it sounds like you're plugging a mono 1/8" into that jack, not a stereo one - there are both versions
― bad milk blood robot (sleeve), Friday, 14 January 2022 21:09 (two years ago) link
make sure the plug of the wire you're using has a stereo tip:
https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-6stteikkyf/product_images/uploaded_images/stereo-vs-mono-plugs.jpg?t=1602102561&_ga=2.189390443.157792817.1601837151-826071131.1599170371
― 龜, Friday, 14 January 2022 21:10 (two years ago) link
^^^
― bad milk blood robot (sleeve), Friday, 14 January 2022 21:10 (two years ago) link
Ah OK, that could be all it is, thanks
― Josefa, Friday, 14 January 2022 21:12 (two years ago) link
And at the other end you need to send one channel to one speaker and the other to the other speaker.
― nickn, Friday, 14 January 2022 21:13 (two years ago) link
Right, but the speaker I’ve been using is just a single speaker (designed for iPods actually)
― Josefa, Friday, 14 January 2022 21:18 (two years ago) link
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ab2c68a32f2e5ece753428fc7b400b00-c
you can get converters for mono sources to stereo earphones, just feeds the same signal to both poles. i guess something else is available for the opposite. although i'm kinda surprised that it isn't designed to take stereo and just deal with it (effectively mixing it down to mono).
fopp famously has no online shop - it only has a few stores as it is.
hmv.com is ok, but there's one local to me so i can just pop in (plus i have vouchers and they don't take them online)
― koogs, Friday, 14 January 2022 22:07 (two years ago) link
Yeah, I just found that I do have a stereo plug in the house… which splits into two plugs at the other end… but then I also have an adapter thingy that takes the two plugs and channels them back into one plug so I can input that into my speaker. And it works! Now I can listen to “Purple Haze” and finally hear a vocal along with the instrumental part.
― Josefa, Friday, 14 January 2022 22:46 (two years ago) link
sounds like it probably splits into rca plugs (i.e. red/white plugs)? if it works, it works! but you could always get a 3/8 to 3/8 stereo aux cord, they're quite cheap and available pretty much everywhere. https://www.radioshack.com/products/3-ft-1-8-stereo-plug-cable
― 龜, Friday, 14 January 2022 22:50 (two years ago) link
Yep that’s what it is, and yeah I figured there must be a single cord to use instead of going thru the adapter. Thanks!
― Josefa, Friday, 14 January 2022 23:03 (two years ago) link
*you mean 1/8” cord tho I assume
― Josefa, Friday, 14 January 2022 23:08 (two years ago) link
ah yes 1/8"
― 龜, Saturday, 15 January 2022 00:33 (two years ago) link
spent the past three months collecting & finally got a hi-fi sorted this week. thrifted for £100. i need a shelf!
https://i.imgur.com/uXv9yG0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gezkpoa.jpg
― maelin, Saturday, 15 January 2022 16:07 (two years ago) link
slick!
― maf you one two (maffew12), Saturday, 15 January 2022 16:14 (two years ago) link
Still buying CDs. Just ordered some late '60s/early '70s out-jazz titles in fancy mini-LP sleeves from Japan:
Stanley Cowell, Brilliant CirclesAndrew Hill, SpiralOliver Lake, NTU: The Point From Which Creation BeginsCharles Tolliver, The Ringer
And ordered the new Iannis Xenakis 5CD box Electroacoustic Works straight from the label in Germany.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Saturday, 15 January 2022 16:30 (two years ago) link
nice maelinalways cool to see Teac
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 15 January 2022 16:34 (two years ago) link
I recently picked up a cd of Joe Chambers excellent 1974 album The Almoravid, reissued on Joel Dorn's 32 Jazz label which uses the fairly rarely seen Q Pack, instead of a jewel case or digipack https://img.discogs.com/7rcu0J-p9Lh92itKXwmJPe4XZzE=/fit-in/600x539/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-3362060-1553861765-3956.jpeg.jpg
I remember these being used by Bar/None records for a while. It's very sturdy feeling.
― mizzell, Saturday, 15 January 2022 16:37 (two years ago) link
32 Jazz was somewhat legendary in jazz circles for slapping the most hideously 1990s cover art imaginable on everything they reissued. That one is a perfect example. I mean, here's the original cover:
https://img.discogs.com/8jj64rEsHb2CGncrJ6-FhYdnxW8=/fit-in/600x600/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-1202485-1200414367.jpeg.jpg
― but also fuck you (unperson), Saturday, 15 January 2022 17:01 (two years ago) link
Now That's What I Call Spiritual Jazz! Vol. 1
― Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 15 January 2022 17:09 (two years ago) link
graphic design was their passion
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 15 January 2022 17:10 (two years ago) link
f^ck.now the "revival" has gone mainstream.
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/cd-revival-compact-discs-rob-sheffield-1284487/
― mark e, Wednesday, 19 January 2022 18:02 (two years ago) link
i must have ~150 discs already, after three months. scored so many pop & indie gems from charity shops for peanuts. i could have never afforded that many records in the same amount of time. it's been such a pleasure to just sit and play them through, not be tethered by my laptop or phone, not skip tracks, know that it is full fidelity. excited to actually be able to afford to press my own music on disc soon, too. there is nothing to lose here.
― maelin, Wednesday, 19 January 2022 21:12 (two years ago) link
after three months. scored so many pop & indie gems from charity shops for peanuts. i could have never afforded that many records in the same amount of time. it's been such a pleasure to just sit and play them through, not be tethered by my laptop or phone, not skip tracks, know that it is full fidelity. excited to actually be able to afford to press my own music on disc soon, too. there is nothing to lose here.
so long as this is not a p£ss taking post then welcome to the nu-old world order.
― mark e, Wednesday, 19 January 2022 21:32 (two years ago) link
We've repressed exactly one CD title in the last half decade, and that's for a band with over 1M monthly listeners. Most of our new CDs struggle to sell out of their meager initial pressing, which is why we've more or less abandoned the format. The CD revival is a myth.— numerogroup (@numerogroup) January 19, 2022
― jpg trouble in wallo gina (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:01 (two years ago) link
if it's a myth why has every music outlet published nearly identical articles about it over the past 3 months
― Paul Ponzi, Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:07 (two years ago) link
Numero pvmic
― Precious, Grace, Hill & Beard LTD. (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:08 (two years ago) link
CDs full of old 45s nobody wanted to begin with ;-)
― feed me with your clicks (Noel Emits), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:10 (two years ago) link
I don't really want to un-debunk the notion that the CD revivial is a myth but the vinyl revival of course started with old stuff long before it was about actually pressing stuff up again.
― feed me with your clicks (Noel Emits), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:14 (two years ago) link
Or un-debunk the notion of the CD revival, rather.
― feed me with your clicks (Noel Emits), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:16 (two years ago) link
I've got a lot of love for Numero Group and I'm not doubting their experiences but, at the same time, I'm not going to look to a label that stopped selling CDs half a decade ago to have their finger on the pulse of what is selling in 2021-22.
I think it depends on genre or label, seems like a lot of metal or stoner leaning labels still do decent CD numbers.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:19 (two years ago) link
i think it's kind of a shame — I'd hold up Numero as a label that actually shows how appealing CDs can be.
― tylerw, Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:28 (two years ago) link
personally i have been having a great time scooping up numero releases during their periodic CD sales as they clean out their stock.
idk at some point it comes down to your definition of "revival" but imo while its a great time to be building/maintaining a CD collection it doesnt seem like a lot of people are exactly rushing to pay retail for new discs (even if that "full-price" is only $10.) while there are certain niches and scenes that obv move more new CDs than others, to me that doesnt spell "revival" so much as, well, "niche format".
― nobody like my rap (One Eye Open), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:29 (two years ago) link
It was a shame, to be sure. Numero had some great CD packages and I was really bummed when they gave up on them.
― a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 22:31 (two years ago) link
serious "sour grapes" vibes from that Numero post
sorry you pressed too many back in the day and took a bath on them, but maybe it's time to reconsider
― bad milk blood robot (sleeve), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 23:51 (two years ago) link
like, if they repressed that fucking Unwound box on CD I would buy it in a second, and (almost) forgive them for the absolutely garbage job they did on the vinyl versions
― bad milk blood robot (sleeve), Wednesday, 19 January 2022 23:52 (two years ago) link
― tylerw, Wednesday, January 19, 2022 5:28 PM (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
this is absolutely right. all their old soul label comps were great CDs--a little disc with 20 or so fun obscure songs that fit on a shelf. i don't really need a 3xLP box and full size book of pictures for that but i guess enough people do.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 20 January 2022 00:49 (two years ago) link
i bought more CDs last year than i did the last decade combined. looking for used CDs can be more fun/fruitful than looking for used records these days... i went into amoeba and searching for vinyl there is completely useless at best and actively aggravating at worst. but i bought CDs of janet jackson's entire discography for like $18 total. they were basically begging me to walk out of there with them. now all i need is a way to play them, lol. but it's worth it for getting the booklets alone... esp CDs from the CD era, there's so much info and personality in the booklets that you can't find online. some of them basically qualify as historical literature at this point imo, should be in the library of congress
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 20 January 2022 01:06 (two years ago) link
can you address my studenst
― So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 20 January 2022 01:07 (two years ago) link
certain kinds of small bookstores and second hand stores are teeming w/ good used CDs these days. i got a pristine copy of 'rhythm of the saints' for a few bucks at a tiny bookstore in santa fe recently and i could've floated all the way back home i was so happy
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 20 January 2022 01:10 (two years ago) link
i've bought > 100 CDs in the past year at thrift stores - most for $1-2 each
most of it's shit but a few gems
― 龜, Thursday, 20 January 2022 01:16 (two years ago) link
i'm not sure i would buy a new CD tho unless i knew for a fact that a lot of effort had been put into the packaging, booklet etc. i'm not really buying them in order to play them.
i just find CDs increasingly interesting and useful as historical artifacts. for me, the vinyl market feels so out of wack now in terms of difficulty in finding good original pressings of records for affordable prices. and then re-pressings are either lazily done just so someone can say a vinyl of album x exists or lavishly done, priced at $32, and buying them feels like you're being robbed. getting a CD that gives you the artist's original artistic vision for less than $5, that's what has a lot of appeal to me.
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 20 January 2022 01:17 (two years ago) link
I'm glad Sheffield mentioned box sets. THAT is where CD's truly shine. Four CD's and a booklet in a long and thin box set seems like the perfect balance of size and economy to me (James Brown's Star Time, Motown's Hitsville, The Patsy Cline Collection, They Call Me the Fat Man, Otis!, etc.) Hefty yet light and portable, the same 300 minutes converted to vinyl would be pretty damn cumbersome.
― birdistheword, Thursday, 20 January 2022 03:14 (two years ago) link
That’s a good point. CDs are a perfect format for comps
― Rockin’, and rollin’, and whatnot (morrisp), Thursday, 20 January 2022 03:18 (two years ago) link
And bands like The Necks, whose 60 minute reveries would be buzzkilled by vinyl.
― henry s, Thursday, 20 January 2022 03:44 (two years ago) link
i just find CDs increasingly interesting and useful as historical artifacts.
I remember talking with Simon Price a couple of years back during a UK visit about how I specifically had been getting them because a good CD booklet with liner notes is kinda invaluable. Obv. you can get that with vinyl too but combine the convenience with the size and there you go. The vast majority of my music buying remains Bandcamp digital but I've picked up a LOT of Ace and Cherry Red sets in recent years, not least because due to licensing and all they're not on and likely never will be on Bandcamp.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 January 2022 04:21 (two years ago) link
The record store in my hometown has a well-stocked Various Artists section, and when I pop in it tends to be my first (and sometimes last) stop. I'll generally snap up whatever Bob Stanley comps have been released in the interim, as well as whatever other Ace/Cherry Red things look good. (They all do.) And it really is all about the liner notes. I can't just listen, I need the context.
― henry s, Thursday, 20 January 2022 13:18 (two years ago) link
cheery red is a good answer to my earlier question, lots of useful looking cd box sets available direct from them
― koogs, Thursday, 20 January 2022 13:48 (two years ago) link
Have you all bought the C86, C87, C88, C89 3CD compilations?
I like them. Haven't gone on to C90 as it was basically moving into Madchester territory.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 20 January 2022 14:03 (two years ago) link
The Rob Sheffield Rolling Stone CD Revival article is bad. Badly written, badly structured. And like so much discourse in this area, it strains to make a very subjective feeling into a convincing argument. Even the claim that 'Sure, you were never sentimental about your CDs' is false. I'm just as sentimental about many of my CDs as about much of my vinyl.
Yet it does contain one compelling argument, about the transience of non-physical music - ie: 'you had an mp3 collection that you can't play anymore', etc. I think there's a lot in that, as also in the points that people on this thread have agreed upon re: the unreliability of streaming due to a) unreliable internet, b) unreliable corporate decisions / copyright.
― the pinefox, Thursday, 20 January 2022 14:12 (two years ago) link
i *lived* the c86 c87 c88 cds 8)
lots of things on those i already have, to the point of making them bad value, whereas...
actually looking at the various 3cd psych compilations which contain about 70 things each that i know very little about. like this https://www.cherryred.co.uk/product/lets-go-down-blow-our-minds-the-british-psychedelic-sounds-of-1967/
― koogs, Thursday, 20 January 2022 14:23 (two years ago) link