The Power Of Nightmares/Adam Curtis

the personal approach in this movie is still imbued with the politics of the era and could potentially be a very crude bunch of caricatures in a bad 80's period movie, and there are lots of them. I respect Hogg's naturalistic approach. But still a movie that couldn't be more detached from the era it was made in.

I just mean that in the sense that Cutis usually seems quite rigidly obsessed with the significance of what popular culture says about the socio political milieu it was created in. I'll let him off with this one!

Surprised "I May Destroy You" isn't listed. He brought it up on his interview on the Red Scare podcast as "a series of films" that captures our age like nothing else. ilx will be pleased to hear.

Would much rather hear/read him talk about movies than history and society tho

Hard disagree. I enjoy Curtis' programmes but, as I think calzino pointed out before, he tends to be a total dolt in interviews.

This list would be ok w/o the blurbs but it's so embarassing - Starship Troopers is prophetic because "the humans send giant armies to kill the insects in the deserts of the remote planet"? Like the US bombing a middle east country was some sort of wild sci-fi in '97?

💥NEW EPISODE💥 @owenhatherley, @zinovievletter, and Alberto Toscano on Adam Curtis' Can't Get You Out of My Head. We chatted about Curtis' politics, the changes in his documentary style since the early 1990s, and why he avoids talking about neoliberalism:https://t.co/cuFxPERLPG

— Politics Theory Other (@poltheoryother) March 28, 2021

lol I'd never heard that rumour before that he went door knocking for Corbyn in '19. He does have some strange definitions of what the Left is in his work and of course there are going to be constrictions on what stories he decides to tell when he is selling his work to the BBC and is completely reliant on the BBC archives.

https://www.thewhitereview.org/feature/on-adam-curtis-cant-get-you-out-of-my-head/

excellent and otm piece by Juliet Jacques

good piece, nice to read a balanced critique for a change

yeah I think she's nailed just about everything that is good and bad about him there and I learned that he cut his teeth on That's Life! (execrable 70's middle-class television for non UK's!)

"arguing that the US counter-culture had failed to change the world because it had become too concerned with individual self-expression"

this was the most ridiculous bit of Hypernormalisation

The son of English surrealist poet and filmmaker Humphrey Jennings’s cinematographer, Curtis

i did not know this

meh, he clearly used his surrealism/avant-garde doc connections to get a plumb production job on That's Life!

or possibly a bat soup production job!

ha this is great

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1bX3F7uTrg

B-, music cues need work

any essay that contains both this passage

I had to spend ninety minutes per day holding Perspex dilators inside my ‘neo-vagina’ to stop it closing. I binged on Curtis films while I did this, and eventually discovered my clitoris worked while watching THE CENTURY OF THE SELF.)

and this one


Graeber argued that the morally and intellectually bankrupt Labour establishment, already furious about losing two leadership elections in what felt like (and was) a repudiation of their public-private partnerships and interventionist foreign policy, deliberately sabotaged their own party to defeat a paradigm shift against them. They did this mainly by casting themselves as supporters of the EU, without questioning the EU’s migration policies or imposition of austerity on Greece and elsewhere, and using Corbyn’s refusal to disregard the EU referendum result as a ‘wedge issue’ to divide his base, hoping to demobilise his young supporters and peel away the liberal end of his voter coalition. In the process, many of Labour’s ‘centrist’ MPs lost what were once safe seats in Leave-voting constituencies and handed a thumping majority to one of the most right-wing governments in British history, who immediately voted through the hardest possible Brexit.

is like it was made by robots for me to like it.

Good read. Thanks calzino

this is absolutely excellent. jacques is really very smart and very unusual now to see someone who can really draw on and bring together the political historical and aesthetic critiques that area ll necessary to thinking about this and using it as a jumping off point to think more broadly and critically about our present moment.

i haven't read much by her, the few bits i have were frustratingly short and now seem even more so after reading this where its really clear that she is well able to draw out a complex critique from a pretty dizzying breadth of insights as uh tracers post intimates

although lol tbf i only half watched this i thought it was boring as sin and i cant really deal w/ curtis's tone though if i like the music and archive footage

the main reason I liked Juliet's piece, aside from the fact that she's always an interesting writer was because I also think Curtis is good and love loads of his work but also consider him very problematic and very myopically dumb at times, although possibly this is by design or part of price for access to the bbc archive or maybe he's just a bit of a dickhead! But the segments on Julia Grant are very empathetic and heartfelt and incredibly moving imo and the cold arrogance of the Mengellesque clinician John Randell, was so enraging and powerful.

I'd felt the series left Julia Grant on a strange note as well. Then heard Curtis on Chapo talking about the very happy ending she has in the film.... in her 5 seconds dancing in the closing montage thing.

there is a bit where Julia encapsulates all the shit she has gone through, can't remember exactly how she put it - but it wasn't exactly a happy ending but sort of defiantly "I've taken so much shit, just punch me to the deck right here and I won't be surprised"

That's a fantastic piece. I struggle with Curtis - I find the programmes physically exhausting to watch for some reason - but this is the summary of his work I've seen.

This is an extraordinary dip into the (relatively) recent past: A look at BBC2 in the first week of June 1992, when PANDORA’S BOX was first broadcast, shows an OPEN SPACE strand where the public could make programmes; documentaries on the failure of the Green Revolution in India, post-Communist Czechoslovakia and the assassination of high-ranking Nazi official Reinhard Heydrich; Toni Morrison on THE LATE SHOW; a set of films on culture and identity from a black perspective; a dance film by Anthony Minghella; a showcase for new filmmakers; a documentary on the Troubles in Northern Ireland, written by poet Damian Gorman, and another on Frida Kahlo, narrated by Helen Chadwick in Mexico; films directed by Alex Cox and Karel Reisz; a political drama made in Colombia; and daily Open University content.

*this is the *best* summary of his work. Gah.

This Politics, Theory, Other podcast (with Owen Hatherley and Alberto Toscano) is a good companion piece: https://soundcloud.com/poltheoryother/hypercurtisisation-w-owen-hatherley-juliet-jacques-and-alberto-toscano

irrationally angry about people on Twitter who, like clockwork, decide to do a bit on Adam Curtis, a person who I have ambivalent feelings about in many ways but who is one of just a handful of half-decent documentary-makers working in the country. hey twitter people, why not instead do a bit on the tidal wave of shit that is 95% of factual programming?

if they had the insight of the above articles then great, however they do not have any insight, just the same crap jokes.

julia grant docs are streaming on iplayer either now or later this week

New Curtis series coming October 13 - "Russia 1985-1999 TraumaZone: What It Felt Like to Live Through the Collapse of Communism and Democracy":
https://www.bbc.com/mediacentre/2022/adam-curtis-russia-1985-1999-traumazone

TraumaZone?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2022/adam-curtis-russia-1985-1999-traumazone

starts 13th october

oh, didn't scroll up, sorry ernest

TraumaZone, a BBC documentary by Adam Curtis on the collapse of communism and democracy in Russia, comes out tomorrow. It is different from Curtis's previous films--there's no voice-over or overarching argument. We started work before the current war; I was a producer for this. pic.twitter.com/6fC2dq2woc

— Grigor Atanesian (@atanessi) October 12, 2022

I was wondering if the no voiceover was just a feature of the trailer. If there is a subtitle narrative I'll still be reading it in his voice.

my Adam Curtis wishlist is more interviews, less voiceover. So sounds good.

more crazy frog less burial

that's right

no overarching argument eh

that's why it's called Some Stuff That Just Happened

Guessing there is no voiceover as Curtis has probably registered the reaction/parodying of it.

Narrator's voice:

if I was him I'd put in a scene with something like some haunted '90s VHS footage of a post-Soviet grocery store with empty shelves and desperate faces with a sad BURIAL soundtrack, just for the haters, lol

a nim nim nah

If there is a subtitle narrative I'll still be reading it in his voice.

this tbh

Guessing there is no voiceover as Curtis has probably registered the reaction/parodying of it.

this is the most recent Adam Curtis documentary afaic

David Baddiel vs the worms pic.twitter.com/vACyOyKTjC

— TheIainDuncanSmiths (@TheIDSmiths) January 5, 2022

if I was him I'd put in a scene with something like some haunted '90s VHS footage of a post-Soviet grocery store with empty shelves and desperate faces with a sad BURIAL soundtrack, just for the haters, lol

ah yes he did. I'm thinking that the "something incredible happened" parts of his narration would actually sound hilarious in a deepfake Starmer voice

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/oct/12/russia-adam-curtis-extreme-capitalism-liz-truss-traumazone

This is good lol