US Politics, March 2023: "We want our own safe space, and we deserve it"

Nobody Wokes in LA

her woke anthem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDhSlFhX-98

President Biden had one cancerous skin lesion removed from his chest on Feb. 16, his longtime doctor Kevin C. O’Connor said in a letter Friday. All cancerous tissue was successfully removed, and no further treatment is needed.

A biopsy confirmed that the small lesion was basal cell carcinoma, O’Connor said. The biopsy was performed on the same day as Biden’s annual physical.

Basal cell carcinoma, O’Connor explained, does not tend to spread or metastasize, as other more serious skin cancers like melanoma do.

Per O’Connor, the area of the biopsy has healed nicely and Biden, 80, will continue under dermatologic surveillance as part of his ongoing health care.

O’Connor noted at the time of Biden’s physical that he had several non-melanoma skin cancers removed before assuming the presidency.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/03/biden-skin-cancer/

So Bolsonaro spoke at CPAC today:

well well look who gets a rock star entrance at CPAC pic.twitter.com/3RMax3sosV

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 4, 2023

Wait, what?

(And I realize there’s no shortage of “wait, what?” these days)

CPAC loves any leader who can instigate an insurrection after losing an election.

Why do they love bolsonaro, again? Because he opposes socialism and wanted to be a dictator? And he hates everyone who isn’t a straight Christian?

The WSJ cheered his victory when he won in 2018

i believe you answered your own question

He also wanted to rape the earth so

bolsonaro is strong! bolsonaro is brave and powerful! the people need a king!!

Trump/Bolsonaro '24

I know there’s a thread for it, but jfc the anti-trans stuff that’s moving through OK and AR right now is so fucked and enraging.

This also happened at CPAC:

“Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.”

These words were in a speech by a major right wing figure at a national conservative conference.

It’s a straight up call for genocide. That’s what this fight is about. They want us gone. pic.twitter.com/HHFyjbCejg

— Senator Scott Wiener (@Scott_Wiener) March 4, 2023

The speaker is a Daily Wire Chud named Michael Knowles.

nazi shit getting applause and laughter from a bunch of fucking assholes

I wish just once one of these bozos would define exactly what they mean by "wokeness." I know the Florida AG's office had to do it court a while back and funny how it didn't actually sound that scary when said out loud.

They never will and they can’t, really. It has to keep this mystified separation because you can’t project all kindsa shit onto it

The Twitter responses to Wiener’s tweet are fucking sickening.

I should say that I also hate Scott Wiener, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

from December:

Taryn Fenske, DeSantis’ Communications Director said “woke” was a “slang term for activism…progressive activism” and a general belief in systemic injustices in the country.

Asked what “woke” means more generally, [Desantis’ General Counsel Ryan] Newman said “it would be the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them.”

can we please reclaim woke and just be done with this

I was vaguely annoyed by a Chicago Tribune op-ed this week about a new line of Legos that has apparently triggered the right because it includes people with different skin tones and physical abilities.

An excerpt: "It’s a blind spot that lives at the heart of all the panic over woke-ism: the assumption that there’s one default way to be a human. That everything else is a deviation. An exception. An aberration. A statement. Virtue signaling. When of course there are endless ways to be, to live, to look, to love during our time on this Earth. Acknowledging and celebrating that isn’t woke. It’s awake."

And yes, sure, I agree with the general sentiment, but it implicitly accepts the right's coopted definition of "woke" as something to be avoided.

Woke is a dog whistle now, there’s no way it is coming back

It's not as if the word "woke" was ever indispensable. It was never much more than a bit of shorthand jargon among insiders. In a similar way critical race theory was only an insider term among academics before the right wing noise machine grabbed hold of it and made it a convenient whipping post.

i'm so fucking sick of hearing the word, it def feels like it's past the point of 'coming back'

i mean just not apologising like damn straight i’m woke af what are you

Post-woke

woke vs volk

can it be more ridiculous that the anti-wokers are among the most intentionally ignorant motherfuckers in our political world? if the culture abandons the word, well. otoh if aimless is right and the culture never really made and claimed the word, i guess nhnf.

conservatives get really hung up on words as magic spells that have immutable meanings that transcend time, culture, and language (like how they think of gender!) Basically they’re on the same spectrum as the sovereign citizens who think by uttering gibberish in court that sounds all-legal-like it will get them out of paying child support.

“Woke" feels like a rerun of "politically correct" , but with more bile and nastiness behind it; I remember conservatives (and some liberals) decrying “pc” but didn’t sense the same amount of rage behind it. It was more like handwringing or eye-rolling.

PC was code for "These hippie professors are trying to radicalize our kids"
Woke is code for the n word

tbf i think "woke" has broadened way beyond that, to become just a new shorthand for "liberals we fight in the culture war." its total vagueness in these right-wing statements and overwhelmed county-council meetings is a reflection of how it's come to cover every grievance the old guard have with every social or political change. it's therefore the perfect foil for conservatism, since the whole ethos is finding all forms of progressive change to be not merely discomforting signs of times changing, but evidence of a sinister plot by insufficiently American Americans to destroy the American Way Of Life. "society is in the gutter and these liberals are actively trying to take it there, with their abortions, their gay people, their pronouns, their political correctness, their hippie professors with stink lines. they want to take away your guns and cigarettes and Big Gulps and SUVs and lawn chemicals and racist monuments, they think America has racism in it, they welcome foreigners, they recycle, they disrespect our beautiful police and our beautiful Christmas".... etc. etc. etc.

PC was code for the n word too. No need to overthink it, woke absolutely is PC mark II, updated for the 2010s and '20s. PC lost whatever meaning and bite it ever had just thru relentless overuse — a fate I think woke is well on its way to as well. But they both always mean the same thing — Why Can't I Just Be a Hateful Bigot Any More?

Yeah, but PC wars was never really about taking rights away from people, or preventing them from being provided. It was mostly a fight over free speech and the like, at least as I remember it. So yeah, essentially the right (in theory) to say the n word. The woke war seems to be much more and much broader, about countering literally *anything* deemed liberal. Like, no one ever thought something like climate change legislation was a fight over political correctness, but it is considered by these coconut skulls as "woke."

nah, anti-PC went hand in hand with anti-environmentalism, they just didn't call it climate change yet

But were all liberal policies dismissed as political correctness? Not as I remember it.

PC just never made it that far, but that was always the end game

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/wggAAOSwu0Zf~sy~/s-l500.jpg

pc anxiety was absolutely about taking rights away from people. it was the banner waved by anti-affirmative action efforts, for a start.

I mean, PC never actually meant anything, it was a way to complain about not being able to use racial/homophobic/misogynistic slurs. It arose from pretty much the same "everyone's so sensitive these days geez" vibe as "woke." I think the biggest difference isn't between the phrases and what they signal as it is between the eras — in the '90s/'00s, the peak "anti-PC" era, we were in a bit of a narrower consensus about how far anyone would push things in either direction. Now there's less patience on the cultural left about waiting for grandma to be "comfortable" with social changes, and more openness on the cultural right about wanting to pretty much roll back an entire century of civil rights gains. But it's all the same thing, it's all the same fight.

One big difference is that "woke" was a term being used by African-Americans, whereas "politically correct" came from the New Left, (adapted from Mao) and was used there ironically to diss other leftists who were too rigid in their ideology. Very often the conservatives who were using PC as a weapon had come from the New Left and knew the origin.

Yeah, although in both cases you have the right repurposing, redefining and vilifying a word from the rhetoric of the left. I just don't think there's any real difference between how the phrases have been/are being used, they are ways to say you're against some nefarious leftist agenda without having to specify which things you're really talking about (bigotry, mostly).

well, whatever. when I hear a conservative personality spit out "Woke" with disdain, it feels the same as when white people mock hip hop lingo.

I think the way "woke" is weaponized far exceeds the scope of how PC was used.

PC was used to complain that everyone was "too sensitive and easily offended", but largely focused on minorities and women, which does put it in the same class as "woke", sure. It was definitely an attempt to get maligned groups to "know their place".

But this came up in water cooler conversations, terrible opinion columns, and stand-up bits more than anywhere else. It also wasn't used quite the same by everyone, as some people used it to refer to offensive media that conservative church-going blue hairs didn't like (not really the RIGHT definition, no, but one used by a decent amount of people)

I remember posting something like "whining about PCism is basically asking for the right to be a dick with impunity" and getting a lot of pushback from all sides - even self-professed liberal minded people.

And there was also the curious (wrong) undercurrent that minorities themselves didn't care about the offensive things people said, that it was white people being unnecessarily performative.

When people use "Woke" pejoratively, it does capture much of what these same assholes referred to when they said PC, but it has a much nastier, more destructive tint to it. Like they're using it to mean like, an actual cultural civil war, that these "Woke" people seek to destroy our privileged way of life.

It's more than just "everybody's too sensitive", it's been weaponized as "Woke people think the flag, the country, white people are "evil" and are seeking to replace us. This is a fight for our country ".

As such, the term has had much more destructive tendencies. Not that "PC" was harmless. People who whined about PC culture became politicians who created legislation that hurt marginalized groups (or became voters that would vote for them). There was also less pushback against it as well - so harmful ideas spread without resistance.

But "Woke" has literally become legislation. DeSantis administration quite literally passed the "Stop WOKE Act", in an attempt to fight back against progressive politics, and his state legislature is chasing it with other measures to curtail the freedoms of so-called "Woke people", and has attempted to essentially create state-run education.

The scope of the destruction has much more terrifying potential because "Woke" is meant to essentially identify enemies of the state to a heavily armed, angry populace

Sorry for saying literally so much.

on a tangent here, something that does bother me is when some comedy video that's racially insensitive (but still pretty funny) makes the rounds and the top 200 comments are all shit like "lets see the snowflakes get offended about this" or "I'm black and I find this hilarious" or "screw the wokes, funny is funny" despite there being basically ZERO people actually finding the content offensive. us snowflakes are never as triggered as they want us to be.

us snowflakes are never as triggered as they want us to be.

TBF, this is exactly how I feel when people talk about how "shocking" a death metal album is. Shocking to whom? Your grandma's never gonna hear it; it's music by knuckle-walkers, for knuckle-walkers. (Me included.)

antifa metal is the only subversive metal atm imo

I agree, the right "repurposing, redefining and vilifying a word from the rhetoric of the left" (a thing they are really good at btw) when "politically correct" was the term in question seemed more eye-rolly and "get over yourselves" like, say, tree-hugger, compared to the weaponization of "woke." They are definitely amping up the "enemy of the state" rhetoric now.

Pantifa: Vulger Display of Woke

Yeah, but again, the difference isn't between the terms "PC" and "woke," it's between the overall tone and aims of the right-wing culture war. It doesn't matter what word they use to delegitimize and marginalize minority groups and the liberal worldview, what's different in 2023 vs. 1993 is 30 years of right-wing media saturation that has radicalized a big portion of white America. Combined with an emboldened progressive movement or movements, for sure, the actual gains in gay rights (and, of course, electing a Black president) have stoked a more strident backlash.

But none of that is inherent to the terms PC or woke, they're both right-wing code for "broadly liberal shit we don't like, especially as it pertains to race and gender."

A lot of stuff people call woke now is the exact same stuff they were calling PC 20-30 years ago, the field has just broadened.