern digital techniques to sound better than it did originally. But Spector's stuff is nearly impossible to clean up, because so much was bounced down to a single track and the individual recording tracks are long gone.

That's an interesting point, but are the master tracks still lying around for almost any of this old stuff?

Probably not, but it's easier to clean up something with a small ensemble recorded more or less with a live sound, provided the parts are separated enough in the frequency space.

Most stuff sounded like crap by modern standards back then.

???

I remember reading an interview with Pete Townsend many years ago where he said "in distortion, there was music of a much higher order than anything I could compose".

I think the wall of sound does something like that. You're losing detail and clarity when a large ensemble is compacted obv. The more interesting thing is how stuff seems to emerge from it that isn't really there.

There's another quote, but I don't remember the source. That most people hear pop recordings as "a vocal with a big sound behind it". And I don't agree with that, it sounds pretty bogus. But one effect of the wall of sound is the arrangement becomes more of an image, and less of an object. It has material properties like density and opacity, but it's not a tangible thing you can deconstruct anymore. It's something like a dream.

And maybe there's an instinct to attribute that to one mind, instead of many hands, which of course is wrong and nothing to do with how this thing actually came about.

As others have pointed out, when the most common way to listen to pop music was AM radio, modern standards of audio quality are kind of beside the point. I guess hi-fi home audio equipment existed, but people probably weren't using those very expensive rigs to play "teeny bopper" mmusic.

The Byrds used to literally give acetates to DJs and drive around listening to the new song, then they tweaked the final mixes after evaluating

There's another quote, but I don't remember the source. That most people hear pop recordings as "a vocal with a big sound behind it".

That sounds like something Steve Albini said in The Problem With Music.

Every record I hear these days has incredibly loud, compressed vocals, and a quiet little murmur of a rock band in the background. The excuse given by producers for inflicting such an imbalance on a rock band is that it makes the record sound more like the Beatles. Yeah, right. Fuck’s sake, Thurston Moore is not Paul McCartney, and nobody on earth, not with unlimited time and resources, could make the Smashing Pumpkins sound like the Beatles. Trying just makes them seem even dumber. Why can’t people try to sound like the Smashchords or Metal Urbain or Third World War for a change?

Isn't that more "a vocal with a small sound behind it", though? I personally agree with the general ire at vocals sitting too high on top of the music (though as someone who has tried their hand at mixing it's really tough to find the right balance where you're showcasing the music but not submerging the vox into shoegaze territory).

Anyway, all this wall of sound challopsing has actually made me a bit mad - it's a great technique and it sounds good, gaaaaah. ums upthread otm.

Are there examples of non-Spector productions of Spector compositions that people might prefer to the Spector version - assuming both versions were roughly contemporaneous and featured similar-type vocals?

One I can think of is "I Wonder," which The Ronettes and The Crystals recorded but my favorite version is the one by The Butterflys on the Red Bird label, which was produced by Jeff Barry and Steve Venet. The only complication is that the Barry/Venet production is itself rather Spectorian in sound.

Yes, ums is otm about "an *exciting* sound". There's an energy that it wouldn't be possible to sustain if your mind was too busy picking individual elements apart.

The Albini quote is not the one i had in mind, tho there are def similarities. The Pumpkins are kind of like a muscular version of a shoegaze band, right? Not sure how Corgan's voice could be submerged, that would be like trying to bury a chainsaw.

beam my beam my butthole

The Byrds used to literally give acetates to DJs and drive around listening to the new song, then they tweaked the final mixes after evaluating

Bands still were doing this into the '90s... listening to mixes in the car!

I mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb88TkuBODw

This blows the original out of the water imo

I disagree that the "wall of sound" thing was "of an era", too. When I listen to contemporaneous Motown tracks I can't believe that Spector had any mythos whatsoever, comparatively; "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" is one of the greatest productions/arrangements/mixing achievements in history imo, but I couldn't tell you who produced it without googling it

OTM re: "River Deep" (I know the cover was recorded four years later, but still...)

Even the "Remastered Version 1991" of the Tina version sounds like it's coming from the basement of the bldg. next door!

Tina's performance on the original is fucking amazing amazing, undeniable, just like all-time great; that said, nobody will ever convince me that Spector's production on it is anything but piss poor

Yeah, Tina herself is amazing, of course

I just don't think "River Deep Mountain High" is a very good song, not even Rod Evans could do anything with it.

speaking of influence, Deflatormouse’s post immediately made me think of Psychocandy, the last instance of a record in the (post-)punk tradition taking over my life. JMC wore their Spector + Shangri-Las Love on their sleeve too:

the album's opening song, "Just Like Honey," borrows Hal Blaine's famous drum intro from The Ronettes 1963 classic, "Be My Baby", produced and co-written by Spector.

I just don't think "River Deep Mountain High" is a very good song, not even Rod Evans could do anything with it.

Yeah, I just called it up on YouTube and...eh. Not for me. Not the vocal, certainly not the production.

I think the thing about Spector is that he created a new pop sound that had the sonic richness of an orchestra but that didn't sound at all staid and old-fashioned. Clearly it blew a lot of people's minds at the time. The list of rock greats who worshipped at the church of Spector is long and well known. The way the distorted "wall of sound" created a woozy pulse of its own that rubbed against the big, front-and-center drum beat slathered in reverb, with the emotive cry of the lovesick vocals over the top, must have leapt out of the radio as something totally alien.

loving the controversial opinions itt! always found river deep mountain high a bad piece of songwriting that compensates by screaming at the top of its lungs... whereas ain't no mountain high enough (similar metaphors) is a great tune

disagree that high fidelity was not a thing (or difficult to achieve) in the 60s, some of the best and most sought out mics ever are from the 40s and 50s afaik - and a lot of gorgeous recordings were made in those years (I think I started a thread once abt hifi mono recordings but can't fint it, but "Fever" (1960) by Presley is a good example)

I agree that the wall of sound is perhaps better appreciated as an aesthetic related to shoegaze, you have to be into the noise of it

disagree that high fidelity was not a thing (or difficult to achieve) in the 60s

Yes that was a very bizarre statement.

here's even more out on a limb quasi but maybe not total b.s.:

was Spector the first step towards prog rock? it has that classical music ambition, overblown drama, cod symphonic vibes (Spector seemed to want to be respected as serious)...plus if Spector begets the pretentious Beach Boys era and they send the Beatles down the path to Sgt. Peppers and so on

Nilssons version of River Deep Mountain High is good, but I guess that's mostly just because of Nilsson

Hard disagree there, but could be convinced that his approach was a progenitor (or at least pressed similar neuro buttons) to punk

how so?

Because his recordings sound like shit and yet are effective casings for explosive vocal performances and capturing a particular desperation and glory, or something

Nilssons version of River Deep Mountain High is good, but I guess that's mostly just because of Nilsson

It's the worst track on the album though.

his recordings sound like shit and yet are effective casings for explosive vocal performances and capturing a particular desperation and glory

very otm!

all things must pass would be a lot more boring without Spector

hard to imagine a more boring version of that album

Harrison's self-production of Living in the Material World suggests he could've done it.

i'm of the opinion that, much like john's plastic ono band, phil spector being around during the sessions for that one had absolutely fuck all to do with how good the album turned out.

Phil Spector, the ultimate ghost producer

(hey, it’s a dad joke!)

I was thinking it would sound less atmospheric and more twiddly idk

i'm of the opinion that, much like john's plastic ono band, phil spector being around during the sessions for that one had absolutely fuck all to do with how good the album turned out.

― ''can be prusuaded to show gayness'' (Austin), Wednesday, March 15, 2023 12:00 PM (seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

based on what?