RFI: Border Community - Nathan Fake, James Holden, The MFA, Petter etc.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (575 of them)
Well, the latest Zabiela one I heard was the Renaissance one, not Utilities.

Also Zabiela is not popular, he's nowhere near as popular as most of the minimal DJs. Sasha may be popular but regardless of skill even the tracklisting on his latest mix was all quite old, for someone with access to any promo around you expect to hear a good record you hadn't heard before, not a load of tried and tested tunes mixed up. I mean that's like what you get from a friends mix CD.

Also this sweaty talk of "skill" makes me feel like a metal fan, please stop it. It's nonsense.

And Tim otm, what's the point of Ableton if people just use it to eliminate any tension between tracks.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 08:48 (eighteen years ago) link

...and while we're on this why does anyone like Hawtin's djing? Why so much effing bloody filter? Why so fucking sparing with the bass?

Barnaby (Barnaby), Thursday, 25 August 2005 15:58 (eighteen years ago) link

whether you're mixing with vinyl/cd's and a mixer of resequencing tracks in Abelton, skill is required. The skill is: finding songs that compliment eachother and continue the "vibe" in the progression of songs, mixing in key, getting your counts down so the 1's match up and the breakdowns happen at the right time. These are skills Mayer, Superpitcher, Dan Bell, Herbert etc. know absolutely nothing about. Listen to the first Renaissance and first Northern Exposure set to hear what a dj mix should sound like. I'm not into progressive like i was in 93/94 but those mixes are flawless. I'd rather hear Sasha restructure tracks in Abelton than hear Mayer etal fuck shit up by not being able to beatmatch/mix in key.

James Holden's Balance mix rocks in so many different ways. Did anyone hear the Jonathan Lyles mix? Somehow i doubt anyone on here did since it was put out by Bedrock, but it's worth checking for sure. Minimal/Koln type DJ's generally can't mix for shit but they select good tracks. Lyles, Sasha and Zabiela can actually mix with precise skill but don't play the wank material obsessed on at ILM.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:38 (eighteen years ago) link

so what are 'good tracks' and what are 'wank material'?

PS: Mayer is honestly an excellent dj (mixing/selection etc.).. never heard the rest

Barnaby (Barnaby), Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link

excellent - compared to who? i thought mayer was standard-to-weak when i saw him play. it was fine, but nothing that the local talent around LA or san diego can't / don't do on a weekly basis. (as opposed to sweet reinhard, who did something that, for better or worse, nobody around here fucks with - stretching "supertiel" + "how we rock" into a 45 minute laptop set)

i don't really think it's fair to lump dan bell in w/ mayer, herbert, superpitcher. he can do the things your talking about - although i wonder why you're still banging on the point when clearly almost everyone here prefers track selection (the tracks they like) to dj'ing skills to the point where they'd probably rather hear mayer spin dubplates w/ NO mixing than listen to well-mixed prog house or breaks ...

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Mayer and Superpitcher can absolutely pick tracks that go together well, and mix too! I base this on both live sets and their mix CDs. "Today" and "Fabric 13" are about as good as it gets for DJ mix CDs.

Honestly this bullshit of "he can't mix" as a diss for any new DJ is such old school dance fan tossed off rubbish. If you don't like the records someone plays just wheel out the "he can't mix" chestnut.

Plus if the ILM stuff is such "wank material" why is your beloved Sasha playing ALL OF IT (6 months after release date) on his latest mix CD??

Well?

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:13 (eighteen years ago) link

well, i suppose i break them down into 2 categories: DJ's and Selectors. Mayer is a selector, Sasha is a DJ. There are benefits to both. At this point, i'd rather hear Mayer's selections than Sasha's perfectly constructed DJ set. I lumped Dan Bell in because i have both of his Buttoned Down Mind discs and while i love the tracks, his mixing is less than perfect. Maybe his actual live sets are more exciting but those 2 mixes have some harsh transitions and a bunch of songs that shouldn't be mixed together.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:16 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean I totally reject this "ILM is not into skills" thing, ILM is not into mad fetishes for "DJ skills" where the point or net advantage of a DJ's alleged "skill" is never explained but instead supposed to act as a be all and end all as to why they are superior.

But other than that I think people here are as bothered with skill as anything else, not least cos track selection fucking is skill! It is the biggest skill of all by a million fucking miles and why Sasha is so fucking lost lately (Goldfrapp mixed into microhouse on Fundacion????, plus as I said totally safe tune selection)

But ignoring that, Mayer actually is a good DJ technically, I have enough live sets of his and have seen him twice, the notion he can't mix is utter fucking rubbish perpetuated by early 90s dance fans flexing their anti-fashion muscles as per usual, "it's fashionable therefore the technical ability must not be present"

DEATH TO FALSE METAL.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

also "a bunch of songs that shouldn't be mixed together" as a criticism is the point where you move beyond technical criticisms back into simple personal opinion. "good mixing" in the technical sense, as was initially criticised, is fairly strictly quantified relative to "he's not playing the right tunes together"

"he's not playing the right tunes together" does not make someone bad at mixing, that's just personal opinion.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:22 (eighteen years ago) link

lumped Dan Bell in because i have both of his Buttoned Down Mind discs and while i love the tracks, his mixing is less than perfect

well, he's mixing a lot of very formless tracks together - i'm not sure w/o specific examples what you mean, but he's working with some pretty abstract source material, as opposed to sasha's perfect 4/4 dj tools.

"Fabric 13" are about as good as it gets for DJ mix CDs

i don't really agree w/ this either, though. doc martin? tyler stadius? ivan smagghe? adam beyer? and this is only counting the fabric mixes - if we throw in jacques lu cont and bent there's a half-dozen which blow the doors off mayer and that's just in the fabric series.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Abelton-assisted manslaughter of tracks

classic!

tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:25 (eighteen years ago) link

i only have the first "buttoned down" dan bell mix and it is unimpeachable. i just listened to it a couple of days ago and it's aging really well which says a lot for a mix imo. the track selection and (more importantly) the flow is near perfect.

tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, Vahid, again it's all subjective but alot of people would agree that Fabric 13 is a really outstanding mix. I think the reason is that they have an really consistent thread running through them, emotionally speaking, which may be a different thing to the Smagghe mixes etc, which tend to be more visceral by default.

I enjoy both types of mix but I don't think you could say Smagghe creates a vibe in the same way as Superpitcher, that said I can be almost certain Smagghe is a more clubby DJ to see out.

The "bad mixing" thing just rankles with me bigtime though, everytime a fucking DJ plays here, whoever it is (once it's not Clarke/Mills etc) somebody's fucking whining "oh his mixing was awful", it's just a lame attempt to make the subjective sound objective, and is almost always directed at new or newly popular DJs.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:37 (eighteen years ago) link

i love the songs those guys play but the can't mix for shit. sasha is absolutely jumping the bandwagon, no doubts about it. his Fundacion mix was shockingly out of touch. he should have the exclusive shit nobody else has but instead, he played tracks that were dated before the mixe hit the shelves. no revalations, no surprises.

take Fabric 13 for example. Mayer should have had time to find tracks the mixed together well and created a vibe but there are several transitions that are either fade-ins or trainwrecks. he can pick a track, he just can't mix it as well as some.

xpost: Sasha's early mid-nineties mixing/track selection was near perfect. Fundacion was a drop in selection but the way they're put together is more pleasant to listen to than if Mayer had taken the same tracks and mixed them together. I've never seen Mayer live so my opinion is only based on Fabric 13, Immer and Neuhaus (plus a couple downloaded sets). He comes clean and admits he's more of a Selector than Mixer.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:37 (eighteen years ago) link

the fade out is the new long blend.

i think maybe part of the issue here is the difference between song-oriented mixing vs. track-oriented mixing. some tunes sound excellent when they are played all of the way to the end whereas some are made to be mixed and blended like crazy.

tricky (disco stu), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:44 (eighteen years ago) link

There's no way that the Doc Martin, Adam Beyer, and Ivan Smagghe Fabric mixes "blow the doors" off Mayer's mix, V.

You may prefer the track selections of the three, but they're not finer mixes in terms of technical skills. Mayer does play it pretty safe, but I'd say the same for most Fabric mixes.

I do like Smagghe's creative risks, especially w/r/t that Kills track, but it's honestly not a very smooth transition either technically or in flow.

Tyler Stadius does SMOKE THEM ALL, though- I agree with that.

jsoulja (jsoulja), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:45 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah I agree with the "selector" thing but that does not equate to shit mixing, you act like one is absolutely inferior to the other.

And I don't hear these trainwrecks in Fabric 13, where are they? Fade ins also are just as valid a way of mixing, if that's what the mix requires, if you inherently believe every track should have a 3 minute transition overlap then of course this is not the case.

I don't know what ridiculously ott standard of "good mixing" you have biz, but I'd love to hear you explain in the abstract why it is better, aside from you simply preferring it.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I always got the impression that a lot of the "seamless" djs are excellent at blending tracks because, while there might be differences in mood that create highs and lows, most of the material is very similar in construction -- like vahid said, 4/4 dj tools.

Part of the beauty of the mix albums released is that you can perform enough tweaking to get disparate tracks to blend together so you end up with well-beatmatched and tone-matched mixes with a lot of variation. I'm fickle, though: I enjoy an occasional straight crossfade or paused transition in the middle sometime, if it works. The ableton aesthetic is pulling the live sets closer to this and it's worrisome if people are just using this to smooth out the bumps in their homogenous sets -- they should be doing more adventurous mixing and throwing in craziness! Suddenly you've lost a lot of worries about being in tune or on time...

If anything we're outing ourselves as a bunch of nerdy trainspotters with this stuff. Like biz said, it's wank material, but he's got a point. Often we end up discussing the tracks that have very distinct personalities, stuff that doesn't quite qualify as "anthemic" but is close. It might just be because the 4/4 dj tools stuff really are tools and we're more into discussing "songs" as they may be. Maybe it's the home listening aesthetic transposed back to the clubs, I don't know.

Back on topic, has anyone heard this Holden set from Sonar 2005? He really throws in some of the kompakt stuff with what I assume is his normal type of set, along with some random stuff like that Blue Monday acid house remix that was on rephlex. Mixing is great as far as I've taken notice even though he's pulling from a variety of sources.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:49 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost

Yes, I'd also like to know what "trainwrecks" exist in Mayer's Fabric mix.

Sorry, but I'm thinking they exist only in your head, maybe via the collision between the quality of the music and that little voice that keeps saying to you "He's so popular right now- I just hate him, Hate Him, HATE HIM!!!!"

jsoulja (jsoulja), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:54 (eighteen years ago) link

as regards ableton, mike totally otm. sasha seems to be the anti-optimo in this respect.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:56 (eighteen years ago) link

I've never seen Mayer live so my opinion is only based on Fabric 13, Immer and Neuhaus (plus a couple downloaded sets). He comes clean and admits he's more of a Selector than Mixer.

Do you mean his admission that he likes to play tracks out? Because as far as I know, none of those was recorded live so it's not like it's even possible the mixing is going to be fucked up unless it's pure laziness or a broken computer.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 17:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I think he had some quote like "I like to mix in the part of tracks where the producer leaves space and says 'here, mix now'" which makes sense to me, I'm not sure he ever said "I'm shit at mixing but you know, I'm more of a track selecting type of guy!"

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Ronan: I prefer seamless mixing because of the interplay between 2 (or more) different songs creating something new when overlapped. When done correctly, this can be very powerful. I bought Renaissance in 1994 when i was living in London and spent many nights out enjoying impecable dj's like Justin Robertson, Billy Nasty and Laurent Garnier. Their "skills" in blending tracks together are what inspired me to buy turntables. I'd have to have the Fabric 13 mix in front of me to remember the bad transitions.

xpost: i don't hate Mayer. In fact, i really enjoy Fabric 13, Immer and the other mix of his i have, however, his ability to mix records together is subpar.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:01 (eighteen years ago) link

your first sentence definitely does nothing to exclude the type of mixing done by Michael Mayer, not by any means whatsoever.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

biz, do you mean actual technical ability, or just that you don't like that mixing style? Mayer just doesn't overlap tracks that much. I haven't seen him live, but on the live mixes I've heard it really sounds like he just plays a track and then cues in the next one with some minor fading at the right point. That doesn't mean he can't mix records through layering, just that he's not doing it.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah live he doesn't seem to overlap a huge amount but there are some good overlaps on Fabric 13, for example the one into "Bring Me Closer" by Richard Davis is totally seamless. I'm sure there are others. It's just a different style though, when I saw him he would quickly mix tracks and change the tone kind of sharply quite alot but it made for a really good DJ set, it did feel a whole by the end, but it also had loads of little peaks/troughs through the night and loads of different types of crowd reaction.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Also, where the hell can I buy "The Sky Was Pink" in the US or anything else off Border Community? I can't even find a good UK store for this stuff that'll ship to me even though their distribution company claims to have copies..

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:16 (eighteen years ago) link

well, if he has the technical ability to blend the tracks, i don't understand why he doesn't do that. As a producer, he should take the songs he wants to mix and do re-edits so they can be properly mixed in the set (like that devil Sasha!). He is getting paid loads to be a DJ. DJ's don't just pick songs and blend the intro's over outro's, in my opinion.

Ronan, by your description above of a set you witnessed from Mayer, we're saying the same thing about his mixing ability but you translate that into a specific style while i see it as lazy DJing. It's one thing to pick great songs, it's another to be able to sequence them in a seamless mix. I don't consider a person who just selects good songs to be a DJ. I know my opinion is not popular but that's the way i feel about it.


xpost: Border Community have all their releases available to purchase in MP3 format at www.bordercommunity.com

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:20 (eighteen years ago) link

You can buy downloads from http://www.3beatdigital.com/labels.php

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:21 (eighteen years ago) link

you don't understand because you think one style if the be all and end all. do you think Mayer's the first do have that style or something?

honestly your definition of quality excludes so many DJs, probably every disco "legend", that I'm not sure how it stands up at all.

also how is one style "lazier" than the other? Where does "hard work" come into talent exactly?

This is yet more Joe Satriani Guitar Magazine monthly bullshit. No place on a dance thread.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:23 (eighteen years ago) link

do you mix? it's harder to mix 2 songs together for 2/3 minutes than to fade one in. what about that don't you understand? it's lazy to let a song play out and fade the next in then collect your pay. mixing well is hard work. From all accounts, including yours, Mayer is a lazy mixer with great taste.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:26 (eighteen years ago) link

like cola

cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:28 (eighteen years ago) link

you live in Seattle right? why don't we meet up and fight over this topic? i'd love to play you examples of what i think are amazing mixes and then contrast them with mixes i enjoy to listen to but don't enjoy the technical "mixing" on. you can play me Disco legend trainwrecks and tell me about how the music speaks for itself.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:29 (eighteen years ago) link

let's talk about Holden's Balance 005 mix. amazing track selection and incredibly skilled mixes.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 18:34 (eighteen years ago) link

Biz you are a moron. By your rationale it was "lazy" of McCartney or someone not to put a big guitar solo into "Yesterday", or Beethoven should have made his symphonies thousands of notes longer because it was harder.

Honestly no point arguing further with someone who has such a facile grasp of "talent/quality", it is EXACTLY like discussing music with a metal fan.

Another DJ excluded by your definition, Jeff Mills! Not saying anyone is beyond reproach but just to show the variety of DJs who don't do long overlaps.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:21 (eighteen years ago) link

do you mix? it's easier to fade in a track at the end that it is to blend tracks. therefore, it requires more skill to match the tempo/key and overlay tracks than it does to start a record over the last 16 beats of the previous record. why is that so hard for you to understand?

btw, i hate Jeff Mills' mixing style. doesn't mean he's a shitty dj, but i don't like his style.

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:38 (eighteen years ago) link

why is it so hard for you to understand that "skill" as you define it is nothing to do with quality.

it's also difficult to play 4000 notes in 3 seconds on a piano but that doesn't mean it sounds better.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:40 (eighteen years ago) link

so, ronan, what are the stakes in your refusing to acknowledge "long blends" as a sign of quality? what do you miss out on, when you cut mayer slack for his uninspired dj'ing, in appreciation of his inspired track selection?

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not refusing to acknowledge them as a sign of quality, I'm refusing to acknowledge them as the definitive or only praiseworthy way of mixing.

Also it's not cutting Mayer slack for "uninspired djing", you're being too absolute, he can actually mix and he does mix, he just doesn't frequently do long extended segues.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:46 (eighteen years ago) link

i don't think i'm being too absolute! i mean, he really does nothing interesting as a dj, except he is a tastemaker.

it'd be like talking about gilles peterson's dj'ing.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:48 (eighteen years ago) link

see again, "does nothing interesting" is subjective, "is crap at mixing" is not so subjective. he actually isn't crap at mixing! there are lots of good transitions on Fabric 13, almost all of them are good.

I still can't see how stylistically the way he mixes is somehow inferior, why is it so hard to believe that someone might choose an "easier" way of creating art (in whatever sense creative processes can be dismissed as "easy") because they believe it to produce superior works?

It's verbatim the same argument as criticising the Beatles or something because their songs are "easy to play".

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Why didn't John Lennon use nuclear physics instead of a guitar

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 19:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Utilizing a technique that doesn't require as much skill doesn't mean you aren't talented, it just means you're doing something that is, in fact, easier. I don't think anyone is calling Mayer out as untalented, only saying that there are certain talents he doesn't employ that he may or may not have. I haven't heard a live set where he did a lot of intermixing. Also, Fabric 13 is not live.

Can we spin this off into the "Mayer is a crap DJ" thread, I really want to figure out where I'm going to order actual Border Community vinyl from, even gemm is looking good by now.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:00 (eighteen years ago) link

Ronan, i'm going to ignore the moron remark and move on. Sasha and Digweed's "Communicate" mix consisted of loads of dark, linear progHouse tracks that were overlayed in the mix quite a bit. I don't rate Communicate very highly even though the mixes were long. I dislike the track selection, and only listened to it the week it was released. Mayer's Fabric mix has been caned at my place yet i find the mixing lackluster. Mayer's "skill" as a DJ is purely in selecting the tracks, not in his ability to overlay tracks in a long mix. I enjoy his selection but his mixing falls short in my opinion. I've continuously stated these ideas as my opinion and my preference, not as the definitive chart to grading DJ mixes. Plenty of Dj's who can produce long mixes between tracks have shitty track selection. Plenty of DJ's with great track selection can't mix. It goes both ways and i'm simply stating my belief that a person who can choose the best tracks and fit them together in a seamless mix is the better DJ. This breaks down to 2 simple catagories: Selecting and Mixing. As i see it, Mayer only has 1 of those down. You obviously don't DJ and if you do, you probably can't match beats, which is the only reason i see for you defending unskilled DJ's. Anyone can choose great songs. Most of the folks who post on ILM have great taste, but can they sequence those tracks in a seamless mix?

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:16 (eighteen years ago) link

...because they'd have to in order to prove their skill and worth! jaysus, biz.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:30 (eighteen years ago) link

if they wanted to get paid and promote themselves as DJ's, then yes, they would!

biz, Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:33 (eighteen years ago) link

You obviously don't DJ and if you do, you probably can't match beats, which is the only reason i see for you defending unskilled DJ's. Anyone can choose great songs

If anyone needed further proof that your over emphasis of mixing is macho rubbish then there it is.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:35 (eighteen years ago) link

if they wanted to get paid and promote themselves as DJ's, then yes, they would!

-- biz (b...), August 25th, 2005.

dude the only reason anyone's arguing with you is because your idea of what constitutes good sequencing and seamlessness is so... i dunno...one dimensional. dullsville.

andrew m. (andrewmorgan), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i couldnt care less about good mixing on mix cds et al (i heart beatsinspace although sweenys mixing is quite horrible at times), but at the club a botched transition can ruin a night, so i kind of see where biz is coming from

fe7 (FE7), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyone can choose great songs

I disagree. Most dance DJ's can learn basic technical mixing (beat matching and phrasing) in a month or two. Great track selection, at least in dance music, is something that can't be "taught" and requires years of work to master.

I'll take a few botched transitions over uninspired track selection any day, whether at the club or listening to a mix CD.

jeffery (jeffery), Thursday, 25 August 2005 20:56 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.