Vampire Weekend; Arctic Monkeys of 2008?

pitchfork are joining the party big time (8.8)

ah this promises to tun into one of the all-stars classic ILM threads

FFS, I even read an enthusiastic review of this album in yesterday's Financial Times week-end supplement.

worst party ever

xpost

Well, it's the most instantly appealing album I've heard in a very long time, so it's entirely possible that I might be sick of them in 6 months' time. Best make the most of them while I can, then.

They could be the Arctic Monkeys of 2008 in terms of "Butbutbut they happened WITHOUT MY PERMISSION!" outraged bluster - but that's a strictly localised phenomenon, right?

but srsly the afro-pop groove plays nicely w/sensitive white boy rocking - dont know why its still a novelty

the new single doesn't really do it for me

ive only heard the 10 song cdr

whereas Paul Simon's last 45 was SLAMMIN xp

[ban me] gave the first Bloc Party album an 8.9, so the praise for this album feels slightly muted

sorry, NABISCO. I didn't realize using the first name of the writer of an article on Pitchfork could get me banned, sorry!

Can I type the word Jess? Scott?

hmmm

well this is amusing

[nabisco] louis jagger

waht u can write louis jagger now? this is an outrage!

[nabisco] [ban me]

lol

what happened was someone fucking w/[nabisco] or something?

I wasn't the proto-Jagger: that thread get revived, and someone (Heave Ho?) kept pasting in my name, and at some point I think mods decided it was easier to just put on the Jagger-filter than keep coming back and snipping it out. At this point it would probably be safe to remove the filter and just go back and clean up the thread.

in my head i keep hearing "ban me" as "marry me" a la maebe funke.

every thread on ILX about a new "indie" band or movie should start with the wikipedia article on the narcissism of small differences

Well, here's one non-small tension you inevitably see between the criticism and the message-board talk: critics have some level of responsibility to talk about whether something's good at what it does, while message-board haters can lay in slams about what it doesn't. There was a line that wound up getting cut from the end of that Pitchfork review, saying that criticizing Vampire Weekend for not being dirtier or bloodier or more progressive is "like having someone cure Alzheimer's and complaining that she should have done cancer instead." One of the parts where this band wins is that they're very convincingly good at what they do do.

(P.S.: It is 100% true that Bloc Party's review should not have a higher rating than this.)

what they -do- do well is be boring, bland, and beige. so, they do succeed very well at that.

It's rare indeed that I find myself nodding in agreement with a Pfork review, but I thought you did an excellent job there, N.

do reviewers give the ratings at pfork?

did anyone catch them on the tour going on right now? they are comming by me next month....worth checking out?

Yes, although editors sometimes do get in their ear about that along the way. And obviously we'll often get an idea of what someone wants to say about a record before assigning it to them.

xpost

heard the whole thing now, for my sins, and i'll stand by the first 3 tracks; then well, i dunno if 'cape code etc etc' is meant to be winsomeley self-deprecating or whatever with the benneton and "unnatural, peter gabriel" refs but it sounds unbelievably smarmy whichever way, and the chamberpop thing after that is just vile and everything you suspected. after that the rest doesn't recover.

yeah i don't know why i'm on this thread either. can we get on with the tweeo walcott gags already or what?

Koenig is a detail guy
Koenig is a detail guy
Koenig is a detail guy
Koenig is a detail guy
Koenig is a detail guy

GOOD WORK NABISCO

(Ha, yes, to be clear: my saying the Bloc Party should be lower was a mea culpa, not an insinuation that it was anyone else's doing.)

(P.S. I love how suddenly in the last week this record has started bring amazing moral judgments out of people who don't enjoy it, accusations that these are bad people for making ... lyrically inoffensive peppy pop music. Which is something I was half-expecting, because the whole thing is that this band seems actively HAPPY, which will read to people they annoy as being smug and superior. This is kind of strange: if they came off less tidy and shiny and pleased with themselves -- if Koenig seemed miserable or something -- I imagine they'd get less of this reaction, which is kind of insane.)

xpost - I have no idea what what means but thank you?

The type of afro-pop that they're jacking has always seemed a little corny and rhythmically dull to me, so I've got no interest in a whitened up version + indie pop.

the whole thing is that this band seems actively HAPPY

which is offensive to pretty much the whole indie rokk value system of the last 10 years

You know "I Know What I Know," off Graceland, where it talks about the cinematographer's party and the Fulbright scholarship? I get the feeling that Vampire Weekend think that's REALLY FUCKING CLEVER to mix uptown intellectual horseshit (see "Oxford Comma") with afrobeat. This is why people think they're smug. I just think they're young. If these guys are under 25, I'm gonna give them benefit of the doubt.

hmmm [banh mi]

Whiney, what "intellectual horseshit" is in "Oxford Comma?" It's a song picking on exactly the kind of smugness/privilege stuff people accuse VW of having, which I suspect Koenig was conscious of whenever he wrote it.

xposts

I love how suddenly in the last week this record has started bring amazing moral judgments out of people who don't enjoy it, accusations that these are bad people for making ... lyrically inoffensive peppy pop music.

Ha! I am all too familiar with people making those kinds of judgments. They are heretics, theirs is a false theology, and it will cast them into perdition.

I get the feeling that Vampire Weekend think that's REALLY FUCKING CLEVER to mix uptown intellectual horseshit (see "Oxford Comma") with afrobeat.

yeah, I can't imagine uptown intellectual horseshit just coming naturally to some Columbia grads or their authentically being really into 'afrobeat' or anything

i mean, it's not like one of them was a summer intern at the OED

they should NOT be themselves

the only thing I don't like about 'em is the music is so god awfully boring, and boring shit makes me angry. I think people might resent them because they're Ivy League kids in NYC who've obviously had really comfortable, easy lives, and to a lot of people struggling in NYC that = grhuargargg. Reminds me of the Strokes backlash of 02.

i don't know whether i should be amused or bemused about the extent to which people are willing to regard this whole thing as intensely calculated. these are dudes who play songs based on a self-mocking-horror flick the singer essayed on a lark.

xpost - (This is what I meant about Cheever and playing it both ways, obviously: he can act skeptical and incisive about prep privilege from right within its ranks.) (Note that that's not any kind of surprising new trick -- actually I'd say its most frequent use is on rap records.)

Really curious what the "intellectual horseshit" is, though; all we know is it's allegedly located in the one song that actually pretends to be anti-intellectual! ("Who gives a fuck about an Oxford comma?")

xpost Burt you've posted like 15 times "this is boring, I'm bored now," which is ... boring, I'm bored now; plus in the grand scale of things it's really hard for me to suss out how having gone to Columbia is somehow just beyond the line of objectionability, as opposed to the million NYC indie kids who went to Oberlin or Brown but wear dirtier-looking clothing so it's not an issue.

Ivy League kids in NYC who've obviously had really comfortable, easy lives

Is that obvious? I don't know these dudes' bios, but I don't think everybody who goes to Columbia obviously has had a really comfortable, easy life. I guess it depends on what your basis of comparison is though.

Whiney, what "intellectual horseshit" is in "Oxford Comma?" It's a song picking on exactly the kind of smugness/privilege stuff people accuse VW of having, which I suspect Koenig was conscious of whenever he wrote it.

Oh, I didn't know that. That's interesting.

My statement is more about why people don't like em, which is more about perception than fact anyway

i really feel like i want to hear this now, i liked the yeasayer album. bring on the benetton, i say. white dudes imitating peter gabriel and kate bush is better than... other options

yeah, I take 'Oxford Comma' as an anti-manners song (at britishes' expense, which I would think, but in a sorta Jane Austen manner). While I guess it does literally attack a class-pretender, overall it's attacking the pretense of class - a relax, we're all in this together, er, vibe.

the yeasayers album I like a little better. the oxford comma thing is probably more about the writing/publishing/journalism types in NYC... over here some people prefer it, some don't, and there's always a debate on whether to use it or not. it'd be like a song about em dashes.

Who gives a fuck about an Oxford comma?
I climbed to Dharamsala too
I did
I met the highest lama
His accent sounded fine
to me, to me

I mean, how great is that?

Not very.