Do you think he has an inner life or is he just an automaton
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Saturday, 26 June 2021 00:11 (two years ago) link
Anyone defending this fucker past this point is extremely suspect imo
― underminer of twenty years of excellent contribution to this borad (dan m), Saturday, 26 June 2021 02:02 (two years ago) link
brooks to yglesias is approximately the rate of change pic.twitter.com/ZXZTg49X26— Whet Moser (@whet) July 3, 2021
― jaymc, Saturday, 3 July 2021 00:42 (two years ago) link
tf
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 3 July 2021 07:40 (two years ago) link
lol at "twitter is real life" tbf
― lag∞n, Saturday, 3 July 2021 13:47 (two years ago) link
hell yeah bud they’re totally buying in on those hard hitting truth bombs you’re selling out of the back of your substack, and def not just a bunch of bloodless freaks who require their worldview reflected back to them while the ocean burns
― Washington Generals D-League affiliate (will), Saturday, 3 July 2021 15:46 (two years ago) link
i know haters itt won't cop to it but klain reading yglesias is a huge improvement over obama reading david brooks. just on monetary/fiscal policy (probably the most important thing the white house has leverage on rn) matt is way more dovish than the median wonk
― flopson, Saturday, 3 July 2021 17:06 (two years ago) link
in general it's kinda wild how online the biden administration are. like economists on staff and in advisory positions are disproportionately ones who have been active on twitter within the past 3 years
― flopson, Saturday, 3 July 2021 17:10 (two years ago) link
Yglesias may be relatively dovish but the Biden team still seems to be fixated on triangulating with increasingly extreme (R) positions which I guess is how we end up at privatizing the TVA. That, or they’re just using all this posturing to cover for the fact that the core platform of the Democratic Party is still rapacious neoliberalism.
― recovering internet addict/shitposter (viborg), Sunday, 4 July 2021 01:08 (two years ago) link
Failing ever upward...
🚨NEW: D.C. journalists @lkmcgann and Mark Bauman are launching a new, DC-based media company with $10 million+ Series A funding— @mattyglesias will be editor at large — Have already hired 20+ people, aiming to have ~60 by end of year— Launching Septhttps://t.co/syKJXKefrd— Sara Fischer (@sarafischer) July 10, 2021
― but also fuck you (unperson), Saturday, 10 July 2021 16:34 (two years ago) link
Guess we'll never get to witness the pure race science era of Matty's substack career.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Saturday, 10 July 2021 16:55 (two years ago) link
(Until whatever billionaires are funding this pull the rug out when Biden's not in the White House anymore.)
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Saturday, 10 July 2021 16:56 (two years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/XDownVq.png
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 20 July 2021 22:12 (two years ago) link
Not politicians comfortable calling people faggots, politicians who *only just recently* became uncomfortable and thus make people with retrograde cultural views feel comfortable with him. https://t.co/C1dnv4wEaq— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) August 2, 2021
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 2 August 2021 03:36 (two years ago) link
I think Yglesias's main things right now are "kill single family zoning" and "the DOJ should be prosecuting crimes committed by Trump administration officials instead of gaily letting bygones be bygones"
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 2 August 2021 03:54 (two years ago) link
I'm in favor of killing single family zoning, Matty is good again
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Monday, 2 August 2021 17:58 (two years ago) link
Matty is good again
he'll move on to worse crap soon enough
― it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Monday, 2 August 2021 18:10 (two years ago) link
I don’t think people were upset that you engaged in something contentious— I think they were upset that you dropped the F bomb as a straight person. pic.twitter.com/zNcLPbaYcc— Michael Havlin (@HavlinMichael) August 2, 2021
I honestly hadn't realized that a straight person typing out 'the f-slur' was considered beyond the pale in a context like this (responding to a direct question about the word, obviously not 'using' the slur etc), but lots of people responding to Yglesias here seem think so. I knew that this was conventual wisdom with the n-word but thought that was essentially a unique thing? Is this a recent development, or is are people just mad in this case because it's Yglesias and he's an annoying guy who likes to passive-aggressively troll people on twitter?
― soref, Monday, 2 August 2021 18:39 (two years ago) link
I think people got pissed at him because he was the one who broached the subject, and it seemed like he did so specifically because it would allow him the opportunity to use the word (in a "just askin' questions here, guy" way, of course of course of course). It was a typical asshole move.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Monday, 2 August 2021 18:55 (two years ago) link
that's his own affair
― Muswell Hillbilly Elegy (President Keyes), Monday, 2 August 2021 19:11 (two years ago) link
Matty deleted all his tweets - not just the ones related to this latest kerfuffle.
― o. nate, Monday, 2 August 2021 19:11 (two years ago) link
It’s like the Library of Alexandria has burned all over again.
(Also this shit was stupid even without the slur, cultural conservatives aren’t going to see Matt Damon as anything but another Hollywood liberal pedophile no matter how many slurs he uses.)
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Monday, 2 August 2021 20:22 (two years ago) link
To answer soref's question, I certainly wouldn't use the f slur even in a context like that. It's just not necessary, everyone knows what's being talked about, imo.
― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 3 August 2021 09:55 (two years ago) link
does anyone even remember what the joke was and if it's anything other than making fun of fearful teen masculine absurdity by having conjoined twins call each other gay as a put-down
― bobo honkin' slobo babe (sic), Tuesday, 3 August 2021 14:44 (two years ago) link
Yglesias wrote something smart. I guess the key is to just not follow/read him on Twitter.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Friday, 6 August 2021 23:06 (two years ago) link
honestly him trolling the Orbanites on twitter all week is his redeeming quality
― symsymsym, Saturday, 7 August 2021 01:27 (two years ago) link
xp. In my opinion, not much good comes out of twitter to begin with.
― Van Horn Street, Saturday, 7 August 2021 01:33 (two years ago) link
― o. nate, Monday, August 2, 2021 3:11 PM (five days ago) bookmarkflaglink
hes had his tweets auto deleting for a while
― lag∞n, Saturday, 7 August 2021 14:02 (two years ago) link
I think Yglesias is trying to bait the Orban-simps into pointing out that he's Jewish and he may well succeed
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 7 August 2021 15:25 (two years ago) link
Well whaddaya know, the rare Jew named “churches”
― Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Saturday, 7 August 2021 17:13 (two years ago) link
When I'm right I'm right
They’re onto me pic.twitter.com/FWVzrPEwn2— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) August 10, 2021
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 10 August 2021 13:36 (two years ago) link
read mattys hungarian nationalism piece, shockingly lazy writing even for him, good work if you can get it i guess
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 11 August 2021 15:50 (two years ago) link
I think there's a genuine conflict in life between good politics, which necessarily emphasizes structural factors and the importance of social change, and good advice (or good teaching or good therapy etc.) which emphasizes internal locus of control and making the best of things. https://t.co/IynWIGd6dN— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) August 13, 2021
I think there was an ilx thread specifically about this tension Yglesias observes here, but I can't find it, does anyone remember?
like the bit in the Black Stuff where Bernard Hill tells Michael Angelis that he hates him because he's "too nice" - that being content with your lot is more likely to make you happy, even a better person, but Yosser is still right to be furious and bitter even though it doesn't do him or anyone else any good
― soref, Friday, 13 August 2021 18:20 (two years ago) link
i vaguely remember a thread/discussion but i'm not sure what it was or if it's the same one you're thinking. unhelpful, i know. this quote from the fake therapist is such a strawman though.
― criminally negligible (harbl), Friday, 13 August 2021 18:37 (two years ago) link
also shocked to see a bad faith essay from Sally Satel is a psychiatrist who works at a methadone clinic in Washington, D.C., a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a visiting professor at Columbia University’s Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, who is bothered by some therapists having politics she doesn't like instead of her politics, which are normal and neutral and in no way make it into her practice. like i would be bothered to hear a therapist say some of the things she's talking about, but i also would not visit one who works at AEI, because her philosophy is likely way incompatible with mine. so what? a couple times i have googled people saying racist or otherwise bad things on nextdoor and found that they were psychiatrists or therapists. why would one want to see them?
― criminally negligible (harbl), Friday, 13 August 2021 18:40 (two years ago) link
i think it was maybe the elitism thread
― criminally negligible (harbl), Friday, 13 August 2021 18:50 (two years ago) link
have to say big media matt's been on a righteous (and basically correct) anti-blob twitter-tear abt afghanistan for the last couple of days
"fool me once" i guess -- he was bad on iraq at the very very start (when he was still baacially a student) but also good on why and how he'd been so wrong
(this is not an endorsement of the many many things he's annoying and wrong about)
― mark s, Monday, 16 August 2021 15:50 (two years ago) link
I've never heard that expression "the blob" before used in the way Matty is using it. Is it basically a new term for "military-industrial complex"?
― o. nate, Monday, 16 August 2021 19:54 (two years ago) link
Sort of, I think of it more as the think tank/natsec bureaucracy complex.
this is the first time I remember it being used, coming from an Obama guy so grains of salt, etc.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/magazine/the-aspiring-novelist-who-became-obamas-foreign-policy-guru.html
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Monday, 16 August 2021 20:00 (two years ago) link
not that new: as milo says obama aide ben rhodes famously used it in 2016 -- more of the foreign policy establishment than the MIC -- but it's been a more general term of dismissive impatience for self-interested bureaucracies since the 80s
(in the uk michael gove used it of the educational establishment in the early teens)
― mark s, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:02 (two years ago) link
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/05/07/blob-abides
This weekend will be the four-year anniversary of “the Blob” entering public discourse with respect to America’s foreign policy community. The term emerged from a New York Times Magazine profile of Ben Rhodes, Barack Obama’s foreign policy amanuensis. According to Rhodes’s account in the story, “the Blob includes Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates and other Iraq-war promoters from both parties who now whine incessantly about the collapse of the American security order in Europe and the Middle East.”The term soon became omnipresent in foreign policy discussions as its definition expanded in scope. It came to mean the foreign policy “establishment” that included those working in government, think tanks, and academia. Four years later, the term, like “globalization” or “neoliberalism” or “populist” or “elite,” tends to obscure as much as it reveals.
The term soon became omnipresent in foreign policy discussions as its definition expanded in scope. It came to mean the foreign policy “establishment” that included those working in government, think tanks, and academia. Four years later, the term, like “globalization” or “neoliberalism” or “populist” or “elite,” tends to obscure as much as it reveals.
― jaymc, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:04 (two years ago) link
OK, so I guess it seems to be more along the lines of "hawks", ie those who believe the US needs to project dominance for its own sake internationally.
― o. nate, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:07 (two years ago) link
I guess typical of Matty that he's doubling down on his take that Biden basically made the right call despite everything that's happened.
― o. nate, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:15 (two years ago) link
^ a member of Team Stay Forever
― it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Monday, 16 August 2021 20:19 (two years ago) link
Nothing lasts forever.
― o. nate, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:21 (two years ago) link
I don’t think making it a synonym of hawks or neolibs is accurate, really - the blob is imperialism by bureaucratic inertia and tradition rather than clearly defined goals.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Monday, 16 August 2021 20:23 (two years ago) link
well of course MY always doubles down, right or wrong, but the argument that it had to be done this way (fast and chaotic) and not e.g. well organised and drawn out with ordered contingencies in place -- bcz the slow and steady way wd certainly have been stalled and derailed by the blob -- is his argument, yes; less defend biden at all costs than identify the forces arrayed against withdrawal and identify what needed to be done to defeat them
josh marshall more or less agrees: another surprising lib centrist in the "fool me once" space
― mark s, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:25 (two years ago) link
Hindsight is 20/20, but I don't buy that this was the only other option besides a generations-long, semi-permanent deployment of US troops in Afghanistan. A few weeks ago I wonder what odds Biden would've given that this would be how it would play out. If he thought there was even a 5% chance it would happen this way, I think he was irresponsible to proceed as he did. If he thought it was less than that, then I guess it was a failure of intelligence.
― o. nate, Monday, 16 August 2021 20:28 (two years ago) link
i think they call it "the blob" because it represents a neoliberal sort of pro-interventionist "conventional wisdom" that transcends party and ideology. the traditional divisions (gop vs. dem, etc.) don't apply.
― bezos did the dub (voodoo chili), Monday, 16 August 2021 20:38 (two years ago) link
The time for a long orderly withdrawal and acceptance of defeat was 2010 at the latest.
― Joe Bombin (milo z), Monday, 16 August 2021 20:46 (two years ago) link