Wherein We Elect Our Favourite Novels of 1935

Don't know Bowen's novels, though have heard this isn't up to her usual. The Collected Stories is catnip doorstop.

Have read several of this year's other choices, going way back to Thomas Wolfe and John O'Hara binges in high school: Butterfield 8 was more low-down on what grown=ups do, appreciated by teen me, as said of Appoitnment, but mainly enjoyable as salty anecdote--Pylon made the widest, deepest, rollercoaster-est impression: brainstorm as barnstorm, with deep purple-blue mood banks: Paul Goodman observed in passing, "Even Faulkner is Beat, in a complicated way," and this goes beyond Kerouac (proto-Beat in a different way than Tropic of Cancer). But WF always zooms back into and through the storyline (like K.. at least in On The Road, the only one of his I've read). Also written to "let off steam," taking a working break from another project, I read somewhere.

I hereby second Brad C.'s take and cast my vote for Pylon.

Butterfield 8 was "mainly enjoyable *to me then* as salty anecdote" and sexy soap opera---might get more out of now, as has sometimes happened with others from way back, like Hemingway stories (haven't read his novels either).

It's entirely possible that I would have gone w Ivy Compton-Burnett, if I'd read that particular novel.

Swami & Friends by R.K. Narayan -- very good early book, coming of age stuff; his later stuff is better, though

They Shoot Horses, Don't They? by Horace McCoy -- tremendous bleak little thing: YOU WILL FAIL AND YOU WILL DIE is the moral here

Untouchable by Mulk Raj Anand -- also bleak, very good

Aller Retour New York by Henry Miller -- entertaining frippery from creepy fantasist

BUtterfield 8 by John O'Hara -- he's very out of fashion these days, I guess, but this I liked a lot; sort of like lesser Scott Fitzgerald, i guess?

The Circus Of Dr.Lao by Charles G. Finney -- mad and fun and creep

It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis -- not a brilliantly written book, but quite a perceptive one; probably more fun to read now Trump's got the arse

Tortilla Flat by John Steinbeck -- one of Steinbeck's most entertaining books, but I'm guessing he's out of fashion these days too?

A Clergyman's Daughter by George Orwell -- thought it was pretty good when I read years ago, but can't remember much about it--hop-picking happens in it, I think

England Made Me by Graham Greene -- great stuff, great sociopath villain with his spider under the glass

A House And Its Head by Ivy Compton-Burnett -- incredibly mannered masterpiece comedy of dialogue

Mr.Norris Changes Trains by Christopher Isherwood -- lovely, evocative stuff

Wigs On The Green by Nancy Mitford -- minor Mitford

Auto-da-Fé by Elias Canetti -- brilliant, maybe gets my vote, I don't know, this is hard

The Frontier by Zofia Nałkowska -- I WANT THIS having read other books by her, a Polish Modernist writer, who is quite amazing--her book on the Nazi death camps, Medallions, is brilliant

Paths Of Glory by Humphrey Cobb -- grim as fuck, very good

The Wine Of Solitude by Irène Némirovsky - entertaining but minor Némirovsky

I kind of want to vote for They Shoot Horses... purely on the basis of the film's genius, but I will not. Had to check if Mr Norris... was part of the Berlin Stories, and it is, but I feel like if it's the only one of these I've read and I didn't even remember it well enough to distinguish it then maybe I shouldn't vote for it. I did rate them highly at the time of reading, though.

voted Circus of Dr. Lao

Gaudy Night might be a completely gendered read. Among women who get degrees in English and related fields, it's a cult classic, and if this poll were on a site like The Toast (RIP), I think there would be a lot of discussion about it. I get the impression that most guys haven't even heard of it, but I could be wrong about that.

I did hear about it, but I think from The Toast? In my mind Sayers is the second most famous golden age detective person (after Agatha Christie, admitidely by a huuuuuge margin) and I've been including her stuff, just didn't remember this one being her most canonical (my bad) and have gotten trigger happy at removing novels from authors who write a lot.

On a different note, I just realised that wikipedia ain't listing Miklos Banffy's Transsylvanian Trilogy in these, boooo.

John Wyndham, The Secret People - pretty standard boys own adventure stuff, he hadn't honed his 'cosy catastrophe' shtick yet.

Gaudy Night might be a completely gendered read. Among women who get degrees in English and related fields, it's a cult classic, and if this poll were on a site like The Toast (RIP), I think there would be a lot of discussion about it. I get the impression that most guys haven't even heard of it, but I could be wrong about that.

I mean, I'm not saying this is completely off-base, but as a(n admittedly somewhat GNC) woman who has degrees in English and related fields... I've never even heard of Gaudy Night. I don't know, I'm always wary of "women read like this" statements, but at the same time I want to be supportive of other literary women, but at the same time again I'm mad about being included in a sweeping generalisation that in fact doesn't adhere to my experiences AT ALL, and once more, simultaneously I'm like, "huh, maybe I should read this book". (The fact that this makes my head explode is why I didn't address the statement in the first place tbh.)

I did say cult classic! I was trying to convey that even within that group not everyone has read it, but a lot of the ones who have are devoted to it. It came across as more of a sweeping generalization than I meant.

I used to think no one but me had read it, and then I started reading The Toast and other sites with a very female comments section, and realized that a lot more people than I thought also had it as a formative teenage reading experience. That was all I was trying to get across, but I see how it came across as a massive generalization about women English majors. Sorry about my clumsy wording!

I think things like this tear me up more than they should because I end up wondering if it's a deficiency in me, that I'm not performing womanhood properly, or I was too socialised to like Dude Literature. But then, as you can see from my posts on these threads, I mostly only know the modernists from this era anyway (my specialism tends to be post-war avant-garde lit), so it's not all that surprising that I don't know it, and maybe I should give myself a break. I'm absolutely not trying to start a fight or anything!

As a big reader of Dude Literature myself, I would never want to make anyone feel that way! I think it more depends on whether you were raised on Golden Age mystery fiction than anything else.

If you happened to be raised on these books, then Gaudy Night had a good chance of meaning a lot to you because it's a feminist novel sneaked into the end of a series about a man. (And also because it's a swoonily immersive romance of the kind that makes a big impression when you're a kid.)

I'm curious to check it out. Is it necessary to read any of the earlier books first?

I'm not sure. I mean, yes, it definitely picks up a lot of stuff from earlier books and tries to resolve it, so you'd probably get more out of reading it as part of the series. But I'm not sure it's worth that much investment on your part. The series as a whole is uneven, and it gets more ambitious as it goes on. One of the interesting things about Gaudy Night is Sayers's (mostly successful) attempt to graft a heavy weight of character development and motivation onto the very slim stalk with which the series started.

So I think you can go straight to Gaudy Night, but if you like mysteries and would like a fun and well-written (though also pretentious and snobbish) series to read in lockdown, these are the books I'd recommend:

Whose Body - Good, light, slightly stylized intro to the series. Lord Peter at his most Bertie Wooster-ish, with some interesting stuff about PTSD.
Clouds of Witness - Okay country-house mystery, not my favorite but fine.
Strong Poison - Introduces Harriet, the main character of Gaudy Night. Tonally all over the place - can't decide if it's drama or comedy - but quite readable all the same.
Have His Carcase - Lord Peter and Harriet investigate a crime together. The archest and most bitchy book in the series but not bad.
Murder Must Advertise - Part mystery novel, part satire about the advertising business. Wildly improbable and pretentious, but pretty good!
The Nine Tailors - All about the bell-ringing in a church in the fens. You either find this one atmospheric and stately or flat and over-researched; I go back and forth. The most ambitious of the books aside from Gaudy Night.
Gaudy Night - Harriet goes back to her old college to help them investigate episodes of vandalism and harassment.

I've read some great descriptions of Gaudy Night, usually ranked among Sayers' best, would like to read all those you list, but may not happen---as daunted by all the big rep unread mystery writers as science fiction (and everything else). (And I'm a dude, at least/most lowercase.)

xp Thanks. I might start at the beginning and see how it goes.

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

The only one of these I've read is House In Paris, which I read last year and enjoyed. I'm always a sucker for a good frame story structure.

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

Wherein We Elect Our Favourite Novels of 1936