Yes and 'How Do You Listen To Prog?'

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (165 of them)
strangely enough i just got my copy of yessongs signed by roger dean a couple of weeks ago. i haven't listened to it for 27 years.

gaz (gaz), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:34 (twenty years ago) link

I have the alternate Gates Of Delirium - I'm not sure I really needed to hear a version with Jon Anderson working out the words... some of those studio run-through things added to the reissues as bonus tracks really show up the flaws in his singing. The alternate version of And You And I isn't too bad though, granted.

Damian (Damian), Monday, 13 October 2003 06:58 (twenty years ago) link

I think the knock on Going for the One is that it represents the first time Yes were hedging their bets on record; hence Moraz out, and Wakeman in as hired gun. However, most of the music comes out OK, especially given that Jon Anderson had basically left our world entirely by then. I have always had a nagging thing for the cyclical chords in "Awaken", but could never bring myself to love the song entirely. I think that song is one of the few moments where Yes actually approaches the mystical ambience they (or at least Anderson) got so much flack/acclaim for.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 13 October 2003 10:19 (twenty years ago) link

I feel that Tales... approaches that mystical ambience for the reason that it's so crammed with detail - it's just a byproduct of all the ideas thrown into the record, so it's not as if Jon Anderson just read the footnote on that page of that book, it's more like he read runes and wanted the band to recreate them in music. This is really just the impression I get from compulsively listening to the album and trying to implant every little riff or melody on my brain.

Damian (Damian), Monday, 13 October 2003 10:44 (twenty years ago) link

Yay lakeside joe is back!!

I actually really like "tales from topographic oceans", even though it's really kind of indefensible in a lot of ways - it's overlong and unfocussed in many places, the playing lacks the crispy dynamic feel of their earlier albums, the whole "concept" is a bit flakey, and so on. I don't think the record's actually great in itself, but there are so many great bits on it, that I really enjoy listening to it.

"Going for the One" is pretty cheesy in a lot of places, I think, but the two tracks where they used the swiss cathedral organ ("parallels" and "awaken") I really like. I wish they'd used it a bit more. "Awaken" I love, I think it's the last really great track they did - "Owner of a Lonely Heart" and all that stuff I like just fine, but you don't, like, inhabit the musical landscape like you do w/say "close to the edge". In "Awaken", it's the whole section where the song breaks down to just the harp and pipe organ, then it builds and builds from there that gets me. Put it up on some decent speakers, nice & loud, and it's just fukcing great.

The new yes remasters are really good, I must say. They seem to have proper dynamics, not maximised like the omd and simple minds re's i got recently, the sound is nice & crisp, the bonus cuts aren't great for the most part, but they are generally interesting at least, and the packaging is nice. They made me happy!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 13 October 2003 10:58 (twenty years ago) link

All Krautrock is prog, isn't it? So why are Yes viifies and...Neu aren't?

No it isn't. Let's see - Neu: songs all on one chord (E usually); all in 4/4 time (no variation allowed); solos (none to speak of); virtuosity and technique (irrelevant). Not really much like Yes then.

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 13 October 2003 11:03 (twenty years ago) link

but the two tracks where they used the swiss cathedral organ

I have to admit, I really love the sound of the full-fledged pipe organ when it's placed outside of the usual, expected context (church music, etc.). One of my favorite tracks by the Incredible String Band is "Antoine," which is just church organ, violin, and vocals...excellent arrangement.

Joe (Joe), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

There's one Keith Jarrett album (Spheres) which consists entirely of improvisations on pipe organ, and some of it is surprisingly good.

Damian (Damian), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:12 (twenty years ago) link

I love that Jarrett album. The original 2 LP set was called Hymns / Spheres and gets into some very dissonant, demonic territory. Also the microtonal effects he gets with the partial stops is bizarre, something I haven't heard anywhere else.

On CD it's just called Spheres and only four relatively mellow cuts have been retained.

Prog?

(Jon L), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:22 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't think what was on the CD was all that mellow myself... it got really freaky towards the end. :)

As for prog, what's Over by Peter Hammill like? Of all the stuff he's done, this is what I'm most curious about.

Damian (Damian), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:44 (twenty years ago) link

Influence from Mozart is OK, but influence from Bartõk or Ginasteria the world can be without.

That's "Ginasteria," coming soon to a store near you! Be on the lookout for the first single: "Pour Some Melody on Me"!

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:03 (twenty years ago) link

p.s. Geir, does Bartok really have a squiggly thing over his "o", or are you being unnecessarily Spinal Tap-ish? :)

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:04 (twenty years ago) link

I thought it was Bartók as opposed to Bartök. Hungarian has a lot of these accents.

Damian (Damian), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:08 (twenty years ago) link

I actually don't care for the pipe organ on the GFTO tracks that much. Especially on Awaken the band reaches an intensity that I actually find a little scary. What are those words about? Awaken Gentle Mass Touching!!

Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:11 (twenty years ago) link

Is anyone going to defend Olias of Sunhillow?

nickn (nickn), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 01:14 (twenty years ago) link

As for prog, what's Over by Peter Hammill like?

It's pretty good but more of a "song" album than a "prog" album - it's also one of the most miserable, self-obsessed, self-absorbed albums I've ever heard, all about his marriage breaking up

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:01 (twenty years ago) link

The fact that it's a break-up album is part of what makes me want to hear it.

Damian (Damian), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:09 (twenty years ago) link

I saw a woman in the bank with a 'Yes' t-shirt on today, most freaked me out. She had on slingback shoes too. And bad jeans.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:12 (twenty years ago) link

There's a bit on Frederick Thordendal's Special Defects with a real pipe organ playing atonal metal stuff. I think it might have been taken out of the reissue though (the one with actual track indexes).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:51 (twenty years ago) link

sex and the city influence, nick; sarah jessica parker was wearing one a few episodes back.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 20:52 (twenty years ago) link

And then there's this (ha ha):

http://www.pepsi.com/music/shakira/wallpapers/wallpapers.php?wp=white_hot_800

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 22:44 (twenty years ago) link

Is anyone going to defend Olias of Sunhillow?

I love Olias of Sunhillow, and wanna see Jessica Simpson wearin' that puppy!!

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 22:46 (twenty years ago) link

Wow, that Shakira singlet thing is awesome! I want one!

Damian (Damian), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 00:37 (twenty years ago) link

btw, thank you Joe for writing about Sonic Seasonings. I got it last night, and was soon zipped away into never-never land.

dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 17:30 (twenty years ago) link

About Olias of Sunhillow: doesn't it just suck that the booklet on the regular cd version of Olias doesn't picture the whole original design? Is there any edition that replicates the original package?

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 20:12 (twenty years ago) link

The Japanese import replicates the original design in its entirety (bring your magnifying glass, though). The German import does not.

Joe (Joe), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 22:57 (twenty years ago) link

I'm intrigued to know whether Dr. C has explored any further in the last couple of weeks - and if he has what he's tried and what he's thought of it.... Doc?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 16 October 2003 07:38 (twenty years ago) link

What's frightened me is that before I first stumbled across this thread (2 weeks ago) I didn't own one Yes cd and now I have 14 of the buggers! Always liked me Genesis y'see but hadn't really dipped my toe into any other pool of prog, so this thread convinced me to dive into the deep end of Yes. My, the waters lovely in here, come join ...

Guy Flower, Thursday, 16 October 2003 08:01 (twenty years ago) link

GUY FLOWER!! This is ILM circa 2001!

Stewart - nothing yet. I've been sidetracked by one of those intensive Bowie binges that happens once every couple of years. I will prob get 'The Yes album' and 'Yes' at the weekend. Maybe a King Crimson or a Caravan or something if I can get them cheaply.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 16 October 2003 08:10 (twenty years ago) link

Yes Dr C, but I'm happy here in 2001! It's all or nothing - I just can't move on ...

Guy Flower, Thursday, 16 October 2003 09:01 (twenty years ago) link

What Genesis is good, Guy?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 16 October 2003 09:36 (twenty years ago) link

I must say, Dr C, I'm very partial to Gabriel-era Genesis, particularly 'Nursery Cryme' and 'Foxtrot'. 'Selling England By The Pound' is probably the most accessible point of entry though. Even Collins-era Genesis has plenty going for it, particularly (IMHO)'Wind and Wuthering' and 'Duke'. 'A Trick Of The Tail' is generally hailed as the best from this period.
My what a world awaits - I'm surprised it's taken me this long to get into Yes. But, as you mentioned earlier, there's always other cds to discover beforehand ...

Guy Flower, Thursday, 16 October 2003 10:21 (twenty years ago) link

Oh BTW Geir when I said CTTE sounds "dated" I didn't mean that 20-minute compositions are inherently dated. I'd be the last person to have a problem with 20-minute compositions (especially if they're by geniuses like Ginastera or Bartok). I meant it's dated as in Rick Wakeman sounds like he's trying to advertise all the preset features on what sounds today like a thrift-store keyboard. Although I was listening to Fragile some days ago and it sort of suffers from this too. I think one reason I much prefer The Yes Album is that Tony Kaye was so much more tasteful.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 17 October 2003 18:06 (twenty years ago) link

Gentle Giant s/t
(a Tony Visconti production)

Russ, Friday, 17 October 2003 19:56 (twenty years ago) link

There's an interesting piece on Simon Reynold's blog about prog in all of its multifarious manifestations:

PROGMETHEUS UNBOUND
a provisional cartography of progward tendencies through the last 40 years of music; a prototype taxonomy of prog substyles, prog-adjacent musics, and post-1976 prog sprog genres.

Some may quibble with some of his classifications, but I thought his conclusions were eminently reasonable and level-headed.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 23:00 (twenty years ago) link

Wot no Krautrock? oh I see, that's "Progressive" not "Prog". Actually I'm sort of in agreement with the little bits I could be bothered reading - can't he get someone to design his website for him?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 13:54 (twenty years ago) link

... but you can't help getting the feeling that Reynolds has looked around, seen that lots of hip people are listening to Prog and thought, "Hello, I've got a reputation to live up to here" and is frantically paddling to try and catch up with all those hipsters who are now hipper than he is - even tho it pretty obviously sticks in his gullet to admit that "Prog" is of any use to anyone whatsoever. Ah! The trials of the terminally hip!

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:03 (twenty years ago) link

Well, I haven't read his piece below the categories, but just from those I suspect he doesn't actually listen to a lot of prog. There are lots and lots of prog sub-genres, but these aren't them - and how are you going to list a top 20 prog label top 20 and not have Cuneiform, one of the most (if not *the* most) successful prog labels around today?

Haha, I notice he hasn't gotten to Henry Cow and Art Bears yet. Points for trying though! Also points for recognizing Virgin Records' importance, not just for prog necessarily, but for experimental rock in general.

dleone (dleone), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:06 (twenty years ago) link

...tonight I'm gonna rock you tonight...

dleone (dleone), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:07 (twenty years ago) link

but just from those I suspect he doesn't actually listen to a lot of prog

Actually it reads pathetically like some indie kid trying pretend he's like really really down with hip hop - or else a middle aged music journalist struggling to come to terms with the latest trends in hipster in-car entertainment

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

I think Simon will just have to admit that this particular wave has left him far behind in its wake while he banged on about ardkore ipop ouse or whatever it is he imagines the young folks to be into these days. Not only has it left him in its wake but he's only just removed his socks and began rolling up his trouser legs for a preparatory paddle - and so he falls back on that old 40-something music journo standby: the pointless list.

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:17 (twenty years ago) link

OK, now I read it, I and I guess he admits to not really being familiar with a lot of prog in there. Also, I think prog haters should take note of his final paragraph, because it makes a great point (and one I tried to do once in a Henry Cow review as well):

"The other thing is that of course an awful lot of not-at-all-awful music after punk fits some or many of those ‘progressive’ parameters. So the cartography above treats ‘prog’ as as a suffix or prefix, something that through hyphenation can come into surprising proximity with things we love. For some, maybe most still, it’s a contaminant, a worrying tendency, something to ward off with punky/indie-rock squeamishness. It’s really weird how long the reflex has persisted, with presumably less and less first-hand contact with the stuff as the years go by."

dleone (dleone), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:24 (twenty years ago) link

Bless him, he's trying really hard, ha ha

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:25 (twenty years ago) link

He's doing an interesting tightrope walk here - he resists calling stuff he actually likes (Krautrock for instance) "Prog" and calls them "Progressive" instead. Then in a sop to the current batch of proglovers, who are all younger and hipper than he is, proceeds to blur the borders between his definitions of "Prog" and "Progressive"- as if to say, "Hey kids, I'm over here, you still like me don't you? You still want to hang out with me don't you?"

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:32 (twenty years ago) link

Surely the list was a bit tongue in cheek, though? I found it quite funny anyway, as well OTM in a few places about the dispersement of 'prog aesthetics'.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:47 (twenty years ago) link

When people are nervous and unsure of themselves they make jokes - see Reynolds' list

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:48 (twenty years ago) link

red rag to a bull innit

i thought some of his list was funny, other bits provoked puzzlement/surprise/sputtering (Bill Nelson's Red Noise? wtf?)
but also a few thought-provoking bits eg FGTH's 'Liverpool' album => all that Trevor Horn & ZTT hugeness => if that album is going to be in there then Propaganda's 'A Secret Wish' seems fairly qualified too - which is not something i imagine some of ILM might feel comfy with (and Morley is then in guilt-by-association with ZTT-Prog up to his neck)

in general though it seems a bit strained - i was just waiting for a '*' reference of 'the bassist used to wear flared trousers'

i like what (little) i've read of SR over the past yr or 2 - i maybe had stopped reading music papers by the time he was a journo cos i don't remember him - and the last section is interesting....BUT:
mellotrons != 'gauche and clumsily overblown gestures in quest of sophistication and high art stature' !
mellotrons were beautifully artificial/awkward/unworldy/delicate sounding - i don't associate 'sophistication' with the kind of phrasing/articulation generally needed on an instrument with a such an unweildy response/sustain/recovery time !

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 30 October 2003 16:03 (twenty years ago) link

When people are nervous and unsure of themselves they make jokes - see Reynolds' list

Can withdraw this extraordinarily twattish remark? No? Well I tried, ha ha.

I haven't read anything by Simon Reynolds for years - his compulsion to always stay ahead of the pack got to me after a while.

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 30 October 2003 16:35 (twenty years ago) link

... but you can't help getting the feeling that Reynolds has looked around, seen that lots of hip people are listening to Prog and thought, "Hello, I've got a reputation to live up to here" and is frantically paddling to try and catch up with all those hipsters who are now hipper than he is - even tho it pretty obviously sticks in his gullet to admit that "Prog" is of any use to anyone whatsoever. Ah! The trials of the terminally hip!

Yeah, Dada is pretty OTM here. He's pretty good at making up some cute lists, but doesn't have anything interesting to say. It's like he's trying to shout, "hey I like this rock stuff too!" after years of blathering on about his precious white label garridge blah blah etc. He even claims to like the White Stripes now (after some post earlier this year where he claimed he didn't even need to listen to them. Whatever. Nobody comes to you Reynolds to learn anything about rock music anyway. It's not like he's going to write a post that parses out the differences between Hackett and Howe's guitar styles or something. He should probably go back to his beloved electronic music; as it is, he's kind of making himself look silly.

Dleone totally OTM about the omission of Cuneiform. I mean, come on.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 30 October 2003 21:06 (twenty years ago) link

That list reminded me of the Dear Catastrophe Asshat thread, but instead of the word 'asshat' you had the word 'prog' instead.

Damian (Damian), Friday, 31 October 2003 00:13 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.