The Rehearsal - Nathan Fielder - HBO

LIke it has to have some understanding for them to deliver, not going to be absolutely abstract. Or they wouldn't be able to coherently.
& is it enough to build to some heavy misunderstandings that they need to work through at a later date.

JUst seems to be something I wouldn't really touch on just to make an amusing tv show. But may be something that has some degree happening every time you have a child actor in a show with adult themes they don't understand. Don't think its completely throwaway.

he keeps doing it. he seems fixated and it's not really that funny.

I thought it was really neat how the final episode turned that whole concept on its head, by using an actor who thought the fake situation was actually real. It did make me wonder a lot about child actors and how often that sort of thing happens. A show like Shameless puts its child actors in much more extreme & graphic situations than this show does & I can't help but wonder if some of them have difficulty differentiating real life and television. afaik this is the only show that really explores that.

also as far as his tendency to use child actors, Nathan's shows thrive on uncomfortable & unpredictable situations, and what's more unpredictable and morally ambiguous than using kids for an adult TV show?

taking real life kids to an evangelical church where they preach about hell all the time

idk i just don't think it's that cool or like taking comedy to the next level. like it's kids man. and the shit he does with them is fucked up.

I would prefer something that did understand consent and I would think consent depended on having an understanding of processes that one was very unlikely to have that young.

i think people are too quick to be like "no this is intelligent tv! there's layers to this! using children is putting a mirror on society!" when it's not actually any of those things. people love nathan and defend him to death. take a step back and look at those eps of nfy and it's actually p fucked up.

Speaking for myself all I was saying was that I don't take anything I saw in the show at face value, including the narrative that a few of the child actors were confused and could not tell real from make-believe. As far as I know those were just plot points in the show as well. Now, whether any of the child actors were confused in the same or other ways OUTSIDE of what we saw, that's another thing. Or maybe both is true and that is sad for those kids and not so funny after all.

This was fascinating television but i dunno if i liked it or can even recommend it exactly? With some distance, it's like a strange dream.

My first reaction after the finale was that the episode was essentially scripted—if not line by line, at least in the “Curb" way. Like, do I believe the real Nathan Fielder, in the course of putting together his show, had some sort of unexpected epiphany about himself or his work on camera? No. I believe he planned the show with a narrative/thematic arc in mind, and as such, he intended from the outset for his character to insert himself into the house, for the show to increasingly focus on “Nathan” and the show’s premise, and that the pointed dialog from fake Angela was scripted. As such, I figured the whole situation with the child actor believing it was real was fictional as well, though that tweet upthread from a family member works against it.

OTOH, my partner took the entire episode at face value as real, unforeseen events—I suppose the answer lies somewhere in between.

I think either the chronology is a little off or he really did leave Angela on her own to go through the motions with ever-aging child actors for a significant amount of time

The irl timeline is one of the many mysteries of the show.

I doubt the months of having a house rented and occupied for months on end was remotely real. But still if they are only filming the small bits that need to be shot to make a narrative it still takes somebody learning parts and rehearsing them and the bits being edited.
Assume that a series of clips supposed to show time lapsing over a given time must be filmed in about that time, though if they're going to go as far as faking weather for the area who really knows. BUt if it is over a longer time then tehy would need to continue to have access to the same place?

When you're out on the town...

Nathan Fielder is at the Mets game and they put him on the Jumbotron 😂 pic.twitter.com/8N66HLRAue

— Lee J 🪩 (@Lee_Jameson) October 8, 2022

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/10/10/kor-skeetes-un-rehearsed-celebrity-life

https://www.gq.com/story/gq-hype-nathan-fielder-men-of-the-year-2022

men for fielder of the year

Fashion can be so ridiculous. In the second photo in that article, you can maybe just about tell that Nathan is wearing a black belt - a few centimetres of it are showing.

Belt (price upon request), by Ann Demeulemeester.

"Oh man, I love that belt he's wearing! I must request the price to see if I can afford to make that kind of impression!"

https://www.interviewmagazine.com/culture/kate-berlant-in-conversation-with-nathan-fielder

i have liked some of Kate Berlant's work but Cinnamon in the Wind left me cold.

ok

it's improv so i imagine it varied from performance to performance. being in the audience for that kind of show is more or less necessary, you have to be part of the energy of the room and watch her react to what the crowd is giving out or else it comes off (as I found it on tape) premeditated, hyperaware and joyless... and not in the way she intended.

i thought it was really good, i find her enjoyable to watch even if i'm not cracking up

Enjoyed the show for the most part until the last episode. I thought there was going to be some “stop”, so to speak, with the rehearsal when he realized what had happened with Remy. The fact he kept going and portraying Remy’s mother and “acting” as her left a real sour taste for me.