Andrea Dworkin RIP

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (235 of them)
(also i have no idea what "more american than whitman/twain" means, unless yr arguin that americanism is in essence ultra-protestantism)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

(ie that whitman/twain AREN'T particuarly american)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

momus what do you mean by "post-protestant"?

I"m just using "post-protestant" to mean "has now or ever been protestant". But you're right, the US is not very post its protestantism. My use follows Geert Hofstede's in his cultural dimensions studies, but actually he restricts the term to places like Germany and Sweden, which are culturally protestant without being very religiously so these days.

Whitman and Twain are seen as the essence of America, but they lack that protestant extremism we see in Dworkin, the Mayflower, Salem, etc. Whitman's sensuality, in particular, seems particularly un-American, don't you think?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

you confuse me mark.

"inherent biological inequalities in heterosexual vaginal sex "

there is no inherent "inequality" here - the perception of inequality comes later with the development of a specific point of view. matriarchal societies still managed to exist and reinforce themselves and still "relied" (as much as any political system relies on perpetuation of the species) on ye olde in-n-out. the sexual act can certainly have political connotations, has been used to reinforce power structures, etc., but the sexual act developed as it did for practical biological reasons that are quite separate from any ideology (ie, it is the most efficient way for the human organism to transfer DNA).

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

i think my defn of american might START w.whitman!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah sorry shakey - as noted, i am actually v.tired and not writin very clearly as a result

if i have time tomorrow (= mum's illness and work nightmares permitting) and if this thread has not gone all ghastly, i shall and say it more clearly

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

it may be prudent to note here that the fixation to characterize the penis as a tool of force, "invasive", stabbing, etc. can easily be inverted and transposed onto the vagina as a tool of absorption, consumption, devouring, etc. Both models are predicated strictly on FEAR of the OTHER, and don't have anything to do with the particular biological mechanics in action.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd say Whitman & Twain define a parallel tradition of Americanism that extends to disparate 20th century figures like HL Mencken and the Beats. Not the hippies, though, they were Protestant at heart.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, perhaps Walt Whitman and John Ashcroft are two sides of the same coin. Sing the body electric, and tap its telephone while you're at it.

Do you see Dworkin as an American writer?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Reproductive mammalian sex may predate modern humans but mothers and babies are notoriously dependent compared to other mammals. Babies can't even hang on or reliably move about and our bipedal stance has made childbirth rather perecarious for mothers. We were probably highly evolved social animals well before we became Homo sapiens sapiens and there are new proofs of it all the time (remains of crippled and toothless elders). Part of that society and much of the basis of early patriarchy is precisely to guarantee that fathers knew who's offspring they were helping to raise. This is surely not just a subconscious biological desire to have one's lineage continued but also the rational choice of men to have some control over reproduction (in a pre-contraceptive world). Do human males have a built in biological impetus to spread their wild oats? Perhaps. But the biological advantages of exogamy apply to females as well provided they have a social structure (clan, family, mate, friends) to help raise their progeny. I don't see the wild hormonal insanity or the cold economic calculation that has led most people to have sex and hence babies as based on any inherent biological inequality. That inequality, where it exists, is the result of individual and/or societal ignorance.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

was the 60s a protestant or an anti-protestant convulsion? (ans = both at once i think)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

i basically agree with that whole post, momus: but it's a particular TYPE of american voice that she represents, i don't think she's "more american" than whitman ("i contain multitudes")

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link

If Protestant becaome a lazy catch-all for all kinds of different individualism, then yes it was both.

xpost

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link

xxx post

As American as violence and apple pie. And I think you're absolutely right about the Janus face of American culture: Whitman greeting the dawn naked and Ashcroft covering up nude statues in the capitol.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, I guess I just invoked Twain and Whitman as people who get called 'great American writers', but I think if you were doing a kind of Noah's Ark thing and wanted to preserve American cultural DNA, you'd be quite wise to select Dworkin. And she could go in, oh, just for fun, with PT Barnum.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

see i think the specific cultural expression of the 60s in anti-atomised forms (eg rock bands, rock audiences, rock culture) (other things too) contains a deep yearning to sway away from individualism, albeit one which is crusted w.all kinds of compromises w.indvidualism

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

she had a great style. i think i really learned something about writing by reading her stuff. she could be funny too.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Not the hippies, though, they were Protestant at heart.

Protestant is an awfully lazy term here, but there is something very pre-industrial and Jeffersonian in their desire for connection to the land, manageable local democracy, and for homespun simplicity which has always made me think that part of the hippy impulse is rather nostalgic and reactionary.

see i think the specific cultural expression of the 60s in anti-atomised forms (eg rock bands, rock audiences, rock culture)

This desire for community at the cost of individuality has always scared me at concerts. There is oftimes the echo there of fascist rallies or mobs.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Identifying w/The Movement/counterculture/My Generation
VS.
"Doing Your Own Thing"

I think the first impulse won out more often in the 60s convulsions, despite mucho lip service paid to the latter.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

one of the main things i wz thinkin of is exactly the opposite of the fascism deal though, which is rock culture takes it as read that members of the audience WILL cross the footlights and become the artist; plus also the audience now and then becomes the "show"

ie it is anti-hierarchical, and expressive rather than submissive

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Not for the majority of the people in the audience.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:30 (nineteen years ago) link

individualism is such a sad religion

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

So is communitarianism.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

That is to say that ideology taken too far and too seriously is a grim thing.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

commununitarianism is worse i think!! not sad, but def scary

(ps i didn't mean sad in the "loser" sense, which i hate: i mean genuinely struck-to-its-depth w.something sorrowful - that everything shared is tainted amd corrupting)

rock culture's dream of itself wz that this wz a vast joyful unity taken on as an active choice: rockbands as little marriages, band-and-audience as a two-way lovematch etc etc

mark s (mark s), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I find myself getting more and more 'conservative' about humanity's ability to radically transform itself. Little ameliorative changes may be accomplished, but the second some unforeseen conjuncture like a plague, an economic collapse, or even the sinking of a ship or a fire in theater come along and, despite some indiviual nobility, there's a good chance most people will revert to their animal selves.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

A talent for metaphor can be a dangerous thing. Dworkin's metaphorical linkage of intercourse with invasion prepared us for stuff like Carol J. Adams' The Sexual Politics of Meat and The Pornography of Meat, which make the metaphorical daisy chain:

Meat eating = objectification = pornography and women = cattle

It's as if she's saying "It's much worse than you think. Women are even more abject than anybody imagined. Cattle. Offal. Hamburgers." I mean, who does that analysis help? Where does that metaphor lead? It makes the image of a leggy hamburger on her book jacket look positively chivalric in comparison.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 11 April 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/25/165734/959
http://afterschoolsnack.blogspot.com/2005/03/outrage-ad-nauseam.html


but the bondage scenario above is queer sex--or at least sex informed by knowledge of power dialectics.

anthony, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not saying the military is right (are they ever?) but I can't say I ever expect them to behave in any other way either.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Over the past 10 years, twice as many accused Army sex offenders were given administrative punishment as were court-martialed. In the civilian world, four of five people arrested for rape are prosecuted. Nearly 5,000 accused sex offenders in the military, including rapists, have avoided prosecution, and the possibility of prison time, since 1992, according to Army records."

WTMFF?

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Andrea Dworkin makes me think of a woman I've seen around NYC for 20+ years. She's a lone protestor, sets up her table on street corners and harrangues people about her cause. For many years her crusade was Stop Pornography. She sat behind a huge photo blow-up of that infamous Hustler cover -- a nude woman shimmying into a meat grinder, putting the sex as hamburger metaphor right in your face. She's little, but her sharp voice echoes down the sidewalk. FIGHT BACK WOMEN!! SIGN THE PA-TISH-UN!! Cantakerous and crazed, she'd eventually scare off anybody who wasn't repelled by the Hustler photos. (In 1983-85 I worked around the corner from Bloomingdale's department store where she was stationed week in/week out.) Every couple years since I'll see her again, though recently her cause has switched to Animal Rights -- she waves another gruesome poster of puppies being tortured and gathering signatures for the eternally unfinsihed pa-tish-un. One day in stroller-infested upper Manhattan, she bellowed in frustration: "STOP BREEDING, PEOPLE!"

m coleman (lovebug starski), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:18 (nineteen years ago) link

haha - man, those late 70s/early 80s Hustler covers are AMAZING.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

(and by "amazing" I mean in the same way Chuck Eddy calls Montgomery Gentry videos "amazing" - ie, still offensive and frightening but strangely unique and compelling nonetheless)

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:24 (nineteen years ago) link

and i dont know, i would like to trust dwarkin on the evil of heterosexual men and their engorged penises, her biography is close enough to mine for affection

but i realize i cant be seduced.

anthony, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Women have all the control. Go out to a club and just see who has to approach whom. Do women come to men? No. Because the hot ones know that by blinking their eyes and swinging their butt they will have men at their feet.

Dworkin just never got any. That was her problem - who would go down on THAT?

NamC, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:25 (nineteen years ago) link

namc this is the kind of offenisve phallocentric, hatred of women dworkin spent her life fighting...and people found her fuckable, people thot she had sexual power--reducing all of womens sexual power to nubile morons

anthony, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:29 (nineteen years ago) link

surely someone has already made a "calum = c. paglia" joke these long years past...

g e o f f (gcannon), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link

i think (sex) victim ideologies in feminism were some of it's most problematic features. it was perhaps started to give a voice to women who went through physical or sexual abuse and raise awareness of their situations, which was definitely needed. but instead of bringing hope and healing to people who were hurt, it sometimes just ended up assimilating a victim's bitterness, anger, and paranoia to the larger (perhaps otherwise healthier) group.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:32 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd rather read Dworkin than Paglia any day of the week.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Paglia at least makes funny, pithy insults. Calum's never said anything funny as far as I can tell.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

namc this is the kind of offenisve phallocentric, hatred of women dworkin spent her life fighting...and people found her fuckable, people thot she had sexual power--reducing all of womens sexual power to nubile morons
-- anthony (anthony.easto...), April 11th, 2005.

Blah blah blah 'hatred of women' blah blah blah. Never met a woman who hated me as a person funnily enough and have plenty of them as friends and, shockingly, was brought up by them too. Blah blah blah - this is nonsense. Dworkin was a pig ugly obese nutcase and if someone only laid her back and gave her some fine oral she'd probably have revised her views a long time ago. As it is she was no worse than a KKK member telling us all blacks are the spawn of satan - only her enemy had a penis.

NamC, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:35 (nineteen years ago) link

What a subtle and intriguing retort.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Calum, you have no clue what you are talking about (it's obvious you've never read a sentence of Dworkin.) Stick to horror flicks.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link

gaze not into the abyss here, people...

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

But Alex you're wrong. I have read Dworkin. And coming from SF where my SF buds are fellow lovers of T and A and splatter cinema and all things that make life worth living I am shocked and horrified that you'd defend this woman.

What makes SF great is just how sexually liberated it is. The Castro district is - like - now one of my fave places ever.

NamC, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd be rather surprised if she didn't get a fair amount of tongue, though I doubt it was from men.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Calum I'm from SF too ya schmuck. AND I like T&A AND I like splatter films.

oddly, I still find yr sub-literate masturbatory fantasies really really REALLY boring.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

(and by sub-literate masturbatory fantasies, I mean every ILX thread you've ever started EVER)

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

While I certainly don't agree with everything that Dworkin wrote (which even if you have read, Calum, you are clearly showing you were/are incapable of grasping) I would defend anyone from your infantile character assassination and insults.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 11 April 2005 22:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Well then that is up to you - you can find them boring if you want. But at least I'm memorable. I can't say I've ever:

A) Noticed you on this board the whole time I've been here

And/ Or

B) Could tell you one post you've made.

So you're clearly a very memorable guy.

NamC, Monday, 11 April 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.