okay, I just finished this...it took me a solid year. I kept having to stop and take breathers, but it was mind-blowing. I feel I must read it again, as I'm sure I've missed a ton of subtext
― Morley Timmons, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 05:14 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm exactly at that point, too, Morley.
― Lostandfound, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 08:22 (seventeen years ago) link
"the smoke of certain afternoons" is such an odd thing to find qualms with.
― thomp, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 23:48 (seventeen years ago) link
can one find qualms or just have them?
"October 25: Rocketmen and Wastelands, an essay by Marshall Shord - Shord is a recent graduate of Washington College, Maryland, who won the nation’s largest undergraduate literary prize, the Sophie Kerr Prize, in large part thanks to his 100-page critical thesis on the first three novels of Thomas Pynchon. Shord was awarded a check for almost $56,000 for his scholarly excellence and last we heard he’s been traveling the world. The Modern Word is proud to share the Pynchon paper worth a BMW, which could be characterized as one reader’s personal dialogue with Pynchon’s first three novels."
http://themodernword.com/pynchon/shord.pdf
― thomp, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 23:49 (seventeen years ago) link
^thanks for this...v. good reading on a slow day at work.
― johnny crunch, Friday, 5 October 2007 23:22 (seventeen years ago) link
pers'n'ly i am for thinking it is awful
― thomp, Sunday, 7 October 2007 10:44 (seventeen years ago) link
who would make the best film adaptation of gravity's rainbow? i think the coen bros would do the best at casting the array of characters.
― cutty, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:37 (sixteen years ago) link
i read this book 15 yrs ago in fits & starts over six months mostly "under the influence" so it passed by in a semi-comprehensible haze. what stuck was the names, i almost made "geli tripping" my first ILM tag.
ken's takes on the science/literary split feel absolutely OTM to me.
― m coleman, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago) link
I read the first ten pages the other day! If I could only quit it with the Internet for a week or two I'd be able to get through the rest. Already I can sense it's gonna be pretty sick.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 12 August 2008 20:28 (sixteen years ago) link
if you read gravity's rainbow in two weeks i doubt you are really reading it
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link
i like the coen brothers doing this, but, dumb question, wouldn't it have to be a miniseries, not a movie?
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:13 (sixteen years ago) link
if you think about the timeline and actual narrative in gravity's rainbow, i think it would fit into a 2 hour (or maybe a little more) film
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link
Have you heard Saunders' Issac Babel reading on the New Yorker podcast?
― C0L1N B..., Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link
no wai cutty -- slothrup would barely be parachuting within the first two hours, and that's omitting the musical numbers.
i do not think coens are a great match, because of their tendency to flatten the whole range of humor into one dry sadistically funny band, and i would submit alex cox as a better director.
― remy bean, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link
i don't think you could do it justice in 2 hours! you'd have to leave too much out and all of the plot digressions are what make the book what it is.
also i think the coen brothers would make it too hokey. i don't really think gr could be made into a worthwhile film, actually.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link
i would say maybe terry gilliam over the coen bros tho
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link
howz about coens for the dance numbers, someone else for the rest.
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link
wrong thread?
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:59 (sixteen years ago) link
Ha, yes. That was for "Book Remakes".
― C0L1N B..., Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link
just found a link to it, i will check it out!
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:03 (sixteen years ago) link
and that's omitting the musical numbers.
the musical number in the white visitation room with all the lab workers in a maze, damn that would be so awesome.
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:04 (sixteen years ago) link
I think this would have to be an animated film to work properly.
Also Louis, I would recommend reading it as quickly as possible and not trying to follow it too closely, just enjoy the language and humour, and then re-reading it extensively at your leisure.
― I am using your worlds, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link
the coens could totally do JR by Gaddis--a bunch of people talking over each other for 2+ hours
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link
resurrect altman
― remy bean, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link
lol singing and dancing octopus
question is who plays rocketman?
― cutty, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link
bill pullman in a surprise cameo
― remy bean, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:17 (sixteen years ago) link
Well already I'm very pleased with the nonchalant approach to the absurd evident in Pynchon's writing-style. I've heard it scales astonishing heights of intense and comic intricacy. Sounds fab. Will get on the case as soon as I get home tomorrow.
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link
I think Roberto Rodriguez would do a fab job, maybe with particularly surreal sections either by Pixar or rotoscope-style (or both!)
― s.clover, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link
pynchon really needs an action director for the most part, and a straight-up genre director in general.
― s.clover, Saturday, 16 August 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link
Is this book anything like 'O Lucky Man'?
I have to say the X-Treme enthusiasm for this over the entire history of ILX has made me not want to read it, ever.
― Abbott, Saturday, 16 August 2008 19:00 (sixteen years ago) link
Not being funny, but y'know O Lucky Man is a re-working of Candide, right? GR does have elements of them in it, come to think of it. I understand what you mean about being off-put, but I think it's beautiful and like most big beautiful books best approached as a quilty wonderland to get lost in rather than as a code to break or a mountain to climb.
― Noodle Vague, Saturday, 16 August 2008 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link
richard kelly
― kl0pper, Monday, 18 August 2008 10:05 (sixteen years ago) link
sorry, coen brothers suck. who could be this funny and amazing? no one. leave it as a fucking book for once.
― strgn, Monday, 18 August 2008 10:09 (sixteen years ago) link
Noodle Vague OTM re "quilty wonderland"
― I am using your worlds, Monday, 18 August 2008 10:24 (sixteen years ago) link
yes! why some things should never be film adapted unless they are something completely different
― strgn, Monday, 18 August 2008 10:51 (sixteen years ago) link
Could work as an ongoing prime time soap opera style serial though, 30 mins a week in perpetuity. And I still think an animated version might work.
― I am using your worlds, Monday, 18 August 2008 10:58 (sixteen years ago) link
totally, anything serial or genre. animated would be amazing but crazy. graphic novel?
― strgn, Monday, 18 August 2008 11:04 (sixteen years ago) link
There is some German film based on (bits of) GR. It also features Robert Forster out of the Go Betweens! Trailer is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ046SJpl8E
― Stevie T, Monday, 18 August 2008 12:36 (sixteen years ago) link
"as per leslie fiedler there is little difference, generically, between sex porn and horror-porn"
huh well even for leslie fiedler that's cracky
-
i haven't reread this book in like almost two years! this makes me sad.
― thomp, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link
malcolm mcdowell would be the best of all possible slothrups
― remy bean, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 02:10 (sixteen years ago) link
leave it as a fucking book for once.
generally, i agree with this sentiment. but i think the narrative of GR is one of the most brilliant and beautifully crafted things i have ever read. i would love to see it in visual form. preferably while pynchon is still alive and is willing to work on it. most likely that will never happen.
― cutty, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link
there's always the opera, which he technically agreed to
― thomp, Wednesday, 20 August 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link
coogan?
― s.clover, Friday, 22 August 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link
x post
He only agreed for the opera if it was entirely scored for kazoo
― I am using your worlds, Saturday, 23 August 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link
Banjo, I think.
― Stevie T, Saturday, 23 August 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link
It is now almost exactly 5 years since I finished this book. I hope it has improved a bit in that time.
― the pinefox, Monday, 25 August 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link
Or maybe you have?
― s.clover, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link
I thought it was ukulele; I wonder if the whole story is actually apocryphal.
I am quite impressed that the pinefox finished this book, considering his distaste for it.
― thomp, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 11:02 (sixteen years ago) link