Which band has the best discography?

for lengthy career, Miles Davis prob

on the rap front I'd say Outkast but then I've never listened to Idlewild in its entirety lol

Missy's discography is incredibly consistent

Roxy Music

The Beatles were pretty great.

seems like this by necessity will be the best band with the smallest discography

VU's official releases -- minus maybe Another View, and definitely minus Squeeze -- hit this mark

Yeah, Velvets would def be the best answer but Doug Yule era fucks it up

Also, yeah, I would be hard pressed to name a bad Beatles song tbh

but the OP explicitly includes that crap, so this has to be a band with real strict quality control

like, say, the Stone Roses

*hides*

Missy's discography is incredibly consistent

GangStarr too

I would be hard pressed to name a bad Beatles song tbh

What's the New Mary Jane is pretty bad

A Taste of Honey

there's others...

E-40 and Scarface also incredibly consistent - although in both cases there's stuff I haven't heard cuz I can't keep up lol

Spacemen 3

Missy's discography is incredibly consistent

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, January 28, 2020 4:03 PM (five minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Love Missy but foh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTQkdQVcEIg

is there a bad Duke Ellington record?

D’Angelo, Big Black

did you mean to post this on RYM Whiney

womp womp

lol

D'Angelo is a good answer

The rap answer might be Biggie :(

surely M|A|R|R|S gets posted by now every time one of these threads is done

aren't there a bunch of Biggie verses scattered across all kinds of shitty post-mortem crap?

Wire - aside from maybe half of "Manscape" and "The First Letter", but both have great bits as well. The rest of their catalog is consistently stellar.

had skinny puppy truly hung it up after the process

surely M|A|R|R|S gets posted by now every time one of these threads is done

― don't care didn't ask still clappin (sic)

i was gonna say elizabeth city state, myself

Big Star never made a bad record

― Οὖτις

never sure when people say these things if they have forgotten about in space or if they actually like that record

Also, yeah, I would be hard pressed to name a bad Beatles song tbh

― The Mandymoorian (Whiney G. Weingarten)

i could name a half a dozen beatles song i hate, i won't because then the thread would just fill up with people trying to convince me that "you know my name, look up the number" isn't that bad, gtfo with that

not a band per se but duke is goddamn insuperable, greatest recording artist in the history of music imo. a bad duke ellington record, _that_ i would have trouble with. duke ellington was great in 1927 and was also great in 1970, with no real point in between where he _wasn't_ great.

if they have forgotten about in space

oh shit, that me

:(

Broadcast!

The answer is so obvious. Joy Division. Two perfect albums, no really bad song in their whole oeuvre including b-sides and stuff.

lol sister ray zzzz

Joy Division mostly sucks

(I say mostly because they have three songs I like)

Broadcast seconded!

Also and this is a feeling I’m just starting to feel so bear with me but maybe Jon Hassell?

portishead

Dolly Mixture

Considering bands with a big output Stereolab have to be taking into account. The quality of their work is consistently high.

Gonna go out on a limb here and say Autechre. I mean there's a LOT to sift through, and that's just their last three full length releases, but every album, EP, b-side, one off, most remixes, even collaborations are all very interesting and engaging at a minimum, and intensely beautiful and otherworldly when they hit their peak, which still happens every release. While their albums have a tendency to be somewhat inconsistent at times (there's more than a few songs I tend to skip), I've found bangers and classics on every single record. Often the songs I consider skip-worthy are tracks others here fawn over (I've noticed imago and I have very differing tastes when it comes to specific Ae tracks for instance). This speaks to their appeal and consistency. Considering the amount of time they've been relevant (nearly 30 years? Fuck me) that's impressive as all hell. Now, that said - they have a pretty significant stylistic split between 1990-2000 and 2001-present but if you're into both styles, that's a lot of amazing music to take in.

The Normal

Gonna go out on a limb here and say Autechre

oh yeah this is the answer

literally everything is worth listening to and figuring out your own relationship with it

I'd go with Goldfrapp. Even their weaker albums (Head First, Silver Eye) are still 8/10.

you say autechre i say boards of canada.

xxp yea the only one of them I think is less than great is Draft which for whatever reason is still somewhat impenetrable to me, outside of 6IE.CR & V-PROC

The Smiths must be a contender for this trophy. There is hardly a crap song in their catalogue and so many jewels. There is def. more consistency than in The Beatles discography. The Smiths did not make an Ob-la-di-ob-la-da.

early Autechre has not aged well imo

Codeine
Bark Psychosis
Talk Talk

Roxy Music

Yeah, Talk Talk and Roxy Music are both to be considered.

early Autechre has not aged well imo

― The Mandymoorian (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, January 28, 2020 3:10 PM (three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

how early we talking? incunabula is their weakest record but "bike" still goes. after that everything is golden

early Ae still sounds pretty good to me, I think the two that sound the most dated are Tri Rep (too crunchy & dry) and LP5, which is a bit over-the-top in that late 90's Aphex way that wasn't really followed up on. but I still think they've held up better than any other 90s IDM records outside of maybe Music Has the Rights to Children

yuup carl craig's discography is very very good!

the only techno artist as consistent as carl is probably... Gas

Not sure I can name anything by Carl Craig from the last twenty years that isn't a remix

Saint Etienne definitely ticks the deep cuts/buried treasure aspect for me (annoyingly the deluxe versions of their albums, excluding the remixes collection, have been off Spotify a while now)

Here to rep for Japan and the individual band members' post-Japan projects. TONS of signal, very little noise.

Saint Etienne are very consciously that sort of discography band I think because they understand the thrill of that kind of fandom. Does anyone really rate the more recent run of albums up against their 90s output though?

If I were to go for sheer quantity of great releases, I'd say REM and Swans.

Consistency is a terrible metric and is for people who enjoy filling out forms and informing on their neighbours.

If there's no garbage in there what's going on

I love w all my heart FoxBase Alpha and So Tough but rest of SE's catalog varies from meh to ugh

i think "catalogues that reward exploration" really nails it, Matt DC otm (altho i would pick very different artists as examples)

with a select few artists i even sort of dread coming to "the end"

Royal Trux has one of the best ratios I can think of, in terms of quantity:quality... everything they released was outstanding* until around ’99 (and even then they never got “bad,” just took their foot off the gas a lil bit). Even their reunion albums are enjoyable.

*it helps to be a fan to have opinions like this, as someone noted above

I feel like 5-6 releases is the sweet spot where you have a big enough discography to be respectable, but haven't been around long enough to run out of ideas. Works for Sade, Pavement, Erykah Badu.

to me, a discography HAS to be consistent in order to "reward exploration." i mean who really wants to wade through ALL the smashing pumpkins albums. whereas you can't go wrong with gorguts.

If there's no garbage in there what's going on

consistency lol

just to clarify, when i say consistent i mean "unchanging in standard" (not "always the same")

Saint Etienne are very consciously that sort of discography band I think because they understand the thrill of that kind of fandom. Does anyone really rate the more recent run of albums up against their 90s output though?

― Matt DC

I rate Tales From Turnpike House as their third best album and Words & Music isn't far behind. Sound Of Water and Finisterre are pretty solid but easily their weakest eras for me. Turnpike House really took me by surprise at the time and stands up 15 years on. Words & Music felt like a continuation of them sounding inspired again and contains some of my favourite songs of theirs (Tonight, DJ, Over The Border, Popular). I wouldn't say Home Counties is quite on the same level, but I still enjoyed it.

I don't like Led Zeppelin II and I don't like a lot of Sister Lovers, and I'm sure there are Jim O'Rourke or Pauline Oliveros records I haven't heard yet that I wouldn't like so much, so I'll cheat and say The Attractions.

Maybe Minutemen is the right answer.

Phenomenal catalog! Tho 3-Way Tie for Last is kind of not on par with the rest imo

meshuggah's discography is really cool and unique

i sort of feel like there's a balance between consistency and adventurousness. like to me looking at gentle giant's catalogue i value "civilian" more than i do, say, "in a glass house", because "civilian" is gentle giant doing an enjoyable record in a style they hadn't done before (and since it was their last record, wouldn't ever do again), whereas "in a glass house", well, you know, they have around eight pretty good records in that style. what can i get out of "in a glass house" that i couldn't get out of "power and the glory"?

the trade-off is that the two records before "civilian" are shit. what's better, a decent record i never listen to or a shitty record i never listen to? does it matter?

I want to say Rockpile, counting the records also nominally by Lowe and Edmunds, but basically all the same band

I agree In a Glass House & The Power and the Glory are pretty similar but the rest of GG's records seem pretty distinct to me

fwiw I think The Missing Piece is alright, especially the proggier second half. Giant for a Day on the other hand...who knows what they were thinking. has a Love Beach sorta vibe to it. what gets me about these records isn't so much that they suck, it's that the production is so weak and the performances so dispirited...its like the band themselves didn't really buy it either.

What's the New Mary Jane is pretty bad

A Taste of Honey

there's others...

They didn't release What's the New Mary Jane or write A Taste of Honey, so not sure what the point is here...

I know they're not an ILM fave but Elbow's discography has been incredibly consistent.

― akm, Saturday, 1 February 2020 17:06 (three days ago)

Elbow's is the only front-to-back catalog I regularly turn and return to as often as The Beatles and Underworld.

But also, Underworld. Dubno... to the present.

(The false start that is/was Underneath the Radar need not apply.)

What's the New Mary Jane was released on Beatles Anthology 3

the OP makes no mention of authorship

xps

and if we’re being extra pedantic OP says “every single thing a band has recorded” (i.e. whether the band released the recording or not shouldn’t matter, leaks and bootlegs fair game, presumably that’s what “loosies” means)

Loosies are songs on, like, soundtracks and comps.

Leaks and bootlegs are up to your own discretion I guess

not even leaks, everything that was ever put on tape, even if they recorded over it later

adding in things that were deliberately not released at the time, only decades after the band split and a member or two died (as with Beatles and Go-Betweens), means that every other act in the thread also ought to be judged by the material they thought was too bad to release.

― don't care didn't ask still clappin (sic), Saturday, February 1, 2020 9:07 AM (four days ago)

yup

― Οὖτις, Saturday, February 1, 2020 9:10 AM (four days ago)

Beatles Anthology 3 is an officially released comp

this is a stupid argument

which good band / artist has the worst discography?

imo if members are dead and the band split up decades earlier, then the intent was clearly not to release the abandoned demos as an authoritative contribution to the discography

this is a stupid argument

agreed, especially if we extend this to cover the entire thread

what is the argument ? i was really only noting that, if you wanted to, you could count bootlegs in a band's discography. or you don't have to. sometimes unofficial shit, particularly concert fan recordings and scrapped studio sessions, are essential to "knowing" a band's discography, at least to some fans. i'm not trying to make "rules" and my post was sort of in jest.

then again other times an artist comes around and says, "yeah those bootlegs, we own that, here they are officially." that was one of the main points of the anthology series ! see also dylan for another obvious example.

which good band / artist has the worst discography?

Black Flag

In a similar vein: Bad Brains

I'd go with The Kinks there, you remove a 5-year chunk of their 30-year career and pretty much all that's left is garbage with a handful of good singles

Start a new thread!

Joan Osborn- One Of Us.

I'm admittedly an album or two behind, but unless she's inexplicably gone into a qualitative freefall: Tara Jane O'Neill. And even if you feel like plugging all of her side work into the equation, it's still a pretty gahdamn unstoppable discography.

Hmm, no mention of Rush or the Ramones in here ...

Catherine Christer Hennix

whoa

Have The Fall been mentioned yet? Seems an obvious choice to me.

They have (I re-read this thread last night); but as much as I’m a fan, I would not call their catalogue “flawless”…

lol definitely not