How many Booker winning novels have you read?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (145 of them)

I suggest you are a prick and wouldn't win it because everyone has seen through your overwritten shite.

Vanishing Point (Chinaski), Wednesday, 2 December 2020 16:30 (three years ago) link

i like some of his overwritten shite but yeah, huge prick energy

Carry On Scamping (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 2 December 2020 16:38 (three years ago) link

Also he's pissed away the last 20 years writing dour, pointless and tedious crime novels, plush a cash-in fake Raymond Chandler, so he's not exactly churning out the masterpieces these days.

Tsar Bombadil (James Morrison), Wednesday, 2 December 2020 22:28 (three years ago) link

nine months pass...

Hotel du Lac is lovely! A small, extremely earnest thing ('somewhat Sparklike but more modern and lost' was my immediate response, which also puts it in Rhys territory tbh) that nonetheless pulls a number of sly games en route to terminus. Probably fits in second behind TLOB for me now, a book to which this makes a decent counterpoint, perhaps.

he ain't perfect but fuck me he's a rheillee (imago), Tuesday, 7 September 2021 20:28 (two years ago) link

I've read

2004 The Line of Beauty by Alan Hollinghurst
2002 Life of Pi by Yann Martel
2000 The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood
1999 Disgrace by J. M. Coetzee
1993 Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha by Roddy Doyle
1992 The English Patient by Michael Ondaatje (co-winner)
1989 The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
1986 The Old Devils by Kingsley Amis

And that's it. I didn't adore any of them, really... the Coetzee in particular seemed to have a thesis that I instinctively thought was weird and bad even when I read it in my early 20s.

Exception to this, of course, was "The Line Of Beauty", which I'm unashamed to state is one of my favourite novels of all time... not just as an effective work of AIDS-related art, and a commentary on Thatcherism, but such an effective skewering of the bourgeois shittiness of "gay" on the whole.

Yeah it really stands clear, my previous post notwithstanding

he ain't perfect but fuck me he's a rheillee (imago), Tuesday, 7 September 2021 21:07 (two years ago) link

Since 2005 I've increased my tally from one to six and I thought most of them were fine, but the fact of their Booker Prize was totally irrelevant to my choosing to read them. My participation in I Love Books has been far more influential in leading me to good books.

it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Tuesday, 7 September 2021 21:08 (two years ago) link

Re what Banville said above, just in the last ten years Howard Jacobson, Julian Barnes, and George Saunders have all won. Is he mad that three women and a gay man won in a row after Saunders?

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 8 September 2021 00:15 (two years ago) link

the Coetzee in particular seemed to have a thesis that I instinctively thought was weird and bad even when I read it in my early 20s.

― what's fgti up to these days? nothing. she's fake (flamboyant goon tie included), Tuesday, 7 September 2021 23:00 (ye

What's the thesis you didn't like?

abcfsk, Wednesday, 8 September 2021 11:45 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.