Lance Armstrong is a God

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (508 of them)
try 6:38, over kloden

duke over, Saturday, 24 July 2004 16:06 (nineteen years ago) link

any jockeying within the top 10 for those mid-race bonus sprints tomorrow? or are those just for a few seconds each? can't remember

duke seconds, Saturday, 24 July 2004 16:09 (nineteen years ago) link

yo i need to get my sprint face on

cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 24 July 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link

try 6:38, over kloden

Even better, then!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 16:45 (nineteen years ago) link

The green jersey competition is still close. It could be decided on the line Sunday.

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 24 July 2004 17:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyway sorry.

x-post

No, no, no apology needed for sure. I was just sayin.

Speedy, while you're in Boise, I was marshalling the Mt. Evans Hill Climb. It was 45 degrees and drizzly at my checkpoint at 8000 ft, I'm really glad I didn't have to go to the top at 14,100 ft. I'm guessing it had to be in the 20's up there. Oh, and Vaughters was riding in his old CA gear--in the Citizens category. I cheered him, he laughed.

Hunter (Hunter), Saturday, 24 July 2004 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Nathalie, I know you probably didn't mean to, but you make it sound like he gave himself cancer to win races.
The strange thing is, if he'd never had cancer then he might have never won the TdF because he was 20-25 lbs heavier pre-cancer. Before 1999 I believe he'd raced three times in the Tour and abandoned twice.
Obviously this is not a backhanded way of wishing cancer on top riders, but just a comment on wierd how things turn out sometimes.

And the only way to be sure that someone is doping is if they a) test positive, or b) admit it. Period. Speculation is a useless excercise . Once you start speculating, then everyone starts looking guilty which again gets you nowhere.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 24 July 2004 17:38 (nineteen years ago) link

i've always understood that most of his success could be explained by specialization - is this not neccessarily the case? specialization has revolutionized most other sports, is it a new thing for cycling? are other cyclists doing it (yet)? if not, if armstrong is the only cyclist who does then it's hardly surprising that he would dominate this race, babe ruth was hitting three to four times the number of home runs as anyone else (sometimes three to four times as any other team) until the cw 'homeruns are a gimmick that don't win games' was overthrown by the yanks actually winning series, then pow! other people start hitting homeruns. how tradition bound and riddled with conventional wisdom is the world of cycling? are armstrong's training methods radically different from the norm?

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:02 (nineteen years ago) link

In Lance's case, I'd say that it's definitely the training, in the sense that his entire year is focused on winning the Tour and nothing else. Hinault recently commented that if Merckx had only concentrated on winning the Tour then he'd have won it 14 times.

This highly focused training means, among other things 1) Lance has to be in peak form for only three weeks of the year, 2) since he's not competing in many other races, then he's got more time to train on the actual TdF route. It's no secret that Lance knows the routes (and the climbs in particular), far better than any of his competitors. But there's no way you can race a full season and still find time to do this -- as part of his training, Lance and his team ride the entire route at least once or twice, and the main climbs even more than that.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:24 (nineteen years ago) link

right, well there is a broad span to the season, and he has generally ignored the rest of it since coming back as a differently composed rider. the irony being that the flipside component of one-day glory (as opposed to stage-race tours like the TdF) to the cycling world, which he was a known achiever within (what was it liege-bastogne-liege? and as hunter pointed out to nathalie, PROFESSIONAL WORLD ROAD RACE CHAMPION), he has up until now at least fully abandoned altogether. not too many others are in the position to do that, as racing is a living like any other, and these teams are corporate-sponsored entities who want maximum results/exposure. the rest of the seasons events are televised too across the globe, some even here in U.S. on OLN.
anyway it is safe to say he deserves this position and doesn't seem to take it for granted, or really ever be interested in resting on laurels at all, but hopefully he try for some more one-days before he ulitmately calls it quits. he also has talked about tackling the hour record, etc. which is very Seventies and killer. lance is taking it back hopefully.
such a tech/stats-head though, and hunter it's no surprise to me he's down with weisel, though i didn't know it before.

duke bonds, Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:28 (nineteen years ago) link

not too many others are in the position to do that, as racing is a living like any other, and these teams are corporate-sponsored entities who want maximum results/exposure. - so, strangely, is it somewhat the lack of interest in cycling in the us that allows armstrong to specialize and focus on the only race most americans are familiar with?

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 24 July 2004 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link

there are other non-yanks (and one other, hamilton, who is as well one) such as ullrich, mayo, heras etc. who are more or less in this position too. and the Tour de France is essentially the acknowledged Big One, to everybody everywhere.
obv. you must have demonstrated an ability to seriously contend before in order to have such support in focusing on it. and it's up to the rider too, and what's important along the season's schedule to him as an individual. eventually Lemond just had his Tour and World Championship. an aberration like Merckx wanted to win every race all the time. and so on..

duke flight, Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link

paradoxically this year there were probably MORE who were able to focus because they somehow thought that they smelled blood or something. ha!

duke paris, Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

funny you should mention merckx: it's widely known (here in belgium at least) he was a *doper*. he's an arrogant bloated twat. i dunno, i don't really think many of the top cyclists do *not* take substances. 1 most want to win at *any* cost and 2 there's sometimes a grey zone between illegal and what's allowed and so on... we'll know in a decade or so (see jones). ;-)

my husband joked that the main reason lance wants to win: his new girlfriend. hah!

jesus nathalie (nathalie), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Armstrong's Lance. *hides*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

When I saw this picture of Ullrich on a new bike via that cyclingnews.com link above I thought it was a joke (it is not):

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Foo, a disappearance:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2004/tour04/stage19/live/jans.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

"funny you should mention merckx: it's widely known (here in belgium at least) he was a *doper*. he's an arrogant bloated twat. i dunno, i don't really think many of the top cyclists do *not* take substances. 1 most want to win at *any* cost and 2 there's sometimes a grey zone between illegal and what's allowed and so on... we'll know in a decade or so (see jones). ;-) "

*yawns*

duke asleep, Saturday, 24 July 2004 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

A letter from a rider allegedly chased to an early retirement by the ascendance of EPO. Word was that he wouldn't even take vitamin injections. Hampsten was a beautiful climber, and won Alpe d'Huez in I think 94, not to mention 4th in the TdF and winning the Giro (his attack to take the maglia rosa over a snowbound Gavia Pass is a legend of the sport).

The letter is more a defense of Lemond, but the attack on Ferrari, as I noted above, reflects strongly on Armstrong.

Hunter (Hunter), Saturday, 24 July 2004 21:54 (nineteen years ago) link

the EPO year zero by lemond's estimation is then 1990. lance was at that point competing in teenage triathlons, years away from being a pro anything.
but there is another dominant champion popping up in lemond's wake. just as "they couldn't keep up with pace." and one escaping this business unscathed. so what gives?
did lemond and his father ever patch up their extreme falling out, or the troubles it caused their company? can anyone else point out a history of lance introducing personal conflict into a business sphere? and i don't mean on the racecourse obv.

duke hello, Saturday, 24 July 2004 22:12 (nineteen years ago) link

oh and hampsten won alpe d'huez in '92, i was lucky enough to be there

duke swiss, Saturday, 24 July 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

another dominant champion popping up in lemond's wake

I'm not sure I understand yr question, but...

Big Mig? Or alleged EPO poster child "up 'til now I've had debilitating wheat allergies that affected my equilibrium, but watch me go now!" Gianni Bugno?

Armstrong is known as a hardcore my way/highway person. I don't know if he's brought his personal beefs into his business side, but I'm not clear on how much differentiation there is there. The first personal beef I think of besides Armstrong is Livingston.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:35 (nineteen years ago) link

"Big Mig? Or alleged EPO poster child "up 'til now I've had debilitating wheat allergies that affected my equilibrium, but watch me go now!" Gianni Bugno?"

mig but take your pick. i saw bugno that day on alpe d'huez too. in a world championship jersey i believe.

"I'm not clear on how much differentiation there is there"

between a racecourse and running/dealing with a company? really?

lemond is way more emotional, less steely a person. not to mention more wily a racer than he ever was dominating. he could not have handled what lance had to last year in the tour IMHO. would have thrown his bike or something i bet.
and what of hinault's take as i said in an earlier post? he's got no real allegiance to anybody and def. knows lemond up close and he has made a call, from what liggett and sherwen said the other day, that greg's jealous.
and greg on ESPN said "if he's clean, greatest comeback, if he's not, greatest fraud" well duh, then why even say anything?
...or bother to qualify at all if you basically say in the next breath he ADMITTED using substances during the phone call to him? something's fishy about it.

duke fish, Sunday, 25 July 2004 00:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, I think there's a substantial overlap, stylewise for Lance. He's not running a company, just managing his brand. But, for example, his sworn vengeance against Cofidis, his unconditional allegiance to Nike and Oakley based upon their treatment of him in his hour of personal need. It's how he works, from what I can see.

I may be misunderstanding, or not making my (perhaps needlessly-nuanced) position clear, but I don't think we're really arguing too much here. I deplored Lemond's comments about LA. I totally dug LA running down Kloeden like a dog, and LA's professionalism and desire are fucking great. Even if he were to be found doping, I'd actually still think he's among the greatest ever. I just don't assume he's clean, and I am concerned about the Simeoni thing yesterday. Simeoni's comments were under oath I believe. Was he supposed to perjure himself to protect the peloton? LA is saying he lied under oath to impugn it? Or just Ferrari? Complicated.

If pro cycling were revealed to be a drugging clown show, it really wouldn't ruin my day, I'd rather ride my own bike and think about trying to get enough training time in to race 'cross this year.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 25 July 2004 02:09 (nineteen years ago) link

lance is a mediocre-good rider on his own, but he has an amazing team, skilled in the art of blocking others and supporting ther leader. It's lke the american fascsit ideal on wheels.

queen G goes round and round, Sunday, 25 July 2004 06:20 (nineteen years ago) link

The CyclingNews.com commentary for the final stage is very amusing. Simeoni breakaway followed by recapture, and as it stands everyone's apparently chatting away calmly while Armstrong's allowing himself a glass of champagne already.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 11:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, further evidence of Robin Williams' extreme cockfarmery:

Speaking of prizes, Floyd Landis (USPS) has been awarded a special prize by comedian Robin Williams, who is a good fried of Lance Armstrong and the team. After his efforts in the mountains, and particularly stage 17, Williams nominated Landis the "baddest mofo of the mountains" and gave him a studly gold ring.

Shouldn't he be off making Patch Adams II: Electric Boogaloo or something?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 11:41 (nineteen years ago) link

And that's that, Armstrong's sixth, McEwen holds onto the green jersey.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:46 (nineteen years ago) link

One of the most embarrassingly fawning ledes in the history of sports reportage (and a long and sorry history that is):

PARIS (AP) _ Lance Armstrong rode into history Sunday by winning
the Tour de France for a record sixth time, an achievement that
confirmed the victory-hungry cancer survivor as one of the greatest
sportsmen of all time.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Sunday, 25 July 2004 17:40 (nineteen years ago) link

"CRAWFORD  -- President Bush called Lance Armstrong today after the bicycle champion won his sixth straight Tour de France victory. "You're awesome," Bush told Armstrong."

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 25 July 2004 17:42 (nineteen years ago) link

bringing this thread full circle.

duke bring, Sunday, 25 July 2004 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link

dear lance:

i hereby declare you to be awesome

love,

g dubbs

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 25 July 2004 17:55 (nineteen years ago) link

thankfully the triumph of St. Lance didn't interfere with the more pressing duties of the president's office:

Bush spent the morning clearing brush at his ranch here, but
came into his house about the time his fellow Texan crossed the
finish line and watched TV coverage after the race's finish, she
said.

rasheed wallace (rasheed wallace), Sunday, 25 July 2004 17:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Simeoni's comments were under oath I believe. Was he supposed to perjure himself to protect the peloton?

He was under oath, and accusing someone of purjury would be a serious charge. I think Armstrong's upset about the way Simeoni framed himself. His testimony was essentially "yeah, I did drugs, but I was just following orders". Thus, he's transfering some of the blame from himself to his doctors, trainers, and team management. Thus, the doping issue acquires a lot more breadth than just a few guys doping on their own without instruction from anybody, and that's what Lance feels is so damaging to cycling.

Eurosport somehow missed out on the Simeoni attacks at the start. That explains why the commentators weren't flipping out like I was when he did it again halfway through the stage.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 25 July 2004 19:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I think this is probably wishful thinking from the Domina Vacanze source, but interesting nonetheless.

According to a Domina Vacanze team source, Simeoni learned on Sunday that magistrates presiding over the trial of Armstrong’s performance consultant, Michele Ferrari, may wish to question the American about his mid-race altercation with Simeoni on Friday’s 18th stage. Legal officials in Florence apparently suspect that Armstrong may have been guilty of attempting to influence a witness.

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link

bwahahaha

duke give me break, Sunday, 25 July 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd rather ride my own bike and think about trying to get enough training time in to race 'cross this year.

Full-on respect to Hunter. I mostly mountain bike, but I've done a handful of cyclocross races over the past couple of years. Bike riding at its most primeval, all that up-bank down-ditch madness, real heart-rate through the roof, sliding around in shite, chunder through your nose, 'what the hell am I doing this for', cold, wet Sunday morning in Hell stuff. Fucking batshit stupid, but it's great. Woohoo!

NickB (NickB), Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

i did one i think, back when i rode/raced.
i hated that type of racing because i don't much believe in getting off the bike, but conversely i love those style of bikes. they're awesome looking, ready for anything...

duke mudd, Sunday, 25 July 2004 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Colorado 'cross is usually sunny and dusty, Nick. I've seen 80 degrees in November. Or, snowy, I've seen snow cover in September. It is rarely just straight up muddy. It IS great.

It's weird how ubiquitous cross bikes are now.

Hunter (Hunter), Monday, 26 July 2004 01:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I have some things to add here but I gotta think them out a bit. I'll be back.

Speedy (Speedy Gonzalas), Monday, 26 July 2004 03:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, Bush is really trying to associate himself w/ him. This is my public prayer that he shows up at the DNC this week and endorses his fellow cyclist and cancer-survivor.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 26 July 2004 03:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Lance is considering the Giro for next year apparently, now *that* will be interesting.

How soon do we see where the route will be next year, seeing as we have free accomodation over there it'd be silly not to go see if it's not near where we stay

Porkpie (porkpie), Monday, 26 July 2004 07:35 (nineteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

um.

The muted sensation feels amazeballs. (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 August 2012 03:38 (eleven years ago) link

LOL

young money color me badd (J0rdan S.), Friday, 24 August 2012 03:40 (eleven years ago) link

Haw.

omar little, Friday, 24 August 2012 03:49 (eleven years ago) link

jan aint gonna win squat. he'll be surpassed by ivan basso and the new french generation once lance quits..

― Jay G (jaybob79), Friday, 23 July 2004 00:13 (8 years ago)

lol, 'new french generation'

your own personal cheeses (haitch), Friday, 24 August 2012 03:51 (eleven years ago) link

does anyone think there's any merit to the rumor that the drugs caused his cancer?

wk, Friday, 24 August 2012 04:46 (eleven years ago) link

you couldn't really say 'caused it' but if he was mucking around with HGH and testosterone and the like, that stuff isn't exactly going to calm down and aggressive tumor.

your own personal cheeses (haitch), Friday, 24 August 2012 04:55 (eleven years ago) link

Possible. High testosterone levels increase the risk of testicular cancer. Anabolics increase IGF-1, and IGF-1 increases cancer risk. Even Epo is implicated in cancer proliferation.

The Painter of Blight™ (Sanpaku), Friday, 24 August 2012 04:55 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.