NFTs (thread now extremely NSFW)

many benifits of boobs poll

Karl Malone, I suppose the word “dox” might be slightly hyperbolic, but there were apparently up to six lists angrily circulating of artists who were “engaging” with NFTs.
― Kim, Friday, March 12, 2021 7:41 AM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

who made those lists? honestly, i want to follow them on twitter.

reflexively separating myself from anyone who is promoting this right now, it's like everyone half the people in an apartment complex starting an Ayn Rand bookclub. fine, do it, but I will also hang a xerox of alan greenspan farting as his toes get tickled on my the door to my apartment, make fun of all of them, and make sure that everyone knows Not Me

Seeing a lot of techno utopian ppl pushing hard online for this with music atm. I totally understand embracing a pyramid scheme to make a buck because there's less money in music these days, but positioning doing this as a revolutionary act is pretty depressing (which I'm seeing online from some "community-based" music spaces/people/thinkers/charlatans)

i'm hoping that the crypto / NFT people will soon realize that they're actually more interested in the crypto part than the art part, and then they will never talk about art ever again and just go make money and move to their island with thiel

please RT into my butthole

congratulations new #NFT artists: you've speculated yourself into an evolving, exciting new butthole!!

— Z_tbd (@weinventyou) March 13, 2021

i haven't heard back yet from my friend -- i fear she has minted "a dick" without me, and screwed me out of my share of dick sales

https://io9.gizmodo.com/dc-comics-tells-artists-to-stay-out-of-nft-business-or-1846466427

I’m on @withFND 🌐

0x2B867e8B4EfDB9a792a5A9C5524B7f61CF143b4Ahttps://t.co/m8iEeChAzw

— Aphex Twin (@AphexTwin) March 14, 2021

ready for the funny part? this is his pinned tweet

We will spend a portion of the money on planting trees and either donating to permaculture projects or setting them up ourselves, depending on how much we get .

— Aphex Twin (@AphexTwin) March 14, 2021

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

I feel like the world has come full Nathan Barley

What is the point of releasing music this way?

$$$

I'd like to discuss how 99% of NFT art is terrible art per se, also.

None of it is good.

I mean like what’s the point of an NFT music release. Is it just mp3s with an extra unique tag on it or something?

Basically when we are all in the meta-verse and you want to play that Feelies mp3 in your digital bar you will be sued by the rightful owner of the track, dogelol_elon44.

the whole concept of NFTs is the most boring thing ever

most boring thing ever

I agree. The fact that it has attracted $$$ makes it fascinating to those who find money an all-consuming obsession. afaics, it is a digital + blockchain version of a lithograph signed by the artist and hand-marked as "x of 100".

nah it's a contemporary giclee

This is useful background on the Beeple sale:

https://nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-2103/msg00041.html

Short version is it is a scam where Business A, controlled by Vignesh sund4resan, sold the work to Business B, controlled by Vignesh sund4resan, to artificially inflate the value of share tokens in Business A.

lol zero surprise there

Update: looks like I can’t get my NFTs back. Even though fraud has been confirmed and I know exactly where my NFTs are sitting at this very moment.

Hacker wins. Secondary market purchaser wins. I lose.

Going to explore other options if I can. Doesn’t sit right with me.

— Michael J. Miraflor (@michaelmiraflor) March 14, 2021

Unsurprisingly, already being hit by hacks.

Does Bitcoin suffer from much hackerage?

(I am totally out the loop with these things as you might have guessed)

One of the longtime criticisms of bitcoin is that you have basically no fraud protection, which is in turn one of a number of its touted features that are actually bugs.

Like the various mechanisms that make credit card transactions more complex also enable you to stop/reverse/challenge them.

@tokenizedtweets 0xe128c547520aa0ad6409ba0a0f30dbcd07098024

— Bean (@Franq_the_Tanq) March 15, 2021

sorry, context is that was someone tokenizing this screenshot of an interaction i had with the #crypto #community last night

Unintentional cryptoart pic.twitter.com/oVFUrhLNkf

— the most touchiest person, right now (@weinventyou) March 14, 2021

After arguing with musician friends (irl!) about NFTs, I listened to this podcast to get some more context and hear what the pro arguments are (it's Mat Dryhurst, who has been the lone defender on techno twitter): https://open.spotify.com/episode/2trxojvIclKsl7IVcynbuG?si=s_2S9ykkQIipnengPyG-9A

I'm not convinced at all but it was an interesting listen. Obviously I have sympathy for my friends in bands that were previously eking out a living through touring, and I'm sure they can make some money from this given that they have existing hardcore fans. But even if we put the environmental issues aside entirely, normalizing blockchain usage and turning all artists into speculative commodities seems very bleak.

A speculative NFT asset has no potential to generate income for anyone but a very well-known artist. Much as with streaming, this is a technology being promoted by people who don't understand anything about the music/art business as great for musicians/artists.

My friend isn't talking about millions, more like hundreds for a touring indie act with a relatively small (in global pop terms) but dedicated fanbase.

But yeah I agree that the NFT evangelists are interested in money and tech/protocols, not art.

fuck around

my brother and I collaborated on our first NFT, check it out https://t.co/YQFstF6VVL

— of Montreal~she/he/they/them (@xxofMontrealxx) March 15, 2021

find out

oooooo fuck we didn't realize NFT's were so bad for the environment!!! this will be a one and done then, thanks for the heads up!

— of Montreal~she/he/they/them (@xxofMontrealxx) March 15, 2021

<3 kevin obv lol

My next release will be on an amazing physical, analogue NFT - a flat, circular polyvinyl chloride disc* with the audio literally engraved into it. Limited in number, each unique object exists even if the platform goes down.

*disc will require some specialist equipment to listen

— Posthuman (@posthuman) March 9, 2021

i am going to burn down the rainforest and mint it as as a NFT

My friend isn't talking about millions, more like hundreds for a touring indie act with a relatively small (in global pop terms) but dedicated fanbase.

But yeah I agree that the NFT evangelists are interested in money and tech/protocols, not art.

― change display name (Jordan), Monday, March 15, 2021 12:48 PM (thirty-seven minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Back in the day, we managed to sell about 1000 copies of our self-released album, 90% of that at shows. I calculated that to earn the same profit we'd probably need between 6-10 million streams. I guess the difference is that an NFT doesn't replace anything, so it's arguably just additive income. But yeah, it's gonna be very small if anything for most bands. Unlike, e.g., a print by a non-famous artist, an NFT has literally zero value except as a metaphysical ownership right.

My friend is saying it could replace the revenue lost from streaming (and now touring). And yeah of course it's a meaningless symbol, especially when associated with a non-digital product. But his optimistic argument is that fans will support their favorite artists in return for that sense of ownership, which would be depressing since it's almost indistinguishable from just donating to a musician if you're only listening on Spotify, and any increasing value of the NFT will likely be symbolic too.

But his optimistic argument is that fans will support their favorite artists in return for that sense of ownership, which would be depressing since it's almost indistinguishable from just donating to a musician if you're only listening on Spotify, and any increasing value of the NFT will likely be symbolic too.

i can very much see why most people would think this is ridiculous, but i can see that too (and not in an optimistic way). not a perfect comparison, but an enormous amount of money is spent every day on purely cosmetic items in free-to-play games. People love to spend money on completely useless, cosmetic/symbolic things to show their friends

of course, the difference is that if you do it around me i'll scream and then move to the woods

Right, I can for sure see it coming to pass, as abstract and ridiculous as it seems.

It's just hard for me to believe people wouldn't have better luck creating a high-priced limited edition of a vinyl album or something.

nobody's ever paid $69 million for a vinyl album

and nobody's going to pay $69 million for a music NFT unless it's a multi-platinum artist or something.

Also, the buyer of the beeple work did so to fuel his own investment scam. And I'd be surprised if some of that money paid to "Beeple" isn't headed back to "MetaKovan"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/india-ban-ownership-cryptocurrencies-110427476.html

sorry wrong link
https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/12/22327594/metakovan-beeple-highest-auction-price-69-million-nft

“When you think of high-valued NFTs, this one is going to be pretty hard to beat,” MetaKovan said in a statement published by Christie’s. “And here’s why — it represents 13 years of everyday work. Techniques are replicable and skill is surpassable, but the only thing you can’t hack digitally is time. This is the crown jewel, the most valuable piece of art for this generation. It is worth $1 billion.”

lol

$69M was the third highest ever sale for a living artist, btw

this all gives me flashbacks to how in like 2014 there was a certain kind of annoying person who would pepper any conversation about any aspect of any kind of creative project with "you should totally do a kickstarter!"

wanna hear my latest dystopic vision, which i think black mirror has already done? imagine a world where NFTs - assigning value and commodifying things that previously were not in a "market" - are ubiquitous, and the whole early 2021-era where the discussion was temporarily focused NFTs and digital art seems hilariously old-fashioned and irrelevant. why not tokenize experiences, or people? shouldn't every person have a NFT value that can fluctuate and go up or down depending on the market forces. at least some people will think this is a wonderful idea, because they believe that the "market" would "reward" "good" "people". then it's basically like that one black mirror episode after that, you know the one