Britney Spears: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (280 of them)
Detroit Rockist City

hee hee.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Putting aside alleged sex-appeal, putting aside pointless discussions of whether she's "fake" or "manufactured" putting aside whether or not she's a role-model, her music is freakin BORING. For the record, so is Madonna's -- though I find Madonna's to be much more offensive because it's so hopelessly middlebrow.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:40 (nineteen years ago) link

what's offensive about middlebrow? expound plz

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:42 (nineteen years ago) link

He who is tired of Britney is tired of Life.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link

"what's offensive about middlebrow? "

Maybe "offensive" is a strong word -- but I'm more bothered by the way Madonna wraps her mediocrity in pomp and pretense (from supposed sexual radicalism to hokey religious experimentation)

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Bottom line though, the music: I find it quite boring.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not tired of life.

Justin (Alba), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

why do you find it boring?

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

"Of course she's a product, she's a fucking pop singer! People don't go to music stores to buy souls, they go there to buy products.",

She's also, at least ostensibly, a product for twelve-year-old girls. Wanna trade hello kitty stickers later?

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

"why do you find it boring? "

Come on, that's a pointless question. You know how the little cillia in your ears dance a certain way when you like something? Well that doesn't happen when I hear Madonna, or Britney Spears.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

oh you silly rockists masquerading as non-rockists. do you judge motorhead by their "own personal talent" and by lemmy's remarkable operatic voice, or do you just go right to the "product"? do you judge the grateful dead by their inability to swing a beat and bob weir's inability to sing, or do you just go to the shows and have a good time? how again is britney any different?

I don't see how pointing out the weaknesses of other artists is supposed to convert me. And with the exception of about two of her tracks, I don't see any originality in her songwriter's work. The difference between her and Motorhead is overexposure. No one has ever shoved Motorhead down my throad. The Grateful Dead is a different story, but I digress.

detroit rockist city (darin), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

how exactly do you shove music down someone's throat???

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Putting aside alleged sex-appeal, putting aside pointless discussions of whether she's "fake" or "manufactured" putting aside whether or not she's a role-model

She's also, at least ostensibly, a product for twelve-year-old girls.

Shurely shome mishtake?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:54 (nineteen years ago) link

so hurting your argument is 'i don't like it cuz it's boring' and 'it's boring cuz i don't like it'???

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't see how pointing out the weaknesses of other artists is supposed to convert me

It's pointless trying to change people's opinions.

Pointing out the ridiculousness/fallacy/logical inconsistency of the assumptions that underlie their opinions is fair game though.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

other products for twelve year old girls: james dean, the beatles, j.d. salinger, hello kitty stickers, bill clinton


products for forty year old men: suv's, viagra, "real music", george w. bush

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:58 (nineteen years ago) link

"so hurting your argument is 'i don't like it cuz it's boring' and 'it's boring cuz i don't like it'??? "

Well, isn't that what it all comes down to? I could come up with specifics -- I find her voice (Britney's) thin and irritating. I find the beats (EVEN TOXIC) repetitive and annoying. But I just don't like it because I don't like it It's not an argument, it's an opinion. I'm not trying to argue you into disliking Britney.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

how exactly do you shove music down someone's throat???

By making it culturally inescapable. And the fact that we put this woman on a huge fucking pedistal for completely superficial reasons (ie: she looks like a porn star) is painful if you have anything called a soul. I know this is nothing new in society, but still...

darin (darin), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

By making it culturally inescapable

I believe there's these things called 'turning off the radio' and 'iPods' and the like which can help you in this regard.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

other products for twelve year old girls: james dean, the beatles, j.d. salinger, hello kitty stickers, bill clinton

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Britney Spears is quite deliberately targeted, or at least was until recently, at pre-teen and teen girls (though there is the likely deliberate secondary target of horny 20-50 year old men). The post I was referring to tried to point out that Britney is *supposed to be* a product. I agree that this has nothing to do one way or another with her being any good, but if you're going to talk about things in those terms, let's really follow their implications.

If Britney is just a *product* then all I should have to say is "I don't like it". That's it. I don't like Pepsi, I prefer Wendy's to McDonalds. If you're trying to make some sort of well-reasoned "argument" for her, then you're abandoning the idea that she's just a product to be liked or disliked.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Err, moving on quickly now, how good is the bonus remix disc that come with the Greatest Hits and what's up with the Carl Cox MEGAMIX???!

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:10 (nineteen years ago) link

um, then why are you posting? so you'll have a record of your opinion re: britney later on in case you forget how your cillia reacted? i mean your position re: britney, madonna, rockism vs. "popism" has been 'i don't hate britney etc. cuz of any snobbery towards her audience or it's perceived realness, my dislike is based on the music itself' but when pressed on what about the music itself you don't like you fall back on snide remarks about her audience and strawman arguments about her defender, about the actual music you have nothing to say beyond tautologies and cuzisaidso's, which makes me wonder if what you're saying is that people who listen to britney (even maybe - gasp! - twelve year old girls) think about music more than people who don't but i don't think this is what you're saying in which case i have to ask you again (i'm thicker than a twelve year old girl i'm afraid)(not as thick as a forty year old man though): what exactly is you are trying to say?

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

x-post

You're implying that some people are "artists" and some are "products". This is bullshit.

You're implying that you know exactly which audience Britney was targeted at. This is highly fucking unlikely.

You're implying that Britney can only appeal to men (and not women) for sexual reasons. This is wilful bullshit.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

"um, then why are you posting? so you'll have a record of your opinion re: britney later on in case you forget how your cillia reacted?"

Read half the posts above: "Classic!" "Yay Britney!" etc. Title of thread: "Classic or Dud?" I say dud. That bothers you so much that you need to keep prodding, hoping I'll slip and say something rockist so you can prove that there's no legitimate reason to dislike Britney?

"You're implying that some people are "artists" and some are "products". This is bullshit." I didn't initially use the word "product," a pro-Britney poster did. I wouldn't have called her that, but I ran with it to make a point.


Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:21 (nineteen years ago) link

sorry, correction, an anti-Britney poster did say it first.

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

ye olde 'product' canard is one of the better facets of rockism, the slight extension of a handshake, backhanded compliment galore - "yes yes this is obviously crap, not real music like jethro tull (or john coltrane or gustav mahler), but it's good crap", fathered by leonard bernstein, father or uncle at least of rockism. see also: "______ is actually a good pop tune", the 'credit to his race' of rockism, clever way of dodging snob charge by noting the monkey's actually managed to type hamlet this once, clever way to maintain snob authority by noting they're still monkeys.

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:23 (nineteen years ago) link

You're implying that Britney can only appeal to men (and not women) for sexual reasons.This is wilful bullshit.

Oh, come on! Replace your mental image of Britney with oh I don't know... Bea Arthur. How do you think that would fly?

darin (darin), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:24 (nineteen years ago) link

hruting you've given us plenty of illegitimate reasons to dislike britney while maintaining that no really your's is legitimate (hint: there are plenty of legit reasons all over this board, britney is no litmus test)(litmus tests by and large = pretty rockist)(which is to say 'boring')(and unlike you i'll give a reason for using the word 'boring' - cuz they discourage thinking what they talk about instead of encourage thinking what they talk about)(= popist), i'm asking: what exactly is your reason?

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Why is finding the sound of someone's voice irritating, for example, an illegitimate reason to dislike something? Should I force it down like vegetables?

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, come on! Replace your mental image of Britney with oh I don't know... Bea Arthur. How do you think that would fly?

Firstly, I'd guess plenty of people are sexually attracted to Bea Arthur.

Secondly, whether I find the image of Britney (never having met her socially) attractive or not, that isn't why, for example, "Toxic" gives me a raging bone-on. It's all about the music, maaaaaaaan.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

None of the "classic" posts above seem to pretend that they have much more of a "legitimate reason" for liking Britney than just liking her. I don't see a single one that says more than "she's pretty" "she's a great dancer" or "I like x songs but don't like y" or "she sounds like an evil slut robot" etc. Nothing wrong with any of this, but why do you, Cin, consider this legitimate discussion but not my sourpuss 2 cents?

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:36 (nineteen years ago) link

show me where i said finding the sound of someone's voice irritating an illegitimate reason for disliking something (note i could show where on this thread i say i don't like 'toxic' as much as yr average old deborah cox remix cuz of, oh, britney's voice)

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

haha - and show me where i consider anyone else's posts legitimate! (note: not limited to this thread!)

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Right, so why single out mine?

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, if you like her music, then you like her music. But the cynic in me still suspects that Britney wouldn't exist if it wasn't for her image. If it's rockist to wish artists were judged on a level playing field, then color me rockist.

darin (darin), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I already had.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

becuz yrs are esp. daft

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

But the cynic in me still suspects that Britney wouldn't exist if it wasn't for her image.

You could say that about at least 50 percent of rock musicians though, even the ones that rockist critics adore.

Leon the Fratboy (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

surely not the beatles nicole! and god knows charlie parker's carefully cultivated (but not 'manufactured' - no way!) image has had nothing to do with his critical reception! bob dylan really was circus folk yknow

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

(x-post)
i don't think three-quarters of the successful musicians in rock, pop, hip-hop, r&b, country or reaggae would "exist" in the same way if they weren't good looking. of course that's true of britney. it's also true of mick jagger. so in a sense, everyone IS on a level playing field because they're all better looking than any of us and most of us have fantasies, somewhere in our dirty little minds, of fucking most of them.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

The level playing field is supposed to be The Market, isn't it?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahaha I love Britney (and Avril and Madonna and Courtney Love) threads!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I love Britney's music. I enjoy it. The enjoyment is irony-free. She is wonderful. It is not complex. Classic.

Atnevon (Atnevon), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 23:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Hurting you're stuck in this wilful blindness schtick. Did you actually read that Yay Kelefa thread you were posting on? There was a very detailed discussion about Britney there which broke down a lot of these issues.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:21 (nineteen years ago) link

The level playing field is supposed to be The Market, isn't it?

Not when the market owns the market. And this is pretty much why I have problems with her music and her peers. It's like embracing Philip Morris or something. But I guess rooting for the underdog = rockism now too.

darin (darin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:41 (nineteen years ago) link

No, it would be like smoking Marlboros. Get your fuckin' metaphors straight.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I was comparing Philip Morris to major labels. I'm talking about markets, hence the metaphor. Chill dude.

darin (darin), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:53 (nineteen years ago) link

The problem with the whole "we can't like Britney because of the market" is that there's no longer any necessary link between enjoyment and expenditure. If your beef is with the record company monopoly which stands behind Britney, don't buy music put out by that record company (but, if you're sincere, don't buy any of the records).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 November 2004 00:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree with that.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:06 (nineteen years ago) link

So do I. Hurting, could you explain your problems with anti-rockism; you seem to be, if not a rockist, at least an anti-anti-rockist, and I would like to understand what the problems are in the anti-rockist approach.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 18 November 2004 01:09 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.