SOLAR POWER

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (122 of them)

There is no degradation of panels or reduction of panel efficiency

this is not a thing that happens, panels have a 25-year output warranty for a reason, and work for even longer as noted above

no fear of needing (or wanting) to upgrade in the near future

also not an issue - don't replace existing panels to upgrade, just add more on a newer inverter.

the biggest drag on a lot of homes, heating and cooling

OK this I agree with.

fwiw my parents have had many painful and expensive difficulties with their geothermal system, they have had no issue with the solar at all.

sure there's an early-adopter price tag still. but as you have seen, the numbers are good in terms of IRR.

sleeve, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 17:52 (four years ago) link

My mom has geothermal and loves it, but is not really a candidate for solar.

And panels absolutely do degrade, however slightly. So says the guy I just spoke with and everything I've seen. The cheaper the panel, the quicker (or more) they will start to degrade. The more expensive the panel (like the ones he was pitching), the better they work and the longer they work before any significantly reduced returns (plus better warranties). Granted, around 1% annual decline in productivity is not that big, but that still means 10% after 10 years, and so on, which is not nothing. If we were to, say, want to sell our house in ten years, solar may factor as a selling point, but esp. if we can say it offsets 100% of the house's consumption. It's still good to say 90%, or 85%, but it may not hit that magic psychological number, imo, to get the ideal ROI.

And adding to the system in the future obviously costs money, too. Just things to consider.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:43 (four years ago) link

it's way less than 1% a year degradation, more like 1/4 of a %

there's a reason they guarantee >80% output for 25 years, 1% a year would be a lot more than that

and yeah you are correct that "100% coverage" is often not a good idea in terms of ROI

sleeve, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:45 (four years ago) link

Just googling I saw something like an average of .5% annual degradation, and that's linked, like output and efficiency, to quality, which is to say, cost. But yeah, that's a relatively minor concern. Degradation, not cost, that is. A higher priced system here would go for around $22K. A lower cost system would go for around $18k. Both are huge numbers, and if you finance, obviously that number goes up.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:55 (four years ago) link

fwiw that amount sounds just about right for installed cost on 5-6 KW

sleeve, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:58 (four years ago) link

I just got his formal pitch, if you're curious, but it includes:

Panel degradation rate: 3% in year 1; 0.26% years 2-25 - 90% efficient @ yr 25

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 19:00 (four years ago) link

ah that's really interesting! thanks. I did not know that more degradation was assumed in year 1.

sleeve, Wednesday, 26 February 2020 19:01 (four years ago) link

After saying my roof isn't great for solar I'm now starting to thing I should jump on this. The Roof is bad because it is flat and mainly taken up by my roof deck, but havingng Saturday up their a lot the shading on the exposed parts isn't actually as bad as I thought and now you can get a 400W standard size panel(SunPower), I could actually get some useful production out of it. There's an outside chance I could squeeze 6 on the eastern end of the roof and 2 on the western end, really its probably 4 and 2 but that could still be 2.4kW. Panels would probably have to be flat rather than on tilt frames or the homeowners association would flip and the shading means I'd have to have micro inverters (Enphase) or optimisers (SolarEdge) to get the best out of a system.

I've had the Enphase option priced out and it comes in at AU$3.74/W which makes me wince, especially as we won't qualify for the current VIC government rebate which would bring that down. I've got a mate going through the same process and his (much bigger) system is quoted out at $1.22/W or AU$1.08/W if he gets the rebate. Thats on a SolarEdge System with optimisers and and Longi 350W Mono PERC panels.

Not that it's really about payback but It would take me about 10 years to breakeven on that

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 11 March 2020 05:41 (four years ago) link

nine months pass...

26% solar tax credit extended for 2 years as part of the COVID bill, definitely a good thing

https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2020/12/solar-investment-tax-credit-extended-at-26-for-two-additional-years/

howls of non-specificity (sleeve), Tuesday, 22 December 2020 21:48 (three years ago) link

one year passes...

Dunno if I mentioned it, but we did end up getting solar and have been very happy with it so far.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 August 2022 18:13 (one year ago) link

what inverter type, do you know?

thinkmanship (sleeve), Thursday, 11 August 2022 18:54 (one year ago) link

also, Josh, note this key provision:

"The tax credit applies to residential adopters of solar technology. If the bill is passed, the 30% credit will be retroactively applied to anyone who installed their system since the beginning of 2022."

thinkmanship (sleeve), Thursday, 11 August 2022 18:56 (one year ago) link

We had it done in 2020, so already got whatever rebates and whatnot we were expecting.

As for inverter type, I believe we have a Solar Edge Single Phase Inverter with HD-Wave.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 11 August 2022 19:06 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.