Art through adversity

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4 of them)

Thanks for asking this interesting question.
The answer is yes, but maybe not in the way you might expect. I'd worked in TV animation long enough to know the kinds of compromises I'd have to make in the quality of animation I could achieve. I pre-emptively lowered the importance of the episodes' technical polish and decided to focus on the intricacy and ambition of the writing. In my mind, if the scripts were engaging on the basis of their structure and psychological subtext, they could withstand any shortcomings of execution. That turned out to be mostly the right choice, but not always.

Peter Chung, Saturday, 5 February 2022 13:15 (eleven months ago) link

https://www.patreon.com/posts/60702270

Here is an example I posted recently which you can view without joining.
Eric Singer, who wrote the scene, is a live action screenwriter. In live action, the scene could be engaging on the basis of nuanced performances by charismatic actors.
I could not count on the viewer's attention being held by static shots of two animated characters talking while lying on cushions. (Read the script pages)
The scene ends up being far more distinct and memorable than what was written as a result of having to compensate.

Peter Chung, Saturday, 5 February 2022 13:27 (eleven months ago) link

Thanks, that was very interesting (and of course I'm on your Patreon! What do you take me for?)

re: Eric, would you have written the scene a different way?

Modern animation is full of shot/reverse shot. It's boring, and a waste of the medium's potential. You can draw almost anything - why make the scene look like a cheap soap opera that has one set and two cameras?

Coagulopath, Thursday, 10 February 2022 02:04 (eleven months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.