I find that lists like this serve two purposes: as a cross-section of an individual or group aesthetic, and as a guide for new music to listen to. I don't see the point of complaining what's on them or not on them, make your own list if you want a mirror of your preferences.
I also wonder why some jazz fans/historians/critics feel that if you like one strand of this music, you ought to enjoy listening to old records that have nothing in common with your taste. I'm not talking about these records appearing on lists, I mean the outrage when this or that is absent or under-appreciated. Is it because this one hundred years of music is all still called "jazz"? I mean, how would extreme metal fans respond to someone shoving Chuck Berry or Yardbirds records at them, because it's all "rock"?
― Halfway there but for you, Sunday, 27 September 2020 16:25 (three years ago) link
I thought a big reason why this was post-45 only was that pre-45 stuff would get lost in the shuffle. Better to separate it out and give it the attention it deserves.
― Mario Meatwagon (Moodles), Sunday, 27 September 2020 16:28 (three years ago) link
Indeed, but Tuomas didn't run it but maybe one of the people on this thread bemoaning the lack of pre 45 jazz could volunteer to run it?
― Oor Neechy, Sunday, 27 September 2020 16:46 (three years ago) link
Rude he wrote the theme tune for this board and didn't even place here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW8NQgqYoVQ
― Stanley Crouch, Monday, 17 April 2023 11:57 (eleven months ago) link
A short rollout meant that someone had to miss out.
― ToshirÅ Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Monday, 17 April 2023 13:06 (eleven months ago) link