Is the Guardian worse than it used to be?

There was a decrease in the number of people identifying their ethnic group as "White: Irish", from 531,000 (0.9%) in 2011 to 507,000 (0.9%) in 2021.

The 2001 UK census was the first which allowed British citizens to identify an Irish ethnicity. In all previous British censuses, figures for the Irish community were based on Irish birthplace. The percentage claiming White Irish descent in England and Wales was 1.2 per cent, with the highest concentration found in the London Borough of Brent, where they made up 6.9 per cent of the population, while the figure for Scotland was 0.98 per cent. The Irish have been the largest source of immigrants to Britain for over 200 years and as many as six million people in the UK are estimated to have at least one Irish grandparent.

i’m white (other) and proud!

Say it loud.

Bizarrely, in 2016 I was included in the Irish census as I was staying in a B&B in Dublin the night it happened. I was thrilled.

Lol

Our census is supposed to be everyone present in the country on the night of. Glad to know they are serious about it!

I'm not going to defend the french approach which is also bad in their special way but the race/ethnicity stuff is a mess in so many ways esp when people/orgs adopt and apply current census categories uncritically. like does asian mean from the indian subcontinent or from asia - since it often seems to exclude (asian) arabs and variously includes or excludes chinese people? and are all muslim bengalis bangladeshi? are turks or kurds or roma white or asian or other? are white irish and "other white" people BAME? where do what americans call hispanic/latinx people go? does it depend on their skin colour? and so on forever

well yeah race in being a social construct that is applied inconsistently across the board shocker, but that is surely an issue that goes way beyond census or state action

yes but those things obvious feed back into and reproduce the construct in particular ways based on which lines they consider more and less important to draw

*obviously

To be clear, you're not saying "they have the wrong answers to these questions" but "it's a sin to consider these questions?"

primarily that this kind of data collection and analysis constructs and naturalises the kind of world it alleges to describe to serve the interests of whoever is ordering/funding/doing it and I think the world constructed by british imperialism is horrifying and indefensible (as well as ugly, boring, and pedantic) but the positivistic scientistic affect of this kind of activity works to obscure this and makes assertions like mine seem sound hysterical, irrationalist, unscientific etc (I assume that's what the sin thing is getting at)

secondarily that it's a mess even on its own terms and causes all kinds of day to day and long term confusion in how we talk about and conceive of these issues

also that even when it's not the initial or primary intention or purpose of the exercise, laying it all out like this in the world we have now makes eugenics and mass surveillance and employment of divide & conquer culture war techniques kind of an inevitability

Sure, I guess science would be, you let us know which of the answers to the questions serve the interests of british imperialism, and then we go and look at what the answers are, right? I don't have to explain why 'whatever the answers are, they're the wrong answers' is a religious position?

Sure, I guess science would be, you let us know which of the answers to the questions serve the interests of british imperialism, and then we go and look at what the answers are, right? I don't have to explain why 'whatever the answers are, they're the wrong answers' is a religious position?

(Sorry for double post)

I don't have to explain why 'whatever the answers are, they're the wrong answers' is a religious position?

Could you? I'm not sure what "religion" has to do with being opposed on principle to the state using racial categories as a tool of governance (assuming I'm following Left's objections)

also that even when it's not the initial or primary intention or purpose of the exercise, laying it all out like this in the world we have now makes eugenics and mass surveillance and employment of divide & conquer culture war techniques kind of an inevitability

Gotta catch ‘em all

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Labour_and_the_London_Poor

i think it was working at a SureStart, the greatest political achievement of anybody ever, that first woke me up to the data panopticon state and its remorseless self-propulsion

I don't quite know how to read you andrew but you also seem to be suggesting some kind of unquestionable objective fact of the matter behind it all. I'm not sure if you're using religion pejoratively or not and if so why it matters. but even if a particular answer does seem to partially capture a material reality (they're more useful if they can do that to some extent), even if some groups can make use of that answer to bond or assimilate or bargain or rebel, I don't see how that justifies the entire edifice, or makes it (actually or theoretically) a neutral enterprise

I'm not saying any of that, I'm saying that "I don't know how this works, but however it works, it's bad" is a stupid fucking thing to say.

Clearly not what Left is saying. Wind your neck in.

clearly I'm not the only one struggling with reading comprehension but call me stupid because that's my position on a lot of things (the discipline of economics, for example)

🚨 Personal news! Today is my last day at The Economist. I am thrilled to be joining The Guardian next month as their senior China correspondent. Will miss all my clever colleagues but so excited to dive back into the biggest story in the world，好久不见！

— Amy Hawkins (@amyhawk_) January 27, 2023

Economist to Guardian.

Cohen done

https://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/nationals/nick-cohen-allegations/

"One insider said that their experience of working with Cohen did not tally with the allegations aired about him."

Was this insider a man?

"He's not that way to me" is a song only those with social capital get to sing.

If you're tempted to sing it, ask whether you are protected in ways others are not, lest you brush abuse under the carpet.

— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) January 27, 2023

you'd think running a one man substack would be more work if anything, if you're poorly

i suppose if you've got 8 arms it helps

he's never groped me by the photocopier, says a paunchy 6"2 bald guy in his mid 50's

Marina Elizabeth Catherine Dudley-Williams re-writing the history of the 2017 election to suit her agenda and embolden the sad divorced men who laud her shite https://t.co/8OdAwXJ5Qr pic.twitter.com/pPzMJQKFlV

— j (@jrc1921) January 27, 2023

It's good to be reminded of this stuff.

ignoring the rest because it's boring to unpack at this point* - but the only way to reconcile "hey who cares what we think we're just glorified bloggers with no real influence on anything" with "we need more of your money to fund our hard hitting journalism because we're the only ones speaking truth to power" is if you *know* you're full of shit on *at least* one of those things!

* not because it's wrong (it is) but because it's so deeply and infuriatingly unserious it would be like trying to debunk a trump speech

Obviously this is completely otm

was Theresa May really the worst candidate? she only got a few hundred k less votes than Johnson in '19 for his landslide victory because that is how FPTP works. If Baroness Hyde wants to talk about the worst candidates it will be interesting to see how much lower the turnout is for the next GE shitshow

Calzino is correct. For one thing May increased the Con vote. For another, prior to the election she was seen as very strong and unbeatable.

'May was a bad candidate' is re-writing for people who want to attack socialists.

My local Labour MP was doing it at branch meetings, within a couple of months of the election.

Hyde smugly mocks Corbyn for losing "against the worst candidate and campaign in recent memory" (Theresa May). This was Hyde in March 2017, sharing her sex pest pal predicting that May would "tear Labour to pieces" and that Labour would be lucky to win 100 seats. https://t.co/qgT1pKEnfZ pic.twitter.com/HceoLfMZJ5

— B (@Obsayxx) January 27, 2023

Well said. Great tweet. The facts are always out there. They always show these people to be wrong.

The Guardian is oddly obsessed with giving up alcohol. Latest of many recent articles.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/feb/10/i-gave-up-booze-and-am-having-more-fun-than-ever-these-seven-tips-could-help-you-do-the-same

Other great self-care investments include a personal trainer (the equivalent cost of two rounds of drinks a week)

what kind of personal trainer can you get for the equivalent cost of a few bottles of Frosty Jack's Cider? (asking for a friend)

tbf frosty jack is my actual personal trainer

affordable ice cold refreshment while you train, sounds like a winning "best of both worlds" option that the graun hasn't considered here!

Surprising as people who work on newspapers have such a reputation for abstemiousness.

I gave up booze for almost the entirety of the lockdown and I can honestly say it made absolutely no difference to my health and wellbeing whatsoever. Should I write an article about it for the Guardian?

Yes.

When I had been sober for three months, I received a really big job offer – the sort that warranted a celebration.

I think there is a graun editorial rule that there are quotas of smug self-satisfaction per article that have to be met.

i can meet them!

that's just the Frost J talking

I now have a version of Phuture's "Your Only Friend" running in my head that starts with "THIS IS FROSTY J TALKING"

Earlier this week I was called by a Daily Mail journalist who told me Cohen had explained the messages he had sent on social media to a junior female colleague offering to take and send photographs of his penis as a "joke".

— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) February 11, 2023

Fair play to the windmill fucker, he’s refused to leave this one alone.

I gave up booze for almost the entirety of the lockdown and I can honestly say it made absolutely no difference to my health and wellbeing whatsoever. Should I write an article about it for the Guardian?

― Maggot Bairn (Tom D.), Friday, February 10, 2023 11:47 AM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

This could work if you also took up wild swimming?

Thank you to those who are reading and commenting on this thread. I've been working on this for over a year and, unless stuff gets reported, I am going to start naming names. https://t.co/EyalJxcKMR

— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) February 12, 2023

good luck to maugham in his quest to destroy the entire rotten media establishment