New Shoes.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1304 of them)
docs can get away with it b/c they are docs. any other kinda shoe that tried that kind of thing would look dumb (HELLO SKETCHERS!!)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 19:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Look Tom just because I bought wingtips at a Baltimore thrift store the day of your wedding doesn't mean they're suddenly IN now, GAWD.

I used to have a pair of Sketchers' engineer boots. They fell apart after a year.

I say #3, too.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

Leather soles -- C/D?

sinful caesar sipped his snifter (kenan), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 20:02 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess this is as good a thread as any to ask what Ugg boots are and why they are so bad and hated.

oh jaymcpaws

it doesn't matter anyway b/c uggs are OVER. be happy in yr ignorance.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 21:38 (seventeen years ago) link

if any of them, the 3rd. first one is gawdawful.

otm

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 21:41 (seventeen years ago) link

oh and btw, i went to payless today and found NOTHING good. ohwell. and found nothing good in all the other shoestores i went into. i'm going to have to stop looking and then good shoes will come. but anyway, i spent money on a usb/sata drive enclosure today instead, which is totally, like, the opposite of blue wedge sandals (but still cool!).

one other thing: do nice sandals for men even exist?? (I am looking for a friend, who will probably end up in something godawful anyway. I have seen nothing nice.)

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 21:42 (seventeen years ago) link

Look Tom just because I bought wingtips at a Baltimore thrift store the day of your wedding doesn't mean they're suddenly IN now, GAWD.

Tracer are you trying to take credit for PAUL EATER'S procurement? I believe it is he who deserves the credit for what were, in fact, great shoes.

Inspired by this shoe thread, I stopped by Daisy Too or whatever the hell it is called (the shoe part in back has a different name! But it is the same shop so WTF?). A pair of kelly green pumps I had admired quite a while back--but at whose price I blanched--was on sale for 75% off! 75%!!! So I bought them, despite the fact they are too big. I plan to fix that with some inserts and heel-sticker thingies.

quincie (quincie), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 21:59 (seventeen years ago) link

OKAY OKAY PEOPLE
I GOT THE BOTTOM ONES
I AM SORRY I EVER EVEN BROUGHT UP THE WINGTIPS
THEY SEEMED ENTERTAININGLY DEVIANT IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT NO OTHER IT PEOPLE WEAR SUCH SILLINESS ON THEIR FEET
ALSO WTF IS WITH KENNETH COLE AND DOC MARTENS CONVERGING ON A SIMILAR STYLE AND PRICE POINT
ARE THESE THE END TIMES

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 22:31 (seventeen years ago) link

I haven't seen the pics but as a rule I love the wingtips.

Thank you for the Ryuichi S. video! It made me smile:)

While we are on the subject, should I go for the new-fangled no-laces slip-on Converse, or stick with the old stand-bys?

http://images.asos.com/inv/D/15/94/67632/OffWhite/image1l.jpg

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 11 May 2006 00:29 (seventeen years ago) link

do nice sandals for men even exist??

no. no. a thousand times over, no. nice sandals for women don't even exist.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 11 May 2006 02:55 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.altrec.com/images/shop/photos/TEV/6407_m.jpg

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 May 2006 03:24 (seventeen years ago) link

is that a cross between an alligator, a bike tire, and my backpack??

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 04:05 (seventeen years ago) link

i want some shoes that combine the best qualities of a jet engine, a merino wool sweater, and a giant fern.

just because obviously shoe designers are randomly splicing away, so why not. it's like fish-tomatoes, for your feet.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 04:13 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually the brogue and/or wingtip thing is a coming trend for A/W 06.

I agree with Lauren about the whole sandals issue, ugh ugh ugh other people's gnarly toes.

Mary, those slip-on Converse look even better in a grey high-top. Nick's girlfriend H has a lovely pair.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 11 May 2006 05:55 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm on the fence about sandals for men (like, other than the cheapest plastic ones for beach-wear) -- I'd LIKE to say "no, there are no such things as un-awful men's sandals" but in fact I think in the right setting and with a little style, they can be fine. Obv EVERYONE has to keep up his/her feet so we're not exposed to cracked calluses and hangnails on the morning commute, but I like simple leather flip-flips on men sometimes with summer-wear, and I'm sure there are decent fisherman's-style sandals out there someplace. I realize this opin will meet much resistance.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:24 (seventeen years ago) link

style isn't the point of sandals, which is why the leather Romanesque shit is awful. but rubber/fabric beach or adventure wear is classic. it's summer. take your clothes off and fuck one fashion.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh yeah, I'm fine with basic plastic flip-flops etc, I just don't think that's the kind of shoe at issue, here. No one's saying "don't wear sandals to the beach", are they? I'm preparing a defense of MANDALS as day-wear.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm sorry, I know this is a techy issue for you gabbneb and you've defended it many times in the past, but sandals are not acceptable "going out and about" wear for men. Bars and workplaces are not for men's feet, really. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMaybe if you kept up your feet REALLY well you could get away with it without looking really manky at a dive bar but why would you want your feet out and about on the floor of a dirty bar?

Going to the beach or running errands is obviously a bit of a different story, I don't think anyone expects pure unadulterated fashion at the Fairway.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:53 (seventeen years ago) link

I dunno, a light-colored suit with a good drape. worn with, say, a very minimal brown leather flip-flop/thong? It's a bit "male model", yes, but this IS New York. I could dig it.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, this convo makes me think of the day I went to visit a very rock'n'roll friend at his day job in a comic book store, and he was wearing his skinny-boy jeans & T and a pair of plastic flip-flops in place of the usual boots. It was like NU-BRIAN.

Laurel (Laurel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 12:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm starting to see jelly shoes/sandals in stores again. Are they coming back? Discus.

The Mercury Krueger (Ex Leon), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:07 (seventeen years ago) link

marc jacobs makes them. i like them, but it's an approach-with-caution issue.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 11 May 2006 13:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I agree with Laurel about MANDALS! If I get to wear sandals all summer long, then guys should too, of course, but the sandals available for men aren't all that nice. But then, women's feet vs men's feet in "cute" department, etc - this is about more than FEET, it's about gender dynamics, form and function, etc etc. Hence, I suppose?, the sport/sturdier-looking/"manly" sandal for men. But I have sturdy sandals that don't look like shoe tanks, so the same should be for men. Like, that sport sandal above, in brown leather with a sturdy, perhaps birkenstock-like sole (but not birks!) would be alright! but apparently does not exist.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Kenneth Cole shoes suck, in my experience.

I was hanging out with a group of friends and we split off into male and female groups for walking around a shopping area. Being the gender stereotype killers we are, we ended up looking at shoes. My two accomplices ended up picking up very similar shoes. When the sales guy asked what size they needed, they both said at the same time, "ten and a half." I'm fairly sure he thought they were some sort of couple with a shoe fetish. In any case, I envy the shoes and wish I'd bought them since they ended up being really comfortable:
http://www.zappos.com/images/793/7177793/1729-165321-p.jpg

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Those Marc Jacobs jelly shoes are, like, 65 quid!

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:23 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't like quite so much visible stitching on a shoe, but those do look comfortable.

I think I am quite happy for men to wear sandals (not flip flops) in most situations as long as their feet are nice. It seems unfair that women should have access to a whole world of acceptable sandals whereas for men it is something of a minefield.

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Opinions: are these cute and practical or just frumpy?
http://www.schuhstore.co.uk/images/product/1305096020_lg.jpg

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link

Cute in a frumpy kind of way (which is to say I like them).

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link

I find these discussions about shoes strange - very alien.

To put that another way, I envy you people, for your knowledge and enthusiasm. Your world of footwear seems very glamorous.

the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Thank you, pinefox.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Thursday, 11 May 2006 14:59 (seventeen years ago) link

archel, yes, cute in a very practical way! i like the criss-cross bits. and the sole looks solid. good for walking.
i have been shoe shopping online uk-style and would also suggest these:
http://www.schuhstore.co.uk/images/product/1300846220_exlg.jpg
or ones like them - i bought a pair of clarks originals (brown, side lace-up) in oxford back when i first visited (2002!) and they're still kicking and i LOVE THEM. i finally wore through the sole last summer though, so need to fix that, if possible.

also, look what i found, cute, i want:
http://www.schuhstore.co.uk/images/product/1707902020_exlg.jpg

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 15:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Archie, sorry to disagree but I really don't like the chunky heel on those black shoes, above. If you don't want spiky heels, how about a kind of hourglass shaped heel?

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 11 May 2006 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link

OK have decided that if I am to get these YSL shoes the colour I want them in is SEPIA. Yes, sepia. Shock horror I have some clothes that require non-black footwear to look good. And worn with sepia not black fishnets/crochet pattern tights this might look divine all year.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:06 (seventeen years ago) link

what is a "bar"?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:08 (seventeen years ago) link

oh those yellow ones are cutey.

Allyzay Rofflesbot (allyzay), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:09 (seventeen years ago) link

a "bar"?

okay, last pair i'll post, but ones i really want b/c even if they're not ultra stylish (like those yellow ones, aw), i KNOW they're really comfortable (clarks originals) and will last. alas, only available in UK and would cost me a stupid amt of money (that i do not have right now, esp for wedge sandals of all things) to get. OH WELLL.

http://www.schuhstore.co.uk/images/product/1103055320_lg.jpg

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:12 (seventeen years ago) link

clarks should stick to wallabees.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:21 (seventeen years ago) link

i would agree with that except that these are like wallabees wedges! i like the originals series, but then, i have twee britishers feet, i think.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:32 (seventeen years ago) link

The wallaby sole/heel material that reminds me of snot in a resin mould makes the wedge look more appropriate to the needs of the senior shopper.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link

i see what you mean about the senior-needs aesthetic. but i'm rather drawn to that kind of thing (yeah...), if styled up a bit. i still think i could pull it off - the wedge appears less gummy in close-up.

i feel like i should post something totally impractical yet gorgeous to make up for this. but i won't. today.

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Thursday, 11 May 2006 18:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I also sort of covet those YSL heels, but I fear that on me they would make me look like I was wearing buckets on my feet. (If I could even afford a pair.) (Any pair of shoes! I am so broke, and wish to buy so many pairs.)

sgs (sgs), Thursday, 11 May 2006 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

three weeks pass...
that impending football tournament may have influenced me into buying these rather retro sneakers, somewhat enigmatically named 'the nike':

http://i6.tinypic.com/11lrjn5.jpg

they even have sorta fake but sorta real studs!!

http://i5.tinypic.com/11lrk47.jpg

lil' merzbow wow (haitch), Sunday, 4 June 2006 13:24 (seventeen years ago) link

those fake soccer runners are pretty awesome.
i got new sandals a couple weeks ago! they are a) wedges and b) blue! which is exactly what i was looking for. crazy.

http://static.flickr.com/70/160974070_0bd2b12fdc_o.jpg

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 5 June 2006 15:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Hot cha cha!!

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 5 June 2006 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

cuuuueeet

Courtney Gidts (ex machina), Monday, 5 June 2006 15:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh my god those shoes are awesome--where did you get them???

quincie (quincie), Monday, 5 June 2006 18:03 (seventeen years ago) link

yaay, i love my new shoes!
i got them at Aldo - i haven't bought shoes there in years and years, but sometimes they have really nice stuff! (most of it's all super trendy and/or not for me.)

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Monday, 5 June 2006 20:33 (seventeen years ago) link

one month passes...
If i wear a UK size 8 and a Euro 42, what size of shoes should i wear in the US?

leigh (leigh), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 11:10 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.