What are Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Flaws?

booming

eh it’s been done

The cliches, end to end.

Boo hoo

xp To have you hovering above the discussion to reiterate how basic you think we are is the worst.

Anyway, let's stop the #whitedudeposturing and start debating how we put AOC's words to work in our communities. I've already signed up locally to do it.

It's pretty amazing that milo and silby still can't see that almost no one here is excited about Biden winning so much as Trump losing and that most people simply want to spend 24-72 hours drinking from the punchbowl of schadenfreude before two leftist edgelords take a dump in it.

We have no power to make you not enjoy it. We have not told you, from what I can see of silby's posts not to enjoy it.

There's an ILX power of transference where criticism of centrists or Biden becomes criticism of... you. That doesn't come from the people doing the criticizing.

It's just blanket hostility to dissent. Even if you want to throw in something about repetition and cliches, I will once again point to a half million posts about Trump's evil over four years - repetition isn't really the problem, people with different views (that, internally, challenge yours?) are the problem.

So sorry I and others like me that've been suffering with pre-existing conditions under the inhumane and indefensible dumpster fire that is the US's "healthcare system"

I have a preexisting condition too. I'm for a single payer system. But I'm grateful a centrist like Obama was able to make some compromises and deliver an improvement on the Healthcare system, one that outlawed denying private health insurance based on one's health history. It's a very flawed system still, but it is better and I have hope it will lead to an even better one.

Oh I was wrong can we tempban him again

Anyway, let's stop the #whitedudeposturing and start debating how we put AOC's words to work in our communities. I've already signed up locally to do it.

Do you know the work someone like milo or me do outside of ilxor? These are really ridiculous assumptions.

start debating how we put AOC's words to work in our communities. I've already signed up locally to do it.

proud of Alfred for signing up to pants Robby Mook

trevor, you can post/speak however you like. Just sayin': while it feels good to get an 'amen' when you're preaching solely to the choir, it doesn't do much to rally those outside the choir to your cause.

Who’s rallying?? We’re posting

No one is rallying anyone to any cause at ILX, except maybe supporting a new album and given the interest bleed at ILM maybe not even then.

Do you know the work someone like milo or me do outside of ilxor? These are really ridiculous assumptions.

― Van Horn Street,

I don't!

I have no real reason to believe it’s possible to convince anyone of anything, I’m not being tactical here

and by the posturing I meant...what goes in threads like this. I've no idea what most of you do, and if so, it sadly gets lost in the scrim.

To be the pants of Robby Mook would mean being the butt of Robby Mook and uh

Not be the pants, pants

Excellent memoir title!

to post is to posture, as to live is to LARP

live, LARP, love

I don't think all of this is posturing, though— I actually believe everything that I wrote. I get wanting to celebrate the downfall of Trump, I was also ecstatic yesterday.

But the center's habit of undermining the people who bring them their power is really wearing thin, based on much of what I have been reading and talking about with people here, including people at the pantry where I volunteer.

The election was won in PA by Black folks in Philly. In Arizona, it was won by Navajo tribes and other Indigenous peoples. Detroit (and Michigan), same as Philly.

And yet it seems like the spoils of these wins are going to white centrists who have spent their careers not giving a fuck about these populations. That isn't posturing, it's just fact.

also speaking to the issue at hand, I agree with this thing a Florida friend said on Friday:

"AOC’s public response to yesterday’s House Dem circular firing squad is exactly what is needed. It was disheartening to hear the right wing Dems try to blame progressive causes for their loses. The problem was not with the causes, which are popular. The problem was their own distaste about them, and their own refusal to defend or endorse them. Case in point: Florida’s ballot measure for a $15 minimum wage received more yes votes than were cast for either Trump or Biden, in a state won by Trump. Conservative Dems refused to associate themselves with a progressive cause that was more popular than they were. They can’t blame progressive causes for their own failures."

otm. It's possible Donna Shalala would not have won her race even if her opponent did not accuse her of socialism; but running for office should come from the impulse to help constituents, and the former Clinton Cabinet member and University of Miami president offered little but a name and a bullseye and her opposition to the Green New Deal and Medicare For All -- this in a district with thousands of rich libs, malnourished seniors, and uninsured workers.

to post is to posture, as to live is to LARP

that is a sad philosophy and I don't think you really believe it

Why would I bring my most authentic self to this thread

I don't. it was a joke. xp

Who knows what we “really believe” anyway, I don’t, I just post man

Who knows what we “really believe” anyway, I don’t, I just post man

Could you at least consolidate your vaporings so they are easier to skip over?

Who knows what we “really believe” anyway, I don’t, I just post man

new board description

Could you at least consolidate your vaporings so they are easier to skip over?

"In Arizona, it was won by Navajo tribes and other Indigenous peoples."

I don't know that that's accurate? Navajo County for instance voted for Trump.

the Navajo nation voted 76,000 to 2,000 for Biden, which iirc was more than the total AZ margin

Where are you seeing that? I was pretty shocked by the county vote going to Trump. Though Apache County which is also on the rez did go for Biden, but not at the % you're citing

I guess the county vote isn't reflective because it includes places like Holbrook and Show Low which are pretty white

https://navajotimes.com/rezpolitics/election-2020/arizona-flips-navajos-contribute-to-historic-shift/

note I was partially incorrect, that's the county total not indigenous total:

"Most experts, however, were attributing the swing to a large increase in the number of young Latinx voters in the southern part of the state. "

but still:

Apache, Navajo and Coconino counties, the three that overlap the Navajo Nation, went solidly for Joe Biden, with 73,954 votes compared to just 2,010 for incumbent President Donald Trump — a 97 percent turnout for Biden compared to 51 percent statewide.

Ha I was just about to post the same thing.
Yeah not the actual Navajo nation vote, and those number don't align with what I'm seeing elsewhere. CNN map shows 26k Trump votes in Coconino alone (which has been a blue County for awhile now due to Native American plus liberal Flagstaff).

In any case your point still stands because the group I've seen commonly cited for turning AZ blue is Latino voters in the southern AZ cities

Many xps:

Guardian: James Clyburn: ‘defund the police’ slogan may have hurt Democrats at polls

“I came out very publicly and very forcibly against sloganeering,” Clyburn said Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union. “John Lewis and I were founders of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. John and I sat on the House floor and talked about that "defund the police" slogan, and both of us concluded that it had the possibilities of doing to the Black Lives Matter movement and current movements across the country what "Burn, Baby, Burn" did to us back in the 1960s,” Clyburn said.

Be cool if he got Cori Bushed in 2022.

Hey Sanpaku shut the fuck up

I’m gonna donate the max to anyone primarying James Clyburn next cycle that’s for sure

re: Clyburn - that was nonsense in the 60's and it's nonsense now

Um, the 1968 election results. Nixon by 301-191 EV, +5 GOP senate seats, +5 GOP House seats. Still worse in 1972. Nixon by 520-17 EV, +12 GOP house seats. Current BLM protests are necessary, but they do present a headwind for national or state allies who could effect positive change.

Or at least the perception of them among low-info voters.

So much hinges on these Georgia runoffs, and every vote will count. Especially the votes of people who find themselves in the middle of the political divide.

That backlash began in 1966 after the Voting and Civil Rights Acts and in response to the civil rights struggle that John Lewis helped lead.

raising awareness is the necessary first step!

― Van Horn Street, Monday, November 9, 2020 3:50 AM (three hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

this turns 15 next year

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth

― it bangs for thee (Simon H.), Monday, November 9, 2020 3:53 AM (three hours ago)

In 1990, the unionist PM of Australia responded to public awareness by setting a "zero emissions by 1995" target (and was then internally deposed by a neoliberal). In 2020, the QAnon-following PM of Australia has set a "zero emissions by 2303" target. What's the second step?

No, I didn't see anything other than the text of the tweet. I didn't click through to see that it was a response to AOC, or read what AOC had tweeted that Karen was responding to. If I want to suck Twitter directly into my system, I'll join Twitter. I can see how others assuming I was somehow following AOC on Twitter would have made my response appear differently intended. That's a very unwarranted assumption, but natural enough if you live in the political Twittersphere. I can't be responsible for bad assumptions that are not revealed.

Nobody assumed you were following AOC on twitter, and following AOC on twitter would not alter anything about the way tweets by people who are not AOC embed on ILX, nor would it ensure that you see anybody who QTs her on twitter. I assume that nobody posting ITT follows AOC on twitter.