Astros series setup in perfect spot for Dusty Baker to produce the playoff nut buster crushing loss across their fan-base that he has delivered to every town he has managed within before.
― earlnash, Saturday, 17 October 2020 13:47 (three years ago) link
I am not liking the Rays situation currently.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 17 October 2020 17:05 (three years ago) link
LA
― calstars, Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:16 (three years ago) link
(xpost) I've subscribed to this theory the last few years that whenever every conceivable sign points to a game going one way, expect the opposite to happen; sports just doesn't make sense a lot of the time. So with 90% of baseball fans nauseous about the prospect of the Astros in the WS, wouldn't surprise me at all if the Rays win.
― clemenza, Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:23 (three years ago) link
Stop trying to put hopeful thoughts in my head! (I realize the odds are pretty much 50/50)
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:37 (three years ago) link
like a football bouncing, we just don't know where it's going to go
― president of my cat (Karl Malone), Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:41 (three years ago) link
clemenza otm
betting line is rays -118 and dodgers -140, both of which i find kind of surprising
― mookieproof, Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:42 (three years ago) link
Or, if you believe momentum to be a myth, probability would heavily favour the Rays. A .667 team should beat a .483 team about 63% of the time, all else being equal. The likelihood of the .483 teams winning four in a row would be--I think--.37 x .37 x .37 x .37, or about a 2% likelihood. (But I'm not sure. Does every game have to be treated independently, in which case it's the same 37% for tonight? I mean, the probability of flipping a head is always 50%, but if you step back, the probability of four in a row is about 6%.)
http://sabr.org/journal/article/probabilities-of-victory-in-head-to-head-team-matchups/
― clemenza, Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:46 (three years ago) link
A .667 team should beat a .483 team about 63% of the time, all else being equal.
given the unbalanced schedule other things are not equal, but yeah
it's the same 37% (or whatever) for tonight, although the starting pitcher matchup will make predicting any one game by overall records essentially meaningless
both teams have scored 21 runs in the series
― mookieproof, Saturday, 17 October 2020 18:53 (three years ago) link
Even factoring in the cheating, I think the Astros are a much better team than their record would indicate.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 17 October 2020 19:11 (three years ago) link
Agree with that, and to take their record literally is, I think--putting the cheating aside--wrong. It reminds me of the ILB poll a few years ago that included the 2000 Yankees as one of the worst WS winners because they were 87-74 for the season. It was, within the context of the Yankee-revolving-door, the same basic team as the '98/99/01 teams; the core was there anyway, plus other overlap. This year's Astros team is more or less the same Astros team of the last few years--not as good, but realistically closer to the WS team than to a .480 team.
― clemenza, Saturday, 17 October 2020 20:14 (three years ago) link
Cardinals 2006 team was probably one of their worst to make the playoffs yet won it all. Looking it up they were only 83-78 that year. Same deal though, as they were in the playoffs nearly every year those days.
― earlnash, Saturday, 17 October 2020 20:38 (three years ago) link
Was going to mention them, too, but then I noticed they were even worse in 2007...but they do go along with the general point, though.
― clemenza, Saturday, 17 October 2020 20:56 (three years ago) link
yeah -- they won 100+ games the last three years, and even with verlander out and cole gone they're still pretty decent
― mookieproof, Saturday, 17 October 2020 21:55 (three years ago) link
This year's Astros team is more or less the same Astros team of the last few years
I don't think the Astros are as bad as their record but losing Verlander and Cole is huge
― ✖, Saturday, 17 October 2020 22:43 (three years ago) link
stunned that treinen didn't give up a game-tying homer there
― mookieproof, Saturday, 17 October 2020 23:04 (three years ago) link
losing Verlander and Cole is huge
I was just thinking of Cole (so more the regular-season 2020 team); you're right, they're without Verlander right now, and that is decidedly not as strong a team.
If you hate the Astros and you're bigger on karma than probability, I would think that losing tonight, after coming all the way back--as opposed to getting swept and shrugging "Not our year"--would be the best possible way to see them exit. (Unless you're a big Rays fan, where the sweep would have obviously been better.)
― clemenza, Saturday, 17 October 2020 23:24 (three years ago) link
What in the wide, wide world of sports is going on here?
― clemenza, Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:04 (three years ago) link
Game 7 bitch
― calstars, Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:08 (three years ago) link
https://i.imgur.com/1uGHkJo.jpg
― calstars, Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:11 (three years ago) link
ok, rays vs astros, who are we rooting for here?
guess i'm going rays, since they have no money, they do have arozarena, and also fuck the astros
― president of my cat (Karl Malone), Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:49 (three years ago) link
the amazing raaaaaaaaaaaandy
― president of my cat (Karl Malone), Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:52 (three years ago) link
7 HRs this postseason - that's your Mazda Rookie Record - driving matters
― president of my cat (Karl Malone), Sunday, 18 October 2020 00:53 (three years ago) link
I really hate the rays but the Astros pulling a 2004 red sox might be too jokerfied even for me
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 01:23 (three years ago) link
Why would anyone hate the Rays
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 01:46 (three years ago) link
you don't have to appreciate their deranged cheapness just because they make it work or because the front office displays unprecedented ingenuity. they lack a concrete team identity because the FO refuses to hold onto 90% of their players when they start to cost money. they're a team of part-time journeymen and it's not because they have to be, it's because the FO is smart enough to make their cheapness work. when i root for a team to win i'm rooting for players, not executives and a probably also underpaid analytics department
moneyball's nothing but an excuse these days
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:05 (three years ago) link
fuck em i like the cheaters more
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:06 (three years ago) link
Kinda lame to put the onus of bad ownership on these players.
Part-time journeymen is a bit much, too.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:12 (three years ago) link
agreed it's no fun when the Rays are good but baseball is fundamentally set up to reward that sort of teambuilding
― frogbs, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:13 (three years ago) link
can't root for them if i can't remember who any of them are!
it's fine, in 2 or 3 years they'll all be on completely different teams, including ones i might actually like. i'll root for them then.
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:15 (three years ago) link
Well if we are going to dislike teams for having bad owners on top of disliking teams that have too much financial power there won't be a lot of baseball left to enjoy.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:16 (three years ago) link
i'm not talking about their owner, i'm talking about how their owner affects the entire structure of the organization, which is unique
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:18 (three years ago) link
Well if you can't enjoy or remember players that went 136 and 86 over the last two regular seasons because of that you might be knocking on the wrong door.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:22 (three years ago) link
it's not a problem i have with any other team! well except the diamondbacks, but that's mostly because of their branding
why are you so invested in my distaste for 1 out of 30 mlb teams?
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:25 (three years ago) link
do they read ilx
i'm sorry blake snell i always pick you in fantasy
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:26 (three years ago) link
Sorry, I don’t mean to be that way. I’m just tired of seeing negative vibes everywhere I look there’s always someone hating on something or someone.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:31 (three years ago) link
i didn't mean for that to come off confrontational, i'm genuinely interested in why people on the internet tend to get so defensive over the A's and the rays. most of the hate people have for opposing teams has nothing to do with the actual players on the teams. i don't see why it's any less valid to hate a team for an extremely shrewd FO than it is for an extremely spending one, other than... the past 20 years of internet sabermetrics fandom imposing a weird morality on analytic ingenuity. i've been reading fangraphs for fifty years, that doesn't mean i have to like teams for giving them a lot of content.
xp no worries VHS i'm being a crank
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:36 (three years ago) link
to be fair to myself i've been super positive about the astros, go astros
― ✖, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:37 (three years ago) link
I’m bandwagonning hard on the Dodgers, so it’s not like I care that much, I do enjoy watching these Rays play that being said.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:48 (three years ago) link
It’s just, I’m not going to let sleazy owners and nerdy FOs alter my appreciation of Ji-Man Choi or Ronald Acuna.
― Van Horn Street, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:49 (three years ago) link
it all gets mixed in
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:52 (three years ago) link
Holding out to see if it’s somehow possible that all four of these teams lose.
― error prone wolf syndicate (Hadrian VIII), Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:57 (three years ago) link
i feel u
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 October 2020 02:59 (three years ago) link
i totally get why some people feel the way x does about the Rays; but one of the main things i love about them – i don't care if it's the players doing it or the FO or analytics departments – is how they've transformed the game. the opener, for example, they took some heat for it at first – but now there's a lot of teams doing it (possibly the majority). love the line-up/bench of moving parts. i don't have a hard time liking their players either, even if they are role players or journey men (not that i would call many of their guys the later).
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 18 October 2020 03:20 (three years ago) link
There’s something about Fairbanks expressions that I love. Like he’s half terrified or something.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 18 October 2020 03:27 (three years ago) link
Like watching Richie Cunningham pitch.
― Three Rings for the Elven Bishop (Dan Peterson), Sunday, 18 October 2020 03:35 (three years ago) link
brilliant analysis
https://i.imgur.com/Xw9vEeM.jpg
charlie morton got two more outs and exited having thrown 66 pitches
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 October 2020 03:39 (three years ago) link
you hate to see it
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 October 2020 04:02 (three years ago) link
Stoked for the Rays. In case you haven't been paying attention, they dominated the league this year (.667) and have been almost as good in the playoffs (.643) to date.
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Sunday, 18 October 2020 04:13 (three years ago) link
The other time Tampa was in the series, that was the crazy ending to the regular season, right, where all those games were decided almost simultaneously?
― clemenza, Sunday, 18 October 2020 04:40 (three years ago) link